1 00:00:02,160 --> 00:00:06,880 Speaker 1: Welcome to the solid verbal hell that for me. I'm 2 00:00:06,880 --> 00:00:09,760 Speaker 1: a man, I'm for I've heard so many players. 3 00:00:09,400 --> 00:00:11,159 Speaker 2: Say, well, I want to be happy, you want to 4 00:00:11,200 --> 00:00:14,440 Speaker 2: be happy for Dake, Edith Steak is that woof woof? 5 00:00:14,920 --> 00:00:20,160 Speaker 1: And Dan and Tie welcome back to these solid verbal 6 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:22,279 Speaker 1: boys and girls. My name is Tye hilde Brandt. That 7 00:00:22,360 --> 00:00:26,520 Speaker 1: fine gentleman over there as always in the heart of 8 00:00:26,600 --> 00:00:30,760 Speaker 1: the Midwest. Dan the man Rubinstein, Sir, welcome back to 9 00:00:30,800 --> 00:00:32,400 Speaker 1: the podcast. How goes it? My friend? 10 00:00:32,680 --> 00:00:35,479 Speaker 2: It's great as always, ty It's great. Very excited for 11 00:00:35,520 --> 00:00:39,240 Speaker 2: this episode because it is the absolute height of the 12 00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:41,480 Speaker 2: math I'm able to do on the fly. 13 00:00:42,560 --> 00:00:43,920 Speaker 1: I maxed out. 14 00:00:44,479 --> 00:00:50,680 Speaker 2: I think at like a trigonometry what's trigonometries? 15 00:00:50,680 --> 00:00:53,560 Speaker 1: After algebra two in high school? I believe so? Yeah, 16 00:00:53,600 --> 00:00:53,920 Speaker 1: I had. 17 00:00:53,920 --> 00:00:58,400 Speaker 2: I never took calculus. I took statistics AP stat gotta 18 00:00:58,480 --> 00:00:59,880 Speaker 2: be tied not to Brad. 19 00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:04,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, I had trigonometry, then I had calculus, and then 20 00:01:04,800 --> 00:01:08,000 Speaker 1: I for whatever reason, when I went to Penn State, 21 00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:10,600 Speaker 1: I was put in another calculus class that I needed 22 00:01:10,600 --> 00:01:13,720 Speaker 1: to take as one of my prerecs for something. Yeah, 23 00:01:13,760 --> 00:01:16,200 Speaker 1: it was one of those pilot courses that allowed you 24 00:01:16,240 --> 00:01:20,160 Speaker 1: to use a graphing calculator, which you're just a felon. 25 00:01:20,520 --> 00:01:23,320 Speaker 1: That saved my hide in a way like you would 26 00:01:23,360 --> 00:01:26,080 Speaker 1: not believe. I do believe it. I don't know any 27 00:01:26,120 --> 00:01:29,400 Speaker 1: of that stuff. I don't remember a damn thing from it. Yeah. 28 00:01:29,480 --> 00:01:33,000 Speaker 2: I remember hearing my smarter friends, whether they were business 29 00:01:33,080 --> 00:01:35,560 Speaker 2: majors or something, that had to keep taking math, and 30 00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:37,480 Speaker 2: I was like, wait, what comes after calculus? And they 31 00:01:37,480 --> 00:01:40,440 Speaker 2: said linear algebra and I was like, that sounds way 32 00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:43,679 Speaker 2: easier than calculus. It's a line, it's algebra. I have 33 00:01:43,720 --> 00:01:47,320 Speaker 2: no idea what I'm talking about. So to all of 34 00:01:47,360 --> 00:01:51,880 Speaker 2: those who are mathematically inclined, I salute you, because again, 35 00:01:52,080 --> 00:01:55,400 Speaker 2: this episode is the absolute height of what I'm now 36 00:01:55,440 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 2: able to do in my fifth day decade of life 37 00:01:57,640 --> 00:01:58,120 Speaker 2: on the fly. 38 00:01:58,960 --> 00:02:01,920 Speaker 1: So here's what we're doing today, Dan, Yeah, you may 39 00:02:01,960 --> 00:02:04,520 Speaker 1: have seen out on ESPN dot com, as they are 40 00:02:04,640 --> 00:02:07,160 Speaker 1: wont to do here in the off season, they put 41 00:02:07,200 --> 00:02:13,600 Speaker 1: together a top ten coaches ranking. Yeah, very subjective. It 42 00:02:13,639 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 1: of course brought in the power and the knowledge and 43 00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:21,040 Speaker 1: the insight of many of ESPN's great college football reporters. 44 00:02:21,760 --> 00:02:25,680 Speaker 1: They're ranking when as follows Kirby Smart, Kalin Debor Kyle 45 00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:31,440 Speaker 1: Whittingham at three, Dabo Swinney, Mike Norvel, Dan Lanning four, three, six, 46 00:02:32,160 --> 00:02:35,600 Speaker 1: Steve Sarksian, Lane Kiffin, Lance Leipold, and Ryan Dada to 47 00:02:35,680 --> 00:02:37,560 Speaker 1: round out the top ten. 48 00:02:37,840 --> 00:02:40,720 Speaker 2: With no real rhyme or reason. Right, it was sort 49 00:02:40,760 --> 00:02:45,600 Speaker 2: of aggregating a number of different opinions, right, I think 50 00:02:45,600 --> 00:02:48,000 Speaker 2: it was different writers or was it one writer? I 51 00:02:48,040 --> 00:02:50,600 Speaker 2: used to say, But it was just it was going 52 00:02:50,639 --> 00:02:55,360 Speaker 2: off of like specific perceptions and you're like, well, this 53 00:02:55,440 --> 00:02:57,560 Speaker 2: is important to me, or this person was able to 54 00:02:57,600 --> 00:03:00,240 Speaker 2: do this at a smaller place so I'm impressed by this, 55 00:03:00,760 --> 00:03:03,280 Speaker 2: or this person has done this lately, or this person 56 00:03:03,600 --> 00:03:06,040 Speaker 2: has shown this over so many years, so he has 57 00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:10,200 Speaker 2: to be here. But it wasn't fully clear, Like everything 58 00:03:10,320 --> 00:03:14,760 Speaker 2: wasn't like attached to the same rubric. That's crazy. That 59 00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:17,440 Speaker 2: wasn't weighed all the same way. Yeah, that's correct. 60 00:03:17,480 --> 00:03:21,880 Speaker 1: So people online have been talking about this ranking system 61 00:03:21,919 --> 00:03:25,320 Speaker 1: because again, it's early April, mid April. What else are 62 00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:27,760 Speaker 1: we going to talk about other than the transfer portal 63 00:03:27,840 --> 00:03:29,840 Speaker 1: and the Super League and some of the other news 64 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:33,040 Speaker 1: topics going on in college football? Spring football is starting up, 65 00:03:33,440 --> 00:03:40,760 Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. We decided this needed an actual formula. Yeah, 66 00:03:40,960 --> 00:03:44,600 Speaker 1: this needed a rubric of sorts. We needed to put 67 00:03:44,680 --> 00:03:49,720 Speaker 1: up some walls around this ranking system. Yes, you said 68 00:03:49,760 --> 00:03:51,720 Speaker 1: to me yesterday, can we come up with a coach 69 00:03:51,840 --> 00:04:00,920 Speaker 1: rating system that uses the initials DABO? Correct? I took 70 00:04:00,960 --> 00:04:04,880 Speaker 1: it into the lab here in Eastern Pennsylvania, Soliverbole East Headquarters. 71 00:04:05,960 --> 00:04:08,520 Speaker 1: What we're going to present before you today is something 72 00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:12,560 Speaker 1: we're calling the x DABO coach and I guess it's unweighted, right, 73 00:04:12,640 --> 00:04:17,360 Speaker 1: because the four elements of the formula, none is weighted 74 00:04:17,440 --> 00:04:20,599 Speaker 1: more than the other. Right, it's equal weight given to 75 00:04:20,640 --> 00:04:24,320 Speaker 1: each one. It's equal weight here in the x DABO scale, 76 00:04:24,440 --> 00:04:27,160 Speaker 1: the unweighted x DABO. Yeah, here is the way that 77 00:04:27,200 --> 00:04:32,120 Speaker 1: this thing works. In each of these four categories, we're 78 00:04:32,120 --> 00:04:34,640 Speaker 1: going to rank a coach on a scale of one 79 00:04:34,680 --> 00:04:38,839 Speaker 1: to ten, one being the worst, ten being the best. Yeah. 80 00:04:39,360 --> 00:04:43,400 Speaker 1: The D stands for dependability. Yep, what does that mean? 81 00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:47,760 Speaker 1: It means dependability? How consistent is a coach? How reliable 82 00:04:47,880 --> 00:04:54,720 Speaker 1: are his results? How comfortable are we with projecting results 83 00:04:54,760 --> 00:04:56,960 Speaker 1: forward based on the track record? 84 00:04:57,120 --> 00:04:59,760 Speaker 2: This is what he's done, and for that we expect 85 00:04:59,839 --> 00:05:00,560 Speaker 2: him to do this. 86 00:05:01,040 --> 00:05:04,280 Speaker 1: Yeah. The A stands for adaptability. And there's a lot 87 00:05:04,279 --> 00:05:07,360 Speaker 1: that I think we can bundle in here. But how 88 00:05:07,400 --> 00:05:10,320 Speaker 1: good is a coach at adjusting on the fly with 89 00:05:10,960 --> 00:05:15,960 Speaker 1: decisions and play calling in the moment and then bigger 90 00:05:15,960 --> 00:05:18,760 Speaker 1: picture if we zoom out, how good is that guy 91 00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:24,039 Speaker 1: at adjusting the philosophy of his program? So the example 92 00:05:24,040 --> 00:05:26,640 Speaker 1: that I've used a million times over, maybe it's not 93 00:05:26,680 --> 00:05:30,039 Speaker 1: as applicable now given what we saw last season. But 94 00:05:30,279 --> 00:05:33,320 Speaker 1: after Dave Randa's year one with Baylor, there were a 95 00:05:33,320 --> 00:05:37,080 Speaker 1: lot of gripes with how he managed things, super conservative. Yeah, 96 00:05:37,120 --> 00:05:39,440 Speaker 1: and he came out the next year and went for 97 00:05:39,600 --> 00:05:41,720 Speaker 1: a lot more and fourth down and made some changes 98 00:05:41,760 --> 00:05:44,719 Speaker 1: and Baylor was a lot better. That was a moment 99 00:05:44,880 --> 00:05:47,760 Speaker 1: of adaptability. We won't spend too much time talking about 100 00:05:47,800 --> 00:05:49,279 Speaker 1: what Dave r and has done since then. 101 00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:53,040 Speaker 2: Right, or somebody hired a coordinator Year one clearly didn't 102 00:05:53,080 --> 00:05:55,560 Speaker 2: work and instead of drawing it out hoping for improvement, 103 00:05:56,240 --> 00:05:57,919 Speaker 2: they knew that it wasn't a match and they just 104 00:05:57,960 --> 00:05:59,000 Speaker 2: moved on immediately. 105 00:05:59,080 --> 00:06:04,359 Speaker 1: That's right, that's right. The bee is build quality. Yep. 106 00:06:05,160 --> 00:06:08,680 Speaker 1: How good is a guy at acquiring talent? How good 107 00:06:08,800 --> 00:06:12,839 Speaker 1: is he at developing the talent? So this applies on 108 00:06:12,880 --> 00:06:17,520 Speaker 1: the recruiting front. This also applies on the hiring front. Yeah, 109 00:06:17,640 --> 00:06:21,800 Speaker 1: Nick Sable, well, Nick Saban for years had this well 110 00:06:21,839 --> 00:06:25,800 Speaker 1: known famous coaching tree. Guys who went there for a 111 00:06:25,800 --> 00:06:28,880 Speaker 1: one or two year internship went on to bigger and 112 00:06:28,920 --> 00:06:31,719 Speaker 1: better things, maybe running their own shop like Sark or 113 00:06:31,839 --> 00:06:35,880 Speaker 1: Lane Kiffin or Nick Saban's known for that. So how 114 00:06:35,880 --> 00:06:39,160 Speaker 1: good are these guys at developing their players and their 115 00:06:39,200 --> 00:06:45,280 Speaker 1: coaches that are underneath them? Correct, that's your b dab. Finally, 116 00:06:45,400 --> 00:06:51,560 Speaker 1: is oh opportunity? H opportunity? What's a coach is ceiling? Man? 117 00:06:52,400 --> 00:06:55,719 Speaker 1: What's a coach's ceiling is? This is a very relative 118 00:06:57,040 --> 00:07:01,080 Speaker 1: measure as part of this extremely goof an imaginary skill. 119 00:07:01,160 --> 00:07:03,159 Speaker 2: Right, how do you define a six? How do you 120 00:07:03,160 --> 00:07:04,880 Speaker 2: define an eight? How do you define a three? How 121 00:07:04,880 --> 00:07:05,640 Speaker 2: do you define a ten? 122 00:07:05,920 --> 00:07:08,799 Speaker 1: Yeah, you can make a pretty good case that Kaylen 123 00:07:08,839 --> 00:07:10,360 Speaker 1: de Bor, even though Kaylan de Bor went to a 124 00:07:10,440 --> 00:07:13,720 Speaker 1: national championship with Washington, he made a pretty good case 125 00:07:13,760 --> 00:07:17,800 Speaker 1: that his ceiling at Washington was a lot lower, bigger 126 00:07:17,840 --> 00:07:20,680 Speaker 1: picture than it will be at Alabama. He will have 127 00:07:21,240 --> 00:07:24,880 Speaker 1: more opportunity at Alabama, I think to be great to 128 00:07:24,960 --> 00:07:28,080 Speaker 1: win championships, to get back to that guy. So no, yeah, okay, 129 00:07:28,120 --> 00:07:30,360 Speaker 1: you can make that case. We can argue that out. 130 00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:33,400 Speaker 2: So what we're doing essentially is we are taking four 131 00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:38,800 Speaker 2: different categories as elements of our methodology. Within those categories, 132 00:07:39,320 --> 00:07:42,640 Speaker 2: we are hoping to consistently define what each number is. 133 00:07:42,680 --> 00:07:47,040 Speaker 2: And even though we are picking numbers subjectively, we're showing 134 00:07:47,080 --> 00:07:50,400 Speaker 2: our work and applying that same method to each guy. 135 00:07:50,640 --> 00:07:53,600 Speaker 2: So you can disagree with you know, I'm giving Ryan 136 00:07:53,640 --> 00:07:56,960 Speaker 2: Day a seven here, I'm giving Luke Fickle a nine here, 137 00:07:57,360 --> 00:08:00,720 Speaker 2: but at least we're applying the same that's right method 138 00:08:00,880 --> 00:08:03,440 Speaker 2: to each of them. And so you know, there are 139 00:08:03,440 --> 00:08:05,400 Speaker 2: some of these where I like, I found out like 140 00:08:05,480 --> 00:08:09,200 Speaker 2: my top ten based on independently selecting scores for each 141 00:08:09,240 --> 00:08:11,640 Speaker 2: of these these elements, and I was like, I don't 142 00:08:11,640 --> 00:08:13,240 Speaker 2: know that that's my top ten, But how do I 143 00:08:13,360 --> 00:08:16,320 Speaker 2: argue with? You know, this is my choice, and this 144 00:08:16,400 --> 00:08:18,000 Speaker 2: is what I have to roll with because at least 145 00:08:18,040 --> 00:08:20,520 Speaker 2: it's applied evenly throughout the process. 146 00:08:21,040 --> 00:08:25,440 Speaker 1: So there is one other element to this. Oh bonus, 147 00:08:26,280 --> 00:08:31,280 Speaker 1: I said, X dabo, Oh, that's true. We put the 148 00:08:31,400 --> 00:08:33,080 Speaker 1: X there to make it look official, like there was 149 00:08:33,080 --> 00:08:35,839 Speaker 1: some actual science behind this. There is no science there 150 00:08:35,880 --> 00:08:38,440 Speaker 1: is just rudimentary math. I assure you of that, we're 151 00:08:38,480 --> 00:08:45,079 Speaker 1: capable of nothing more. Thank you computer. The X stands 152 00:08:45,160 --> 00:08:52,199 Speaker 1: for pr and media chops. Yeah, doesn't apply to everybody. 153 00:08:52,760 --> 00:08:56,559 Speaker 1: So I think for somebody like Brian Kelly, Brian Kelly, 154 00:08:56,600 --> 00:08:59,280 Speaker 1: we might be willing to give them a few bonus points. 155 00:08:59,320 --> 00:09:02,600 Speaker 1: So this is something that we can use if we 156 00:09:02,640 --> 00:09:05,400 Speaker 1: want to zero to five, if we want to add 157 00:09:05,440 --> 00:09:08,920 Speaker 1: a few bonus points for somebody who is particularly good 158 00:09:08,920 --> 00:09:12,200 Speaker 1: at dealing with the media. Now, can we say the excess. 159 00:09:11,920 --> 00:09:16,800 Speaker 2: For extroverts extraversion per extraversion If that's a word, sure, 160 00:09:17,040 --> 00:09:18,120 Speaker 2: synergy right here. 161 00:09:18,679 --> 00:09:21,760 Speaker 1: Love it. I love it. The reason that we would 162 00:09:21,760 --> 00:09:24,400 Speaker 1: incorporate this as part of the skill, it doesn't have 163 00:09:24,440 --> 00:09:26,440 Speaker 1: anything to do with what's going on on the field, 164 00:09:26,800 --> 00:09:30,120 Speaker 1: right but back check, extraversion is a word. Extraversion is 165 00:09:30,120 --> 00:09:32,960 Speaker 1: definitely word. I didn't know. The reason that we should 166 00:09:33,000 --> 00:09:35,520 Speaker 1: put this in here is because if the media turns 167 00:09:35,559 --> 00:09:38,120 Speaker 1: against a guy, or if the fan base turns against 168 00:09:38,120 --> 00:09:40,680 Speaker 1: a guy because of the way he handles the media 169 00:09:40,760 --> 00:09:44,360 Speaker 1: or the media portrays him, that often can spell doom. 170 00:09:45,320 --> 00:09:48,000 Speaker 1: We have seen that happen before. Got to play the game. 171 00:09:48,200 --> 00:09:49,920 Speaker 1: Got to play the game. So Brian Kelly's going to 172 00:09:49,920 --> 00:09:52,440 Speaker 1: get a few extra bonus points with this zero to five. 173 00:09:53,200 --> 00:09:54,800 Speaker 1: Don't have to use it, but you can use it 174 00:09:54,840 --> 00:09:56,880 Speaker 1: if you want to give a guy a few more 175 00:09:56,920 --> 00:09:59,360 Speaker 1: bonus points to boost is rating a little bit based 176 00:09:59,360 --> 00:10:02,480 Speaker 1: on what he's doing. That rule with the emojis, that's 177 00:10:02,520 --> 00:10:03,959 Speaker 1: gotta be worth something, right. 178 00:10:04,440 --> 00:10:06,080 Speaker 2: Well, Look, if it's out of five, I'm giving mac 179 00:10:06,120 --> 00:10:08,880 Speaker 2: Brown like a nine right now for memorizing every reporter's 180 00:10:08,880 --> 00:10:13,760 Speaker 2: first name, Doc Rivers, Mac Brown, great question, Adrian. 181 00:10:13,679 --> 00:10:16,280 Speaker 1: You could get a five. So that is the x 182 00:10:16,400 --> 00:10:19,320 Speaker 1: DABO scale. We came up with it yesterday. We're very 183 00:10:19,400 --> 00:10:22,360 Speaker 1: proud of it. We're very excited about this, and I 184 00:10:22,400 --> 00:10:25,200 Speaker 1: think it finally puts some walls up with respect to 185 00:10:25,480 --> 00:10:28,560 Speaker 1: how we're going to actually rank coaches. 186 00:10:28,840 --> 00:10:33,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, so your worst coach is probably a four, right, Yeah, 187 00:10:33,720 --> 00:10:35,640 Speaker 2: if we're doing four categories one through ten, and of 188 00:10:35,679 --> 00:10:40,800 Speaker 2: course if a coach has a perfect grade. Essentially this 189 00:10:40,960 --> 00:10:46,800 Speaker 2: scoring is out of just a clean, A clean, A clean, okay. 190 00:10:47,160 --> 00:10:49,440 Speaker 1: Beautiful, and could go up to forty five if for 191 00:10:49,480 --> 00:10:50,240 Speaker 1: feeling generous. 192 00:10:50,640 --> 00:10:52,920 Speaker 2: Well, no, I'm saying I'm using that as a bonus, 193 00:10:52,960 --> 00:10:55,520 Speaker 2: but yes we can after the fact, I scored it 194 00:10:55,559 --> 00:10:58,520 Speaker 2: out of forty and I'm using it the X extra 195 00:10:58,600 --> 00:11:01,160 Speaker 2: version as a separate element. But yeah, we can do 196 00:11:01,200 --> 00:11:03,360 Speaker 2: the math on the fly because once again, between us, 197 00:11:03,760 --> 00:11:06,800 Speaker 2: we have a twelfth grade education mathematically. 198 00:11:06,920 --> 00:11:10,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, this is the moment in the show where I 199 00:11:10,360 --> 00:11:14,280 Speaker 1: just casually remind everyone that if you like this concept, 200 00:11:14,480 --> 00:11:16,960 Speaker 1: if you like this show, if you want to support us, 201 00:11:17,440 --> 00:11:19,559 Speaker 1: the most important thing you can do is hit follow 202 00:11:19,679 --> 00:11:22,400 Speaker 1: or subscribe wherever it is that you're listening or watching 203 00:11:23,040 --> 00:11:26,920 Speaker 1: this show right now. Yeah, following on social media, hit 204 00:11:26,920 --> 00:11:28,680 Speaker 1: the like button on all the stuff we're doing there. 205 00:11:28,679 --> 00:11:31,680 Speaker 1: We've been pushing extra hard in the off season because 206 00:11:31,679 --> 00:11:33,640 Speaker 1: we've got the time and the energy and we're excited 207 00:11:33,679 --> 00:11:36,440 Speaker 1: about the season ahead. But these are some basic things, 208 00:11:36,520 --> 00:11:38,360 Speaker 1: some simple things. We have people email all the time, 209 00:11:38,360 --> 00:11:40,800 Speaker 1: what can I do to support the show? That's what 210 00:11:40,840 --> 00:11:42,440 Speaker 1: you can do to support the show if you're really 211 00:11:42,480 --> 00:11:44,880 Speaker 1: into it. For Ballers dot Com, we'll post this episode 212 00:11:44,920 --> 00:11:47,480 Speaker 1: early without the ads. There's a discord that I know 213 00:11:47,559 --> 00:11:49,440 Speaker 1: is going to be popping off talking about this as 214 00:11:49,520 --> 00:11:54,679 Speaker 1: well as we get into all things x Nabo, Dan Rubinstein, 215 00:11:54,720 --> 00:11:58,360 Speaker 1: Shall we dive in? Let's dive in the number one 216 00:11:58,480 --> 00:12:03,360 Speaker 1: ranked coach in ESPN's on official ranking system was Kirby Smart. 217 00:12:04,760 --> 00:12:07,760 Speaker 1: Kirby Smart, I think, for all intents and purposes here 218 00:12:08,520 --> 00:12:11,880 Speaker 1: does he represent the forty? Would he be the perfect 219 00:12:11,880 --> 00:12:17,080 Speaker 1: forty or Dabbo scale x daboskill? Absolutely not? Why not? 220 00:12:17,679 --> 00:12:19,840 Speaker 1: I don't know. I want to make people earn it over, 221 00:12:20,000 --> 00:12:21,280 Speaker 1: Like forty just seems like. 222 00:12:22,360 --> 00:12:26,360 Speaker 2: There's only one forty in my mind. Ty, that's you. Okay, 223 00:12:26,480 --> 00:12:29,199 Speaker 2: thank you. I have Kirby Smart at thirty eight. Okay, 224 00:12:29,360 --> 00:12:30,760 Speaker 2: where is he getting doc points? 225 00:12:31,080 --> 00:12:31,360 Speaker 1: Okay? 226 00:12:31,400 --> 00:12:34,080 Speaker 2: So I have a ten in terms of dependability. Okay, 227 00:12:34,120 --> 00:12:37,080 Speaker 2: I have him as a ten in terms of adaptability. 228 00:12:37,360 --> 00:12:40,120 Speaker 2: I have him an eight in terms of build quality 229 00:12:40,320 --> 00:12:43,240 Speaker 2: and a ten in terms of opportunity ceiling. I'm giving 230 00:12:43,320 --> 00:12:46,280 Speaker 2: him the eight in terms of build quality. Obviously Georgia 231 00:12:46,360 --> 00:12:50,800 Speaker 2: and Kirby Smart, they've been a sensational recruiting machine. But 232 00:12:51,880 --> 00:12:56,600 Speaker 2: I'm docking him the eight because of the quarterback shuffling 233 00:12:57,240 --> 00:13:00,640 Speaker 2: and the quarterback question throughout the years. But I'm taking 234 00:13:00,720 --> 00:13:06,760 Speaker 2: his experience in totality and so we're talking about using 235 00:13:07,360 --> 00:13:11,680 Speaker 2: the Justin Fields example, mismanaged. We're talking about you know, 236 00:13:11,840 --> 00:13:15,120 Speaker 2: Jake from getting worse that like and I don't know 237 00:13:15,160 --> 00:13:17,040 Speaker 2: if you want to put that in terms of development whatever, 238 00:13:17,080 --> 00:13:19,880 Speaker 2: but Jake from and it's a defensible move to stick 239 00:13:19,880 --> 00:13:21,320 Speaker 2: with Jake from the way he did. 240 00:13:21,840 --> 00:13:22,880 Speaker 1: But the JT. 241 00:13:23,080 --> 00:13:27,840 Speaker 2: Daniels element, the Jamie Newman not playing element, you know, 242 00:13:28,520 --> 00:13:31,520 Speaker 2: it's hard to put that fully on Kirby Smart and 243 00:13:31,559 --> 00:13:36,440 Speaker 2: then like essentially peaking at quarterback kind of by accident 244 00:13:36,480 --> 00:13:37,440 Speaker 2: with Stetson Bennett. 245 00:13:37,480 --> 00:13:40,400 Speaker 1: Well, and so I think there is an important distinction 246 00:13:40,440 --> 00:13:41,640 Speaker 1: here that we should draw if we're going to go 247 00:13:41,640 --> 00:13:44,320 Speaker 1: based on this scale. Sure, there is a distinction to 248 00:13:44,320 --> 00:13:48,080 Speaker 1: be made between acquiring the talent and developing the talent. Agree, 249 00:13:48,400 --> 00:13:51,000 Speaker 1: And they're almost two separate things. He's been very good 250 00:13:51,040 --> 00:13:53,480 Speaker 1: at developing talent. What we do with Stet's and Bennett agree, 251 00:13:53,600 --> 00:13:56,680 Speaker 1: totally agree, right, Ste's stets and Bennett turned into like 252 00:13:56,720 --> 00:13:58,840 Speaker 1: one of the all time greats in Georgia history, maybe 253 00:13:58,960 --> 00:14:02,200 Speaker 1: SEC history, A very very good college quarterback by the 254 00:14:02,200 --> 00:14:04,600 Speaker 1: time he left. But I think if Kirby Smart were 255 00:14:04,640 --> 00:14:08,720 Speaker 1: starting over again Sets and Bennett, he wouldn't have been 256 00:14:08,720 --> 00:14:11,040 Speaker 1: the number one guy that he recruited to run his offense. Right, 257 00:14:11,080 --> 00:14:13,840 Speaker 1: as you said, that quarterback system was a bit mismanaged, 258 00:14:13,840 --> 00:14:18,600 Speaker 1: So I'm not against docking some points there for build quality. 259 00:14:18,840 --> 00:14:23,160 Speaker 1: We know that assistant coaches have developed handsomely under Kirby, 260 00:14:23,200 --> 00:14:25,920 Speaker 1: Smart Dan Lanning. Dan Lanning, who we're going to talk 261 00:14:25,920 --> 00:14:28,480 Speaker 1: about here, I'm sure in a little bit, is a 262 00:14:28,520 --> 00:14:31,040 Speaker 1: great example of that. Fran Brown just left to go 263 00:14:31,080 --> 00:14:33,760 Speaker 1: and coach Syracuse. He's obviously, Kin is doing great things 264 00:14:33,800 --> 00:14:36,000 Speaker 1: in the NFL. Yeah, Monkin's doing well in the NFL. 265 00:14:36,080 --> 00:14:38,040 Speaker 1: Like there are definitely some guys that will go through 266 00:14:38,080 --> 00:14:40,720 Speaker 1: and mention in passing that get it incomplete because we 267 00:14:40,760 --> 00:14:42,800 Speaker 1: don't have a full picture of what they can do yet. 268 00:14:42,800 --> 00:14:45,920 Speaker 1: But in terms of that side of things, Kirby's been 269 00:14:45,920 --> 00:14:49,320 Speaker 1: really really good. If we're pointing to just one thing though, 270 00:14:50,040 --> 00:14:52,640 Speaker 1: the most important thing to me at quarterback, and like 271 00:14:52,680 --> 00:14:55,080 Speaker 1: the Jacob Eason thing didn't work out like that, That's 272 00:14:55,120 --> 00:15:01,800 Speaker 1: what I'm pointing to, quarterback recruitment, selection and management. Can 273 00:15:01,840 --> 00:15:04,200 Speaker 1: we give him a few extra bonus points though at 274 00:15:04,200 --> 00:15:08,520 Speaker 1: the PR and media chops the extra version category? Can 275 00:15:08,560 --> 00:15:10,240 Speaker 1: we throw in a few out of five? What would 276 00:15:10,240 --> 00:15:15,240 Speaker 1: I give Kirby? Yeah, we'll give him like a maybe 277 00:15:15,280 --> 00:15:19,720 Speaker 1: a three. Give him it's two or three. 278 00:15:19,800 --> 00:15:22,600 Speaker 2: The only the docking thing is the way that he 279 00:15:22,760 --> 00:15:25,320 Speaker 2: is weaponizing the state of Georgia with like the foyer 280 00:15:25,400 --> 00:15:28,840 Speaker 2: stuff that's not as open as you'd like. But yeah, 281 00:15:28,880 --> 00:15:30,080 Speaker 2: two or three somewhere in there. 282 00:15:30,000 --> 00:15:31,400 Speaker 1: We'll give him a two. We'll get we'll get him 283 00:15:31,480 --> 00:15:34,360 Speaker 1: up to an even forty. Yeah, if that works for you. 284 00:15:35,560 --> 00:15:37,240 Speaker 2: Do you want me to quickly go through all of 285 00:15:37,280 --> 00:15:39,800 Speaker 2: the coaches I have outside of my top ten? Or 286 00:15:39,840 --> 00:15:41,160 Speaker 2: is that jumping around too much? 287 00:15:42,720 --> 00:15:47,000 Speaker 1: Why don't we go next man up after Kirby? Okay? 288 00:15:47,600 --> 00:15:50,479 Speaker 1: On my list, on your lift or on the ESPN list. 289 00:15:51,080 --> 00:15:54,000 Speaker 1: On your list, they've got Klin to board number two, 290 00:15:54,120 --> 00:15:57,600 Speaker 1: which I saw and that I understand why they put 291 00:15:57,640 --> 00:16:00,360 Speaker 1: him that high. Yeah, surprise me a little bit. Surprised 292 00:16:00,360 --> 00:16:02,400 Speaker 1: me a little bit that he was number two on 293 00:16:02,440 --> 00:16:05,480 Speaker 1: this list already. Who do you have two on yours? 294 00:16:05,840 --> 00:16:08,520 Speaker 2: I have Kyle Whittingham on mind, which I might not 295 00:16:08,800 --> 00:16:11,080 Speaker 2: do if you were just having a conversation with me 296 00:16:11,640 --> 00:16:15,040 Speaker 2: just over some fantas or something. TI. I don't know 297 00:16:15,120 --> 00:16:18,320 Speaker 2: what the kids drink now, But in terms of like 298 00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:21,640 Speaker 2: when I went item by item, I have him at 299 00:16:21,720 --> 00:16:23,480 Speaker 2: thirty four out of forty. 300 00:16:23,520 --> 00:16:25,160 Speaker 1: Wow, that's really high. 301 00:16:25,200 --> 00:16:27,040 Speaker 2: I have Kyle Whittingham there, And I don't know if 302 00:16:27,080 --> 00:16:29,520 Speaker 2: that's just because he's been like the sort of one 303 00:16:29,520 --> 00:16:31,440 Speaker 2: of the deans of the sport, because he's been at 304 00:16:31,520 --> 00:16:35,600 Speaker 2: Utah forever and succeeding at Utah forever in different circumstances, 305 00:16:35,600 --> 00:16:38,200 Speaker 2: with different assistants and different conferences. This will now be 306 00:16:38,240 --> 00:16:41,680 Speaker 2: what his third conference. Sure while at Utah at least 307 00:16:43,240 --> 00:16:46,200 Speaker 2: and so here I scored him nine to nine eight, 308 00:16:47,600 --> 00:16:51,520 Speaker 2: so a nine. Dependability. He has been consistent, you know 309 00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:53,560 Speaker 2: that the results are something you can depend on, led 310 00:16:53,560 --> 00:16:56,920 Speaker 2: by defense, led by line play, adaptability on the fly 311 00:16:56,960 --> 00:16:59,080 Speaker 2: with decisions, play calling. Utah is not a team that 312 00:16:59,120 --> 00:17:01,880 Speaker 2: generally beats its elf in these games. They're the actual 313 00:17:01,880 --> 00:17:03,800 Speaker 2: They're the one who knock. They're the ones who beat 314 00:17:03,840 --> 00:17:08,000 Speaker 2: the teams that are not able to navigate games consistently 315 00:17:08,040 --> 00:17:12,320 Speaker 2: well build quality. I knock them a little bit because 316 00:17:12,520 --> 00:17:16,080 Speaker 2: of you know, some offensive struggles, especially passing game struggles 317 00:17:16,119 --> 00:17:18,800 Speaker 2: throughout the year that like, he hasn't been able to 318 00:17:18,840 --> 00:17:21,680 Speaker 2: adapt well. I guess adaptability is nine, but he hasn't 319 00:17:21,680 --> 00:17:25,240 Speaker 2: in terms of like, uh, finding offensive players, game changers 320 00:17:25,280 --> 00:17:27,720 Speaker 2: at receiver, specifically quarterbacks to go downfield. 321 00:17:27,720 --> 00:17:29,040 Speaker 1: That has not always been the case. 322 00:17:29,480 --> 00:17:31,720 Speaker 2: And I have a ceiling as eight, and the eight 323 00:17:31,920 --> 00:17:35,520 Speaker 2: ceiling I came to define as this is somebody who 324 00:17:35,600 --> 00:17:40,000 Speaker 2: can with regularity compete for a conference title, to end 325 00:17:40,080 --> 00:17:43,080 Speaker 2: up in a conference title game, or beat teams consistently 326 00:17:43,119 --> 00:17:43,560 Speaker 2: who are. 327 00:17:43,480 --> 00:17:44,360 Speaker 1: Of that quality. 328 00:17:45,080 --> 00:17:47,800 Speaker 2: Nine I have is like you know, in a playoff 329 00:17:47,840 --> 00:17:52,359 Speaker 2: conversation pretty often. Ten I have as like a definitive 330 00:17:52,440 --> 00:17:56,679 Speaker 2: national championship threat often Kirby So right, So I have 331 00:17:56,760 --> 00:17:59,320 Speaker 2: Kyle Whittingham in that eight category because Utah has been 332 00:17:59,320 --> 00:18:02,440 Speaker 2: to those games, They've won those games, They've beaten teams 333 00:18:02,440 --> 00:18:04,800 Speaker 2: who've won those games, like they've been played in major 334 00:18:04,840 --> 00:18:06,880 Speaker 2: bowl games as recently as what a couple of years 335 00:18:06,880 --> 00:18:10,120 Speaker 2: ago with the Rose Bowl gave what Penn State all 336 00:18:10,160 --> 00:18:12,760 Speaker 2: they could handle. They had you know, Ohio State recently. 337 00:18:14,000 --> 00:18:17,080 Speaker 2: So that's where I have him scoring as a thirty four. 338 00:18:17,359 --> 00:18:23,840 Speaker 1: Dependability is I think his greatest ability. He's been very, 339 00:18:23,920 --> 00:18:27,160 Speaker 1: very solid. Yeah. As a coach, you sort of are 340 00:18:27,200 --> 00:18:31,560 Speaker 1: more comfortable with Kyle Whittingham projecting his track record forward, 341 00:18:32,280 --> 00:18:35,880 Speaker 1: yeah than maybe anybody else on this list. Yeah, you 342 00:18:35,960 --> 00:18:37,640 Speaker 1: just know what you're going to get from year to year. 343 00:18:38,720 --> 00:18:41,560 Speaker 1: Adaptability and build quality though I push back a little bit, 344 00:18:42,520 --> 00:18:46,959 Speaker 1: especially in the build quality. You know, like the dependability 345 00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:49,760 Speaker 1: is good in that you know, most years you're going 346 00:18:49,800 --> 00:18:51,119 Speaker 1: to get nine or ten wins out of them, you 347 00:18:51,200 --> 00:18:58,520 Speaker 1: just but from an adaptability standpoint, from a build quality standpoint, 348 00:18:59,119 --> 00:19:02,600 Speaker 1: do we feel like the talent do we feel like 349 00:19:02,960 --> 00:19:07,920 Speaker 1: the willingness to adjust has gotten better with witting him? 350 00:19:08,080 --> 00:19:11,239 Speaker 1: Because I see the same team kind of year and in 351 00:19:11,359 --> 00:19:16,920 Speaker 1: year out, dependable but not always adaptable to the way 352 00:19:16,920 --> 00:19:20,679 Speaker 1: that college football around has changed. I don't know. 353 00:19:20,720 --> 00:19:23,159 Speaker 2: I still feel like more teams are scared of Utah 354 00:19:23,240 --> 00:19:25,720 Speaker 2: and their evolution over the course of the years. And look, 355 00:19:25,760 --> 00:19:31,680 Speaker 2: it's it's consistency. I mean that's under dependability. The way 356 00:19:31,720 --> 00:19:33,760 Speaker 2: that they've used the portal on both sides of the 357 00:19:33,760 --> 00:19:37,000 Speaker 2: ball has been impressive, Right have maybe their best playmaking 358 00:19:37,080 --> 00:19:41,960 Speaker 2: quarterback ever via the portal. They've filled in some gaps 359 00:19:42,040 --> 00:19:44,200 Speaker 2: via the portal. They're not crazy aggressive, I know they've 360 00:19:44,200 --> 00:19:47,320 Speaker 2: done pretty well at corner there. And even build quality 361 00:19:47,400 --> 00:19:50,880 Speaker 2: via high school recruiting has steadily improved, probably maxing out 362 00:19:50,880 --> 00:19:54,280 Speaker 2: with the Clark Phillips recruitment and development, you know, into 363 00:19:54,520 --> 00:19:59,040 Speaker 2: a an all American caliber corner. So I don't know, man, 364 00:19:59,080 --> 00:20:02,360 Speaker 2: the evaluation, you know, even though recruiting stars wise, they're 365 00:20:02,400 --> 00:20:05,040 Speaker 2: like top twenty five ish, Like, I don't know, they've 366 00:20:05,040 --> 00:20:07,320 Speaker 2: got an unbelievable eye for talent on both sides of 367 00:20:07,359 --> 00:20:09,719 Speaker 2: the ball outside of wide receiver. 368 00:20:10,280 --> 00:20:13,920 Speaker 1: Do we want to throw in a bonus point or two? Oh? 369 00:20:13,920 --> 00:20:15,679 Speaker 1: I think he's super likable. I'd put him in like 370 00:20:15,760 --> 00:20:17,560 Speaker 1: two or three. I think he's probably a three. He's 371 00:20:17,600 --> 00:20:19,880 Speaker 1: a good. Yeah, he's a good all right, So he's 372 00:20:19,880 --> 00:20:23,000 Speaker 1: a thirty four. I don't fundamentally disagree with any of that. 373 00:20:23,760 --> 00:20:25,960 Speaker 1: I think that's fair, but yeah, we need to push 374 00:20:25,960 --> 00:20:28,920 Speaker 1: back on he's also let some local talent go. When 375 00:20:28,960 --> 00:20:33,040 Speaker 1: you look at like what Devin Brown, panay Sewell Jackson 376 00:20:33,080 --> 00:20:36,800 Speaker 1: powers Johnson's probably a first round pick here, there's been 377 00:20:36,840 --> 00:20:39,400 Speaker 1: some some top level Utah talent that hasn't stayed home. 378 00:20:39,400 --> 00:20:42,760 Speaker 2: But I don't know. I'm grading him pretty highly still. 379 00:20:42,640 --> 00:20:45,040 Speaker 1: So what's interesting about this? If he's number two on 380 00:20:45,119 --> 00:20:48,960 Speaker 1: your list? Yeah, who's number two? Again? On ESPN's they've 381 00:20:48,960 --> 00:20:52,040 Speaker 1: got Caitlyn de Bor, but they've got Kyle Whittingham three, right, Okay, 382 00:20:52,080 --> 00:20:55,400 Speaker 1: witting him at thirty four number two. I think that 383 00:20:55,600 --> 00:20:56,679 Speaker 1: feels about right to me. 384 00:20:56,800 --> 00:20:59,080 Speaker 2: So you would dock him where you would dock him 385 00:20:59,119 --> 00:21:01,240 Speaker 2: with the build quality like a six seven. 386 00:21:01,320 --> 00:21:03,400 Speaker 1: I think I dock him with build quality a little bit. Yeah, 387 00:21:03,400 --> 00:21:05,119 Speaker 1: it might go down a little bit more on that. 388 00:21:05,200 --> 00:21:07,840 Speaker 1: So you gave him a nine, a nine, an eight, 389 00:21:07,920 --> 00:21:12,360 Speaker 1: and an eight. Yes, okay, So that's thirty four. 390 00:21:12,600 --> 00:21:16,080 Speaker 2: Thirty four for Winningham, thirty eight for smart, thirty four 391 00:21:16,320 --> 00:21:18,040 Speaker 2: and out of a possible Yeah. 392 00:21:18,119 --> 00:21:20,439 Speaker 1: What I like about this is that there is a 393 00:21:20,600 --> 00:21:24,760 Speaker 1: clear tier system drop yes, and that feels right to me. 394 00:21:25,040 --> 00:21:27,800 Speaker 2: Continue, all right, So I have three guys tied at 395 00:21:27,800 --> 00:21:29,360 Speaker 2: thirty three. 396 00:21:29,480 --> 00:21:31,840 Speaker 1: Are you ready for it? Please this one? 397 00:21:31,920 --> 00:21:35,480 Speaker 2: So this is not necessarily my number three tied for third. 398 00:21:35,600 --> 00:21:42,240 Speaker 2: This might be the most controversial today, Ryan Day. Okay, here, 399 00:21:42,280 --> 00:21:44,680 Speaker 2: here's here. The knock on Ryan Day obviously is like, oh, 400 00:21:44,680 --> 00:21:46,639 Speaker 2: he started on third base. Like Urban Meyer built up 401 00:21:46,640 --> 00:21:49,360 Speaker 2: that program. Ryan Day has largely kept it going successfully. 402 00:21:49,440 --> 00:21:52,639 Speaker 2: He inherited a bunch of talent. You still have to 403 00:21:52,680 --> 00:21:55,800 Speaker 2: win the games. To me, so Ryan Day has been 404 00:21:55,800 --> 00:22:00,239 Speaker 2: to a national championship game and lost, and has been 405 00:22:00,240 --> 00:22:02,879 Speaker 2: to a semi final against the clear best team in 406 00:22:02,920 --> 00:22:08,280 Speaker 2: America and barely lost. He's lost to precisely one team 407 00:22:08,320 --> 00:22:11,680 Speaker 2: in conference, which is the absolute worst team for Ryan 408 00:22:11,720 --> 00:22:15,439 Speaker 2: Day and Ohio State to lose two. But his record 409 00:22:15,480 --> 00:22:18,880 Speaker 2: is still crazy good. He does actually win the games 410 00:22:19,560 --> 00:22:23,520 Speaker 2: more often than not. They're blowing teams out with regularity. 411 00:22:25,200 --> 00:22:28,800 Speaker 2: And I think it's very easy to look at Ryan 412 00:22:28,920 --> 00:22:31,200 Speaker 2: Day and saying like, oh, he's diet Urban or whatever, 413 00:22:31,280 --> 00:22:33,399 Speaker 2: and he's building off of something else. And obviously he 414 00:22:33,440 --> 00:22:35,480 Speaker 2: can't win the big one against Michigan, so we dock 415 00:22:35,560 --> 00:22:39,679 Speaker 2: him there. All fair, but in this specific rubric tie, 416 00:22:40,359 --> 00:22:45,880 Speaker 2: I grade Ryan Day out as a nine six nine, okay, 417 00:22:46,480 --> 00:22:48,120 Speaker 2: So I would be glad is to say. 418 00:22:50,080 --> 00:22:54,000 Speaker 1: Nine. Give him another point for build quality. The talent 419 00:22:54,119 --> 00:23:00,439 Speaker 1: on hand is sure ridiculous, and furthermore, the coaching talent 420 00:23:00,560 --> 00:23:03,359 Speaker 1: that he's got around him, I think is pretty good. 421 00:23:03,760 --> 00:23:06,639 Speaker 1: They have kept their foot on the gas this offseason, 422 00:23:06,680 --> 00:23:11,080 Speaker 1: in particular, will trying to improve their talent. Again. I 423 00:23:11,160 --> 00:23:13,320 Speaker 1: harken back to what I said on the last episode 424 00:23:13,400 --> 00:23:16,320 Speaker 1: or two episodes ago about Jeremiah Smith, who looks like 425 00:23:16,400 --> 00:23:20,600 Speaker 1: a man among boys, probably is going to contribute, hopefully 426 00:23:20,640 --> 00:23:23,600 Speaker 1: will contribute as part of that receiving corps. Sure this 427 00:23:23,720 --> 00:23:26,080 Speaker 1: year could already be the best receiver on the damn roster. 428 00:23:26,640 --> 00:23:31,520 Speaker 1: The build quality at Ohio State is I mean, I 429 00:23:31,640 --> 00:23:34,080 Speaker 1: it's like second to none at this point. They've got 430 00:23:34,119 --> 00:23:36,280 Speaker 1: so much talent, Dan, I hear you. 431 00:23:37,359 --> 00:23:41,680 Speaker 2: They get a nine because they just had a quarterback 432 00:23:41,800 --> 00:23:45,160 Speaker 2: who for a number of reasons didn't fully work out, 433 00:23:45,200 --> 00:23:48,439 Speaker 2: and offensive line recruiting and developments is not in a 434 00:23:48,480 --> 00:23:50,480 Speaker 2: great place at the moment. Am I a victim of 435 00:23:50,520 --> 00:23:55,159 Speaker 2: the moment? Perhaps, but ten just means across the board, 436 00:23:55,560 --> 00:24:00,520 Speaker 2: your nails deep right, and they're not at the moment. 437 00:24:00,640 --> 00:24:04,879 Speaker 2: I've liked most of the hires. He has had to 438 00:24:04,920 --> 00:24:07,320 Speaker 2: make some changes because it hasn't worked out at a 439 00:24:07,359 --> 00:24:10,960 Speaker 2: couple of different positions. Had to make a defensive coordinator 440 00:24:11,040 --> 00:24:15,560 Speaker 2: change a couple of years ago, and that was kind 441 00:24:15,560 --> 00:24:18,040 Speaker 2: of the reason that that team was a little bit 442 00:24:18,080 --> 00:24:20,240 Speaker 2: too flawed in that national look. DeVante Smith was going 443 00:24:20,320 --> 00:24:22,719 Speaker 2: to get in on anybody, but like, I don't know, 444 00:24:22,760 --> 00:24:25,840 Speaker 2: the linebackers that year being torched by receivers against the 445 00:24:25,880 --> 00:24:28,960 Speaker 2: better team. Like, I just don't think it's perfect. Ten 446 00:24:29,000 --> 00:24:31,840 Speaker 2: out of ten is an a plus, all right. I 447 00:24:31,840 --> 00:24:33,879 Speaker 2: don't think we give him any bonus points for media. 448 00:24:36,600 --> 00:24:39,399 Speaker 2: I probably have maybe one or two, maybe one somewhere 449 00:24:39,400 --> 00:24:42,240 Speaker 2: in there. I have Ryan Day tied. Do you have 450 00:24:42,359 --> 00:24:44,240 Speaker 2: issue with the other? I have A six is like 451 00:24:44,280 --> 00:24:47,359 Speaker 2: the in game no, a little bit stubborn, And. 452 00:24:47,960 --> 00:24:50,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think I think Ohio State fans who listened 453 00:24:50,840 --> 00:24:54,800 Speaker 1: to this would take issue bitpicky, would take issue, mostly 454 00:24:54,880 --> 00:24:57,719 Speaker 1: with the adaptability part of it, because everybody in their 455 00:24:57,760 --> 00:24:59,560 Speaker 1: right mind new follows this would agree that there's plenty 456 00:24:59,560 --> 00:25:02,560 Speaker 1: of opportunit Ohio State, Like it's still all there for him, 457 00:25:02,720 --> 00:25:06,760 Speaker 1: and if they can assemble the troops and get organized 458 00:25:06,840 --> 00:25:09,320 Speaker 1: in a big way this season, I mean, this could 459 00:25:09,320 --> 00:25:11,200 Speaker 1: be the year they're gonna there. We're pretty much already 460 00:25:11,200 --> 00:25:13,879 Speaker 1: writing them into the playoffs. So I think A nine 461 00:25:13,960 --> 00:25:18,680 Speaker 1: is like a starting point for opportunity, you know, build quality. 462 00:25:18,720 --> 00:25:21,440 Speaker 1: The talents there, the coaches are there, and he's obviously 463 00:25:21,480 --> 00:25:24,040 Speaker 1: developing guys. Lovemore hate him. He's developing guys and putting 464 00:25:24,080 --> 00:25:26,639 Speaker 1: them in the league. There, the recruiting system seems to 465 00:25:26,640 --> 00:25:28,720 Speaker 1: have reached critical mass where kind of recruits. 466 00:25:28,440 --> 00:25:31,280 Speaker 2: Bringing Jim Knowles and Chip Kelly to run either side 467 00:25:31,280 --> 00:25:31,880 Speaker 2: of the ball. 468 00:25:31,720 --> 00:25:36,200 Speaker 1: I mean, come on, and dependability again, Michigan fans would say, yeah, 469 00:25:36,200 --> 00:25:39,400 Speaker 1: we love Ryan Day's dependability. He loses to us every year. Yeah, 470 00:25:39,400 --> 00:25:42,120 Speaker 1: of course, fair point, but he beats everybody else, So 471 00:25:42,359 --> 00:25:45,439 Speaker 1: that in and of itself, I think we'll maybe dock 472 00:25:45,520 --> 00:25:48,120 Speaker 1: him a point because he's not beating Michigan, but otherwise 473 00:25:48,160 --> 00:25:51,080 Speaker 1: he's like right there. It's the adaptability piece of this. 474 00:25:51,119 --> 00:25:52,840 Speaker 1: So what number would you give him? I give him 475 00:25:52,840 --> 00:25:54,399 Speaker 1: a sick. I think I agree with you on that one. 476 00:25:55,040 --> 00:25:57,360 Speaker 1: I think I agree with you on that one, and 477 00:25:58,240 --> 00:26:01,879 Speaker 1: it's a six by it has potential to go up 478 00:26:01,960 --> 00:26:04,600 Speaker 1: to like an eight very quickly depending on how they 479 00:26:04,600 --> 00:26:05,359 Speaker 1: look this season. 480 00:26:06,680 --> 00:26:12,359 Speaker 2: I suppose, yeah, all thirty three on your list. I 481 00:26:12,359 --> 00:26:15,160 Speaker 2: have Lance Leipold out of thirty three as well. Woh, 482 00:26:16,800 --> 00:26:18,400 Speaker 2: I have Lance Lipole who else? 483 00:26:18,440 --> 00:26:19,160 Speaker 1: Who else? With? 484 00:26:19,160 --> 00:26:22,360 Speaker 2: With Lance and Kaylin de Boor. I have Lance Liphold 485 00:26:22,480 --> 00:26:27,200 Speaker 2: with nine eight eight eight that I believe checks out. 486 00:26:27,119 --> 00:26:28,320 Speaker 1: Eight eight eight, Okay. 487 00:26:29,119 --> 00:26:31,400 Speaker 2: So the interesting thing with Lance Leipold is I think 488 00:26:31,400 --> 00:26:34,120 Speaker 2: it's only fair. You're not just looking at what he's 489 00:26:34,160 --> 00:26:36,520 Speaker 2: done and improving Kansas, right. You look at what he 490 00:26:36,560 --> 00:26:38,159 Speaker 2: did at Buffalo, and then you look at what he 491 00:26:38,200 --> 00:26:40,920 Speaker 2: did on every other level that he's coached at, winning 492 00:26:40,920 --> 00:26:43,160 Speaker 2: a ton of national champion you know, national championship, winning 493 00:26:43,160 --> 00:26:46,080 Speaker 2: a ton of games. So I have Lance Lightpold nine 494 00:26:46,119 --> 00:26:49,000 Speaker 2: eight eight eight. So the dependability of like, you can 495 00:26:49,040 --> 00:26:52,760 Speaker 2: depend on Lance Lightpold growing a program without a doubt? 496 00:26:53,040 --> 00:26:54,680 Speaker 1: Right? Nine? 497 00:26:54,840 --> 00:26:58,440 Speaker 2: Can you a nine? Did it at Buffalo, a very 498 00:26:58,440 --> 00:26:59,680 Speaker 2: difficult place to win. 499 00:27:00,119 --> 00:27:04,159 Speaker 1: It at Wisconsin Whitewater, Yeah, did it at Buffalo and 500 00:27:04,200 --> 00:27:08,240 Speaker 1: now is in the process of doing it at Kansas. Okay, 501 00:27:08,280 --> 00:27:11,919 Speaker 1: you could argue though Devil's Advocate. I love Lance Lipold. 502 00:27:11,960 --> 00:27:16,040 Speaker 1: You know this, sure Devil's Advocate. He has done that 503 00:27:16,240 --> 00:27:22,200 Speaker 1: at places that couldn't really go down any further, right, Okay, 504 00:27:22,240 --> 00:27:24,720 Speaker 1: I'm not going to speak for Wisconsin Whitewater. I certainly 505 00:27:24,760 --> 00:27:26,359 Speaker 1: don't know that side of his career as. 506 00:27:26,280 --> 00:27:28,000 Speaker 2: Right now, and it's been a machine there. But yeah, 507 00:27:28,040 --> 00:27:30,679 Speaker 2: but like I'm just saying, his vorp is off the charts. 508 00:27:30,800 --> 00:27:32,919 Speaker 1: His vorp is off the charts. But in terms of 509 00:27:33,040 --> 00:27:38,600 Speaker 1: dependability in the early part of his Power five career, yeah, 510 00:27:38,720 --> 00:27:42,080 Speaker 1: it is definitely taking flight. I'm not going to nine though, 511 00:27:42,800 --> 00:27:45,080 Speaker 1: if lance Leipold would have taken over at Michigan. If 512 00:27:45,160 --> 00:27:47,840 Speaker 1: lance Leipold eventually takes over at I'll throw a rock 513 00:27:47,880 --> 00:27:50,600 Speaker 1: and say Florida. Sure. I mean, we know Jed Fish 514 00:27:50,680 --> 00:27:51,960 Speaker 1: is going to go to Florida in a year, But 515 00:27:52,240 --> 00:27:54,760 Speaker 1: let's just throw lance Leipold in that discussion for now. 516 00:27:55,040 --> 00:27:58,040 Speaker 1: What what does Lance Leipold look like at a bigger 517 00:27:58,080 --> 00:27:59,760 Speaker 1: place with better competition. 518 00:27:59,359 --> 00:28:01,959 Speaker 2: Than what existing in a universe that doesn't exist. I'm 519 00:28:02,040 --> 00:28:04,680 Speaker 2: choosing to be a reality based evaluator here. 520 00:28:05,200 --> 00:28:08,680 Speaker 1: He has been consistent. I think his results have been 521 00:28:08,800 --> 00:28:11,720 Speaker 1: reliably pointed up and to the right. 522 00:28:12,240 --> 00:28:16,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, beats big teams, takes players that other people recruited, 523 00:28:16,640 --> 00:28:19,240 Speaker 2: brought in transfers that contributed right away. 524 00:28:20,720 --> 00:28:23,919 Speaker 1: I am not giving him a nine though with dependability. 525 00:28:24,359 --> 00:28:26,960 Speaker 1: It's too soon for me to give him a nine too. 526 00:28:26,960 --> 00:28:29,199 Speaker 1: He's been a head coach forever. Too soon for me 527 00:28:29,240 --> 00:28:30,919 Speaker 1: to at at the Power five level. How long has 528 00:28:30,920 --> 00:28:32,960 Speaker 1: it been in Kansas, But he's been ahead. 529 00:28:33,000 --> 00:28:34,960 Speaker 2: We're talking about we're evaluating him as a head coach, 530 00:28:36,080 --> 00:28:37,960 Speaker 2: not only the Kansas head coach. 531 00:28:38,040 --> 00:28:40,880 Speaker 1: I need more Power five data before I'm willing to 532 00:28:40,920 --> 00:28:44,880 Speaker 1: go nine on Lancelipold, who I love like a father. Okay, 533 00:28:45,280 --> 00:28:47,680 Speaker 1: I love the guy. I'd love for him as a 534 00:28:47,760 --> 00:28:51,400 Speaker 1: coach any of my teams. Yeah, but if we are 535 00:28:51,440 --> 00:28:58,680 Speaker 1: putting true scientific what's the word methodology? Dan? Behind this? 536 00:28:59,120 --> 00:29:00,920 Speaker 1: I don't go nine, Maybe I go and eat. 537 00:29:01,040 --> 00:29:03,600 Speaker 2: But so this is how you describe it. How consistent 538 00:29:03,680 --> 00:29:06,480 Speaker 2: is a coach consistently improving a team without a doubt? 539 00:29:06,560 --> 00:29:06,720 Speaker 1: Right? 540 00:29:07,280 --> 00:29:10,240 Speaker 2: How reliable are his results? He beats big teams and 541 00:29:10,360 --> 00:29:11,320 Speaker 2: keeps winning games? 542 00:29:11,600 --> 00:29:13,200 Speaker 1: Right? Yes? 543 00:29:13,880 --> 00:29:16,560 Speaker 2: How comfortable are we in projecting these results forward? Now 544 00:29:16,560 --> 00:29:18,920 Speaker 2: you can say maybe he has a ceiling of improving 545 00:29:18,920 --> 00:29:21,480 Speaker 2: a team but not taking them to you know, a 546 00:29:21,520 --> 00:29:23,520 Speaker 2: top tier. Well, that's where opportunity would come in. 547 00:29:23,800 --> 00:29:29,800 Speaker 1: Okay, opportunity. You're giving him an eight for opportunity at Kansas? Yes? 548 00:29:30,520 --> 00:29:33,880 Speaker 1: At Kansas? Yes? Is that because of the Big twelve changing? 549 00:29:35,040 --> 00:29:37,240 Speaker 2: It's both because of the Big twelve changing, and it's 550 00:29:37,240 --> 00:29:40,040 Speaker 2: also because of the teams. He has already shown Kansas 551 00:29:40,240 --> 00:29:44,080 Speaker 2: having an ability to beat or compete with. Right, he's 552 00:29:44,080 --> 00:29:47,240 Speaker 2: gone toe to toe or beaten Texas Oklahoma schools like that. 553 00:29:49,680 --> 00:29:52,640 Speaker 1: I just know he's beaten both. Right, you are out 554 00:29:52,680 --> 00:29:55,880 Speaker 1: of your mind going this high on lance Leipold on 555 00:29:55,880 --> 00:29:56,120 Speaker 1: this one. 556 00:29:56,160 --> 00:29:58,240 Speaker 2: Well, basically what I'm saying is I think Lance Leipold 557 00:29:58,320 --> 00:30:01,240 Speaker 2: has the ability to be Kyle Whittingham, Right, which is 558 00:30:01,280 --> 00:30:03,760 Speaker 2: not a crazy thing to say. If Kyle Whittingham has 559 00:30:03,760 --> 00:30:06,120 Speaker 2: an eight ceiling because he's proven it. 560 00:30:06,480 --> 00:30:07,040 Speaker 1: Wow, And. 561 00:30:09,360 --> 00:30:12,320 Speaker 2: I don't know, man, Okay, Look he's won a bunch 562 00:30:12,320 --> 00:30:15,840 Speaker 2: of games. Look, maybe it's optimistic for sure, but the 563 00:30:15,920 --> 00:30:19,360 Speaker 2: other elements of this I feel like balance it out. 564 00:30:20,560 --> 00:30:24,160 Speaker 1: Well to be fair. I mean, ESPN ranked Lance Lipold 565 00:30:24,160 --> 00:30:27,400 Speaker 1: ahead of Ryan Day. Sure, and they've got Ryan Day 566 00:30:27,400 --> 00:30:29,520 Speaker 1: at nine. They've got Lancelipe or Ryan Day at ten, 567 00:30:29,640 --> 00:30:33,680 Speaker 1: Lance Slipold at nine. Yeah, they're pretty high on Lance Lipol. 568 00:30:33,760 --> 00:30:36,880 Speaker 1: They've got him again in between Ryan Day and Lane 569 00:30:36,960 --> 00:30:39,400 Speaker 1: Kiffin towards the bottom of their top ten. Obviously a 570 00:30:39,520 --> 00:30:42,959 Speaker 1: very very good coach. I can't go nine, eight, eight, 571 00:30:43,040 --> 00:30:44,960 Speaker 1: eight for Lance Lipold. I don't know, man. 572 00:30:45,000 --> 00:30:48,400 Speaker 2: You look at the depths of Kansas. I'll go look 573 00:30:48,400 --> 00:30:51,800 Speaker 2: at Charlie Weiss, Les Miles, David Beatty like they've tried 574 00:30:51,800 --> 00:30:54,000 Speaker 2: a bunch of different ways and the only one that 575 00:30:54,120 --> 00:30:58,320 Speaker 2: works since Mark Mangino, Lance Lightphold. 576 00:30:58,720 --> 00:31:03,920 Speaker 1: I will go eight for dependability Turner Gill god, I 577 00:31:03,960 --> 00:31:09,920 Speaker 1: will go eight. In terms of adaptability, build quality, you're 578 00:31:09,920 --> 00:31:13,720 Speaker 1: giving him an eight, Yes, I'm not giving him an eight. 579 00:31:14,080 --> 00:31:16,280 Speaker 2: What has he done that is that you feel like 580 00:31:16,320 --> 00:31:21,040 Speaker 2: he's done an average job building this roster out. 581 00:31:22,200 --> 00:31:25,520 Speaker 1: He hasn't played defense. He has multiple quarterbacks. I haven't 582 00:31:25,560 --> 00:31:27,000 Speaker 1: played defense in two years. 583 00:31:27,160 --> 00:31:29,720 Speaker 2: That's fair, that's fair. If you want to give him 584 00:31:29,720 --> 00:31:31,360 Speaker 2: a seven there, it still puts him in the top 585 00:31:31,400 --> 00:31:32,480 Speaker 2: five ish category. 586 00:31:32,840 --> 00:31:39,280 Speaker 1: I will go eight eight seven, and for opportunity at Kansas. 587 00:31:38,920 --> 00:31:43,560 Speaker 2: I'll go seven eight eight seven seven, So sixteen and fourteen. 588 00:31:43,600 --> 00:31:45,320 Speaker 1: So you have him at a thirty. I got him 589 00:31:45,320 --> 00:31:48,600 Speaker 1: at a thirty. Okay, that's fair, and I don't have 590 00:31:48,720 --> 00:31:50,480 Speaker 1: Are you okay with that? Are you okay with that? 591 00:31:51,720 --> 00:31:53,840 Speaker 2: I'm okay with your opinion of it. I'm not gonna, 592 00:31:54,040 --> 00:31:56,400 Speaker 2: you know, take specific all right, because I've. 593 00:31:56,240 --> 00:31:59,880 Speaker 1: Got him thirty three. In terms of media, I've never 594 00:32:00,000 --> 00:32:03,640 Speaker 1: heard Lance slide pold speak. He's pretty good. He's all business. 595 00:32:03,760 --> 00:32:05,880 Speaker 1: It seems. We'll give him a one. We'll just throw 596 00:32:05,960 --> 00:32:06,480 Speaker 1: one in there. 597 00:32:06,600 --> 00:32:09,360 Speaker 2: So I have Kaylen de Borr in here, and Kaylen 598 00:32:09,400 --> 00:32:11,240 Speaker 2: de Boor I have as a nine nine to six 599 00:32:11,320 --> 00:32:11,680 Speaker 2: y nine. 600 00:32:12,760 --> 00:32:17,120 Speaker 1: Okay, talk me through. So nine is dependability nine. I 601 00:32:17,320 --> 00:32:21,680 Speaker 1: look we I'm talking myself into a bit of a 602 00:32:21,680 --> 00:32:23,840 Speaker 1: corner here because of what I just said about Lance 603 00:32:23,840 --> 00:32:24,680 Speaker 1: slide pold. 604 00:32:24,600 --> 00:32:30,400 Speaker 2: But similar background, smaller school, overwhelming success. But also, if 605 00:32:30,400 --> 00:32:33,440 Speaker 2: you're talking about Kaylen de Bor's track record, you're including 606 00:32:33,600 --> 00:32:36,000 Speaker 2: I guess coordinator time and certainly presno state time. 607 00:32:36,160 --> 00:32:37,720 Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, so say that again. 608 00:32:37,760 --> 00:32:40,960 Speaker 2: It was nine nine six nine for Kaylen de Bor. 609 00:32:41,120 --> 00:32:41,320 Speaker 1: Nine. 610 00:32:41,360 --> 00:32:46,160 Speaker 2: Dependability. How consistent is he yeah, wins beats really good teams. 611 00:32:46,480 --> 00:32:50,080 Speaker 2: How reliable is results, does it in almost identical fashion 612 00:32:50,120 --> 00:32:55,120 Speaker 2: every time? How comfortable we projecting these results forward? I 613 00:32:55,120 --> 00:32:58,520 Speaker 2: think he's gonna win at Alabama. I think when you 614 00:32:58,560 --> 00:33:01,360 Speaker 2: look at he's just all he does is exclusively win, 615 00:33:02,200 --> 00:33:05,480 Speaker 2: And a coach's track record is exclusively winning to a 616 00:33:05,560 --> 00:33:06,240 Speaker 2: huge degree. 617 00:33:06,440 --> 00:33:08,680 Speaker 1: Adaptability, I'd be inclined to go up to a ten 618 00:33:08,840 --> 00:33:11,920 Speaker 1: after this year. After this year. I agree with the 619 00:33:12,040 --> 00:33:16,160 Speaker 1: nine because I think just the multitude of guys that 620 00:33:16,240 --> 00:33:19,400 Speaker 1: he has had under him that he has made better, yeah, 621 00:33:19,880 --> 00:33:22,440 Speaker 1: in a short period of time, indicates somebody who knows 622 00:33:22,480 --> 00:33:25,360 Speaker 1: how to adapt. Sure, right, So I'm I'm with that. 623 00:33:25,880 --> 00:33:29,959 Speaker 1: If he can turn Jalen Milrow into a quarterback that 624 00:33:30,200 --> 00:33:33,040 Speaker 1: thrives in his system, which is something you know, I 625 00:33:33,080 --> 00:33:36,440 Speaker 1: am skeptical of, even though I like Jalen Milrow generally speaking, 626 00:33:37,040 --> 00:33:39,720 Speaker 1: I need to see how he fits into this offense, 627 00:33:39,920 --> 00:33:42,040 Speaker 1: because that, to me, remains a big unknown. That's like 628 00:33:42,080 --> 00:33:45,080 Speaker 1: a big spring and summer and fall question that I 629 00:33:45,120 --> 00:33:47,800 Speaker 1: think we need to figure out. So I'll go nine 630 00:33:48,000 --> 00:33:50,080 Speaker 1: because I agree. But if he gets mill Row to 631 00:33:50,120 --> 00:33:52,520 Speaker 1: the point where he's thriving in that offense, it's an 632 00:33:52,560 --> 00:33:53,160 Speaker 1: easy ten. 633 00:33:53,480 --> 00:33:57,200 Speaker 2: Well, certainly, so the adaptability thing wasn't there with the defense, 634 00:33:58,320 --> 00:34:01,440 Speaker 2: and it's you gotta just way the fact that he 635 00:34:01,560 --> 00:34:04,360 Speaker 2: didn't recruit the roster, didn't by a large that he 636 00:34:04,400 --> 00:34:08,719 Speaker 2: had at Washington, and so that's the knock there. But 637 00:34:09,480 --> 00:34:13,000 Speaker 2: obviously in game Kaylin de Borr and you know, winning 638 00:34:13,000 --> 00:34:17,080 Speaker 2: close games, you know, game planning successfully, Like even when 639 00:34:17,080 --> 00:34:20,360 Speaker 2: they're not playing well, they're not losing because of coaches 640 00:34:20,400 --> 00:34:21,280 Speaker 2: on the sideline. 641 00:34:21,320 --> 00:34:24,800 Speaker 1: Generally, Hey, look at and you know this better than anybody. Yeah, 642 00:34:24,840 --> 00:34:27,360 Speaker 1: look at what he did against Oregon. Look at what 643 00:34:27,440 --> 00:34:29,840 Speaker 1: he did against Oregon twice. I'm not saying this is 644 00:34:29,840 --> 00:34:34,280 Speaker 1: Trent and Dunk on you or Oregon, sure, but like finishes. 645 00:34:34,560 --> 00:34:37,080 Speaker 1: I remember those conversations we had. I remember the text 646 00:34:37,120 --> 00:34:40,640 Speaker 1: you were getting from Jeff Jeff Schwartz talking about you know, 647 00:34:40,719 --> 00:34:42,920 Speaker 1: Oregon's got an advantage here. Oregon should be able to 648 00:34:42,920 --> 00:34:48,200 Speaker 1: press that advantage, and Washington played defense in a way 649 00:34:48,200 --> 00:34:52,080 Speaker 1: that we did not expect against a really good Oregon offense. 650 00:34:52,120 --> 00:34:55,040 Speaker 1: They especially earlier, were ready. Yeah, they were ready, and 651 00:34:55,080 --> 00:34:58,120 Speaker 1: they were well prepared for that moment. Build quality, though, 652 00:34:58,160 --> 00:34:58,759 Speaker 1: you got a six. 653 00:34:59,320 --> 00:35:02,520 Speaker 2: I have a six because it's not really proven. Look, 654 00:35:02,520 --> 00:35:04,600 Speaker 2: you have to give him a ton of credit for 655 00:35:04,680 --> 00:35:07,200 Speaker 2: Michael Pennix that he had the relationship with Michael tent 656 00:35:07,200 --> 00:35:11,640 Speaker 2: Pennix brings him in. Obviously, the offensive coaching staff. Bringing 657 00:35:11,640 --> 00:35:14,480 Speaker 2: in the new receivers coach I believe from Purdue Ryan 658 00:35:14,560 --> 00:35:18,759 Speaker 2: Grubb in huge demand, is now what the Seahawks offensive coordinator. 659 00:35:20,000 --> 00:35:23,320 Speaker 2: So in terms of, you know, the offensive line continue 660 00:35:23,320 --> 00:35:26,520 Speaker 2: to develop and get better at Washington under him. So 661 00:35:27,520 --> 00:35:30,439 Speaker 2: a number of different position groups did really well under 662 00:35:30,440 --> 00:35:35,400 Speaker 2: his assistance. Offense obviously thrived bringing in Michael Pennix was huge, 663 00:35:36,040 --> 00:35:40,480 Speaker 2: but didn't recruit on a level that is comparable to 664 00:35:40,680 --> 00:35:42,400 Speaker 2: some of the best coaches on this list. 665 00:35:42,440 --> 00:35:44,760 Speaker 1: I was thinking about it as he gave me those numbers, 666 00:35:45,560 --> 00:35:47,520 Speaker 1: trying to figure out why you would go so low 667 00:35:47,560 --> 00:35:50,600 Speaker 1: on the build quality. Yeah, and then I remembered. Oh, 668 00:35:50,600 --> 00:35:52,880 Speaker 1: he didn't really recruit the guys he had. He developed, 669 00:35:53,239 --> 00:35:56,000 Speaker 1: and that's going to stand for something. But in terms 670 00:35:56,040 --> 00:35:59,160 Speaker 1: of recruiting, I think he's got a lot to prove it. 671 00:35:59,160 --> 00:36:01,160 Speaker 1: Certainly he had a lot to prove at Washington, and 672 00:36:01,200 --> 00:36:02,640 Speaker 1: I think he's going to have even more to prove 673 00:36:02,680 --> 00:36:04,760 Speaker 1: at Alabama. It's certainly going to be easier to recruit 674 00:36:04,800 --> 00:36:05,600 Speaker 1: at Alabama. 675 00:36:06,480 --> 00:36:08,960 Speaker 2: I think Jalen Polk was another key. I think it 676 00:36:09,000 --> 00:36:11,239 Speaker 2: was a Texas Tech transfer, but I don't remember if 677 00:36:11,280 --> 00:36:13,839 Speaker 2: it was under debor or I think it was early 678 00:36:13,920 --> 00:36:18,160 Speaker 2: to bor. But yeah, by and large, Dylan Johnson was 679 00:36:18,160 --> 00:36:21,239 Speaker 2: a Mississippi State transfer, so filled in some gaps really impressively. 680 00:36:21,320 --> 00:36:25,560 Speaker 2: Jabarmahammad from Oklahoma State. So utilize the portal well in 681 00:36:25,640 --> 00:36:28,840 Speaker 2: terms of finding, you know, sometime or a lot of 682 00:36:28,880 --> 00:36:33,279 Speaker 2: the time star power. But yeah, high school recruiting still 683 00:36:33,320 --> 00:36:33,759 Speaker 2: matters to me. 684 00:36:33,880 --> 00:36:35,880 Speaker 1: We should do one of two things here. Okay, I'm 685 00:36:35,960 --> 00:36:37,400 Speaker 1: don't really take issue with this at all. I mean, 686 00:36:37,400 --> 00:36:39,640 Speaker 1: he deserves to be in the top five, right, Yeah, 687 00:36:39,680 --> 00:36:41,880 Speaker 1: we either need to bump up build quality to a 688 00:36:41,920 --> 00:36:44,000 Speaker 1: seven or opportunity to attend. 689 00:36:45,960 --> 00:36:50,719 Speaker 2: Build quality to a seven. Opportunity to attend. 690 00:36:50,480 --> 00:36:54,480 Speaker 1: One of those two. Why just went to a national 691 00:36:54,520 --> 00:36:59,359 Speaker 1: championship game. Yeah, went to a national championship game. Did 692 00:36:59,400 --> 00:37:02,000 Speaker 1: well for as Oh also with Jake Hayner. Yeah, did 693 00:37:02,040 --> 00:37:06,000 Speaker 1: very well at Fresno. And I think day one stepping 694 00:37:06,000 --> 00:37:07,880 Speaker 1: in at Alabama is going to have an opportunity to 695 00:37:07,920 --> 00:37:13,120 Speaker 1: get back to that national championship. Okay, so you're talking 696 00:37:13,120 --> 00:37:17,120 Speaker 1: about opportunity though his ceiling is about as high as 697 00:37:17,120 --> 00:37:18,320 Speaker 1: any coach in college football. 698 00:37:19,719 --> 00:37:23,759 Speaker 2: No, I mean, I'm a ten. Opportunity indicates to me 699 00:37:24,480 --> 00:37:30,040 Speaker 2: that you can go toe to toe often with Kirby Smart. Okay, well, 700 00:37:30,040 --> 00:37:31,879 Speaker 2: then let's don't have somebody on this list that can. 701 00:37:32,040 --> 00:37:35,000 Speaker 2: Then let's go up build quality. Let's take that seven. 702 00:37:35,080 --> 00:37:35,600 Speaker 2: Let's take that. 703 00:37:35,960 --> 00:37:42,000 Speaker 1: One, because look it, it definitely stands to reason that 704 00:37:43,120 --> 00:37:44,800 Speaker 1: he didn't recruit at Washington in the way that we 705 00:37:44,840 --> 00:37:46,239 Speaker 1: would like to put him a little bit higher on 706 00:37:46,280 --> 00:37:48,040 Speaker 1: this list. So we're gonna we're going to dock him 707 00:37:48,080 --> 00:37:51,240 Speaker 1: for that. But and developing those receivers was huge. Yeah. 708 00:37:51,280 --> 00:37:54,000 Speaker 1: His his ability to develop those guys, though if you 709 00:37:54,000 --> 00:37:56,920 Speaker 1: didn't recruit them, definitely stands for and is not the 710 00:37:56,920 --> 00:37:59,799 Speaker 1: position coach. Yeah, right, so we'll go we'll go seven there, 711 00:37:59,800 --> 00:38:04,040 Speaker 1: what is that? Nine? Nine, thirty four? Sure, thirty four. 712 00:38:04,120 --> 00:38:06,080 Speaker 1: I think he's crazy like, so that puts him even 713 00:38:06,080 --> 00:38:09,400 Speaker 1: with Whittingham. Even with Whittingham. I think he's crazy likable, 714 00:38:10,160 --> 00:38:12,520 Speaker 1: and I'll give we'll give him a three. Let's give 715 00:38:12,600 --> 00:38:15,040 Speaker 1: him three on the on the on the X side of. 716 00:38:15,000 --> 00:38:17,000 Speaker 2: That crazy likable, I don't know. He seems kind of. 717 00:38:17,040 --> 00:38:20,640 Speaker 1: Understated, but he's very understated. I think that makes him likable. Okay, 718 00:38:20,960 --> 00:38:22,440 Speaker 1: I'm gonna give him a three on that front. So 719 00:38:22,480 --> 00:38:25,839 Speaker 1: we've got right now, Kirby Smart with thirty eight. Yeah, 720 00:38:25,880 --> 00:38:29,279 Speaker 1: we've got Whittingham with a thirty four alongside Klein de 721 00:38:29,360 --> 00:38:34,360 Speaker 1: boor Ryan Day and Lance Lipold. I'll I'm not as 722 00:38:34,440 --> 00:38:36,600 Speaker 1: high on Lance Lighthold. I've only got him with a thirty. 723 00:38:36,640 --> 00:38:40,319 Speaker 1: You've got him a thirty three alongside Ryan. Yeah. We've 724 00:38:40,320 --> 00:38:44,359 Speaker 1: done five coaches here. Let's go have a few other 725 00:38:44,719 --> 00:38:47,760 Speaker 1: four way tie a four way tie, Okay, six through nine? 726 00:38:48,440 --> 00:38:50,520 Speaker 1: What is your yeah? 727 00:38:50,920 --> 00:38:56,280 Speaker 2: Okay, in no particular order, Chris Cleman, Dabels, Twiney, Dan Lanning, 728 00:38:56,440 --> 00:38:57,040 Speaker 2: Mike Norvell. 729 00:38:58,640 --> 00:39:03,200 Speaker 1: Ooh, why don't we do dabbo? Because this is the 730 00:39:03,360 --> 00:39:05,680 Speaker 1: X DABO scale right, Yeah, this one was very difficult 731 00:39:05,680 --> 00:39:07,279 Speaker 1: for me. I changed this one a bunch. I have 732 00:39:07,360 --> 00:39:13,839 Speaker 1: Dabbo as an eight seven seven ten, eight seven seven ten, Yeah, 733 00:39:14,000 --> 00:39:14,719 Speaker 1: ten nine tents. 734 00:39:15,480 --> 00:39:18,040 Speaker 2: I can go eight seven seven nine If I'm saying 735 00:39:18,040 --> 00:39:19,839 Speaker 2: he can go toe to toe with Kirby Smart, which 736 00:39:19,840 --> 00:39:22,040 Speaker 2: I don't believe to be the case in the present. 737 00:39:22,840 --> 00:39:25,200 Speaker 2: But when you win multiple national championships and you have 738 00:39:25,320 --> 00:39:28,120 Speaker 2: proven that you can go toe to toe with the 739 00:39:28,160 --> 00:39:31,279 Speaker 2: modern I mean the modern, the all time goat here 740 00:39:31,280 --> 00:39:36,200 Speaker 2: and Nick Saban. We know Dabo's ceiling is multiple national championship. 741 00:39:36,239 --> 00:39:37,440 Speaker 2: It's got to be a fact. It's got to be 742 00:39:37,440 --> 00:39:39,319 Speaker 2: a ten. So I have it as a ten, and 743 00:39:39,360 --> 00:39:40,880 Speaker 2: it has to be a ten. Stay on it. It 744 00:39:40,920 --> 00:39:43,200 Speaker 2: has to do ten. So what did I say? Eight 745 00:39:43,280 --> 00:39:45,960 Speaker 2: nine nine seven eight seven seven ten excuse me? Yeah, 746 00:39:45,960 --> 00:39:48,160 Speaker 2: we've got eight seven seven ten. 747 00:39:48,239 --> 00:39:49,879 Speaker 1: By the way, in the dock, I'm jotting these down 748 00:39:49,920 --> 00:39:51,680 Speaker 1: as you mentioned them, if it if it helps to 749 00:39:51,760 --> 00:39:57,399 Speaker 1: kind of keep us aligned here. Yeah, lowest grades than 750 00:39:57,640 --> 00:40:03,040 Speaker 1: are for the adapt adaptability and build and build quality. Yeah, 751 00:40:03,600 --> 00:40:06,480 Speaker 1: which do you think he is worse at between those two? 752 00:40:07,840 --> 00:40:13,280 Speaker 2: Adaptability program philosophy with the portal? I think is where 753 00:40:13,960 --> 00:40:16,719 Speaker 2: you're gonna get knocked down with dabble, because still like 754 00:40:17,040 --> 00:40:21,640 Speaker 2: adjusting on the fly with decisions play calling, like for 755 00:40:21,800 --> 00:40:26,200 Speaker 2: the overwhelming majority of his tenure at Clemson, you know, 756 00:40:26,400 --> 00:40:30,200 Speaker 2: having Brent Venables there, having you know, Jeff Scott and 757 00:40:30,200 --> 00:40:33,680 Speaker 2: Tony Elliott do the job they mostly did, especially when 758 00:40:33,680 --> 00:40:38,200 Speaker 2: they were co coordinators. Like he oversaw really good philosophy. 759 00:40:38,400 --> 00:40:48,480 Speaker 2: He oversaw teams just destroying everybody in their path, and philosophically, 760 00:40:49,160 --> 00:40:54,360 Speaker 2: his vision was nearly flawless for a long stretch. Now though, 761 00:40:54,920 --> 00:40:58,080 Speaker 2: via the portal, via some of those assistant hires, you're 762 00:40:58,080 --> 00:41:00,560 Speaker 2: seeing a stubbornness that are not come down. 763 00:41:01,080 --> 00:41:03,680 Speaker 1: I would go down farther man further, I know. 764 00:41:03,719 --> 00:41:06,360 Speaker 2: But you still have to weigh the totality of his career. 765 00:41:08,200 --> 00:41:09,920 Speaker 2: You can say this is what Dabo is in this 766 00:41:10,000 --> 00:41:12,759 Speaker 2: if you were to say, like, I am judging this 767 00:41:14,000 --> 00:41:16,680 Speaker 2: by exactly what I feel about them in this second 768 00:41:16,719 --> 00:41:21,200 Speaker 2: as a coach with zero track record, sure I. 769 00:41:21,200 --> 00:41:25,520 Speaker 1: Go down to a at least a six on adaptability, 770 00:41:27,040 --> 00:41:29,399 Speaker 1: I go down to I think I gotta go down 771 00:41:29,440 --> 00:41:31,120 Speaker 1: to a six. I agree with the aid I think 772 00:41:31,160 --> 00:41:35,399 Speaker 1: eight is actually very very smart for dependability. I think 773 00:41:35,440 --> 00:41:38,400 Speaker 1: By the way, that's the right number for the for 774 00:41:38,480 --> 00:41:43,520 Speaker 1: the d side of this. But the adaptability and build 775 00:41:43,600 --> 00:41:47,120 Speaker 1: quality I think kind of work hand in hand, you know, 776 00:41:47,400 --> 00:41:50,479 Speaker 1: Like he has proven he used to be a little 777 00:41:50,480 --> 00:41:53,160 Speaker 1: bit more adaptable, but even now he's bringing Remember it 778 00:41:53,200 --> 00:41:55,800 Speaker 1: was like a big deal, like, wow, Dabo's got ice 779 00:41:55,840 --> 00:41:58,040 Speaker 1: in his veins. He went, he stole Garrett Riley. They're 780 00:41:58,040 --> 00:42:00,359 Speaker 1: in the same offense, the same offense and that they 781 00:42:00,400 --> 00:42:04,480 Speaker 1: ran the year before. And I think you can argue 782 00:42:04,560 --> 00:42:07,320 Speaker 1: I docked the portal thing a lot. I'm a five 783 00:42:07,440 --> 00:42:08,920 Speaker 1: with adaptability for Dabo. 784 00:42:09,920 --> 00:42:14,320 Speaker 2: Here's the here's the knot I worked myself into with Dabo. 785 00:42:14,880 --> 00:42:19,480 Speaker 2: You can say philosophically, Dabbo is taking things off the table. 786 00:42:20,040 --> 00:42:22,839 Speaker 2: But now with one hand tied behind their back, they 787 00:42:22,920 --> 00:42:25,760 Speaker 2: still win nine and ten games still, so he's adapting 788 00:42:25,840 --> 00:42:29,959 Speaker 2: to his own poor adaptation pretty well. They've won since 789 00:42:30,040 --> 00:42:32,560 Speaker 2: Clemson has you know, quote unquote fallen off a cliff 790 00:42:32,600 --> 00:42:35,600 Speaker 2: or whatever. Ten and three, eleven and three, nine and four. 791 00:42:35,800 --> 00:42:38,000 Speaker 1: Is he is like the best example we have in 792 00:42:38,040 --> 00:42:39,920 Speaker 1: the coaching ranks of machine learning. 793 00:42:40,600 --> 00:42:44,160 Speaker 2: Right, It's the cause and solution to all of Clemson's problems. 794 00:42:44,760 --> 00:42:47,080 Speaker 2: So yeah, they went eight to oh in the ACC in. 795 00:42:47,040 --> 00:42:51,560 Speaker 1: Twenty twenty two. I'll give the six In adaptability. Here 796 00:42:51,680 --> 00:42:54,359 Speaker 1: was again in the last three years. Here were there. 797 00:42:54,560 --> 00:42:58,520 Speaker 2: They're year ending AP ranks fourteen, thirteen and twenty for 798 00:42:58,600 --> 00:43:02,560 Speaker 2: somebody who fell off a cliff. Still not terrible. He's 799 00:43:02,600 --> 00:43:04,520 Speaker 2: adapting to his poor adaptation. 800 00:43:04,680 --> 00:43:04,960 Speaker 1: Well. 801 00:43:06,360 --> 00:43:09,800 Speaker 2: Build quality, yeah, I mean the high school recruiting is 802 00:43:09,800 --> 00:43:13,480 Speaker 2: still strong, the defense is still very as great at 803 00:43:13,480 --> 00:43:18,000 Speaker 2: developing players. Running back has been good. Receiver has fallen 804 00:43:18,000 --> 00:43:20,640 Speaker 2: off the cliff for sure, which is specifically against Dabo 805 00:43:20,719 --> 00:43:23,920 Speaker 2: given his position, coaching background, and the track record at 806 00:43:23,960 --> 00:43:25,120 Speaker 2: receiver previously. 807 00:43:26,360 --> 00:43:29,080 Speaker 1: You've got eight seven, seven ten. I'll go eight six. 808 00:43:32,160 --> 00:43:32,680 Speaker 1: Do I want to. 809 00:43:32,640 --> 00:43:34,239 Speaker 2: Sellfing NFL players? 810 00:43:35,719 --> 00:43:40,520 Speaker 1: I'll go eight six, seven ten. So I'm a point 811 00:43:40,640 --> 00:43:42,759 Speaker 1: underneath you. What is that? What does that add up to? 812 00:43:42,840 --> 00:43:47,320 Speaker 2: Eighteen eight, seven, six ten, thirty two? Eight and seven 813 00:43:47,400 --> 00:43:51,120 Speaker 2: is fifteen six is twenty one thirty one. 814 00:43:51,640 --> 00:43:55,200 Speaker 1: I'm a thirty one year thirty two? Yeah? What what 815 00:43:55,320 --> 00:44:00,799 Speaker 1: kind of media score does he get in terms of 816 00:44:00,840 --> 00:44:03,480 Speaker 1: extra version? The locals love him. I mean, if you're 817 00:44:03,520 --> 00:44:07,760 Speaker 1: a media if you're a media guy in Clemson, yeah, 818 00:44:07,880 --> 00:44:11,360 Speaker 1: you love Dabo Sweeney. If you're a Clemson fan, I 819 00:44:11,360 --> 00:44:15,200 Speaker 1: think you probably, on most things anyway, enjoy hearing what 820 00:44:15,280 --> 00:44:18,400 Speaker 1: Dabo has to say. We enjoyed it from a content 821 00:44:18,480 --> 00:44:21,200 Speaker 1: creation standpoint, just because when you get him off script 822 00:44:21,200 --> 00:44:22,800 Speaker 1: a little bit, that's when it gets real weird. 823 00:44:22,920 --> 00:44:25,400 Speaker 2: He is the personality of Clemson football. I think you're 824 00:44:25,400 --> 00:44:28,680 Speaker 2: probably giving him a four, right, I. 825 00:44:28,640 --> 00:44:31,360 Speaker 1: Think I'm inclined to go four. You don't have to 826 00:44:31,600 --> 00:44:34,240 Speaker 1: love him. He's got great mic skills. 827 00:44:34,760 --> 00:44:37,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, in terms of like his presence behind a microphone. 828 00:44:38,000 --> 00:44:41,400 Speaker 2: In terms of you understanding who he is as a 829 00:44:41,440 --> 00:44:46,800 Speaker 2: public person, I think he communicates that very well. Like 830 00:44:46,840 --> 00:44:49,399 Speaker 2: it or not, I think he does a very good 831 00:44:49,480 --> 00:44:56,440 Speaker 2: job as a face of a largely winning program. Likable, unlikable, 832 00:44:56,760 --> 00:44:59,000 Speaker 2: you know where he standing, You know where he stands. 833 00:44:59,040 --> 00:45:00,279 Speaker 1: I agree with that, all right, Which, what are the 834 00:45:00,360 --> 00:45:03,120 Speaker 1: other three coaches that you had tied with Dabo? 835 00:45:03,920 --> 00:45:08,560 Speaker 2: So tied with Dabo? I have Chris Cleman, Dan Lanning, 836 00:45:08,640 --> 00:45:09,240 Speaker 2: Mike Norvel. 837 00:45:10,520 --> 00:45:16,600 Speaker 1: Okay, so Climban is not part of ESPN's top ten ranking, right, 838 00:45:17,000 --> 00:45:20,520 Speaker 1: but both Norvella and Landing are. Norvell and Lanning are 839 00:45:21,520 --> 00:45:27,440 Speaker 1: five and six. We have now accounted for ESPN's top six. 840 00:45:28,360 --> 00:45:32,640 Speaker 1: In addition to Lancelipold and Ryan Day. We can get 841 00:45:32,640 --> 00:45:36,360 Speaker 1: to Sark and Lean Kiffen here momentarily, I'm sure. But 842 00:45:37,640 --> 00:45:40,560 Speaker 1: to talk me through the reasoning on Chris Climan, I 843 00:45:40,600 --> 00:45:44,880 Speaker 1: have eight's across the board for Chris Climan. Okay. 844 00:45:45,400 --> 00:45:47,840 Speaker 2: I think he's dependable and has a track record to 845 00:45:47,880 --> 00:45:51,640 Speaker 2: back it up. I think he adapts well. Both sides 846 00:45:51,640 --> 00:45:55,400 Speaker 2: of the ball have succeeded. They're another one of those 847 00:45:55,480 --> 00:45:58,879 Speaker 2: teams that by and large they're beating the flawed they 848 00:45:58,920 --> 00:46:03,279 Speaker 2: are not the flawed game build quality. I think he's 849 00:46:03,280 --> 00:46:06,719 Speaker 2: done a nice job utilizing the portal. He's done a 850 00:46:06,800 --> 00:46:09,600 Speaker 2: nice job on the trail, nice job developing. I think 851 00:46:09,640 --> 00:46:13,759 Speaker 2: his hires have been sound. I mean, we'll see how 852 00:46:14,000 --> 00:46:16,399 Speaker 2: you know how well. I think it's the offensive line coach, 853 00:46:16,400 --> 00:46:21,240 Speaker 2: replacing Colin Klein at offensive coordinator. But they've developed NFL 854 00:46:21,440 --> 00:46:25,040 Speaker 2: players on both sides of the ball. They've won without 855 00:46:25,200 --> 00:46:29,160 Speaker 2: NFL players, you know, especially you know, quarterback whatever. But 856 00:46:29,200 --> 00:46:33,360 Speaker 2: Will Howard a couple of years ago, now I knocked 857 00:46:33,400 --> 00:46:37,520 Speaker 2: him down from like a nine, maybe because the Adrian 858 00:46:37,560 --> 00:46:42,920 Speaker 2: Martinez experiment. I think that was poor vision. There coaches 859 00:46:42,960 --> 00:46:46,439 Speaker 2: ceiling eight as like can threaten, especially in the current 860 00:46:46,440 --> 00:46:49,640 Speaker 2: Big Twelve, can threaten for the conference more often than not. Yeah, 861 00:46:50,239 --> 00:46:53,920 Speaker 2: Conference championship caliber won the conference with Texas and Oklahoma 862 00:46:53,960 --> 00:46:54,759 Speaker 2: in it two years ago. 863 00:46:55,840 --> 00:46:59,720 Speaker 1: I'm a solid thirty on climbing. So you're eights across 864 00:46:59,719 --> 00:47:02,480 Speaker 1: the board thirty two. Yeah, I agree with the first 865 00:47:02,560 --> 00:47:05,280 Speaker 1: two eights. I go seven in terms of build quality 866 00:47:05,320 --> 00:47:09,680 Speaker 1: because it's a talent question. It's not a development question. Sure, 867 00:47:09,719 --> 00:47:10,760 Speaker 1: it is a talent question. 868 00:47:11,520 --> 00:47:13,480 Speaker 2: Yeah, receiver fell off last year a bit. 869 00:47:14,239 --> 00:47:17,319 Speaker 1: I want to see what Avery Johnson looks like. I 870 00:47:17,360 --> 00:47:19,440 Speaker 1: want to see what Avery Johnson looks like if given 871 00:47:19,880 --> 00:47:21,440 Speaker 1: more of a role in this offense. I know you're 872 00:47:21,520 --> 00:47:23,400 Speaker 1: high on him. I'm high on on two they are 873 00:47:23,440 --> 00:47:26,040 Speaker 1: as well. But I want to see what he can do. 874 00:47:26,480 --> 00:47:29,759 Speaker 1: If he can turn that. Yeah, it's a pretty highly 875 00:47:29,840 --> 00:47:33,839 Speaker 1: rated recruit. If he can turn him into something at 876 00:47:33,920 --> 00:47:36,520 Speaker 1: quarterback that they have not had, that would be I 877 00:47:36,560 --> 00:47:40,560 Speaker 1: think a very positive signal on the opportunity side. It's interesting, 878 00:47:40,600 --> 00:47:42,800 Speaker 1: you know, there's a little bit of addition by subtraction, 879 00:47:42,920 --> 00:47:48,440 Speaker 1: isn't there. Because you've got Texas and Oklahoma leaving, leaving 880 00:47:48,440 --> 00:47:52,680 Speaker 1: the Big twelve, You've got I think a power vacuum 881 00:47:52,719 --> 00:47:54,919 Speaker 1: of sorts at the top. Now because those schools are gone, 882 00:47:54,960 --> 00:47:57,680 Speaker 1: you've also got an expanded playoff and there's probably gonna 883 00:47:57,680 --> 00:47:59,640 Speaker 1: be two teams from the Big twelve getting into this thing, 884 00:48:00,280 --> 00:48:03,880 Speaker 1: which is opportunity for Kansas State in a way that 885 00:48:03,920 --> 00:48:06,359 Speaker 1: they have not had again given that vacuum. So I'm 886 00:48:07,560 --> 00:48:10,560 Speaker 1: I think before if I were a six, I'm going 887 00:48:10,640 --> 00:48:14,520 Speaker 1: to go seven now on the opportunity side, just because 888 00:48:14,520 --> 00:48:17,760 Speaker 1: of the addition by subtraction things. So I'm we agree, 889 00:48:17,800 --> 00:48:21,280 Speaker 1: We disagree, agree on most disagree on the final number. 890 00:48:21,920 --> 00:48:24,720 Speaker 1: I've ultimately got climb In in line with Lance Leipold, 891 00:48:24,760 --> 00:48:26,759 Speaker 1: which is not something I planned but kind of works 892 00:48:26,800 --> 00:48:29,640 Speaker 1: out in the great state of Kansas. What do we 893 00:48:29,680 --> 00:48:32,480 Speaker 1: think for media chops any kind of bonus points here 894 00:48:32,520 --> 00:48:36,600 Speaker 1: for the two or three? It's fine. We got lance 895 00:48:36,680 --> 00:48:41,080 Speaker 1: Leipold as a one. Yeah, yeah, somewhere there one or two. 896 00:48:41,120 --> 00:48:43,359 Speaker 1: I'll give them a one. Fine, all right, So climb In. 897 00:48:43,520 --> 00:48:46,120 Speaker 1: We you know, I always agree on some minor things 898 00:48:46,440 --> 00:48:49,120 Speaker 1: just in terms of build quality as well. The twenty 899 00:48:49,160 --> 00:48:53,600 Speaker 1: four to seven Sports Metric had the number twelve hundred 900 00:48:53,760 --> 00:48:57,120 Speaker 1: player in the class of twenty twenty as somebody Kansas 901 00:48:57,120 --> 00:49:00,919 Speaker 1: State looked at and said, come on in, do spun. Wow, 902 00:49:00,960 --> 00:49:05,600 Speaker 1: it's pretty good. Pretty good Lanning. Okay. 903 00:49:06,120 --> 00:49:12,640 Speaker 2: Lanning's grades as I have them are eight seven nine eight. 904 00:49:14,000 --> 00:49:19,120 Speaker 1: Eight seven nine eight. And let me start the conversation 905 00:49:19,239 --> 00:49:22,480 Speaker 1: with on Landing with this. M hm. He gets the 906 00:49:22,520 --> 00:49:27,080 Speaker 1: full five in extra version. Okay, he gets the full five. 907 00:49:28,120 --> 00:49:30,800 Speaker 1: I think he has played the media about as well 908 00:49:30,880 --> 00:49:34,680 Speaker 1: as anybody in college football, better than Lane Kiffin. 909 00:49:35,000 --> 00:49:37,319 Speaker 2: He's out there. He puts himself out there a great 910 00:49:37,360 --> 00:49:40,120 Speaker 2: he puts himself out there. And I will harken back 911 00:49:40,160 --> 00:49:43,320 Speaker 2: to something that we talked a little bit about amid 912 00:49:43,320 --> 00:49:49,279 Speaker 2: the coaching carousel. Dan Lanning used the rumors about him 913 00:49:49,320 --> 00:49:56,560 Speaker 2: potentially being interested in you know, Alabama better than anybody. 914 00:49:57,000 --> 00:49:59,600 Speaker 2: Mike Norvell used it to get a pay increase and 915 00:49:59,640 --> 00:50:03,759 Speaker 2: maybe interested in that job, but Dan Lanning reportedly was 916 00:50:03,800 --> 00:50:06,560 Speaker 2: never all that interested in it. Likes where he's at. 917 00:50:07,239 --> 00:50:09,400 Speaker 1: Wasn't so much interested in getting the pay increase or 918 00:50:09,400 --> 00:50:11,759 Speaker 1: anything like that. He was interested in the social media 919 00:50:11,840 --> 00:50:13,880 Speaker 1: hit that he could get from it. They had a 920 00:50:14,000 --> 00:50:18,040 Speaker 1: video ready to roll. I am not the Oregon alum 921 00:50:18,120 --> 00:50:18,440 Speaker 1: between it. 922 00:50:18,680 --> 00:50:21,759 Speaker 2: Is this his personality or is this his like strategic 923 00:50:21,840 --> 00:50:22,520 Speaker 2: It doesn't matter. 924 00:50:23,120 --> 00:50:26,799 Speaker 1: It doesn't matter if it's personality or strategicy. But the 925 00:50:26,880 --> 00:50:30,440 Speaker 1: fact that they had a video ready to roll almost 926 00:50:30,600 --> 00:50:34,480 Speaker 1: the millisecond that he turned that job down. That tells 927 00:50:34,480 --> 00:50:36,400 Speaker 1: me this is a dude who's scheming, like there's some 928 00:50:36,480 --> 00:50:38,640 Speaker 1: game of Throne stuff going on up in his head. 929 00:50:39,200 --> 00:50:42,319 Speaker 1: That he gets the five. He gets the five for 930 00:50:42,400 --> 00:50:44,840 Speaker 1: how he used the media. The only other person that 931 00:50:44,840 --> 00:50:47,080 Speaker 1: I'm going to give a five to two on the 932 00:50:47,120 --> 00:50:50,719 Speaker 1: media side is Brian Kelly. Because Brian Kelly is a 933 00:50:50,719 --> 00:50:53,640 Speaker 1: politician first and foremost. A lot of folks don't like 934 00:50:53,719 --> 00:50:55,919 Speaker 1: him for that. I have Mac Brown as a five. 935 00:50:55,960 --> 00:50:59,880 Speaker 2: But continue, uh, okay, we could go. I could be 936 00:51:00,320 --> 00:51:05,160 Speaker 2: he's the politician's politician. Yeah, eight, seven, nine, eight with 937 00:51:05,360 --> 00:51:07,360 Speaker 2: the with the kicker of the five for Landing is 938 00:51:07,360 --> 00:51:09,840 Speaker 2: what you've got. Talk me through that quickly. I have 939 00:51:09,960 --> 00:51:12,399 Speaker 2: Landing as a three. By the way, in terms of personality, 940 00:51:12,840 --> 00:51:15,680 Speaker 2: really he gives very generic answers. I don't think he's 941 00:51:15,680 --> 00:51:17,760 Speaker 2: shown much of a sense of humor, which is fine. 942 00:51:18,239 --> 00:51:22,760 Speaker 1: I'll split the difference and go four with you, Okay, 943 00:51:24,320 --> 00:51:25,239 Speaker 1: all right? Eight. 944 00:51:25,360 --> 00:51:29,839 Speaker 2: As in terms of dependability, one double digit games ended 945 00:51:29,880 --> 00:51:33,759 Speaker 2: his season in the conference championship game and blowing out 946 00:51:33,840 --> 00:51:36,600 Speaker 2: a clearly inferior team in a New Year six game. 947 00:51:38,320 --> 00:51:40,880 Speaker 2: I have very comfortable, given where the talent is and 948 00:51:40,960 --> 00:51:43,000 Speaker 2: will continue to be, saying he is going to be 949 00:51:43,719 --> 00:51:48,160 Speaker 2: dependably at an eight or nine. But right now, you know, 950 00:51:48,480 --> 00:51:50,600 Speaker 2: I just have him as an eight because he just 951 00:51:50,600 --> 00:51:54,040 Speaker 2: hasn't broken through in terms of like showing that what 952 00:51:54,120 --> 00:51:59,200 Speaker 2: he can do against Utah or whoever is meaningful when 953 00:51:59,239 --> 00:52:03,960 Speaker 2: they play Washington. Right, Adaptability on the fly with decisions. 954 00:52:03,960 --> 00:52:05,239 Speaker 2: What did I say six, No. 955 00:52:05,440 --> 00:52:07,160 Speaker 1: You've got a seven? Seven? Yeah? 956 00:52:07,480 --> 00:52:13,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, So I obviously have a orgon bias here, but like, yes, 957 00:52:13,400 --> 00:52:16,080 Speaker 2: there are moments where you can argue, yes, too aggressive, 958 00:52:16,560 --> 00:52:20,759 Speaker 2: but there is a very specific vision to it. He's 959 00:52:20,760 --> 00:52:26,000 Speaker 2: not inconsistent with that, and so philosophically, he's saying we 960 00:52:26,040 --> 00:52:28,600 Speaker 2: are always going to have our foot on the gas, 961 00:52:29,239 --> 00:52:32,160 Speaker 2: and yes, that might get him in trouble. Yes you 962 00:52:32,200 --> 00:52:37,439 Speaker 2: can question some of the individual ones, absolutely, but he's 963 00:52:37,480 --> 00:52:40,840 Speaker 2: sticking to an ethos and I think that's smart. So 964 00:52:41,480 --> 00:52:44,279 Speaker 2: that's why I docked points, because you know, some of 965 00:52:44,320 --> 00:52:48,399 Speaker 2: the over aggression, But play calling wise, I think they've 966 00:52:48,440 --> 00:52:51,279 Speaker 2: been a great place he's hired two good offensive coordinators 967 00:52:52,239 --> 00:52:53,640 Speaker 2: that have adapted to the modern game. 968 00:52:53,680 --> 00:52:56,920 Speaker 1: Really well, I take issue with some of this, but 969 00:52:56,960 --> 00:53:00,760 Speaker 1: why don't you, why don't you close it out build quality? 970 00:53:00,920 --> 00:53:06,839 Speaker 2: I'm near a ten, but it's a nine, and I 971 00:53:06,840 --> 00:53:10,880 Speaker 2: don't really have like if it's a ten's he's stringing 972 00:53:10,920 --> 00:53:13,879 Speaker 2: together top three classes essentially, and he hasn't done that yet. 973 00:53:14,000 --> 00:53:16,480 Speaker 2: They've been incredible in the portal. They've added a ton 974 00:53:16,520 --> 00:53:18,759 Speaker 2: of value in the portal. Obviously bo Nicks is the 975 00:53:18,760 --> 00:53:22,239 Speaker 2: height of that, but you know, bringing Dylan Gabriel, now 976 00:53:22,280 --> 00:53:24,799 Speaker 2: Dante more, the pieces on defense, especially at corner this 977 00:53:24,840 --> 00:53:28,200 Speaker 2: coming year, Evan Stewart at receiver, Tess Johnson. Last year 978 00:53:28,400 --> 00:53:32,839 Speaker 2: it said, you know, went over a thousand yards, Bucky Irving, like, 979 00:53:33,120 --> 00:53:35,920 Speaker 2: they're all just enormous wins. So I've hadded nine just 980 00:53:35,960 --> 00:53:40,839 Speaker 2: because they haven't strung together enormous classes yet. And then 981 00:53:40,880 --> 00:53:43,279 Speaker 2: what did I have as the final one? Landing had 982 00:53:43,320 --> 00:53:49,719 Speaker 2: an eight in terms of ceiling, mostly because I haven't 983 00:53:49,719 --> 00:53:51,600 Speaker 2: seen him win a conference, haven't seen him in this 984 00:53:51,640 --> 00:53:56,960 Speaker 2: current conference. So okay, okay, I can see a universe 985 00:53:57,440 --> 00:54:01,200 Speaker 2: in which, especially in a twelve team playoff world, he's 986 00:54:01,239 --> 00:54:02,480 Speaker 2: a nine after next year. 987 00:54:02,560 --> 00:54:05,160 Speaker 1: I agree. I agree with that. Here, here's the issue. 988 00:54:05,200 --> 00:54:07,160 Speaker 1: It has to take in the data we have as well. 989 00:54:07,640 --> 00:54:11,240 Speaker 1: The issue I have with this is on the dependability side. Okay, 990 00:54:11,640 --> 00:54:15,040 Speaker 1: and it's just a numbers game. He's been coach at 991 00:54:15,040 --> 00:54:18,520 Speaker 1: Oregon for what two years? Yep, We've got two years 992 00:54:18,600 --> 00:54:23,560 Speaker 1: worth of data. Three recruiting classes, three recruiting classes. Want 993 00:54:23,680 --> 00:54:27,279 Speaker 1: finished ten to three overall after the first season with 994 00:54:27,320 --> 00:54:30,960 Speaker 1: the Bowl win twelve and two this past year destroyed 995 00:54:30,960 --> 00:54:35,439 Speaker 1: Liberty in the Fiesta Bowl. Yeah, those are two really 996 00:54:35,480 --> 00:54:39,600 Speaker 1: good results. You're one and two. I'm not ready to 997 00:54:39,680 --> 00:54:45,320 Speaker 1: go that high on the dependability scale, you know, because 998 00:54:45,320 --> 00:54:48,799 Speaker 1: why going into a new conference that I think is 999 00:54:51,080 --> 00:54:56,040 Speaker 1: more difficult. I think, only two years to fall back 1000 00:54:56,040 --> 00:54:59,319 Speaker 1: at the top at the top, only two years to 1001 00:54:59,360 --> 00:55:05,160 Speaker 1: fall back on with that number with a usc that 1002 00:55:05,280 --> 00:55:10,480 Speaker 1: was problematic with a Utah team didn't have a quarterback. 1003 00:55:11,800 --> 00:55:13,560 Speaker 1: With the Washington team that was very good that they 1004 00:55:13,640 --> 00:55:16,759 Speaker 1: lost to twice this past three times, three three times 1005 00:55:16,800 --> 00:55:22,759 Speaker 1: time you three times? Excuse me. I'm a six on dependability, 1006 00:55:22,840 --> 00:55:27,120 Speaker 1: Dan six, I'm a six with the potential to go 1007 00:55:27,239 --> 00:55:29,520 Speaker 1: up very quickly, you know, if he if he wins 1008 00:55:29,520 --> 00:55:34,560 Speaker 1: eleven games this year, let's go up to seven and eight. Okay, 1009 00:55:34,640 --> 00:55:38,080 Speaker 1: we're grading him with respect to track record. We are 1010 00:55:38,120 --> 00:55:42,840 Speaker 1: grading him against guys who have been in their positions 1011 00:55:42,840 --> 00:55:45,120 Speaker 1: for much longer and have much more of a proven 1012 00:55:45,200 --> 00:55:48,680 Speaker 1: track record. By comparison, Dabo Sweeney is also an eight. 1013 00:55:49,440 --> 00:55:52,040 Speaker 1: Are we going to give Chris Cleiman is also an eight? 1014 00:55:52,600 --> 00:55:56,279 Speaker 1: By your metric? Lance Leipolds in nine? Are we going 1015 00:55:56,320 --> 00:56:00,480 Speaker 1: to give Dan Lanning an eight when compared to Ryan Day, 1016 00:56:00,520 --> 00:56:03,680 Speaker 1: who's a nine winning ten games a year? Are we 1017 00:56:03,680 --> 00:56:07,160 Speaker 1: gonna put Dan Lanning that high? In the dependability. 1018 00:56:06,680 --> 00:56:10,080 Speaker 2: He's consistently won, He's consistently improved both twice. 1019 00:56:10,120 --> 00:56:12,520 Speaker 1: He's done it twice. Not consistently he's done it twice. 1020 00:56:12,880 --> 00:56:15,400 Speaker 2: I'm saying consistently won over like twenty five games or 1021 00:56:15,440 --> 00:56:20,720 Speaker 2: something like that. How comfortable in projecting what he's done forward? 1022 00:56:20,760 --> 00:56:22,400 Speaker 2: I'm very comfortable. Are you comfortable? 1023 00:56:24,200 --> 00:56:25,719 Speaker 1: No? That's why I give him a six? 1024 00:56:25,760 --> 00:56:27,840 Speaker 2: So you're not comfortable, Okay, agree to disagree. 1025 00:56:27,880 --> 00:56:31,040 Speaker 1: That's the only thing I disagree with. I love Dan Lanning. Yeah, 1026 00:56:31,840 --> 00:56:35,440 Speaker 1: I've got him a six, seven nine eight, So I'm 1027 00:56:35,440 --> 00:56:38,319 Speaker 1: at six or seven nine eight, So thirty thirty for me, 1028 00:56:38,400 --> 00:56:41,080 Speaker 1: thirty two for you. We split the difference will go 1029 00:56:41,200 --> 00:56:45,320 Speaker 1: four and the ex kicker and then I think it's Norvel. 1030 00:56:46,440 --> 00:56:50,719 Speaker 1: You got Mike Norvell. Okay, yes, give me his. 1031 00:56:50,719 --> 00:56:56,920 Speaker 2: Numbers, Mike Norvell, I have at seven, eight, eight, nine. 1032 00:56:58,000 --> 00:57:03,240 Speaker 1: Seven, dependability, eight, adaptability eight in terms of build quality 1033 00:57:03,480 --> 00:57:06,839 Speaker 1: nine no nine nine build quality nine build five opportunity 1034 00:57:06,840 --> 00:57:12,280 Speaker 1: and nine opportunity. Okay, thank you, computer, appreciate that talking 1035 00:57:12,280 --> 00:57:14,520 Speaker 1: me through it quick. Dependability? Why seven? 1036 00:57:14,800 --> 00:57:18,160 Speaker 2: The consistency, the consistency through his time. Now you you 1037 00:57:18,240 --> 00:57:22,280 Speaker 2: add in success at Memphis, of course, but at Florida State, 1038 00:57:23,240 --> 00:57:26,720 Speaker 2: I don't know. There's it's been a little bit inconsistent, 1039 00:57:26,800 --> 00:57:29,240 Speaker 2: not blowing out teams like you blow out LSU in 1040 00:57:29,240 --> 00:57:31,400 Speaker 2: the second half and then you sneak by a couple 1041 00:57:31,440 --> 00:57:34,880 Speaker 2: of ACC teams, or you just don't look as up 1042 00:57:35,040 --> 00:57:38,840 Speaker 2: for some of those games within the ACC, it seems 1043 00:57:40,720 --> 00:57:46,720 Speaker 2: projecting the results forward, I don't know they're they're overhauling 1044 00:57:46,720 --> 00:57:50,360 Speaker 2: a lot. Yeah, I just don't think they've been a 1045 00:57:50,400 --> 00:57:54,320 Speaker 2: super consistent performer, even when winning games. I think his 1046 00:57:54,440 --> 00:57:56,240 Speaker 2: track record is there, but I think I'm just a 1047 00:57:56,280 --> 00:57:59,320 Speaker 2: little impressed, less impressed with the pop that Florida State 1048 00:57:59,360 --> 00:57:59,680 Speaker 2: has had. 1049 00:58:00,080 --> 00:58:05,080 Speaker 1: Here where Here's where the dependability and build quality I 1050 00:58:05,080 --> 00:58:08,240 Speaker 1: think play off each other really well. Okay, all right, 1051 00:58:08,320 --> 00:58:11,960 Speaker 1: So the build quality side of this from Mike Norvell 1052 00:58:12,560 --> 00:58:15,400 Speaker 1: in his time at Florida State has been an interesting 1053 00:58:15,440 --> 00:58:18,520 Speaker 1: balance that he has walked. And I've used Norvel often 1054 00:58:18,560 --> 00:58:21,360 Speaker 1: as an example of somebody who knew how to use 1055 00:58:21,400 --> 00:58:25,240 Speaker 1: the portal well in addition to definitely the recruiting. He 1056 00:58:25,320 --> 00:58:31,080 Speaker 1: has walked that balance, used the portal effectively, used recruiting effectively, 1057 00:58:31,960 --> 00:58:35,040 Speaker 1: kind of use them together as one thing, as opposed 1058 00:58:35,040 --> 00:58:39,400 Speaker 1: to high school recruiting transfer portal being separated. He has 1059 00:58:39,440 --> 00:58:42,440 Speaker 1: played one off the other, and I think a particularly 1060 00:58:43,200 --> 00:58:46,240 Speaker 1: interesting way, bringing in guys like Jared Vers, bringing guys 1061 00:58:46,280 --> 00:58:49,800 Speaker 1: like Keon Coleman in right. He has had an eye 1062 00:58:49,840 --> 00:58:51,640 Speaker 1: for the talent that is out there and you use 1063 00:58:51,720 --> 00:58:53,800 Speaker 1: that to make the team better. We'll see this year 1064 00:58:53,840 --> 00:58:56,920 Speaker 1: with DJU. You know, we could do our own ex 1065 00:58:57,000 --> 00:59:00,560 Speaker 1: Dabo on DJU if we wanted to, and we could 1066 00:59:00,600 --> 00:59:04,880 Speaker 1: talk through that. So the dependability side of this is 1067 00:59:04,880 --> 00:59:06,760 Speaker 1: is an interesting concept. 1068 00:59:06,920 --> 00:59:08,720 Speaker 2: I mean, he's had a he's had a five and 1069 00:59:08,800 --> 00:59:12,320 Speaker 2: seven season that featured a loss to Jacksonville State, and 1070 00:59:12,680 --> 00:59:14,800 Speaker 2: like there has to be some knocks on him. There 1071 00:59:14,840 --> 00:59:19,200 Speaker 2: has to be a knock And yeah, the Jordan Travis 1072 00:59:19,600 --> 00:59:26,680 Speaker 2: thing kind of masks the dependability side of this. Yeah, 1073 00:59:26,800 --> 00:59:29,200 Speaker 2: he made Jordan Travis better. Jordan Travis got of course, 1074 00:59:30,480 --> 00:59:34,000 Speaker 2: but what do you have behind Jordan Travis? 1075 00:59:35,440 --> 00:59:39,880 Speaker 1: Not much? That was kind of the argument against Florida State, right. 1076 00:59:40,320 --> 00:59:42,240 Speaker 2: But I think it's just more and more difficult now 1077 00:59:42,400 --> 00:59:45,640 Speaker 2: in twenty in the Portal era to have like a 1078 00:59:45,640 --> 00:59:49,640 Speaker 2: deep quarterback room. Like it's just, you know, it's never 1079 00:59:49,680 --> 00:59:53,160 Speaker 2: going to be usc with like Carson Palmer and Matt 1080 00:59:53,240 --> 00:59:55,520 Speaker 2: Leonard in the same room and John David Boot Like, 1081 00:59:55,520 --> 00:59:56,640 Speaker 2: it's just not to happen. 1082 00:59:56,760 --> 00:59:59,360 Speaker 1: A bunch of capable guys. Yeah, it's not going to 1083 00:59:59,400 --> 01:00:02,000 Speaker 1: be that to have like at nuss Meyer as your backup. Yeah, 1084 01:00:02,160 --> 01:00:07,200 Speaker 1: it's it's not going to be that. I I agree, 1085 01:00:07,440 --> 01:00:10,560 Speaker 1: But I do wonder if we knock him a little 1086 01:00:10,560 --> 01:00:15,920 Speaker 1: bit because there wasn't a plan B behind Jordan Travis. Sure, 1087 01:00:16,320 --> 01:00:18,360 Speaker 1: if we knock him a little bit because there is 1088 01:00:18,400 --> 01:00:21,600 Speaker 1: the five and seven season gotten better, right, Yeah. 1089 01:00:22,160 --> 01:00:24,880 Speaker 2: Rota Maker did get hurt. He was like a capable guy, 1090 01:00:25,080 --> 01:00:25,600 Speaker 2: got hurt. 1091 01:00:25,480 --> 01:00:27,880 Speaker 1: Got hurt. Okay, all right, that's fair, that's fair. Yeah, 1092 01:00:29,000 --> 01:00:31,400 Speaker 1: you've got here again for Norvelle, just three out or 1093 01:00:31,400 --> 01:00:34,600 Speaker 1: eight A seven eight eight nine seven in terms of 1094 01:00:34,640 --> 01:00:38,920 Speaker 1: dependability and eight in terms of adaptability. I think he's 1095 01:00:38,920 --> 01:00:39,520 Speaker 1: been pretty good. 1096 01:00:39,880 --> 01:00:42,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that's been improvement on both sides of 1097 01:00:42,200 --> 01:00:42,480 Speaker 2: the ball. 1098 01:00:42,560 --> 01:00:45,439 Speaker 1: Yeah, in eight or excuse me, a nine in terms 1099 01:00:45,480 --> 01:00:46,280 Speaker 1: of build quality. 1100 01:00:46,760 --> 01:00:48,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean the portal stuff has been great. 1101 01:00:48,840 --> 01:00:50,400 Speaker 1: Portal stuff's been I'm going down. 1102 01:00:50,240 --> 01:00:52,360 Speaker 2: Here and Johnny Wilson, Yeah, I'm gonna go down to 1103 01:00:52,360 --> 01:00:56,320 Speaker 2: an eighth though, Trey Benson seven eight eight and I'll 1104 01:00:56,360 --> 01:00:58,200 Speaker 2: go nine as well. I don't know, man, you're bringing 1105 01:00:58,200 --> 01:01:00,480 Speaker 2: in full on star power in the portal. 1106 01:01:00,600 --> 01:01:01,080 Speaker 1: I don't you know. 1107 01:01:01,120 --> 01:01:04,280 Speaker 2: I'm not crazy high on DJU, but year over year 1108 01:01:04,320 --> 01:01:09,200 Speaker 2: to keep doing that now hasn't been stringing together Jimbo 1109 01:01:09,280 --> 01:01:13,320 Speaker 2: light classes right, had a couple of pretty major whiffs, 1110 01:01:13,480 --> 01:01:15,080 Speaker 2: and like has developed the talent. 1111 01:01:15,160 --> 01:01:18,560 Speaker 1: Well, okay, we'll go, we'll go. I agree with you. 1112 01:01:18,560 --> 01:01:20,959 Speaker 1: You talked me into it. Seven eight eight nine seven 1113 01:01:20,960 --> 01:01:23,720 Speaker 1: eight eight nine. So that's what fifteen eighteen thirty three 1114 01:01:23,760 --> 01:01:24,320 Speaker 1: for Norville. 1115 01:01:24,960 --> 01:01:27,040 Speaker 2: Now, I may have been a little bit ambitious with 1116 01:01:27,080 --> 01:01:31,200 Speaker 2: the nine opportunity, But that also just sort of comes 1117 01:01:31,240 --> 01:01:34,160 Speaker 2: in what the acc for as long as Florida State 1118 01:01:34,240 --> 01:01:38,480 Speaker 2: is in it, like clear path to the playoff consistently 1119 01:01:39,240 --> 01:01:43,000 Speaker 2: has already shown the ability to build a playoff caliber program, 1120 01:01:43,560 --> 01:01:46,680 Speaker 2: has won double digit games these last two years. So 1121 01:01:46,800 --> 01:01:48,640 Speaker 2: I don't think it's crazy to say, like, if a 1122 01:01:48,720 --> 01:01:53,400 Speaker 2: nine opportunity means consistent playoff conversation, I think Florida State 1123 01:01:53,520 --> 01:01:57,120 Speaker 2: fits that, pending long term quarterback proof. 1124 01:01:57,200 --> 01:02:01,000 Speaker 1: I suppose I'll throw in an extra point, but. 1125 01:02:01,000 --> 01:02:02,800 Speaker 2: Because of his background, you know, I give him the 1126 01:02:02,840 --> 01:02:04,320 Speaker 2: benefit of the doubt with quarterback as well. 1127 01:02:04,880 --> 01:02:06,600 Speaker 1: Thirty three and then one point if we want to 1128 01:02:06,600 --> 01:02:10,400 Speaker 1: go kicker. Yeah, that was your four way tie. 1129 01:02:10,960 --> 01:02:12,640 Speaker 2: You want to my four way tie went around out 1130 01:02:12,680 --> 01:02:15,760 Speaker 2: the top ten quick? Well, I have another set of 1131 01:02:15,800 --> 01:02:19,120 Speaker 2: ties there. Okay, the I didn't use decimals. Oh but 1132 01:02:19,240 --> 01:02:22,440 Speaker 2: here's so I have another four five way tie. All right, well, 1133 01:02:22,480 --> 01:02:24,480 Speaker 2: ten through fourteen, I'll go through it quickly. We don't 1134 01:02:24,480 --> 01:02:25,720 Speaker 2: need to go through each elements. 1135 01:02:25,720 --> 01:02:27,920 Speaker 1: Why why don't we do this? My hunch is that 1136 01:02:27,920 --> 01:02:31,080 Speaker 1: there will be a fair amount of discussion around this 1137 01:02:31,160 --> 01:02:33,840 Speaker 1: ranking system. We know our audience wall people are gonna 1138 01:02:33,960 --> 01:02:36,880 Speaker 1: I think be into the ex Dabo and we can 1139 01:02:36,920 --> 01:02:40,320 Speaker 1: certainly make another show out of this at some point soon. Yeah, 1140 01:02:40,400 --> 01:02:42,640 Speaker 1: let's round out what you've got nowt here with your 1141 01:02:42,680 --> 01:02:43,439 Speaker 1: five way tie. 1142 01:02:43,480 --> 01:02:46,760 Speaker 2: You said five way tie, thirty way tie, thirty ones. 1143 01:02:47,400 --> 01:02:50,320 Speaker 2: All right, you just tell me if you would separate 1144 01:02:50,360 --> 01:02:51,720 Speaker 2: it or leave it as is. 1145 01:02:51,880 --> 01:02:53,480 Speaker 1: Okay, Okay, go ahead. 1146 01:02:53,960 --> 01:02:57,920 Speaker 2: James Franklin, Lane Kiffin, Mike Gundy, Steve Sarksian, Luke Fickle. 1147 01:02:59,160 --> 01:03:01,360 Speaker 2: I have in there our own thirty one point tier. 1148 01:03:01,920 --> 01:03:09,840 Speaker 1: James Franklin, Steve Sarksian. Yeah, Lane Kiffin, Mike Gundy, Luke Fickle. Hmmm. 1149 01:03:10,960 --> 01:03:12,919 Speaker 2: Sark for recent pop, but you have to take full 1150 01:03:12,960 --> 01:03:16,560 Speaker 2: track record. Gundhy for totality of his career, Kiffin for 1151 01:03:16,680 --> 01:03:22,960 Speaker 2: recent pop, Franklin for consistency, but with the definitive ceiling. 1152 01:03:23,400 --> 01:03:27,120 Speaker 2: Luke Fickle, with what he did at Cincinnati is crazy impressive, 1153 01:03:27,280 --> 01:03:29,800 Speaker 2: and I'm still optimistic that he can hit a bunch 1154 01:03:29,840 --> 01:03:31,240 Speaker 2: of benchmarks at Wisconsin. 1155 01:03:32,240 --> 01:03:33,360 Speaker 1: And you say Gundy too. 1156 01:03:33,960 --> 01:03:37,440 Speaker 2: Gundhy as well, just because he's been largely very consistent, 1157 01:03:37,520 --> 01:03:39,360 Speaker 2: has developed players on both sides of the ball, Well 1158 01:03:39,400 --> 01:03:43,280 Speaker 2: has largely a really good eye for assistant coaches, so 1159 01:03:43,480 --> 01:03:45,840 Speaker 2: that's what powered his score there. Do you want to 1160 01:03:45,840 --> 01:03:47,320 Speaker 2: see the next three way tie or do you want 1161 01:03:47,320 --> 01:03:50,040 Speaker 2: to hit anything specifically? Like do any of those guys 1162 01:03:50,040 --> 01:03:53,919 Speaker 2: not fit in that region? I'm surprised Brian Kelly isn't 1163 01:03:53,960 --> 01:03:57,800 Speaker 2: higher for you. Now I'll tell you why Brian Kelly 1164 01:03:58,040 --> 01:03:59,400 Speaker 2: is not as high for me? 1165 01:04:00,120 --> 01:04:01,720 Speaker 1: You why that's the one? Go ahead? 1166 01:04:01,720 --> 01:04:04,280 Speaker 2: I'll I completely forgot to grate Brian Kelly. 1167 01:04:04,480 --> 01:04:05,880 Speaker 1: Okay, that's okay. 1168 01:04:05,920 --> 01:04:08,800 Speaker 2: Look, let's be honest. This is about Brian Kelly. 1169 01:04:08,920 --> 01:04:10,520 Speaker 1: This is a show about honesty. Do you want me 1170 01:04:10,560 --> 01:04:12,560 Speaker 1: to quickly grade out Brian Kelly. No, I want you 1171 01:04:12,600 --> 01:04:15,640 Speaker 1: to go through your your your tie breaking thoughts here 1172 01:04:15,760 --> 01:04:17,760 Speaker 1: on those five guys that you had tight. Give me 1173 01:04:17,800 --> 01:04:21,120 Speaker 1: your numbers for all five of those guys, just real quick. 1174 01:04:21,160 --> 01:04:22,960 Speaker 1: We don't have to talk through each of them in detail, 1175 01:04:23,040 --> 01:04:25,160 Speaker 1: and then we can we can maybe figure out where 1176 01:04:25,160 --> 01:04:26,200 Speaker 1: we want to put Brian Kelly. 1177 01:04:26,480 --> 01:04:32,120 Speaker 2: All right, Kiffin, I have as seven eight eight eight, okay, Sark, 1178 01:04:32,440 --> 01:04:38,400 Speaker 2: I have as seven seven nine eight. Gundhy I have 1179 01:04:38,680 --> 01:04:44,680 Speaker 2: at eight seven eight eight, Fickle, I have at eight 1180 01:04:44,760 --> 01:04:46,120 Speaker 2: seven eight eight as well. 1181 01:04:47,600 --> 01:04:50,080 Speaker 1: And who's the last one? The last one here would 1182 01:04:50,080 --> 01:04:51,280 Speaker 1: be James Franklin. 1183 01:04:51,440 --> 01:04:54,320 Speaker 2: Franklin, I have as eight, six, nine. 1184 01:04:54,240 --> 01:04:57,160 Speaker 1: Eight, Man, I don't agree with these. 1185 01:04:57,720 --> 01:04:59,400 Speaker 2: I really tell me about the Franklin one that you 1186 01:04:59,440 --> 01:05:03,680 Speaker 2: don't agree with. I absolutely know what I'm getting from 1187 01:05:03,720 --> 01:05:06,160 Speaker 2: James Franklin dependability. You know, I know that he is 1188 01:05:06,200 --> 01:05:10,200 Speaker 2: going to struggle to adapt and philosophically struggle at times. 1189 01:05:10,200 --> 01:05:14,120 Speaker 2: That's a six build quality both portal and high school. 1190 01:05:14,320 --> 01:05:18,160 Speaker 1: I was a nine, I would go lower. I would 1191 01:05:18,160 --> 01:05:20,360 Speaker 1: go lower. I mean he's been, he's been so good 1192 01:05:20,400 --> 01:05:24,120 Speaker 1: as a recruiter. Where I think there is some real 1193 01:05:24,200 --> 01:05:25,400 Speaker 1: question is. 1194 01:05:25,600 --> 01:05:28,439 Speaker 2: Oh, man, I don't know. He's developed like high round 1195 01:05:28,440 --> 01:05:30,040 Speaker 2: picks at like every position. 1196 01:05:29,760 --> 01:05:33,680 Speaker 1: Group, not quarterback. Does quarterback matter still? Okay? 1197 01:05:33,760 --> 01:05:37,960 Speaker 2: Quarterback matter is a lot quieback quarterback has developed like 1198 01:05:38,040 --> 01:05:40,960 Speaker 2: trace mcsreally like I think they've at least been You're right, 1199 01:05:41,000 --> 01:05:45,320 Speaker 2: You're right. So you want to say eight, fine, I'll 1200 01:05:45,320 --> 01:05:46,760 Speaker 2: say you know. 1201 01:05:46,880 --> 01:05:48,560 Speaker 1: You definitely know what you're getting with him from a 1202 01:05:48,560 --> 01:05:53,280 Speaker 1: dependability side. Effings and I would actually go a seven 1203 01:05:53,360 --> 01:05:56,640 Speaker 1: instead of an eight because I think this is one 1204 01:05:56,680 --> 01:06:00,160 Speaker 1: of those instances where dependability and adaptability are hand in hand. 1205 01:06:00,600 --> 01:06:04,240 Speaker 1: He is dependably bad at in game decisions, Okay, okay, 1206 01:06:04,680 --> 01:06:07,600 Speaker 1: So I dock him on on both of those fronts. 1207 01:06:08,240 --> 01:06:13,040 Speaker 1: I would say seven, five, eight, eight For Franklin, man. 1208 01:06:12,880 --> 01:06:15,440 Speaker 2: I still think the build quality, Like you're totally right 1209 01:06:15,480 --> 01:06:19,040 Speaker 2: about quarterback, and that's where I docked Kirby Smart. So 1210 01:06:19,200 --> 01:06:23,040 Speaker 2: it would be you know a bit of a a 1211 01:06:23,080 --> 01:06:26,880 Speaker 2: both direction element for me here, but like I don't 1212 01:06:26,880 --> 01:06:29,560 Speaker 2: know with like the defenses that have come through recently, 1213 01:06:29,960 --> 01:06:32,440 Speaker 2: offensive line and just in terms of development, you know, 1214 01:06:32,640 --> 01:06:34,520 Speaker 2: Ola Fashan, who's going to be a you know, top 1215 01:06:34,520 --> 01:06:37,440 Speaker 2: whatever draft pick. This very good book has put it's 1216 01:06:37,480 --> 01:06:41,400 Speaker 2: been money receiver. There's been star power until this past year, 1217 01:06:41,720 --> 01:06:44,160 Speaker 2: last year, until this past year, this past year. But 1218 01:06:44,200 --> 01:06:47,160 Speaker 2: there has been star quality there with what Jaha Dotson, 1219 01:06:47,440 --> 01:06:50,240 Speaker 2: John Dotson and kJ Hamler most recently. 1220 01:06:50,120 --> 01:06:52,040 Speaker 1: Hanler, even Chris Godwin. I mean there have been plenty 1221 01:06:52,080 --> 01:06:52,560 Speaker 1: of guys. 1222 01:06:52,440 --> 01:06:55,240 Speaker 2: Sean Hamilton, Yeah, like there have been real like across 1223 01:06:55,320 --> 01:06:59,840 Speaker 2: the field corner safety, linebacker, Like they may have had 1224 01:06:59,880 --> 01:07:02,600 Speaker 2: the best linebacker of the past decade at Penn State. 1225 01:07:02,760 --> 01:07:04,960 Speaker 1: An eight. Parsons, we have an eight? Right? Did you 1226 01:07:05,000 --> 01:07:05,840 Speaker 1: give him an eight or a nine? 1227 01:07:05,840 --> 01:07:06,000 Speaker 2: There? 1228 01:07:06,000 --> 01:07:07,000 Speaker 1: Oh? I had him medicine nine. 1229 01:07:07,040 --> 01:07:09,000 Speaker 2: You would give him a just because of across the 1230 01:07:09,000 --> 01:07:11,160 Speaker 2: board on both sides of the ball. Give me your 1231 01:07:11,200 --> 01:07:13,760 Speaker 2: numbers again for Franklin running back has been struggle. Give 1232 01:07:13,800 --> 01:07:16,800 Speaker 2: me a number one more hih level star power for Franklin. Yeah, 1233 01:07:16,840 --> 01:07:19,960 Speaker 2: you had an eight six nine eight. Yeah, I'm a 1234 01:07:20,040 --> 01:07:23,160 Speaker 2: seven five nine eight seven five nine eight. So you 1235 01:07:23,160 --> 01:07:25,480 Speaker 2: have a twenty nine I have uh. 1236 01:07:25,120 --> 01:07:28,000 Speaker 1: No, no, no, what is that? Seventeen? Yeah, twenty nine, 1237 01:07:29,680 --> 01:07:31,560 Speaker 1: and you're a little bit higher than you've got a fourteen, 1238 01:07:31,560 --> 01:07:32,160 Speaker 1: And go. 1239 01:07:32,120 --> 01:07:33,880 Speaker 2: Through the rest of my stuff. I think it's fair 1240 01:07:33,920 --> 01:07:36,400 Speaker 2: to give Brian Kelly a score here. He's at LSU, 1241 01:07:36,400 --> 01:07:38,439 Speaker 2: He's done incredible things as a college football coach. 1242 01:07:38,520 --> 01:07:42,160 Speaker 1: Do this firstly, Okay, yeah, just give me give me 1243 01:07:42,360 --> 01:07:46,360 Speaker 1: a real quick rundown of the lane Kiffen versus Steve 1244 01:07:46,400 --> 01:07:50,720 Speaker 1: Sarkisian debate. You've got seven seven nine eight for sark 1245 01:07:51,360 --> 01:07:54,680 Speaker 1: and seven eight eight eight four k. 1246 01:07:54,760 --> 01:07:57,680 Speaker 2: Well, so these guys have like the interesting element compared 1247 01:07:57,720 --> 01:07:59,960 Speaker 2: to a lot of these guys of coaching at major 1248 01:08:00,120 --> 01:08:01,360 Speaker 2: places previously. 1249 01:08:01,600 --> 01:08:04,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, and coaching at the same place for a moment 1250 01:08:04,280 --> 01:08:06,320 Speaker 1: in touching at the same place, right, So that that's 1251 01:08:06,320 --> 01:08:09,080 Speaker 1: why I wanted to spot shadow these two and. 1252 01:08:09,400 --> 01:08:12,440 Speaker 2: Also within the Alabama program as well, like very close 1253 01:08:12,480 --> 01:08:12,919 Speaker 2: ten years. 1254 01:08:13,000 --> 01:08:13,320 Speaker 1: Yeah. 1255 01:08:13,440 --> 01:08:16,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, so talking overlapped through Sark took over in the 1256 01:08:16,400 --> 01:08:17,360 Speaker 2: National championship game. 1257 01:08:17,400 --> 01:08:20,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, talk me through how you graded these guys out 1258 01:08:20,280 --> 01:08:24,200 Speaker 1: Because Sark recently was at a playoff. Lane Kiffin has 1259 01:08:24,280 --> 01:08:26,719 Speaker 1: obviously been doing a lot on the on the talent 1260 01:08:26,880 --> 01:08:29,720 Speaker 1: side as well that has made waves in the in 1261 01:08:29,800 --> 01:08:32,559 Speaker 1: the portal here so far this offseason. You still grade 1262 01:08:32,560 --> 01:08:35,800 Speaker 1: Sark higher, which I think I agree with. But seven 1263 01:08:35,960 --> 01:08:39,439 Speaker 1: seven nine eight for Sark, seven eight eight eight for 1264 01:08:39,600 --> 01:08:41,600 Speaker 1: Lane Kiffin. If you add it up again, this is 1265 01:08:41,600 --> 01:08:43,960 Speaker 1: the Dan list, not necessarily mine. I'm kind of Devil's 1266 01:08:44,000 --> 01:08:46,639 Speaker 1: advocate here. You've got them graded equally. 1267 01:08:47,240 --> 01:08:51,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm comfortable with saying Texas will dependably have a 1268 01:08:51,920 --> 01:08:56,200 Speaker 2: good defense and great offense by and large moving forward 1269 01:08:57,120 --> 01:09:00,680 Speaker 2: after these last couple of years. Adaptability, I think I 1270 01:09:00,760 --> 01:09:05,040 Speaker 2: knocked I have as a seven there. Philosophically, I think 1271 01:09:05,080 --> 01:09:05,960 Speaker 2: they're in a good place. 1272 01:09:06,280 --> 01:09:06,880 Speaker 1: You know they're there. 1273 01:09:06,960 --> 01:09:10,200 Speaker 2: Year two years ago gave me some pause about Texas 1274 01:09:10,200 --> 01:09:13,719 Speaker 2: in the second half and even in their game against Washington, 1275 01:09:13,760 --> 01:09:17,439 Speaker 2: to be honest, like just deciding, you know, to go 1276 01:09:17,560 --> 01:09:19,920 Speaker 2: against what has worked for them this year, and that 1277 01:09:20,040 --> 01:09:21,920 Speaker 2: was the run setting up the pass. Like they went 1278 01:09:21,920 --> 01:09:23,599 Speaker 2: away from the run, and I know there were fumbles 1279 01:09:23,600 --> 01:09:26,800 Speaker 2: that helped to inform those decisions, but even still like 1280 01:09:26,840 --> 01:09:28,760 Speaker 2: they were getting whatever they wanted against Washington on the 1281 01:09:28,760 --> 01:09:31,599 Speaker 2: ground and went away from it, especially early on in drives. 1282 01:09:32,640 --> 01:09:34,400 Speaker 2: So I knocked him there as a seven, but like 1283 01:09:34,479 --> 01:09:37,120 Speaker 2: you still like it worked to the tune of winning 1284 01:09:37,120 --> 01:09:39,280 Speaker 2: the conference in a blowout and ending up in the playoffs. 1285 01:09:39,400 --> 01:09:42,920 Speaker 2: So that's why I give them nine. Build quality been 1286 01:09:42,960 --> 01:09:46,760 Speaker 2: great in the portal and high school ranks, and I 1287 01:09:46,760 --> 01:09:49,800 Speaker 2: think his assistant hires have been strong to very strong, 1288 01:09:49,880 --> 01:09:51,800 Speaker 2: especially when you look at Pete Kuitkowski and what he 1289 01:09:51,840 --> 01:09:54,200 Speaker 2: did with the defense in a couple of years and 1290 01:09:54,240 --> 01:09:56,360 Speaker 2: what the both lines turned into. 1291 01:09:56,200 --> 01:09:56,920 Speaker 1: This past year. 1292 01:09:58,240 --> 01:09:59,559 Speaker 2: I just think it would be hard to give him 1293 01:09:59,560 --> 01:10:01,880 Speaker 2: anything less than a nine, uh, and then an eight 1294 01:10:01,960 --> 01:10:06,839 Speaker 2: in terms of opportunity just within the SEC moving forward, 1295 01:10:07,360 --> 01:10:11,000 Speaker 2: Like I have them in the mix for winning the conference, 1296 01:10:11,320 --> 01:10:14,200 Speaker 2: and I just don't think they're going to be consistently 1297 01:10:14,200 --> 01:10:17,400 Speaker 2: in the playoff conversation, but I can see universe in 1298 01:10:17,439 --> 01:10:20,880 Speaker 2: which they are. I just we've seen a year from 1299 01:10:20,960 --> 01:10:21,960 Speaker 2: Sark putting it together. 1300 01:10:21,960 --> 01:10:24,200 Speaker 1: We've seen a year. Yeah, I think I agree with 1301 01:10:24,240 --> 01:10:27,320 Speaker 1: all that on Sark. Where I disagree is with Kiffin. Okay, 1302 01:10:27,439 --> 01:10:29,679 Speaker 1: I disagree a little bit with Kiffin. I understand where 1303 01:10:29,680 --> 01:10:32,479 Speaker 1: you're coming from, dependability with the seven seven eight eight eight, Yeah, 1304 01:10:32,880 --> 01:10:36,360 Speaker 1: I understand where you're coming from. Adaptability in eight Okay, 1305 01:10:36,400 --> 01:10:38,439 Speaker 1: It's been pretty good in game, has been pretty good 1306 01:10:38,439 --> 01:10:41,519 Speaker 1: at modifying the philosophy of the program as needed. Has 1307 01:10:41,560 --> 01:10:46,600 Speaker 1: been good using the portal. Right, yeah, but again, adaptability 1308 01:10:46,600 --> 01:10:48,560 Speaker 1: build quality do kind of work hand in hand a 1309 01:10:48,600 --> 01:10:50,479 Speaker 1: little bit. I dock them a little bit on the 1310 01:10:50,479 --> 01:10:55,879 Speaker 1: build quality. Docs recruited well and has been like nails 1311 01:10:55,920 --> 01:10:58,160 Speaker 1: in the portal. He's been really good. He's been really 1312 01:10:58,160 --> 01:11:00,599 Speaker 1: good at talent acquisition. Do you do you feel like 1313 01:11:00,680 --> 01:11:05,040 Speaker 1: they are making guys better? Do you feel like there 1314 01:11:05,040 --> 01:11:08,920 Speaker 1: are there is like this conveyor belt of guys who 1315 01:11:08,960 --> 01:11:12,320 Speaker 1: are getting better under Kiffin? Moving on to the NFL 1316 01:11:12,479 --> 01:11:14,799 Speaker 1: and that that has become an NFL factory of sorts 1317 01:11:15,000 --> 01:11:16,320 Speaker 1: in terms of player development. 1318 01:11:17,320 --> 01:11:23,240 Speaker 2: No, maybe not an NFL factory, but this is college football, 1319 01:11:23,520 --> 01:11:25,000 Speaker 2: and I all you them to get to a point 1320 01:11:25,040 --> 01:11:27,280 Speaker 2: where they're good players winning college games. 1321 01:11:27,840 --> 01:11:32,280 Speaker 1: I'm a seven there. I'm an easily influenced seven, maybe 1322 01:11:32,360 --> 01:11:34,439 Speaker 1: up to an eight, but I go down. I go 1323 01:11:34,600 --> 01:11:37,000 Speaker 1: down just because of them as an eight. Yeah you've 1324 01:11:37,000 --> 01:11:39,519 Speaker 1: got an eight, I've got I've got a seven. And 1325 01:11:39,640 --> 01:11:43,639 Speaker 1: I think it's because I feel like they get into 1326 01:11:43,640 --> 01:11:46,439 Speaker 1: these big games and with the talent that they have, 1327 01:11:46,560 --> 01:11:49,200 Speaker 1: maybe I should knock them with adaptability instead. Actually that's 1328 01:11:49,240 --> 01:11:51,719 Speaker 1: what I'll do. Let me go seven to seven eight. 1329 01:11:52,720 --> 01:11:54,920 Speaker 1: They get into these big games and they just get 1330 01:11:54,960 --> 01:11:58,200 Speaker 1: like blown off the field by Georgia. You know, sure 1331 01:11:58,800 --> 01:12:02,040 Speaker 1: that's not necessarily a scarlet letter. A lot of teams 1332 01:12:02,160 --> 01:12:05,240 Speaker 1: get blown off the field by Georgia. Yeah, I just 1333 01:12:05,360 --> 01:12:08,679 Speaker 1: want to expect more from Lane Kiffin. The part where 1334 01:12:08,680 --> 01:12:14,160 Speaker 1: I really disagree is on opportunity. I really disagree with opportunity. 1335 01:12:13,720 --> 01:12:18,240 Speaker 2: Eight as in conversation for Conference Crown, I'm gonna go 1336 01:12:18,280 --> 01:12:22,360 Speaker 2: down to a six six with ten and two last year, Okay. 1337 01:12:22,720 --> 01:12:24,679 Speaker 1: They did go ten and two, and that I think 1338 01:12:24,760 --> 01:12:31,160 Speaker 1: works too. Dependability. I just think it's really hard to 1339 01:12:31,160 --> 01:12:34,599 Speaker 1: to realize that ceiling that you're saying within eight, when 1340 01:12:34,600 --> 01:12:38,479 Speaker 1: you've got SEC competition and when we've got the almost 1341 01:12:38,560 --> 01:12:43,679 Speaker 1: track record of not living up to that hype. Yeah, 1342 01:12:43,800 --> 01:12:46,040 Speaker 1: and that that's why I dock him there, because I 1343 01:12:46,120 --> 01:12:49,040 Speaker 1: just think I think it has gotten harder. It has 1344 01:12:49,040 --> 01:12:51,719 Speaker 1: gotten harder. It's gotten a little bit easier because Kiffin's 1345 01:12:51,720 --> 01:12:54,679 Speaker 1: walking away, But everything else around the SEC is wide 1346 01:12:54,720 --> 01:12:57,559 Speaker 1: open and harder, and just adding a guy like a 1347 01:12:57,600 --> 01:13:00,600 Speaker 1: Walter Nolan or whoever through the portal does not necessarily 1348 01:13:01,760 --> 01:13:03,799 Speaker 1: make me forget about what we've seen in the past. 1349 01:13:04,479 --> 01:13:06,840 Speaker 1: So I agree that the opportunity is there. I think 1350 01:13:06,880 --> 01:13:09,280 Speaker 1: we're all pretty high on Lane Kiffin. I we like 1351 01:13:09,360 --> 01:13:09,880 Speaker 1: Lane Kiffin. 1352 01:13:10,280 --> 01:13:12,639 Speaker 2: But by the way, if we're dealing if Lane Kiffin 1353 01:13:12,640 --> 01:13:15,360 Speaker 2: at ole Miss existed in a twelve team playoff universe, 1354 01:13:15,360 --> 01:13:17,400 Speaker 2: he's making the playoff two of the past three years. 1355 01:13:17,600 --> 01:13:20,639 Speaker 2: I know, I know, I know, so I know fits 1356 01:13:20,680 --> 01:13:23,080 Speaker 2: how I'm I looked at it and we're looking at 1357 01:13:23,080 --> 01:13:24,880 Speaker 2: it in different ways. But that's how that's my defense 1358 01:13:24,920 --> 01:13:27,519 Speaker 2: of an eight there, that he's in the playoff conversation 1359 01:13:27,560 --> 01:13:28,439 Speaker 2: two out of three years. 1360 01:13:28,600 --> 01:13:32,480 Speaker 1: I mean, like in the playoff, I don't know. I'm 1361 01:13:33,040 --> 01:13:37,759 Speaker 1: I'm mixed on how high this program can fly. Okay, 1362 01:13:38,400 --> 01:13:42,040 Speaker 1: I'm ant a twenty eight. I'll give him, though, give 1363 01:13:42,120 --> 01:13:46,280 Speaker 1: him a solid four for the for the X factor 1364 01:13:46,320 --> 01:13:49,479 Speaker 1: there with the extra version. I think he's been really 1365 01:13:49,479 --> 01:13:52,840 Speaker 1: good at doing that. Do you want me to keep going? 1366 01:13:53,160 --> 01:13:56,320 Speaker 1: We've got Gundy and Fickle both eight seven eight eight. 1367 01:13:56,479 --> 01:13:59,320 Speaker 1: I'm I don't know how you can give Gundy an 1368 01:13:59,320 --> 01:14:02,080 Speaker 1: eight with buildco q. I just I don't know how 1369 01:14:02,080 --> 01:14:04,080 Speaker 1: you could do that. That That to me is like 1370 01:14:05,000 --> 01:14:08,440 Speaker 1: now practice, he's a good coach. I might go nine dependability. 1371 01:14:08,479 --> 01:14:10,360 Speaker 1: You know what you're gonna get with him pretty much 1372 01:14:10,360 --> 01:14:10,920 Speaker 1: most years. 1373 01:14:10,920 --> 01:14:14,200 Speaker 2: But yeah, there's twenty twenty two thrown in there though. 1374 01:14:14,280 --> 01:14:16,920 Speaker 1: Yeah. I've been throwing around build quality with Mike Gundy 1375 01:14:16,960 --> 01:14:20,160 Speaker 1: as like a pejorative for the last three years. So 1376 01:14:20,560 --> 01:14:22,800 Speaker 1: we can have that discussion at some other point in time. 1377 01:14:23,200 --> 01:14:25,280 Speaker 1: And my hunch is, again because there are so many 1378 01:14:25,320 --> 01:14:26,920 Speaker 1: other coaches that I know people are going to have 1379 01:14:26,920 --> 01:14:29,720 Speaker 1: an opinion on, we're almost definitely gonna need to do 1380 01:14:29,760 --> 01:14:34,599 Speaker 1: a part two of this. Sure. Brian Kelly, though, Brian Kelly, let's. 1381 01:14:34,439 --> 01:14:36,240 Speaker 2: Great him out to finish this out, to finish the 1382 01:14:36,280 --> 01:14:37,479 Speaker 2: show out and see where he fits. 1383 01:14:37,880 --> 01:14:40,639 Speaker 1: Where does Brian Kelly fit here? Let's talk it through 1384 01:14:41,360 --> 01:14:42,200 Speaker 1: as a collective. 1385 01:14:43,680 --> 01:14:47,679 Speaker 2: I would have Brian Kelly as a nine dependability eight 1386 01:14:47,760 --> 01:14:52,160 Speaker 2: or nine. It's gotta be adaptability, play calling, overall program 1387 01:14:52,280 --> 01:14:58,920 Speaker 2: philosophy decisions. I'd have him as an eight there, Okay, 1388 01:14:59,520 --> 01:15:03,320 Speaker 2: I'm not wowed year to year with what Notre Dame 1389 01:15:03,360 --> 01:15:05,280 Speaker 2: and LSU have always looked liked in games, and the 1390 01:15:05,560 --> 01:15:11,439 Speaker 2: big step back on defense has has definitely shown throughout 1391 01:15:11,479 --> 01:15:12,080 Speaker 2: his career. 1392 01:15:13,120 --> 01:15:18,840 Speaker 1: The ability to be adaptable. Yeah, the ability to be adaptable. 1393 01:15:19,400 --> 01:15:24,040 Speaker 1: There is some I think question as to whether or 1394 01:15:24,120 --> 01:15:27,040 Speaker 1: not he is proactively adaptable or if it's just when 1395 01:15:27,080 --> 01:15:28,840 Speaker 1: guys leave. Now, he did fire Matt House. 1396 01:15:29,720 --> 01:15:32,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, has whipped on DC a couple at least a 1397 01:15:32,920 --> 01:15:33,960 Speaker 2: couple of times. 1398 01:15:34,520 --> 01:15:37,120 Speaker 1: But I think by a large is pretty adaptable and 1399 01:15:38,240 --> 01:15:41,160 Speaker 1: has a good, strong philosophy for his programs. So I 1400 01:15:41,160 --> 01:15:42,360 Speaker 1: think eight's about right to me. 1401 01:15:42,920 --> 01:15:48,639 Speaker 2: But also you're talking about Brian Kelly, who has done 1402 01:15:49,040 --> 01:15:52,400 Speaker 2: like Tommy Reese is a good offensive coordinator. I don't 1403 01:15:52,400 --> 01:15:55,959 Speaker 2: know if he's great, he's good. You have Tommy Reese, 1404 01:15:56,160 --> 01:15:59,639 Speaker 2: you have the string of defensive coordinators at Notre Dame, 1405 01:16:00,080 --> 01:16:04,920 Speaker 2: and what Marcus Freeman, Clark Lee and mikeke elcho like 1406 01:16:05,760 --> 01:16:09,439 Speaker 2: really nice eye for both position coaches by and large, 1407 01:16:10,280 --> 01:16:13,639 Speaker 2: but especially defensive coordinator, which as an offensive guy. Nailing 1408 01:16:13,680 --> 01:16:17,599 Speaker 2: defensive coordinator is pretty significant and not batting a thousand, 1409 01:16:17,880 --> 01:16:23,280 Speaker 2: but has hit some solid wood build quality. I have 1410 01:16:23,320 --> 01:16:26,960 Speaker 2: it as an eight. I have nine, eight eight nine. 1411 01:16:27,479 --> 01:16:33,040 Speaker 2: For Brian Kelly. Notre Dame is competing for a playoff 1412 01:16:33,080 --> 01:16:35,679 Speaker 2: pretty often with him as head coach, and he will 1413 01:16:35,680 --> 01:16:38,120 Speaker 2: absolutely be competing pretty often at LSU for a twelve 1414 01:16:38,160 --> 01:16:38,719 Speaker 2: team playoff. 1415 01:16:41,120 --> 01:16:44,800 Speaker 1: I'm eight eight eight nine. I'll go one point shy. 1416 01:16:45,200 --> 01:16:49,400 Speaker 2: So step I said nine eight eight nine, that's eighteen 1417 01:16:49,439 --> 01:16:51,599 Speaker 2: and sixteen. That's thirty four, So that puts him at 1418 01:16:51,600 --> 01:16:53,799 Speaker 2: like the two or three. 1419 01:16:54,000 --> 01:16:55,519 Speaker 1: You got him as a thirty four. I'll go I'll 1420 01:16:55,560 --> 01:17:00,439 Speaker 1: go thirty three, okay, and look I'm a five. I'm 1421 01:17:00,439 --> 01:17:03,840 Speaker 1: a five with the X the X factor, the extra 1422 01:17:03,920 --> 01:17:07,519 Speaker 1: version thing. I don't know if Brian Kelly is the 1423 01:17:07,560 --> 01:17:09,600 Speaker 1: proverbial guy you'd like to have a beer with, like 1424 01:17:09,720 --> 01:17:13,879 Speaker 1: Lane Kiffin, maybe like Dan Lanning or even James Franklin. 1425 01:17:13,920 --> 01:17:16,920 Speaker 1: To some extent, Dabbo probably goes into that conversation as well. 1426 01:17:17,560 --> 01:17:20,559 Speaker 1: I think the knock on Kelly from people who have 1427 01:17:20,600 --> 01:17:22,479 Speaker 1: played under him is that agent you don't really know 1428 01:17:22,520 --> 01:17:25,120 Speaker 1: who he is. He sort of plays a character when 1429 01:17:25,120 --> 01:17:29,160 Speaker 1: he's out there as the coach. But he's very good 1430 01:17:29,200 --> 01:17:33,040 Speaker 1: at playing politician. He's very good at doing that everywhere 1431 01:17:33,080 --> 01:17:34,719 Speaker 1: he's been even very very good. 1432 01:17:35,120 --> 01:17:37,760 Speaker 2: He's a decent quote. I think I knock I do 1433 01:17:37,880 --> 01:17:39,640 Speaker 2: a little bit of the knock against him with like 1434 01:17:39,680 --> 01:17:42,439 Speaker 2: the turning beat Red on the sidelines early on in 1435 01:17:42,520 --> 01:17:46,200 Speaker 2: Notre Dame beat Red. I might give him a four here. 1436 01:17:46,280 --> 01:17:50,080 Speaker 1: Throwing coaches, throwing players under the bus, not taking responsibility 1437 01:17:50,080 --> 01:17:52,240 Speaker 1: for things. He's got a track record for that as well. 1438 01:17:52,840 --> 01:17:55,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, but again you have a sense for his personality. 1439 01:17:55,040 --> 01:17:56,559 Speaker 2: Though he's not covering up. 1440 01:17:56,800 --> 01:17:59,200 Speaker 1: You know exactly who he is. So I'm a solid 1441 01:17:59,280 --> 01:18:02,160 Speaker 1: five here because I think he's a good politician. We agree, 1442 01:18:02,840 --> 01:18:06,600 Speaker 1: I disagree slightly on the overall metric, but here is 1443 01:18:06,640 --> 01:18:09,680 Speaker 1: the way that this has kind of shaken out. If 1444 01:18:09,720 --> 01:18:12,519 Speaker 1: we are talking through our top ten, this is our 1445 01:18:12,600 --> 01:18:16,800 Speaker 1: general consensus. Also generally generally speaking, and again there will 1446 01:18:16,800 --> 01:18:18,519 Speaker 1: be a part two. We need to talk about the 1447 01:18:18,640 --> 01:18:23,120 Speaker 1: likes of Dean Sanders and Lincoln Riley. There's a Brent 1448 01:18:23,200 --> 01:18:26,679 Speaker 1: Venables conversation that needs to be had, and jeff. 1449 01:18:26,479 --> 01:18:28,880 Speaker 2: I Havenables on my list, yep, a crystal ball. 1450 01:18:29,439 --> 01:18:32,240 Speaker 1: I want to talk about Kirk Farrence and Matt Ruhle 1451 01:18:32,320 --> 01:18:33,120 Speaker 1: and Mike Elko. 1452 01:18:33,240 --> 01:18:35,800 Speaker 2: And here's, by the way, this is who I graded out. 1453 01:18:35,800 --> 01:18:38,360 Speaker 2: I'm not going to give you their grades. Yeah, after 1454 01:18:38,439 --> 01:18:42,759 Speaker 2: that tie, that five way tie, I have Marcus Freeman, Mario, 1455 01:18:42,840 --> 01:18:47,000 Speaker 2: Chris Ball again, no order, Marcus Freeman, Mario, Christobal, Kirk Farrence, 1456 01:18:47,080 --> 01:18:51,600 Speaker 2: Jonathan Smith, Lincoln Riley, Gus Malson, Mark Stoops, Jeff Tedford, 1457 01:18:51,640 --> 01:18:53,080 Speaker 2: Pat Nardoozy. 1458 01:18:54,880 --> 01:18:55,760 Speaker 1: Troy Calhoun. 1459 01:18:57,760 --> 01:18:59,599 Speaker 2: I'm trying to like scramble these, so I don't give 1460 01:18:59,600 --> 01:19:02,840 Speaker 2: anything way. Yeah, yeah, this is no particular order. He said, 1461 01:19:02,840 --> 01:19:05,720 Speaker 2: no particular order those guys. So I've with Brian Kelly 1462 01:19:05,800 --> 01:19:06,960 Speaker 2: upgraded out thirty guys. 1463 01:19:07,040 --> 01:19:09,479 Speaker 1: I almost had a caronary when you said Freeman next. 1464 01:19:09,520 --> 01:19:12,960 Speaker 2: There's no way, but Marcus Freeman's on my list of 1465 01:19:12,960 --> 01:19:13,839 Speaker 2: graded out coaches. 1466 01:19:13,880 --> 01:19:16,240 Speaker 1: But yeah, he he deserves a grade. He does not 1467 01:19:16,320 --> 01:19:19,240 Speaker 1: deserve to be in the upper echelon, not yet. Could 1468 01:19:19,280 --> 01:19:22,439 Speaker 1: get there, a lot of potential, obviously, But okay, here 1469 01:19:22,520 --> 01:19:24,439 Speaker 1: is the way that we have ranked these out. Then 1470 01:19:24,479 --> 01:19:27,680 Speaker 1: we've got Kirby smart one. I think I think that's obvious. 1471 01:19:28,120 --> 01:19:30,479 Speaker 1: The next highest score. He's got thirty eight points. The 1472 01:19:30,479 --> 01:19:34,320 Speaker 1: next highest scores are Kyle Whittingham with the thirty four, 1473 01:19:35,120 --> 01:19:38,599 Speaker 1: Kaylin de Boor with the thirty four, and we've got 1474 01:19:38,600 --> 01:19:42,760 Speaker 1: Brian Kelly also with a thirty four. There are some 1475 01:19:42,920 --> 01:19:48,759 Speaker 1: slight disagreements here, but generally that's where we're at. Next 1476 01:19:48,840 --> 01:19:52,360 Speaker 1: rung down after that thirty four, there is a gap 1477 01:19:52,400 --> 01:19:55,280 Speaker 1: between Kirby Smart and the next closest. We've got Ryan 1478 01:19:55,360 --> 01:19:59,639 Speaker 1: Day with the thirty three, Mike Norvell with the thirty three. 1479 01:20:00,000 --> 01:20:02,040 Speaker 1: I've got Brian Kelly with thirty three, but obviously he's 1480 01:20:02,040 --> 01:20:05,080 Speaker 1: still in that conversation. And then the next wrong down 1481 01:20:05,120 --> 01:20:08,120 Speaker 1: we've got Dabbo with thirty two to thirty one points. 1482 01:20:08,160 --> 01:20:13,840 Speaker 1: We've got Chris Climbing thirty two points, Dan Lanning with 1483 01:20:13,880 --> 01:20:16,320 Speaker 1: thirty two points. I should add Lance Sliphold also had 1484 01:20:16,320 --> 01:20:21,040 Speaker 1: a thirty three. Yeah, pretty high. Lance Lightphold, and then 1485 01:20:21,080 --> 01:20:24,960 Speaker 1: beyond that, we've got the likes of guys like Steve Sarkisian. 1486 01:20:25,600 --> 01:20:27,640 Speaker 1: We've got the likes of guys like Len Kiffin with 1487 01:20:27,680 --> 01:20:31,680 Speaker 1: a thirty one. We've also got James Franklin, who's in there. 1488 01:20:31,720 --> 01:20:33,320 Speaker 1: You had him at a thirty one, I had him 1489 01:20:33,320 --> 01:20:35,519 Speaker 1: at a twenty nine. You had Luke Fickel and Mike 1490 01:20:35,560 --> 01:20:38,320 Speaker 1: Gundy and such. So listen, here is what I promised 1491 01:20:38,320 --> 01:20:41,720 Speaker 1: to do for the verballer hood. Okay, on our website, 1492 01:20:42,600 --> 01:20:46,960 Speaker 1: I will put these numbers together into a table so 1493 01:20:47,000 --> 01:20:49,760 Speaker 1: that you can read them more easily and you could 1494 01:20:49,800 --> 01:20:53,479 Speaker 1: tell us what you think and where we went wrong. 1495 01:20:53,520 --> 01:20:57,080 Speaker 1: That will be on our website at solid verbal dot com, 1496 01:20:57,080 --> 01:20:59,640 Speaker 1: where you can find all of our old episodes and 1497 01:20:59,680 --> 01:21:01,920 Speaker 1: clip if you want to read more about Dan and I. Okay, 1498 01:21:01,920 --> 01:21:04,400 Speaker 1: if you're into that thing, I will make a table 1499 01:21:04,439 --> 01:21:06,840 Speaker 1: out there where you can read all of these and 1500 01:21:06,960 --> 01:21:10,400 Speaker 1: think about them and put your thoughts into an email 1501 01:21:10,960 --> 01:21:15,320 Speaker 1: or preferably into a social media response. Out on Twitter, 1502 01:21:15,560 --> 01:21:18,559 Speaker 1: out on Instagram, out on threads, wherever you are. We 1503 01:21:18,600 --> 01:21:21,080 Speaker 1: will post this yeah, and you can let us know 1504 01:21:21,120 --> 01:21:23,080 Speaker 1: what you think. There will be a part two coming 1505 01:21:23,120 --> 01:21:26,960 Speaker 1: next week. Do we agree on all that? Agree? Done? 1506 01:21:27,200 --> 01:21:36,800 Speaker 1: The x DABO Dan x DABO dependability, adaptability, build quality, opportunity, 1507 01:21:36,840 --> 01:21:38,720 Speaker 1: and then the X factor is just how they are 1508 01:21:38,760 --> 01:21:41,320 Speaker 1: behind them, like dealing with the media, that sort of thing. 1509 01:21:41,600 --> 01:21:44,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, extraversion grade extra version. 1510 01:21:45,280 --> 01:21:48,680 Speaker 1: We covered all of ESPN's top ten in our own 1511 01:21:48,720 --> 01:21:51,600 Speaker 1: specific way write in sliver, but at gmail dot com. 1512 01:21:51,680 --> 01:21:55,200 Speaker 1: Let us know your thoughts. Yeah, on the x DABO metric. 1513 01:21:55,600 --> 01:21:57,920 Speaker 2: Who we should grade out? How you grade that person out? 1514 01:21:57,920 --> 01:22:02,920 Speaker 2: By the way, alphabetically, it's own Farrence Freeman, Fritz Gus, Hypel, 1515 01:22:03,000 --> 01:22:10,520 Speaker 2: mac Mario, Narducci, Narduzzi, Narducci, Ci Naduzzi, Rule, Riley Smith, Stoops, Tedford, Venables. 1516 01:22:10,840 --> 01:22:14,519 Speaker 2: That's all just alphabetical, not grade wise. Okay, we've just 1517 01:22:14,600 --> 01:22:15,439 Speaker 2: got a first name in there. 1518 01:22:15,439 --> 01:22:18,080 Speaker 1: That was nice. We've got many more coaches to cover 1519 01:22:18,240 --> 01:22:21,160 Speaker 1: here as part of this new thing we were rolling out. 1520 01:22:21,240 --> 01:22:25,839 Speaker 1: Let us know your thoughts again. Appreciate the social media engagement. 1521 01:22:25,880 --> 01:22:29,519 Speaker 1: It helps more people find us. Just that's true. Link link, nudge, nudge, 1522 01:22:29,600 --> 01:22:33,040 Speaker 1: hit follow, hit subscribe wherever it is you are listening 1523 01:22:33,160 --> 01:22:36,880 Speaker 1: or watching to this podcast episode right now. Rebowlers dot 1524 01:22:36,880 --> 01:22:39,960 Speaker 1: com get this a little bit early without the ads 1525 01:22:39,960 --> 01:22:43,880 Speaker 1: for the support. What Dan and I do agree, this 1526 01:22:43,920 --> 01:22:46,240 Speaker 1: is fun. Man. I enjoyed it. I really enjoyed it. 1527 01:22:46,920 --> 01:22:49,800 Speaker 2: I'm surprised you enjoyed it being wrong as often as 1528 01:22:49,840 --> 01:22:52,639 Speaker 2: you were, Like, I felt like that would have dented 1529 01:22:52,800 --> 01:22:54,719 Speaker 2: your excitement, but I'm glad to say it didn't. 1530 01:22:54,920 --> 01:22:57,600 Speaker 1: For that guy over there, my good friend Dan Rubinstein 1531 01:22:57,640 --> 01:23:00,519 Speaker 1: for myself, Tie Hildebrant. We will be back with more 1532 01:23:00,720 --> 01:23:04,040 Speaker 1: x Dabo x Dabo next week. We meet Times Pay 1533 01:23:04,080 --> 01:23:11,360 Speaker 1: Solid Peace m HM