WEBVTT - Bengals Booth Podcast: Welcome To The Future

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Hi, get everybody. I'm Dan Hoard and thanks for downloading

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals Booth Podcast. The Welcome to the Future addition,

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>as I discussed some of the Bengals' biggest offseason questions

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 1>with Sam Monson, lead NFL analyst for Pro Football Focus.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 1>But first I'll talk to a player who says he

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>did not play up to his own expectations this season,

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>linebacker Jermaine Pratt. And we'll wrap things up with a

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>crazy NFL Weather edition of story Time with Dan. The

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Bengals Booth Podcast is brought to you by pay Core,

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>proud to be the Bengals official hr software provider, by

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Alta Fiber, future proof fiber Internet designed to elevate your home,

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>business and community to a new level, and by Kettering

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Health the best care for the best fans. Kettering Health

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is the official healthcare provider of the Bengals. Now here's

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a quick reminder that you can have the latest edition

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast delivered right to your phone, tablet, or

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>computer by subscribing wherever you get your podcasts. It's the

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>greatest thing since the Bengals Bar and Kitchen at the Airport.

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>There are seven new dining and beverage options coming to

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cincinnati Northern Kentucky International Airport, including the Bengals Bar

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and Kitchen, which is being described as a sports bar

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>which pays tribute to the city's NFL franchise. What a

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>great idea. According to the CBG website, the airport welcome

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>more than seven point six million passengers in twenty twenty two,

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and now many of them will be reminded that Cincinnati

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>is one of only thirty cities in the country that

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>has an NFL team. According to an airport press release,

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>it's expected to open in the coming months. Now, let's

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>get to my first guest. According to Pro Football Focus,

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Jermaine Pratt was one of the best linebackers in the

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>NFL two years ago. PFF grated your main eighth overall

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>among linebackers and number one in pass coverage. That was

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the final year of Pratt's rookie contract, and he earned

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a three year extension for twenty point twenty five million dollars.

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Here was defensive coordinator lou Anarumo after the Bengals re

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>signed Jermaine. I mean Jermaine's you know, since his rookie year,

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>he's always taken a step forward every year.

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, if he doesn't come away with a turnover

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 2>each game.

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 3>He's he's you know, upset, so mind, but he's he's

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 3>on everything.

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>He's a strong tackler, always around the ball. You know,

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>so love him. Jermaine certainly had stellar moments this year.

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>His red zone interception at San Francisco thwarted a potential

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>game tying drive, and he forced to fumble in the

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.119
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter of the Buffalo game that helped seal that win.

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>But by his own admission, Pratt wasn't as consistent as

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the year before, and his Pro Football Focus grade reflected that,

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 1>dropping to number fifty seven among linebackers. I talked to

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Jermaine about it at the end of the season.

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 4>I can't look back and see what I did and

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 4>like looked up and say I did well. I play okay,

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 4>it's a par you know, I gotta play elite for

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 4>us to be great on defense.

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You don't sound like you were happy with your own

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>play this year.

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 4>Nah, I say sometimes I made good plays, but I didn't.

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't.

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 4>I wasn't consistent enough to help us win games. You know,

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.119
<v Speaker 4>I I win some. I help us win games late

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 4>with like a big turnover and stuff. But I need

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 4>to be consistent within you know, helping younger guys be

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 4>more impactful. You know it was this probably was harder,

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 4>I say, because I didn't have the guys around me

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 4>that make my job more easier.

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 4>Then you got young guys they're trying to feel you know,

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 4>sometimes you be out there thinking you're still playing with

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 4>better than guys, but you're playing with rookie. So it's

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 4>just getting better each and every year.

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>It's hard for me to analyze why the run defense

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been as good. You got most of the same

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>guys back. What do you think have been the biggest

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>issues for why that that portion of the defense just

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been quite as good.

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 4>It's a eleven man. You know, everybody gotta do they

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 4>one eleven? You know, it's like we have a supposed

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 4>to run every game, one or two a game, and

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 4>then they be like did so you know that that's

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 4>a hit, But we gotta figure out ways to stop it.

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 4>You might have to get beef up front, or or

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 4>I just got to play better.

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Big plays in general, right, Passing and running have been

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a major issue this year.

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 4>Yes, you know that's that's we I think the lead

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 4>the NFL. It's mostly supposed to plays. You know, that's

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 4>something I ain't customed to say. You know, that's that's everybody.

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 4>You know, everybody gotta do their job better. You know,

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 4>everybody gotta look at itself in the mirror and get better.

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>You had a I guess about a five game stretch

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>where Joe is fully healthy, beat the forty nine ers,

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>beat the Bills. Looked like the team that you guys

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>probably expected to be. Do you feel like that's the

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>team you're going to be next year when he healthy again.

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 4>You know, every year they'll be a new team, new

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 4>challenges we may face. But I know next year we

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 4>gotta start faster. I mean we said that each and

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 4>every week. It's the start faster we get if we

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 4>win some games early in the in the season, get

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 4>rolling fast. We gotta figure out where to start faster.

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 4>And said, I don't know, maybe like we be having

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 4>a long playoff run and we're trying to itch our

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 4>way back into the season, So I think it shall

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 4>be this. Obviously it will be huged for a lot

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 4>of guys. You know, guys are coming off injury. So

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 4>you know when you got a guy that's off injury,

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 4>he get the focus more on himself and become more dangerous.

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 4>As we've seen Joe did become more dangerous and led

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 4>us to the super Bowl. You know, guys get back,

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 4>get back right, and then guys look at itself as individuals.

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>How can you get better? How can you pat the team?

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 4>How can you grow from this year the less next

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 4>year to be better.

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So as one of the veteran leaders on this team,

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be your massage. It could be in

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the next year. We've got to start fast.

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 4>Because yeah, that's what be everybody mind say. You know,

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 4>we can't keep on dropping early games. You know that's costness,

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.799
<v Speaker 4>I say, because we're trying to fight and call letter

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 4>in season. You know later in the season. Last year

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 4>was winning games, so it was unefeated roll into the playoffs.

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 4>This game, we were trying to play kitsch up. You know,

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 4>everybody are playing MEFL games and end of the year.

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 4>But we gotta jump out. I feel like we gotta

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 4>start faster.

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Jermaine is twenty seven years old and has been mister

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>reliable in Cincinnati, only missing one game due to injury

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in five NFL seasons. He helped force the fumble in

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the jungle in the twenty twenty two playoffs and picked

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>off Derek Carr the two yard line with twelve seconds

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to go in the twenty twenty one wild Card round

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to clinch Cincinnati's first playoff win in thirty one years.

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Nine yards of real estate will determine this playoff game

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 3>fourth down end goal from the nine seventeen seconds to

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 3>go to play clock at three shotgun snap car throws

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 3>in the traffics prep.

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 2>A the football coffin now fam bam bam. How about

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 2>that it ends on a turnover? Unbelievable? Huh? The Cardiac

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 2>kids take it to the last snap.

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Want to play by Jermaine Proud extending the arms to

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 3>intercept that throw by Derek Carr and win the game

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 3>for Cincinnati and twelve seconds left, the Bengals have to

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 3>snap it one time and the drought is over.

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>He's earned the nickname Playoff p and I think he's

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a strong bet to bounce back with a better season

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four. The Bengals Booth Podcast is brought

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to you by pay Corps. Proud to be the Bengals

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Official HR software provider by Alta Fiber future proof Fiber

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Internet design to elevate your home, business and community to

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a new level, and by Cattering Health the best care

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>for the best fan. Kettering Health is the official healthcare

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>provider of the Bengals. Now time for an in depth

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the key issues facing the Bengals

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>this offseason. My guest is Sam Monson, lead analyst for

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus. Sam, one of your PFF colleagues, wrote

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>this week that the Bengals will undoubtedly be back in

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>contention with a healthy Joe Burrow. Do you agree?

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think that's true. I mean, Joe Burrow I

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 5>think has already shown himself to be one of those

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 5>quarterbacks that's good enough that, assuming he's healthy, he's going

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 5>to put you in contention every single year. You know,

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 5>Joe Burrow, Josh Allen, Patrick Mahomes, those teams are always

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 5>going to be in contention as long as they have

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 5>quarterbacks that good. Another teams will come and go. But

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 5>I think that's an incredible starting point. So yeah, I

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 5>think a lot of the season's problems were sourced with

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 5>Joe Burrow's injuries. Even though Jake Browning played very well

0:08:57.720 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 5>in Instead, let me.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Follow up on Jake Browning because I suppose that's one

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of the positives from this season. The Bengals learned that

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>they have a competent backup quarterback in Jake and they

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>control his rights for two more years. How good was

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>he in your opinion and should the Bengals consider trying

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to get something in exchange or do you need to

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>have a guy like that, especially when Joe's had some

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>injury problems.

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 5>I think he was really good. Outside of playing Pittsburgh,

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 5>Jake Browny was fantastic this year. It was weird, like

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 5>his two worst games by a distance, came against the Steelers,

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 5>and pretty much every other game I think he played

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 5>really well. Some of his performances felt a little bit

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 5>sort of unsustainable. I don't want to say lucky, but

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 5>they were more you know, let's put the ball up

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:44.839
<v Speaker 5>and see if a receiver makes a play, and they

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 5>did quite a lot of the time, because you know,

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 5>the Bengals have really good wide receivers. But that's always

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 5>a little bit of a precarious style of play to

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 5>replicate week after week after week. Sometimes those balls are

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 5>not going to go your way, and you're not going

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 5>to get the payoff from them. But overall, I mean,

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 5>he showed he could run the offense, he showed he

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 5>could make good decisions, he showed he could be accurate

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 5>with the ball, and maybe wrote his look a little

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 5>bit at times during the season. But I agree he

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 5>showed that he is immediately one of the better backups

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 5>in the NFL. I think this year, of all the years,

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 5>showed not just from the Bengals point of view, but

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 5>league wide, the value in having a good backup quarterback.

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 5>You know, so many teams had to turn to their

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 5>backups this year, and if you need a guy to

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 5>win you you know, three or four games in the season,

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 5>Jake Brown just showed that he's capable of doing that.

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 5>So I would be inclined to say the value of

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 5>that exceeds the value of anything you could get for

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 5>him in a trade, So keep him around.

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>So Pro Football Focus has come out with a ranking

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of the top one hundred free agents, and t Higgins

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is high on the list at number four. Most of us,

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>or many of us, myself included, think that the Bengals

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>are likely to franchise tag him for roughly twenty one

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>million bucks to keep the band together, so to speak,

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>for at least another year. Is that what they should do.

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 5>I think the decision should be between that and getting

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 5>a long term deal with him sorted out, you know,

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 5>trying to keep him around long term as part of

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 5>the whole thing. But it's felt like for a while

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 5>they were going to go the sort of Jesse Bates

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 5>rut with T Higgins and play him throughout that rookie deal, franchise,

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 5>tag him and for you know, a step up in costs,

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 5>and then move on when it's time to really commit

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 5>big money to him and instead go in a different direction.

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 5>I don't think it's necessarily a bad decision, a bad approach.

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 5>You know, you get one more year of T Higgins

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 5>and then theoretically you've had a chance to come up

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 5>with the backup solution, and Cincinnati is good generally, I

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 5>think at four planning these things and having already made

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 5>back up there to step into the bigger role. But

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 5>it's always a risk. You know that the Bengals had

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 5>Tax Hill this year to step into the role left

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 5>by Jesse Bates, and it didn't quite go that way.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 5>It didn't quite work the way he wanted it to.

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 5>You might have the best laid plan, but it doesn't

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 5>mean that guy is going to be able to step

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 5>into that role. You know, this year, I imagine maybe they'll

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 5>draft somebody as well. But you know, the Andre Yoshivas

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 5>looks like a receiver that could potentially become, you know,

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 5>step into that number two role in a year's time,

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 5>But it's projection at this point. That might be the plan,

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 5>that might be what you want to happen, but you're

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 5>really not going to know whether it's going to work

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 5>or not until at the end, you know, twenty twenty five,

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 5>when you actually make that switch and then hope fingers

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 5>crossed that it's going to have the results you expected

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 5>it to. So I definitely think it's a sensible plan.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 5>It's one that makes sense, but it is a risk

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 5>anytime you're going to an unknown quantity versus someone that

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 5>you know is good in this offense.

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Sam Monson is our guest lead analyst for Pro Football Focus.

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>For other Bengals free agents made that PFF Top one hundred,

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>DJ Reader nineteenth, Chinna Beao Wuji twenty sixth, Joana Williams

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty fourth, and Tyler Boyd seventy fourth. Who should they keep.

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 5>I think they should try and keep DJ Reader. He

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 5>would be the the first name on that list that

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 5>I would try and bring back. He's so important to

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 5>what they do. He's the most difficult skill set I

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 5>think to replace as well, Like you can't find DJ

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 5>Readers just out there on the open market. He's incredibly

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 5>good against the run. He brings enough as a pass

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 5>rusher he can impact that side of the game as well,

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 5>and they really miss him when he's not in that

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 5>defensive lineup. So I think he's the first guy I

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 5>would try and bring back. Ouzie I think is a

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 5>player that they would like to have back, but it

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 5>kind of depends on the costs, and I think that's

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 5>one that maybe you can replace easier. I think Jonah

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 5>Williams the move to right tackle didn't really work out

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 5>for him. He didn't bounce back to the level that

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 5>he'd been at before last year, which was the worst

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 5>year of his career. Was more in line with that

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 5>just on the other side of the line. So I

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 5>think they'll be looking to move on from him anyway,

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 5>regardless of the costs, regardless of whether they need to

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 5>give him a big extra deal and then Tyler Boyd

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 5>kind of depends on the cost. You know, I think

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 5>they would like to have him back, but it also

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 5>feels like a player that would be the easiest to

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 5>try and replace and have somebody step into that role

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 5>and do what Tyler er Boyd did fur them, or

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 5>at least an approximation of it. Again, they might already

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 5>have that guy on the roster. You know, maybe it's

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 5>not Yosebast this time. Maybe it's Charlie Jones that can

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 5>become their primary slot receiver and take those targets. So

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, if Tyler Boyd, if the market isn't strong,

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 5>or if he's willing to come back on a cheap deal,

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 5>maybe they'd be interested. But otherwise I think they would

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 5>be looking to move in a different direction.

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Sam, is there a pending free agent on another NFL

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>roster that you think makes sense for Cincinnati.

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 5>It's a weird year for a free agency this year.

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 5>It's not the strongest class in the world. There's some

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 5>guys that at the top end I think that make

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 5>a lot of sense, but you're gonna have to bring

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 5>big money to the table. I mean, if a guy

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 5>like DJ Reader does make it out of the door,

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 5>and you're looking to try and replace that. Christian Wilkins

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 5>from the Miami Dolphins is potentially available if he hits

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 5>the open market. That is one of the few guys

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 5>I think that kind of replicate what DJ Reader brings

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 5>to the table. Really good against the run, enough about

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 5>him as a pastrusher to be a factor there as well.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 5>You know, Justinmoutabuike. I imagine it's going to make a

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 5>ton of money given the season he just had for

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 5>the Ravens, but if they were able to steal him

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 5>away from a division rival, that would be absolutely spectacular.

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 5>And then I think there will be a few cornerbacks

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 5>available in free agency as well. Whether it's lugurious need,

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 5>I imagine the Chiefs will lock him up and not

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 5>let him hit the market. The Bears Jalen Johnson, similar

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 5>kind of thing. I imagine they'll franchise tag him. I

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 5>can't see him hitting the market either, but there will

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 5>be I think some intriguing players available that they could

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 5>dip into.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>If Jonah Williams leaves as a free agent, there's going

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to be an obvious needed right tackle. How's that pool

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in free agency? And or the draft.

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 5>It's not good in free agency, not taking that it's

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 5>a better year in the draft, and absolutely I think

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 5>that would be a live situation for them. One name

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 5>I think that is interesting though, in a free agent

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 5>he is Michael Owenu from the New England Patriots. He's

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 5>had a weird career where they've bounced him around the

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 5>line an awful lot, whether it's left guard or whether

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 5>it's the either guard position or right tackle. I think

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 5>his best position has been right tackle. And basically anytime

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 5>he's played, he's he's played extremely well, really good PFF grades,

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 5>really good performance. They've never seemed to quite buy into

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 5>him one hundred percent. And he's now scheduled to hit

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 5>free agency, so you know, it's not like they've been

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 5>proactive and bringing him back and keeping him as part

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 5>of the future there. And I wonder what his sort

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 5>of league wide standing is, whether he's underrated by everybody

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 5>and he's a guy that could be had for relatively

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 5>low money, or if for some reason the Patriots just

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 5>didn't value him as much as maybe the play suggests

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 5>they should have. And actually he'll have a strong market

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 5>in free agency given the relative lack of players at

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 5>that position. But if Michael Owenu, you know, was available

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 5>for not a huge amount of money, I think that

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 5>would be a huge upgrade at that spot.

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>We're chatting with Sam Monson from Pro Football Focus. You

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>can follow him up on Twitter at PFF Underscore. Sam.

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk Bengals running backs. When you look at Joe

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Mixon's numbers for the year, he had more than fourteen

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollar purpose yards, he scored twelve touchdowns. Chase Brown

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 1>added explosive this once he started to play for the

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>latter end of the season. Are they good with that

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>duo going forward or do they need to add something

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>at that position.

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:26.479
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I think it's a good duo going forward,

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 5>and I think they're a pair that compliment each other. Well,

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 5>it's not like Joe Mixon is reaching the age where

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 5>you're particularly concerned about running backs as well. He's still

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 5>only twenty seven years old. Okay, there's quite a lot

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 5>of mileage on the clock for him. I think it's

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 5>a position where you know, you should always have an

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 5>eye on the draft, right and just bring in a

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 5>young player and see if that guy is going to

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.479
<v Speaker 5>bring you something that may be unexpected or maybe simply

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 5>just with the benefit of being a young player. When

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 5>generally speaking, I think running backs at this point the

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 5>first contract is the best play you're going to get

0:17:58.440 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 5>from them.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think they're.

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 5>Fine if that's the two they end up rolling with

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 5>primarily next season. But I would absolutely draft somebody and

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 5>see what you can find or on Earth and maybe

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 5>you're in a position where you can move on from

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 5>Joe Mixon and get cheaper and not suffer any kind

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 5>of drop off at at that spot.

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Sam, I think we'd all agree that the Bengals defense

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>was disappointing this year. The question is why. Was it

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>largely the result of having youth in the secondary? Did

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>veterans at other positions underperform? What do you think were

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the biggest contributing factors to that disappointing performance.

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think it was a bit of everything.

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, we said before.

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 5>They had this contingency plan of moving on from Jesse Bates,

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 5>going to a design success or an error a parent.

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that they planned on losing both safeties

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 5>at the same time. I think that was a bit

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 5>of a surprise to them and that sort of upset

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 5>the Apple card A bit. Now we don't just have

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 5>to rely on one new guy back there. We've got

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 5>to do it with two injuries. So obviously played in

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 5>as well, and suddenly you just got the secondary that

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 5>is not used to playing with each other, that isn't

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 5>on the same page consistently, and.

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Really the front four as well.

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Trey Hendrickson had a great year, an incredible

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 5>pass rusher, had a ton of pressure, a ton of sacks,

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 5>but they didn't have that consistent, complimentary piece to him.

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 5>Particularly on the other side. They weren't able to get,

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, a ton of pressure outside of Hendrickson. I

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 5>think that impacted everybody behind him. Anytime you can get

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 5>a ton of pressure, it's going to negate some of

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 5>the deficiencies on the back end, and the Bengals weren't

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 5>really able to do that.

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>PFF's highest graded defensive player on the Bengals roster was

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a rookie safety, Jordan Battle, who once he started playing,

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>really helped solidify that position. Did the Bengals strike it

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>rich would that third round draft pick?

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he looked absolutely fantastic. He's one of those guys

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 5>that you know had had really good hey but didn't

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 5>necessarily test off the charts and was just sort of

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 5>good at everything. You know, didn't necessarily stand out, didn't

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 5>look like an a credible athlete, didn't get pushed up

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 5>draft boards because you get enamored by the potential of

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 5>what he could do and all the crazy things. He

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 5>was just a really good player in all facets of

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 5>the game, coming out of a good program. You know,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 5>that asks quite a lot of those defensive backs. But

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 5>I think players like that tend to fly under the

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 5>radar sometimes when you get distracted by shiny objects and

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 5>guys that run in the four to threes and things

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 5>like that. But I think he showed that he can

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 5>step into an NFL defense and do exactly the same

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 5>job as he could in the SEC against top level competition.

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Damn, When you add up the production of the bengals

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>four tight ends, you get eighty eight catches for six

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty six yards at seven point eight per catch,

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and four touchdowns. Should the Bengals have upgrading tight end

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>near the top of their list of priorities or is

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that enough production?

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I think they would like to. I think

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 5>it's a position that you're seeing the value of and

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 5>the impact that can come from the tight end position

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 5>if you have a good one, if you have a

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.360
<v Speaker 5>quality receiver at that spot. Look what the Bills did

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 5>last season by going to get Dalton Kinkaid in the

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 5>first round, even though they've already given a significant contract

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 5>to a guy like Dawson Knox. I think you're also

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 5>seeing a growth in the proliferation of two tight ends

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 5>sets in the NFL. It's not something Cincinnati does an

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 5>awful lot of, but maybe this would give them the

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 5>ability to go in that direction a bit more, or

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 5>at least give them some more options when it comes

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 5>to personnel groupings. So yeah, I think that's an area

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 5>that they've I don't want to say they've scrimped on,

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 5>but they haven't hit on a guy in recent years

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 5>at that spot to be able to come in and

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 5>make the difference. They've rolled the dice a few times

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 5>on sort of former big talents, first round picks, guys

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 5>that have a pedigree but haven't worked out so far

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 5>in the NFL, and they haven't been able to recapture that.

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 5>They haven't been able to find the ability the talent

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 5>that got those guys drafted it high up. Obviously, the

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 5>injuries were a big part of that, but it might

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 5>be time to just go and get your own sort

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 5>of high draft pick at the tight end position and

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 5>see if you can strike it rich that way.

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>What about offensive tweaks, whether it is more two tight

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 1>end sets, whether it's more under center runs, whether it's

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>more play action. Do you think that there's something along

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>those lines that the Bengals really need to seriously consider

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four.

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 5>I think there is something to being more versatile and

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 5>more multiple when it comes to personnel groupings and the

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 5>way you deploy the group.

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>That you have.

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 5>The Bengals have tended to skew on the other side

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 5>of that, which is we run basically the same personnel

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 5>and we just out execute you. And there's it's absolutely

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 5>a valid way of thinking, but I think generally speaking,

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 5>it is easier to cause problems for defense if you

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 5>can mess with the personnel and you can change things

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 5>up and give them different looks on a consistent basis,

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 5>as opposed to they're going to have a pretty good

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 5>idea how you're going to line up before you even

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 5>get on the field, and you just have to execute

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 5>better than they do. I think you just gain so

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 5>much more by introducing that element of doubt and causing

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 5>them problems before the snap, as opposed to letting them

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 5>be the ones that are proactive with misdirection and you know,

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 5>disguise and rotating safeties and changing the look pre and

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 5>posted snap and those kinds of things. I think when

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 5>you see all the offenses that are really starting to

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 5>take over the NFL right now, it is ones that

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 5>are much more diverse and multiple when it comes to

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 5>those things, Sam m.

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals went one in five in the AFC North.

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Their only win was over Cleveland when the Browns basically

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.959
<v Speaker 1>rested everybody in the final week of the regular season.

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a healthy Joe Burrow fix that? Or do the

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Bengals need to specifically think about those six games against Baltimore, Pittsburgh,

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and Cleveland as they build their roster in the offseason. Yeah.

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 5>As we said before, I think a healthy Joe Burrow

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 5>makes you puts you at every single game, you know,

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 5>and it certainly changes the outcome of several games relative

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 5>to a Jake Browning. So yeah, I don't think that

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 5>there's I don't think they exposed anything about Cincinnati this year.

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 5>Other than the fact that they didn't have Joe Burrow

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 5>for a lot of the season and they weren't as

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 5>good as they've been in previous years. And that division

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 5>was really.

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Good this year.

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the Browns had the best defense in the

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 5>NFL for most of the year. The Ravens looked like

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 5>the best team in the AFC, and Pittsburgh were what

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 5>Pittsburgh usually is, which is good enough to win, you know,

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 5>nine games, scrape over that five hundred mark from Mike

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 5>Tomlins record that he never loses.

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's a tough place.

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there's a reason all four teams in that

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 5>division had a winning record. It's harder to get wins

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 5>in that division that it would have been if you

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 5>were playing in the NFC South for example.

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Final question for Sam Monson from Pro Football Focus, and

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate your time. We've reached the second round of

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, so you got Yeah, it's tough.

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean it's interesting now we get the number one

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 5>seeds entering the equation and you know the line the

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 5>points spread has them both as big favorites. I think

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 5>sometimes we tend to forget based off the wildcard week

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 5>that actually the best teams are sitting at home watching

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 5>this and ready to enter the fray with a week

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 5>of rest behind them. But Houston were fantastic a week

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 5>ago against Cleveland Green Bay the same thing against Dallas,

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 5>so I think both those games are live. But the

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 5>forty nine Ers are the best team in the NFC.

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 5>The Ravens probably are the best team in the AFC.

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 5>So it's still the most likely super Bowl, I think.

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>And if that is the Super Bowl, which of the

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>twoty alike?

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 5>I think everyone will be going for Baltimore because of

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 5>the way the last game went. I think that game

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 5>was kind of I don't want to say fluky, but

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 5>the way that it went against San Francisco doesn't happen,

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, very often everything bounced against them. I would

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 5>actually I would back to forty nine Ers in that scenario.

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Sam, appreciate your time as always, Thanks so much, great

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff anytime.

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for having me.

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Before we wrapped things up, how about an addition of

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>story time with Dan. Last week, insanely cold weather for

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>playoff games in Kansas City and Buffalo brought back memories

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>of the coldest playoff game of them all, the nineteen

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>eighty two Freezer Bowl at Riverfront Stadium, where the temperature

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>hit minus nine and the wind chill reached minus fifty nine.

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>The end result was good, as the Bengals beat the

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Chargers to earn a trip to their first Super Bowl,

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>but the conditions were miserable for everybody involved, with one

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>possible exception the weather forecasters, who get very excited when

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it's nasty outside. I wrote a commercial about that once,

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and you're about to hear it on Storytime with Dan.

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Remember bud Light's Real Men of Genius commercials. For several years,

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>the mock salutes were the funniest thing on the radio.

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>There were tributes to mister Giant foam fingermaker and mister

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>bowling shoe giver Router, and well, just listen.

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 6>Bud Light presents real men of genius, Real men of genius. Today,

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 6>we salute you, mister tiny thong bikini ware, mister tiny

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 6>thummy Gediwhere beach goers the world over see you coming

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 6>and say hey, check out the wooly mammoth and the

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 6>rubber bands.

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 1>A mammoth.

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 6>Defying the natural laws of physics, you managed to squeeze

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 6>a forty six inch waist into a thirty in suit

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 6>like ground meat crammed into a sausage skin. You take

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 6>to the beach and proudly strut your stuff. If you've

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 6>got it, flaunt it. That's your motto, which is ironic

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 6>because you haven't got it. So crack off in a

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 6>nice cold bud light, sweet cheeks, and know that if

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 6>you weren't wearing that suit, we'd ask you to take

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 6>a bumkin.

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Women, I'd like.

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 6>Here and iss Missouri.

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>The real men and women of Genius were the writers

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of those commercials, along with the two voices you hear

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>on every one of them. The deep voice narrator is

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>an actor named Pete Stacker, and the singer is Dave Bickler,

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the lead singer of the Band's Survivor, best known for

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the hit I of the Tiger. So what does all

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of this have to do with me? Here's the story.

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Many years ago, when I was still a sports anchor

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>at Fox nineteen, I learned that those two guys were

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be doing some recording at a studio in Cincinnati.

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>So I contacted the advertising agency that did the campaign

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and told them I was interested in doing a story

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>about the real men of Genius commercials and the two

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>guys that we hear but never see. The advertising agency

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>set up interviews with Pete and Dave and the story

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>turned out great. But I also asked them for a favor.

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I figured it would be fun to write a couple

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of those ads about the TV news business, and I

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>asked if they would be willing to record them. They

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>said yes, and you're about to hear the result. Here's

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>my real Men of Genius tribute to meteorologists everywhere.

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 6>Bud Light presents Fox nineteen Real Men of Genius, Real

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 6>Men of genius. Today we salute you, mister excited about

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 6>storms weather man. Mister excited about storms weather that'd while

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 6>normal people hate snow, sleet and heavy rain, you act

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 6>like it's your birthday. How can I thank you for

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 6>on those nights a one hour newscast becomes all weather

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 6>all the time, and most of us don't even know

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 6>what barometric pressure is?

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Jumulo nimbus what?

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 6>And for all we know, there's no such thing as

0:29:56.440 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 6>Doppler radar for Doppler nineteen thousand. Open a nice cold

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 6>bud Light, mister meteorologist. But remember, even when the weather's lousy,

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 6>you don't care. You're bone dry in a room with

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 6>no Windows, Mister excited about Stock swather Man, bud Light

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 6>Beer and ISAA Bush Saint Louis, Missouri.

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>That concludes Storytime with Dan and this episode of the

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Bengals Booth Podcast brought to you by pay Core, Proud

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to be the Bengals Official HR software provider, by Alta

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Fiber future proof fiber Internet designed to elevate your home,

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>business and community to a new level, and by Kettering

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Health the best care for the best fans. Kettering Health

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is the official healthcare provider of the Bengals. If you

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't done so already, please subscribe to this podcast and

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>if you have a minute, give it a rating or

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>share a comment that helps more Bengals fans find us.

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Dan Horde and thanks for listening to The Bengals

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Booth Podcast