WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Eliminating Mistakes?

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>The following. Here's a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Let's go. Are you

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>ready for a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, and so much for that.

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>It is Friday, October second, twenty twenty, season sixteen, episode

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>number thirty six. Welcome to another edition of The Break.

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>It is the final episode of the week. We're gonna

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>get you guys ready for Cowboys versus Browns that happens

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this Sunday at noon at at and T Stadium. And

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>very excited for this game because my hope is that

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys will put it all together against the team

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that Amber feels like is not very good and get

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>a win here that we could all be proud of.

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to show, everybody. Let's start first start with an

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>injury update, Dave. Why don't you give me an update

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>from the coaches press conference A day on Tyron Smith

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:19.839
<v Speaker 1>and Marcus Larns's what's their outlook for this weekend? They're

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>playing that's the outlook, they're playing. Honestly, Mike McCarthy hasn't

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>always been super forthcoming with injury stuff, so I was

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>very surprised. I mean, he did kind of couch it that,

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, they'll see make sure there's no setbacks between

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>now and Sunday morning. But he basically was like, yeah,

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I think both of those guys are going to play.

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>They're on track, and that's a good thing for the Cowboys.

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>This weekend, you're heading into a game against one of

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the premier pass rushers in the league. How much does

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this help them? Amber a lot? I mean, I would

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>hope that the Tyrant is able to really play this day.

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it's another one of those scenarios where

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:01.639
<v Speaker 1>it's like, okay, he'll go out there at the beginning

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of the game, I mean, prior of the game starting,

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>just to see how his body is feeling. If that's

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna end up being a game day decision. But obviously,

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>anytime you get a guy back like Tyrant, that is

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be something positive for your old line. Just

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in general. All right, we're gonna jump into some game previews,

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and Nick, I'm gonna start with you this first question

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that we have, and I got a list of questions

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>here that's gonna help break down this upcoming matchup Cowboys

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>versus Browns. But let's start with you, Nick. The first question.

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy said, earlier in this morning, he had a call

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>with our radio, our sister, our partner the fan here

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>locally one on five dot three the Fan, and he

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>said that they were purposefully aggressive on special teams to

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>start the season, but he wouldn't really divulge details as

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to why he was pressed on and he said that's

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>not something he'd want to necessarily divulge. I thought it

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting comment because I never really heard a

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>coach talk about doing certain things at certain points in

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the year, specifically to prepare them for other parts of

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the year. What would you think would be the reason

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>why the Cowboys might want to be especially aggressive on

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>special teams to start to see them. Well, there's different reasons.

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll pick one. I think that what this team and

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>this franchise needed was a culture change. Everyone knew that,

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>saw that felt that, and this is one of the

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>things to do that is to come in here and

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>show that you're going to change it up. You know, Now,

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 1>this whole year has been a culture change just because

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of things out of our control. But I think as

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>far as the football goes, I think Mike McCarthy wanted

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to come in and prove that they're going to do

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>things differently. They're going to be more aggressive, they're going

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to take more chances, and I think that one of

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the ways to do that is to do some things

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>shake it up to the way that you've never had. Now,

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>there's other reasons for it, but I think that was

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>one of them as well. Amber, What do you think

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is the reason why the Cowboys

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>may have been especially aggressive on special teams to start

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the season. I would as him, you always want to

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>get put different things on tape just to keep opposing

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>teams from kind of guessing what you're going to do.

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>The only thing when I think about that is that

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you want when you do that, you want to be

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>successful on making those plays actually happen. And that hasn't

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily been the case for the Cowboys special teams group,

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>where they have been making mistakes and it's like, Okay,

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>how much does that really scare the opposing team? I mean,

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>do they see that as an advantage of like, Okay,

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>special teams are susceptible to making mistakes, so we're just

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna prepare to attack them this way. So that's all

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I can think of of wanting to put things on

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>tape to keep your posing guessing. But I just I

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen it really working for the Cowboys so far. Dave,

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>what do you think and do you think it's it's

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>helped at all? Whatever that that strategy may have been,

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>or whatever you think of that strategy. I don't know

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>if it's helped because it hasn't worked, but I mean, yeah,

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Nick and Ag laid it out

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty well for me. I think it's it's probably just

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>all about tendencies, showing future opponents what you're willing to

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>do and influencing the way that they play you. Which yeah,

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>like Amber said, like the irony is that it hasn't

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>really worked. But if you've got teams second guessing the

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>way you're going to handle things on special teams, I

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>would imagine it can work as an advantage as the

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>season goes along, even not you know, not necessarily when

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to do something crazy, but changes the way

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>that they cover you for standard stuff. So that's that's

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the best that I have. Hopefully it works a little

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>bit better as they continue to do it. Yeah, I

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>think I think I agree with you guys that it

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely could help just putting it on tape. I think

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it could also kind of hinder a little bit because

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>I think you get farther into the season, if teams

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of have seen some of the things that you're

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>willing to do, then they may be a little bit

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>more prepared. So you're not going to take anybody by surprise.

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 1>That element is now probably gone to some degree, and

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>so I do think that it can It can kind

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>of go either way on you there, Let's go to

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the next question. Here's the question the greatest challenge for

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the for the Dallas Dallas controlling Miles Garrett or stopping

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb, which is a greater challenge for them. Nick,

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you. The greater challenge would probably be

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say stopping Miles Garrett. That definitely is the

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>biggest That's the area that that would hurt this team

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the most if he can't get get him blocked. But

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>but I would say, you know, Tyron will help there.

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Even if he doesn't rush against Tyron, I think able

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to give some help to the other side of it,

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you know, Chip double team, whatever it takes.

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think having Tyron on one side certainly would help.

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think that would be the biggest key for me, Dave.

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>It's chubbed for me because what Miles Garrett does. You

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>can't completely control it, but you have a large say

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in how that plays out. You can get the ball

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>out of the quarterback's hand quickly, you can run the ball,

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you can misdirect, you can move you know, you can

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>roll Dak away from wherever Garrett's rushing from. You can

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of stuff to negate a pass rush.

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>You just got to tackle Chubb and not very many

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>people have success, and this Cowboys defense has been susceptible

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to it at times, so that's scarier for me. Honestly, Hamber,

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say with Chubb as well, just because, yes,

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>MOUs Garrett, he's a very talented guy. But the Cowboys

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>have already faced some talented players on on the opposing

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>defensive line and they've been able to kind of manage this.

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>And yes, it's gonna be a problem, but at the

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, I can't get over the fact

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of previous years, and I know every year it's a

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>new team, and especially now with the new coaching staff,

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but I've seen well too often how the running game

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>can really hurt the Cowboys, how the opposing team can

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>really attack the Cowboys defense using the running backs, running

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>backs that aren't necessarily the best a round the league,

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and they've been able to make it happen. So I

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>would go with with Chubb for sure. Yeah, I think

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree with AG and UH and Dave on this one.

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that when you look at this Cowboys have

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>been able to figure out ways to to get their

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterback time to be able to throw the ball. I

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's been a problem in and quite frankly,

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they face some pretty good pass rushers, maybe

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>not the same edge rusher as they're facing this weekend,

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think there's some ways they can neutralize that.

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Stopping the run to me as a bigger challenge for

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>this team because I just I know that there are

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>games when they just kind of have have these lapses

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>where they just can't seem to get it right. It's

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>two different questions, though, really, I mean it seemed like

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>there y'all were answering it differently. I think I think

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's like, is it what's the bigger challenge or

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 1>what is you know, what do we see happening? Actually,

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean do we see them? I mean does this

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>team built to stop the run? Because I think I mean,

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>if you have a pass rusher that that that that

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you can't block, that's that's the biggest thing. Now the

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>question is are they gonna Are they going to block them?

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Are they gonna tackle Nick Chubb? I mean, I think

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>there's two different things. But I think I think go

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>into a game, you can you can definitely wreck you know,

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a defensive end can definitely wreck the game. I don't

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>know if you will, but I mean that to answer

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>your question, I mean, I still think it's it's Miles Garrett,

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 1>and I hear what you're saying. I guess the way

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I look at it is again, I think the challenge

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>here is how do you how do you negate either

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>one of them or how do you neutralize one of them?

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think the it's a bigger challenge to me

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to stop Chub than it is necessarily to stop Garret,

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>because I think there's some things you can do to

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of neutralize Carrett a bit a bit more than

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe the running game. Let's roll to the next question,

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>who has a better set of offensive weapons? We heard

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Bucky earlier this week say that this may be the

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>best set of offensive weapons as the Cowboys that faced

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.719
<v Speaker 1>all season, and I think they face some pretty good

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>offensive weapons. But who has better offensive weapons? You got Chubb, Hunt, Beckham,

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Landry on one side, you got Elliott, Cooper, Gallop and

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Lamb on the other. I purposefully did not include the

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>quarterback because I think that slants it way too much.

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>But looking at the skill position, who has the better

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>offensive weapons? Let's start first with you Amber. I'm gonna

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>go with the Cowboys. Yeah, those other guys are pretty talented.

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, and I know you said

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you purposely left the quarterback out, but I have to

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>lean on the quarterback. I think that Dak Prescott is

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>currently a better quarterback. He's the one that starts with

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball in his hand and hands it off to

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys. So I think that that just overall,

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>including Dak Prescott in there, I would definitely just pick

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys within that group, Dave, you didn't even mention

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hooper, did you did not, and you could throw

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>him in there if you want to. That's that's honestly

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>really tough. I don't I mean, I don't. I don't

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>know if there's a wrong answer. I think the Cowboys

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>have three great receivers. The Browns really have two. But

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the Browns have a much much better tight end. Uh.

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>The Browns have two legitimately really good running backs. We

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Kareem Hunt's gonna play in this game,

0:10:57.679 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>but you would you would say their backfield is deep

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>at least, if not better. Um, that's really tough. I'd

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>probably say the Cowboys because they have the extra receiver. Uh,

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and I you know, uh that that's hard. I'd say

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys because it's a Cowboys show. But like, I don't

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>think Browns is a wrong answer. So you're staying over

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>there on Brown's break right now, they're like the Browns

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>all the way on Brown's break, They're like, are you kidding?

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Like who they're playing at tight end? Who's you know?

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Like get out of here? Yeah all right, Nick, you

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>got well, I mean you do have to factor in

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback, like she said, because he makes those guys better,

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you know. And um, so I'm looking at it like

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes gets to pick which team he wants to

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>play on. You know, if that would happen. God, I

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>hope that's not tampering. But I'm just talking about the

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>best quarterback in the league having the options I would

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say Cleveland, Okay, why because I think that

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Baker Mayfield doesn't help those guys enough. I've

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>seen Jarvis Landry and Odell Beckham really you know, play

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>at a very high level and when they don't have

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback helping them. And the same with the Marii Cooper.

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Mark Cooper was struggling too before he got

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>into a better offense. I think the two backs are

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 1>way better in Cleveland. I don't say yeah, they are,

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>yeah better. Well, Hunt is better than Tony Pollard, and

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I think is that because he's had more opportunity than

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard has. I mean, obviously he was a starter

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas City before. So I think I think I

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 1>think those two give you give the check mark to

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 1>running backs there because of the two. The tight end

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>gets it and then the receiver. He would go to

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Dallas because of what Dave said the third receiver. But

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's so close. I don't know. I mean,

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a tough one. But I would say Cleveland,

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess, all right, you would probably say O'Dell is

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the best of the five right now. Probably maybe I'm biased.

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I obviously I'm of us say definitely your bias.

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'll say this Odell what he was doing

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>early in his career in New York. Yes, you would

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>say that I have not seen that Odell since he's

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>been in Cleveland. Now, part of that is what Nick's

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about. I don't think he has the trigger man

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to get him the ball in those places where he

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>can make those great catches and show us that all

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the time. But again, you can only go about what

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you see. I haven't seen that O'Dell since he's been

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>in Cleveland. I don't I don't put I don't think

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>his production has been a top ten, top fifteen receiver

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>since he's been in Cleveland. And I do think Amari

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is that type. Yeah, that's a good one. That they're

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 1>very close, very very close. All right, let's go on

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>to the next question. If Dallas does one thing better

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in week three than they did in week I'm sorry

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in week four, then they did in week three? What

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>would be to have the biggest impact and how likely

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is it to happen. Let's start first with you, Dave.

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>This is basic, Like, this isn't even analysis, just whin

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the fricking turnover battle. And if this team can stay

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>neutral or win the turnover battle, they're gonna win like

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>twelve or thirteen games. The problem is that they've been

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>very careless with the ball the last two weeks. And

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you know it's early, but it doesn't look like this

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>is a this is a defense that's gonna finish with

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>more than fifteen to eighteen takeaways, Like unless something crazy happens,

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that's we just haven't seen that. So it's going to

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>take the offense playing much cleaner football to even stay neutral,

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>let alone win. But if they can do it, if

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>they if they're either neutral or positive and turnovers, they're

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna win so many more games than they lose. And

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that just hasn't been the case so far. Amber That's

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly what I would say as well. I'm not even

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>asking the Cowboys defense to get the ball. I'm not

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>even asking them to get some turnovers for their offense.

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not given up on the Cowboys offense to All

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking is for the Cowboys offense to hang onto

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the ball and quit making the mistakes that they've been

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>making so far. It is it has cost them, and

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it's very important, and I don't expect to see veterans

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>like dak or Zeke just let the ball loose on

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>little things that shouldn't be happening it. And the thing

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that concerns me is how often we've seen it, Like

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought, oh that was that one game. Okay, next week,

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll get better, but it's still kind of carrying over

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a week by week where they make little mistakes like

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that that at one point it needs to stop. So

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>hopefully that point is this weekend. Nick Well, I mean,

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>what do they gotta do better? I mean, stop the

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>deep ball, obviously, but also you know, it was a

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>seven point game, but a lot of these games are

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be even closer than that. They gotta they

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>gotta make their extra points. I mean, they gotta kicking games,

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>gotta be short up. I mean, I don't know what's

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>going on there, but I mean having blocks and missing

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>extra points and drop it the kickoff. I mean, these

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>are routine plays that like I said last week, these

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>are routine plays that we will see tonight on Friday night,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, high school football, and so you see it

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday, definitely have to see it on Sunday. And

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that's that's just inexcusable. Yeah, you know, I'll throw this

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>one out there. I think really what we're seeing that

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the story for me this season is can the Cowboys finish?

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Because in all three games they were in position and

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in one of the games they were able to make

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the play that needed to be made in order to

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>win the game, and the other two they weren't. And

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's gonna be the storyline all season. When

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you have a defense like they have that's not really

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>going to get a lot of stops, and probably in

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>critical moments when you're playing good teams, they're probably not

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>going to get that stop. It's gonna be up to

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Dak and the offense to be able to figure out

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a way to be able to move the ball down

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the field and either tie or win, right, And I

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to be the storyline. If they can

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>do it, and if they can be successful in it,

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>they'll get way more wins and losses. If they can't,

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>then I think that's going to be a challenge for them. Yeah,

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you know one of the things that they I guess

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you could say they had to lead against the Falcons

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in the second half because they kicked it at the game,

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, as the time was out. But they've only

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>led by one point. They they've only led by one

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in all three games they have. They have led in

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the second half, but only by a point. And they've

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>never led by more than one point. I think it

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>was fourteen thirteen and Rams, and of course it's to

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 1>forty thirty nine and then thirty one thirty for just

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a second against Seattle, But that that goes to show

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're not playing. I mean, just think how better

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the offense could be and the defense would be if

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you could have more than just a one point lead.

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think getting out to a fast

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>start is really critical here. Yeah, and against against teams

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that are not as good. Maybe they can manage to

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>do that. Against good especially good good offenses, I think

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be in situations where they're just teams are

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna match them. If they go out to score, then

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 1>that team are gonna come right back and score, and

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be in these close games and they're ultimately

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to fancy. Think about Atlanta and Seattle. They

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they're not built to hang on to leads like that

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>because they you know, they like to throw it around.

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>So Atlanta, that's not comfortable trying to run out the clock.

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>They want to really throw it around. But Cleveland gets

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>up by ten or fifteen points, they'll they'll be just

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>fine because that's the way they want to Actually gonna

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>get to be a problem for the Cowboys because they

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>can run the ball, and they can run it well. Right,

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're gonna take our first break when we

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>come back. I'm gonna ask these guys the question if

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys lose, the primary reason will be blank. We'll

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>do that when we come right back. This is Dallas

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Radio. We're back in a tasty treat

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's new Doctor Pepper

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and Cream Soda. Let's take a listen, Doctor Baba Cream Soda.

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Is he a new combone that's music to my ears? Okay,

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Doctor bad Time, music to my ears and mouths. New

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper and Cream soda delas just do Bay, I

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>want to use what the pros use. How about the

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black.

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Right now you can get the Jack Black Starter, a

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just ten

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>bucks with free shipping. The starter includes four Jack Clack

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>skincare favorite plus a full size and tents therapy whip

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>bamb Go to get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and use the code word team JB. That's get Jack

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Black dot com slash Cowboys. The Jack Black Starter ten bucks,

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>free shipping since eighteen sixty five. Stetson hats are American

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>maid with pride right here in Texas, and Stetson is

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team. Want

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to show your Texas and team pride too? You can

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>by purchasing your own Stetson. You can look just like

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>how the flag guys do on field at every home game.

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Stetson hats the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and your favorite football team. Get yours today at Shop

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>dot Dallas Cowboys dot com or at Stetson dot com.

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>It's funny as we travel places. Often we find the

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>places we want to travel aren't really places at all.

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>They're people, their grandparents, moms, old friends, and new nephews.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 1>That's why at American Airlines we using enhanced cleaning measures

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>so you can feel confident every step until you get

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to them. So as always, our people can't wait to

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>take you to yours American Airlines. You are why we

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>fly back to the Break. Get your tickets to see

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys take on the Browns when they return to

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.959
<v Speaker 1>AT and T Stadium Sunday, October fourth. Just a limited

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 1>number of tickets are on sale now. Get yours Dallas

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot com slash tickets. Welcome back. It is the

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>second segment of The Break Life and the SWBC Mortgage

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Studios at the Star we're talking Cowboys versus Browns, and

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>before the Break, I let you guys know we're gonna

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>The question I'm gonna ask you coming out of the

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>break is if the Cowboys lose, the primary reason will

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>be blank. I'm gonna start first with Amber. If the

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys lose, the primary reason I think will be because

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they weren't able to get out of their own way.

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the Cowboys have actually had a pretty If

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you take out all the mistakes, there would be so

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>much better. We've seen when they play good. We've seen

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>when they just get the offense moving, regardless of what

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the defense is currently struggling with this offense, I see

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>them as having the capability of carrying the team, but

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>right now they just can't get out of their own way.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>If they clean up the game, if they if they

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>stop getting penalties, which have again cost them a lot

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 1>this year so far, I think they can win the game.

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 1>But if that's not the case, then we'll end up

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing another loss. That's actually a great point, and because

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I think all season, like if you go back and

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>look at all these games, there's just this whole litany

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>of mistakes that they've made throughout the games, and and

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>some the one time in Atlanta they were able to

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>overcome them. The other two games they were not. Nick

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>what your answer, Yeah, I think if they don't, if

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they have to kick field goals, I think that they'll

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>win in this game if they get down and bog

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>down in the red zone, get penalties or even turnovers,

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>and settle for three points, which isn't always three points,

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean you have to kind of wonder

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>about the operation of everything right now on the special team.

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So but they they've got to cash in and they've

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>got to get touchdowns. We know that these games are

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be high scoring, so I've ever really seen

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of high scoring games with field goals. So

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got to score touchdown. So I think that just

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>like she said, I mean, you can't have those mistakes

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to go score touchdown, Dave. If they

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>if they lose, I assume it's because the defense can't

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>hold up. It's into the bargain. And when I say that,

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not asking I'm not asking them to

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>hold anybody to ten points. But you know what we've

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>seen in the last two weeks is it's rough. I mean,

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine points, thirty eight points, busting coverages. You know,

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you think about what Odell could do or if if

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Chubb just absolutely gashes them and they can't do anything

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>about it. Because I have absolute confidence that the offense

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>can score twenty seven, twenty eight thirty points, like I

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>just do even with you know, even with Miles Garrett

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and all that. Like, I believe in the offense. So

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I just need the defense to force a field goal

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>or two, or hey, get a takeaway. That would be great.

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a lot of optimism that they will,

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 1>but that would be wonderful. So I just need a

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>little extra, just a little bit more from the defense,

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>make that one extra stop that lets you win the

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>game twenty eight to twenty four instead of losing thirty

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>one to twenty eight. All Right, we're gonna start a

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>new segment today, and I want to preface this by saying,

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>we actually got into this conversation yesterday with Bucky Nick.

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 1>You asked him about it, and he explained what it is.

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Where's Waldo. It's kind of this scouting term of looking

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>for the guy that is the most the point of

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>greatest vulnerability for the opponent. So what I think we're

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna do is we're gonna wait, why do you look

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>like that? It's just just because you're so diplomatic the

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>way you say it. I mean most people just be like,

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>who sucks? I mean, like I don't want to say it, like, no,

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that's great, that's rude. I'm not rude. Director. So here's

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna do. You're gonna play the game. You're

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna play the game where we single out the weakness

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>on the team. But you don't want to be rude

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>about Yes, I don't want to be rude about it.

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a better way to say it. You can say

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 1>it nicely. As my wife always says, a shout out there,

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a birthday. But as my wife always says, like,

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a nice way to say everything. Well, right, just

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a good way to say everything. It's It's funny when

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>what I talked about Baker Mayfield and he said he

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was overdrafted. That's like when they say at the bar,

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I think you've been overserved. No, you're drunk. That's what

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it is. You suck. That's what. Okay? All right, So

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>here's what we're gonna do. We're playing, Well, where's Waldo.

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you the team and the side of

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and you're gonna tell me who's Waldo? All right?

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So actually let's start with the Browns. Brown's offense, Nick,

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>who's Waldo? And by the way, it doesn't have to

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>be a person. It could be a position groups so

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you could say secondary or whatever. This could be famous

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>last words, but I mean, it's the quarterback. It's that guy.

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't like him. I mean, he I

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>respect what he's done, but I don't I don't talk

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>about personal. No, it's not personal with him. I never

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>met the guy. I mean, I'm sure you know if

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>he was huh, you don't like A and M, you

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>don't like Oklahoma. So I think it probably what is

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it tech? Baker Mayfield tech? And then yeah, yeah, I

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>mean yeah whatever. But but let's guys move around a lot.

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing, the same thing that that everybody

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>other than OU fans hated about him, it is probably

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the reason why he was good and why he got it.

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he just plays with that and his players,

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, gravitate toward him. But I just don't think

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that he has the arm talent to just kind of

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>lead them down the field to make all the throws.

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's that mobile to do that. I mean,

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>they're yeah, I'm sure they have a left guard or center.

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>That's probably a weak link. But I think that he's

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you gotta make him beat you, and yeah, because they

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of those those weapons. He gotta put

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it the ball in his hands to say, hey, this

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>guy's gonna beat this. And he hasn't just proven that

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>he can go and do that. So I'm gonna I'm

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna say here, I don't like calling him Waldo, but

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just think I think he's the one

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that he's not. You know, he's not gonna lead him

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Amber Brown's offense. Where's Waldo? I was gonna pick the

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterback as well, just because, like I mentioned earlier, that

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>is that is who gets the ball in their hands first,

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Like the ball doesn't get to Odell without getting to

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>him first. So I think if the Cowboys defense manages

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to make him uncomfortable throughout the game, creates some pressure,

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>just get hit. I don't see him as a type

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of quarterback who is able to keep that poise all

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>through throughout the game, stay focused, manage to get out

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of the pocket, and be precise with his throat. So

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just the easiest point of attack for

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys this week. Just make him uncomfortable, and then

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>dad just trickles down to everything else, just simplifying things

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys secondary and just so on. I mean,

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>it seems pretty obvious like, yeah, attacked the quarterback, but

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that he has the biggest effect if the

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys really do pressure him throughout the game. Helman, I

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be very clear, he's definitely not a bad player.

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>But Jedrick Wills is a rookie starting his fourth career game.

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>He's a top ten pick at left tackle. Like, he's

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a good player and he probably will be for a

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>long time to paraphrase Jason Garrett, but he's still a rookie.

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And the Cowboys have the NFL sack leader and two

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Pro bowlers, and they should be able to make this

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:57.199
<v Speaker 1>guy's life uncomfortable. That that should be a benefit for

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. If they can't, then what the hell's going on?

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And the beauty of it is. I think Baker Mayfield's

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest problem is he's just not one hundred percent comfortable

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in the pocket. He gets happy feet, he likes to

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>bail out of there. So you don't even have to

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>get sacks. Just make him uncomfortable, make him have to move,

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and you should be able to have success doing that

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>against the guys starting his fourth career game. You would

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 1>like to think, at least, all right, Dave, we're gonna

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:25.360
<v Speaker 1>double back. Give us the where's Waldo? On the Browns defense.

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I would like to think it's the cornerbacks. You know,

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 1>our buddy Terrence Mitchell's out there are the old Cowboys

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>draft pick who loves to hold people. Denzel Ward. I

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>think he upgraded his status so it looks like he's

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna play, but he's dealing with He's dealing with an injury.

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know your your first round picks dealing with

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>an injury. You don't have a lot else there. By

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the way, that's the strength of the Cowboys entire rosters receivers.

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you can protect Dak, I gotta believe there's

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be open receivers all over the field. Amber where's

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Waldo on the Browns defense? Just a secondary in general,

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>just because I mean, we we've talked about the kind

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of pressure that they can have on your offense and

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>just stopping or trying to stop the running game. So

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that that there's gonna be a pretty good

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>battle there. But where the Cowboys can take advantage is

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>using Dak's mobility, getting out and just throwing the ball

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to the receivers. That in my opinion, I mean, they've

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>played pretty well just in general, so I think that

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the weakest length just because of how good I

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>see the Cowboys receiver group being Yeah, it's Mitchell for me.

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>He h. We was here and he was he was

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a feisty player and he still is, I'm sure and

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:50.239
<v Speaker 1>he you know, he's very aggressive. But but you know,

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>they drafted Ward number one because they needed help there,

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if he's lived up to those expectations.

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Just yeah, I mean I think he's He's been pretty good,

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>but you know, he's still a young ownerback as well.

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>But Mitchell on the other side, I think that's where

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have to attack. All Right, We're gonna take

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:06.719
<v Speaker 1>our final break. We'll come back and we'll find Waldo

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Cowboys offense and on the Cowboys defense. We'll

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>do that when come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Radio Sam's eighteen sixty five. Stetson Hats are

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>American maid with pride right here in Texas, and Stetson

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is proud to be on the field with America's team.

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Want to show your Texas and Team pride two You

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.479
<v Speaker 1>can by purchasing your own stetson. You can look just

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>like how the flag guys do on field at every

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>home game. Stetson hats the official crown of all self

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>respecting Cowboys and your favorite football team. Get yours today

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>at shop dot Dallas Cowboys dot com or at Stetson

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com. I'm Jay Novachek, former tight end for the

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys back in the day. How was the guy

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>who always got the tough yards and that's why I

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>run with John Deer today. In fact, I have a

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>John Deer three zero twenty five E tractor that can

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>handle any yard work I need to do, even the

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>tough yards way out back. So if you have one

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>acre or a thousand, John Deer has the equipment that's

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>just right for you. Visit a John Dear dealer today

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and run with us. We are the official tractor provider

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of your Dallas Cowboys. Want to use what the pros use?

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>How about the official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black. Right now, you can get the Jack Black Starter,

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks with free shipping. The starter includes four Jack

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Black skincare favorites plus a full sized and tense therapy

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>whip bomb. Go to get Jack Black dot com, slash

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys and use the code word Team JB. That's Get

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys, the Jack Black Starter,

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>ten Bucks free shipping. We're back in the Tasty Treat

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's new Doctor pepper

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and cream Soda. Let's take a listen, Doctor bad cream Soda.

0:31:51.120 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Is he a Newcombonut's music to my ears? Okay, Doctor

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>music to my ears and mouths new Doctor pepper and

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>cream Soda deles. Just do back back to the break.

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to AT and T Stadium this weekend,

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I watched the Cowboys take on the Browns. Be aware

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of the safe stadium policies such as wearing a mask,

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>keeping distance, prepare yourself for cashlist transactions. You can visit

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot com slash Safe Stadium for details. All Right,

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it is the final segment of the Break. We a

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>lie from the SWBC Mortgage studios. At the start, we're

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>playing our new segment called Where's Waldo. We talked about

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the Browns and their points of vulnerability. Let's go to

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys side. Let's talk about the Cowboys offense. Amber

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Where's Waldo? On the Cowboys offense? It has to be

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>someone on the O line just depends on what combination

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys do up going with this weekend. I don't

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>know how they're gonna decide to make their little combos here,

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>but it all depends on what happens with Tyran Smith,

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>if he plays or not. But I think your weakest

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>link would be someone on the on the old line. Now,

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's gonna and the game for you,

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>but out of the whole offense, it just just someone

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on the old line, one of those end positions, their

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>tackle or if they shovel things. I just don't know.

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is they gonna be Connor Williams there playing

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the way that he's been playing, So just the old

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>line in a session there, Nick, I mean, I'm one

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent confident that this is gonna be. I know,

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I know whoever I pick, I will probably get to

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the chance to talk to this. So the game, Yeah,

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>after the game, they don't see this segment, you know,

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, think about what Dave just said. The left

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>tackle wells, I think Cleveland. I mean, top ten pick,

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>fourth fourth start, you gotta go after him, right, Well,

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>what does that say about Terrence Steele on the right side,

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean Terren Steele as gritty as he

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>might be, and he's surpassing expectations. Yeah, I mean Miles

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Garrett's gonna go after him, not so much Tyrann Smith,

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I would think, so I would say the right tackle,

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 1>and I think the right tackle will be Terrence Steele, Dave.

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the right answer, and I'll just flop

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it for the sake of being interesting, I guess. But

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>there's not a whole lot you can do about the

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>tackle situation. I mean, you're gonna have to play steel

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>or night. I guess. You know, you can kick Zach

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>out there in an emergency, but you're down to these

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>last options because of the injuries that you're facing. Whereas

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I am curious about the interior. It hasn't been an

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>amazing start for either Connor Williams or Joe Looney, and

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>there is stuff you can do about that. Yeah, the

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys don't seem to want to, but Connor McGovern's still

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>there and Tyler Biottish played very well, I thought, in

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>his debut the other day, So I don't I don't

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>anticipate them doing that coming into this game. But maybe

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>if those guys continue to struggle, there's stuff you can

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 1>do there, and so I've got a really close eye

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>on what they look like this weekend. You mentioned Connor McGovern.

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Coach McCarthy actual talked about him this morning on the

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>on the College. You hear what he said, and then

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>what were your thoughts on that. He said he's still

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a developmental player, and I, you know, I think I

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>think the coaching staff just leans toward the experience in

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>both of those regards. Obviously, Connor's in his third year

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>as a starter and Joe has been in the league

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for almost a decade at this point. And that was

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of my thought process heading into training camp, is

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that the guys that have been there and done that

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>are going to have the leg up over somebody that

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any NFL snaps. It is curious though, I mean,

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Biattas has gotten in and has looked good doing

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 1>so they haven't done the same with Connor McGovern. I

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>wonder what level that they would have to struggle out

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 1>before they would be willing to look at that. But

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't give you a lot of optimism that they

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>feel that Connor McGovern can do that for him, right now,

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's let's go to Cowboys defense. Where's Waldoll

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Cowboys defenseample, let's start with you, Takendary. Just

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 1>based on last week's game, I mean, some of the

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:27.839
<v Speaker 1>separations that you saw between a receiver and a guy

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>on the secondary, that's just ridiculous and it cannot happen

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>again this week, especially when you're playing a guy like

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Odell where he's so skilled. So I think that there

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 1>are many different points that you can point out in

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:44.799
<v Speaker 1>the defense as a whole. But I would just say

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the secondary, Dave. Again, I think that's the right answer,

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'll switch it up and just say between Nick

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Job and Austin Hooper, I bet that Cleveland Browns are

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna challenge Jalen Smith a lot this weekend, and and

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna need to rise to that occasion. He's, you know,

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of on an island. Joe Thomas has played well,

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:08.359
<v Speaker 1>But when I say he's on an island, I just

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:11.240
<v Speaker 1>mean Leyton's not out there. Sean Lee's not ready either.

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>He's supposed to be the best player in your linebacker corps.

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Us He's had moments. He I mean, he played better

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>after Week one I thought, but he's also he's had,

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>he's gotten exposed a few times. The play that Tyler

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Higbee made on him in week one is still burned

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:28.760
<v Speaker 1>into my brain. That's why I brought up Austin Hooper.

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:31.879
<v Speaker 1>So between dealing with the tight end and making sure

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>the running backs are on the ground, I think the

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Browns are gonna try to challenge Jalen Smith and see

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>if he's up to it. I agree with you on

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that one, Dave. Sorry, Nick, I would say the answer

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 1>for me would be Diggs thinking about Yeah. I mean

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a good player. I mean, I think

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be. But I the game is called

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 1>where's Walden? Like who do we attack here? And that's

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.360
<v Speaker 1>who teams are attacking when it comes to the I

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 1>mean they are going after him. Um, he is getting

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>close to interceptions. He's got the ball in his hands

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>every time every game. He's not picking it off, but

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 1>he will, he will, He'll get there. Um that might

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>even be my gut feeling this week because that he

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>finally gets an interception. But I'm just saying that's where

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the attack point is and they're gonna keep doing that

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 1>until he proves them and he will. He's gonna he

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:27.240
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of uh maybe like a Geners Jenkins type player,

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 1>where he's aggressive, he's gonna get an interception, he's gonna

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>give up some plays as well. All right, before we

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 1>get to our predictions, we're gonna do a little. I know,

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 1>I think I have no idea. Nick, Let's start with you.

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>What do you know? I know they're gonna go after

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Treyvon Diggs. Now, I know that I know that that

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the the secondary will be better this week, the Cowboys secondary,

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>because it can't get worse. I mean it can't. I mean,

0:38:57.560 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>he really can't. Well, no, you can't get worse because

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:03.320
<v Speaker 1>they're playing, in your opinion, a lesser quarterbacks. That quarterback.

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that they will. They will, I know,

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Sorry I say I think I know that the secondary

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 1>will play much better this week. All right, Dave. I

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:19.879
<v Speaker 1>know that the Cowboys have the better quarterback in this game,

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and if they can protect him, then I think that

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:31.439
<v Speaker 1>they'll win it. I don't pretty simple, amber, h. I'm

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 1>having a hard time trying to say what I think

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I know because I don't want to hear you. I'm

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna challenge you on this is that. Are you gonna

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 1>have a great answer. I'm just gonna say, I know

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that Aldona Smith is gonna be your best player on defense.

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that that one I can see I can

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:56.719
<v Speaker 1>say more confidently. Okay, let me challenge you on that

0:39:56.840 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 1>with that. I'm just playing. I'm just playing, all right.

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I know. I know the best offensive line

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>group that this team could put on the field right

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>now would include Zack Martin at right tackle. That's what

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I know, all right. I think Nick, start with I

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>think I I think that Seedee Lamb is gonna be

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the best receiver on the field in this game. I

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 1>think I think he is going to have his breakout game. Um,

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I just I just feel like it's kind of a

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 1>rotation thing. And it happened and it was Gallops turn,

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and now it'll it'll be It'll be CD. I'm seeing

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it down the center of the field, foamy. Maybe not

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:45.240
<v Speaker 1>eighty yards, but like I can see from the slot area,

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I see some big plays for Ceedee Lamb. I think

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>he scores his first touchdown, he'll be the best receiver

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>on the field. Dave, what do you think both sides?

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that if the Cowboys are actually a good team.

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:00.080
<v Speaker 1>They should win this game. Um, there's no shade and

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>losing on the road to want of you know, either

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the best or second best quarterback in the league. I mean,

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Russ is out of his mind. The Rams look like

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a playoff contender. The Falcons, you know, they played the

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 1>worst first quarter in Cowboy history. Like it all kind

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of it makes sense. But this Browns team is just

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>like the Cowboys, like they're talented without a lot to

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 1>show for it. They got their doors blown off by

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the only good team they've played this year. Um, I

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 1>already said I think they have the better quarterback and

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 1>if they can't find a way to win this game,

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>then they're probably just not all that good. And I'm

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>going to readjust my expectations for what the season's going

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to be like. All right, Amber, what do you think

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that's fair? By the way, before see that's that's it's

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a very good statement. That's what it needs to be.

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>A cow bite right there, cow bite Thomas Thomas hit it.

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I think, I really do think this is a game

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:50.879
<v Speaker 1>where the Cowboys who will be able to find a

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 1>really good balance between the running game and the passing game.

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I know it's going to be a challenge to get

0:41:57.960 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the running game going, because of the kind

0:41:59.920 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of defense that Cleveland has. But for some reason, I

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:07.840
<v Speaker 1>do think that the Cowboys will be able just to

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to play around with trying to figure out the balance

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and not really exhaust one option versus the other. All right,

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>And what I think is a Brandon Knight and Terence Still,

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>whichever is on the right side, will be outmatched by

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a Miles Garrett, which will lead to some significant problems

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Cowboys offense. And at some point in this game,

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I think Zack Martin ends up being the guy that

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 1>they slide out there in order to protect and give

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 1>them a better opportunity to be able to complete some

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.239
<v Speaker 1>of their passes. All right, so let's get to the

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:41.839
<v Speaker 1>final part. I have no idea Nick, we start with you.

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I just have no idea what to expect from special teams.

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that their coach is good, he's been there

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:51.240
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. But but you know, veteran special

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:54.759
<v Speaker 1>teams coaches doesn't That doesn't always mean that you have success.

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And so right now, it's just one thing after another,

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's never the same thing. It's just something, And

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 1>so I just don't know if you can count on

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the special teams. I just have no idea what to

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:11.799
<v Speaker 1>expect from them, Dave. I hope Nick was right with

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:14.319
<v Speaker 1>what he knows, because I have no idea if we're

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna see a better effort from the secondary in this game.

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, hopefully they really buckled down on the details,

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>because Odell Beckham and Jarvis Landry are They're twitchy guys,

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 1>like they're such good route runners. You know, Dk Metcalf

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>like he's just fast. Odell Beckham and Jarvis Landry can

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>create separation on their own with the way that they play,

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and it scares me to think, you know what kind

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 1>of breakdowns might be in store while these guys wait

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 1>for some of their cornerbacks to come back. That's that's

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:45.839
<v Speaker 1>the bit I said it earlier in the week. That's

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing for me is is can the secondary

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>improve on what we've seen in the last two weeks?

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:55.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, Amber, I would say I have no idea

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>how well the Cowboys defensive line and linebackers will be

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 1>able to play in this game. Like one, can they

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>put enough pressure? Can they get to the quarterback enough?

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 1>And two can they actually stop the run? Can they

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the success that Cleveland has had with the

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>running backs, and I quite frankly don't don't fully trust

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys defense to fully be able to dominate that

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 1>area of the game. All right, And what I have

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:31.479
<v Speaker 1>no idea about is if this team is any good

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 1>or if they're just having a having to find a

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>way with their news game and not having as much

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:40.479
<v Speaker 1>prep time. I want to see against a team that

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is at best comparable to them, at worse lesser than them.

0:44:45.239 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 1>I want to see if they can just come out

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and be more balanced in their run and their passing attack,

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 1>in their run and their passing defense. I want to

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 1>see if what we've seen so far this year has

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 1>been just them trying to find their way, and we've

0:44:57.960 --> 0:44:59.959
<v Speaker 1>seen some good things and we've seen some bad things.

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Can they level that out now against an equal or

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>lesser opponent. That'll tell me a lot about how good

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 1>this team really is or is not. All right, We're

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna go ahead and real quick get our predictions before

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:12.319
<v Speaker 1>we end the show. We're gonna start first with you, Dave.

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>What happens is Sunday? I sort of said it. I

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:19.879
<v Speaker 1>just you know, if they're actually good. They should find

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a way to win. You know, dealing with Myles Garrett,

0:45:21.800 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be tough. I get that. You know, the

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Browns are a very good team. I'm not saying that

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:29.799
<v Speaker 1>they're bad. But you've got enough talent and you've got

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>enough things working in your favor that you should be

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:33.720
<v Speaker 1>able to win. I think the passing game is gonna

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 1>be wide open for Dak if he can stay on

0:45:36.200 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>his feet. And like I said, I think Dak's the

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 1>better quarterback. I think at the end of the day,

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I trust Dak to outplay Baker Mayfield. I got Cowboys

0:45:44.640 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight twenty seven. But it's not It's not gonna

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:50.880
<v Speaker 1>be comfortable. It's gonna be one of those situations where

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:53.319
<v Speaker 1>you know the Cowboys are up by two or three

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and they score a touchdown late to kind of ice it.

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>You know it'll be close way for the vast majority

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of the game, but you know they put it away

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to go up by two scores in the final two

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 1>or three minutes. Camber, what happens this Sunday? Oh, it's

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:12.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be easy, piec. The Cowboys got this in the pocket. No, No,

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kidding. It never goes that way. The Cowboys

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>can never just give you a peaceful game. But regardless

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 1>of all the talent and based on the games that

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>we've seen so far, I just don't fully I'm not

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 1>fully convinced of the Browns just yet, not that I'm

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:32.800
<v Speaker 1>fully convinced about the Cowboys either, But I do see

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:36.759
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys just being able to get a win in

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>this one. I see them being the most dominant team.

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that they might be able to turn things

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>around a little bit on defense. So without being said,

0:46:45.320 --> 0:46:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I do think the Cowboys win as long as they

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 1>don't make freaking mistakes. Stop dropping the ball, stop giving

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 1>giving the ball away, and don't freaking get penalties. Stop

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that boys win. I would say, like twenty eight twenty four,

0:47:05.120 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 1>something like that, Nick Europe, twenty eight twenty three. It

0:47:09.520 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 1>was put on the I said on the radio this morning,

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:14.319
<v Speaker 1>so that that was the score, So that that's that's

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not copying anybody square. I just think the

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys will make mistakes. They're gonna keep making them. It'll

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>be They'll be good enough though, to win. They've got

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the better quarterback, and they've got they've got some playmakers

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that that will help them be the team that they

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:31.640
<v Speaker 1>should beat. All right, I actually think the opposite of

0:47:31.680 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that nick. From the standpoint, I actually think this will

0:47:33.480 --> 0:47:35.239
<v Speaker 1>be a much cleaner game for the Cowboys. I think

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:37.200
<v Speaker 1>they will start to round things out a little bit,

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and they'll start to settle in and you'll see a

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 1>lot better brand of football from the Cowboys here in

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Week four. I actually think it'll be a lot less

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of a close game than we than we've seen over

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks. I think the Cowboys win. I

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 1>think they win thirty one twenty. I think there'll be

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 1>some moments when their defense will go some plays just

0:47:54.920 --> 0:47:57.879
<v Speaker 1>because their defense is not great. We know that, but

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 1>I do think overall, I don't think Cleveland and We'll

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:01.839
<v Speaker 1>be able to keep up with the Cowboys. I think

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys will just outpace them. I think they'll get

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 1>out to a faster start, and I think they will

0:48:05.760 --> 0:48:08.440
<v Speaker 1>finally get an opportunity to see this pass rush in

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:10.879
<v Speaker 1>situations where they have a lead and they can kind

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of pin their errors back. I do think I expect

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in that kind of situation, Cowboys are going to have

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:17.839
<v Speaker 1>four or five sacks in this game. Because I think

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll have some opportunities to really get after the quarterback,

0:48:20.080 --> 0:48:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think they'll make the most of it, all right,

0:48:21.680 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you guys. Join us. We're back on Monday. We'll

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 1>tell you what went right and what went wrong for

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys till then. For Nick Eaton, Dave Hellman, Amber Garcia,

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I am Derek Eilton. This has been The Break live

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:37.440
<v Speaker 1>on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been a

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 1>production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Football Club.