1 00:00:01,240 --> 00:00:06,480 Speaker 1: The volume. It's Hoops and I presented by FanDuel. The 2 00:00:06,559 --> 00:00:09,360 Speaker 1: NBA season is kicking into gear and there's no better 3 00:00:09,400 --> 00:00:12,360 Speaker 1: place to get in on the action than with FanDuel. 4 00:00:12,440 --> 00:00:14,960 Speaker 1: The app is safe and secure, getting your money out 5 00:00:15,040 --> 00:00:17,440 Speaker 1: is super easy. You can jump into the action at 6 00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:19,880 Speaker 1: any time during the game with live betting and I 7 00:00:19,920 --> 00:00:24,040 Speaker 1: love building those same game parlays and Fanduels now live 8 00:00:24,079 --> 00:00:27,479 Speaker 1: in Ohio, so use promo code Jason T and download 9 00:00:27,520 --> 00:00:30,440 Speaker 1: the fandel app today to start making every moment more 10 00:00:31,000 --> 00:00:33,920 Speaker 1: twenty one plus In select states, gambling problem called one 11 00:00:34,159 --> 00:00:36,760 Speaker 1: hundred gambler or visit FanDuel dot com. Slash r g 12 00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:42,000 Speaker 1: in Colorado, Iowa, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Tennessee, Virginia, 13 00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:45,840 Speaker 1: and Ohio called one hundred next step or text next 14 00:00:46,040 --> 00:00:49,919 Speaker 1: step to five three three four two in Arizona called 15 00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:53,920 Speaker 1: one eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or 16 00:00:54,000 --> 00:00:59,279 Speaker 1: visit CCPG dot org. Slash chat in Connecticut called one 17 00:00:59,480 --> 00:01:04,319 Speaker 1: hundred Mine with it in Indiana, visit k S Gambling 18 00:01:04,400 --> 00:01:08,319 Speaker 1: help dot com. In Kansas call one eight seven seven 19 00:01:08,600 --> 00:01:13,679 Speaker 1: seven seven zero stop. In l A visit www dot 20 00:01:13,959 --> 00:01:18,240 Speaker 1: m D gambling help dot org in Maryland dial one 21 00:01:18,400 --> 00:01:22,600 Speaker 1: eight seven seven eight Hope and Why, or text Hope 22 00:01:22,720 --> 00:01:26,240 Speaker 1: and Why to four six seven three six nine in 23 00:01:26,280 --> 00:01:30,440 Speaker 1: New York, called one five to two four seven zero 24 00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:35,560 Speaker 1: zero in Wyoming, or visit www dot one Gambler dot 25 00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:49,440 Speaker 1: net in West Virginia. All right, welcome to Hoops Tonight 26 00:01:49,440 --> 00:01:52,560 Speaker 1: for Zenta by Fan Duel here at the volume. Happy Monday, everybody. 27 00:01:52,560 --> 00:01:55,120 Speaker 1: I hope all of you guys had a great we get. 28 00:01:55,240 --> 00:01:58,440 Speaker 1: We are live on AMP. And for those of you 29 00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:00,800 Speaker 1: guys who are watching on YouTube or listening on the 30 00:02:00,840 --> 00:02:03,520 Speaker 1: podcast feed, don't forget that the very first place you 31 00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:07,120 Speaker 1: guys can find these shows is on AMP. Today we 32 00:02:07,160 --> 00:02:08,959 Speaker 1: are just going to be touching up on two m 33 00:02:09,040 --> 00:02:12,200 Speaker 1: v P cases. Here come the Milwaukee Bucks and here 34 00:02:12,240 --> 00:02:14,640 Speaker 1: comes be Honest. So we're gonna talk about the Bucks 35 00:02:14,680 --> 00:02:17,520 Speaker 1: and Janice's m v P case to start. We talked 36 00:02:17,560 --> 00:02:19,440 Speaker 1: a lot about Joel Embia yesterday, but I want to 37 00:02:19,440 --> 00:02:21,800 Speaker 1: touch a little bit deeper on his m v P case, 38 00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:23,600 Speaker 1: so we'll touch on that as well. And then I 39 00:02:23,600 --> 00:02:27,720 Speaker 1: have two quick hitters centering around Lebron. First of all, 40 00:02:27,760 --> 00:02:31,720 Speaker 1: all of the reaction to his overly dramatic reaction to 41 00:02:31,760 --> 00:02:34,040 Speaker 1: the missfoul call against the Celtics. I have some thoughts 42 00:02:34,200 --> 00:02:38,240 Speaker 1: they're involving Lebron's competitiveness. And then there was a lot 43 00:02:38,280 --> 00:02:40,720 Speaker 1: of talk going around on Twitter the other day over 44 00:02:40,760 --> 00:02:45,800 Speaker 1: who was better two thousand eight Lebron or this year's 45 00:02:45,960 --> 00:02:49,760 Speaker 1: Luca don Shitch, and I have some thoughts there as well. 46 00:02:49,840 --> 00:02:52,160 Speaker 1: You guys know the drill before we get started. Subscribe 47 00:02:52,200 --> 00:02:54,280 Speaker 1: to the volumes YouTube channels. You don't miss any more 48 00:02:54,320 --> 00:02:56,760 Speaker 1: of our videos. Follow me on Twitter at underscore Jason 49 00:02:56,960 --> 00:02:59,480 Speaker 1: lt so you guys don't miss any show announcements. And if, 50 00:02:59,520 --> 00:03:01,560 Speaker 1: for whatever seen you guys miss one of these and 51 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:04,040 Speaker 1: you can't get back over to YouTube or to amp, 52 00:03:04,360 --> 00:03:07,680 Speaker 1: you can find them wherever you get your podcasts. Under 53 00:03:07,960 --> 00:03:10,720 Speaker 1: Hoops tonight, So the Bucks are in a four game 54 00:03:10,720 --> 00:03:12,960 Speaker 1: winning streak. They beat the crap out of the Pelicans 55 00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:16,200 Speaker 1: last night, won by for their fourth consecutive win. That 56 00:03:16,320 --> 00:03:19,880 Speaker 1: is their sixth consecutive win when Janice plays. They've also 57 00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:23,519 Speaker 1: won eight of their last ten when Chris Middleton plays. 58 00:03:23,639 --> 00:03:26,400 Speaker 1: So here comes the Bucks. You know. One of the 59 00:03:26,440 --> 00:03:28,800 Speaker 1: things for the people who have followed me for a 60 00:03:28,800 --> 00:03:31,800 Speaker 1: while or followed the show for a while, and one 61 00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:33,960 Speaker 1: of the things you'll learn if you're new is that, 62 00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:38,840 Speaker 1: generally speaking, I don't overreact to regular season trends. I'm 63 00:03:38,840 --> 00:03:42,080 Speaker 1: always paying attention to regular season trends. I always consider 64 00:03:42,120 --> 00:03:45,360 Speaker 1: it as information. But at the end of the day, 65 00:03:45,440 --> 00:03:48,080 Speaker 1: I'm not going it's gonna take a lot more evidence 66 00:03:48,360 --> 00:03:50,960 Speaker 1: in a regular season sample to sway me of something 67 00:03:51,800 --> 00:03:54,440 Speaker 1: compared to what I would see in a postseason environment. 68 00:03:54,800 --> 00:03:57,839 Speaker 1: I just find postseason basketball to be so much more informative, 69 00:03:57,920 --> 00:04:00,240 Speaker 1: and you'll see that a lot throughout my analysis is 70 00:04:00,680 --> 00:04:03,200 Speaker 1: this season. So, for instance, when the Lakers start into 71 00:04:03,280 --> 00:04:07,160 Speaker 1: inten I didn't jump off the bandwagon. I was, you know, 72 00:04:07,200 --> 00:04:09,080 Speaker 1: pointing out some of the issues that would go that 73 00:04:09,120 --> 00:04:11,160 Speaker 1: we're going on there. But what did I keep saying? 74 00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:15,800 Speaker 1: Lebron's not playing well. He should, in theory, start playing well, 75 00:04:16,400 --> 00:04:19,119 Speaker 1: and when he does, that's a massive influx of talent 76 00:04:19,200 --> 00:04:21,279 Speaker 1: that should cover up for a lot of the issues 77 00:04:21,720 --> 00:04:24,440 Speaker 1: that they have on the roster. And now Lebron's healthy 78 00:04:24,440 --> 00:04:27,800 Speaker 1: and inner rhythm. The Lakers are over five hundred because 79 00:04:27,839 --> 00:04:30,440 Speaker 1: significantly over five dred over the last half of the season, 80 00:04:31,000 --> 00:04:33,280 Speaker 1: Lebron's playing like an MVP. Anthony Davis is coming back 81 00:04:33,279 --> 00:04:35,640 Speaker 1: they've made a trade for the for a real forward. 82 00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:38,479 Speaker 1: Now the Lakers are starting to enter onto the scene 83 00:04:38,480 --> 00:04:42,160 Speaker 1: as like a real serious basketball team. So we're not 84 00:04:42,240 --> 00:04:45,960 Speaker 1: gonna overreact to a two intense start. When the Warriors 85 00:04:45,960 --> 00:04:48,880 Speaker 1: have struggled this season, I haven't changed them from being 86 00:04:48,920 --> 00:04:52,760 Speaker 1: my championship favorite. Why Well, for starters, it's been regular 87 00:04:52,760 --> 00:04:55,200 Speaker 1: season basketball to most of their struggles are on the 88 00:04:55,279 --> 00:04:58,440 Speaker 1: road and associated with effort. And three, there are twenty 89 00:04:58,480 --> 00:05:00,880 Speaker 1: one lineups in the NBA this year that have played 90 00:05:00,880 --> 00:05:03,200 Speaker 1: at least two hundred minutes, and the Warrior starters are 91 00:05:03,200 --> 00:05:07,760 Speaker 1: still the best by far. With Kevin Looney, Draymond Green, 92 00:05:07,800 --> 00:05:11,480 Speaker 1: Clay Thompson, Steph Curry, and Andrew Wiggins on the floor, 93 00:05:11,480 --> 00:05:13,680 Speaker 1: the Warriors are outscoring teams by nineteen and a half 94 00:05:13,680 --> 00:05:17,960 Speaker 1: points per one hundred possessions. That's utter destruction, and no 95 00:05:18,080 --> 00:05:22,719 Speaker 1: other team is close, not the Nuggets, not anybody. So 96 00:05:22,760 --> 00:05:25,000 Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not gonna jump off the Warriors even 97 00:05:25,040 --> 00:05:27,520 Speaker 1: though they're only one game over five hundred, because all 98 00:05:27,520 --> 00:05:29,680 Speaker 1: they have to do is maybe make a deal for 99 00:05:29,720 --> 00:05:32,600 Speaker 1: somebody on the bench, get their stuff together as it 100 00:05:32,640 --> 00:05:34,760 Speaker 1: pertains to their night and night out effort and the 101 00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:37,479 Speaker 1: talent is still there, and good luck beating those five 102 00:05:37,480 --> 00:05:41,120 Speaker 1: guys four times out of seven. And the same thing 103 00:05:41,160 --> 00:05:43,360 Speaker 1: goes for the Bucks when the Bucks have had down 104 00:05:43,400 --> 00:05:47,040 Speaker 1: stretches this year, when Janice has had one of the 105 00:05:47,080 --> 00:05:51,000 Speaker 1: worst perimeter jump shooting seasons of his prime. I never 106 00:05:51,160 --> 00:05:53,720 Speaker 1: changed my pick as the Bucks as the team I 107 00:05:53,760 --> 00:05:55,839 Speaker 1: picked to get out of the Eastern Conference, and I 108 00:05:55,880 --> 00:05:59,000 Speaker 1: never changed Janice as my m v P pick because 109 00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:01,520 Speaker 1: they were always, in spite of all that, still within 110 00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:05,120 Speaker 1: striking distance of being within the top record in the league, 111 00:06:05,160 --> 00:06:07,760 Speaker 1: which is part of the m v P case, and Janice, 112 00:06:07,880 --> 00:06:11,320 Speaker 1: as we all know, is capable of hitting the Jets 113 00:06:11,360 --> 00:06:16,080 Speaker 1: for a month and putting up ridiculous numbers. Janice is 114 00:06:16,160 --> 00:06:19,080 Speaker 1: last four games thirty eight points per game, thirteen rebounds, 115 00:06:19,120 --> 00:06:25,600 Speaker 1: five assists on sixty sixty shooting. He's shooting on four 116 00:06:25,680 --> 00:06:28,280 Speaker 1: or three point attempts a game in this four game stretch. 117 00:06:29,279 --> 00:06:31,320 Speaker 1: Last night, on his way to fifty, he was just 118 00:06:31,480 --> 00:06:34,120 Speaker 1: casually dribbling up the floor and pulling up off the 119 00:06:34,200 --> 00:06:39,560 Speaker 1: dribble from like ft and just sticking those jumpers. The 120 00:06:39,600 --> 00:06:42,240 Speaker 1: Bucks also have a top five defense. In this four 121 00:06:42,279 --> 00:06:45,000 Speaker 1: game stretch, Janice is still one of the very best 122 00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:48,280 Speaker 1: defensive players in the world, and the Bucks are now 123 00:06:48,360 --> 00:06:50,400 Speaker 1: just two and a half games back the first place 124 00:06:50,400 --> 00:06:54,640 Speaker 1: in the league. So again, if the season ended today, 125 00:06:55,000 --> 00:06:59,040 Speaker 1: Yokis would be my m v P. But the reason 126 00:06:59,080 --> 00:07:01,200 Speaker 1: why I haven't changed Joannice is my pick for the 127 00:07:01,240 --> 00:07:03,799 Speaker 1: season is this is what I kind of saw coming. 128 00:07:03,880 --> 00:07:06,480 Speaker 1: The Bucks would start to get healthy, Chris Middleton back 129 00:07:06,480 --> 00:07:08,160 Speaker 1: in the line up, Joe Ingles back in the lineup, 130 00:07:08,680 --> 00:07:11,280 Speaker 1: Johanna is starting to get kick into gear as he 131 00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:14,200 Speaker 1: ramps up for the playoffs. They're gonna rip off some 132 00:07:14,240 --> 00:07:16,040 Speaker 1: wins and Janice is gonna put up numbers. And that's 133 00:07:16,040 --> 00:07:18,800 Speaker 1: what's happening. Looking at his m v P case, I 134 00:07:18,840 --> 00:07:20,840 Speaker 1: think he's the best player in the world. So remember 135 00:07:20,880 --> 00:07:23,680 Speaker 1: my three criteria are are you in the conversation for 136 00:07:23,720 --> 00:07:25,840 Speaker 1: the best player in the world, are you on the 137 00:07:25,880 --> 00:07:29,800 Speaker 1: best team in the league, And how valuable are you 138 00:07:29,880 --> 00:07:33,920 Speaker 1: to your team's success? Those three categories are the way 139 00:07:33,920 --> 00:07:35,920 Speaker 1: that I measure m v P. I think he's the 140 00:07:35,920 --> 00:07:38,120 Speaker 1: best player in the world, so solid on that spot. 141 00:07:40,160 --> 00:07:42,840 Speaker 1: The Bucks are seven points per one hund possessions better 142 00:07:42,880 --> 00:07:45,360 Speaker 1: when Janice is on versus when he's off, so he's 143 00:07:45,360 --> 00:07:49,640 Speaker 1: incredibly valuable. The Bucks are getting outscored by one point 144 00:07:49,640 --> 00:07:52,280 Speaker 1: per possession when Janice is off the floor in their 145 00:07:52,320 --> 00:07:55,800 Speaker 1: thirty three and seventeen, so you can do the math 146 00:07:55,840 --> 00:07:59,200 Speaker 1: on that. So if they finished with the best record 147 00:07:59,200 --> 00:08:01,680 Speaker 1: in the league, which fig is that important section, they're 148 00:08:01,840 --> 00:08:03,840 Speaker 1: best team in the league. If they finished with the 149 00:08:03,840 --> 00:08:05,880 Speaker 1: best record in the league, which is completely on the table, 150 00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:08,120 Speaker 1: then he checks all the boxes. He's the best player 151 00:08:08,160 --> 00:08:09,440 Speaker 1: in the world on the best team in the league 152 00:08:09,440 --> 00:08:11,680 Speaker 1: and putting up up third numbers and his team struggles 153 00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:15,640 Speaker 1: without him. That's textbook m v P case. So if 154 00:08:15,680 --> 00:08:18,040 Speaker 1: he goes over, if he goes out and averages thirty 155 00:08:18,040 --> 00:08:20,560 Speaker 1: five and fifteen over the last thirty two games of 156 00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:23,760 Speaker 1: the season, it will not be It will be impossible 157 00:08:23,760 --> 00:08:27,640 Speaker 1: not to give him the award, And so keep an 158 00:08:27,640 --> 00:08:30,800 Speaker 1: eye on fan duel look at those janis odds in 159 00:08:30,920 --> 00:08:34,080 Speaker 1: terms of staying healthy, giving nightly effort, the talent for 160 00:08:34,120 --> 00:08:35,560 Speaker 1: his team to be able to win games. He's just 161 00:08:35,600 --> 00:08:37,120 Speaker 1: a safe bet and that's why I picked him. That 162 00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:38,439 Speaker 1: doesn't mean he's going to win. The m v P 163 00:08:38,960 --> 00:08:42,880 Speaker 1: odds are he's not. Look at vanduel. But the reason 164 00:08:42,880 --> 00:08:45,480 Speaker 1: why that was my pick is because of all those 165 00:08:45,520 --> 00:08:48,080 Speaker 1: things that just laid out, and I'm sticking with that 166 00:08:48,120 --> 00:08:50,000 Speaker 1: pick for right now. A couple of caveats. He needs 167 00:08:50,000 --> 00:08:52,160 Speaker 1: to stay healthy. He's already missed eleven games this year. 168 00:08:52,200 --> 00:08:54,640 Speaker 1: I don't think he can miss more than fifteen without 169 00:08:54,640 --> 00:08:57,440 Speaker 1: it being a differentiator he can't overcome, so he'll you know, 170 00:08:57,520 --> 00:08:59,079 Speaker 1: we can miss maybe two or three games the rest 171 00:08:59,080 --> 00:09:00,800 Speaker 1: of the season, and he eats his role players to 172 00:09:00,800 --> 00:09:03,439 Speaker 1: stay healthy. A big part of this recent surges Chris 173 00:09:03,480 --> 00:09:08,040 Speaker 1: Middleton and Joe Ingles being in the lineup to give 174 00:09:08,080 --> 00:09:10,880 Speaker 1: you an idea of just how important spacing is to 175 00:09:10,960 --> 00:09:13,520 Speaker 1: be honest. This is a very small sample size for 176 00:09:13,520 --> 00:09:17,000 Speaker 1: the record, but when Joe Ingles and Chris Middleton are 177 00:09:17,040 --> 00:09:18,600 Speaker 1: on the floor with the honest this year, the Bucks 178 00:09:18,640 --> 00:09:21,000 Speaker 1: are scoring a hundred and forty eight point four points 179 00:09:21,040 --> 00:09:23,960 Speaker 1: per one hundred possessions. That's what happens when you put 180 00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:27,040 Speaker 1: real spot up shooting and ball handling and shooting around 181 00:09:27,080 --> 00:09:31,240 Speaker 1: Janice as an offensive folk grow so all in order 182 00:09:31,280 --> 00:09:33,840 Speaker 1: from my preseason prediction to come true, all I need 183 00:09:33,880 --> 00:09:35,840 Speaker 1: is be honest average something like thirty five and fifteen 184 00:09:35,880 --> 00:09:37,600 Speaker 1: the rest of the way, don't miss more than two 185 00:09:37,679 --> 00:09:40,520 Speaker 1: or three games and finish above the of Boston in 186 00:09:40,559 --> 00:09:43,560 Speaker 1: the standings. It's good to see the Bucks starting around 187 00:09:43,559 --> 00:09:47,240 Speaker 1: into form just in time for the playoffs. Um, all right, 188 00:09:47,280 --> 00:09:48,760 Speaker 1: So I wanted to talk about Joel and beats m 189 00:09:48,800 --> 00:09:50,280 Speaker 1: v P case for a second now. We talked a 190 00:09:50,280 --> 00:09:53,640 Speaker 1: lot about him yesterday in the Weeds, and so I'm 191 00:09:53,640 --> 00:09:55,720 Speaker 1: not gonna dive any further into that and beat fans 192 00:09:55,760 --> 00:09:57,560 Speaker 1: Sixers fans, if you're looking for that. I talked about 193 00:09:57,559 --> 00:09:59,920 Speaker 1: it a lot yesterday as we broke down his showdown 194 00:10:00,280 --> 00:10:03,280 Speaker 1: and as kicking of Nicola Yokit on National TV. But 195 00:10:03,320 --> 00:10:04,520 Speaker 1: I did want to take a quick look at his 196 00:10:04,600 --> 00:10:06,680 Speaker 1: MVP case because we did not do that yesterday. Again. 197 00:10:06,720 --> 00:10:09,440 Speaker 1: Three factors. Best player in the world, best team in 198 00:10:09,440 --> 00:10:13,600 Speaker 1: the league, Most valuable player in the league. Um, definitely 199 00:10:13,600 --> 00:10:15,480 Speaker 1: in the conversation for best player in the world. This season, 200 00:10:15,480 --> 00:10:18,240 Speaker 1: He's averaging ten and four on a career high sixty 201 00:10:18,480 --> 00:10:21,120 Speaker 1: percent for shooting, which is outrageous. He's also having an 202 00:10:21,160 --> 00:10:23,400 Speaker 1: outstanding jump shooting season. I wanted to give you, guys. 203 00:10:23,440 --> 00:10:25,240 Speaker 1: I've been talking a lot about this this season, but 204 00:10:25,280 --> 00:10:26,679 Speaker 1: I wanted to give you some numbers to give you 205 00:10:26,720 --> 00:10:30,439 Speaker 1: guys some perspective. So Joel Embiad is having what would 206 00:10:30,440 --> 00:10:34,000 Speaker 1: be considered a league average, middle of the pack jump 207 00:10:34,080 --> 00:10:39,280 Speaker 1: shooting season for a high volume guard, not for a center. So, 208 00:10:39,400 --> 00:10:41,600 Speaker 1: for instance, there are seventy one NBA players this year 209 00:10:41,640 --> 00:10:43,480 Speaker 1: that have taken at least three d jump shots, and 210 00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:46,800 Speaker 1: the vast majority of them are perimeter players, and Beats 211 00:10:46,800 --> 00:10:50,680 Speaker 1: averaging one point zero four points per possession on jump shots, 212 00:10:50,679 --> 00:10:55,400 Speaker 1: which ranks forty one out. So that's again that doesn't 213 00:10:55,400 --> 00:10:59,760 Speaker 1: seem super impressive, but that's a center. So out of 214 00:11:00,000 --> 00:11:02,319 Speaker 1: any one guards and wings that are taking tons of 215 00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:05,160 Speaker 1: jump shots, and Beat is performing the middle of the 216 00:11:05,200 --> 00:11:08,360 Speaker 1: pack as those guys on the same volume, and I 217 00:11:08,360 --> 00:11:13,480 Speaker 1: think that's incredibly impressive for a gigantic center. He's also 218 00:11:13,480 --> 00:11:16,680 Speaker 1: been outstanding defensively in the half court. He's definitely good 219 00:11:16,679 --> 00:11:18,200 Speaker 1: on the best player in the world side of things. 220 00:11:18,400 --> 00:11:21,240 Speaker 1: The Sixers are eleven points per one hundred possessions better 221 00:11:21,280 --> 00:11:23,160 Speaker 1: with a meat on the floor versus when he's off. 222 00:11:24,400 --> 00:11:27,120 Speaker 1: Anything over ten on that front is like outstanding, bona 223 00:11:27,160 --> 00:11:29,839 Speaker 1: fide MVP stuff. The Sixers are negative two point for 224 00:11:30,080 --> 00:11:32,520 Speaker 1: net in a hundred per one hundred possessions with and 225 00:11:32,559 --> 00:11:34,920 Speaker 1: beat off the floor, and again two and a half 226 00:11:34,960 --> 00:11:36,240 Speaker 1: games back in the best record in the league. The 227 00:11:36,280 --> 00:11:38,400 Speaker 1: Sixers are on a seven game win streak, which is 228 00:11:38,400 --> 00:11:41,880 Speaker 1: something I predicted back in December, based on them getting 229 00:11:41,880 --> 00:11:43,520 Speaker 1: healthy and all the talent they have on the roster. 230 00:11:43,679 --> 00:11:45,000 Speaker 1: I had a feeling that they would go on to 231 00:11:45,080 --> 00:11:48,800 Speaker 1: run into in January. That's what's happening, and just like Milwaukee, 232 00:11:48,880 --> 00:11:50,199 Speaker 1: they are now just two and a half games back 233 00:11:50,200 --> 00:11:52,640 Speaker 1: in the best record in basketball. So similarly, the honest 234 00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:55,120 Speaker 1: he's missed twelve games, so he needs to play the 235 00:11:55,120 --> 00:11:56,640 Speaker 1: rest of the season, can't miss more than two or 236 00:11:56,679 --> 00:11:59,000 Speaker 1: three more, and the Sixers need to finish in first 237 00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:01,880 Speaker 1: place again. The reason why I'm hammering those specific points 238 00:12:01,880 --> 00:12:04,679 Speaker 1: home is this particular m v P case is going 239 00:12:04,720 --> 00:12:07,040 Speaker 1: to be one of the most tightly contested MVP races 240 00:12:07,040 --> 00:12:09,120 Speaker 1: in the history of the league. There's too many good 241 00:12:09,160 --> 00:12:12,040 Speaker 1: players that deserve to win the award, so little talking 242 00:12:12,080 --> 00:12:15,160 Speaker 1: points are gonna be big differentiators. Being able to say 243 00:12:15,360 --> 00:12:17,600 Speaker 1: my team had the best record is going to be 244 00:12:17,640 --> 00:12:20,360 Speaker 1: a big differentiator. Being able to say I played more 245 00:12:20,400 --> 00:12:24,640 Speaker 1: games is going to be a big differentiator, especially with 246 00:12:24,640 --> 00:12:27,720 Speaker 1: all the different archetypes. We're gonna be comparing a scoring 247 00:12:27,800 --> 00:12:30,800 Speaker 1: center like in Bid to a playmaking center like Ki 248 00:12:31,520 --> 00:12:34,680 Speaker 1: to a playmaking wing like Luca, to a scoring wing 249 00:12:34,800 --> 00:12:38,880 Speaker 1: like Jayson Tatum to a scoring, playmaking wing like Kevin Durant. 250 00:12:39,440 --> 00:12:44,079 Speaker 1: It's all super convoluted and different. So these clear cut 251 00:12:44,120 --> 00:12:47,120 Speaker 1: markers are gonna be big differentiators for people. So keep 252 00:12:47,120 --> 00:12:48,520 Speaker 1: an eye on the standings the rest of the season. 253 00:12:48,559 --> 00:12:50,360 Speaker 1: You're not just playing for home court advantage. You're playing 254 00:12:50,360 --> 00:12:54,000 Speaker 1: for that MVP award. Turn every Thursday into pay Day 255 00:12:54,040 --> 00:12:56,920 Speaker 1: with TNT Thursdays on fandel Sports Book. Doesn't matter if 256 00:12:56,920 --> 00:12:59,880 Speaker 1: you win or lose. Fandeel is giving all customers ten 257 00:13:00,040 --> 00:13:03,720 Speaker 1: dollars in bonus bets every Thursday. Just bet ten dollars 258 00:13:03,800 --> 00:13:05,800 Speaker 1: or more on the same game. Parlay on any NBA 259 00:13:05,880 --> 00:13:09,040 Speaker 1: on TNT game. Same game parlays. Let you combine the money, line, 260 00:13:09,120 --> 00:13:12,760 Speaker 1: point spread, player props, and more all into one wager. 261 00:13:12,880 --> 00:13:16,040 Speaker 1: This Thursday, I would take the Bucks over the Clippers. 262 00:13:16,440 --> 00:13:20,439 Speaker 1: Parlayed with Janice to go over forty is on a tear. 263 00:13:20,559 --> 00:13:22,600 Speaker 1: The Bucks are on a tear, and it's a physical 264 00:13:22,679 --> 00:13:25,320 Speaker 1: mismatch for the Clippers. I like the Bucks in that game, 265 00:13:25,320 --> 00:13:28,160 Speaker 1: So start building your own or just bet a popular 266 00:13:28,200 --> 00:13:31,600 Speaker 1: same game parlay already made for you in America's number 267 00:13:31,600 --> 00:13:34,840 Speaker 1: one sports book, and win or lose you're guaranteed to 268 00:13:34,880 --> 00:13:37,360 Speaker 1: get ten dollars added to your account. If you're new 269 00:13:37,360 --> 00:13:39,480 Speaker 1: to Fandel, just sign up with promo code Jason t 270 00:13:40,160 --> 00:13:44,080 Speaker 1: get ten dollars back every Thursday, win or Lose with 271 00:13:44,160 --> 00:13:48,440 Speaker 1: TNT Thursdays exclusively on Fandel Sports Book, an official sports 272 00:13:48,440 --> 00:13:50,760 Speaker 1: betting partner of the NBA. All right, I have two 273 00:13:50,800 --> 00:13:52,360 Speaker 1: quick hitters before we get out of here today. First, 274 00:13:52,440 --> 00:13:56,200 Speaker 1: Lebron's reaction to the missed foul call against Boston. I 275 00:13:56,200 --> 00:13:58,160 Speaker 1: did a full episode on this that you guys can 276 00:13:58,160 --> 00:14:02,880 Speaker 1: find on the feed, uh, yesterday about that game. Uh. 277 00:14:02,920 --> 00:14:04,439 Speaker 1: The reason why I wanted to talk about this game 278 00:14:04,600 --> 00:14:10,120 Speaker 1: is Bossman Colining Cowherd tweeted this yesterday and it hit 279 00:14:10,200 --> 00:14:11,760 Speaker 1: home for me because it's something that I feel very 280 00:14:11,800 --> 00:14:15,120 Speaker 1: passionately about. He said, yeah, he said quote. Yes, Lebron 281 00:14:15,240 --> 00:14:19,240 Speaker 1: was dramatic, but he cares absolutely love his passion for 282 00:14:19,280 --> 00:14:22,560 Speaker 1: the game and the Celtics games have always felt bigger 283 00:14:22,600 --> 00:14:27,120 Speaker 1: for Lebron. Refs blew a late call that changed the 284 00:14:27,120 --> 00:14:30,440 Speaker 1: result he was pissed about a regular season outcome all 285 00:14:30,480 --> 00:14:36,800 Speaker 1: these years later, explain why he's still king Emoji bossman 286 00:14:36,880 --> 00:14:40,760 Speaker 1: calling coward from the top rope with some knowledge for everybody. Look, 287 00:14:40,800 --> 00:14:44,680 Speaker 1: here's the deal. Lebron is corny. I've consistently said this. 288 00:14:44,760 --> 00:14:48,480 Speaker 1: Lebron's off court persona is bizarre. He's corny, he's dramatic, 289 00:14:48,520 --> 00:14:51,680 Speaker 1: he always plays to the cameras. He's a unique type 290 00:14:51,680 --> 00:14:54,320 Speaker 1: of personality in that regard. But I hate it when 291 00:14:54,400 --> 00:14:57,400 Speaker 1: people draw that line as some sort of indicator of 292 00:14:57,480 --> 00:15:02,760 Speaker 1: his competitiveness. And the problem that what's driven this particular 293 00:15:03,080 --> 00:15:07,800 Speaker 1: stupid narrative is Kobe fans and Michael Jordan fans then 294 00:15:07,840 --> 00:15:11,040 Speaker 1: pushing this idea that in order to be a competitor, 295 00:15:11,160 --> 00:15:13,800 Speaker 1: you've got to be an asshole, that you have to 296 00:15:13,840 --> 00:15:16,720 Speaker 1: be laser focused all the time, that you have to 297 00:15:16,720 --> 00:15:25,560 Speaker 1: be serious, almost mythological with the scope of your psycho competitiveness. 298 00:15:26,400 --> 00:15:30,640 Speaker 1: That became basically the blueprint for what we accepted as 299 00:15:30,680 --> 00:15:34,440 Speaker 1: the competitor. Call it Mamba mentality, call it, you know, 300 00:15:34,520 --> 00:15:39,080 Speaker 1: just the general you know, Jordan's greatness that we saw 301 00:15:39,080 --> 00:15:42,720 Speaker 1: in the last dance. But that became the only acceptable 302 00:15:42,760 --> 00:15:45,080 Speaker 1: view of the competitor, and I've never seen it that way. 303 00:15:45,360 --> 00:15:48,960 Speaker 1: I think you can have a overarching personality but have 304 00:15:50,040 --> 00:15:53,760 Speaker 1: top tier competitiveness underneath it. For instance, Kobe and MJ 305 00:15:53,880 --> 00:15:57,520 Speaker 1: are that kind of psycho asshole competitor, but like Steph 306 00:15:57,560 --> 00:16:01,440 Speaker 1: Curry and Tim Duncan are more quiet, more nice. Step 307 00:16:01,640 --> 00:16:05,240 Speaker 1: is like super religious. Those two guys want to murder 308 00:16:05,280 --> 00:16:08,960 Speaker 1: you figuratively on a basketball court. Steph, one of my 309 00:16:09,240 --> 00:16:12,520 Speaker 1: good friends, is a big Warriors fan, calls him Bundy. 310 00:16:12,640 --> 00:16:16,440 Speaker 1: Like the serial Killers, Steff is a serial killer under 311 00:16:16,440 --> 00:16:18,960 Speaker 1: the guys of a nice guy and a quiet guy. 312 00:16:19,240 --> 00:16:22,600 Speaker 1: Tim Duncan was a serial killer under the guys of 313 00:16:22,600 --> 00:16:24,400 Speaker 1: a guy that would be incredibly nice to you on 314 00:16:24,440 --> 00:16:28,640 Speaker 1: the basketball court. Those guys are top tier competitors that 315 00:16:28,760 --> 00:16:31,200 Speaker 1: aren't wired like Kobe and MJ. And the same goes 316 00:16:31,240 --> 00:16:36,000 Speaker 1: for Lebron or Magic Johnson. There that class clown, overly boisterous, dramatic, 317 00:16:36,000 --> 00:16:39,040 Speaker 1: play to the crowd type of personality. They are freak 318 00:16:39,280 --> 00:16:44,240 Speaker 1: high end competitors. They all care about winning the same amount, 319 00:16:44,720 --> 00:16:48,080 Speaker 1: which is more than everyone else. Kobe and MJ are 320 00:16:48,160 --> 00:16:51,280 Speaker 1: role models. They present one way to be that type 321 00:16:51,320 --> 00:16:54,200 Speaker 1: of competitor, but not the only version of what a 322 00:16:54,200 --> 00:16:57,400 Speaker 1: competitor looks like. Lebron reacted hilariously to a no call 323 00:16:58,240 --> 00:17:00,680 Speaker 1: and made kind of a fool out of himself national TV. 324 00:17:00,920 --> 00:17:05,760 Speaker 1: But why because he poured his heart and soul into 325 00:17:05,840 --> 00:17:10,640 Speaker 1: a game, a game that his team didn't need to win, 326 00:17:10,720 --> 00:17:13,000 Speaker 1: but that could have been monumentally important to changing the 327 00:17:13,040 --> 00:17:15,680 Speaker 1: outlook of their season, and at the end of the game, 328 00:17:15,920 --> 00:17:18,280 Speaker 1: he made a play that should have won the game, 329 00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:23,240 Speaker 1: and the rest took it away from him. Behind the 330 00:17:23,400 --> 00:17:29,040 Speaker 1: ridiculous performance and all the dramatics of it and theatrics 331 00:17:29,080 --> 00:17:34,280 Speaker 1: of it, was authentic pain from a competitor that wanted 332 00:17:34,320 --> 00:17:37,439 Speaker 1: to win the damn basketball game and something out of 333 00:17:37,440 --> 00:17:43,400 Speaker 1: his control took it away from him. As a fan 334 00:17:43,440 --> 00:17:46,320 Speaker 1: of Lebron over the years, one of the things that 335 00:17:46,359 --> 00:17:50,200 Speaker 1: I've enjoyed the most about rooting for him is that 336 00:17:50,800 --> 00:17:54,439 Speaker 1: when there's been an environment like that, some sort of 337 00:17:54,480 --> 00:17:58,240 Speaker 1: big game, whether it's a key nationally televised game during 338 00:17:58,240 --> 00:18:02,320 Speaker 1: the regular season or a play of game. As someone 339 00:18:02,359 --> 00:18:04,680 Speaker 1: who rooted for Lebron a lot, especially when I was younger, 340 00:18:06,200 --> 00:18:08,399 Speaker 1: I never ever had a doubt as to whether or 341 00:18:08,480 --> 00:18:12,560 Speaker 1: not he would bring it competitively. Now did the jump 342 00:18:12,560 --> 00:18:16,080 Speaker 1: shot go in or not. That depended on the night. 343 00:18:16,880 --> 00:18:19,080 Speaker 1: Did he take care care of the basketball? Some nights 344 00:18:19,080 --> 00:18:21,679 Speaker 1: he was sloppier than others, But when it came to 345 00:18:21,760 --> 00:18:25,199 Speaker 1: the things he could control in a big game, Lebron 346 00:18:25,320 --> 00:18:28,360 Speaker 1: was the most dependable guy in the league, especially because 347 00:18:28,400 --> 00:18:31,720 Speaker 1: of the things he could do defensively, and so like, Yes, 348 00:18:31,840 --> 00:18:34,360 Speaker 1: Lebron is corny, Lebron is dramatic all of those things. 349 00:18:34,400 --> 00:18:36,520 Speaker 1: Some of it's objectively unlikable, which I think is a 350 00:18:36,560 --> 00:18:40,199 Speaker 1: big part of why he's so polarizing. But make no mistake, 351 00:18:41,040 --> 00:18:44,720 Speaker 1: the dude is a savage competitor that cares about winning 352 00:18:44,720 --> 00:18:49,600 Speaker 1: above all else, and those two things are not related 353 00:18:49,600 --> 00:18:54,560 Speaker 1: to each other. Him being dramatic doesn't affect his competitiveness 354 00:18:54,600 --> 00:18:57,960 Speaker 1: or vice versa. I just wanted to point that out 355 00:18:58,600 --> 00:19:01,560 Speaker 1: all right quickly before we get out of year. The 356 00:19:01,640 --> 00:19:03,639 Speaker 1: debate that was raging around Twitter the other day as 357 00:19:03,640 --> 00:19:06,280 Speaker 1: to who's better Luca now or Lebron in two thousand 358 00:19:06,320 --> 00:19:08,399 Speaker 1: and eight. And the reason why I wanted to talk 359 00:19:08,440 --> 00:19:12,040 Speaker 1: about this particularly is this, to me, represents one of 360 00:19:12,080 --> 00:19:18,240 Speaker 1: the key foundational principles I use when comparing players all time, 361 00:19:20,040 --> 00:19:25,080 Speaker 1: and the main idea there is basketball changes from decade 362 00:19:25,119 --> 00:19:27,280 Speaker 1: to decade, from era to era, from player to player, 363 00:19:28,720 --> 00:19:32,359 Speaker 1: and it's not fair to compare any player to any 364 00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:35,880 Speaker 1: specific player in another era based solely on what they 365 00:19:35,880 --> 00:19:39,720 Speaker 1: do on the basketball court, because what impacts winning is 366 00:19:39,720 --> 00:19:41,479 Speaker 1: different from era to era. What you're allowed to do 367 00:19:41,640 --> 00:19:46,199 Speaker 1: is different from era to era. For instance, heliocentric Lebron, 368 00:19:47,080 --> 00:19:49,800 Speaker 1: like we saw towards the end of the Miami Heat 369 00:19:49,840 --> 00:19:52,280 Speaker 1: era and the basically the second half of his career, 370 00:19:52,560 --> 00:19:56,080 Speaker 1: that wasn't a thing to start when he came into 371 00:19:56,080 --> 00:19:58,440 Speaker 1: the into the NBA, Paul Silis had him running off 372 00:19:58,480 --> 00:20:01,400 Speaker 1: of floppy action and under the basket as an off 373 00:20:01,400 --> 00:20:05,240 Speaker 1: ball player. Luca came right into the league and played 374 00:20:05,240 --> 00:20:10,720 Speaker 1: heliocentric point forward. See the difference there. And so here's 375 00:20:10,720 --> 00:20:13,520 Speaker 1: the deal. I do think Luca is a better basketball 376 00:20:13,520 --> 00:20:15,919 Speaker 1: player right now than Lebron in two thousand eight. If 377 00:20:15,960 --> 00:20:18,399 Speaker 1: I picked those two players up and I dropped them 378 00:20:18,440 --> 00:20:22,080 Speaker 1: into a playoff series, I think Luca as that top 379 00:20:22,119 --> 00:20:25,400 Speaker 1: of the key point forward type of guy right now, 380 00:20:25,800 --> 00:20:28,000 Speaker 1: I would have more success than Lebron from two thousand 381 00:20:28,040 --> 00:20:33,680 Speaker 1: eight right now. But that's not the rules. Lebron didn't 382 00:20:33,720 --> 00:20:36,800 Speaker 1: have access to the knowledge of where the game was 383 00:20:36,840 --> 00:20:39,399 Speaker 1: going back in two thousand eight, and so he was 384 00:20:39,400 --> 00:20:41,679 Speaker 1: playing off the ball a lot more, and so he 385 00:20:41,720 --> 00:20:45,320 Speaker 1: wasn't working on his jump shot as much. It was 386 00:20:45,359 --> 00:20:49,720 Speaker 1: a completely different era. Here's what I do know, compared 387 00:20:49,760 --> 00:20:55,760 Speaker 1: to today's players, Lucas, what the fourth or fifth best 388 00:20:55,800 --> 00:21:00,240 Speaker 1: player in the league in two thousand eight? It was 389 00:21:00,359 --> 00:21:05,159 Speaker 1: Lebron and Kobe and no one else was close. And 390 00:21:05,200 --> 00:21:07,000 Speaker 1: you can make the case for Lebron. I thought Kobe 391 00:21:07,000 --> 00:21:09,600 Speaker 1: was still better then, but Lebron was the second best 392 00:21:09,600 --> 00:21:12,399 Speaker 1: player in the league at worst unassailably in two thousand 393 00:21:12,440 --> 00:21:18,960 Speaker 1: and eight. Why does that matter, Because as a basketball player, 394 00:21:19,560 --> 00:21:21,919 Speaker 1: you should be held accountable to what was going on 395 00:21:22,040 --> 00:21:25,520 Speaker 1: in your era, and you should be gauged based on 396 00:21:25,560 --> 00:21:31,280 Speaker 1: how you performed against your competition in your era. One 397 00:21:31,280 --> 00:21:33,400 Speaker 1: of the biggest things that bothers me from Lebron fans 398 00:21:33,400 --> 00:21:36,680 Speaker 1: when we're talking Lebron verse MJ is Lebron fans will 399 00:21:36,680 --> 00:21:42,399 Speaker 1: say things like MJ played against plumbers. Go look at 400 00:21:42,400 --> 00:21:45,600 Speaker 1: the nineties. The types of players he was playing against 401 00:21:45,680 --> 00:21:48,879 Speaker 1: weren't as good as the guys Lebron is playing against now. 402 00:21:49,280 --> 00:21:54,960 Speaker 1: And that's true. Lebron has to compete right now against 403 00:21:55,080 --> 00:21:58,320 Speaker 1: Steph Curry and Kevin Durant and Jana Santana Coumbo and 404 00:21:58,400 --> 00:22:01,439 Speaker 1: Nicola Yokich and Luca don Ship and Joel Embiide and 405 00:22:01,520 --> 00:22:04,800 Speaker 1: Jayson Tatum and Kawhi Leonard at the top of the 406 00:22:04,840 --> 00:22:12,320 Speaker 1: league right now is insane. But differentiating yourself from that 407 00:22:12,480 --> 00:22:17,280 Speaker 1: is different than differentiating yourself or than than being in 408 00:22:17,320 --> 00:22:21,040 Speaker 1: the middle of the pack. So, for instance, MJ, what 409 00:22:21,240 --> 00:22:26,360 Speaker 1: makes MJ's nineties dominance so impressive to me is that 410 00:22:26,400 --> 00:22:31,240 Speaker 1: he was so much better than everybody in that era. 411 00:22:32,119 --> 00:22:38,680 Speaker 1: It was m J huge gap everyone else in that era. 412 00:22:38,800 --> 00:22:41,840 Speaker 1: He was the best. That's what he had to go against. 413 00:22:42,840 --> 00:22:45,359 Speaker 1: That was who was pushing him motivationally on a day 414 00:22:45,359 --> 00:22:49,520 Speaker 1: to day basis, and he elevated to that height anyway. So, 415 00:22:50,200 --> 00:22:53,320 Speaker 1: even though I think Luca right now in two thousand 416 00:22:53,720 --> 00:22:55,640 Speaker 1: three is a better player than Lebron was in two 417 00:22:55,640 --> 00:22:59,919 Speaker 1: thousand and eight, by some small amount, Lebron into Thou 418 00:23:00,000 --> 00:23:03,160 Speaker 1: the eight deserves credit for being the better basketball player 419 00:23:03,960 --> 00:23:07,440 Speaker 1: then Luca now because Lebron was the second best player 420 00:23:07,480 --> 00:23:09,840 Speaker 1: in the NBA at worst, if not the best player 421 00:23:09,840 --> 00:23:13,159 Speaker 1: in the NBA in two thousand eight against what was 422 00:23:13,160 --> 00:23:15,800 Speaker 1: available in that era against the players that were in 423 00:23:15,840 --> 00:23:17,960 Speaker 1: that era, with the knowledge of the game that was 424 00:23:18,000 --> 00:23:19,800 Speaker 1: in that era, in the play style that was in 425 00:23:19,840 --> 00:23:24,720 Speaker 1: that era. If I took Lebron the same Lebron from 426 00:23:24,720 --> 00:23:28,280 Speaker 1: two thousand three and I got him drafted at the 427 00:23:28,320 --> 00:23:30,440 Speaker 1: same time Luca got drafted and whatever it was two 428 00:23:30,480 --> 00:23:35,200 Speaker 1: thousand nineteen or whatever, he would immediately come into the 429 00:23:35,240 --> 00:23:37,360 Speaker 1: league with the ball in his hands. Top of the key, 430 00:23:37,680 --> 00:23:41,720 Speaker 1: spread floor is shooting, don't make plays. He would have 431 00:23:41,760 --> 00:23:44,639 Speaker 1: developed that stuff earlier, and by the time he reached 432 00:23:44,640 --> 00:23:47,600 Speaker 1: his two thousand eight whatever that is, age age twenty 433 00:23:47,600 --> 00:23:49,720 Speaker 1: three season, he'd be a better ball handler, he'd be 434 00:23:49,760 --> 00:23:51,760 Speaker 1: a better shooter, he'd be a better half court surgeon. 435 00:23:53,720 --> 00:23:57,320 Speaker 1: Luca has the benefit of all of that. Now see 436 00:23:57,359 --> 00:24:01,400 Speaker 1: the difference, So that that that's kind of the way 437 00:24:01,400 --> 00:24:05,120 Speaker 1: I look at it when I'm evaluating basketball players, when 438 00:24:05,119 --> 00:24:07,080 Speaker 1: we're taking a look, when it's all said and done 439 00:24:08,119 --> 00:24:12,280 Speaker 1: and we look back and Janice is retired, I want 440 00:24:12,280 --> 00:24:16,600 Speaker 1: to look at what Janice did in Janice's MBA and 441 00:24:16,680 --> 00:24:20,000 Speaker 1: compare it to what Lebron did in Lebron's NBA, and 442 00:24:20,080 --> 00:24:22,440 Speaker 1: compare it to what MJ did in MJ's m b 443 00:24:22,600 --> 00:24:28,000 Speaker 1: A not compare what Janice did statistically and from a 444 00:24:28,119 --> 00:24:33,080 Speaker 1: skill aptitude standpoint to exactly what Lebron did statistically and 445 00:24:33,119 --> 00:24:38,119 Speaker 1: from a skill aptitude standpoint in a different sport, because 446 00:24:38,119 --> 00:24:41,360 Speaker 1: basketball in two thousand and eight doesn't look remotely similar 447 00:24:41,560 --> 00:24:44,320 Speaker 1: to basketball today. Just go look at league average in 448 00:24:44,359 --> 00:24:48,800 Speaker 1: three point attempts. I don't have the data in front 449 00:24:48,800 --> 00:24:50,160 Speaker 1: of me, but I bet you that are taken three 450 00:24:50,160 --> 00:24:55,240 Speaker 1: times as many threes now, So we I just I 451 00:24:55,320 --> 00:24:57,320 Speaker 1: just want to set that as an expectation, especially as 452 00:24:57,320 --> 00:24:59,920 Speaker 1: we move forward with the show. We get into this offseason, 453 00:25:00,000 --> 00:25:02,240 Speaker 1: gonna do more all time stuff. You should know. The 454 00:25:02,280 --> 00:25:05,480 Speaker 1: way that I look at this is based on what 455 00:25:05,520 --> 00:25:08,560 Speaker 1: you do in your era, with your set of circumstances. 456 00:25:09,359 --> 00:25:13,440 Speaker 1: How dominant are you now, because Luca is not dominant now, 457 00:25:14,560 --> 00:25:17,240 Speaker 1: he's very much one of the guys at the top 458 00:25:17,280 --> 00:25:21,359 Speaker 1: of the league. If somebody in this pack separates themselves 459 00:25:22,600 --> 00:25:24,600 Speaker 1: kind of like Janice is starting to do. But we'll 460 00:25:24,600 --> 00:25:26,720 Speaker 1: see over the next couple of years, that's when we're 461 00:25:26,720 --> 00:25:28,800 Speaker 1: starting to enter into that conversation with the all time 462 00:25:28,840 --> 00:25:32,320 Speaker 1: grades again because you're seeing that separation within your era. 463 00:25:33,960 --> 00:25:37,080 Speaker 1: The way that Lebron separated in his era in the 464 00:25:37,119 --> 00:25:40,159 Speaker 1: way that MJ did in his era. All right, that 465 00:25:40,240 --> 00:25:42,439 Speaker 1: is all I have for today. As always, I sincerely 466 00:25:42,480 --> 00:25:45,120 Speaker 1: appreciate you guys support. We were gonna be doing UH 467 00:25:45,200 --> 00:25:51,120 Speaker 1: instant reaction on uh AMP immediately after Lakers Nick's tomorrow Wednesday. 468 00:25:51,160 --> 00:25:54,040 Speaker 1: It's either gonna be after Net Celtics or Warriors Wolves, 469 00:25:54,080 --> 00:25:57,159 Speaker 1: depending on if the Warrior Starters play UH. If the 470 00:25:57,200 --> 00:25:59,240 Speaker 1: Warrior Starters play, will push it back about a half 471 00:25:59,240 --> 00:26:02,760 Speaker 1: hour um Thursday night. We'll see. I've got I'm heading 472 00:26:02,800 --> 00:26:04,359 Speaker 1: out of town on Friday morning, so I've got a 473 00:26:04,400 --> 00:26:07,719 Speaker 1: bunch of stuff going on that particular evening. So depending 474 00:26:07,760 --> 00:26:09,560 Speaker 1: on how things work, we might have a reaction to 475 00:26:09,640 --> 00:26:13,080 Speaker 1: Nuggets Warriors or we might not. I'll keep you guys posted. Again, 476 00:26:13,160 --> 00:26:15,160 Speaker 1: I appreciate you guys, and I'll see you tomorrow night. 477 00:26:24,480 --> 00:26:25,120 Speaker 1: The volume