WEBVTT - Mnuchin Pitching $916B Relief Plan

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser. Every day

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing you the latest news from the world of

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>business and finance, plus technology, politics. So much going on

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world of politics, economics, and it's all harnessing

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the power of Business Week reporters and editors. If you

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>can download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You can also listen to our radio show

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and be sure

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to watch us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News.

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>The two things that bother people they say, well, maybe

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we did this too quickly. They need to understand the

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>speed is really a reflection of the extraordinary scientific advances

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that have been made that allowed us to do things

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in weeks two months that normally would have taken several years.

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>That was not compromising safety, nor was it compromising scientific integrity.

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>The process that went into deciding the safety and efficacy

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>was both independent and transparent. We need to make sure

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>people on the stand that all right that of course

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you know that voice, Dry Faucci, Right, it's one of

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>those few voices that everybody knows. Yeah, you don't even

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>need to everyone knows Vauci at this point exactly. Um,

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>he was talking though at the third annual Bloomberg Health Summit,

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and of course addressing concerns that are real about people

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe not wanting to take the vaccine concerned about safety.

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into a discussion with Dr Seth Letterman back

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>with US, co founder, CEO and chairman of the New

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>York based specialty pharmaceutical company Tonics Pharmaceuticals. Set Back with Us.

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>He is on the phone in New York City. Dr Letterman,

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Nice to have you here with Tim and myself. Vaccine

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.759
<v Speaker 1>and what we've seen a lot of news coming down

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the UK starting there are still some concerns. How do

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>you see it right now? Well, first, I agree with

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Dr Faucci that the progress UH on the the two

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>or three leading vaccines has been remarkable. I mean, it

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is just awesome to be less than a year out

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>from the first time this virus was recognized and have

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you know clinical trial data on you know, at least

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>four vaccines. But I do think that we have to

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>temper our expectations. While the data are intriguing so far,

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>there are really four things that haven't been shown. There

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>has not been shown. There are questions about the duration

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>of protection. There are questions about whether these vaccines will

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>protect against death and really severe symptoms. There are questions

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>about whether these vaccines will block forward transmission, and finally,

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>there are questions about safety. So while I share Dr

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Facy's enthusiasm, I think that we all have to remain

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>cautiously optimistic and await more data. What are the questions

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>about safety. It's not something that we've heard a lot about. Well, Uh,

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>safety you have to think of two different groups. Uh.

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>You have to think about the older people in retirement communities,

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>who represent one population at risk, and then think about

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>younger people for example, you know, college studes, healthy young adults,

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, particularly those without presisting medical problems. So for

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the older people in retirement communities, any vaccine will have

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>some effect on their health. So I think we're gonna

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>have to look at a large number of people to

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>see how they react to this vaccine. Now, for the

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>younger people, you know, let's call them college students with

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>no pre existing conditions, they're really a pretty low risk

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of developing serious consequences anyway. So it's a lot of

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>information is going to be needed before we can really

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>recommend that would be beneficial to them, uh in terms

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of their own personal health to get any vaccine. But

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>we've got a lot more information, certainly yesterday from the FDA,

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and I know there's a big review going on tomorrow

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that will ultimately decide, I guess whether or not there's

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>US approval and we can move ahead. I mean, my

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>understanding is the vaccine that you tend to know the

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>worst of it in terms of any kind of side

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>effects within the first month. Um. I wish that was

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the case, but you know, we're talking about you know,

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>using these products potentially in hundreds of millions of Americans,

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>let alone people all over the world, So I think

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that you need a larger samples. And by the way,

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, the kind of approval that they're getting now

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is really you know, emergency use authorization. It's not full

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>FDA approval, and the guidelines for full FDA approval really

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>required that they're going to have to show protection you know,

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit longer period out from from vaccination than

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>where they are now. Well, that's sort of that at

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>this point, that's sort of a worry for later because

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>the idea here is to get as many people as possible,

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>especially those vulnerable people inoculated as soon as possible. Right,

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>That's that's correct. But but the question is will will

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>these acts have to be administered repeatedly? Right? So, so

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>would you take this Dr letterman Um, Well, that's an

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting question. First of all, I'm unlikely to be a

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>candidate because they're being you know, essentially reserved for people

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>at risk groups. And I think that what the pediatricians

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and other groups have done working with the CDC to

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>work out in equitable and um efficient way to distribute

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the first vaccines is great. So it's really a theoretical question.

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I wouldn't qualify. Although I'm a doctor,

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not currently a front healthcare worker. You know, said

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>let me just because we're running out of time. Unfortunately,

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>got about forty five seconds here. You guys that are

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>working on a vaccine right with a live COVID virus, Well, yes,

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>well we're going on a live vaccine, but ours is

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>based at Tonics. Ours is based on a live viral

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>vector and we're designing it so it provides longer duration

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of immunity. And you know, Mark is also working into

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>live viral vector vaccine so it's a different approach, right,

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think ultimately COVID is going to become endemic,

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna have to think about vaccinating people for

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>the long term and even people who haven't been born yet. Yeah,

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it's I think it's definitely an upheaval when it comes

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to how we treat this. UM. Dr Seth Letterman, thank

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you so much, co founder, chief executive officer Tonics Pharmaceuticals

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>with us on the phone from New York City. I mean,

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 1>you know what we hear, Tim, right, is that we

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>expect we're going to need multiple vaccine. Even if we

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>see with fiser you have to wait three weeks to

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>get the second dose of that, right, So it's gonna

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>take a laugh. Interesting thoughts for perspective. This is Bloomberg

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer from Bloomberg Radio. Let's bring

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in Naomi Nicks. She is corporate Influence reporter at Bloomberg News.

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>On the phone from Washington, d C. Sonami, we were

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>expecting this, but now that we've got some of the headlines, Um,

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>what jumps out at you? What do you think is

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the most significant? What could this mean for Facebook? Well,

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, So the Federal Trade Commission specifically highlighted Facebook's

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>per which just of WhatsApp Instagram in in the lawsuits

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that it filed just moments ago. UM. And part of

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>what it's calling for UM is a potential unwinding or

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>dibecter of those companies by Facebook. That would be a

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>significant alteration of Facebook's business model um and one of

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the growing parts of its company. UH. And so that's

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. And what they're saying is, UM, you know

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook essentially looked around for for potential competitors rivals,

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>uh and then just instead of competing against them, bought

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>them up. Well, I mean, there's no question that that's

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>what happened to Yeah, that's I mean, that's the way

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it goes. I guess the question is to what extent

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>does the federal government do these states actually have a

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>case here? It is that that is that is the question.

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And one of the defenses that Facebook will likely say

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is that, for for instance, in the case of Instagram,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that Instagram became Intagram because Facebook bought it, and that

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>actually at the time Instagram wasn't as much of a

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>competitor in the market sense, and that Facebook was the

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>one to help it grow and become such a popular

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that's a fair argument. I mean,

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Instagram was tiny, it had a staff that you could

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you could count on fingers and toes back then when

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Facebook brought it in a billion dollars and it was

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a huge acquisition back then. But I think a lot

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>has changed since then. And I do think Facebook has

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a case that says, hey, Instagram is what it is

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>because of our investment, right, And I want to just

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>bring it like, is the consumer hurt in all of this? Naomi?

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't that ultimately what um? Those bringing the case? UM,

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>all of these regulators and state attorneys in the FTC,

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the lawyers for the FTC, don't they have to prove

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that consumers were hurt in the process. Yes, And that's

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the tricky parts about some of these tech

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>ant I trust cases because these UM, because these platforms

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>are free UH, lawyers can't rely on the usual measure

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of harm UH that they would normally use, which is

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>priced to establish that a company hurt competition by hurting consumers.

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And so in this case they're going to have to

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>be really specific in their market analysis and defining the market,

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in defining the consumer and in defining the harm which

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>might use less traditional measures. I'm just gonna remind everybody Microsoft,

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>right when all of this first came down, how many

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>years of lawsuits went on and on and on. I mean,

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>who knows how long this could ultimately tim take. And

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:36.079
<v Speaker 1>and it's a it's a really good point. And I

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>think people look back at what happened with Microsoft as

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>creating this environment for all these startups that we're talking

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>about right now when it comes to anti trust to

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>actually succeed. And in the meantime, you have Microsoft turning

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>into one of the most valuable companies in the world again,

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>right exactly. I mean, Naomi, this is just the beginning

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of what's going to be probably a very long process.

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Just got about twenty seconds here. It will be a

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>very long past. And the key for Facebook will be

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>how does it maintain its competitive rigger in the marketplace

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>while fighting, uh, this this issue on the regulatory front.

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>That is always something that analyst investors right jump on

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and be like they're distracted. It's not a great thing,

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>right overhang, Yeah, And as Charlie said, Facebook stock down

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>three So it's not like investors are that concerned now exactly, Um, Naomi,

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Naomi Nick's corporate influence for Porter

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg News on the phone from Washington, d C.

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, I was going to just

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>take a quick check what is Facebook doing this year?

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>They're up, So I mean, listen, we all understand kind

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of how this goes. Yeah, so we'll keep a watch

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>on it, but definitely moving lower here a little bit.

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer from Bloomberg Radio.

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>They're listening to Bloomberg Business Week Carol Masser along with

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:47.079
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanivic Bloomberg Quick Take, and um, listen, this is

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a great story, great conversation because we just

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>got the headlines about the FTC suing Facebook for illegal monopolization,

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>for illegal monopolization. Let's get that out. Um. So they

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>are certainly on the radar. And we love our Boomberg

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>team because they understand companies. They understand nuances to when

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>they do a deal or potentially what this could mean. Yeah,

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and this is a perfect time to get Kurt on

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the show because he writes about what's happen. His most

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>recent Bloomberg Business Week story in Joel Weber also joining

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>us live from Brooklyn right now, Hey Joel, Hello, and yeah,

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't have scripted this timing any better, but you know, yeah,

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>had been so patient. He filed this story months ago

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and then we were like, yeah, well we're gonna do

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it soon. No time like the present Kurt um So story.

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, we we often try and have what I

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>considered like a strategic lens on our stories. And you know,

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>at Facebook, um this this behemoth that has you know,

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>basically made a series of acquisitions that is obviously uh capturing,

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>has captured regulators attention, hence the news today. But one

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of these is What's App? Right, and What's App they've

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>basically added to the report folio. It's huge internationally, far

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>bigger internationally than than here in the US. But the

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>big question is has always remained sort of like, how

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>could they go about monetizing this? And when they do

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>monitor when Facebook does get around and monetizing things. You

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>look at Instagram and it has just become a cash

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>cow for for Facebook and it really relies on on advertising.

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>But the question is has been sort of, you know,

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>what's app is not Instagram, so how would you go

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>about making money off of it? And that seems to

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>be the big priority now at Facebook. So so walk

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>us through what their plan seems to be. Curt Yeah,

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to your point, it is not advertising in the way

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that we know from the News speed or for from Instagram.

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And part of the reason of that is because it's

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to get the same level of data in a

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 1>private messaging app that they are able to get from

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>those other services. So it's harder to do the targeted

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>ads that we're used to. So in this case, what

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Facebook wants to do is really turn what'sapp into a

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>commerce and payments platform. And so imagine that you know,

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you're interacting with the business, perhaps in the way you

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>do today. You might send them an email, you might

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>actually pick up the phone and dial a number. They

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>envisioned a future in which you're doing all of those

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>interactions on WhatsApp, and you're using the service to maybe

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>place in order make a payment, handle a customer service issue.

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>And if they are sitting at the middle of all

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of those interactions between businesses and consumers, they see a

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>really big business opportunity there, especially in markets outside the

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>US where people are already kind of doing this behavior.

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>They just don't have the structure in place to actually

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>capitalize on it. So Facebook, but What's App for close

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 1>to twenty billion dollars just a few years ago back

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in Kurt, what's the time frame for when we're gonna

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>start seeing Facebook actually monetize this huge purchase. Well, this

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is something we've been talking about for years at this point,

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and when you pay nineteen billion dollars for a company, UH,

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.719
<v Speaker 1>you you have to answer those questions usually sooner rather

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>than later. Facebook's abilities to continue to grow its ads

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>business has bought it a lot more time, I think

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>than many people thought they would have to make money

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>from What's App. But what we saw in is that

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>they're really starting to kind of double down on this investment.

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>They made a five point seven billion dollar investment in

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>an Indian technology company called Geo Platforms. The whole idea

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>there is that they're hoping that What's acting kind of

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>partner with Geo on a lot of this commerce and

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>payment stuff. We saw them making the acquisition of more

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>than a billion dollars just last week of a customer

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>service UH software company, and so the fact that they're

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>making these big strategic investments in these acquisitions right now

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is a signal to me that we're going to see

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>this idea materialize in a more real way, probably sometime

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in the next six to twelve prot Kurt, Before this

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>FTC moved, you mentioned that that Customer Service acquisition that

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>was the last kind of big story from Facebook. Um,

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that was the purchase of a company called Customer Uh.

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And as you write in the story, you know, that

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>was met with basically crickets and kind of a shrug

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>from everyone. But how could how could the customer acquisition

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and this this Nissan strategy, with what's happened, how could

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that all sort of start to come together? Well, the

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>idea of being that if you are again using what's

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>up already to communicate with your family and friends, it

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that you might want to just kind of

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>bring your business or retailer relationships, if you want to

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>call them those that's kind of an optimistic word for Facebook.

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>You have a relationship with these business businesses, but you

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>might imagine if you bring all those into one app, right,

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and let's pretend that you're a large scale retailer. You're fielding,

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, questions or complaints from people on Twitter and

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Instagram and WhatsApp and Facebook you kind of want to

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>bring all of those into one place so that you

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>can manage them. That's what customer does. And so if

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Facebook is buying this with the idea that perhaps that

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>they can make it easier for businesses to you know,

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>message with people on one of their platforms, including WhatsApp,

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that they could make the whole Facebook ecosystem

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot more valuable to businesses around the world and

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to them, that's that's an incredibly important thing to not

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>only grow you know, their ads business, but build out

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that payment stuff that we're talking about. Okay, so these

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>are all kind of nuts, nuts and bolts questions and

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>blocking and tackling and all that stuff. But can we

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about the drama because you do have some some

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>some additional drama about the when WhatsApp was acquired, the

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>drama that unfolded between uh those founders in Zegerberg. That

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is an ongoing thing that we we love to report about.

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Friar's book No Filter about the Instagram saga was

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Financial Times Business Book of the Year. Um So I

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>just have endless appetite to learn more about the drama

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes, and you know, basically inability to share power,

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>what is what did you learn in the course of

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>reporting this and what tech drama? Oh my god. I

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>think that the very very simple way to summarize this

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 1>is to say that, you know, Mark Zuckerberg acquired a

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>company from two guys who had the exact opposite idea

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of of what they wanted to build. Whereas Facebook was

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>building this thing that you shared publicly and they counted

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>your data and they showed you targeted ads. What that

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>wanted everything to be incredibly private. It didn't want to

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>read your messages. And most importantly, the founders said, we're

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>never going to show you ads ever, that's a promise.

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't even worry about it. So how did the company

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>that makes that promise then go sell itself to Facebook? Right?

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>That those two just do not align. And so really

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>once they got in the door, we saw a few

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>years after the acquisition was closed that that tension really

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>start it to build. Where Mark Zuckerberg is saying, hey,

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we want you to start building an ADS business, that's

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>what we do best, and these guys saying, hey, we promised,

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>are you We're never going to do that. We're not

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>going to build what you want us to build, And

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately we saw both the founders leave in the

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>late seventeen early eighteen UM and and it's just you know,

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>anytime you bring together clashing cultures like that, you're gonna

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of a lot of issues. That's right.

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>When there's ever a merger, we think about salesforce and

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>slack like this is a question we asked, like, how

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>is that integration going to work right? Because so often

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't exactly right. We see it throughout history. Um,

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>for those of you listening to New York d C

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco watching a YouTube Bloomberg Business Week, Tim

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and I, we're gonna be back. If you're listening to

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg one or six one in Boston, paste tape Business

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is coming up next or thanks to Kurt Wagner, tech

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>reporter at Bloomberg News and to Jill Webber, editor Bloomberg

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Find more Business Week stories on the Terminal

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>and at Bloomberg dot com. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>with Kirol Masser on Bloomberg Radio. So you're listening to

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg rad bu Bloomberg Business Week Carol mass along with

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanivik, a Bloomberg Quicktake and you're on air live

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on nine and noon nine and Noon, you talked about stimulus. Oh,

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it was the lead story for both of our both

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>of our shows today. Yeah, I mean it's listen, we

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>keep talking about this that until we find out what's

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>going to happen if we get it. I mean, this

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is kind of crucial for so many Americans and really

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like for the US economy. Yeah, it's true.

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, up until now, really I think that

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the story has been this disconnect between Main Street and

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. But it does seem like, at least today,

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>investors are taking a little bit of a pause because

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 1>lawmakers certainly seem to be taking their time to get

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>this stimulus done. They're taking a pause to So let's

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>get into it. Let's find out the latest. Eric Watson

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is all over this busy guy congressional reporter at Bloomberg News.

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>He's with us on the phone from the nation's capital. So, Eric,

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>where are we Because we just looked at Tim just

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>sharing your latest story with me, um that both sides

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of the aisle are working on a compromise pandemic relief plan.

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>So where are we in this process? Well, there are

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>different paths going on. But one thing we've been keeping

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>an eye on is this gang of know eight to

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>their coins seals are nine coalition. Uh. There were eight

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>senators um from both parties as well as fifty Republicans

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of Democrats, and they had come up with an outline

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>for a nine billion dollars stimulus. The details were lacking,

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and they released them along the way that outline of

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that but today, but they did not have the two

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>key provisions, the lib liability protections for companies and state

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and local aid filled out. It just was kind of

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a placeholder there. So that was kind of a bad sign.

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>We're talking to Joe Mansion at West Virginia just now

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's saying, you know, by tonight, perhaps we'll have

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>some resolution on this. Now. For professional leaders, they don't

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>really like these side groups to form and sort of

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>take manage into their owned hand. They like to seize

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.479
<v Speaker 1>back control and we're hearing really from from Republicans they

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>would like just to go be more of a leader

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to leader discussion. I think that's where we'reheaded. Next week

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is the deadline for government funding. A few more days,

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's when we'll see a deal come

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>together and it probably won't be this gang which has

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>at least quoted some ideas, but probably won't be able

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to close the deal. Well, now, it's not just liability

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>protection four companies that's holding up this on Capitol Hill, right,

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it's also Republicans are sort of unwilling to budge when

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes to what they're saying, our bailouts of state

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and local governments. What's the progress there? Yeah, well that

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting move from from Secretary Minution of the Treasury.

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>He put forward a nine hundred sixteen billion dollar a

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>plan that has a hundred and sixty billion dollars in

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>state and local eight in it. And that apparently one

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>into our sources had McConnell on board. Kevin McCarthy said

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>he was on board that the top of public commuter

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>in the House. This is really the first time that

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>they've gone on record supporting this this concept. Now, there

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>were other parts of that proposal that were problematic for Democrats.

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:46.479
<v Speaker 1>To eliminate the three dollar per week a plus up

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>for unemployment insurance that have been talked about. Democrats have

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>been seeking six huntre dolls per week and uh and

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:54.880
<v Speaker 1>this just would zeal that out instead give a six

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollar payment uh to uh most Americans. Eric, I

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>want to pause on that because that's a really big

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 1>deal for people who aren't working right now. Yeah, I mean,

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing, and it's not really target as Democrats

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>are saying, Look, why are you giving payments to people

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>who are employed? We saw in the spring a lot

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of people just pocketed that didn't even really spend it necessarily,

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>while you know, short changing by four thousand dollars or

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>so those who are unemployed because there's be four four

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>months of benefits. Is it a clean measure or is

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it getting bogged down on a lot of side issues. Well,

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean because of you might clean. I mean they're

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>they're they're the outline of the biparson thing has as

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>many different provisions as a small business aid three hundred

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars or so, a child care centers, broadband internet education.

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a grab bag of of measures, you know. But

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>it is also tied to this government funding UH bill,

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>giant one point four chillion dollar billis need to keep

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>the government open for us the year. Uh. You know,

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna extend that deirline for a week in December

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 1>eighteens and that has been bogged down by a lot

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of small issues, indeed, but they're more likely to be resolved.

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>If you remember, the President continues to push for a

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.479
<v Speaker 1>border wall. That's one of the signature issues there, as

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>well as the money for immigration rates. So we're seeing

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>those get worked out definitely on a separate track, but

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>have to come together by the A team. That's what

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering. I was wondering how much you know,

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of horse trading was going on here. Um, cut

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:24.239
<v Speaker 1>to the chase, Eric, do you think we're gonna get

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>something before the end of the year, Because I just

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>like Tim said, I mean, Americans who are you know,

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:33.360
<v Speaker 1>facing eviction? Um, you know, just have nowhere to go anymore.

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>You know. I actually I am optimistic when I saw

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the monution offer and the Republicans come into the nine

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollar ranged. Uh. You know, this is really

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 1>within the scope that the by Parson group have been

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about, the level that that the Pelosi and Schumer

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the Tought Democrats had had endured. So on the numbers,

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>they're really coming together. There there are policy differences, you know,

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>but I'm I'm more optimistic that I had been. I

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know about you Carol, But it doesn't it feel

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>like there's this more sense of urgency at least with

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 1>what we're hearing from lawmakers and Eric, is that what

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you're experiencing on Capitol Hill? Do they do? They seem

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>like there is this sense of urgency to get something

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>done A S A P. Well, I wouldn't say I

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>should be but by next week because cars always operates

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>on the they always say it doesn't operate on the clock,

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>operates on the calendar. And the fact that they need

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to go home for Christmas, they need to fund the government.

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>That creates a deadline. And when you're trying to hurt cats,

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to get all these people with very

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>different viewpoints to finally this, you know, copy and do

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a deal, you need that kind of deadline. That's what's

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>causing the urgency. Hey, just does it come down to

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>also Erica a red blue thing that blue states are

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>hurting a lot more than red and that's why we're

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>not seeing Republicans play ball as much. I mean, that's

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly part of it. I think, you know, you have

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a sense that that people can feel like blue states

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>are mismanaged, that they are super generous to their state

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>employees have huge pension unfund unfunda pensioned my abilities, and

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>that the states will just take this money and pocket it.

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So there's a there's a feeling of resentment on that,

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 1>on that, but you know, you know that's certainly a

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the issue there. I mean, I have such

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 1>a hard time hearing that because you know, I live

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in New York and I don't believe it. I don't

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>believe it just when I hear lawmakers use that line

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 1>of argument, I think about the federal tax contribution that

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>large blues California, New York compared to the federal tax

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>contributions that other states make and money that goes all

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>around the country. So the argument rings hollow with me. Yeah, no,

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, you're preaching to the choir. But it

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>does make go ahead, go ahead, Eric. I mean that

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:36.199
<v Speaker 1>even may more important to Illinois or are there are

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>other governments that are more famous to unable to really

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>be physically responsible, But you know, yeah, it's certainly that

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrats make that argument that allow of the blue states

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>contribute more federal text as well. Listen, thank you for

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>keeping us up to date, because we are seeing multiple stories,

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>multiple headlines and watching this process, so hopefully we can

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>get something done here in crossed Yeah, exactly. Eric Watson,

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Congressional Report at Bloomberg New on the phone from Washington,

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>d C. We'll see what maybe our our next guest

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>has to say about it. Tom Plum watches the markets,

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>really huns in on specific names. Specifically he is president,

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>chief investment Officer plum Plum Phones, excuse me, and the

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>plumb balanced vun top performer Incent Off of the past

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>five years, returning on average annually. About let's bring Tom in.

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>He's on the phone in Madison, Wisconsin. Tom, nice to

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have you here with Tim and myself. How are you?

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>How do you make sense? I don't know. I'm always

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 1>curious what you think about some of these i PO

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>issues in the IPO market that we've seen this year. Well,

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's been the I p O market has been

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty exciting for the tech area. But you do I

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>always wonder about the evaluations and then eventually you may

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>have some overhead as some of the original families and

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the original investors basically start looking at selling

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>some of their stock over the next few months. But uh,

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>normally what we have been seeing is some real fast

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>bounce and then a little digestion after that. The valuations,

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 1>of course, are just like we're seeing in all the

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>tech area where they're they're high compared to historical numbers,

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>but they certainly may not be high compared to what

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the expectations are. Tom. What what are clients coming to

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you with right now? People whose money you manage? What

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>are the questions that they have and what are the

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:31.719
<v Speaker 1>answers that you're giving them? Well, I think you know

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, a lot of people are concerned about whether

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>or not the economy is going to advance next year.

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>We hear a lot of people concerned even today. You

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>get bounced around by are there going to be a

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>type of a stimulus program or not? Is it going

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to be something that's going to affect all people? How

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>does it affect me? Um. We do expect the economy

0:27:56.000 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to recover next year and usually in a recover three

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>time that it's pretty good for the stock market in general.

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 1>But what we warned people is that you know, there

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>may be a rising tide, but it doesn't rise all boats,

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>because some areas of our economy are boats that have

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>big holes in their holes. Yeah, it's we've definitely seen

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 1>that play out. Um just you know, we continued to

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>have conversations over the past nine months. There are definitely

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>winners and losers in this environment, even as we take

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>out records on the major equity averages. So Tom, I'm

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:33.120
<v Speaker 1>curious in your fun which has done consistently so well,

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly as I mentioned, just even over the past five years.

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>So where are you committing new money? Where? What do

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you like in this environment? Well, we've continue to think

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that the pandemic really just accelerated some secular trends and

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to be in a digital economy for

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a long long time and it's changed how we do everything.

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we look at what if you know,

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we talk about uh greenhouse gases, and we talk about

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.239
<v Speaker 1>all the different things we need for energy efficiency, and

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a, um a big important point

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>for the new administration. And we look at who's going

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to enable of that. And one of the companies that

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>we look at as a company like Autodesk, which is

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the software company that provides all the architects and engineers

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>with visualization and all the new digital tools that they

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 1>need to address the current market Uh, they provide a

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of economies. We know that there's probably ten to

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent waste and materials on every new construction project

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>because they over buy different things. With autodesks of virtualization, UM,

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you can actually minimize that quite a bit. But there's

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>also going to be an incredible amount of energy put

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to reducing energy footprint. There's some people to think that

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the buildings that we have are greater than the automobiles

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>as far as causing greenhouse gases and CEO two emissions.

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So if they're thirty percent of the world's CEO two emissions,

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a continuous effort to reduce that.

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>And Auto Desk is a company that could do that.

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>We have seen you talked about secular trends just being

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>accelerated and online payments, purchasing, direct delivery, the idea of

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>using digital wallets. I know you argue that's something that's

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>here to stay. How do you get exposure to that? Well,

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:36.719
<v Speaker 1>tim it's not just here to stay, but it's going

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to continue to grow and accelerate, and we've we definitely

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>think that there's still a long path in front of

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>papal and Ali Baba and Amazon and companies like that.

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But but if you look at some real opportunities in

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Latin America, for example, Brazil as historically shown about an

0:30:56.320 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen percent online growth in their UM purchasing and this

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>year and accelerate. And then the leader in that industry,

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Marcado Libre, had over a seventy revenue growth in last quarter.

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So we see the company that can combine fintech with

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>managed logistics, so that there basically a lot like an Amazon.

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>They delivered product in one to three days in a

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>place like Brazil, and you have an incredible amount of

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>underserved young people who are going to continue to use this.

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>That is a seventy six billion dollar market cap company.

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the a d rs. It looks like

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the trade here and it's up a hundred and six

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and Tom, you see more growth here just quickly, Yes,

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>we do. I think it's a lot like saying Amazon

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago or five years ago, where people thought

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it was all behind them, when there's still an incredible

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>road in front of them. Yeah, that's definitely maybe a

0:31:58.360 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>CEO we have to reach out to find out with

0:31:59.880 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the up to Let's do it. Yeah, let's do it. Absolutely,

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>this is why we love Tom. He just brings these companies. Uh,

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely things like Adobe that we know that's a top

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>holding for them, but also um Orcado Libre. Uh interesting

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to see what they're up to. Thanks so much for

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>or at Bloomberg dot com, and be sure to check

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>out our daily radio show at two pm Eastern on

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, and be sure to watch us to on

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 1>YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News