WEBVTT - The Macintosh Story Part 3

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Technology with tech Stuff from dot com. Hey thereon Welcome

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland, senior writer

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>for how Stuff Works dot com. And today we're gonna

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 1>try and wrap up the grand saga that is the

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>history of the Macintosh computer. This is part three of

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that series, and it's going to be a little shorter

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>than parts one and two, because, honestly, once we get

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>toward the end of this saga, really all that I

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>would be saying is how the next generation of the

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh is x amount more powerful than the last generation,

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and just kind of being a specs podcast, and that's

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>not really interesting to me. I really want to talk

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>about the big innovations, the big changes, the big design

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>implementations that have happened throughout the course of Apple's line

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of Macintosh computers, rather than just be a laundry list

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of all the specifications of every mac that has ever

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>ever come out. That would just be boring and I

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do that. So if you don't remember,

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Part one of this series covered the people responsible for

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>launching the first Macintosh, which came out in nineteen eighty four.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.839
<v Speaker 1>The second part largely focused on the mac from about

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty five up through the point where Steve Jobs

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>returned to Apple. So between five and nine seven Steve

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Jobs was effectively forced out of the company he had

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>co founded, and then in nineteen seven he returned to Apple.

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So this third part we're going to pick back up

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>right around that time, which requires me to do a

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>little backtracking just so that we're all on this on

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the same page. So it's nineteen seven. Uh. The Apple

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>CEO at the time, at the big getting of was

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Gil Emilio, and he was in charge during the time

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>where Apple started looking at developing the next generation of

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>operating systems. It had been developing operating systems in house,

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to develop a brand new operating system for the

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:24.119
<v Speaker 1>power PC microchip as a a partnership with Motorola and IBM.

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>It became known as the AIM project because it was Apple, UH,

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>IBM and Motorola, and it was meant to be a

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 1>competitor to Intel and the Windows operating system. And how

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>well that partnership was working, UH, they were looking at

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>acquiring a company in order to get a new operating

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>system on board, and they were looking at two different

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>companies that were each founded by a different former member

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Apple team. One of those two companies was

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>called Next. Next was a company that Steve Jobs founded

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>after he had left Apple. Uh. He was trying to

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>create a new computer standard, a new type of computer

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>for the educational industry, and Next was the computer system

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 1>he developed. It was not really a super success. It

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>was modest in its successes. It was a very expensive machine. Again,

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 1>like many of the stories I've told about the Macintosh,

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>not only was it expensive, but it was hard to

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>get developers to make software for it. So it was

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>not a bad idea. It just didn't have a lot

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of support and it was really expensive, so it didn't

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>get a huge number of of of purchases out there. Well.

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple acquired Next, and as a result, they also kind

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of acquired Steve Jobs. He came along with the the company.

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Jobs would then convince the board of directors that Amelio

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>needed to go. I mean, he had led the charge

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>about acquiring Next, but he had also of made some

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>decisions that Steve Jobs viewed as being incredibly negative for

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the health of Apple as a company. Apple stocks were

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>at a twelve year low when Gil Emilio was CEO.

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>The board agreed with Steve Jobs and removed Gil Emilio

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.799
<v Speaker 1>from the position of CEO, and then Steve Jobs essentially

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>became the CEO of Apple, although originally he was just

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>called the interim CEO. He would later become the permanent CEO,

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>but in the meantime he was the interim CEO, which

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>would mean that he was just keeping the seat warm

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>for somebody else. It just turned out he was keeping

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:43.799
<v Speaker 1>the seat warm for himself. He didn't turn the company

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>around instantly, but he did get to work right away.

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>The day after he was named interim CEO of Apple,

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>he launched a new project that would really pay off

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>at and that was the iMac uh. He started that

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the day at September seven. He started that iMac project,

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>so he didn't waste any time once he stepped into

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that role. Now was also the year that Apple decided

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>to rename the operating system for the Macintosh. If you

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>remember in our last episode, they had started calling the

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>operating system a pretty simple name. The name was System,

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>So the first mac operating system was just System one

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>point oh. The last version of System using this naming

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:35.119
<v Speaker 1>style was System seven point five point five or seven

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>dot five dot five. Of you prefer starting with version

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>seven dot six, they decided to rename it and they

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>went with Mac OS eight. Now, what's more, this version

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of the operating system wasn't compatible with the Mac Plus.

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>It was the first of the operating systems that Apple

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>had designed that would not work on the old Mac

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Plus computer. If you remember, Mac Plus was the longest

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>lived Macintosh on the market. It had been developed by

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 1>Apple and manufactured for four years. That's a long time

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.239
<v Speaker 1>in the computer business to keep making the same model

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of computer. But the they had stopped making Mac Plus

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is for a long time. They just continued to support

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>it by developing operating systems that could still run on

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a Mac Plus. You just would update your Mac Plus

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to the latest operating system and you're good to go. Well,

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Mac OS eight was the first operating system that would

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>not run on a Mac Plus. So this was sort

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of the mark of Mac Plus marching into the sunset.

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>It was over. It was an obsolete form at that point.

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:42.679
<v Speaker 1>You could run old stuff on it, but you couldn't

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>run anything new on it. Now you might wonder why

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>they changed the name of the operating system from system

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to mac OS And I'll explain that in just a minute.

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>But another thing that Apple discontinued continued at this point

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 1>was it's licensing program, or at least it really change

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that licensing program that had been rather disastrous for Apple

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years. So what had happened

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>was Apple had, before Steve Jobs came back on board,

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple had started to license out its technology to other

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>computer manufacturers, which meant that other companies could make computers

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that were Mac compatible. Essentially, they were called Mac clones,

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and there were several companies that were doing this, and

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>they were making cheaper versions of Macintosh hardware. It was

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in a totally different form factor. It didn't look the

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>way a Macintosh looked, but it ran Macintosh operating systems

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and programs. So you could go out and buy a

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>clone from one of these companies that was fully licensed.

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>They were they were not breaking the law or anything,

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and you could run that Mac operating system and software

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>on your Mac clone for much less money than it

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>would cost for you to buy an official Macintosh, which

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>meant that ultimately Apple was undercutting its own sales. Why

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>why would you go out and buy an official Apple

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Mac if you could get a comparable system for much

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>less money somewhere else. Steve Jobs didn't really care for this.

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>He thought it was a terrible idea, and so he

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to renegotiate all those licensing agreements. So once the

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>term was coming up, you wanted to renegotiate where the

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>royalty fees would be much higher, so that every sale

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of a macclone would guarantee Apple a certain percentage of

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the revenue. Now, of course, that doesn't make the manufacturing

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>companies all that eager to sign a new agreement. It

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>means cutting into their profit margin, and it would mean

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that they would have to start raising the prices of

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>their computers to regain that lost profit margin. But that

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>would mean that the higher price computers would be in

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>direct competition with the Apple computers. It would just mean

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tough decisions on the part of these

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>licensed companies. So there was a lot of resistance on that,

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's when Steve Jobs decided to really make a move.

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You see, the agreement that they Apple had with these

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>clone companies was that they could continue to make clones

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of Mac computers as long as they were in the

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>system seven range. If they were in that system seven range,

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>then you could continue to make mac clones. But once

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>they renamed the operating system from system to mac os

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that probably the agreement no longer was valid because it

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>was a different operating system at least in name. And

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what the agreement had said that as long as

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it was system, they could continue to make them. It

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>meant that all the macclone companies could not make the

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>most up to date version of the Macintosh. They couldn't

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>include the most the latest version of the operating system

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>without paying another hefty license fee, and as a result,

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>one by one these licensed companies began to get out

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of the macclone business, until by the middle of nineteen

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>none of them were doing it anymore. So within about

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a year Steve Jobs stopped this cloning program that was

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>going on from his predecessor. Now that, in in full

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty good decision, at least from a sales

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>perspective for Apple. Back in Apple had sold four and

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a half million MAX. So at four and a half

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>million MAX, but then it started this clone program where

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it began to license the technology to competitors, and in

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>nine sales of MAX dropped to four million units, so

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>five units fewer than a year before. Now, you never

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 1>want to see the number go down. When you are

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in a company, you always want that that graph to

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>go up into the right, not down into the right.

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a bad graph if you're in a sales department.

0:10:56.520 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>It was worse the following year in nine, and the

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>writing was on the wall because sales had dropped to

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>two point eight million units. So two point eight million

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>from four point five is awful now. To be fair,

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>there were other mitigating factors that were also affecting this.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>For example, Microsoft launched Windows five and that really affected

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>sales at the end of ninety five and throughout ninety

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>six and ninety seven. It was a very powerful operating system.

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It was much friendlier than previous versions of Windows. People said, oh,

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>this is more like what I expect from Apple, and

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>so people began to become more uh happy with Microsoft's

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>approach to a graphic user interface or gooey operating system.

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>So there were other factors besides the fact that there

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>were cheaper clones on the market than Apple computers. But

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>all of this together meant that UH getting rid of

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that clone program made sense, and that's exactly what Steve

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Jobs was able to do through this renegotiation process. And

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>then by changing the operating system name. Now I'm gonna

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>keep talking about Steve Jobs because his history and mac

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>history are so closely tied together. Remember, the Macintosh started

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>not as one of Steve jobs as projects. It was

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>an Apple project, but it wasn't headed by Steve Jobs.

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't until Steve Jobs was removed from a Lisa project,

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and then he decided to get involved with the Macintosh project.

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But from that point forward, the Macintosh was really affected

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>by Steve Jobs. Even when he was away from the company,

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his decisions would end up finding their

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>way into the Macintosh generation after generation. He made some

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>more big changes to Apple. In n For one thing,

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs shut down the Newton project. The Newton was

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a personal digital assistant that had become the butt of

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of jokes thanks to uh inconsistent, let's say,

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>imperfect design and implementation. It had a handwriting recognition feature

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that frequently did not work very well and was made

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>fun of on The Simpsons. Among other things, Steve Jobs

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>also decided to streamline the product lines in the computer

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and printer divisions. He started to eliminate some of the

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>types of computers they were selling. He thought that they

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>needed to refocus and start selling a more narrow band

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of computers and make sure that they got that right

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to selling a wide variety of computers that

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>are of varying degrees of quality. UH Now, one of

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the lines of computers that survived this process was the Mac.

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>He decided that the Mac had some value to it.

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 1>It did not need to be completely done away with

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>or replaced with some other name. He wanted to reinvigorate it,

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>but not to UH to completely scrap it and start over.

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So the biggest jump for Apple was the introduction of

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the iMac. This was a new attempt for Apple to

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>push into the consumer market in a really big way,

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and the basic iMac was a pretty decent machine for

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>its era. It had a two hundred thirty three Mega

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Hurts G three CPU, had thirty two megabytes of RAM,

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a four gigabyte hard drive, a CD ROM drive, and

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>an a t I rage to see graphics card with

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>two hold megabytes of video memory. Now, Apple originally stated

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that the iMac could support up to a hundred twenty

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>megabytes of RAM, which users could upgrade. So this was

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the times where you could actually boost the

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>performance of your machine by adding in extra memory to

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the device yourself, something that Apple would eventually get away

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>from to the point where if you wanted anything upgraded,

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you're really stuck. Often you don't have an option at

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>all unless you just go out and buy a new computer.

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Which I mean, if you're selling computers, if that's the

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>business you're in, if you could convince your users to

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>just buy a new computer every time they needed something

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a little more powerful, that's lucrative. If there's enough people

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>who will actually do it. Well, the iMac you could upgrade,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and again, Apple originally said that you could upgrade up

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to a hundred megabytes RAM, but people found out that

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you could actually upgrade it beyond that, depending upon the

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>RAM you bought, because not all RAM chips were compatible,

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>but some were, And in fact, some users found out

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that depending upon the chip they bought, they could get

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>up to five hundred and twelve megabyte modules working on

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>an iMac, which meant that you could get a maximum

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>amount of RAM of around a gigabyte. Now that was

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressive by standards. The computer and display of the

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>iMac were paired together, so the computer and display were

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>one big unit that you would plug a keyboard and

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>mouse into, and it looked a lot like a television set.

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>The display was a fifteen inch display. Uh, it did

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>not have the basic one anyway, did not have a

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>floppy disk drive. In fact, this marked a trend for

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple where it began to get away from including floppy

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>drives in their computers, and eventually other computer manufacturers began

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to follow suit and stopped including floppy drives in their machines.

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So this was the beginning of the end for the

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>floppy disk drive as a storage medium. It began to

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>go into obsolescence. But the display on the iMac was

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a cathode ray tube display, a CRT UM. I talked

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot about c r t s in the History

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of TV podcasts, So if you want to know how

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a cathode ray tube works, listen to my History of

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Television podcasts because I talked about in detail there. But

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the thing to remember is that these machines are take

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of space. So these are those big,

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>clunky TVs from yesterday that you might have seen, not

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>like flat screens. Those are you know, either l c

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>D or l E ED or plasma displays. But the

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>original IMAX for CRT s, so they were a little

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>hefty as a result. Uh they could support a resolution

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>originally anyway of one thousand four by seven or seven

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight if you prefer now. Later in Apple introduced

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>an updated version of the iMac that had better graphics

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>card with more video memory, and the most recent version

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>of the Mac operating system, which was at that point

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Mac version Mac OS version eight point five. And on

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>top of the iMac, Apple also introduced new power books

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 1>in their laptop lineup, which included a curvy laptop that

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>was called the Wall Street power Book. And I this

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>every now and then Apple would come out with a

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>product that I just don't get the aesthetics. If you

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know what a Wall Street power Book looks like,

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>do an image search on Apple Wall Street power Book.

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Because this thing just does not appeal to me. It

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>was kind of funky and also suffered from a design

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>flaw in The early models of the Hinges were a

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>little weak, which meant that once they wore out, the

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>laptop screen wouldn't stay in place anymore would start to

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>fall over, which is pretty inconvenient for a laptop. So

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't the best product to ever come out of Apple.

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>The Wall Street line also had a few other issues.

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>For one thing, it was it was noticeably slower than

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the desktop Power Max that were coming out at the time.

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>And you'd expect that to a point. But when you're

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>selling these laptops at a premium price and you're saying

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the field version of the desktops that you

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>can get for your for your your basic home set up,

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>it's not great when it works significantly slower than the

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>desktop version. Alright, So we've come up to our first

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 1>little break here. Now after the break, we're going to

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>talk more about some interesting developments from Apple, including some

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>changes in ports systems, as well as some interesting aesthetic

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>choices to really set Apple apart from the herd. But

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>before we get into that, let's take a quick break

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to thank our sponsor. All Right. So around this time,

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Apple introduced a new protocol that really took a large

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>part in the Macintosh from that point forward, and that

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>was FireWire. Uh Now, originally you had to get FireWire

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>expansion cards so that you could get a FireWire port

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>in your mac but but over time, FireWire would become

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a standard port in the Macintosh. Lines for several years. Uh.

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Now if you don't know what FireWire is, because it's

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it's largely been replaced at this stage. Uh. It is

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a protocol, a technology for moving data from one device

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>to another, and it's meant to move a large amount

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of data in a small amount of time. So it's

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>really essentially similar to other types of ports that you

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>would find on computers, like Scuzzy ports back in the day,

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>or USB ports or USBC today USB three point oh

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>style ports. Now, at the time, FireWire was a big

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>advance from Scuzzy, at least your basic Guzzy. Unless you

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>were using top of the line Scuzzy ports with the

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>best cables that money could buy, you weren't maxing out

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>your speeds that high. In fact, Scuzzy Ultra had about

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>ten megabytes per second top speed for data transfers, which

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is not bad except if you're trying to transfer very

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>large files. Let's let's say video files are very high

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>quality audio files. That was a little slow. And remember

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>that the Mac line of computers was frequently being used

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 1>by video producers audio producers for a lot of creative

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>applications like that as opposed to your productivity software which

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>was typically viewed as a Windows machine. Duty Max. We're

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>taking on all these really high end and very demanding

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>applications when it comes to audio and video production, so

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>they needed something that would allow you to transfer data

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>at faster speeds. Now, FireWire's initial capabilities stretched up to

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the four megabits per second range. Now, megabits versus megabytes

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>very different. Right, A bit is one single unit of information.

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>It's either a zero or a one. A byte is

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>eight of those collectively, So foreigner megabits is equivalent to

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>around fifty megabytes per second, but that's like five times

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 1>faster than Scuzzy trub was. So Apple was looking at

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 1>re inventing data transfers from device to device using the

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>FireWire as their primary protocol. And also over time they

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>had the plan and they implemented this to increase the

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>capability of FireWire to move at greater and greater speeds.

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>So over the generations of the technology, it can move

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>more information in a shorter amount of time. So it

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>would become a standard port on max from about two

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand one to two thousand eight, and God's development in

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the late nineties, but really got wide rollout by about

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand one, and over the next seven years, it

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:45.479
<v Speaker 1>was standard on almost every map that came out from Apple.

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Also in Apple discontinued quite a few machines from their lineup.

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>They officially stopped supporting all of the motor Rola processor

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>MAX that preceded the switch to the power PC microchip. Now,

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>remember to Rolla still had UH involvement in developing the

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>power PC chips, but the chips that were in Macintosh

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>computers prior to power pc chips were all Motorola chips.

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So at that point Apple said, well, we're not going

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>to support those anymore. Uh, everything is gonna now depend

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>upon this power PC microchip because that's what we're putting

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in our MAX from this point forward. They also discontinued

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>support for the Apple two line, which is pretty incredible

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that they had supported Apple two all the way up

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>to nine. Now, they had discontinued manufacturing the Apple two

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>long before that, but they continued to support it all

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:45.199
<v Speaker 1>the way until when they officially ended support. Uh that

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>really tells you how long that Apple two's life was,

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.479
<v Speaker 1>because remember that was introduced. Apple two came out like

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in the late seventies early eighties, So the fact that

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it lasted all the way to and at least some

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>capacity in Apple support was amazing, So it's really the

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>last hurrah for the Apple too. I still love the

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Apple too, and I wouldn't mind finding one just to

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>mess around with one, but uh that I doubt that

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I could easily find one in good working order at

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this stage. I wish I could, because I loved the

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple too. Now, the following year, Apple released some new Imax. Uh.

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Like the previous episodes, I'm not going to cover every

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>single model Apple released, which would just make this episode

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>incredibly dull. But one thing I want to mention is

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>because the Imax came out in a selection of new colors.

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't just this beige computer that had been kind

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of Apple's trademark ever since the old Apple two days.

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>You could get a selection of different colors which included blue, purple, orange, green,

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>or red, but Apple called them different names. You could

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:04.360
<v Speaker 1>get an iMac and blueberry, grape, tangerine, lime, and strawberry.

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And I gotta be honest with you guys, even though

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm the dude from tech stuff who from the beginning

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>has been accused of having an anti Mac bias and

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>even though these machines are woefully outdated by today's standards,

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I really still dig the designs of these early Imax,

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>these nineteen nine Imax and these bright colors. They're really

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>appealing to me. Uh, I would love to have one

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in grape or lime. So I guess this episode is

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately a Jonathan which list of old computers that are obsolete,

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that are no longer supported, that don't run any useful

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>operating system or software at this point, but I still

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of one. So the Apple two and a nineteen

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>iMac are on that list. There's just something really appealing

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>about those vibrant color schemes. So look up ninete Imax

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to get a look at what these these brightly colored

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>machines look like back in the day, and maybe you'll

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>agree that they're They've got a certain appeal to them.

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>They are big, clunky machines because these are not flat

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:08.360
<v Speaker 1>panel displays. These are still CRT machines, But I don't know,

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>they just seemed kind of friendly to me. Now. Apple

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>also introduced a desktop tower style computer called the Yosemite

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Power MACG three. Some people refer to this one as

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the Smurf, and the reason they do that is the

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>case was uh blue. It also had white accents, and

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it had sort of a transparent cover over the white aspects.

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>The design included a drawbridge like door that could fold

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>down to the right of the computer that would allow

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you to add expansions to the actual motherboard, and you

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.479
<v Speaker 1>could even open the computer while it was working, Like

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.239
<v Speaker 1>you could have the computer on and open it up

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and it would still run because all the modules were

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>still connected to that hinged door. Um, it's kind of neat,

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>not really any point of doing that, but it's neat

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that you could do it. Apple offered a three hundred

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Mega Hurts version initially in this Yosemite computer, but by

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:11.400
<v Speaker 1>June so within a few months of introducing it, they

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>discontinued the three hundred Mega Hurts version and instead relied

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>on a more powerful four hundred fifty Mega Hurts model.

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>They also used a similar design for their power Machine,

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>like this was for their high end users who were

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 1>hoping to use it for like video production and that

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. This was Apple's power Mac G four,

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 1>and the US government initially called this computer this desktop

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>personal computer, high end personal computer but still a personal computer.

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>They called it a supercomputer. Now, why did they call

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a personal computer a supercomputer. Well, this was the first

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Mac that could perform one billion floating operations per second,

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise known as a giga flop, and at the

0:27:56.880 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>time gigga flop was considered a capability was in the

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>supercomputer range, so the US government said, technically, this power

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Mac is a supercomputer. The case was essentially identical to

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the Yosemite tower I just described, only this one was white,

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>graphite gray and had silver accents. And I guess this

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>was meant to make it look more professional and business

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>like and less sort of sleek and fun. I suppose

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it still was a very nice design. The top level

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Max in this model line introduced a new type of

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>motherboard called the saw tooth, which allowed for a more

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>powerful machine overall. You could fit more memory, you could

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>fit a faster processor, you could fit a better graphics

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>card to it, so it was a more powerful machine overall.

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But there were various lines in this G four model,

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>so the entry level did not have this saw tooth motherboard.

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>It was only the higher end models that did. The

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>entry level had a motherboard that was modeled after the

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Yosemite design, so it had a slightly less powerful approach,

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>which now this was a particularly potent machine. If you've

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>got the top of the line G four power Mac,

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>then you had a machine that was comparable or actually

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>faster than a PENTTHEUM three processor computer from the IBM

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>compatible lines and Pathium three's were known to be screaming

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>fast back in the day. Today they're slow as a snail,

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But back in the day that was cutting edge if

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you were going the Intel slash Windows route. So the

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple computers were no slouch. They could go head to

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>head with the the fastest machines coming out from Intel's side.

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>But Apple did do something that was kind of lu

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>zy to their customers when they introduced this power Mac

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>G four, and uh it was all because of a

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issue. So one of the things that computer

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers in general have run into are these supply chain

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>problem where one element, or maybe more than one element

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in some cases, is being held up by the the

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the suppliers of the specific components that are going into

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the computer. In this case, it was the microprocessors. Apple

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>was finding that Motorola could not supply five hundred Mega

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>hurts processors at the rate that Apple needed them. Which

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>was unfortunate because Apple had a bunch of orders for

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>five hundred Mega Hurts Power MACG four computers. So Apple

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>did something that a lot of people found a bit questionable.

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>The company scaled back all their models by fifty Mega Hurts,

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>so instead of selling a five hundred Mega Hurts machine

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>as their top machine, they went with a four hundred

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty Mega Hurts machine as their top machine. This refers

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to the processor speed, so how fast is the CPU

0:30:55.600 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>inside the Powermax four or fifty Mega Hurts. Obviously fifty

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>mega Hurts slower than a five hundred Mega Hurts machine.

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And then the four fifty Mega Hurts machines were scaled

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>back to four hundred Mega Hurts, so on and so forth,

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>so everything took like a half step back from where

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it was supposed to be. But Apple did not change

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the prices of their models, so the top model was

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>still the same price, even though it had a less

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>powerful processor than what was originally planned. And Apple customers

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>got a tiny bit peeved about this, understandably so that

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>they were paying a premium price for something that was

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>less powerful than what they were promised. So this was

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a pretty nasty little situation. For Apple. Fortunately the company

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>was able to rectify things in like a week, but

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it still was a rough week over at Apple Computers

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>due to this little kerfuffle. And um, yeah, so people

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>who talk about Apple being a company that that sets

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a premium price, it's stuff like this particular incident that

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>reinforces that idea. Now, the Wall Street power Book ended

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>up taking a bow. In nine, they discontinued the Wall

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Street and decided to launch a new model of power

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Book that was code named Lombard. And this was the

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>first power book Mac to have a USB port on it,

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>so it was revolutionary at the time, and it was

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the fastest laptop line at the time of its debut,

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>not not fastest for Apple. The power Book Mac that

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>was code named Lombard was the fastest laptop on the

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>market period when it came out. Uh. It also had

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a bronze translucent keyboard, which I think actually looks more

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>brown than bronze and was in my mind really unattractive.

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>That's my own personal perspective on it. Maybe that's that

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>anti Mac bias kicking in again. But the specs were

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>really impressive, even though I found the aesthetic to be

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>not terribly attractive. Taking a page from their success with

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the Mac, Apple also introduced a laptop for the education

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>market called the Eyebook. This was a bit chunkier and

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 1>more rugged than their power Book line. It was less powerful,

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't need to be as powerful as the power Book. Uh,

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's still had a lot of curved lines in

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the design. I kind of dig the Eyebook. It does

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>look a little unwieldy, especially compared to the laptops that

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple produces today, but it has again a kind of

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a friendly look to it. I think. Now. One thing

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:32.719
<v Speaker 1>that really helped Apple out at this time something that

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>was completely outside of Apple's control. It was a little

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>thing called the Y two K scare. And you may

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>owe my drugs not remember what this was about. Things

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>changing so scory and people like to forget. But the

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Y two K bug or the Y two K Scare

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>was all about how some lazy computer programmers and computer

0:33:56.000 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>scientists had really made a terrible design decision that frightened

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the pants off a whole bunch of people back in

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the late nineties. So here's what it was all about.

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you a quick summary because I could

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>do a full episode. In fact, I have done a

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>full episode about Y two K. The problem was that

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>programmers were a little lazy back in the day, and

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>when some programmers were designing various architectures, they took a

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.919
<v Speaker 1>shortcut when it came to designating years, and they used

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>a two digit method of designating the year. So if

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you put eight nine as the two digits, then the

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>computer knew you met nineteen nine. But you're probably already

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>spotting the problem, which is that once you got to

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:44.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety nine, you're gonna roll over to two thousand.

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>But computers only had two digit digits to tell what

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the year was going to be, so zero zero could

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>be interpreted as nineteen hundred instead of two thousand, and

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different computer processes could screw up. As

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a result, you had things that were pretty easy to

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine going haywire, like like, uh, financial software that is

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>calculating stuff like interest, Well, if it rolls back a

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred years, that's really going to mess things up. But

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 1>people were worried about all sorts of stuff, like computers

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>just stop maybe they could stop working, and not just computers,

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>but other devices too that we're working on. Microchips that

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 1>had this kind of architecture, so people were worried about

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:29.879
<v Speaker 1>getting stuck in elevators or what would happen on a plane. Well,

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple didn't have to worry about this because there programmers

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't use that convention when they were designating years, so

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have to worry about running out of time

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with two digits. Uh So, with time continuing to pass

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>as it does and two thousand coming along, people began

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to think, well, maybe we should get Apple computers because

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>they don't suffer the same weakness as other computers that

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>have this two digit problem. So, uh, yeah, it doesn't

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 1>do you any good if your computer thinks it's nineteen

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.839
<v Speaker 1>hundred and suddenly decides to put on an Edwardian suit

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and start talking about the latest George Bernard Shaw play.

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't help you out if you want to do

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>some modern computing. And the mac Os didn't have that issue,

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>so people started to look at Macintosh computers and sales

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>uh increased or Apple. Now, whether or not that had

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with the Y two K bug is

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>hard to say because there's so many other variables that

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>play here, but it's probably something that factored into at

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>least a few people's decision to switch over to the

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh platform because it was why two K proof. In fact,

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>power PC Max not the old Motorola ones, but the

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>power Pc Max actually allow computers to keep good time

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>up to the year twenty nine thousand ninety, So we're

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>good for now. Even if you're using an obsolete mac

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry about the operating system suddenly

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking it's nineteen hundred, because it's gonna keep on chugging

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>along until the hardware breaks. Because I guarantee you that

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 1>hardware will break before the year twenty nine thousand ninety.

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And if it doesn't, I'm guessing you won't be around.

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 1>That's not a you know, that's not a slam against you.

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just i'm recording this in and I don't think

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>people in the year twenty thousand are still listening to

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff. If you are, thanks for listening. You're awesome now.

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>In case you were curious, the world did not end

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand spoiler alert. But Apple did introduce some

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>new stuff that year, like the Cube. This was a

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>desktop computer that was shaped like a cube. It was

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>five one cubic inches and it was a really powerful

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 1>machine for its time. This was also the year that

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple previewed the mac OS ten using the Roman numeral

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>for ten, which is an X. Now that led me,

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the ignorant person that I was at the time, to

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>call it mac os X, which got lots of people

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>laughing at me for calling it mac os X. But

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>if you are going to be using a bunch of

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>letters in the name of your product, don't use a

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Roman numeral to designate its operating system number. So it's

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>macOS ten. Uh. And sometimes I still say mac OSX

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes I just like to have a little fun

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>at my own expense. Now, moving ahead to two thousand one,

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple again boosted the power of its various computers. Nothing

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>new there. Pretty much every year Apple would update its

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 1>line of existing computers and increase their abilities by putting

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in more powerful processors, putting in more memory, giving it

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a few different ports. So again I'm not going to

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:37.919
<v Speaker 1>cover all of those changes. I'm just going to cover

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the big, big differences. Uh. They also introduced some new

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 1>color schemes in their iMac lines, so you could buy

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the Blue Dalmatian or Flower Power. These actually had designs,

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 1>not just a solid color. They actually had you know,

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>designs on them that I find almost but not quite

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>completely unappealing. So I don't want either of those. If

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>anyone's listening and they want to get me the which

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>list of items I've talked about, like Apple two's and

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the iMac you know lime or the iMac grape. That's cool,

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:10.720
<v Speaker 1>but don't get me a blue Dalmatian or flower Power.

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't need them. Um, They're just not for me.

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>The company also released a lighter, more powerful eyebook sometimes

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>called the ice Book, and Apple created the quicksilver version

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of its power Mac G four line. And they also

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>opened up their first two Apple stores in two thousand one.

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Now there's hundreds of the things, but back in two

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand one they were brand new. It was the first

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 1>time Apple had opened up a retail space of its own,

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and of course that ends up being a popular destination

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>for people all around the world. There's there are Apple

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>stores that get crowds of tourists because they are particularly

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting in their design and layout. Oh, that's also your

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple launched the next product to help defind the company

0:39:56.560 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>as its new identity. That would be the iPod. But

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the iPod in our History of MP

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:06.879
<v Speaker 1>three players podcast. So I'm not going to cover it here,

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 1>but just to say that two thousand one marked a

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>real turning point in Apple's history, because that was the

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:17.280
<v Speaker 1>moment when Apple began to really expand beyond personal computers

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and printers and workstations. They began to get into personal

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 1>electronics in a serious way. The Newton was kind of

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a failure, but the iPod was totally the opposite. iPod

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>was a runaway success, particularly once you've got a couple

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of generations in and really took off once iTunes became

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a real player in the in the data management or

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>music management space. Now two it was more of the

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>same with tweaked computer designs, some boosted performance, and not

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 1>much else. Apple did create a new line of MAX

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for educational institutions. They called it the eMac E for education.

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>It was housed in an iMac like CRT style case. Uh,

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the stream was flat, it wasn't curve, but it still

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.240
<v Speaker 1>was a cathode ray tube that was providing the actual

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 1>image that you saw in there. So big bulky case

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in fact, really big and bulky. The basic model weighed

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>fifty pounds, but it cost a little less than a

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand bucks, So Apple was really trying to price these

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>computers in a way where education systems would be able

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to shell out the bucks to buy them, because again

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Max were pretty expensive and a lot of education systems

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 1>just didn't have the budget to buy Macintosh computers. So

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 1>this was Apple's attempt to kind of get into that

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>market with a slightly less powerful computer. In two thousand three,

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple began introducing Max that were no longer backwards compatible

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 1>with the old classic Mac operating system, and this began

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the March of obsolescence for those old OS builds. The

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>company continued its trend of updating machines, but again there

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>were no major revolutions that happened. In two thousand three,

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Apple did introduce the power Mac G five with the

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 1>IBM power Pc NV CPU that gave the Mac a

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 1>processor speed of between one point six to two point

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>oh giga hurts, depending upon the model that you bought.

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>This computer generated so much heat that it required nine

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 1>cooling fans to manage it. Nine fans inside of this

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:27.840
<v Speaker 1>computer so that it would not overheat. The case was

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 1>also made out of aluminum, which is a very effective

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>conductor of heat, which is good because a lot of

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 1>heat gets generated inside the machine, it transfers out to

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the case, and the case transfers it out to the

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:44.839
<v Speaker 1>air around it. But yeah, these machines got pretty toasty. Well,

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we've got one last section to go through to talk

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:50.319
<v Speaker 1>about the history of the Macintosh and get up to

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>present day. But before I jump into that, let's take

0:42:53.120 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>another quick break to thank our sponsor. Jumping into two

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand four, the big news that year for Apple was

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a redesign of the iMac. Now. The older CRT versions

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>were replaced that year with a new flat panel display version.

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.800
<v Speaker 1>The computer was in the same housing as the display,

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:22.320
<v Speaker 1>with an optical drive to the right of the screen

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and all the ports helpfully on the back of the

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>darn thing. I hated that design decision, by the way,

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to have all the ports on this computer on the back.

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I understand it was necessary for the layout for the motherboard,

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:38.280
<v Speaker 1>but man, it was so irritating to have to plug

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:40.880
<v Speaker 1>everything into the back of the machine in order to

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>use it, including stuff like your mouse and your keyboard

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. But this looked like a flat

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 1>panel television on a stand. The entire computer was housed

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:55.479
<v Speaker 1>inside of this thing, big, dramatic change from those big,

0:43:55.520 --> 0:44:01.240
<v Speaker 1>bulky CRT sets of the iMac before, and a totally

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 1>new design, brand new aesthetic move for Apple, and it

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of started Apple down the pathway of that smooth

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:12.959
<v Speaker 1>white two thousand one ish aesthetic that they became known for.

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>A lot of Apple's products would end up following that

0:44:16.320 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 1>same sort of design philosophy, but this was one of

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the earliest ones. And I actually had an iMac in

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this style, although it wasn't a two thousand four iMac.

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>It was a bit later. It might have been as

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>late as two thousand six, but um, I definitely had

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>one of these. Max was the only Mac I've ever owned.

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:38.839
<v Speaker 1>I liked it just fine. I just never bought another one.

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Um so kind of cool. This two thousand one ish

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 1>approach very different from the lollipop colorful approach of the

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 1>CRT Imax from just a few years earlier. And in

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five, we got the Mac Mini. Now by we,

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean the general we I never owned a Mac Mini,

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:01.360
<v Speaker 1>but this was a really cool idea too. This was

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a desktop computer in miniature, and it didn't have a

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 1>built in display. There was no display that came along

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>with it, but you would get this tiny little computer,

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 1>and I mean it was tiny. It was six and

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a half inches per side and two inches tall and

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that was the whole desktop. And he would just connect

0:45:18.760 --> 0:45:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that to an existing display using whichever port you needed.

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And uh it was bargain priced, at least as far

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 1>as Apple is concerned. It was on sale for four dollars.

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:33.720
<v Speaker 1>That's dirt cheap with Apple. Uh. So it gave people

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to own a Mac as long as they

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:38.879
<v Speaker 1>already had a display, or they didn't mind buying a

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:42.280
<v Speaker 1>display and a keyboard and all that other stuff for

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a bargain price compared to the other Max that were

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>on the market at that same time. One drawback to

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 1>this design was that you couldn't expand it. You couldn't

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>add more memory or or change it in any meaningful

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 1>way because it was so small and everything was packed

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 1>so tightly together that there was no room to expand

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:03.359
<v Speaker 1>it at all. So if you bought one, you were

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 1>pretty much stuck with the initial specs that it came

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 1>out with. That same year, Steve Jobs made a big announcement,

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 1>so this is again two thousand five. He said that

0:46:13.120 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 1>future Max would move away from power pc chips that

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>had provided Mac processing power for the last decade or so,

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and instead Apple would make a move to Intel. Intel

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>would supply the future CPUs to all Macintosh computers that

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>would be released after that point. Those first Mac Intel's

0:46:33.600 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 1>would not go on sale until the following year, and

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that worried a lot of Mac users because not all

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:47.480
<v Speaker 1>software is compatible with various uh microprocessor architecture. So if

0:46:47.520 --> 0:46:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you have operating system and software that was designed to

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:54.720
<v Speaker 1>work on the power Pc platform, it might not work

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>on the Intel platform. And if those programs are important

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to you and your business or or what you know,

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 1>whatever you're using your Mac for, then upgrading to a

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>new Macintosh could be harmful to you. So, for example,

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 1>here at how Stuff Works, we use very specific editing

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 1>suites for our video and audio stuff like this podcast

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and video series. We use very specific types of software

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:22.800
<v Speaker 1>for that on Macintosh computers. If we were to upgrade

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to a new processor that could not run those old programs,

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we would be kind of stuck. Now, Apple solution for

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 1>this was to release a power Pc emulator. It's called Rosetta,

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:38.439
<v Speaker 1>named after the Rosetta stone, which of course was used

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to help translate Hiero glyphics back in the day. So

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the Rosetta was an emulator, which means it's a program

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that simulates another type of technology, in this case another

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 1>type of microprocessor, the power PC style microprocessor, and this

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:57.759
<v Speaker 1>would allow you to continue to use some of that

0:47:57.880 --> 0:48:02.440
<v Speaker 1>legacy software even on these in TELL powered machines. Also

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand five, Apple introduced the Mighty Mouse. You

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 1>can't see this audio listeners, but I'm making a very

0:48:13.040 --> 0:48:16.320
<v Speaker 1>unimpressed face into the webcam I'm using for the Twitch

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:19.400
<v Speaker 1>stream of this episode. Remember, you can always go to

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 1>twitch dot tv, slash techt stuff if you want to

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:25.800
<v Speaker 1>watch an episode live as I recorded. Well, the Mighty

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Mouse was a mouse that had more than just one

0:48:28.400 --> 0:48:32.400
<v Speaker 1>button capability. The Macintosh was famous for shipping with a

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>mouse that only had one button, and if you wanted

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 1>other types of functionality, you had to hold down a

0:48:38.040 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 1>key on the keyboard while pressing down on the button.

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 1>The Mighty Mouse actually had ability to use the left

0:48:44.760 --> 0:48:47.280
<v Speaker 1>side of the mouse or the right side of the mouse,

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 1>or you could squeeze both sides and create three different

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:54.960
<v Speaker 1>types of controls with this mouse, or three different types

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of commands with one mouse. So it still felt like

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:00.800
<v Speaker 1>one button, but you could us the left side of

0:49:00.840 --> 0:49:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the button down, or press the right side of the

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:05.040
<v Speaker 1>button down, or squeeze it, and that would allow you

0:49:05.040 --> 0:49:09.239
<v Speaker 1>to execute different commands in various programs. Why not just

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 1>make a mouse with extra buttons, with each button dedicated

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to a specific function. Because Johnny I've who's a chief

0:49:17.239 --> 0:49:21.279
<v Speaker 1>designer over at Apple, and Steve Jobs hate buttons. I

0:49:21.360 --> 0:49:25.040
<v Speaker 1>guess they just don't like them. They like the ascetic

0:49:25.400 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of a smooth, buttonless type of device, even if it

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:34.439
<v Speaker 1>means that they are stressing form over functionality. Now, maybe

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:38.600
<v Speaker 1>again that's my anti Mac bias, but I like functionality

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 1>over form. I want something to work first and then

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:45.000
<v Speaker 1>look nice. I don't want it to look nice and

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 1>then just work. Okay, but that just shows the difference

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:53.799
<v Speaker 1>of approach I take to technology than Apple takes. Now,

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple would argue that they value both equal, that something

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 1>needs to look amazing and work perfectly. I would argue

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the Mighty Mouse does not quite achieve that. That's my

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:08.000
<v Speaker 1>own personal opinion as someone who had a Mighty Mouse

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and a and iMac and I despise that mouse a lot.

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:17.879
<v Speaker 1>But again, anti Mac bias, So don't pay too much

0:50:17.880 --> 0:50:22.720
<v Speaker 1>attention to me. The company also began to ship dual

0:50:22.840 --> 0:50:26.720
<v Speaker 1>core Power Max at this time, using dual core processors.

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 1>This is part of a new era in computing at

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 1>this point where we started to see these multi core

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 1>processors find their way into consumer computers. Now I'll likely

0:50:35.120 --> 0:50:38.480
<v Speaker 1>do a full episode about what multi core core processors

0:50:38.520 --> 0:50:40.839
<v Speaker 1>are and how they work and why it's important at

0:50:40.880 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a later date. I've covered it a little bit in

0:50:43.120 --> 0:50:46.640
<v Speaker 1>previous tech Stuff podcasts, but just know that it would

0:50:46.680 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 1>take a full episode to really explain this. But it

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 1>was a big advance for Macintosh computers at the time. Now,

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand six, the first Intel Max started to

0:50:56.040 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>hit store shelves, and the biggest drawback for Mac users

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:03.760
<v Speaker 1>was that these machines wouldn't support any classic mac Os applications.

0:51:03.800 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you had those legacy apps you depended on,

0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't run them on those machines. You had to

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:11.319
<v Speaker 1>keep an older Mac around or you had to create

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:14.400
<v Speaker 1>an emulator to run them. And that's the problem in

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:17.520
<v Speaker 1>general with legacy systems is the hardware gets faster, sometimes

0:51:17.560 --> 0:51:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you lose support for older software, and that's still a

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:23.840
<v Speaker 1>problem if you really depend on that older software to

0:51:24.400 --> 0:51:27.320
<v Speaker 1>do something. Like I said before, with audio and video production.

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Here at how stuff works, that could be an issue.

0:51:29.880 --> 0:51:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Anyone who used garage Band with Macintosh computers knows that

0:51:34.440 --> 0:51:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the various evolutions of the garage band software and the

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:41.680
<v Speaker 1>changes to the Mac operating system and Mac processors meant

0:51:41.719 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes you would end up losing features that you

0:51:44.800 --> 0:51:48.360
<v Speaker 1>thought were absolutely important for you, and you had to

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:51.440
<v Speaker 1>stick with older, obsolete machines just to get stuff done.

0:51:52.960 --> 0:51:56.839
<v Speaker 1>The company also introduced a new line in laptops. They

0:51:56.840 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 1>called this new line the MacBook Pro, which of course

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you can still find today. These are higher end Mac laptops,

0:52:04.400 --> 0:52:07.320
<v Speaker 1>so these are meant for power users. They're more expensive,

0:52:07.360 --> 0:52:11.359
<v Speaker 1>they have more features there, they've got faster processors. Uh.

0:52:11.360 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>It's essentially, you know, they're your sports vehicle version of

0:52:15.040 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the Macintosh laptops. People really hated this name when it

0:52:20.160 --> 0:52:24.080
<v Speaker 1>first came out. The MacBook Pro was replacing the old

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 1>power Book line, and people really liked power Book and

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:31.800
<v Speaker 1>they hated the name MacBook. But today MacBook is standard,

0:52:31.800 --> 0:52:33.799
<v Speaker 1>and I think most people probably don't even remember the

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:36.359
<v Speaker 1>old power Books, and they probably don't remember that they

0:52:36.400 --> 0:52:38.799
<v Speaker 1>put up a fuss when it went from power book

0:52:38.840 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to MacBook. The moral of that story is people hate change,

0:52:44.239 --> 0:52:49.279
<v Speaker 1>whether it's good, bad, or indifferent. Now, nothing of real

0:52:49.320 --> 0:52:53.240
<v Speaker 1>significance happened in the Macintosh history in two thousand seven,

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:56.839
<v Speaker 1>other than Apple making flat screen Imax and brushed aluminum

0:52:56.880 --> 0:53:00.480
<v Speaker 1>instead of white plastic. So let's skip ahead to two

0:53:00.520 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight. I'm not going to spend time on

0:53:02.440 --> 0:53:06.239
<v Speaker 1>a year where not really anything happened. Now, this was

0:53:06.280 --> 0:53:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the year that Steve Jobs introduced the MacBook Air, which

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 1>was a big deal in a small package. It was

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the thinnest MacBook at that point, and at it was amazing.

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>It was three quarters of an inch thick, which is

0:53:19.280 --> 0:53:22.880
<v Speaker 1>incredibly thin for a laptop, especially one as powerful as

0:53:22.880 --> 0:53:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the MacBook Air, and it weighed in at three pounds.

0:53:26.280 --> 0:53:29.000
<v Speaker 1>It had no optical drive, so you couldn't insert any

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:31.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of c D or DVD into it, but did

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:35.120
<v Speaker 1>have a sweet aluminum body. And it had one port

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:38.000
<v Speaker 1>on it, which was a single USB two point oh

0:53:38.200 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 1>connector port, and that was behind a little door. You

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:44.120
<v Speaker 1>had to open the little door to access this port

0:53:44.680 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 1>because ports, I guess spoiled the computer's lines otherwise. Also,

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:52.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to add more ports, it would have

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:55.839
<v Speaker 1>meant having to create a thicker version of the backbook Air,

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:58.319
<v Speaker 1>which was not what Steve Jobs had in mind when

0:53:58.320 --> 0:54:01.600
<v Speaker 1>he actually, you know, when he launched this project to

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:06.880
<v Speaker 1>create a super thin MacBook. So it ended up having

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:10.000
<v Speaker 1>just one port. From that point forward, Max and their

0:54:10.080 --> 0:54:13.680
<v Speaker 1>various lines received regular updates and a refresh to their appearances.

0:54:14.320 --> 0:54:19.760
<v Speaker 1>But that was mostly it. Right the future MacBooks would

0:54:19.800 --> 0:54:24.480
<v Speaker 1>largely follow simple trends in that you'd get faster processors,

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:30.759
<v Speaker 1>better graphics. Uh, ports would change eventually, you would get

0:54:31.239 --> 0:54:36.120
<v Speaker 1>better resolution on your displays as well. They'd get more expensive,

0:54:36.360 --> 0:54:39.080
<v Speaker 1>they'd get thinner, and they get lighter. But that's pretty

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 1>much the trend. There wasn't anything really revolutionary after this point,

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:47.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing that jumped completely out of the line of what

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you would come to expect from Apple. There were a

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:54.359
<v Speaker 1>couple of exceptions, a couple of standouts. The MacBook Pro

0:54:54.440 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand twelve came in a model with a

0:54:56.600 --> 0:55:00.400
<v Speaker 1>retina display that was the first MacBook Pro to actually

0:55:00.400 --> 0:55:03.319
<v Speaker 1>have a retina display that's similar to the display you

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:07.719
<v Speaker 1>find in iPhones of that time. It's a very high definition,

0:55:08.040 --> 0:55:12.520
<v Speaker 1>high resolution display. And in two thousand thirteen, Apple introduced

0:55:12.520 --> 0:55:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a cylindrical case for a new Mac Pro, so you

0:55:16.880 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 1>suddenly had a tower that was a cylinder instead of

0:55:19.960 --> 0:55:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a rectangle style, which was what was common at the time.

0:55:24.480 --> 0:55:27.880
<v Speaker 1>And the cylinder was gorgeous. It looks like it belongs

0:55:27.920 --> 0:55:30.719
<v Speaker 1>in some sort of science fiction film. It's kind of

0:55:30.760 --> 0:55:35.839
<v Speaker 1>a high tech supercomputer sort of look to it. And

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:38.640
<v Speaker 1>this MacPro was really meant to work as a server

0:55:38.920 --> 0:55:42.080
<v Speaker 1>or a workstation. It wasn't necessarily meant to be your

0:55:42.320 --> 0:55:45.680
<v Speaker 1>own personal computer. They were pretty darn expensive when they

0:55:45.719 --> 0:55:49.280
<v Speaker 1>came out, um, and it was a really unique aesthetic

0:55:49.360 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 1>something that stood out. However, I can tell you that

0:55:52.120 --> 0:55:54.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the video team here at How Stuff Works

0:55:54.000 --> 0:55:57.600
<v Speaker 1>have a few strong opinions about the performance of this

0:55:57.800 --> 0:56:01.080
<v Speaker 1>specific model of the Mac row and they are not

0:56:01.880 --> 0:56:05.960
<v Speaker 1>entirely positive. May just be our own experiences with them,

0:56:06.360 --> 0:56:11.480
<v Speaker 1>but something that they found somewhat frustrating is a good

0:56:11.520 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>words trying searching for a word that wouldn't be too harsh.

0:56:15.280 --> 0:56:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Frustrating is a good one. But this was another example

0:56:18.640 --> 0:56:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of Apple taking a dramatic departure from the general esthetics

0:56:21.680 --> 0:56:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that were prevalent in personal computers at the time, and

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:27.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to make it their own. M One thing else

0:56:27.280 --> 0:56:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I need to mention before we conclude, really uh. Obviously,

0:56:33.400 --> 0:56:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a moment that really changed the direction of Apple overall

0:56:38.239 --> 0:56:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and the mac in particular was the death of Steve Jobs.

0:56:42.719 --> 0:56:45.520
<v Speaker 1>He passed away in two thousand eleven. We did an

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:48.799
<v Speaker 1>episode called One More Thing all about Steve Jobs where

0:56:48.800 --> 0:56:52.839
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this, and this obviously had a monumental

0:56:52.880 --> 0:56:55.640
<v Speaker 1>impact on the company as a whole. He had already

0:56:55.640 --> 0:57:01.640
<v Speaker 1>stepped down as CEO earlier before his passing, but he

0:57:01.719 --> 0:57:05.400
<v Speaker 1>was still very much a presence at Apple up until

0:57:05.440 --> 0:57:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months before his death, and he had

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:10.520
<v Speaker 1>handed the reins over to Tim Cook to become the

0:57:10.520 --> 0:57:14.239
<v Speaker 1>new CEO. But it had been Jobs, along with a

0:57:14.320 --> 0:57:18.479
<v Speaker 1>top tier level of designers like Johnny I've who had

0:57:18.560 --> 0:57:23.040
<v Speaker 1>really set the direction of Apple and the the aesthetic

0:57:23.080 --> 0:57:26.720
<v Speaker 1>direction for products like the Macintosh computer line and the

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 1>MAX that followed. It would be another couple of years

0:57:31.320 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 1>before Jobs is direct influence would no longer be a

0:57:34.640 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 1>major factor in MAX, and this is largely because the

0:57:38.080 --> 0:57:40.520
<v Speaker 1>products that launch on any given year have been in

0:57:40.560 --> 0:57:44.320
<v Speaker 1>development for a while behind the scenes. So while Steve

0:57:44.400 --> 0:57:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Jobs passed away in two thousand eleven. It would be

0:57:46.560 --> 0:57:49.600
<v Speaker 1>another year or two before his direct influence was no

0:57:49.680 --> 0:57:56.560
<v Speaker 1>longer a living component of the max that followed. But

0:57:56.680 --> 0:58:00.280
<v Speaker 1>this did mean that Apple started having to produce computers

0:58:00.400 --> 0:58:05.200
<v Speaker 1>without that guidance from Steve Jobs himself, and that uh

0:58:05.280 --> 0:58:09.440
<v Speaker 1>some people ended up pointing out as being a an issue.

0:58:09.520 --> 0:58:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Some people say that the changes to the Mac line

0:58:12.760 --> 0:58:19.120
<v Speaker 1>post Steve Jobs haven't been terribly inspirational or innovative. Others

0:58:19.120 --> 0:58:22.600
<v Speaker 1>have said that been more frustrating as Apple has continued

0:58:22.640 --> 0:58:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to change things up. Remember in two thousand and eight

0:58:25.520 --> 0:58:30.960
<v Speaker 1>they stopped making FireWire a standard on all Macintosh computers.

0:58:31.840 --> 0:58:35.880
<v Speaker 1>By a couple of years later they started moving toward well,

0:58:36.240 --> 0:58:38.720
<v Speaker 1>actually really this year they started moving in last year

0:58:38.760 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 1>they started moving towards USBC ports and abandoning things like

0:58:43.800 --> 0:58:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the thunderbolt connectors. So there have been changes. A lot

0:58:50.240 --> 0:58:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of them have been changes that some Apple users have

0:58:53.480 --> 0:58:56.880
<v Speaker 1>been very upset about because they feel like Apple is

0:58:56.920 --> 0:59:02.200
<v Speaker 1>ignoring consumer needs uh and as instead demanding that consumers

0:59:02.240 --> 0:59:05.920
<v Speaker 1>follow in the footsteps that they are forging, which is

0:59:05.960 --> 0:59:08.200
<v Speaker 1>mixing metaphors. But never mind it. But I would say

0:59:08.280 --> 0:59:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that that's been Apple's history all along Apple has made

0:59:12.760 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 1>very strong decisions to go in certain directions that require

0:59:18.480 --> 0:59:23.640
<v Speaker 1>users to follow suit or they get left behind. That's

0:59:23.680 --> 0:59:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the history of Apple. It might be frustrating, but it's

0:59:27.560 --> 0:59:30.280
<v Speaker 1>not out of character. It is something that has been

0:59:30.360 --> 0:59:33.800
<v Speaker 1>part of the company culture from the earliest days. I

0:59:33.800 --> 0:59:40.000
<v Speaker 1>would argue, now, ultimately you can start classifying Max by

0:59:40.000 --> 0:59:44.240
<v Speaker 1>their specs and they're disappearing ports. Uh. But again, it

0:59:44.280 --> 0:59:46.560
<v Speaker 1>would just turn into a laundry list at this point,

0:59:46.600 --> 0:59:48.680
<v Speaker 1>so we're really going to leave off here. I will

0:59:48.720 --> 0:59:54.960
<v Speaker 1>say that Macintosh computers continue to be really powerful machines.

0:59:55.640 --> 0:59:59.240
<v Speaker 1>They're really beautiful machines. The aesthetic design on them tends

0:59:59.280 --> 1:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to be top not much, and they're really expensive machines.

1:00:03.000 --> 1:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>And you might argue whether or not the expense is justified,

1:00:06.000 --> 1:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's outside the scope of my own episode. And

1:00:09.840 --> 1:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>this kind of brings us to a close on the

1:00:12.680 --> 1:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh saga, keeping in mind that will probably see more

1:00:16.960 --> 1:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>changes to the line in the near future. Maybe we'll

1:00:19.840 --> 1:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>even see some dramatic departures from what we've seen before,

1:00:22.720 --> 1:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe introduction of new models of Macintosh computers. But I

1:00:26.960 --> 1:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>can't predict the future because I don't work for Apple

1:00:30.480 --> 1:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and they won't let me in the building. Now. What

1:00:33.280 --> 1:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I really hope to do in the future is look

1:00:35.520 --> 1:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>at some other Apple products stuff for other episodes. I

1:00:38.960 --> 1:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>would love to do a full episode on their Flying

1:00:41.800 --> 1:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Saucer headquarters building, which should be opening up really soon

1:00:47.080 --> 1:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and looks phenomenal from the photos I've seen. Apple. If

1:00:51.520 --> 1:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to invite me out to see your headquarters,

1:00:54.800 --> 1:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I would love to check it out because it looks

1:00:57.640 --> 1:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal and I wouldn't mind getting lost in the Flying

1:01:01.560 --> 1:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Saucer for a while, But I expect that invitation will

1:01:04.560 --> 1:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>get lost in the mail. In the meantime, If you

1:01:07.280 --> 1:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>guys have any suggestions for future episodes of tech Stuff,

1:01:10.360 --> 1:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>why don't you send a message to me. You can

1:01:12.680 --> 1:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>send me an email. The address for the show is

1:01:16.360 --> 1:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>text Stuff at how stuff works dot com, or you

1:01:20.720 --> 1:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>can drop me a line on Twitter or Facebook. The

1:01:23.280 --> 1:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>handle for the show at both of those is text

1:01:25.320 --> 1:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Stuff H s W. And let me know if there's

1:01:28.480 --> 1:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a subject you want me to cover, or someone you

1:01:30.320 --> 1:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>want me to interview, or even a guest you want

1:01:32.200 --> 1:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>me to have on as sort of a guest host

1:01:34.840 --> 1:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk with me, send me a note, and as always,

1:01:38.400 --> 1:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you can go to twitch, dot tv, slash tech stuff

1:01:41.360 --> 1:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to see me record these shows live. There is a

1:01:43.840 --> 1:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>schedule up on the websites, and sometimes I even stick

1:01:48.280 --> 1:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to it. I got a little bit of a late

1:01:50.160 --> 1:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>start today, so big kudos for those of you watching

1:01:52.800 --> 1:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>live right now. And that's all for me. I'll talk

1:01:56.160 --> 1:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. For more on this and

1:02:05.600 --> 1:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>thousands of other topics is at how stuff works dot com.

1:02:12.640 --> 1:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Wh