WEBVTT - Horse Barn: HVAC, Windsurf, Vanguard

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited with for today's episode. I'm only really excited to

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 2>talk about search funds if I'm being honest, because.

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to get straight into you your future as

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>an h VAC tech.

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 2>I was reading this article as a guide, you know, right.

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 1>The appeal to the search fund is that, like, who

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>among us hasn't wanted to own a lucrative HVAC business

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey?

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Just run into the swamps of New Jersey and get

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 2>into waste management. Wait, that's a different thing. It is similar,

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry about Yeah, right right, right, right, right, right right.

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the Money Stuff Podcast, your weekly

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast where we talk about stuff related to money. I'm

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt Levien, and I write the Money Stuff column.

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>For Bloomberg Opinion, and I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News and an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't that be a great story, though, if you're like

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>some twenty eight year old Harvard MBA and you're like,

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna start a search fund, and you scour the

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>earth and you send cold emails to a bunch of

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>people and you end up getting into the waste management

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>business in New Jersey, and you're like, oh great, now

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I can be my own boss and like run this

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>licrative business. And then like the mob shows up.

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, surprise, Yeah, now you have you have many bosses,

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:33.199
<v Speaker 2>and they'll kill you. I'd never heard of search funds before,

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 2>even as a dedicated money stuff reader. I guess I

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>never absorbed it, but I was so charmed by this piece.

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 2>This is probably the longest article I've read in a

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 2>long time, but I wrote it start to finish in

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Business Insider.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, there's a Business Insider story about search funds. I

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>love search funds so much because search funds are like

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>if you get a business degree from a fancy school,

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the highest calling could be running a duct cleaning business,

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 1>or I always say pest control. Like pest control to

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>me is the archetypal search fund. I don't know if

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it's actually that common search fund use, but basically, right,

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a search fund is like you go to business school,

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you graduate, you raise a like six or seven figure

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>fund from investors. The investors, I think are often like

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>your family, but sometimes are professional investors. Because the returns

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on search ones are really good. And then you go

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>out and search for years to find a boring small

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:40.119
<v Speaker 1>business who's somewhat aging owner is looking to get out

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>of the business and sell to some young whipper snapper,

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and then you buy it and then you run it,

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and you use the tips and tricks that you learned

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in your two years of business school to like optimize it,

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and you're like a little private equity king pin. Except

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>instead of being like an associated a big private equity

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>fund is just you. And instead of like rolling up

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a giant business, you like buy one pest control company

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and then you run the pest control company.

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 2>It's so good, it is so charming. And I mean

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 2>reading this Business Insider article, Okay, so it's told through

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the lens of this man, Dan Schweber, I believe his

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 2>name is. And I mean I thought that I deal

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of rejection as a journalist. Being a

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 2>search fund founder, what do you call them? Just a

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 2>search fundor a searcher. Being a searcher sounds absolutely grueling

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 2>in terms of dealing with the word no. By the

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 2>end of it, he sent thirty six hundred initial emails,

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and seventy five introductory calls, just thirty intro

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 2>meetings and six signed letters of intent and this business

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 2>that he ended up buying, which is an HVAC company.

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 2>He emailed the guy twelve times, as you pointed out

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>in your column, And I don't think I've ever made

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 2>it to the twelve email. But I don't think I've

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 2>sent twelve emails to the same person pitching them, which

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 2>is I don't know. It was inspiring. It was inspiring

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 2>on so many different levels, Matt.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>How persistence pays off by getting you an HVAC.

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Company exactly, but just sends a dozen emails. Maybe I

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 2>can own an HVAC company.

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>What I love about it is that this was a

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of novel idea at some point, you know, twenty

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and it has now really like pervaded the

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>top business schools, so that a lot of people are

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>doing this, which means that if you run an h

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>BAC company, you are constantly, constantly getting cold emails from

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>searchers and so like. Of course you had to email

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I twelve times because the guy who was like, ah

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>more search funds.

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is.

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Such an amazing time to be in an unglamorous business

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>because there are so many people with MBAs who want

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>your glamorous business. Right. A lot of them are searchers,

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>but some of them are like private equity funds doing

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>roll ups of like pest control or whatever. Right, Like,

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of buyers to choose from if

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 1>you happen to own an HVAC company. And I don't know,

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just so strange to me to think, like, you're

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>a plumber, you like work in plumbing for twenty years,

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you start your own plumbing company, you like go around

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>doing plumbing, and then like you occasionally check your email

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's like four hundred emails from private equity firms

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and MBAs. It's just like a strange dynamic.

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a seller's market. I wish I had a plumbing

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 2>company to.

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Sell, right, And Like, one thing I wondered about is like,

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>if you are a search funder and you buy yourself

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a plumbing company in a year, do you flip it

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to another search funder, because like the demand keeps growing.

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I do want to talk about that how you exit

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 2>it as a searcher. But you seemed charmed by particular

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 2>from getting into the shoes of the man who owned

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 2>this HVAC company. The article also got into the shoes

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 2>of the employees who worked there. I think that's another

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 2>interesting level. Like, Okay, the founder and owner of the

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 2>business is getting a bunch of emails. How do the

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 2>employees react when you tell them this thirty two year

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>old now owns the business and you work for him

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 2>and he's the CEO, and you know he's some Harvard MBA.

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, here's how I think about this. I think in

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the olden days, people would start businesses and they would

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>be like, you know, high school educated, like you know,

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>they start a business because like they're just scrappy entrepreneurs,

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>and then they would run the business for a while.

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>They'd have employees, and they would have like a kid,

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and they'd be like, well, of course the kid is

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>going to take over the family business. But because they're

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>rich now, instead of like the kid just like you know,

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>starting at the family business. After high school, they send

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the kid to Harvard Business School and the kid gets

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>all these like new fangled business ideas and he comes

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>back at age twenty eight and he's like, I'm going

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to take over the family business and run it in

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a modern way, and like, you know that's good, right,

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Like you have like the scrappy founder, and then you

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 1>have the next generations like professional and educated. But the

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>chain has been broken. So now like the founder gets

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>rich and the kids are like, well, I don't want

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to work at the family h fact business sounds terrible, right,

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>So the kids go off and like become documentary filmmakers.

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 1>And meanwhile, like, it's really hard to get into Harvard

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Business School now, So you can't just get into Harvard

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Business School by being the like shiftless child of an

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>h back founder. But all the people in Harvard Business School,

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's still a demand for Harvard MBAs to

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>run h back companies. So now instead of it like

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>being the kid of the founder, it's just like some

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>random person who happened to get a Harvard MBA and

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>now wants to run the you know, hvac business in Peoria.

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's disaggregated the like family you know family family air. Yeah,

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>instead of like the son taking over the family business

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>with his fancy Harvard degree, it's like some random person

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>takes over the family business with his fancy Harvard degree.

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's like still kind of the same.

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like the employees still have to work for a

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty two year old who hasn't marked the back. You know,

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like it all makes a kind of sense. It's

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>just become more like coldly logical and market driven.

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Something that I kept thinking about while reading this article

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 2>for some reason, a meme that keeps popping into my

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 2>various algorithm is, you know, a cartoon guy hand in

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 2>his face in the middle of the circle, and it's like,

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I meet a girl. Her dad owns like a twenty

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 2>million dollar a year, like waste management company or pest

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 2>control or something, but he doesn't want to like hand

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 2>the keys to his ambitious future son in law, and

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 2>then we stop talking, which it would be a lot

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 2>funnier if I could show the meme, but I promise

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 2>it's funny, but it kind of reminded me of this

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 2>sure anyway, I thought also it was interesting. You know,

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 2>this article described it as a phenomenon happening around like

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 2>late twenty year old and like graduates in their thirties,

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 2>and I think it speaks to something about millennial culture,

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 2>that there is that desire to run into the woods

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 2>or go to Peoria and run an HVAC company, versus

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 2>stay in a city and try to climb the corporate ladder.

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Like this probably happens with every single generation, but it

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 2>does feel like it speaks to some sort of disillusionment.

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know. You think about like what you

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>can do with your MBA, right, Like if you're a

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of corporate type, like you can go work in

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>private equity, and you can start by building models and

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>doing kind of grunt work, and your hope is that

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in ten or fifteen years you'll be you know, kind

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>of leading big deals and sitting on boards of companies

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and kind of running portfolio companies. Or you can just

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 1>do deals and run companies yourself immediately, with the trade

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>off being that those companies are small pest control companies

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in Peoria. But like maybe that's good trade, right, Like

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe you want that trade, right, Like I am sure

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that in like ten years you'll be reading about people

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 1>who started as search funders and bought like one HVAC

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>company and then bought another HVAC company and then became

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>like billionaire private equity kingpins by like doing roll ups

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of their industries. There's kind of two paths to that outcome, right,

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>There's like the outcome of being a private equity associated

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and there's the outcome of taking over an HVAC company.

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And I bet the second path is more we're likely

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to get you to the billionaire Kington outcome at this

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>point than like being a private equity associate.

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think you have to have some ridiculous amount

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 2>of just self confidence or real earned ego to think

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 2>like I'm going to go in and I am going

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 2>to ceo this small company, like it hasn't been ceoed before.

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's here like a little bit more confident, a

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit more risk taking. You're not like just following

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the expected prestigious path of going to a private equity

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>fram and you're like, I'm going to strike out on

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>my own and see what happens. Well, you know, it's

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting because like also in ten years, this will be

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>such a like well trodden path, you know, they'll be

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like incubators for search funds and like it'll be so

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>standardized that it won't be like particularly entrepreneurial and risky anymore.

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>But right now it's still a little entrepreneurial and risky.

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 2>So you're saying I should get it now, is what

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm hearing.

0:10:58.080 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know I was gonna say you should have

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>gotten in five years ago. I have no idea what

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the market is like. I think you shouldn't get in

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 1>ten years.

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, get really pandemic.

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I think this is great. I feel like we've had

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a number of like career ideas for each other during

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the course of this podcast. But you like taking you

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>raising money from friends and family to take over an

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>HHAC company. I like it. I didn't know that you

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>had such an intense interest in HPAC.

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm not specifically h we're using a horse barn, but yes,

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 2>that's the thing.

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that works. I think like the

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>whole point of this is that you're taking over like

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 1>non glamorous family businesses from like aging founders who don't

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>want to do it anymore, not like people's like delightful

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>lifestyle businesses.

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 2>But there's there's plenty of people who would think that

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 2>a barn is un glamorous.

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Do any of them own barns?

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 2>No, they don't.

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>It's your problem. You have to buy the barn from

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>someone who runs the barn. I don't know.

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm reading this have like a renewed I'm reinvigorated, and

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, I thought I wanted to be a podcaster

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 2>or I did that, It's okay. I wanted to be

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 2>a novelist, still working on that, but I think that

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 2>what I really want to be is a searcher. I've

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 2>always wanted to buy a trissage barn, but now I

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 2>have a fancy, not yet saturated sort of term to

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 2>apply to it.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean that is really like. The thing about

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the Search Funding is like it's given people a set

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of concepts to sort of standardize and think about and

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>justify this thing of like I want to buy an

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>existing small business and run it according to my own

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you know ideas. I think like a while ago, if

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you're in business school and you're like, I want to

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>run an HVAC company, people would be like, that's a

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>strange thing to want to do with your forward MBA,

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Whereas now it's like totally standardized. I was like, oh,

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of course the Search fund. And similarly, I feel like

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be like season two of the

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast is going to be You're going to go to

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>investor meetings. We're going to record them. People are going

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to be like, of course, here's a million dollars you're

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>going to people. I think send every horse barn in

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>America at.

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Least twelve at least twelve. If anyone listening right now.

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>You own cold email, you'll show up on a horse.

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 2>That's true, and they'll know I'm the real deal. They won't.

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, That's like one thing in this h RAG article

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is like, you know, the guy who owned the h

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>RAG company was like, all these search funders emailed me

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, all right, come out and they're like,

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>let me check my schedule. But this guy and the

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>guy who bought the company from him, I was like,

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll be there tomorrow, right, You're going to show your

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasm by like showing up on a horse.

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 2>That's the other thing I found charming is that it's

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 2>just like old fashioned sort of you know, I'm going

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 2>to come up and meet you in person. I'm going

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 2>to shake your hand and I'm going to look you

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 2>in the eye. And that has a lot of currency

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 2>with the people who are selling these un sexy businesses.

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Right because these are people who have built businesses over

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>years and they are the owner, but they also like

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>work closely with the employees, and they are not just

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>maximizing shareholder value. And if they were to sell to

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a private equity firm that laid off all the employees,

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>they'd be sad and like they live in the community,

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:14.719
<v Speaker 1>they'd be looked down upon. So if they can sell

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to someone who gives them a firm handshake and looks

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:18.719
<v Speaker 1>them in the eye, and so they'll take care of

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>your employee. You know, it's a very family business oriented,

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of tool making environment, and you're not

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>just paying the highest price to maximize shareolder value. You're

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of taking over a business that has lies to

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a community.

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I do want to talk about how Schweber is

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 2>going to get this big payout. The business insider says

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 2>that he's in for so if all of this goes

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 2>according to plan, he's in for a big payout. Of

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 2>the search entrepreneurs who eventually sell their business, just under

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>a quarter of them get nothing. Another twenty seven percent

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 2>get less than four million dollars in equity, twenty eight

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 2>percent get four million dollars to ten million dollars. The

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 2>luckiest eighteen percent get more than ten million dollars. So,

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, after I buy the horse barn, I have

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 2>to stay there and make it better and grow it.

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 2>And then the idea is that I'm going to sell

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 2>it in like a decade and make a big profit.

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine some people go into it thinking like

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to make my life in p area running

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>an HRC company. But you know, most of them are

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>like business school people, and like they're choosing between this

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and private equity, and yeah, they want to do a flip, right.

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>They want to like buy a sleepy family business that

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't you know, optimizing everything, and they want to spruce

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>up the financials and maybe do a few like tuck

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in acquisitions and then sell it to you know, a

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of more scale buyer, sell it to you know,

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>private equity roll up or something for you know, if

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you can buy it at like one time's revenue and

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>sell it at you know, five times revenue, then they

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, make a lot of money.

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 2>And so the investors who.

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, or you retire or something on it.

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Or you become an investor in search funds. Sure, so

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 2>if you invest in a search fund, you're in it

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 2>for the long haul. You're in it until there's a flip.

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know the terms, right, Like you could imagine,

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the investors just getting a share of the

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>cash loough and being happy with never flipping it. But no,

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>most of them want to cash out, and yeah, you're

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in it for a flip, and you know, you say

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the long term. I don't know what the holding periods are.

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>But like you know, again, the sort of alternative to

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>this is private equity funds. And so yeah, you might

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>think I'm going to take over an HVAC company. I'm

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna learn hvac, I'm gonna do some deals. I'm gonna

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>spruce things up that won't take me more than five

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>years until I can flip the company, right Like, it's

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily your family business for the rest of your life.

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 2>I have to imagine a lot of these fail I

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what fail means. I mean, right like,

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>probably some of them, at least of them, they don't

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>scurce them up, and then they get bored and then

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>they're like, I were shutting this down and I'm going

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>back to New York. But right like, you're taking were

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>like a stable business with customers, and you know, you

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>like that, You're not founding a business, right like, your

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>downside is not as bad as if you were founding

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a business from scratch, right you know that this company

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>already has a business and customers and you know, revenue

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and employees, and probably in many cases it could operate

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>on its own that much from you, So you might

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not be able to do a flip. You might like

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>get bored and close it down rather than eke out

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a very small profit for yourself every year. But like

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to lose all your money.

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's true. I mean to your point that they're

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 2>not founding a brand new business. So I was thinking

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 2>about this in terms of, like, you know, maybe these

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 2>smart young people with these big degrees, maybe their brain

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 2>power would better serve the economy by putting that towards

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 2>new ideas.

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Why degrees are not in astrophysics, right, there's there masters

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of business administration, right, they've learned to administer businesses. I

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's like a really good thing for the economy

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>if like the local sort of mid sized businesses get

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>really good business administration, Right, if like the Harvard MBA

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is instead of just going to work in finance, like

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>actually go and work for real companies that do you

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>know HVAC.

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 2>This reminded me, I know these people who there was

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 2>a bed and breakfast for sale in a small Pennsylvania town,

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 2>really charming, and it was an existing business with existing

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 2>customer base who they had a lot of repeat customers

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 2>and the owners were retiring and they bought the business

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 2>and it's going really well.

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>And those people are named.

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 2>Bob and Julia. And Friday is my dad's birthday, So

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 2>happy birthday, Dad, Happy.

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Birthday, Bob. I meant to tell you that I saw someone.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Hold on, that's you, Okay, that is me. I mean

0:18:55.320 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it's your's your home studio. You need to go to

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the ville.

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 2>It's literally a hairball. He's fine, he's fine. Windsurf windsurf

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 2>man buying companies, Yeah, but not really, not really buying

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 2>the company. Well kind of set the scene.

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Windsurf is like an AI coding assistant company, and of

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>course it was in talks to be acquired by open

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Ai for a while. The rumor was that open Eye

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 1>was going to pay three billion dollars to acquire it,

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>which I think means to acquired in the normal way,

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>like buy all the stock of the company. But they

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 1>couldn't get to an agreement on some weird terms, including

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>like sharing the technology with Microsoft. It's open I walked

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>away and then Google did this weird deal where it

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>paid two point four billion dollars to Windsurf for basically

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>like some but not all, of Windsurf's employees. Like basically

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Google was trying to acquire like the top talent from

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Windsurf to feed into the mall of like having AI

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>researchers do AI at Google. And they've got like a

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>non exclusive license to Windserf's product. But it seemed pretty

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>clear that it was a talent acquisition, but they didn't

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>buy the company. They got no stake in the company,

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.360
<v Speaker 1>but the shareholders of the company mostly got cashed out,

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>like the venture capitalists got paid off for their stock.

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>So Google paid for the stock of the company, but

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't acquire the stock of the company. They just got

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the talent and like left of the company on its own.

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And this is kind of a weird outcome, in particular

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 1>for the employees of Windsurf who didn't go over to Google,

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>because they were kind of left in this company that

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 1>had some cash and like a business, but no more

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of its founders. And it's kind of like it loose ends.

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 1>And then a couple of days later, Cognition, another AI company,

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>bought the rest of Windsurf for an unspecified price that

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>might have been just like here, you're gonna have a job,

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and so yeah, that was the deal. It was like

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.479
<v Speaker 1>quite controversial. There'should a lot of the deals kind of

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>like this in the AI space, where you know, you

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>have very big tech companies that want to pay a

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>very large amount of money for AI talent, and the

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>top AI talent often has their own startups, and their

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 1>startups often have the effect of proving that their founders

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>are good at AI stuff but do not have products

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that the big tech companies want. And historically the way

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that ended was the big tech companies would buy the startup,

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>shut down the product that they didn't want, and like

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>give the employees jobs. But that has changed, like that

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>aqui hier model has changed, and I don't quite know why.

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Like the leading theory for why it has changed is

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that in the Biden administration there was a lot of

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>anti trust scrutiny of big tech companies buying even small startups,

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and so they stopped doing aqui hiers and started doing

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>just hires. Yeah, but the other thing that is happening

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 1>is if you're Google or Meta whoever, it's sort of

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>dawning on you, like, well, we don't really have to

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>acquire the company. We just have to pay the founders

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to come work for us. And we have to pay

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>them a lot because they have the startup. I have

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>equity in the startup, so like they have to give

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>up the equity in the startups, we have to pay

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>them a lot. But like, do we need to acquire

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 1>all of the employees. Do we need to pay the

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>vcs the full value of the company or can we

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>just like acquire the founders and like let the rest go.

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of talk about like the social

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 1>contract of startups and vcs being violated by these deals,

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like, so far, actually the social contract

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>holds up pretty well. We're like the vcs who fund

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it Windsurf. You know, they got several times their money, right,

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Like they got rewarded for funding Windsurf, even though I

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 1>think people would say in a sense like the product

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't what's making the money. It's just like the founders

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 1>are going somewhere else is what's making them the money.

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know, and the employees ultimately ended up his jobs,

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>although not at Google, So like the social contract sort

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of held, but it's like it just feels like it's

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit under pressure, where like, you know, the

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>next deal Google could just be like, we're going to

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>pay the founders, you know, a billion dollars each, and

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to cash out of the vcs.

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, reading this and just thinking about similar circumstances, my

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 2>thought was, why don't they just try to poach people

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 2>the normal way? Like why is tech this special, weird

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 2>place where there is acqua hiring, Like why can't they

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 2>just offer the founder one hundred million dollars or something

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 2>like that, similar to what Mark Zuckerberg is doing. Why

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 2>do we have to go through all the hoops of

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, buying the company or doing whatever Google just did.

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that part of it is like you can

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 1>now pay AI researchers one hundred million dollars, but you

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>can't pay them five hundred million dollars because all the

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>other A researchers would be mad. And like if they

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>have a startup, you know, that has raised money at

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:19.479
<v Speaker 1>a four billion dollar valuation and they own you know,

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever they own twenty five they own a billion dollars

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>worth of it, right, you have to lure them away

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>from that startup by giving them a lot of money.

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's not a billion dollars, maybe they don't think

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>it's worth what, you know, what it raised that, but

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to give them something like a billion dollars.

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And the way to do that is to have some

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of M and A like transaction. Right Like, if

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>you're just saying I'm going to give you a salary

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.479
<v Speaker 1>of a billion dollars, that's tough to sell to your

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>other employees. But if you say I'm going to do

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>an M and A transaction that technically doesn't involve buying

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>any of the company, but like there's a licensing deal

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's like an agreement with Windsurf, then you can

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>do a transaction that effectively gives the founders a billion dollars.

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that's part of it. Where Like,

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the going rate for poaching an employee from like open

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Ai to Meta is you know, one hundred million dollars.

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>But the going rate for poaching a founder of a

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>startup that like was valued at a lot of money

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>by a VC, the going rate for that might be

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars. And the only way to pay that

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>is in something that looks like an MNA transaction.

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 2>The other thought I had was that there is still

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 2>some acquihiring going on. If you think about the recent

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 2>example of also Meta with skill AI.

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>These are the same thing, Like these are not quite acquisitions. Yeah,

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they're like state acquisitions, but not one hundred percent acquisitions.

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes they're more like the Windsurf deal where it's

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>like a commercial license and a big payment, but not

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent acquisition.

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 2>I was just thinking about the employees who didn't get

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 2>picked to go to Google, and that's probably a pretty

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.880
<v Speaker 2>lousy feeling, but maybe they're happy a cognition.

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It's like there's this incredible gold rush for AI,

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's incredible variance in people's perceived market value, right,

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Like there are people who are you like, there are

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>people who are multi billionaires because they like were in

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>earlier and AI, and then there are people who are

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>paid like, you know, six hundred thousand dollars a year

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, oh my god, I'm so poor, like

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>like there's a huge range. And some of that is

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the sort of classic startup like were you there at

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the founding of a hot company? But some of it

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>is like people's perceived value to the big tech companies,

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>where like, if you are really really good, a big

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>tech company will pay you, you know, much much, much

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 1>more than one hundred million dollars if they have to.

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And then if you're less good, it's like, yeah, you're

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 1>on salary. It's fine.

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 2>And where we are in the world right now, I mean,

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 2>is this uniquely a tech industry phenomenon and specifically in

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 2>AI industry.

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Phenomenally, Like given in tech people have normal jobs like

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>this is very localized to AI, you know, like they're

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>not these kinds of bidding wars for people who do

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>non AI tech business man.

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 2>If I had any practical skills, I'd be thinking I

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 2>need to be an AI person somehow, But I think

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 2>search fund founder is more realistic.

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 2>You know who else is in the business of buying

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:44.199
<v Speaker 2>up a lot of companies is it's Vanguard. They are

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 2>an index company all the companies. As much as Vanguard

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 2>likes to talk specifically to me and everyone else about

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 2>their you know, active management ambitions, they are huge. That

0:27:56.720 --> 0:28:00.160
<v Speaker 2>means that they own a lot of the shares outstanding

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 2>of a lot of companies, including companies that you might

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 2>not expect I.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Would expect, Wait, can I ask you, are they the

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest total stock market index fund? Oh my god, God

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>runs you know, a big S and P five hundred

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and index fund, and so does everyone else. But like,

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I definitely own some of the Vanguard Total stock Market

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Index fund, which is not the S and P five hundred.

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>It's everything, including small companies and including bigcern treasure companies.

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to find out because I don't want to

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 2>miscall myself, but I think that the Vanguard Total stock

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Market Index fund is the largest. I mean, it's it's

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 2>in the trillions, so I would imagine that that's it.

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So when you say Vanguard owns is one of the

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>biggest sholders of companies, you wouldn't expect. I would expect

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>them to be the big sholder of every single public company.

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what I.

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Would and they are, and they are, including Strategy in.

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Particular, I'd expect them to be one of the biggest

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>holders of every non P five hundred company because like,

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of SMP index funds, but like, yeah,

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard is really into total stock market index ones. But anyway,

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, they're the biggest holder of Strategy micro Strategy

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>now called strategy.

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 2>I guess I did not appreciate that strategy isn't in

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the S and P five hundred, but we're also talking

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 2>about a non S and P five hundred tracking fund.

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Because I don't know, it just feels like increasingly the

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 2>whole world revolves around the S and P five hundred,

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 2>but the Vanguard Total Stock Market funds biggest shareholder of strategy.

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I say that you might not expect it because the

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 2>personality of Vanguard is an asset manager that is deeply,

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 2>deeply skeptical slash repulse by cryptocurrencies.

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I know. This is the thing about running index fund.

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like it doesn't matter what you think, you just

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>buy it. Yeah, It's like a really good, like disciplining mechanism. Right,

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Like you consider that and be like, wow, I think

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>this company is overvalued, but it doesn't matter to buy

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it because you're an index one manager and like that's

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>what people are paying you for, and they're not paying

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you very much. Right, If they're paying you a lot,

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>then you might be like, well, I'm going to short

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>this company because like I think it's overvalued and I'm

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting paid a lot from my wisdom. But

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>they're paying you like two basis points to buy every company,

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>so you buy every company. It's a really good pass.

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 2>The thing that's slightly different here is that Vanguard obviously

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 2>has control over what products that it launches.

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but like it's it's products or index ones.

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 2>I know, I know, but this is a relatively new

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 2>phenomenon where you have equity companies that just hold bitcoin

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 2>and you think about like commodities. For example, Vanguard for

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 2>a long time would not launch a commodities fund. They're

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 2>never going to launch their own cryptocurrency funds. And okay,

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 2>yes they're going to buy every single stock out there,

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 2>but it's a new phenomenon where that means you're also

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 2>buying crypto indirectly.

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, the things I like about it is that

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a little inside baseball but not really. Bloomberg has this

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>like view that you shouldn't own stock in companies that

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you write about. So like I don't own stock in

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, Goldman or Apollo or whatever, but I own

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>index funds they own stock in those companies, and so

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I e right, and like in some ways it would

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>be weird if I didn't. Right, Like to me, like

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I should have my savings in like the global financial portfolio,

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and if I owned like all of the stocks except Goldman,

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>then like in theory, that would create a financial bias

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>against Goldman. I would be like, well, I don't want

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>any of their stock, but I own every other stocks.

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I want their stock to go down relative to the

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>rest of the market. And then like crypto is kind

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of the same, right, Like, you know, we have like

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of rules that you shouldn't own crypto if you're

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>writing about it, but like if I own zero crypto,

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>then I'm sort of biased against crypto, right Like I

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I own like all of these stocks, and

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I want the stocks to go out, but I don't

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>want crypto to go because I don't want any crypto.

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>But now, because on the Vanguard Total Stock Market Fund,

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I own some bitcoin indirectly, but like I have some

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>exposure to bitcoin through strategy, and I think, like more generally,

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>like it is good for ordinary investors to be able

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to get low cost access to like market cap weighted

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>ownership of like the entire global financial portfolio, right like,

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>just as like it's probably good for you to not

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>have to pick which stocks will go up and just

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>buy all the stocks, like you shouldn't even have to

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>like pick like which asset classes will go You just

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>like be able to be like I'm going to buy

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the market right, And you can't really do that that

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not really a thing like people try. It's not

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>really a thing because like, you know, how do you

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>decide how much real estate to have in that? But

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>by smuggling a little bitcoin into your you know, total

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>stock market fund, it means you have like a little

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>bit closer to exposure to the entire financial portfolio. And

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>if you don't like crypto, you'll be mad about that.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you're buying the total stock market fund, your

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>thesis has to be I don't know what I want

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to buy. I have no strong views about which companies

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>will go up, So like you have some bitcoin, why not?

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Occasionally Tom Keane invites me on radio and just

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of bullies me about crypto for a couple of minutes,

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 2>and then I get off air and super I don't

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 2>I would not describe him as pro christ I'm not

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 2>surprised yet he famously calls it bitdog. But in trying

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 2>to make him care, I have tried to make the

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 2>case that you should care because it's probably in your

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 2>retirement account through this sort of indirect exposure, Like your

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 2>fortunes in a small way are tied to bitcoin now, right.

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I would reverse that. I would say that, like, if

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a strong reason to be short crypto,

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you should be long crypto in proportion to it's like

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>weight in the market, right, and like that weight has

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:44.719
<v Speaker 1>gone up a lot in the last ten years, right

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>now trillion dollars. And if you are just like completely

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>on a blank slate, completely agnostic about everything, like your

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>weight should not be zero and now it's in your

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>retirement fund. Great problem solved. I'm not saying you should

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:00.479
<v Speaker 1>buy crypto of like by all means, this is not

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>investing advice, but like you know, I'm just saying, if

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you have no views, like the default weight in your

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.919
<v Speaker 1>portfolio for every asset is not zero. The default weight

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 1>is like it's market weight, right, And so if you're

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>just setting it to defaults, you should have some crypto.

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And the way to have some crypto is either like, ah,

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you go create an account on coinbase, or like you

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>just you know, own a total stock market index one

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that happens to have some crypto.

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:28.879
<v Speaker 2>So you're a marked cap weighted guy.

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:31.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that's the best way to invest. I'm

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:35.839
<v Speaker 1>saying that's the neutral way to invest. I'm saying that,

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>like anything that you do to deviate from like the

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>market cap weighted global financial portfolio, should ideally have every

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>reason ideally not that, not that I you know, follow that.

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just you know, as a theoretical matter, like you

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>should own the market unless you have some reason to

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>think that something else is better.

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 2>And that is investment advice.

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, I don't know how I could get

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>suit over that, but no, it's not investment advice. The

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin treasury companies are interesting in part because they give

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>you away to own crypto if your only investment is

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the total stock market. But more broadly, they're interesting because

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>they are a way for equity investors to own crypto

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:26.879
<v Speaker 1>without owning crypto. And I think that there's a lot

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of demand for that. Some of it is from like Vanguard, Right, Vanguard,

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 1>which let's hypothesize does not want to own crypto, nonetheless

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>owns a lot of micro strategy. It's like that's like

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a good arbitrage, right, Like you have like bitcoin, which

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>like Vanguard doesn't want to buy and you have micro Strategy,

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 1>which Vanguard, against its will does want to buy, and

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 1>so like you can like transport bitcoin into Vanguard and

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>make some money on it. But like, more broadly, I

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>mean there's a lot of like equity investors who for

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:56.799
<v Speaker 1>one reason or another can or want to buy micro

0:35:56.880 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>strategy for bitcoin exposure, can't buy like just bitcoin for

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin exposure. They get an email from one guy saying,

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 1>like my hedge fund, our prime broker will give us

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>sixteen to one leverage on micro strategy, and they'll give

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>us no leverage on I bet like the bitcoin ETF. Right,

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to get exposure to bitcoin, getting

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it in the form of a stock, like a real stock,

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>not an ETF, like a corporate stock. Getting in the

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:26.800
<v Speaker 1>formu of a corporate stock is in many ways preferable

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:29.399
<v Speaker 1>to other forms of owning it. And that's why that's

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>part of why the bitcoin treasury companies often traded a

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.839
<v Speaker 1>premium to their underlying bitcoin, because like there's a whole

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>class of investors who can get crypto that way, but

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>can get it as easily or as efficiently in other forms.

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 2>That's really interesting because after the spot bitcoin ETF's launched,

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of people, perhaps myself, questioned what

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 2>the use case for micro Strategy was.

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the number one answer is index funds. Vanguard's

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:03.280
<v Speaker 1>total stock more good fund does not own ETFs. Yeah,

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it owns companies, and micro Strategy is still a company

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>even though it's a pot of bitcoins. Like that's the

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>number one answer. There are other answers, because like someone

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 1>at some prime brokerage is like, we'll give more leverage

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on corporates than we will on ETFs, even though the

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>corporate is like more volatile than the ATF. But like

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:21.959
<v Speaker 1>the number one answers index ones, and like, yeah, micro

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Strategy is not in the S and P five hundred.

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 1>It wants to be in the SP five hundred. That's

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>like the next that's the next frontier.

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 2>It did make it into the NASTAC one hundred, and

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 2>that's a big d. It was somewhat controversial.

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because like these indexes don't include ETFs, They don't

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 1>include investment vehicles with like rare interesting exceptions, right, Like

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>there's like an argument that Berkshire Hathaway is an investment

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 1>vehicle and like you know and then you I don't

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>if you remember, but friend of the show Bill Ackman

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:52.879
<v Speaker 1>of perching Square Capital Management. Uh, when he.

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:56.359
<v Speaker 2>Found his way into another episode when he was so not.

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:58.959
<v Speaker 1>The bird but the actual Bilackman when he was.

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 2>Trying to trow Yeah.

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I haven't even talked about that long. When he was

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>launching his clothes un fund, he's like, it's going to

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>be in the S and P five hundred. It was

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to be in the S and P five

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred because the S and P five hundred does not

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>include clothes down funds, but it does include Berkshire Hathaway

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's not quite a closed un fund, it's a

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:18.839
<v Speaker 1>company and microshrate is the same deal, right, Like, if

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you're like, I'm going to launch a fund that holds bitcoin,

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>that will not be in the S and P five

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred or even the Nazak one hundred. But if you're like,

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I am a tech company, I'm going to almost exclusively

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>hold bitcoin and talk about it a lot, you can

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 1>be in the S five hundred at least the Nazak

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 1>one hundred, and that's different.

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, that was the controversy around its NASDAQ one hundred.

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 2>NASTACK one hundred does not hold financial companies and it

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:46.839
<v Speaker 2>feels like micro strategy. It was micro strategy at the time,

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 2>like it was sort of grandfathered in because it is

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 2>nominally still a tech company, very nominally.

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're right, that's the arbitrage, right, It's like, we're

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 1>not a financial company, we're not an investment company. We're

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.439
<v Speaker 1>just the tech company that happens own seventy billion dollars

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 1>a bit quin. Yeah, it's a good trade. I'm sorry

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 1>that Bill Lackman caught so many strays at the end

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of this episode.

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 2>It's okay. I don't think he listened to the end

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 2>if you want to say that.

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Like when we mentioned last week that we're going to

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 1>name your bird friend of the show, Bill Lackman, we

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>got approximately twenty emails saying of Perching Square Capital Management.

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people will I know I did that joke,

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and we did not, and I'm sorry.

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 2>But very clever.

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:33.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll do better next time. Perching Square. Yeah, he just

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 1>learned to perch. And that was the Money Stuff podcast.

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Livian and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:47.439
<v Speaker 1>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg dot com.

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 2>And you can find me on Bloomberg TV every day

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 2>on Open Interest between nine to eleven am Eastern.

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net, ask us a

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 1>question and we might answer it on air.

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:07.919
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Ana ma Aserakus

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and Moses onm Our.

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Theme music was composed by Blake Maples and Stage Bauman

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg's head of Podcasts.

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>back next week with more stuff