WEBVTT - NBA Opening Night Preview & Picks | Tue Oct 20

0:00:00.740 --> 0:00:04.300
<v Speaker 1>What these young bloods have to understand, that this game

0:00:05.130 --> 0:00:10.110
<v Speaker 1>has always been and will always be about buckets. Just

0:00:10.190 --> 0:00:12.010
<v Speaker 1>attack the basket. Stop it!

0:00:12.710 --> 0:00:18.550
<v Speaker 2>Stop it! You cannot do it like that! Oh!

0:00:18.610 --> 0:00:24.420
<v Speaker 3>With no regard for human life! Bang! Bang!

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I cannot believe you've done it again!

0:00:27.620 --> 0:00:28.510
<v Speaker 4>Are you kidding me?

0:00:28.580 --> 0:00:36.570
<v Speaker 3>Oh! Welcome to Buckets by DraftKings Sportsbook. We're back, baby.

0:00:36.830 --> 0:00:37.290
<v Speaker 1>We're back.

0:00:37.690 --> 0:00:39.970
<v Speaker 3>The NBA season is here and we have best bets

0:00:40.010 --> 0:00:43.430
<v Speaker 3>for you for the opening slate of the NBA season 26-27.

0:00:43.750 --> 0:00:46.770
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for joining us. I'm your host, Matt Moore. Joined

0:00:46.790 --> 0:00:49.490
<v Speaker 3>for this episode by Brian Fonseca. Brian Fonseca, NY from

0:00:49.510 --> 0:00:52.630
<v Speaker 3>the New York Post sports page, as well as his

0:00:52.729 --> 0:00:56.660
<v Speaker 3>own page. You can catch him at youtube.com slash Brian

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Fonseca at Brian Fonseca. Um, you can catch him Brian,

0:00:59.820 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 3>but it's like an NY on Twitter. Also join me,

0:01:03.780 --> 0:01:07.020
<v Speaker 3>Michael fiddle at Phil's picks, the maestro of the market.

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:09.390
<v Speaker 3>He joined me on an episode with Raheem Palmer for

0:01:09.410 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 3>the ringer gambling show where he, um, talked in the, I,

0:01:12.130 --> 0:01:15.090
<v Speaker 3>I allowed, I haven't, I have held fiddle in for

0:01:15.150 --> 0:01:18.310
<v Speaker 3>long enough and allowed him to completely nerd out about

0:01:18.430 --> 0:01:21.090
<v Speaker 3>all of, uh, the market tendencies and ways to attack

0:01:21.130 --> 0:01:23.710
<v Speaker 3>the market and how to approach process betting. So if

0:01:23.750 --> 0:01:25.550
<v Speaker 3>you really want to get in the weeds, go check

0:01:25.569 --> 0:01:27.310
<v Speaker 3>that one out, uh, in your feeds.

0:01:27.490 --> 0:01:27.670
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:01:28.370 --> 0:01:31.300
<v Speaker 3>Now, on today's show, like I said, we will talk

0:01:31.340 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 3>about the three NBA games that are on the slate,

0:01:34.420 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 3>including a game that I am still just like really

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 3>struggling with the fact that it starts at 3 p.m.

0:01:40.060 --> 0:01:40.540
<v Speaker 1>Eastern.

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:45.550
<v Speaker 3>People have jobs, NBA. Not me, but like real people,

0:01:45.850 --> 0:01:49.370
<v Speaker 3>other people have real jobs. But we'll get to all

0:01:49.390 --> 0:01:51.590
<v Speaker 3>those today. Before we get started, don't forget to download

0:01:51.610 --> 0:01:54.380
<v Speaker 3>the free award-winning Action Network app. And if you want

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:55.660
<v Speaker 3>to get a step further, you can sign up for

0:01:55.860 --> 0:01:58.830
<v Speaker 3>Action Pro. Our listeners get $ 20 off their first year

0:01:59.190 --> 0:02:03.070
<v Speaker 3>of Action Pro by using promo code POD20 at actionnetwork.com

0:02:03.850 --> 0:02:08.310
<v Speaker 3>slash pro. As we record this on Monday afternoon, I

0:02:08.990 --> 0:02:12.820
<v Speaker 3>have less than 24 hours to cash my minus 250

0:02:12.820 --> 0:02:16.139
<v Speaker 3>bet on Brandon Anderson to log at least 20 NBA

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:18.900
<v Speaker 3>futures before the season starts, despite him saying he's not

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 3>going to do any prep work on it. Clock's ticking,

0:02:22.380 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 3>but I feel confident we're going to get home. I

0:02:24.090 --> 0:02:26.030
<v Speaker 3>don't know how, but we're going to get home on this.

0:02:26.060 --> 0:02:28.010
<v Speaker 3>You can catch all of Brandon's futures as well as

0:02:28.050 --> 0:02:29.790
<v Speaker 3>all of our bets. If you sign up for Action

0:02:29.830 --> 0:02:33.429
<v Speaker 3>Pro with going to actionnetwork.com slash pro and using code

0:02:33.470 --> 0:02:37.130
<v Speaker 3>pod 20 plus. BetSync is back in the Action Network

0:02:37.250 --> 0:02:40.510
<v Speaker 3>app now. You can automatically track your activity access across

0:02:40.510 --> 0:02:44.410
<v Speaker 3>15 plus sports books and prediction markets all in one place.

0:02:44.490 --> 0:02:46.790
<v Speaker 3>Connect your accounts once and your bets and trades will

0:02:46.910 --> 0:02:49.590
<v Speaker 3>automatically appear as soon as you place them. No manual

0:02:49.610 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 3>tracking required. Just open the Action app. Head to my accounts,

0:02:53.020 --> 0:02:55.740
<v Speaker 3>connect your sports book or prediction market, and you're ready

0:02:56.419 --> 0:02:58.860
<v Speaker 3>to go. All right, we have three games on the

0:02:58.900 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 3>slate for opening night in the NBA. The Detroit Pistons

0:03:02.660 --> 0:03:05.290
<v Speaker 3>were minus one and a half. That line has moved

0:03:05.430 --> 0:03:07.810
<v Speaker 3>while I was recording podcast today. The Boston Celtics are

0:03:07.850 --> 0:03:11.010
<v Speaker 3>now minus one and a half at DraftKings. Minus 105

0:03:11.010 --> 0:03:13.769
<v Speaker 3>is your juice on that. Total 222 and a half

0:03:13.810 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 3>in the market. Juiced to the under at minus 115.

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Moneyline is Celtics minus 112. That will be relevant later.

0:03:22.340 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Philadelphia 76ers take on the Knicks in Banner Night for

0:03:25.810 --> 0:03:28.550
<v Speaker 3>New York. Knicks are four and a half point favorites.

0:03:28.870 --> 0:03:33.330
<v Speaker 3>Juice towards the Knicks. Totals 231 and a half in

0:03:33.350 --> 0:03:37.570
<v Speaker 3>the market. Juice towards the over. Sixers on the Moneyline

0:03:37.590 --> 0:03:42.810
<v Speaker 3>are plus 154. Knicks are minus 185. Thunder taking on

0:03:42.850 --> 0:03:45.380
<v Speaker 3>the Spurs in the Western Conference Finals rematch. The Spurs

0:03:45.410 --> 0:03:47.300
<v Speaker 3>are minus two and a half. It's a juice to

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.380
<v Speaker 3>plus two and a half towards the Oklahoma city thunder

0:03:49.420 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 3>on the road. Totals two 31 and a half juiced

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.690
<v Speaker 3>again towards the over slightly a thunder plus one 14

0:03:56.690 --> 0:03:57.770
<v Speaker 3>on the money line.

0:03:58.130 --> 0:03:58.430
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:03:58.830 --> 0:04:00.170
<v Speaker 3>We're going to get into best bets as a reminder

0:04:00.190 --> 0:04:01.690
<v Speaker 3>of how this works. I got to remember how we

0:04:01.730 --> 0:04:04.350
<v Speaker 3>do this. We have three bets from each of us.

0:04:04.450 --> 0:04:08.050
<v Speaker 3>Three star, two star, one star, three star bets are absolute.

0:04:08.190 --> 0:04:10.850
<v Speaker 3>We're in it full unit. We feel great about those

0:04:10.900 --> 0:04:11.340
<v Speaker 3>two stars.

0:04:11.630 --> 0:04:11.970
<v Speaker 2>Like them.

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>We like them.

0:04:13.180 --> 0:04:18.539
<v Speaker 3>They're playable. One stars are typically leans, leans, Or I'm

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.730
<v Speaker 3>dabbling in on this from a longer perspective. Especially Brian

0:04:22.750 --> 0:04:26.549
<v Speaker 3>Fonseca because he's a fucking coward. We will start, however,

0:04:26.870 --> 0:04:29.409
<v Speaker 3>with Michael Fiddle. I want to get your first play

0:04:29.589 --> 0:04:31.969
<v Speaker 3>on the slate. Michael Fiddle, kick us off. What's your

0:04:31.990 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 3>three-star bet for NBA opening night?

0:04:35.220 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 4>First three-star bet of the season is going to be

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 4>a player prop.

0:04:38.180 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>On Chet Holmgren.

0:04:39.300 --> 0:04:46.630
<v Speaker 4>Under 13.5 points. For Chet, he is injured and has

0:04:46.690 --> 0:04:51.190
<v Speaker 4>not played throughout preseason. And the market is fully pricing

0:04:51.250 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 4>him into the game. Now, I wouldn't be surprised if

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 4>he's out for this game. He has been seen at

0:04:57.860 --> 0:05:00.820
<v Speaker 4>the most recent Thunder practice getting some shots up. Dagnall

0:05:00.860 --> 0:05:03.700
<v Speaker 4>said he wasn't going to speak to his availability, but

0:05:03.740 --> 0:05:06.849
<v Speaker 4>said everyone did a little at practice today. I really

0:05:06.890 --> 0:05:09.670
<v Speaker 4>just don't expect coach Mark Dagnall of the Thunder to

0:05:09.710 --> 0:05:13.380
<v Speaker 4>play Chet Holmgren 28 minutes after playing zero preseason games.

0:05:13.420 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is a.

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.060
<v Speaker 4>Clear spot where if Chet plays, he's going to be

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 4>on a minutes limit. So this is, for me, a

0:05:20.779 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 4>clear underplay. And I think the funny part to this,

0:05:23.980 --> 0:05:27.539
<v Speaker 4>for me at least, is we just had Shams tweet

0:05:27.580 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 4>those changes to NBA betting that the league was working

0:05:32.380 --> 0:05:34.820
<v Speaker 4>in compliance with some of the prominent sportsbooks that you

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.750
<v Speaker 4>can't parlay unders for certain players. You can't bet on

0:05:38.790 --> 0:05:42.300
<v Speaker 4>players who are projected to play 12 minutes or less

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.419
<v Speaker 4>you can't it was specially their unders you can't um

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:47.550
<v Speaker 4>what was the other one i'm missing one of them

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.550
<v Speaker 4>but anyways all these changes come out and my my

0:05:50.589 --> 0:05:53.490
<v Speaker 4>reaction to that was like this is generally a vast

0:05:53.589 --> 0:05:56.930
<v Speaker 4>overreaction the last one was like uh the highly riggable

0:05:56.970 --> 0:06:00.690
<v Speaker 4>markets like the first basket first assist type markets are

0:06:00.740 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 4>gone so it's like the markets where there's potentially some

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 4>shenanigans are just not going to be available to limit

0:06:07.580 --> 0:06:10.290
<v Speaker 4>you know any kind of negative PR. Like there was

0:06:10.330 --> 0:06:13.130
<v Speaker 4>a baseball pitcher who was like intentionally throwing first. I

0:06:13.150 --> 0:06:16.190
<v Speaker 4>think that's where it's coming from. But anyways, my whole

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.900
<v Speaker 4>reaction was like, this is an overreaction. Like it's not

0:06:18.940 --> 0:06:20.860
<v Speaker 4>that big of a deal. And I said, there is

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 4>a slight loss of edge in that you can't parlay

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.500
<v Speaker 4>certain players unders like Chet Holmgren's obviously not rigging markets.

0:06:28.540 --> 0:06:30.820
<v Speaker 4>He's worth hundreds of millions of dollars. He's not the

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.289
<v Speaker 4>one we're worried about. And so there are people who

0:06:33.330 --> 0:06:36.490
<v Speaker 4>want to shoot angles of like, well, He might play

0:06:36.510 --> 0:06:38.409
<v Speaker 4>way less minutes, so this is the night to parlay

0:06:38.450 --> 0:06:38.970
<v Speaker 4>all his unders.

0:06:39.670 --> 0:06:40.790
<v Speaker 1>Matt and Brian, it took.

0:06:40.710 --> 0:06:43.650
<v Speaker 4>Zero games for me to find a spot that I

0:06:43.690 --> 0:06:48.349
<v Speaker 4>would love to parlay all the unders for. And I'm

0:06:48.390 --> 0:06:51.070
<v Speaker 4>just going to play his under 13.5 points. I think

0:06:51.089 --> 0:06:53.610
<v Speaker 4>he can pretty much play any Chet under as a

0:06:53.650 --> 0:06:56.590
<v Speaker 4>straight prop for this game and play it that way

0:06:56.630 --> 0:06:58.190
<v Speaker 4>as well. But I don't think he's going to get

0:06:58.230 --> 0:07:01.850
<v Speaker 4>the minutes that would be requisite for this type of average.

0:07:01.870 --> 0:07:02.570
<v Speaker 1>He averaged 28.9 last season.

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.100
<v Speaker 4>I think he's closer in the 18 to 22 range

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 4>for this game if he does play at all.

0:07:08.980 --> 0:07:10.170
<v Speaker 1>And so give me the chat under.

0:07:11.350 --> 0:07:14.030
<v Speaker 3>I like I go to fiddle first.

0:07:14.090 --> 0:07:14.530
<v Speaker 1>Hey, fiddle.

0:07:14.550 --> 0:07:17.490
<v Speaker 3>What's your first bet for the all season? Everybody's so excited.

0:07:17.550 --> 0:07:20.390
<v Speaker 3>What's fiddle? What's your first bet? Oh, I bet that 50%

0:07:20.390 --> 0:07:23.830
<v Speaker 3>might get voided because he won't play. That's that's my first.

0:07:24.110 --> 0:07:25.110
<v Speaker 3>That's my first three star play.

0:07:25.390 --> 0:07:25.890
<v Speaker 1>Won't be now.

0:07:27.890 --> 0:07:29.030
<v Speaker 3>On brand Michael fiddle.

0:07:29.130 --> 0:07:29.830
<v Speaker 1>All right, Brian.

0:07:29.850 --> 0:07:31.470
<v Speaker 3>But second, where are you going? You're going to the

0:07:31.550 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 3>late slate here. And you want to get in on

0:07:33.860 --> 0:07:39.140
<v Speaker 3>everybody's favorite San Antonio guard, Dylan Harper.

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.340
<v Speaker 2>Dylan Harper over points, rebounds, assists, 23 and a half,

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.700
<v Speaker 2>which I would imagine will be a popular one since

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 2>it's been announced that he'll be in the starting lineup.

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.140
<v Speaker 2>Is it confirmed that it's going to be the four

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 2>guards plus Wemby? Or are we just confirming that it's

0:07:56.250 --> 0:08:02.430
<v Speaker 2>Dylan Harper in the starting lineup? Okay, so we're doing Fox, Vassell, Castle, Harper, Wemby.

0:08:02.940 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I kind of think Champagne should take Vassell's spot, but

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe we'll get there in November or December. Or that

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Harper should just take Fox's spot, but that's another conversation

0:08:14.420 --> 0:08:16.860
<v Speaker 2>for another day. I don't know how long they're going

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 2>to do this. I don't know how long this is

0:08:18.460 --> 0:08:22.780
<v Speaker 2>going to work for because I think Champagne, who Matt,

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:26.270
<v Speaker 2>you'll talk about later, is like the perfect glue guy

0:08:26.310 --> 0:08:28.350
<v Speaker 2>to have in a starting lineup where you have all

0:08:28.390 --> 0:08:30.190
<v Speaker 2>these ball handlers and all these guys who can create

0:08:30.230 --> 0:08:34.170
<v Speaker 2>different shots. But Dylan Harper is too good to continue

0:08:34.210 --> 0:08:36.270
<v Speaker 2>to bring him off the bench. He made that clear

0:08:36.290 --> 0:08:39.109
<v Speaker 2>during the finals. He made that clear during the playoffs, frankly,

0:08:39.150 --> 0:08:43.300
<v Speaker 2>at times during the regular season. And again, reiterated this

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.340
<v Speaker 2>one more time, which is why he's starting now. And

0:08:46.460 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 2>when he plays, he gets usage. I think as long

0:08:49.980 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 2>as he's a starter all season long, I kind of

0:08:51.820 --> 0:08:55.660
<v Speaker 2>expect him to be second in usage for this team.

0:08:56.380 --> 0:08:57.990
<v Speaker 2>I think this is a number and this is sort

0:08:58.010 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 2>of what I'm looking at on opening night. and the

0:09:00.350 --> 0:09:02.890
<v Speaker 2>opening week in general, what are these early season numbers

0:09:02.910 --> 0:09:06.070
<v Speaker 2>that I think are too low? If Dylan Harper is

0:09:06.130 --> 0:09:08.790
<v Speaker 2>going to start, don't we think he's going to average

0:09:08.870 --> 0:09:14.209
<v Speaker 2>more than 23.5 PRA during the season? Probably. Probably a

0:09:14.670 --> 0:09:17.010
<v Speaker 2>decent amount more than that, if he's as good as

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.579
<v Speaker 2>we think this second year. If that's the case, we're

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 2>starting off low here. This is a theme for me.

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:25.380
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how much longer this number is going

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.690
<v Speaker 2>to be available. To me, I'm going to jump on it,

0:09:27.740 --> 0:09:30.780
<v Speaker 2>especially against Spurs, You know, this is a rivalry matchup.

0:09:30.820 --> 0:09:33.390
<v Speaker 2>Dylan Harper's had some decent games against them, against the

0:09:33.410 --> 0:09:35.849
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma City Thunder. But yeah, I think this is just

0:09:35.929 --> 0:09:41.010
<v Speaker 2>me projecting what I expect from Harper during the season.

0:09:41.429 --> 0:09:43.330
<v Speaker 2>And we'll start off here at 23 and a half

0:09:43.370 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 2>because I don't know how much longer he's going to

0:09:45.270 --> 0:09:47.820
<v Speaker 2>live in the low 20s as it relates to PRA projections.

0:09:49.260 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Okay. I'm a little skeptical.

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 3>I think the hype around Dylan Harper is a little

0:09:54.100 --> 0:09:56.579
<v Speaker 3>bit much. I think he can be a top five

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.620
<v Speaker 3>player in the league within like 10 years. I also

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:01.380
<v Speaker 3>think we're a little we're getting a little bit ahead

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:05.450
<v Speaker 3>of ourselves he took advantage a lot of how the

0:10:05.470 --> 0:10:07.790
<v Speaker 3>knicks defended him in the finals.

0:10:08.230 --> 0:10:10.810
<v Speaker 2>He just needs like a 16 7 and 4 and

0:10:10.830 --> 0:10:15.069
<v Speaker 2>we're good yeah yeah it's true um That's actually way over.

0:10:15.350 --> 0:10:18.010
<v Speaker 3>I did look at his three pointer prop over because

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 3>of the way that the Knicks defend and pick and rolls.

0:10:20.300 --> 0:10:22.219
<v Speaker 3>I think there's an opportunity there for, for Harper to

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.179
<v Speaker 3>be able to get up. But I also looked at

0:10:24.220 --> 0:10:27.380
<v Speaker 3>the matchups last year and across the course of the season,

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 3>there just weren't enough catch and shoot opportunities for Harper.

0:10:29.260 --> 0:10:30.860
<v Speaker 3>I still think he's going to be trigger man instead

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:32.540
<v Speaker 3>of initiator. I just don't think that they're going to

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.459
<v Speaker 3>be like, here you go, kid, take the keys. I

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:36.830
<v Speaker 3>think it's still going to be Fox and castle and

0:10:36.850 --> 0:10:38.330
<v Speaker 3>he's going to be a finisher for the most part,

0:10:38.710 --> 0:10:41.209
<v Speaker 3>which means I'm worried about the assists and I'm worried

0:10:41.250 --> 0:10:44.950
<v Speaker 3>a little bit about the points. but I understand you

0:10:44.970 --> 0:10:48.589
<v Speaker 3>getting in on this. Should put some respect on De'Aaron

0:10:48.610 --> 0:10:52.130
<v Speaker 3>Fox's name. Fox was hurt, had a bad series. Fox

0:10:52.190 --> 0:10:54.069
<v Speaker 3>is still really good. They value what he does.

0:10:54.510 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you think Champagny should start for one of these guys?

0:10:58.700 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Is Tobias out?

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:00.420
<v Speaker 3>Did I miss this?

0:11:01.460 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>He has a calf injury.

0:11:03.140 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 3>I was going to say.

0:11:04.380 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 4>Tobias should probably start when he's healthy again.

0:11:07.540 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it's probably Tobias. I don't know if that's

0:11:09.900 --> 0:11:13.140
<v Speaker 3>the best one. I get what you're saying, Brian, because

0:11:13.620 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Champagne is just a crack shooter. He's just a crack shooter.

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I get it. He never needs the ball offensively.

0:11:21.460 --> 0:11:24.980
<v Speaker 3>But they like having five. What the league is moving towards,

0:11:25.260 --> 0:11:27.420
<v Speaker 3>and Spurs are part of this, is having five guys

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:30.620
<v Speaker 3>who can all handle, shoot, and pass. They want five

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 3>interchangeable guys that nobody's a specialist. And Champagne is definitely

0:11:34.540 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 3>a specialist. So I think that's one of the reasons why.

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.250
<v Speaker 2>I mean, but he gives you great spacing.

0:11:39.420 --> 0:11:42.610
<v Speaker 3>I know. I agree, because I'm just kind of like, look, man,

0:11:42.650 --> 0:11:45.170
<v Speaker 3>just run Fox pick and roll with Weminyama, and then

0:11:45.230 --> 0:11:46.690
<v Speaker 3>they have to react to it, and then you just

0:11:46.710 --> 0:11:48.750
<v Speaker 3>kick to the corner. If you've just done that more

0:11:48.770 --> 0:11:51.350
<v Speaker 3>in the finals, maybe you don't give up the lead

0:11:51.350 --> 0:11:55.170
<v Speaker 3>700 times. All right, my three-star bet of the night

0:11:55.350 --> 0:11:58.150
<v Speaker 3>is going to be Nick Sixers under 231.5. I'm going

0:11:58.210 --> 0:12:02.330
<v Speaker 3>head-to-head with Fiddle on this one a little bit later

0:12:02.510 --> 0:12:03.570
<v Speaker 3>on in his slate.

0:12:04.750 --> 0:12:06.550
<v Speaker 1>The Tuesday.

0:12:07.260 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 3>the Tuesday night openers tend to go under the rate

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.930
<v Speaker 3>across all time has been about 60%. That has dipped

0:12:15.210 --> 0:12:19.550
<v Speaker 3>in more recent years, particularly since COVID that's dipped a

0:12:19.570 --> 0:12:22.429
<v Speaker 3>little bit, but I did look this up even since

0:12:22.490 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 3>COVID the average total on these games is two 26

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.260
<v Speaker 3>and a half. This was a two 31 and I've got,

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 3>A Knicks team that's probably going to be a little

0:12:33.540 --> 0:12:36.250
<v Speaker 3>bit emotional. Like, this is a more emotional, I think,

0:12:36.290 --> 0:12:38.290
<v Speaker 3>championship night than some others that you're going to see. Like,

0:12:38.330 --> 0:12:40.870
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that the Celtics was that emotional. I

0:12:40.950 --> 0:12:42.829
<v Speaker 3>honestly don't think the Thunder was that emotional because the

0:12:42.850 --> 0:12:43.770
<v Speaker 3>kids are just like, this is.

0:12:43.730 --> 0:12:44.370
<v Speaker 1>What we're supposed to do.

0:12:44.410 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Everything is easy. It's not as emotional as the Knicks

0:12:47.390 --> 0:12:51.180
<v Speaker 3>because Jokic is dead inside. This one is.

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:52.180
<v Speaker 2>Denver.

0:12:52.980 --> 0:12:53.579
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Denver. Sorry.

0:12:54.420 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 3>This one with the Knicks is very emotional.

0:12:56.780 --> 0:12:57.540
<v Speaker 1>Right? So.

0:12:58.580 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that'll cause it. I also think that the

0:13:00.460 --> 0:13:03.060
<v Speaker 3>Sixers offense, this has been my prediction is that the

0:13:03.100 --> 0:13:05.450
<v Speaker 3>Sixers offense is going to be clunky to start. You

0:13:05.470 --> 0:13:08.589
<v Speaker 3>got Jalen Brown, Joel and B LeBron James all operate

0:13:08.610 --> 0:13:11.210
<v Speaker 3>in the same area of the court, which is essentially

0:13:11.250 --> 0:13:13.750
<v Speaker 3>the nail and extended elbow areas. That's where a vast

0:13:13.809 --> 0:13:16.170
<v Speaker 3>majority of their shots come from. There's too much overlap.

0:13:16.190 --> 0:13:17.790
<v Speaker 3>They got to figure out how to play around each

0:13:17.830 --> 0:13:19.430
<v Speaker 3>other and how to get out of each other's way.

0:13:19.450 --> 0:13:21.690
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be a little clunky. And I think

0:13:21.710 --> 0:13:23.830
<v Speaker 3>that that's going to be, there's going to be some turnovers.

0:13:24.570 --> 0:13:27.020
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Brown will be a part of that turnover machine. Um,

0:13:28.230 --> 0:13:29.410
<v Speaker 3>And I think that there will be a little bit

0:13:29.460 --> 0:13:31.790
<v Speaker 3>of clunkiness and lower shooting. I don't think Dean Wade

0:13:31.820 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 3>will play enough to adequately space. The bench might space

0:13:35.059 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 3>appropriately for Philly. So I'm a little bit worried about,

0:13:38.500 --> 0:13:42.060
<v Speaker 3>especially like any lineup that is maxi and in bead

0:13:42.300 --> 0:13:44.780
<v Speaker 3>with Simon spacing. I'm going to be like, oh no,

0:13:45.179 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 3>that's going to boost this over. But I do think

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 3>the starters are likely to play heavy minutes. I think

0:13:50.700 --> 0:13:51.900
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be clunky. I think it's going to

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.390
<v Speaker 3>be awkward. I think the trend's, play towards an under

0:13:54.710 --> 0:13:56.410
<v Speaker 3>i think this line is higher than what you're what

0:13:56.429 --> 0:13:58.210
<v Speaker 3>you're average going to see for an opener in this

0:13:58.230 --> 0:13:59.870
<v Speaker 3>kind of spot so i'm going to take the next

0:14:00.170 --> 0:14:04.109
<v Speaker 3>next six years under 231 and a half um let's

0:14:04.150 --> 0:14:06.230
<v Speaker 3>go ahead and hit to get this out of the

0:14:06.270 --> 0:14:09.230
<v Speaker 3>way fiddles one star because fiddles going against me on

0:14:09.270 --> 0:14:12.550
<v Speaker 3>this nick sixers he's taking the over 231 and a

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:13.900
<v Speaker 3>half it'll give me your cap.

0:14:14.140 --> 0:14:16.300
<v Speaker 4>Yeah i like how you preference prefaced in the beginning

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.450
<v Speaker 4>like one star is kind of like lean or or

0:14:19.570 --> 0:14:22.870
<v Speaker 4>less of a of a big play because I took

0:14:22.870 --> 0:14:26.250
<v Speaker 4>228 and a half towards the over um like weeks

0:14:26.310 --> 0:14:28.270
<v Speaker 4>ago when these lines were first starting to come out

0:14:28.650 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 4>so it's gone up a little bit it's it actually

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 4>hit 233 and a half and it started to work

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 4>its way back down I'm still like subjectively a little

0:14:36.260 --> 0:14:38.140
<v Speaker 4>bit on the over here but I don't think market

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 4>wise there's like huge value either way I think the

0:14:40.780 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 4>number is pretty sharp at this point But I do

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:47.070
<v Speaker 4>think that, you know, they the Sixers often started to

0:14:47.090 --> 0:14:49.030
<v Speaker 4>play a lot better last year when they were willing

0:14:49.090 --> 0:14:52.070
<v Speaker 4>to leave Joel Embiid in the dust and kind of

0:14:52.090 --> 0:14:54.270
<v Speaker 4>just run transition and be like, if you don't cross

0:14:54.290 --> 0:14:55.810
<v Speaker 4>half court by the time we get our shots up,

0:14:55.830 --> 0:14:57.510
<v Speaker 4>that's OK. We're not going to wait for you to

0:14:57.550 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 4>plot up. So I think they're still going to run

0:15:00.100 --> 0:15:03.340
<v Speaker 4>between Edgecombe, Brown, Maxie and LeBron. I think they're still

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 4>going to run in transition a lot. And I think

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.540
<v Speaker 4>the Knicks are going to try and counteract and run

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 4>a lot in their own transition as well. And then

0:15:09.820 --> 0:15:13.180
<v Speaker 4>you spoke to it well, the Sixers bench unit. I

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 4>actually have a lot of faith into score. And so

0:15:15.620 --> 0:15:18.580
<v Speaker 4>I think that Dean Wade with Simon's combo is just

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:20.500
<v Speaker 4>going to be really well spaced out and going to

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:21.420
<v Speaker 4>be able to shoot really well.

0:15:22.420 --> 0:15:24.710
<v Speaker 1>So for those reasons, I still do like the over.

0:15:24.730 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a little bit of an overreaction in

0:15:26.780 --> 0:15:30.710
<v Speaker 4>market to the new rules about hand checking and illegal

0:15:30.790 --> 0:15:33.250
<v Speaker 4>screens and those points of emphasis that the refs laid

0:15:33.310 --> 0:15:36.650
<v Speaker 4>out there. So I still like the over subjectively, but

0:15:36.810 --> 0:15:38.729
<v Speaker 4>it's one star because I don't think the number is

0:15:38.750 --> 0:15:41.180
<v Speaker 4>going to move too much in either direction anymore.

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:42.940
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.180
<v Speaker 3>Before we continue, let's get to a quick word from

0:15:45.420 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 3>our sponsor at DraftKings. Buckets is sponsored by DraftKings, where

0:15:50.210 --> 0:15:53.970
<v Speaker 3>new customers can turn $ 5 into $ 200 in total bonus

0:15:54.010 --> 0:15:57.489
<v Speaker 3>rewards this basketball season. DraftKings Sports is now available in

0:15:57.650 --> 0:16:00.690
<v Speaker 3>all 50 states, bringing the excitement straight to your fingertips,

0:16:00.790 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 3>no matter where you're watching. From Florida to Texas to California,

0:16:04.580 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 3>you'll never miss a beat. Follow every moment, every matchup,

0:16:08.100 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 3>and every highlight in a seamless experience all in one app.

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 3>So if you're new to DraftKings, be sure to sign

0:16:13.540 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 3>up with code BUCKETS. Spend $ 5 and get $ 200 in

0:16:17.420 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 3>total rewards. That's code BUCKETS. Download the DraftKings Sports app

0:16:22.540 --> 0:16:26.350
<v Speaker 3>and keep basketball at your fingertips all season long. DraftKings,

0:16:26.870 --> 0:16:30.270
<v Speaker 3>the crown is yours. All right, let's get to the

0:16:30.330 --> 0:16:33.130
<v Speaker 3>two-star bets. I'm going to go back to Brian Fonseca.

0:16:33.630 --> 0:16:36.910
<v Speaker 3>who's got to play on a Boston Celtics shooter, which

0:16:36.950 --> 0:16:38.130
<v Speaker 3>I know he's got to be thrilled about.

0:16:40.900 --> 0:16:44.620
<v Speaker 2>Be careful. Um, Peyton Pritchard over 15 and a half

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:50.900
<v Speaker 2>points in the 3 PM game, which I don't know

0:16:50.940 --> 0:16:52.460
<v Speaker 2>why we're doing that. I don't know what the point

0:16:52.500 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 2>of that is, but okay. Uh, maybe it'll work. Maybe

0:16:55.180 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 2>it'll draw a great number. I don't know. Um, it

0:16:57.300 --> 0:17:01.460
<v Speaker 2>probably will be on in every bar in the country. Uh,

0:17:01.500 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 2>so that'll help the ratings. Um, I think Peyton Pritchard's

0:17:06.060 --> 0:17:10.580
<v Speaker 2>speaking back to or touching on again what I mentioned

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:14.940
<v Speaker 2>earlier in terms of guys outperforming their projections. I think

0:17:15.020 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 2>we're going to get a lot of 20-point games from

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.139
<v Speaker 2>Peyton Pritchard this year. I'm going to stop short of

0:17:19.180 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 2>saying he's going to average 20. I don't know if

0:17:21.380 --> 0:17:23.980
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be the case, but I think he's

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.980
<v Speaker 2>going to have a bunch of games as he has

0:17:27.030 --> 0:17:29.430
<v Speaker 2>in previous years, but more so this year because without

0:17:29.470 --> 0:17:31.970
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Brown, I don't think this is going to be

0:17:31.990 --> 0:17:35.910
<v Speaker 2>a one-person game swallows up all the usage that Jalen

0:17:35.930 --> 0:17:37.830
<v Speaker 2>Brown sort of left on the table. Obviously you just

0:17:37.890 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 2>reinsert Jason Tatum and he's going to do a lot

0:17:41.380 --> 0:17:45.580
<v Speaker 2>of that, but with better playmaking. And I think Paul

0:17:45.619 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 2>George fits in pretty seamlessly, but I think Peyton Pritchard

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.370
<v Speaker 2>is probably the guy who levels up the most relative

0:17:52.390 --> 0:17:55.409
<v Speaker 2>to like all the other guys who are not stars

0:17:55.470 --> 0:17:57.949
<v Speaker 2>on the Celtics team. Like this is a number that

0:17:57.990 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I think he's going to exceed like, pretty much like,

0:18:02.100 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 2>like pretty often early on in the year to where

0:18:04.540 --> 0:18:06.340
<v Speaker 2>we're starting to see 17 and a half, 18 and

0:18:06.380 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 2>a half and things of that nature. I know this

0:18:08.340 --> 0:18:10.659
<v Speaker 2>isn't like the, the best matchup for it, but I

0:18:10.700 --> 0:18:13.380
<v Speaker 2>also don't know what to expect of Detroit defensively this

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:15.460
<v Speaker 2>year relative to before. I still think there'll be a

0:18:15.530 --> 0:18:18.629
<v Speaker 2>really good defense, but you know, the personnel is slightly different.

0:18:18.650 --> 0:18:20.730
<v Speaker 2>We have to see how that goes, but I think

0:18:20.770 --> 0:18:22.590
<v Speaker 2>Peyton Pritchard will be able to get to his three

0:18:22.630 --> 0:18:24.790
<v Speaker 2>point shot in this game. He'll be able to get

0:18:24.850 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 2>some of these pull-up looks and, With the focus of,

0:18:28.859 --> 0:18:31.710
<v Speaker 2>you know, Jason Tatum commanding a lot of the focus.

0:18:32.210 --> 0:18:34.629
<v Speaker 2>And just overall, I don't care what his role is

0:18:34.690 --> 0:18:36.820
<v Speaker 2>in terms of whether he actually ends up getting into

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 2>the starting lineup at some point, whether he comes off

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.820
<v Speaker 2>the bench. Obviously, if he's a six-man, it's easier for

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 2>him to sort of lead that second unit. But I

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 2>just think he's going to get a lot of opportunities now.

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.660
<v Speaker 2>He's probably going to be the person who statistically benefits

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:53.690
<v Speaker 2>the most from Jalen Brown being gone. From a shock

0:18:53.750 --> 0:18:56.110
<v Speaker 2>race standpoint, they need him. From a three-point standpoint, they're

0:18:56.130 --> 0:18:57.710
<v Speaker 2>going to need him. He's just going to get a

0:18:57.730 --> 0:19:00.050
<v Speaker 2>lot of opportunities, and I think this number's a little

0:19:00.070 --> 0:19:01.020
<v Speaker 2>bit low to start out.

0:19:02.010 --> 0:19:05.129
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is a pretty baffling line. I understand that

0:19:05.170 --> 0:19:07.330
<v Speaker 3>they're basing it off of the preseason where he was

0:19:07.350 --> 0:19:10.250
<v Speaker 3>still coming off the bench. I'm not convinced. Like, I

0:19:10.270 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be surprised if he started game one. Would not

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:14.100
<v Speaker 3>be shocked at all if he started game one.

0:19:15.300 --> 0:19:20.780
<v Speaker 2>And it would be him, White, Tatum, George, and Cato.

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:21.580
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:19:21.619 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, or Cato or Mitchell Robinson.

0:19:23.619 --> 0:19:23.810
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:19:24.070 --> 0:19:28.730
<v Speaker 3>Like this, the Celtics have broadcast that like, One of

0:19:28.750 --> 0:19:31.230
<v Speaker 3>the reasons that they felt okay about the Jalen Brown trade,

0:19:31.430 --> 0:19:33.540
<v Speaker 3>and there's a lot of reasons they felt okay about

0:19:33.580 --> 0:19:36.300
<v Speaker 3>that trade. One of them was Peyton Pritchard. Like they

0:19:36.340 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 3>genuinely are just like, yeah, no, we're good.

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.100
<v Speaker 1>We have Pritchard. We're good.

0:19:40.260 --> 0:19:42.460
<v Speaker 3>Like, yeah, it sucks. Jalen's really good, but we have Pritchard.

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:43.180
<v Speaker 1>It'll be okay.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:45.820
<v Speaker 3>Like he'll make up for a lot of that. Um,

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.360
<v Speaker 3>I think Pritchard's going to have a huge usage role

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 3>on this team on ball on ball. Like, I don't

0:19:52.140 --> 0:19:54.379
<v Speaker 3>think he's just a spot up shooter. I think he

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.060
<v Speaker 3>is just going to be a focal point of this

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:00.060
<v Speaker 3>offense to the point where if you want to give Tatum,

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.210
<v Speaker 3>if you like possession breaks, you're more likely to give,

0:20:03.450 --> 0:20:06.060
<v Speaker 3>I think Pritchard the ball than even PG, right? who's

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 3>got so much experience with the ball. So yeah, this

0:20:08.340 --> 0:20:09.859
<v Speaker 3>number feels extremely soft to me.

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Fiddle.

0:20:11.060 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I, I for sure agree. I mean, I've been

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.050
<v Speaker 4>huge on Peyton. I made the joke that, uh, the

0:20:16.330 --> 0:20:21.990
<v Speaker 4>one player who's short, uh, number 11 has videos of

0:20:22.050 --> 0:20:25.250
<v Speaker 4>himself as a kid practicing and could take the Jalen

0:20:25.270 --> 0:20:27.820
<v Speaker 4>Brunson leap. If there's anyone next in the, in the NBA,

0:20:27.859 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 4>his name is Peyton Pritchard. Uh, so yeah, I think

0:20:30.460 --> 0:20:33.140
<v Speaker 4>a huge usage rate bump is coming and I agree.

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:34.930
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't be surprised if he's a starter, uh, Do

0:20:34.950 --> 0:20:37.450
<v Speaker 4>you guys have any lean on if it's Mitchell Robinson

0:20:37.490 --> 0:20:37.929
<v Speaker 4>or Kata?

0:20:39.270 --> 0:20:39.570
<v Speaker 1>Kata.

0:20:39.990 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's Kata because it worked last year.

0:20:43.580 --> 0:20:46.699
<v Speaker 4>Mitchell Robinson came off the bench in New York anyways.

0:20:48.180 --> 0:20:49.580
<v Speaker 3>One, you want to reward the guy that's come up

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 3>through your system as put the time in. You don't

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:53.380
<v Speaker 3>want to jump in front of him and you definitely

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:54.510
<v Speaker 3>don't want to jump in front of him with a

0:20:54.530 --> 0:20:58.990
<v Speaker 3>guy who needs the maintenance for his body and is

0:20:59.090 --> 0:21:01.230
<v Speaker 3>unreliable so you don't want to build chemistry with a

0:21:01.250 --> 0:21:02.669
<v Speaker 3>guy who might miss time and then you have to

0:21:02.730 --> 0:21:05.389
<v Speaker 3>figure then you have to No. So I think it's,

0:21:05.670 --> 0:21:07.170
<v Speaker 3>I think it's Kata for sure. Yeah.

0:21:07.210 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Mitchell Robinson hasn't played a back-to-back in like three years

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.340
<v Speaker 2>or something along those lines. So it makes more sense

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.620
<v Speaker 2>to start Kata. Although I do think Mitch will play,

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.780
<v Speaker 2>he'll play like he'll play consistently, but Kata should start.

0:21:21.740 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking up how many games Pritchard had.

0:21:24.780 --> 0:21:25.060
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:25.939
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Pritchard had.

0:21:26.940 --> 0:21:27.140
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah.

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.930
<v Speaker 3>What the hell is this line? Richard had 45 games

0:21:31.990 --> 0:21:33.950
<v Speaker 3>last year where he had more than 15 and a half.

0:21:36.270 --> 0:21:38.210
<v Speaker 1>I guess just the defenders. And yeah.

0:21:38.550 --> 0:21:38.710
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:21:38.730 --> 0:21:40.869
<v Speaker 2>That's what I wonder is like, is it, is it like, Oh,

0:21:40.910 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't do it against great defenses all the time.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I guess if a SARS dogged him, that's, that's fair,

0:21:46.980 --> 0:21:47.340
<v Speaker 3>but man.

0:21:47.380 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 2>But it's usually increased. But is this are going to

0:21:49.820 --> 0:21:50.660
<v Speaker 2>be dogging him?

0:21:50.980 --> 0:21:51.980
<v Speaker 1>Him? Yeah.

0:21:53.140 --> 0:21:55.260
<v Speaker 3>We'll see now. So I'm with you on this. I'm

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 3>going to, I'm going to tell you on this for sure.

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.060
<v Speaker 2>A great bet by Brian. All right.

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 3>I am once again, head to head with fiddle. I

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.540
<v Speaker 3>wonder how this is going to work out. Not, I

0:22:02.619 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 3>saw this rundown and was just like, God damn it.

0:22:04.540 --> 0:22:08.020
<v Speaker 3>First day. So not only am I on the under

0:22:08.060 --> 0:22:10.580
<v Speaker 3>and he's on the over and Nick Sixers, I'm taking

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:11.780
<v Speaker 3>pistons plus one and a half.

0:22:11.820 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Now you can both win.

0:22:14.420 --> 0:22:16.380
<v Speaker 3>That's true.

0:22:16.660 --> 0:22:19.340
<v Speaker 1>This is true. With a Peyton Pritchard game winning half

0:22:19.380 --> 0:22:19.900
<v Speaker 1>court shot.

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:25.730
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Fiddle is on Celtics money line. this really is

0:22:25.750 --> 0:22:28.230
<v Speaker 3>just like a power rating play. And, you know, I don't,

0:22:28.550 --> 0:22:29.750
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to use a lot of the spread

0:22:29.770 --> 0:22:31.909
<v Speaker 3>projections heavy in the regular season. I've talked about this

0:22:31.990 --> 0:22:35.830
<v Speaker 3>on previous shows. I'm leaning more towards matchup. I'm going

0:22:35.850 --> 0:22:37.230
<v Speaker 3>to do more stuff with matchups this year. I think

0:22:37.250 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 3>that's where my strength is, but I have the Pistons

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:41.940
<v Speaker 3>power rated higher. So I can't get to a spot

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.220
<v Speaker 3>where they're at home and now they're, and I didn't

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:45.580
<v Speaker 3>like them when the, like, I liked them in minus

0:22:45.660 --> 0:22:48.580
<v Speaker 3>one and a half. Cause I make a 2.8. I

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.179
<v Speaker 3>just think that this, the Detroit is good enough for

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:53.990
<v Speaker 3>them to get the respect of the, being favored in

0:22:54.030 --> 0:22:57.020
<v Speaker 3>this matchup. I do not think that Boston is decidedly

0:22:57.060 --> 0:22:58.780
<v Speaker 3>ahead of them. I do not think that Boston, I.

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Think Boston's good.

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:02.700
<v Speaker 3>I'm also high on Boston. These are my two top

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.780
<v Speaker 3>teams in the Eastern Conference. But I am not predicting

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 3>a fall off from Detroit. I like their offseason. I

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:10.820
<v Speaker 3>think John Collins is a more complete player for the

0:23:10.900 --> 0:23:13.780
<v Speaker 3>system that they run than Tobias Harris was, even though

0:23:13.820 --> 0:23:17.340
<v Speaker 3>I respect and love Toby. I think Isaiah Joe is

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 3>a sneaky addition with being able to provide real spacing

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.260
<v Speaker 3>around Kate Cunningham. in those bench minutes, that's really valuable.

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.990
<v Speaker 3>Just having a pure shooter in this regard, a SAR

0:23:26.030 --> 0:23:28.290
<v Speaker 3>looks better on ball than he did last year. He

0:23:28.330 --> 0:23:31.609
<v Speaker 3>has improved. I was concerned about Jalen Duran because I

0:23:31.630 --> 0:23:33.250
<v Speaker 3>was like, I don't know what kind of shape he's in.

0:23:33.350 --> 0:23:34.949
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what he's been doing. And then he

0:23:34.970 --> 0:23:38.910
<v Speaker 3>came into like his preseason game and destroyed everything like Godzilla.

0:23:40.690 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 3>So look, I like the center matchup. I lean towards,

0:23:45.740 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, Cade over both guards. I think a SAR

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.940
<v Speaker 3>versus white is interesting. as far as like a combination here, um,

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 3>power forward, you know, PG is better if he's playing

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:02.369
<v Speaker 3>power forward. Um, if it's Tatum, obviously Tatum is better. Uh,

0:24:03.570 --> 0:24:06.369
<v Speaker 3>but like, I, I like the length of Detroit in

0:24:06.410 --> 0:24:12.210
<v Speaker 3>this matchup. I like the way that they match up

0:24:12.250 --> 0:24:15.030
<v Speaker 3>with them in terms of a physicality standpoint. I, I

0:24:15.109 --> 0:24:18.140
<v Speaker 3>know that there's a math advantage between, For Boston, because

0:24:18.180 --> 0:24:20.129
<v Speaker 3>Detroit doesn't take enough threes, I think that's going to

0:24:20.140 --> 0:24:22.250
<v Speaker 3>be mitigated somewhat by their roster changes and some of

0:24:22.270 --> 0:24:25.449
<v Speaker 3>the tweaks that they've done to their offense. So I

0:24:25.490 --> 0:24:28.450
<v Speaker 3>think this line is incorrect, and I like the Detroit

0:24:28.470 --> 0:24:31.050
<v Speaker 3>Pistons plus one and a half. Fidel, you like the

0:24:31.090 --> 0:24:32.030
<v Speaker 3>Celtics on the money line.

0:24:32.740 --> 0:24:34.090
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I like the Celtics on the money line. And

0:24:34.230 --> 0:24:37.430
<v Speaker 4>we just did a strategy podcast with Raheem. And towards

0:24:37.450 --> 0:24:39.310
<v Speaker 4>the end of it, you asked me for my half

0:24:39.390 --> 0:24:42.430
<v Speaker 4>point values of what line movements are worth. And sometimes

0:24:42.550 --> 0:24:46.170
<v Speaker 4>money line is the better price than spread and vice versa.

0:24:46.580 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 4>This is a great example right here where at DraftKings,

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.830
<v Speaker 4>the money line on Celtics is minus 112. But the

0:24:54.030 --> 0:24:57.369
<v Speaker 4>line is Celtics minus one and a half minus one

0:24:57.410 --> 0:25:00.820
<v Speaker 4>oh five. So there's a seven point seven cent gap

0:25:01.500 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 4>to lay two points or just to buy the insurance

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 4>for the for the money line. It's actually worth 12 cents.

0:25:06.220 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 4>So you're saving five cents by grabbing the money line. Inversely, Matt,

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.500
<v Speaker 4>with you, you're the money line for the Pistons is

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.260
<v Speaker 4>minus one oh eight. But the plus 1.5 is minus 115.

0:25:17.260 --> 0:25:20.620
<v Speaker 4>So you're also more incentivized to take the plus 1.5.

0:25:20.619 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm more incentivized.

0:25:21.660 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 4>It's objectively in a vacuum that we're each choosing the

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.060
<v Speaker 4>better line here with what the value is. So I

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.270
<v Speaker 4>think that's like a good starting point. But yeah, I

0:25:29.290 --> 0:25:32.550
<v Speaker 4>just disagree on the center matchup. I think 48 minutes

0:25:32.670 --> 0:25:37.110
<v Speaker 4>of lengthy, athletic, strong rebounding bigs is a decent neutralization

0:25:37.170 --> 0:25:38.230
<v Speaker 4>factor against Durin.

0:25:38.670 --> 0:25:40.950
<v Speaker 1>I do have a slight downgrade. We talked about the

0:25:40.950 --> 0:25:43.449
<v Speaker 1>3 p.m. start. I do have a slight downgrade in

0:25:43.470 --> 0:25:44.390
<v Speaker 1>home court advantage.

0:25:45.210 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 4>In these early start times, especially on a Tuesday in

0:25:48.140 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 4>a blue collar city of Detroit. Like how nuts are

0:25:51.619 --> 0:25:53.619
<v Speaker 4>they going to be going on Tuesday at three o'clock?

0:25:54.700 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 4>So I do have a slight downgrade on what the

0:25:56.740 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 4>home court advantage is worth in this environment, especially with

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.340
<v Speaker 4>first travel of the year for Boston. And I think

0:26:02.380 --> 0:26:05.380
<v Speaker 4>Boston's net rating stuff is just so phenomenal with this group.

0:26:05.420 --> 0:26:07.659
<v Speaker 4>And I expect Paul George to slide in pretty seamlessly.

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.390
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I'm going to go Celtics here, hoping that,

0:26:11.530 --> 0:26:14.310
<v Speaker 4>you know, the bench is strong. the starters I expect

0:26:14.330 --> 0:26:16.410
<v Speaker 4>to win their minutes and the home court advantage should

0:26:16.430 --> 0:26:17.050
<v Speaker 4>be a little weakened.

0:26:17.810 --> 0:26:19.290
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Okay.

0:26:19.570 --> 0:26:21.889
<v Speaker 3>God help me. We'll see if I can sneak one

0:26:21.970 --> 0:26:25.710
<v Speaker 3>out here on fiddle. Uh, we're going to one star bets.

0:26:25.730 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 3>We've already talked about fiddles play on the next six

0:26:27.619 --> 0:26:31.340
<v Speaker 3>years over. Uh, I'm going to take Julian champagne over 1.5,

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 3>three pointers made. I'm laying the juice at minus one 70.

0:26:33.500 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to be more assertive with taking these kinds

0:26:36.060 --> 0:26:37.380
<v Speaker 3>of lines. And I want to bet more three point

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 3>props this year. Um, this just comes down to the

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 3>thunders profile under Mark Dagnall has been, Hey, we pick

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:44.790
<v Speaker 3>a guy and that guy we're going to leave open.

0:26:44.810 --> 0:26:47.530
<v Speaker 3>And it's usually a corner shooter. And it has, it

0:26:47.670 --> 0:26:49.910
<v Speaker 3>really was last year. It was Julian champagne. Like he's

0:26:49.950 --> 0:26:53.690
<v Speaker 3>left him open consistently. I'm not worried about, I want

0:26:53.710 --> 0:26:55.629
<v Speaker 3>him on this number and not points. I don't want

0:26:55.650 --> 0:26:57.930
<v Speaker 3>to mess with any other metric because of kind of

0:26:57.950 --> 0:27:00.070
<v Speaker 3>what we talked about with the uncertainty around the rotation,

0:27:00.570 --> 0:27:02.740
<v Speaker 3>where it's like, what if Tobias Harris gets upgraded or

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 3>what if they, you know, what if they start champagne,

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:06.459
<v Speaker 3>but what if they start them? So what if, you know,

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 3>all these kinds of things, I just still think champagne

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 3>is going to play a lot. And I think that

0:27:10.180 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 3>he's going to get good looks and the thunder have

0:27:12.859 --> 0:27:16.100
<v Speaker 3>consistently shown a propensity to give up three pointers. It's

0:27:16.140 --> 0:27:18.220
<v Speaker 3>weird that they're the most elite defense in the world,

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.310
<v Speaker 3>but they're, they do give up a high three point rate.

0:27:20.670 --> 0:27:22.990
<v Speaker 3>Their closeouts are great, but champagne is able to, able

0:27:23.010 --> 0:27:26.409
<v Speaker 3>to hit them pretty consistently. Uh, so I'm going to

0:27:26.430 --> 0:27:28.629
<v Speaker 3>take Julian champagne over one and a half, three pointers

0:27:28.830 --> 0:27:31.910
<v Speaker 3>minus one 70 for our final bet on the slate.

0:27:32.210 --> 0:27:36.330
<v Speaker 3>As Michael Fiddle attends to his puppy dog, uh, Finseca, uh,

0:27:38.350 --> 0:27:40.129
<v Speaker 3>are you trolling me with all these Celtics? But like,

0:27:40.150 --> 0:27:43.230
<v Speaker 3>are you, this, this is some, with how I know

0:27:43.250 --> 0:27:46.729
<v Speaker 3>you feel about Boston, this is not Boston, but this

0:27:46.770 --> 0:27:49.290
<v Speaker 3>is a Boston guy. It's Jalen Brown. You're taking Jalen

0:27:49.310 --> 0:27:54.189
<v Speaker 3>Brown over 20 and a half right away. Jalen's going

0:27:54.210 --> 0:27:56.899
<v Speaker 3>to get it started and like make Boston regret their decision.

0:27:56.940 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Huh?

0:27:58.060 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know if he's going to do that

0:27:59.740 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 2>because I don't know how many shots he'll take, but,

0:28:03.490 --> 0:28:05.790
<v Speaker 2>I kind of think in looking at this Philly team,

0:28:05.850 --> 0:28:07.689
<v Speaker 2>look at how he's played in the preseason. I don't

0:28:07.710 --> 0:28:11.530
<v Speaker 2>want to over index on preseason, but from everything we've

0:28:11.570 --> 0:28:17.310
<v Speaker 2>learned about Jalen Brown, it would suggest that he internalizes

0:28:17.810 --> 0:28:21.510
<v Speaker 2>criticism and he wants to prove people wrong. And that's

0:28:21.550 --> 0:28:24.030
<v Speaker 2>not like slander or anything of that nature. It's just

0:28:24.310 --> 0:28:27.890
<v Speaker 2>to give you a framework of how I'm thinking. Like

0:28:27.930 --> 0:28:30.709
<v Speaker 2>he's going to get the attempts because he will make

0:28:30.770 --> 0:28:35.170
<v Speaker 2>sure of it. whether it's better or worse or they

0:28:35.190 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 2>win or they lose, whatever, whatever. I just think fundamentally,

0:28:38.540 --> 0:28:40.340
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't surprise me at all if he came in

0:28:40.940 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 2>and led this team in field goal attempts per game.

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 2>As a matter of fact, I think if there were

0:28:44.740 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 2>a market for that, he'd probably be the favorite above

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:52.390
<v Speaker 2>Tyrese Maxey because Tyrese Maxey seems to be more deferential.

0:28:52.930 --> 0:28:56.710
<v Speaker 2>He'll delegate. We all think he's capable of running an

0:28:56.790 --> 0:29:01.180
<v Speaker 2>offense and averaging 30 plus points a game, but I

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know if he's always going to want to do

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.780
<v Speaker 2>that given who's on his team, given, you know, and

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:09.479
<v Speaker 2>given the way Philly is going to play this, like

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I just, Jalen Brown, I think is going to probably

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 2>feed off of that energy too. Like we talked about the,

0:29:14.980 --> 0:29:17.260
<v Speaker 2>the emotions in that building for Nick Sixers. I think

0:29:17.300 --> 0:29:19.700
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Brown's going to feed off of that also. So

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 2>I just think he's going to put up to, he's

0:29:21.180 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 2>going to have too many attempts for me to think,

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.060
<v Speaker 2>oh yeah, he'll be under 20. It's just a matter of, okay.

0:29:26.820 --> 0:29:29.650
<v Speaker 2>Is he going to go seven for 18 and go under?

0:29:29.670 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a world where he could put up 21,

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.530
<v Speaker 2>22 shots and it wouldn't surprise me even with everybody

0:29:34.610 --> 0:29:36.850
<v Speaker 2>out there in Philadelphia. So for me, this is more

0:29:36.870 --> 0:29:40.370
<v Speaker 2>of a lean, but I'm just looking at, okay, another number. that,

0:29:40.510 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 2>and this will obviously be higher if and when LeBron

0:29:43.340 --> 0:29:45.660
<v Speaker 2>is out, if and when Joel Embiid is out. But

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know much about what this Philly offense is

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 2>going to be. One thing I do know is Jalen

0:29:51.340 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Brown is going to shoot. He will get his shots

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 2>up more than anything else. So for me, I'm looking

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.410
<v Speaker 2>at that and I'm saying, okay, He's going to be

0:29:58.450 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the guy that I look at here. And I do

0:30:00.660 --> 0:30:03.300
<v Speaker 2>wonder how the Knicks guard that. Like, they've experimented with

0:30:03.420 --> 0:30:05.700
<v Speaker 2>OG on Tyrese Maxey. I wonder if that's something we're

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:07.860
<v Speaker 2>going to see right off the bat, like how they

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of spread this around because Philadelphia is going to

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 2>have what we think is going to be a more

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.750
<v Speaker 2>dynamic offense. But as long as Jalen Brown isn't guarded

0:30:14.790 --> 0:30:17.110
<v Speaker 2>by OG the entire game, and even if he is,

0:30:17.150 --> 0:30:19.910
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the regular season, so we're good. I

0:30:19.950 --> 0:30:21.570
<v Speaker 2>just think he's going to shoot so much. He can

0:30:21.590 --> 0:30:24.850
<v Speaker 2>get to the free throw line, obviously, and he's going

0:30:24.870 --> 0:30:27.540
<v Speaker 2>to try to put his thumbprint on the game. Heller Highwater.

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Seems likely.

0:30:29.900 --> 0:30:32.060
<v Speaker 3>It's funny, all the analysis coming out, like Derek Bodnar

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 3>over at PHLA was talking about like, man, the Maxie

0:30:34.340 --> 0:30:37.340
<v Speaker 3>Embiid pick and roll looks so good. And I'm like,

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.850
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad it looks good because you may not see

0:30:39.870 --> 0:30:42.570
<v Speaker 3>it much depending on who gets the ball and when.

0:30:42.590 --> 0:30:45.030
<v Speaker 3>I think that Sixers offense is one of the most

0:30:45.050 --> 0:30:46.970
<v Speaker 3>fascinating things to watch. Again, it's another reason why I

0:30:46.970 --> 0:30:48.930
<v Speaker 3>like the under here. But again, I'm kind of up

0:30:48.950 --> 0:30:51.610
<v Speaker 3>on you because you're taking Brown over and obviously.

0:30:51.350 --> 0:30:54.420
<v Speaker 2>Fiddle's... Reverse correlation. There you go.

0:30:54.460 --> 0:30:55.180
<v Speaker 3>Reverse correlation.

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:55.860
<v Speaker 1>There you go.

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:58.020
<v Speaker 3>All right, before we go, we're going to recap our

0:30:58.060 --> 0:31:03.300
<v Speaker 3>three-star best bets here presented by DraftKings. Michael Fiddle likes

0:31:03.380 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Chet Holmgren under 13.5 points. Brian Fitzsack, Dylan Harper over

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 3>PRA 23.5. And I'm on the Knicks Sixers under 231.5.

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Those are our best bets presented by DraftKings. Don't forget

0:31:16.540 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 3>to use code BUCKETS when signing up for a great offer. DraftKings,

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.350
<v Speaker 3>the crown is yours. All right. Episode one of Best

0:31:24.390 --> 0:31:26.470
<v Speaker 3>Bets in the books. We'll be back with you tomorrow night.

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Breaking down the, I'm so excited for the Wednesday slate.

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm so excited for the way, like the Tuesday slate's good.

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 3>The Wednesday slate's going to be so good. I'm very

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 3>excited about it. Lots of plays to get to. Make

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:38.420
<v Speaker 3>sure to come back. Give us a five-star review. Give

0:31:38.460 --> 0:31:40.590
<v Speaker 3>us a like. Check us out at youtube.com slash the

0:31:40.620 --> 0:31:43.830
<v Speaker 3>action network. Download us wherever you get podcasts. Feedback's a gift.

0:31:44.300 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 3>If you want to tail some of the bets from

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:46.860
<v Speaker 3>our shows, look for the quick slip link in the

0:31:46.900 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 3>podcast and video description. Go to actionnetwork.com slash bets. There's

0:31:50.820 --> 0:31:52.220
<v Speaker 3>a little QR code at the top of this video

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 3>where you can snag them. Don't miss our live shows

0:31:55.940 --> 0:31:58.180
<v Speaker 3>Sunday through Monday at 11 p.m. Eastern with best bets

0:31:58.300 --> 0:32:01.100
<v Speaker 3>for the next day's slate. See you next time. Till then,

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:02.900
<v Speaker 3>let's get buckets.

0:32:10.060 --> 0:32:14.490
<v Speaker 2>Action Network reminds you, please gamble responsibly. If you or

0:32:14.530 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 2>someone you care about has a gambling problem, help is

0:32:17.380 --> 0:32:18.220
<v Speaker 2>available 24 7 at 1-800-GAMBLER.