WEBVTT - Vaccinating America

0:00:15.396 --> 0:00:23.836
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:23.836 --> 0:00:26.956
<v Speaker 1>where we explore the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:27.276 --> 0:00:31.756
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. I didn't feel a thing well done.

0:00:32.316 --> 0:00:36.796
<v Speaker 1>That's Vice President Mike Pence last Friday, just after receiving

0:00:36.836 --> 0:00:41.836
<v Speaker 1>a coronavirus vaccine on national television. President elect Joe Biden

0:00:41.996 --> 0:00:45.956
<v Speaker 1>has also been vaccinated. But what about the rest of us?

0:00:46.556 --> 0:00:51.116
<v Speaker 1>The distribution of the coronavirus vaccine raises massive practical and

0:00:51.196 --> 0:00:54.476
<v Speaker 1>ethical questions. Here to walk us through some of them

0:00:54.716 --> 0:00:59.476
<v Speaker 1>is Michelle Mellow. Professor Mellow teaches at the Stanford Law

0:00:59.516 --> 0:01:04.116
<v Speaker 1>School and holds a joint appointment at Stanford's School of Medicine.

0:01:04.396 --> 0:01:08.836
<v Speaker 1>She's an expert on medical liability, public health law, pharmaceuticals

0:01:08.836 --> 0:01:14.236
<v Speaker 1>and vaccines, and importantly ethics and governance associated with all

0:01:14.356 --> 0:01:19.796
<v Speaker 1>of those things. Michelle, thank you so much for joining us.

0:01:20.156 --> 0:01:23.596
<v Speaker 1>I knew the minute that we hit this stage of

0:01:23.956 --> 0:01:26.436
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine process where we have vaccines that appear to

0:01:26.476 --> 0:01:29.156
<v Speaker 1>work and now we have to struggle with the practical

0:01:29.156 --> 0:01:32.396
<v Speaker 1>and ethical questions and the legal questions around distribution, that

0:01:32.476 --> 0:01:35.836
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to hear your input. So let's just dive

0:01:35.876 --> 0:01:40.076
<v Speaker 1>in and I want to start with the priorities that

0:01:40.276 --> 0:01:43.636
<v Speaker 1>different actors have been setting for who gets vaccines when,

0:01:44.196 --> 0:01:48.436
<v Speaker 1>and ask you, what do you think that those priorities

0:01:48.596 --> 0:01:53.956
<v Speaker 1>should be. So, I actually think that the ethical framework

0:01:54.076 --> 0:01:57.316
<v Speaker 1>that the National Academy of Sciences and Engineering Medicine Committee

0:01:57.316 --> 0:02:00.956
<v Speaker 1>came up with is spot on. They start with a

0:02:01.076 --> 0:02:05.436
<v Speaker 1>series of both substantive and procedural ethical principles, and the

0:02:05.516 --> 0:02:08.436
<v Speaker 1>substantive principles are the ones that are most salient for

0:02:08.636 --> 0:02:11.836
<v Speaker 1>figuring out who's in what priority group, and they are

0:02:12.036 --> 0:02:18.236
<v Speaker 1>equity or addressing health inequities, assuring maximum benefit, what they

0:02:18.276 --> 0:02:21.716
<v Speaker 1>call equal concern, which is the idea that every person

0:02:21.916 --> 0:02:25.676
<v Speaker 1>is of equal moral worth and should be protected from discrimination.

0:02:26.276 --> 0:02:29.676
<v Speaker 1>And then there are also a series of these procedural

0:02:29.836 --> 0:02:33.316
<v Speaker 1>ethical principles that they articulate, which include fairness and transparency

0:02:33.356 --> 0:02:37.276
<v Speaker 1>and hewing closely to the evidence. So unpacking those a

0:02:37.276 --> 0:02:39.236
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, you know, what is it. I've talked

0:02:39.236 --> 0:02:42.916
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what equal concern means. It doesn't, however,

0:02:43.036 --> 0:02:46.116
<v Speaker 1>mean that it's not right to make decisions based on

0:02:46.156 --> 0:02:50.036
<v Speaker 1>a person's societal role, like the instrumental value that they

0:02:50.116 --> 0:02:53.996
<v Speaker 1>bring to fighting COVID, for example. But beyond that, we

0:02:54.036 --> 0:02:58.556
<v Speaker 1>want to protect people from nvidious discrimination. The maximum benefit

0:02:58.676 --> 0:03:01.276
<v Speaker 1>principle I think they did a very good job of

0:03:01.356 --> 0:03:06.036
<v Speaker 1>describing as pertaining both to the reduction of serious comorbidity

0:03:06.036 --> 0:03:09.436
<v Speaker 1>and mortality, so finding people who are especially like they

0:03:09.476 --> 0:03:14.156
<v Speaker 1>get really bad COVID and also eliminating transmission to the

0:03:14.156 --> 0:03:18.796
<v Speaker 1>maximum extent possible. Those are both important elements of maximal benefit.

0:03:19.316 --> 0:03:22.996
<v Speaker 1>They also refer to the fact that people who are

0:03:23.036 --> 0:03:27.316
<v Speaker 1>in roles that are essential for societal functioning should be

0:03:27.396 --> 0:03:32.276
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated because performing their role brings about additional benefits to society.

0:03:33.236 --> 0:03:37.276
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the mitigating inequities, the committee is interested

0:03:37.316 --> 0:03:40.556
<v Speaker 1>in the communities that have been especially hard hit by

0:03:40.596 --> 0:03:43.116
<v Speaker 1>the disease, and then interesting also as their focus on

0:03:43.516 --> 0:03:48.116
<v Speaker 1>respecting tribal sovereignty as a form of respecting vulnerable groups.

0:03:48.876 --> 0:03:51.876
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask a skeptical question, every single principle that

0:03:51.916 --> 0:03:56.676
<v Speaker 1>you just articulated, drawn from this National Academy of Sciences approach,

0:03:57.036 --> 0:04:00.756
<v Speaker 1>Every single principle is a good principle, but it's not

0:04:00.796 --> 0:04:03.716
<v Speaker 1>at all obvious to me how they work together. In fact,

0:04:03.756 --> 0:04:05.876
<v Speaker 1>some of those principles seem like in practice they would

0:04:05.876 --> 0:04:09.596
<v Speaker 1>be in contradiction with other principles. I mean, generally, aiming

0:04:09.636 --> 0:04:14.156
<v Speaker 1>for maximal benefit does mean treating people not as individuals

0:04:14.196 --> 0:04:16.956
<v Speaker 1>on their own, but seeing them in terms of the

0:04:17.076 --> 0:04:21.476
<v Speaker 1>role that their physical bodies will play in transmission. I mean,

0:04:21.516 --> 0:04:24.476
<v Speaker 1>if someone is especially likely to transmit, we should stop

0:04:24.516 --> 0:04:28.076
<v Speaker 1>that person from transmitting by vaccinating that person. The idea

0:04:28.116 --> 0:04:31.356
<v Speaker 1>of moral weight doesn't really come into that. We're thinking

0:04:31.356 --> 0:04:33.756
<v Speaker 1>of the society as a collective and the greatest good

0:04:33.756 --> 0:04:37.556
<v Speaker 1>for the greatest number. But the other principles are to

0:04:37.596 --> 0:04:40.396
<v Speaker 1>a certain degree very much based in a tradition that

0:04:40.476 --> 0:04:43.556
<v Speaker 1>says each human being has equal value and equal weight

0:04:43.916 --> 0:04:46.636
<v Speaker 1>and shouldn't be treated differently from any other person on

0:04:46.676 --> 0:04:49.316
<v Speaker 1>the basis of some quality that's not directly connected to

0:04:49.356 --> 0:04:53.516
<v Speaker 1>their moral worth. So do these principles talk at all

0:04:53.556 --> 0:04:57.596
<v Speaker 1>about how to reconcile the potential conflicts or is this

0:04:57.636 --> 0:04:59.196
<v Speaker 1>one of those cases where you just list a lot

0:04:59.236 --> 0:05:01.156
<v Speaker 1>of good moral principles and then the devil is in

0:05:01.156 --> 0:05:04.076
<v Speaker 1>the details. Well, it's a really important question, and they

0:05:04.076 --> 0:05:06.276
<v Speaker 1>don't go into great death. But I think the clear

0:05:06.316 --> 0:05:11.356
<v Speaker 1>intent is that when they say it's appropriate to let's

0:05:11.436 --> 0:05:13.676
<v Speaker 1>use the word discriminate, but here it's not in a

0:05:13.716 --> 0:05:17.076
<v Speaker 1>negative way. It's picking out people for priority. It's appropriate

0:05:17.116 --> 0:05:21.996
<v Speaker 1>to do it on that basis when the role concerns

0:05:22.076 --> 0:05:26.036
<v Speaker 1>the virus. So we're not talking about valuing some lives

0:05:26.076 --> 0:05:30.236
<v Speaker 1>more than others because they're not criminals, or they're just

0:05:30.316 --> 0:05:33.196
<v Speaker 1>better citizens, or they pay more taxes where they are

0:05:33.276 --> 0:05:36.836
<v Speaker 1>engaged in industries like I don't know, tech that we

0:05:36.916 --> 0:05:40.076
<v Speaker 1>think bring really innovative products to us. That's not what's

0:05:40.076 --> 0:05:42.716
<v Speaker 1>going on here. They're talking about people who, by dint

0:05:42.756 --> 0:05:49.276
<v Speaker 1>of their social roles, are either big transmitters or serving functions,

0:05:49.276 --> 0:05:52.436
<v Speaker 1>serving professional functions that help us contain the epidemic, or

0:05:52.476 --> 0:05:56.436
<v Speaker 1>that otherwise help us maintain some symblance of normal civil

0:05:56.516 --> 0:06:01.436
<v Speaker 1>life by providing food, transportation, essential infrastructure. So I think

0:06:01.476 --> 0:06:04.276
<v Speaker 1>they've tried to tow the line there by drawing this

0:06:04.396 --> 0:06:08.756
<v Speaker 1>boundary around what they are willing to consider when evaluating

0:06:08.796 --> 0:06:12.436
<v Speaker 1>a person's role. Do teachers come up here, because they

0:06:12.436 --> 0:06:14.396
<v Speaker 1>seem like a fascinating case to me, because on the

0:06:14.436 --> 0:06:18.876
<v Speaker 1>one hand, teachers are fulfilling a fundamental social role. Without them,

0:06:18.876 --> 0:06:20.876
<v Speaker 1>we can't open the schools, at least not in person.

0:06:21.836 --> 0:06:25.396
<v Speaker 1>But then again, they're not frontline health responders. So teachers

0:06:25.396 --> 0:06:28.356
<v Speaker 1>have been one of the most interesting points of discussion

0:06:28.396 --> 0:06:31.476
<v Speaker 1>in the broader debates about vaccine allocation, because you know,

0:06:31.796 --> 0:06:35.156
<v Speaker 1>to a large degree, we're talking about relatively young people

0:06:35.276 --> 0:06:40.156
<v Speaker 1>who are relatively robust and able to withstand this virus,

0:06:40.196 --> 0:06:42.956
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the emerging evidence suggests that at least

0:06:43.036 --> 0:06:46.996
<v Speaker 1>smaller children are not particularly big vectors. So the teachers

0:06:47.276 --> 0:06:50.316
<v Speaker 1>perceive themselves to be at high risk, but actually might

0:06:50.356 --> 0:06:53.076
<v Speaker 1>not be as quite a high risk as they worried

0:06:53.116 --> 0:06:56.676
<v Speaker 1>that they would be early on. Having said that, there's

0:06:56.756 --> 0:07:01.156
<v Speaker 1>no denying the fact that they are the backbone of

0:07:01.396 --> 0:07:05.356
<v Speaker 1>the most critical infrastructure outside of maybe the provision of

0:07:05.356 --> 0:07:07.956
<v Speaker 1>food and housing. You know, the economy does not run

0:07:08.196 --> 0:07:11.076
<v Speaker 1>when kids are not as school and so as a result,

0:07:11.156 --> 0:07:14.756
<v Speaker 1>the Nation Committee and I think most states will put

0:07:14.836 --> 0:07:18.636
<v Speaker 1>teachers in Phase two, behind healthcare workers and nursing home

0:07:18.636 --> 0:07:21.556
<v Speaker 1>residents and perhaps a few others, but toward the front

0:07:21.556 --> 0:07:24.276
<v Speaker 1>of the line, because again they're playing a role in

0:07:24.956 --> 0:07:28.516
<v Speaker 1>making an essential sector work. You just raised an issue

0:07:28.556 --> 0:07:30.836
<v Speaker 1>that's also of great interest to me, and that is

0:07:30.876 --> 0:07:33.156
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that it's the states that are going to

0:07:33.236 --> 0:07:36.276
<v Speaker 1>be making the actual decision. So first we talked about

0:07:36.316 --> 0:07:40.076
<v Speaker 1>this framework produced by a kind of blue ribbon panel

0:07:40.676 --> 0:07:44.596
<v Speaker 1>of the quasi governmental but not really governmental, National Academy

0:07:44.596 --> 0:07:47.076
<v Speaker 1>of Sciences, so it's not technically part of the government.

0:07:47.476 --> 0:07:50.236
<v Speaker 1>The governments that will be making the decisions about allocation

0:07:50.276 --> 0:07:55.196
<v Speaker 1>of vaccines are state governments. Why isn't this something that

0:07:55.236 --> 0:07:59.876
<v Speaker 1>should have been decided by the federal government. Well, I

0:07:59.916 --> 0:08:02.116
<v Speaker 1>think really the only way one could answer that is

0:08:02.156 --> 0:08:04.516
<v Speaker 1>just by saying, it's always been the states that have

0:08:04.596 --> 0:08:08.116
<v Speaker 1>run immunization programs. It's just kind of always been that way.

0:08:08.116 --> 0:08:11.796
<v Speaker 1>That there are are federal bodies, most prominently the Advisory

0:08:11.836 --> 0:08:14.556
<v Speaker 1>Committee on Immunization and Practices that you might have heard

0:08:14.596 --> 0:08:20.036
<v Speaker 1>referred to as ASIP, that make recommendations, highly informed, expert

0:08:20.156 --> 0:08:24.436
<v Speaker 1>credible recommendations about who to vaccinate, how to vaccinate them,

0:08:24.476 --> 0:08:27.396
<v Speaker 1>when to vaccinate them. And then states pick up the

0:08:27.436 --> 0:08:29.796
<v Speaker 1>ball and they do it, and they can tweak those

0:08:29.796 --> 0:08:33.316
<v Speaker 1>recommendations if they want to, but it's their game. If

0:08:33.316 --> 0:08:36.436
<v Speaker 1>you were to start over here and design yeah, but

0:08:36.756 --> 0:08:38.516
<v Speaker 1>let's make you the czar and design it not for

0:08:38.556 --> 0:08:40.876
<v Speaker 1>this time, but for the next time. You know. I

0:08:40.916 --> 0:08:44.756
<v Speaker 1>think that there are critical logistical differences among the states

0:08:44.796 --> 0:08:47.316
<v Speaker 1>that cause it to make sense to have them in

0:08:47.436 --> 0:08:52.156
<v Speaker 1>charge of implementation. But I don't appreciate a significant reason

0:08:52.836 --> 0:08:56.276
<v Speaker 1>for the prioritization to be different across states. If it's

0:08:56.316 --> 0:09:02.356
<v Speaker 1>evidence based and it reflects very careful deliberation about important

0:09:02.396 --> 0:09:05.396
<v Speaker 1>values that are shared, it's not clear to me why

0:09:05.436 --> 0:09:08.436
<v Speaker 1>it should be tweaked at the state level. That leads

0:09:08.436 --> 0:09:10.676
<v Speaker 1>me to a very practical question. I mean, what I've

0:09:10.716 --> 0:09:14.356
<v Speaker 1>been sort of picturing is, if you're a hospital worker

0:09:14.396 --> 0:09:17.356
<v Speaker 1>or a frontline worker, you'll get the vaccine through your hospital,

0:09:17.436 --> 0:09:19.756
<v Speaker 1>or if you're a policeman or a fireman or a firefighter,

0:09:19.836 --> 0:09:22.636
<v Speaker 1>or you'll get it, you know, at your firehouse or

0:09:22.876 --> 0:09:24.796
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the police department and so forth. But

0:09:24.876 --> 0:09:27.516
<v Speaker 1>I've been picturing for the vast majority of the population

0:09:27.516 --> 0:09:30.196
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't fit into one of those categories lining up

0:09:30.236 --> 0:09:34.676
<v Speaker 1>in big numbers outside of some large facility, sort of

0:09:34.716 --> 0:09:37.396
<v Speaker 1>the way that testing is sort of happening in some

0:09:37.436 --> 0:09:41.676
<v Speaker 1>places now. Is that wrong? The allocation frameworks mostly are

0:09:41.676 --> 0:09:45.476
<v Speaker 1>putting healthcare workers, nursing home residents, and a few others

0:09:45.476 --> 0:09:47.956
<v Speaker 1>at the front of the line phase one A or

0:09:47.516 --> 0:09:50.676
<v Speaker 1>one B, and then we get down to people with

0:09:50.796 --> 0:09:54.196
<v Speaker 1>significant comorbidities, and then we get down to a phase two,

0:09:54.316 --> 0:09:58.556
<v Speaker 1>where we're dealing with other important people for infrastructure and

0:09:58.596 --> 0:10:01.356
<v Speaker 1>people who have milder comorbidities. And if that's how we

0:10:01.396 --> 0:10:03.716
<v Speaker 1>get to a phase three where there's wide availability the

0:10:03.796 --> 0:10:07.156
<v Speaker 1>vaccine that it starts to penetrate the general population and

0:10:07.196 --> 0:10:11.236
<v Speaker 1>eventually reach younger adults and children. And at that stage, yeah,

0:10:11.236 --> 0:10:14.156
<v Speaker 1>I think we're talking about mass vaccination clinics. But in

0:10:14.156 --> 0:10:16.796
<v Speaker 1>the early stages, when we're trying to identify people who

0:10:16.836 --> 0:10:21.396
<v Speaker 1>are eligible for vaccination under these allocation frameworks, it has

0:10:21.436 --> 0:10:25.516
<v Speaker 1>to work through organizations that already have that information. We're

0:10:25.556 --> 0:10:29.836
<v Speaker 1>not going to have a corner Kiosk vaccinating people asking

0:10:29.876 --> 0:10:32.876
<v Speaker 1>them to show proof of diabetes. And it's not because

0:10:32.916 --> 0:10:35.436
<v Speaker 1>we just don't have enough vaccine yet to reach the

0:10:35.516 --> 0:10:37.956
<v Speaker 1>larger numbers of people. I mean, presumably the moment there

0:10:37.996 --> 0:10:41.756
<v Speaker 1>are enough doses to start lining people up. We want

0:10:41.756 --> 0:10:43.796
<v Speaker 1>to do that. We want to do that, but you

0:10:43.836 --> 0:10:46.516
<v Speaker 1>have to understand the logistical hurdles involved in getting this

0:10:46.596 --> 0:10:50.396
<v Speaker 1>vaccine out and administering it, particularly for the fiser vaccine

0:10:50.436 --> 0:10:51.956
<v Speaker 1>that has to be stored, as you know, at this

0:10:52.116 --> 0:10:55.476
<v Speaker 1>extremely cold temperature, and if your facility doesn't have one

0:10:55.476 --> 0:10:58.796
<v Speaker 1>of those freezers, you're out now. With MADERNA coming online,

0:10:58.796 --> 0:11:01.116
<v Speaker 1>it'll be a little easier. But that's just one example

0:11:01.156 --> 0:11:04.796
<v Speaker 1>of the kind of logistical challenges in scaling this program up.

0:11:05.556 --> 0:11:07.716
<v Speaker 1>So it is going to take some time. Even if

0:11:07.756 --> 0:11:11.236
<v Speaker 1>all of these doses were warehouse right now, not all

0:11:11.276 --> 0:11:13.556
<v Speaker 1>states would be ready to give them to all people.

0:11:14.636 --> 0:11:17.116
<v Speaker 1>Do you have I realized that nobody knows a definitive

0:11:17.156 --> 0:11:18.556
<v Speaker 1>answer to this, and I don't mean to put you

0:11:18.596 --> 0:11:21.196
<v Speaker 1>on the spot, but do you have an instinctive answer

0:11:21.716 --> 0:11:23.836
<v Speaker 1>as to how long this is going to take in

0:11:23.836 --> 0:11:26.516
<v Speaker 1>the different phases? I have heard people say with some

0:11:26.636 --> 0:11:30.996
<v Speaker 1>confidence that at least they speak with confidence that by

0:11:31.156 --> 0:11:34.076
<v Speaker 1>next end of next August beginning of next September, when

0:11:34.476 --> 0:11:39.036
<v Speaker 1>the twenty one twenty two school year begins, people should

0:11:39.156 --> 0:11:42.596
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmingly have been vaccinated. But do you think that is

0:11:42.676 --> 0:11:47.276
<v Speaker 1>actually unrealistically optimistic? I mean, that's consistent with what I'm hearing.

0:11:47.276 --> 0:11:50.116
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any inside information about this. I think

0:11:50.356 --> 0:11:54.076
<v Speaker 1>that's realistic, probably for adults. Kids are the big question

0:11:54.116 --> 0:11:56.516
<v Speaker 1>mark at this point, because, as I'm sure you know,

0:11:56.676 --> 0:11:59.076
<v Speaker 1>you have to have a separate set of clinical trials

0:11:59.116 --> 0:12:02.276
<v Speaker 1>to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine for

0:12:02.396 --> 0:12:05.196
<v Speaker 1>children Right now, I think no trial has gone below

0:12:05.196 --> 0:12:09.236
<v Speaker 1>age sixteen, so those trials are just getting underway. And

0:12:09.556 --> 0:12:12.116
<v Speaker 1>as you probably remember, there is a debate about whether

0:12:12.196 --> 0:12:15.476
<v Speaker 1>to end the adult trials early. There will be similar

0:12:15.516 --> 0:12:17.636
<v Speaker 1>debates for these trials as to how long to run

0:12:17.676 --> 0:12:20.396
<v Speaker 1>them before you get the initial approval for children. So

0:12:20.636 --> 0:12:24.956
<v Speaker 1>there's just a lot more uncertainty about when approval will

0:12:24.996 --> 0:12:27.356
<v Speaker 1>come through. You know, once it does come through, I

0:12:27.356 --> 0:12:30.436
<v Speaker 1>would expect things to happen relatively quickly because we will

0:12:30.476 --> 0:12:33.316
<v Speaker 1>have experience at that point with supply chain and with

0:12:33.556 --> 0:12:36.076
<v Speaker 1>setting things up in clinics, and we will have providers

0:12:36.196 --> 0:12:38.796
<v Speaker 1>enrolled in the program and so forth. But it could

0:12:38.796 --> 0:12:40.756
<v Speaker 1>take some time. And then, of course there's going to

0:12:40.796 --> 0:12:44.676
<v Speaker 1>be the inevitable resistance when we talk about vaccinating children.

0:12:45.796 --> 0:12:48.116
<v Speaker 1>That brings us to the resistance question, which I really

0:12:48.156 --> 0:12:52.276
<v Speaker 1>want to explore with you. So let's start by just

0:12:52.396 --> 0:12:58.396
<v Speaker 1>asking whether you think there are justifiable reasons that individuals

0:12:58.436 --> 0:13:01.876
<v Speaker 1>could use to say I don't want to be vaccinated

0:13:02.156 --> 0:13:05.396
<v Speaker 1>or I don't want my kids to be vaccinated. What

0:13:05.556 --> 0:13:09.716
<v Speaker 1>distinguishes this vaccine from other vaccines that we choir for

0:13:09.876 --> 0:13:13.556
<v Speaker 1>kids is that it's new and not only is it new,

0:13:13.596 --> 0:13:15.876
<v Speaker 1>but it is for some of the makers based on

0:13:15.916 --> 0:13:20.196
<v Speaker 1>a new kind of approach to making vaccines, this mRNA approach.

0:13:20.716 --> 0:13:24.276
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's not unreasonable that people are voicing

0:13:24.396 --> 0:13:29.636
<v Speaker 1>concerns or having questions about safety. It's very unusual, for example,

0:13:29.676 --> 0:13:32.916
<v Speaker 1>for US to require children to accept a vaccine that

0:13:33.036 --> 0:13:35.716
<v Speaker 1>is novel on the market. Obviously take a very extraordinary

0:13:35.716 --> 0:13:38.956
<v Speaker 1>set of circumstances. The other thing, of course, that makes

0:13:38.996 --> 0:13:42.676
<v Speaker 1>these fears not unreasonable is the process through which the

0:13:42.796 --> 0:13:46.036
<v Speaker 1>vaccines have been approved. You know, I think two months

0:13:46.036 --> 0:13:47.996
<v Speaker 1>ago I would have said it's very reasonable for people

0:13:48.036 --> 0:13:50.556
<v Speaker 1>to have concerns about that. Since then, I've personally been

0:13:50.596 --> 0:13:53.836
<v Speaker 1>reassured by the process that has emerged from FDA, the

0:13:53.876 --> 0:13:59.116
<v Speaker 1>director asserting his independence, the transparency around the basis for

0:13:59.236 --> 0:14:02.996
<v Speaker 1>approval that have certainly not heard anyone who has independently

0:14:03.036 --> 0:14:06.036
<v Speaker 1>reviewed those data packages voicing concerns about well, were they

0:14:06.036 --> 0:14:09.796
<v Speaker 1>careful enough or was this the right standard? Their decision

0:14:09.876 --> 0:14:11.836
<v Speaker 1>was also made a lot easier by the fact that

0:14:11.876 --> 0:14:15.636
<v Speaker 1>these were not close cases in terms of efficacy. You know,

0:14:15.676 --> 0:14:17.436
<v Speaker 1>they had set this initial bar it has to be

0:14:17.476 --> 0:14:21.356
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent or more effective, and these things just absolutely

0:14:21.436 --> 0:14:24.476
<v Speaker 1>vaulted over that bar. So I think there's a lot

0:14:24.556 --> 0:14:27.316
<v Speaker 1>to feel good about now relative to where we were

0:14:27.356 --> 0:14:30.676
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months ago, and my own personal apprehensions

0:14:30.716 --> 0:14:33.356
<v Speaker 1>about this I think have been relieved by what I've

0:14:33.396 --> 0:14:37.156
<v Speaker 1>seen over those months. Having said that, anybody who's hesitant

0:14:37.196 --> 0:14:40.396
<v Speaker 1>about regular vaccines is definitely gonna be hesitant about this

0:14:40.436 --> 0:14:43.076
<v Speaker 1>one because it's new. What I think we have going

0:14:43.116 --> 0:14:44.956
<v Speaker 1>for us again is that by the time we get

0:14:44.956 --> 0:14:48.556
<v Speaker 1>to kids, there will be millions and millions and millions

0:14:48.556 --> 0:14:51.356
<v Speaker 1>of doses having been delivered to adults, and we will

0:14:51.676 --> 0:14:53.716
<v Speaker 1>know a lot. So even though it will be new

0:14:53.876 --> 0:14:57.716
<v Speaker 1>in terms of months or years, in terms of doses delivered,

0:14:57.996 --> 0:15:00.316
<v Speaker 1>it might look a lot more like the knowledge base

0:15:00.396 --> 0:15:13.316
<v Speaker 1>that we have about older vaccines. We'll be right back, Michelle.

0:15:13.316 --> 0:15:18.236
<v Speaker 1>You're a highly rational, logical thinking person, and your description

0:15:18.396 --> 0:15:22.316
<v Speaker 1>of what count as reasons to be concerned we're all

0:15:22.356 --> 0:15:26.436
<v Speaker 1>derived from logic and reason there but I presume that

0:15:26.916 --> 0:15:29.836
<v Speaker 1>you share my view. Maybe I shouldn't that some of

0:15:29.876 --> 0:15:32.836
<v Speaker 1>the reasons that people are skeptical of vaccines generally may

0:15:32.876 --> 0:15:36.716
<v Speaker 1>be grounded in formal logical reason, but others are grounded

0:15:36.716 --> 0:15:39.956
<v Speaker 1>in other features. You know, whether that's religious faith, which

0:15:39.996 --> 0:15:43.356
<v Speaker 1>sometimes by its own self description, is grounded in something

0:15:43.436 --> 0:15:46.676
<v Speaker 1>other than logic or reason, not for everybody but for some,

0:15:47.476 --> 0:15:52.356
<v Speaker 1>or in paranoia or structural distrust of science or of

0:15:52.356 --> 0:15:56.196
<v Speaker 1>the government. So what about people who say, you know,

0:15:56.236 --> 0:15:58.956
<v Speaker 1>I don't like vaccines in general, forget about for my kids,

0:15:58.956 --> 0:16:02.756
<v Speaker 1>but for me, and I don't want to be vaccinated.

0:16:03.196 --> 0:16:07.156
<v Speaker 1>Here how tolerant in your view? Should the government be

0:16:08.076 --> 0:16:11.156
<v Speaker 1>of the kind of a response, And then from government

0:16:11.156 --> 0:16:13.676
<v Speaker 1>will move on to private businesses and so forth. Yeah,

0:16:13.716 --> 0:16:15.876
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I'm very familiar with the range of

0:16:15.876 --> 0:16:19.676
<v Speaker 1>different concerns. I get lots of mail from folks in

0:16:19.716 --> 0:16:22.156
<v Speaker 1>the anti vACC community expressing their hopes and dreams for

0:16:22.236 --> 0:16:25.596
<v Speaker 1>my family and my own health and safety, and so

0:16:25.796 --> 0:16:28.796
<v Speaker 1>I'm aware all of them very positive, a certain very sweet.

0:16:28.836 --> 0:16:31.636
<v Speaker 1>As a recipient of occasional hate mail myself, I'm sure

0:16:31.676 --> 0:16:34.156
<v Speaker 1>that the loving spirit that pervades all hate mail is

0:16:34.196 --> 0:16:37.516
<v Speaker 1>present in yours too. So I know that people who

0:16:37.596 --> 0:16:41.196
<v Speaker 1>are hesitant or resistant of vaccines really run the gamut

0:16:41.236 --> 0:16:43.796
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how well informed their beliefs are, what

0:16:43.876 --> 0:16:46.796
<v Speaker 1>their beliefs are, why they have these concerns. So the

0:16:46.876 --> 0:16:49.156
<v Speaker 1>question is, what do we do about it. I guess

0:16:49.196 --> 0:16:52.116
<v Speaker 1>my own feeling is that one thing we have going

0:16:52.156 --> 0:16:55.636
<v Speaker 1>for us here is that we don't need ninety percent vaccination.

0:16:55.676 --> 0:16:59.236
<v Speaker 1>We don't need ninety five percent. The best estimates are

0:16:59.276 --> 0:17:02.196
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the sixty to eighty percent range, probably seventy

0:17:02.196 --> 0:17:05.116
<v Speaker 1>to eighty percent coverage in order to really kill this

0:17:05.236 --> 0:17:07.796
<v Speaker 1>thing because the vaccine is so effective. I mean, we're

0:17:07.796 --> 0:17:10.236
<v Speaker 1>actually getting lucky there. If theaccine we're less effective, we

0:17:10.236 --> 0:17:12.356
<v Speaker 1>would need more people to take it. But even more

0:17:12.356 --> 0:17:14.236
<v Speaker 1>critical than that is what we call the ar not,

0:17:14.356 --> 0:17:17.716
<v Speaker 1>the reproductive number for this virus, which you know, as

0:17:17.716 --> 0:17:20.436
<v Speaker 1>you probably know, is around one somewhere right now in

0:17:20.476 --> 0:17:22.876
<v Speaker 1>most parts of the country. In California here, I think

0:17:22.916 --> 0:17:24.476
<v Speaker 1>it's at one point two right now, which is the

0:17:24.516 --> 0:17:27.396
<v Speaker 1>worst it's been in a while. Compare that to measles,

0:17:27.436 --> 0:17:29.916
<v Speaker 1>where we've got an ar not of twelve to fifteen.

0:17:30.036 --> 0:17:32.276
<v Speaker 1>That means for every person with measles, they're going to

0:17:32.356 --> 0:17:36.836
<v Speaker 1>infect on average, twelve to fifteen additional people. And because

0:17:36.876 --> 0:17:39.356
<v Speaker 1>of that, we have to have close to ninety five

0:17:39.396 --> 0:17:43.796
<v Speaker 1>percent vaccine coverage in order to kill measles in the population.

0:17:44.476 --> 0:17:47.036
<v Speaker 1>So what this all means is we can let a

0:17:47.036 --> 0:17:49.356
<v Speaker 1>few go, we can let more than a few go,

0:17:50.036 --> 0:17:52.036
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, I think we're going to have to

0:17:52.076 --> 0:17:55.476
<v Speaker 1>because there's going to be enough vaccine to get to

0:17:55.556 --> 0:17:59.436
<v Speaker 1>that place of ninety plus percent coverage for quite a

0:17:59.436 --> 0:18:02.676
<v Speaker 1>long time. So what's been interesting to me and having

0:18:02.716 --> 0:18:07.116
<v Speaker 1>conversations about this topic is how much we pivot back

0:18:07.156 --> 0:18:09.796
<v Speaker 1>and forth from talking about who get to get it,

0:18:09.956 --> 0:18:11.876
<v Speaker 1>who gets to be in the line to get it too,

0:18:12.116 --> 0:18:14.396
<v Speaker 1>who has to get it? We're having like these both

0:18:14.436 --> 0:18:17.316
<v Speaker 1>of these conversations at the same time, and the reality

0:18:17.436 --> 0:18:19.356
<v Speaker 1>is that's not going to take place at the same time.

0:18:19.356 --> 0:18:21.556
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be a long time where the question

0:18:21.676 --> 0:18:24.676
<v Speaker 1>is only who gets to get it, and way down

0:18:24.716 --> 0:18:27.676
<v Speaker 1>the line where everybody who would like to get it

0:18:27.716 --> 0:18:29.996
<v Speaker 1>has gotten it, then we can talk about whether there's

0:18:30.036 --> 0:18:33.196
<v Speaker 1>a need to do anything about the remaining whatever it

0:18:33.276 --> 0:18:37.236
<v Speaker 1>is ten twenty percent, thirty percent, forty percent, we'll see.

0:18:37.956 --> 0:18:41.676
<v Speaker 1>But at that point we'll know a lot more about

0:18:41.796 --> 0:18:45.716
<v Speaker 1>the effect of population vaccination on the spread of this virus,

0:18:45.756 --> 0:18:47.836
<v Speaker 1>and my expectation is we won't have to do a

0:18:47.836 --> 0:18:50.236
<v Speaker 1>lot of chasing people that we will get to where

0:18:50.236 --> 0:18:54.956
<v Speaker 1>we need to be with voluntary vaccination as long as

0:18:55.236 --> 0:18:57.796
<v Speaker 1>we do a decent job on two things. One is

0:18:57.916 --> 0:19:00.716
<v Speaker 1>bringing the vaccine to people where they are at zero cost,

0:19:00.756 --> 0:19:04.236
<v Speaker 1>with zero logistical barriers, and the second is learning how

0:19:04.276 --> 0:19:06.716
<v Speaker 1>to talk to people about this vaccine in a way

0:19:06.876 --> 0:19:09.956
<v Speaker 1>that resonates with them. Do you think there might actually

0:19:09.956 --> 0:19:13.116
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting cultural effect of this sequencing that you're describing,

0:19:13.636 --> 0:19:16.636
<v Speaker 1>where if a lot of people really really want the

0:19:16.716 --> 0:19:19.876
<v Speaker 1>vaccine and are trying to get it, that might actually

0:19:20.036 --> 0:19:23.276
<v Speaker 1>create a norm that the vaccine is desirable and reduce

0:19:23.396 --> 0:19:25.756
<v Speaker 1>some of the objections. Because the way many people say

0:19:25.756 --> 0:19:29.116
<v Speaker 1>experience vaccines is you know, they're saying their kids to school,

0:19:29.196 --> 0:19:31.116
<v Speaker 1>or their kids have just been born, or at the

0:19:31.116 --> 0:19:34.756
<v Speaker 1>relevant check up age, and then the government or or

0:19:34.796 --> 0:19:36.836
<v Speaker 1>the doctors speaking on behalf the government says it's time

0:19:36.836 --> 0:19:39.316
<v Speaker 1>for the vaccine. So people see it as a coercive structure.

0:19:39.716 --> 0:19:42.516
<v Speaker 1>And what's more, because those vaccine programs are on the

0:19:42.516 --> 0:19:46.196
<v Speaker 1>whole relatively successful, people don't really see the diseases that

0:19:46.236 --> 0:19:49.716
<v Speaker 1>they would be getting, you know, if they weren't vaccinated. Here,

0:19:49.796 --> 0:19:53.116
<v Speaker 1>we've all seen the effects of COVID. We've seen most

0:19:53.116 --> 0:19:55.236
<v Speaker 1>of us in the United States now, no people who've

0:19:55.276 --> 0:19:57.796
<v Speaker 1>gotten sick and in many cases we know people who

0:19:57.796 --> 0:20:00.956
<v Speaker 1>have unfortunately died, So there's a kind of you know,

0:20:01.036 --> 0:20:04.836
<v Speaker 1>maybe if everyone wants one, it will reduce the likelihood

0:20:04.836 --> 0:20:07.716
<v Speaker 1>that people will be skeptical of taking it. I mean,

0:20:07.756 --> 0:20:10.636
<v Speaker 1>they're probably a certain people in the population who think

0:20:10.636 --> 0:20:13.396
<v Speaker 1>in those terms. I think what will be more influential

0:20:13.596 --> 0:20:15.756
<v Speaker 1>is just the experience of seeing with your own eyes

0:20:15.876 --> 0:20:20.716
<v Speaker 1>friends and family getting vaccinated, being fine, shedding tears of relief,

0:20:21.076 --> 0:20:23.516
<v Speaker 1>and being able to resume their lives in ways that you,

0:20:23.596 --> 0:20:27.996
<v Speaker 1>as an unvaccinated person can't or shouldn't. So what is

0:20:27.996 --> 0:20:29.836
<v Speaker 1>scary about this vaccine, as I mentioned to a lot

0:20:29.876 --> 0:20:32.316
<v Speaker 1>of people, is that it is new, it's unknown, and

0:20:32.556 --> 0:20:34.916
<v Speaker 1>quite understandably, they don't want to be in line first

0:20:34.996 --> 0:20:37.836
<v Speaker 1>for something that they have concerns about. But one hundred

0:20:37.876 --> 0:20:40.796
<v Speaker 1>million doses later, I think people will start to feel differently.

0:20:41.076 --> 0:20:44.236
<v Speaker 1>It's going to take special outreach to certain populations to

0:20:44.276 --> 0:20:48.156
<v Speaker 1>be sure, including racial and minority communities who need to

0:20:48.196 --> 0:20:51.596
<v Speaker 1>hear this from particular kinds of messengers. And then also

0:20:51.636 --> 0:20:54.156
<v Speaker 1>this time around people on the right who you know,

0:20:54.236 --> 0:20:59.836
<v Speaker 1>quite curiously, given the President's investment in vaccine development, share

0:21:00.156 --> 0:21:05.076
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine skepticism of many in the vaccine resistance community,

0:21:05.076 --> 0:21:09.316
<v Speaker 1>which have traditionally been more left leaning women. So there's

0:21:09.316 --> 0:21:12.996
<v Speaker 1>this bizarre concentration or constellation of people who have concerns

0:21:13.036 --> 0:21:15.196
<v Speaker 1>about the vaccine that we're going to have to figure

0:21:15.236 --> 0:21:17.996
<v Speaker 1>out how to reach. But you know, there will be

0:21:17.996 --> 0:21:20.876
<v Speaker 1>people that it will be pretty tough for. My stepmom

0:21:21.036 --> 0:21:24.916
<v Speaker 1>is a retired corrections officer. She lives in rural Iowa,

0:21:24.996 --> 0:21:27.716
<v Speaker 1>and she's you know, elderly and at some risk for

0:21:28.076 --> 0:21:31.156
<v Speaker 1>serious cummorbidities. And when I talk to her about the vaccine,

0:21:31.676 --> 0:21:35.276
<v Speaker 1>she says, hell, no, I'm not getting no vaccine full stop.

0:21:35.316 --> 0:21:37.316
<v Speaker 1>There's not a lot to work with there in terms

0:21:37.356 --> 0:21:39.756
<v Speaker 1>of you know, we talked about with rational reasons. There's

0:21:39.796 --> 0:21:42.956
<v Speaker 1>there's just not a lot there other than distrust. And

0:21:43.156 --> 0:21:44.676
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're going to have to figure out how

0:21:44.676 --> 0:21:47.116
<v Speaker 1>to turn some of the messaging around to reach out

0:21:47.156 --> 0:21:51.436
<v Speaker 1>to people who see vaccination as part of a broader

0:21:51.996 --> 0:21:56.636
<v Speaker 1>set of intrusive measures perpetrated on the public by left

0:21:56.716 --> 0:22:00.436
<v Speaker 1>leaning public health officials and governors. Can you imagine a

0:22:00.476 --> 0:22:04.356
<v Speaker 1>scenario where we actually aren't able to vaccinate enough people

0:22:04.396 --> 0:22:08.636
<v Speaker 1>to reach her community because of widespread skepticism. I mean

0:22:08.676 --> 0:22:10.956
<v Speaker 1>that would be massive crisis. I mean, here we are,

0:22:11.116 --> 0:22:13.996
<v Speaker 1>people like us are sitting around in universities, and the

0:22:14.036 --> 0:22:16.756
<v Speaker 1>moment that the vaccines were reported as working, we all

0:22:16.836 --> 0:22:20.876
<v Speaker 1>breathed an enormous sigh of relief. Right, I mean science worked.

0:22:21.036 --> 0:22:23.916
<v Speaker 1>You know what a relief. Life will return to normal.

0:22:23.996 --> 0:22:27.516
<v Speaker 1>What a relief. And I don't think I've heard serious

0:22:27.556 --> 0:22:30.556
<v Speaker 1>discussion in the last few weeks, let's say, since the

0:22:31.356 --> 0:22:35.316
<v Speaker 1>good numbers came in, of oh, what if we just

0:22:35.516 --> 0:22:38.876
<v Speaker 1>cannot convince a sufficient number of people to take it,

0:22:38.956 --> 0:22:41.796
<v Speaker 1>to get the R not down below one. I mean,

0:22:41.996 --> 0:22:44.556
<v Speaker 1>I look that. I think those discussions are happening. There's

0:22:44.596 --> 0:22:48.276
<v Speaker 1>still so much interest. I'm hearing and talking about mandates

0:22:48.316 --> 0:22:51.596
<v Speaker 1>and you can employers required and can schools require it?

0:22:51.996 --> 0:22:54.196
<v Speaker 1>This is not, to be clear, something that state officials

0:22:54.196 --> 0:22:56.676
<v Speaker 1>are talking about, or even many employers. There's very little

0:22:56.676 --> 0:22:58.836
<v Speaker 1>appetite for that among the employers that I know of,

0:22:59.316 --> 0:23:01.596
<v Speaker 1>but reporters want to talk about it. People are curious

0:23:01.636 --> 0:23:05.116
<v Speaker 1>about that, And my answer is always, I just don't

0:23:05.116 --> 0:23:07.196
<v Speaker 1>think we need to go there right now. I think

0:23:07.236 --> 0:23:10.596
<v Speaker 1>we have massive challenge over the next six months in

0:23:10.676 --> 0:23:12.676
<v Speaker 1>getting this to the people who want to get it,

0:23:13.476 --> 0:23:17.196
<v Speaker 1>and at that point, when we've done that, I think

0:23:17.236 --> 0:23:19.636
<v Speaker 1>it will be less of a crisis atmosphere. We will

0:23:19.676 --> 0:23:23.036
<v Speaker 1>know a lot more about the safety profile of the vaccine.

0:23:23.556 --> 0:23:26.396
<v Speaker 1>People will know more people who've gotten the vaccine and

0:23:26.436 --> 0:23:29.356
<v Speaker 1>feel a little bit more personally comfortable with it. And

0:23:29.476 --> 0:23:31.556
<v Speaker 1>so while it's possible that at that time we might

0:23:31.596 --> 0:23:34.196
<v Speaker 1>have to revisit this conversation about can we make people

0:23:34.236 --> 0:23:36.636
<v Speaker 1>get it, I don't think it does the effort any

0:23:36.676 --> 0:23:39.116
<v Speaker 1>good to go there now. We don't need to do it,

0:23:39.156 --> 0:23:41.476
<v Speaker 1>and it's just going to foment the concerns that are

0:23:41.556 --> 0:23:46.236
<v Speaker 1>causing a problem. I hear the pragmatics behind what you're saying.

0:23:46.636 --> 0:23:49.796
<v Speaker 1>If you and I are you with other journalists have

0:23:49.876 --> 0:23:53.396
<v Speaker 1>conversations about the ethics of coercion by the government or

0:23:53.436 --> 0:23:56.396
<v Speaker 1>by private employers, as you say, that will just rile

0:23:56.556 --> 0:24:00.076
<v Speaker 1>up the opponents. So I get it. What I wonder, though,

0:24:00.436 --> 0:24:02.916
<v Speaker 1>is whether it might not be a mistake not to

0:24:02.956 --> 0:24:05.996
<v Speaker 1>start talking about it now for the following reason. I

0:24:06.076 --> 0:24:09.876
<v Speaker 1>take it that one of the big differences between eighty

0:24:09.956 --> 0:24:12.636
<v Speaker 1>or ninety percent of the population getting a vaccine and

0:24:13.036 --> 0:24:15.756
<v Speaker 1>fifty or sixty percent getting a vaccine, even a very

0:24:15.756 --> 0:24:22.556
<v Speaker 1>effective vaccine is whether COVID nineteen is eliminated altogether, or

0:24:22.596 --> 0:24:29.236
<v Speaker 1>whether it becomes a recurring but relatively low likelihood disease

0:24:29.316 --> 0:24:34.436
<v Speaker 1>that's out there. It's still circulating and flares up every

0:24:34.516 --> 0:24:37.876
<v Speaker 1>so often and kills of you know, a handful of

0:24:37.916 --> 0:24:41.196
<v Speaker 1>people here there or in the other place. And that

0:24:41.356 --> 0:24:43.316
<v Speaker 1>that does seem to be a huge difference. And I

0:24:43.676 --> 0:24:46.636
<v Speaker 1>wonder if maybe we would do ourselves a disservice by

0:24:46.676 --> 0:24:51.196
<v Speaker 1>not laying out the case now for actually eliminating the

0:24:51.276 --> 0:24:55.396
<v Speaker 1>disease the way that smallpox was, at least in principle eliminated.

0:24:56.036 --> 0:24:58.156
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not that it's not worth thinking about,

0:24:58.236 --> 0:24:59.996
<v Speaker 1>and I think people have thought about it. I've written

0:25:00.036 --> 0:25:02.196
<v Speaker 1>about it, you know, I've written a list of trigger

0:25:02.276 --> 0:25:04.276
<v Speaker 1>criteria that I think would have to be satisfied in

0:25:04.356 --> 0:25:06.796
<v Speaker 1>order for us to be able to justify a mandate

0:25:06.836 --> 0:25:09.556
<v Speaker 1>for adults. And only you know certain adults. What kinds

0:25:09.556 --> 0:25:12.156
<v Speaker 1>of criteria are in your trigger list, Christia? Number one

0:25:12.236 --> 0:25:14.796
<v Speaker 1>is you tried the voluntary thing and it didn't work right.

0:25:15.436 --> 0:25:17.516
<v Speaker 1>And not only did you try it, you set up

0:25:17.596 --> 0:25:21.276
<v Speaker 1>a vaccination program that has a high likelihood of success,

0:25:21.436 --> 0:25:24.436
<v Speaker 1>meaning that you have the vaccine is free, and it

0:25:24.516 --> 0:25:26.876
<v Speaker 1>is brought to people where they can access it physically

0:25:26.956 --> 0:25:30.556
<v Speaker 1>and logistically, and there is a compensation program in place

0:25:30.596 --> 0:25:33.516
<v Speaker 1>for healthcare workers who are injured by the vaccine, and

0:25:33.636 --> 0:25:35.756
<v Speaker 1>you know, and others who are as a practical matter

0:25:35.796 --> 0:25:38.476
<v Speaker 1>required to have it who are injured. And then beyond that,

0:25:38.556 --> 0:25:41.596
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's an assessment that that program, having run

0:25:41.636 --> 0:25:43.556
<v Speaker 1>for a limited period of time, has not produced the

0:25:43.836 --> 0:25:47.636
<v Speaker 1>necessary levels of population immunity. And there are certain other

0:25:47.836 --> 0:25:51.636
<v Speaker 1>criterion places as well, like transparent communication with the public,

0:25:52.156 --> 0:25:55.916
<v Speaker 1>sufficient supply of vaccine, and so forth. I think it'll

0:25:55.956 --> 0:25:58.916
<v Speaker 1>be really interesting to see where Donald Trump himself comes

0:25:58.916 --> 0:26:02.796
<v Speaker 1>down on this. So far, because the vaccine was developed

0:26:02.796 --> 0:26:05.516
<v Speaker 1>while he was president, he seems eager to take credit

0:26:05.516 --> 0:26:08.236
<v Speaker 1>for it. Just recently. There was a big public to

0:26:08.276 --> 0:26:11.396
<v Speaker 1>do when the vice president was vaccinated, and so if

0:26:11.396 --> 0:26:15.556
<v Speaker 1>the president, when he's no longer president, continues that narrative,

0:26:16.236 --> 0:26:18.836
<v Speaker 1>that might be a plus from the standpoint of convincing

0:26:19.316 --> 0:26:22.796
<v Speaker 1>people who follow him to be vaccinated. There is of course,

0:26:22.836 --> 0:26:25.756
<v Speaker 1>always some danger with Donald Trump that he'll flip and say,

0:26:25.796 --> 0:26:27.516
<v Speaker 1>you know, the vaccine was great when I was president,

0:26:27.516 --> 0:26:29.196
<v Speaker 1>but now that I'm not president. There's reasons to be

0:26:29.276 --> 0:26:32.196
<v Speaker 1>skeptical about how it's being implemented, and therefore my followers

0:26:32.476 --> 0:26:34.796
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't take it. I mean, I pray that he doesn't

0:26:34.796 --> 0:26:36.476
<v Speaker 1>do that, but you know, you can never say never

0:26:36.516 --> 0:26:39.236
<v Speaker 1>with Donald Trump. Do you have some sense of how

0:26:39.236 --> 0:26:40.836
<v Speaker 1>the politics that are going to play out? I mean,

0:26:40.876 --> 0:26:43.916
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that there is now a meaningful component of

0:26:43.996 --> 0:26:46.796
<v Speaker 1>right wing anti vaxxers to go alongside with left wing

0:26:46.796 --> 0:26:49.836
<v Speaker 1>anti vaxers. Yeah, I do think it would be helpful.

0:26:49.876 --> 0:26:52.716
<v Speaker 1>They have more key opinion leaders in the Republican Party,

0:26:52.756 --> 0:26:55.716
<v Speaker 1>including the President, talking not only about the vaccine, but

0:26:55.756 --> 0:26:59.236
<v Speaker 1>about vaccination. And to me, the President's actually being curiously

0:26:59.316 --> 0:27:02.276
<v Speaker 1>muted on this point. Given the magnitude of the achievement

0:27:02.316 --> 0:27:06.076
<v Speaker 1>of his Operation Warp Speed, you'd think he'd want to

0:27:06.076 --> 0:27:08.596
<v Speaker 1>take credit for getting the vaccine into people, not just

0:27:08.636 --> 0:27:11.076
<v Speaker 1>to get it through the FDA. Well, that's what I'm

0:27:11.116 --> 0:27:13.116
<v Speaker 1>worried about. I mean, I'm worried that, as is always

0:27:13.116 --> 0:27:15.396
<v Speaker 1>the case the Trump he's keeping his options open, and

0:27:15.436 --> 0:27:17.196
<v Speaker 1>that if he thinks that his base is going to

0:27:17.236 --> 0:27:19.956
<v Speaker 1>be anti vax then he doesn't want to be too

0:27:20.036 --> 0:27:22.636
<v Speaker 1>connected to the vaccine, and that's why he sent out

0:27:22.676 --> 0:27:24.636
<v Speaker 1>Mike Pence and didn't have the picture of himself being

0:27:24.676 --> 0:27:26.756
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated apart from the fact that he's already been infected.

0:27:26.956 --> 0:27:29.716
<v Speaker 1>So I think what's more, much more helpful is, for example,

0:27:29.756 --> 0:27:33.676
<v Speaker 1>what Mitch McConnell said recently about vaccination, which is, you know,

0:27:33.796 --> 0:27:36.316
<v Speaker 1>first of all going to do it, Secondly you should

0:27:36.356 --> 0:27:38.116
<v Speaker 1>do it too, and third you know, we all kind

0:27:38.116 --> 0:27:40.116
<v Speaker 1>of owe this to one another. And it's not a

0:27:40.156 --> 0:27:42.916
<v Speaker 1>difficult message for those on the right to say to people, Look,

0:27:42.956 --> 0:27:45.476
<v Speaker 1>you don't like the economy being shut down, you don't

0:27:45.476 --> 0:27:48.316
<v Speaker 1>like being told to stay home. There's a fix, now,

0:27:48.756 --> 0:27:52.036
<v Speaker 1>do it. I want to close with that question of

0:27:52.116 --> 0:27:55.116
<v Speaker 1>communal responsibility and what we owe to one another with

0:27:55.156 --> 0:27:58.116
<v Speaker 1>respect to a vaccine, because we have a tendency to

0:27:58.156 --> 0:28:01.676
<v Speaker 1>think about issues of government coercion solely in terms of

0:28:01.716 --> 0:28:06.156
<v Speaker 1>the individual's right to resist a government mandate, and to

0:28:06.236 --> 0:28:09.396
<v Speaker 1>forget that when it comes to vaccines, the mandate isn't

0:28:09.436 --> 0:28:11.636
<v Speaker 1>just that the government wants you to be healthy, but

0:28:11.716 --> 0:28:14.556
<v Speaker 1>that the government doesn't want you to infect others, and

0:28:14.596 --> 0:28:18.476
<v Speaker 1>that the presence of disease in a population has generally

0:28:18.476 --> 0:28:22.156
<v Speaker 1>harmful effects. Because even a vaccine that's ninety five percent efficacious.

0:28:22.236 --> 0:28:24.636
<v Speaker 1>That means that you know, one in twenty people who

0:28:24.756 --> 0:28:29.156
<v Speaker 1>have the vaccine could still potentially be infected under the

0:28:29.236 --> 0:28:32.116
<v Speaker 1>right set of circumstances. So when you think about the

0:28:32.156 --> 0:28:36.436
<v Speaker 1>ethics of vaccination, do you start with the collective or

0:28:36.436 --> 0:28:39.236
<v Speaker 1>do you start with the individual? I do start with

0:28:39.316 --> 0:28:42.276
<v Speaker 1>the collective, because that is the purpose of vaccinations. That

0:28:42.356 --> 0:28:45.636
<v Speaker 1>it is to produce true heard immunity, not the kind

0:28:45.716 --> 0:28:48.396
<v Speaker 1>where we let everybody get infected and hope for the best,

0:28:48.436 --> 0:28:51.236
<v Speaker 1>but the kind where your body is trained to become

0:28:51.276 --> 0:28:54.076
<v Speaker 1>immune to the virus. That's what the purpose of vaccines is.

0:28:54.156 --> 0:28:58.676
<v Speaker 1>And and no vaccination or you know, outside extraordinarily high

0:28:58.756 --> 0:29:03.316
<v Speaker 1>risk context, is ever an individually rational decision. You know,

0:29:03.356 --> 0:29:07.636
<v Speaker 1>all vaccines have risks of some side effects. For most diseases,

0:29:07.676 --> 0:29:09.876
<v Speaker 1>we've more or less wiped them out as long as

0:29:09.916 --> 0:29:12.436
<v Speaker 1>everybody stays vaccinated. So for any one of us, it

0:29:12.516 --> 0:29:14.676
<v Speaker 1>makes more sense not to get vaccinated than to get

0:29:14.756 --> 0:29:17.756
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated from a risk benefit standpoint. But we do it

0:29:17.836 --> 0:29:21.156
<v Speaker 1>because we know, like any collective action problem, if everybody

0:29:21.196 --> 0:29:23.836
<v Speaker 1>acted that way, we'd all be worse off because the

0:29:23.916 --> 0:29:26.836
<v Speaker 1>disease would search And we know that it happens over

0:29:26.996 --> 0:29:30.196
<v Speaker 1>and over again. When we have dips in coverage for

0:29:30.476 --> 0:29:34.796
<v Speaker 1>diseases like measles, mumps, and pertusses, we see outbreaks every year.

0:29:35.516 --> 0:29:37.916
<v Speaker 1>So that's the way we have to think about it,

0:29:37.956 --> 0:29:41.156
<v Speaker 1>is that every individual is doing their part to maintain

0:29:41.196 --> 0:29:44.676
<v Speaker 1>this collective good. That we all benefit enormously from the

0:29:44.676 --> 0:29:46.796
<v Speaker 1>collective good, albeit in ways that, as you said, are

0:29:46.876 --> 0:29:50.916
<v Speaker 1>usually invisible. Now, where does individual liberty come into this.

0:29:51.916 --> 0:29:54.796
<v Speaker 1>The courts, as you know, have been very clear that

0:29:54.836 --> 0:29:57.716
<v Speaker 1>the reasons that people can opt out of mandated vaccinations

0:29:57.756 --> 0:30:00.636
<v Speaker 1>are pretty narrow. There's no question that a valid medical

0:30:00.676 --> 0:30:04.676
<v Speaker 1>condraindication is a valid reason to opt out. Religious bases

0:30:04.716 --> 0:30:07.996
<v Speaker 1>for opting out are tougher. The Supreme Court has never

0:30:08.036 --> 0:30:10.956
<v Speaker 1>held that states a acquired to offer that many states

0:30:11.036 --> 0:30:14.756
<v Speaker 1>choose to do it, but increasingly they're choosing to restrict those.

0:30:15.076 --> 0:30:18.316
<v Speaker 1>And then there are these other sort of philosophical reasons

0:30:18.356 --> 0:30:21.276
<v Speaker 1>why people object to vaccines, which is maybe the most

0:30:21.316 --> 0:30:25.276
<v Speaker 1>trenchant avenue to focus on in this context, because although

0:30:25.276 --> 0:30:27.676
<v Speaker 1>we've heard a lot about certain religious communities, and during

0:30:27.676 --> 0:30:30.916
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen, it's actually pretty hard to find a religious

0:30:31.036 --> 0:30:35.876
<v Speaker 1>faith then rejects vaccines outright. They tend to when you

0:30:35.916 --> 0:30:38.036
<v Speaker 1>sort of scratch below the surface, most of those religious

0:30:38.036 --> 0:30:40.356
<v Speaker 1>beliefs are more a set of philosophical beliefs about the

0:30:40.356 --> 0:30:44.196
<v Speaker 1>body and about the spirit and the body healing itself.

0:30:44.196 --> 0:30:46.076
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't tend to be connected to what the courts

0:30:46.116 --> 0:30:49.476
<v Speaker 1>think about as religions. So the liberties that are being

0:30:49.476 --> 0:30:52.956
<v Speaker 1>implicated here are mostly of this last variety here, of

0:30:53.036 --> 0:30:55.476
<v Speaker 1>this idea that simply I just don't believe in vaccines

0:30:55.596 --> 0:30:58.116
<v Speaker 1>or I just don't want it, and for a disease

0:30:58.156 --> 0:31:00.716
<v Speaker 1>like COVID or any of the other even more serious

0:31:00.716 --> 0:31:04.396
<v Speaker 1>diseases for which we require vaccinations, it's just really hard

0:31:04.436 --> 0:31:08.716
<v Speaker 1>to square that as a weighty interest against what's at

0:31:08.756 --> 0:31:11.636
<v Speaker 1>stake here. On the whole, I think the story you're

0:31:11.636 --> 0:31:14.956
<v Speaker 1>telling is a relatively optimistic one, and I'm grateful for that.

0:31:15.036 --> 0:31:19.996
<v Speaker 1>This might be the first genuinely optimistic COVID related episode

0:31:19.996 --> 0:31:21.836
<v Speaker 1>of a deep background that we've had in the last

0:31:22.156 --> 0:31:24.316
<v Speaker 1>nine or ten months. But at the same time, you

0:31:24.316 --> 0:31:26.436
<v Speaker 1>gave us a very realistic account of what the ongoing

0:31:26.476 --> 0:31:28.596
<v Speaker 1>challenges are. So thank you very much for that, and

0:31:28.676 --> 0:31:30.436
<v Speaker 1>thank you for your time, and thank you for the

0:31:30.436 --> 0:31:32.716
<v Speaker 1>amazing work you're doing. Thanks very much for having me

0:31:39.356 --> 0:31:43.396
<v Speaker 1>listening to Professor Mellow made me realize that things are

0:31:43.396 --> 0:31:46.196
<v Speaker 1>both simpler and more complicated when it comes to the

0:31:46.236 --> 0:31:50.636
<v Speaker 1>distribution and implementation of the COVID vaccines than I had

0:31:50.676 --> 0:31:55.076
<v Speaker 1>previously thought. In a sense, they're simpler because the frameworks

0:31:55.156 --> 0:31:59.436
<v Speaker 1>expressed by the National Academy of Medicine are mostly being

0:31:59.596 --> 0:32:03.316
<v Speaker 1>followed by most of the states, and they're does not

0:32:03.476 --> 0:32:06.796
<v Speaker 1>seem to be at least thus far, any major public

0:32:06.796 --> 0:32:11.276
<v Speaker 1>outcry objecting to them. They're more complicated because the values

0:32:11.316 --> 0:32:15.236
<v Speaker 1>and principles laid out in those standards are actually pretty

0:32:15.476 --> 0:32:19.356
<v Speaker 1>under specific with respect to what to do in situations

0:32:19.356 --> 0:32:24.236
<v Speaker 1>of conflict. The values expressed are all wonderful values, but

0:32:24.276 --> 0:32:27.436
<v Speaker 1>if you really drill down, there probably would be tensions

0:32:27.476 --> 0:32:30.156
<v Speaker 1>between them. But it may well be that no one

0:32:30.196 --> 0:32:34.716
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally objects to the process by which vaccines are being distributed,

0:32:34.956 --> 0:32:37.956
<v Speaker 1>and that enough vaccine may soon be available that people

0:32:37.996 --> 0:32:40.996
<v Speaker 1>who want to get the vaccine can get their hands

0:32:41.036 --> 0:32:44.636
<v Speaker 1>on it. If we don't have a moment of shortage,

0:32:44.996 --> 0:32:48.836
<v Speaker 1>then there need not be any intense public debate over

0:32:48.876 --> 0:32:52.636
<v Speaker 1>the question of who gets the vaccine first. That, of

0:32:52.636 --> 0:32:55.076
<v Speaker 1>course leads to the question of what will happen when

0:32:55.196 --> 0:32:58.516
<v Speaker 1>lots of people have gotten the vaccine and some begin

0:32:58.596 --> 0:33:01.116
<v Speaker 1>to say that they don't want to take it. And

0:33:01.236 --> 0:33:05.436
<v Speaker 1>here Professor Mellow's view is, let's not worry about that

0:33:05.516 --> 0:33:08.916
<v Speaker 1>problem yet. Let's focus in the short term on getting

0:33:08.916 --> 0:33:11.916
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine to as many people as possible and encouraging

0:33:11.916 --> 0:33:14.196
<v Speaker 1>people to take it. And then if we get into

0:33:14.236 --> 0:33:19.196
<v Speaker 1>circumstances where the government or schools or private actors want

0:33:19.236 --> 0:33:22.396
<v Speaker 1>to obligate people to have vaccines, we will deal with

0:33:22.436 --> 0:33:25.396
<v Speaker 1>that problem when we come to it. That's a highly

0:33:25.556 --> 0:33:29.236
<v Speaker 1>sensible attitude, and I promise that if and when the

0:33:29.316 --> 0:33:32.956
<v Speaker 1>question of coercing people to get vaccines does arise, we

0:33:33.036 --> 0:33:38.356
<v Speaker 1>will revisit the issue. Here on Deep Background. We at

0:33:38.356 --> 0:33:41.556
<v Speaker 1>Deep Background are going to take a short holiday break now,

0:33:41.716 --> 0:33:45.156
<v Speaker 1>and we hope you'll be able to also until I

0:33:45.196 --> 0:33:48.996
<v Speaker 1>speak to you next time. Get some rest, Be careful,

0:33:49.516 --> 0:33:53.956
<v Speaker 1>be safe, and be well. Deep Background is brought to

0:33:53.956 --> 0:33:57.596
<v Speaker 1>you by Pushkin Industries. Our producer is Lydia Gencott, our

0:33:57.636 --> 0:34:01.476
<v Speaker 1>engineer is Martin Gonzalez, and our showrunner is Sophie Crane mckibbeck.

0:34:01.716 --> 0:34:04.876
<v Speaker 1>Theme music by Luis Kara at Pushkin. Thanks to Mia

0:34:04.916 --> 0:34:08.836
<v Speaker 1>Lobell Julia Barton, Heather Fain, Carlie mcgliori, Mackie Taylor, Eric

0:34:09.356 --> 0:34:11.996
<v Speaker 1>and Jacob Weisberg. You can find me on Twitter at

0:34:12.076 --> 0:34:15.236
<v Speaker 1>Noah Rfeld. I also write a column for Bloomberg Opinion,

0:34:15.356 --> 0:34:18.556
<v Speaker 1>which you can find at bloomberg dot com slashfeld. To

0:34:18.636 --> 0:34:22.076
<v Speaker 1>discover Bloomberg's original slate of podcasts, go to Bloomberg dot

0:34:22.076 --> 0:34:25.556
<v Speaker 1>com slash podcasts, and if you liked what you heard today,

0:34:25.596 --> 0:34:28.316
<v Speaker 1>please write a review or tell a friend. This is

0:34:28.356 --> 0:34:29.116
<v Speaker 1>deep background