WEBVTT - Progressive Squad Member Loses NY Primary; FedEx Delivers

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Good morning, I'm Nathan Hager and I'm Karen Moscow. Here

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 2>are the stories we're following today.

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Karen, we begin with some key primary results across the country.

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 3>First stop is New York, with results from the most

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 3>expensive congressional primary in US history. Let's get the latest

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 3>with Bloomberg's John Tucker.

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 4>In New York, John Nathan, Westchester County's top elected official,

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 4>Pro Israel centrist George Latimer defeated incumbent Jamal Bowman, a

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 4>member of the so called squad at Progressive Democrats on

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 4>Capitol Hill. Latimer's win is a boost of more moderate Democrats.

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 4>His victory speech was an appeal for unity.

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 5>We have to look at the arguments of the far

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 5>right and the far left and say you cannot destroy

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 5>this country with your rhetoric and your arguments.

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 4>One of the top issues was the war in Gaza.

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 4>Bowman hammered it home and his session speech, we.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 5>Will never stand for the bombing and killing of babies

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 5>in Gaza.

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 4>The closely watched campaign devolved into bittery infighting, but symbolized

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 4>larger divisions within the party nationally, a riff that some

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 4>Democrats Worr he could damage President Biden's reelection and spending

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 4>in the race clocked in in and eye popping twenty

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 4>three million dollars. With seventy one percent of the votes counted,

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 4>Latimer was ahead fifty five point eight percent to forty

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 4>four point three percent. His victory in the heavily democratic

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 4>sixteenth District all but insures will win the general election

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.759
<v Speaker 4>in New York. I'm John Tucker, Bloomberg.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 2>Radio, All right, John, Thanks well. Besides New York, three

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 2>other states held congressional primaries, and Republican candidates back by

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump came up short in two of them. In

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 2>South Carolina's third and district, Sherry Biggs defeated Mark Burns

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 2>in a runoff election fifty one percent to forty nine percent.

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Biggs is a political.

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Newcomer who was backed by South Carolina's governor, Henry McMaster.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Burns is a black pastor who supported Trump for nearly

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 2>a decade, though the former president did not campaign for him.

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 3>In Utah, hearen the race for Mitt Romney's open Senate

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 3>seat goes to Congressman John Curtis. He won with fifty

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 3>point seven percent, defeating a Trump endorsed Mayor Trent Staggs

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 3>and two other Trump supporting candidates. And in Colorado, Congresswoman

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Lauren Bobert won her bid for reelection after switching districts

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 3>to run for retiring Ken Buck's open house seat. Bobert

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 3>defeated several lesser known candidates with forty three point three

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 3>percent of the vote.

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, Nathan, as we continue to assess the primary results,

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 2>we are now just one day away from the first

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 2>presidential debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. The ninety

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 2>minute debate will include no audience and the candidate's microphones

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 2>will be turned off when it's not their turn to speak.

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberry. David Gurra is covering debate for US in Atlanta.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 6>It'll be strange it hearkens back to the debate in

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 6>nineteen sixty and Mark Thompson, who runs CNN now, has

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 6>been very clear about that he wants to return to

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 6>the sort of Kennedy Nixon style intimate debate on a

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 6>stage without the presence of an audience. And we're going

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 6>to have the moderators of the debate, Dana Bash and

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 6>Jake Tapper, with the ability to mute the candidates while

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 6>each other is speaking. It'll be very interesting to see

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 6>how each feeds off that lack of audience, if that

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 6>makes sense. We know of Donald Trump, the former president,

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 6>and how he loves to speak to big crowds, how

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 6>that animates him. This will be an entirely different thing

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 6>to be in this studio, in a room with just

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 6>the moderators and his opponent, with the President, Joe Biden.

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's David Gerrol will be part of our special coverage

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 2>of the CNN presidential debate. It all begins tomorrow night

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 2>at eight pm Wall Street Time with this special edition

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 2>of Balance of Power with Joe, Matthew and Kayley Lines

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 2>in Washington. Listen to the debate on Bloomberg Radio or

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 2>watch it on Bloomberg Television.

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Now Karen to the latest on the war in the

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Middle East. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin is warning that a

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 3>clash between Israel and Hesbelah could set off a new war.

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Zed Baxter has the story.

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 7>Austin, standing beside Israeli Foreign Minister Jov Golan sent out

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 7>the message to the globe generally and Israel specifically. This

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 7>is Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin that Yahoo pulls troops to

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 7>the north near has Bela.

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 8>Another war between Israel and Hisbela could easily become a

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 8>regional war with terrible consequences for the Middle East.

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 7>Austin's message to has belaws that has provocations threatened to

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 7>drag the Israeli and Lebanese people into a war they

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 7>do not want. Ad Baxter, Bloomberg Radio.

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>Right and thanks.

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 2>We turned to the markets now in nearly seven percent

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 2>rally and Nvidia shares HOWP tech stocks bounce back yesterday.

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 2>The Nasdaq rose one point two percent and NASDAK futures

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 2>are higher once again this morning. So Rebecca Patterson, former

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 2>chief investment officer at Bridgewater Associate, says there could be

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 2>some headwinds for investors.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 9>I do think as we get closer to the election,

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 9>as we're higher for longer on fed funds for longer,

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 9>that equity gains could be more limited. From here. We've

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 9>had a huge run up already, notwithstanding the couple days

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 9>pullback we got, so I'm not looking to reduce equities

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 9>or get out of equities in the short term.

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 2>And former Bridgewater CIO or Rebecca Patterson notes the S

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 2>and P five hundred is up almost fifteen percent this year.

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 3>And helping give a boost to the markets this morning

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 3>is FedEx Karen. Those shares are higher by nearly thirteen percent.

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 3>In early trading, the company delivered a profit forecast above

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street's expectations. More from Bloomberg's Doug Prisner.

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 10>It comes after a slew of cost cutting measures aimed

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 10>at increasing margins and coping with sluggish demand. FedEx is

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 10>expecting two point two billion dollars of permanent cost savings

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 10>in the fiscal year. The company also hinted at a

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 10>possible divestiture of its freight business FedEx it's assessing the

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 10>unit's place in the company's portfolio, and on top of that,

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 10>FedEx is expecting to buy back two and a half

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 10>billion dollars worth of common stock in fiscal twenty twenty five.

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 10>The company is also forecasting capital spending of five point

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 10>two billion. This will include fleet and facility modernization and automation.

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 10>In New York, I'm Doug Prisner, Bloomberg Radio.

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Doug banks Well. Fedech's shares are not the

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 2>only ones on the move this morning. Rivian a surging

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 2>more than thirty seven percent. The ev maker is getting

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 2>a much needed cash in fusion through a new partnership

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 2>with Volkswagen. BW will make an initial billion dollar investment

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 2>in Rivian and up to four billion dollars more over time.

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 2>The Surprise TIAT provides Rivian with a financial lifeline after

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 2>it has struggled to ramp up production and deliveries of

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 2>its electric pickup and sub models.

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 3>And Karen Disney maybe giving an even faster pass to

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 3>visitors at Walt Disney World. Disney's Florida theme parks will

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 3>now let park goers reserve a space in shorter lines

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 3>for rides up to a week in advance. Right now,

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 3>visitors can only book a day ahead on the Genie

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Plus reservation system. The new system will be called Lightning

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 3>Lane Multipass. Guests at Disney hotels will be able to

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 3>make seven day reservations fro up to three rides. Other

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 3>guests will get to book three days ahead. Price is

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 3>very depending on the park and time of day. The

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 3>three day multi pass will start at fifteen dollars. The

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 3>most popular rides can start at ten bucks. The changes

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 3>take effect July twenty.

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Fourth, and my another note here, Nathan Bloomberg Business Week

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 2>is out with a new monthly magazine that's redesigned from

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 2>the ground up. Check out the cover story on Bloomberg

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 2>dot com and the Bloomberg Terminal, featuring an interview with

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Bernard Arnault, the head of LVMH and.

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>One of the richest people on Earth.

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 2>The new magazine puts an emphasis on original photography and

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 2>includes new story formats to give you context, analysis and

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 2>perspectives that provide new ways.

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>To think about the world. Check it all out the.

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 2>New Bloomberg BusinessWeek at Bloomberg dot com. And it's time

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 2>now for a look at some of the other stories

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 2>making news in New York and around the world. From that,

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 2>we're joined by Bloomberg So Michael Barr, Michael, good Morning, Good.

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 11>Morning, Karen wall Street journal reporter Evan Gerskovich went on

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 11>trial behind closed doors in the Russian EuroCity of Caterinberg,

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 11>fifteen months after his arrest on espionage charges that he

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 11>his employer and the US government vehemently denied. The thirty

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 11>two year old journalist appeared in the court in a

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 11>glass defendant's cage with his head shaved. Griskevich is the

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 11>first Western journalist arrested on espionage charges in the post's

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 11>Soviet Russia. The State Department has declared him wrongfully detained.

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.239
<v Speaker 11>Wiki Leak's founder, Julian Assage, is on a plane heading

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 11>to his home country of Australia. Massage was sentenced time

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 11>served all in Britain as part of a plea agreement

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 11>with the US Justice Department that secures his freedom. The

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 11>plea was entered in the US court in Saipan. The

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 11>judge pronounced him a freeman after imposing the sentence. Lawyer

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 11>Jennifer Robinson has been representing as Sage in Australia and

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 11>the UK.

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 12>Julane has suffered for more than fourteen years because of

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 12>the risk of extradition to the United States. It's one

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 12>hundred and seventy five years in prison for publishing evidence

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 12>of war crimes, human rights abuse, and US wrongdoing around

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 12>the world.

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 11>In a no holds Barred report, the National Transportation Safety

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 11>Board called out a rail giant, Norfolk Southern, and the

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 11>handling of last year's train to railmen in East Palestine, Ohio.

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 11>Norfolk Southern was criticized on everything from the faulty wheel

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 11>that led to the trains going off the tracks to

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 11>the company's lack of cooperation during the investigation. NTSB chair Jennifer.

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 13>Hammedy Norfolk Southern tried to submit their investigation their own

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 13>investigation under the guise of a party submission, not once,

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 13>not twice, not three times, but four times.

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 11>The NTSB's Jennifer Hammedy also pointed out it was unnecessary

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 11>for Norfolk Southern to recommend firefighters perform a vent and burn,

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 11>which potentially cause further health hazards. President Joe Biden will

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 11>issue a proclamation giving back clemency the US service members

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 11>convicted of charges under a Cold War era purge of

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 11>gay and lesbian people, reversing a decades long policy of

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 11>discrimination that forced and estimated one hundred thousand people from

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 11>the military. Global News twenty four hours a day and

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 11>whenever you want it with Bloomberg News Now. I'm Michael

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 11>barn This is Bloomberg.

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Cart Jerry, Michael, thank you time for the Bloomberg Sports

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Update with John stash Hour.

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 5>John, Good morning, Good morning Caroon. On the eve of

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 5>the NBA Draft, It begins tonight in Brooklyn. A big trade.

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 5>It was between the Knicks and the Nets. The Knicks

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 5>had accumulated a boatload of draft picks, and most of

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 5>those picks are now moving burrows Is. The Nets get

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 5>the Knicks first rounder tonight and future first rounders in

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty seven, twenty nine, and thirty one in exchange.

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 5>The Nets traded to the Knicks. They're best player at

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 5>Michael Bridges, so the Knicks have now yet another former

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 5>Villanova stars. Bridges will be reunited with his college teammates

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 5>Jalen Brunson, Josh Hart, and Dante Devencenzo. Atlanta has the

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 5>first pick tonight, then Washington and both may take French

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 5>teenager Zachary Reezushia and seven footer Alex Starr a top

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 5>most mock draft boards. Another French teenager, Victor Wembinyama, was

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 5>taken first a year ago. While the Knicks and Nets

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 5>made the trade. The Mets played the Yankees and Mark

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 5>Biento's came up fourth inning, heaving already homered.

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 14>Once is cracked in the air on a line toward

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 14>right center, it is.

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Off the top of the loaf.

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 15>Thank god.

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 14>Fientos hits an absolute laser to right center and hit

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 14>the top of the wall and pumped into the Yankee bullpen,

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 14>his second home run of the night on WCBS.

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 5>Both Viento's homers came up Garrett Cole, who also served

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 5>up homers by Harrison Vader and Brandon Nimo. The Mets

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 5>built up a big lead and then held on after

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 5>an Aaron Judge grand slam in the eighth inning. They

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:53.719
<v Speaker 5>beat the Yankees nine to seven. The Mets have won

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 5>ten of their last twelve, and half those wins they've

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 5>scored nine or more runs. Yanks have lost seven of nine.

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 5>In six of the seven they've given up at least

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 5>seven run series In tonight at City Field, seventh raight

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 5>win for Cleveland ten six in Baltimore. Guardians of the

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 5>best record in Baseball. John Stashedwer, Bloomberg Sports, Karen.

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 8>Eathan Coast to Coast on Bloomberg Radio, nationwide on Sirius XM,

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 8>and around the world on Bloomberg dot Com and the

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 8>Bloomberg Business app.

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Daybreak. Good morning on Nathan Hager. We

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.599
<v Speaker 3>want to turn down to a conversation from the Bloomberg

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 3>invest Conference in New York. Cliff Astez, founder managing principal

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 3>and chief investment officer at AQR Capital Management, spoke to

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Shanali Bassek in a wide ranging conversation touching on

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 3>active and passive investing and the rise of meme stocks.

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 3>They began by talking about the efficiency of the market today.

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's listen.

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 16>In efficient is this idea that prices are accurately reflecting fundamentals.

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 16>This can get really geeky on how to define that,

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 16>but let's just be colloquial. I do have a view.

0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 16>It's not a short term view. It's not a market

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 16>call that again, markets are never perfectly efficient. But over

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 16>my career, which is annoyingly about thirty two years now,

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 16>I guess the opposite would be even more annoying, but

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 16>it's a long time. I'm a little obsessed these days

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 16>with those internet memes of when they show you like

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 16>an actor like Ed Asner in Mary Tyler Moore was

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 16>ten years younger than me when he did the World's

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 16>Very Upsetting. But over my career, I actually think markets

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 16>have gotten somewhat less efficient, meaning prices are a little

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 16>bit more disconnected from reality.

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 15>It ebbs and.

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 16>Flows, It's never the same at each point in time.

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 16>But I find that an odd view because one tends

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 16>to think as technology in particular advances that things should

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 16>march towards better, with better I think being efficiency in

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 16>this case, and I actually, I actually think maybe I'm

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 16>biased by having a front row seat, but I think

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 16>over the last thirty so years, i'd say the market

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 16>is somewhat less efficient than when I started.

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 17>So why do you say that is what is causing

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 17>it to be that way?

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 16>It's well, first I start out by just observing a

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 16>few facts, and I do, and I am of course

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.599
<v Speaker 16>biased by what I've lived through, but I love the

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 16>genus presentation. The dot com bubble stuff was bringing, you know,

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 16>PTSD like memories for me. We try to very formally

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 16>measure how disconnected from reality or not, or how or

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 16>how reasonable our stock prices, in particular, not the price

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 16>of the whole market, but within the stock market, are

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 16>you know, cheap versus expensive stocks? You could define that

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 16>very narrowly in a quant sense, in terms of just multiples.

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 16>You could define it more broadly in terms of a

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 16>gram and DoD sense.

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 15>Yeah you want to pay.

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 16>A little multiple, but what's the quality of the stock,

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 16>what's the risk of the stock. But either way, measured

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 16>very formally, the dot com bubble saw by far the

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 16>largest disparity between cheap and expensive we had ever seen

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 16>in about fifty years of data.

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 15>We survived that. It was a little ugly for a while,

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 15>but we actually thrive through it.

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 16>If you take the whole round trip, But when you

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 16>almost die in the first half, you tend to remember that.

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 16>If you had asked me in say two thousand and two,

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 16>when all of that excess was pretty much worked off,

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 16>are you going to see something more extreme than that

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 16>in your career. I think I'm smart enough even back

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 16>then to never say never. We don't live in a

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 16>business where any of us should say never. It's a

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 16>dangerous word, but I think I would have said, it's

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 16>highly unlikely.

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 15>That was the craziest thing we had seen in fifty years.

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 16>I would have said, well, in twenty years, people like

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 16>me will still be around. I hope who with some memory.

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 16>It's not one hundred years where everyone is forgotten. And

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 16>then pre COVID it was close. And then after COVID hitting,

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 16>we saw things measured very similarly price price multiples or

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 16>even price multiple scale by.

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 15>Quality to go to level well beyond the.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 16>Tech bubble and lasting about doubly as long as the

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 16>tech bubble if you ever have the misfortune to have

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 16>an investment that ever goes down for any amount of time,

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 16>you will learn something that they don't teach you in

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 16>a PhD program. Severity is bad, but duration is underrated

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 16>when it comes to pain. Three years of pain, even

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 16>if it's cumulatively not worse than a year and a

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 16>half of pain, is a ton worse. The first year,

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 16>you go back to your clients and go, we think

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 16>we're right, look what's going on here.

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 15>They go, okay, okay.

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 16>The second year they're like, that's the same thing you

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 16>said a year ago, and you go, yeah, but it's

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 16>still going on and we're still going to be right.

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 16>The third year, I mean, your mom's still invested, but

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 16>it's getting tougher.

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 15>So duration counts. So we've seen both the severity and

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 15>the duration of those.

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 16>So I start out just observing facts and then trying

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 16>to feel and why. Admittedly, this is a lot of

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.239
<v Speaker 16>op ed. This is very hard to prove. And I

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 16>love to you know, I'm a card carrying quant I

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 16>love to, you know, produce tables. I can show you

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 16>these spreads, But why, and I tend to have I

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 16>think it's a multitude of things. I think the number

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 16>one thing is probably the thing we all love to blame,

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 16>the Internet and social media. I think a lot of

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 16>people naturally assume such a thing would bring us information

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 16>so quickly and so ubiquitously knowing everything that prices would

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 16>be very efficient. But that's never been the hard part.

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 16>When I started in this industry, we got earnings and

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 16>within twenty minutes they're missing twenty minutes, and a nanosecond

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 16>matters to an HFT, it doesn't matter to almost every

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 16>other investor. We didn't really materially get more. And I

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 16>do think that level of information overload gives people a

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 16>lot of illusion of control. You know, I don't want

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 16>to go into this deeply because I know you'd like

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 16>to get me going on this, but I think the

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.479
<v Speaker 16>Meme stock examples, I don't think they're a norm by

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 16>any means, but I think they're the ultimate example of

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 16>a little bit of information making you think you really

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 16>know something very deeply, and I think that gets into

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 16>market prices.

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 17>I'll be careful to keep this a little rained in,

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 17>but on the meme stock.

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 15>Issue, I knew i'd get that started.

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 17>How much are the retail traders that are bidding up

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 17>prices of stocks like game stock, contributing to this idea

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 17>that markets are less efficient.

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 16>To you, I think they are very small part in dollars.

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 16>They maybe post their children in some sense for the

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 16>effect the whole idea that this disconnect in prices can

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 16>come in a world where we have all the information

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 16>at our fingertips. I think we're all raised at some

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 16>point we've all read about the quote wisdom of crowds.

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 16>The way you know, if you take a crowd that

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 16>on average people have fifty one percent information, but you

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 16>poll them. You hope many of us here are old

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 16>enough to remember Regis Philbin and you know who wants

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 16>to be a millionaire. The absolute best lifeline was always

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 16>pull the crowd right, because because if they asked the question,

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 16>you know, what does it say in the back of

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 16>a quarter, eighty five percent of the people don't know,

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 16>but they're evenly split, and the fifteen percent.

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 15>Of do not all go one way.

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 16>But there was always a little unspoken footnote to the

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 16>wisdom of crowds. To have a wise crowd, it's got

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 16>to be fairly independent. If everyone got to talk about

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 16>the quarter, not look at a quarter, that's cheating, but

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 16>talk about it. The people who are wrong convinced the

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 16>people who are right, and whatnot. A crowd where everyone

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 16>is coordinated and not independent has the risk of becoming

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 16>a dangerous mob.

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 15>And I don't know about you, guys, but.

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 16>I can't think of anything better at turning a wise,

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 16>independent crowd into a dangerous mob than the Internet and

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 16>social media. So I do think they're kind of the

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 16>poster child. I don't think economically they are they are that.

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 15>Important they you know.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 16>I don't want to disparage either side of it, but

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 16>it's nine dollars in terms of you know, in video

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 16>laughs at that on a daily basis. The entire memestock

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 16>phenomenon is like a little part of the day of Nvidia.

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 16>But I think it is a poster child for the

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 16>concept I'm talking about. There are other candidates. People talk

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 16>about the role of passive. That's really complicated. I'm not

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 16>one who just looks at passive and goes that that's

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 16>causing all kinds of havoc.

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 15>What is causing? Okay, I'll disappoint you here, people.

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 16>I don't think we really quite know yet. First of all,

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 16>here are the things we know about passive. Not everyone

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 16>can be passive. The whole world breaks down. Even back

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 16>when I was a PhD student, So this is the

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 16>early nineties, a kind of stant This is what happens

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 16>when PhD students in finance get drunk late at night.

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 15>They sit around going, what if everybody tried to be passed?

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 16>And that's a black hole, that's a singularity in finance.

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 16>Nobody's looking at individual stocks, and that just can't work.

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 15>Passive as a free rider is a free rider.

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 16>On active managers making sure prices are somewhat reasonable. But

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 16>the question of how many people can be passive, nobody

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 16>really knows.

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 17>You think it's contributing to an efficiency, and is efficiency,

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.719
<v Speaker 17>frankly another way of saying wild swings in markets.

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 16>I think I would guess yes, but I think it's

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 16>pretty small versus the social media, the illusion of control

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 16>of the data overload things I'm talking about.

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 15>It's not clear theoretically. If you imagine you had.

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 16>A world we had a certain amount of passive and active,

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 16>and suddenly a lot of active move to passive.

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 15>Whether active is now easier.

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 16>Or harder, whether it's more or less efficient, depends on

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 16>who moved. Let me be really obnoxious and go. There

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 16>were sharks and minnows. There were people who were good

0:21:57.720 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 16>at it and people who were bad. If all the

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 16>men move, markets get really efficient. Because sharks are trading

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 16>with sharks, they all are pretty good at valuing these things,

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 16>and the sharks don't.

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 15>Make a lot of money. We don't really know who moved.

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 16>I tend my reasoning here is really just correlation, not causation.

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 16>This has occurred at the same time that massive price disparities.

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.479
<v Speaker 15>Have grown and lasted longer.

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 16>So as a pure guess, I would have to go,

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 16>it's probably contributed something.

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 15>It's very hard to assign.

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 16>Another one is you know, I'm probably the billions person

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 16>to mention this, but over the same period, we've had

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 16>ten years prior to a couple of years ago of

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 16>ultra low nominal and real interest rates. I am not

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 16>a person who thinks that means growth stocks should go

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 16>to the moon. I've written papers on the math of

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 16>that's kind of wrong. They're not actually that much longer duration.

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 16>But the market disagrees with me. The market things with

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 16>interest rates fall, growth stocks should go to the moon,

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 16>and so ultra low interest rates have probably contributed to

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.239
<v Speaker 16>a fair amount of that also, so I think it's

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 16>a witch's brew. But if I had to put the three,

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 16>I think maybe I'm just an old man ranting at TikTok.

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 16>But I think the feeling that you own all the

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 16>information and are on a level playing field, and therefore

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 16>you can own two stocks and be very confident about

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 16>it is probably.

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 15>My number one thing to point at.

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 17>So let's step back for a minute. Because you were

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 17>concerned about the efficiency of markets here and reasked, has

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 17>the market gone awry? Has something about the market broken?

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 15>To you?

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 16>Broken such an ugly word. These are points on a spectrum.

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 16>For me, broken is very I'm going to define that

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 16>as are we in a bubble or the opposite of

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 16>a bubble and irrational depression where people won't pay any

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 16>fair amount for stronger companies or whatnot. A bubble is

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 16>when wet the companies people like and they're willing to

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 16>pay giantly excessive amounts. So let's say bubble and broken

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 16>are equivalent. I use the word bubble.

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 15>I think less than a lot in the industry.

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 16>I once wrote a sarcastic piece really doesn't narrow it

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 16>down amongst the pieces I've written but making fun of

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 16>the term bubble that on the extended use of the

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 16>word Wall Street people who a lot of people will

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 16>see bubbles everywhere, and they translated a little too weakly

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 16>as a bubble means a stock. I kind of don't like. No,

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 16>that's not a bubble. A bubble, to me is a

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 16>vastly diversified set of things that I cannot come up

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 16>with any reasonable assumptions that could possibly make these valuations work.

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 16>I have seen two in my career that I think

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 16>we identified before the fact, and one I was a

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 16>passive watcher of the dot com bubble, which again the

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 16>PTSD from the earlier presentation.

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 15>And then really nineteen and twenty when stocks surpassed, I

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 15>would use the word bubble for that.

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Man.

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg day Break Today, your morning brief on

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 3>the stories making news from Wall Street to Washington and beyond.

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Look for us on your podcast feed at six am

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Eastern each morning, on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts.

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 3>You can also listen live each morning starting at five

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 3>am Wall Street time on Bloomberg eleven three to zero

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 3>in New York, Bloomberg ninety nine one in Washington. Bloomberg

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 3>one oh six' one in Boston and Bloomberg ninety sixty

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 3>in San Francisco.

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Our flagship New York station is also available on your

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 2>Amazon Alexa devices. Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty plus.

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Listen coast to coast on the Bloomberg Business app, SERIUSXM,

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 3>the iHeartRadio app, and on Bloomberg dot Com. I'm Nathan Hager.

0:25:57.960 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Karen Moscow.

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 2>Join us again tomorrow morning for all the news you

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 2>need to start

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Your day right here on Bloomberg Daybreak