WEBVTT - Why You Should Stop Selling UK Equities

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>John. Things are beginning to break, aren't they. We've talked

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>about how interest rates rise after interest rates who've been

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>falling the main for kind of footy years or so.

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Everything is geared around interest rates being lower, going lower. Still.

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Entire industry is sectors, and particularly the entire financial industry.

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>This is what they're used to. And it's turned around

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>interest rates beginning to go up. Stuff beginning to break it.

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the first clue was, you know, the LDI thing

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>under the short lived trust government. Stuff beginning to break.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And then credit sees definitely broken. Yeah, yeah, fairly comprehensively broken.

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:49.319
<v Speaker 1>And then there is just tiny little things, more kind

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of cracks at the moment, but things that you look

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>at and you think, well that might turn into a fracture,

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then it might actually break looking at

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So Scottish Mortgage, let's talk about Scottish mortgage. Let's talk

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>about Scottish mortgage. Now this is barely give it as

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic company. Scottish Mortgage has always been an absolutely

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>brilliant trust. And we've talked about it for years and

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>we've written about it for years, and I hold it

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>my portfolio. I don't know if you do it. Pretty

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>much every retail investor in the UK does hold it,

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>and it's made this extraordinary name for itself on the

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>back of investing in growth companies mainly tech but you know,

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>let's just call it growth super high growth, both listed

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:38.759
<v Speaker 1>and unlisted, with this idea that you know, you should

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>hold unlisted companies as well as listed if you're going

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to be an exciting growth growth spaces. Because companies don't

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>list like they used to, they stay private for much longer.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>There's lots of exciting stuff going on down there, and

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>so why should you differentiate between the listed and the unlisted?

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And maybe this week we kind of found out. I mean,

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's all been a logic to that, but

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the well, there's there's a couple things. The

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>philosophy that went or goes with Scottish Mortgage and similar companies,

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 1>but Scottish Mortgage in particular, is that one about all

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of the tons in the stock market come from like

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>a handful accompanies. Four percent, yes, and so you should

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>just buy the four percent. One reason I've always slightly

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 1>struggled with that theory is how do you choose the

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>four percent? But Scottish mortgage did a very good job

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of it, for right to interest rates started to rise. Yeah. Well,

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the things they always said, and let's not forget,

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 1>by the way, on this podcast that we did it

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.679
<v Speaker 1>interview TOMPs later become manager of that fund eight weeks ago,

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>nine weeks ago and maybe longer than that, but relatively

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>weakning within the last three months. We interviewed him and

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the things he said was that because of

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>this idea that all the returns come from four percent

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of the companies, everything in his portfolio was the wrong price,

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the wrong price. So the majority of the stuff in

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio was grotesquely overpriced because it would never end

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>up being part of that four percent. But the companies

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in the portfolio that are the four percent were hideously underpriced.

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So nothing in the portfolio is the correct price. But

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the risk, of course is that the four percent aren't

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in there. Yeah, I mean, that's that is kind of

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>what I've always felt the fundamental problem with that app

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>which but I think I suppose the weird thing is

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>it's also it's the diametric corpus of passive investing and

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>buy an an index. It's sort of the ultimate technically

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>speaking an active investment in some ways to say there's

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>only like, you know, kind of lessons to a fifth

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>licensed five percent of companies actually make all of the tons,

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and I am the person who can choose those points

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>um and then but then you're also kind of delving

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>amid the area that you think they're most likely to

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>come from, but the promise that that area kind of

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>largely thrives under certain conditions, and then those conditions are changing,

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what. And then growth appears in other areas,

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.799
<v Speaker 1>all that surprise growth and the energy industry price growth

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in oil. But it's growth, right. But the problem is

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Gottish mortgage, and it's not unique gottig mortgage. Of course,

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is that with listed equities, you know the price. You

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about what they're worth because the

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>market tells you. You You might not agree with the market. Yeah,

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>but the market gave you the price, and it gives

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it to you every day, multiple times every day. No

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>one can ever be in any doubt what the price is.

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Now with the unlisted investments, nobody knows the price. Nobody knows.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>The press who can possibly know what these things are worth?

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Nobody knows. So there's always the suspicion in the market

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, when thing's going down that maybe they they're

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>on the books at the wrong price. No one cares,

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>No one cares what you value a private equity investment out.

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>When everything's going up up a lot is great. We

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>like up a lot, right, we don't need any precision

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>up a lot, hooray, right, yes, But when things are

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>going down and the valuation is down a little bit,

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit, like, well, that's not enough any

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>more precision than that? Is it down a little bit down?

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>The medium matters it down a lot, and it was

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>not downe a lot? Why is it not down the

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>same as your listed investments? What's the difference? You invest

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>in the same stuff, right, yeah, So why why would

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>your unless the portfolio and not have gone down as

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>much as your listed portfolio? And now I'm worried. Yeah,

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>And I mean it's entirely understandable because the other problem

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>is that because they're not unless these companies don't benefit

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>from the one thing that well, there's a reason we

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>like public markets and they're very good. Yeah, they're good.

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Are putting prices on things relative to everything else, So

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you're not getting the ways to make modes along with

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>these unlisted companies. And then of course there's all kinds

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>of things you can do. UM, but you can do

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of things to fight your fighters. But the

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>other thing is that there's also not accusing anyone of

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that by the way, no, absolutely no basic stuffy leaning

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 1>for years. They know what they're doing. But but but

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>but it's a difficult environment. There's no actual answer. Yeah,

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's the other problem is that the kinds of

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>companies that aren't listed are also smaller, and they're far

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>more vulnerable. And so I I, you know, I would

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the data to hand. I am assuming

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that politician sounds like politician you can't recall it hasn't

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>seen that full story earlier. They only told him the

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>story today. It wasn't the time to investigate properly. We

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>always go drinking a Friday. But they know the the

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>unlisted start it's probably has a higher propensity to go

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to zero and unlested stuff. And the problem is that

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the kind of environment where stuff goes to zero.

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's I actually think that's the main problem

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>with this UM And as you said, doesn't just apply

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Scottish mortgage. It's all of the unlisted moment and our

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>ideas in a little trouble at the moment too. You're

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>about forty percent unlisted, you know. Anyway, Um, watching weight,

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>watching weight. Things are breaking, but you know one has

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to failed. Sorry for I don't know, yes, probably sorry

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>for that. The chair of Scottish movies you had to

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>stand down this week, you know, and then she another

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>victim a rising interest rates. Yeah, well this is it.

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>It's it's interesting how you can say that the ultra

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>low rate environment didn't just create Um, it's all like

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>financial bubbles. There's a lot of tan gentle kind of

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>bubbles that you know you can think of. I mean,

0:07:55.560 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there's a sattweeze sort of look

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to where you can say that Nicholas Durgeon's career is

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a kind of ultra low interest rate phenomenon. Um. You know,

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just interesting shity step down along at the

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>same time as you know, credit sweet and all the

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>rest of them are going bankrupt. So maybe perhaps I

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>am reaching, but I think, well, now there's another one

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to wait and watch. There's a lot of watching and waiting.

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of watching the day for those two.

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that we've we've had like a

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a fired blanket thrown over volatility, like

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in all areas of our life since the Great Financial Crisis, UM,

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in the form of kind of like ultra low interest

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>rates and complete safety rails on the government bond market,

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the can equity markets, and that kind of suffocation of

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>volatility has got to come out somewhere UM. And I

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of explains the whole sense because I

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 1>was writing to the readers the other day, so it's

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>talking to them about what decade is it most like?

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know, whiteb the twenty tents so flat and

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of miserable, really compared to even some of the

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>late sixties and seven or so, even some time period

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>like the seventies, which was nihilistic but quite energetic. It

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>was the twenty tents was nihilistic and totally lacking in

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>energy right in By the way, people don't tell me

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>if you'd say night nihilistic or nihilistic nihilistic that's a

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>good point. Moving on, sorry maybe, um Yeah, so where

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it was it? Yeah, I was just kind of coughing,

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So I was just going off in like a flight

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>of fancy there. But but basically, yeah, this idea that

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>almost as a like social mood has been kind of

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>crushed as well, and that's enabled these kind of long

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>periods of just trend following, whether that trend is Scottish

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>nationalism or whether that trend is something like Scottish mortgage

0:09:55.520 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>or growth triumphing over value. And so now that that's

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the interests are going up and they're kind of like

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>putting bombs under things. A lot of the if you like,

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the philosophical offshoots of a lower interest rate era are

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>also blowing up. Yeah, there's a book in that, John,

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 1>I think are right. I think I think that the

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>shift in interest rates doesn't change our economic life, it

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>changes our political life, and it changes our cultural life.

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Follow on that, Uh, I think it's probably healthy. I

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>absolutely agree, But I also think that that we need

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>more than a podcast with us. We'll go for a

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>drink when we're done here, Okay, the idea right, Moving on,

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Marin Talks Money, the podcast in which people

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>who know the markets explain the markets. I'm Marin Sumset Web.

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>This week our guest is Ian Lance Temple Bar investment

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Trust portfolio manager. Now he is the exact opposite of

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>John and I have just been talking about. He is

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a genuine value investor. I started by asking about a

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>blog he wrote recently, the tankle of which was just

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>stop selling UK equities. The numbers to us that there

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is a huge, a NonStop outflow from the UK equity market.

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>So I asked Ian to tell us exactly what is happening.

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a couple of things. One of

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>them is it's a long term phenomena, which is that,

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned in the blog, if you went back

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to the nineties, I used to run balanced pension funds

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>at a firm called Gartmore, and back back in those days,

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the big balance pension funds used to have about fifty

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>five percent of their allocation in UK equities and probably

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>another twenty percent or so in overseas equities. And that

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>meant two things. Number one is they were massively overexposed

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to equities per se. But number two, they were probably

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>massively overexposed to the UK. And then of course along

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>comes two thousands. We have two things. We have the

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>eputy markets go down quite aggressively. Interest rates also come down.

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>That means the liabilities on the pension funds go up,

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 1>so complete tastrophe for lots of pension funds and they

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>were basically forced to adjust their positions quite aggressively. And

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>what they did was they cut their exposure to equities,

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in particularly they cut their exposure to UK equities. And

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we have a chart in the in the blog which

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of tracks the decline of ukits from about fifty

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>five percent down to it I think about five percent now.

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>That's been the sort of long term trend. And then

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the secondary issue is just colossal barishes about

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the UK economy and that that probably started around the

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>time of Brexit. And then you know, we've had we've

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>just given investors, haven't we loads of excuses to be

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>negative on the UK over the last few years that

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the number of prime ministers we've had, the

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>number of chancellors, we've had, the strikes in et cetera,

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. It is just sort of twenty four seven

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>negative sentiment towards the UK. So I think I think

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that's been a factor as well, probably thrown in with

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the UK has high exposure to sectors

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that people don't really like or haven't really liked until recently,

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>so banks, energy miners, and it's got low exposure to

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>sext as people do like so technology. So I think

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that's probably the sort of the background to it all.

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of fun back here. Let's go let's

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:06.719
<v Speaker 1>go back a bit when the bench of the fun

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>started selling all their equities. If we accept that they

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 1>were overexposed to equities in the first place, but one

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons they started selling equities as a whole

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>was because they felt they needed to do a little

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>bit more liability matching, so they moved into bonds in volume. Right,

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>So Land involved selling a lot of equities, which in

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>itself we can argue about whether that turned out to

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>be a good idea or not, but maybe that that's

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the subject for another day. That's what they did. But

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 1>why was the majority of these equity sales in the

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>UK market? What made them think for themselves, if we're

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>getting get out of equities, we need in particular to

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>get out of the UK. It's almost a change in benchmark.

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So back in the nineties, bench funds used to follow

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>something called the caps medium, which which is a bizarre

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>benchmark because it basically it just looked at all other

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.959
<v Speaker 1>farm managers. So you were just benchmark in yourself against

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>other farm managers. Other farm managers have fifty five cent

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, then you did. And I think over

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>time we drifted away from that, we more towards these

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>market cat weighted industries. So people began to look at

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, MSCI World for instance, and if you look,

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>if you do look at MSCI World, you know, the

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>figures today are that the US market is seventy percent

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and the UK market is about five percent. And so

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there was that people basically moving towards that benchmark.

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that I say in the

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>blog is I think that is just crazy because what

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that means is that people are forced towards having a

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>large percentage of their assets in large markets and a

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>small percentage in small markets, rather than a large percentage

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in cheap markets and a small percentage in expensive markets.

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And to me that just seems completely and utterly counterintuitive. Yeah,

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>so what it does if you're hugging global benchmark flate,

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>there's what you're doing is buying a whole pile of

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff that has already gone up and selling stuff that

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>hasn't gone up yet. I mean, it seems that of

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>slightly mad everybody who is following exactly the same momentum

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>strategy exactly right. It's yeah, completely and utterly counterintuitive in

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>my opinion. Again, there's a nice chart in this blog,

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and it basically just tracks returns of eperty markets against

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the valuation of the valuation measure is effectively a sort

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of market capture GDP. And then it's the subsequent returns

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>over the next twelve years. And the our square of

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the chart is about point nine or you know, I'm

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>supposed to put that in simple terms, that there is

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a very very close correlation between valuation inverse correlation between

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>valuation and subsequent returns subsequent twelve years returns from eptew markets.

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>And why people therefore would literally do the opposite of

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>what that chart implies and actually overallocate to expensive markets

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and under allocates to cheat markets is just beyond me.

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the maddest things in markets that you

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>actually just had to say that, So you actually had

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to say aloud that there is a relationship between the

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>price you pay and the future returns that you make.

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>That is something that has been so completely gotten in

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>markets for the last decade, they were actually having to

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>remind people that the entire history of markets proves their

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>valuations matter absolutely, right. Do you ever do you ever

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>read the Credit Squeeze Investment Returns hand but when that

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>comes out, you know that that that comes out. I

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>have it right here, right here on my desk, the

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Credit Squeee Global Investment Returns Yearbook twenty twenty three exactly.

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And so so that thing is that thing is that

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just a study of exactly what we've just been

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Isn't it the fact that you know, you

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you buy lowly value markets, or you buy lowly values,

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, equities within those markets, and you subsequently make

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>higher returns not on not on a six month basis

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>or a one year basis, but but on a sort

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of ten year basis. You know, there's a very very

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>strong correlation. And perhaps what I just said actually answers

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that conundrum, which is that I don't know, maybe ten

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>years is just way too long for people these days.

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe people are that their time horizons are much much shorter,

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and therefore sort of taking a bet that expensive markets

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>can get even more expensive. Well, I mean that's been

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>reasonably fair for some time. You know, if you look

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>at you and I I think would have said two

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago, five years ago, eight years ago, goodness me,

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the valuation gap between the US and the UK is

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>getting out of control. You want to be shifting back

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>into the UK. But if we'd been doing that, obviously

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we would have been the ones who looked stupid, if

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that were the ones who looked stupid. Because the UK

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>market one hundred continued to basically flatline and the US

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>market continued to go up, So this valuation got wider.

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Gap got wider and wider and wider. And you now

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>talk to people, younger people obviously, who believe that it

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is perfectly normal and natural for there to be a

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.479
<v Speaker 1>huge valuation gap between the UK and the US. And

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>if you say to them, actually, this only happened a

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of decades ago. It used to be valued in

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>roughly the same way that that's entirely new news. That's

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>right again. We you know, we have a chart which

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>looks at the looks at exactly that the difference in

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>valuations between the two markets, that is back over fifty years,

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think you know, for most of that period

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the average was about fifteen cents something like that, and

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>then last couple of years you're right, it blew out

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to about forty five percent, and so you're right, you know,

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a relatively new phenomenon, and what's the gap now?

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>It is it's a little bit less because you know, surprise, surprise.

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Actually last year the SMP was down twenty percent and

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the UK was up four percent, So so it's probably

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>about forty percent, but it's a way way wider. And

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>I think the other thing that I would add is

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>cause that's the average for the market. If you look

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>within the market, there are things within the market that

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>are much much cheaper. So there is, as I said,

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 1>quadlock going on here. But one thing I think we

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>can say, probably for sure with the fifty one hundred

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>is that the selling of UK equities maybe about the

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>perception of the UK economy as a result of breakcast,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's certainly not about the performance of the companies

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>as a result of breakit because the UK large have

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>been performing extremely well, right they have. And I think

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, another thing I mentioned in the blog is

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that there are lots of companies within the UK market

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that have virtually no exposure to the UK economy, and

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>yet they are valued at massive discounts to their the uspers.

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 1>So the example within the energy sector, the example I

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>uses BP today trays on about five times earnings. X

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 1>X on trays on about ten times earnings. You know

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that those are very very similar companies with very very

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>similar drivers to their profitability, and yet one trays at

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>half the valuation of the other. And yet and if

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>we picked up BP and dumped it in America, rehead

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>corded it with the share price double. Well, you know,

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing you should they should say that BP had

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>results about about six weeks ago, and there are a

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. The number one is they basically said

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 1>they were going to slow down their move into renewables

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and invest more in upstream. But the stop went up

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>about thirty percent in the following sort a few weeks,

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>and that was attributed to US buying, interestingly, and the

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>management team. Interestingly, the CEO did his road show around

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the US. The CFO was in the UK, and the

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>CEO went around the US, and there was as I said,

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the share probably went up a lot and and apparently

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that was that was US buying. So that's, you know,

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>just an interesting anecdotal point. And do you think they

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>were buying Um, I know you have, you have no

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>idea what I've interested in your opinion. Do you think

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they were buying because they looked at and thought this

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is extremely cheap, or they looked at it and thought,

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we've known this as cheap for a while. But they're

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>backing away from renewables lass transition and focusing on what

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>they're actually really good at is a positive. Yeah. I

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>suspect they looked at the change in strategy and thought, actually,

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a positive because even the company, even the company

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>themselves talk about returns in the upstream area being significantly

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>higher than returns in the renewable era. So I suspect

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the US investors looked at that change in actually and thought, actually,

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing. And then they looked at the valuation.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>I thought, my god, I can buy this for about

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>halfway one I'm paying for Excel. Interesting And because when

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>when you were talking earlier, you were talking about the

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>UK market being stuffed full of companies that people have

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>not been keen on for a little while. So we've

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>had what you might call it an ESG discount on

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the UK market, but the conversation around ESG is changing

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>really fast. You'll have noticed that, I certainly have. You know,

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>if we go right back to the beginning of the

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>war in Ukraine, when suddenly defense doc turned from somethingl

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>something and evil and filthy to a social good. And

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>now again people are looking at the energy companies and

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the commodity companies, and particularly commodity is pointing out that

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we can't possibly have an energy transition without being really,

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>really very commodity heavy. And of course we can't maintain

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>our living standards in the short, medium and possibly long

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>term without being a little politer to the fossil fuel companies.

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So that ESG discount is beginning to narrow as well. Yeah,

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with that. I think i'd also make

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>one other point, which is that the the ESG pressures

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of the last sort of five to ten years on

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>these companies is the main part of our positive thesis

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>on the sector. In other words, the companies have basically

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 1>just been told you've got to stop investing in fossil fuels,

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and they have. So, you know, a couple of statistics

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>for you. Aggregate capex for energy companies is down seventy

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>five percent adjusted for GDP over the last decade, isn't

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>it incredible? And for the equivalent for minors again, this

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>is adjusted for GDP going up down sixty seven percent.

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know you don't need to you don't need

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a genius to work out you can't cut

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>your capex by that amount and expect to production levels

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>to remain at the same at the same rate, and

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 1>surprise prize, they haven't. So you know, so production has

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 1>gone down across the companies and demand despite everyone's expectation

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that demand for demand has not gone down. So people

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>are forecasting that oil demand in the fourth quarter of

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>this year will be one hundred five million barrels a day.

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.479
<v Speaker 1>So in others it keeps going up. All the one

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>keeps going up, oil production keeps going down. It's really interesting,

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>isn't it, Because we've been told for years, And the

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>first thing you tell analysts when they start training in

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>the city is that when it comes to commodity is

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and energy of the solution to high prices is high pricess.

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, high prices or solve their own problems. Because

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>as prices rise, capex rises, supply rises, and down we

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>go again. And this is the first cycle in my career,

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm guzzing in yours as well. When high prices

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 1>are not the solution to high prices. Yeah, fascinating, isn't it,

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Because you're you're you're absolutely right, you know, you've some

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>people describe it as a sort of capital cycle down

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>though the fact that returns go up and that should

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>attract more investment into the sector and that eventually that

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.679
<v Speaker 1>shows the seeds of oversupply. And you're right, this is

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the first one I've seen where that market mechanism has

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>failed because at these sorts of returns that they're making,

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the companies should be investing hugely and they're not. You know,

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>even in the last year or so, we've not really

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>seen kpex go up amongst either the energy companies or

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the or the mining companies. And it's kind of hard

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to see how, you know, in the absence of a

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>massive global recession, it's kind of hard to see how

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that situation, that supply demand situation resolves itself. Interesting. But

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to the energy company. Because you hold

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>for Shell and BP, don't you do you worry about

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>because what we're really talking about here is the political environment, right,

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>But We've been talking about the political environment in terms

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of supply and demand, but the other element of the

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>political environment around the big energy companies is the windfall taxes,

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, it may be that these companies

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>can continue to make a vast amount of money out

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of the rising present and crimp to supply of their goods,

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>but we can't be absolutely sure that the government is

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>going to allow them to keep that money for the moment.

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't. The reason I don't is because it goes

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>back to this point about the fact that BP and

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 1>She'll make a relatively small amount of their profits in

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the UK, and therefore the government can only tax those

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>profits that are made in the UK. So when they

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 1>were hit with the windfall tax last year, it was

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>basically about one percent of profits. It wasn't very significant.

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>But what it did do, back to our conversation of

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes ago about the capital cycle, is it

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>basically elongated the capital cycle, because within months we had

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>announcements from BP, Shell, Total Harbor Energy all saying bless it,

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>we're cutting back on norc oral investment. So you know,

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just a crazy policy for the government

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to be following because you know, the answer to the

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>energy crisis that people facing at the moment is more investment.

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 1>We need more supply, and for them to basically hit

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the companies and naturally force supply down, it's just a

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>crazy policy in my opinion. Okay, so you'll hang on

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to those those two big old companies, you know, the

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>other the other thing there. And as we stand today,

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 1>BP is trading on five times this year's earnings. And

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>because and you know, given and the yeld of five

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>percent or so, pretty much the same for Shell, And

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>because they translate nearly all their profits into cash, that's

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a that's a kind of about twenty percent free cash

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>flow yield. So these companies are still even though even

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>though they've gone up in the best forming sector for

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years, because the earnings keep going up,

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>because community prices can keep going up, they still look

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>very very lowly value to us. So fascinating dynamic, isn't

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it that in these sectors that people have been ignoring

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>for so long, share prices can can basically double and

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 1>valuations can fall at the same time because the rise

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and earnings is so unexpected to the market. And yeah,

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, people, people clearly don't believe these levels of

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>profits are sustainable. I think people still look at them

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in the way that they used to that the assumption

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, we must be at peak oil prices,

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>because that's the only thing that explains PEP trading on

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a on a pe of five. That people just think

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the ear is is now at its peak and it's

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>going to go down. And for the reasons we've just discussed,

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not convinced that is the case. And

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the dividend eels on these stops at the

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>moment about about five percent, But don't forget, they're buying

0:26:56.200 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>back huge amounts of their stock as well, So so

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you're getting a five centiveen and yield, but you'll probably

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>get another five six seven percent in terms of share

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 1>buybacks as well. Why do they buy back instead of

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>just paying out a special dividend. But I mean, I

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>know it's different in the institutional world, but certainly in

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.719
<v Speaker 1>the retail world, I think people would prefer a special dividend,

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 1>and particularly if they're holding stock slates this as incomparabader.

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure, to be honest with you, why why

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>they favor buybacks? Over over special difference. I think mechanistically

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>they're very similar to each other, aren't they. But you know,

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know the answer. Sum Yeah, but one

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>puts cash in our pockets and the other doesn't. Doesn't,

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>but I guess it increases the value of the business

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>over time. Don't know. If you looked at another blog

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that I wrote on on this issue share buybacks, and

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I just used the example of Next, which very briefly,

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>if you invested one hundred quid in Next in two

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one, it was to day be worth one

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight hundred pounds, despite the fact that the

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>top line has only grown in line with uk GDP,

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's been through three recessions due throughout that period.

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is share buybacks. They brought back over

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent of their shares. An issue, they only do

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it when the shares are cheap. So when what Simon

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Wolfson does is when when the shares are cheap, he

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>will basically buy about stop. When the shares get expensive,

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>he turns it off and then actually Mary and he

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>pays a special dividend at that point in time. Okay,

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>but if he keeps doing that indefinitely there'll be nothing left.

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>O the way, at some stays you you Mary and

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>will own the last share in Next and it'll be

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>worth five billion quid. I mean that is slightly my

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>problem with buy back. You know that has to be

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the natural end game. Is the disappearance of the number

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of shares. Yes, yeah, this is true, but you see

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>my point over over the last twenty years. But for

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>shareholders in Next who didn't sell, you know, it's been

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a very very successful policy. Now I do see that,

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And how is the Next looking at the moment? Would

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:58.719
<v Speaker 1>you buy that in the portfolio? Just a bit too

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>expensive for us? Actually, as you know, we have a

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>strong value bias. So actually we own mark suspenses within retail,

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but we don't own Next. Okay, I want to go

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>back to mark suspenses. That's interesting. But first, when you

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>say that you're a strong value bias, and I know that,

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>what are the parameters if you say something's a bit

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>too expensive for us? I mean Next is obviously a

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>company that you thoroughly approve of. What is it invaluation

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>terms that make something too expensive? Way you're looking at

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of its cash flows? You looking at on

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a pe basis, Is it a price to book. What

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>tells you something is a little too expensive for us? Okay,

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>So without maybe getting too technical, So too technical, please,

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>no technical, give a big picture. I'll go board. I

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>will try to basically, what we what we try to

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>do is we assess what's called a company's long run

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>normalized earnings pounds. So what that means is we look

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>at where we think the earnings can get back to

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>on a five year basis. So we're typically are buying

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>stocks which are going through a sort of temporary downturn

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in their own is either as a result of the

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>economic cycle or maybe because of a blunder the company

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>has made. So we'll basically assume a recovery. We convert

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>accounting earnings into cash earnings, and then we basically will

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:09.719
<v Speaker 1>apply multiple to that and we will come up with

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>what we think is roughly the intrinsic value of the business.

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So what do we think is the business worth on

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a five year basis? And if we can buy something

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>at about half that soon others about one hundred percent upside,

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>then that's normally attractive for the portfolio. Okay, and Martin

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and Spencers fits into that criteria at the moment yeah,

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it certainly does. Actually so a share price in Marks

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and Spencers today one pound forty. The management have given

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>out targets for where they think the sort of margins

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of the businesses can get. So got two businesses here.

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.719
<v Speaker 1>We've got food retail business and we've got a clothing

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and home business. So they basically think food returning about

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>four percent margin, clothing and home about ten percent. And

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we agree with those figures. They should be able to

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>get to those if they do make those margins that

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that gives you about twenty seven pm earnings, So you know,

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>put stick that on I don't know, twelve thirteen times

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>or something, that would give you about about three quid

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.239
<v Speaker 1>for the intrinsic value of the business. And as I say,

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>share price today about one pound forty. So that's, in

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>our opinion a potential doubler and I've obviously I've massively

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>simplified it there. But that's how we think about value.

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>We don't think about value in terms of priced a book.

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been trying to do some research for you in

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I did go to Marks and Spencers to day before

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>yesterday because I keep reading in the fashion magazines. By

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the weekend magazines anyway that you know, markus Spencer's jeans

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>at the thing right now. So I was walking past

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Marks and Spencer at the other day and I went

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and I did buy a pair of jeans. But unfortunately

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you any more than that because my

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>house is such a tip I brought them home and

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>put them down somewhere, and I've been meaning to try

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>them on before we had this conversation, so I could

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>tell you whether you're doing the right thing or not,

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>because obviously it's all about the genes right in. Oh well,

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>on a serious point, or is it all about the food?

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the food business is good, and you know

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>with that link cover with the cardo, I think it's

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>now a very very good business. Very briefly, the issue

0:31:57.680 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>with the clothing and home business was that they had

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a gray, big, long tale of stores which are unprofitable,

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and they they basically had no online business. So going

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>back to the next, you know, next to spent a decade,

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>hadn't they establishing next directory? And Mark's basically had no

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>online business at all. And they've effectively gone about solving

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>both of those issues. So, believe it or not, the

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>clothing of home business is now the number two online

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>online retailing business in the UK behind next Directory, so

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know they've ticked that box and they have

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>shut down lots of the unprofitable stores. So that's this

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the mechanism that you can see to

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the improving profitability in our opinion. Okay, and what's the yield?

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I've got a lot of income invest deserve. They're listening

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to us. The yield is not great because they're sort

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of they're coming off a recovery, coming off a tropho.

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>This is about two cent. Yeah, it's not all bad,

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:46.959
<v Speaker 1>is it. It is not all bad. It's not it's

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>not it's not a disaster. But yeah, I want to

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>go briefly back to mining before we get to the

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>elephant in the room, which I read listeners can probably

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>guess by now with the elephant in the rooms. But

0:32:57.120 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to to mining. What's your top holding

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in the mind any sector? Anglo American? Yeah, what's good

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>about Anglo American. It's a similar it's a similar thesis

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to the energy companies, and it is this idea that

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the industry as a whole has basically been beaten up

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>by politicians and ESG Investors has, as I said earlier

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>on capex for the industry is down sixty seven percent.

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Anglos has got another dimension, which is that they were

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>probably one of the less efficient of the big miners

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>if you went back five or six years ago. So

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>if you compare them to Billetin or Rio, they were

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>less efficient than them, and they spent the last few

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>years taking costs out improving their profitability. They have they're

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>still very very disciplined in terms of capital spend. So

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we just like the all companies, we haven't seen the

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>capolic spenders start to go up. And there is there

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is one added dimension to this, where which is whereas

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we can say probably that over time demand for fossil

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>fuels goes down. I think you can make a structural

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>growth case, can't you, with a lot of the materials

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that they produced becaultously. They produced lots of the things

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to need if we're going to transition

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to a to a greener world, so namely copper and

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>things like that. So so again it kind of feels

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>there like there's a structural demand in the in these

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>types of things that they produce, and yet supply is

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>just not keeping up with that increasing structural demand, and

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, normally one would therefore expect prices to go

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>up as a result of that. Yeah, I wonder if

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we can really say that demand for oil is going

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to fall. I think we could probably say that demand

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 1>for fossil fuels is a percentage of global energy demand

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 1>will fall. But as global energy demand just keeps going

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>up and up and up. Um. You know, let's say

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that the fossil fuels that we use to provide our

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 1>energy globally falls from the current level of what's at

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>about eighty percent to seventy five percent, but the absolute

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>volume of fossil fuels that we use, and there's something

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>very dramatic happens very soon, it's still going to go up, right, Yeah,

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you're probably right. And I think

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you also have to think about where is the increase

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:04.959
<v Speaker 1>in demand for energy usage coming from. Is basically coming

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>from areas like China and India and in Africa, And

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in those regions, you're going to see an increasing demanding

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels, aren't you, as as demand continues to grow. Yeah,

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think we have we have to be careful

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>about about thinking that fossil fuel demand is actually going

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to fall just because we'd like it to the world works,

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>is this? Yes, no fair point, right, Let's come to financials.

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>So a large part of their portfolio is in financials

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other. And you've got a couple

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 1>of big holdings in banks. You've gotten at worst, you've

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>got standard charters. And the wonderful thing about these is

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be significantly cheaper today as we

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 1>talk than there were a couple of weeks ago. Now,

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to we're not going to delve too

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>deeply into whether we're in the middle of a banking

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>crisis or not in a banking crisis, and whether our

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>entire financial system is going to collapse, and whether you

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and I should not be talking but attempting to figure

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>out how to put our entire net worth in bitcoin.

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:00.439
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to delve into that. I just wanted

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about the banks that you do hold

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>and how confident you feel in their well being. Yeah,

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty confident. This is a sort of dangerous conversation we're having,

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>aren't with because but you know, by the time this

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast airs, things could have changed dramatically. Things are moving

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>so fast at the moment. I suppose the serious point

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that O make is the all of these banks, all

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of the UK banks, have spent about the lost fifteen

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>years improving the state of their balance sheets. For all

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>of them, the financial crisis was a near death experience,

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and confidently was for the regulators of the government, for

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the country, et cetera, et cetera. And as a result

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of that, thing's dramatically changed. So the management teams across

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 1>all of them are totally different and not in you know,

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>it's not Stread Godwin, et cetera, Restera still running these things.

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 1>It's Alison Rose running that West group, who is you know,

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>much more conservative. The balance sheets are much stronger, the

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>lending books are much much stronger. So take an example

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of of n West of the loans to value ratio

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and the mortgage book is about fifty three percent. So

0:36:57.239 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>house prices could go down quite a long way for

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, before that would start to cause trouble. And

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>again that would be just completely different from what we

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>had during the financial crisis. And you know, they're very

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>tightly regulated. They have correpty Tier one ratios of sort

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of fourteen percent and more they have very strong liquidity ratios.

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, my personal view is that what's going

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>on in the world at the moment shouldn't affect these banks.

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's always hard to call, because George Soros

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>used to have that expression reflexivity didn't heed whereby movement

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in share prices can actually influence things, and in this

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 1>case it could be movement in share prices eventually spooks

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>depositors who start to withdraw their deposits. So so it's

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>always hard to say these things with banks, you know,

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 1>for definite. But from from where I'm sitting at the moment,

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I think these things are they're still well capitalized, and

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 1>they are and at the moment they're actually the prossibility

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is going in the right direction. Again, you know, who

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>knows that that that might change. And the valuations bearing

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>are still very very low. So if you just let's

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:00.320
<v Speaker 1>just go across the three that we own, that West following,

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, following the markdown last week, it's now on

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a price earnings ratio five times Standard Chartered six times

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Barkley's four times give it and yields for your income

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 1>investors that West eight cent standards a bit lower three percent,

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Barkley's six and a half percent. And for those who

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, for those who like price to books point

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>seven point five point four, so trading a discounts to

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Price to book as well. So they you know, they

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:28.359
<v Speaker 1>to us they're much much better businesses than they used

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.959
<v Speaker 1>to and they're still very lowly valued. And the tube

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of they get, you know, based on what we were

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>discussing earlier, the tube of the get, the greater the

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>future returns, right should be, yeah, should be. As an aside,

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>house prices you said they had they could go down

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a long way before we had to worry about the

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 1>stability of any of the banks. Have you got a

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>view on where UK house prices might there's the horribly

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>unfair questions not your area, but but lately is your

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>area if you're invested in UK banks, it is? It is?

0:38:56.560 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, So I write another I won't call it

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 1>a blog. It was more of a white paper last

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>year actually, and it was called Reversion to the long

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>run mean and and and it literally just asked the

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 1>questions that if you take actually valuations, bond yields, house

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>prices and you basically take them back to their long run,

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, their long run averages. That that has some

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>quite significant implications across across all of those things. So

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 1>so for you know, for US extis, usxty should be

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 1>down fifty percent on more, you know. But I mean,

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I finally love the bondial ones actually come come true

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 1>very very quickly, hasn't it? Because bond yields back then

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>were one and I was saying, you know, long run

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>bondyls are normally about four or five cent, and here

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 1>we are, you know, and here we are back at

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 1>four or five percent. And the other one that I

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>mentioned was house prices. I mean, you know, house prices

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>looked very very expensive on a long run basis, and

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I just said that could be one of those things

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that eventually mean reverts back to its long run average.

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I have, I have kind of no reason to assume

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that that it won't. And again, if it does, you know,

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 1>house prices should be probably thirty or forty percent lower

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>than they are to day nominal terms or real terms. Yeah,

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 1>nominal terms. Yikes. Yeah, that's not a prediction. But I suppose,

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I suppose I'm just saying that almost Why why wouldn't

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 1>they Why why shouldn't why shouldn't ext markets mean reverts

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to their long run average valuations and bondeal town house prices.

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>And we know what drove these things above substantially above

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 1>their long run averages, right it was you know, it

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>was low interest racing, it was contentated easing, etc. Et cetera.

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Now to the extent that all those things are now

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 1>going away, why why wouldn't these things mean revert to

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the long run averages? Well, now I agree with you,

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 1>but I have to spend a lot of time on

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>this podcast trying to goad people into making, you know,

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 1>making excitable forecasts about house prices, and just be clear,

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you have not made a forecast. I get that. But nonetheless, nonetheless,

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I think think forty was said nominal as the furthest

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we've gone so far. So congratulations to both of us

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 1>on that. Thank you. Listen. Last question, last question, I'm

0:40:58.280 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>holding you down. I'm not leaking out of the house

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>for a decade. You're not going to be able to

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>trade again. You're going to beake gold or bitcoin. Oh,

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>gold gold definitely. Do you have any gold in the portfolio.

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>We own two gold miners. Actually, we own Barrack Barrack

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Resources and New more mining. Point number one actually sorry

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to be boring here, but similar thesis to the energy

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and and and Anglo Americans, which is, you know that

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 1>they if you went back ten years, they just they

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:26.879
<v Speaker 1>were just awful businesses. They were doing big mergers, they

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:29.839
<v Speaker 1>were spending too much, et cetera, et cetera. And then

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 1>you had come of massive management change. Obviously price gold

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:34.799
<v Speaker 1>prices fail, and they're now going through this cycle at

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the moment where they have much much better capital, discipline,

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>costs much lower et cetera, et cetera. So you know,

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>big tick in the box there. But also it is

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:45.320
<v Speaker 1>very interesting in a week like last week when lots

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of are you know, more cyclically orientated things are going down,

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:52.280
<v Speaker 1>is you know, those things just act as a fantastic hedge,

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>so that those share prices were going up last week

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>whilst everything else was going down, And obviously the gold

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>price was going up last week as well, wasn't it.

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 1>So you've got the hedges in their portfolio in the

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>films of goal, and of course in terms of the dividend,

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:07.840
<v Speaker 1>because you know, a good dividend is one of the

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:11.240
<v Speaker 1>greatest hedges we've got against chaos and against inflation, isn't it.

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:13.440
<v Speaker 1>It certainly is. Yeah, it certainly is. I mean again,

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, you're you'll you'll remember the days

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>when the income sector in the UK was I think

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:24.919
<v Speaker 1>one of the most popular sectors wasn't absolutely money. Those

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:27.880
<v Speaker 1>days are coming back. I'm pretty convinced of it. I

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>hope you're right. I hope you're right. But but you know,

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the serious point is that in the long run again

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>again actually this is in your in your credit sueet

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 1>book that you've got there. In the long run, I

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 1>think dividend yield is about half of your total return. Yep. Yeah,

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:43.400
<v Speaker 1>but we just got we got used to that environment

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:45.879
<v Speaker 1>in which ext's were going up twenty percent a year,

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think people just thought, well, who on Earth

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>and he's dived and yield? When your ex's are going

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 1>up twenty percent a year, we can just sell some capital. Now,

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>if we're moving back to an environment when we can't

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 1>rely on ext's going up to any percent a year,

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 1>then maybe divn and yield does become important again. And

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I think your other point is right is I think

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, historically given and yields has proved to be

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a good inflation head as well. If you can start,

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>if you can start with your diven and yielding sort

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:13.359
<v Speaker 1>of four or five percent, that gets your reasonable way there,

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it? It does. It does to basically keeping up

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>with inflation. Yeah, well with inflation at temps enter and

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:21.359
<v Speaker 1>it gets you halfway there. But it's an awful lot

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>better start than nothing, right, So Ian, I think we

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:25.360
<v Speaker 1>better wind it up. But I think I can come

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and sum up what you said to us in one sentence,

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:31.279
<v Speaker 1>which is that you know, history tells you you have

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to buy cheap stuff and lots of stuff that's cheap now,

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 1>so you know, maybe buy that stuff not the other stuff.

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Would that be fair? I think that's a very good summary. Perfect. Perfect.

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where we bother with the whole half

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 1>an hour, we could just do it like that. Thank

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:47.919
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us today. We hugely appreciate it.

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:58.440
<v Speaker 1>That's a pleasure. Thank you for listening to this week's

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Marin Talks Money. We will be back next week in

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the meantime. If you like our show, rate review and

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 1>subscribe wherever you listen to your podcasts, and please do

0:44:06.840 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>so positively. Will you'd appreciate that a lot more than

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:13.359
<v Speaker 1>anything else. This episode was hosted by me Maria's Sumset Web.

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 1>It was produced by Samersadi, additional editing by Desta wonder Rad,

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:20.800
<v Speaker 1>special thanks to Ian Lancer and to John Steppock of course,

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and finally, a weekly reminder to sign up to John's

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>daily newsletter, Money Distilled. You will like it. The link

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is in the show notes