WEBVTT - When Did We All Start Saying "Bulls*t"?

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Ridiculous History is a production of iHeartRadio. Welcome back to

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the show, fellow Ridiculous Historians. Thank you, as always so

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>much for tuning in. Let's hear it for the Man,

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the Myth, the Legend, our super producer, mister Max the

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>freight Train Williams.

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm still here in the Bahamas.

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 3>We're all in the Bahamas in our hearts. Max Bullshnip Williams.

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 3>That's mister nol no poop Brown.

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 2>They called me straight poop.

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>They call me Ben Bullen in this part of the world,

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>primarily due to tax purposes and folks. Before we get

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>into today's exploration, we have a disclaimer disclaimer disclaimer.

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Somebody's one We're talking disclaimer disclaimer disclaimer.

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>This episode may not be appropriate for all Ridiculous Historians.

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>It may be one that you cannot play in the classroom.

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>We were on the fence about whether to include a

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 1>million bleeps here or just to label it explicit and

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>let it ride spoiler. We went for the latter.

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 3>Death by a million bleeps was not something that we wanted.

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 2>To go with right right.

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 3>We did it out of honestly, we did it out

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 3>of empathy for our dear long suffering producer Max.

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 2>The conversation was, uh, yeah, I mean, as long as

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 2>it gets more production time on this one, we can

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I'll believe them all, and both Ben and nol No

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 2>we're not gonna. We're not gonna. Yeah, no, we're not

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna do that.

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, there were also philosophical reasons for the choice, you know.

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Also, I believe that censorship is bullshity.

0:01:59.400 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 2>First one.

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Also, first one, lets we have kind of agreeed, or

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 3>it ended up on the same page, that bullshit is

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a PG. Thirteen swear, not even sure

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 3>if it makes an R rating. I think you can

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 3>have unlimited bullshit.

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 2>You can have what bullshit if you want, and that

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 2>bullshit will be fine. That's right, folks agreed.

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>We think the term bullshit has been normalized throughout throughout

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a US discourse, throughout the anglosphere, honestly, And a few

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, you guys had this moment of ridiculous epiphany.

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I was talking with some friends about Believe It or

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Not politics, and I realized we were all using an

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>English phrase bullshit. And it's kind of bizarre because every

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>English speaker knows what that phrase means. But riddle me this.

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>There's so many animals walking, flying, and swimming along this

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>wide world of ours, so know how to cows of

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>all things, and just apparently male cows in specific. How

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 1>did they get such an unfair wrap? With everything pooping

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>all the time on the world?

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 2>How did everybody poops?

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Or the less popular book, nobody poops but you you

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 3>shout out?

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Family guys? How did how did bull feces in particular

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>become a stand in for that all that is untrue,

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>false or misleading? Like when did we all start saying bullshit?

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 2>You know? It's funny, Ben.

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 3>I also enjoy using the phrase horseshit, but that usually

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 3>just refers to something that I'm not into, like that's horseshit,

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Like I'm angry about that. Bullshit, however, does imply incredulity,

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 3>And that's what I want to dig into. Man, Where

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 3>does that come from? Why are we so suspicious of bullpoop?

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>First off, this may surprise the more polite, ridiculous historians

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in the crowd. Bullshit is a real word. It is

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>found in multiple dictionaries from Oxford English down to Merriam

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Webster and Cambridge. Merriam Webster defines bullshit as also, I'm

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna stop keeping it tally because I don't have a

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>fool errand yeah. Merriam Webster defines bullshit as both a

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>noun and a verb, because anything can become a verb,

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>especially in American English. But no, I am not yeah

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>God as a as a noun to your earlier point there,

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>noel as a noun. Mirriam Webster says bullshit indicates quote, foolish,

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>or insolent talk. As a verb, it can mean either

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>to talk foolish, foolishly, boastfly, or idly, or the less

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>cutting second definition, which I think is kind of wholesome

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to engage in a discursive discussion, which you know they

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>like to.

0:04:58.440 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 2>We're just having a bull sash.

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>You can me if you want to be polite about it,

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 3>you could call it a bull sash. But it we're

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 3>just bullshitting man, just having a good old time talking,

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.559
<v Speaker 3>talking a game. But yeah again, yeah we're just horsing around,

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 3>balling around.

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that second definition is fascinating, guys. It shows us

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 1>a meaning wherein bullshit is not always inherently bad. It's

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>just sort of irrelevant. It's small talk. It's like shooting

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the breeze. We all stayed a little later after dinner

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>just bullshitting, which literally happened to us in Baha Mar.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean we all stayed late to shout quote foolish,

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>insolent talk at each other. Instead, we probably joked about

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the weather, caught up with old friends, We talked about books,

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>we were reading, new films we wanted to see. In

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>our case, we talked a little bit about the beach

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and the casino in that sense, in the beach casino, Yeah,

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in that sense. People around the world bullshit constantly.

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 3>So let's jump right into uh, you know, one of

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 3>the more high falutin dictionaries the Cambridge who agrees that

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 3>bullshit is both a noun and a verb, but they

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 3>take a slightly different and arguably meaner approach because they're British.

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah they're they're a little bit less. Let's know how

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>to cut you to the quick. Oh yeah, they've got

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the best insults either of us have ever heard.

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 2>To Cabridge, there's just bollocks. To Cambridge.

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Bullshit as a noun is a rude word for complete

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>nonsense or something that is not true and spoiler, there's

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a clue in that definition They also turn up the

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>heat with their definition of bullshit as a verb, which

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>sounds downright accusatory. Noel, would you do the honors?

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.119
<v Speaker 3>I mean this is we've kind of touched on this one.

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 2>A rude word. Why did you do an H? There?

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 3>It's just not being British that they wouldn't have done.

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 2>That either, A rude word.

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 3>I do love it though, when they say the letter H,

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 3>they say H, which is a lot of fun. Sorry

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 3>to continue. A rude word meaning to try to persuade

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 3>someone or make them admire you by saying things that

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 3>are not true. Don't bullshit a bullshitter, Ben, Yeah, don't

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 3>bes a bs or so.

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Again, this is all too common in political discourse. As

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we were talking with maxoft Air and we all, I

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's fair to say ridiculous historians, we all almost

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly have met someone that makes wild claims in day

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to day life. Surely a lot of us, especially in

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the States. We had that one kid in grade school

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>whose dad definitely invented Nintendo, or that one or the

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>cop Salad who yeah, who swore up and down that

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>they had a boyfriend or girlfriend for real, for real,

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>who just happened to go to a different school.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's me.

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 3>My girlfriend does go to a different school, lives in

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 3>a different state, as it turns out.

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh you're going to school.

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, oh yeah, I'm going to night school. I'm studying

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 3>bullshittery Ah.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 2>That's not bullshit at all, right, yes, the God honest. Hey.

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 3>And also, by the way, we talked about this a

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 3>little bit in the inso or I may be dropped it.

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm fascinated with a kind of Midwestern term, the straight poop,

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 3>which is which means the truth, the God honest. So

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 3>how can shit be both true and fault at the

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 3>same time?

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Strangers shit.

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>There's this great Finnish comedian that I follow, a stand

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>up guy who plays with language a lot, and he

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>is fascinated by something being a piece of shit being bad,

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>something being the shit being good. That guy's name is

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Ismo I S m O. Last name Likola l e

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I k O l A. Do check him out. He's

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>just a genius, and we're wrestling with a lot of

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the stuff our Finnish stand up pal is wrestling with

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 1>as well. You know, it's weird because Noel, there are

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>dozens of synonyms that convey the same or similar meaning

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>without themselves being curse words. Nonsense, hogwash, ballooney bollocks in

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the UK also means nonsense. It is considered a rude

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>word like bloody, but it's not on the left.

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 3>Bollocks. Also the bulls bollocks. Right, Yeah, that's a good thing.

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like yelling.

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Balls now the bulls. The dog's bollocks is a good thing. Ah.

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, once again, I'm just saying we've got and antonyms.

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Huh is that Cockney rhyming the dog ball, porky pies.

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, porky pies is lies. Being in Barney is being

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 3>in trouble because Barney rubble. A lot of Cockney rhyming

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 3>slang seems to involve Hannah Barbara cartoon characters. Scooby. Not

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 3>a Scooby means you don't know what you're talking about,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 3>not a Scooby doo a clue, that's the right one.

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I believe the dog's bollocks may be

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a different episode of World put it in our were

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>our quarterly things we left out?

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the dogs bollocks is good, but a dog's breakfasts

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 3>not good?

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, yes, because as we know it, dogs youatpoop, and.

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 2>It all comes back around, comes from dust to dust.

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, bull dust is also an Australian version of bullshit.

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:27.599
<v Speaker 1>But there there are so many words, right, nonsense, hogwash, maloney, bollocks,

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>uh and who could forget obviously, flap doodle, oh my gosh,

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not to mention, not to mention. Still, for some reason,

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 1>bullshit as a phrase occupies this special place in the

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>beating heart of the American dialect, right, or the various

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>American dialects. It's weird because it crosses generations, acrosses demographics.

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You will hear the most wealthy, oldest people say something

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is bullshit, and then you will hear the youngest people

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>say bullshit, like a fifth grader might say bullshit, and

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>then you both pause. Right, It's like uh in a

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Christmas story where the kid says the F word RF

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and then the narrator kicks in. But I didn't say fudge.

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 3>No, he sure, that's a fun movie. Now, this is great, Ben,

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a really good point. It does seem to cross

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of generational divides. I think it also just

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 3>has a good mouthfeel to it. I think sometimes words

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 3>just kind of take on a life of their own

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 3>and get popular because they're fun to say.

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>It's that it's got that cool you in the first syllable,

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 1>and then it's got not to sound too spectrmy here,

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's got a.

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Tight t at the end, so yeah, and a hard sush.

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It's emphatic, right, and so. Like so many other words,

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>the origin story of the phrase bullshit is surprisingly murky.

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>It is fraught with misconceptions. Uh, let's put on our

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>etymology caps nol because.

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 3>We played wearing it, Ben, Yeah you did.

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it looks good on you, and we played

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a trick at the top of the show.

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>We were kind of bullshitting you, fellow ridiculous historians about bullshit.

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>It is a common misconception that bullshit directly refers to

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>male cattle. That is not the case. It is a portmanteau,

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>which we love, of bull meaning nonsense, not a bovine animal,

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>not a cow. It's pretty directly related, therefore, to the

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>English phrase bollocks, which comes to English via the French

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>word bull, which means fraud or deceit. And it's also

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>quite likely the meaning of bull here.

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Latines, way, Wayne, that's wild, Okay, so that's one mystery

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 3>somewhat done and dusted.

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 2>We'll get back to it.

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Yet, things, as they tend to do in the historical

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 3>game of telephone, we always like to reference, get a

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 3>little bit murkier and order to part the more we

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 3>attempt to figure out exactly how this term originated. And

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, much like manure spread gardener, that was a

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 3>gardening joke.

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>That's for all the gardeners in the crowd tonight. Similar

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to the F word, sorry mom, bullshit has several competing

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>origin stories, and one of these is really interesting. A

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>common bit of scuttle but argues that the word comes

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>from agrarian communities.

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Right all right, already said that one up by accident,

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 3>and they would sell cow manure, of course, to use

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 3>as fertilizer that they would spread.

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>According to this story, the poop of the female cow

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is good for plants and agriculture, yet the poop from

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>the male cow is either less helpful or downright harmful.

0:13:56.400 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a bad intention unethical farm you are

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>out to up your profits, then you start to step

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>on or cut your proper cow manure with poop from

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the male cows as well, you sell the literal bullshit

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>by claiming it is cowshit. Later down the line, as

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the seasons progressed, the customer they had suckered would see

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>damaging effects on the crops. So the story tells us

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that people started saying, don't sell me no bullshit, and

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>over the years this was shortened to just bullshit, and

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>then further shortened to bull.

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. That seems like something someone invented.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 3>And Ben I definitely had no idea, this idea or

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 3>this notion that cow manure, not all manure was created equal.

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 3>But I have a little bit of a suspicion that

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 3>the negative effects of manure had less to do with

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 3>the gender of where the poop came from and more

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 3>to do with the fact that it may have been

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 3>uncomposted fresh uncomposted or it turns out can actually be

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 3>harmful to crops due to high levels of ammonia and

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 3>nitrogen and salts that can actually damage and inhibit seed germination.

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 3>But I think you were going to that place with this.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, what's a fun story. We love a

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>fun story. I'm a Max's team here. It's up there

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>with the concept of buying a pig in a poke

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>or caveat temptur it's probably wrong. There are a couple

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of immediately obvious issues with the narratives. So first off,

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>cowpoop is going to be more or less a question

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of processing. It's the same across biological sex. The things

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that are really going to affect your cowpoop output or

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>cowpoop output are going to be factors like the diet,

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>hydration environment, individual medical conditions or disease, and again processing.

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>And secondly, you know, as we were pointing now, the

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>timeline doesn't really match with the etymology here. You can

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>still see dictionaries of great repute. Encyclopedia is arguing over

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>this bull as an animal versus bull as nonsense question.

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>But for now it is safe to say the farmer

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>origin story is itself wait for it, a bullshit you need.

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 2>It's a bit.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 3>It's a bit of shit, So it's full of shit

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 3>it is. Whoever may have told this tale out of school,

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 3>It does turn out the real meaning of it, as

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned earlier, much more likely stems from that French

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 3>translation bull meaning nonsense or an untruth, dating back to

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 3>the seventeenth century. Bullshit's been used since around nineteen fourteen

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 3>nineteen fifteen and British and American slang, and that word

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 3>made its way into the American lexicon late in the

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 3>nineteenth century, where bullshit was first documented in a nineteen

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 3>fifteen edition of The New Republic and used to describe hollow,

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 3>empty rhetoric. You know thing or two about that. American

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 3>serviceman in World War One adopted the term to describe

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 3>things taking it's a little broader as just things that

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 3>are generally not good, and.

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So by the mid twentieth century, bullshit is firmly ensconced

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>in the casual American vocabulary, but it's mostly going to

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>be confined to these unrecorded, unpublished conversations because of the

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>vulgarity of its second syllable.

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of haram right.

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>In fancy pants discourse. It becomes popularized in World War Two,

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and no kidding, this is a bit of a plot

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>twist for us, we have to thank one of America's

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>best writers for the popularization of bullshit.

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Guys.

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>It's none other than the legendarily uptight, the lovingly pretentious,

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the problematically racist poet Extraordinariy ts Elliott.

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Ah.

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the jellical man himself.

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 2>There it is, that's.

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Him, right, yeah, yeah, he wrote cats Yeah, the Cats guy.

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>He would not have liked the Filmata.

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 3>She would have preferred them with buttholes.

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 2>So it sounds crazy, right, He was kind of a

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 2>buttle Yeah, he kind of was.

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, man, we know you're from Missouri. So it sounds crazy.

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>It sounds almost like bullshit. Hang on, hear us out.

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Between nineteen ten and nineteen fifteen he wrote a poem

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:48.239
<v Speaker 1>called The Triumph of Bullshit and it's a ballad, and

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>he finalized it with a few small changes in nineteen sixteen.

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Just to give you a sense of this. It is

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>not on the level of Proof Rock or The Wasteland,

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>but it is an early example of this phrase in print.

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>The final form of it, Just to give you the

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:13.360
<v Speaker 1>first first verse is ladies on whom my attentions have waited.

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>If you consider my merits a small it, deoliated, alembicated, utund, tasteless, fantastical, monotonous, crotchety, constipated, impotent,

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>galimattias affected, possibly imitated. For Christ's sake, stick it up

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>your ass, and every scene, everythow dude, every verse. And

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like a three verses right, and every verse ends

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>with a refrain for Christ's sakes, For Christ's sake, stick

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:50.719
<v Speaker 1>it up your ass, the triumph of bullshit. Look this

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>guy is all.

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 3>Right Susian for a minute there, Ben, it was I love.

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 1>All this jelical language.

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that is true. Susianis to that as well.

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Elliott did not invent this word sucineity.

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 2>I love it.

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>We should keep it, Max, keep it please. And he

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>popularized the phrase bullshit with this poem, but the poem

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>did not see print immediately after he wrote it. The

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>earliest citations of the phrase bullshit come to us from

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the equally fancy pants boffins at the Oxford English Dictionary.

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Ah.

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 3>Yes, second in fancy pants neess only to Cambridge in

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 3>my humble estimation. Not sure there's the data there to

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 3>back it up.

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Cambridge versus Oxford ultimate smash.

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's go fight, So the earlier. That's a great question.

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how they feel about each other.

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, who's the fancist of lads?

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Who's got the cravat versus the regular necktie?

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that is the question. You know, we're a cravat?

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 2>To Ben, who's that? It was? Uh?

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Fred from the Scooby Doo Gang.

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's right. A bit of a cravat, I keep

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>forgetting about or.

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Was it an ascot?

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Never mind? I think wait, wait, wait, didn't we know?

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 3>I think a cravat is just to catch all the

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 3>umbrella term.

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 2>That's where I was going. Yeah, everything's necktie everything like that.

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 3>I love quibbling over semantics.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, Max, with the facts, we are one and

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we know that regardless of egghead hierarchy. The Oxford English Dictionary,

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 1>which we love, says the earliest citations.

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Book, it's you. It's a page turner, second only to

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 2>the Bible.

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, okay, I've definitely read cover to cover a

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>question about.

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 2>It many times. I U name a verse.

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 3>They're all good, They're all just so good.

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, that's real write my.

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 3>Favorite, especially that one from Bubble Fiction that wasn't in

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 3>the Bible. You know it isn't in the Bible. Ben,

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 3>what's that potatoes? And that was a big reason that

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 3>the people were suspicious of.

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, during the Great Exchange, which will be another episode.

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Dare I say a series we're getting to in the

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>futures coming right up day tuned for Thursday for part

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>one of that. We want you to know that the

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Oxford English Dictionary the OED they cite the first occurrence

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>of bullshit coming from the letters of a British writer

0:22:55.920 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>named Wynton Lewis and the American essayists and poet Ee Cummings.

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 2>This is still.

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Confusing because here Wyndham Lewis is directly quoting Elliot's poem

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in a letter from nineteen fifteen, and Lewis writes, quote,

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Elliot has sent me bullshit and the ballad for Big Louise.

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>They are excellent bits of scholarly reboldry. So rebolds cheeky

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>cheeky devil that that ts Eliot. So we do know

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that there are other modern writers that began using the

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>phrase as well, because why wouldn't they. It's already starting

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 1>to creep into the lexicon. It's fun to say. One

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite names in modern literature Ezra Pound.

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 3>It's like give me an Ezra pound you meaning like

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 3>dab me up. He used it in nineteen fourteen in

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 3>a letter to James Joyce, who liked farts writing include

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 3>check that one out if you want another rebald episode

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 3>talking about James Joyce and love of Lady Farts. He said,

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 3>I enclose a prize sample of bullshit.

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he spaced it out, he said bull space ship

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>he did.

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 3>It's still we're still getting there. We're still getting there.

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we can all agree. We're pretty sure that

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Ezra Pounds, another problematic guy who was an excellent poet.

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>We're pretty sure he meant bullshit in the figurative sense, because,

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>so far as we can tell, ol Ezra did not

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>actually include cow poop with the letter.

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 2>That would have been a terrorist act.

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that would have been like Jared Leto playing the joker.

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, apparently all those rumors though, by the way

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 3>he started himself, Oh my gosh, yeah yeah that guy.

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Wow, classic Morbius, what a fellow. Well he's morb Morban

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 2>out so.

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Hard right now.

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 2>It's true.

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>There's one other origin story that we have to get to,

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and this one takes us halfway around the world.

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, New Zealand, I can't do it. Are not New Zealand. Hey, God,

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 2>that was better.

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 3>Come at us and we deserve it, and we're ready

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 3>for your blows. New Zealanders and Australians alike. Aussie's Eric Partridge,

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 3>is this fellow's name, and he claimed that the term

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 3>was popularized by soldiers, which we already have another version

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 3>of the story where it's American soldiers beginning to use

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 3>the term as just bad stuff. And we know that Army,

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 3>my job is Army, very fond of quippie and sometimes

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 3>body terms like fu bar all of that stuff, so

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 3>it makes a lot of sense. In this version, it

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 3>is the new Zealand and Australian soldiers the Army Corps.

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Rather and Zach shouting yeah.

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 3>During World War One, this term began being flung around.

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 3>According to Partridge, British officers of the war placed high

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 3>emphasis on bull bullshit, which I love that that is

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of how we say it, but I also enjoy

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 3>it quite a lot when people say bullshit with a question,

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of with a upward We're.

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Almost Mandarin in our intonations there.

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 3>It's true high emphasis on bull which consisted of ensuring

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 3>soldiers were perfectly dressed with clean clothing when it proved

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 3>to be a hindrance during military operations. ANZAC troops mocked

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 3>this emphasis on presentation by calling it a bullshit bull

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 3>shit bullshit right sucking the Chinese meal, Oh guys, we're

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 3>just bullshitting, and there we have it, fellow ridiculous historians.

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Like so many other popular words and phrases, the true

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>origin of bullshit may be lost to history. It might

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>even be an example of parallel thinking because the word

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>is just so tasty. You know, we don't know who

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly was the.

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 2>First edgy with bullshit just.

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>That tasty bullshit. We don't know who exactly was the

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>first edgy wit in all of human history to cook

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>this one up, but we know it was again becoming

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>commonplace by the early twentieth century, and it became massively

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>popular once civilization fell into World War Two. And if

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at the various linguistic measures of the frequency

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of a word, it's skyrockets as a noun as we

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>go into the nineteen eighties, right, And then at the

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>same time we see the growth of bullshit as a verb,

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 1>as bullshitting someone, and this becomes this becomes a fascinating,

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>i would say, case test or case study, a proof

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of concept that you can kind of do whatever you

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 1>want in American English. That's part of why words like

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 1>bullshit become popular, because almost any word you can imagine

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>can be turned into.

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 2>A verb right.

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 3>We williamsed it verbify it. I'm a fan. I'm a

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, and I'm also a fan of it. I

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 3>think I speak for all of us language. It's a

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of fun.

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Three out of five.

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, fair enough, I'm great and hard No, it's good

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 3>you are.

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 2>You're great. I'm grading on a curve.

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 3>You couldn't leave us, though, Ben, without some fun bullshitty

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 3>bits of trivia at a step two, several of which

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 3>we've already mentioned, but leading off here in this list

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 3>that you've included is dipshit, which is fun because but

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.479
<v Speaker 3>it also weirdly, it just it cuts man calling somebody

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 3>a dipshit.

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 2>It feels hurtful.

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>It's dismissive, it's a diminutive. Dipshit means stupid. These all

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>have their own spin on the earlier formula horseship, which

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>was mentioned earlier. It means bullshit, but it's somehow dumber.

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't I think with dipshit, I kind of it's

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of like disrespectful, like work. I don't even think

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 2>highly of horseshit is. I don't know. It's maybe a

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 2>little bit more respectful, but somehow calling you dummer, that's

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 2>personal max context.

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Though, horseshit to me is sort of interchangeable. I think

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 3>bullshit has become so almost saturated and overused that I

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 3>tend towards horseshit just as a way of changing it

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 3>up a little bit.

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, the horseshit a lot too, for the same reason.

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, pig shit means be meat slopping down pig shit

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 3>with these meatbags, right, meats.

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Both dumb and simultaneously repulsive. Shout out to I think

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you should leave. Dog Shit means disgusting, also just bad.

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Like you say that movie was dog shit. Yeah, you

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say that movie was bullshit unless you had some

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>philosophical issue with it. But if you were just gonna

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>outright say something sucks, you call it dog shit. Yeah.

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And shitbird means an objectionable or despicable person, sometimes also

0:29:57.680 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>with the low key connotation of being lacey.

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, that also is one that gets thrown around in

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 3>military parlance a lot, and also in like you know,

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:10.479
<v Speaker 3>law enforcement and prison. It seems like the prison what

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 3>is it called pos or CEOs correctional officers, they will

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 3>call you a shitbird at least in you know OZ.

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>We also know that the etymology of bullshit has not

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>actually been studied as well as we would assume or hope,

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>given the ubiquity of the word, because part of it

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is because it became so mainstreamed, especially with the historic

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>South Park episode, which was one of the first programs

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>in the US to use the word shit on television.

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Also, I mean, speaking of bullshit on television, there's that

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Penn and Teller TV show literally called bullshit where I

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 3>think they may stylize it in print with like an

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 3>asterisk or something like that, but I've never seen it,

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 3>but I'm pretty certain they say it, and I'm wondering,

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 3>we got to look this up before we wrap. Where

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 3>does it land on the FCCS.

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 2>So I will say so Rick and Morty is a

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 2>show that is always trying to push it as far

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 2>as possible. So in like Rick and Morty, you can say,

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 2>like shit, they say shit all the time, and it's

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 2>on censored on TV. But it's like the conducts around

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 2>it they.

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Got, but it's also on cable. It's different rules. It's

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 3>not on like broadcast.

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:25.959
<v Speaker 2>Well, Penn and Teller was on HBO. Okay, okay, they

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have it doesn't have to comply with the FEC

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 2>rules on that way. Yeah, the the issue was I

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 2>with HBO was one of the one of the pay channels.

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:34.479
<v Speaker 2>I believe.

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>For a while the FCC was rationing out uses of

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>strong language. So for instance in show uh, in even

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>cable shows like Lost or Breaking Bad, they started to

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>run into well, pre Breaking Bad, they started to run

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>into situations where they could use a strong word once

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and the FCC maybe still find them. But but they

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>ate it. Yeah, but they just ate a cost of

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>doing business makes the show better.

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>The FCC currently defines three things they don't like obscene

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in decent or profane obscene consumptively indecen Right, you know

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it when you see it, right, So obscene means you

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>don't have protection of the First Amendment. Uh. The indecent

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>content is you know your bits, Yeah, it's Australia country.

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Last one is profane content, yes.

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, and the sacred and the profane. And interestingly enough,

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 3>the Commission the FCC has previously found the word bullshit

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 3>to be presumptively indecent and they define it as profane

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 3>or vulgar or irreverence of course language, et cetera. And

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 3>to your point band that can lead to fines for broadcasters.

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 3>But courts, on the other hand, have oftentimes struck down

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 3>FCC and decency policies, finding them to be too vague

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 3>as recently as twenty ten, and appeals courts struck down

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 3>some aspects of this policy after it they tried to

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 3>apply it to quote, fleeting expletives that kind of slide

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 3>through on live television.

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, language or material that in context depicts or describes

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms patently offensive as measured by here this well

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium end quote. So

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they're really going back to that old argument about James

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Joyce's ulysses, which is what is pornography? What is indecent?

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I know it when I read here or see it.

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And that also is inherently flawed because it is

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 3>so subjective, right, And if I'm not mistaken, the current

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 3>stance the FC takes on bullshit is that it is

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 3>not considered profane in all contexts, meaning that set and

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 3>setting is everything. You know, So I would argue, or

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 3>it would seem that if you're saying something's bullshit, that's

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 3>not inherently profane. But if you're like being gross or something.

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Then that's different.

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's more about or at least it seems to

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>be more about in the days of destination watching and

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>broadcast TV, it's more about when the program is aired.

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, that would be six am to ten pm.

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And then after ten you know, Gil will freaky with it.

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Six am to ten pm rather is considered I believe

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 3>the term is safe harbor. It is applied to stuff

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 3>that children may, within a reasonable doubt be around to

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 3>check out.

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:53.479
<v Speaker 2>And that's why I show like Wrick and Mortar gets

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 2>a little bit morelywey, because it's always playing, you know,

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 2>eleven twelve pm.

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Right, and so will end it here. We hope you've

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed this exploration. We hope you don't find the story

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:08.919
<v Speaker 1>of bullshit bullshit because we're obviously very interested, so much

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>so that we lost account of the times, the amount

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>of times we said, we're still going, it's still going, okay, I.

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 2>Say before I say we have to cut it off, so.

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>We have to go okay, that's another one. We have

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to end on this. Why has this ubiquitous word bullshit

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:36.479
<v Speaker 1>been been kind of ignored. It's probably because it had

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>it had this social taboo. Aura about it. But in

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five, and this is thanks to a

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>guy named Larry Walsh. In two thousand and five, a

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>philosopher named Harry Frankfurt gave the word academic weight. He

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 1>wrote a book called on Bullshit. He argued that bullshit

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is more dangerous than lying because it reflects in different

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to truth rather than deliberate deceptions. So liars will distort facts.

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Bullshitters count it speak to impress or persuade without regard

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>for accuracy, so that, like propaganda, the truth is sort

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of irrelevant. And this leads us to what we church is,

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>what I say it is. This leads us to exactly

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the post truth society we've talked about on our sister

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>show stuff they don't want you to know. If you

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>want to learn more about bullshit, check out books like

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Business Bullshit twenty seventeen, Bullshit Jobs A Theory twenty eighteen,

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Bullshit Management twenty twelve, and of course, The A Disea

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of Business Bullshit twenty eighteen. Now when catalogs corporate buzzwords, Max,

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>how did we do? What's our final count?

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, we're going to we're cutting it off now? Okay, yes,

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 2>so I'm gonna go who list. We said shitbird twice,

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 2>we said dogshit twice, we said pig shit twice, we

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 2>said dipshit four times, we said horseshit seven times, we

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 2>said just the word shit ten times, and we have

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 2>said bullshit, not counting that one obviously. Actually let's count

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 2>that one. Go ahead. Yeah, we've said bullshit, so both

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 2>of those ninety times.

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Leading us to a grand total of.

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 2>Oh I got them all together. I haven't all separated, sonety.

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 2>But out of ninety one hundred, one hundred and seven,

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and eleven plus one seventeen.

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>All right, I think we did pretty well. Big big

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks to our super producer mister Max Williams for counting

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the poops quite literally, big big thanks, of course, you

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:52.879
<v Speaker 1>fellow ridiculous historians for tuning in.

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:37:54.840 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I think Jonathan Strickland aka the Quist curses Okay, yes, okay.

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 3>You guys got got a dirty mouth.

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>He probably adds like the old school an achronistic British curse,

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So true, so true.

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 3>Who else do we think, Oh, Christoph Fracionas need to

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Jeff cod here. In spirit, of course, we thanked the quizzler.

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.760
<v Speaker 3>We must thank the puzzler mister A J. Bahamas himself.

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Big big thanks to the rude dudes of Ridiculous Crime.

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:26.320
<v Speaker 1>If you like us, you will love them. Please tune

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>into some of their upcoming past and present episodes. This

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:36.359
<v Speaker 1>is a true crime show all about the most ridiculous

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>things you can imagine, and it is the only true

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:43.760
<v Speaker 1>crime show that is guaranteed ninety nine percent murder free.

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Big thanks to everybody who went with us despite the explicit,

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>expleditive nature of this episode, and Noel, thanks to you.

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:56.919
<v Speaker 2>Ah, thanks to you as well.

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Man.

0:38:57.239 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 2>We'll see you next time. Folks.

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 3>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 3>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.