WEBVTT - It’s Time to Buy Japan

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>John, Hello him.

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, John, you and I have done something that

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 2>is increasingly unusual.

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not recording a podcast. I could tell you half

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>or not.

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 3>No, I'll tell you what.

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>It's not that. And just to be clear, recording a

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 2>podcast is something we do together, and the thing I'm

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 2>mentioning is not something we do together.

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 3>We have replaced ourselves.

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>I like that.

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>We that we are looking at it. Yes, we have

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>spawned new people.

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 3>We have we will when.

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>We leave this earth, all fingers crossed, we will leave

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>behind us a replacement.

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Carry on our good work.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure my children are going to want to

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>take over the podcast, but maybe one of yours.

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 3>Well. The point being that we've been talking.

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 2>About this for years, Ear and me about the fall

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 2>in the global fertility rate. You know, done to what

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 2>is it now? I can't remember, but it was thirty

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 2>years ago, was pushing pushing three and now we're down

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 2>to only just over two. And there are an awful

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of countries where where fertility rate is well below

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 2>replacement rates. So you know, the US, China, India the

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 2>most recent one to see it. For quite a lot

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 2>of countries, particularly in Europe, I have already seen their

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 2>population's peak. If we put immigration potential to one side,

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the Japan, Italy, Germany, Spain, etcter. As far as we

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 2>can see, all of those populations of peak and fertility

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 2>rates in Africa that is supposed to be the big

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>driver of global population are falling much faster than people

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 2>expected as well. So if ten years ago the main

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 2>worry was population explosion, today we're actually thinking more empty planet.

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think this is really fascinating, persibly for slightly

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>different reasons, because I just find it amazing that we

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>can have turned around so quickly. And I bet you,

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I bet a lot of your listeners podcasts still think

0:01:55.760 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that overpopulation is the biggest problem, and this will actually

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>still come as a surprise them, despite the fact was

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>on the cover of The Economists.

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 4>The other day.

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Finally, well, usually if.

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Something's in the front cover of the Economists, that's kind

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>of it's in the place.

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Actually, we shouldn't go down this road of criticizing you

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 2>and I have formed job.

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely absolutely. Yeah, we did put back coin on the

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>cover in December twenty seventeen at Money Week. I do

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>rememb about that, but.

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure that was your decision.

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>That was my fault.

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, But listen, so when we think about this, when

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 2>we think about this, you don't think that we should

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 2>really think about this much in terms of investment, but

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 2>it does have a big impact on the inflationary slash

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 2>deflationary environment. And there's an ongoing conversation about whether aging

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 2>populations and falling populations are inflationary or deflationary, and I

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 2>think you and I both veered towards thinking that it's

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 2>one of the drivers behind the inflation rey environment because

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 2>you have a well off, older population demanding all sorts

0:02:59.960 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 2>of things and a much more limited supply.

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Of labor to provide those things. So obviously the cost

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 3>of stuff is going to go up.

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I actually I agree with that. I think that's

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that's true. I think that's fair. But the point you

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>just made it about a there's a debate about it,

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>so you know, economists have been tossing it back and

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>forth for years. But the other thing I suppose is

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that I think the demographics is one of those things

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that can change so quickly because the forecast are so

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>long term and they're based on a certain number of assumptions,

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and the very fact that for most of my adult life.

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>People have been carping about how there's too many people,

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and lots of people still believe that Malthusian crap put

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>forward by Airlick in the population bomb that I guess

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't see the point of investors worrying their heads

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>about it simply because it's it's such a it's way

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>out in the future, and there are so many more

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>things that affect affect individual investments before that. I just

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.839
<v Speaker 1>don't think, and I certainly don't see it as a theme.

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like I don't think. I mean, yes, okay, you

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>can invest in agent populations in that they'll need more

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>medical care, but in and of itself, that's not a

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>recently by a specific farmer company. You should other things.

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 3>I'll give you all that. I mean, it could drive

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 3>healthcare innovation.

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 2>It's one reason to be interested in AI because that's

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 2>the kind of thing that could really eventually help us

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 2>manage our healthcare and the care of our elderly. It

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 2>might drive innovation. And I don't know the life insurance

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 2>industry that sort of things. So there's a lot of

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 2>stuff going on with the aging population.

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 3>But I'll give you that.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 2>The much longer term demographics might not make much difference

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 2>to one's investments over a five or TENNYAR period, But

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I did want to say one thing I prefer what

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about in the podcast today, which is Japan,

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 2>which is that there's a general view that declining populations

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 2>or even static populations are a bad thing for economies,

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 2>and that an aging population is also a bad.

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Thing for an economy.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 2>And people look at Japan and they go look at

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 2>that flatlining GDP, Look at that, you know, Japanese GDP

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 2>barely grows, etcetera, etcetera, and they forget to look at

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 2>the really important thing, which is GDP per capita, And

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 2>particularly if a population is shrinking, you don't want to

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 2>look at the main GDP numbers. You want to look

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 2>at every individual's every individual person's purchasing pair. And I've

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 2>just been looking up on the World Bank website to

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 2>see what's happening to Japanese GDP per head in terms

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 2>of purchasing power, and it's been incredibly.

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Healthy over the last few decades. You're seeing real growth there.

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Interestingly, as an aside, I looked up the UK as well,

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 2>and in terms of absolute purchasing power GDP per head

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 2>in the UK has actually been growing rather substantially as well,

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 2>and is above pre COVID levels.

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 3>So that's something interesting.

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>That's really interesting, especially Kevin that imignation has were sitting

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of years, it's rocketed and it's

0:05:58.040 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>always been very high compared to Japan.

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 3>That is interesting.

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>If you asked me a bit, I would have thought

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.119
<v Speaker 1>that gdpeople ahead in the UK would have been weak

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>at best, if not negative.

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, this isn't purchasing power parity measurement as opposed to

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 2>in absolute pound terms.

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right, we'll come.

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Back to living.

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting and it's exactly the opposite to what

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I expected as well, because I having looked at the

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Japanese data. One of our listeners actually suggested that I

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 2>looked at the UK data as well and said, you know,

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 2>you're going to be surprised, and he was absolutely right.

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 3>I was surprised at you. That doesn't happen now.

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>That is really interesting. We should come back to that

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>at some point, I think, or in Japan. The other

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that I actually do find interesting is that I

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>always again remember Japan being held up is the kind

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of archetype of the declining population, but when you know,

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>look at Japan and relationship to the rest of Asia.

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not even in the bottom five anymore. I don't

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>think I think you get like South Korea is by

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>far the worst I think on the planet, which makes

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you wonderful. Why is that specifically? But there's a lot

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of other interesting.

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 3>And look at the way that you're framing that the worst.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, John is.

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Judging your career. John is judging.

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>You well, all traditional patriarch at the end of the day,

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Look up.

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Look up the way he's replaced.

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Himself exactly, growing a great big beal as we speak.

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Right. Moving on, Welcome to Meren Dogs Money, the podcast

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 2>in which the people who know the markets explain the markets.

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm Maren Sunset Web this week of conversation with David Mitchison,

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 2>fund manager at Xeno Asset Management. It's got more than

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty years investment experience. He's an antholute expert on Japan.

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 2>He speaks Japanese. You know, so it says on the website,

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 2>but I did touch him with a couple of words.

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Has youmaged it? We're not actually going to do it

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 3>in Japanese.

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>I was just a true because that's the only word

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 2>I can remember from my ten years in Japan as well,

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 2>seven years whatever it.

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 4>Was this sight, Sinara, I'm sure this more.

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh, thank you discard so David. Exciting times right.

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 2>The Japanese markets are the thirty three year high, the

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 2>topics up thirteen percent already year to date.

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Now, I started my career.

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.239
<v Speaker 2>In Japan in the nineteen nineties and this is about

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 2>exciting as it's been since since then.

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 3>So what I want to do. I want to talk

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 3>about Japan obviously the whole way through.

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 2>This podcast, but I want to start off by talking

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 2>about why it is that investing in Japan has been

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 2>such a difficult one for the last couple of decades,

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 2>you know. I mean I've looked at it with John together.

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 2>We've been working together for years, and we've looked at

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Japan a year after year after year and said, this

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 2>is getting better, this is kind of cheap, people should

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 2>buy that, and we've been wrong over and over and

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 2>over again. So let's talk first about why it is

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 2>that John and I have been in this is unusual,

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 2>by the way, completely wrong for so long.

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 4>I think it's not just you that's been completely wrong

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 4>for so long. I mean a lot of people have

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 4>been completely wrong for so long, frankly, including you know,

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 4>my business partner James, who I think started investing in

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 4>Japan in nineteen eighty nine. I sort of started to

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 4>look in Japan perhaps in the year two thousand and

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, since then, the market has had some bigger

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 4>ups and downs, but it's really only the lasts of perhaps

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.119
<v Speaker 4>ten years that the market has begun to move up steadily.

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 4>And I think we have to kind of go back

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 4>to where Japan was in you know, the end of

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 4>the bubble, which was basic Christmas Day in nineteen eighty

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 4>nine when they raised interest rates over the previous nearly

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 4>forty years after Second World War, Japan had gone through

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 4>this of huge economic boom and it was obviously reindustrialized.

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 4>You had amazing companies like Sony, You've had, you know,

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 4>the rise of video recorders, of consumer electronics, and you're

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 4>also at the same time saw this massive domestic property

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 4>bubble where you know, the end of that bubble in Japan,

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 4>the price of kind of a meter of land in

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, or apartment in Tokyo was three hundred and

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 4>fifty times higher than it was in Manhattan. I mean,

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 4>this is absolutely bonkers level of bubble. And so but obviously,

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 4>if you're sitting in an apartment, you know, worth fifty

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.719
<v Speaker 4>million dollars in nineteen eighty nine, that's a lot of

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 4>money today. In nineteen nine, that was huge, and you know,

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 4>so the spending was out of control, The amount of

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 4>leverage people took was out of control, and a bit

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 4>like America before the GFC, the belief was almost that

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 4>the real estate prices could only go up. And for

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 4>fifty years they had so the belief that, you know,

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 4>you could lever up, and you know, from the bank's

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 4>point of view, you know, well if they couldn't pay

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 4>you for some reason, well the land price would have

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 4>gone up so much that you could always just sell

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 4>the asset and you'll be fine. And so you ended

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 4>up with these sort of interlayered companies who had basically

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 4>borrowed money against their collateral weather as stocks or land.

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 4>They then invested in not only other companies, but also

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 4>in projects that maybe not caught their business because of

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 4>everything you did seem to work during the bubble. And

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 4>it was only once the capital starts stopped flowing when

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 4>the bubble burst and people suddenly realized that the land

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 4>prices were extraordinarily high, their stock prices were extraordinarily high,

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 4>and as everything went into reverse, you had to repay

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 4>this debt. But suddenly the assets weren't there, the cash

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 4>flowers weren't there. And Japan, unlike most countries, chose to

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.599
<v Speaker 4>save its way out of a bubble, which is, I

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 4>guess is the opposite of what we've seen in the West,

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, after GFC. But it's really, I think probably

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 4>the only country in history that I can think of

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 4>that has actively chosen to save its way out of

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 4>a bubble.

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 3>And it's slightly too early to tell whether that was

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 3>the right or the wrong approach, isn't it.

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 4>So if we were to look at as sort of

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 4>senior Japanese business leader today, he probably I feel lucky,

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 4>just caught the tail end of the bubble, but then

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 4>has spent the next thirty odd years trying to work

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 4>through a debt deflation. And those sort of business executives

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 4>who are the most aggressive at the end of the

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 4>bubble are likely not to be here anymore because their

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 4>companies went bust, and so there's been an enormous survivorship

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 4>bias amongst those executives who are still here, companies who

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 4>are still here, and you can see that and perhaps

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 4>in some of the banks. You know, the biggest bank

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 4>in Japan is Mitsubishi UFJ, but that's a combination of Mitsubishi,

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 4>Cocasai UFJ and you know, and so many other banks.

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 4>And the same thing is true for you know, SMBC.

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 4>The same thing is true for Misoho, which is you know,

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 4>at least made of three very large banks. They used

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 4>to be many, many different companies have been forced to

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 4>merge and consolidate and rationalize, and in the process, obviously

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 4>that's created a lot of managers, the aggressive ones have

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 4>lost their jobs. And that's I think something that people,

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 4>perhaps I don't understand is that there's been this very

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 4>strong survivorship buyas. So for a long time, Japanese companies

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 4>were really just focused on surviving, being very very risk

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 4>averse and not taking any risks. And to some extent,

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 4>it meant that wasn't maybe the best and the most

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 4>aggressive managers who have thrived like they might maybe in

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 4>the US, but the dullest and the safest. And I

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 4>think what perhaps we're finally begin you see is that

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 4>that's changing, and that there are new companies coming through,

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 4>whether it's an internet or services in retail. You know

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 4>that you are seeing a newer generation of managers who

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 4>are coming through, who are perhaps a bit more attuned

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 4>to what's happened in the rest of the world. But

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 4>it means that a lot of Japanese companies have used

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 4>those that last of thirty years as an opportunity basically

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 4>to just hoard assets and hoard cash.

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 3>So this sounds like an absolutely brilliant combination.

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 2>We've got companies that are solid, high quality, conservatively but

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 2>reasonably run, perhaps low debt, and they're sitting there just waiting.

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Making up a story for you. By the way, I

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 3>hope this is true.

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 2>They're just sitting there waiting these high quality, load debck

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 2>companies for a new generation of managers to come in

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 2>and leverage what they have.

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and it's not just that they're load debt. Most

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 4>companies in Japan are net cash. About forty percent of

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 4>companies have a quarter of their shareholder equity in net cash.

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 4>So we're not talking about real estate. We're not saying

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 4>about investment securities and things like that. This is just cash.

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 3>And in a deflation re environment or a very low

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 3>inflation environment.

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 2>That's fine, it makes sense to keep pilecast sitting around

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 2>on your balance set to agree.

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it means the return on cash is in real terms,

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 4>is pretty good. But it also means that if your

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 4>banking system is failing, and you know, you go to

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 4>the bank and you say, peace, can I borrow a

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars? They say, actually, we were really rather hoping

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 4>you could lend us some money to recapitalize ourselves again.

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 4>So I mean during this debt deflation, the Japanese banking

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 4>system probably recapitalize itself about three times over. So that's

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 4>the kind of extent of the kind of debt wipeout

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 4>that you've seen in Japan. So companies weren't able to

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 4>rely upon the banks to finance them, and to some

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 4>extent they've had to build up, you know, or either

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 4>generate their own cash flow to pay for things, or

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 4>they've had to sort of save up effectively build their

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 4>own cash pile. And then you then go out and

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, run their businesses they wanted to. But it

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 4>does mean that this incredible conservatism, as perhaps we move

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 4>engineer where inflation is let's say more than zero, is

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 4>something that begins to weigh on them. And the second

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 4>point about it is it's not just the cash the

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 4>return on the cash is, you know, positive or negative.

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Is that if you start think about the cost of capital,

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 4>which is something that Tokyo Stock Exchange is beginning to

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 4>ask companies to do, suddenly realize that actually, for your

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 4>cost of capital or equity in Japan is say ten

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 4>percent roughly, then actually your cash is not returning you zero,

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 4>it's actually earning you minus ten once you're adjust for

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 4>the carrying cost. So if you think about companies with

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 4>twenty five thirty forty percent of their equity is basically

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 4>net cash, then actually it means you know that they're

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 4>overall the return you have to generate from your core

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 4>business to get a good roe is actually incredibly high.

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 4>And that's one of the things that you know, the

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 4>say Tokyo Socket Change right now is the new president

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 4>is particularly focused on and he's saying, we don't think

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 4>Japanese companies understand what their cost of capital is properly,

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 4>and we would like them really to look at this

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 4>and to understand more about what the cost of holding

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 4>the assets they use to run and operate their businesses.

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 4>Are and maybe some companies have actually got far too

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 4>many assets. And I think that this is really part

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 4>of this big change in kind of corporate governance that

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 4>has been going on since the days of you know,

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 4>O shinzo Abe, which you know was perhaps kicked off

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 4>kicked it all off with the shareholder governance and corporate

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 4>governance codes. And we think that you know, the this

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 4>is just taking time to gather and gather momentum and

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 4>to bear fruit. But we're now moving into a phase

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 4>where this is actually becoming much more real and the

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 4>conversations you have with companies are becoming much more meaningful.

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting.

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 2>It's another example of people expecting things to happen too fast,

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 2>isn't it. And when abbe In produced all his reforms,

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 2>everyone got temporarily very excited and rushed into Japan and

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 2>then was disappointed a year or too later when really

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 2>nothing particular had happened, not noticing that under the surface.

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 3>All this was beginning to happen.

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 2>And now we're starting to see that the fruits of

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 2>that renewed focus on shareholder value for example.

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I mean I think the key tempersise is

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 4>you're starting off from a very very low base and

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 4>the kinds of you know, you know, But also that

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 4>means the scope for improvement from that low base and

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 4>those very low valuations is quite big. So's I think

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 4>it's about the direction of travel and hopefully the pace

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 4>of that journey as opposed to the current level being

0:17:59.280 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 4>being very good.

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 5>And if you look at Japan in absolute valuation in terms,

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 5>it's still pretty cheap, isn't it. If you look at

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 5>relative the rest of the world is one of the

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 5>few markets that outside the UK that actually doesn't look

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 5>relatively inexpensive.

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's very cheap. Companies have a lot of physical

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 4>and financial assets, so when you look at say shareholder equity,

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 4>it's almost all sort of tangible book value. And there

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 4>are aspects of Japanese accounting because of the deflation that

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 4>means that effectively assets are carried at either book cost

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 4>or market price, whichever is lower, so that there's kind

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 4>of an inherent downside bias in some of that accounting,

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 4>which kind of probably even understates some of the valuation

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 4>that you can see out there. But you also have

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 4>a number of perhaps some of the very large cap

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 4>global companies have been perhaps operating a more global fashion

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.199
<v Speaker 4>have been more competitive, So you know, I think the

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 4>real opportunities more in the medium and smaller sized companies,

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 4>and perhaps more in the domestic companies than is in

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 4>some of the global companies. There there are some very

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 4>big names like Panasonic or Kaserah, for example, where focus

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 4>on shareholders has certainly not been a priority, and where

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 4>companies have not been very disciplined, and where there's a

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 4>lot of potential for change.

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a little bit about Warren Buffett, right, because

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 2>you're not the only one who sees value in Japan.

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Buffett sees it too, and he's been investing. When did

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 2>he first invest in the big trading company's a couple

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 2>of years back. He's done extremely well out of that,

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 2>and he says that he says, we're not done investing

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 2>in Japan yet. He's in for the long term. What

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.479
<v Speaker 2>is it that he's seeing in it? Is this purely value?

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 2>There's been some talk about him seeing Japan as a

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 2>beacon of stability in a geopolitically difficult world.

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Is it that as well? Or are we just talking

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 3>about valuations with him?

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 4>Do you think I think it's it's there is some

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 4>very well Rund the trading comes in Japan, it generally

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 4>relatively well, tell you what.

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 2>Don't explain what a trading company is. I mean, in

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 2>some of these companies, they're almost unique to Japan. It's

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 2>hard to look around the to the world and put

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 2>your finger on a company that does exactly what these

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 2>this group of companies.

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Do, right, Yeah, So a classic trading company would be

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 4>say Mitspishi Core, Mitsui and Company. And their role really

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 4>has been to go abroad to source products and especially

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 4>raw materials, to organize their transportation back to Japan, and

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 4>to find customers in Japan for those kinds of materials.

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 4>And they're also often a kind of an organizing basis

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 4>for much bigger groups called Kretzu. So we'd say Mittspishy,

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 4>I've got Mitspishi Trading, but you also have mits Spishi Bank,

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 4>it's Specih Chemical and Mitspecie Electric, Mitspishly Heavy Industries, mits

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 4>Spishi Motors as used to be. So there are many

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 4>many companies within that broader group that.

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 3>They're part of a group.

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 2>But they used to be held together by networks of

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 2>cross shareholding, right, which made them into a group. But

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 2>now it's not quite that connected. It's a very loose

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 2>connect so.

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 4>The crush shareholdings have gone down. But they're not just

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 4>connections of money, which is basically from the bank, but

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 4>also connections of people, connections of you know, things like

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 4>trade unions. You could even have, for example, a Nissan

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 4>group trade union and they would basically represent the workers

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 4>of the broader group, but that would also be another

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 4>point of connection between those organizations. But what it meant

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 4>historically is that the primary alignment for let's say managers

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 4>and companies wasn't to their shareholders. It was to the

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 4>group as a whole, because that's where their customers were,

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 4>that's where their you know, let's say directors were from,

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 4>that's where the personal relationships were, that's where the bank

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 4>who provided their money came from. And perhaps it's if

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 4>you think about Japan as a culture, it's a group culture,

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 4>so the group is very important. I mean foreigners in

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Japan called gekokagin, which you know, kind of translated means

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 4>outside people. So you're outside and if you're outside, you're nothing.

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 4>So if I were to meet someone, you know, I

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 4>am you know, David, but I'm really Zenyl non Mitchenson.

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm the Mitchison from Zenyl, and I derive some status

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 4>from being part of ZENYL. If I was a member

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 4>of a big Japanese group, I could drive a lot

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 4>of social status from being part of that group. And

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 4>people within the group are much closer to me than

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 4>people outside the group. And it's those different degrees of

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 4>relationship that have really driven a lot of those those

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 4>issues and changes in Japan. That the alignment within the

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 4>group is very, very strong, and I guess all of

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 4>the reforms around shareholders and corporate governance have been around

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 4>trying to increase the alignment between shareholders, and one of

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 4>the other sides would be is they break down That

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 4>those groups have kind of broken down a little bit.

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 4>So yes, say Honda effectively dissolve this relationship with the

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 4>number or reduced its relationship with an i'm ris key

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 4>suppliers because they weren't able to compete because they couldn't

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 4>get the right components and the right products and technology.

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 4>So they actually exited a number of positions they've reduced

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 4>their alliance on. That's on those group companies, and it's

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 4>a bit the same as some of the German companies

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 4>went through some of the nineteen nineties of this unwind

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 4>of what boutschland are gay and those group relationships and

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 4>structural relationships broke down are slightly straight away from the

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 4>trading companies slightly, but.

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 3>That was totally interesting. I would have interrupted. You have

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 3>been boringqteresing.

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 2>So let's take us back to the trading companies, so

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 2>that they're domestic and global companies. They're relatively inexpensive, and

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 2>they're fully invested in you know, they're going to be

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 2>big beneficiaries of the resurgence of Japan's economy, assuming we

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 2>think that's going to happen, and the resurgent of the market.

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 4>They do lots, They do lots and lots of different things,

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 4>so I guess the originally it was to bring in

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 4>these raw materials from overseas, to organize the logistics, to say,

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 4>work with group companies to help manage supply chains. But

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 4>over over time that's all have evolved into investing in

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 4>some infrastructure projects, being invested in a cable TV and

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 4>you as part of those groups, you know, organizing some

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 4>very complex large projects. So they have a lot of

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 4>safe project management skills. But also they formed partly like

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 4>a role a little bit like private equity in Japan

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 4>as well supporting new ideas and new ventures in Japan.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 4>So they're very very connected in Japan, and they were

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 4>trading very cheaply. But what Warren Buffett has been doing

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 4>is he's actually been borrowing money in yen and then

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 4>buying some of these companies. And partly what he's noticed

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 4>is that the I guess, the spread between what these

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 4>companies are yielding in dividends and buybacks versus the funding

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 4>cost in yen has been massive. He's really saying equities

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 4>in Japan compared to the price of Japanese financing are

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 4>ridiculously cheap. That you know, you can borrow for one

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 4>percent and you can get a five, five, six seven

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 4>percent dividend yield, which for him was really attractive. He's also,

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 4>as a kind of indust operator able to go into

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 4>those companies who have these incredible connections throughout Japan and say,

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 4>are there any other areas where we can do business together?

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.959
<v Speaker 4>So he's also got like as well as that purely

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 4>financial play, he's also got this operating play where he

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 4>may be able to find assets that other people want

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 4>to sell or where he can be introduced and they

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 4>can do other forms of business. But he's clearly you know,

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 4>his starting point is, you know, these are really cheaply

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 4>priced assets. The cash flows are really good, the balance

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 4>sheets are strong enough, and you know that their priced

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 4>far below the intrinsic value that they offer.

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 2>And one thing we're not going to do here is

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 2>recommend that our listeners go out and borrow in the

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 2>end to buy Japanese equity.

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Listeners, please do not do that.

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 2>But the trading companies are worth buying on valuation brands

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 2>alone without borrowing to visit.

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, and.

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 4>I think he's recently added to that position, so he

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 4>clearly clearly has a view.

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Do you hold any of them in your portfolio?

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 2>You have two portfolios, right, Japan and Japan Income, so

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 2>two separate Japanese portfolios.

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 4>So we've got two funds at Japan Income Fund and

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Luxembourg Fund, which is are originally named or Japan Fund.

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 4>We hold quite a few trading companies, but we don't

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 4>tend to hold the very big ones. We tend to

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 4>hold niche ones because it's not just that these very

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 4>large companies, but there's also other companies who involved in

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 4>example trading trading and doing religious six for drugs and cosmetics,

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 4>and electronics and a steel and a whole range of

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 4>other areas. So these trading companies are kind of middle

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 4>men in the Japanese market, basically easing the transactions between

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 4>large groups and say smaller either industrial companies or pharmacists

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 4>and people like that. So there's a lot of opportunity

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 4>for these companies within an economy as big as Japan

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:58.719
<v Speaker 4>to kind of create quite a lot of value. And

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 4>what we're seeing is a lot of these companies historically

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 4>have been quite inefficiently run, and they're now beginning to consolidate,

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 4>and in the process, they're also realizing they've basically been

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 4>using far too much of their balance sheets, so very

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 4>very inefficient working capital management, or companies holding enormous cross

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 4>shareholdings amongst their business partners, and they're realizing that actually

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 4>this isn't necessary to run their business. And so some

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 4>of these companies might be trading for let's say, the

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 4>value of their equity portfolio, which we think is probably

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 4>too cheap.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 3>Can you give us an example of a stock like that.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 4>We own a drug wholesaler called Medipal, for example, and

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 4>effectively they they basically help manage logistics between the large

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 4>drug companies comes like Takeda, but also foreign companies like

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 4>a Fiser or someone like that, and the pharmacists and

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 4>hospitals in Japan, so the big dispensing pharmacy chains, so

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 4>they will help manage the logistics of that supply chain.

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 4>But as a result, they've historically held a large number

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 4>of shares in drug companies, in medical equipment companies, in

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 4>pharmacy companies, so basically so they've deployed their capital in

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 4>trying to build these relationships. And as that kind of

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 4>emphasis on capital relationships is becoming weaker and pressure from

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 4>shareholders becoming stronger, they're recognizing that actually the cost of

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 4>holding this capital and these relationships is very, very high,

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 4>and they say it's a process where these companies will

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 4>gradually sell down their shareholdings. But they're also finally accepting

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 4>that the amount of assets they have is too big

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 4>for their business size. And so the question we're having

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 4>really today is you know, this is your asset base,

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 4>what is necessary for your business? And then what is

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 4>the best way to deploy that extra capital? So is

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 4>it maybe to do M and A, is it to

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 4>grow your business organically? Is it maybe to do a

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 4>big dividend, or to buy back shares if the sh

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 4>are very very cheap. But the conversation, which has kind

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 4>of been catalyzed by the TESE is really what is

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 4>the appropriate size of your balance sheet?

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 2>And now there's definitely a very sharp rising buybacks in Japan, right,

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 2>So this is something that we haven't seen for a while.

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 3>It's American thing.

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Buybacks, and now we're suddenly seeing a lot of Japanese

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 2>companies doing that.

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 4>So buybacks, if you got to go back over ten years,

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 4>will probably say five trillion any year, and dividends are

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 4>about the same, so to say ten trillion any year

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 4>in shareholder returns, I think this year it's going to

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 4>exceed forty trillion. So we've already seen a pretty big increase.

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 4>But actually at the same time, Japanese profitability has grown

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 4>a lot, so actually companies now have even kind of

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 4>more cash than they had at the beginning, so they

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 4>haven't been distributing all of their cash, and the balance

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 4>sheets have kept on growing. We still find that companies

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 4>often don't really understand why they're doing a buy back,

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 4>but they do know that they should be doing a

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 4>buy back, and what was say, what we've begun to

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 4>see is companies say, Okay, we accept we've got too

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 4>much money basically, and we are going to pay out

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and twenty percent of our profits over the

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 4>next few years, or we're going to target more than

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 4>ten percent ROE. And with the reason our ROE is

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 4>low today is because we've got too many assets. So

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 4>some companies are beginning to understand that this kind of

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 4>excess non operating assets are actually hindering their returns because

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 4>the shareholder base has broken up a bit and you

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 4>have more active investors pushing companies incredibly hard on their

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 4>balance sheets and on their capital, and that's pressure is

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 4>beginning to make it self felt, not just in those

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 4>companies who under direct pressure, but under companies who fear

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 4>they may come under pressure. And I think that that's

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 4>causing them, along with strong encouragement from the Tokyo Stock

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 4>Exchange itself, for them to really look again at their

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 4>capital policy. And that's one reason this year we've seen

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 4>so many companies hike their dividends, do buybacks, and kind

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 4>of commit to higher levels of return going forward.

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 3>So good time to own a Japan income fund.

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 4>What's the yield on We definitely think so it's just

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 4>over three percent. We are hopeful running basis.

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 2>From market that everybody thinks produces no income whatsoever.

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Three percent is not bad, is it.

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 4>We think you could, I mean, you could construct a

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 4>portfolio with a much higher running yield. But we also

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 4>as well as that three percent, we're normally expecting to

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 4>get probably another three or four percent in terms of

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, buybacks as well. So it's not that's not

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 4>the total shareholder return. And in many cases we're expecting

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 4>those companies to continue to grow their dividend not just

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 4>in line with earnings, but faster than that. And there's

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 4>clearly quite a few companies that we own where there

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 4>will probably be let's say, extraordinary returns of capital as

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 4>they downsize their balance sheet and bring them in line

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 4>with with where the operation entity is. And there's definitely

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 4>quite a few companies where you know, you talk to

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 4>them and they have you know, ROIC targets, which obviously

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 4>is a Japanese companies. ROIC is not a new concept,

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 4>but something that most companies in Japan are not really

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 4>familiar with.

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Sure, a lot of our listeners are not going to

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 3>be familiar with it.

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 4>So this is basically the return on the company's capital.

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 4>So it's not just the return on the equity but

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 4>on the whole company. So it's really about how efficiently

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 4>you're turning the assets you've got into profits. Some of

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 4>the companies we look at are looking at that against

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 4>how much it costs to kind of carry those assets,

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 4>the cost of capital, and they're saying, actually, we need

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 4>not just to cover the cost, we need to earn

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 4>like a positive spread. So we need to run our

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 4>business to exceed the cost of our capital. And when

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 4>use of run the numbers, either their profits have to

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 4>grow extraordinarily, which we would be quite happy about, or

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 4>they need to shrink their assets, and that would probably

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 4>mean in many cases big dividends. And so company I

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 4>think of at the moanent is actually committed to return

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 4>one hundred percent of its profits over the next three

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 4>years in dividends. But also it would probably mean that

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 4>they have to sell and shrink, you know, non core assets,

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 4>and that's something that you know, in Japan hasn't ever

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 4>happened before. So companies in Japan have mostly grown their

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 4>assets and have sort of often struggled to get out

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 4>of businesses that weren't doing very well, so I think

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 4>probably at the moment the focuses is on the balance sheet,

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 4>so bringing the balance sheet to the right size for

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 4>the operating company, and you can see that for example,

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 4>Sony has announced that it's going to spin out its

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 4>financial service business, and this is probably the first really

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 4>big example of a this kind of tax free spin

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 4>The government has been propos has talked about, but they've

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 4>kind of accepted it it. You know, the market of

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 4>discussion is that possibly Panasonic will do the same thing

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:44.719
<v Speaker 4>with their battery business, which is one of the main

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 4>supplies for Tesla. But obviously that battery business is quite

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 4>different from a lot of their other businesses and actually

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 4>know to fund its growth because of the big growth

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 4>in evs over the next couple of years, it needs

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 4>to be spending a lot of money. But a lot

0:33:57.240 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 4>of the other bits of Panasonic probably you know, a

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 4>very very different and so if you were to look

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 4>at to say, a careering company that did something very similar,

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 4>their battery business trades a completely different way than the

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 4>rest of their business did historically. And I think this

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 4>is one of the issues Japanese firms have had, is

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 4>that you know, the internal needs of these different companies

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 4>have been very very different, and the managers have struggled

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 4>to combine, say, managing some business that are in decline,

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 4>some that are very very successful, and some that need

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 4>perhaps lots and lots of growth capex. But they've sort

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 4>of struggled to decide how to allocate resources internally, and

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 4>they haven't been able to be very dynamic in terms

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 4>of how they approach things because you've had to form

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 4>this consensus. And so creating more focused or agile companies

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 4>should improve the decision making and it should allow I

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 4>guess investors to say, we really like this high growth business,

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 4>will pay a high price for that. We not that

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, we don't really like this other business, but

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 4>it's very stable and the dividends are great. And there

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 4>could be some businesses that maybe should be owned, say

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 4>by private equity, or should merge and consolidate with other companies,

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:08.359
<v Speaker 4>and perhaps they're in sort of a managed decline where

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 4>you focus on generating cash flow and you focus on

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 4>generating efficiency rather than trying to grow the business any longer.

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 4>So these trying to do all of those things inside

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 4>one group is very very hard. And if we were

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 4>to look at Japanese firms. There's definitely a clear kind

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 4>of empirical evidence that more focused companies have better returns.

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so there's a lot of a lot of movement

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of change coming.

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, listen, David. They ask you something that I don't

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 3>that I'm having trouble with.

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Which is that the market as a whole has outperformed

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 2>really nicely.

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Looks great. What I run down.

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 2>The performance from a lot of your competitors, A lot

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 2>of them are well, most of them are underperforming the market.

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 3>So after all these.

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Years that they've had to spend picking out the best

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 2>stocks in Japan and waiting for the market to turn,

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, and me writing endless articles about how Japan

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 2>as a stock pickers heaven, et cetera, they're still underperforming.

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 3>Why is that?

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 4>I think there are probably two reasons. The first of

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.840
<v Speaker 4>which is that the market, because it's been so horrible

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 4>for so long, has actually kind of bifurcated into totally

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 4>passive management. So so you know, whether it's an ETF

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:31.919
<v Speaker 4>for something, an active fund that's basically passive, so there's

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 4>no view and obviously with costs, that means you're probably underperform,

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 4>or you've had people had quite strong style biases who

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 4>you've gone for growth managers who invest in the new,

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:44.959
<v Speaker 4>dynamic changing companies in Japan, which there are quite a lot,

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 4>but obviously.

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 2>There have been just as expensive as some of the

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 2>more expensive companies in the worst.

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 4>Right exactly, so some of the some cases, perhaps the

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 4>valuation as in the West, has got ahead of the reality.

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 4>And on the other side, you've had value which also

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 4>includes a lot of companies that are not doing very well,

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 4>that are not that exciting, and obviously in the last

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 4>you know, year or so, those companies have done well

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 4>until the last month a lot lot better, but they

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 4>had a pretty horrible five years before then. So you know,

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 4>so it's been a very tough market because you know,

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.280
<v Speaker 4>you've either had that sort of style that you're investing

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 4>in your investors want you to buy or want to own,

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 4>and so you've ended up with investors having a growth

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:31.280
<v Speaker 4>manager and a value manager, and they've both performed well

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 4>when their style has been in favor, but when their

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 4>file style is not in favor, they haven't. So by

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 4>combining the two you have still ended up with an

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 4>average return. But it's very hard because you've got to

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 4>pick you know, the market and the style at the

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 4>same time to get it right. But I think the

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 4>second factor as well is that the companies that benefit

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 4>most from this pressure and the corporate governance reforms are

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 4>almost the companies that you wouldn't have bought because the

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 4>management didn't care because returns were very, very low. So

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 4>you you kind of almost have to find those companies

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 4>who are wanting to change or willing to change and

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 4>really chase those, you know, look at the try and

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 4>find those companies and find the catalyst for what that

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.319
<v Speaker 4>change is going to be. Now, sometimes that's you meet

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 4>the management team and they talk to you about what

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 4>they would like to achieve. Sometimes you see there's a

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 4>succession change between an old manager and a young manager

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 4>who's coming in with different perspective. But it's about those

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 4>companies who are changing and improving much more than it

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 4>is about some of those, you know, perhaps those legacy companies.

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 4>So it's been I think very hard for managers to

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 4>always to catch those unless they're explicitly focused on that,

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 4>and very few managers have that kind of mandate.

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:46.320
<v Speaker 3>So they're just all bad stock pickers basically.

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean it's always the stock pickers market in

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 4>some way or other. It's just whether you picked the.

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Right ones right back to your right ones.

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 2>If you had to go on holiday for five years

0:38:58.080 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 2>and hang on to maybe.

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Two of the So in your portfolio, which ones do

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 3>you think you choose?

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean one of our companies that we actually bought

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 4>of you at its Ipo, perhaps just well a year

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 4>and a half ago is a is a company that

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 4>specializes in producing private band water bottles water so for supermarkets,

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:22.879
<v Speaker 4>convenience stores, and the management is extremely good. It's called

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Life Drink. The management is extremely strong. They basically came

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 4>from a private ectory company. They basically rescued a Japanese

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 4>family firm that was struggling to compete and they refocused

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 4>the business. So even though it's quite a small business,

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 4>they have you know, they just have nine different products.

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 4>They've got still water, sparkling water, and tea in a small, medium,

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 4>in large size, so for each production line they have

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 4>really really big scale. And they are now in the

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 4>process of expanding their footprint, building more capacity, as they said,

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 4>filling out so geographically to Japan, and they're also going

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.799
<v Speaker 4>to conduct we imagine some more m and A, and

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 4>we actually introduced them to one company they ended up buying,

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 4>or a subsidiary of another company they ended up buying.

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 4>And it's really a good case in point where they

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 4>were able to go to an asset that this other

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 4>firm was struggling to run and make it only marginally profitable.

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:22.720
<v Speaker 4>They were able to buy it for a far below

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 4>replacement cost. They think they'll make a twenty percent return

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 4>under their business model. So it's really a case of

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:31.799
<v Speaker 4>these assets moving from a sort of a week a

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 4>week in so not the best owner, to a better

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 4>owner of those assets. And in the process both parties

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 4>of one one company didn't know got cash, they didn't

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 4>have to close down the facility, they didn't have to

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:46.319
<v Speaker 4>lay off the workers, and the other company was able

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 4>to acquire this asset and run it in a much

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 4>much better way, in a much better model, and make

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 4>really really good returns on it. And we think that

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 4>that kind of focusing in Japan is going to be

0:40:57.000 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 4>a really powerful force. It's not an ultra high growth company,

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 4>but it's probably going to grow between ten to fifteen

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:06.839
<v Speaker 4>percent a year with very high profitability, and we think

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:10.359
<v Speaker 4>that ultimately this will be reflected in a much higher

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 4>multiple for the company than it currently trades. That what

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 4>is current multiple it is currently well, depending on it's

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 4>currently doing a big share share placement. We think we

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 4>can get it down to a low double digit multiple

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:24.720
<v Speaker 4>and we think it will probably end ultimately trade between

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty to twenty five times, So we think it can

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 4>double again.

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 3>And if it was listed in the US, what do

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 3>you think it would trade.

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 4>On probably thirty times, I guess, I mean if we

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 4>were to think back as I mean, the way we

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:41.240
<v Speaker 4>look at it is a very very stable core business.

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 4>We think that you know, that's very macro insensitive, and

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:47.720
<v Speaker 4>we just think it has got a very very big

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 4>runway in terms of its ability to grow, to consolidate,

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 4>and to roll out, you know, to roll into adjacent categories.

0:41:57.239 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 4>For example, at the moment it doesn't do sports drinks,

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 4>but the asset it or has a lot of sports

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 4>drinks technology. That could be a big area which they

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 4>could again roll into the existing customer base across the

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 4>whole of their their footprint throughout Japan. And there's a

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 4>lot of sort of small incremental things they can do

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 4>to grow the profitability on it.

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, brilliant. Let me ask you, we're running out of time.

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 2>I've had you for far too long, But let me

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:23.840
<v Speaker 2>ask you before we finish up. It all sounds wonderful.

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 2>This is a great story.

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I love it. Cheap quality companies. What more would you

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 3>possibly want? Something is bound to derail that. Something always

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:34.399
<v Speaker 3>derails great rallies in the Japanese market. What's it going

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 3>to be? What's the big risk here? What's going to mean?

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 3>Because we're going to listen to this conversation with you,

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 3>and lots of my.

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Listeners are going to that's what I need. I need

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 2>a big part of Japanese stocks. We're going to go

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 2>out by a big part of Japanese stocks. I've been

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:46.919
<v Speaker 2>here before, and.

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 3>The next thing they know, they're going to be losing money,

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 3>almost inevitable. What's the risk here? So?

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:53.760
<v Speaker 4>I think that the biggest risk is that the government

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:56.400
<v Speaker 4>decides that actually, you know, this is creating if you're

0:42:56.520 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 4>too much change and too much disruption, that actually, you know,

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 4>they don't want all these Japanese companies buying and selling

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 4>different assets and disrupting the social harmony in Japan. You

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 4>know what the Japanese government really wants is more successful

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 4>companies that pay workers better, so real wages in Japan,

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 4>which have been completely stagnant since nineteen ninety. I mean

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 4>literally they've gone nowhere for thirty years. They want them

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 4>to start going up, and so I guess there is

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 4>a risk that, you know, if they're not achieving that,

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 4>then they may look for some other measures and try

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:31.880
<v Speaker 4>to go back to a kind of more state directed,

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 4>bureaucratically driven mode of kind of command and control. And

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:41.320
<v Speaker 4>there's definitely no elements in the Japanese kind of corporate structure,

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 4>whether it's the kind of Japanese version of the CBI,

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 4>the caden Ran or you know, the Ministry of Trade

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 4>in Industry or Ministry of Finance, who are very you

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 4>could say conservative but almost reactionary, and that they want

0:43:56.640 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 4>to stay on top and to control everything. Actually, all

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:04.960
<v Speaker 4>of this change in dynamism is undermines their power to

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 4>control things, and that means that you know, then don't

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 4>have the same level of influencing control that they used

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:11.840
<v Speaker 4>to have. And I think you know that they like

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 4>running the show, and I guess if there's a sense

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 4>that it's really not working, that they will try to

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:21.400
<v Speaker 4>reassert themselves and some of the companies who are under pressure.

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's not nice if you're a CEO and

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:27.320
<v Speaker 4>a nasty activist fund appears at a five percent or

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:31.280
<v Speaker 4>big shareholder and your shareholder list and then starts asking

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 4>you to run your business better, to hand over the cash.

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:37.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's your cash, not the shareholders. And you know,

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 4>the way of thinking for them is that you know,

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:43.840
<v Speaker 4>this is that the managers is the managers and company

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 4>to some extent more than it is the shareholders, and

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 4>that change of who owns those companies isn't yet fully embedded.

0:44:51.880 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 4>And there are some really bitter struggles at the moment

0:44:55.560 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 4>over governance, and it's it's not entirely clear that you

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 4>know you're always going to win, and there you know,

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:06.720
<v Speaker 4>there are some really really dirty fights going on around

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 4>and other things.

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I absolutely love it that you think the

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:14.319
<v Speaker 2>major risk here is that the changes too fast, when

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 2>this is about the slowest change anyone's ever seen, but

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 2>it still could conceivably be too fast.

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Hy David. Last question this, do you have to answer

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 3>this in one word?

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:25.799
<v Speaker 2>All right? Yeah?

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Ready?

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Bitcoin or gold?

0:45:30.840 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 4>Gold?

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, good answer.

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 2>One day someone's going to say bitcoin and then you

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:37.920
<v Speaker 2>know a whole big row is going to kick off.

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 2>But so for every single person I've ever interviewed on

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 2>this podcast at least has said gold.

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 3>I think so. Maybe someone said bitcoin, I don't think so.

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Enough Gold all the way, David.

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, Thank you very much, thanks for

0:45:51.120 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 2>listening to this week's Marion Talks Money.

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 3>We'll be back next week in the meantime.

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:57.720
<v Speaker 2>If you like our show, rate review and subscribe wherever

0:45:57.760 --> 0:45:59.839
<v Speaker 2>you listen to your podcast, and thank you very much.

0:45:59.800 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 2>By the way, those of you who have recently left

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 2>good reviews, we hugely appreciate them. This episode was hosted

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 2>by me Meren Somerset Web. It was produced by Someasadi

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:11.760
<v Speaker 2>and Mohammad Faruk. Additional editing by Blake Maple. Special thanks

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 2>of course to David Mitchinson and tie John Steppe. And finally,

0:46:16.040 --> 0:46:19.480
<v Speaker 2>your weekly reminder, and it's an important reminder sign up

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 2>to John's daily newsletter money distilled for the link is

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 2>in this show notes