WEBVTT - Cisco Posts Weak Sales Forecast, Alibaba Stops Cloud Unit Spinoff

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>From Bahart where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, Nbon.

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Heinder Bloomswelta Quarters in New York and I'm

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Yet more earnings courage for you. Ahead will break down

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 3>all you need to know about. Cisco is the largest

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 3>makro of computer networking equipment, and it is tumbling after

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 3>its numbers.

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 5>And we'll have more on Ali Barber's results as the

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 5>e commerce giant falls after abruptly ending a planned spinoff

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 5>of its cloud unit.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 4>Details ahead class Apex.

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 3>It continues in San Francisco, tex CEO's They Dying with

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 3>China's President will bring you the takeaways from the executive's dinner,

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 3>but first let's check in on these markets. The takeaways

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 3>are what a little bit of moon music shifting In

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 3>terms of the rampant rally, we've seen NASAC off by

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 3>some three tenths of percent on the day.

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 6>We actually had some pretty well.

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Depressing, shall we say, macro economic data. But is that

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 3>good news in terms of whether the federal Reserve will

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 3>go in terms of interest rates, many feeling that the

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:17.639
<v Speaker 3>jobless claims on the rise, Many feeling that the factory

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 3>output on the downward.

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, all of.

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 3>That speaks to the fact that the federal Reserve cannot

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 3>hike yet again, and indeed, maybe we'll see cuts in

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 3>the second half of next year. We therefore see a

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 3>bid coming into the bond market. We're off by some

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 3>six basis points. Looking at Brent crude really down four

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 3>point five percent, let's call it this. As we see

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 3>the inventories build up. That's more of a signal of

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 3>maybe cooling demand. What does that mean about global economic growth?

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 3>Have a look at what's happening in terms of our

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 3>risk asset of choice. I'm looking at bitcoin and still

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 3>we trade within this general thirty six thousand dollars level,

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 3>but we're off by some three percent on the day.

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 6>And what if you've gone in terms of the micro.

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, in the context of China, it's both the micro

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 5>and the macro.

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 4>This is shares that Ali Barber.

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 5>The news is that they have decided not to spin

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 5>off their cloud unit. Commentary is that they have been

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 5>impacted by US technology ker export curbs. We're going to

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 5>dig into that later in the program with our reporters

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 5>on both the.

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 4>Macro and micro China.

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 5>For the ADRs of Ali Baba, the US listed shares

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 5>on track for their biggest drop in more than a year.

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 5>We'll get very specific in that later in the show.

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 5>Here in the US, Cisco, that is the name that

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 5>we are looking at. They gave this forecast for the

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 5>fiscal second quarter ending in January that was well below

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 5>street expectations. What Cisco said was, this is not macroeconomic

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 5>pressures or headwinds. They have big enterprise customers working through

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 5>backlogs and networking equipment and that's why they're not ordering.

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 5>But those orders should re accelerate. Do we buy what

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 5>Chuck Robbins is saying?

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 7>Joining us now?

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 5>Pyper Sandler's senior research analyst, Jim Fish neutral rating on

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 5>Cisco fifty dollars price target. I was reading your note and,

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 5>as far as I can tell you, one of the

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 5>few that basically is calling a downturn in this networking

0:02:58.760 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 5>equipment market.

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 4>What was your takeaway?

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, Caroline, ed great to chat with you again. It

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 8>feels like it's been only about a month since we

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 8>caught up on Cisco given the splug field. But look,

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 8>I think there's we agreed and we don't agree at

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 8>the same time with what Cisco's saying. Now our checks

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 8>heading into this print and even some of its peers

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 8>on Calendar like Arista and Juniper and F five and

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 8>sort of the networking space overall, we started to see

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 8>a downtick and sort of.

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 9>What enterprises we're looking to order.

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 8>And really the key theme I think for us heading

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 8>into all these prints, including last night, was digestion.

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 9>That's the best word you can use.

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 8>You've had orders from twenty twenty one and twenty twenty

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 8>two pushed into calendar twenty three, and you're just seeing

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 8>that digestion of orders. And meanwhile, when budgets start to

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 8>get tighter, networking tends to be the first thing that

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 8>you try to run, hotter and squeeze as you can

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 8>get away.

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 9>With it for some time. So we're a little bit

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 9>skeptical that we could see.

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 8>At an acceleration again in product orders in their fiscal

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 8>second half, especially when you start to think about budgets

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 8>getting set for calendar twenty four roughly.

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 9>About now with a lot of CIOs and heads of it.

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Jane you mentioned that the last time we were on

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about the Spunk deal. Does that, therefore thesis

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 3>still make sense, the diversification not just hardware networking gear,

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 3>but getting into the software, getting into sort of longer

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 3>term payments from clients.

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, Caroline.

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 8>It's a great part of really why they need systems.

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 8>I'm sorry, why why Cisco needs Splunk. And overall it

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 8>will help with that recurring revenue piece. It'll remove the

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 8>lumpiness of Cisco's current business. But at the end of

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 8>the day, even with Splunk, you're still going to have

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 8>the cyclicality that Cisco has to deal with, given that

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 8>networking piece the biggest part of its business at this point.

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 6>Talk op AI a little bit.

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they did seem to be saying that the

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 3>appetite is there. They're building what a billion dollars of

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 3>orders that they see in their line of sight. Is

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 3>that enough to offset what we see is basically managed

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 3>decline or managed digestion as you say, for the next

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 3>few quarters.

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, it's a nice narrative to have, But

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 8>we did this kind of back to basics piece around networking,

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 8>specifically switching and routing not too long ago.

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 9>And you dive deep into.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 8>You know where could AI spending on switches be, essentially

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 8>and you see estimates out there calling for about ten

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 8>billion ish and even Chuck mentioned that last night, with

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 8>seventy five percent of it expected to be on Ethernet

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 8>as opposed to Navidio's Infinite Band being the.

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 9>Other roughly twenty five percent.

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 8>But even when you talk about, say ten percent of

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 8>Cisco's switching business a few years from now being AI driven,

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 8>that's a small part of Cisco's networking business. When you're

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 8>talking about a thirty billion dollar plus networking business on

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 8>its own.

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 5>You're talking about wide and wireless whatever, connects, devices, news

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 5>data from a to be. But what jumped at me

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 5>about your note versus others is the end customer we're

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 5>talking about in Cisco's argument, big enterprise customers, right, not SMEs.

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 5>And I kind of think of it like the pandemic.

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 5>Right coming out of the pandemic, we all had an

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 5>excess of hand sanitizer and toilet paper. Bear with me,

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 5>but it seems like a lot of these big enterprise

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 5>companies they just have an excess of the networking and

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 5>routing gear. Do you see that as evidence that that

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 5>Chuck Robbins presented.

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, no, that's definitely showing up in our customer conversations,

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 8>and as Chuck also pointed out, it's also showing up

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 8>with some of the largest channel partners in those conversations

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 8>as well. So, look, you just have a glut of

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 8>equipment sitting there that needs to be deployed, and I

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 8>don't disagree it's going to take at least a couple

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 8>of quarters. And it's more of the concern for US

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 8>is does this start to stem into the SMB commercial

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 8>base as well, where that can be actually more macro

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 8>sensitive as you think about moving ahead, And it doesn't

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 8>really leave a whole lot of wiggle rooms still when

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 8>you think about roughly thirty percent of their businesses that

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 8>commercial line, and we've already seen struggles on the carrier

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 8>side that started popping up earlier this year.

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 9>Cloud.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 8>It depends a bit on your exposure to which hyperscaler,

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 8>let's say, but overall, enterprise was essentially that last leg

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 8>of the stool that was holding most of the space

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 8>up and it just now you're starting to see that

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 8>down cycle of networking really come about here. And specifically

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 8>add to your comment, on wireless land. Keep in mind,

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 8>this has been wireless land's been one of the strongest

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 8>part of networking over the last year plus. And what

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 8>we're seeing is it's actually twofold one. You've gotten a

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 8>lot of those access point up it's already and so

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 8>Cisco Morocki for example, has really benefited been growing double

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 8>digits for quite a while here. But secondly, when you

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 8>look at why they needed to upgrade those access points,

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 8>it's because of exactly what I'm sitting on right now

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 8>with Zoom or in other cases Microsoft teams, where that

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 8>sucks up so much bandwidth at all these campuses and

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 8>branches that you needed to upgrade those access points. And

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 8>so now you've kind of gone through that, and those

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 8>applications themselves are trying to reduce down their bandwidth by

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 8>over twenty percent in the latest version, so you just

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 8>haven't slow down in that space.

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 5>In particular, it's why I ask if attentions turned to SMBs,

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 5>because loads of folks use SMBs as their kind of

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 5>lead indicator for the health of an economy in this

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 5>In this context, Jim Fish, Phypisandler seeing a research and

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 5>this greates catch up.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 4>Rocks by US sanctions.

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 5>Huawei unveiled a new smartphone in August with five G

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 5>capabilities and a cutting edge process or. A teardown of

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 5>the May sixty pro revealed the chip powering the device

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 5>was produced by China's Smick. This raised questions about smick

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 5>we s miic's capabilities and the effectiveness of US LED controls.

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 7>Check this out.

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 10>This at first glance is just a smartphone, but once

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 10>you know what's inside, it becomes clear it's so much

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 10>more than that.

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 11>So what really changed everybody's view of this device was

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 11>what was at the heart of it, the microprocessor that

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 11>was designed and manufactured in China.

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 10>It's at the center of tensions between the world's two

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 10>biggest economies. The phone made by Chinese tech giant Huawei

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 10>represents a breakthrough by Beijing as it tries to escape

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 10>Washington's controls on its access to technology and establish a

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 10>self sufficient chip industry. If those US controls had been successful,

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 10>then a smartphone as advances this simply should not be

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 10>possible without important key components.

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 12>China now is more capable than ever of building advanced technologies.

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 10>And it worried US officials, who are more concerned about

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 10>advance chips going into military equipment than smartphones. It left

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 10>them wondering how exactly did China do It.

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Can catch that full documentary on the Bloomberg and on

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg dot Com tonight five pm and indeed tomorrow on YouTube. Meanwhile,

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 3>let's stay with the theme of China shares of Ali

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Baba actually slepping pretty hard after China's largest e commerce

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 3>company called off a spinoff of its giant cloud business.

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, in fact, the US is tightening chip cubs.

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Of course, all of this links, but please to welcome

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 3>to the show. Henry ren over in London as well, Lee,

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 3>who sat right next to me here and Henry, I

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 3>start with you. It feels as though its first dividend

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 3>just wasn't enough to offset the fact that now that

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 3>some of the parts perhaps don't look quite so valuable.

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 13>Yes, indeed, so it's a double whammy situation for alibah

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 13>Bau this quarter. So its core business of selling goods

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 13>to Chinese consumers is not posting the exciting revenue that

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 13>we've been seeing for last quarter. But more importantly, as

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 13>you line out that the company scrapped its plan to

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 13>spin up its cloud unit, it's that before that it's

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 13>going to relinquish its control of the cloud unit and

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 13>send out the cloud unit as dividend to shareholders, but

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 13>not materializing for now because the company called off the plan,

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 13>although the company did issue a cash dividend, but it's

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 13>seen as just a minor offset to the disappointment because

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 13>investors were really expecting that the company would issue this

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 13>special dividend after the spinoff, and as we know that

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 13>the cloud is the second biggest segment for Ali Baba,

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 13>So it's definitely a day of disappointment, a double whamy

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 13>situation for Ali Baba Shaholders Today team.

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 5>The timing of this is just extraordinary. We're going to

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 5>go to our reporter at APEC later in the show,

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 5>but you know, a centerpiece of what happened last night

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 5>was President g and Biden talking about kind of closer

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 5>economic cooperation while Biden saying we're going to stay competitive,

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 5>is about what are we learning through these earnings out

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 5>of Ali Baba about the health of the Chinese economy

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 5>right now.

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 14>So this definitely doesn't look good because, as Henry said,

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 14>many were really banking on the breakup of the six

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 14>Baby Baba's optimism, we're surrounding it. They were saying that

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 14>Beijing probably has the approve, Beijing probably gave its approval

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 14>signal because this wouldn't happen. That many dubbed it as

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 14>the most radical change in history. And it even looks

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 14>worse because they cited the US restrictions on as one

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 14>of the reasons why they weren't going to continue this.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 14>And as we know, President Biden and Presidency has met

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 14>their first time in a one year, and that's as

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 14>relations between the two nations are there. I say, at

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 14>the all time look. Oh and while there were no

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 14>really big major headlines, there were small wins, but no

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 14>one was really expecting a major concession. And some analysts

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 14>told me that the fact that this meeting is happening

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 14>is more than enough because the optics is important. But

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 14>to your point, a lot of investors were really disappointed.

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 14>As Henry said, it's a big disappointment for everyone. And

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 14>if you look at Alibaba ADRs, they're now falling to

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 14>the most in more than one year.

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's notable given that actually we saw

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 3>JD manage to be, we saw ten Cent managed to

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 3>be even with some stiff competition coming from the social

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 3>apps coming in and the smaller businesses as well. Does

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 3>this really reflect a consumer under pressure or.

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 6>Does this also reflect competition. I think it's both, but.

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 14>It's really more of the tepid demand that we're seeing.

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 14>China hasn't seen the big recovery that they were poping

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 14>on and that global investors are really really banking on

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 14>after the COVID pandemic, and you could see that Presidencies

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 14>even trying his best. He visited the Central Bank of

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 14>China just a few weeks back to show that, you know,

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 14>he's on top of this, but so far, and we

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 14>also have foreign investments in China, but they're really all

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 14>time low. So it's really kind of a complex picture.

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 14>But it's really not a monolith. As you said, ten

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 14>Cent is doing well, JD is doing well at least

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 14>based on last month, but so far, for now, optimism

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 14>is still not evident in Chinese.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 5>Investors always think about Ali Barbars like analogous with Amazon. Right,

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 5>you got your e commerce component and then the news

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 5>today being the cloud component, and Henry you were writing

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 5>this morning's street rap. Vali Barber, what's the kind of

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 5>cell side specific takeaway? From the numbers, but also the

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 5>different parts of the bids.

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so from the numbers perspective, the e commerce part

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 13>of the business is still occupying more than fifty percent

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 13>of Ali Baba's core revenue.

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 7>However that part is slowing.

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 13>So we saw some revival trends in the last quarter,

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 13>which shows that Alibaba might be again its momentum again

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 13>when its competitors like pindle Do or the price aggressor

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 13>as well as live streaming e commerce platforms like going

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 13>like quite a show, or like entering the space and

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 13>grabbing the market share. But it's not it's not happening

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 13>once again this quarter because the sales has been a

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 13>bit disappointing and for analysts it's a disappointment. And on

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 13>the other hand, as we said, it's now scrapping it's

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 13>planned to spin off the cloud unit. It's also scrapping

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 13>its plan to IPO, it's.

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 7>Freshupul, which is a grocery shipping chain.

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 13>It's another disappointment for analysts as FOP so a lot

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 13>of things to digest.

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 7>FULI Barbi inverstrously.

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 5>And as we pointed out, that disappointment reflected in shares.

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 5>The ADRs down nine percent biggest dropping more than a year,

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 5>and the stock trading at its lowest level since May.

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Henry Ren and Isabel Lee the dream team back together.

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 4>Thank you now coming up.

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 5>APEC continues here in San Francisco as China's president dines

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 5>with the CEOs of some pretty major firms. We're gonna

0:15:50.160 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 5>bring you all those details next. This is Bloomberg Technology. Okay,

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 5>time for talking tech and first up. Shares of Hello

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 5>Fresh falling today after the mailkit delivery company shocked investors

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 5>by cutting its twenty twenty three e bit dar Guide

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 5>and HelloFresh was down as much as a record twenty

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 5>four percent eraising nearly seven hundred and eighty million dollars

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 5>of market value. The changes to it outlook come just

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 5>three weeks after it reaffirmed its targets, and Lenovo says

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 5>it expects to see revenue growth this quarter generated from

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 5>personal computer demand in China that the world's largest PC

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 5>maker says it's investing a lot of money into AI

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 5>optimized devices, something that CEO says could drive another round

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 5>of PC replacement. Plus, semiconductor firm Sapien is unveiling its

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 5>latest artificial intelligence chip for Data cent. It's the startup

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 5>backs by South Korean firm sk Group is ramping up

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 5>its offering to compete with.

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 4>The likes of Nvidia and others.

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 5>Sapient will be conducting testing for major customers before it

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 5>begins mass production in the first half of next year.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Carrot, Well, let's turn attention to what's happening in your

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 3>city at the moment.

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Ed.

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Of course, APEC underwearing way in San Francisco, and Arey

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Horden has been there throughout talking to some big names

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 3>and attendance, and notably there were some big executives and

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 3>attendants at a dinner with Jijingping last night. It's notable

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 3>we've got some reporting at the moment saying that Tesla

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 3>CEO in a Musk is no longer actually going to

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 3>be in today's lineup of speakers at APEX. That's largely

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 3>because he endorsed an anti Semitic post on X his

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 3>own social media site. We'll talk about that later about Marie.

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 3>But who have we seen and why have we seen

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 3>these certain executives with Shijingping.

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 15>Well, I have a full list of who sat at

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 15>Shijingping's table last night where you saw a number of

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 15>ceo stand up and applaud him, the likes of Ray Dalio,

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 15>Larry Fink, Tim Kirk, all of them. You see them

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 15>on the screen there in attendance to meet with Shijingping

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 15>where one Republican official, Mike Gallagher Wisconsin, who chairs the

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 15>China House Select Committee, said when he was at a

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 15>protest against the Chinese Communist Party this weekend, said that

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 15>executives were paying as much as forty thousand dollars or

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 15>a company paying as much as forty thousand dollars for

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 15>their CEO to be able to go to this dinner

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 15>and sit with the President of China. But I think

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 15>more importantly we should also look at what the President

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 15>of China said yesterday. He really struck a more conciliatory,

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 15>duvish tone. Part of this was the fact that he

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 15>is dealing with a fragile economy at home. We've seen

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 15>a huge hit to foreign direct investment into China, and

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 15>it looked like he was trying to set a path

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 15>forward to be more welcoming when it comes to US

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 15>businesses this summer. Gina Ramundo, the Commerce Secretary, when she

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 15>was in China, said that she told Chinese leaders that

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 15>what she hears time and time again from businesses, and

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 15>that China is becoming more uninvestable.

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 6>So Shijingping yesterday.

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 15>Said that he has no plans to unseat the United States,

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 15>and he'd also said that he doesn't want to see

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 15>China in a hot or cold war.

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 6>Now, it remains to be seen.

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 15>If this is going to assuage some of these business concerns.

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 5>So I imaged on the other side of the table

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 5>and the negotiation, President Biden was asked a very specific

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 5>question about whether he viewed Jijiping as a dictator.

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 15>What was his response, Well, Biden has said it before,

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 15>he said it yesterday, and he will probably say it again,

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 15>especially as we get into the November twenty twenty four

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 15>presidential election. He said, Shijingping is a dictator, and then

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 15>he explained it's a very different system in China than

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 15>the one we have here at.

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 4>The United States.

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 15>This comment, though, came after Biden fielded a number of

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 15>questions in the press conference, and then he took some

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 15>ad hoc questions as he was leaving that press conference.

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 15>I think the main takeaway from the White House is

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 15>Biden's k not going to back away. Have asked this again,

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 15>especially as the rhetoric gets heated before November of twenty

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 15>twenty four. But the main takeway from the White House

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 15>is they feel that this was a way a deliverable.

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 15>These two individuals met, and Biden really just wants to

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 15>get the relationship in a better place where he can

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 15>pick up the phone in a time of conflict.

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 5>AMH, real quick? What's left to come on the agenda?

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 5>While Biden's in town well waiting.

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 15>To hear from Biden, he's going to be addressing apex

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 15>CEO's there'll be a family photo and then this evening

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 15>he's going to be looking a little bit more forward

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 15>to the iPath, which is this water down trade deal,

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 15>not the DPP but iPath, the Indo Pacific Economic Framework.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 15>One thing to note about this is potentially some pushback

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 15>that Biden administration is going to see because the trade

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 15>pillar has been ditched. It was potentially going to be

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.239
<v Speaker 15>announced at this forum and it's not all right.

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg'sa Marie hoarding over from DC in San Francisco for apeg.

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 6>Wellcome out to bloom teen onogym.

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 5>I hid in New York and I'm ed Lovelow in

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 5>San Francisco.

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Two movers.

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 5>I want to check back in on one for the

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 5>first time. Palo Alto Networks, a name that we've not

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 5>mentioned yet. We're talking about largely software in Palo Alto

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 5>Networks case, it's trying to jump on this AI bandwagon,

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 5>but it missed estimates in its fiscal first quarter and

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 5>lowered its full year guidance, which has hit the shares

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 5>you can see down almost six percent. And revisiting Cisco right,

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 5>We've covered it in debt furlier in the show, but

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 5>the stock is down more than eleven percent, on track

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 5>for its biggest drop in almost eighteen months. And the

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 5>concern here is that its outlook for its fiscal second

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 5>quarter came in well below what the street was expecting.

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 5>The answer from Cisco customers are working through a backlog

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 5>on networking equipment. The concern from the cell side hold on,

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 5>We're worried about the health of that market and what

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 5>the mecroeconomic conditions are. But two big movers, similar spaces

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 5>and those having an impact on the broader market.

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 4>This Thursday, carrac.

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and we want to dig in on the broader market.

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 3>The appetite of corporate spending, right, now, particularly when it

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 3>comes to the application.

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 6>Of cybersecurity, of defense, and.

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Indeed in a world where AI is helping and hindering.

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 3>With all of that, we want to talk with Lane

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 3>mess CEO at Deep Instinct, and of course you yourself

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 3>were former CEO of Palo Alto Networks. We were just

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 3>hearing about some of the PATS earnings that aren't living

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 3>up to expectations, even though there seems to be this

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 3>rampant demand for cyber protection in the here and now.

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 3>What do you make of the fact that Palo Alto Networks,

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 3>for example, isn't managing to lean into perhaps that growth

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 3>in that particular area.

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I can't say that they're not leaning into the growth.

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 2>First of all, I have to commend Nikesh and the

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 2>team there. What they've done with the company post my

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 2>time there has been very good. The focus of palow

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 2>out there was a platform play, and the platform play

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 2>is to really give you a protection around accessing your

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure and the threats that might hit it.

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>The other aspects are how do you guard the door?

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Platform players are going broad, they're not going deep, and

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 2>that's where the AI focus needs to come in. Deep

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Instinct goes deep and as you can appreciate, I got

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 2>off my bench to do this because the challenge of

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 2>AI is really becoming paramount.

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 5>One thing we've reflected on this year is that when

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 5>we're talking about AI and the context of cybersecurity, it's

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 5>as much a tool for the threat actors as it

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 5>is for your customers. Right, people trying to ward against

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 5>cyber threats. Who is making the most progress the threat

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 5>actors or those trying to defend against them.

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think a lot of people were caught off guard.

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 2>Many of the platform players have machine learning models, but

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 2>to really get ahead of the threat actors, you have

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 2>to have the more sophisticated technology. It's a think called

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 2>deep learning, and I won't get into the specific science

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 2>of it, but it acts similar to a brain in

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 2>the fact that you've got to count this in fact

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 2>infinity parameters that you're checking against, so you can create

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 2>a predictive capability and get out ahead of the actors. Now,

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Deep Instinct has been developing this capability for ten years.

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So when AI became in vogue.

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 2>In terms of the things you could do from a

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 2>salesforce enhancement, customer support enhancement, a lot of the security companies,

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 2>including some of the ones you noted, were still focused

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 2>on broadening their coverage but not going deep into the

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 2>more advanced sophisticated deep learning algorithms. That's what we do

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 2>with the ninety nine percent efficacy. But the main challenge

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 2>right now is protecting data. So everybody's looking to protect data,

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 2>everybody's looking to attack the data. You can't fight fire

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 2>unless you have fire to fight fire, and deep learning

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 2>is going to be the answer that most of the

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 2>security companies and platform players are going to have to

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 2>focus on. That's what we focus from ground up one

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent.

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 5>Your choice of words. That very interesting. Twenty four hours

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 5>ago we had the Rubric CEO, your industry colleague on

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:07.360
<v Speaker 5>people sitting here on the show.

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 7>Have a listener to what.

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 16>I know people will cyber attacks have gone beyond human comprehension.

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 16>You have to fight fire with fire, and as attackers

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 16>are leveraging AI to generate more codes to actually attack you,

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 16>you have to apply AI to understand what the heck

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 16>is really going on.

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 2>You guys are changing notes or the no, no, actually, Bipple,

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.360
<v Speaker 2>he's a very good friend. In fact, I'm an investor

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 2>in Rubrics, so and they're addressing the very big challenge

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 2>storage recovery, and it's something that went unnoticed for a

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 2>long time. It's something we focus heavily on. There are

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 2>people are focusing on the eder, the endpoint, CrowdStrike, Sentinel one.

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 2>They almost accept the fact that you're going to have

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 2>a breach, and then they help you clean it up.

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 2>But you cannot accept the breach anymore. You have to

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 2>get out ahead of it. And I and Dipple share

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 2>a lot of views. But the secret is in the

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 2>technology and the uniqueness of the deep learning framework work.

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 3>And let's talk about therefore prevention having to take center

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 3>stage rather than just be dealing with the aftermath Lane.

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 3>We are at our hearts a technology show. What is

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 3>it about deep learning that can go there? Unlike other

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 3>applications that we're seeing from rivals or indeed AI more.

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Broadly, Yes, rivals and most security companies are using the

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 2>AI term very loosely, and they focus on machine learning.

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 2>These are models that are made by humans and trained,

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 2>trained on millions of feeds. But at the end of

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 2>the day, the models are only sophisticated as a people

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:52.679
<v Speaker 2>who design them. The algorithms are not sophisticated. And the

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 2>best comparison is compare if you would chat GPT to

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 2>text learning Deep Instinct to cybersecurity.

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>It's that level of quantum leap.

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Interesting use of analogies there. We really appreciate some of

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 3>the time that we've just had with you in Deep Instinct,

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 3>CEO and similarly investor in all areas of cybersecurity and

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 3>air applications.

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 6>We thank you so much for your time.

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Wean while coming up, we're going to talk about more

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 3>of investment, particularly in the world of AI men and adventures,

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 3>raising one point three billion dollars to advance oftificial intelligence startups.

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 6>On that next with partner Matt Murphy ed.

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 5>What have you got, Let's go to space real quick.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking at shares of Amazon modestly lower ten to

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 5>one percent, But the company actually confirmed this morning that

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 5>the two prototype Kuyper satellites it currently has in orbit

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 5>are functioning one hundred percent is intended. That is important

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 5>because they now can start a broader mass production pro

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:57.199
<v Speaker 5>program to build out the constellation literally make the satellites

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 5>and then get them into orbit. Remember, this is a

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 5>be competitors to SpaceX is Starlink, which we've talked about

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 5>a lot on the show this week, but all going

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 5>well so far. For Amazon's own satellite based internet future.

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 5>This has been botechnology one point three five billion. That's

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 5>how much Menlo Ventures has raised in new capital to

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 5>fund promising AIS startups. This new capital will be invested

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 5>by its flagship venture fund, Menlo sixteen, as well as

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 5>Menlo Inflection three and affiliated funds. Melo Ventures partner Matt

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 5>Murphy joins us now for more. Matt, I think you'd

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 5>argue that you've got a good track record both of

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 5>investing in AI and early stage right, but there's clearly

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 5>some near term momentum here. Explain how quickly you raise

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 5>the funds and where you raise them from.

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 17>It was mainly our standard LPs been good long term

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 17>partners with us. We had positive net dollar retention, which

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 17>in kind of the world assassin means that you raised more,

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 17>you increased your base of capital from those who were

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 17>already with you.

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>But we did add a number of additional LPs.

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 17>I think the reality is that we've been through kind

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 17>of a bumpy time in the venture business. But if

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 17>one can promise the kind of focus around this opportunity,

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 17>the ability to win be in great companies and build

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 17>a portfolio around AI. It's very compelling to new investors

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 17>and existing investors.

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 3>What's been so interesting is instead of VC money going

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 3>into a lot of these AI startups, particularly the foundational

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 3>model types, we've seen money come from big tech.

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 6>Ultimately, how have you discerned.

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 3>What is the right sort of reward structure that you

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 3>need to see from companies that are sort of wrapping

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 3>around AI, perhaps not building their own models, or indeed

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 3>whether it's those that are building, how do you discern

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 3>what is the best VC backed company?

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I mean, I think there's really two massive opportunities

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 17>right now.

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>One is kind of this generative AI stack.

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 17>So in technology trends, like when a bunch of companies

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 17>moved to the cloud, we had a whole rebuilding of infrastructure,

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 17>and that's exactly what is going on here in AI.

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 17>And then you look at the application layer and we

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 17>feel like the application layer is a ten year trend.

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>There are a bunch of companies that are i mean.

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 17>The entire portfolio you mentioned a lot of big companies

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 17>or at this like perfect intersection of technology readiness and

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 17>kind of CEO company readiness. There's this real move to

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 17>kind of adopt AI as fast as possible. We'd say

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 17>that the application opportunity is really a ten year opportunity,

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 17>and maybe even some of the best applications will be

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 17>built in a couple few years. Is the technology matures

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 17>and entrepreneurs imagination and comfort with deploying these technologies evolves.

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 17>But right here now we feel like there's the biggest

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 17>opportunity in picks and shovels. So it's those kind of

0:30:56.480 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 17>infrastructure building blocks obviously in nvidial like anthropic and open AI.

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 17>But there's a whole big middle there that has to

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 17>happen well for applications to be built. So it's picking models,

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 17>training models, observing models, optimizing models. There's just a whole

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 17>big body of work that's coming together right now that's

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 17>going to make all of this easier and accelerate the

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 17>application innovation even more so.

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Of course, I mean Meno aventures itself one of the

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 3>oldest vcs from the Bay Area. I mean, is the

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 3>founder you want to backcoming from the West coast? Is

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 3>it now dispersed throughout global opportunities?

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 17>Now the venture business has gotten more global, but San

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 17>Francisco's definitely having another renaissance.

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 7>The Bay Area.

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 17>We have the most AI talent, i'd say, in the world,

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 17>and people are kind of flocking back to be part

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 17>of a lot of these companies. So there are many

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 17>pockets of venture capital these days. Obviously New York's been

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 17>a big hub. Some good infrastructure opportunities and application companies

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 17>there La Seattle, Austin, et cetera, Boston.

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>But San Francisco for AI is definitely the upper center.

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 5>I want to go back real quick to that that

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 5>kind of ten year time horizon that you're outlining. It's

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 5>kind of like bench capital one oh one. But across

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 5>the startup curve, loads of folks come on this show

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 5>and say the reality is ninety percent of these startups

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 5>are going to fail. AI startups nine zero percent. Do

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 5>you share that kind of outlook.

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 17>Well, I think that the numbers are a bit better

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 17>than that. I mean, I think about fifty percent of

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 17>companies you know failed, don't don't don't return capital. There

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 17>is a gold rush right now and rightfully because the

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 17>opportunity is so big, I mean, and just to put

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 17>that in perspective for you, Historically in venture if you

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 17>went from zero to one the first year, one to three,

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 17>three to ten to third year, that's really good by

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 17>you know, classic venture standards. We're seeing companies in our

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 17>own portfolio not to be named, but going from zero

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 17>to twenty and zero to one hundred in one year.

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 17>So rightfully, there's a gold rush around this market, and

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 17>there will of course be some things that don't stand

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 17>the test of time, but we're more leaning into it

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 17>optimisticly that we're seeing signals that this is the fastest

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 17>moving ecosystem we've ever seen.

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Adventure Matt.

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 5>When a founder comes to you with the pitch deck

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 5>and it's super shiny and exciting, how much emphasis do

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 5>you put on their access to compute? You know, like

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 5>capital is one thing, but their ability to actually you

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 5>get the resources to build the thing that they tell

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 5>you they're going to build.

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I feel like that problem has been a little

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 17>bit overhyped. I feel like Jensen's going to ramp up

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 17>production and a number of other companies are come forward,

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 17>coming forward with GPU GPU capabilities. The main issue right

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 17>now is people really figuring out the way to do

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 17>something innovative. I think the application layer especially, there's a

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 17>lot of bolt on things, and there should be because

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 17>you can take a current application, apply an LLM to

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 17>it and makes the application smarter better when in the

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 17>history we had this opportunity for a computer to do

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 17>reasoning and writing at the level that it's doing right now.

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:14.919
<v Speaker 17>So all those things are super exciting, but there's kind

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 17>of early stages for imagination of what's possible, and that's

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 17>really what we're going to see involve and accelerate over

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 17>the next couple of years. So I'd say as we

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 17>look at entrepreneurs, it's less about can you get access

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 17>to compute?

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that'll be solved.

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 17>It's more about what are you doing that's distinctive that

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 17>others can't do well?

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 3>You made the right bets in the past. I think Ruber, Roku, Poshmark,

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 3>to name but a few. We thank you so much,

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:38.399
<v Speaker 3>Matt Murphy for bringing on where you see the next

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 3>sort of opportunities for menlo ventures.

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 5>Billionaire Elon Musk endorsed an anti Semitic post on x

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 5>that attacked members of the Jewish community for pushing quote

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 5>hatred against white people. Also point out that we've heard

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 5>in the last hour that Musk's name is no longer

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 5>on the lineup as speakers at apex here in San Francisco.

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 5>We do not know the reason why his name is

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 5>no longer on that list of speakers, and here at

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg News we will chase that throughout the day. Let's

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 5>bring in Bloomberg's big tech editors, Sarah Freyer. What do

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 5>we know about this post and Musk's response to it?

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 12>Well, this has this post had echoes of the great

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 12>replacement theory, one of the things that has motivated some

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 12>of the shootings in the Jewish community of past years.

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 12>And Musk responded to it saying that it was the truth.

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 12>And then he built on his comments. He related them

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 12>to his dissatisfaction with the d L, the Anti Defamation League,

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 12>which is a group that is probably the biggest fighter

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 12>of anti anti Semitism in the world, a nonprofit, and

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 12>then he brought into his comments back and said, you know,

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 12>I'm not just talking about the ADL, but anyone who

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 12>espouses anti white rhetoric and anti Asian rhetoric. So I

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 12>think we have seen a bit more from Musk his

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 12>concern about anti white rhetoric. And of course this is

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:25.800
<v Speaker 12>a very charged time to be saying those sorts of things.

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.720
<v Speaker 12>There is ongoing violence in the world. He is running

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 12>a massive communication platform. He has more than one hundred

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 12>and forty million followers himself. So I do think that

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 12>you know, when he does this, it is news and.

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Talk about of course, that this isn't the first time.

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 3>It was last year the American Jewish Committee actually sort

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 3>of really pushed on Musk to apologize previously for a

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 3>deleted controversial tweet as they were then known post once

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 3>again that made satirical comparisons at the time. And I'm

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 3>interested in the fact that he in particular has been

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 3>sort of blaming the ADL, the Anti Defamation League for

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 3>a slump in his own advertising right.

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 6>And I wonder to this end.

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Like what how we try and balance Mosque says is

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 3>pro free speech, and actually he said at the time

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:18.879
<v Speaker 3>against Annie's anti semitism in of any kind, but yet

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 3>he continues to perhaps walk a very difficult line.

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:26.760
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I think I think when people hear the words

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 12>anti semitism, they sort of cringe and say, oh, that's

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 12>not that's not me. But then when you look at

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 12>the actual content of his tweets and the people that

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 12>he has been responding to, remember on Twitter, who you

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 12>respond to actually affects the algorithm to the weight of

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 12>his following where he replies to people even to say

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 12>things like hm or interesting that can then amplify those voices,

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 12>and we've seen him do that a number of times.

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 12>I would say this most recent post is maybe the

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 12>most explicit that he's been so far about his concern

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 12>over anti white sentiment. But I do think that it's

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 12>something that is affecting his company.

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:11.240
<v Speaker 6>Like you said, more than.

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 12>Half of advertisers are off the platform. He is wholeheartedly

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 12>blaming the anti deformation leaf for that. They had a

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 12>bit of a patching up since then, but now it

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.399
<v Speaker 12>sounds like he's back to criticizing.

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 6>Them so far.

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for breaking that particular news point down. And

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 3>we want to keep on discussing the fact that ad

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 3>advertising revenue has been under pressure at X more and

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:40.359
<v Speaker 3>most broadly, and let's talk about that with Rachel Timographs course,

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 3>founderacy of e Commerce Enablement and analytics software provider Makemac

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 3>and Rachel Ultimately, are you hearing from any of those

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:53.280
<v Speaker 3>clients and discussion that you're having that people are willing

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 3>to come back to X in its current form, in

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 3>the current environment in which we see it.

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 12>So Ever, since Musk took ownership of Twitter last fall

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 12>in twenty twenty two, at MCMAC, we've essentially seen a

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 12>ninety percent decline in brand traffic. In May of twenty

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 12>to twenty three, when Linda Racirino was stepping in, we

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 12>actually saw some hope where brands were like, Okay, here's

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 12>someone who understands brand safety, and we're going to try

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 12>a few dollars, not five hundred thousand, not a million

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 12>dollars in advertising buy. But I'm talking about publicly traded

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:32.760
<v Speaker 12>companies saying hey, we'll try fifty thousand dollars in Twitter

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 12>ad spend and see how it works.

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 7>But Musk is voltile.

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Yep, I'll I'm sorry to intrup. He's keep going.

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:43.720
<v Speaker 12>Musk is Boltle, and every single time he does something

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 12>like this, we see a massive decline in Twitter traffic.

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:52.839
<v Speaker 12>So there is a direct correlation to his activities and

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 12>brand AdSpend.

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.319
<v Speaker 5>Rachel, one of the things we've been been tracking on

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 5>the X platform from a technol perspective is a world

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 5>you know well, which is video. They put a huge

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 5>emphasis on video as a strategy to bring back creators

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 5>and then bring back advertisers.

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 12>How do you see that going? So this is the

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:18.279
<v Speaker 12>interesting thing. When we saw brands retest the water with

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 12>Twitter essentially around May and June of twenty twenty three,

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 12>we actually saw strong results. So I can tell you

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 12>that the investments that they have made in their ad

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 12>products aren't improving the ad products, but it's not enough

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 12>for these brands to want to be associated with his

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:42.399
<v Speaker 12>volatile behavior. Brand safety trumps any investments that they're making

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 12>in their ad products.

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 3>And to reflect on Linda Yakarino, she has really been

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 3>trying to ampart the focus on brand safety. Have any

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 3>of the moves they've made thus far made a mark

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 3>on the clients?

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 7>Unfortunately?

0:40:56.080 --> 0:41:01.359
<v Speaker 12>I feel that Elon's brand is bigger than brand and

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 12>anything that he does puts a heart to the advancements

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 12>that they're trying to make.

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 3>We want to thank you McK macfounder always so to

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 3>the point and also bring us real data on all

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 3>of it. Found our CEO Rachel Photographs. We thank you

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 3>so much from Brooklyn. Meanwhile, that does it for this

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:18.359
<v Speaker 3>edition of Bloomberg Technology YEP.

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 5>Recap the show on the podcast, and thank you again

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 5>everyone that tunes into the podcast wherever you get them.

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 5>Apple Spotify, iHeart, and of course we publish the podcast

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 5>to all of the Bloomberg platforms. It's been a really

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 5>great way to keep some of you connected with the show.

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:35.439
<v Speaker 5>From San Francisco going out in New York City four

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 5>days in the week. This is Bloomberg Technology.