WEBVTT - Selects: What's the misery index?

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody, it's Chuck here. I guess it's time to

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>introduce another Saturday Select. I'm pretty miserable, so maybe I

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>should just do this one on the Misery Index. It's

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>called What's the Misery Index? And it's from June. I

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>hope you'd like it. It was a lot of fun

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>recording it. Welcome to Stuff you should know, a production

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio. Hey, and welcome to the podcast.

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Clark and there's Charles W Chuck Bryant. The

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>W stands for Wayne Dr Wayne Coyne. That gets you

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>every time. I know, it's funny to be forty five

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>years old and named after Wayne Coyne because he's like, right, no,

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>he's his fifties too. But it would be weird. I

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>would have been named after a very uh like kindergarten

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>age Wayne con Right. You know, maybe your parents were

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>friends with his parents and they really thought a lot

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>about him. Play he's a real achiever, right that, Wayne?

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Coins are going places? Okay, Uh, that was a weird sidetrack.

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>It was already out of the gate. Man, how are

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you feeling. I'm good. I got a lot on your plate,

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>got a lot going on? Oh, you know what today is?

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 1>What dude? Today is the day that I leave this

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>office and I go to a shop in Edmond Park

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 1>and pick up four brand new last chance garage hats.

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, it's a big day, very big day. So

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I have a couple of people would like to thank.

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a bigger deal than it should be for a

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>grown man in a hat. But we all understand. First

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of all, Katie, my custom patchmaker, this is really where

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it all came together. It's a patch, isn't right? The

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>hat's not right. Katie killed it. It looks identical and

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you can find her work at tulip cake dot com.

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>T U l I P Cake. And I said, you know,

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>people might ask you to make you to make them

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>last chance garage patches. Did you have her destroy the mold?

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>And I said, I don't you know. It's on you.

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>It's up to you legally. Uh. I'm just saying you

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>might get requests. You should have been like Ivan the

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Terrible who blinded his architects after they've built his pal Now,

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't care people, I'd love to see these things

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>around and la mood big hats l A m o

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>O d uh for big heads. Because part of the

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>problem was finding Uh yeah, man, like, uh, the problem

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I have with hats these days. I don't look like

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I have a huge chat, but they just fit so

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>snugly and they don't go far down enough on my head.

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>So I finally looked up oversized hats and found La

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>mood Hats and dude, their exactly like the old hat

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>except it doesn't stink. Oh yeah, like, these are great.

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I got four brands, an improvement for sure. So are

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 1>you gonna put one in like the seed Vault in Norway? Uh?

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Probably one there? Uh, there will be one in the

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>nuclear suitcase and um, I'll wear the other two at

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the same time at the same from back. That's right. Anyway,

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm super excited. So that's pretty cool. Thank you to

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Katie and lemod Hats for allowing me to spend too

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.399
<v Speaker 1>much money getting four hats remade. And speaking of while

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>we're thanking people, we we owe a long overdue thank

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you to a guy who um made us a really

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>cool sign. Um. Oh you mean the sign this guy

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>made for us like seven years ago. Yeah, his name

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is Matt Street. He's at fat Bison dot com. And

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>it made a really cool wood carved sign. It was

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>in our TV show. It was like like the production

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>company got clearance rights for it and all this stuff,

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and we love the sign, but we just forgot to

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>ever thank Matt. So, Matt, thank you so much for

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the sign. We love it. We have it hanging here

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in the studio. It is a work of art and

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate it. We're sorry for the oversight. Okay, is

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that all? But thank you? So let's talk about the

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Misery Index. Huh. Yeah, what a great transition have you? Um?

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Had you heard of it before you came across this article? Yeah,

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know a lot about it though, and um,

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>apparently it's going a little bit out of fashion lately

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>from what I understand. Yeah, I think so, because well,

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>well let's get into it. Okay. It turns out economics

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>as a whole is in danger of going out of fashion.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I read this, I've read this really interesting article on

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a on which is maybe the greatest website on the

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>planet a E O N dot It might be dot

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>CEO because you said that British about a lot of websites.

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I said about a on a lot and

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and it just seems like I'm talking about different ones.

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>But there's this article by Allen J. Levinovitz and it's

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>called The New Astrology, and he basically makes a parallel

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>between economics and economists and economic theory when you take

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>economics and try to apply it to future forecasting and

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the um the BCE Chinese astrologers that basically directed the

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>way that the economy or the government was going to

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>move based on the movements of the stars. So what

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>are they saying, It's you might as well just do that.

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>He draw some pretty pretty interesting parallels between the two

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that that economics in and of itself is not necessarily flawed,

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>but when it's used to forecast the future, then it

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>becomes inherently flawed. Yeah, this this article really kind of

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>kind yeah a little bit, Yeah, to an extent. I mean,

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the Misery index is a legitimate economic tool, and it's

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>hit or miss in a lot of ways. Yeah. I

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>think one thing that hit home to me with researching

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>this is it just seems impossible to say that there's

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>one correct way of doing things right or that is absolute,

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, you know, if you do things this way,

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>then there will be nothing but growth in job abs

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and the GDP and g MP, and uh, it just

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't seem to work that way, right. I

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>think the problem is is that if you listen to economists,

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they like to act like they do have a handle

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>on that kind of thing. But if you really look

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 1>into economics, it's very politicized. There's liberal economics and there's

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>conservative economics, and the fact that each one saying it's

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>right kind of makes you think that maybe no one is,

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, But the misery index actually is is it

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>started out from a guy who was pretty good at

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>walking the line between conservative and liberal economics. Um, a guy, uh,

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>what was his name? Okin? Yeah, Arthur Oakin, and he

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>uh he worked on Kennedy's staff as Council of Economic Advisors,

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>John F. Kennedy that is, and he was, Um, I

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>get the feeling, one of the main influences and talking Kennedy,

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>who initially did not necessarily agree, but talking Kennedy into

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to an act both conservative and liberal

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>economic policies simultaneously. Right. They were. The US was in

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a recession when Kennedy took office in nineteen one, um,

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and they talked him into not only increasing government spending

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>like welfare programs. They raised the UM the minimum wage

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and um some other stuff like that. But they also

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>cut taxes, which is, you do one or the other.

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>You cut taxes and hope everything goes for the best

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>because businesses will start investing in spending or you start

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you start investing in welfare programs to help your ailing

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>UM lower in middle classes. Right, you don't do both,

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And Kennedy did both and it was successful. Yeah. He

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>well he at first he said, I don't know about this.

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about this author. Mike Kennedy sounds like

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a robot. My Gooda did too. Actually this is fine,

0:07:54.720 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>but Arthur, mr okunn, I think, ok it's a weird name. Okay,

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you in? Uh he talked him into it and said

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>trust me, and things worked out in that case. Yeah. Well,

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of guys, including Oaken's, names, were made

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>by this advice that panned out like the US Center

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to Boom. Yeah and um. Oakin ended up as being

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the head of the Council of Economic Advisors for Kennedy's successor,

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Lyndon Johnson. Right, yeah, and um. One thing that economic

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>economists economists love to do is um. I mean, he

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>loved to forecast and all that stuff. But it's all

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>about data. Man. They love to pour over data like

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:45.479
<v Speaker 1>stuff that makes the average person their mind bleed from boredom.

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>They just find it fascinating. That's what they do on

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Friday nights. Friday nights, they pour over data, historical data,

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to find you know, it's like the big puzzle

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and they're all trying to solve it, so they pour

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 1>over this data. Okin did and um he said, you

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>know what, I noticed something here between when we started

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>recording some some decent unemployment rates, which I didn't know.

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know we started that. Yeah, it seems like

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it would have gone back before then. But between sixty

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know what, I've noticed that the gross

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>national product rises three for every percentage point that unemployment falls,

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>with a caveat that unemployment has to be between three

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and seven point five, which is a pretty like it's

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a pretty bold statement to say I've noticed this is

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a definite trend. It is, and it came to be

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>called Oakland's law because it was verified other people poured

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>over the data. Like this guy's right, man, he just

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.599
<v Speaker 1>keeps coming up with hits, doesn't he Um and The

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>reason you would want to know some arcane piece of

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>data like that is that if you know that that's

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the case, then you can say, well, if we attack unemployment,

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>can get it down a couple of points. We can

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, raise g d P or g MP you know,

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>by three percent every time we drop it. So when

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>we need to but bulk g m P up, we

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>just attack unemployment, right, easy peasy. Uh yeah, And everyone said,

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you are Yeah. Things worked out pretty well for

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>a while, but then the nineteen seventies came along, and um,

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>if you we're gonna talk a little bit about stagflation now.

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you haven't heard it, we have a pretty

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>good episode. What's good? I think? So it's called what

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is Stagflation? From February twenty four, two thousand eleven. Um, yeah,

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I think as far as our economics episodes that it

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>was not bad. I went back and listened to a

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of it before I got bored, so it checks out. Yeah,

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the first three minutes were great. Um, but yeah, I

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>go back and listen to that. But um, like he said,

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>he served as chairman of the c e A for

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Johnson and then in seventy three a very unfortunate thing

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>happened that kind of ended up rocking the world and

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the United States in particular with our economy. Um. So

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a break and we're gonna talk when

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>we get back about the Middle East. All right, what

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 1>happened in the I'm two years old, I am negative three, Okay,

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>The Arab oil embargo happened, right, that's right. So at

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the time, until very recently, the US was super dependent

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>on for in oil, like like other countries, we wouldn't

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>even sit down at the table with we were getting

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>oil from right. Yeah, we're doing and better now, yeah,

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>with our dependency, But back then, very bad, very um.

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And it was a it was a source of anxiety

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people. And that anxiety actually panned out.

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>So in UM nineteen seventy three, Egypt and Syria and

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a few other Arab nations invaded the Golden Heights and

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the Sinai Peninsula to attempt to take back land um

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>from the State of Israel. The us UH was found

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to be supplying arms to Israel, So as far as

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the Arab states were concerned, the US had cast its

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>lot on israel side, and they were fairly peeved about that,

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>so they literally shut off the tap of oil flowing

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to the United States and other countries that were found

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>considered to be on the side of Israel in this

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in this war, UM huge deal. It was an enormous deal.

0:12:55.320 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>The the this foreign dependency in the the precarious situation

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that it places the United States and came to pass

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and the price of oil rose thirty seven. The long

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>lines at the gas station were never seen before or since,

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>even after the financial crisis of two thousand eight. UM,

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it was just insane. There was gas rationing in the

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>United States in nineteen because the UM the oil embargoing.

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>After a while, the tips were turned back on. But

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that shocked to the system, screwed the economy up for

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>a decade. Yeah, inflation went out of control and UM

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>a very another unfortunately happened along the same timeline. Unemployment

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>started to creep up. And these two things happening at

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the same time as devastating. Yeah, and up to this point.

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, the US had never had a

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>shock to the system like that. That was one thing.

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a gradual thing it was. But the other

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>thing is when you have something that has never happened before.

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>You can look at it and say, wow, what happened,

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and new things that have never happened before come out

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of that. And one of the things was inflation and

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>unemployment going up, because up to this point, economists just

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>assumed that the two were mutually exclusive. If you're if

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you're um. If inflation was up, prices were high, that

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>meant that companies could go out and hire more people,

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>so unemployment of course would be low. Yeah, it kind

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of made sense. Well not not. After the oil embargo.

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>The shock to the system led to, like you said,

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>high unemployment rates and high inflation, and uh, it was

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a miserable time. Yeah, and that was called stagflation. It

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>also led to skateboarding, as we all know. Oh yeah,

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>because of the pools, right, yeah, they could and cal

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>well actually that was the drought, but I think the

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>drought was also tied into the economics. Sure, but they

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>couldn't fill up swimming pools, so they started skating in

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>swimming pools. Well, yeah, if you have a drought, then

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you lose your crops, and if you lose your crops,

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you lose money, a significant sector of the of money exactly.

0:14:55.400 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So good news. We have half pipes now quarter pipe

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and peralta. There they're still around, right. I think bad

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>news is like you said, it had a devastating effect

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>for many, many years on the United States. So Oakland

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>starts to look around. He said, you know what, things

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>are pretty bad here. One might even say miserable. I

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't gotten any acclaim for a while. Yeah, nothing's been

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>named after me in a while. So let me create

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>this new, uh, this new method for looking at the economy.

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out to not be like a a

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>look over a period of time or anything, but just

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a polaroid of that day and not

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>just that day for like the country as a whole,

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>or um for the FED or anything like that. But

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>what he did that was different was he looked into

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>what the what it was like that day or that

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>year for the average American in their daily life. And

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>he called it the misery index. Yeah, and it was

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>very rudimentary. Uh at the time. It was just simple

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>calculation of the yearly rate of inflation plus the unemployment rate. Yeah.

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you have like five percent inflation and two

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>percent unemployment, you have a seven percent misery index. It's

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>as simple as that. I don't know why it got

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>so much, you know what. It was hailed as a

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>big deal because I think Oakin had a a a

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>knack for noticing things that seemed obvious in retrospect, but

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>at the time no one had ever noticed before. I'll

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>buy it, thank you. Why not? Alright, So now he

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>has this index, and not only can he look at

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a snapshot of that day, he can go back because

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>he was a a data walk and he could look

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>at data throughout history, well at least to yeah, which

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>is just when we started recording unemployment, like we said,

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>which must have been frustrating for him because our um

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>our inflation rates data goes back to nineteen But that's

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>only part of the equation. Well, it must have been like,

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>oh man, sure, and to be able to look at

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the great depress and you could have learned a lot,

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you know. Uh. So he went and he looked back

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and he says, here is what we've noticed, and this

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is so obvious to me, uh, that that presidents and

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>political parties are brought in and out of office largely

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>depending on how the economy is doing. Yeah, but they

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of proved it, but not even just how the

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>economy is doing like he he was saying, like, the

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>misery index you can use to predict whether the the

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>presidency's going to change hands politically. So, uh, misery index

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is six point five three, which is great. That's during like, yeah,

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>very low. Mr Eisenhower, President Eisenhower, and he got reelected

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>because things were pretty good, right as far as the

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>misery index goes. Yeah, yeah, everybody was pretty happy, even

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>though they didn't really know what the misery index was

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.959
<v Speaker 1>because it wasn't invented yet. They just had a general sense.

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, they didn't call it that at a time. No,

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>They're just like, seems fine to me. You're miserable. We

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I No, I'm not miserable, are you? So night Johnson

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>came to the end of his term and the misery

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>index was up to eight point one three, And then

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>he had his Democratic successor, Hubert Humphrey in line, and

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>because the thing had crept up, people a little more

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>miserable and they said, now get out of here. I

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>want Mr Nixon in office, right, And I guess I'm not.

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure about this, So I don't understand why

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Johnson was replaced by Humphrey by the Democrats and in

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>this article, and it seems to be because of this

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>misery index that it would have predicted that. But he

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 1>was the incumbent president, so let's see, so he was

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.719
<v Speaker 1>he would have should know this, No, he Yeah, he

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>was a one term or technically one in a third

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>or one in a quarter because he took over after

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy's assassination. But if his term was up in sixty eight,

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>then he would have won the sixty four election, so

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>he technically, I think, would have been able to have

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>been president. Again, I'm not sure we could have found

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this out too sure, but I'll bet there's somebody out

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>there who can explain it to us, and so email us,

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>will you? Uh? At any rate, Nixon gets elected and um,

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the misery index shot up to eleven point six seven

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>during the first term, but then started to decline enough

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that he did get re elected. UM. But then uh,

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy four, with Watergate, the misery index leapt

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to seventeen point oh one. That's

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>not good now, that's that was the all time high

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>at the time from what I understand. I UM, and

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that happened around nineteen seventy four, which meant that when

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Watergate broke. Some people who have really subscribed to the

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>misery index say Watergate might not have been quite as

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>big a deal. If, um the misery index have been

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>low at the time, he might have been able to

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>squeak by without resigning or being forced out of office.

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone has more leeway if things are great,

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. But he his his his currency had been spent. Man.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I watched All the President's Men a few weeks ago. Again,

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>have you ever seen that great, great movie? Yeah, I've

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>always meant to, really really good and just sort of like,

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't make a lot of movies like that anymore.

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Spotlight reminded me of All the Presidents Men. It's good.

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just I call it movies for adults. You know.

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>There's no chase scenes or anything remarkable. It's just good

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>dramatic movie making. Yeah, good stuff anyway, Wait, what's wrong

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>with chase scenes? Huh? What's wrong with chase? No, there's

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>nothing inherently wrong with the chase. But I know what

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you mean, just for the sake of a chase scene,

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>which we see a lot of these days, you know

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, Like Mark Ruffalo is chasing a priest

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>in a car and spotlight. Yeah, um, where were we? Okay,

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we're with Nixon. Um one that with Nixon, you know

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. Ford comes in office for a short

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>time and he actually managed to get the misery and

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>next year down. Well, I think just the fact that

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Nixon was out. I think that probably helped um you

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>know and inspire like consumer confidence in the like. So

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 1>it crept back down to twelve point six six, but

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>not enough to keep um, the Democrats and Jimmy Carter

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>from coming into office. And Carter actually cited the misery index.

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>It was relatively new at the time. He talked too

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>much about it, but it was it was a g

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>whiz thing that you could really just point to like

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>this plus this, this is the misery index. Can you

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>can you hear me? That's my car? But that was

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>his famous quote, can you hear me? It came back

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to haunt him though, to say the least, because he

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about the misery Index and then in

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>his term the it reached an all time high of

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. Yeah, which, man, I really think that shock

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to the system. Under the oil embargo, UM and plenty

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of other stuff. This stuff gets laid at Carter's feet,

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I think unfairly in a lot of respects. Well, I mean,

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I would love for someone to really that really knows

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>their stuff to explain to me exactly how much a

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 1>president's influence has on the economy and how long it

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>takes for that to bear fruit. Yeah, I would love

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to know that too, I think though, Uh, the guy

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>who came after Carter Reagan is a pretty sterling, unassailable

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>example of an impact a president can have on the economy.

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Whether you agree with his politics or his economic policies

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>or not, he most decidedly had an effect on the economy. Yeah.

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I just remember hearing one time. I need to look

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this up, but somebody told me once that that the

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 1>economic impact of a presidential four year term is felt

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the most like eight years later or something. Yeah, that

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to me. Economies don't move on a dime. Yeah,

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't know if that's holking lumbering things.

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>They aren't fully understood by anybody. Yeah, it's interesting to

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>me now more than ever before. Though, don't remember. Economics

0:22:58.160 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>used to just bore me. I know, I was really

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.959
<v Speaker 1>really surprised when you suggested this one. It's slightly more

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me, now what changed? Oh? Just wondering things

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>like that and during an election season, like are the

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>decisions we make now gonna affect us in one year

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 1>or two years? Eight years? Uh? Yeah, Well, if there's

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>any economists who are still listening after that initial remark

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>about the new astrology, we'd love to to get a

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>primer on how long it takes for a president to

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>impact an economy, if they do at all. And I'm

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>sure it's a arranged you know, it's not like starting

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>at eight years and really honestly, was Carter that band

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>or was he a victim of cross stars? Yeah? I

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>mean you can make a case where a lot of

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>bills of presidencies not being directly at their feet. Well

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you remember that, uh Simpsons where they unveil a statue

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of Jimmy Carter in Springfield and on the pedestal it

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>says Malaise Forever, and somebody goes, Jimmy Carter, He's history's

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>greatest monster. Carter. So, like we said, that came back

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to haunt Carter because he talked a lot about the index.

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>It rose a lot. Then Reagan came in was like, well,

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about that misery index that you like to

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 1>talk about so much, that's at an all time high.

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Reagan got in there, um knocked it down to nine

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>point five five by the end of his term, enough

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to get Bush Senior in UM it inched up some.

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Then Clinton was able to Uh, it didn't go up

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that much, though. And I read an interesting article today

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>on whether or not Ross Pero really got Clinton elected,

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>because that's sort of the popular thought he was a spoiler. Yeah,

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I could see that, but um, he's definitely more in

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>line with UM Bush Seniors policies than Clinton's. Well at

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the time, yeah, you would think, but I read, uh,

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I read one article that said that it was kind

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of a myth that basically that Clinton won by six

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>million votes and it would have taken seventy of Paros

0:24:55.720 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 1>supporters to have uh been aligned with with Bush m hm,

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and supposedly exit polls showed showed it more like thirty

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And so they're saying it's sort of a myth that

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Pero swung the election to Clinton. I see, but I

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>mean that was one person's opinion to who knows. You know,

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>I've been reading a lot about you know that we

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that that suspicion you can't quite kick that there's really

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>no difference between Republicans and Democrats these days, that they're

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>really just kind of all in the same little club.

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I think people feel that way sometimes. I've been reading

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot about that, and apparently it's all based on neoliberalism.

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>That's like the key and um, there's there's a lot

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of If you look into Neil liberalism and the policies

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of neoliberalism, you realize we're like living in the thick

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 1>of it. But no one everyone's kind of blind to

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the idea that it's just a single thing that basically

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody in power subscribes to and that it has a

0:25:55.920 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>trickle down effect of screwing over everybody below the top. Um.

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.239
<v Speaker 1>But just the name itself seems totally fine, you know,

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's a it's it's interesting. Yeah. I researched that

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>a little bit lately too. Yeah, there's been some good article.

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>We totally should let's do it, Chuck agreed. Man, we're

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna get some emails for that one from billionaires. Yeah. Um,

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>so let's just finish out this quick little recap. Clinton

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>brought it down to seven point three five. Things were great,

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Bush Junior gets elected. Um, despite the fact that Clinton

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>had a low index. Well, it depends on how you

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the two thousand election. We should do one

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>on that one too. But this is the This is

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>that's considered one of those rare instances where the misery

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>index didn't indicate where it was going to go. But

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you could also say it might have had things gone

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>slightly differently. In the Supreme Court, George W. Bush, the

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>index rose from seven point three five to eleven point four,

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and then Obama came in it went down to seven

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>point eight seven. But another weird flaw in the system

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>is exposed there because, um, despite the fact that the

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>misery index was lower, things were not good. The stock

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 1>market had crashed, unemployment was rising at a rapid rate,

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and they said, you know this. It basically was another

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>example of like, look, this misery index isn't all it's

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>cracked up to be, right, so let's work on it. Yeah,

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people said this is too simplistic,

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't rely on this. But we'll talk about some

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of the additional factors that people have worked into the

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>misery index after this. All right, Chuck, So the misery

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>index open. Everybody's happy with him. They're like, this is

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>just too simple. Well, especially in what's called the post

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>stagflation era after the oil embargo UM. And so some

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>people have said, okay, you can there's certainly there's other

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>things you can add and to give a genuine, true

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>snapshot of what the conditions are like on the ground,

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>as it were, right, Well, yeah, not only what the

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>conditions are, but whether or not performance over a period

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of time is getting better getting worse. Yes, And you know,

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>rather than say, oh, under under this president, the misery

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>index was this, you know, and it gives you a

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty good idea. This with this one guy um named

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Robert Barrow. He wrote book called Getting It Right, Markets

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and Choices in a Free Society, and in it he

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>takes the misery index Oapen's Misery Index, and he says,

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>we can add some stuff to this to to make

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it an even clearer picture, not just of the conditions

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, but you can take it and apply

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it genuinely to a president's entire term to see just

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>how good their economic policies were or weren't the health

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. And he added some other stuff. Yeah,

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>he added four main new measurements. Uh, took the inflation

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>rate during the last year of the president's term, compared

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it to the average inflation rate over the entire course

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of the subsequent president's term, which is based on what

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you were saying that like the a four year term,

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the effects are felt like years down the road. Sure,

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's what he was doing there, right, Yeah,

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense. Did the same thing with the rate

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:33.239
<v Speaker 1>of unemployment. That was number two. Ah. He added in

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>changes for the thirty year government bond yield over a presidency.

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And then finally he said, UM, I need to look

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>at the difference between the long term GDP growth the

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>real rate of growth. Compare all these things along with

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the original Uh, this plus this equals this, right, and

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>with the real growth rate. Um, that's where you take

0:29:55.800 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the actual change either the shrinking or the growth of

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy the g d P year over year. Right.

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And he took that for year after year over the

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>course of a presidency and averaged it out. I guess

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Yeah, And he came up with what's called

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the Barrow Misery Index. And UM, A lot of people

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>think that that's where the misery index started. When In fact,

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it was Oakin who came up with it about twenty

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>years before Barrow took it up and improved it. So

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>under Barrow's misery index, UM Clinton and Reagan that's Bill

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Clinton of course came out on top. Uh. And then

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it got named Steve Hankey about ten years later. This

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>was originally and then Hankey came along in two thousand

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>six and said, you know what, we need to add

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>even more things. And this all just makes sense. You

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>need to if you want a more detailed picture, then

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>add more detail to the data going in, you know.

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So he said, we need more detail. Uh, why don't

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we do this. Let's um, let's measure inflation and unemployment

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>like we're doing, and then let's now add interest rates

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and subtract annual percentages from the GDP to get a

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>more accurate picture. And he said, you can use us anywhere,

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you can use it all over the world. Well that's

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>what he did, and that's kind of what made his

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>his version of it pretty famous. He figured out how

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to apply it to other countries, even countries that used

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>UM price controls to keep inflation in check, which means

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>price inflation is held back artificially. So Hanky looked into

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>other things like, um, the exchange rate in the black

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>market in the given country, that kind of thing, um,

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and he figured out real inflation rates and he applied

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it around the world to find out what country is

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the most miserable in what country is the least miserable.

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>And what he found in two thousand fourteen was that

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the most miserable country in the world was Venezuela, which

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>had a Hanky Misery index of seventy nine point four.

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty high high, uh, and then Japan had the

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>lowest misery at five point four one. Yeah. The US

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>came in at about nineteen, correct I think eleven? Yeah? No, no, no,

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>eleven was our Oh I'm sorry nineteen yeah, yeah, ranked

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen within eleven. I didn't hear that, Yeah, because my

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>tooth is still gone. You think it'd be it would

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>be more pronounced if there were nineteen, I would have

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>heard it clear as about August can't get here soon enough.

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So um. There are critics of this one too, though.

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>There's critics of all these indexes. Well, yeah, a lot

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of them say no, still too elementary. Yeah, some people

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>say this is all just try like you can't you

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>can't use this stuff to to make any real predictions.

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>You could use it to look back at the past,

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>but to use it for the future, probably not. But

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>some people do believe in the idea that if you

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>have enough data and the right kind of data, you

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>can get a clear picture of misery. And again, that's

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>what we're after here, Like the whole point of the

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>misery and next is to figure out how unhappy and

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and just low the average person in a country is

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>feeling at that moment. Right. So, um, HuffPo actually came

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>up with a pretty good one huff po boo. Yeah.

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:17.479
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand nine, HuffPo came up with what they

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>called the Real Misery Index, Right. And so a lot

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of people cite the the use of what's called you

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>three unemployment statistics, which when you hear unemployment numbers in

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the news, that's what you're hearing. That's what the Bureau

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of Labor Statistics issues as the official unemployment numbers. Right. Yeah,

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's the very first thing that people will say,

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>if they want to poop poo the unemployment numbers, that

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that these are these are just false numbers. Yeah. If

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>someone says, hey, man, look how great ex president is doing.

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Look at the unemployment rate, right man, they're just using

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the U three. They need to use the U six.

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Wake up, pal up in your eyes, which you know

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is valid. Well yeah, so, um, the e l S

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>has six measurements of unemployment. You one through U six,

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and YOU six is the broadest. It includes people who

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 1>are so discouraged with the state of the job market

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>that they've given up looking for work and are just like,

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>have given themselves over entirely to judge Alex right, and

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 1>then um. It also includes people who are working part

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>time but wish they could work full time, but there's

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.720
<v Speaker 1>no full time work available, Like I'm a graphic designer

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>about I work at Starbucks. So that's the U six measurement.

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>That's and that's considered the the broadest snapshot of unemployment,

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:43.959
<v Speaker 1>the real um vision of unemployment. Yeah, like you said,

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>mostly they use you three, I guess because it's in

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the middle. I mean you one. They would never use

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you two. Everybody used to like but not anymore. I

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>still like you too, you get yeah, you know, not

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>like I used to. I'm not poo and anything, but

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I did see that concert they did on the HBO,

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 1>and I have to hand it to him. My big

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>problem with you two for years it was they just

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>got so out of control with those live shows like

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>these Giant Spider spaceships and things. And I was always

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of the belief that, man, you need to go back

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to basics and just get up on stage and play again.

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's what they did with this new tour. I mean,

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a cool visual element, but the stage set

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>up in the way they did it was very much

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.240
<v Speaker 1>back to basics, and it I think they really connected

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>with fans again. Yeah, that's kind of help. Yeah, because

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you can only when the when the interactions between you

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and the fans rather than the fans and giant spiders. Yeah,

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you just you can only go so far in that direction.

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they realized that. Sure. Anyway, where do you

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>go YouTube? I'll defend those guys. Um, even though I

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:55.839
<v Speaker 1>know everyone in the world generally wants to punch Bono

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:58.359
<v Speaker 1>in the face, I know I'm not one of them.

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Kind of feel weird. I like them. Yeah, I'm on record.

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I know if you're listening, well, if you're Jared indicators,

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>any any predictor Bono is going to come out to

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>be canonized one day, what you know, you're like, just

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>something about Jared. I don't like him, and you know

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 1>we found out about Jared and then um, now you're

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>saying something's got like they're going to find a cure

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>for cancer and a saliva or something. You never know. Um,

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>so did we even mention what the HuffPo what kind

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 1>of outrageous numbers they came up with? No, well, we

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't mention everything they used. We were talking about the

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>use six measurement. HuffPo used that measurement, the most extreme

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>one of unemployment numbers. They also used other things like, um,

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the inflation rate of food and drink and fuel and healthcare.

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Because other the misery index just uses the consumer price index,

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>which is inflation as a whole. HuffPo used, um, the

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:01.359
<v Speaker 1>the inflation of some really essential things that people can't

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>do without and where you're gonna immediately feel the pinch

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 1>when prices go up with those factors, right. Um. They

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>also included the rate of credit card delinquency, the cost

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of housing, how many people are using food stamps. That

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 1>seems like a smart move to home, equity loan deficiencies.

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess people who are laid on their payments um.

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:23.360
<v Speaker 1>And then they took the average of those seven numbers

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and added it to the U six unemployment numbers, which

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:29.959
<v Speaker 1>here you can step back and say, wait a minute,

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 1>how would you how are you adding this together? How

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.359
<v Speaker 1>does this make any sense? You can't just keep adding things, right,

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>And really you can take that all the way back

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to the initial misery index, like what You're just adding

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>unemployment percentage and inflation, and all of a sudden you

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 1>have a magic number that doesn't make any sense. This

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>HuffPo metric really points out the inherent flaw in it.

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, because in two thousand eight, the Oakland

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Misery Index was eight point one, but huff po's real

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Misery Index a k A. You think things are bad,

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 1>here's how bad they really are index was twenty nine

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 1>point nine compared to the eight point one, right, And

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:06.839
<v Speaker 1>some people are like, oh, well, that just shows how

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>off the Oaken misery index is. Who knows. I know

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:15.359
<v Speaker 1>they quit doing the real Misery Index at HUFPO like

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>five years ago. I think it was a am I

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>going to call it a stunt. It was a bit

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of a stunt maybe, but I'm sure Really what happened

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>was the writer who was contributing it for free. Sure,

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>like left for a paying job. That's probably what happened

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to the HuffPo Real Misery in Dingy. Yeah, you're probably right. Um,

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I was reading this guy, Tim McMahon. He has a site,

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 1>or he writes first site, I'm not sure it's his.

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Are not called inflation data dot com. Jim McMahon, Tim

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>his brother, not the Super Bowl Shuffle, No, his brother. Um.

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>So he mentioned this two thousand one paper that concluded

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that unemployment causes one point seven times more misery than inflation.

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:01.320
<v Speaker 1>And so if you're doing any kind of misery index

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:04.959
<v Speaker 1>that uses those two, you need to first multiply the

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>unemployment number by one point seven before adding it to

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>um the inflation number to to properly wait it and

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 1>like how did they come up with that? So I

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 1>looked at the paper. It was actually pretty clever. There's

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:20.359
<v Speaker 1>like twenty three years of the survey of life satisfaction

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and happiness that these researchers looked at back in two

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>thousand one, and they found that um economically based or

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>just like how happy are you? Know here's the thing,

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 1>it was, how happy are you? It was like a

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 1>single question like would you say, based on how you're

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 1>feeling right now, that you are fairly satisfied, unsatisfied, very

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>satisfied with your life right now right. And then they

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>took that that measurement for that that country as a whole,

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and you can do this for any country that participated

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in the survey. And then they looked at inflation, and

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:52.759
<v Speaker 1>then they looked at um unemployment for those years and

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>they could figure out the the variation between or the

0:39:56.440 --> 0:40:02.839
<v Speaker 1>interplay between unemployment and inflation andatisfaction. And they found that

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that um that unemployment was one time one point seven

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>times more miserable than inflation in regards to life satis

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 1>fashion as that survey goes pretty clever. Yeah, it's a

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>lot of hocus pocus, but it's I thought it was

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 1>pretty clever how they did it. That makes sense to

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 1>me because to be without work, like if you have

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 1>a job and things inflation is happening, you still have

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>your job, sure, and you're like, man, this sucks to

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>pay this much more, but you can still conceivably pay

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:32.719
<v Speaker 1>for Yeah, I'll cut back here or there. If you

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 1>if you're unemployed, then there's not a lot of hope. Yeah,

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:38.879
<v Speaker 1>one the number might be conservative you. Yeah, I agree

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>with you. Very interesting stuff. So that's uh, that's it, man,

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>that's the misery Index. You got anything else, No, but

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to hearing from economists that me too,

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 1>like in an unbiased way to try to explain things.

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Me too. If you if you send just you know,

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>these crazy political emails and they're they're gonna fall in

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:04.839
<v Speaker 1>deaf ears because everyone yells at each other that they're right.

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I just want to hear some real numbers, do it, chuck. Uh.

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know more about the misery index,

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you can type those words in the search bar how

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:16.879
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. And since I said search bar,

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.279
<v Speaker 1>just play an old search bar. It's time for a

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>listener mail. I'm gonna call this, uh follow up on

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:30.439
<v Speaker 1>vocal fry once again. Oh yeah, um. Regarding vocal fry, guys, Uh,

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys were offended because someone said vocal fry was repulsive.

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:38.320
<v Speaker 1>But there is another side of this, Dude's I suffer

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 1>from a neurological disorder known as miss aphonia, which we

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 1>totally should do a show in this. I agree. It's

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a condition where a person has extreme emotional response to

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>commonly occurring sounds and I remember hearing a lot of times,

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>just like people chewing noises or gum or whatever, um

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>he said. In my case, my trigger noise is the

0:41:56.239 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 1>high pitched s sound when some people speak. Uh. It

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:03.240
<v Speaker 1>feels like my brain is cringing, as if an allergic

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 1>reaction is taking place. Cannot stress enough. This is not

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a mere annoyance, as a legitimate mental disorder that can

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:12.879
<v Speaker 1>vary great and greatly in severity. I don't visibly freak

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:14.399
<v Speaker 1>out when I hear my trigger noise, but it really

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 1>kills me inside. Gives me an instant headache. And that's why,

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>which is why I will get away from the noise

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:24.280
<v Speaker 1>if at all possible. UM. I believe in avoiding complaining

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:26.839
<v Speaker 1>in life and playing the victim, but this disorder really

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 1>has made my life like a subtle hell. It's been

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 1>especially toxic to my family relationships and my ability to

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:36.279
<v Speaker 1>learn in school. UM. I felt compelled to email you guys,

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>because you definitely appreciate interesting medical conditions. I think would

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 1>be a great topic for a show someday. There's a

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 1>documentary about it called Quiet Please. If you watch the trailer,

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you might be inspired to watch it to learn what

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the condition is huge, thanks to everyone and Stuff you

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Should Know. You make a mundane parts of my life

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting and educational. Uh, I'm gonna anonymize this from Texas

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 1>because I didn't. You're back from him from text. Yeah,

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>text PS was in disbelief when Chuck said he had

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>not seen Billy Madison or Happy Gilmore. That's a good PS.

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I believe it. It's a good PostScript and post PPS right,

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>not p s S. I think his post PostScript. Yeah,

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 1>but people often put PSS. What doesn't mean? Do you

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>think Stuff you Should Know could ever become a television show? Well?

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Text never we actually did that. We we found out

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the hard way that it came. Yeah, we did a

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 1>TV show on the Science Channel and it ran for

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 1>one full season that played out over the course of

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>several days, which we will always have. Chu, we'll always

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 1>have that season television. We did once. It lasted nine

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>or ten days. Let's just show them all at once,

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 1>out of order. But you never know, we might get

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>another shot at stardom. But we're not looking to no.

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I like it. In this room where no one's looking

0:43:57.480 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 1>at us. Jerry didn't even look at us. She's just

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 1>there looking away and discuss That's right, good idea about

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the mesophonia. I think we mentioned that before, Like that

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:10.880
<v Speaker 1>was I really like that vocal fry episode, And that

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:12.799
<v Speaker 1>was the one thing that I wish we would have

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned because it's a legitimate thing that it does affect

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 1>some people. Um, but yeah, look for a mesophonia episode

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:21.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point in the future. Text uh. If you

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 1>want to get in touch with us, if you can

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>send us an email to Stuff Podcasts at how Stuff

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com and you can join us at our

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>very own home on the web, Stuff you Should Know

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:35.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Stuff you Should Know is a production of

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more podcasts my Heart Radio, visit

0:44:38.760 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:42.920
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.