WEBVTT - S14, Ep9 | How Climate Obstruction Works at the Local Level

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome back to Drilled. I'm Amy Westervelt again.

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:08.879
<v Speaker 1>This season we are making our way through a huge

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>collection of all the peer reviewed research we have so

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>far on climate obstruction and how it works globally. It's

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>called Climate Obstruction, a Global Survey. It comes to you

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>from the Climate Social Science Network, and in each episode

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>of this season we're talking to the lead authors of

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a different chapter focus on a different area of this research,

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>who are walking us through what we know so far

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>about how this stuff works. As is one of the

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>editors of this volume, Tim Ands Roberts said in our

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>first episode of this season, for a really long time,

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.319
<v Speaker 1>people who wanted climate policy had no idea what they

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>were up against in terms of the organized and very

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>well funded efforts to block climate policy. Sometimes in action

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>on climate or the sort of stalled spot that we're

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>at so far gets chalked up to, you know, bad

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>policy making or bad messaging from the climate movement. And

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>while any or all of those things could very well

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>be true, you can't discount the impact that the large,

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>extremely well funded, very consistent, global, decades long effort to

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>obstruct climate policy has had on our ability to make

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>progress on this issue. Last week we talked about what

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>climate obstruction looks like in the global south. Today we

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 1>look at local obstruction. So in a lot of cases,

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>local governments can be really helpful in climate policy even

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>when the national or federal or international negotiations are going badly.

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes a mayor or a governor can get climate policy

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>going at the local level. But the opposite is also true.

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a real double edged sword. Local governments can also

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>block the implementation of national or international efforts. Joining me

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>today to talk about how that works in both directions

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>are Rebecca Bromley Trujillo from Christopher Newport University and Joshua

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Bessechis from Tulane University. That conversation is coming up after

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>this quick break. Okay, so I know this sounds really basic,

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like people do actually have a lot

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of questions about what can non federal government entities sub

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>national government entities do about climate. And I know obviously

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>this changes from country to country and even region to region,

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>but if you could offer sort of an overview of

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the sorts of things that these types of government bodies

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>can do about climate.

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 2>So our chapter focuses on certain regions such as the US, Canada,

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 2>and Latin America and Europe. Certainly there's variation across those

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and across the globe, but generally speaking, sub national governments

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 2>have a big role in things like transportation, the energy sector,

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 2>land use, and so this is sort of a double

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 2>edged sword. It means that they can be a source

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 2>for policy that is mitigating the climate, or they.

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Can be a source for obstruction.

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:30.399
<v Speaker 2>And so we see these sub national units again, such

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 2>as things like states, provinces, cities, counties. They do things

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 2>like climate action plans or renewal energy requirements, or changes

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 2>their transportation systems that are more efficient, and so there's

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of opportunity. But certainly all of the sources

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 2>of obstruction that happen at national levels come to play

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 2>at the state and local and provincial levels as well.

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I would just add, of course that sub

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 4>national power relative to the nownational government varies considerably. So

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 4>in the United States, subnational states are actually much more

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 4>powerful because of the Tenth Amendment and other things like that.

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 4>There's much more that they're able to do than subnational

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 4>governments in other parts of the world. One thing that

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 4>varies by country is how much power institutionally and legally

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 4>the subnational government has relative to the national government. And

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 4>then just like Becky said, it's a double edged sword,

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 4>tons of opportunities. In the US, almost all of the

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 4>climate policy we've seen has been at the state level.

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 4>But also there are some added challenges like less levels

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 4>of media coverage. Right, so those who would obstruct can

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 4>often get away with more at the state level just

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 4>because there might be weaker mechanisms of accountability.

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a good segue into the next thing I wanted

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about, which is the public opinion piece,

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and especially how this plays out in the US and Canada,

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>just how public opinion plays into climate obstruction at this level.

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 2>So both the US and Canada, you show variation in

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 2>public opinion on climate change from a range of things

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 2>as to whether it's human cause, or whether the scientific

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 2>consensus is there, and support for public policy to address

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 2>climate change. What I'd say is in the US there

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 2>is a more pronounced polarization between liberals and conservatives, Republicans

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 2>and Democrats, and so you really see this especially in

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 2>the priority placed on climate policy issues, and also in

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 2>terms of like the broad idea that it's human caused

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 2>and so these variations and public opinion on this issue

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 2>can make it easier or harder for some national governments

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 2>to pass policy, both in the US and Canada. So

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 2>if you have a public that doesn't really see climate

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 2>change as an important issue and doesn't really show strong

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 2>support for public policy, then it's easier for those governments

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 2>to then say, well, we shouldn't do anything. And I'd

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 2>also say we do actually find a lot of support

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 2>for renewable energy investment and other policies among both Republicans

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 2>and Democrats, or conservatives and liberals. But there is a

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 2>pretty clear disconnect between some of those public positions versus

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 2>positions of political elites. And I'm sure we'll talk more

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 2>about how political elites plai into this process, but that

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 2>connection is important to think about in both the US

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 2>and Canada. And again, in the US, public opinion overall

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 2>is less supportive than it is in Canada for climate

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 2>mitigation policy, but we do see some of the same

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 2>challenges play out in both countries.

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Interesting, Okay, I want to ask you about political

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>party affiliation and how that works, especially this difference you

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>point out between the US and Canada, where it's actually

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>much more like if you're a Republican, you're doing this

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in the US, and it might be in Canada.

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I mean at the subnational level in the US,

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 2>arguably the greatest obstruction is happening within these state legislatures

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 2>and by governors and other actors that you know, for

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>the Republican Party, generally they are opposed to any sort

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 2>of climate mitigation policy.

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 3>And so if there's a.

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Single Republican control, whether it's a lower house or upper

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 2>house of the state legislature or the governorship, it acts

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 2>as a veto point for any sort of renewable energy

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 2>or climate policy at that state level. And that also

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 2>occurs at the local level in the US and in Canada.

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Certainly we see as there are shifts in party leadership

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.679
<v Speaker 2>from like a liberal to a conservative party leadership in Canada,

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 2>we do see some changes in what they're doing. It's

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 2>just it's more based on sort of the extraction interests

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>and economic interests there than party interests, although there's some

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 2>certainly some role there.

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 4>State legislators are closer to the publics that they serve,

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 4>they have fewer and then the other thing is they

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 4>just have less access to information, fewer inputs into the

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 4>policy making process more likely rely on autol legislation from

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 4>a group like the American Legislator Change Council or ALEC,

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 4>which is funded largely by fossil fuel companies. Fortunately, one

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 4>of the problems that we face is one of accountability

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 4>to voters. At both the state and the federal level.

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 4>There's so many, so much politicians and get away that,

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, when the public isn't paying attention, and that's

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 4>even more so at the state level.

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Well to your point earlier, there's just there's a lack

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of media coverage and just a lack of outlets that

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>are even right there too. So yeah, anyway, okay, so

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>how do extractive industries come to play the subnational level?

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I can start with that one. So, I

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 4>mean basically there's sort of the more overt ways and

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 4>then the more subtle ways. So the more overt ways

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 4>is that you know, these groups, the fossil fuel interests

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 4>have tremendously skilled lobbyists. They have tremendous resources to actually

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 4>help with drafting legislation and to actually intervene directly in

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 4>the legislative and regulatory process. And the regulatory process is

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 4>the process that does often gets less attention, right, So

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 4>like public utility commissions, or you know, in Texas, there's

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 4>this railroad Commission that actually, even though it's called the

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 4>Railroad Commission, it regulates the oil and gas industries. And

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 4>so there's all kinds of ways in which they can

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 4>just use their resources to directly influence the legislative process.

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 4>But then there's also all of these sort of ways

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 4>that they try to influence the discourse, right, like the

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 4>public discourse as well as the education system. So there's

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 4>this great article that we cite in our chapter looking

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 4>at Saskatchewan in Canada and how oil industry funded groups

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 4>have produced like educational resources that are used in classrooms

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 4>to like educate children about the realities with a lens

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 4>towards what's good for their industry. And then we can

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 4>talk about you know, think tanks and front groups as well.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 4>But one of the big ways that they influence the

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 4>discourses by funding these nonprofit organizations that you know are

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 4>not called Exxon Mobile or Chevron or all these other companies.

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 4>They're called things like the Texas Public Policy Foundation, which

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 4>sounds so innocuous, right and so neutral. So those are

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 4>just some of the ways that they the more insidious

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 4>and ways that they influence policy, as well as the

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 4>more obvious ones like lobbyists and contributions and things like that.

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that reminds me. Just talking about the Texas Public

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Policy Foundation reminds me of another way they get involved,

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>which is weird court cases.

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and this is this is a side note, but

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, the Texas Public Policy Foundation was also heavily

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 4>involved with Project twenty twenty five as well.

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I'll just devtail onto all of what you're saying.

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 2>So certainly, fossil fuel interests get involved through think tanks,

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 2>and it's really kind of a very clever way of

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 2>producing misinformation, and so that links directly to that public

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 2>opinion piece. So basically you've got fossil fuel interests funding

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 2>think tanks and funding these groups like Josh mentioned, and

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 2>some of these groups even sound like environmental organizations like

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Protect our Coasts or Save the Whales, and so they

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 2>will create these entities, these little groups, they will push

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 2>money through them that spreads misinformation, and so we see this,

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, especially on the East Coast in the US,

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of misinformation spread about offshore wind and

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 2>harm to whales. There's no evidence that that's an issue,

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 2>but EXI Mobile and other fossil fuel interests are funding

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 2>various entities that spread this idea. The same is true

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>of this idea that wind farms are extremely bad for birds,

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 2>for instance. So there's a lot of misinformation around those things,

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 2>and if you follow the money back, it goes all

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the way back to those fossil fuel interests.

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>You talked about political elites earlier and how they play

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>into the public opinion piece too. Could I have you

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>unpack that a little bit and maybe give some specific

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>examples in the US and Canada.

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, So, I mean politically elites are also part

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 2>of this misinformation ecosystem, if you will. And so I

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 2>just mentioned think tanks possil fuel interests. Certainly political elites

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 2>are joining in that effort and trying to influence public opinion,

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 2>downplaying issues and.

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Making it sound like renewable as a problem.

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 2>In the chapter, we talk specifically in the US about

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Texas and how politically leads the governor members of the

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 2>state legislature in Texas use a crisis a statewide power

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 2>failure back in twenty twenty one to suggest it was

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 2>actually renewables that cause this, But when we actually look

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 2>at the evidence, there were widespread failures related to natural gas,

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 2>but they kind of grab this issue and spread that

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 2>misinformation alongside all of these other powerful interests. And so

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of a US example, Josh, I don't know

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 2>if you have a Canadian example you want to share.

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, the Texas example that Becky mentioned, Like, in

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 4>addition to gas plants failing and being literally frozen during

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 4>that winter storm in twenty twenty one, there's also more

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 4>technical limitations on the Texas grid. For example, the Texas

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 4>grid is not adequately connected to the Eastern and Western grids,

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 4>so basically their supply is very scarce. And that's true.

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 4>And of course electrons are electrons, regardless of whether they're

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 4>generated from wind turbines or gas plants or coal plants,

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 4>and so those kinds of grid infrastructure issues are also

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 4>at play. And yet the instinct of political elites in

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 4>Texas is to immediately blame green energy and wind and

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 4>solar and say that the wind doesn't always and the

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 4>sun doesn't always shine and all. So in Canada we

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 4>see a lot of similar dynamics. One important difference though,

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 4>is that when it comes to electricity, Kiedro electricity and

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 4>nuclear play a much greater role in the country's electricity system.

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 4>And so that being said, there are particular provinces like

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 4>Saskatchewan and Alberta, for example, where the oil and gas

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 4>industry is extremely effective at shaping elite behavior as well

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 4>as public opinion. But I guess that's one difference that

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 4>I see between the US and Canada, and that in

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 4>the US there are so many states that have extractive industries.

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 4>They're the majority of the fifty states, whereas in Canada

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 4>it's actually the minority of the provinces. But then within

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 4>those provinces we see similar things in terms of fossil

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 4>fuel industries and elites to what we see in the.

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>US, which is why Alberta wants to secede. Right. Weirdly,

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I have neighbors in Costa Rica who are from Canada,

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>from Alberta and worked in the tarcans industry, and like

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>have a giant we Love Texas poster in their house.

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 3>And like that sounds very unbranded. Yeah, it's a vibe.

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, So in yeah, I wonder if you if

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you feel comfortable talking about how this shows up in

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Latin America too.

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 4>Before we move on to Latin America, I have to

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 4>talk about utilities. So utilities are really important because they

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 4>are often monopolies within their service territories. So corporations provide

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 4>a government function, which is you know, gas and electricity,

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 4>and so in some states and areas of the country,

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 4>the gas utilities and the electric utilities are separate companies,

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 4>but in other places they're the same, like for example,

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 4>National Grid. There are many utilities that provide both gas

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 4>and electric service, and they have historically been considered part

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 4>of the fossil fuel industry, but really they're actually quite

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 4>distinct and there are really their interests have to do

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 4>with maintaining monopoly control, and so rooftop solar or virtual

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 4>power plants or consumers that want to produce their own

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 4>clean energy right involves some independence from the grid. And

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 4>so you know, in general, more competitive resources are clean resources,

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 4>whether it's at the individual household level or utility scale.

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 4>And so we end up seeing utilities very much being obstructionists.

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 4>But instead of like where the oil and gas industry,

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 4>what they're really obstructing to is direct competition in the

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 4>utility industry. They're obstructing to the idea that anyone other

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 4>than them might control the grid, and so it's a

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 4>really interesting dynamic. And of course utilities, even though their

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 4>policy preferences are more nuanced, they're extremely powerful in state legislatures,

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 4>at public utility commissions, et cetera. And so there's sort

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 4>of this pivotal player where one once you can convince

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 4>them to go green, they can be really helpful, but

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 4>until then they can be very challenging. The other kind

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 4>of policies that they tend to oppose our policies known

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 4>as decoupling, where the revenue that they get is decoupled

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 4>from the energy that they sell, which of course is

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 4>a good type of policy for promoting energy efficiency. But

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 4>because their business model is so much based on building

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 4>new infrastructure and having demand be higher, it ends up

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 4>that they oppose those kinds of policies.

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that kind of what happened with rooftop solar in California?

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It was mostly utilities that were pushing that, right, Yeah,

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>so yeah.

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 4>The more people that put solar panels on the roof,

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 4>the more that the other customers that don't have solar

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:47.959
<v Speaker 4>end up paying. But of course that's a result of

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 4>the rate design, the way that the public utility commissions

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 4>allocate costs, and that those policies have been largely shaped

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 4>over the years by the utilities. So it's like the

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 4>utilities influence has created this problem and rate design that

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 4>then conveniently gets blamed on rooftop solar as opposed to

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 4>all the efforts over decades to have you know, cost

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 4>of service regulation where the utilities get rewarded for building

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 4>more of their own infrastructure as opposed to compensating individuals

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 4>who choose to put solar on their roofs. Yeah.

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, with both utilities and oil and gas in terms

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of the organizations that they use at the subnational level

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>to kind of shape policy. Do you see their investments

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in like community organizations and arts centers and all of

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that stuff as part of that as well, like sponsoring

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the Little League team and all that.

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 4>And sometimes it's Little League and sometimes it's like actual

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 4>sports stadiums and wings of museums like Oklahoma Gas and

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Electric sponsors a big, a big wing of the Cowboy

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 4>Museum in Oklahoma City, which is very cool but also

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 4>completely unrelated to their business. They just are really good

0:18:58.280 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 4>at branding.

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Yeah, Virginia Dominion energy sponsors like various Christmas light

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 2>displays at gardens, and yeah, I mean they're very good

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 2>at branding. And it's adding to what Josh has said

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 2>about utilities. I know much less than he does, but

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 2>in Virginia, you know, Dominion is this really powerful investor

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 2>in utility. But they kind of swing a little back

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 2>and forth. You know, when there were Democrats in control,

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 2>they started to shift a little more towards more pro

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 2>renewable energy types of plans because they thought, well, this

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 2>is going.

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 3>To be the future, and so we need to shape

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 3>what it's going to look like.

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 2>And so they got actively involved in the legislative process

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 2>and shaping.

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well we're going to do this, so we want

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 3>to make it as favorable to us as possible.

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 2>But once Republicans took back control of state government, Dominion

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 2>shifted the other way along with Republicans, and so they're

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 2>playing both sides sometimes to really just to ensure that

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 2>their business model performs the best.

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I mean that it's kind of like what

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 4>I was saying about like blaming you know, rooftop solar

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 4>in California. So because they literally run the grid and

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 4>they know more about the grid than any state policy makers.

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 4>They almost have sort of like the privileges of government themselves,

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 4>but the incentives of private companies. And that makes them

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 4>different than other fossil fuel actors. And it's kind of

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 4>like what Becky was saying is, you know, they try

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 4>to get ahead of things. They don't testify very often

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 4>at the public hearings because they've usually already done their

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 4>influential work at the Public Service Commission or at the

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 4>state legislature. So yeah, they're really interesting actors.

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just feel like they stay behind the scenes

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot. People just don't think of them that often.

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 4>Right, They'll think of them when they see their name

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 4>on a subconscious level, like when they participate in a

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 4>sporting event or an arts museum, but then they don't

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 4>connect that all the way back to like their policy

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 4>influence over the clean energy transition. They're just like, oh,

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 4>how nice of them to sponsor this wing of the

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 4>art museum.

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So Latin America. I'm curious what you guys saw

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>as not experts actually on Latin America, Like what jumped

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>out to you as key differences between that region and

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>what you've studied in North America.

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I would say the first is it's so

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 2>much more complex because certainly there's huge variation across Latin

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 2>American countries in terms of their governing systems. So some

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 2>are federal systems, some are unitary, but even some of

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 2>their federal systems don't look anything like the US federal

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 2>systems in terms of the autonomy granted the state and

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 2>local or subnational governments. And so that stood out to

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 2>me also just kind of more higher levels of political corruption,

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 2>less accountability, remnants of colonialism that really empowered certain interests,

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 2>especially extractive industries, and so there's, yes, it's just a

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 2>much more complex situation going on there, and so how

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 2>things go on in each individual country than Latin America

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 2>can really vary.

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, just to add to that, like it's pretty clear

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 4>from reading the work that our colleague Marcella put into

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 4>the chapter that one thing that's different is that a

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 4>lot of the energy, like the oil and gas companies,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 4>are state owned companies, so they are actually part of

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 4>the national government, which makes the obstruction, which sort of

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 4>changes the whole lens through which you view obstruction, because

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 4>it's like the state is obstructing rather than different actors

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 4>trying to influence the state's government, and then they have

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 4>really weak institutions. Even though our institutions right now in

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 4>the United States are being tested. This is all new

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 4>for US, But in Latin America for decades they've been

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 4>dealing with the sort of corruption and weak institutions, So

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 4>that's another difference.

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting. Actually, I was talking to someone in

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Mexico who's like a climate campaigner, and he was saying

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 1>that the trouble in Mexico is not just all of

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the things that you deal with in any situation where

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>people are like, but I use gas in my car,

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>so like what about that and whatever, but also that

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico, saying something bad about Pemex is like saying

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>something bad about Mexican identity.

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes, right, And epay FA, I think is the state

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 4>owned corporation Argentina, and I'm sure Brazil has something.

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Marcella had described both in the chapter and discussions many

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 2>examples of these sort of corruption intertwining between government leaders

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 2>and these various extractive industries, and there's just so much

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 2>economic interests a way that you know, the money is

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 2>doled out in terms of royalties and all kinds of things.

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 4>And we talked about how in the US and Canada,

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 4>like there is clearly a partisan alignment with fossil fuel

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 4>interests like the Republican Party or the Conservative Party, but

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 4>in a lot of these Latin American countries, irrespective of

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 4>what parties empower, the industry you know, is one and

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 4>the same with the you know, the national government, and

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 4>they're so like it doesn't really or as much which

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 4>parties are in power. The obstruction is less dependent on

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 4>which parties are in power than it is here.

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>That's really interesting. I was going to ask you about that,

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the party affiliation thing and how it comes into play there.

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean basically just less correlated. So certainly changes

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 2>in party leadership can produce changes in climate policy in

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Latin America, but there's just a less direct link between

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of right parties, left parties, center parties and climate policy.

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Again, in Brazil, I think the assumption from outside Brazil

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is like, oh, Lula's in charge, so he's going to

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>like do all this great environmental stuff. But you know,

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>he just passed this massive rollback of environmental laws there,

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's as cozy with the Industrial Act guys as

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>any other Brazilian prisonent.

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, something else Marcella pointed out about land use.

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 2>So they're to these transnational companies that are coming in

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 2>and getting licenses to explore lands, and she mentions some

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 2>particular indigenous lands and they say they're there to explore

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 2>them for one reason, but then they may go in

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 2>and do something very different, and so that's also challenge.

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, awesome, let's talk about Europe.

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, what's interesting about Europe. It's so it has this

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 2>supernational the EU, that dictates a lot of policy on

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 2>down and so certainly there's obstruction in Europe, but it's

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 2>happening at higher levels. And so it's not that there

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 2>isn't any pushback at the subnational level in Europe, but

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 2>it looks very different in terms of the kind of

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 2>ability to make a change.

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 3>It seems less impactful.

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 2>So, for instance, even when we see major protests, you know,

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 2>around renewable energy and concerns about renewable energy and economic concerns,

0:25:56.440 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 2>those haven't necessarily moved those subnational governments in terms of

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 2>rejecting renewable energy policy as much as it has in

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 2>the US. So I think sort of the summary of

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 2>the European section in terms of subnational so there is

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 2>some pushback. Much of it aligns similarly to other nations

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 2>in the North America and other parts of the globe

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 2>around fossil fuel interests and those sorts of things, but

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>it hasn't been as effective at the subnational level as

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 2>it has been in those places.

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 4>And just to add to that, like even the defining

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 4>the subnational level is a bit more complicated because of

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 4>what you're saying about the EU, Like in some ways,

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 4>the EU acts maybe somehow like more like what we

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 4>would see as a national government in other parts of

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 4>the world, and the actual European countries or states act

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 4>like states. So because there's the supranational level in addition

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 4>to the national and subnational you know, like Germany does

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 4>have subnational governments that are like relatively strong, but in

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 4>general it's the country. The two most consequential levels of

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 4>government are the EU and then the national country level.

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 4>And then the other thing I would just point out

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 4>about Europe is that it is, you know, even though

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 4>it's not accurate to say that obstruction doesn't exist in Europe,

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 4>compared to what we're dealing with now in our country,

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 4>we really do need to give the Europeans credit. But

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 4>a big part of it is that a lot of

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 4>the renewable energy industries were actually born in Europe. So

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 4>like a lot of the big wind companies like vest

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 4>Us or you know, avan Grid or Yberdrola, a lot

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 4>of these companies that are primoriarily clean energy we were

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 4>started in Europe there, and so as a proportion of

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 4>the interest groups or political land, political you know groups,

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 4>the fossil fuel industry is weaker in Europe than it

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 4>is in North America or Latin America or pretty much

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 4>anywhere else in the world. But instead what you do

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 4>have in Europe is economic populism, which like the I'm

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 4>thinking about, like the yellow vest protests in France and

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 4>so well, obstruction may happen there, it's not as likely

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 4>to be coming from the fossil fuel industry. It's more

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 4>likely to be coming from you know, still from misinformation,

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 4>but also from you know, real economic inequality and how

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 4>that gets and how the clean energy transition or carbon

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 4>taxation might get blamed for that.

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, coming back to the US actually for a moment,

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>since we are in this current moment where I think

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>people are desperate to believe that the subnational governments can

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>do something. Obviously, this is a again, as you mentioned,

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a double edged sword. It can go both ways, right,

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, what are you seeing the subnational governments doing

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to try to sort of like go against the national

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>government on some of its energy policies.

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is obviously it's a difficult time for

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 2>people who are trying to advance reneable energy or advance

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 2>climate mitigation policy because of the national government.

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 3>We have a President Trump and office who's very supportive.

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Apostle fuels and not at all supportive of renewables. And

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 2>so what does states and localities kind of do to

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 2>counterbalance that? I mean, for one, the states that have

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 2>been active in this space for at this point, you know,

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 2>around twenty plus years continue to advance their policies. So

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 2>we see states passing more stringent and renewable energy mandates,

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent clean energy mandates, that sort of thing. See,

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, it certainly challenges to Trump's changes to national law.

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 2>So we see attorneys general firing back at what Trump

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 2>is doing through the executive branch. And so that's another

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 2>role for states in the US to kind of push

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 2>back and act as a sort of accountability mechanism to

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the federal government.

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:51.719
<v Speaker 3>And so there's a lot going on.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, some states are doing new things, some states are

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 2>pushing back on federal power. But as you mentioned again

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 2>with that double edged or the states that were not

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 2>engaged before are certainly not still pretty much not engaged now.

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 2>So that obstruction at the subnational level really does matter,

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 2>especially in a power vacuum where the federal government is

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 2>either walking back or not doing anything to advance a

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 2>climate policy.

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 4>Right There's this concept in the political science literature called

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 4>fiscal federalism, which basically has to do with state. Even

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 4>though states have a lot of autonomy, they have become

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 4>in recent years, like aka Biden years, dependent on the

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 4>federal government and like the funds in the IRA the

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 4>Inflation Reduction Act to actually fund a lot of their

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 4>innovative ideas. So they're needing state level revenue sources to

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 4>become less dependent on the federal government to advance climate

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 4>and clean energy. And so I think there is probably

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 4>a slowing down even across all states right now, just

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 4>because there's this like frozenness. But like Becky was saying,

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 4>the Democratic attorneys general have also played a big role

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 4>in resisting a lot of the Trump decisions, which is

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 4>sort of ironic because previously to Trump, it was like

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 4>the Republican attorneys general that we're very active in like

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 4>slowing down, you know, what the Biden administration was doing.

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 4>And now we're seeing the Democratic attorneys general trying to

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 4>slow down the reversals of the Trump administration so that

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 4>court system and the federalism remains important as ever now

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:31.239
<v Speaker 4>under Trump. The other thing is that historically, just as

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 4>Becky said, it's been like a red state blue state thing.

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 4>But I'm going to be working on an op ED

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 4>because of some of the because of how severe some

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 4>of the changes are that Trump is making now, like

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 4>getting rid of the epas and dangerment finding. I really

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 4>think it's time for red states to find ways that

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 4>they can make progress, and it might mean not talking

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 4>about climate change and talking about it more in terms

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 4>of energy affordability now that renewable energy is cheaper local

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 4>economic development. In the early years of the renewable and

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 4>of renewable portfolio standards, like in Texas and other Red

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:08.719
<v Speaker 4>states like Iowa, these policies were effective because of their

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 4>economic benefits, and so like going forward, even though it's

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 4>been so polarized in the past. I think that encouraging

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 4>red states to use their power but to define the

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 4>issues in less polarizing ways can be a really important

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 4>strategy because the retreat, the degree of retreat that we're

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 4>seeing from national government is like unprecedented. Like they're not

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 4>just eracing what Biden did, They're like going further to

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 4>prevent future federal administration from attempting to do that.

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So they've all but made it illegal to say climate change.

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 3>It's something so Josh's point, Yeah, if you can avoid saying.

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Those words and focus on the economic issues, sometimes that help.

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes also helps to focus on things like public health issues,

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 2>environmental justice. Broadly speaking, tying the challenges associated with climate

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 2>change their issues can help spur things along.

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 3>And we haven't talked about this at all, but a

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of.

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:11.239
<v Speaker 2>A new both challenge and in some ways opportunity is

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 2>data centers.

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 3>There. They're blowing up in the US.

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 2>In certain states more than others, and they've actually made

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 2>it harder in some states to promote renewable energy because

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 2>they take up so much energy that like there's a

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 2>need to keep fossil fuel systems online.

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 3>In the eyes of lawmakers.

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 2>And you know, certainly people disagree with that argument, but

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 2>in some states, including Texas, they're starting to think about, Okay,

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe we do need to rein in the data centers

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 2>related to that energy affordability issue that Josh raised as well.

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 2>And so that's that's sort of a new issue within

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 2>state and local politics in terms of energy and climate,

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 2>is how to kind of grapple with data centers and

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 2>their expansion and how to maybe rein it in and that.

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 3>So that's a heavy debate we're seeing

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>MHM.