WEBVTT - Elon Goes 'Thermonuclear'

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I know your commitment to free speech. I respect that

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's a integral it's the foundational thing

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of democracies really, But I also know your opposition to

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>anti semitism. You've spoken about it and tweeted about it.

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 2>That was Israelly, Prime Minister, bb NET and Yahoo talking

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 2>to Elon Musk at a Tesla factory two months ago.

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 2>A lot has happened since then, and much of it

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 2>has been fairly disastrous for Elon's social media platform of

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 2>choice X. The fallout continues for Elo Musk after the

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 2>billionaire and Dawson anti semitic.

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Post scrative advertisers like Disney, Apple, and IBM have pulled

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 3>their ads from the social media site X.

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Yesterday, Musk and I claims he's anti Semitic.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>He also threatened a Thermo nuclear lawsuit against a media

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 2>watchdog company, Bill.

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk is now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 2>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 2>controlled by one man.

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Starting his own artificial intelligence company.

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, he's a legitimate, super genius and legitimate. He says

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 2>He's always voted for Democrats, but this year it will

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>be different.

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 5>He'll vote Republican.

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 3>There is a reason the US government is so reliant

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 3>on him.

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 6>Alon Musk is a scam artist and he's done nothing.

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Anything he does, He's fascinating people.

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Elan, Inc. Where we discuss Elon Musk's vast

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 2>corporate empire, his latest gambits and antics, and how to

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 2>make sense of it all. I'm your host, David Papodopolis.

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Last Thursday night, we released an emergency podcast after Musk

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 2>went further in amplifying and agreeing with anti Semitic ideas

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 2>than he ever had before. The fallout from those posts

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 2>is ongoing. Musk has rejected accusations of bigotry, but advertisers

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 2>are still fleeing the site, and his CEO, Linda Yakarino,

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 2>is feeling the heat. Here with the Today to discuss

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the latest in all things acts and another wild development

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 2>in the tech world, the power Struggle. At OpenAI. Are

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 2>our regular muscologists, Sarah Friar, who oversees our coverage of

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley's biggest companies. Hello, Max Chafkin, senior reporter at

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg BusinessWeek, Hey, Hey Max. And Danahull, who covers Tesla

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 2>and has also been writing about the reaction to Elon's

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>controversial comments.

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 5>Always a pleasure.

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So, Sarah, the past few days have been action packed.

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Give us a bit of a refresher on what Elon

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 2>said last week that people found so objectionable.

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 6>Well, he was responding to a tweet that espoused of

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 6>a very racist theory about Jewish people that was actually

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.679
<v Speaker 6>tied to I'm not going to repeat it again. You

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 6>can listen to our emergency episode. But he said that

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.119
<v Speaker 6>is the actual truth, and then it caused this, this

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 6>backlash and really shock from all of his his supporters

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 6>and also his advertisers. Even the White House put out

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 6>of statement saying that this wasn't something that they were

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 6>aligned with. And furthermore, Linda Yakarino, who is the CEO

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 6>of X and who is supposed to be in this

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 6>job to bring back advertisers to the platform, basically had

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 6>to ignore it. Had to ignore what he said and

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 6>change the subjects to retaliation against a research group. So

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 6>that's where we are today, all.

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, Max, So in the last few days now, what

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 2>has Elon's response been. Well, so, the.

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Most interesting thing about this to me is that Elon

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Musk typically in these situations. Somebody says a racist thing,

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 3>they apologize, and Elon Musk has not apologized, which is

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 3>very much in character for Elon Musk. He's very much

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 3>a you know, never back down kind of fellow. What

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 3>he's done is, as Sarah said, denied the sort of

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 3>central allegation. He's deny that he's anti Semitic, and he's

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>had some sort of help from some of his buddies.

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 3>But what he's largely tried to do is sort of

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 3>changed the subject. He's attacked Media Matters.

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 2>And what has Media Matters done here?

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Media Matters, before this tweet, had put out a report

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 3>alleging that X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, was

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 3>showing ads next to anti Semitic content, and then Elon

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Musk tweets this thing, which really I would say reinforces

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 3>the problem that Media Matters is counting out because it's

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 3>not just like as Media Matters saying there were some

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 3>anti Semites on this platform. The call is coming from

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 3>inside the house, So that totally reinforces the problem with

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Media Matters is report and I think is part of

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 3>what kind of kicked off the cascade of essentially advertiser boycott.

0:04:57.640 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 2>This cuts it just before we go through the media

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 2>matter Lawsuitdan give us the exact lineup in the exact

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 2>rundown who has broken now and called off advertising with

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 2>X Well, I just want.

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:10.239
<v Speaker 5>To back up for one moment and make the point

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 5>that Musk is blaming this on the media, that you know,

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 5>media matters, this research group and journalists like us have

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 5>made this into a Maelstrom. But I want to be

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 5>very clear that pretty quickly after Musk did this tweet,

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 5>the American Jewish community came out with a very strong

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:30.119
<v Speaker 5>statement that said elon Musk's agreement agreement with the user

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 5>promoting elements of the Great Replacement theory isn't the truth.

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 5>It is the deadliest anti Semitic conspiracy theory in modern

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 5>US history and motivated the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting. Like he

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 5>was called out by pretty significant organizations, then the media

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 5>wrote about it, Then the advertiser boycott started happening, and

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 5>so that's where we are today. But I just think

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 5>it's disingenuous to sort of blame this on reporters when

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 5>you have some pretty large and significant organizations calling him

0:05:58.400 --> 0:05:59.799
<v Speaker 5>out for the tweet in the first place.

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 3>One other thing, which is that he one way he

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 3>tried to cover up the damage, or to do a

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 3>little bit of damage control was by sort of redirecting

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:12.679
<v Speaker 3>this to the Israeli Palestinian crisis. So he's essentially trying

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 3>to say I could not be an anti Semite because

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm incredibly pro Israel, which just to say that is

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 3>not those two things are not necessarily are not necessarily

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 3>mutually exclusives.

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 6>And also we haven't seen him enforced that. And also

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 6>it was this moment where you saw a lot of

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 6>Jewish leaders who normally would probably have criticized him, say hey,

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 6>that's great that you're doing that, and they sort of

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 6>seem to prioritize Elon Must's power and influence over the conversation,

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 6>over any personal anti Semitism or racism he may be espousing.

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 6>And that just goes to show how much control this

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 6>man has and how it's very difficult for people to

0:06:58.320 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 6>make an enemy of him.

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 3>For all.

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, but Dan, can you give me that rundown of

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 2>companies that have pulled advertising for Max Pause?

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 5>This is what I believe they're calling it. Sarah backed

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 5>me up here. I believe it's Apple, Disney, IBM are

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 5>the big three.

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 6>Those are the big ones. There are a few banks,

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 6>a few communications companies, a lot of companies that already

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 6>had a pause in place that are just continuing that pause.

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 6>The sixty percent drop in advertising revenue that Musk has

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 6>talked about, it doesn't seem to be reversing, all right.

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 2>So now let's get into this. You know, must describe

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 2>that I believe as a thermonuclear lawsuit against Media Matters.

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 2>It that the lawsuit has dropped Max.

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 3>And it says what the lawsuit says that Media Matters

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 3>report was contrived.

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't stipulated.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, It doesn't say that Media Matters made up these adjacencies.

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 3>It says that Media Matters refreshed their Twitter feeds.

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 2>So many times.

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 3>They are they cherry they cherry picked? Yeah, And I'm

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 3>not sure. Look, I'm not a legal scholar. I don't

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 3>know if this is gonna hold up in court or not.

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 3>But I would say that the goal here, I don't

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 3>think is to extract a settlement from Media Matters. It's

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 3>to basically respond to this general swirl of allegations in

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 3>the most aggressive way possible. And also, you know, I think, unfortunately,

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 3>to kind of create a chilling effect, to make it

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 3>more difficult for nonprofits and yes, journalists.

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 6>By the way, the Center for Countering Digital Hate was

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 6>already facing legal complaints from X earlier this year. This

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 6>is a pattern. He said he would go after the

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 6>ADL of the Anti Defamation League as well. They ended

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 6>up having a somewhat of a truce. And this is

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 6>just a company that has made their API, which researchers

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 6>used to that's an application programming interface. But what it

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 6>means is that the way that researchers used to look

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 6>at the content on X to figure out if there

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 6>was misinformation spreading ahead of an election, to figure out

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 6>what was going viral, what was happening in global conversation,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 6>Now that costs at a minimum forty two thousand dollars

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 6>a month, which is incredibly unaffordable for any nonprofit to

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 6>even hold X accountable in the way that they used to.

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 6>So all of this to say, X would prefer that

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 6>the only data that we believe about that company comes

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 6>from the company itself.

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 2>So we believe that this attempt to essentially enforce them

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 2>or have something of a chilling effect on the media

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 2>will be successful.

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Max.

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 3>I think the way that media chilling effects worth it's

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 3>not like a one to one thing. No, I don't

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 3>think it's going to be successful because in certain ways,

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 3>the lawsuit actually confirms certain aspects of the Media Matters port.

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he doesn't.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 3>The lawsuit doesn't dispute that these were real so greenshots.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't dispute that there were, you know, anti Semites

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 3>on this platform. It disputes that Media Matters was overstating

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 3>the likelihood that you would see an anti Semitic ad

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 3>next to that. And I don't think it's going to

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 3>have an immediate chilling effect. But when you see like

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 3>a cascade of things like this, you know it doesn't.

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't make people more anxious to call out discrimination

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.839
<v Speaker 3>and so on. And honestly, I think it's it's kind

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 3>of a clever way for him to respond to these

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 3>allegations without apologizing for them, because he almost can't apologize

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 3>for them because this is sort of important to his

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 3>like right wing persona, like a lot of his fans

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 3>would be really disappointed if he said, no, I totally misspoke.

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 3>I need a moment of reflection. He doesn't want to

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 3>do that, so this is a way to kind of zig.

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 5>What strikes me is that it's kind of like with politics,

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 5>you know how, like the politician does something bad and

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 5>then the surrogates rally to the defense. You're seeing that

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 5>play at now, Like so Elon creates this horrific news

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 5>cycle last week, never apologizes, the board doesn't apologize, and

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 5>believe me, like they had ample opportunity to. No one

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 5>puts out a statement. But then you see like Bill

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 5>Eckman ride to the rescue over the weekend, and then

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 5>yesterday Sam Teller, elunch chief former chief of staff, puts

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 5>out a tweet. I spent nearly five years as Elunch

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 5>chief of staff, and that time I never observed a

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 5>trace of anti Semitism. He goes on, and then, like

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 5>you know, Elon responds thanks Sam with a heart emoji.

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 6>This is all a distraction from what's actually happening at

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 6>this company, which is that they've really reduced their content

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 6>moderation rules because Elon Musk says he wants anyone to

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 6>speak freely, and in order to fix it, they're relying

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 6>on this community notes.

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Tool, which citizen journalists basically thousands.

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 6>Of people who just rate tweets and explain why they're

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 6>wrong or add context where needed and Bloomberg actually has

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 6>an investigation out today showing that this system is incredibly slow.

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 6>It can take hours for viral misinformation to get a

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 6>label put on it because it's this voting process that

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 6>takes place. And then it's also really inconsistent, and it

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 6>allows for repeat offenders who would have been banned under

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 6>the prior Twitter regime to continue to post at their pleasure.

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Sarah, So earlier on you reminded us that X's revenue,

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 2>its advertising revenue is down roughly sixty percent since Elon

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 2>took over the company. We've had additional advertisers pull out.

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Now you know how much damage has been done and

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 2>how existential is this? I mean listen, Elon himself in

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 2>the recent past has thrown out the word bankruptcy. Those

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 2>are his words. And how does Linda Yakarino turn this around?

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 6>Well, a lot of damage has been done to the

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 6>revenue model. That said, they think that they can eventually

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 6>replace it with the subscription business of paying for ex

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 6>premium that is still not reaching even a fraction of

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 6>the users that they would need for it to reach,

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 6>or to replace the revenues that they've lost from advertisers.

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 6>Linda Yakarino. Oh my goodness, I don't know where where

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 6>I start. I thought that she would last a few weeks,

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 6>maybe before she realized.

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh wrong, Sarah, I was so wrong.

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 6>She's in it to win it. She's in it for

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 6>the long haul. I am. I'm actually, you know, impressed

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 6>with her ability to withstand, you know, all the pressures

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 6>of this job and still survive in the role. Her

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 6>main goal seems to be to not get fired. She's

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 6>she is incredibly devoted to espousing whatever Musk wants her to.

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 6>So she was also part of this weekend spin of

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 6>turning this anti semitic tweet backlash into a backlash over

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 6>the media matters and bogus reports from journalist.

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 3>What I love about this, though, is honestly she is trying.

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Her plan as far as I can tell, which Sarah

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 3>was alluding to, is that they're going to just tack right.

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 3>They see twenty twenty four election is coming. You got

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 3>a nice size conservative audience on X right now. I

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 3>mean you know that we can we could have a

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 3>debate about how big the audience is overall and what

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 3>engagement is like, but it's definitely clear that you've got

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot of right wingers are spending a lot of

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 3>time there, and so her plan seems to be to

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 3>use this and to and to sell advertisements to you know,

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 3>political action committees and I guess candidates and nonprofits. Again,

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 3>this is not a huge market, and Apple and these

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 3>advertisers that are pulling out are huge advertisers, and it

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 3>seems exceedingly unlikely that you would actually you would actually

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 3>be able to make up the difference. On the other hand,

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 3>maybe they don't need to because it's a much smaller company.

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 3>They've laid off, you know, a huge amount of the

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 3>staff costs the lower and you know you have this

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 3>like trickle of the debt of subscribers. I'm just trying

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 3>to give you the Linda, you know, the best case

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 3>scenario from Linda's pot of view.

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 5>Andrew Tate is going to like is going to advertise

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 5>right like these right wing influencers are offering to sort

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 5>of pay money.

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 6>Okay, but two things right wing influencers hate being on

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 6>a platform where there are no left wing woke people

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 6>to troll, and if there aren't any then they'll be bored.

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 6>And the other thing is all of these advertisers who

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 6>are pulling out and making this big statement of you know,

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 6>we don't endorse anti Semitism. It's not that big of

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 6>a deal for their balance sheets to pull out of

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 6>Twitter advertising. It's not that effective. They have Meta, they

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 6>have Google, they have these other places to advertise. They

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 6>don't need to be on Twitter. They were on Twitter

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 6>because of the relationships and where it counts for Elon

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 6>Musk in his government contracts, in his relationships with bankers.

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 6>People aren't pulling up.

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, welcome back. So somehow X isn't even the biggest

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 2>news story in the tech world right now. Open Ai

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 2>a company that Elon started with Sam Altman before he

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 2>would leave in a twenty eighteen power struggle Max, what

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 2>exactly has it been facing? For the love of god,

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 2>what is going on here?

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Open ai is pretty much the hottest thing, or was

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 3>until a few days ago, pretty much the hottest.

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Thing in tech.

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Open Ai created chat GPT, the the chatbot that that

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 3>many people are very excited about, many companies are very

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 3>excited about. And Microsoft, you know, one of the world's

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 3>largest companies, has essentially put at the center of its

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 3>of an entire like.

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Corporate overhaul effort.

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 3>We should say, first of all, open Ai was co

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 3>founded by Elon Musk or Elon Musk played a key

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 3>role in the creation of the of this startup, was

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 3>the main funder early on, and for years open AI's

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 3>CEO Sam Altman, who was kind of Musk's partner in

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 3>the in the creation of the of the entity, was

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 3>going around saying this technology is so amazing, it could

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 3>end the world, Like we really need to be careful

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 3>here because Ai could take over and the robots could

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 3>somehow decide to annihilate the human race. And Elon Musk

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 3>actually played a big role in kind of pumping.

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Up this idea.

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 3>Now, I don't think that open AI's senior management, I

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 3>don't think Microsoft, I don't think Sam Altman ever really

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 3>took seriously the idea that open Ai was its little

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 3>chatbot that can write an email for you, was going

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 3>to turn around and annihilate the whole human race.

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 2>But that is the very argument that they apparently made here.

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 3>But crucially, unfortunately for Sam Altman, some open ai board members,

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 3>I think, do really buy into that idea. And we

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 3>had this amazingly sudden coup that happened on Friday where

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 3>a number of open ai board members. Open ai was

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 3>governed by a nonprofit. It's kind of a weird structure.

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Voted Sam Altman off the island, fired him, and they

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 3>were able to do so, strangely, without consulting any of

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 3>the venture capitalists who I invested in this thing, and

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 3>without consulting with Microsoft, which had put thirteen billion dollars

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 3>into this thing.

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's funny because I grew up journalistically in

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Latin America and I witnessed a lot of coups. Some worked,

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 2>some didn't. This has got to be the worst coup

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 2>I've seen since the two thousand and two attempt to

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 2>ousto Goo jobs. It's been pretty bad. And right now

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 2>as we speak, Sarah Friar, there's a mutiny going on

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 2>inside open a open ai correct.

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 6>Yes, About ninety percent or above of the existing employees

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 6>that open ai have signed a petition, by the way,

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 6>including the chief scientist who is on the board, pushing

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 6>out Sam Altman and Greg Brockman. These people have all

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 6>signed this memo saying that if they aren't reinstated, they're

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 6>out of there. Which is it? It's wild? Right?

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Are all?

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 6>Is Microsoft going to end up acquiring open ai for

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 6>like zero dollars, and you know the rest of this

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 6>is in their hands. Are these leaders who were ousted

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 6>going to come back and try to say businesses running

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 6>as usual?

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 2>It is.

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 6>One of the craziest, Like people have compared it to

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 6>like Steve Jobs getting kicked out of Apple and brought back,

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 6>or Jack Dorsy is getting kicked out of Twitter and

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 6>brought back. Those two situations happened over a matter of years.

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 6>This is happening in a matter of days. So we're

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 6>all not sleeping that much.

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 7>But I do think he played some role, right, which

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 7>is what I want to get at, because you know,

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 7>we don't ultimately know all should be revealed at some point,

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 7>but you know, to a certain degree, Yeah, it is

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 7>interesting without really knowing anything.

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 2>God, it seems like his fingerprints would be all over this.

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you told us the other day, Max that

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 2>they Musk that Elon Musk Samultman rivalry was a top

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty Musk rub I had it. I think I.

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Underrated it, right, I mean, clearly this was a bigger,

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 3>more consequential rivalry than I had even at Yeah, last

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 3>week we talked about Elon Musk going on the Lex

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Friedman podcast and he said a few things that kind

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 3>of anticipated this. He brought up ilias suit Skiver, the

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 3>chief scientist uh and and basically took credit for hiring him,

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 3>and heaped a lot of praise on him, and and

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 3>also made a kind of complaint about Sam Altman open AI.

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 3>He said, open a I was supposed to be open source,

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 3>and now it's profitable. He's been complaining for years that

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 3>this is like a startup worth billions of dollars that

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 3>he founded as a nonprofit. And what we saw with

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 3>the board, right was this effort to take this startup,

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 3>take this thing that Microsoft is so excited about, that

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 3>venture capitalists are so excited about, and wrestle it back

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 3>to its nonprofit roots, which you know, does two things

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 3>for for Elon Musk. One is it validates this thing

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 3>that he's been saying he can he can claim to

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 3>be right, which he loves to do. And also it

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 3>kind of does him a favor because Elon Musk just

0:20:54.240 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 3>launched this kind of haphazard chant of Rock. Yes, I'm saying,

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 3>and I regret to say, I know that Grock has

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 3>its defenders and everything like that, but basically this thing

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Rock was assembled in a matter of months, there's Yeah,

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I'd say there's a little excitement among Elon's fans, but

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's exactly caught fire. But now all

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden you have this utter crisis at the

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 3>leading player. I mean, I think that could only help

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk, either in terms of recruiting or just in

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 3>terms of getting people to try a different chatbox.

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Right now, one other thing on this, Sarah, do we

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 2>have any sense right because indeed, as maxis said here,

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Elon played a role in the founding of open Ai.

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 6>He was the co founder. He put one hundred million

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 6>of his own money into it. He tried to take

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 6>full control at some point and that didn't work out.

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 6>But he was very passionate about trying to prevent AI

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 6>from getting out of control. And of course this narrative

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 6>of like, we've got to prevent AI from taking over

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 6>is also somewhat self serving because it's like the only

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 6>one who can save you from it is me.

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 3>We should also say, for future feud watching potential Musk

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 3>weighing in here, Musk, you know, hinting darkly that there

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 3>must have been something going on that the public needs

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 3>to know about. That is a big problem for Microsoft,

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 3>which is like really trying to just clean up this mess,

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's a big problem for the venture capitalists who

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 3>invested in open Ai. I mean, part of what makes

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:29.199
<v Speaker 3>this whole thing so wild is that is that, like overnight,

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 3>this incredibly valuable startup that all of these very powerful

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 3>people were sort of banking on is getting taken apart.

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, It's amazing, Max, this thing went from apparently a

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 2>value of eighty six billion dollars to perhaps zero in seconds.

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 2>It's one hundred percent, right, It's a staggering if it

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 2>really goes down this way.

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's not going to go down to zero, but

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 3>at least I don't think it will.

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 6>That's the thing, Max, This tension, these relationships, they all

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 6>go way back. Elon Musk has known Sam Altman forever.

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 6>Sam Altman, by the way, was in the first Y

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 6>Combinator class with Emmett Sheer, who's now the CEO taking

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 6>over maybe on an interim basis, we don't know for

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 6>open Ai.

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 2>All these here, Sarah Emmit, Sarah Sheer is just simply

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 2>sitting in that position, keeping it warm until I think,

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 2>as you once said, until Elon Musk takes that seat.

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 6>Oh gosh, Yeah, Thanksgivings coming up. One thing I'm grateful

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 6>for is that that Elon Musk didn't end up getting

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 6>that CEO role over the weekend.

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 2>Hey, note that we're recording this on Tuesday afternoon, and

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 2>this is a very quickly developing story. The latest here

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 2>is that Altman is apparently now in talks to return

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 2>to open Ai Crazy times. So before we head into

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 2>our final segment here, we should mention that the SpaceX

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 2>starship launch that we previewed last week did indeed happen

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 2>on Saturday, and alas ended in flames. The flames, though,

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 2>came a little later than the last time on these

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 2>things went up in space, so Elon is a touch

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 2>closer to that Mars colony he's dreaming of. If you

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 2>want to know what's at stake with the launch and

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 2>all those going forward, picture to check out last week's spot.

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Thanksgiving is just two days away, everyone, and our thoughts

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 2>here at least as always turned to the Musk family table.

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 2>In the past, it's been a pretty raucous and wild event. Max.

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Paint us a picture here. What's it going to be

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 2>like this year?

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 3>I feel like all Thanksgiving dinners to some extent are

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 3>exercises in like avoiding politics, and you're just trying to

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 3>like sit there with your family just.

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Like hoping head down, just can't avoid it. And so

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I imagine it's kind of the same situation,

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 4>except it's all of them just hoping that Elon will,

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 4>like you do, not go on a wokeness rant, which

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 4>I again like that feels like a common Thanksgiving tableau

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of brings everyone down, And I imagine that could

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 4>that's you know, almost inevitability, and the real the only

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 4>question is how do they kind of steer away from it?

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 2>Well, listen, the one thing that I'm hoping for this

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Thanksgiving is so that Sarah Friar can get some rest

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 2>and that there isn't some like enormous open ai slash

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 2>x news on Thursday morning.

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 6>Okay, let's help.

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 2>All Right, that's it. Thanks for listening to Elon, Inc.

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 2>And thanks to our panel Sarah, Dana Max.

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Great to be here, have a great week.

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 6>Thanks all.

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 2>This episode was produced by Stacy Wong, Naomi Shaven and

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Rayhan Harmancia are senior editors. The idea for this very

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 2>show also came from Rayhon Blake Maples handles engineering, and

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 2>we get special editing assistant from Jeff Gropat. Our supervising

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 2>producer is Magnus Hendrickson, Thanks a bunch of Angel Rascio

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 2>and to BusinessWeek editor Weber as well. The Elon Inc.

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Theme is written and performed by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex Sugiira.

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Sage Bauman is the head of Bloomberg Podcast and our

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 2>executive producer. I am David Papadopoulos. If you have a minute,

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 2>rate and review our show, it'll help other listeners find

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 2>us happy Thanksgiving all. See you next week.