WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Disney Earnings, BP Reports, Apple India Shift

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 2>top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak anchors

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 2>all around the world. Straight ahead on the program, and

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>look at how streaming can impact earnings at the media

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 2>and entertainment giant Walt Disney.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm collying Hetkit in London, where we're asking what's on

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 4>the cards for BP's earnings.

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 5>I'm Dog Krisner looking at how a production shift by

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 5>Apple has made India the number one exporter of smartphones

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 5>to the US.

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>eleven three zero, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety two to nine, Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London,

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Sirius XM one twenty one, and around the world on

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Good day to you. I'm Tom Buzzby.

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>We begin today's program with a look at a fresh

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 2>round of corporate earning, starting with the world's biggest entertainment giant, Disney.

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 2>For more, We're joined by Githa raganathin Bloomberg Intelligence analyst

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 2>on US media. Well, Geetha, thank you so much for

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 2>being with us once again, booming theme parks, Blockbuster Movies,

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 2>ESP and other networks, cruises, merchandising and with all that

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>besides Netflix, no one has proven how important streaming is

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 2>like Disney. So what do you expect this week from

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Disney's results?

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 6>Thanks Tom, So. The sentiment actually has been really positive

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 6>for Disney, and it's really important that you bring up

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 6>the streaming segment because I think investors are now laser

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 6>focused on the rising profitability of the streaming business, and

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 6>we've seen Disney kind of completely turn that business around.

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 6>I mean, just a few years ago, they were losing

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 6>something like about four billion dollars a year. This year

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 6>they're going to a probably post almost one point two

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 6>to one point three billion dollars in profits, So definitely

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 6>a lot of good stuff going on there. They've increased prices,

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 6>so we're seeing great pricing power. They're really kind of

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:16.399
<v Speaker 6>doubling down on their advertising business. And the one big

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 6>thing that happened during the quarter, and I think we're

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 6>going to want to hear a lot more about this

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 6>during the call is you know, everybody kind of knows

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 6>about this big Hulu custody battle that Disney was fighting

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 6>with Comcast that has finally concluded. So with full ownership

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:34.839
<v Speaker 6>of Hulu now under their belt, we think it will

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 6>pave the way for much greater and deeper integration with

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 6>Disney Plus and that should really drive I think, overall

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 6>profitability as well as their advertising business.

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 2>And they've got now three properties that are streaming right

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Disney Plus, Hulu and ESPN Plus.

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 3>Are they all?

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I know, the crown jewel in that is Disney Plus,

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 2>But how are the other two doing?

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 6>They're doing very well And again very glad that you

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 6>bring that up, because yes, they do have ESPN Plus

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 6>right now. But the really big debut that we're all

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 6>waiting for is the what we call the flagship ESPN products.

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 6>So what you see right now on ESPN Plus is

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 6>more like the second tier sports. What we're going to

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 6>see with the flagship ESPN product, which launches in a

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 6>few weeks, is that everything that you get on their

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 6>ESPN linear TV network is now going to be available

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 6>on their streaming on the streaming platform for thirty dollars

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 6>a month. And again What is going to be really

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 6>interesting here, and you know investors are going to focus

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 6>a lot of their attention on, is the bundling strategy

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 6>that Disney is going to adopt. So we think when

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 6>they have these three great marquee products, you know, the

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 6>flagship ESPN streaming they have obviously Disney Plus as you mentioned,

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 6>and Hulu and kind of the bundle there, it is

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 6>really going to drive streaming profitability pretty significantly going forward.

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about subscribers, because Disney Plus now profitable

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 2>has what one hundred twenty five million or.

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 6>More, Yeah, somewhere in that region. Yeah, about one hundred

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 6>and thirty million subscribers and.

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 2>A lot of buzzworthy shows, not just and Or, but

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 2>a whole bunch of Star Wars shows, lucasfilms as well

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 2>as Marvel comic spinoffs. I mean, their content has really,

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, really grown and matured.

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 6>You're absolutely right. So, you know, this was something that

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 6>they were struggling with just a few years ago. You know,

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 6>there was a lot of content, but people were kind

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 6>of complaining that maybe you know, it was more of

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 6>a focus of quantity rather than quality. They have definitely

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 6>kind of completely rejiggered their content engine, and we've seen

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 6>that kind of play out very very well, Tom on

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 6>the on the studio side of the business. So we've

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 6>seen you know, a lot more of their films kind

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 6>of perform pretty well. Just recently, you know, we had Thunderbolts,

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 6>we had of course, Fantastic Four, you know, so a

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 6>whole reboot of the of the Marvel franchise entering a

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 6>new phase. And you speak about content and how it's

0:04:57.839 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 6>going to be such a great differentiator. I mean, just

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 6>look at the next year. So just look at fiscal

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty six for Disney. This is going to be

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 6>an absolute bumper year for this company at the box office.

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 6>We're looking at the release of Zootopia two. You're going

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 6>to have Avatar, Avengers, Mandalorian, Toy Story, so all their

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 6>biggest franchises. And then remember all of that is going

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 6>to come to the Disney Plus platform as well, So

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 6>we're going to you know, definitely see content keep driving

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 6>that flywheel for Disney at least when it comes to

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 6>subscriber momentum.

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, and it's not only the movies that you talked

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 2>about next year, Avatar, Star Wars, Avengers, all coming back.

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that could be a blowout year at the

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 2>box office.

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 6>It absolutely is going to be because you know, all

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 6>these movies, each of these properties, Tom, I mean, they

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 6>generate easily. We're talking like, you know, one and a

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 6>half to two billion dollars in you know, in global

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 6>box office ticket sales, so you have multiples of those

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 6>kind of coming out. You think of just even Zouotopia two,

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 6>that's a huge, huge franchise when it comes to the

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 6>Chinese market. So you know, they have all of these different, uh,

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, titles that are coming out on on the

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 6>on the on the movie side, and then of course

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 6>you have a whole bunch of a different series that

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 6>they have for Disney Plus. So it looks really really strong.

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the setup looks extremely strong for both this

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 6>year as well as fiscal twenty twenty six.

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, a lot to look forward to.

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Disney Q three earnings out on Wednesday, that's ahead of

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street's opening bell Our thanks to GEETHA. Raganaffin, Bloomberg

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence analyst on US Media. We move next to earnings

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 2>from the nation's biggest ride hailing giant, Uber, which, like

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 2>rival Lift, is now offering a lot more than just

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 2>rides and for more. We're joined by Mandeep Singh, Bloomberg

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence Senior tech industry analyst Mandeep There is ride hailing,

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Uber won subscriptions, Uber eats, partnerships with Instacart, Home Depot,

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Delta Airlines, and a burgeoning robotaxi business, including a deal

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 2>with Lucid to make the next generation high end cars.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot going on. So what do you expect

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 2>to see from Uber's latest earnings.

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 7>I mean, look, when it comes to this quarter, you know,

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 7>the futuristic stuff like the robotaxis don't really matter as much.

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 7>At the same time, you know, everyone cares about the

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 7>ramp up of Wemo, so you want to see you know,

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 7>them expanding that partnership that they have in two cities,

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 7>Austin and Atlanta. Wemo has talked about using you know,

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 7>different partners like they've recently announced a partnership with Avis.

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 7>So it sort of puts Uber in a tough spot

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 7>that they don't want to rely just on Wemo. At

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 7>the same time, they've been doing their own stuff. You know,

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 7>you mentioned neuro I think that probably will help them

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 7>and lose it, you know, So to my mind, robotaxis

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 7>is an important aspect of how investors look at Uber,

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 7>you know, for the next five to ten years. BET,

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 7>but there's no doubt that Uber still has the scale

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 7>with one hundred and seventy five million monthly active users.

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 7>They've aggregated their demand when it comes to both delivery

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 7>as well as ride sharing, and that is what has

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 7>worked to their advantage. So being the scale player, being

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 7>able to grow ebit faster than the top line growth,

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 7>that is what has driven that shift in sentiment for

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 7>the stock over the last three four quarters. And I

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 7>expect them to execute on that. Where top line will

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 7>grow around sixteen seventeen percent, the ebitdel line would probably

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 7>grow over thirty percent, and they continue to show a

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 7>steady operating leverage.

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 2>The one hundred and seventy five million active monthly users. Yeah,

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 2>with all the economic uncertainty, it's really an astounding figure

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 2>that they're still adding customers.

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 7>When it comes to ride sharing and delivery. I mean,

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 7>these are integral part of our day to day lives.

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 7>You know, everyone has to eat three meals a day. Now,

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 7>you're not going to order it on Uber or door

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 7>dash every meal, but there are always times when you

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 7>like to use these type of services, and that's what's

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 7>drive the frequency for both door Dash and Uber. The

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 7>field has consolidated now to these two players. I think

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 7>Uber's partnership with instacart has also helped them sort of

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 7>connect with more users. That's why that MAU number has

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 7>grown faster over the last few quarters because of that

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 7>cross sell. But with that being said, look they've ramped

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 7>up ads now. The reason why operating leverage has been

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 7>better over the past few quarters is because ads is

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 7>a one point five billion dollar business for Uber. That

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 7>wasn't the case. And the reason why ads are working

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 7>is because they have the scale, they aggregate demand, they

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 7>have the supply on the platform, and once you have that,

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 7>ads become obvious choice for monetization, and that's what they've

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 7>been successfully able to do. Door Dashes doing the same.

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 7>Lift's problem is because of the smaller size, their ads

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 7>are just not as useful to the advertisers as they

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 7>are on just.

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Out ranging that volume of people.

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 2>That's right, Yeah, Well, I want to go back to

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 2>the robotaxi wars because that's what it really is. And

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 2>you're right, a lot of this is futuristic, a lot

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 2>of it is five ten years, but there are more

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 2>players than ever.

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>We know that Tesla just in June finally came out

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 2>with its cybercab in Austin. Very small, very limited, but

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 2>lift we talked about their self driving shuttles. Uber, you know,

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 2>the partnerships and expanding more. However, way Mo looks like

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 2>it has another partner in Dallas next year with Avas.

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is it are they just hedging their bets

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 2>or is there enough out there, enough business, enough partners,

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 2>enough autos that we're going to see this everywhere or

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 2>try to see it everywhere? And is it really going

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 2>to be a game changer?

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 7>I mean, just to give you a sense of Uber scale,

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 7>they do almost nine billion ride sharing trips every year

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 7>globally and out of that US is close to four billion.

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 7>So when you compare that to Wemo's current volume, Vemo

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 7>is at a run rate of maybe thirteen to fifteen

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 7>million rides annually. Uber does that in one day exactly.

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 7>And Uber has that scale that no one else has.

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:36.319
<v Speaker 7>And that's where Wemo, even though they're hedging their bets,

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 7>I think partnering with Uber does give them that, you know,

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 7>demand in terms of the user base and the volume

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 7>of trips that they can do with Uber that they

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 7>can't do elsewhere on their own. At the same time,

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 7>You're right, I think Wevemo's approach right now is to

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 7>hedge their bets and partner with as many people because

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 7>they don't want to be overly ligned on Uber because

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.719
<v Speaker 7>it hurts the take rates. You know, in the end,

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 7>it's all about how much is Uber gonna keep, how

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 7>much is WIMO gonna keep, how much is fleet operator

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 7>gonna get because there is some cleaning and maintenance involved

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 7>with these autonomous rights, and you know, there are different

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 7>parts of the ecosystem. So I think luring your reliance

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 7>on one player does serve Waymo well in the long term.

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Uber Q two earnings out this Wednesday, just ahead of

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 2>the opening. Bell Lift is out that same day after

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 2>the close. Our thanks to man Deep Sing, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 2>senior tech industry analyst, and coming up on Bloomberg Day

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Break weekend, we'll look ahead to earnings from the British

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Oil on the Gas Giant BP. I'm Tom Busby and

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 2>this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Day Break weekend, our

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 2>global look ahead at the top stories for investors in

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 2>the coming week.

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Up later in our program we'll look at how a

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 2>production shift by Apple is impacting smartphone production elsewhere in Asia.

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 2>But first, following a deluge of European results, oil giant

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 2>BP reports its earnings this week. The London based energy

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 2>firm recently replaced its chairman amid pressure for a new direction,

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 2>but has that change paid off for more Let's get

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 2>to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe anchor Caroline

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 2>hepgar Tom.

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 4>BP is one of the big names of the oil industry,

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 4>but it's lagged behind fellow oil and gas majors in

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 4>recent years, with lackluster returns, a mountain of debt, and

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 4>an aborted attempt to transition to renewables. Activist shareholder Elliott

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 4>Investment Management has criticized the company for lacking urgency and ambition,

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:55.359
<v Speaker 4>appealing to new chairman Albert Manifold to focus on improving

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 4>the firm's cost base and capital allocation. This is in

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 4>contrast rival Shell, which has focused its business on oil

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 4>and gas and denied reports in June that it was

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 4>in talks to acquire BP. Also to contend with are

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 4>the sector headwinds a trading environment beset by geopolitical uncertainty,

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 4>conflict in the Middle East and between Russia and Ukraine.

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 4>The plight of oil markets and energy providers is such

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 4>a precarious environment. It's something that Bloomberg's Asia Energy editor

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 4>Stephen Sapcinski expanded on recently, discussing the risks posed by

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 4>current White House policy.

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 8>While oil prices did rise and there is a fear

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 8>that Trump will do something that could restrict Russian oil

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 8>on the market, there is also the view that this

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 8>could be a taco sort of situation. Trump always chickens out.

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 8>So how exactly will this play out? It's unclear, But

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 8>because there are so few details, it's hard for people

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 8>in the market to take a really bullish position on

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 8>this at the moment.

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 4>That was Bloomberg Energy reporter stephen's Chinsky. So can BP

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 4>put its best foot forward against a difficult backdrop. I'm

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:09.239
<v Speaker 4>joined Boblinberg's team leader for oil trading in Europe, Alic Nightingale,

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 4>and our markets report to sam Un said, welcome to

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 4>both of you. How can I start with you? Just

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 4>give us the context ahead of BP's earnings. What is

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 4>your impression of the first half of the year for BP.

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Do they have a turnaround plan.

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, they've got a turnaround plan. They haven't got into

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 9>the real meat of the turnaround yet. They need to

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 9>kind of start looking at att disposals and you know,

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 9>a lot of the big work is still to come.

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 9>They have got a new chairman, which was an important

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 9>part part of, you know, their strategy and just getting

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 9>things on the right footing. They've made changes to the board,

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 9>so things are starting to come into place, and now

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 9>they're under pressure to deliver on the big kind of

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 9>strategic reset that they've they promised investors.

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 4>Has uncertainty from tariffs and geopolitical instability affected the market

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 4>around BP, the oil markets, that's a great question.

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 9>And what we're seeing time and time again so far

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 9>this quarter is that the oil majors and oil companies

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 9>are saying that they've had the wrong kind of volatility.

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 9>These guys are really good at trading, you know, supply

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 9>and demand. They've got better visibility than anybody else on

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 9>where things are tight, when there's not enough supply, or

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 9>then when there's too much supply. But when you move

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 9>into kind of tweets and geopolitical things and things that

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 9>you know, we have as good an idea as anybody

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 9>else of whether the US is going to bomb Iran

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 9>or something like that. You know, it becomes a bit

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 9>more of a guessing game. So what they do. They

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 9>retreat from risk. It doesn't mean that they become worse traders.

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 9>It just means that they retreat from risk and risk

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 9>and trading is a big part of kind of profit

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 9>boosting for the European all majors like BP and Shell.

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 9>So I think he's probably been a tougher environment on

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 9>the trading side for the whole space were yet to see.

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 9>BP didn't warn about that in their updates, so maybe

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 9>they did, Okay, but I think there is you know,

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 9>Total said they have to be careful about trading. Shell

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 9>said that there's a risk of environment equanor similar stuff.

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 9>So yeah, there are issues around just trying to be

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 9>more risk averse when you've got these geopolitical headlines and

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 9>headlines that are not about supply demand fundamentals.

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Sam, how are BP's results likely to compare with other

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 4>energy companies in the market in the middle of results season.

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, And I think actually what I was just talking

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 10>about there is really the interesting part of it, because

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 10>BP didn't have such a weak trading update, you know,

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 10>in terms of how their all training is doing and

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 10>that kind of thing. But that has been what we've

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 10>heard from everyone else across the sector, and what you're

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 10>also hearing as well is that investors are trying to

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 10>sort of look through this a little bit. You know

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 10>that hopefully with tariff deals getting done, with a little

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 10>bit of that those trade tensions coming down, the old

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 10>traders can get back to focusing on the supply demand

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 10>fundamentals and get away from the kind of as I

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 10>was saying, the kind of wrong kind of volatility. However,

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 10>you know, I think, as we've seen with the copper market,

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 10>for example, the potential that these unpredictable events can keep

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 10>happening is very much still in play. So I think

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 10>that will be a key part for BP, and then

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 10>across the rest of their results it will be the

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 10>same things as a lot of the other companies with

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 10>the trading, with the trading almost put aside, if you like,

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 10>because they release a little bit earlier on that, how

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 10>are the actual operations doing, how are they performing within

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 10>the company, And then for BP, specifically buybacks. You know,

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 10>are they going to keep up the pace of bibacs

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 10>cut it and the restructuring? You know, how have they

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 10>made any kind of extra progress on this very big,

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 10>very significantly structuring.

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>They have to do well in.

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 4>Terms of the buyback, paying out dividends. That is always

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 4>a very important component in the London market, isn't it.

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 4>What are we expecting around that?

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 9>We saw declining profits for the other oil companies and

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 9>BP's training update wasn't too bad, So I would have

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 9>thought that they'll keep it, keep the buybacks and there

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 9>won't be too much alarm on that front. So yeah,

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 9>I wouldn't be you know, I think that the expectation

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 9>is that that won't be.

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Changing in terms of also the sustainability issues for BP.

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 4>So they're in the middle of reversing what was a

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 4>pivot to sustainability. How does that compare to what other

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 4>oil companies are doing and fossil fuel production now, I

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 4>think I.

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 9>Think there's a general is not singular, there's not one theme,

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 9>but I think there is a move to kind of

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 9>be less engaged with renewables and things like that, and

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 9>an emphasis on hydrocarbons. If you look at how the

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 9>US oil companies that have never been quite so kind

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 9>of wedded to kind of environmental sustainability type of stuff.

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 9>You know, they've done better and they've been more focused

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 9>on what they always were and I think you've seen

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.199
<v Speaker 9>a pivot back towards that. But it's not universal. You know,

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 9>there are oil companies that have kind of stuck stuck

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 9>to it more. But you know, we've seen moves out

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 9>of green hydrogen. BP is a big Australia project, so

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 9>you know there's a lot going on in terms of

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 9>moving away from it and moving back to a focus

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 9>on oil and gas.

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 4>In terms of activist management, Sam BP shareholder's Elliott Investment Management,

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 4>they are so called activists investors, aren't they And they

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 4>certainly have made a number umber of statements around BP

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 4>and what they'd like the business to look like. How

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 4>do you think that relationship is and how does it

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 4>fit into kind of US activist investment in the UK

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 4>and Europe.

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think with the BP in particular. So you know,

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 10>as I was just talking about, you know a lot

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 10>of companies are still staying in that renewable space and

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 10>one of the big things that was pushed for for

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 10>at BP and by Elliott in particular, is moving back

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 10>over to these the hydrocarbs, the fossil fuels, because in

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 10>part of the valuation on the stock, you know, BP's

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 10>evaluation and their shares have done extremely poorly, you know,

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 10>against a lot of the other majors over the last

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 10>couple of years. I think that's a major part of it.

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 10>But what they need to be able to do over

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 10>the course of you know, the whole restructuring process that

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 10>they're going through, is balance that with decent operations and

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 10>then with you know, pulling away from the new renewable

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 10>side of things, but balancing those two things out. Other

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:55.239
<v Speaker 10>companies have just done that a little bit better than

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 10>BP have, I think for the results, I think what

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 10>you're likely to see is if there's an in honesty,

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 10>there's not probably going to be an enormous amount of

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 10>extra progress made, you know what we'll see. But what

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 10>Elliott and what certainly investors seem to think when the

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 10>restructuring was first announced is that it needed to go

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 10>a little bit further. So maybe they will be looking

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 10>for that kind of thing. I don't think that's the

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 10>kind of thing you'll get with the results, But that's

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 10>going to be the focus going forward for Eliot in particular.

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.239
<v Speaker 4>Al can you just give us a view on the

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 4>second half of this year and into next year what

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 4>BP will be thinking about. As you say, it's a

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 4>much more unstable, uncertain world, maybe risk is coming off

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 4>the table. I mean, OPEK and its allies continue to

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 4>add barrels to the market. There's a very uncertain white

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 4>house when it comes to energy policy. What are you

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 4>thinking about? What are all the market's thinking about when

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 4>it comes to BP and the market for the rest

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 4>of this year.

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 9>I think BP everybody else is easy to forget that

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 9>the oil price is really important and the gas price

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 9>is really important. You know, a few bucks of move

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 9>in the oil price can affect their revenues very significantly,

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 9>and so that's important. Now what's going on with the

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 9>oil price. The widespread expectation is that as we move

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 9>into the second half of this year into early twenty

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 9>twenty six, we're going to see a surplus building up.

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 9>OPIC keeps on adding barrels, you know, I think I

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 9>think that the Trump terrris haven't really crushed demand like

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 9>people kind of maybe predicted it they would, But there's

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 9>still are kind of an uncertainty economically that probably hasn't

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.360
<v Speaker 9>been helpful. So you've lost a bit of demand, you're

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 9>certainly adding some supply. There's non opic supply coming in.

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 9>So the expectation among the big forecasting agencies like the

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:54.479
<v Speaker 9>International Energy Agency and the EIA is that they're going

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 9>to see a surplus moving into next year. Surplus isn't

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 9>usually very good for oil prices, and therefore, you know,

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 9>it's not great for BP or anybody else if that

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 9>starts to be the case. If you start to see

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 9>a glove building up, then oil price is bad and

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 9>that's that isn't good for the stock prices of these

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 9>oil companies.

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 4>And Europe of course has recently committed SAM to buying

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 4>much more energy and energy products from the US, for example.

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 4>So we have geopolitics, we have conflicts, we have uncertainty.

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 4>How are you thinking about the rest of the year

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 4>for BP and in context for the earning picture?

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I actually what Ilse said there is is a

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 10>really important point which you know, we should always keep

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 10>in mind what the oil price is doing and what

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 10>the outlook is for the ol press over the course

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 10>of the rest of the year. But when you have

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 10>a market that is under pressure like that, you know,

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 10>either it coming from the oil price or from the

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 10>kind of broader uncertainties in the market. Demand. Uncertainty is

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 10>going into the rest of the year. I don't think

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 10>we can sit here and say that uncertainty is over

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 10>in any way. So over the course of rest of

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 10>the year for BP, because they are coming at it

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 10>from a slightly weaker position, I think that they will

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 10>they will have to deliver, you know, well, they have

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 10>to show their investors that they are delivering on the

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 10>plan that they have managed to put together, and so

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 10>there will be a bar for them to get over

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 10>I think for the earning and then for the rest

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 10>of the year to show that progress.

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Okay, many thanks to both of you. To Bloomberg, Sam

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Onsteed and Alec Nightingale, thank you so much for your time.

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Really good to speak to you ahead of BP's earnings

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 4>in the next few days. I'm Caroline Hepge here in London.

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 4>You can catch us every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 4>you at beginning at six am in London. That's one

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 4>I am on Wall Street.

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 7>Tom.

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Caroline and coming up on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend how

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 2>a shift by Apple has turned India into the world's

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 2>top maker of smartphones ship to the US. I'm Tom Busby,

0:25:49.160 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 2>and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend,

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 2>our global look ahead at the top stories for investors

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 2>in the coming week.

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:11.479
<v Speaker 2>Global supply chains began to shift during the pandemic, and

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 2>that shifting became more dramatic with the rollout of President

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Trump's tariffs as high as one hundred and fifty percent

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 2>for Chinese exports to the US, and that caused Apple

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 2>to reimagine its production network. For more on those results,

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 2>let's get to the host of the Daybreak Asia podcast,

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Doug Krisner.

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 5>Tom As Apple began to diversify its supply chain further,

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 5>the company doubled down on India, and that got a

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 5>reaction from President Trump. Back in May, he threatened CEO

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 5>Tim Cook with a twenty five percent tariff on Apple

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 5>products unless the company shifted production to the US.

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 11>I had an understanding with him that he wouldn't be

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 11>doing this.

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 12>He said, he's going to India to bill plants.

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:52.719
<v Speaker 11>I said, that's okay, to go to India, but you're

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 11>not going to sell them to here without tariffs.

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 5>But Apple followed through and deepened its ties in India,

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 5>and in the quarter through June, India became the largest

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 5>manufacturer of smartphone shipped to the US for the very

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 5>first time. According to data from Canalis, Indian produced handhelds

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 5>accounted for forty four percent of the American market. Vietnam,

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 5>home to much of Samsung's production, came in second. China

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 5>dropped to just twenty five percent. That's down from more

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 5>than sixty percent a year ago. Let's take a closer

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 5>look now. Joining me is Sun Culp Fartial. He is

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 5>India technology reporter for Bloomberg News, joining us from our

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 5>bureau in New Delhi. Sun Culp, thank you so much

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 5>for making time to chat with me. Can I begin

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 5>by asking for some perspective on Apple's relationship with India.

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 5>When did it actually begin?

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 12>I mean, Apple sol iPhones it India forever, but the

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 12>relationship has especially become better and more meaningful and more

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 12>important in the last four years. Twenty seventeen was the

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:59.239
<v Speaker 12>first time Tim Cook visited India as Apple CEO. At

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 12>that time, he met with the Prime Minister and Ardiamodi.

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 12>Both of them had a chat and there was requests

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 12>from India that Apple should manufacture in India. And then

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 12>we saw that in twenty seventeen, Apple actually started assembling

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 12>a few test units of what was back then called

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 12>the iPhone SE but that was sort of a test run.

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 12>This assembly was done in Bangalore in south of India,

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 12>so the relationship started there. But in twenty twenty one,

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 12>Apple actually won financial incentives or what I should actually

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 12>call state subsidies to manufacture in India, and that's when

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 12>they really scaled up production. And you know, today more

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.479
<v Speaker 12>than a fifth of iPhones are assembled in India. More

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 12>than a fifth of the global iPhone output is being

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 12>done out of India. So that's a quick recap of

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 12>the history.

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 5>So we know that Apple has been diversifying its supply

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 5>chain away from China. I'm curious about the technology that

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 5>Apple is using in India to produce these devices. Hanhaigh

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:08.479
<v Speaker 5>Precision is the world's largest maker of iPhones. How does

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 5>a company like Hanhai fit into the picture of Apple

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 5>in India.

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 12>Yes, they have been key in Apple's manufacturing success or

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 12>assembly in India. I just want our listeners to know

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 12>that there's very little difference between manufacturing and assembly now,

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 12>and India does quite a bit of assembly now, but

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 12>a lot of components is yet are sourced from China.

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 12>Fox Corn, as Hanahai is more widely known. They made

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 12>the first iPhone in India sometime in late twenty twenty

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 12>or twenty one, and they made iPhone ten in India

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 12>for the first time, and from then on, you know,

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 12>they've been ramping up production. Last year they produced iPhone

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 12>sixteen at the same time as the global launch from India.

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 12>So a lot of components still come from China, but

0:29:56.040 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 12>Apple is very actively scouting for partners here. Fox Corn

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 12>has one factory in the south of India and they're

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 12>building another one, which is their second largest plant in

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 12>the world.

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 5>To what extent has the workforce in India been an

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 5>attraction for a company like Apple, a workforce that may

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 5>be technologically sophisticated.

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 12>So the workforce is quite a big advantage for Apple

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 12>in India. First of all, when fox Conn began assembling

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 12>iPhones in India, another unit of fox Corn was already

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 12>active in India making Shaomi phones and you know, some

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 12>other phones. They had devised the model where they brought

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 12>in a lot of women workers in India, especially women

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 12>workers as seen as more hard working, more reliable. They

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 12>stick to the job. Sometimes they're the only breadwinners in

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 12>the family, so Apple stuck to that model. About seventy

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 12>percent of their workforce in the factories is comprised of women.

0:30:55.840 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 12>It's an advantage because these workers otherwise have not gotten jobs.

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 12>Probably some of them would have been married really early,

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 12>so it's a good thing for their families. And this

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 12>workforce has proven very reliable for Apple and from scratched

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 12>to making one fifth of the iPhones. That says something.

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm wondering whether other technology firms beyond Apple are looking

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 5>at India on the production side and seeing all of

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 5>the points of attraction that you've just kind of laid

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 5>out and thinking about maybe investing resources putting more production

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 5>lines in place in India.

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 12>Is that happening, Yes, to some extent, it is happening,

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 12>to be sure, China still is a huge manufacturing superpower,

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 12>and we're very small compared to China, but it's also

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 12>early days for India. Some other firms that are now

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 12>making their products in India include Google, Bloomberg broke the

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 12>story last year about Google making its Pixel phones in India. Now,

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 12>the volumes of Pixel phones or the sales are much

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 12>smaller compared to Apple. Samsung has a huge factory on

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 12>the outskirts of Delhi. It's a little bit smaller than

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 12>their plant in Vietnam, but they make phones in India

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 12>and they export them as well. In fact, when that

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 12>factory was inaugurated a few years ago, I remember Samsung

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 12>said that we're now going to make in India for

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 12>the world. There are companies here that assemble laptops for

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 12>ACER and HP and Dell. So yes, I mean India's

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 12>stature as a manufacturing hub is definitely growing. Is it

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 12>right to compare it to China? No, We're still very early.

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 5>But I'm curious whether or not it's beginning to move

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 5>beyond some of these devices like handheld or smartphones and

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 5>into things like semiconductors, whether we're talking about microprocessors or

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 5>sophisticated computer memory. Is that happening at all.

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 12>Yes, that's beginning to happen. I think it's a very

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 12>big push by Prime Minister and Arrange Room, these government

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 12>to make India reliant electronically in electronic products and the

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 12>chip shortage kind of showed nations that they needed to

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 12>be reliant, self reliant. So what we've seen is that Micron,

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 12>the US company, has entered India. They're building a plant

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 12>in the western state of Gujarat, which also happens to

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 12>be the home state of the Prime Minister of India.

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 12>Then we see Tata Conglomerate, which is one of the

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 12>biggest Indian conglomerates. They are building a factory again in Gujarat.

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 12>They're going to be making legacy semiconductors. So India is

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.719
<v Speaker 12>not making the kind of cutting edge semiconductors that are

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 12>TSMC makes. TSMC has not even come to India and

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 12>may not for some time, but India started its journey

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 12>towards manufacturing chips.

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 5>So it seems like there's a fair amount of foreign

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 5>direct investment that's been moving into the Indian market.

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 12>Yes, definitely. So you know, India announced billions of dollars

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 12>worth of state subsidies to encourage the assembly and the

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 12>manufacturing of smartphones. Then it has announced another scheme with

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 12>some early billions to push the manufacturing of servers and

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:17.240
<v Speaker 12>laptops and tablets. It has a ten billion dollar fund

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 12>to encourage chip making in the country. So it has

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 12>spent some amount of government money, some substantial amount of

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 12>government money to attract assembly and manufacturing to India.

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 5>That was send culled Farti al There, India Tech reporter

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 5>for Bloomberg News. Let's move next to the property sector.

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 5>For both Hong Kong and mainland China, new property sales

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:42.479
<v Speaker 5>across forty seven Chinese cities fell nineteen percent between July

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 5>first and the twenty third, and Bloomberg Intelligence says this

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:49.439
<v Speaker 5>could portend a deepening sales downturn in the second half

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 5>of the year. Buyer sentiment has weakened since April's US

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 5>tariff announcements, and it's threatening to undermine previous stimulus efforts.

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 5>For some insight, let's bring in Adrill Chan. He is

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 5>chair of Hong Long Properties. Adrill joins us from our

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 5>studios in Hong Kong. Good of you to make time

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 5>to chat with me. I want to bring up a

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:10.800
<v Speaker 5>sore subject right out of the gate. I'm sorry because

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 5>I noted that net income for your company was down

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 5>fourteen percent year over year in the latest period. Can

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 5>you give me a sense of what's happening, what you're

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 5>struggling with right.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 11>Now, Thanks Doug. The decrease in net income really is

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 11>as a result of a lower number of sales of departments,

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 11>and that is something that fluctuates for us. The primary

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.320
<v Speaker 11>sector of our business is retail leasing and office leasing,

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 11>so commercial leasing is actually down low single digits, which

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 11>is a lot less bad than being down fourteen percent,

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 11>but that's the explanation for that. If you look into

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 11>retail and offices, retail has been actually surprisingly resilient in

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 11>the Mainland. I think our share price has reacted relatively

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 11>well since the announcement of our results, and that's a

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 11>little bit of a surprise to me, honestly, but I

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 11>think that the market was perhaps expecting worse. So we're

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:09.760
<v Speaker 11>down retail sales low single digits, but I think people

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 11>were probably expecting worse than that.

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 5>So give me a sense of what your portfolio looks like.

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 5>When you talk about retail spaces, I think shopping malls.

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:22.240
<v Speaker 5>Are you catering to retailers that perhaps service the higher

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.320
<v Speaker 5>end of the market. Are these luxury type retailers primarily?

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely so. Our biggest exposure is to the luxury brands,

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 11>and as we've been seeing over the past couple of days,

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:36.320
<v Speaker 11>the luxury brands have been posting let's say, mixed results.

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 11>Asia extrapan is sort of broadly flat ish, while Japan

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 11>is down significantly, and that kind of I think is

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 11>what explains our reasonable performance. A lot less Chinese outbound

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 11>tourism to Japan for shopping and staying on shore to

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 11>do that shopping. So that's one of the macro trends

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 11>that we've seen. I don't know if that's because of

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 11>all this rumors about earthquakes and this and that, but

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 11>for various reasons, the Chinese consumers seem to be staying

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 11>put on shore.

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 5>So when you cater to that segment of the real

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:14.800
<v Speaker 5>estate market, those higher end retailers, do they have expectations

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:20.399
<v Speaker 5>about certain upgrades or modifications that the landlord in your

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 5>case has to provide them, And does that kind of

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:26.919
<v Speaker 5>draw down or maybe force you to do a little

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 5>bit of cap.

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:31.919
<v Speaker 11>X Oh, it certainly does. So, you know, in terms

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 11>of luxury moles, this sector in the mainland of China

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 11>has only been around for maybe twenty years or so,

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:41.879
<v Speaker 11>twenty twenty five years, and so if you think about

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:44.760
<v Speaker 11>the lifetime of a mall, that's kind of the time

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 11>that you need to definitely start looking into CAPEX upgrades.

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 11>We've done quite a few. We've done three upgrades in

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 11>three of our separate males across the mainland.

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 5>They've been well received.

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 11>I think now in terms of the market cycles, it's

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 11>a relative down it's probably a good time to be

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 11>investing in oneself. That being said, because we're in a

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 11>down market, the tenants have pricing power. It's a buyer's

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 11>market for our tenants, and so we have to make

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 11>sure that we're on the ball in terms of how

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 11>those capecks upgrades go and our ability to deliver on

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 11>an operations and service that is.

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 5>A drill chan share of Hong Long Properties. And I'm

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:25.720
<v Speaker 5>Doug Krisner. You can catch us weekdays for the Daybreak

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Asia podcast. It's available wherever you get your podcast.

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Tom, Thanks Doug, and that does it for this edition

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 2>at five am Wall Street Time for the latest on

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 2>markets overseas and the news you need to start your day.

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:44.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby. Stay with us. Top stories and global

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 2>business headlines are coming up right now.