Speaker 1: Our two Sean Hannity Show. Here's our toll free number.
Speaker 1: It's eight hundred and nine to four one Sean if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. While
Speaker 1: I guess the rest of the world has kind of
Speaker 1: been caught flat footed. John Solomon, I think the greatest
Speaker 1: investigative reporter we have in our time at justinnews dot comments,
Speaker 1: as founder its editor in chief chief investigative reporter, has
Speaker 1: been busy at work and he has a story out
Speaker 1: how the FBI went after reporters and journalists and clergy
Speaker 1: with zero evidence, zero probable cause, using a loophole, and
Speaker 1: the FBI opened over one thousand, matter of fact, over
Speaker 1: twelve hundred probes related to politicians, journalists, religious leaders, academics,
Speaker 1: others tied to sensitive investigative matters using a special investigative
Speaker 1: tool that requires no factual predicate to launch. According to
Speaker 1: the Government Accountability Office. Now the GAO report, which was
Speaker 1: obtained by just thenews dot com published last month not
Speaker 1: made public and it's titled FBI Investigative Activities Oversight Efforts
Speaker 1: for opening and conducting assessments should be strengthened, and the
Speaker 1: report now is Assistant Congressional oversight the executive brands, providing
Speaker 1: details on roughly one hundred and twenty seven thousand FBI
Speaker 1: assessments in all opened, you know, all that were open
Speaker 1: from twenty eighteen to twenty twenty four, the vast majority
Speaker 1: of which were eventually closed without accusations of wrongdoing or
Speaker 1: criminal charges. It's sort of like Big Brother personified in
Speaker 1: ways that nobody really ever knew. And anyway, let's go back.
Speaker 1: You know, for some reason, Director Chris Ray has kind
Speaker 1: of ducked any responsibility or questioning, and I know there's
Speaker 1: been more focused on James Comi and as far as
Speaker 1: I'm concerned, James Homie knew everything that he was doing
Speaker 1: and was involved in, you know, everything from helping Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton and helping you know, cover up the Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: laptop and you know, the Russia collusion hoax and everything
Speaker 1: in between. And he knew damn well what he was doing.
Speaker 1: That's my personal opinion based on my knowledge of what
Speaker 1: we know at this time. We'll see what happens over
Speaker 1: time if there's a grand conspiracy investigation that is real.
Speaker 2: Well, let's go back to a hearing.
Speaker 1: This is in twenty twenty three of Jim Jordan, questioning
Speaker 1: Director Ray about suppression of conservatives investigating Catholics.
Speaker 3: So your FBI wrote a memo talking about radical traditional Catholics.
Speaker 2: I'm just wondering if you can define it for us.
Speaker 4: Well, what I can tell you is you're referring to
Speaker 4: the Richmond product, which was a single product by a
Speaker 4: single field office, which as soon as I found out
Speaker 4: about it, I was a gas.
Speaker 5: Do you think prece should be informants inside the church?
Speaker 6: Director?
Speaker 4: We do not recruit, open or operate confidential human sources
Speaker 4: to infiltrate target report.
Speaker 2: But that's not religious or what this said. It sounds
Speaker 2: like you were trying to do it in Richmond, Virginia. No, sir, No,
Speaker 2: you weren't. That just didn't happen.
Speaker 7: You can assure us that this didn't happen.
Speaker 4: That product did not to as best as we can tell,
Speaker 4: result in any investigative action as a result of it.
Speaker 3: None.
Speaker 1: Now, the other big issue, and this goes for Tiger
Speaker 1: moms like Linda. Linda likes to show up at school
Speaker 1: board meetings and because she wants to know what her
Speaker 1: kids are being taught, and she doesn't want her kids
Speaker 1: to be indoctrinated and remember the FBI was getting involved
Speaker 1: in school board meetings. Here's Christopher Ray testifying to Laurel Lee,
Speaker 1: the FBI is non policing speech at school board meetings,
Speaker 1: which is just not true.
Speaker 5: They were agents surveilled, That agents did in fact surveil
Speaker 5: and investigate certain parents who were attending school board meetings.
Speaker 4: No, ma'am, that's actually not correct. We opened twenty five
Speaker 4: assessments into reports that were tagged, but none of those
Speaker 4: involved incidents at school board meetings. And to my knowledge,
Speaker 4: FBI has not opened investigations on any parent for exercising
Speaker 4: speech at.
Speaker 2: School board meetings.
Speaker 5: Would you be concerned that to do so would be
Speaker 5: an infringement, perhaps a chilling on the First Amendment rights
Speaker 5: appearance to participate freely and openly in those meetings. Do
Speaker 5: you believe that would be an appropriate function of the bureau.
Speaker 4: I believe that our mission is to protect the American
Speaker 4: people and uphold the Constitution. And the uphold the Constitution
Speaker 4: part is very important to me and to our people.
Speaker 4: And I will say to you the same thing I
Speaker 4: said to all fifty six of our field offices as
Speaker 4: soon as I read that memo, which is the FBI
Speaker 4: is not and has never been in the business of
Speaker 4: policing or investigating speech by parents at school board meetings,
Speaker 4: and we're not about to start now.
Speaker 1: Joining us now founder editor in chief, chief investigative reporter
Speaker 1: just thenews dot com Tom John Solomon, is what we
Speaker 1: heard from then director of the FBI, Director Ray True.
Speaker 6: I don't think so. Now. There are three things we
Speaker 6: have to decide in that. One, was Chris ray not
Speaker 6: told the truth about what his agents were doing. That's
Speaker 6: a strong possibility given what we've learned over the last
Speaker 6: three years. Two is he's trying to play cute and
Speaker 6: play in the ambiguity of terms. That means something very
Speaker 6: specific in the FBI, but to the average human doesn't
Speaker 6: mean anything. So you can say we never opened up
Speaker 6: an investigated, predicated investigation on the school PRAM. But if
Speaker 6: you did twenty five assessments, which he admitted to, you've
Speaker 6: been investigating those parents. You just investigated in them under
Speaker 6: a standard that was lower, which is, we don't have
Speaker 6: reason to believe they committed a crime. We just looked
Speaker 6: at him. That's what an assessment is. And I think
Speaker 6: that he played in the margins of ambiguity, and he
Speaker 6: hasn't been pinned down, but I think the era of
Speaker 6: Chris Ray is going to become the most troubling era
Speaker 6: of the FBI since the day Edgar Hoover. I think
Speaker 6: we're moving into some really extraordinary revelations about what Chris
Speaker 6: Ray's FBI did, what they knew, what they didn't tell them.
Speaker 1: By the way, I want everyone to pay very close
Speaker 1: attention because what John Solomon is saying to you now
Speaker 1: is what he knows to be true and is in
Speaker 1: the process of putting together and what will be a
Speaker 1: blockbuster I think report at some point in the near future.
Speaker 1: I'm just going based on my past experience with you.
Speaker 1: Let's be real, because I've known you for fifteen years,
Speaker 1: and this is John Solomon speak for I know what's coming.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I think, Yeah, we are really very close to
Speaker 6: putting some very troubling pieces together. Some of them will
Speaker 6: be what we didn't what we weren't told about foreign
Speaker 6: influence operations in the United States aimed at elections. Some
Speaker 6: of it will be the monitoring of what these assessments
Speaker 6: ultimately did. These assessments. Let me just tell you what
Speaker 6: assessment is. An assessment is I don't have enough to
Speaker 6: investigate John Solomon and Seohn Handy open up a preliminary investigation.
Speaker 6: And I certainly can't open a full investigations because I
Speaker 6: don't have a predicate. But I assessed that I should
Speaker 6: be looking at Don Selloman. There's something bad about this guy.
Speaker 6: He's been writing about Hunter Biden. He's a national security threat,
Speaker 6: and so you open up an assessment. And those assessments,
Speaker 6: according to the GEO report that was never released but
Speaker 6: that we've made public last week, include the ability to
Speaker 6: monitor someone basically have a surveillance team on them, be
Speaker 6: able to do peak in sections and try to find out, oh,
Speaker 6: interview people around them and cause doubt about them. I
Speaker 6: believe we're about to learn about a new operation. All right,
Speaker 6: we know several operations. Let's go to Operation Cross by
Speaker 6: a hurricane, a fake effort to make it look like
Speaker 6: Trump World was in bed with Russia was never true. Right.
Speaker 6: We know about Arctic Frost, an effort to look at
Speaker 6: everybody around Donald Trump and hopes that they would one
Speaker 6: day find some sort of crime. And oh, by the way,
Speaker 6: that meant monitoring the protected communications of nine members of
Speaker 6: Congress between Operation Arctic Cross twenty twenty two to twenty
Speaker 6: five and Operation Crossfire Hurricane. There is going to be
Speaker 6: a new operation that was looking at people who dared
Speaker 6: to investigate the Biden family, who dared to investigate things
Speaker 6: that challenged the official narrative in Washington, who dared to
Speaker 6: ask questions about Ukraine and view them as national security
Speaker 6: risks and assess them as that, and begin to use
Speaker 6: the tools of the f GUI. So Chris Ray will say,
Speaker 6: we didn't investigate journalists, we'd investigate parents. Now you couldn't
Speaker 6: meet the standard of an investigation, so you just put
Speaker 6: us under review under a thing called an assessment, basically
Speaker 6: a no proof used the tools of the f GI
Speaker 6: to turn someone's life upside down. I believe that's what
Speaker 6: we're going to learn in the next few weeks, a
Speaker 6: brand new operation that fell between Arctic Cross and across
Speaker 6: Fire Hurricane that has some very troubling hallmarks of the
Speaker 6: day Edgar Hoover era all over again.
Speaker 1: I ask you this because I know that both the
Speaker 1: Attorney General Pam Bondi, the FBI Director Cash Battel, then
Speaker 1: Deputy FBI Director Dan Bong, you know, have all spoken
Speaker 1: publicly about opening a brand conspiracy investigation do you have
Speaker 1: an update on whether or not that is progressing, whether
Speaker 1: or not that is a possibility, because why that would
Speaker 1: be critical is all the Statute of limitations that apply
Speaker 1: to James Comey and others that they that would be
Speaker 1: washed away. Now, I do need to caution people. Grand
Speaker 1: conspiracies are very hard to prove in a court of law.
Speaker 1: It takes a lot of thought to get to this.
Speaker 6: Yeah, you're exactly right. Yes, in Fort Pierce, Florida, there
Speaker 6: is a very active grand jury investigation, lots of subpoenas.
Speaker 6: This is a sign that we know it's a conspiracy
Speaker 6: case in not a case looking just at crimes that
Speaker 6: are currently in the Statute of Limitations. One of the
Speaker 6: people we know got grand jury subpoenas, and that the
Speaker 6: subpoenas are about the former CIA Derector John Brennan. Now
Speaker 6: there is a legitimate criminal referral against John Brennan for
Speaker 6: testimony he gave in twenty twenty three to the House
Speaker 6: ted Issuary Command. Jim Jordan made that referral. That is
Speaker 6: a chargeable offense within the.
Speaker 1: By the way I've been I've been hearing rumors for
Speaker 1: weeks now that his arrest is possibly im minute.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I think that there's well at least a decision
Speaker 6: by the grand jury. They're going to ask the grand
Speaker 6: jury soon. It seems like they're certainly moving in that
Speaker 6: direction all the signs that you watch as a reporter.
Speaker 6: But something happened last week that is very important. The
Speaker 6: grand jury and the prosecutors running it made a request
Speaker 6: to the United States Senate for things that John Brennan
Speaker 6: said that are outside the Statute of limitations memory he
Speaker 6: started testifying about Russia inclusion in seventeen, way outside the
Speaker 6: Statute of limitations. The fact that the grand jury and
Speaker 6: the prosecutors running that grand jury want things outside the
Speaker 6: statue of the limitations clearly a sign that they're looking
Speaker 6: at an ongoing conspiracy and not things that just happened
Speaker 6: and in the time that is a big giant revelation.
Speaker 6: The request came into the Senate. Unfortunately, the senate's on
Speaker 6: vacation again, so until they get back, that may not
Speaker 6: be fully returned to the grand jury. But those are
Speaker 6: the sort of things that are going on, and you know,
Speaker 6: John Brennan's lawyers know this, they're watching it. But these
Speaker 6: are very big moments and there are real signs that
Speaker 6: this Miami US Attorney's Office and the career group of
Speaker 6: prosecutors who are really battle tested, excellent conspiracy case prosecutors.
Speaker 6: They went after the drug lords and the cartels and
Speaker 6: the mob. They're now running this case and it's going
Speaker 6: to be done professionally. The grand jury is going to
Speaker 6: make a decision based on the evidence, not on the politics.
Speaker 6: And we'll know soon, but certainly there is clear evidence
Speaker 6: that John Brennan is currently a focal point of that
Speaker 6: conspiracy investigation. We'll see whether they take any action or whether,
Speaker 6: as he has always said, he says he thinks he's
Speaker 6: innoc him, there's a lot of evidence that contradicts themple
Speaker 6: we'll see see what happens.
Speaker 1: Well, we are going to see what happens, and it's
Speaker 1: going to get very very interesting. One of the things
Speaker 1: that I hear from my sources all the time is
Speaker 1: that they are discovering more and more evidence. I mean,
Speaker 1: we had the burn bag issue, but more things that
Speaker 1: maybe we thought were never going to be recovered but
Speaker 1: we'd never get to get a hold of. I'm even
Speaker 1: hearing you know, patter about Hillary Clinton's you know servers
Speaker 1: that you washed clean with bleach bit, you know, like
Speaker 1: with a cloth that that may be on the table,
Speaker 1: that may be recovered. Is there any truth to that?
Speaker 6: There are some efforts that have been going on in
Speaker 6: the Intelligence Committee which are completely legitimate. By the way,
Speaker 6: the first reason to do this is not just to
Speaker 6: go get Hillary Clinton. It's to make sure that if
Speaker 6: there were national security vulnerabilities at Hillary Clinton's reckless use
Speaker 6: of the private email server for classified information created, that
Speaker 6: those who got to the bottom of them. There's a
Speaker 6: second reason. There's been ongoing concern and we broke the
Speaker 6: story last summer, and you were kind enough to have
Speaker 6: me on the show. There were three separate f Guy
Speaker 6: investigations looking at whether the Clinton Foundation operated as a
Speaker 6: as a pay to play operation. There is some new
Speaker 6: evidence that has been recovered because in the world we
Speaker 6: live in, you may have your server, but when you
Speaker 6: send your email, it goes out into the web and
Speaker 6: various bits of it stay in different servers around the world.
Speaker 6: And there are new technologies that our government has that
Speaker 6: can recreate emails from ten years ago, fourteen years ago,
Speaker 6: and also allow some of our allies to do so.
Speaker 6: In Europe, and there has been an effort to recover
Speaker 6: some of Hillary Clinton's unrecovered emails and ones that have
Speaker 6: yet not been along with many other pieces of information
Speaker 6: that would help us understand did a bad actor like
Speaker 6: China gain access to something? Did somebody compromise a public
Speaker 6: figure because they got access to something they shouldn't have.
Speaker 6: All of that is going on. And while that's going on,
Speaker 6: those capabilities have also led the United States government to
Speaker 6: discover some new types of intrusions into our elections and
Speaker 6: into certain types of election database. And now I'm not
Speaker 6: talking voting machine. I'm talking about where your voter IDs are,
Speaker 6: where your registration records are correct, and they're beginning to
Speaker 6: make connections. Remember we talked about this in November, John,
Speaker 6: that they had these driver's licenses at China sent to
Speaker 6: the United States and then plot to help Joe Biden
Speaker 6: potentially win the elections. Where did the data come from
Speaker 6: that that could have come from hacking? And we're now
Speaker 6: being recreating some of these capabilities to find out what
Speaker 6: was found that we haven't been told. Those are important moments,
Speaker 6: same technology, same group of people doing it.
Speaker 1: John Solomon, Founder, creator, editor in chief, chief investigative reporter
Speaker 1: justinews dot Com always John a pleasure. We appreciate you
Speaker 1: sharing your information your hard work with us. Thank you, sir.
Speaker 6: Yeah, good to be with you. Thanks so much.
Speaker 1: All right, lightning round with Linda today. Now, just you
Speaker 1: got to be careful. You know this, this is radio.
Speaker 1: We are governed by some rules and some of this
Speaker 1: may may trigger you, knowing your personality, which you know
Speaker 1: can be at times volatile.
Speaker 7: Wow, your school board meeting a good leader?
Speaker 5: True?
Speaker 2: False?
Speaker 1: Are you a tiger mama at the school board.
Speaker 7: I'm working my way to lion.
Speaker 2: I never heard of a lion mom.
Speaker 7: I want to be in.
Speaker 2: I'm going to be the first.
Speaker 1: I think that's a compliment. I think it's cool, agreed,
Speaker 1: caring of about your kids. You show up and you
Speaker 1: want to make sure if you think you're teaching that
Speaker 1: crap to my kids, you got another thing coming that's
Speaker 1: from them getting a piece of your mind.
Speaker 2: Anyway.
Speaker 1: Uh So, just a quick reaction. I just thought I
Speaker 1: just thought of this idea today. Don Lemon says people
Speaker 1: of Minnesota in the church he entered didn't believe he
Speaker 1: was a journalist because he is black. Reaction, one sentence.
Speaker 7: Nobody cares that he's black. They just don't care about
Speaker 7: him period.
Speaker 2: Nobody.
Speaker 1: In other words, people are not looking at the skin color,
Speaker 1: that's simple.
Speaker 8: But even if they are, they hate him because he's him,
Speaker 8: not because he's black.
Speaker 7: So those people are Christians, they probably don't hate anybody.
Speaker 1: I'm home and we just found one two days ago,
Speaker 1: a fourteen year old girl, little girl, living with two
Speaker 1: adult males. We found her. She's pregnant from trafficking, forced
Speaker 1: into prostitution, fourteen years old. They have found hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands of these children lost or in the Biden years
Speaker 1: of open borders and no vetting. This is insane.
Speaker 8: I'm sure that we are going to have a lot
Speaker 8: of buttons worn't on red carpets for that fourteen year old.
Speaker 8: I'm sure everybody cares a lot about her.
Speaker 1: Uh Okay, well, it just breaks my heart.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: There were five thousand, four hundred arrests of illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: accused or found guilty or convicted of raping or sexually
Speaker 1: assaulting Americans.
Speaker 8: Right, But the problem is how fast are they let
Speaker 8: out on cash free bail sanctuary cities and states.
Speaker 1: That's the real issue to repeat of the country. As
Speaker 1: we learned earlier in the week, thirty one percent of
Speaker 1: the country lives into the sanctuary under sanctuary provisions, thirty
Speaker 1: one percent of the country. I mean it's insane. Twenty
Speaker 1: one hundred Americans last year, twenty one hundred illegals that
Speaker 1: murdered Americans are either accused or convicted of murdering Americans
Speaker 1: were captured by ice.
Speaker 2: You never hear about that part of the story.
Speaker 1: You do not hear about the Oakland Maya Barbara Lee's
Speaker 1: vehicles stolen after someone broke into her office.
Speaker 7: That I did not hear.
Speaker 2: You didn't hear about that, I did not.
Speaker 7: You stamp me on.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, the liberal is only a liberal till
Speaker 1: they get propped. They're all against gun control until somebody
Speaker 1: breaks into their house. Maybe they have a different view
Speaker 1: on it. Our buddy, Stephen A. Smith, he's getting pissed
Speaker 1: at Gavin. Did you see what he said? That Gavin's
Speaker 1: stuck in his show, still waiting gavenusam, I simply want
Speaker 1: you to answer for your state about homelessness, crime, defunding,
Speaker 1: police being sanctuary city, and state billions in debt.
Speaker 8: Okay, Well, how about all the money he funneled to
Speaker 8: his wife. They just uncovered that too.
Speaker 1: Unbelievable. Unbelievable. What else do we have here that I
Speaker 1: think you might be interested in?
Speaker 9: Oh?
Speaker 1: Did you see? The only sport I care about in
Speaker 1: the Olympics is only one? You know what it is?
Speaker 2: What is it?
Speaker 1: Uh?
Speaker 2: Hockey? Oh? Come on, is it not hard hockey? Hockey? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Anyway, So we got a really close game the other
Speaker 1: night and we won an overtime, and this guy, Quinn Hughes,
Speaker 1: who scored the overtime goal, says he loves representing the
Speaker 1: US because it's the greatest country in the world. Unlike
Speaker 1: all these other woke athletes, I won't watch it. I
Speaker 1: don't want anything to do with any sport that's woke.
Speaker 1: Hockey is the coolest sport. I mean, American hockey players
Speaker 1: are the coolest people out there, you know.
Speaker 7: It said.
Speaker 8: When I was a kid, I always remember watching the
Speaker 8: Olympics and it being such a big deal and it
Speaker 8: was on you know, typically NBC.
Speaker 7: And it was you know, we all watched. It was
Speaker 7: so cool.
Speaker 8: And now it's like our kids don't even know what
Speaker 8: it is, nor do they have any interest in it.
Speaker 8: And then when they get up there and you finally
Speaker 8: get to hear them speak, they trash the country, and
Speaker 8: I'm like, what are we doing? Like the one guy
Speaker 8: urinated in the snow ice and I'm like, really, bro,
Speaker 8: that's that's your moment, that's what you want to do
Speaker 8: with your five seconds of fame.
Speaker 7: It's pathetic.
Speaker 1: No, let's get to her busy phones. Catherine Missouri on
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Show, Catherine, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 3: Well, you know I called because of Linda giving up
Speaker 3: chocolate for lent.
Speaker 1: But then but no, no, no, no, no, we have
Speaker 1: to give a history here. Oh, okay, the years she's
Speaker 1: tried to give up cursing and within like three hours
Speaker 1: she's already failed spectacularly. And now she's like, all going
Speaker 1: to give up chocolate, meaning she needs to give up
Speaker 1: that which she is hardest to give up.
Speaker 3: Right, yes, but she should not give up dark chocolate,
Speaker 3: coco or coco uh never, because that stuff is good
Speaker 3: for your cardiovascular sister, it's anti carcinogen, it's good for
Speaker 3: your gut biome, it's it's just all around good.
Speaker 10: Hi.
Speaker 3: You know it's women who participate dark chocolate have less
Speaker 3: breast cancer. It's good.
Speaker 7: It's good.
Speaker 1: It's for forty days for crying out loud.
Speaker 7: Sean's like screwing your breast.
Speaker 1: He's not giving it up for She's not giving it
Speaker 1: up for the rest of her life.
Speaker 8: Her Catherine's calling him positivity.
Speaker 7: Sean's like Russia.
Speaker 2: No, I know.
Speaker 1: I just try to live a good life every day.
Speaker 1: And maybe this is just faulty thinking on my part.
Speaker 1: And yesterday was ash Wednesday, and but I haven't really
Speaker 1: thought maybe I should need to start thinking about going
Speaker 1: back to what I did as a kid and giving
Speaker 1: up something I don't know.
Speaker 2: I haven't.
Speaker 1: You don't give up anything, and I give up being
Speaker 1: aggravated by you because you try to aggravate me every day.
Speaker 7: You got to give up something you love. You don't love.
Speaker 3: That a curse in different languages, I.
Speaker 7: Do, Catherine. This is this is let me advise you.
Speaker 7: I am not proud. I am definitely somebody who swears
Speaker 7: a lot.
Speaker 8: And I swear in many languages because I want to
Speaker 8: make sure the person I'm yelling at understands, just in
Speaker 8: case they don't.
Speaker 7: Yesterday yelled at somebody in Italian.
Speaker 3: Oh, okay, well you know, coming from a Norwegian background,
Speaker 3: job try that.
Speaker 7: I'm gonna look it up. Thank you, Catherine.
Speaker 1: Oh great, You're going to teach her new new ways
Speaker 1: to curse, considering she can't give it up for lunch.
Speaker 1: You're not allowed of help. But we love you, Catherine.
Speaker 1: Thank you, We appreciate the call. Let's go say hi
Speaker 1: to Marty. He is she is in Texas. Marty, how
Speaker 1: are you glad you called?
Speaker 9: I'm glad to be talking to you, Glad to be
Speaker 9: alive and I heard you.
Speaker 2: I'm glad to talk to you. I love Texas. God
Speaker 2: loves Texas.
Speaker 9: Oh. Yes, absolutely wanted to talk to you about a
Speaker 9: and let you know, at seventy five years young, oh
Speaker 9: whatever you want to call it, I'm still here and
Speaker 9: I'm using that tool to kind of learn a lot.
Speaker 9: I think that it can be used for good, and
Speaker 9: I'm aware that it certainly can be used for evil,
Speaker 9: but I'm using it, choosing to use it for good.
Speaker 9: And I used it even to get some medical results,
Speaker 9: like a little pre diagnosis. Words to ask or questions
Speaker 9: to ask.
Speaker 1: So there is a great article that is freaking people
Speaker 1: out and it's gone very viral from a tech worker.
Speaker 1: The guy's name is Matt Human and he describes how
Speaker 1: recent AI advances have made his expertise obsolete as models
Speaker 1: are handling complex tasks. And he said, last year he
Speaker 1: writes new techniques for building these models unlocked a much
Speaker 1: faster pace of progress, and then it got even faster,
Speaker 1: and then faster again, and each new model wasn't just
Speaker 1: better than the last, it was better by a wider margin,
Speaker 1: and the time between the new model releases was shorter.
Speaker 1: And he said he was using AI more and more,
Speaker 1: going back and forth with it less and less, watching
Speaker 1: AI handle things that he used to think required his expertise.
Speaker 1: And then he goes on to explain a couple of examples,
Speaker 1: and they were releasing new models all the time, and
Speaker 1: he said he came to the realization that he is
Speaker 1: no longer needed for actual technical work for his job.
Speaker 1: And then he goes on to say and he says
Speaker 1: he will put in the information walk away and not
Speaker 1: a rough draft that he needs to fix anymore. He says,
Speaker 1: he tells AI what he wants, walks away from his
Speaker 1: computer for four hours, comes back and finds the work done,
Speaker 1: done well, done, better than I could have done it myself,
Speaker 1: no corrections needed. And a couple of months ago I
Speaker 1: was going back and forth with AI guiding it making edits.
Speaker 1: Now I just describe the outcome and I leave. And
Speaker 1: what he's saying is that AI is not just executing
Speaker 1: his instructions now he's an expert. It was making intelligent decisions.
Speaker 1: It had something that felt for the first time like
Speaker 1: judgment and taste and the inexplicable sense of knowing what
Speaker 1: the right call is. That people always said AI would
Speaker 1: never have the model has it and something close enough
Speaker 1: to that distinction is you know, doesn't matter anymore. He
Speaker 1: said it will impact law, finance, medicine and everything. Here's
Speaker 1: my point is, I want Marty this audience to dig
Speaker 1: deep into artificial intelligence. You need to understand it. I
Speaker 1: don't care what your age. And you're saying that you're
Speaker 1: doing that right, Yes I am.
Speaker 9: I'm dabbling with it and I'm finding it very fascinating
Speaker 9: and I use it as a tool just to help
Speaker 9: guide me along the way. But I know that my
Speaker 9: big boss is and that's Jesus himself.
Speaker 1: Amen to that. I can't disagree with that. And at
Speaker 1: the end of the day, the guy that built universes
Speaker 1: and galaxies. Within universes and galaxies is way smarter than
Speaker 1: anything any human can build. I can promise you that.
Speaker 1: Praise God anyway, I appreciate you being with us. God
Speaker 1: bless your Marty, God buss Texas. All right, let's get
Speaker 1: back for our busy phones cold free. It's eight hundred
Speaker 1: ninety four one, Shan if you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program, Rich in New Jersey, Rich, how
Speaker 1: are you.
Speaker 10: Sure it's such a pleasure to speak with you? Just
Speaker 10: you know, piggybacking on what Buck Sayston was talking about
Speaker 10: regarding the colleges, you know, with this indoctrination, you know,
Speaker 10: we could do this with half our brains, type hard
Speaker 10: our backs, you know, little tribute to rush that this
Speaker 10: this this indoctrination starts in the public schools in kindergarten.
Speaker 10: I've seen it, I live through it. So it and
Speaker 10: and I believe that that so much of of the
Speaker 10: left hypocrisy that you talk about all the time has
Speaker 10: to do with this as well. And you could look
Speaker 10: at even just I mean, you've spoken about how you
Speaker 10: need an ID to get into the Democratic National Convention,
Speaker 10: you know, but of course the you know you don't
Speaker 10: need one to vote. They they they won't fund ICE
Speaker 10: because they want federal agents who are trying to uphold
Speaker 10: law to have ideas, but yet anyone can go and
Speaker 10: cast a vote in a federal election. It is insane.
Speaker 10: And on another little little little just side side note,
Speaker 10: you know you've got some I'm surprised that I would
Speaker 10: love to ask Jasmine Crockett, who throws around the race
Speaker 10: card like and hole covers, why she was not outraged
Speaker 10: at the turn at the result of the Virginia governor
Speaker 10: toil race, where you know, of course, the white Democrat
Speaker 10: woman won, the black Republican woman lost. And I have
Speaker 10: to believe that if it were switched that that's what
Speaker 10: we would have heard about would have been racism. And
Speaker 10: you know, the race card thrown out there, and it's
Speaker 10: just it's just unbelievable.
Speaker 1: The double standard is unbelievable. And you're right about bucking
Speaker 1: his book.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: For example, hypnotism is real. All right, imagine that you're
Speaker 1: in front of me. I'm gonna uh, you know how
Speaker 1: easy it is to hypnotize somebody? Let me tell you
Speaker 1: how to do it? Ready, all right, first I want
Speaker 1: you to you have rings on.
Speaker 2: Take off your.
Speaker 10: Rings, okay, take off my ring okay.
Speaker 1: Sit in a straight back chair and sit up straight I'm.
Speaker 10: In my car, sitting up straight with my ring off.
Speaker 2: Remove your shoes.
Speaker 6: Move my shoes. Okay, I have speakers on. Is that okay?
Speaker 2: Yep?
Speaker 1: Take them off. Now, put your hands together in prayer
Speaker 1: like fashion. And when I say squeeze your hands together,
Speaker 1: want you to squeeze them. Yes, okay, I'm gonna stop here.
Speaker 1: And then I would have you squeeze so hard. And
Speaker 1: then I'd say and if you try to open your hands,
Speaker 1: your hands won't open up. You see these people do
Speaker 1: it on stage. Call the law of reverse suggestion. When
Speaker 1: I started telling you, take off your rings, sit in
Speaker 1: a straight back chair, take off your shoes, they were
Speaker 1: all commands. I wasn't requesting. I wasn't being polite. Hypnotism,
Speaker 1: that stuff you see on stage that's funny, is real.
Speaker 1: You can hypnotize people. Some people are more susceptible than others. Anyway,
Speaker 1: it's a topic near and dear to my heart. We'll
Speaker 1: talk more about it maybe tomorrow. Rich got to run
Speaker 1: man appreciate it. Eight hundred and ninety four one Shawn
Speaker 1: is a number you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program.