WEBVTT - How Ultraprocessed Foods Work

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of I

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh,

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and there's Chuck and Jerry's even here, and this is

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know. Welcome everybody, Welcome. Yet another food.

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh well, I was going to classify this. I don't

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>think this belongs with our food like coffee beans like that,

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>but food industry, sure, sweet, can't stop, can't stop, can't

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>stop talking about food. That's what I say. I love it.

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>This is more um yeah, food industry like um, massive

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>problem in the world faces now that kind of thing.

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>It's it's in that sweet like the huge problem sweet.

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>That's where yeah, we do, and it's growing every day, unfortunately,

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>because we haven't solved the single one, Chuck, even though

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we've tried. I know we're trying. But what we're talking

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>about today are called ultra processed foods. And a lot

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of people say, you mean junk food, and yeah, it

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is junk food. But it's applying science and public health

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to the idea of what to do about junk food,

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>because as people look into it more and more, they

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>find more and more evidence that it's as bad for

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you as you think it is. Maybe even worse. But

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it's also painfully obvious that it's so fully entrenched in

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>cultures around the world that it's not going anywhere. We're

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get rid of. You can't just get rid

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of junk food. People survive on junk food, as we'll

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>see um. But so we have to figure out then

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>how to balance those two things, the presence of junk

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>food and the the harm that junk food can do

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to your health. Yeah, and you know, I would even say,

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure you would agree that calling it junk food,

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people might think, like, well,

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't need Cheetos, and I hate that we're gonna

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>have to just rattle off brands like that. I love

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a Cheeto every now and then Cheese Oh no, no, no,

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 1>that the ones that look like Little Caveman Club look

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>like that too. When I was a kid, I used

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to I didn't eat many Cheetos then either, just because

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have no money to buy Cheetos. We had

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 1>whatever the off brand was that came in, like gigantic bags. Yeah, probably,

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>but I hate that we're gonna have to name brands

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>here and there like that as reference. But let's just

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>say cheetos. Uh, but people might think, oh, I don't

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>eat cheetos, so I'm good. Uh. That's not true. Though.

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.239
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of foods that you probably eat

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that you don't realize. You may not call junk food.

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at the back of the package,

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh, wait a minute, there's like fourteen ingredients

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and two of them sound like food. Yeah, and that's

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a really good indicator. Though what you're eating is ultra

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>processed food. Um. And that actually that term ultra process

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>food you may have heard before, but it's a relatively

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>recent development. I think it was two thousand and ten

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>when a Brazilian epidemiologist named Carlos Montero came up with

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it as part of like a four point um food group.

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty obvious, but it was, But what he

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>did was not obvious. It was actually pretty revolutionary because

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.839
<v Speaker 1>at the time in Brazil in two thousand and ten

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and still today in the United States and plenty of

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>other countries, there was a focus on on the food group. Says,

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we know, I'm like grains in um, cereals, fruits and vegetables, meat, dairy,

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. Right, there's we still talk about

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that here today in the United States. So what this

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>guy said was like, that is so ridiculously confusing and

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it's such a problem to keep up with that. I'm

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>going to basically take it upon myself to reclassify food

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>into easier to understand stuff. And that's where he came

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>up with ultra processed food. But he actually came up

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>with it from an observation, Chuck, that was kind of

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>like a mystery. At first. It sounds like a set

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>up to me, take it, Chuck, just so people know.

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>We don't write down set chuck up for the next bit. No, No,

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just very organic, it is. And it's getting clunkier

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>as we're entering four teeth here. Organic and clunky sounds

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>like a set up. Yeah, he did notice something. He

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>realized that the purchase of actual sugar by Brazilians had

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>gone down a lot between the nineteen eighties and two thousand's,

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 1>but obesity and type two diabetes were still on the rise.

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>And I guess he thought, it's almost as if they're

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>getting all that sugar from other things that aren't just

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>bags of sugar. And so he looked to the to

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the package food industry and came up with a system

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to classify it, and never has there been a system

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that should be an acronym. It's not so frustrating. It's

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>even capitalized nova in O v A and like what

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>does it stand for? Nothing? Absolutely nothing, not your ordinary

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 1>variant analysis? Uh yeah, yeah, I worked on it even

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what I could come up with. Oh really yeah, Okay.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason he chose novas because nova means

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>new star. Um so, I think he was saying, like

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 1>this is providing like a new north Star to guide

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>people towards nutrition. I guess or that he is the

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>new star of talking about food, right, That's that's what

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>he talks about himself as for sure. Uh so, I

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>guess we should talk about the four groups. Uh. Group

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>one is what you might call like whole foods, which

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>are it's just food. It's unprocessed, it's fruit, and it's meat,

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's the eggs and stuff like that. Uh you know,

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>comes out of a chicken's butt and into your mouth.

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully there's something in between that happens though. Right then

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a good point too, because people be like, well,

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>meats processed. Yes. Group one also includes minimally processed foods.

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So the distinction isn't that it's totally unprocessed. The distinction

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>is is that it's substantially intact, asn't been pulled apart

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and put back together again. And it's nutrient composition as

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it exists in the cow that's walking around or the

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>chicken that's walking around or the plant that's growing, remains

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>basically the same in this form, this minimally processed form.

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>That's right. That's Group one, and that's what you should

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>shoot for. Group to our processed foods a little more processed. Uh.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know we're talking about oils, packaged herbs. These

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>are things that are used as ingredients or things to

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>cook other things, right, yeah. Um, So if you put

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Group one and Group two together, what you're doing is cooking,

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're coming up with basically Group three foods and

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>basically anything that you cook in your kitchen using normal ingredients,

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>even things like cakes and cookies and things like that.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:14.239
<v Speaker 1>If you're using sugar and butter um and basically whole

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>foods from Groups one or two, you're you're coming up

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>with Group three, which are processed foods, but they're recommend

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>their recommended processed food. So the kind of foods that

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you're making yourself or if you're buying it at the store,

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's being it's being processed in a way that is

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>still retaining as much of the nutrients as possible with

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>as few additional ingredients as possible. And the ingredients, like

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you're saying before you can you can understand what they're

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>what they're saying in the ingredient list. Yeah, Like if

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you see, uh, some strawberry preserves on the shelf of

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a grocery store and it says and this is, uh,

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>this is actually in our research and something will point

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>out later again probably, but food brands are starting to

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>teut stuff like this, Like I bought some. It's we

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>don't get eat a lot of like frozen treats like

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>ice cream and stuff, but I got some because the summertime,

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get my daughter some like a little treat,

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little frozen treat, like some fruit pops.

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>And when you go down the fruit pop aisle, that

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that aisle especially is made up of things where they'll

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>say like three ingredients and big letters on the front,

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like you know, cane, sugar and water and real fruits. Yeah,

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the third ingredient, but that would be a group three.

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And there are you know, I think the bell has

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>been ringing. So food companies are are beginning to tout

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>things like fewer ingredients here and there, uh, so they

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>don't fall into group four, which is the ultra process

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>foods that we're gonna talk about today. And these are

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, contain a lot of engineered ingredients. Uh. When

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you look at the back, that's when you're gonna see

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>things like soy protein and high hydrogenated fats and things

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>like that and things you can't even pronounce, right, um.

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And the longer the list of ingredients is, the likelier

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it is to be in group four. UM. The more

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>difficult to understand ingredients are probably in group four. And

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>then also even without UM looking at the ingredient list,

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you can usually catch a group for type ultra processed

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>food UM because it's heavily marketed. There's lots of colors

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and neat logos and stuff like that, and you've seen

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>ads for it on TV. That's definitely a hallmark, right,

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a definite hallmark of ultra processed foods. UM. So

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you can usually tell from the packaging and then to

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of meet the industry where it's going to um.

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Some people who are into the Nova system of food

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 1>groups say, actually, if you see a packaged food or

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a pre prepared food that is making health claims, you

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>should actually take that as a signal that it's not

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>actually healthy, that that healthy foods don't have to tout

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. Unhealthy foods are the ones that

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to watch out for. They say healthy, low fat,

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff, it actually means it's ultra processed. Right,

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you won't see a bunch of bananas with a

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>sticker that says now with more potassium. No. And if

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to kind of imagine what the differences between,

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, where we are between ultra processed foods and

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 1>actual whole foods. Like imagine Mountain Dew, the Mountain Dew logo,

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>all of the Mountain Dew advertising you've ever heard. Remember

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>they used to say it was extreme with just an

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>X that is like classic ultra processed food marketing. Now

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine yes, for sure. Now imagine that same ad campaign

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>was for pairs like it will make your brain do

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a somersault just trying to even it's just trying to

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>come up with it, and that's shape it really kind

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of brings in to start contrast the difference between ultra

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>processed foods and whole foods from groups one, two, or three. Yeah,

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty sad, and it's they've been Uh. I mean,

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>there's some staggering facts in here. The first one that

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I came across was right here on our first page,

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>where it says that, uh, in the US and the UK,

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>ultraprocessed foods make up more than half of the calories

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that we eat period. Uh, and they are on the rise. Uh.

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>They've they've shown that the percentage of adults US adults

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>diets that are consist of upfs or ultra processed foods

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>went from fifty three point five to fifty seven. And

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that's from let's say, two thousand two to two thousand seventeen,

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>which is a long time, but you know, of four

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>percentage point rise in like a total caloric intake is substantial. Yeah,

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And that means that since it was at fifty three

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>point five percent, already American adults have gotten at least

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>half of their calories for more than twenty years, at

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>least half of their calories from junk food for more

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>than two decades. And that's just the adults. Like, if

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you look into studies of ultra processed foods, by far

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:02.479
<v Speaker 1>the largest consumers of them are younger kids, in particular

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>younger boys. So if our if adults are getting that much,

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:08.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it just makes you wonder how much how

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>much kids are getting And it just so happens that

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that's our next stat uh. Yeah, kids. Over an eighteen

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>year period from ninety nine to two thousand eighteen, they

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 1>went from to sixty seven percent. And they found that,

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's generally across all races save one, which

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is pretty amazing and awesome. Hispanic adults don't eat nearly

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>as much ultra processed foods as other people. Uh. And

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they've also found that it's basically across um income demographics,

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>although lower income uh, people with lower incomes do eating

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>more upfs, but it has been rising across almost all demographics. Yeah,

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and um globally too, Like the US has long been

0:12:55.040 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>feeding our kids and eating ourselves the ultra processed foods. Uh,

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's long been kind of a hallmark of a

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>wealthier country, ironically, because ultra processed foods are so cheap

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>compared to whole foods UM. But in other countries, as

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>they started to develop more and more economically UM their

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>intake of ultra processed foods has increased. In step two,

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>so you see ultra processed foods making up a larger

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and larger share of the caloric intake of all people

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>around the world. It's becoming a new kind of diet

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that wherever you go in the world, you're going to

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to find basically the same food and it's

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>wrapped in extreme packaging and contain something that was extruded

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and dusted with something that used to be cheese. All right,

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a great setup. Uh, let's take a break and

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk a little bit about where, or at least

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>what some people considered the big bang of upfs started

0:13:54.040 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>right after this. By the way, Chuck extrusion, I was like,

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I know what that is. I just want

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you remember the Plato fun factory. Like

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that thing that you you put the Plato in one

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>end and then you pulled the lever and it squeezed

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>out like a star shape or a moon shape. That's extrusion, yes,

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but they never called it the extruder In my day.

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>They called it the fun factory, the star maker. All right,

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to look to where some people

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>consider the Big Bang, or at least as um Anastasia

0:14:49.640 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>marks de Salsado, Yeah, salceto, yes, yes. Uh. Anastasia the

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>journalist who wrote a book called Combat Ready Kitchen colon

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>how the US military shapes the way you eat and

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>lays claim to the fact that World War Two was

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is uh known at least to this journalist as the

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Big Bang of ultra processed foods and that revolution. Uh

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we should point out this is nothing new. Canning, I

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>realized comes from a competition that was used or held

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to help feed Napoleon's army. So there's been a long

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>history of food R and D when it comes to

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>feeding lots and lots of soldiers on the battlefield. In

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a way that makes sense because you know, you obviously

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>have to have food that's not going to spoil, stuff

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that light and that travels, and um, what it kind

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of comes down to is getting rid of as much

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>water as you can from food, right, because that prevents spoilage. It's,

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>like you said, makes it lighter, so it's easier to

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>ship and move around. Um. But it still should retain

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>mostly the same nutrient density, which is what you're really after. UM.

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's a huge, huge thing that kind of

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>came out of World War two, I believe, UM, which

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>was drying food, learning to dry not just food but

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>also coffee. UM. And apparently all of that that drawing

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>process came out of UM a way to to dry

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and store plasma for later use. And they said, you

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>know what would would also go through this process really well, coffee?

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>That was it pretty amazing? Yeah, there was some that.

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is just one tiny little fact. I

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>think the one that really got me was something like

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the McRib was actually born out of this same military

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>research into something called and this is an album title.

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>If I've ever heard one, fabricated modules of meat, that's

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the Diarrhea Planet album. Oh man, they're not together anymore,

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we heard from people. I think I knew they weren't together,

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>but they'll always be together in my heart. Uh. And

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this is very interesting too. What they've UM the start

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>doing was found out a way to remove or what

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to end up with something called intermediate moisture foods. So

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>if you think of like a chewy granola bar, uh,

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that thing is chewy. It's not super dry, but it's

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>not super wet. And the power bar is something that

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>was born directly from World War Two. There was something

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>called a logan bar that was packed in the you know,

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>soldiers kits as a meal replacement, but it was designed

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 1>purposefully to not taste very good, so the soldiers wouldn't

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>just like dive in after it. It's sort of like

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a last resort thing. And they're there in lies the

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>power bar. So if you're ever like, these things taste terrible,

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you can thank the US Army for deliberately making them

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>taste terrible so that you don't want to eat them, like,

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, like their kudos, remember kudos, Oh yeah, I

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>love they were great. They were like a cross between

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a candy bar and a granola bar, and they somehow

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we're greater than the sum of all its parts. And

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>those were the kind of things that you're like, oh,

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I like this, I think I'll have the rest of

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the box. And that's another hallmark of ultra process foods,

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.959
<v Speaker 1>as we'll see, I think though we can now not

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>avoid it any longer. We need to talk about processed

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>cheese and cheese dust. What the Army ended up calling

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>jungle cheese because they developed a new way to make cheese.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>The people have been making cheese for millennia and it

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>was great, but it didn't travel well. And so the

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Army or I guess you know, the military industrial complex,

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>said let's find a way to make better cheese that

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>can travel, and they did it. They did so. One

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of the huge challenges was as you dry out cheese,

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>if you don't do it right, the oil separates out

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>of the cheese, it becomes sweaty, and the cheese you

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>have left with is oil and dry and not good

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 1>at all. So somebody figured out there was an actual guy,

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>George Sanders, who was a U. S d. A dairy scientist.

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>He figured out that if you dry the cheese at

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>really low temper the protein actually encapsulates the lipids the

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>fats and locks them in place. So then after that

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you can pulverize it and dry it even further and

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the fat will stay locked into it. And then you

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>can take that and you can either turn it into

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>powder or you can reconstitute it into whatever shape you want. Specifically,

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>sliced cheese, which is those yellow squares of cheese. That's

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>what happens to him. Yeah, but when it came to

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the powder, like if you've ever made that delicious still

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>delicious kraffmac and cheese and not the kind with the

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>packet squeezy cheese. Yeah, I'm talking that yellow orange powder

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and you dump it in there with a little butter,

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little heavy cream if you really want to

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>treat yourself, and you wonder what the heck is this?

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 1>It is cheese. It's just treat cheese that has been

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>ultra processed thanks to George Sanders. And he would shread

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it up and then dry it out, and then it

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>would harden up, and then he would grind it and

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>then dehydrated even more, and eventually you do that over

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and over and you get down to that beautiful orange powder. Yeah.

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>What's confusing is there seems to be a discrepancy between

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 1>who first invented cheese powder. Was it George Saunders in

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty three? Um? If so, then how did Kraft

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>come out with their macaroni and cheese or craft dinner

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>if you're in Canada, Um, back in ninety seven with

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>powdered cheese. So it's weird. There's a there's a weird

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>misunderstanding around who created cheese powder, but it does seem

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to have come about in the either the late nineteen

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen forties, possibly through military research. But it was

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 1>that we got our first cheese dust snack when the

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Freedo Company. I guess, I mean, was it a Cheeto?

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Was it like a cheesy friedo? My friend, it was

0:20:53.720 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a cheeto or cho cho as what you grew up. Uh.

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I've worked with the director years ago, Tom Schiller, who

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>was the remember the black and white SNL shorts from

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>the Blue. Yeah, he was like Al Franken's writing partner,

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I think. Yeah, I was like Schiller's kind of head

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>p a. When he came to town, he would request

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>me because we were buddies. Uh. And he was great

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>with like one of the best dudess ever worked for.

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>But he as a gag would um he didn't even

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>like Cheetos, but he would eat cheetos on set with

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:28.719
<v Speaker 1>a white surgical glove just to make people laugh. That's funny.

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>There's these little finger protectors that look like tiny condoms

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that you put on your fingertips and I used to

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>use those to eat buffalo wings just for effect. Well,

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>but that also has a practical effect, because that that

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>stink can go to other places, you know, if you

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>rub your eyes or oh sure, sure, sure, but I

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>still rub my eyes with little finger condoms on him

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>just that, Tom, No, you gotta take those things off.

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I forget every time or accidentally swallow one when I'm

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>licking my fingers. I don't get the hot wings. I

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't eaten a buffalo wing in years. Oh chuck, you're

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>missing out. I get the lemon pepper now if I

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 1>get anything. Okay, that's good too, But I think you

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>can mix it up a little bit, all right. They always, uh,

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this is no good for my digestive system. So you

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>said something that I think is um. Well, I hope

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>your digestive system comes back around so you can eat

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>some buffalo wings. Um. But you said something a little

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>while back that I think is worth kind of fleshing out,

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and that is that this stuff that's cheese dust used

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to be cheese. It's actually made from real cheese. And

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that is um an argument that a lot of people make.

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>When people poo poo junk food, ultra process food, that

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff, they're like, there's there. It basically amounts

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:50.199
<v Speaker 1>to you're afraid of science, is what you're responding to.

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>This is still food. In some cases, it's more nutritional

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>than the whole food it was made from. Um, so

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>what's the problem. And we'll get into that whole thing.

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>But I just wanted to kind of point that out

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>because you did, I mean, you did hit on something

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's worth worth saying. Yeah, we're just leadites. I mean, sure,

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that's I'm a convert though. Um through some of

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>this one particular study that we'll talk about that I

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 1>think is very mind changing. Oh all right, that's a

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>nice tease. But first, Chuck, I think we have to

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about corn because you can't really do all this.

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>You can't make very cheap ultra processed foods without very

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>cheap base ingredients. And corn is about as cheap as

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 1>they come in the United States. It is now because

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>they over the years figured out how to grow corn

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>much more efficiently and much more densely. Uh, the nineteen

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>twenties and thirties is when they started develop these new

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>strains of corn. The corn ears themselves are actually bigger,

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and they could pack them in a lot more. And

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe between the thirties and the two thousands, an

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>acre of corn yield jumped from thirty bushel to about

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and forty, which is a big I mean,

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>what is that a fourfold increase a little more? Actually, yeah,

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>it's like uh four almost five. Yeah, we we did it.

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>We got there. They got there and or we got

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.719
<v Speaker 1>their math wise, but they got their corn wise. And

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>now corn is the largest crop in the United States. Uh.

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>It accounts for about all crop sales in the US,

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>with about only about a third of that being used

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>for actual food uh and some other industrial uses that

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>don't include ethanol or livestock teed right, right, But because

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>we're feeding most of that corn to our livestock and

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>then we eat the live stock, well, we were in

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>turn still consuming the corn which are young one way,

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>right sure, but we um, I didn't get that. But

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I love the young ones so nice. Um. But wait,

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 1>So the reason corn is so profitable and so well

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>grown and so tinkered with is because it's so heavily

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>subsidized in the United it states, Like the government will

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>pay you to grow corn. Sometimes they'll pay you to

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 1>stop growing other crops to grow corn. Um. And you

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>if your if your crop goes bad, they'll give you

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>money for it. Because you try to grow corn. It's

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>just extremely subsidized, which means that, um, there's always a

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>market for it. You're always going to be able to

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>sell it. So lots and lots of people grow corn.

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's what we use as our staple crop to

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>to make almost all of our other food from. And

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that was discussed at length in the really great book

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Derito Effect by Mark Shatzker, which we talked about in

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>our junk Food episode, because remember we did one just

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>on junk food. This is different, this is slightly different. Uh.

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>We grew a little corn growing up, um a couple

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of times. I think it was kind of a pain.

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 1>So we didn't end up doing it more than like

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>once or twice. But we had a very robust garden

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>over about an acre. I lived out in the woods

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>like a you know, like a yokol. I've talked about

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 1>canny or on food and stuff, but um, corn was

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>something we grew a little bit every now and then.

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>How much do you want to talk about high fruit

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>just corn syrup? I mean we did a whole episode

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>on it, right, So how much do you want to

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>get into this should we tell people I would done again? Yeah,

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that we ever talked about how it's made,

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>did we? It seemed all new to me. No, we

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about it. Well, I mean it's a typical. It's

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a good, great example of Wow, you really just shifted

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>from this corn story of you growing it to whether

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:31.360
<v Speaker 1>or not we're going to talk about high fruit chose corn.

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So it was like a whip lash and now we're

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 1>talking about yeah, clunky, clunky, year four ten, Well why

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>don't why don't you go over it then? Because I'm

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>done with it now, I'm just kidding. Um. You should

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about it though, because it is pretty interesting. Yeah.

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why it's so interesting is because high

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Fruit Choice corn syrup is just one of the many

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>things that are made out of a single like batch

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of corn kernels. That's what makes it such a great

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>like poster child for ultra process foods because out of

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a single kernel of corn, you get everything

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>from um, the like corn oil from the germ, um

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>from the fiber from the shell gets sent off to

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>be used in breakfast cereal. So if you see like

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>corn bran or corn fiber or something like that, it

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>was separated out from what eventually became high fruit toast

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>corn syrup. UM. The stuff that's left over is corn

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>starch and corn gluten, and gluten gets fed to the livestock,

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and the corn starts you could just use around your kitchen.

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>They use it in building materials, UM, and that you

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 1>can also use it to create high fruit toast corn syrup.

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So just that one process of taking some of that

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>corn converts it into all these different things from building

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>products to high fruit toast corn syrup to cattle feed. UM.

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Just with this one type of corn dent corn is

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>what it's called. Yeah, it is. It's one of those

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>things where you wish HFCs wasn't so bad for you

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and and everything, because when you look at that process

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>that you just described, it's hard not to sit back

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.959
<v Speaker 1>and just and as science food science and pat themselves

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 1>on the back and just say, what a amazing process

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>we developed. That all of this stuff is being used

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in all these different areas and in the end we

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>get are evil ingredient. Right Yeah, yeah, for sure, UM,

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>but I mean not all of it is evil. Like Um,

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever had a cardboard box that you had

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>trouble pulling apart to recycle because the adhesive was so strong.

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>You can bet that was made with corn starch or adhesive. Yeah,

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the adhesive, industrial adhesive. UM, some of them power some

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of our machinery. Ethanol is made from a lot of corn.

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So there it is like a real like you know,

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>pat on the back for science, like you were saying,

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just that nutrition. Science, as we'll see, has not

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>figured out how to how to take that stuff and

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>make it work for humans, the way that we can

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>make a machine work with ethanol derived from corn. Yeah,

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think where they I was about to say

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>where they aired, but they would say this was the genius.

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Part of it was the corn syrup that they end

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>up with after all those processes. Uh is dextros basically,

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And if they would have stopped there, it might not

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>have been so bad, but they went dextros just isn't

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>as sweet as we needed to be. It doesn't taste

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>like that sweet sweet sucrose. So let's make it sweeter.

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's process it more and add an enzyme to it

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and some uh, some pressure and some temperature and body

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>being bought a boom will turn it into fruit. Toast,

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's sort of that that final step of the

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>process is really where it nutritionally went wrong. I think, well, yeah,

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>because don't forget to add the hydrochloric acid to turn

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it into fruit toast too, you know. Yeah, Well, I

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>mean that's kind of one of the first steps, right, Uh,

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that is that toward the end, that's where you when

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you add like pressure and heat and everything I've been,

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that's where it converts it. So yeah, I mean, like

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the epitome of what people call like Frank and food.

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's really really easy to tee off on if

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you're a whole food proponent, and there are a lot

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of whole food proponents, and they got a ton of traction,

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>especially in like the early two thousand's, early two thousand tens,

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks in large part to Michael Poland's Omnivor's Dilemma, which

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>came out in two thousand seven and basically introduced everybody

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to the concept that like we're eating all wrong. Essentially,

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:35.719
<v Speaker 1>I want to point out that's your that was your

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>second Al Franken reference, Tom Chiller's writing partner, and then

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>frank and Food was that that was not Al Franken reference.

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh was it? No, Although I'm picturing him like eating

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>like lucky charms and the couple are just like falling

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>out of his mouth onto his shirt. I have a

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>joke there, but I can't tell it, so uh yeah,

0:30:57.880 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the omnivorous dilemma. There were a few other books that

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>lood from Michael Poland in Defensive Food, very big book, uh,

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and then Food Rules, and one called Cooked about eight

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>or nine years ago. And if you've ever been anywhere

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and seeing this slogan on a wall on a poster, um,

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>eat food, not too much, mostly plants. That comes from

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Michael Poland, and that has become a bit of a

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>rallying cry for the eat better whole Foods movement. Eat

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>food like you know, food food, and don't eat too

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:33.959
<v Speaker 1>much of it and try to mostly eat plants. And

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>if you literally do that, then you're probably gonna a

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty good diet. Yeah. And they have some other like

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>rules of thumb to like don't eat food that your

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>great grandmother wouldn't recognize as food, um, which means you

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>could still eat oreos because they've been around since the

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:52.479
<v Speaker 1>nine um. Also, I think we've talked about how grocery

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>stores are laid out before, at least in a video,

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>if not an episode. Um, And how if you hug

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the outside perimeter, you're going to get the whole foods.

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>It's the middle aisles that the processed foods take up.

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>It's another we just talked about. Um. And then avoid

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>foods with like more than five ingredients. That's a little restrictive,

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>but you get the point. The fewer the ingredients, the

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>likelier it is to just be whole foods without a

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of added stuff and tinkering and engineering to

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>make it taste the way it's supposed to taste. Yeah,

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>And there's also you know, we should talk just for

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a second about the other thing wrapped up in this,

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>which is food culture. Um Poland and uh is it Monteiro?

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that what we're saying? Yeah? Or Montero Montero. They

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>both talk a lot about food culture, which is not

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>just the things you're putting in your mouth, but how

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at food and dining in general. Which is

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to say that they believe and I would tend to

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>agree probably that too many people these days are just

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>grabbing food as they quickly move about life from appointment

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to appointment or commitment to commitment rather than the day

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is where you could cook a meal and it sit

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>down as a family and eat it together. Uh. And

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>he's not just saying, like, you know, this is good

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>for the family, even though it is. They're just talking

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>about just societal and cultural Uh. I guess norms and

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>how they've changed over the years, and how we should

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>strive to sort of get back to that, because chances are,

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're sitting down at a table with your family

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're eating together, you're probably not you know, dump

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on a bunch of chicken nugets on a plate, and

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>probably not. You may and that's what we did at

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the seventies sort of Even if you are, though, it's

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>still probably preferable to eating them in the car while

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you're hurrying, you know, to piano practice or something like that.

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>At least you're sitting down together, So there's that aspect

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of culture to it. One of the problems, though, Chuck,

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is if you've ever, you know, taken steps to replace

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>some of your ultra processed foods with some of you know,

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>whole foods that you cook yourself, the just the difference

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in time that it takes to prepare those foods is

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>really significant and it can really tough. That just kind

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of goes to underscore why ultra processed foods have become

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>so ubiquitous. They fit really really well into our current

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.919
<v Speaker 1>culture of like go go, go, go, get another thing done,

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>sign up for another extracurricular activity, Like, um, you can

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>eat these foods like anywhere. They're available anywhere, and um,

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>they you can basically just snack throughout the whole day.

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>You'll never even need to eat a meal, and you

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:27.919
<v Speaker 1>can do it in your car the whole time while

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you're going from place to place. Yeah, I mean that's

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the big criticisms of people like Poland and Montereiro,

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>which is like, who was cooking this stuff back in

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the day. It was probably a housewife in the kitchen

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>or domestic servant or previous to that, and you know,

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>previous years enslave people. And it's really easy to sort

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of sit back and say if you're in a certain

0:34:55.120 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>income bracket and say, hey, slow down cook your meal. Um,

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get criticized. Probably it comes across as a

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>little tone deaf, especially when Poland says something that he

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.879
<v Speaker 1>said in two thousand nine and an article that uh

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 1>seventies feminists uh thoughtlessly trampled the pleasures of cooking and

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>their rushed to get women out of the kitchen. Um,

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you did say that men should also cook, but like

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you can't laugh out a statement like that and not

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>expect blowback. Like someone has to cook these meals and

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to income families, it's like it's it's tough. There's not

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time to do that and to shop

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for these foods. So we see why it's a problem

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>basically definitely. And there's more problems to you know that

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you could use to critique the whole idea of you know,

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>eating whole foods and all of the extra time and

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 1>effort it takes. Um. But I say, we take a

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>break and then we come back and we talk about

0:35:49.760 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the health benefits or problems of upfs. Let's do it, okay, okay, chuck.

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So there's uh, there's one thing, um that a lot

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.839
<v Speaker 1>of people say is like, there's some foods out there

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 1>that are more nutritious for you in their ultra processed

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 1>form than they would be if you made it yourself. Um.

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 1>The problem seems to be this that there's become a

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>focus on nutrients like the whole fat free thing back

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in like the eighties and early nineties. Uh, the low

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>carb thing, like we focus on nutrients and food has

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:48.760
<v Speaker 1>not has become not food anymore, and it's ultra process

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>form it's become. I saw it described as a delivery

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 1>system for nutrients. Were just obsessed with nutrients. That's what

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you see touted on the packages of ultra processed food

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that you're opposed to kind of take as a warning

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 1>signal to stay away from. The problem is is that

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it's becoming more and more apparent that we can engineer

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 1>food all we want, but we don't understand the dynamic

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of how nutrients within a food interact with one another

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to faithfully recreate them, and so the food that we're

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:24.320
<v Speaker 1>creating is substantially less healthy than the whole food versions

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 1>of it. The way that Montero puts it is that

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>ultra processed foods are intrinsically unhealthy, even if you don't

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:34.720
<v Speaker 1>compare them to anything else. If you eat ultra processed foods,

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you're going to suffer greater health problems then you would

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't eat or eat a less amounts of

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:44.919
<v Speaker 1>ultra processed foods. And that is the entire problem with

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 1>ultra processed foods right now. Well, and that goes lockstep

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that they are engineered to be um.

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess he calls it hyper palatable formations. Uh, they're

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>sold in large rings, and they're easy to eat a

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:04.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of, and they're made to be easy to eat

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of. They've actually looked at like the structure

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of some of these processed foods. They make it harder

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to feel satisfied, Like you literally chemically aren't achieving satiation

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 1>as quickly with these foods, so you're gonna eat more

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of them. That's why somebody can sit down and eat

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a sleeve a Pringles with the TV on without really

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it, or those intermediate moisture foods that are

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>chewy and stay chewy for five years on the shelf.

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Like they found that you with ultra processed foods, you

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>typically chew less. And one of the ways that we

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:39.959
<v Speaker 1>become satiated, one of the ways that our body knows

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that it's full is I guess it counts the number

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of times that we chew. And just because we're chewing

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>less and we're eating more, that in and of itself

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 1>makes ultra processed foods less healthy than whole foods. But

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the critics of the anti ultra processed food camp, even

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>proponents of ultra processed foods say, okay, that that's a problem,

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that can be designed out. The if

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you put nutrient against nutrient, if you put fiber against fiber,

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>calorie against calorie, um um, you know, vitamin D against

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 1>vitamin D in whole foods and ulder processed foods, they're

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>basically the same thing. People might eat too many ultra

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>processed foods, maybe you don't chew as much, but still

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 1>if if we if we changed that, they would be

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the same. And that was the big critique on Montero

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and ultra processed foods in general for almost ten years

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>until a really really important study came out in two

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen UM out of UM what was the National

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases in Maryland,

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 1>so this guy. It was a study led by Kevin

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Hall Chuck and it's considered the gold standard of UM

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of nutritional studies. It was a randomized controlled trial with

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 1>just twenty participants, but it was so oh well designed

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that there's basically no critics of its methodology or findings.

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just roundly touted as finally evidence that ultra processed

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>foods are, like Montero said, intrinsically unhealthy. Yeah, and we

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>should point out they did this study with just the

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty people, because before this, everything you would ever read

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>about UPS were correlative studies and meta analyzes among huge,

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 1>huge populations. So they Kevin Hall, actually dug in on

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a smaller level. Uh And, like you said, twenty people

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>spent two weeks and they were eating either almost all

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>ultra processed foods or almost all unprocessed foods. But the

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:44.720
<v Speaker 1>key here, like you were talking about, is they matched

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:49.320
<v Speaker 1>these diets calorically. They matched it their protein, their fiber,

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 1>their fats and sugars. They tried to match them so

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they were basically equal. And then they said, all right,

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty people, uh, U ten go and eat however much

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:00.919
<v Speaker 1>you want, and U ten go eat however much you want.

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 1>And then they rated those diets in the end just

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 1>this was of course subjective, but they rated them as

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 1>equally as good tasting. But the ultra processed food people

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 1>ate five extra calories per day. Yes, so that's like

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 1>eating an extra big maca day. Imagine if every day

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:23.879
<v Speaker 1>you just also ate an extra big Mac on top

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of everything else you or an extra an extra Taco

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Bell beefy five layer burrito. So yeah, it's good in

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>moderation and on occasion, but eating one every single day

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on top of the food that you ate, that's problematic.

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:43.359
<v Speaker 1>And so they also found chuck that the people who

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:47.439
<v Speaker 1>um who uh were in the ultra processed food group,

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 1>they gained about two pounds over the two weeks, while

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 1>the control group lost about two pounds. So they found like, no,

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:58.239
<v Speaker 1>this is actually this this stuff is is actually when

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you compare apples to apples, the older processed food is

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>actually unhealthier. Like that it was finally proven what what

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:10.480
<v Speaker 1>basically everyone suspected, but because it hadn't been proven, there

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:13.399
<v Speaker 1>was room to argue against it. And since then it's

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:16.239
<v Speaker 1>become harder and harder to argue in favor of ultra

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:20.479
<v Speaker 1>processed foods, at least as they exist today. Yeah, and there,

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's just like how healthy are They're all

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>kinds of environmental concerns. We've talked a lot about bio diversity,

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 1>agro biodiversity and putting all your eggs in one basket. UM,

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>crop wise, is really bad if disease comes along, like

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it happen time and time again through history,

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:41.959
<v Speaker 1>and we're at the point now. This is another sort

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of fact of the show for me. UM. There are

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of edible plant species, but more than

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:51.360
<v Speaker 1>half of the calories that humans on planet Earth consume

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>come from rice, corn, and wheat. That's it. I notice sing,

0:42:56.239 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that's putting your that's not agrobiodiversity. No, it's putting all

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of your corn in one basket. That's right, Which is

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>a good way to carry corn. It is, um, not

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in the basket. No, it's particularly a green and yellow basket.

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right. UM. But I grow bio biodiversity. Is it's

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>an extra concern because it's kind of like, by limiting

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 1>our diet globally, we're also um, we're not only harming

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:27.879
<v Speaker 1>our health, we're harming the ecosystems of Earth's health as well. UM.

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And then in addition to that, all of that slick

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:33.959
<v Speaker 1>packaging and um and and wrappers and all that those

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 1>require natural resources to make, and they are automatically converted

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 1>into waste after you are sold. That that ultra processed

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 1>food and if you consider Earth's natural processes as belonging

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to all humankind, it can kind of start to tick

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:54.319
<v Speaker 1>you off that there's companies out there that are using

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 1>these natural resources to market. They're extremely unhealthy foods to

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to me imediately be converted into waste. It's kind of irksome,

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you know it is. As for Montero and Brazil, they

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>have made some big changes about eight years ago and

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:16.440
<v Speaker 1>their government um created basically a whole new health guideline

0:44:16.480 --> 0:44:20.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of based on this NOVA framework, and they don't

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:23.879
<v Speaker 1>categorize foods according to like how much fat they have

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and how much fiber and how many other nutrients they have.

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:30.439
<v Speaker 1>They based it on that NOVA framework and talk about

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 1>food culture a lot. They say to eat regularly and

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 1>carefully in appropriate environments and whenever possible in company like

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've got people with you. And some other

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:46.240
<v Speaker 1>countries have followed suit over their Peru, Uruguay, Ecuador, France

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:48.839
<v Speaker 1>has jumped on board as far as saying just try

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and avoid ultra processed foods altogether, or at least try

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and limit them. And we haven't seen it as much

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in the US aside from what I mentioned earlier, which

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is certain, uh, certain manufacturers sort of seeing the future

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and knowing where this is headed and trying to, I guess,

0:45:08.600 --> 0:45:10.720
<v Speaker 1>get ahead of the curb and tout how few ingredients

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 1>they have. Sure one of the problems is in the

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>US the so Brazil said like, this is our new thing.

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:21.959
<v Speaker 1>These are food groups Montero's Nova system, that's what we do.

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 1>In the U S we're still doing those that food

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 1>pyramid kind of thing. And the U s c A,

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>from what I can tell, has no official position on

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>ultra processed foods or how much we should eat or

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>not eat. At some point, well, apparently back in the seventies,

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>George McGovern from either South or North Dakota tried to

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:42.839
<v Speaker 1>get the government to issue guidelines saying like you should

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 1>eat less red meat and dairy. I think because there

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>were studies coming out that that we're saying it was

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 1>bad for you. And he got ousted from office in

0:45:52.120 --> 0:45:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the next election because of that by the Cattle Association,

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And it kicked off a long trend to where food

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 1>producers lat be the government to not take official positions

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 1>against something. Instead they might target you know, nutrients, macro molecules,

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:12.439
<v Speaker 1>things like that like eat less fat, not don't eat

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>so much red meat, um, and that that kind of

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 1>has the United States in a in a quagmire right

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>now where our scientists are fully aware of like the

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:28.360
<v Speaker 1>health risks of eating certain kinds of food over others,

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:31.399
<v Speaker 1>and yet the government is standing mute as far as

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>advising citizens what to do or not do, which means

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that marketers can fill in that vacuum and argue, no,

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, just eat this, it's good. Yeah. I mean,

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I think people like us who do this kind of research,

0:46:44.080 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and I would argue, like a lot of our listeners

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:51.320
<v Speaker 1>are genuinely curious people who see a headline about a

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 1>nutritional study and they will click on that and read that.

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>But the majority of people don't, and they, you know,

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 1>they may look to official guide like eating Health Eating

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Guidelines of the U s d A and not say, oh,

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 1>look at this article I saw and on this website

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:12.719
<v Speaker 1>that clearly says to avoid this or that, you know,

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to avoid red meat or something like that, where like

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the lobby can't touch that, right. But also there's other

0:47:18.280 --> 0:47:20.920
<v Speaker 1>ways that the government can directly influence your diet. It

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 1>can say, okay, it's actually really bad to eat as

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>much corn as we're eating in all these different ways,

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna subsidize soy. Apparently soy is very is not

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>subsidized almost at all. So maybe they'll start subsidizing soy

0:47:35.760 --> 0:47:40.280
<v Speaker 1>over corn, and that that will make the food producers

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:43.200
<v Speaker 1>start using more soy rather than more corn, and then

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:45.800
<v Speaker 1>people start eating soy, which may or may not be healthier.

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:48.840
<v Speaker 1>So the government can make these kind of macro decisions

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that affect people's diets even more than just issuing guidelines too. Yeah,

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and some people say, just stick your nose out of

0:47:56.960 --> 0:47:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it and I'll do what I want. Yes, which is

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:01.880
<v Speaker 1>totally fair. It's completely fair. But if from a public

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:04.920
<v Speaker 1>health standpoint, when you look at you know, meta analysis

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that says the higher amount of ultra processed foods you eat,

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the higher your risk of death, UM, cardiovascular disease, type

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:17.240
<v Speaker 1>two diabetes, etcetera. UM, it is it's a it's a problem.

0:48:17.280 --> 0:48:20.400
<v Speaker 1>It's alarming, especially if you're seeing it developing earlier and

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:23.879
<v Speaker 1>earlier and younger kids who are being raised on ultra

0:48:23.960 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 1>processed foods and as they grow into adults are going

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to have no idea how to cook or what foods

0:48:29.040 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to eat and won't be able to pass that on

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to their kids. There's there. We're we're looking at a

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:36.800
<v Speaker 1>transitional generation right now, and it's not a transition in

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:40.240
<v Speaker 1>any kind of positive way right And to be clear,

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we're not arguing for some nanny state where the government

0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 1>like outlaws ultra processed foods. We're talking about issuing fair

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:50.919
<v Speaker 1>and honest guidelines that people can still fund their nose

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 1>out if they want to write. And Plus, also, this

0:48:53.120 --> 0:48:55.799
<v Speaker 1>is not a hit job against ultra processed foods. There's

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who say, again, like we've come

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a really far away in um fortifying foods through processing

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to cure certain diseases that used to happen to prevent

0:49:07.440 --> 0:49:11.880
<v Speaker 1>birth effects by adding fullate to breakfast cereals. Um that

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that it's not that it's not processing itself, it's we

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:18.879
<v Speaker 1>don't quite know how to do it yet, or we're

0:49:18.880 --> 0:49:21.800
<v Speaker 1>adding too much sugar, we're adding too many trans fats,

0:49:21.880 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 1>and we need to go in and tinker with the

0:49:24.280 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 1>tastes and the flavors and also the nutrient composition, and

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 1>then we'll have everybody eating ultra processed food that actually

0:49:31.360 --> 0:49:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is good for you. Whether that whether we're able to

0:49:35.040 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 1>do that anytime soon, as that remains to be seen. Yeah,

0:49:39.080 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a journalist named David H. Friedman who in the

0:49:42.080 --> 0:49:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic said, where there are too many people and we

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:51.080
<v Speaker 1>can't literally can't feed the world on this delicious whole food.

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh that's affordable. So maybe the onus is on some

0:49:54.920 --> 0:49:58.239
<v Speaker 1>of these companies to mess with their recipes a little bit.

0:49:58.600 --> 0:50:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we should look to McDonald to tweak their recipes

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:04.400
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit, not to where it tastes like

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 1>some drastically. You know, not not to push health food necessarily,

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know there are things you can do. They

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>pointed out that the smell of vanilla can mask uh,

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:16.840
<v Speaker 1>if you reduce sugar content, it can mask that and

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:19.760
<v Speaker 1>trick you into thinking that it's still just as sweet.

0:50:20.360 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Or there um plant derived compounds that can replicate the

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:30.600
<v Speaker 1>effects of fat on the tongue and basically you experience

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that satiation that allows you to stop eating. And he's saying, like,

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:38.680
<v Speaker 1>we can do this, we can make our ultra process

0:50:38.719 --> 0:50:41.279
<v Speaker 1>foods a little better at least. Yeah, and other people

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 1>argue like, just because the food is ultra process doesn't

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:47.319
<v Speaker 1>necessarily mean it's harmful to you. Um. There was a

0:50:47.480 --> 0:50:51.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and twenty two meta analysis in the American

0:50:51.200 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Journal of Epidemiology found the highest consumption of ultra processed

0:50:54.880 --> 0:50:57.799
<v Speaker 1>foods was associated with the highest risk of death, but

0:50:58.280 --> 0:51:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the highest consumption of breakfast cereal was associated with a

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 1>much lower risk of death. So they kind of says like, Okay,

0:51:06.160 --> 0:51:08.279
<v Speaker 1>just because this ultra processed food does not make it

0:51:08.320 --> 0:51:11.759
<v Speaker 1>inherently bad, and it also suggests that we may be

0:51:11.840 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>able to make healthier ultra processed foods. Again, the problem is,

0:51:16.160 --> 0:51:19.399
<v Speaker 1>it seems like nutritional science is not at a point

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:22.719
<v Speaker 1>where it can advise of food companies on how to

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 1>actually do that in as in a way that's that

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:29.760
<v Speaker 1>can actually replicate the nutrition you get from whole food.

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 1>We just can't do it right now. Yeah, And I

0:51:33.200 --> 0:51:36.760
<v Speaker 1>think the truth is if a large fast food retail

0:51:36.840 --> 0:51:42.239
<v Speaker 1>chain tweak their recipes to make them a little bit better, uh,

0:51:42.440 --> 0:51:44.640
<v Speaker 1>people may notice there may be a stink, and then

0:51:44.840 --> 0:51:46.839
<v Speaker 1>you know what, people would still go there and eat

0:51:46.880 --> 0:51:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. Yeah, Like Burger King has impossible burgers and

0:51:50.239 --> 0:51:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought those were gonna last about five days, and

0:51:52.520 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they've been on the menu for years, so obviously some

0:51:55.120 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 1>people are eating them. Which, by the way, that is

0:51:57.560 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 1>about as ultra process to food as you can find.

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>It just happens to be um healthier on meat. I guess.

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:07.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It could be based, plant based. There

0:52:07.360 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you go. Yeah, I had a Beyond burger the other day.

0:52:09.680 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>It was delicious, talk about really good. Do they make

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you gassy? I mean, I couldn't tell any difference. I'm

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 1>always farting, so who knows your vowels didn't step it

0:52:22.080 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 1>up a little after business as usual? I have to

0:52:26.239 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 1>like sleep in another room after I feel like an

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:34.359
<v Speaker 1>impossible burger. Yeah, oh interesting, Okay, I'm considerate like that. Well,

0:52:34.400 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I haven't had Impossible. I don't know how much different

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:38.160
<v Speaker 1>they are from Beyond. It's probably about the same thing.

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 1>It's basically the same. Although I will tell you this,

0:52:40.800 --> 0:52:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I would but Buzz Market Incognitos chicken tenders. They are good.

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:52.359
<v Speaker 1>They nailed plant based. Yes, they nailed chicken tenders. Um Like,

0:52:52.440 --> 0:52:54.439
<v Speaker 1>if you pull it apart and look at it, you're like, yes,

0:52:54.480 --> 0:52:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this is not chicken, but it looks kind of like chicken,

0:52:57.800 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and it tastes like chickenold study right exactly. But if

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:04.359
<v Speaker 1>they did a really good job, I would recommend those

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:06.839
<v Speaker 1>if you can find to try that, because fried chicken

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 1>is one of my achilles heels, you know, anything else.

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we could go on about this for hours

0:53:13.400 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>if we wanted to. Oh I've got one more thing, Chuck,

0:53:15.719 --> 0:53:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I do have one more thing. So another huge critique

0:53:18.719 --> 0:53:22.799
<v Speaker 1>is that, UM, whole foods, non ultra processed foods are

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:28.400
<v Speaker 1>typically much much more expensive than ultra processed foods, and

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:30.439
<v Speaker 1>so it's a lot easier for people to be like, yeah,

0:53:30.560 --> 0:53:34.719
<v Speaker 1>see whole foods. You know. UM, Not only is that

0:53:34.880 --> 0:53:39.359
<v Speaker 1>not taking into account the time that people don't have,

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it's also not taking into account the lower income that

0:53:42.600 --> 0:53:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have. So it's kind of shaming

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:48.759
<v Speaker 1>people for what they they're only option to eat is.

0:53:49.160 --> 0:53:52.319
<v Speaker 1>And that's a huge criticism of of UM that kind

0:53:52.320 --> 0:53:55.919
<v Speaker 1>of anti ultra processed food camp too well, and kind

0:53:55.920 --> 0:53:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of ties in with the tone deafness of just spend

0:53:59.680 --> 0:54:02.200
<v Speaker 1>three hours shopping and cooking for your family and then

0:54:02.400 --> 0:54:05.200
<v Speaker 1>sit down and eat it together like the nine exactly.

0:54:06.680 --> 0:54:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So let's it for ultra processed food for now, until

0:54:09.800 --> 0:54:11.880
<v Speaker 1>we do another episode on it in a few years,

0:54:11.920 --> 0:54:17.120
<v Speaker 1>probably ultra ultra processed foods, right, somebody will come out

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:18.960
<v Speaker 1>with another name for junk food and we'll do an

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:21.840
<v Speaker 1>entire new episode on it, or we'll just get to

0:54:21.920 --> 0:54:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that space food we all yearned for when we were kids,

0:54:24.200 --> 0:54:28.400
<v Speaker 1>where it's like a dinner pill. Yeah, apparently space food

0:54:28.520 --> 0:54:32.360
<v Speaker 1>sticks was like one of the first ultra processed foods.

0:54:32.360 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 1>It was Pillsbury. Did you ever have this? I mean

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I had that, you know, ice cream of the future,

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff that eventually morphed into dipping dots. These were more

0:54:42.040 --> 0:54:46.040
<v Speaker 1>like an energy bar. Okay, yeah, I don't think I

0:54:46.040 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>had that. Oh well, did it taste like ice cream? Maybe?

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Then it was made of little tiny babies? Who knows.

0:54:53.800 --> 0:54:55.680
<v Speaker 1>It is funny though, how much like the Army and

0:54:55.800 --> 0:54:59.080
<v Speaker 1>NASA has influenced the food that we eat. I got

0:54:59.080 --> 0:55:02.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing else, though, So hats off to NASA and the

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Army for coming up with the food we eat. That's right. Uh.

0:55:05.640 --> 0:55:07.960
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know more about ultra process foods,

0:55:07.960 --> 0:55:10.120
<v Speaker 1>go start reading up on it. There's a lot from

0:55:10.120 --> 0:55:13.440
<v Speaker 1>both camps on the internet to satisfy you, to satiate you.

0:55:13.920 --> 0:55:16.239
<v Speaker 1>And since I said satiate, it's time for listener mail.

0:55:19.040 --> 0:55:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this one of two kidney transplant emails

0:55:23.080 --> 0:55:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna read. Uh, We're gonna read the next one

0:55:25.000 --> 0:55:28.359
<v Speaker 1>in the next episode. But boy, we heard some really

0:55:28.360 --> 0:55:30.680
<v Speaker 1>good stuff and got great feedback and hurt from some

0:55:30.760 --> 0:55:34.040
<v Speaker 1>donors and some doctors. Uh. And this is from an

0:55:34.160 --> 0:55:38.239
<v Speaker 1>r N in South Dakota named Danielle. Hey, guys, longtime fan,

0:55:38.360 --> 0:55:40.719
<v Speaker 1>first time writer. I've been waiting seven years to be

0:55:40.760 --> 0:55:43.799
<v Speaker 1>able to contribute to your lovely show, and that opportunity

0:55:43.840 --> 0:55:46.239
<v Speaker 1>hit after your kidney don't wrap. I'm a nurse who

0:55:46.239 --> 0:55:48.719
<v Speaker 1>works in a small city hospital, and the kidney transplant

0:55:48.760 --> 0:55:51.080
<v Speaker 1>for you did a great job with this info. But

0:55:51.120 --> 0:55:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I do want to inform you that uh, anti rejection

0:55:54.560 --> 0:55:59.480
<v Speaker 1>medications must be taken for life, although the dose might change.

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think i'd said you can eventually get off of them,

0:56:02.000 --> 0:56:04.879
<v Speaker 1>which apparently is we're just trying to be optimistic, right.

0:56:05.840 --> 0:56:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Uh And Chuck, you said the fact of the show

0:56:07.800 --> 0:56:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is that all kidney stay in your body. But here's

0:56:10.280 --> 0:56:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact of this listener mail. I had a patient

0:56:13.040 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 1>at one time with five kidneys in their body because

0:56:18.120 --> 0:56:21.840
<v Speaker 1>they had been through several transplants. They had chronic disease

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:24.640
<v Speaker 1>because each kidney to last about ten or fifteen years

0:56:25.280 --> 0:56:27.279
<v Speaker 1>and trust me, I was sure to pull up those

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:33.040
<v Speaker 1>radiology images to see, but apparently Danielle believes in patient

0:56:33.080 --> 0:56:35.759
<v Speaker 1>privacy because daniel did not send those to me. That's

0:56:35.920 --> 0:56:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that's nice. Thanks for spreading tolerance, unbiased, ish information, and

0:56:43.320 --> 0:56:46.400
<v Speaker 1>light conversation to the world. Very nice. Thanks a lot, Danielle.

0:56:46.440 --> 0:56:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for saving lives and mending um broken kidneys. Yeah,

0:56:51.880 --> 0:56:54.040
<v Speaker 1>all five of them. If you want to be like

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Danielle and get in touch with us, we'd love to

0:56:56.040 --> 0:56:58.080
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. You can send us an email to

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Stuff podcast at i heart radio dot com. Stuff you

0:57:04.239 --> 0:57:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Should Know is a production of I heart Radio. For

0:57:06.800 --> 0:57:09.839
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:57:10.040 --> 0:57:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:57:15.760 --> 0:57:15.800
<v Speaker 1>H