WEBVTT - OpenAI Pushes for Policies to Offset AI’s Impact 

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and Eva low In sent Francesco.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Open AI releases a slew of policy recommendations to help

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 3>navigate the AI era. We'll discuss its chief Global Affairs Officer,

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Chris Lahine later this hour.

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 4>Plus Oracle names a new CFO to help the company

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 4>navigate massive data center development plans and a cash crunch.

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 3>And NASA's artemist too, is set for the first lunar

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 3>flyby with astronauts on board in more than fifty years.

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 2>We'll discuss what to expect.

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 4>And all of this amid the context of global instability,

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 4>concerns about the Middle East conflict, and indeed a market

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 4>that's on edge, hopeful that cespig could be up on us,

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 4>but still we're seeing the latest rebuttals.

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Coming from Iran.

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 4>We're still holding onto games that four ten percent on

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 4>the Nasdaq one hundred. I'm looking at Bitcoin holding above

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 4>that level of two almost three percent higher but just

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 4>sub the seventy thousand dollars. But there is optimism in

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 4>the market is it right to be had at the.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Moment ed the headlines on the term of this morning

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 3>is about Iran rejecting a ceasefire and wanting a permanent

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 3>end to the war in Iran. That's bringing bloembost Tyler

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Kendo out of Washington, DC.

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 2>That's where we're at.

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, there is a back and forth between which

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 3>each side wants from the President's perspective and from the

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 3>United States of America's perspective.

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 2>What is the latest, Tyler.

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 5>Hey And Well, at this point, it's not necessarily surprising

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 5>that we heard from Irani and state media within the

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 5>last thirty minutes saying that Iran has rejected a ceasefire proposal,

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 5>because earlier this morning, an Iranian official came out and

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 5>said that quote, no rational person would agree to cease fire,

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 5>accusing a short term agreement of being in favor of

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 5>the US to give the US time to regroup. But

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 5>this is really raising questions as we get closer to

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 5>President Trump's now extended deadline of tomorrow at eight pm

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 5>Eastern for Iran to make a deal amid US threats

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.399
<v Speaker 5>to hit Iranian civilian infrastructure. So we'll have to watch

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 5>where this goes from here. President Trump is set to

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 5>brief reporters at one pm Eastern, where we may be

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 5>able to get some more of our questions answered, because

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 5>Axios is now reporting that Iran has instead submitted a

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 5>ten point plan to the US, which US officials are

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 5>calling maximalist in their demands. We don't have the details

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 5>quite yet on this proposal, but we know previously Iran

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 5>has demanded, for example, to have sovereignty over the Strait

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 5>of her moves, and that appears to still be the

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 5>biggest sticking point. We've heard from Iranian state media over

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 5>the weekend saying that Iran needs to have payments for

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 5>war damages that they are seeking to be repaid through

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 5>tolls charged on ships going through the Strait.

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 2>There has been a little bit.

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 5>Of progress, as you all know, Bloomberg News crunch the

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 5>data and are now saying that we have seen the

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 5>highest amount of traffic through the Strait at this weekend,

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 5>but it is still falling well below those levels that

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 5>we saw before the war began.

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 4>The most Tyler Kendall with what you need to know

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 4>in terms of geopolitics, we thank you. Look as tensions

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 4>in the Middle East remain elevated to say the least.

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 4>Investors are weighing what it means for the markets, full risk,

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 4>apetite and the outlook of big tech.

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 2>For us on this.

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 4>Show, Jed Elbertson person to talk to about it. Urgent

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Capital Management joins us. Now, you help manage the large

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 4>cap equity fund over there, and it's a tough time

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.679
<v Speaker 4>for anyone trying to navigate these markets. When will big

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 4>tech manage to go back on the upside. We had

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 4>a strong week last week or will that last?

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:38.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 6>I think that's probably the biggest question facing the market

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 6>today heading into earning season here in two weeks. I

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 6>think investors in big tech, the big CAPEX spenders, especially Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Google,

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 6>investors want more confidence that those humongous CAPEX spending plans

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 6>are going to pay off in higher revenue and higher profits.

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 6>And there are initial signs of that, but not enough

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 6>to get investors over the hump. And so this is

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 6>a really big earning season for them. They announced last quarter,

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 6>you know, humongous increases sixty seventy eighty percent increases in

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 6>capex for twenty twenty six. Investors want to see positive

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 6>revenue estimate revisions you know, to follow that, and I

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 6>think AWS and Google's GCP in particular are going to

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 6>show us that in the first quarter, with more to

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 6>come later in the year. And then Microsoft is more

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 6>of a mixed picture because over the last year they've

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 6>kind of reprioritized their own model development within the company

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 6>after their Opening Eye agreement was renegotiated. So a little

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 6>bit of a messy picture with Microsoft. But I think

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 6>we're going to see clear signs of acceleration for AWS and.

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 4>GCP, and that will be the catalyst enough to put

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 4>the geopolitical acts to the sidelines for big fund managers,

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 4>you think.

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 6>I think it has the potential to be. Investors have

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 6>been disappointed in Amazon and Google and Microsoft over the

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 6>last year because their free cash flow estimates have been

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 6>declining because of those really big catbacks increases. I think

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 6>that trend is going to reverse here as twenty twenty

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 6>six progresses, and I hope that the first quarter is

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 6>kind of the first tangible side of.

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 3>That jed state of play is then, as that one

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 3>hundred down more than four percent, modestly underperforming the S

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 3>and P five hundred chip stocks up eleven percent year today,

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 3>in part because of memory probably earlier in the year.

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 2>What I'm trying to get a.

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Sense of is how micro focused investors in the technology

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 3>sector are on the war in Iran, where if they

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 3>were already looking past it anyway at other structural and

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 3>spending issues that you just outlined in part with the hyperscalers.

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think prior to the war breaking out, tech

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 6>was underperforming meaningfully. From the start of the year to

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 6>the start of the war. Since the war broke out,

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, the last you know, twenty five trading days

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 6>or so, tech has performed better relative to other sectors.

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 6>So you know, I interpret that as the market being

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 6>more concerned with AI and it's really fast, you know,

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 6>adoption within our economy and the positives and negatives there

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 6>more so than the impact of war.

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I have to ask you about some of the IPOs

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 3>waiting in the wings. There was a lot over the

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 3>weekend on the social media is about the relative performance

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 3>of some public names might be indicative of investors getting

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 3>themselves ready for a SpaceX IPO in June. We reported

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 3>just last week that the S one file confidentially it's

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 3>going to be June. Is that something that actually happens

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 3>in markets where people are like, I'd better have some

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 3>cash ready for this.

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think you know.

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 6>Perhaps the most fascinating tech question in twenty twenty six

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 6>is where's the money going to come from for the SpaceX,

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 6>Anthropic and Open AI IPOs. And I think an obvious

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 6>first thought is the rest of publicly traded tech. Do

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 6>investors pre trade that to the extent you're suggesting, you know,

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 6>trade's happening in March and April for an IPO that

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 6>will come in June and then perhaps the fourth quarter

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 6>in the case of Anthropic.

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not suggesting, Jed, I'm asking. I've got no

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 3>idea because I don't participate in the market, So that's

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 3>why I want to ask you.

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, I doubt it. Personally, We're not doing that

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 6>at Argent Capital. We will consider Anthropic and an Open

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 6>AI and SpaceX, but we wouldn't pre trade it by

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 6>a couple months and get that cash lined up with that,

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, duration, that's not necessary for us.

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 4>What's so interesting is they are, yes, a space focused company,

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 4>and I know you have exposure to space and aerospace

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 4>more poorly in the fund. But we've got through the

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 4>biggest players in AI all coming to the market at

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 4>the same time.

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 4>Interestingly, Jamie Diamond's been putting his very long pen to

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 4>paper or typing away for his annual letter to investors,

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 4>and today he did talk about AI in many ways,

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 4>and I want to focus in on the investment side

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 4>because he's saying it's not a speculative bubble. But at

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 4>the moment, you can't see who the winners and the

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 4>losers are actually going to be in AI related industry.

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that's right?

0:07:58.080 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 4>Can you not discern who the winners are yet?

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 6>I think those comments stuck out to me and really

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 6>spoke to me. I think that he gave a pretty

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 6>accurate description of what's happening in tech today. I think

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 6>that they're you know, in any investing environment, there are

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 6>certain companies that fit in the too hard bucket for investors.

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 6>There are too many unanswered questions, there's too much uncertainty.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 6>Investors decide I'd rather be on the sideline. I don't

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 6>want to invest in this right now. Today it feels

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 6>like that too hard bucket is really large, much bigger

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 6>than normal, And of course software is in the two

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 6>hard bucket. I think insurance brokers are in the two

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 6>hard bucket, and a whole bunch of other sectors and

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 6>industries or investors are not sure if AI is going

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 6>to be a net positive for these businesses and industries

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 6>or if it will be a net negative. And so

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 6>we've seen valuations compressed significantly for software most notably, but

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 6>many other industries and sectors too. So his comments today just,

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, I think it was a good kind of

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 6>description of ware markets to today. That too hard bucket

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 6>is really big. His comments indicate, you know, he sees

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 6>a lot of companies in that too hard bucket, and

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, me, as an investor, my response to that is,

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 6>I think that.

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Smells like opportunity in many ways.

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 6>I think investors are starting to pick through the rubble

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 6>as it relates to software in particular, and I think

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 6>there's a lot more of that to come in the future.

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 6>There are software companies whose competitive position will erode because

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 6>of AI and the reduced cost of software development, But

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 6>I think there are other software companies that are going

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 6>to adopt AI integrated into their products, set improve the

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 6>offerings for consumers, and grow and thrive.

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Right Jed Elberate, Large and Capital Management, thank you very

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 3>much now coming up the world face is an era

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 3>of AI upheaval. But fear not, Open ai is out

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 3>with a set of policy recommendations for people, real human

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 3>people first will discuss that next.

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 2>This has been bog tech.

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 4>Open ai says it's working to quote ensure AI benefits everyone,

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 4>and it's now rolling out policy recommendations to address the

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 4>rapid social changes AI is driving, from jobs to regulation

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 4>for more. Oplomerg's AI reporter Seth Figman, choices, now you're

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 4>not a reporter, you're an editor, and you're help managing

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 4>the team in many ways. Seth, I'm really interested in

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 4>on the why now. This is a lot of proposals,

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.959
<v Speaker 4>conversation starters, the intertwining of public private partnerships.

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 2>But why are they're putting it out now?

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, certainly the rhetoric from open ai and

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 8>elsewhere is that we are moving very fast towards more

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 8>advanced aisystems. Open ai specifically it's supposed to be working

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 8>on a new model in the coming week, so it

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 8>could partly be a way of getting ahead of that.

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 8>Keep in mind that what they're saying here is still hypothetical.

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 8>They're talking about a more advanced form I called super

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 8>intelligence outperform any person on Earth, like any task. We're

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 8>in that there yet, But these proposals are just that

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 8>they're trying to shift the discourse a little bit and

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 8>trying to incentivize bigger ideas a new social contract, if

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 8>you will. That they seem to liken loftily to the

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 8>new deal.

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 3>So for a lot of open AI news over a

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 3>long weekend in the United States, reshuffle in terms of

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 3>leadership and manage to health related and one sort of

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 3>strategic just update us as best you can.

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, a lot of news right before the holiday weekend.

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 8>You know, Fiji Cimo, who has really been sort of

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 8>a fast growing influential figure in the organization, is stepping

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 8>back for a short term medical leave. She was previously

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 8>the CEO of Instacart and has been really instrumental in

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 8>a lot of their product and business initiatives. Brad Leikap,

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 8>who we've certainly had on our air before, the CEO

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 8>of the company, who have assumed some of the CEO

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 8>responsibilities over the last year and change, is now stepping

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 8>into a new special role where he'll help oversee partly

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 8>the efforts to bring AI to more businesses through a

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 8>joint venture with PE firms, and then their CMO is

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 8>stepping down permanently to deal with her recovery from cancer.

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 8>So it's a mix of factors here and stepping back.

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 8>It's a meaningful shake up at the time when we

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 8>understand this company is moving ahead with plans for possible

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 8>IPO and just close the largest funding round that we

0:11:58.880 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 8>have ever seen.

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 3>All Right, Bloomberg's AI editor Seth Fighmann, thank you very much.

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 3>Another story out this morning, Oracle has tapped former Schneider

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Electric EVP Hillary Maxon as CFO and that's effective immediately.

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>For more on the move, let's get out to Bloomberg's

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Brady Ford, who covers Oracle Hillary Maxon. Interesting appointment, But

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 3>I think the big story is, you know, Oracle has

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 3>a new CFO at a critically important time for managing

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Oracle finances.

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 2>What do we need to know?

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 9>You get to remember Oracle is going through a pretty

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 9>narrowly financial situation, right, I mean, they are transitioning from

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 9>an asset lied database company, the one that is going

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 9>through tens of billions of dollars in data center development,

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 9>and they've had to issue equity. They're doing thousands of

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 9>layoffs and so they're navigating a pretty complicated financial picture

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 9>and it's not shocking to see a new leader for

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 9>those finances.

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 4>The expertise that she brings in particular the background and

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 4>where really how focused will lie you think, Brady.

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well I think that's really interesting because you know,

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 9>they didn't pick a software CFO. They picked someone with

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 9>heavy industrial experience, and that's effectively how the biggest tech companies.

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 2>Are operating now right.

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 9>They are heavy industrial companies with massive cap x books,

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 9>and it makes sense that they would bring somebody kind

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 9>of outside the software world to navigate that.

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 4>Thirty four across all things, Oracle as well, if you

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 4>always are, thank you very much. Indeedah Coming up SpaceX

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 4>it prepares for its launch into the public markets. That

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 4>says more than two trillion dollar valuation potentially. We'll discuss

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 4>expectations for its listing and other mega public debuts. That's next.

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 10>This is a.

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Brumbig tech.

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 4>You know, masks SpaceX, but it's meeting with banks today.

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 4>We understand as the world's most valuable startup gears to

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 4>pitch potentially because ever market debut. Let's get the latest

0:13:57.559 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 4>room Meg's Bailey Lipshalts.

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 2>So we understand much.

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Is on the table, much has been asked of banks,

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 4>not just only advice it would seem in some reporting,

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 4>But what are we likely to get in terms of

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 4>a sense of when they could come, how significantly they're

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 4>going to get to this true trillion number.

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.439
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So what you'll see play out over the coming

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 11>weeks is these so called testing the waters meetings. So basically,

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 11>bankers will meet with their pitch decks, show investors and say, hey,

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 11>look at Tara fab, how exciting our orbital space data centers, and.

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 2>What the ultimate vision could look like.

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 11>It won't necessarily focus on actual valuation just yet, but

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 11>it'll really center on the financials, financial forecast, what twenty seven,

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 11>what twenty twenty eight could look like, given the expectations

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 11>that this should price in June. So the next kind

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 11>of march forward would be waiting for that formal flip public,

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 11>which would then kick start Caught twenty two days to

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 11>go in public.

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 2>So that's the next key milestone.

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 11>But we're going to be talking to investors, talking to sources,

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 11>trying and to understand what these meetings look like while

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 11>the company awaits a formal response from the SEC, which

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 11>would then kind of.

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Move this along.

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 3>We report right in the middle of last week that

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 3>the confidential filings in Then we reported that the valuation

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 3>being targeted is climbing above two trillion dollars. But all

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 3>of those little bits of reporting would indicate what you

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 3>just talked about, that June is happening. What else would

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 3>give us confidence that a June IPO is realistic at

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 3>this point?

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 11>The big thing d is that it'll take a month

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 11>typically for the SEC to give formal comments. So they

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 11>filed the middle of last week, call it the early

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 11>first few days of May. Is when they would get

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 11>that filing response from the SEC. It would be up

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 11>to the company and up to its lawyers to address

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 11>any qualms from regulators to really set the stage for

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 11>what we call a formal public flip, which then kicks

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 11>off again a fifteen day waiting period before a formal

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 11>marketing could take place and then the deal could be priced.

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 11>So the big thing to keep in mind is if

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 11>there's any hold up with the SEC that could delay

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 11>this process. But from our understanding, the company wants to

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 11>move as quickly as possible, which would then mean a

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 11>public flip where you formally see that s one on

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 11>Edgar kind of being breaking news sometime in mid to

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 11>late May, which would then set the stage for an

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 11>IPO two price in the company to start trading at

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 11>some point in mid to late June.

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, retail investors get excited, but who are the big

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 4>players that like you to be talking to at the moment.

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 4>There has been reporting of big anchor investors who are

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 4>being looked for.

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 11>Anyone in everyone will be kind of tasked with investing.

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 11>When you're looking to raise seventy five billion dollars, that's

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 11>more than double the largest IPO of all time. And

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 11>when you look at a book that, according to our reporting,

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 11>they could try to sell about thirty percent to retail,

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 11>that's more than twenty two billion dollars. So you're still

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 11>solving for a fifty billion dollar problem, whether that's sovereign

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 11>wealth funds around the world, whether that's institutional investors. And also, oh,

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 11>by the way, probably being pitched to some of the

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 11>largest strategic investors, just given the propensity for XAI orbital

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 11>data centers and kind of the grand vision that Elon

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 11>Musk is pitching.

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's beaty Lipschultz.

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much that stick with expectations for a

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 3>SPACEXIPO and other possible mega listings this year at lease

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Via is with us. She's the founder partner at IPO

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Advisory firm Class five Group. Bailey was just talking about

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 3>the Test the Waters meetings and one of the things

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 3>we've tried to report on in some detail over a

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 3>number of years. It's not you is the revenues breakdown

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 3>at SpaceX right there was a point where it went

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 3>from mostly launched to mostly starlink. What I'm seeing and

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 3>hearing right now is starlink at the top end tracking

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 3>to maybe twenty billion dollars of revenues this year. You know,

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 3>if they exceed, how do you price an IPO on

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 3>that data?

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 10>It's it's the perfect question, and thanks for having me here.

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 10>First of all, all the numbers we've seen so far

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 10>are leaked numbers or rumored numbers or through the great mind.

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 10>Until they flipped that document public, we aren't really going

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 10>to know what any of the numbers are. And then

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 10>until they go out as you just heard, and meet

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 10>with investors and the test the Waters, we're not going

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 10>to know what the expect the Bank's expectations are for

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 10>twenty twenty seven twenty twenty eight. I presume they'll go

0:17:56.480 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 10>out much further. But none of them that are being

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 10>bandied about in any way fundamentally correlate to a trillion

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 10>dollar or a trillion and a half dollar or a

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 10>two trillion dollar valuation. It's all, it's all hope. It's

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 10>all do we believe the vision. It's all do we

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 10>believe and believe that they will have limited competition, which

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 10>we know there's more coming. So it's a leap of

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 10>faith and there's going to be a lot of fomo here.

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 10>And the best way to look at how to value

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 10>it is to go way back to nineteen thirty four

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 10>where you look at Graham and God who wrote the

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 10>book on Fundamental Securities valuations, and they had a great

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 10>comment that was applicable during the Internet phase, and it's

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 10>applicable now and it's hey, look, there are times I'm paraphrasing,

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 10>but there are times when there are new fields of endeavor,

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 10>new companies in areas we've never seen before, and investors

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 10>can in fact make a lot of money if they

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 10>are involved early enough. But everybody needs to understand it

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 10>is not a fundamental investment. It is a bet. It

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 10>is a speculative bet, and that's what money at these

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 10>valuations will be going into SpaceX. You roll a dice

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 10>and you see, you know, Starlink's pretty cool, Lisa, this

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 10>is rolling a dice situation that's suddenly not so.

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be being discussed with banks talking to

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 4>investors today.

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 10>There is no math that correlates the current revenues to

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 10>two trillion dollars none. So Yes, it's a bet on

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 10>the future, and it's a compelling and potentially fascinating and

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 10>enormous and also very uncertain.

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Future, Lise.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Typically before a big IPO of a late stage startup,

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 3>they would raise a big round right, largely to bringing

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:56.640
<v Speaker 3>the crossover investors. In this case, SpaceX merged with XAI,

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 3>which changed the valuation dynamic, brought debt onto the balance sheet,

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. What was your assessment at that transaction?

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Pre IPA.

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 10>Typical mosque, I would say, I think again, until we

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 10>know what the math looks like, it's very hard to

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 10>make any sort of a sound assessment. It's clearly bundling

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 10>things together, and heaven knows, he's done pretty astonishing things

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 10>in the past that have worked out and some that haven't.

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 10>So it's we don't yet know. And again I've not

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 10>been on the test the waters meetings. Maybe they're explaining that,

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 10>maybe they're explaining this, but how the two are going

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 10>to interact such that one in one equal eight.

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 4>Does this have read across to any of the others

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 4>in the pipeline, Lisa, or is this very much your

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 4>view on Elo Musk and this bet in SpaceX because

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 4>it's also a beten XAI and we have plenty of

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 4>the AI companies potentially waiting in the wings.

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 10>So from a general sense, when you have a very

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 10>large IPO, and we've never seen one like this before,

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 10>but we've had attlee Baba, We've had Facebook, We've had

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 10>other big we had Saudi a Ramco, although kind of

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 10>a very different industry. When you have a big IPO

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 10>that goes goes well as Ali Baba did, usually a

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 10>number of the companies in the wings put the foot

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 10>on the guests and say we're going to take advantage

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 10>of the fact that investors are feeling good about ideos,

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 10>and you see much more activity when you see a

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 10>larger IPO that stumbles out of the Gate as Facebook did,

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 10>people and companies go back into hibernation for a while.

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 10>So this could be the opening of the door that

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 10>certainly bankers would love to see, but we have to

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 10>see how it plays.

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 4>Is Abaya, It's been fascinating talking to you, partner and

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 4>founder at Class five Group about the lineup, and that's

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 4>currently happening with all things public markets. Let's so quick

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 4>recap on the public markets right now as to what's

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 4>happening when President Trump has been speaking. Some headlines have

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 4>been coming out moments ago part of the White House

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 4>East egg roll, but of course conversation has moved into

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 4>the world of Iran. We understand that President Trump currently

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 4>is saying that ron as some missiles and drones left,

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 4>and the Runian people will fight the regime when it's

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 4>safe for them to do so. But more broadly, he's

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 4>talking about Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon ed. He's

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 4>also talking about his popularity right now, the American people

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 4>wanting the US to win and to come home, and

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 4>more broadly that he'd like this end to the current conflict.

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 2>D okay.

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on the program, we're speak of Chris Lahane,

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 3>open AI's chief Global Affairs officer. As the company releases

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 3>social and economic policy proposals for the AI era, it's

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 3>half time in the program will be right back in.

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. In

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 3>an era of artificial intelligence, upheave or open ayes proposing

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 3>ways to spread the benefits of the technology and put

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 3>people first. To start, It's published a set of policy

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 3>recommendations ranging from a public wealth fund and expanded safety

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 3>nets to shorter work weeks and faster electrical grid development.

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 2>For more.

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Open AI's chief Global Affairs Officer, Chris Lane is with

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 3>us here on Bloomberg Tech. I mean they are proposals, they.

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Are not formal proposals.

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 3>But what I'm trying to understand with this, Chris, if

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 3>we get the idea is how everyday people would participate

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 3>in it. Who enacts it Open AI or government? But

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about people whose lives are impacted themselves by

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 3>AI participating in it.

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Explain it.

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, that's exactly right. Let me take a step back

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 12>and Caroline, thanks for having me so first and foremost

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 12>with this document. Really reflects is the work and thinking

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 12>of open AIS researchers, the folks who are really building

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 12>and innovating this AI technology, and I think they understand

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 12>and recognize that this is technology that's on power with

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 12>historic general purpose technologies are the past that weel, the

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 12>printing press, combustion engine, electricity, you know, each of those

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 12>ultimately drove the human condition forward by driving economic progress.

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 12>But every time one of these technologies came along, there

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 12>was obviously challenges they came with it. And so what

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 12>this document really is attempting to do is to put

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 12>out some concepts and ideas that are really as transformative

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 12>as the actual underlying technology. And so it's divide into

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 12>two sections. One section really deals with an open economy,

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 12>which is what you are talking about. How do we

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 12>make sure AI is free, fair safe, How can people

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 12>participate as much as possible? And you know, the Software

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 12>and Wealth Fund idea, you know, is something that we

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 12>really took from what we had seen in Alaska with

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 12>the Alaska Permanent Fund, where the entire population of Alaska

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 12>gets to participate in the economics of the fossil fuel

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 12>extraction in Alaska. But ultimately there's a whole range of ideas.

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 12>One of the I think at the core of all

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 12>of this, though particularly on the economic opportunity piece, is

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 12>the understanding that AI needs to be understood as a

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 12>right that everyone in this country, everyone in the world,

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 12>has at least the opportunity to be able to participate in.

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 12>And that's really what's fun of this.

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Chris, a public or sovereign wealth fund is

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 3>a very specific proposal. Have you discussed that idea with

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 3>anyone within the administration? Who within the administration have you

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 3>discussed that with?

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I'm not going to get into specific names, which

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 12>may be a shock to you, but we have certainly

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 12>had those conversations with folks both in the administration. You

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 12>obviously have the Trump Accounts, which is a version of

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 12>some kind of a fund. I think in the last

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 12>two or three weeks, I've probably met with a dozen

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 12>two dozen actually, as I think about it, members of

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 12>the United States Senate where we've been talking about these

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 12>types of concepts, And I think what's really going on

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 12>right now is that there is a growing awareness from policymakers,

0:25:54.960 --> 0:26:00.120
<v Speaker 12>particularly in Washington, DC, of just how fast this technology

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 12>is accelerating, the scale that it's going to be impacting

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 12>all of us, and an interest and desire to really

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 12>up level the nature of the policy conversations. You know,

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 12>to date, the conversations have really been almost binary. On

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 12>one hand, there is, you know, an approach, keep your

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 12>hands off, don't worry, everything's going to be great. On

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 12>the other possible extreme, there is the doomer view, which

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 12>is that this is technology that's so powerful only a

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 12>small number of people should control it. We're really trying

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 12>to put out a different approach, and this approach is

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 12>based on actually offering solutions that are going to meet

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 12>the technology where the technology is, but doing it in

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 12>a way that's inherently small de democratic, working through the

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 12>democratic process to actually identify the ideas to will allow

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 12>this technology to benefit as many people as possible. And

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 12>that's really what we're trying to put out here today.

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 12>And this is a conversation starter, as you were alluding to.

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.880
<v Speaker 12>We don't pretend to have all the answers. Certainly people

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.199
<v Speaker 12>have smarter ideas, people will pressure test these, but we

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 12>do think we need to open up that proverbial Overton

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 12>window so that we begin having these conversations now, so

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 12>that we can identify the solutions quickly.

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Amount of the now is interesting. Was the now prompted

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 4>by this growing awareness that this isn't very popular with

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 4>the general public right now, or is it now because

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 4>you've got something coming, The models are updating, an IPO

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 4>is on the diverge, and therefore you need to get

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 4>ahead of the policy perspective too.

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.959
<v Speaker 12>It's really the ladder and not the former. And it's

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 12>certainly when you talk about and you look at the

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 12>underlying data, those who use AI tend to have a

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 12>pretty positive to very positive perspective on it. And you know,

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 12>we're nearing a billion folks who are using this on

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 12>a regular basis, so it's more and where people use AI,

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 12>obviously perceptions of it understand how it's can to impact education, healthcare,

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 12>their daily lives grows. But this is really at the core,

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 12>and again this came from our researchers who are really

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 12>understanding where technology is going and how quickly it's moving

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 12>in that direction that we do need to begin to

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 12>identify those ideas, those solutions, those concepts that are going

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 12>to meet the technology where it is. And I've said this,

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 12>but Chris, technology is transformative. We're going to need policy

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 12>ideas are equally transformative. And if I could, I mean

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 12>maybe an analogy here is the New Deal. And I

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 12>don't mean the New Deal in a sense that we

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 12>believe that there's big government solutions for this. But what

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 12>the New Deal ultimately recognized was that as technology drove industrialization,

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 12>there really needed to be a calibration or perhaps a

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 12>recalibration between the allocation of capital and labor to make

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 12>sure that the social contract was really in balance.

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 4>And you want labor to what we're thinking about it.

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, you.

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 4>Want labor to have more of a voice, Chris. And

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 4>what's interesting is others are speaking to this too. Jamie

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 4>Diamond putting out his letter to shareholders today also talking

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 4>about his view that this is moving quickly, it could

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:00.959
<v Speaker 4>eliminate some jobs and his therm has got definitive plans

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 4>on how we can support and redeploy our affected workforce.

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 4>How is other business going to play a role, Chris?

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.479
<v Speaker 4>And also what are the governments doing? You look at

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 4>this from a global perspective, Where is doing this right

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 4>versus the act?

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 12>It's a great question, and I think you can see

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 12>interesting pockets around the world. You know, when I travel

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 12>to Asia, a Japan or a Korea, you see a

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 12>real focus on driving up AI literacy, raising the amount

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 12>of people in those countries who actually understand how to

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 12>use AI. I think Japan has a goal of eighty

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 12>percent of its country or graduating students literate by twenty thirty.

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 12>You go to places like Estonia, which has always been

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 12>a digital forward country, they're building AI into their actual

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 12>government infrastructure. A Greece, We've spent a lot of time

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 12>with the Prime Minister of Greece in his government. He's

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 12>in the process of building AI into their public education system,

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 12>and so you're seeing pockets of this. But again, I

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 12>think part of what's bah behind this release of this

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 12>particular document is our belief that we really do need

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 12>to scale up the kinds of conversations that are taking

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 12>place so that we're actually able to meet this technology

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 12>where it is and moreover, where it's going.

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Chris, there's been some reporting from the Information that your

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 3>CFO Sarah Fryer has some concerns about the spending plan

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 3>over the next few years and the reality of a

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 3>timeline to IPO this year, in disagreement with Sam Altman,

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 3>your CEO. The report also details that Sarah Fryer was

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 3>excluded from some finance or investor meetings as a result

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 3>of that disagreement.

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 2>What can you tell us please?

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 12>So, first of all, I'm actually blessed in privilege to

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 12>work with an incredible team, not just in terms of

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 12>the talent, but how well everyone really works together. Perhaps

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 12>the greatest validation of both the team are researchers and

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 12>really our overall strategy is that last week, as you

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 12>all covered right, we announced the single largest raise in

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 12>history one hundred and twenty two billion dollars. And at

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 12>the core of that I think was the validation of

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 12>our of our focused or really laser focused strategy, which

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 12>is on compute. Compute is really Sam's insight. He deserves

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 12>enormous credit for this. He was there long before anyone

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 12>else that it is the most finite and most precious

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 12>resource when it comes to the intelligence age, and we

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 12>have focused a lot of our work on making sure

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 12>that we have access to that compute. That compute drives

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 12>a flywheel. Right, for every quantum of compute we get,

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 12>we effectively get a three x in revenue, and it

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 12>works the following way. Compute drives innovation. When our researchers

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 12>do that then leads to more tools. Those tools lead

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 12>to more users. Right, we were the first to ten million,

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 12>first one hundred million approaching.

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I think we've looked one hundred approaching. Chris, You're fine.

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Your your zoom froze for a moment there, But I'm

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 3>going to go back to my question. Sarah I was

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 3>or was not excluded from meetings because of a disagreement

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 3>on strategy with Sam Oltman.

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 12>We just raised one hundred and twenty two billion dollars

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 12>and Sarah Fryar was at the center of all of

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 12>those meetings, pulling all of those conversations together. It's awesome

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 12>to see the teamwork that exists between her Sam Fiji,

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 12>you know, our head of applications, and as I said,

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 12>I get to work with a dream team in terms

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 12>of talent and how well everyone works together. And again,

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 12>one hundred and twenty two billion dollars, it's not the

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 12>amount of money, though that is a large amount of money.

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 12>It is the fact that you've had probably one of

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 12>the most impressive cap tables in the world. Take a

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 12>look at our business strategy, take a look at our leadership,

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 12>take a look at our researchers, and really give us

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 12>a huge vote of confidence. I mean, think about where

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 12>we are from a revenue perspective in twenty twenty four,

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 12>I'm doing this from kind of I think we had

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 12>a billion dollars in revenue a quarter. We're now doing

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 12>two billion dollars in revenue a month. I mean, you

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 12>just haven't seen growth numbers like that historically.

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about the time, because it's got bigger and

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 4>that has been reshuffling, and our thoughts go to those

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 4>with health issues, particularly fujis.

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 6>She takes a step back.

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 4>Chris, but TIVYPN if that's coming under your leadership, why I'm.

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 12>So excited for this, Caroline, I am so excited for this.

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited for.

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 12>It for two reasons. On one hand, you know, these

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 12>guys Geordie and John and their whole team do as

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 12>good a job as anyone out there and unpacking the

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 12>why and the how behind technology and explicitly AI I

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 12>think folks come on to other media outlets. I mean,

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 12>you guys do an incredible job of breaking news and

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 12>scoopy news. What these guys do is really break down

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 12>ideas and scoop out what's behind those ideas and at

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 12>a time, and you know, this even relates to the

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 12>beginning of this conversation on the document that we put

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 12>out today at a time when we really need to

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 12>be scaling how the world understands AI. These folks do

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 12>one of the best jobs out there. We want to

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 12>give them the resources that their audience grows. This second

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 12>point here is that I'm able to bring in house really,

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 12>in my view, what is the leading agency when it

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 12>comes to being content forward and digital first. You know

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 12>a lot of analogies that have been used. I mean,

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 12>Bloomberg is obviously owned by a financial services company and

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 12>then has a media entity. In terms of you know

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 12>analogies out there, I think there's actually a different analogy

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 12>here that's a little bit more applicable, and that as

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 12>you think about Apple under Steve Jobs in the nineteen

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 12>eighties and early nineties, they actually brought in Shiat Day,

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.879
<v Speaker 12>which had been their outside marketing agency, and created something

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 12>called the Apple Media Lab, and it really became a

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 12>model for how to build in house marketing in an

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.919
<v Speaker 12>age when a lot of that marketing was done through

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 12>what we are now called traditional advertising. We're in a

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 12>different age today. Digital is at the center of the

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 12>conversation and I see this as analogous to that but

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 12>for the digital age we're bringing in really I think

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:00.839
<v Speaker 12>the best agency in the We're ad to help us

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 12>do the best job we possibly can do as we

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 12>could either grow in terms of how we market and communicate.

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:10.320
<v Speaker 12>So I'm totally punk for it. That's really excited when.

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 4>You came on to talk about that communication, that potential

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 4>of policy initiatives as well, Chris Lahne. We always wish

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:17.800
<v Speaker 4>we had another ten to fifteen minutes with you, Chrystalahane.

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 12>I thought we were going to talk about the night.

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 4>Next time we'll go affair for that, Affairs Officer. We

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 4>so appreciate you tuning in today and joining us. I mean,

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 4>while coming up a new show, well, it's making fun

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 4>at the Silicon Valley so called bubble. We sit down

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 4>with the creator and start of the new AMC show,

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 4>The Audacity. As a Blueberg tech.

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 13>Genius is not about figuring out the solution, It's about

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 13>being unhinged.

0:35:56.040 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 2>To do something outrageous with it. Fear in p innovation.

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I call that self police brutality. Tech lives matter exactly.

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 4>I was a bit of the trailer for The Audacity,

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 4>so you shall I say dark comedy coming to AMC,

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:14.879
<v Speaker 4>said inside the bubble of Silicon Valley, please to say

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 4>the show's executive producer, don't think that says with us

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 4>as well as one of the stars, Billy Magnuson, who

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 4>had slightly longer locks.

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 2>Great to have you, denti On, Thank you so much.

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 4>Let's poke some fun or let's have some reality check

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 4>as well. What a time to be writing about what

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 4>maybe you're presenting as masters of the universe in some

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:33.919
<v Speaker 4>way here? How did this come to bear?

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 2>How relevant is it for our time?

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 14>I think it's extremely relevant, But it is one of

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 14>these funny things with television. You rate it a year

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:44.879
<v Speaker 14>or so before it actually airs, so you're guessing at

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 14>what might be relevant. Uh, and it's a difficult thing

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 14>to chase. Obviously with tech, it's just moving way too

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 14>fast to try to anticipate what the next thing is

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 14>going to be. I think we managed to do that.

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 14>It's kind of like sometimes the Defense Department brings in

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 14>screenwriters to say, like, would what would a great weapon be?

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:06.800
<v Speaker 2>That of the future.

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 14>In a lot of ways, that's what we did in

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 14>terms of like where we thought tech was going. The

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 14>therapy bought things like even aspects that were major news

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 14>items like what happened with the VA and Doge and

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 14>everything like that is a major story point for us,

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:27.240
<v Speaker 14>but we wrote it before that actually happened.

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Life imitating h indeed.

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 4>But it was interesting is on the X Prize actually

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 4>is going out there at the moment wanting people to

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 4>come up with more positive views of how technology is

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 4>going to change because they want the next phone in

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 4>the way that was inspired by Star Trek. But for you,

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 4>how did you get into character?

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 2>How did you think about.

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 4>This tension that we have of utopia versus well dystopia.

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's quite interesting.

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 13>You know, basing as an actor, you know, you take

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 13>in you decipher what you see out there.

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 2>We know all the people on the headlines. We know

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 2>who is in the tech Titans of who are you

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 2>most fascinating?

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:03.359
<v Speaker 13>All of them to tell you too, I don't want

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 13>to put names out there, but we know who they are.

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:06.840
<v Speaker 2>And then you just take the good.

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 13>The bad, the ugly, and then you try to build

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 13>a character through all that and make this milange with

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 13>a character that I was like, Okay, what's interesting to me?

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 2>What's scary to me? Yeah, it's just they're out there,

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 2>we see them, we know who we.

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 13>Are and the best part about Jonathan Glatz are making

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 13>the story.

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, there's the.

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 13>Tech Titans, but Duncan Park is right under them, and

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 13>he is hungry for it. And it just kind of

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 13>shows a little bit the toxic nature that can seep

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 13>into these guys who probably genuinely when they started they

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 13>had hope and had hoped to build something positive for

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 13>the world, and then greed corruption all the beautiful things

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 13>and we see out there seeps in so beautiful.

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, And I think it was important also for there

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 14>to be for him to be a wanna be Titan,

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 14>for that desperation to be there to fuel the story,

0:38:55.719 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 14>but also to not necessarily be influent by the fame

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 14>and the spotlight that the people at the very top

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 14>of the ladder. We see them be like rock stars,

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 14>and I feel like that desire to be amongst them

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 14>it was so important, but not actually being one of

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 14>them was was.

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's a fun world he's created. Actually it's not.

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:24.359
<v Speaker 13>It's just again, our job is to tow a little

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 13>bit of a early the reality.

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh hey, I hear really no, I know you don't

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 3>want to name names, right, So your character is an

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 3>audacious data mining CEO.

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you.

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 13>Decade that's like the or well industry.

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 2>So how do you prepare for that character?

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:44.759
<v Speaker 3>So there are some real world examples out there of

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 3>the audacious.

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Data mining CEO. Go through the process, the process of it.

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 13>Honestly, it's just looking and regarding what's out there, and

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 13>then you slowly just pull back each little layer of

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:59.359
<v Speaker 13>it and you make a beautiful dish out of it.

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 2>And I think that that's the fun part.

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 13>Again, the world was created in Jonathan Glatter's mind, and

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 13>like to have one of the most profound writers of

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 13>our time.

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 2>And I'll quote me on that.

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 13>I think he is absolutely exceptional. That playground then is

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:15.760
<v Speaker 13>created for me just to dance on, and I couldn't

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:18.319
<v Speaker 13>be more grateful to be a collaborator with this fine

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 13>gentleman to my right.

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Likewise, Jonathan, I want to respect the specifics of the

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 3>audacity and the distinction in genre almost but I came

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 3>to San Francisco in twenty eighteen with several seasons of

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Silicon Valley under my belt, right, and that show so

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 3>closely aligned with the culture satirical, poked fun at.

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:40.399
<v Speaker 2>At what it is to be at.

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Maybe the lower end of the spectrum, the startup, small scale,

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:47.400
<v Speaker 3>early stage. How conscious of that were you that that

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 3>exists out there, and how much you wanted Audacity to

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.839
<v Speaker 3>be representative of all of the capital that's here, intellectual

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 3>and financial capital that underpins the technology industry.

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.280
<v Speaker 14>That I was a huge fan of Silicon Valley myself.

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 14>It's brilliant, brilliant satire. It definitely is about a time

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 14>in the Valley that was a little bit more optimistic,

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:19.839
<v Speaker 14>the garage incubator type of culture, and that that striving

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 14>to uh, you know, make it to a place, which is,

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 14>as I said before, is part of what what Duncan

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 14>is is going through. But Duncan already Duncan Park, the

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 14>character that Billy plays so brilliantly. He he He had

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 14>a company prior to this called Fathah, which was about

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 14>bringing people together and you know, they would trading candles

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:49.800
<v Speaker 14>and canoes and stuff like that. And then he became

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 14>a data merchant, h third party type of uh data merchant.

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 14>And I think that what we're showing in our you know,

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 14>it's a very different show. It's a much more of

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 14>a families interacting as a psychiatrist is the second lead

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 14>of the show. But the idea that everybody back in

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 14>the day was truly optimistic in a genuine way, that

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:19.359
<v Speaker 14>they were going to be bringing people together. They're going

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 14>to lower the barriers in terms of tolerance and people

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:29.839
<v Speaker 14>communicating together, and the idea of that information is going

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 14>to be something that's reliable and accessible, and that all

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:36.359
<v Speaker 14>kind of went in the opposite direction for the most part,

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 14>for the most part, right, But they made a lot

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:42.239
<v Speaker 14>of money doing it, and so it was kind of like, wait,

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 14>are we We're sort of tearing at society in a

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:49.919
<v Speaker 14>lot of ways here, and communication has been completely bifurcated

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 14>and people are don't seem to be any more tolerant,

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.319
<v Speaker 14>let alone all the other things that they that they

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 14>talked about. But we're making so much money doing it.

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 2>This is what people want, you know.

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 14>And so that sort of cynicism and that, I think

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:12.360
<v Speaker 14>it just imbued a different chapter in the Silicon Valley story.

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 14>And hopefully there's a chapter coming up. I don't know when,

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 14>but hopefully there will be one where they realize that

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 14>the power that they that they have is also the

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 14>power to do Good's.

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:30.320
<v Speaker 13>The characters He's created, it is the culture you're examining

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 13>the culture that lives inside the Silicon Valley now, and

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:36.840
<v Speaker 13>I love that that dynamic of the whole project. I

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 13>feel lucky to be a part of this project.

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Honestly, gentlemen, we appreciate having you here on Bloomberg Tech.

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 3>And I think I'm right and saying it's already been

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 3>renewed for a second season as well.

0:43:45.120 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 2>The Audacity premier.

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Is April twelfth on AMC Jonathan Glatzer, Billy magnuson Thank

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 3>You for Coming by.

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 2>NASA's Automus two.

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Is set to pass at the closest distance that humors

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 3>have come to the lunar surface in fifty years. Seven

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 3>PM New York Times tonight is the crew as it's

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 3>fly by of the Moon. Let's bring in Bloomberg's Lauren

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Grush just back from first Florida, then Houston.

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Big moment seven PM. What do we need to know?

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:12.240
<v Speaker 7>There are quite a few big moments today.

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 15>Actually, one thing that I'll start before even seven pm

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:19.240
<v Speaker 15>is around two pm Eastern, the crew will actually break

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 15>the distance record previously set by apall of thirteen of

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 15>the farthest any humans have traveled from Earth. So that

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 15>will kind of be a nice little lead into the

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:30.799
<v Speaker 15>fly by, and then.

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, this is today is the day. What the Artemis

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:35.280
<v Speaker 7>two mission is all about.

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 15>It's getting close to the Moon and being able to

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 15>see the far side of the Moon, parts of the.

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:42.359
<v Speaker 7>Far side that humans have never seen before. So it's

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:43.399
<v Speaker 7>a really exciting day.

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 4>And it's been so exciting to watch this minute by minute,

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 4>take by take as this journey continues. Lauren, You've got

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 4>some fascinating reporting on what's working well out there and

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:54.799
<v Speaker 4>also what's not working well.

0:44:55.960 --> 0:44:59.280
<v Speaker 15>Right So, actually, I've been blown away by how smooth

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 15>this mission has gone. Obviously, there's little glitches here and

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:05.360
<v Speaker 15>there that they'll be reporting to mission control, but overall

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:08.320
<v Speaker 15>it seems to be a relatively smooth mission.

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 7>One thing that we have all.

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:13.240
<v Speaker 15>Noticed is that the biggest headache might be.

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 7>The onboard toilet.

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 15>So it kind of started acting up that first day

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 15>of flight. They were able to fix it by helping

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:22.839
<v Speaker 15>to prime the pump, but then on the next day

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 15>or a few days after, they had an issue with

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 15>maybe some ice blockage from the vent line.

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 7>They dump the.

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 16>Contents overboard periodically, and there was kind of some blockage there,

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 16>but they seem to get it working again, So it's

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 16>just been it's been a nice comedic moment, you know,

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:42.400
<v Speaker 16>if that's if.

0:45:42.239 --> 0:45:44.840
<v Speaker 7>The only issue is your toilet, obviously it's.

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:48.439
<v Speaker 15>Probably not something the astronauts want to be for malfunctioning,

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 15>but at least that's the only thing that seems to

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 15>be a real problem.

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 4>Laura. It's been some beautiful writing, some incredible reporting throughout

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:58.600
<v Speaker 4>the weekend, and we so appreciate you joining us ahead

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 4>of today's really important day of space ed. That does

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:03.879
<v Speaker 4>it with this edition, Boombog Tech back together again.

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, strong starts of the week, a lot to recap.

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Check out the podcast. You know exactly where to find it.

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 3>On the Bloomberg terminal, as well as online on Apple, Spotify,

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:15.320
<v Speaker 3>and on iHeart. From New York and from San Francisco,

0:46:16.040 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 3>this is Bloomberg Tech.