WEBVTT - #575 Packers Unscripted: High-stakes showdown

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody, Welcome to another edition of Packers unscripted from

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Packers dot Com. I am like Spofford, joined as always

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>by my partner and Crime West Hodcoits were coming to

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you here from socially distant locations at lambeau Field West.

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Week seventeen. It is here, Packers Bears, Soldier Field three

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Central time kickoff, and we all know what's at stake.

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>The Packers going for the number one seed. The Bears

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>are trying to get into the playoffs as a wild card.

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And you take a look at this Bears season five

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and one, a six game losing streak, now a three

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>game winning streak, trying to make it four to slip

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>into the postseason. It's been a hard team to figure out,

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>but it is a team that is playing really well

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>right now. It's a team we've learned a lot about

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>two I think, and the course of the season has

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>worn on the Chicago Bears have gotten back to what

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>they do well. For a long time, Mike, it seemed

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>like they were trying to become something that they weren't,

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think that kind of factored into the decision

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and moved to Nick Foles and go away from Mitchell Troubinsky,

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>but they also went away from the run game at

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>that time. They also weren't getting the tight ends as

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>involved as they have in the past. And when Troubinsky

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>came back and in his big comeback game was against

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay, it didn't go completely how he wanted it to,

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>but that was a building block, and I think one

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that they found out in that matchup was the

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that all Right, David Montgomery was a guy that

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>we invested into a number of years ago. They had

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to maneuver without him mid season. Then they were trying

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to use Cordell Patterson in that running back role. Since

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery has returned, he's averaging twenty almost twenty four touches

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>per game. Now they've established the running game again, they're

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>putting up points. And I know a lot of Packer

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>fans are quick to point out the competition that they've

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>done that against is not elite in terms of the

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL rankings, but it's production nonetheless, And for the Chicago Bears,

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>they're feeling much better about themselves going into this matchup

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>today then I think they did a month ago into

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>lambeau Field. Yeah, it's interesting heading into this one. I

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this when I did our weekly Three Things video

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>with UH with Larry McCarn yesterday, that you look at

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>that first Bears Packers matchup and the Bears first handoff

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in that game was to David Montgomery and he busted

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a fifty seven yard run. And it's that sort of

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>became a turning point in a lot of ways for

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>both of these teams. Because for the Bears it reminded them, hey,

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery needs to be a big part of this

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>offense moving forward. And yes, they did not beat the

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Packers that night. They ended up blowing a late lead

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the following week against the Detroit Lions, but they figured

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>out that David Montgomery the role that he needs to

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>have in order to be successful. That fifty seven yard

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>run I think was a big part of that. On

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the Packers side of things, the Packers run defense has

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>been quite good since that fifty seven yard run. It

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>was sort of like that was the final kick in

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the teeth or whatever you want to call it for

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the run defense to get things turned around. And the

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>turnaround came to fruition UH in some respects with the

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.679
<v Speaker 1>performance against Derrick Henry last week. So as you head

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>into this week seventeen matchup and Soldier Field, the Bears

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>run game and the Packers run defense is going to

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>be front and center here. Yeah, And as much as

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about the Bears and where they went and offensively,

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're in a better rhythm now than

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>they were a month ago, the Packers defense is in

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a much different position today than it was back in November,

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and a big reason for that is how well they've

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>defended against the run. To some extent in his scheme,

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it is being able to just fit your gaps and

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and be in the right position at the right time.

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>But Mike, I've really been blown away, especially these last

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, the number of players, individuals who have stepped

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>up their games here in these this final stretch of

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the season. Chris Barnes moving in as the mic linebacker,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the every down guy, that's been the right adjustment for

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>this defense. I think you're getting more and you're the

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>first one to point this out. I think you're getting

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>more out of Christian Kirksey, and that will roll playing

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>more on nickel situations and then also being able to

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>incorporate Kamal Martin that rotations actually I think worked out

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>pretty well for them. But Dean Lowery, Kenny Clark, both

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of those guys have been playing at an elite level.

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>The outside linebackers have been very gap sound understanding their assignments,

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:30.919
<v Speaker 1>where Shawn Garry has been a big part of that

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>as well, and certainly the safety stepping up and making

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>plays when they have to. All of those things bode

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>well for Green Bay and a lot of lessons were

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.119
<v Speaker 1>learned when they ruptured for that fifty seven yard carry

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>against Montgomery. And the green Bay has they've seen Montgomery,

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>they know what this guy can do. And if you

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>go back and listen to all the unscripteds we've been

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>doing for the past three years now, I've continued to

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>toot the horn for him that this guy's a guy

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that must be respected. Now he's over a thousand yards

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>on the season. I think there's only what five running

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>backs that have already achieve eve that Mike he is

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a top of the line running back who must be respected.

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>But the Packers defense, because of how they've rebounded the

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>second half of the season, has worked its way into

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the top yard in total defense is in the top seven. Now.

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe in passing defense in their run defense has

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>vastly improved, but that's only as good as your last performance.

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>And Greenway needs to get one more marker here to

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>show that this is a different unit. They can play

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>gaps sound, they can play fundamental before they move into

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that postseason. Yeah. Absolutely, and you have to believe with

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen of the Bears offense as as has

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>been mentioned, it wasn't exactly against a murderers row of

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>defensive opponents over the last few weeks. But as you said,

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>production is production, and the Bears have figured out what

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it takes to be successful. So I you know, even

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>if the Packers run defense starts the game the way

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>they did against Derrick Henry, I think we're going to

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>see the Bears stay committed to that run with David Montgomery,

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, unless this becomes you know, a twenty point,

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, three score deficit or something like that. I

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>think the Bears are going to stay committed to the

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>run for as long as they can in order to

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>try to pull this one out. And Mike, everybody knows

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that's head home right now. They understand that you are

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>an exceptional racquetball player, one of the best in green Bay,

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe the four counties surrounding Brow County as well, if

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we want to push it out there. You and I

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>both know if you would go down to the y

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>m c A and you play five straight games and

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>maybe you play some West hot quits is maybe you

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>play some enhancement talent guys that you can beat up on.

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Mike Spofford is gonna walk out that day feeling pretty

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>darn good about himself. Now, if you go in there

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you play some of the top guys in

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the country at racketball, you don't do so hot, You're

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>not gonna feel that good about yourself. It doesn't matter

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the Bears maybe haven't beaten the top

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of the line defenses here with their offensive scheming, their

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty plus points per game since Lazar took back over

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the play since has has taken over the play calling

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>from Mattnegie. The fact of the matter is they feel

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>confident now. There is some momentum again, and this is

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a momentum driven sport. Jimmy Graham, as well as much

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 1>maligned as I know he is sometimes at the Packers

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>fan base two touchdowns last week, I mean they are

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>being able to find ways to win on offense, and

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you and I all week long, like we've discussed this,

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you cannot look past the Chicago Bears. I understand that

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>was a big win for Green Bay. It was the

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>most complete performance of the season. But if you don't

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>respect the threat that the Bears present, you're gonna be

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>walking out of Soldier Field disappointed on Sunday night. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think it's it's the reality checks somewhat.

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And as as I say all the time, as we

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>say all the time, it's a it's a week to

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>week league, right, And if it were as easy as

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>playing as well as the Packers played last Sunday night

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>against Tennessee, of course they would play like that all

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the time. But it doesn't just because they did it

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>against Tennessee against a very good team, you know, under

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the lights, the prime time, all of that, it doesn't

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>mean you're just going to show up and play like

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that again. By the same token, the Packers performance back

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in Week five or six, whatever it was against Tampa

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Bay not a good performance for Green Bay, but they

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't go out and play like that every week either.

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>That's just that's just not how it works. So you

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>can't assume things. You can't take things for granted. And

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you said it was momentum. Momentum in this league is real.

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And the Bears were headed the wrong way with six

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>consecutive losses. Everyone was talking about are they gonna blow

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing up and start over? Suddenly they win

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>three straight. They're still in the playoff hunt, looking to

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>get back to the postseason after winning the NFC North

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. And uh, and you just can't. You

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 1>just can't count them out. I do want to get

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to our sponsor business here though, before I forget so serious.

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>X M NFL Radio channel is the only radio outlet

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to the National Football League seven days a week,

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>three hundred sixty five days a year. And Packers fans

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>score up to five hundred dollars for your devotion to

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the pack when you open a pack is checking account

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>from Associated Bank. Learn more Associated Bank dot com backslash

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 1>Packers Go. And you understood where I was going at

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>with that racquetball analogy, right, because because I wasn't just

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>putting you over as a superb racketball player. It also,

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is week seventeen, man, it doesn't matter

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>who the Bears beat. It doesn't matter if they pass

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>your eye tests as a fan or they don't. They

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>beat those teams, they succeeded, they won offensively in those matchups,

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're ready for this test that Green Bay presents.

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be. It's a lot different ballgame winning,

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>succeeding putting points on the board than being shut down

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in the way you're gonna look at that thing mentally.

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I just I've said all along this week,

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like Green Bay and they have. I mean,

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Matt laflour is saying all the right things, but you

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>just gotta respect that because I think in some areas

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of the fan base, the way I've seen on Twitter

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 1>and on iron Boxing, you know, submissions, I'm glad the

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>fans aren't playing this game. I'm it's positive that it's

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the that locker room. Yeah, I agree. I just I

0:09:57.920 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>get the sense that there are a lot of assumptions

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>out there, not from within this building, but outside this building.

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of assumptions that the Packers are

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>just going to show up and play exactly like they

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>played against Tennessee in Chicago. Doesn't have a chance, You

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>can't you can't assume that the Packers could do that.

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>They certainly could, and that's what they wanted. That's what

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>they wanted, and we'll talk about that next Monday if

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the case. But but you can't you can't assume

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that that is going to happen. To recap the scenarios here, obviously,

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>if the Packers win this game, they get the number

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>one seed and the only first round by in the

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>NFC playoffs. The Packers can also get the number one

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>seed if the Seattle Seahawks lose to the San Francisco

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners. The Bears are in a similar situation in

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of, you know that one other game that could

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>impact them if the Bears win. If the Bears beat

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, they are in the playoffs as a wild card.

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The Bears can also get a wild card if the

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Rams can beat the Arizona Cardinals. But the

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Rams are without their starting quarterback and without one of

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>their top receivers in Cooper Cup, so that's going to

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>be a tough one for the Rams. I think the

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Bears are. The Bears are certainly looking at this as

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>they've got to win this to get in and hey,

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're the Packers, here's the thing. If you don't

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>win this game and you don't get the number one seed,

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you will be either two or the three seed. If

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bears are in the playoffs, they will be either

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the six or the seven, which would create a possibility

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 1>of having to play the Bears right away again next

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>week in the wild card round. It could happen. So

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>from green based perspective, it's like, well, you can either

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>knock the Bears out now or you might have to

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>knock him out again next week. So sort of like

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 1>why wait around, right? And I think that's sort of

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>what Matt Lafleur has been getting at this week when

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>he's been saying this is a playoff mentality game for

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, not just because the number one seed is

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>at stake, but if you don't take care of the Bears,

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you might have to try to beat them again in

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>six or seven days. Yeah. And the big reason that

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you end up pushing that message home, guys, is you've

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>earned this opportunity. Mike. It's week seventeen. The Packers reported

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for camp on July. It's currently as we're taping this

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>New Year's Eve. Everything you've invested in the last five

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>months has been to be in a position to have

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the number one seed, to get the buy heading into

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. And it's right there for you, man, thirty

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>one minute flight down, thirty one minute flight back. If

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you take care of business in between. You have a

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>direct path from green Bay, Wisconsin to Tampa Bay, Florida.

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Florida. Sorry, a direct as the crow flies path

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to the super Bowl that runs through this stadium. You

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to waste that opportunity. Yeah, absolutely, Well. We

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>talked obviously a lot about the running game for the Bears,

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the run defense for the Packers. What are some other

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 1>keys to victory here for Green Bay that jump out

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>at us as far as what the Packers have to

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>do on either side of the ball in order to

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>emerge victorious and lockdown that number one seed. The Keen

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Hicks factor. I mean, last time that the Packers played them,

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>there was that question all week long if Hicks was

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be ready. The Bears ended up designed to

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.479
<v Speaker 1>sit him out, and I thought that had a direct correlation,

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily on the outcome of the game, but definitely

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the way that Green Bay was able to assert themselves

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and scoring forty one points against the defense. I still

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>think I has a lot of playmakers. There's been some

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>question about Eddie Jackson this year. I saw and in

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>his level of play. I haven't followed the Bears enough

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to be able to comment on that, but when you

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>look at that front and Kyle Fuller is one of

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the top cornerbacks in this league, I really respect what

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>he brings to the table. And and obviously there you know,

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>we everyone knows the story there with Green Bay and

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>whatnot with him. So I just feel like the Hicks

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>factor is going to give them a boost in this one,

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in addition to the fact that he's one of the

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>most disruptive, if not underrated, defensive lineman in the National

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Football League. Yeah. Absolutely. I mean I said it back

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in week twelve when it happened, and I've been saying

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it this week as well, that you could see the

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Bear the Packers completely exploited the absence of a Chem

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Hicks right from the get go in that first matchup

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Bears. I believe it was within Aaron Jones

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>first four carries of that game, he had runs of fourteen,

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>nine and eight yards that were between the tackles. The

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Packers took advantage of the fact that Hicks wasn't in there.

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to be as easy this time. And

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I think in that respect that speaks to the commitment

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the Packers are going to need to have to the

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>run game in this game in order to stay balanced,

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in order in order to keep this offense operating at

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that at that balanced deficient level, because Hicks is gonna

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>make it harder to get six and seven yard carries

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>between the tackles. But you can't just give up on

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the run and and and completely turned to the past

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>because we've seen we've seen good defenses, you know, give

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the Packers trouble when when they get away from the

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>running game. So I think offensively, staying balance is going

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to be is going to be big in this game,

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's when we've seen the Packers offense at his best.

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, defensively, I'll throw out there too.

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I say this every time the Packers go up against

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Mitch tru Whisky, and you can't let this guy run

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>around and make plays with his legs because you know,

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is he the most prolific efficient passer in the league. No,

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>he's he's not even close to that, frankly, but he

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is a guy who will scramble to the chains and

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>get first downs. He will get out of the pocket

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and make plays on the run. You have to keep

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Mr True Whisky in the pocket and make him beat

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you from there. Don't make him beat you where he's better,

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>which is when he's on the move. In my opinion, Yeah,

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's a momentum quarterback. He's almost a definition of it.

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>When things are going right, and he can be really

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>difficult to stop. And when things are going wrong, well

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that over the last three years. What what

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the you know after effect of that is. But things

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>are going right for him right now, Mike, as I

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>wrote an Insider inbox on Thursday, you look back to

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that game against Green Bay, he's right there as far

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>as pass or passing completion percentage. I mean, he's he's

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>been efficient and absence of a really terrible pass in Jacksonville,

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone talks about how he's throw into quadruple coverage and

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>this was how could you have done that? They're playing

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the Jacksonville Jaguars. What people don't really talk about is

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the Bears basically dominated the rest of

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the football game, and really that was the one bad moment.

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's the thing that ended up on social media,

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what ended up on ESPN. They don't really look

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at the fact that if not for that, uh, Trabinsky

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>would have had a freaking forty passer rating or whatever

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it would have been. I mean, that was the one

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>mistake that he made. It just happened that all the

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>eyeballs were on it. But that's the key to victory

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in this game too. He's gonna probably give the defensive

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>secondary two or three chances at balls in this game.

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>That's just the way he plays the position, especially if

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you can stop David Montgomery on early downs, like Green

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Bay was able to control the line of scrimmage against

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. If you're able to do that, that's where

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to get your bisky. You want to put

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.359
<v Speaker 1>this game in his hands. You want to make him uncomfortable,

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to get after him. He was. He was

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>hit six times in that game. Zadarius Smith has had

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a man ignitt for the backfield when he's back there

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>during his you know, almost two full seasons in Green Bay.

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Now there is a path here. I keep I'm propping

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 1>up the Bears. I'm not trying to present them as

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City Chiefs right now, but there is a

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>path for green Bay and I think that this is

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>a game that they're obviously favored in and for good reason.

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Packers have a good history at Soldier Field during Aaron

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers tenure. Is is the starting quarterback and Trabisky is

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>only one one of his six games against green Bay.

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, you just need to find a

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>way to pre able to pressure him and get a

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of takeaways. That's been the difference Mike. As much

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>as green Bay has controlled and has avoided the explosive

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>plays in recent weeks, the takeaways have been the biggest difference.

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And when you have an offense that doesn't give it

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>away like Aaron Rodgers and Matt with floor don't, good

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>things are gonna happen. Yeah. And the one other aspect

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to this game all throw in there too is obviously

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>special teams. We've seen the Packers have had. The Packers

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 1>have had their hiccups on special teams over the last

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 1>couple of months. There's no doubt about it. One of

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the best special teams performances the Packers had in this

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>time was against the Bears. In that first meeting, Cordorrell

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Patterson didn't get really anything going on kickoff returns. Bears

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't get much going on on punt return But traditionally

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bears have been the better special teams unit compared

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to Green Bay. That's a phase that not saying the

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Packers have to have to win the phase, but you

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>can't let the Bears dominate that phase, which then would

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>lead to dominating field position. Can't let that happen on stuffing.

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>The bizarre thing is, and this goes before Sean Menning

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>goes here, and honestly probably goes before run Zoock to

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay always seems to do okay against Patterson, Like

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll spend the whole week talking about how dangerous he

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>is and how much of a problem he causes teams

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>in Green Bay I think absent and maybe one kickoff

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>return during his time in Minnesota, I can't really remember.

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>There was a hundred plus yard kickoff return at the

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>at the Metro Dome and that was early was that

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>his rookie year? It was early in his career. I

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>don't remember exactly which year, but yeah, other the other

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 1>than that one. Yeah, the Packers knock on wood you know,

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>have have done pretty well against it. So the point being,

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's still a pro bowler. He still can

0:18:58.400 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, hurt you in a lot of ways. But

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:01.719
<v Speaker 1>you just you have to be on your your your

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>p's and ques here, just like last week the defense

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>was against Derrick Henry because he could still have yards

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and still look really good statistically, but you just can't

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>let him take over a game. It's just that that

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is the key against Patterson, and especially the way that

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bears use him now is sort of a backfield

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, time Montgomery, you know, get him in space,

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of offensive target. Yeah, well, quickly before we go,

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 1>just to get your thoughts a little bit on the

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>playoff picture. We know in the NFC, as we've already

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about, the Packers are playing for the one seed.

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>The Bears are fighting with the Cardinals and the Rams

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>for two uh two potential wild card spots amongst those

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 1>three teams. I'd like your thoughts on what's going on

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in the a f C because there's a whole bunch

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of ten and five teams somebody is going to have

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>is going to finish the season with ten wins and

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe eleven. If all of these ten win teams get

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>victories and one of those either ten or eleven win

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>teams is not going to make the postseason, how do

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you think this is going to shake out in the

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a f C on something? I mean, talk about high

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>stakes too, right, Mike. I mean, Tennessee is trying to

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>get its first division title in twelve years. Cleveland, who

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>was left out as a ten win team what was

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 1>it thirteen years ago? Uh, they're trying to find a

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>way to get in. And then you got the Indianapolis Colts,

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>who just have to beat the Jacksonville Jaguars to get

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to eleven wins, but even if they do that, they're

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily guaranteed a playoff spot and hence becoming the

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>biggest Mason Rudolph fans. Uh this side of whatever the

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>famous river is in Pittsburgh. That's escaping my name right now. Alleghany,

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>thanks Mike, look at you. Of course one of us

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>did well in geography, one of us didn't. Uh No,

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>But that that's the interesting thing of how this season

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>has worked out, especially from the Colts perspective, Mike. I

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>mean that the fact that you know, you've beaten the

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Packers and some of these teams, and yet

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>even a win over the Jaguars doesn't necessarily necessarily necessarily

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>get you that playoff spot you're coveting. Uh And in

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the year in which we added the seventh spot for

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>some teams, that might not even be enough. So yeah,

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of drama, a lot of drama that is

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>attached to other things, as we talked about earlier this week.

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 1>So seeing how that a f C schedule, you know,

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of finishes out, and who's going to be able

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the ones that to punch their ticket into January, this

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a really interesting week week of football. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 1>And I'll just say this, I know the Colts are

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the team in the a f C that needs to

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>win and get a little bit of help in order

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to get in. I'd like to see him get in.

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Just in case this is Philip rivers last season, I'd

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>like to see him get one more shot in the playoffs.

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Just just my own personal preference. I mean, the guy

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really get enough respect for the way he was

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>able to dominate games throughout the course of his career.

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Now he's having to do it a little differently with

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the Colts now at thirty nine years old, uh than

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>he did during his prime with the Chargers. But he's smart,

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>he's efficient, and he he is the ultimate game. Right.

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So many people want to throw comparisons to Farv. I

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>saw even like people saying, like Josh Allen he could

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>be like you know, far I think Rivers had the

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>mentality that Farve had. He's going to find a way.

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna make mistakes, he's not gonna apologize for it,

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but he's gonna keep things exciting. And if you give

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>him a defense. I mean that's probably the biggest thing

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>in his career is when he had a defense, he

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>won football games. And you know, we'll we'll see how

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>all this shuffles out. I gotta mention too before we

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>get out, looking at the NFC race to to one

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>last thing on the Bears. Yeah, if I'm Matt Niggie,

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling my guys this week, you are better than

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Rams. You're better than them. They're they're

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>just sputtering into the station right now. You're on the incline.

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So seeing how that that aspect of this works out

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>as well, is gonna be something really interesting to follow

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>because the Rams are hurting unit now, but they have

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>the advantage going into weeks seventeen. Yeah. Absolutely, well, it

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>should be a great weekend of regular season finale football

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. With that, we will call it a

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>rap on this edition of Packers Unscripted. Be sure to

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>follow all of our coverage of the team and of

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Sunday afternoons Big Game from Chicago. Will have it all

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>for you on Packers dot com for West I Am Mike.

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for tuning in, everybody, and we won't just

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. We'll see you next year. Happy

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>New Year, everybody. Take care,