WEBVTT - Bloomberg Tech Live From Apple's WWDC Event

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and ev love Low into sent Francisco.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech and Caroline.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Heid in New York.

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 4>And am Ed Ludlow live in Coopertino from Apple. Is

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 4>the company's biggest product launch event of the year, and

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 4>we're waiting for the next generation of iPhone, smart watches

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 4>and much more character.

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 2>And let's just talk about what Apple is already pricing

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 2>in from a market valuation perspective, ED, I'm looking at

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Apple off by six tens percent, as perhaps we brought.

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 3>The news into this unveil.

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Usually stock does sinc after a product launch, and this

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 2>one is the iPhone seventeen ED. But let's look at

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 2>it on a longer term basis. This company has added

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 2>four hundred and thirty billion dollars in market capitalization since

0:00:57.960 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 2>the end.

0:00:58.240 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Of July alone.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 2>We have really not enough to bring it green in

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 2>a year to date perspective, though, ED. But that's because

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 2>we continue to worry about trade in so many other overhangs.

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 4>The way I think about it was third most valuable

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 4>company half of revenue as iPhone. Apple's biggest product launch

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 4>of the year is today in the company, which has

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 4>fallen behind in the generative AI race, will focus on hardware,

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 4>show off the new iPhone seventeen range. Let's bring in

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Global Consumer Tech Managing editor Mark German the basics

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 4>seventeen base model, through Pro and Pro maxin in the middle,

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 4>a seventeen air per you're reporting, Explain the features that

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 4>come with the seventeen air mark, but also why does

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 4>that matter?

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.279
<v Speaker 5>The seventeen ear that's going to be the big deal today.

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 5>This is a slim down phone. On paper, it's a

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 5>third thinner than the other new iPhones that you're going

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 5>to see today, and this is an entirely new industrial design.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 5>It's something brand new for the company. They have not

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 5>done an air phone to this point. Obviously there's the

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 5>Magwook Gear, there's the iPad Air, and now there's going

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 5>to be the iPhone Air.

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 6>This is going to be a pricey.

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 5>Phone, not as pricey as the pro models, but it's

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 5>going to be quite expensive, right somewhere between nine hundred

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 5>and around one thousand dollars, give or take.

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 6>It's going to only have one camera. It's going to.

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 5>Have drastically less battery life than the pro models.

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 6>But this is going to be exciting.

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 5>It's going to get people really interested in the phones

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 5>this year.

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 6>It's going to help draw people to Apple stores.

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 5>It's going to give Apple a way to have a

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 5>big marketing push going to the holiday season. But in

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 5>my view, as I've written, the most popular phones will

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 5>still remain the profones, and those prophones will also still

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 5>be the most practical new iPhones because of the better

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 5>battery life performance and cameras.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 2>A lot of this, as you told us yesterday, is

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of a warm up act to a foldable phone.

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Having to make it as slim as possible and redesigning

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 2>that camera. Tell us about some of the health perks

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 2>that we're going to be getting. You've got a whole

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 2>new lineup of smart watches. We've also got AirPods really

0:02:57.720 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>lifting their game.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 5>Pods Pro three that is going to be a health

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 5>centric upgrade. Last year they added hearing health features. This

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 5>year they're adding heart health features, so you're going to

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 5>have a heart rate monitor in the air pods for

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 5>the first time. This is interesting for people who want

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 5>to work out with their earbuds, which obviously is an

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 5>extraordinarily common use case, but people who don't have Apple

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 5>watches right the Apple Watch right, if you're like you

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 5>have an Apple Watch, it has a heart rate monitor

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 5>on there, but the total addressable market because of the

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 5>price and the more ubiquitous nature of the earbuds category,

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 5>will bring heart rate to more Apple customers, and if

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 5>you're an Android user, right, you might find that to

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 5>be an easier way to get into the Apple ecosystem

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 5>as well through the air pods.

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 6>So definitely a big upgrade there.

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 5>The smart watches, you're going to see the biggest overhaul

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 5>to the Apple Watch lineup in three years. So you're

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 5>going to see updates to the se which is their

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 5>low cost of three hundred dollars watch. You're going to

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 5>see a Series eleven minor after the big Series ten

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 5>overhaul last year, and then a pretty big update, the

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 5>biggest update ever the Apple Watch Ultra. Slightly bigger screen,

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 5>five G red cap so, faster internet connectivity, big thing

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 5>satellite capabilities. So if you are on the go in

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 5>a mountain range without cellular connectivity and you don't have

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 5>your phone with satellite, now.

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 6>Your watch the Ultra Watch will have it.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 5>Apple is going squarely today after Fipit and Garmin Mark.

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 7>Pricing is going to be a story.

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 4>I've away right, Either Apple raises prices, passes it onto

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 4>the consumer, or they don't. They eat that cost largely

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 4>relating to tariffs, and then the carriers come in with

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 4>trade in deals.

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 7>What do we know about those three factors.

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so the pricing is interesting, You're right. Either way,

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 5>it's going to be noteworthy. It's interesting because Samsung and

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 5>Google both recently rolled out new phones and they did

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 5>not increase their prices. So the precedent is not set

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 5>there for Apple to raise the prices, even though they

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 5>do have the air cover of tariffs. If they do

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 5>raise prices, they're not really going to get into it.

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 5>But if they did, my bet would be they explain

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 5>it away as this is the first redesign, major camera upgrades,

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 5>new processors, whatever, whatever, whatever. They're not going to blame

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 5>Trump and tariffs because we as we all know, that

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 5>is a no no with this administration. In terms of

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 5>carrier deals, I am expecting an extraordinary amount of trade

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 5>in specials in deals from all the.

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 6>Major carriers in the US.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 5>Apple has been working in the last several months with

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 5>these carriers to ensure that there are major deals in place.

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 5>To me, that implies there will be some tweaks to

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 5>the pricing strategy, and this could be positioned as a

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 5>way to offset any of those changes.

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Bloomos Mark Gunman, who will be with us on the

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 4>network for coverage out throughout the day.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 7>Thank you very much.

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Let's get more Carly in a Millionacy president and principle

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 4>analyst of creative Strategies. You have a Galaxy S twenty

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 4>five edge handset. It is the Samsung Slim thin phone. Yeah,

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 4>it is a segment. So you've got Mark's reporting there

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 4>on a seventeen air Again, why does it matter for Samsung?

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 8>It was clearly a stepping stone to a much thinner

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 8>fold seven. They didn't put a lot of marketing behind

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 8>the product. To your point, is a segment, it's not

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 8>consumers are screaming for finner phones. But we also haven't

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 8>seen much difference in design for a long time. You know,

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 8>all the phones kind of look the same. The thing

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 8>that changes the most is the back where the camera is.

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 8>So it'd be interesting to see if a rumors are right.

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 8>But Apples is changing that part of the phone because

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 8>it's going to be very obvious that you have a

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 8>new model of your iPhone. But yes, the thinner phone

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 8>is something that vendors seem to be doing to lead

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 8>their way to a foldable which would make me wrong

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 8>about Apple doing affordable iPad before an iphable phone affordable iPhone,

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 8>which was always my theory.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Your theory unfoldable, though, is one that we listen to

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 2>because eventually we do anticipate a foldable phone from Apple,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 2>but they lag there behind competition, and of course everyone

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 2>says they lag behind on gender to AI.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Does that matter to a consumer?

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 8>I don't think that consumers are going into a store

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 8>as in four AI, and I think what plays in

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 8>Apple's favor or what they don't have a tunnel of time,

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 8>is the fact that there's the assurance that when they

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 8>are ready, the software will come with all the phones

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 8>that you already have. So if consumers are drawn to

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 8>this year's models because of a change in hardware design,

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 8>they know they have peace on minding going in and

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 8>buy now knowing that when Apple Intelligence redesign will happen,

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 8>they will have access to it.

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Karly, Now, what do we know from third party data

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 4>from consumer trends about what happened after iPhone sixteen launch,

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 4>particularly on Pro. You heard Mark explain that whatever happens

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 4>with pricing, the carriers will come out and say trade

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 4>in your handset. Lots of people get really frustrated, particularly

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 4>in the USA, where they say, I only just got

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 4>a sixteen Pro. Is there going to be enough in

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 4>the capability to drive me even with a trade in

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 4>to upgrade?

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 8>Yes, last year's upgrade from the carriers were very aggressive.

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 8>The tradeing pricing was really good for consumers. I think,

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 8>as always, you have a segment of the market that

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 8>is going to hold on to their phone no matter what.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 8>The Where it really makes a difference is the early

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 8>adopters that will get that bump. Usually the hardware redesign

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 8>really drives a lot of upgrades, and I think that

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 8>between what we've see as room or colors and then

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 8>the finn design, people will get into the store. Whether

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 8>or not they'll decide to buy, we'll see depending on pricing.

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 8>As you just discussed with Mark.

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 4>May I ask in a quick fire around how many

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 4>iPhone events have you been to?

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 8>Oh my god since two thousand and seven, so too

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 8>many odd time.

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 4>We always say this is the biggest event for Apple

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 4>in the year. I put it back to basics. iPhone

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 4>is more than half of revenue. But this idea of

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 4>a seventeen generation with a thin and air thrown in

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 4>the middle, where do you think that ranks in the

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 4>history of the sort of storied Apple launches.

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 8>I think is to me, if it's true that this

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 8>is a step in stone to fold, is a moment

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 8>that is going to really fine the next generation. It'll

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 8>be interesting to see how much they get into the

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 8>architecture of the actual device, whatever they change, how they

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 8>are redesigned. Making something thin is really hard when it

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 8>comes to the phone, from battery size to not compromise

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 8>your battery life, which was the biggest drawback for some song,

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 8>and then the camera and the camera capability. You cannot

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 8>have the same camera set as you do on a Promax,

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 8>so how do you reinvent your camera to make sure

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 8>that there's no compromise for people that care?

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Carolina talk to us about caring on wearables. How important

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 2>are the new iterations of their pods of the watch is.

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Going to be for you?

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 8>I think they're really important, and there is the reason

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 8>why Apple always does these three products together because it

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 8>is the trifecta of what being mobile is. I do

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 8>think that the RT rate monitoring on the AirPods, if true,

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 8>is going to be a really interesting for Apple. There

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 8>are people who don't want to wear a watch, or

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 8>people that cannot afford to add that to their list

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 8>of products that they own, and so having AirPods allowing

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 8>you to work out and do what you need, you

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 8>will see, my guess, is a strong upgrade from regular

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 8>AirPods to Airport Pro and so nice revenue uptake for Apple.

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 2>What about to the bottom line, What about pushing up

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>the price points for.

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 8>These It'll be interesting to see if they're pushing up

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 8>the price point. I agree totally with market that they

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 8>cannot blame me on tariff if they do. There is

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 8>the president of both Google and Samsung not raising prices,

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 8>so it'll be really hard for them to do that.

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 8>I also do think that they're a moment where they

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 8>want to make sure that they're install based upgrades to

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 8>the latest devices so that they have the latest chipset.

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 8>That at the end of the day is what is

0:10:55.640 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 8>going to matter for Apple intelligence ANYI in general, you.

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Know when you're setting the Steve jobs theater, what is

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 4>the one thing the absolute focus for you in that

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 4>moment that you're tracking.

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 8>I'm still looking at how Apple brings everything together so

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 8>that consumers stay tied to the ecosystem. That is going

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 8>to be their biggest ticket to winning when it comes

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 8>to AI.

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Currently in a Milanasy, President principal Analystic Creative Strategies, She's

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 2>going to be back on Bloomberg again after Apple's keynote

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 2>this afternoon, so stay tuned. Meanwhile, coming up, Europe's AI

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure company Nevious soaring after it said it will provide

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft access to GPU infrastructure capacity.

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 3>This is putting their tech in video.

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 2>It plans to offer a new product design to make

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 2>certain types of AI work more efficient, such as video

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 2>generation and software creation. That The product, called REUBENCPX, will

0:11:58.120 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 2>debut at the end of twenty twenty six and will

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 2>be offered in the form of cards that can be

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 2>incorporated into existing server computer designs or used in discrete

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 2>computers that can operate separately.

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Alongside other hardware in data centers.

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 4>Elshore A AI a massive infrastructure deal between Microsoft and

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Europe's Nebius worth as much as nineteen point four billion dollars.

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 4>Neocloud nebbiis recently spun off from Russia's tech giant Yandex

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 4>will provide compute to Microsoft from a data center in

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 4>New Jersey. Let's get out to Bloomberg's Matt Day, who

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 4>covers Microsoft for US. And Matt, let's start with what

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft gets out of this cloud arrangement.

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 9>So they get access to a whole bunch of video

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 9>GPUs that Nebus is said to receive and fire up

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 9>in New Jersey. They also get some optionality, right, They've

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 9>been spending a ton of money on their own data

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 9>center construction. They've also been throwing some to partners. This

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 9>is maybe a way for them to grow that portfolio

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 9>without so much of their risk if they had have

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 9>been buying all the stuff themselves.

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 2>We will Mebbius really making its name in neoc offering

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 2>extraordinary storied business where it spun out of yan Nex.

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Of course, posts.

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the CEO backs away and now

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 2>has this new European based juggernaut that's all things AI.

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, out of nowhere, right, and it's a huge vote

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 9>of confidence in the yandexprass and some of the staffers

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 9>who who left Russia to set up this rebranded holding company.

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 9>They are quite quite a bet on a name that

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 9>just didn't have a whole lot going for it. Here

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 9>a couple of years ago.

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 4>Matt, You've got to get back to your desk because

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 4>in the time you've been in the seat, some news

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 4>from Microsoft a change in rto policy.

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 7>Do you have the details?

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it looks like three days a week starting in

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 9>Puget Sound, rolling out later to the rest of the

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 9>US and then abroad. Microsoft have been a pretty a

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.839
<v Speaker 9>pretty lax hand on this sort of recommending two days

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 9>a week, but it really varied by team. Some teams

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 9>had an arty oot at all. So looks like they're

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 9>kind of following some of the some of the folks

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:54.599
<v Speaker 9>like Amazon, the who have taken a harder line on

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 9>getting folks back into the office.

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it doesn't seem to set them back in

0:13:57.559 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 2>terms of market valuation, in terms of performance as far,

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 2>But how much is there the fierce talent wars upon

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft weighing as well as some of the other names

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 2>that we think about.

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 9>Well, for sure, and I think for some who would

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 9>argue that Microsoft's pres arrangements working well. It's been a

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 9>recruiting advantage for them right particularly here in Seattle, where

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 9>both Microsoft and Amazon are based. You know, you could say, hey, listen,

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 9>if you don't want to have to commute the office

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 9>five days a week, Microsoft's your bet. A little bit

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 9>less advantage there, but they still are relatively flexible by

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 9>big tech standards.

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Matt Day all things Microsoft and Nevis, we appreciate it.

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Look, let's talk about the.

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Dutch chip making equipment company ASML. Now it's investing one

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 2>and a half billion dollars in France's Mistral AI.

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 3>This is pretty unusual move.

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 2>It's going to allow ASML to incorporate Mistral's generative AI

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 2>services in its own machinery and operations.

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Makes ASML the larger shareholder in Mistral within a Levember

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 3>cent steak.

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Benoir Buffalo is here for more from Paris. It

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 2>is the pin up generative AI business Mistral for France.

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 2>ASML coming in taking such a stake, what does it

0:14:57.920 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 2>mean for the French government.

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 10>It's obviously super important to French and I would say

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 10>to European tech because now Mistral is probably the only

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 10>European tech startup that's doing language models AI language models

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 10>and that has a full suite of products also doing

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 10>computing here, So it's definitely key.

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 6>And key is also the fact.

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 10>That it's a European tech giant, ASML investing in Mistral.

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 10>Mistral previously got back in from US venture funds people

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 10>who are doubting that they could continue to grow and

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 10>raise capital with the European backers, and this is the

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 10>case now, and it's important for Mistral because obviously we've

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 10>got these giants like open Ai and the x et

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 10>cetera doing the leading language models now, but there are

0:15:55.880 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 10>European companies choosing to cut deals with Mistral because they're

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 10>European and they see it as a sovereignty or strategic

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 10>independence issue to make this contract and it's important for

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 10>them for this reason. So it's extremely key for that reason.

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Ben, While SML participated in that broader funding round,

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 4>valuing Mistrau at almost twelve billion euros, that's the finance part.

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 4>But there's a technology story here too, right, What is

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 4>it that each company is partnering on in the technology sense.

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 11>So.

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 10>In a way they are on both ends of the

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 10>AI value chain right, ALSML, it is really at the

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 10>top of the value chain, really doing these very powerful

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 10>and sophisticated machines, the only one in the world to

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 10>do these machines, allowing chip makers to do very advanced chips.

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 10>They have Nvidia, they are powering Nvida for example. Stroll

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 10>is really at the end selling AI AI products. So

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 10>Mistral for example, is a customer of Nvidia because they've

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 10>got data centers that they're building in Europe to train

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 10>their models. So what they say of this deal, it's

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.479
<v Speaker 10>a bit of a surprising deal in a way. What

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 10>they say on ICML sides is that it's going to

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 10>be for them a way to incorporate AI into the

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 10>whole company, and ASML is going to use Mistral AI

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 10>to improve the scanning of data to improve really it's

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 10>core products, to improve efficiency. So that's what they're telling

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 10>for now, but it's going to be interesting to follow

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 10>what they're going to do, and they might use other

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 10>AI companies, but they choose Mistral, and they choose to

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 10>back this company.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Well and immediately made every one thing.

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Maybe SML eventually wants to buy it, but there was

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 2>pushback from the CEO.

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 7>On that.

0:17:58.320 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, he said.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 10>They don't want to win corporate every technology they use,

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 10>they don't want to integrate that into their company. So

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 10>it looks like a put back, a pushback for sure.

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 10>The founders of Mistrall and employees Mistral says they still

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 10>have the majority of the company, so for surely it

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 10>doesn't seem to be undergouts.

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 6>It's already a very sizable.

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 10>Investment for SML because they haven't done that kind of

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 10>venture deals before, so it's already something unusual for them

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 10>in a way to do.

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg spend war Butelo in Paris, thank you very much.

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 2>Attack association funded by the likes of Battle, Google and

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 2>other major tech companies, when it's launching a new initiative

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 2>to strengthen the freight relationship between Democrats and Silicon Valley,

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 2>all ahead of the twenty twenty six midterm elections, and

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Emily Burnbaun, who covers corporate lobbying for US, has

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 2>that story. It looks support for the Trump administration is

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 2>spiked among tech executives. So what does the Chamber of

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Progress hope to achieve here?

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 12>Yes, they say that that movement, that right word shift

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 12>in Silicon Valley is in part due to a reaction

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 12>to the Biden administration's policies, which were much more skeptical

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 12>and critical of big tech and AI companies. So they

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 12>say we're here to do some relationship counseling. You know,

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 12>Silicon Valley was once associated with Democrats. They want to

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 12>bring us back to that more you know, Obama tech

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 12>friendly era.

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 4>Emily, I'm live here at Apple Park and Cupertino, And

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 4>in the story we note that Apple is one of

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 4>a number of technology companies helping to fund this association.

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 4>In the last week, we've seen Tim Cook at the

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 4>table with the President discussing the almost quid pro coo

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 4>of investing in America in return for sort.

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 7>Of policy relief. I gave you that backdrop, Souse.

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 4>I just want to understand who's involved here on the

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 4>company side and the democratic side, away from the association itself.

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, the association has hired a Democrat who has relationships

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 12>with tech companies. So that's Dave Borland from the Department

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 12>of Defense.

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 3>And when I.

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 12>Asked which company specifically signed off on this, you know,

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 12>democratic project held under the Chamber of Progress, they said

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 12>they couldn't say specifically, but They pointed to their members.

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 3>They said, their members have.

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 12>You know, they are also interested in looking ahead to

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 12>a potentially more democratically controlled Washington and they want to

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 12>start thinking about what it's going to look like when

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 12>Trump is no longer in power.

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's going to be quite a major reset

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 2>because you just go back to the previous administration and

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 2>how CEO off the CEO really felt that they were

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 2>either being investigated or being fined. What's the next steps

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 2>to rectify it?

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 12>Well, you know, different people have different opinions on this contest.

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 12>You know, it's contested within the Democratic Party if this

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 12>is something to fix, but you know, if your chamber

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 12>of progress, if you're a tech friendly Democrat, then I

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 12>think first steps would be at least hearing out industry more.

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 12>There was kind of a blanket policy in the Biden

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 12>administration not to even speak to tech on issues that

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 12>might impact them for fear of corporate capture.

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 6>I think it would also be.

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 12>You know, not having as strong M and A policies

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 12>and things like that.

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Emily Burnbound, thank you very much, welcome back.

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 3>To Bloomberg Tech. And Caroline heid in New York.

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 4>And Amed Lovelow live in Cooper Tino from Apple. It

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 4>is iPhone day. I think it's worth thinking about the

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 4>stock carra right, It's normal not just to see the

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 4>stock treading water in advance of the presentation, but for

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 4>it to be a seldom used kind of event. Overall

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 4>yere to date, the stock's down almost six percent, but

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 4>since the end of July, Apple's had a big rally.

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 4>Some of the political issues behind it, some of the

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 4>tariff questions partly put to bed but not completely. And

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 4>now the overhang is what happens with AI. We don't

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 4>expect anything from that today. I'm also thinking about what

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 4>historically happens on iPhone day. Yes, sell the news, but

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 4>in the thirty day or sixty day period afterwards, we

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 4>do sometimes see that stock rally where the handset of

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 4>that generation has had a warm reception with the consumer.

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 4>We're in the fiscal fourth quarter, we're entering the holiday

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 4>period of fiscal first quarter. That's why we're here tracking

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 4>the third most valuable company in the world and the

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 4>latest handsets.

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 2>What you're looking at, I'm looking at another stock that's

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 2>rallied hard going into today, Oracle. It's earnings about after

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 2>the Bell Bloomberg Intelligence senior software analysts and rag Rana

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 2>writing that solid recent results from Microsoft and call we've

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 2>they're mode well for Oracle's own cloud infrastructure business. When

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 2>are report's earnings, anra joins us now for more?

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 3>The key question is.

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Whether the news is going to be strong enough to

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 2>vindicate the run up in the stock. What strength do

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 2>you want on fundamental.

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 13>Zanerag Yeah, I think that is absolutely right. We really

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 13>have a lot of their solidy baked into expectations going in.

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 13>But the big question is going to be how much

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 13>capital expenditures have to go up in order to take

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 13>care of these you know backlock that is going to

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 13>be extremely strong. When outicle reports tonight, you know what

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 13>kind of funding they need? Well, you know when will

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 13>it go live? So there's a lot of supply chain

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 13>as well as financing questions, not so much demand issues

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 13>at this point.

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 4>And our Oracle to me has been a bit of

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 4>a surprise story, the relationship with open Ai and Stargate.

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 4>It's also just sort of getting a lot of wins.

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 4>How much has it surprised you when you put it

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 4>in the context of that broader field of let's call

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 4>them Hyperscalers.

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, yeah, I know that's absolutely true. So when you

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 13>go back to twenty eighteen when we started looking at

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 13>the OCI infrastructure build up, you know, we were surprised

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 13>that why Larry is spending so much money? Why not

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.479
<v Speaker 13>just you know, work with the hyperscalers to expand its

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 13>database business, which is the cash cow and the high

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 13>margin business. But frankly speaking, his bet was right because

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 13>right now the question is where can I get compute

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 13>And frankly speaking, they are now the fourth largest cloud

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 13>providers in terms of size. The next few years they're

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 13>going to generate twenty thirty billion dollars from it, so

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 13>it's fairly lucrative business. Right now, the margins are low,

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 13>but over time we anticipate that to improve as well.

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, going back to their last learnings, we learned

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 2>to the thirty billion dollars per year run. Right, we're

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 2>going to get from one client alone we want anticipate,

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 2>of course, that was open AI. Are we going to

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 2>hear any major victories once again in terms of new

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 2>clients or is it going to be more just showing

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 2>the proof in AYI infrastructure revenue growth?

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, Oracle is very good at detailing the number of

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 13>customers it has gained every quarter, so we do anticipate

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 13>a long relist of that. But frankly speaking, the biggest

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 13>question is when can you get these data centers up

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 13>in live and running, and when do you start recognizing

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 13>this backlog into revenue and improve on the growth rate

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 13>which has already gone from you know, there was a

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 13>time they were growing at subpart five five percent and

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 13>now it's going to be low double digit's moving towards

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 13>middle double digit growth rate, So very good for uticle shareholders.

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 13>And you know management team and.

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 4>Rona a Bloomberg Intelligence setting us up for Oracle after

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 4>the bell, Thank you very much. It is iPhone day

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 4>here in Coopertino at Apple, Samantha Kelly recently joining Bloomberg's

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 4>consumer tech team. We have this squad now, but you

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 4>know how this works. Let's start with the basics. What

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 4>is it that you are looking out for and that

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 4>you think is going to be the big story here?

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:36.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thank you for having me.

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 14>So Apple is a master of you know, stagery basically,

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 14>you know, I just walked in a little while ago.

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 14>Everyone's had enjoyed the show, and I think it's a

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 14>reminder that this day is as almost about theatrics as

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 14>it is about the tech aspect. So we're here to

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 14>you know, listen to what they have to veil go,

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 14>we test it out and we kind of decipher. You know,

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 14>there's a lot of hype around it. Sometimes they might say,

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 14>you know, a certain feature might represent you know, the

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 14>whole new wave of what's to expect.

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 3>But is that the case?

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 14>How does that translate to why is it impactful to people?

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 14>Will it really impact the industry and does it really

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 14>actually matter?

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to questioning if it really matters, many

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 2>feel it's the air that really matters to show the

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 2>next leap forward in a foldable phone?

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:21.719
<v Speaker 3>Is that right for you? Sammy? Excited to get your

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 3>hand on the air.

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 14>I'm definitely excited to see it, that's for sure. I

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 14>do think whether or not it translates to whether people

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 14>actually need something like that. Again, it's going to be

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 14>a lot slimmer, But what does that mean for battery life?

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 14>What does it mean for the camera system? Kind of

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 14>will sit in this like murky spot in between the

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 14>entry level iPhone and higher end iPhone, But of course,

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 14>you know, why does it exist anyway? Could perhaps lead

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 14>the way to thinner perhaps foldable devices down the line.

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 14>So definitely interested to see how the form factor impacts

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 14>the functionality as well.

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 4>We perhaps assume or take for granted that everyone knows

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 4>what's going to happen. But the basics are local time

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 4>one pm New York time, a keynote, a presentation, take

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 4>it from there. How does Apple usually do it? Did

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 4>they just sort of come up front and say, Okay,

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 4>here's all the stuff. Do they tease things out?

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:15.439
<v Speaker 14>What's interesting is it's changed in recent years. Before COVID,

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 14>we used to come out here and it was a

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 14>live presentation, a lot of excitement around that. You know what,

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 14>will they announce? Will the demo even work? More authentic?

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 14>During COVID they did. They switched to live streams. A

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 14>lot of other companies did that. A lot of companies

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 14>have since switched back, but Apple is still doing the

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 14>pre recorded streaming. So it depends. You know, wherever you

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 14>are in the world watching, you're going to see what

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 14>we're sitting in the lawn chairs watching. So what's different

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 14>here is Tim Cook usually addresses the audience, has a

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 14>few words, We watch the live stream and then we

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 14>get funneled into another room, we're able to try out

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 14>have some minutes with the devices for the first time,

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 14>and that allows us to see sort of what they're

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 14>conveying and how it translates to touch.

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Some people love the people behind these stories, and we

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 2>know that actually a lot of key talent has been

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 2>being lost from Apple but largely in the AI sphere.

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Who are we going to see getting off on a

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 2>pre recorded stage today.

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Who's going to be making an impact? Yes, that's a

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 3>great question.

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 14>So of course it'll be introductions by Tim Cook, who

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 14>will be throughout the entire presentation, and then the leads

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 14>around the different products. So again we're expecting new iPhones,

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 14>we're expecting Apple Watches, we might see some air new AirPods,

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 14>home pods, so the respective leads will join.

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 3>But what's interesting too is.

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 14>Sort of before the event, you can kind of see

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 14>some key players in the audience. Last year, I remember

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 14>there was some buzz about whether or not there's going

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 14>to be an open AI partnership. In just moments before

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 14>the live stream, we saw Sam Altman walking around the grounds.

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 14>So it's always really kind of exciting to see sort

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 14>of who might play a part in what that means

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 14>for the announcements later in the day.

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm bog Samantha Kelly.

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 2>We so appreciate you being live for us from Coombertino today.

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Re ready to get your hands on some of the

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 2>new devices. Meanwhile, coming up, we're going to be joined

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 2>by the Cisco Chief Product Officer discussing the company's latest

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 2>agentic AI announcements.

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, amid the frenzy of demand for AI infrastructure, companies

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 2>are focused on monitoring its impact, crucially the security and

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the cost.

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Of their AI application stack.

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 2>That's including infrastructure but also LMS and agents. Now, Cisco

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 2>is today unveiling new Splunk enterprise solutions to do just this,

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 2>eighteen months after Cisco's.

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Acquisition are Plunk.

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 2>The teams are revealing further product innovation focused on actionable AI,

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 2>and here to discuss it all, Cisco's Chief Product Officer

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Gue two Patel a Splunks user conference. G two, what

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 2>is it that you really think Cisco can offer a

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 2>world in which AIA agree running left, right and center.

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 15>Caroline, It's good to see you again. Thank you for

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 15>having me on the show. Look, if you take a

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 15>step back, we are probably witnessing one of the most

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 15>seismic shifts that we've seen in humanity with AI, and

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 15>we're now squarely in the second phase of AI, where

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 15>you're moving from these chat pots that intelligently answered questions

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 15>to agents that are going to conduct tasks and jobs

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 15>almost fully autonomously, to automated workflows. Now, as that happens,

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 15>you know, we start to think about, like, what are

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 15>the constraints and impediments that might actually really limit the

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 15>growth of AI, And we think there are three big constraints.

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 15>First one is infrastructure where you just don't have enough

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 15>power compute networking bandwidth to go out and you know,

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 15>satiate the demand for AI. The second is a trust

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 15>deficit where if you don't trust these systems, you're not

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 15>going to use them, and so you have to make

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 15>sure that the safety and security is really well thought through.

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 15>And the third one is a data gap. And in

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 15>all these three areas, Splunk out he plays a pretty

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 15>big role. We happen to be at the user conferences

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:07.719
<v Speaker 15>Plunk in Boston and we've just made some pretty amazing

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 15>announcements around what we're going to be able to do,

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 15>specifically around machine data in AI. Like, so far AI

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 15>has been really good with human data and training models

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 15>and human kind of human generated data that's publicly available

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 15>on the internet. What they've not been as good at

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 15>as good at is machine data. And so what we

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 15>want to do is make sure that we can actually

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 15>have the time series machine data also be used to

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:34.959
<v Speaker 15>train these models. And we're excited about all the all

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 15>the innovations that we've ad So I mean.

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 2>You to as the product innovator here. How is it

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 2>that you what is the technological feats that you have

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 2>to do working alongside Splung? What is it that you

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 2>have to drive it's different from others Now.

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 15>I feel like that formula is pretty simple, Caroline. It's

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 15>like you know, in tech, you just have to be

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 15>relentlessly obsessed about continuing to innovate and making sure that

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 15>you keep listening to customers and creating solutions that are

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 15>at least an order of magnitude better than what's available

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 15>in the market. No one switches to you for ten

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 15>percent better. You have to be at least an order

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 15>of magnitude better. And so we have this rule internally

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 15>called B tenex better. And you're going to actually make

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 15>sure that customers will get excited, and we saw that

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 15>level of palpable energy today and at the event where

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.719
<v Speaker 15>all of our customers were just completely excited about the

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 15>machine data Lake announcement we made. We made an announcement

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 15>around an open source model for time series data. These

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 15>are all really hard problems that actually require a level

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 15>of assistance so their organizations can harness the full potential

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 15>of AI because of the way that they can use data.

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 4>G Two, is there evidence that Splunk's historic customers are

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 4>using Cisco's other products and signing on for deals on

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 4>that side and vice versa.

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 7>Since you guys have closed.

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 15>We've actually seen a lot of great evidence around it.

0:32:55.600 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 15>In fact, just last quarter we closed one of the

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 15>large financial service or organizations that happen to be a

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 15>great Cisco customer is also a Splunk customer and now

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 15>and they had actually we replaced another competitor in that

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 15>account with Splunk. And let me tell you the reason why.

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 15>If you really think about where Splunk shines is correlating

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 15>data across multiple different sources, and if you start thinking

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 15>about the kind of data that we have, if you

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 15>assume that the attacker is already in your network, and

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 15>what you're trying to do is prevent lateral movement. Who

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 15>has the most amount of data about the network. Cisco

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 15>does the telemetry from that network. Hydrating Splunk actually gives

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 15>Plunk meaningful insights. The telemetry from users and devices, and

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 15>the security firewalls that we might have. All of these

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 15>pieces add value to Splunk. So what ends up happening

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 15>is customers when they're starting to use Cisco technology with

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 15>Splunk actually fine. Then not only be able to drive

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 15>insights that we're not able to be derived, but we

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 15>also get to be very economical in the way that

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 15>you use it. And we made this one big announcement

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 15>around Cisco firewall telemetry getting ingested in Splunk for free,

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 15>and so that actually provides incentives from a financial perspective

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 15>to our customers as well. G.

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 7>Two.

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 4>When I speak to industry, they say it's you personally

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 4>that's responsible for bringing Cisco into this AI era. So

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 4>very quickly to end, I wanted to ask where you

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 4>feel Cisco is today versus where you want it to

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 4>be in three to five years time now that Splunk's

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 4>being integrated.

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 15>Well, let me just start by saying that it is

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 15>not just me. There's a wonderful team of people behind

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 15>me that do all the work, and so I'm just

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 15>lucky to be a small part of it. Where we

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 15>see AI moving forward is we are now a squarely

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 15>in the second phase and we're helping companies out with

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 15>massive data center buildouts, whether it be hyperscalers or neo clouds,

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 15>or serve providers or the enterprise. And the fact that

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 15>we serve all those four constituencies helps each one of

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:07.839
<v Speaker 15>the constituencies from the learnings that we get from each

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 15>one of them. So that's the first area that we're

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 15>really helping in a big way, and low latency, high performance,

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 15>energy efficient networking is one of our core value propositions there. Second,

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 15>we're really helping with making sure that AI is safe

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 15>and secure, and by the way, what I mean by

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:27.760
<v Speaker 15>that is not just using AI for security, but securing

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 15>AI itself. That's a really, really important area that we've

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 15>got a tremendous amount of offerings that are helping customers out.

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 15>And the third one is this notion of fifty five

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 15>percent of the growth of data is coming from machine data,

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 15>and the market has not really gone out and figured

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.879
<v Speaker 15>out how to use machine data effectively. With AI. That's

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 15>the problem that we want to solve and that's where

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 15>we've actually made these announcements with Splunk and so the

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 15>combination of those three technologies coming together in a unified

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 15>platform is where we can really shine. And very few

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 15>companies in the world have the level of breath and

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 15>depth of technology that we do, so we feel pretty

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 15>fortunate about that.

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 4>Cisco's Chief Product Officer G two Patel, thank you. I'm

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:19.840
<v Speaker 4>joined now buying Nabila Popeau, senior research director at IDC

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 4>where she focuses on smartphones and consumer electronics. Smartphone is

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 4>key and Nabila, it's good to see you again. I

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 4>want to get something we haven't yet discussed in the show,

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 4>which is upgrade cycle and what it will take the

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:36.320
<v Speaker 4>capability of an iPhone seventeen generation the features to drive

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 4>an upgrade cycle. Have you modeled for that?

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely, that's what we've been talking about for I guess

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 11>as long as I can you know the past few years,

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.439
<v Speaker 11>when is the next upgrade cycle going to come? And

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 11>you know we are right now looking at about a

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 11>forty plus or almost four year upgrade cycle for iPhones,

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 11>and this is what primes the iPhone seventeen regardless of

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 11>obviously there's big upgrades to the phone and device itself

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 11>in terms of hardware, and of course very anticipated and

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 11>exciting excitement around iPhone seventeen Air. But regardless of all that,

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 11>or on top of all that, the Apple devices themselves

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:12.720
<v Speaker 11>are looking at a major upwoid cycle coming up, because

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 11>we're approaching that four year mark. So that's what we're

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 11>you know, looking baking that.

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 4>In Bluebosmark Gunman reports that an iPhone seventeen Air, a

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 4>thin five point five millimeters thickness phone, will be eSIM,

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 4>and he talks about how eSIM in the Chinese market

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 4>very interesting.

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 7>Why is that an important factor?

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:37.240
<v Speaker 11>That's important because that makes it a barrier, right because

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 11>the Chinese market right now, on top of all the

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.840
<v Speaker 11>other challenges that Apple is facing in terms of competition

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 11>being very driven with all the AI features that they

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 11>have been marketing to the hill, right, that's that's a big,

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 11>big challenge for Apple, on top of the accelerated growth

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 11>of Huawei and the support that they have from the

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 11>government as well as the consumer loyalty the ATH feature.

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 11>Despite the excitement that the consumers have with the Ultrasim

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 11>Ultraslim device. The fact that it doesn't is not going

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 11>to support that is going to be another challenge. So yes,

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 11>the Chinese market we're still expecting again regardless of you know,

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 11>on top of despite the great upgrades that the seventeen

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 11>will bring, there is the excitement in the Chinese market,

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 11>but we're still expecting a decline. So it's still going

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 11>to be a tough, uphill battle for Apple.

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 3>And China Narina.

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 2>How price sensitive are well China if you even called

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 2>it an emerging market now, but India they'd be making

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 2>scale there. How much is price and ability to move

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:41.879
<v Speaker 2>higher on some of these newer and the ones you're

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 2>excited about, the slimmer versions.

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 11>So I'm glad you you know, you've brought India and

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 11>some of these emerging markets up.

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 7>I think.

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 11>What's interesting is that despite these markets being extremely price

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 11>sensitive traditionally, right we've seen the opposite trend. We've seen,

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:02.280
<v Speaker 11>especially in India, the large ASB growth or in history

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 11>for the Indian market in twenty in Q two right

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 11>now we saw ten percent growth and the largest ASP

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 11>for smartphones ever. And Apple has been seeing double digit growth.

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 11>So regardless of where the price, despite the price increases,

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 11>and even with the new devices that will see Apple

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 11>is seeing tremendous growth and that is because of the

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.839
<v Speaker 11>support from financing programs that we're seeing in all.

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Of these markets. What will steal the show?

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Is it all about the slimmer versions or will the

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 2>pro still be the standout? Will ultimately people go for

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 2>more power, more battery life versus trying out something that's

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 2>incredibly slim but might be better for a next generation.

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 11>So again, great question, and you know, for me, I

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 11>think it depends. It's going to be a combination. I

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 11>think that's what Apple is doing really well, and it's

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 11>ingenious move because with the Slim, they've gotten the buzz,

0:39:55.520 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 11>the marketing and a great you know lead up to

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 11>the event. Because the Slim will hit the mark with

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 11>a lot of consumers, or with a few consumers actually,

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 11>then the majority of consumers who are looking for camera

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 11>a better performance, so the Pro will hit the majority

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 11>of consumers. We will generate more volume and certainly more

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 11>revenue for Apple, but the slim device will also hit

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 11>the mark. So I think combined is what will lead

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 11>to a bigger upraight cycle for Apple this year. And

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 11>that's why, as a result, for total. So if you

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 11>look at the seventeen series, we're expecting them to do

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:33.840
<v Speaker 11>bigger volume.

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 4>Listening very quickly, trade in how big a fact will

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 4>that be? Particular in America? Very quick huge, Okay, enormous

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 4>that sixtinct carry you had it there.

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Nada Profile. It's so good to have you back on

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the show. Senior research director at IDC. We love their

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 2>number crunching. Meanwhile, and that does it for this edition

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 2>a Bloomberg Tech.

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 3>We got more.

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:56.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, stay with us throughout the news day for more

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 4>on Apple. Special coverage later today. It's very focused on

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:02.280
<v Speaker 4>price seeing, bring in the tariffs and the political story.

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:05.799
<v Speaker 4>And Zambila just talked about. Huge factor is trade.

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Ins from New York, from Kupertino.

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 2>People all eyes on Apple, one of the most valuable

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:11.280
<v Speaker 2>companies in the world.

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:12.480
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech.