WEBVTT - Investors Question Oracle’s Data Center Financing

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and v Lovelow in San Francisco.

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Oracle data center financing being questioned. Ellison's Giant says the

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 3>equity deal for its Michigan project is on schedule and

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 3>doesn't include Blue ol Capital.

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 2>US.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Open Ai is in talks to raise ten billion dollars

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 3>from Amazon.

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll use this trainium chips.

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 3>We have the story, and Waimo is in talks to

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 3>raise more than fifteen billion dollars at a valuation that

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 3>could exceed one hundred billion. Details later in the hour,

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>but we begin with our top story. Oracle shares extending losses,

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 3>worst day that we've seen since December, the tenth for

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 3>the lowest since June of this year. Oracle's largest data

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 3>center finance partner, that's Blue ol Capital, will not back

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 3>a ten billion dollar deal for a one gigawatt facility

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 3>in Michigan. Still, Oracle says that the data center project

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 3>remains on schedule and said it's development partner Related Digital

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 3>shows the best equity partner from a competitive group of options,

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 3>which in this instance was not Blue ou More returned

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 3>to Ploomberg's Brodie.

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Ford covering all things Oracle.

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 3>You've talked about how certain data center projects that are

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 3>going to be there for open AI might be behind schedule.

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 2>But have you heard and.

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 3>Are we reporting out that financing is becoming more difficult

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 3>to raise for these data centers.

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 4>The big context on Oracle is that they are embarking

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 4>on a historic build out data centers where it's.

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 5>Really a logistical feat.

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 4>It's quite a tight schedule they need to be on

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 4>and if it all goes right, it's transformational for Oracle

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 4>and the entire industry. But all that needs to happen

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 4>for that to get off is a couple things falling

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 4>out right. And that's the issue with what we're seeing

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 4>today is that the FT is reporting that there's been

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 4>some issues in getting the financing for one of their

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 4>big centers, and that's giving investors a lot of anxiety that, Hey,

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 4>are are these lenders seeing something that we are not.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 4>That's what's driving the fear this morning.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 3>What interesting is you've been writing about the sheer scale

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 3>of leases, right, and I think leases is something different

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 3>because it's off balance sheet. You're always saying, we're hearing

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 3>it in attend Q that they could have up to

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 3>three hundred billion dollars worth they're about in terms of

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 3>their overall leases that eventually they're on.

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 2>The hook for paying. Yes, how is this different?

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 3>How is this sort of financing different from capital expenditure?

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 4>And they're like, right, so we're used to hearing about

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.559
<v Speaker 4>capital expenditures, which is I'm going out and buying computers,

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm buying wires, I'm buying the data centers themselves. But

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 4>what's becoming more popular is renting the data centers, and

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 4>that allows you to not pay everything upfront and not

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 4>have that beyond your books directly. And so what we've

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 4>seen is a big spike in these kind of future

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 4>dated commitments. That Oracle is the example that they have

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 4>about two hundred and fifty billion that they're on the

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 4>hook for over the next twenty years or so, and

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 4>most likely this Michigan data center would be one of them.

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 4>It's just kind of, you know, one more pool of

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 4>spending that we realize quite how large this buildout is

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 4>going to be.

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting, I think is the Oracle is different from

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 3>the other hyperscalers. And then it's relatively new to this

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 3>whole data center least build out element.

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 2>It used to be a software company.

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 3>So is that something that also the market's trying to

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:32.119
<v Speaker 3>factor in How good is it at this compared to Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon,

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 3>who've been in this game for a very long time.

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a huge part, right, I mean, if Microsoft

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 4>has one hundred billion in commitments, people don't batinize much

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 4>because their cash flow is quite a different style than

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 4>of Oracles. Right, I mean, oracles spending is such a

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 4>large percentage of its overall company size because it's making

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 4>a very ambitious transformation. Now, if you're a bull on Oracle,

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 4>you say, yeah, well, you know they are doing what

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 4>it takes to transform their business. But a lot of

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 4>things need to go exactly as planned for this to

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 4>go right.

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 3>You're going to be across how all of it does

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 3>go right or as planned? Rarely forward across the Oracle story. Look,

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 3>let's turn to well, the company that's buying a lot

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 3>of the data center or needs the data center compute

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 3>from Oracle, and it's Open AI.

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 2>It's in initial discussions.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 3>To raise at least ten billion dollars from Amazon, and

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 3>we'll use some of the cloud giant's Trainium chips as well.

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 3>For more, let's go to Bloomberg's Matt Day, who covers Amazon.

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Is this a circular deal?

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 6>Oh, it sure looks like it.

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 7>A few row o'clock back a month, open ai bought

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 7>thirty eight billion dollars of compute capacity from Amazon.

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 6>That was a seven year deal. It was primarily for

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 6>Nvidio chips.

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 7>Per for this news that emerged last night, looks like

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 7>Amazon maybe giving some chunk of that back and investment

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 7>open Ai.

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 3>So ten million dollars in equity so that open ai

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 3>can continue to afford to buy compute, of which is

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 3>going to be buying from Amazon and its trips. But

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 3>go to the chips part of this, because Matt, this

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 3>could be a real endorsement once again for Trainium in

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 3>the same way that Anthropic lent its name on its

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 3>capacity for actually using them.

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's right.

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 7>Amazon also a close partner of Anthropic. They've invested eight

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 7>billion dollars in that company as part of a deal

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 7>that got Anthropic to use Amazon's own homegrown AI chip

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 7>for their models. Right, So this would definitely be a

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 7>coup for Amazon's in house chip making effort, but ch

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 7>analysts are still trying to struggling a little bit to

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 7>understand the effectiveness of to date, in part because there's

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 7>just few enormous customers for this stuff. There's not a

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 7>whole lot of big model trainers out there, so those

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 7>without saying that if open ai can make the GPT

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 7>suite work on top of Amazon's Silicon, that's a big

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 7>deal for eight offus and for Amazon.

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 3>Because it was such a big deal for Alphabet, And

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 3>we think about the endorsement that its vertical model seems

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>to be getting from the market. What does it mean

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 3>for in video because as you mentioned, the previous cloud

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 3>deal between open ai and Amazon actually was a ringing

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 3>endorsement for in video chips.

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.559
<v Speaker 7>It means there's hunger for an alternative too in video.

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 7>I mean, in video stuff works well, but it's expensive,

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 7>it's in short supply only one supplier. So you've definitely

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 7>got increased credibility among the other folks who are putting

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 7>out AI accelerators on the market. You know, AMD has

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 7>an open Ai ideal. For instance, Amazon and Google's TPUs

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 7>are all making a claim for some of that big

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 7>Nvidia business.

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 3>All of this is about trying to finance the heaven

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 3>needing compute coming from the likes of open ai, mat day,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 3>brilliant reporting.

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.239
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much. Indeed, let's get the market reaction.

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's get an investor perspective for you, Tony Ams with

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 3>us here is put flow Manager at t rope. Price

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 3>is twelve billion dollars Science and Technology Fund. You are

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 3>naming an own who's who of the players within AI

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure and AI used. Tony, are you worried let's start

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 3>with Amazon and open ai. Are you worried about the

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 3>circularity of deals once again at play here?

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, Well, I think that whenever there's some type of

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 8>creative financing, there's always some scrutiny that's on there. But

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 8>I kind of view it as you know, there is

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 8>a synergistic partnership here and that you know, open ai

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 8>is growing rapidly, they need to compute, and it makes

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 8>sense that they want to look forward multisurce, and so

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 8>I think going to Amazon does make sense.

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 6>In addition, I think they want some of that upside.

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 8>And so you're seeing like whenever there's like a new

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 8>frontier of technology, there's often you know, companies that need

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 8>to come together and build the ecosystem, and I think

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 8>that this is an instance.

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 6>Of this, and so you know, I think it's definitely

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 6>something to watch.

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 8>But I think that what matters at the end of

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 8>the day is that AI continues to progress as scaling

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 8>laws hold, the use of you know, CHATTERBTL, lens continue

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 8>to grow, and I think that when you look at

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 8>these tools that are coming out for the companies, they

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 8>are like transformational in terms of how we are rethinking work.

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 8>So I think what really matters is that the end

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 8>demand continues to be really strong and that we're seeing

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 8>progress on AI.

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at your holdings and the number one holding

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 3>that you have at the moment is Alphabet. Interesting news

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 3>with a new Gemini release this morning, which we'll get into,

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 3>But video is your second biggest. Now are you worried

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 3>about in video losing any sort of market share too

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet to Amazon, to some of these other chip players.

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, I think the person market is growing and

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 8>so you know, this is an exponentcial growth curve. So

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 8>I don't think that it's a winner take all and

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 8>so you know, multiple companies can can do well and

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 8>in some ways I think when you step back and

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 8>think about what's going on, you know there are there

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 8>is kind of a space race for AI, but they're

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 8>going to multiple areas, multiple moons, and so they're all

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 8>doing their own kind of domain expertise. I think like

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 8>with the TPU, it's very optimized, you know, for a

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 8>specific stack and for the Google ecosystem.

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 6>And then I think in video is like kind of

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 6>more of the merchant.

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 8>A broader platform can run everything, and I think both

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 8>can have a place and you can see that. You know,

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 8>Google has been doing really well over the last five years,

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 8>so as Nvidia. So has a MD so has Broadcom,

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 8>and so to me, I think that you know, there's

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 8>not a winner take all year.

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I love that sort of element of there are many races,

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 3>maybe many moons, Tony, But talk to us about the

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 3>moon shot that Oracle is making at the moment, and

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 3>the anxiety that people might not be wanting to lend

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 3>to their future of leasing and the sheer scale of

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 3>capacity that they're building with other partners of course out

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 3>there like related Digital.

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Have you got any anxiety around Oracle?

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 3>I know it's in your portfolio last time that it

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 3>was published.

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so I think that you know, Oracle delways sees

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 8>the demand signals that are probably really strong, and so

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 8>they're looking to meet that demand, you know, in the

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 8>near term with leases and then over the long term

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 8>probably with owning their own capacity. And so to me,

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 8>they see that this has a big opportunity that is

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 8>once in a generation, and so they're building for it

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 8>and they're you know, kind of.

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 6>Being creative with it.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 8>And so to me, it definitely you know, Marcus super concerned.

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 8>I think that there's probably somewhat an overreaction. And I

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 8>think as long as like you know, the demand is

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 8>there in years three to five, I think that that's

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 8>what made kind of the oracle that made sense.

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 3>So all of this anxiety written large around sort of

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 3>whether it's more experimental financing, creative financing, circular financing.

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Is it actually a buying opportunity for you.

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 8>Tony, I think we're constantly managing risk and you know,

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 8>rotating the portfolio to what has the highest RLI, what

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 8>has the best press could justin in return, you know,

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 8>I still think that AI is like continue to be

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 8>a really good area of place capital.

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 6>You know, it's a lot of multi year inflection.

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 8>That being said, it's also been uh, you know, two

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 8>three years since chatcha met has been launched, and so

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 8>we are kind of, you know, further along in AI,

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 8>but I still think we're pretty early, and so you

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 8>know a lot of my views, you know, are expressed

0:10:57.520 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 8>over the multi year and think that you want to

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 8>invest in companies that strong competitive advantages, that capture the

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 8>value with their ecosystem. And I think that not everyone's

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 8>going to be a winner in the space race, like

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 8>some rockets might not make it. But to me, I

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 8>think it still is like a really great overall theme

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 8>to be invested in.

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 2>At the moment.

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 3>You think the rockets to be betting on are in

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 3>order of importance, Alphabet and Video, Broadcom, Apple, Microsoft, But

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 3>how will that change as the application of AI comes.

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Thus far, it has all been about the AI infrastructure,

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 3>but there's going to have to be proof in the

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 3>putting the productivity. Are your science and tech fund going

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 3>to end up looking like healthcare companies, like financial companies,

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 3>like actually the users of this tech?

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think that's a great question.

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 8>And you know, often I think about where the economic

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 8>profit pools are are shifting or where is the second derivative,

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 8>like you know, accelerating too, and you've been right, like

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 8>you know, the last few years have been really heavy

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 8>infrastructure build outs and that's where a lot of the

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 8>companies have crewed.

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 6>A lot of value.

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 8>You think about you know, in video broadcom those have

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 8>been like you know examples, and then you're also seeing

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 8>the components that are going in this system like you know, memory,

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 8>hp M, you know, networking. Those companies are seeing a

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 8>lot of like traction and economic profit accruing there. And

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:21.719
<v Speaker 8>then I think the next space probably is on the

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 8>application layer, and so you know, there are large language

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 8>models like you know, TRAGBT andthropic, you know, XAI that

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 8>are all working on this, and so yeah, I think

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 8>it's going to be exciting, and I think you might

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 8>even see some you know previously you know, viewed as

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 8>kind of on the wrong side of AI, like perhaps

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 8>be able to capture value. I think there's software companies

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 8>that have kind of been written off here in enterprise

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 8>that you know, if you're a fortunate by grant companies,

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 8>often you're going to go to your software vendor once

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 8>you figured out, you know, what play you want to

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 8>implement AI. So I think that there could be you know,

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 8>new companies that form on application were but there could

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 8>also be incumbents that are now leveraging AI seeing the

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 8>compute costs go down and you know, the capabilities and

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 8>models be more domain specific. So I think it's an

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 8>exciting time to be in technology. It's constantly evolving, and

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 8>I think that there will be also great opportunities you

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 8>know that we don't think about right now.

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, you're in some of the software play, in particular salesforce,

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 3>which has been a bit beaten up for perhaps being

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 3>not at the typical sphere of things AI in terms

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 3>of the monetization. But where's really been monetizing has been

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 3>the picks and shovels and memory of late. You just

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 3>mentioned memory, we've got Micron after the bell. Are you

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 3>feeling positive about how much more we're seeing price strength

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 3>from these sorts of companies.

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, we're definitely on an upward trajectory and memory prices.

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 8>So I think what's going on there is that HPM,

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 8>the stuff that goes into these GPUs and AI systems,

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 8>you know, they soak up a lot of way for

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 8>capacity and so as a results, creating shortage is in

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 8>broader dram and then also that's great shortages in broader

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.959
<v Speaker 8>land and so that you're seeing list ripple effect into

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 8>other areas like sand disks for example, I've seen, you know,

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 8>tremendous appreciation of their stock price.

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 6>So yeah, I think that there will be.

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 8>These areas where you know, the economic product can be

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 8>distributed to even more that didn't participate as much over

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 8>the last few years.

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 3>What's really interesting and correct me if I'm wrong, But

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 3>I've gone to the bluemog terminal. I've looked at the

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 3>members that make up your fund. Lambing private company is

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 3>in there. You of course, of course a tro price

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 3>know the opportunity there is in these crossover financings and

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 3>the desire there is for private companies and exposure to it.

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 2>So are you going to be.

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Seeing these companies going public? You're looking more for private

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 3>holdings as well as public.

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, thanks for asking about that.

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 8>You know, at Hero, I think whatever our biggest competitive

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 8>avantages that we are you know, both public and we're

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 8>also one of the biggest financers in the private markets,

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 8>and so we partnered up with lamb Uh. You know,

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 8>I think that they've got a really interesting cloud stat

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 8>that is unique, and they're on the right side change

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 8>of building these data centers really on you know, to

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 8>what you would want a true AI data center to

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 8>be like, so without a lot of the baggages that

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 8>you would have to hold in traditional compute and so,

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 8>you know, I think the future is bright for them.

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 8>The team's executing extremely well and excited that you know,

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 8>they continue to progress, you know in terms of you know,

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 8>timing on public markets, like I think that they'll do

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 8>it when they're ready.

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 3>We'll keep an eye on Lambda and the executive team

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 3>over there as well. Turny On he's portfolio manager at

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 3>t Rowe Price Science and Technology Fund Public private. We

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 3>went everywhere mean while coming up the bidding battle for

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Warner Brothers Reaching across Roads.

0:15:44.160 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 2>That's up next is a Blomberg Tech Discovery.

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 3>It is urging its shareholders to reject the Paramount's Guide

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 3>dounce takeover bid, favoring its original agreement with Netflix, and

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Meg's Michelle Davis joins us. Now in the latest we're

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 3>seeing the market reaction Paramounts guideounce off by four and

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 3>a half percent. Now, so what is the thesis of

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Warner Brothers Discovery is why the thirty dollars. Paramount is

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 3>not living up to what's been offered elsewhere.

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 9>So what Warner Brothers is saying is they reviewed the

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 9>Paramount thirty.

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Dollars a share offer.

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 9>It's the same offer that Paramount had offered them two

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 9>weeks ago when the board already deliberated and decided to

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 9>go with Netflix. And in some ways they're saying this offer,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 9>the tender offer, is worse than what was initially offered.

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 9>The logic is they don't view it as certain as

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 9>the deal they already have signed with Netflix. And part

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 9>of that has to do with the fact that Paramount

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 9>has lined up okay, fifty four billion dollars of debt,

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 9>but they also are going to need forty billion dollars

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 9>of equity. And as detailed in this one hundred page

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 9>filing that came out today, Warner Brothers' board says that

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 9>they tried multiple time to get the Ellisons to make

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 9>basically a personal commitment personally backstop the equity commitment, but they,

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 9>so Warner Brothers said, refuse to do that. They're using

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 9>a revocable trust to backstop the commitment, which Warner brother

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 9>says is risky. You know, assets could be moved in

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 9>and out of it. What they want is something that

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 9>looks a little bit more like what Elon Musk did

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 9>in the Twitter deal, which, if you remember, helped Twitter

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 9>close that deal when Musk tried to back out of it.

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean fascinating that everywhere in our show, it's questioning

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 3>of Larry Ellison's financing for various things at the moment,

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 3>whether it's his son's bid for Warner Brother's Discovery, or

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 3>whether it's his financing for future Oracle Data Center leases.

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting though, also that others have been pulling back

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 3>on the potential financing. Talk to us about what's happening

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 3>with Jared Kushner's Affinity.

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 9>So yesterday we reported that Jared Kushner's Affinity was pulling

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 9>out of the equity commitment or the backing of the

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 9>Paramount bid in this kind of underscored some of the

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 9>concern that the Warner Brothers board has around where all

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 9>the equity is coming from, because Paramount has said that

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 9>it's lined up, you know, sovereign wealth funds across the

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 9>Middle East as well as Affinity as well as others

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 9>to back the funding. And if those are falling through,

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 9>what does that mean. It's also interesting because Kushner's involvement

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 9>there had been seen as maybe something that would help

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 9>Paramount clinch this if you know, he is the ally

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 9>to Trump, that Paramount needs to get this through regulators

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 9>without him there. I mean, it remains to be seen

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 9>what that means. Warner Brothers has said that actually they

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 9>view both the Paramount deal and the Netflix deal as

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 9>on equal footing from a regulatory perspective.

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 2>They say both.

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 9>Can get through and we don't see any you know,

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 9>marginal risk or difference between the two of them, and

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 9>so it's kind of a moot point.

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess we'll.

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 3>See how the formal rejection of Paramount software continues in

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 3>this unfolding story.

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Quite the drama. Michelle Davis covering it all for us.

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 2>We thank you.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Now let's turn our attention back to large language models

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 3>for a minute, because Google is rolling out a more efficient,

0:18:58.640 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 3>more affordable version.

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 2>It was my powerful AI model across its products.

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 3>The company announcing today the release of Gemini three Flash,

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 3>and this comes just one month after the release of

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Gemini three Pro, which reasserted its leadership in the AI race.

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Since then, of course, opening I declared a quote code

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 3>read and pushed out a new version of its flagship

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.959
<v Speaker 3>GPT five model, as well as an updated image generation

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 3>model to trankey pace for Google AI's offerings. Tesla it's

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 3>facing a thirty day ban on car sales in California,

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 3>the biggest US market. State regulators say the company's ads

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 3>well they've misled consumers about its self driving technology. Tesla's

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 3>lawyers insisted that the ads were protected speech.

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Now a judge back the DMV's complaint.

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 3>The auto maker has ninety days to appeal or comply

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 3>before the band take effects, and Tesla has worn the

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 3>ban could have major consequences for the business. It Shares

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.120
<v Speaker 3>have been on a tear before today. They hit your

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 3>all time high yesterday. Today we just pulled back some

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 3>almost three percent lower. Now, turning to other autoe news,

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Weimo is in talks to raise more than fifteen billion

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 3>dollars at evaluation that could exceed one hundred billion.

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 2>It's all according to sources.

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 3>Now the robotaxi maker has discussed raising billions in equity

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 3>from external backers as well as it's parent company, Alphabet.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's get the details. Some pretty bags. Sarah Fry, who

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 2>helped break this story.

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 3>And really we're starting to see the race being on

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.360
<v Speaker 3>one hundred billion or in excess of is a lot

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 3>more than what it was previously valued back in twenty

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty four.

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 10>And really those numbers, I mean in the AI race,

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 10>they seem they seem equivalent to what we're seeing from

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 10>you know, opening eye and found that there is a

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 10>really big hope here for these companies in Weimo. The

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 10>difference is it has a product that is changeable. People

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 10>are using it.

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 6>People are.

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 10>Taking their waymos around San Francisco right around you know,

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 10>see them outside by my window all the time as

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 10>regular transportation options. It is real happening in many cities

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 10>throughout the US right now, and I think that that

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 10>is why they need so much money. This is a

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 10>very expensive business. This is a business that's going to

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 10>require a lot of capital to expand into other cities

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 10>and also other types of roads right like freeways and.

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 6>More rural areas. I don't know.

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 10>How quickly that's going to roll out, but we are

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 10>seeing some international expansion in the next few months as well.

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 10>So it's a very big moment for wave Land, for

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 10>Alphabet and.

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Your revenue run right you are reporting is above three

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty million dollars. Tell us just very briefly

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 3>the Alphabet relationship here, they are being able to go

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 3>to external capital.

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 10>I've gotten a lot of questions about this because people

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 10>are like, wait, isn't it way more part of Alphabet?

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 10>But Alphabet is investing in them. What's going on here?

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 10>So it's one of Alphabet's so called other bets. That's

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 10>the division that includes these We previously thought of them

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 10>as moons companies like Verily, the life science company, Weimo

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 10>and Ruth Porrat under her leadership, has tried to make

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 10>this a more financially financially safe and smart find the business.

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 10>She's encouraging spin out, she's encouraging independence, and so Weimo

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 10>is getting a lot of external support as well. And

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 10>that idea is yes.

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 2>I have to leave it there.

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Sarah on all the news to do with Weymo, Congratulations

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 3>on the scoop with a Blue bag Tech.

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Blue bag Tech.

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 3>We check in on these markets that have some anxiety

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 3>baked into them at the moment. When it comes to

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 3>the financing of the AI spend. Still the question of

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 3>bubble lingers. We're off by one point two percent on

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 3>the NASTAC one hundred.

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>We're looking at some.

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Of the biggest draws in terms of the overall points perspective.

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 3>And look, we've got Sea of Read and Videos off

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 3>by three point seven percent. When you're worth four trillion dollars.

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 3>That matters to an overall benchmark.

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 2>We've perhaps got some competition.

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Coming if open Ai does indeed start using Trainium over

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 3>an Amazon.

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 2>A key story for US today.

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Broadcom once again under pressure, this time by almost five percent.

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Remember it had been sort of hard since its earnings.

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 3>We see it now at three hundred and twenty four.

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Micron has its earnings after the bell, or two and

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 3>a half percent ahead of that number. But we're expecting

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent growth in revenue for this business as it's

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 3>and managing to really capitalize a memory and the price

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 3>of We'll dig into that in a minute, but for

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 3>now we focus in on what's happening with Oracle. We're

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 3>down by five percent once again. There is concerns about

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 3>how Oracle is financing its big pivot into the world

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 3>of cloud computing, the data centers, the leases, and indeed

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 3>whether Blue Owl is able to be able to financing

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 3>the latest one over in what's happening in Michigan. Let's

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 3>talk about it with Manup saying Blue Mega Intelligence, Global

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 3>head of Tech Research, And we are again questioning Oracle's

0:23:55.880 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 3>capacity to get into this data leasing pivot. Are you

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 3>worried about some of the intricacies. Look, the reporting from

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg is that Oracle is still going ahead with the

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Michigan project. It's not being delayed from a financing perspective,

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 3>it's just not blew out behind it.

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, And look, I think a lot of it is

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 11>around what kind of open Ai run rate will we

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 11>see in twenty twenty eight, twenty twenty nine, because you know,

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 11>we're talking about build out of data center infrastructure for

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 11>things that are going to go live, you know, in

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 11>twenty twenty eight, twenty twenty nine. And that's where investors

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 11>who are funding this do they have the patience to

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 11>wait for revenues to show up, you know, three years out.

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 11>I mean, in the case of Oracle, had the backlog

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 11>not been skewed to open Ai, I don't think there

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 11>would be as much anxiety.

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 5>But because open ai seems to.

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 11>Be losing its lead when it comes to, you know,

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 11>the model provider race, and now Gemini and Tropic Xai.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 5>They all seem to have caught up.

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 11>And that's where the anxiety seems to be stemming from.

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 11>Is are you better off just you know, focusing on

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 11>one LLM provider when you know it's going to be

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 11>a race where you know, four or five providers are.

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 5>Neck and neck.

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 11>And if they diversify that you know, exposure in terms

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 11>of having someone else like Xai use Oracle capacity, then

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 11>I think that may calm down that anxiety.

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 5>But for now, I.

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 11>Think that's one thing and the other thing is training

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 11>versus inferencing. I mean, if Oracle is more exposed to

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 11>training workloads, then you have to ask yourself how much

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 11>ROI will open Ai have with training the next version

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 11>of their model, which is going to cost a lot more,

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 11>but will it have the kind of returns that everyone

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 11>expects in terms of the model intelligence and how much

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 11>they're going to get out of that next training run.

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 11>So no one wants to underwrite, you know, training workloads,

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 11>which is why Microsoft refused that to begin with, and

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 11>all that open Ai business went to Oracle. And now

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 11>I think market is putting a question around why they

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 11>should be funding Oracle because training is not someone something

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 11>that you know, everyone is keen to invest in right now,

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 11>because I mean, training costs will plateau and it's just

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 11>a question of when, not if, and we don't know

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 11>when it's going to happen.

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 3>There's also the question of what chips you can use

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 3>for training, and we're questioning in videos dominance at the

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.479
<v Speaker 3>same time. What's so interesting, though, is the more we

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 3>peel away the layers of the onion, more we understand

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 3>what this data center financing looks like and a lot

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 3>of it.

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 2>We all talked about capital expenditure.

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 3>From all these big cloud companies, but actually we've got

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 3>to look off balance sheet and we've got to look

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 3>to ten Q reports with Oracle, how much is that

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 3>being sacked in by equity investors as well as debt investors.

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 11>I mean even a Meta is looking to finance stuff

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 11>off balance sheets.

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 5>So that's about to yeah, exactly.

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 11>So that's where you know, all these companies don't want

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 11>to take too much debt. In fact, part of the

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 11>reason why Oracles equity seems to be going down is

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 11>everyone is thinking maybe they should be you know, raising

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 11>this money. Why raise everything using debt? And so that's

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 11>where you know they're going to be creative, and sometimes

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 11>you have to course correct. I mean, if look, the

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 11>CDs spreads keep expanding and the market is now ready

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 11>to fund it, maybe Oracle may have to bring down

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 11>its ambitions in terms of you know, how much they

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 11>are will be looking to build because all this is

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 11>for future capacity. I mean, if you have capacity right now,

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 11>you know the new clouds are doing well, Coreviv has

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 11>a nice backlog and your supply constrained. So the question

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 11>is will that demand pattern remain for the next three

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 11>to five years, And if it does, then Oracle will

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 11>be fine.

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 5>It's just a question of you know how much training

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 5>needs these model providers will have.

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 11>And how much are you going to make from the

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 11>next version of the model training. Is it really worth

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 11>the ROI in terms of spending five x on the

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 11>next training run when things seem to be closing down

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 11>when it comes to all these frontier models. At the end,

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.919
<v Speaker 11>it comes down to who has the lead when it

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 11>comes to models and or a while it was just

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 11>open Ai Mandy saying.

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 3>Of Blue Meg Intelligence the breakdown there. Let's focus in

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 3>on some earnings after the Bell Micron schedule to report

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 3>first quarter fiscal first quarture results and Alicus expect the

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 3>chip make it to benefit from strong pricing trends. Let's

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 3>get to Kim Forest, Boca Capital Partners, CIO. We're all

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 3>ahead of these numbers, but a lot of optimism baked

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 3>into Micron and memory makers.

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 12>Right now, absolutely, and the price shows it. And there

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 12>is a pattern to Micron's earnings right that, oh maybe

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 12>a month before people and it's probably in reaction to

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 12>Micron's customers talking about, you know, what they're buying from

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 12>Micron the stock generally and when things are good, this

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 12>is a very cyclical stock. But when things are good,

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 12>things are very very good for Micron, and I think

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 12>in a short term things are going to be really

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 12>really good for Micron, But often the stock sells off

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 12>right after just because of that build up that has happened,

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 12>and you know, in the recent past.

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 3>So I mean today kim stalks up one hundred and

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 3>sixty eight percent, So we've got a little bit of

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 3>a dip into the earnings. It's kind of nothing in

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 3>terms of its performance, But what are you looking for

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 3>after the bell in terms of signals that the strength

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 3>is there and that we don't keep questioning the AI

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 3>bubble as we know it.

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 12>So there are very few providers of the big product

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 12>that AI once, which is high bandwidth memory DRAM, and

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 12>there's only two other players in the market. Micron has

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 12>had a nice lead. The other players are coming up,

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 12>but it looks like for at least the foreseeable future,

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 12>infinite demand is there for this product. And I'm teasing, Okay,

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 12>I don't really believe it's infinity, but it's a very

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 12>high demand. So we would like to know what that's doing.

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 12>And you can see how Micron is shifting away from

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 12>its older products and it's more consumer related nand device

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 12>is They announced, you know, one of their longtime franchises,

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 12>they're going to be closing that in favor of putting

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 12>all its effort behind d rams.

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 5>So that's what I'm looking.

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 12>For, is what is the Why do they have that

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 12>confidence and why should we as shareholders, you know, go

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 12>along with the ride.

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Because right now there is shaky confidence around certain names

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 3>about the AIF structure buildout. Do you have shaky confidence

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 3>about certain newer players to cloud newer areas and data centers.

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 12>Well, this is going to sound like a Miss America

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 12>kind of speech. I have a real I know AI

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 12>is going to work out. I just don't know how

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 12>The large language models seem to be consumers of tons

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 12>of bandwidth, which you talked about on your last segment

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 12>or not, you know, computing power.

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 6>Not bandwidth.

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 5>But I don't know that that goes on.

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 12>Forever because this whole scaling thing where just throw more

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 12>compute power at it seems like the brute force method

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 12>and it's not very computer science. We like to think.

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 12>I'm an ex practitioner. We like to think rather than

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 12>just you know, build. So I'm thinking that breakthroughs in

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 12>the design of these things are going to help out

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 12>and may make a lot of the demand that we

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 12>assume is there for hardware not irrelevant, but not infinite.

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Well to that point, we've seen what China has been

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 3>forced to do because it can't just throw ever more

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 3>compute at the situation, doesn't have access in terms of

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 3>supply chain, what about micron zone ability to the global

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 3>opportunity here, And they're exposed to China in some ways.

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 12>Sure, I mean it is a concern because we don't

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 12>really want to allow them to sell the really good

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 12>stuff into China because of military issues. And well, just

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 12>you know leadership, but that we're capitalist society, so some

0:31:55.560 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 12>of that kind of has to get pushed aside and

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 12>we let companies work throughout the world. That is a concern,

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 12>But right now, for the foreseeable future, let's say eighteen

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 12>months to thirty six months, there doesn't look to be

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 12>another breakthrough other than scaling, and it looks like, all

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 12>things being equal, that scaling is the path forward, especially

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 12>for large language models. So it unless information comes to

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 12>life tonight, it looks like the companies that are offering

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 12>products to these big data centers are going to continue

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 12>to have their products very much in demand.

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's interesting, So we're trying to understand how much

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.239
<v Speaker 3>Nvidia is still in demand at the same time as

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 3>an Amazon builds out as trainium, as the same time

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 3>as TPUs come to the forward alphabet, and indeed broadcoms

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 3>used for a six What do you make of where

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 3>if they can all win?

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think they can all win because the training, training,

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 12>test and validation are parts of this prot and they

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 12>can better use different hardware setups. So I think that

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 12>there's a place for everyone. What you're trying to figure

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 12>out is how much of a place for each one

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 12>of these items. I think competition always makes it better

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 12>for the end consumer. And I'm not talking about the

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 12>people using lms. I'm talking about the people building LMS now.

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 12>So I am very heartened to see that the leadership

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 12>of Nvidia isn't overshadowing everybody else with an idea. I

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 12>think it's also kind of interesting just from a performance standpoint,

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 12>that companies like Google and Amazon have been able to

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 12>quickly come out with something that's very usable, and we

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 12>all had the assumption maybe eighteen months ago that that

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 12>was you know, the horse was out of the barn

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 12>and over the hill and you know, so far away,

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 12>and video was.

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 5>The clear winner.

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 12>So actually I love it as a capitalist.

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Kim Forrest a poker Capital Partners Capitals in the name,

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate it. Fintech startup Imprint Payments has reached evaluation

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 3>of one point two billion dollars, the company that helps

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 3>retailers offer co branding credit cards. It's brought in one

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty million dollars in a new funding round

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 3>there by. Coast Adventures CEO Darra Murphy joins us now

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 3>for more, what are you using the one hundred and

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 3>fifty million for dollar.

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 13>Hey Carl, and great to see you. Thanks for having

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 13>me at in Print. Our bet has been the same

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 13>since we started the company five years ago. We want

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 13>to be the modern co branded credit card and loyalty

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 13>platform for the world's great brands, and we've raised as

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 13>capitals to allow us to double down on that strategy.

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 13>Our bet was relatively simple, and we started the company

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 13>that the world's biggest banks weren't building good enough experience

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 13>for great brands to launch co branded credit cards.

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 6>And that's been true.

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 13>And what you see is we've taken a siloed experience

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:55.839
<v Speaker 13>that used to live in the banks app and put

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 13>it at the heart of our partner's experience. And so

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 13>when you open our partners app or you open their website,

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 13>you can engage with the card, you can pay your bill,

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:07.720
<v Speaker 13>you can check your balance, and that puts you one tap,

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 13>one click away from buying your next bag of groceries

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 13>and book your next flight. And for our partners, that

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.280
<v Speaker 13>has meant huge increases in lifetime value. It's why brands

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 13>like Booking dot Com, Raku, ten create and Barrel or

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 13>choosing in Print over legacy banks, and why we continue

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 13>to focus on this mission with the money we've raised, a.

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Mission that is actually incubated in Thrive Capital. They participate

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 3>in this round RIBTDG, Klaneperkins, Spice.

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Capital, and the Likedara.

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 3>But I've sort of got a bigger question of just

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 3>how many of these credit cards am I going to

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 3>have or even in debit card that you're looking at now?

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Am I as an individual going to have a Booking

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 3>dot Com one and a Racutin one and I'm going

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 3>to have a turkishare line?

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 2>At what point do I become exhausted with all the offerings.

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 13>Well, what you see is we're working with partners that

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 13>demand a lot of share of wallet from their customers.

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 13>Right like, if you think about Booking dot Com, they're

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 13>winning against airlines, they're winning against hotel companies, and customers

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 13>are going there to book the full trip experience. And

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 13>so by partnering with Booking or by partnering with Bracketen,

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 13>that's taking such a large share of online commerce for customers.

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 13>We end up being a meaning meaningful share of each

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 13>customer's what and so you're able to give them rewards

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:16.240
<v Speaker 13>for a huge portion of they're spent. We would agree

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 13>that very small, fractual brands probably don't need credit cards.

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 13>But more and more we partner with brands that are

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 13>parallel winners in their categories. They're winning in all of

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 13>e comm, they're winning in all of travel, and so

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 13>we get to give customers way more value for a

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 13>bigger portion of their wallet, and so more and more

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 13>customers sign up for that benefit rather than thinking I'm

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 13>going to have fifty versions of a credit card.

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Now and do the inevitable AI question. But I imagine

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.399
<v Speaker 3>a lawful lot of this is about personalization, understanding where

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 3>my next offering or next purchase is coming from, making

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 3>sure you're meeting me where I am at. So how

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 3>much are you looking at AIAI, how much you're having

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 3>to hire an AI.

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, we think about it as kind of two sides

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 13>of the coin, right. One is the customer experience that

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 13>you've mentioned, and one is how we build the company

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 13>on customer experience. Automation and ail I let us personalize

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.760
<v Speaker 13>how much rewards you get, how we talk to the customer,

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 13>how the experience even shape shifts for the customer, and

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:08.839
<v Speaker 13>more and more investing in that.

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 6>So it feels.

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 13>Radically different to anything that a bank has ever provided

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 13>in the past for these brands or free these customers.

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 13>The really interesting thing, and maybe it's not as apparent

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 13>under the surface, is we get to rebuild what looks

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 13>like a financial company or even a fintech in the

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 13>time of automation and AI and so over the last year,

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 13>we've grown the business by almost three hundred percent. We've

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 13>grown headcount by twenty percent. At every turn, we get

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 13>to choose, are we going to build a new team

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 13>here or are we going to invest in technology and

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 13>automation so we don't have to hire a team of people.

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 13>We can actually scale the company. We're using technology, which

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 13>is an amazing opportunity that I don't think anybody has

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 13>ever had.

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:49.920
<v Speaker 3>So I imagine that one hundred and fifty million dollars

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 3>doesn't actually go that much on talent. It goes more

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 3>on the marketing of your product. And what does it

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 3>double down on in particular?

0:37:57.600 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, three things.

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 13>One is we continue to grow, right, so we obviously

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 13>continue to market to customers, but we're not burning all

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 13>this capital. If you think about the market we're in,

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 13>big brands can choose one hundred year old banks, or

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 13>they can choose Imprint. If you choose one hundred year

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 13>old bank, you probably sleep really well at night. If

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 13>you choose a relatively new company, maybe you worry a

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 13>little more. And so we just want to be very

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 13>well capitalized to make that choice easy. BOOKO two is

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 13>more financial products. We have the credit card today that

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 13>serves many of the brands customers, but depending on your

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 13>financial life, you don't want a credit card. Maybe you

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 13>want to debit card with more rewards, So more of

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 13>those products. And then the last thing is, as we've

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 13>talked about, how do we build a company using automation

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 13>and AI and scale without headcount, which is an amazing

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 13>opportunity relative relative to where we would have been ten

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:45.320
<v Speaker 13>years ago. You see public company FinTechs today with thousands

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:47.760
<v Speaker 13>and thousands of employees. We get to make a decision

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 13>every time do we hire or do we build? And

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 13>more and more we get to build.

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Dara Murphy in Print CEO, fascinating talking to congratulations on

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 3>the funding round.

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Thank you coming up.

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 3>After burning through more than one billion dollars a space

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 3>startup with turning to a tech veteran more on relativities,

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:11.320
<v Speaker 3>say that again, relativity spaces new CEO Serah Schmidt.

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 2>This is going to beg tech. It's time now for

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:33.439
<v Speaker 2>talking tech.

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 3>First up, China's PDD Holding. It's creator of e commerce

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 3>site Temo. Of course, it's fired dozens of workers following

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:43.880
<v Speaker 3>a fistfight between employees and Chinese regulators. And that's according

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 3>to sources. Two fights occurred during a government visit to

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 3>investigate claims of fortulent e commerce deliveries. Class chip startup

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:53.399
<v Speaker 3>Mythic Well, it's raised one hundred and twenty five million

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:55.879
<v Speaker 3>dollars to support its efforts to challenge Nvidia.

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Take a look at some of the investors.

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Mythics Tech relies on analog chips with far less power

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 3>consumption than the traditional brains of a computer, and sticking

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 3>with chip maker shares, China's metax jump at least seven

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent on their first trading date is the latest

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 3>outsize market debut by Chinese chip maker, as investors really

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 3>beanning on the domestic firms that could become viable competitors

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 3>to Nvidia.

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Now, let's talk about another startup, Relativity Space.

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 3>It's set out to revolutionize the rocket industry with three

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 3>D printing, but it burnt through more than a billion

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 3>dollars and his big idea hasn't exactly planned out. Now

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:35.240
<v Speaker 3>the company is turning to form a Google boss, Eric Schmidt,

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 3>and an eight hundred million dollar fresh funding round from

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 3>him to turn around. The company has get more on

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 3>this Suppoomberg Space reporter Lauren grush So a new exec

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:46.840
<v Speaker 3>same thesis, still three D printing of rockets.

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:52.839
<v Speaker 14>Now unfortunately that seems to have been changed and now

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:56.800
<v Speaker 14>the company is much more focused on traditional manufacturing, which,

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 14>as you said, it's a far cry from what they

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 14>started as, which was supposed to be this SpaceX disruptor

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 14>that was going to revolutionize manufacturing rockets with three D printing.

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:11.480
<v Speaker 14>But what we found after months and months of reporting

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 14>is that they were really struggling with the three D

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 14>printing technology for a while, and over time they started

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 14>to slowly incorporate more traditional manufacturing into the process, so

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 14>much to the point that three D printing is barely

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 14>involved in the rocket making process anymore.

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 3>All this sort of speaks there for more to Eric

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Schmidt's commitment that we've seen of late, of competition versus

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 3>China and supply chain and defense space tech. But have

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 3>you heard exactly why he's decided to take the CEO role.

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:47.399
<v Speaker 14>The overwhelming theory in what he has also hinted out

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 14>on social media is that he purchased Relativity for a

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 14>trend that we've actually been hearing out about a lot lately,

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:57.280
<v Speaker 14>putting data centers into space.

0:41:57.320 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 6>So you might have heard.

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 14>That from CEO SpaceX, CEO Elon Musk or Blue Origin

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:06.879
<v Speaker 14>or Blue Orange and founder Jeff Bezos, because they've also

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 14>talked about putting data centers in space, and so it

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:11.720
<v Speaker 14>seems that Eric Schmidt also has that plan as well.

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 14>There might be some other things that he's cooking up

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 14>that he'd like to do with a rocket company, but

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 14>so far that seems to be the prevailing reason the

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 14>he bought this and.

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 3>We're now looking at, well, his fortune fifty two billion dollars,

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 3>He has money to put to work into this, so

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 3>this is his own bet on space yees.

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 14>So he was actually keeping the company aflow for a

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 14>little while, and then he is, so far, from what

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:40.720
<v Speaker 14>we've learned, has invested a substantial portrait of money into

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 14>this company. And then we've also heard that the company

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:47.319
<v Speaker 14>is potentially fundraising again, so they're actually going out to

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 14>high net worth investors to see if they want to

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 14>be a part of the company. So it looks like

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:56.400
<v Speaker 14>they actually do want to grow and maybe have big plans.

0:42:56.680 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 14>But yes, for a while now he has been injecting

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:01.840
<v Speaker 14>a lot of into this endeavor.

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Long grush for the latest space startup to keep an

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:05.360
<v Speaker 3>eye on.

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much. Indeed, now that does it for

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 2>this edition of Bloomberg Tech. Do not forget to check

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:12.320
<v Speaker 2>out our podcast. You can find it on the Terminal,

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Blows online on Apple.

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Spotify, and iHeart or continue on the theme of Oracle

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 3>of financing of data centers throughout the shows from New York.

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:22.919
<v Speaker 2>This is Blomberg Tech.