WEBVTT - Many Fed Officials See Need for Half-Point Rate Hikes

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Charle Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg glovel News. FED officials weighing shrieking the

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.319
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet by billion a month, UH, signaling it will

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>reduce those massive bond holdings and further tightening credit across

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Also has Charlie mentioned many FED officials saying

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>what or more fifty basis point hikes may be warranted.

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, it feels like the bond market knew this

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>was coming, but it feels like the equity market did

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>not not at all. If you look at the SMP

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>five right now, sharply pairing losses still negative on the day,

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>but direction travel definitely higher. Alright, so let's get to

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it with our team. We've got Kathleen Hayes, Global Economic

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and Policy Editor, Bloomberg News. She's in our Interactive Brokers studio,

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.639
<v Speaker 1>so too is Creedy Gupta, Markets Correspondent APT Bloomberg. Kathleen,

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>let's get to you what jumps out? Well, first of all,

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>let's start with the not so obvious but important line

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that FEDE officials say one or more fifty basis point

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>hikes may be warranted. Are Bloomberg ride Up suggests that

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>at the last meeting there were many, now many, I

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's half, but that's a lot of

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>mean Well, look, a few, you would mean honestly, a

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>few would mean just a couple, maybe three, that's my guess.

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I think many and several several maybe more than half,

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>but many is a substantial number. So there are people saying, no,

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready for fifty basis points. That really shouldn't excide

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to me a little because I know subsequently everyone's kind

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of freaking out about inflation. But that's important. So that means, okay,

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the May fifty basis point high, Beau's gotta be a

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>done deal. Besides that, though the rolloff cap phase is

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>going to take, is gonna phase in three months or

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>modestly lower, modestly fewer. They want to get to nine

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars a month pretty quickly at the past.

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Was that more aggressive than when everybody was expecting, Well,

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it's more aggresive than I expected. People were figuring they'd

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>ultimately get to a hundred a month or a hundred

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>and twenty a month. But to get there in three

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 1>months or less, I think it's pretty aggressive. One more

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that Layo brainer the feddvice chair touched on yesterday

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in her prepared re marks not just an off the

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>cuff answer to something Esther George's exclusive interview on bloe

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>Brick Television touched on, once you start reducing the balance

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>sheet and you're you're reducing stimulus, right, it's the opposite

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.959
<v Speaker 1>of buying bonds. And when you're raising rates and even

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you to fifty basis point us, you're moving fairly aggressively

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>on rates. So how are you going to calibrate that?

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>How much is a month's worth or three months worth

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of about three hundred that was about three hundred billion

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of that how how does that equate to rate hikes.

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 1>That's the question they're going to have to work on,

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's what markets, Katie, have to figure out absolutely.

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, creaty come in here. How do you

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>explain the market reaction that we're seeing, because it is

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you can see the SMP five hundred jumping right now.

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>The Nastact too, that had been the big underperformer on

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the day, pairing losses quite significantly. Yeah. Well back up

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>for just a second, and I want to follow what

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Kathleen said here on the billion, because we talked about

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>what the expectation was. You said one twenty on the

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 1>higher end. The lower end of that was eighty billion

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>per month. So it's interesting that it came out at

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>ninety five. From what I'm seeing here, the range was

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>eight two hundred billion. People were thinking a hundred billion

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a month, as much as a hundred and twenty, like

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you said. So on the surface, it kind of seems

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>like because it's less than perhaps that a hundred billion,

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>not by much, but still um that perhaps could be

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a reason the stocks are moving higher. But still look,

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>we're down um over one pent on the SMP five hundred,

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>still still almost two percent on the nastack. So this

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>does seem like a knee jerk reaction. Even as we're

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>did we dip down for a second then bounce back.

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Even as we're speaking, we are now back to exactly

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>where we were before the minutes came out, So you're

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>once again see knee jerk reactions. It doesn't look like

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a ton has changed when it comes to exactly what

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>people are thinking. One of the headlines that struck out

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to me though, was the fact that they said, head

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just gonna find this really quickly that if

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>if it weren't for the war, more officials would talk

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>about a fifty basis point march hike, And they made

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it very clear if not for the war. What's interesting

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>here is that the conversation has very often been that

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the war would accelerate the rate hikes or make

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>them bigger. So to see them say, well, actually, maybe

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of something that we should be a

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit cautious and maybe a little bit more dubs

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>on instead of because of the war, that's that's new. Well,

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we know that it's going to hit everyone says it

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>will hit Europe. Artist those economies they are a big,

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a big purchaser of certainly exports from China. China is

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>droppling with these lockdowns that are spreading so quickly in Shanghai.

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>The global forces that the FED has to watch are

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are something potentially that could temper. But it get the feeling.

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like Bill Dudley hit his piece today saying the

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>FED is going to have to actually shock the stock market.

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>They're really going to have to show an aggressive move

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to start changing expectations so they can get financial conditions

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>to tighten. And that's that's part of the balancing act

0:04:59.920 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is well and also likely is that though that the

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Fed's appetite would be to actually cause that to happen,

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>because you have seen calls for it. But among current

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say this, Jim Bullard, who is frequently a

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>leader a thought leader the FED, said what two months

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>ago he wanted to see a hundred basis points in rainhikes,

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>but July one, okay, that would mean uh, in the

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>next three meetings you get at least one fifty basis

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>point hike. And then he said, let's pause and see

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>what's happening. I wonder if that kind of thinking is

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>what's going to come out of this maybeing. Okay, let's

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>hit a target, you guys, we're gonna do fifty. We'll

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>see if we know they're fifty, We'll see how the

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>markets react. We'll see what happens to inflation. We'll see

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>what the war is doing to the rest of you know,

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>how that is all playing out, what it does to

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>oil prices, et cetera, and then move forward. I'm so

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>glad you mentioned Sorry if I can just jump in here,

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad you mentioned that, the aggression of it,

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>because we're also getting numbers on the bouncy once again,

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the other part of the equation like you were talking

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>about and the llion, which we already talked about. It

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>is a little more dubish than the market was expecting anyway,

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>so that could explain the Knegric react. But if you

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>compare this to the last time you have this kind

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of quantitative tightening, it took a year to ratchet it

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>up to fifty billion dollars, this is completely different, and

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that seems like the push to get that and kind

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of shrink the balance sheet is faster, it's more aggressive.

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of this approach that you were mentioned with

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the rate hikes as well, does this support what Brainard

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>said yesterday about will continue you tightening monetary policy methodically,

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>like we've all been kind of obsessing over that word. Well, methodically,

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say means we're going to watch the data,

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>We're going to respond to the data. Look, the Fed

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>knows it waited too long. J. Powell has admitted that

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>as much as admitted it publicly. We thought one thing.

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Look that their board, the staff board economist in Washington,

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>figured it was going to get she was gonna move

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty back down pretty quickly. It didn't. So now they

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>know they have to make up ground. Now they know

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 1>they have to get worried about inflation expectations getting more embedded.

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>So methodically I would take we're gonna move and we're

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>going to We're made it pretty clear doors open to

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive hikes, faster balance sheet tighten. But one more

0:06:58.080 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>thing to remember, this is not at all like the

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis. We had a huge falling off a cliff

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>because we got hit by a pend. There's chaos and

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>catastroph drawing back huge fiscal stimulus. You've got lots that

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you can remove. The question is, though I'm sure they're

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>very sensitive, though they don't want to see this stock market.

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>What's tricky is there's just so many variables out there

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Fed right now to deal with, including, as

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you pointed out, the war right that is out there,

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>just like everybody kept saying that the pandemic, you know,

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like these are just factors they have to continue to

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>deal with. Thank you both so much. Kathleen Hayes, Global

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Economics and Policy at a Bloomberg News and Pretty Group

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to Markets correspon Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, Carol master in Low Katie Gray felt, Tim

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is off today. So among our most read stories on

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg on this Wednesday is what about the x

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Russian oligarch who says President Putin sees the war with

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the West already underway. So let's get into it. Let's

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>bring in Bloomberg TV Washington correspondent Amory Horton. She's with

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>us from our Washington d C Bureau. So, Amory, who

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>are we talking about? So we shut down with me

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Kronkowski And as you say, he's an exiled oligarch he

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>ran Ukos Oil, which a lot of those assets now

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>our present day roy Snaff, which is run by a

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>very close confidant of President Putin, Igor set him and

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>he kind of took Putin on. He crossed the line

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of um talking about politics, getting involved in politics, and

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>then he was faced with charges on fraud and tax evasion.

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>He was thrown in jail for a decade and he

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>was able to leave Russia. But he's never been back

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and he basically lives in exile now. And so what

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>what is his view of Putin's view of the response

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>that the US has staged thus far, Because you talk

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>about how in the story, how there there's a nuance

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>there that, uh, it's probably not one that Putin is

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to. So Putin will not pay attention to

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the nuance of the war spreading into NATO territory members

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>the way maybe the United States Wilks. You hear the

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>US say and other U your western officials say, not

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a single inch of NATO territory will defend it. All.

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>The issue is is that the way Putin perceives the war.

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>According to Kodakovski, who has really studied the man and

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously has met and known him in his former life.

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Is that the US is failing to see that. From

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Putin's perspective, the war is already happening between the United

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>States and Moscow, and between Western European capitals and Moscow,

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>so they already view what is going on as an

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>outright war just on Ukrainian soil. But Putin has said this,

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>He said, sanctions, the training of Ukrainian military, the shipping

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of of US weapons and other weapons to Ukraine, he

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>views all of that as a war. I would say,

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and Marina that many people would agree with Putin that

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of splitting hairs because there is a lot

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of support going to Ukraine right from the NATO lies um.

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>But but it is important to kind of understand. We've

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>all been trying to work on understanding Vladimir Putin's mindset,

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>why he has done this and what his intentions are. So,

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>if he perceives that he's already at war with the

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>westmore broadly, what are the implications of that. Well, if

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>he thinks he's already at war with the West, the

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>implications are and what you get a sense of if

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you're traveling. I was recently in Poland, and Warsaw, and

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you get a sense of that anxiety and nervousness in

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>these countries. A border Ukraine and the Baltic countries is

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that it could be them next. And that's really the

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>concern on Eastern Europe. And you already hear some of

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the rhetoric of divisions between these countries, between say France

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and Germanys and the Baltic nations. They want much tougher

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>sanctions on Russia immediately, but it's also because they're incredibly

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>worried because their backyard. And what's interesting, I mean, obviously

0:10:55.679 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the US has unleashed many sanctions against Russia, really on

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 1>Russian billionaires, but you go into this article that you

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>know he doesn't think that is necessarily going to be

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>effective at all when it comes to Putin. So the

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.839
<v Speaker 1>way Dakowski sees it, and he was an oligarch from

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the Yeltsin era, is one if Putin is not afraid

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of sanctions, sanctions do not scare him. And that too,

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>While the idea of going after oligarchs is correct, the

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>presumption that it would change Putin's calculus is wrong because

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>when Karakosti talks about the fact that Russia is a

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>full dictatorship, so he would know Oligarch is going to

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to go up to Putin and say you

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>need to end this war. We saw none of them

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>say they call for peace and they're against the war,

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but no one has criticized Putin directly. If so, they'll

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>be incredibly scary for them as individuals. You know, it's

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting too, and I do think about a time like

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this U S official, State Department officials, National Secure officials

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and even European officials who they lean on to really

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of get inside Vladimir Putin's mind. I mean, it

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>sounds like he has maybe talked to the government before

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and is doing it again. Is that fair to say? Yeah, Well,

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>he's in Washington this week and a State Department official

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>told Bloomberg that he met with US Under Secretary of

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>State Victoria Newland last week on Friday, and then he

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>met with officials at the National Security Council on Tuesday.

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So on top of speaking to you know, sink tankers

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and foreign policy experts of the Atlantic Council places like that,

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>he's also briefing officials. And let me just ask you,

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 1>because you're on the ground, as you said in Poland

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and surrounded you know by world leaders and just you know,

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>could feel probably the mood, the tone, if you will.

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>And I do wonder if how much conflict there is

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>right now about you know, the fear of this becoming

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>even bigger than it already is. There is a lot

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of fear in places like Poland and Eastern Europe. Um.

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>And I think part of that fear is one because

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you have you know, any given day, UM missiles hitting Levie,

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>which is very close to the Polish border. But then

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>also you just look at Putin's rhetoric of late and

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>his actions of the past, and his actions of the past,

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is that um, he has changed the map of Soviet

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the fall of the Soviet Union. He's changed that map

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>four times. In Georgia, there's incursions in Moldova. He's been

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>fighting Russian back forces have been fighting in eastern Ukraine

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>for eight years, right, So someone even viewed this as

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>an ongoing of that war, the annexed Crimean. So it

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is a concern for those that are close by. Yeah, unfortunately,

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 1>we've seen certainly some of Putin's play playbook before. Hey

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and Marie, thank you so much. Emory Hordon She's part

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 1>of a team who put out this story about this

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>ex oligarch. She of course is watching correspondent at Bloomberg Television.

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. You know, we often

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about Miami a great place to go for fun

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in the sun. There's a lot going on, a lot

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of financial types are going on and moving there. And

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>then there's what Bitcoino. What is that Bitcoino. It is

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>a huge conference. It's sort of the industry one of

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the industry's marquee events. Crosshouse and reporter Vildonna hi Rich

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is there on the ground. She joins us. Now, vill Donna,

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear about the conference and what's going

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to happen, But first I want to hear about the

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Miami Bowl. Tell me about this statue. Why have I

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>heard so much about it? They have a bullet to Yeah,

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that was a big reveal this morning. We had

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the Mayor of Miami, Francis fuire Is, unveiling this bull

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>statue this morning and it drew quite a crowd and

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of media attention as well, and it really

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>resembles the Wall Streets charging bull statue that we see

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>down in southern Manhattan, but it looks a little bit

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>more like a transformer. It sort of has this like

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>digital feel to it, and of course it has laser eyes,

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>which in the crypto world connotates that somebody's really into

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies and that you're a crypto fan. And the bull

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>does have these blue laser eyes. I just walked by

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>it a couple of minutes ago again and it's it's

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>quite striking. And that was the big reveal this morning

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>at the conference. For those watching on YouTube right now,

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.239
<v Speaker 1>sorry radio folks, you're just gonna to use your imagination.

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you're watching on YouTube, yeah, that's exactly. It

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>does look like a very high tech you know Avenger's

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>type with blue eyes, right, yes, yeah, So it has

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a sort of digital feel. It's almost like it's made

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>up of tiny little like a black little chips or something.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>It has a shiny feel to it. Do people like

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the bull, I mean looking at it like, I don't know,

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm fighting the temptation to roll my eyes. But what

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is the reaction on the ground of this big reveal? Well,

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that was the interesting thing. Because it did draw a crowd,

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and we had the Mayor of Miami there, and we

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of other mayors from surrounding cities from

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dade over here also attending. And we had Trade Station,

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Trade Station, which is the trading platform,

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>also attending because they're doing the bull reveal in partnership

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>with the City of Miami. And so the crowd was

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>really excited. And that's the mood that's been prevalent sort

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of all day here where everybody's been really really excited

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to be here, been really happy to be together, and too,

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it sort of feels like it's the first big event

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>post you know, the past couple of years. I mean,

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>we had the conference here last year, but it wasn't

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>as big, it wasn't as sort of open in the

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>post COVID world as it is this year. And just

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to give you a sense of how a bulliant the

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>mood has been, I did overhear somebody say that she

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>was so excited about the bull that she was ready

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to cry. So that's my little tidbit. It's just to

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>give you a send what the mood is like on

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the ground. Just got a couple of minutes here, so

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>we know Florida long uh, you know, looking to be

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street of the South, right, and that's why

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the bull is sign it again right like the bull

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that we have in downtown uh Manhattan. Here. What's interesting

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is what are you going to be looking for? Because

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>we've talked a lot about Miami the financial aspect of it,

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>but looking to really you know, put a flag down,

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>if you will, when it comes to crypto. What's gonna

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 1>be key? What are you gonna be looking at for

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>at this event? I mean we've already heard from what

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Mike Novograds, Yeah, we did. We heard we heard from

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Mike Novograts. He was sort of giving his take on

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 1>where he sees bitcoin and cryptocurrencies going right now. You know,

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys were just talking about the Federal Reserve and

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>their tightening plants, and he was saying that as soon

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>as the as soon as the economy slows done in

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the set actually stops hiking race, that he can see

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin taking off after that. So that was one of

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the bigger comments that we heard this morning, just in

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>terms of projections for crypto prices, but then in terms

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of you know, Southern Florida. In the city of Miami,

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the mayor really has been very gung ho about creating

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a sort of crypto haven here and he was talking

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this morning. He gave a speech after the reveal of

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the bull statue where he was saying that he he

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.640
<v Speaker 1>called this plan Bitcoin America four and he was saying

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the country really needs to elect more pro bitcoin politicians

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>and people to lead different cities across America where you

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>know there he is hoping that more of them will

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>be more pro crypto. So, uh, that's sort of the

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>mood in in Miami, and especially from this mayor who

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>has been so so into crypto and he takes his

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>paychecks in crypto as well in bitcoin. Still, hey, Bil,

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Donna just got about twenty seconds. Is there any big

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>voice that you're looking forward to hearing from very quickly?

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, there's so many really big voices. Although

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the one big big news is that the President of

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Solvador is no longer coming. We heard that, uh just

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit ago. I think he was announced via Twitter.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>And Salvator has been out there in front right yea

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>for their bitcoin bond, their Volcano bonds. That's really fascinating.

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>That he won't be there. All right, we'll listen. We'll

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>definitely be leaning on you and getting updates on the

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg in and on air. Um vill Donna, thank you

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>so much. Vildnna Hi Reck, she's Bloomberg News cross asset

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>reporter on the phone Miami. That's significant, right, yeah, definitely.

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean people are expecting a big reveal, so I

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>guess we're not going to get it. You're listening to

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stenovich on Bloomberg Radio. I will say this was

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the first thing I read in its entirety this morning.

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you read in and your skimming this. I was

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>just glued to the story from the get go. It

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is among the most read it's the Bloomberg Big Take,

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and it is the domestic cover story of the new

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>issue of Bloomberg, which is out Bloomberg Business Week Magazine,

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I should say, out tomorrow, already online and on the Bloomberg.

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>It's about the former financial elite and champion of diversity

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>and inclusion who is now running for a seat a

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Senate seat in Pennsylvania. UM, I gotta say, Joel Love

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>love this story. Joe Webber, editor Bloomberg business Week, is

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>here in our interactive broker studio. Who wrote it? Josh Green,

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>who is Bloomberg Business Week national correspondent. Uh, this story

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is about Give McCormick, who's uh not that long ago,

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>is the CEO of Bridgewater. Obviously Bridgewater, the world's biggest

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund. Uh. Now, David McCormick is running for a

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Senate seat in Pennsylvania. It's a hot race because he's

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>going up against Dr Oz. So we've got a TV

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>personality versus a former hedge fund ceo. Josh, how's that

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 1>going so far? Uh? It is, without a doubt, the

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>most bizarre, surreal Republican Senate primary of this cycle, for

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>for precisely the reasons you laid out, uh and more.

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 1>You know is I write in this problem it's really

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>profile McCormick. But there are kind of dispatches from the

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Oz campaign and the McCormick campaign. What both candidates are

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>really trying to do here is shed their old personas

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and reinvent themselves as Trump loving Maga acolytes. Because both

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>have concluded, um possibly not incorrectly, that that that is

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the surest way to power. So there's some jockeying for

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump's endorsement in trying to shed all the biographical baggage

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>um that might interfere with that. In McCormick's case, the

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that he, until just a few months ago was

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of the world's largest hedge fund and sort

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of the embodiment of establishment republicans um that of course, uh,

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Trump despises and doesn't want to support. So

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>writing about his his reinvention was was a lot of fun.

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's sort of the focus of this long profile. Well,

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about that reinvention more. How is it actually going?

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Because I mean, like you alluded to being the CEO

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of one of the biggest hedge funds, the largest hedge

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>fund out there, it's not exactly relatable experience, that is right.

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>So I described the transformation as being sort of like

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Clark Kent in a phone booth with McCormick went overnight

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>from uh, you know, being a regular at Davos to

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:57.360
<v Speaker 1>being somebody who's out on a campaign trail um, campaigning

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>against woke liberalism and that sort of thing. Um. But

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the upshot is it's working for him. So far. There

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>have been a lot of polls of this race, but

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the most recent one that I've seen has him up

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>about five or six points over Dr Oz. So the

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>primary isn't until May seventeenth, but he seems to be

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 1>doing a serviceable job of convincing Pennsylvania Republicans uh that

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>he is aligned with Trump and that he will govern

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in a Trump friendly way, which has come as a

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>shock to a lot of his former colleagues of Bridgewater

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>who don't recognize the guy they see out their campaigning Uh,

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and kind of wonder who the authentic David McCormick is. Uh,

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you had a very memorable interaction with Dr Oz in

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>a bathroom. Um what did you? What did Oz have

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to say about McCormick. Well, Uh, you know, the interesting

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>thing with Oz is he doesn't like to talk to

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>national reporters. But I sort of felt it was my

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>duty to go to an Oz campaign event and see

0:22:57.720 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>if I could get him. So I showed up a

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of hours early and went into the men's room

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>to clean up, and lo and behold, Uh there is

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Dr Oz. And so I politely used myself said that

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I was doing a profile of David McCormick and Oz

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>was dying to talk right there as he was washing

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>his hands fulminating against Bridgewater and McCormick. And so it's

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>one of the otter scenes that I've encountered in my journalism.

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>But it goes to show you there's some interview somebody anywhere. Yeah.

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh and when you know what one of the things

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that he basically says in that moment though, is, you

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>know McCormick is is soft on on China. And so

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>there's this tension that you can see where you know

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>the Maga element uh that you know, essentral to this

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 1>story that Oz is you know, using that as leverage

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>against McCormick. Right, that's exactly right. I mean, Ray Dalio

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 1>and Bridgewater are you know, famously great fans of and

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>investors in China. And that's something that is politically problematic

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to win over Trump and the Mago audience. Uh.

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So part of McCormick's transformation has been from China dub

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 1>to China hawk uh. And that's a real vulnerability. I mean,

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>speaking to political consultants Republicans around Pennsylvania, that is still

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>something that people care about. China and they have some

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>suspicion some McCormick's work in convincing people that he's authentically

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:22.719
<v Speaker 1>MAGA on China probably isn't yet isn't yet complete, And

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it is one of the area's vulnerability that that ODDS

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>is trying to exploit. Hey, Josh, speaking of going back

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and forth in conversations, your conversation with McCormick on near

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of your story where you really try to

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>get him to commit to an answer about whether or

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:42.199
<v Speaker 1>not he agrees with Donald Trump that his election was stolen. Um,

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it feels like he dodged it, wouldn't answer it. Yeah,

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, to me, the most shocking thing about McCormick

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and in this profile is that in order to demonstrate

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>your MAGA allegiance, I think he and many other candidates

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:01.719
<v Speaker 1>have concluded that they have to indulge Trump's uh falsehood

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that election was stolen from him. And so the piece

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>concludes with McCormick and I sitting in a in a

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>diner booth and I sort of asked him, I'm like,

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you know you you you claim to be authentically pro Trump,

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but do you agree that the election was stolen from

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>And I put the question to him four or five

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>different times. He simply refused to answer and eventually ended

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the interview. Um So, I think I think what that

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 1>means it shows how enduring Trump's grip over the GOP

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>still is. If somebody is credentialed and established and impressive

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in their own way, as McCormick is, fields the need

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to kind of subordinate to Trump to that degree. I

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>think what that says is that, you know, our politics

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is a long way from being finished with Donald Trump,

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>even if he's not in the headlines every day. So, Josh,

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>what all of this this odds and McCormick rays. All

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of this is just to you know, basically win a primary,

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>right how much money? And then who might they face

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>off on the Democrat side, since you know this would

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 1>just be the Republican Uh well, that is wild. I mean, yeah,

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:05.199
<v Speaker 1>as you said, this is already shaping up to be

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 1>the world's most expensive Senate primary because you know, McCormick

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is worth somewhere around nine nine figures and Oz has

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>tons of money himself. There are other wealthy candidates in

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the race, and they're all wailing on each other with

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>negative ads. So we're up in the mid forty million

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars already in the primary isn't until May. Whoever does

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to have a very expensive general election race.

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now on the Democratic side is between John Fetterman,

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>very blue collar guy, and Connor Lamb, a moderate who

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is trailing um. But no matter what it is, I

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>think this is gonna be probably the central Senate race

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that people are looking at in November. So is McCormick

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>survives the primary, he's gonna have another big race right

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>after that. In general, it is amazing though about that

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of feeling of kissing the ring right for Donald

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump still, and that is all about the Republican Party

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and the and the variable is also like what Trump

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 1>has has been quiet, so relatively quiet on this one.

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Right at some point if he opens his boorn, what

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>does he say? Yeah, we'll see if Twitter welcomes him back. Hey, guys,

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we gotta run. Josh Green, thank you so much now,

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>so national correspondent Bloomberg Business Week on the phone from Washington,

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 1>d C. And of course I think so always to

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Jilt Weber, editor of Bloomberg Business Week, you are listening

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week, Carol Master, Katy Greifeld, and this

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of things going on when it comes

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.679
<v Speaker 1>to Tesla and Elon Musk and Katie and I just

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about more things coming this week. More things coming

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>this week, including a big party. I wasn't invited. That's

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>weird Rodeo Rodio. Where's our invitation? Hey, listen, um, let's

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 1>get to our next guest. He's a Tesla owner and

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>investor of Voice that we count on to talk all

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>things Tesla. A. Russ Gerber's back with us. He's president

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>n CEO Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management. He's on

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Santa Monica, California. Are you out driving

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>around in your Tesla now? Oh? Actually, I'm actually at

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the airport going to Austin right now, and I didn't

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>want to miss talking to you guys. Ah, So okay,

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>what are you expecting? Oh my god. I just set

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>off the phone with people from Austin and this is incredible.

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>People from all over the country are Pesto fans that

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't even going to the event. Are just coming into

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Austin to celebrate the most consequential factory being opened in

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 1>probably modern American history, at the most perfect time to

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>be opening, and it's an exciting time. And so will

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you be at the rodeo itself? Oh, for sure, I'm

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be at the rodeo, and I'm hopefully going to

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to get access to, you know, the people

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I like to talk to you where I can get

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a great idea of this amazing combination of hardware, software,

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and the complete manufacturing process from you know, you're talking

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>from basically rocks all the way through until I finished

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>e V all going through. And remember they're using new

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>battery cells as well as new hardware in the computers

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that drive full self driving, and now that full self

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>driving is getting closer and closer, this entire thing is

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>coming together all here and often, and it's hugely consequential technology.

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>And so, Ross, I know you're a big Tesla fan,

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like I might know your answer to

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>this question. But something I've been wondering about this week is,

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, with Elon Musk clearly going to be taking

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>uh not a passive interest in Twitter joining the board,

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you have any concerns that you know,

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>he could be spreading himself a little too thin, that

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe with this focus on Twitter, you know,

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>he won't be focusing as much on Tesla. Okay, well,

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>let's let's be real if he's got a human being. Okay,

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm spread thin and I'm exhausted. So how Elon functions

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in this world that just, frank you don't understand. So

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't see with the time he spends on Twitter

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and I do too, and how important Twitter is as

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a vehicle, I don't see this as negative in any way.

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this is very common among the extremely wealthy

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to control media platforms as basically that conclose every media

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>platform is just smarter than everybody because they're still buying newspapers.

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And he bought Twitter. Uh well, I mean, I mean,

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>with with that, lat how do you feel about Twitter?

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, is this news enough to you know, make

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you bullish on the stock if you weren't already are

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you buying it? Well? Yeah, you know it's funny because

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I of course immediately wanted to buy the stock, and

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I followed Twitter, and you know, the company internals probably

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>better than Elon in some ways, Um, because I know

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who work there, and Twitter is

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>going through a big transition right now with Hug and

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the jury is still out on the math

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and reorganization that's going on actually at Twitter. So I

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I I hear people's perspectives of a good and bad So,

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just I like the direction that Twitter

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>is going in, and with Elon on board, I think

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge posits that said, I'm not investment in

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>social media at this time. I think it's a really

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>hard way to make money. I don't think Twitter's value

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is as much as a profit driver as much as

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a utility to society in a way globally. So it's

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>worth a lot of money, but I also think I

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much more it works. So you didn't

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>buy any of the stock, and I'm not per se

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>against it either, and we're still considering it. What about Tesla,

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>which is up almost since mid March? You've gotten sold? Right?

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Have you been selling and pocketing some game here? Well? Um,

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of a couple of our older clients,

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>were you know, barking at me, So I have to

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, But now that said, for my fun. You know,

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>g K we bought down at eight hundred and we

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't sold even though we've actually have over our mandates

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and Tesla right now at a well person allocation, but

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>for how uh well educated now with the caveat China

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is a big, big problem right now, and it is

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>an issue for Tesla short terms, not long term, and

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to discount that. But they're also just opened

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>two factories in completely different markets right now. So you know,

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>when you think about twelve months from now, I think

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Tesla execution and I think the stuck stot that you

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 1>stuck by any means here. But but I tell me

0:32:56.000 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a company more consequences than Tesla. Well listen, um, Ross.

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you. You're a busy man. You're headed to Austin, UH,

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be looking for your research after the event

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>there with Tesla. And we appreciate our audience who's been listening,

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>because we know the sound and audio is a little rough,

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>but we like to be able to get to some

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of these investors on these specific names and somebody like

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Ross Gerber, who has owns the car, has been in

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and out of Tesla and has really followed it, really

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>closely so our thanks to Ross Gerber, UH President CEO

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management. On the way to

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the airport UH there in California, headed to Austin. I mean,

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>stocks down four point two percent, but as I set

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>up about since mid March, oh big time, and I

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>mean it's still over a thousand dollars a share. That

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>is quite a price tag, even with you know, in

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>eight point seven per center off of the last two days, right,

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty significant. Yeah, but you let me drive, no, no, no,

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, please, I want to drive. It's a good question,

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 1>good drive ride to the globe on radio. Alright, we're

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 1>all getting a little driven crazy by the NonStop FED talk,

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation talk, what happens next, balance sheet interest rates? And

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it definitely is playing out after those latest FED minutes today,

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 1>f OMC minutes that we got it two pm. Wall

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Street time, because equity markets bouncing back and forth here

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Katie really trying to make sense. Bond market though, seems

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to have taken it like okay, got this. Yeah, and

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:33.280
<v Speaker 1>usually I mean you've been seeing bond volatility March higher,

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.799
<v Speaker 1>stock vulatility maybe calmed down a little bit, not so

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>much today all right, So let's get to it with

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>our market guest. Our Drive to the Close guest with

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sheldon. He's executive director, chief investment Officer over at

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:45.839
<v Speaker 1>High Tower r d M Financial Group. He is with

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Westport, Connecticut. Michael, good to

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>have you here with Katie and myself. Um, how did

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:53.839
<v Speaker 1>you Yeah, great to have you here. How did you

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>read the minutes today? Well, I think we did get

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 1>some additional information from the FED today and they said

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things that caught my attention. One is,

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the March minutes make it clear that that

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>rates will be increased by fifty basis points at the

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>May meeting, borrowing some kind of significant shock. Generally, the

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>participants at the FED were fairly positive on the outlook

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>for the economy right now, and I think, why do

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 1>you say you feel like you've got that clarity. I'm

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 1>just reading. Well, I just read through the individual comments

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of all the different FED districts which contribute to the

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>FED for the FED minutes and again, just for all

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the viewers out there, Fed minutes or comments from the

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>last FED meeting. The more important FED comments will actually

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:41.280
<v Speaker 1>be the Beige Book, which comes out in a few weeks,

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and for reference, the Beige Book is what the FED

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>will be talking about at their next meeting coming up,

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so just to put things in perspective. But the other thing,

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.240
<v Speaker 1>just to mention is they talked about the balance sheet runoff,

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 1>which is something which was just sort of floating out there,

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and they identified that they planned to roll off about

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:00.800
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars that will be sort of target amount for

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>treasuries and agencies and then only once that's up and

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 1>running will they eventually start actually selling securities. So I

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:10.720
<v Speaker 1>think we have at least we have a better idea

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of what's ahead. And the market kind of moved around

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and actually was off its lows following the minutes, possibly

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:22.359
<v Speaker 1>because some investors were expecting even more hawkish comments and

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>more negative comments in terms of the balance sheet rolloff.

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:28.359
<v Speaker 1>And this Fed has come under a lot of criticism,

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, for maybe waiting too long, maybe letting themselves

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 1>fall behind the curve. What is your view on the matter,

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Where do you fall on that debate? And how does

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that inform how you're thinking equities and markets will perform

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 1>from here? Right? Well, I mean, if you think about it,

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>the FED goals sounds simple in theory. Their goal is

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates a few times. They want to slow

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>the economy somewhat, they want to reduce inflation, but they

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>want to keep the economic expansion on track. So the

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>FED has accomplished this before in the I think in

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the sixties, the eighties, and the nine nineties, but they

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>also unfortunately have a poor track record of of raising

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>rates too aggressively and causing a downturn in the economy.

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I think investors are getting kind of

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a jittery rabat right now. So unfortunately for investors, until

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we find out more about how much the FED intends

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates, what the speed of the FED sort

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of trajectory will be, um, we're not going to have

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of clarity until later this year, so that

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>could create more of a periods of volatility as we

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>go through the summer into the fall. So it feels like,

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we go, we get we get some more insight,

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a FED meeting or FOMC minutes. As you

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:42.240
<v Speaker 1>said Beige Book. You know, this will be also important

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:44.959
<v Speaker 1>of course as a next point in terms of figure

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>out what FED policy is. But it's kind of a

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>reminder Michael right, that the FED um is going to

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.240
<v Speaker 1>look at where we are in the current market condition

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 1>and what they're getting from their regional banks and what

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the data points are telling us. Well, that's really important

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to us. So the said Powell has talked about it

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>many meetings in the past. The feed data dependent. So

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the issues if you remember back in two

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand eighteen, going into Christmas, last of two thousand eighteen,

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>after the FED had started as last rate cycle, the

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>stock markets sold off sharply heading into Christmas period, and

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.839
<v Speaker 1>that was because after the Feds started raising rates, they

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>started to reduce the balance sheet, but they sort of

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>kept it on what I think they called it autopilot,

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and they really needed to make adjustments. So this time around,

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the FED will be more aware of that.

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>In the minutes, they actually talked about looking at the

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seventeen period for reference. They did talk about

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact the economy is on better footing now and

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 1>they do plan to be more aggressive, but I think

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 1>they will be data dependent. And you know, it's not

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>it's not all terrible. I mean, there is some good

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>news out there. The unemployment rate is currently at three

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 1>point six per weekly jobless claims were recently the lowest

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>since nineteen. Consumer balance sheets are strong, and I think

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the outlook for manufacturing generally is pretty positive. But the

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>issue is that to consume or sentiment index recently fell

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to a multi year low, and that's really all about inflation,

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 1>and consumers are not feeling good about inflation, and that's

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>what's you know, impacting the markets a bit. And when

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>you wrap that all together, you know, you have a

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty lousy consumers sentiment. You have still very robust job market,

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a federal reserve that is starting to tighten,

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:22.439
<v Speaker 1>plenty more to come. I mean, where do you see

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the most opportunities across asset classes, across markets right now? Well,

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter, it was really all about a

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>very sort of narrow group the steels, the coppers, oil

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and oil and gas, the commodities. So it was it

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>was difficult to make money in the first quarter if

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you weren't in those very small specific parts of the market.

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I think going forward, for now you want to be

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in high quality versus low quality stocks. I think you're

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>probably better off in large versus small stocks. Um the

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>US is probably a safer place than overseas, although at

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 1>some point in the future foreign stocks will start to

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:58.760
<v Speaker 1>do better. One thing to watch is the dollar for example,

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and sort of obviously the military events between Ukraine and Russia. Um,

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and between value and growth there is a sort of

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 1>a tough one. But I think you want to have

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:10.320
<v Speaker 1>whereas over the past decade you wanted to be overweight growth,

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>which is what we were, but I think going forward

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>you want to have a little more balanced between growth

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 1>and value in your portfolios. Is there a longer term

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:23.320
<v Speaker 1>thought here in terms of you know, the market, the

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 1>stock market. It's higher than it was five years ago,

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>it's higher than it was ten years ago, Like, is

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 1>there a longer thought Michael that we need to have

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 1>in what is a very tricky environment And just got

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 1>about thirty seconds here. Sure, Well, that's that's really a

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>good comment. We're investment planners at heart. We run a

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>financial advisory firm, so we try and encourage clients to

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>have the appropriate asset allocation to basically ride out the

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 1>inevitable ups and downs. And we try and basically preach

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's time time in the market, not timing the

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>market over the long term. That helps clients reach their

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>long term investment goals. Yeah, I know it's it's not

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>always easy to do. Things are a little crazy. Um.

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sheldon, thank you so much. We really appreciate like

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:06.319
<v Speaker 1>all the prep you do and the reading through UH

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of your commentary that you can bring to

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg audience. Michael Sheldon, executive director and chief investment

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Officer over at High Tower r d M Financial Group,

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Westport, Connecticut. Thanks for listening to

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to our

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 1>watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News