WEBVTT - Libya Conflict Is Hugely Overlooked Issue On Oil Capacity: Wald

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Oil

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>prices are just a tick down today ahead of that

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>all important Opeque meeting. Will they all come together, have

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 1>a Kumbaya moment and have an agreement that doesn't end

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>up with Saudi Arabia on one side and Iran and

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Brazil on the other. Joining us now, Dr Ellen Walt,

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>President of Transversal Consulting. She has an energy industry and

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Middle East expert. She is also author of Saudi Inc.

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Which takes a look at Saudi Aramco and the family

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that controls the multi trillion dollar enterprise. Dr will thank

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. What do you expect

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>to happen at the upcoming meeting which takes place in

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>less than twenty four hours. I think that right now

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>we are leaning towards some sort of agreement for a

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>across the board production increase, and that's probably one of

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why we're seeing oil taking downwards. What's interesting

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>right now is that Saudi Arabia is floating proposals of

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>potential increases of anywhere between eight hundred thousand barrels per

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>day to one million barrels per day. Now, the key here, though,

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>is that even if that is pushed through on paper

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in practice, because countries like Venezuela and Iran and Angola

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>can't actually increase their production, they're just physically and financially

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>unable to, that wouldn't actually bring that much oil back

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>onto the market, and increase of one point five million

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>barrels per day would only add eight hundred thousand barrels

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>per day. Does any potential agreement also have political implications

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Iran and Saudi Arabia. Yeah, and

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>this is the big, the big question. Iran has come

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>into this meeting kind of with its UH pistols blazing.

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>It said, no agreement, It's not going to agree to

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>any kind of production increase. It's going to veto anything

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that that's put forward. And so it really does that

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>they really are pitted kind of across from each other. Now,

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>what I think is likely that we will see is

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>some sort of agreement that allows Iran with with wording

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that allows Iran to say, hey, we're not really increasing production,

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just we're moving back to full compliance as opposed

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to under compliance, and then to satisfy Russia on the

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>other hand, which is really pushing for a big increase.

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>They'll have language where Russia can kind of say to

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's oil companies, hey, look, you can increase production, all right.

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>This is this is headspinning to me on many levels.

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Number one, uh, the question of Iran and Venezuela posing

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>output increases or sort of lifting some of the caps

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>simply because that cannibalizes from their own business because they're

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>unable to make the additional production. I'm struggling to see

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>how it factors into the price of oil, because, as

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you were saying, any increase will be offset by decreases elsewhere.

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that the oil market is being overly

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>sensitive right now, given how complicated this is, in the

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>unlikelihood that it would be a rush of oil into

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the market, exactly, I think the oil market is very

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>very sensitive right now. Um, any news about, for example,

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>news that China is considering putting tariffs on American oil.

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Any news about any oil refiners deciding to drop Ivanni oil,

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it all kind of sends shock waves through the prices.

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Everyone is extremely sensitive right now, and that's why every

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of a bit of news that comes out seems

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to kind of rock the prices. What about the addition

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of oil, let's say, from a country as such as Libya,

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Will that have any effect? Libya is a huge issue

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that I think is really being underlooked right now. The

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>fighting in Libya has taken out a significant number of

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Libya's a storage capacity to store oil for export. And

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.799
<v Speaker 1>even though um the Libyan government has kind of taken

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>retaken control of uh its oil, it's going to take

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>a while to get its oil exports back up to

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the levels where they were. And apparently some of these

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>UH some more storage fsacilities have caught on fire. This

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is a huge, huge issue that could really send Libyan

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>production into a tailspin and mean that the market is

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.119
<v Speaker 1>really going to be undersupplied going into the second half

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of Yeah, you know, I'm just struck by sort of

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>the power and cloud of OPEC. Are we seeing the

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>decline of that? And is this cartel basically drastically losing

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>its power. You know, everyone is kind of the you know,

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>been saying, oh, OPEC is dead two years ago when

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>they weren't able to really lift prices. They were they

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>were calling OPEC, you know, a relic, and now we're

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing everyone has basically defended on opaque headquarters just to

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>see what they're going to decide. I think one of

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the reasons they've become more powerful, though, is this relationship

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that they have with Russia. Russia's the largest oral producer

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>out there, and without that relationship they really wouldn't have

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the kind of clouds that we're seeing now. I guess

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I ask that is because when you

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>think about Iran coming in with their guns a blazing

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>uh and saying we're not going to sign off on

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>any increase to output, they have no recourse other than

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of the mirage of unity of OPEC, right, I

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>mean they have no leverage here. Yeah, OPAQ is not

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>OPEC is not UM you know, a majority rules organization,

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>but they do have ways that certain countries can either

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>veto ideas or that other countries can override it. But

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>really what we're looking at is UM Saudi Arabia's oil

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>minister is a very talented negotiator, and he's been described

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>as someone who just doesn't give up, whereas the previous

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>oil minister, Alian the Emi, would sometimes get very frustrated

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, just decide it's not worth it and

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>walk out of the room. All Fala is known as

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>exceptionally patient and he will uh someone someone uh. One

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of my sources told me that he will talk and

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>talk and talk until he's basically bloodened you into agreeing

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>with him, because he's talked so much. And so I

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>think we can't discount that and his ability to bring

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this group together basically just through the power of continued negotiation.

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>What kind of patients are countries that are supporting Venezuela

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>going to have if Venezeuela continues on its current economic path.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>It's really a terrible situation for Venezuela. And it's very

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>sad because originally OPEC was formed as kind of a

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>solidarity movement for these producing countries who really were relying

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>on Western companies to produce their oil, and it was

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>designed for them to be able to kind of stand

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>up to these companies together. And now that idea has

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of fallen apart in Venezuela has really been left

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>by the wayside. It's almost as if they don't care

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>really what is happening in Venezuela and kind of see

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it as look at it's your own fault. All right, Well,

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to leave it there. And I know that

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be following this opaque meeting for us.

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Much appreciated as always. Dr ellen Wald is the president

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of a transversal consulting energy industry and also Middle East expert,

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and she can be followed on Twitter at energies d Economy.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>That's e N E R g z D Economy. So

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I a you to do that right now. It is

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a seventy one billion dollar deal. This is a Walt

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Disney's offer for twenty one century Foxes entertainment assets. And

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>here to tell us more about the battle in the

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>world of media is Porter bid, managing partner Media Tech

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Capital Partners, and you can follow Porter on Twitter at

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Porter three. Okay, Porter three, tell us why are these

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>assets so valuable to the long term strategy of Walt

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Disney and Bob Iger. Well, Bob Iger has been late

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 1>to the game in over the top content. He's still

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>selling most of Disney's product to the legacy television networks

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>cable industry, and he wants to go over the top,

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>wants to take on Netflix and everybody else who's streaming

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and acquiring the content that one century Foxes entertainment assets

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>represent gives him an unassailable cache of huge, huge, popular

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>content to mind. And Disney has proven that they can

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>take Marvel or Pixar or Lucas Films product and turn

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it into a ten times bigger business than it was

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>as a standalone, and they'll do the same thing with

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Fox Porter. When we were talking ahead of this segment,

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you said that at the beginning of next year, Walt

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Disney Company is going to launch a Netflix killer. It's

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a net A Disney streaming channel. Uh. Priced,

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 1>We don't know, but if they're smart, they will price

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>it at at comparable pricing seven a month to Netflix,

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 1>or maybe even a discount for the first year or

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>two to build up traffic. Bob Iger has has made tentative,

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>unsuccessful attempts to get into the streaming business. Now he's

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>set everything he's got on the table towards building a

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Netflix Killer and making Disney the over the top champion

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in the world. One thing that strikes me is that

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>coming with this, Disney will probably pull all of its

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>content off of Netflix, which is currently available to people

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>who subscribe to Netflix. Correct, without question. There are contractual

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>hurdles that Disney has to get over some some of

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the content that they licensed to Netflix has a year

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>or two to run. But as soon as those contracts

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>are over, you can bet Disney won't show up anywhere

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix. Disney has, of course ESPN, ABC all the

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>film content that you just described. Fox has Star India

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>FS one. If you want to watch the World Cup,

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you're watching. Fox also got FX Network, National Geographic, the

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>film division, the television division, and Sky. Can they put

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it all together. That's what Bob Iger's grand plan is.

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>He wants to take Disney global. They they sell theme

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 1>park and merchandise and and tickets in Europe and Asia

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>and China, but they don't really have a viable footprint globally.

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what the Fox assets and Sky, which is

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a critical part of this deal and is very likely

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to cost nearly as much as the Century Entertainment assets themselves.

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>You know it sounds like it's obviously a huge win

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>for Bob Iger to get the Fox assets, and he's

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously willing to pay quite a bit for them seventy

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>one point three billion dollars, as my co host was

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>saying earlier in Fox. Um, I'm just wondering, at what

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>point do people start to worry that they are overpaying,

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>given that there is a bitting war going on with Comcast. Well,

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the problem with saying anybody is overpaying is what is

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 1>the price? What is the value you? It's it's not

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>really what it costs, it's what you can create out

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of it. And uh, Disney has has dominated the content

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and film industry over the last several years. Last year

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>they represented almost of the profits of all of the

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>movie studios in the world. So they're going to do

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 1>the same thing increase and not just incrementally, but gigantically

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the profit potential that the Fox assets they're acquired, they

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>will acquire. So basically, just to let I understand this,

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the the idea here is if you have enough of

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a critical mass, people cannot live without them, and that

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>all of that content that people have gotten used to

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>being able to stream elsewhere, they will not be able

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to get except directly from Disney, which will undermine the

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>business model of Netflix. That that's exactly right. And Disney

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>has existed in the legacy media world on retransmission rights

0:12:55.480 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and contracts with cable and and UH tradition television networks

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 1>for their content that has eroded. Everybody looked at the

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>decline in in viewers and ESPN and that had a

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>big impact on Disney's share price over the last eighteen months.

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>They want to control the director consumer facing that their

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>content can generate. They don't want to depend on old media.

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Ten years from now, we won't even have a cable

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>television system. All the cable companies will be going over

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the top. I'm glad you mentioned stock prices because if

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you compare what investors in Comcast have done to their stock,

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it's down seventeen so far this year, So clearly they're

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>not dying to have this deal come through. On the

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>other hand, Walt Disney shares basically unchanged. That's right. Why

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 1>do you believe investors in Comcast feel so, let's say

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>negatively about this potential. Well, if if this deal were

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to go to Comcast, UH, they would take on a

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy billion dollars of new debt. They're already

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>well over leveraged, and investors don't like that. And I

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>think that that's a serious problem with Brian Roberts all

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>cash offer. The interesting thing it's not been made very

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>clear by the media. The interesting thing about Disney's new

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>offer is it on the surface, it appears to be

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>half cash and half stock, but Disney put a rider

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in there that if any shareholder decides to take it

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in all stock, he can, and certainly the Murdoch interests

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to take all all stock because one of

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Rupert's legacies is I want to be the largest shareholder

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in Disney the We're the biggest entertainment company in the world,

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and taxes and no taxes right until unless he sells him.

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you brought up stock prices because Netflix, meanwhile,

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>which you know we're saying, is going to pay some

0:14:55.000 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>stiff competition. Netflix shares at record highs eighteen dollars share.

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is going to happen in Netflix?

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>If Disney goes through it there it's a momo stock.

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>It just keeps going up because everybody says they keep

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>adding subscribers, but they look at the cash flow it's diminimous,

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and look at the increasing content costs that they're having

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to budget to keep those subscribers coming on board. It's

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>not a sustainable business model, and the market is taking

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>advantage of the momentum um. They They are very good

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>at marketing, they're very good at at selling a few

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>original titles that have massive appeal. But what are they

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>going to do when they run out of hits and

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>they can't keep doing it. The odds against making hits

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in Hollywood for the last hundred years have been two

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>out of ten, break even in one out of ten

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>as a blockbuster. What happens the other nine? Most of

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>those end up in the dumper at Netflix. Quarter bit,

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. Highly illuminating

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>porter by managing partner at Media Tech Capital Partners in

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>New York. It looked like perhaps things were coming down

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>for Italy after their bond yields blew out just weeks ago,

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>but today, well the turmoil is back. Joining us now

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that is Alberto Gallo. He's partner and

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager for the Algebras Macro Credit Fund that Algebras

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Investments Limited. He's also a Bloomberg opinion columnist. Alberto, thank

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. So this latest hiccup

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is coming after two prominent euroskeptics were handed key roles

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Italian parliament. Do you think that the hiccup

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>today is a more longer lasting kind of concern that

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>will cause investors to continue just to withdraw from the nation.

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Good morning. I do think that the situation will remain volatile,

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and simply because the spending plans are very ambitious from

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the from the Italian government. So you're looking at the

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>potential plant spending of a hundred billion euros, which probably

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 1>will be revised down but still unfunded by tax raises.

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>So we think the short term probability of euro exit.

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, all these fears of our weekend type of

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it are a bit overdone, but the depths it spending

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>is still a problem in an environment where you know,

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Europe isn't really focusing on growth, so um, it's good

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to think about growth, but the depth spending plans they

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>have are excessive. So Alberta, when does this hiccup turn

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>into asset reflux? We've already seen a repricing in the

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Italian BTPs and some of the assets, some of the

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>other assets like stocks and bonds. The reality is on

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the ground on the corporates. Are the corporates that have

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>survived the crisis. Um, you know, around one in four

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>small or medium businesses have defaulted throughout the crisis. So

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the remaining corporates are much stronger. But obviously, you know,

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the situation, a crisis, situation m scares investors,

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 1>and we have seen a repricing across all assets, but

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>we see fundamental still strong. On the ground. Um, what

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we see is political volatility and unfortunately, you know, that's

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>something that will continue in Europe because Europe needs to change.

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>Europe needs to change the wards a more cohesive union

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that focuses on growth, not just on austerity. And I

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>think you know, even in Germany, um Angela Merkel is

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>getting the message with some dwindling in her contensus. So

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>here here's what's so amazing to me. You say that

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>there's been a repricing, and certainly there has. In two

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>year Italian yields are now gasped less than ninety basis

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>points zero point nine percent. Right, this is still nothing

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>mama mama miya. Indeed, so repricing to even uh, you know,

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:10.239
<v Speaker 1>extremely low levels from unbelievably low levels. You do have

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to wonder, given the fact that the e c B

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>has basically demonstrated its willingness to backstop this market, given

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you are seeing other peripheral regions also

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>experience weakness on the heels of what's going on in Italy,

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>is this a buying opportunity for you as the head

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of a macro credit fund. We think that there are

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>some things in credit that are becoming interesting. Um. We

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>are still looking at UM corporate credit and some banks

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in countries that remain very stable from a political perspective,

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>like Spain or Portugal, And tonight we'll learn the Eurogroup

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>solutions for Greece, which has been working on reforms for

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.959
<v Speaker 1>a very long time and he's waiting for debt relief

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and there's there's very likely to be a an extension

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of maturities for the loans degree. So when you see

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>indiscriminate selling across the whole of Europe, every risk cast

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>at selling off because of one country, because of one

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>political headline. Yeah, that creates some um, some buying opportunities. Uh,

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>in Italy, we do think the volatility will continue in

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>the long end of the curves of five year plus

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>ten year plus BTPs, so you know, it's a bit

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>early to to step in. But in other countries there

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>are some opportunities, so you were saying incorporate debt in

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>perhaps Spain or Portugal. UM are the particular industries that

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you see as being immune to some of the political

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>discussions and seeing opportunities in Generally, the volatility will hit

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>every um, every credit in these countries. In Europe, UM,

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the corporates have been historically much more resilient to sovereign

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to sovereign volatility, because corporates have the levers, they have

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>good balances, and many of them could survive even the

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>worst case of a euro exit. The banks are more

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>connected to the sovereign still in Europe, even though they've

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>solved a lot of sovereign debt. UM Greece has been

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>in the sovereign market. Greece has been very resilient in

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks because again it's going to benefit

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>from a potential extension of maturities. And Grease remains the

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>widest name, the widest sovereign debt in Europe with you know,

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a ten year yield of four two percent in euros,

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>which is equivalent to around seven percent seven plus percent

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>in dollars. So it's trading still like an emerging market. UM.

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>So we we think still Greece is good opportunity given

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the UM you know, the E s M European stability

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms just declare that they have satisfied all the reforms

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>they needed to do to get help. UM. So we

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>think Grease is reprising towards the same trajectory as as Portugal.

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>But generally speaking, UM, we continue to see political risk

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.959
<v Speaker 1>populism in Europe and in other countries creating polatility for investors.

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And we've been working on strategies that are short like

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a like a new fund that we launched a few

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>days ago. Thank you very much. Alberto Gallo as a

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>partner and portfolio manager at Algebra's UK Limited, talking about

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>corporate debt in Europe. So we have been talking quite

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit about the Supreme Court decision. It is one

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that is absolutely moving markets. Basically, it frees states and

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>local governments to start collecting billions of dollars in sales

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>tax from internet retailers that don't currently charge tax to

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.439
<v Speaker 1>their customers. Sure of it and joins us now. She

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is a Bloomberg opinion columnist covering all things tech. I'm

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at some of the bigger decla lines Overstock dot

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Com down more than one point three percent, Amazon down

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>nearly a percent, eBay down two percent. Uh. Just how

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>much does this potentially bite into the business of these

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>online behemoths. I don't know. I think it's probably not

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that big of a deal, particularly for the largest e

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>commerce companies like Amazon. So the the issue is that Amazon,

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, already charges sales tax um in for for

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>products that it sells directly two shoppers um on any

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in any state that charges sales tax, So that doesn't

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't do anything for Amazon. But there are also

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>about half the sales on on Amazon are coming from

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>these independent merchants that use Amazon as a sales channel,

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>and they may or may not charge sales tax. So

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>now they'll have to be probably some enforcement mechanisms on

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>sales tax in in on those independent merchants. But look,

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Amazon and eBay, to their wealthy companies, they can afford it.

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 1>The burden though, falls on these smaller players, these independent merchants,

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>these mom and pop shops that are now going to

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out the tangle of US sales tax

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>rules in every state in the country. And it's worth

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>noting right that they are not charging it, they're just

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>collecting it. That's right, right. And the reason the reason

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I say this is just because that feeds into your

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>your point about third party sellers that use Amazon or

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>even maybe Facebook as a platform in order to sell,

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and now they have to compete with the stores that

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>are around the corner. Perhaps that's right, and I look,

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>it's it's there's been some research on the impact of

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>what happens to the sales of an online retailer when

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>they begin to charge sales tax. At least from what

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I've seen, it's a little bit of a mixed bag.

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not like they've already run out of town all

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of the independence, right, I mean, because this has been

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>going since Amazon started in business, and that was a

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>way to beat the competition because it actually took less

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>money out of the consumer pocket. It was I mean, look,

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a good point that Amazon for many years

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>fought paying sales tax, uh, in part because I mean

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>It's stated rationale was the company wanted there to be

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>a national rule about sales tax. En. That's kind of

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 1>state by state hodgepodge, But you're right it did give

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Amazon an advantage, at least on paper, that it's it's

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 1>bottom line for shoppers was less expensive than Walmart or

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>whoever was forced to charge a sales tax on on everything.

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.959
<v Speaker 1>All right, So Sharovida has spoken, and it seems like

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>perhaps people are overreacting with the knee jerk reaction that

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 1>this will somehow sync earnings for the Amazon's knee bays

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of the world. Uh, and correct me if I'm mischaracterizing

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that happence. Um, Sarah, I do want to switch gears

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Intel made news today by firing the

0:25:55.280 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 1>chief executive for a consensual relationship UM with an emloyee.

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>This to me seemed to signal a sea change in

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a tolerance for some of these things. What's your take? Yeah,

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that's exactly right. Um. Look, Brian Personage is

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>not the first CEO to be pushed out over a

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>consensual relationship with an employee. UM. It happened to the

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Price Line CEO a couple of years ago. It's not

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>an unprecedented move. But we are in this me too era.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>There is more scrutiny of workplace behavior than ever before,

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And behavior that may have been kind of brushed, overlooked,

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>or kind of covered up or ignored in the past,

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it can no longer be ignored. That these things are

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>now under heightened scrutiny. Corporate executive behavior is being more

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>closely watched than ever, and so is the behavior of

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 1>boards of directors and responding to that behavior, and the

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>potential for lawsuits and the potential for lawsuits, and look,

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and the potential of kind of loss of faith among

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>investors and loyse. It's it's a big deal now, and um, look,

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Krasana didn't do himself any favors, maybe by he was

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>a very vocal champion for gender equality in the workplace,

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to his credit, But when you're that kind of outspoken

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>champion for workplace equity, your behavior has to be above

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>board too. Indeed. All right, thanks very much, Shara over Day,

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg columnist for Bloomberg Opinion for all things technology related.

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you need help maybe setting up your new iPhone,

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's the person. I'm not tech support tech support.

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Although she did. She did spend about two years laughing

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 1>at my lack of technological prowess. Well, it's not laughing

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>at you, laughing with you. Thanks very much, sharra Ovi Day.

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox, I'm

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.239
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio