WEBVTT - US Hydrogen Industry at Odds Over Tax Credit Rules

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins and your listening to Switched on

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the BNAF podcast. Draft guidance for the US hydrogen Production

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 1>tax Credit was introduced in December of twenty twenty three,

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>with the aim of promoting decarbonization in hard to abate

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>sectors and enhancing energy security in the country as well.

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>The draft guidance requires electrolysis projects to meet additional criteria,

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>including hourly matching between clean energy production and power consumption.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>While some applaud the draft guidance for preventing greenwashing and

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 1>driving real decarbonization, others view these requirements as excessive in

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>fear they could potentially discourage investment in green hydrogen production.

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>On today's show, we bring you a discussion from bnaf's

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>recent summit in New York, where Martin Tangler, who leads

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>BNF's hydrogen research, spoke with Kathleen Baron, Executive vice president

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and chief Strategy Officer at Constellation, alongside Claire Bahar, chief

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>commercial officer at High Store Energy, and Elena Scaltreaty, chief

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>commercial officer at TOPSO and l. Lastly, Andy Vezy, President

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and chief executive officer at forties U North America. During

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>their lively discussion of the forty five v tax credit.

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>They considered whether a heavy focus on green hydrogen production

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>overlooks hydrogen adoption, and they compared the US to Europe,

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>where you do see demand side incentives. As they consider

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>what it will take to build out a hydrogen industry

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, they got into which technologies are

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>going to help them get there and the associated costs.

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Agendas and videos from previous b andF summits, including this one,

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>can be found at BNF dot com under the events tab.

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>As always, if you like this podcast, make sure to

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts,

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>and consider giving us a review to make us more

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>discoverable by others. Right now, though, let's hear Martin's panel

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>from the BNF summit in New York titled Controversial Shifts

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in America's green hydrogen Landscape.

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's jump straight in.

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 3>So when President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act in

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 3>August twenty twenty two, many in the hydrogen industry saw

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 3>it as a turning point, as a real game changer.

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 3>A three dollar per kilogram tax credit for anybody who

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 3>can make hydrogen with very, very low carbon emissions, but

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 3>almost two years later, no one has actually received a

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 3>single dollar because we're waiting for guidance on how these

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 3>credits can be claimed. In December, the Treasury and the

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 3>IRS published a draft of this guidance, and this draft

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 3>is quite controversial for including the so called three pillars

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 3>of additionality, time matching, and deliverability. Most companies want leniency

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 3>on these three pillars, but some are in favor. Billions

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 3>of dollars.

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Are a stake in this debate, and everybody agrees on

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:03.519
<v Speaker 2>one thing.

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 3>We need final rules as soon as possible, and this

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 3>is where we get to our panelists. Claire, you've become

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 3>quite famous recently for coming out in favor of these

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 3>really strict rules. So I'm going to quote your recent

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 3>testimony at a public hearing on March the twenty fifth,

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 3>where you said high store energy urges the Treasury and

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 3>the IRS to adopt the three pillars approach, requiring additionality

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 3>from day one, strong deliverability standards, and a phase in

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 3>of hourly matching by twenty twenty eight. First, can you

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 3>explain to us what these three pillars are so we

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 3>educate the audience, And second, what makes it possible for

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 3>you to argue in favor of these three pillars when

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 3>some of our other panelists and most of the industry

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 3>seem to be in favor of some leniency.

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 4>Perfect.

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 5>Thank you Martin, and thank you Bin Yaf for the

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 5>upper to need to speak today. I'll start with defining

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 5>what the three pillars are. The three pillars are strict

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 5>guidelines in relation to the guidelines.

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 4>For grid connected electrilizers.

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 5>And these guidelines are to ensure that there is robust

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 5>accounting for the carbon emissions associated with grid connected electrilizers.

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 5>And so, starting with additionality, it's a requirement that new

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 5>new green electrons are powering the electrilizers. For regionality, this

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:41.479
<v Speaker 5>is to ensure that the clean hydrogen production is in

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 5>the same location as the clean electricity that's powering them.

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 5>And this is to ensure that you're not claiming green

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 5>electrons in West Texas, for example. Are then correlating to

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 5>your project, your hydrogen project in the new work.

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 4>And then lastly is time matching.

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 5>That's to ensure that the clean electricity is being produced

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 5>at the same time as the green hydrogen production. So

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 5>the guidelines have a transition periods similar to that of

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 5>the EU that allow for an annual matching until twenty

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 5>twenty eight, and then from then on it's an hourly matching.

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 5>And the reason why these three pillars are so important,

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 5>it's to ensure that we're investing in long term infrastructure

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 5>that are decreasing emissions instead of in fact increasing emissions.

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 5>And unfortunately, today our electric grid is still predominantly fossil

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 5>fuel based sixty seventy, as high as eighty percent in

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 5>some locations.

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 4>And so if you are putting on a large.

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 5>Load and you're not then adding more renewable electricity such

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 5>as wind or solar, you are in fact increasing the

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 5>demand for fossil fuels that would be backfilled by peakers

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 5>that are coal and natural gas and so high store energy.

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, really applauds the Treasury.

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 5>For taking this stance and ensuring that the three pillars

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 5>are upheld. And from our perspective, our project prior to

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 5>the guidelines is going to be three pillar compliant from

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 5>day one. And our first project is the Mississipi Clean

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 5>Hydrogen Hub, which couples on site, off grid dedicated renewables

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 5>for our electrolysis production and salt cavern storage CO located

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 5>and storage gives us the ability to store access hydrogen

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 5>and then it is dispatchable on demand four times when.

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 4>The wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 5>And you know, holistically, we're in this business to decarbonize

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 5>and it's not about just having another another molecule. We say,

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 5>if you're going to burn natural gas, burnatural gas, don't.

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Go through all the loops, okay to get there.

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 3>So it's a combination of those off gride renewables as

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.679
<v Speaker 3>opposed to on grid, which I think that's that's relatively

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 3>easy to understand. You managed to save some costs by

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 3>not paying some of the expensive grid fees, and then

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 3>those that salt cavern storage, right, and the salt caverns

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 3>is to me that that's a really really key factor

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 3>of the projects that you're building.

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 2>And salt caverns.

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Are quite quite rare, right, You don't get to build

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 3>salt caverns just just anywhere. I don't think you could

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 3>build a salt cabon Europe because we're not sitting on

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 3>a salt deposit right now. So would you consider building

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 3>projects if you didn't have salt caverns?

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, So the salt cavern storage is really key for

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 5>both the scale and the duration. It's that long duration,

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 5>that multi day, multi week and seasonal energy storage that

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 5>we're prioritizing in the off take markets we're looking at,

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 5>which are the energy intensive industries where direct electrification is

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 5>not a viable option. And it's these off take markets,

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 5>for example, steel, that are the first movers that are

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 5>already there with their customers showing the green premium that they.

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Want a zero carbon solution.

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 5>And from the commercial point of view, this transparency in

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 5>carbon emissions is exactly what our customers are asking for to.

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 4>Ensure that they can.

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 5>Account for their scope one, two and three emissions and

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 5>most importantly that the products they're producing today in the

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 5>United States with clean hydrogen is competitive and accepted on

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 5>a global scale.

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so customers wanted one final one before we get

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 3>to Andy, who I sure, I'm sure has very different,

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 3>very different view on this. So would your position be different,

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Claire if your project was not based on top of

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 3>salt caverns, which you'd be also asking for some leniency There.

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 5>No, because leniency with the market in such infancy, there

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 5>is urgency, but we cannot be sacrificing urgency with investing

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 5>in infrastructure that's going to continue to lock in fossil fuels.

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 4>The goal is decarbonization and.

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 5>To transition off of fossil fuels and hydrogen is an

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 5>excellent solution because it provides that molecule that can be

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 5>stored and transported over long distances, and we need to

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 5>be prioritizing it in the areas of the economy where

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 5>direct electrification is not a viable option, and not trying

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 5>to have it spread thin, wide and thin.

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:49.359
<v Speaker 4>It needs to be concentrated.

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, good to know.

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 3>So no leniency even if you don't have if you

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 3>didn't have salt caverns.

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 3>I wonder what Andy has to say, because Andy, you

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 3>are one of the strongest, is asking for those more

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 3>lenient rules in your testimony in that same hearing where

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Claire was speaking in March, you said, I'm quoting forty

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 3>five V in its current form is a strait jacket

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 3>on the energy on the emerging industry. The only solution

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 3>is to add a minimum include grandfathering first mover projects.

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 2>First, can you explain what grandfathering means?

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 3>And then second, why do you feel this way if

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Claire says that she can make her projects work even

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 3>with those strict rules.

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 7>Sure, And first of all, let me say that I

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 7>hope everybody's sitting in this panel is wildly successful because

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 7>because we need very low carbon hydrogen, right, we need

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 7>it as soon as possible, but we needed to have

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 7>it at the lowest possible cost, right. I think there's

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 7>a lot in here to unpack. And you know, I

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 7>think we've talked before. I said that you know where

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 7>you stand on this issue starts with where you sit, right,

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 7>And if I was sitting in a similar position, then

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 7>I could basically say, Yep, I'm supportive of these things

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 7>because I know why seventy five percent of the industry

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 7>can't compete with me because I can't do it and

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 7>it's all price. So I think that's great. But here's

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 7>the deal. We're not doing projects here. We're trying to

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 7>build an industry. We're trying to build an industry, and

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 7>the key in building the industry is driving the cost

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 7>of every molecule down. I always get challenged, well, nobody

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 7>wants to buy green hydrogen. No, nobody wants to pay

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 7>the price. But if I could sell that green molecule

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 7>at the same price as grey. Everybody would buy green hydrogen.

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 7>We'd all be happy as heck. Right, So how do

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 7>you get there? Well, the Body Administration in the Inflation

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 7>Reduction Act anticipated driving the cost of that molecule down

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 7>by twenty thirty to a dollar a kilogram.

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 6>And this was really to incent and get this started. Right,

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 6>And why is it so important that we have as

0:11:58.440 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 6>many projects going now?

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 7>Include I mean the early ones that don't meet the

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 7>three pillars or one of the three pillars, because almost

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.719
<v Speaker 7>all of them can meet one, which is deliverability.

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 6>I can't find too many that don't. Right. Why is

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 6>it so important?

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 7>Because the more you do, the more projects that go,

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 7>the ones that are successful, the ones that fail. You're

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 7>building economies of scale, economies of manufacture to bring down

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 7>your costs, and economies of novels. You get smarter about

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 7>how to do it. You got to drive that engine.

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 6>To be successful. And here's the deal.

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 7>If we made the same requirements from this industry to

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 7>have to bring its own green electrons to the party,

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 7>and we made that apply to everybody who was making

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 7>electric vehicles, I would not be driving my electric vehicle today.

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 6>Why this one. Right. And here's the other issue. We're

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 6>trying to solve too.

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 7>Many problems with one piece of rulemaking. Right, there are

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 7>two point six tero watts of renewable standing in queues.

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 7>That's twice the installed total capacity. Now we're going to

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 7>require even more pressure to push through that houses in

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 7>the industry going to start. Yes, I'm very happy that

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 7>high store is going to have a project.

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 6>I really am. But that's not going to build an industry.

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 7>You have to open and broaden that aperture, right, and

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 7>then it will close over time.

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 6>We're not advocating that.

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 7>We people don't pay attention to the three pillars because

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 7>they are critically important. Right, you said it. We have

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 7>no totally green grids, right, we have done right. The

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 7>other thing we don't have is we don't have enough

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 7>green electrons. We have to sort that in time. But

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 7>we're saying that for projects that can get into construction

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 7>by twenty twenty eight, they should be grand funds so

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 7>we get them going.

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 7>And one other issue which no one talks about outside

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 7>the Three Pillars is the creep model. So every year

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 7>you have to reevaluate the credits you're getting what they're worth.

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 6>Who can finance a project that way. So there's a

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 6>lot of work to be done.

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 7>But here's the deal. Every effort, every effort is good.

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 7>Let's widen the aperture, let's not restrict it right off

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 7>the bat. So we have a few projects because here's

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 7>what forty five in its purest form will do.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 6>It will make the plant smaller.

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 7>All right, you can ask me why, but I'm not

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 7>going to explain.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 7>Smaller, there will be fewer of them, and they will

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 7>cost more. Estimates right now is that projects will increase

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 7>in cost between one hundred and forty one seventy five percent.

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 6>To the end consumer.

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 7>How are you going to build demand that is ensuring

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 7>absolutely ensuring that high carbon intensity hydrogen.

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 6>Comes into this market. So let me stop there and.

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 2>I get it.

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 3>So, more expensive hydrogen, fewer projects, smaller projects. So you

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 3>said your position, You know you stand where you sit.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Why don't you or why doesn't Fortescue sit on top

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 3>of salt caverns?

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 7>Well, I'll tell you where we do so. Well, first

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 7>of all, look, I think you said it right. They're

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 7>very few and it's not all salt, it's domo salt.

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 7>And if you look at a map. There are only

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 7>so many, right, it's a scarce resource. But if you'd

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 7>ask me where Fordescue sits, it sits on planet Earth. Yeah,

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 7>we all do, right, we all do, and therefore get

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 7>to decarbonization with a molecule for people who can't use

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 7>an electron should be in all our best interests. Widening

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 7>the amperture, right, doesn't impact I store. Right, you call

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 7>it lenient, or you called it lenient, that's a judgment already.

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 6>I call it appropriate.

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 7>Right, So let's build an industry here, and let's not

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 7>try to solve every problem with one piece of rulemaking

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 7>today when we're really building an industry for the twenty

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 7>thirties and twenty forties.

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, I call it more lenient, not linient. Andy.

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 3>One final for you before we move on to Elena

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 3>and Kathleen. So both you and Claire, this is really interesting.

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Both you and Claire are members of GH two, which

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 3>is one of the strictest hydrogen standards before you have

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 3>to produce your hydrogen at one kilogram of CO two

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 3>or less per kilogram of hydrogen that you make. Your CEO,

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Forest is on the board of the GH two organization.

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 3>So isn't your dislike of the hourly matching pillar at

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 3>odds with your membership of the GH two.

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 7>No, I don't think so, because it doesn't actually specify

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 7>hourly matching, monthly matching, or annually matching. What it does

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 7>requires we follow the rules and laws that are in

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 7>place that it does.

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 6>Look.

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 7>I think for FORDESCU, we have an absolute commitment that

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 7>we will never leave anything worse offt than when we come,

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 7>whether it's a water aquifer, the community in terms of

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 7>what we're doing, or that we will directly impact in

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 7>higher emissions of CO two.

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 6>We have a.

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 7>Project in Washington State, in Washington State, they manage that

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 7>in Washington State. It's hydro power in Washington State. That

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 7>project would not meet this requirement, and it's a perfectly

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 7>good project.

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 6>This is what we have to sort out.

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 7>There's nothing There are a few pieces in conflict here,

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 7>but what's non in conflict for anybody on this stage

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 7>is the urgency by which we have to produce those

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 7>very low carbon intensity molecules.

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 6>So let's get at it.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 7>Let's make it so people can come to this game

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 7>and we can learn, we can build, we can manufacture.

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 6>And here's the other piece of it.

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 7>If we're increasing the cost of these projects, what's a

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 7>project developed going to do. You're gonna buy the cheapest

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 7>electualized as you can know where they're.

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 8>Made China, tie them.

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 7>And the whole purpose of this bill was to build

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 7>infrastructure in this country.

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 3>We have a report on electronizing in China. They're not

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 3>gonna have it as easy as it seems.

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 7>Even let me tell you, they'll have it easier when

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 7>everybody's buying them, because they have to get those costs.

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 6>Down here to manage the cost of that molecule. All right.

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 7>And here's the other thing. Fortescue is a large public

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 7>company in Australia. We're in thirty different countries and I

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 7>have to go before Andrew Farst and tell them why

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 7>I think he should put a dollar of his money

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 7>here versus Morocco, versus Egypt, versus Norway. Right, So, think

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 7>about where capital is going to go, where the capital

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 7>flows are going to go. And one other aspect of

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 7>this and the Inflation Reduction Act was the creation of

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 7>an industry having capital invested here. So these are the

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 7>things why we're concerned about and why we might have

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 7>a slightly different view on this than.

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 6>High stool good.

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Good to know that your membership of the G two

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 3>standard is not at odds with your arguments for leniency

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 3>or more leniency on these rules.

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Moving on to Elena, So Elena.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Many green hydrogen proponents say that the proposed guidance, the

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 3>strict guidance, benefits blue hydrogen by being too strict on

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 3>green and therefore constraining green hydrogen and making blue the

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 3>default technology to go to. And your company, top so So

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 3>licenses a blue hydrogen technology called sincore to firms like

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Exxon and Fidelis. But your client, Exxon is now threatening

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 3>to ditch a blue hydrogen project that would use your

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 3>technology because the rules would make it hard for them

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 3>to qualify for the clean Hydrogen credit and they would

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 3>have to settle for a lower credit, the forty five

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Q credit for carbon.

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 2>Capture and storage. So what is your view?

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Does the current guidance on green hydrogen help blue hydrogen

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 3>by constraining green or does it hurt blue hydrogen because

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't get those doesn't allow them to get those credits.

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 9>So thank you and really pleased to be here. Let

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 9>me start by saying that at TOPS we have the

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 9>beauty of having a number of technologies that actually speak

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 9>to all colors, and for that, we are color agnostic

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 9>when it comes to hydrogen. So in fact, we tend

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 9>to talk about low carbon hydrogen and renewable hydrogen.

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 8>And when you look at our.

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 9>Portfolio of technologies, it's true we have blue with our sinker,

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 9>which is fully commercial and fully scaled technology, but we

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 9>are making huge investments for our size of company in

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 9>green with the electoralizer, the sec electoralizer, So we are

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 9>really invested in both technologies and in many more because

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 9>we are as well in renewable fuels. So as a

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 9>matter of fact, we are quite agnostic. And as and said,

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 9>we are all for the carbonization in whatever form and

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 9>shape it takes place, as long as it takes place

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 9>fast enough that we can commit and actually get to

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 9>our twenty to fifty targets. So I think everybody that

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 9>talks about forty five V at the moment is unhappy, whether.

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 2>It's green or blue.

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 9>So in any shade of color, when we think of green,

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 9>and we think of our own investments and the customers

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 9>we talk to, there is certainly a concern about availability

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 9>of fitstocks to actually scale the technology, tests, the technology

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 9>make it making sure that it comes you know, at

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 9>the right cost, in the right amount of time. But

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 9>also when we speak to our customers in the low

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 9>carbon hydrogen and low carbon ammonia for that or blue

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 9>hydrogen and ammonia, they do have concerns that actually, as

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 9>it is shaped at the moment, the forty five V

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 9>doesn't really favor decarbonization. Why because actually it sets a

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 9>standard which is for the calculation of the carbon intensity

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 9>based on the carbon intensity of the fitstocks, which are

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 9>based on historical heverages, So actually not favoring projects and

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 9>those and those project developers that want to be more

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 9>ambitious that actually want to make investment towards decarbonizing the

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 9>whole value chain methane emissions and also being more ambitious

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.959
<v Speaker 9>on the carbon capture on the process of hydrogen production,

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 9>hence actually failing a bit the whole purpose and the

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 9>philosophy of the i RA and the forty five V specifically.

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 9>So if we have advice accordingly, we would actually advise

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 9>changes both with regards to green hydrogen and to low

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 9>carbon hydrogen, and just with the purpose of doing things

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 9>quickly enough that you can scale up technology, but that

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 9>you can also enable and implement technologies that are already

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 9>fully scaled and commercial and can bring an enormous impact

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 9>in a relatively short amount of time.

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So Topsail winds either way, whether it's blue or green,

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 3>or low carbon or renewable.

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 6>What a happy company?

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:48.360
<v Speaker 9>No, I always say, I don't know if it's by

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 9>design or by luck, but we sit right in the

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 9>middle of the energy transition, and our ambition is actually

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 9>to make it happen. And it's just good that I

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 9>think we're quite neutral towards the quarter that it is

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 9>to take.

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, do our other panels have anything to say? And

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 3>de Claire, what do you guys think about the impact.

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Of this guidance on blue? Is it good for blue?

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Or is it bad for blue?

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 5>I think the common I'll make is, unfortunately, so much

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 5>attention has been brought to forty five V and almost

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 5>pitting green hydrogen companies against each other, while no attention

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 5>has been put on forty five Q with blue hydrogen.

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 5>So I think, you know, as Andy said, everyone up

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 5>here in favor of green, and it's it is about decarbonization.

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 4>So I think I'll say.

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 3>That, okay, or all in favor of decarbonization, that's good.

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 2>So if not, we were in the wrong place.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Moving on to another topic, and this is where we

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 3>bring our last panelist to Kathleen. Kathleen, your company, Constellation

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 3>has the biggest nuclear fleet in the US, twenty one reactors.

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 2>If I check correctly.

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Now, the nuclear industry has struggled somewhat economically in the

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 3>recent past, at least so my colleagues in the Power

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 3>team tell me. So it's not a surprise, of course

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 3>that the nuclear industry would like to get some benefits

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 3>from from making making hydrogen. But the draft guidance right

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 3>now excludes most nuclear because of the additionality claws. So

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.360
<v Speaker 3>if you're three years or older, your plants is three

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 3>years older than you know, you don't qualify it with

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 3>the current rules. So your CEO, Joe Dominguez, in an

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 3>interview with Bloomberg called the additionality rule crazy.

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 2>So how that's that's quoting quoting it.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 3>How important is hydrogen And it seems like hygien really

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 3>is very important for the nuclear industry, But how important

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 3>is it for nuclear industry? Is it a matter of

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 3>life and death for the nuclear industry that these credits

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 3>don't work out?

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 2>Then, you know, we're folding.

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 10>So I have to start out by saying, not only

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 10>do we have an expert moderator, but we.

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 8>Have a comedian moderator. So this is the best panel

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 8>I've ever been on. This is great.

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 10>Hydrogen is important to nuclear nuclear is important to hydrogen.

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 10>I just I need to go back to the passage

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 10>of the bill. This is not like a policy conversation.

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 10>I am a recovering lawyer, so I have to focus

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 10>on the fact that the statute is explicit that nuclear

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 10>can be used to power an electrolyizer and make hydrogen

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.719
<v Speaker 10>that can qualify for the credit. In fact, we are

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 10>already making clean hydrogen with nuclear energy at an electrolyizer

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 10>that we built in New York right next to one

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 10>of our plants.

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 8>The reason we built that is because we've got.

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 10>A grant from the Department of Energy to build that electrilyizer.

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 10>We've also gone to grant to power one of the

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 10>seven hydrogen hubs, the one that is encompassing the Midwest States.

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 10>Not going to happen if we can't use the nuclear

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 10>energy to make the hydrogen at that For that hub,

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 10>all that work, that's nine hundred million dollars of an investment.

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 10>That's on pause while we wait for the guidance to

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 10>come out. So we'll see what happens when we see

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 10>the final rules. But you said a moment ago, no

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 10>one's making hydrogen here. We're making hydrogen here, we're claiming

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 10>the credit. So if we have to visit with the

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 10>courts to sort out whether the final guidance is consistent

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 10>with the statute or not, we've already had center mansion

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 10>offered right an Amikus brief.

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 8>The people who wrote this bill.

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 10>Didn't write additionality into it. They knew how to specify

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 10>when something needed to be built by a certain date.

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 10>They didn't do that with respect to the electricity going

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 10>into the electrolyzer.

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 8>They just said it had to be zero carbon.

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 10>We make more zero carbon magwats than anyone in the country.

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 8>One out of every ten comes out of one or.

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 10>Machines, and so yes, we are focusing on this as

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 10>a way to ensure the long term operation of the

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 10>nation's nuclear fleet. The Inflation Reduction Act was the first

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 10>time the federal government provided a credit to existing resources.

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 10>So the fleet is receiving your credit, But unlike the

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 10>other credits in the Act, it does expire in eight years.

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 10>So if a nuclear reactor were able to sell clean electricity,

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 10>whether through the grid or directly behind the meter to

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 10>an electoralizer, those types of contracts only need to be

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 10>You could still claim the credit if you sign one

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 10>of those contracts early in the twenty thirties and it's

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 10>in place for ten years. So it's a long term

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 10>potential revenue stream to provide the reactor a reason to

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 10>stay on the grid past the expiration of the forty

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 10>five year credit.

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so this is a long term mechanism for nuclear

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 3>to live. And I'm glad you mentioned the other credit

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 3>because that was going to be my next question. Nuclear

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 3>industry is getting its own forty five you credit for.

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Nuclear power plants.

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 3>So do I understand it correctly that the forty five

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 3>view in your view is not giving you enough of

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 3>a long long, you know, long enough supply of money,

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 3>and then you would need for the longer term to

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 3>be producing the hydrogen.

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 10>To be clear, forty five view is designed to ensure

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 10>that a reactor can recover its cost of operations if

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 10>market prices are below its cost of operation. So, unlike

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 10>credits for wind and solar, the forty five U credit

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 10>actually phases down as market prices go up. It has

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 10>that built in consumer projection feature. But the point is

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 10>it expires in eight years, So unlike the renewable credits,

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 10>which will be in place till all of your children

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 10>are grown and have their own kids, this this this

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 10>credit will not be So it is a potential revenue source.

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 10>You know, all the points we've made here about demand

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 10>are accurate. We need to have a market for this commodity,

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 10>and therefore we need to get going at bringing down

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 10>the cost, as we've done with other types of technology,

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 10>so that it can be a long term source of revenue.

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 10>But you know, we're sort of stuck in the starting

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 10>blocks here, and you know, this notion of additionality just

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 10>we struggle with it just economically. I mean, if the

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 10>logic is that wind farm or solar farm wouldn't be

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 10>there but for the hydrogen credit, I just I struggle

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 10>with that because I know all of you who woke

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 10>up this morning and say, gee, I wish we had

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 10>more wind and solar on the grid.

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 8>You don't think, well.

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 10>Geez, if only we had more hydrogen, you know, subsidies.

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 10>It's we don't have an interconnection queue that works. We

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 10>need wind, and we need zoning and permitting to improve.

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 10>We need a better supply chain, We need the skilled workforce.

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 10>We have demand for new renewables.

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 8>They are not coming on the grid because of hydrogen.

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 10>So if you're using renewables to make hydrogen, you are

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 10>accountable the grid when you use new resource the same

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 10>way as the argument goes, you do so if you're

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 10>using an existing resource. So we need to build more

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 10>clean We need to get to a clean grid. We're

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 10>trying to do too much with this credit. You know,

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 10>the courts don't usually love it when agencies that aren't

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 10>you know, experts in something to try to manage it.

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 10>So I fear that's where this is going if if

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 10>we don't have some more rationality in the final rule.

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so we learn about the importance of the hydrogen

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:36.239
<v Speaker 3>credit to the nuclear industry. Now what I'm interested in

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 3>is the other way around. What's the importance of the

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 3>nuclear industry to the hydrogen industry? And clear I think

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 3>you're in particular actually said in that March testimony that

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 3>you would actually favor exceptions from additionality for nuclear power plants.

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Could you explain the reasoning behind that.

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And I think you brought up the point, which is,

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 5>if it is making it so that an asset is

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 5>not going into retirement, then this is a firm based load,

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 5>zero carbon source. And whereas if you are not adding

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 5>new renewables to a grid, from our view, that is cannibalizing.

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 5>We're adding massive demand by plugging an electrolyizer into a grid,

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 5>and we are not adding more zero carbon assets to

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 5>that grid. What's going to happen, in turn, is that

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 5>it's going to fuel more fossil fuel generation to then

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 5>feed that load.

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 4>So we can't. We need to be creating.

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 5>A more a decarbonized grid, but also a more resilient grid.

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 3>And nuclear additionality exceptions help that. Sorry, and exceptions for

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 3>nuclear from from additionality help help if it.

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 5>Keeps yes, then if it keeps that asset from going

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 5>into retirement.

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Kathleen say you are going to say something.

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think that's right, and I think the Treasury

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 10>suggested as much in the proposed role. So we'll see

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 10>what that translates into into in terms of flexibility in

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 10>the final world. What we've said is, you know, if

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 10>you're causing a station to seek a second license renewal,

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:23.239
<v Speaker 10>in other words, approval from the government to run for

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 10>another twenty years, and that is sort of in the

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 10>same time vicinity as the contract with the hydrogen customer

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 10>that should qualify. There's also a suggestion that there'd be

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 10>some you know, potential phase in or you know, if

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 10>you look at what the EIA says, not what we say,

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 10>but the EIA says about what will happen when this

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 10>forty five ye credit expires, we will see nuclear retirements.

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 10>They estimate that's twenty percent of the fleet, so you

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 10>get up a twenty percent exemption something like that. Ten percent,

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 10>those are all in the mix. But your question was

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 10>is nuclear important to hydrogen? And I think that is

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 10>true because and it's why it was explicit in the

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 10>statute that nuclear existing nuclear can make hydrogen is because

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 10>it is operating twenty four to seven and that is

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 10>the way to get the most efficiency out of your electoralizer,

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 10>to have a constant sorts of power at the power

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 10>quality that you need that runs ninety five percent of

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 10>the time. So it's you know, you don't want to

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 10>take the cheap stoption off the table right out of

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 10>the bat and that's essentially what we've done with this guidance.

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 7>So we also publicly common and put into our testament

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 7>testimony exemptions for nuclear We may never use nuclear electrons.

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 6>We may, but right now we don't.

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 7>We don't mean intention to, but we think it's important

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 7>because it goes back to my initial argument. I hope

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 7>they have electoralizers, really big ones that every nuclear plant

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 7>they have. Why, because then someone has to produce more electoralizers.

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 7>The more you produce economy as a manufacturer, the price

0:33:58.240 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 7>goes down.

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 6>They tect. Somebody invests in advanced membrane technology.

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 7>Everything that pulls and creates demand for all the bits

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 7>and pieces that make it is good for the entire industry.

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 6>Right, and I finished. I have one more point.

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 7>I don't buy into blue why because I don't think

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 7>the future to a decarbonized world is the pathway has

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 7>methane underneath it. But at this point I'm not arguing

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 7>incident because again I want everybody to be successful. At

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 7>the end of the day, the market's going to decide

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 7>what they want to buy. Right, And that's another piece

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 7>to the incrementality thing. The idea that we should have

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 7>tax policy allocating a scarce resource to me, is nuts, right,

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 7>because I go back to my argument, why is this

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.760
<v Speaker 7>the only industry that has to bring their own Everybody

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 7>who wants to buy it should be as to do

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 7>the same thing. And then what you do You have

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 7>a market because we'll compete. My view is, if I

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 7>can buy a green electron and I can pay the

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 7>price for it, that must be the highest value for it,

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:58.800
<v Speaker 7>and otherwise somebody would ask to pay more. Let markets decide.

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 7>But the bottom line here, we're getting overly focused on

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 7>these little bits and pieces of policy of tax policy

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:06.760
<v Speaker 7>and rulemaking.

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 6>When we're trying to build an industry.

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 7>Remember the administration's goal one dollar kilogram by twenty thirty.

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 7>There is nothing in this rule making proposed rule making

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 7>that will get us there.

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So that actually leads us to the final part

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 3>of this discussion. I think it's fitting that we have

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 3>only nine out of forty minutes left and we're talking

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 3>about the most important topic because that's how it seems

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 3>to work throughout the whole discussion around hydrogen, which is

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 3>demand for hydrogen. So my team believes that BNF that

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 3>the world and the US needs demand side incentives. So

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 3>for somebody to actually want to buy the hydrogen that

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 3>you guys produce. But the tax credits, which we just

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 3>spent thirty minutes talking about, they are worth one hundred

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars and they're all for the producers. And the

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 3>US does have a demand side incentive being developed right now,

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 3>but that's a one billion dollar incentive, So we're talking

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 3>one to one hundred ratio possibly for the demand side,

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 3>which is very different from Europe La right. Europe has

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 3>the subsidies, it has the carbon prices, it has the

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 3>quotas and the mandates, so lots of demand side incentives

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 3>going on over there. So, as someone who just came

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 3>to US from Europe, should the US be doing more

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 3>on supporting the demand side or incentivizing the demand side

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 3>in order to get the industry going, creating an industry

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:27.439
<v Speaker 3>like Andy's saying, So.

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 9>First of all, coming from the European perspective, everybody in

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 9>Europe has been talking about the IRA as a game

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 9>changer and as actually you know, an initiative that has

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 9>drawn a lot of you know, investments towards the US,

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 9>and I think it's a great initiative and it's really

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 9>trying to move the needle now I come from Europe

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 9>and based in Copenhagen, and Europe is I think the

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 9>best in class for mandates.

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 8>So for the famous stick, we are very good at that.

0:36:56.280 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 9>Now and we also have subsidies. But you know, it's

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 9>much more complex to get subsidies in Europe than to

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 9>get text credit through the IRA. And we do as

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 9>well have some experience because we are looking at a

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 9>US site for our electoralizer production as we speak, and

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 9>we realize that, you know, the tremendous difference in complexity

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 9>in going through this discussion. But back to you to

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 9>your question. I mean when we talk to our customers

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 9>in the in the US and we have a very

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 9>broad pipeline of projects here in the region driven by

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 9>the IRA, and they really blossomed as soon as the

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 9>IRA was was published.

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 8>It's two things.

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 9>It's certainty for the incentives, clarity and long term sustainability

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:46.360
<v Speaker 9>of the incentives. And the other side, because it's text

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 9>credit and it's when you produce, is that you have

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 9>a demand and the demand at the moment is not

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 9>clear at all, and actually there's no driver in the

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 9>US in North America that would you know, really incentivize them.

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 9>And then as you say, the one billion from the

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 9>taken from the hydrogen hub.

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 8>It's a good idea, but it's a very timey thing.

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 9>So actually US and the future US producers would be

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:15.439
<v Speaker 9>looking at Europe or at Northeast Asia, Japan and Korea

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 9>to actually export. And I think, you know, if we

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 9>want to make this successful. It's great that Europe is

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 9>doing this, and you know it will drive demand, it

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:26.800
<v Speaker 9>will impose.

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 8>A competitive issue on.

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 9>The European producers, but US should also think about how

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 9>to really deploy demand to make this a success.

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Thank you to our panelists.

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it's clear that the forty five V credit

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 3>is a very very hot debate. I think no matter

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 3>how it's going to pan out, the US is going

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 3>to become a leader on low carbon hydrogen. And it's

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 3>clear that our panelist companies are going to be at

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 3>the forefront of it all.

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 2>So thank you very much.

0:38:55.719 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 11>Thank you to our panelists and Native the Day everyone.

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode of Switched On was produced by Cam Gray

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 1>with production assistance from Kamala Shelling. Bloomberg NIF is a

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 1>service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>recording does not constitute nor should it be construed as

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 1>investment advice, investment recommendations, or a recommendation as to an

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>investment or other strategy. Bloomberg ANIF should not be considered

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 1>as information sufficient upon which to base an investment decision.

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Neither Bloomberg Finance LP nor any of its affiliates makes

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 1>any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>of the information contained in this recording, and any liability

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 1>as a result of this recording is expressly disclaimed.