1 00:00:07,200 --> 00:00:11,760 Speaker 1: Welcome to Strictly Business, Variety's weekly podcast featuring conversations with 2 00:00:11,840 --> 00:00:15,640 Speaker 1: industry leaders about the business of media and entertainment. I'm 3 00:00:15,720 --> 00:00:19,439 Speaker 1: Cynthia Lyttleton, co editor in chief of Variety Today. My 4 00:00:19,520 --> 00:00:23,560 Speaker 1: guest is Scherise Clark Suarez, founder and CEO of Harbor 5 00:00:23,640 --> 00:00:27,040 Speaker 1: View Equity. Clark Suarez is a busy investor who is 6 00:00:27,080 --> 00:00:31,200 Speaker 1: making interesting bets on music, film and television. She's doing 7 00:00:31,240 --> 00:00:34,479 Speaker 1: so at a time of genuine chaos in the traditional business. 8 00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:36,479 Speaker 2: The industry's largest. 9 00:00:36,120 --> 00:00:38,720 Speaker 1: Companies are struggling to turn a profit on film and 10 00:00:38,760 --> 00:00:42,240 Speaker 1: TV production. So what does she see that others don't. 11 00:00:42,760 --> 00:00:45,159 Speaker 1: Clark Suarez has a lot to say about that. In 12 00:00:45,200 --> 00:00:49,120 Speaker 1: our wide ranging interview, she explains the motivation behind her 13 00:00:49,159 --> 00:00:52,600 Speaker 1: recent investment in Charles Kings Macro and in the production 14 00:00:52,720 --> 00:00:56,840 Speaker 1: company Mucho mass Media. She also expects to be busy 15 00:00:56,880 --> 00:01:00,600 Speaker 1: in the coming months as the media metamorphosis can continues 16 00:01:00,880 --> 00:01:04,960 Speaker 1: and bigger companies let go of interesting assets. Clark Suarez 17 00:01:05,040 --> 00:01:08,600 Speaker 1: learned the ropes of private equity, credit markets, and film 18 00:01:08,640 --> 00:01:12,639 Speaker 1: financing during her fifteen years at Morgan Stanley. In twenty 19 00:01:12,680 --> 00:01:16,280 Speaker 1: twenty one, she planted her flag as harbor View Equity. 20 00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:17,200 Speaker 2: In Newark, New Jersey. 21 00:01:17,560 --> 00:01:20,200 Speaker 1: She'll explain how the company has made its mark in 22 00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:21,200 Speaker 1: just a few years. 23 00:01:21,480 --> 00:01:23,120 Speaker 2: Right after this break. 24 00:01:31,560 --> 00:01:34,480 Speaker 1: And we're back with more from harbor View Equity CEO 25 00:01:34,600 --> 00:01:36,480 Speaker 1: Sharise Clark Suarez. 26 00:01:38,800 --> 00:01:40,520 Speaker 3: So nice to be with you. Thank you for having 27 00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:41,560 Speaker 3: me appreciate it. 28 00:01:41,600 --> 00:01:44,520 Speaker 1: Well, harbor View has been on my radar for a while. 29 00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:47,320 Speaker 1: I've seen you've done some deals in the music arena 30 00:01:47,960 --> 00:01:52,120 Speaker 1: and I've noted those with interest. And then what really 31 00:01:52,160 --> 00:01:54,680 Speaker 1: got all my attention because I am an old TV 32 00:01:54,760 --> 00:01:57,440 Speaker 1: geek I have covered television for Variety for a long time, 33 00:01:58,080 --> 00:02:00,560 Speaker 1: and I noted with interest that you you made an 34 00:02:00,600 --> 00:02:05,560 Speaker 1: investment in an interesting company called Mucho Moss and that 35 00:02:05,680 --> 00:02:09,799 Speaker 1: develops a particular kind of content that have After talking 36 00:02:09,840 --> 00:02:11,800 Speaker 1: with you, I know that you really have a strong 37 00:02:12,320 --> 00:02:15,840 Speaker 1: sense about where the media marketplace is going, where there 38 00:02:15,919 --> 00:02:19,000 Speaker 1: are investment opportunities. And so after a few minutes on 39 00:02:19,040 --> 00:02:20,760 Speaker 1: the phone, I was like, we have to take this 40 00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:23,320 Speaker 1: to the podcast. So I'm so glad, thank you for 41 00:02:23,400 --> 00:02:25,880 Speaker 1: making the trek from Newark, where you are based. We 42 00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:28,000 Speaker 1: were just talking about lots of good things going on 43 00:02:28,080 --> 00:02:32,280 Speaker 1: in Newark, a nice example of civic and public and 44 00:02:32,400 --> 00:02:35,920 Speaker 1: private partnership. What a concept. We'll talk a little bit 45 00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:38,200 Speaker 1: about Newark at the end, but let me just let's 46 00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:41,720 Speaker 1: take the thirty thousand foot view and let me ask you, 47 00:02:41,800 --> 00:02:45,919 Speaker 1: as a smaller and independent investment firm. Media companies of 48 00:02:45,960 --> 00:02:48,839 Speaker 1: all sizes are struggling to find the path to old 49 00:02:48,840 --> 00:02:51,399 Speaker 1: fashioned profits that this business used to be known for. 50 00:02:51,919 --> 00:02:54,239 Speaker 1: So what is it that amid all of this chaos 51 00:02:54,280 --> 00:02:56,400 Speaker 1: and all of this tummult, what is it that you 52 00:02:56,600 --> 00:02:59,160 Speaker 1: see that is driving your investment strategy? 53 00:02:59,440 --> 00:03:03,480 Speaker 3: Absolutely well, listen, I think one of the things that's 54 00:03:03,520 --> 00:03:08,400 Speaker 3: central to our value system at Harvard View is really 55 00:03:08,520 --> 00:03:14,080 Speaker 3: about honing in on and identifying where audience is. And 56 00:03:14,120 --> 00:03:16,320 Speaker 3: I think you and I talked about this a little bit, 57 00:03:17,040 --> 00:03:20,360 Speaker 3: but everybody who I talked to the conversation is the same. 58 00:03:20,680 --> 00:03:23,320 Speaker 3: We all have lots of music. We're listening to more 59 00:03:23,400 --> 00:03:26,440 Speaker 3: music than we ever have in our entire lifetime. We 60 00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:29,680 Speaker 3: can all trade notes on all our favorite shows that 61 00:03:29,760 --> 00:03:32,520 Speaker 3: we're watching at nauseum over and over and over again. 62 00:03:33,320 --> 00:03:40,280 Speaker 3: And so the audience experience and demand for nuanced and 63 00:03:40,360 --> 00:03:44,880 Speaker 3: specific content to them for them has not gone away. 64 00:03:44,920 --> 00:03:48,880 Speaker 3: It's only gotten enriched as the way that we experience 65 00:03:48,960 --> 00:03:54,080 Speaker 3: that content has become more and more decentralized. Right, growing up, 66 00:03:54,120 --> 00:03:57,840 Speaker 3: when it was Mussy TV on Thursday night on NBC, 67 00:03:58,120 --> 00:04:00,720 Speaker 3: we all sat down at eight o'clock and watched the 68 00:04:00,760 --> 00:04:03,800 Speaker 3: series of shows that came one after the other. On 69 00:04:03,960 --> 00:04:07,080 Speaker 3: In New York it's NBC Channel four. So that was 70 00:04:07,160 --> 00:04:10,920 Speaker 3: much more of a top down push to everybody believing 71 00:04:11,040 --> 00:04:17,840 Speaker 3: in and buying into a centralized IP theme. Today, audiences 72 00:04:18,320 --> 00:04:21,960 Speaker 3: can make much more nuanced and specific choices based on 73 00:04:22,040 --> 00:04:26,720 Speaker 3: the way that technology platforms exist, Its streaming platforms exist, 74 00:04:26,960 --> 00:04:29,800 Speaker 3: the way that kids find content through YouTube and other 75 00:04:29,880 --> 00:04:34,760 Speaker 3: types of digital platforms, and so that paradigm in that shift, 76 00:04:34,960 --> 00:04:40,600 Speaker 3: to me is a fundamental economic infrastructure and scaffolding that 77 00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:48,800 Speaker 3: doesn't go away. Right. Storytelling experiencing music is fundamental to 78 00:04:49,279 --> 00:04:53,599 Speaker 3: the human condition, and so that is a truth that 79 00:04:53,839 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 3: stands the test of time, whether it was one hundred 80 00:04:56,120 --> 00:05:00,120 Speaker 3: years ago to fifty years in the future. That's a 81 00:05:00,160 --> 00:05:03,680 Speaker 3: constant truth. What's also a constant truth is that the 82 00:05:03,760 --> 00:05:08,920 Speaker 3: creative spirit reigns stronger and more active than ever. Right, 83 00:05:09,160 --> 00:05:13,159 Speaker 3: there's lots of really inspired creatives both in the film 84 00:05:13,240 --> 00:05:15,760 Speaker 3: and television world, as well as in the music world 85 00:05:15,800 --> 00:05:20,000 Speaker 3: and other types of forms of content. And so that 86 00:05:20,120 --> 00:05:24,000 Speaker 3: means that there's an abundance of opportunities to also choose from. 87 00:05:24,120 --> 00:05:29,000 Speaker 3: There's a huge economy of people and creators who are 88 00:05:29,120 --> 00:05:33,160 Speaker 3: creating really great or ideating really great opportunity sets. What 89 00:05:33,240 --> 00:05:40,159 Speaker 3: the chaos is about the large institutional frameworks that were 90 00:05:40,200 --> 00:05:42,640 Speaker 3: built for another age. 91 00:05:42,560 --> 00:05:44,720 Speaker 2: Built for tune in Thursdays at night. 92 00:05:44,760 --> 00:05:50,000 Speaker 3: They were built at nine and then further built for 93 00:05:51,160 --> 00:05:55,919 Speaker 3: you know the cable package, right, the basic cable package, 94 00:05:56,360 --> 00:06:00,320 Speaker 3: which were really attractive economics for a very long time 95 00:06:00,760 --> 00:06:04,520 Speaker 3: that leaned on you know, ratings that only sampled household 96 00:06:04,680 --> 00:06:08,919 Speaker 3: rather that got down to very specific unit by unit 97 00:06:09,360 --> 00:06:15,200 Speaker 3: audience engagement. And now with the decentralized ways we experience content, 98 00:06:15,920 --> 00:06:20,400 Speaker 3: that whole path to audience has completely unpended. But you 99 00:06:20,480 --> 00:06:25,080 Speaker 3: have these large institutional frames that were built for again 100 00:06:25,240 --> 00:06:29,159 Speaker 3: a yesteryear. It's almost like we're going through, particularly on 101 00:06:29,200 --> 00:06:32,839 Speaker 3: the media landscape. I liken it to two points in 102 00:06:32,880 --> 00:06:35,760 Speaker 3: time in the music space. I call this for the 103 00:06:35,800 --> 00:06:41,480 Speaker 3: media moment, it's Napster moment. In the industrialized revolution. We're 104 00:06:41,560 --> 00:06:47,840 Speaker 3: going from horse and buggy into you know, motorized cars. 105 00:06:48,200 --> 00:06:51,159 Speaker 3: But when you have a large institution or several large 106 00:06:51,200 --> 00:06:57,280 Speaker 3: institutions that have stables of horses and barnyards of carriages. 107 00:06:58,200 --> 00:07:00,640 Speaker 3: It's so hard to just shift done a dime. 108 00:07:00,760 --> 00:07:03,039 Speaker 2: And they know how to turn out those buggy whips. 109 00:07:02,760 --> 00:07:04,599 Speaker 3: And they know how to turn out those buggy whips 110 00:07:04,640 --> 00:07:06,719 Speaker 3: and get everybody on them and it gets you across. 111 00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:08,440 Speaker 3: And it may not be the most efficient, and it's 112 00:07:08,440 --> 00:07:11,080 Speaker 3: hell of expensive, but that's kind of what you got. 113 00:07:11,360 --> 00:07:14,200 Speaker 3: It's hard to turning that on a dime, and it's disruptive, 114 00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:16,840 Speaker 3: and there's a lot of good people with great skill 115 00:07:16,920 --> 00:07:19,320 Speaker 3: sets in those organizations, but a lot of that has 116 00:07:19,360 --> 00:07:23,320 Speaker 3: to probably be rationalized to meet the moment. So that's 117 00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:25,400 Speaker 3: I think the chios that we're feeling. What gives me 118 00:07:25,520 --> 00:07:28,240 Speaker 3: excitement is the two pieces that I started with, the 119 00:07:28,320 --> 00:07:31,160 Speaker 3: audience and the creator, And so we just got to 120 00:07:31,160 --> 00:07:33,160 Speaker 3: figure out how to get the creator to the audience 121 00:07:33,200 --> 00:07:37,480 Speaker 3: more efficiently in a way that optimizes for the exact moment. 122 00:07:38,240 --> 00:07:41,680 Speaker 3: We also, I think, as a community around this space, 123 00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:43,840 Speaker 3: as investors in the space, executives in the space, have 124 00:07:43,880 --> 00:07:44,800 Speaker 3: to start thinking about. 125 00:07:44,640 --> 00:07:45,200 Speaker 2: How we do. 126 00:07:46,680 --> 00:07:51,280 Speaker 3: More with less. Right like we as technologies has advanced, 127 00:07:51,320 --> 00:07:53,120 Speaker 3: you would think the content costs would come down, but 128 00:07:53,200 --> 00:07:55,880 Speaker 3: they haven't. But that's again a little bit about how 129 00:07:55,920 --> 00:07:58,640 Speaker 3: the business was built and shaped over the last fifteen 130 00:07:58,760 --> 00:08:01,520 Speaker 3: or so years. For the you know, the cost plus 131 00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:04,560 Speaker 3: model really encourage that. Right, Like, if I'm a producer 132 00:08:04,680 --> 00:08:07,600 Speaker 3: making something for one hundred dollars, twenty dollars is more 133 00:08:07,640 --> 00:08:11,360 Speaker 3: than and get paid a cost plus fee of twenty percent, 134 00:08:11,440 --> 00:08:13,360 Speaker 3: twenty dollars is more than ten dollars if I made 135 00:08:13,360 --> 00:08:15,720 Speaker 3: it for fifty dollars, right, So, like we had an 136 00:08:15,720 --> 00:08:21,600 Speaker 3: incentive structure that really actually optimized costs to a higher 137 00:08:21,760 --> 00:08:23,280 Speaker 3: right to be higher. 138 00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:26,880 Speaker 1: The incentives were aligned, but not in the right direction. 139 00:08:27,160 --> 00:08:30,840 Speaker 3: They were aligned to higher costs. And so now we 140 00:08:30,880 --> 00:08:34,960 Speaker 3: see the institutional frame and scaffolding needing to change and 141 00:08:35,040 --> 00:08:38,480 Speaker 3: change rapidly. But they're huge, their laryers, they're complex there, 142 00:08:38,600 --> 00:08:42,480 Speaker 3: they've got lots of various tentacles. But they also need 143 00:08:42,520 --> 00:08:44,480 Speaker 3: to be thinking about how to get to audience faster 144 00:08:44,679 --> 00:08:47,720 Speaker 3: and cheaper, but also get to audience in a more 145 00:08:47,760 --> 00:08:51,640 Speaker 3: cost effective way. The cost per hour of programming cannot 146 00:08:51,679 --> 00:08:53,800 Speaker 3: cost the same as a cost in the last ten 147 00:08:53,840 --> 00:08:54,680 Speaker 3: to fifteen. 148 00:08:54,400 --> 00:08:58,079 Speaker 1: Years, five million dollars for a half. 149 00:08:57,360 --> 00:09:02,199 Speaker 2: Hour show is kind of the a half hour you know, comedy. 150 00:09:01,920 --> 00:09:04,439 Speaker 1: Maybe not a not a traditional multi cam sitcom, but 151 00:09:04,559 --> 00:09:08,120 Speaker 1: even single camera. And I've had many producers tell me 152 00:09:08,200 --> 00:09:12,160 Speaker 1: that this is beyond it's it's profligate in the extreme 153 00:09:12,320 --> 00:09:16,280 Speaker 1: because it's people can sense that it's hurt you know, 154 00:09:16,280 --> 00:09:18,600 Speaker 1: I think the smart people can sense that this level 155 00:09:18,640 --> 00:09:21,119 Speaker 1: of spending is actually hurting the business. 156 00:09:20,880 --> 00:09:25,080 Speaker 3: And the yeah at does right. And you know, I've 157 00:09:25,120 --> 00:09:28,800 Speaker 3: had conversations where people are like, well, you know, the 158 00:09:28,880 --> 00:09:31,600 Speaker 3: audience deserves one hundred million dollar project. Well, like, the 159 00:09:31,679 --> 00:09:34,200 Speaker 3: thing is the ROI to one hundred million dollars project 160 00:09:34,440 --> 00:09:37,720 Speaker 3: is proliferation of that project everywhere. Or to your point, 161 00:09:37,960 --> 00:09:40,959 Speaker 3: a five million dollar an episode or ten million dollars 162 00:09:40,960 --> 00:09:44,959 Speaker 3: per hour let's say, you know, against eight hours of programming, 163 00:09:45,320 --> 00:09:50,040 Speaker 3: that's eighty million bucks. Like even and because of how 164 00:09:50,120 --> 00:09:54,320 Speaker 3: nuanced our viewership is, it's really hard. Like I could 165 00:09:54,320 --> 00:09:56,439 Speaker 3: probably list a show for you today that I think 166 00:09:56,520 --> 00:09:59,960 Speaker 3: is amazing. I really enjoyed it. Maybe it cost five 167 00:10:00,160 --> 00:10:03,400 Speaker 3: to ten million dollars an episode, maybe let's say five 168 00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:06,559 Speaker 3: on the lower end the spectrum, And there's a good 169 00:10:06,600 --> 00:10:08,720 Speaker 3: chance you've never even heard of it. But not because 170 00:10:08,720 --> 00:10:11,080 Speaker 3: the show isn't good and all the various things, and 171 00:10:11,120 --> 00:10:13,400 Speaker 3: so when you add all that up together, like how 172 00:10:13,400 --> 00:10:16,760 Speaker 3: do you pencil from just a pure math perspective, an 173 00:10:16,880 --> 00:10:21,200 Speaker 3: ROI on a fifty million dollar eight episode opportunity set, 174 00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:27,080 Speaker 3: given how decentralized the accesses and my list of things 175 00:10:27,080 --> 00:10:30,679 Speaker 3: that I watch and enjoy are probably distinctly different than yours. 176 00:10:30,720 --> 00:10:32,680 Speaker 3: Maybe there's one or two things that are overlapped, but 177 00:10:32,679 --> 00:10:34,920 Speaker 3: it's distinctly different. And you multiply that by billions of 178 00:10:34,960 --> 00:10:37,640 Speaker 3: people and that just continues to happen. So it doesn't 179 00:10:37,640 --> 00:10:40,760 Speaker 3: mean that audience doesn't deserve great things. They need to 180 00:10:40,800 --> 00:10:43,440 Speaker 3: deserve it at a better price point is sort of 181 00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:47,680 Speaker 3: I think what's interesting. So my excitement is that one, 182 00:10:48,040 --> 00:10:51,040 Speaker 3: the audience is there and it's enriched. Two technology has 183 00:10:51,160 --> 00:10:55,240 Speaker 3: really improved how you can get to audience faster and cheaper. 184 00:10:55,800 --> 00:11:00,480 Speaker 3: But then three, from a cost perspective, there's got to 185 00:11:00,480 --> 00:11:02,360 Speaker 3: be a way. And there's a lot of creators that 186 00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:05,319 Speaker 3: I think are going to come out of this shakedown 187 00:11:05,480 --> 00:11:09,640 Speaker 3: with this chaos, who are excited about having more aligned 188 00:11:09,640 --> 00:11:14,440 Speaker 3: interests and having more cost effective ways to getting product 189 00:11:14,600 --> 00:11:19,800 Speaker 3: to market. But as the institutional scaffolding starts to change 190 00:11:20,160 --> 00:11:22,600 Speaker 3: in order to meet the moment. One of the things 191 00:11:22,640 --> 00:11:25,920 Speaker 3: that will become more and more critical and may even 192 00:11:25,960 --> 00:11:30,959 Speaker 3: become as a consequence, more transparent is data and engaged audiences. 193 00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:34,080 Speaker 3: Like last year, as Ray and I did a talk 194 00:11:34,160 --> 00:11:37,000 Speaker 3: at Milkan and we were talking about how she had 195 00:11:37,040 --> 00:11:42,239 Speaker 3: more visibility and transparency into how her content was performing 196 00:11:42,720 --> 00:11:46,720 Speaker 3: when she was on YouTube, because you get really instant feedback, 197 00:11:46,760 --> 00:11:49,120 Speaker 3: so you know who your audience was, where you feed them, 198 00:11:49,160 --> 00:11:52,200 Speaker 3: how you feed them, how you serve them. In today's environment, 199 00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:54,360 Speaker 3: as we start shifting to figure out how do we 200 00:11:54,440 --> 00:11:57,000 Speaker 3: find and identify ROI, is some more of that going 201 00:11:57,080 --> 00:12:00,400 Speaker 3: to be paid for? From an app perspective, I think 202 00:12:00,440 --> 00:12:04,880 Speaker 3: advertisers should, if they aren't, start demanding, you know, real 203 00:12:05,120 --> 00:12:10,480 Speaker 3: audience visibility against that and demanding that audience visibility gives 204 00:12:11,080 --> 00:12:15,319 Speaker 3: both the brands and the studio systems or the producers 205 00:12:15,320 --> 00:12:18,640 Speaker 3: have said content transparency on that audience. But I think 206 00:12:18,679 --> 00:12:23,520 Speaker 3: increasingly creators can start to get that same transparency in 207 00:12:24,040 --> 00:12:26,840 Speaker 3: the audience engagement. Now that everybody may love what that 208 00:12:26,880 --> 00:12:30,600 Speaker 3: audience engagement says and may say nobody's watching right right, 209 00:12:30,640 --> 00:12:34,160 Speaker 3: but it can then align reward with where there is 210 00:12:34,240 --> 00:12:37,640 Speaker 3: high engagement and high value and then create better alignment 211 00:12:37,679 --> 00:12:39,800 Speaker 3: over time. So I'm really excited about that too. I 212 00:12:39,840 --> 00:12:42,880 Speaker 3: see that on the horizon, and that continues to make 213 00:12:42,920 --> 00:12:45,480 Speaker 3: things more investible. One of the reasons why music became 214 00:12:45,520 --> 00:12:48,880 Speaker 3: so investible over the last you know, decade with real 215 00:12:48,920 --> 00:12:55,080 Speaker 3: institutional capital and force is that transparency on usage, that 216 00:12:55,160 --> 00:12:58,640 Speaker 3: transparency on cash and cash generation and from one channels, 217 00:12:59,240 --> 00:13:03,199 Speaker 3: it's model, it's forecastable, and it gives you real currency, 218 00:13:03,320 --> 00:13:06,320 Speaker 3: and then that currency became an ability to be a 219 00:13:06,360 --> 00:13:09,679 Speaker 3: center point for transaction exchange right between virons. You can 220 00:13:09,760 --> 00:13:12,880 Speaker 3: forecast like you said, yeah, I can now see it. 221 00:13:12,920 --> 00:13:14,640 Speaker 3: I can tell you how much I'm going to pay 222 00:13:15,280 --> 00:13:17,680 Speaker 3: you as a seller. Have that information and then we 223 00:13:17,679 --> 00:13:21,800 Speaker 3: can engage across a conversation based on fact versus based 224 00:13:21,840 --> 00:13:25,360 Speaker 3: on only feeling. And it's not to say that the 225 00:13:25,480 --> 00:13:28,760 Speaker 3: art isn't important, right Like for us as a firm, 226 00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:32,400 Speaker 3: we again center audience, but we also center the creator 227 00:13:32,600 --> 00:13:36,040 Speaker 3: in a way that the art is super important. But 228 00:13:36,120 --> 00:13:39,320 Speaker 3: we believe that the art will drive the science, right Like, 229 00:13:39,360 --> 00:13:42,440 Speaker 3: when we can have measurable information, then you can see 230 00:13:42,480 --> 00:13:44,640 Speaker 3: if the art will drive the science, and people will 231 00:13:44,640 --> 00:13:45,600 Speaker 3: show up and engage. 232 00:13:46,240 --> 00:13:48,360 Speaker 2: I mean, that's certainly what Netflix is doing now, is 233 00:13:48,400 --> 00:13:52,160 Speaker 2: that they can see you know, exactly what's percolating under 234 00:13:52,200 --> 00:13:54,840 Speaker 2: that well stocked in that well stocked larder. 235 00:13:55,559 --> 00:13:58,319 Speaker 3: That's exactly right. So we think that those two things 236 00:13:58,360 --> 00:14:03,400 Speaker 3: are true. I think there's still ill opportunity in the 237 00:14:03,440 --> 00:14:07,560 Speaker 3: marketplace to dig deeper in how we get to specific audience, 238 00:14:07,559 --> 00:14:11,200 Speaker 3: specifically around film and television. Now we're still I think 239 00:14:11,280 --> 00:14:14,280 Speaker 3: because the model has been to spend so much per 240 00:14:14,320 --> 00:14:21,280 Speaker 3: hour or per project, that it's always the sense of 241 00:14:21,520 --> 00:14:24,760 Speaker 3: whether it's theatrical marketing or marketing for television and film, 242 00:14:25,080 --> 00:14:29,120 Speaker 3: to go big broad general audience when your approach to 243 00:14:29,200 --> 00:14:34,000 Speaker 3: try to create awareness and also costs a lot of money, 244 00:14:34,360 --> 00:14:37,240 Speaker 3: and you're going a mile wide and an inch deep 245 00:14:37,400 --> 00:14:40,800 Speaker 3: versus going a mile deep and an inch wide. So 246 00:14:40,880 --> 00:14:47,720 Speaker 3: I thinks are and so unapologetically in a way that 247 00:14:48,640 --> 00:14:51,480 Speaker 3: doesn't sacrifice the quality of the works, doesn't say anything 248 00:14:51,480 --> 00:14:55,400 Speaker 3: about the quality of work, but recognizes that as consumers. 249 00:14:55,600 --> 00:14:58,520 Speaker 3: I'm raising my hand and saying, I like, I don't know, 250 00:14:58,560 --> 00:15:01,360 Speaker 3: I'll pick up something because I'm streamed. Probably I like 251 00:15:01,680 --> 00:15:06,280 Speaker 3: Nordic procedurals. It's crazy and strange, but go talk to 252 00:15:06,360 --> 00:15:09,640 Speaker 3: the people who like Nordic procedurals. And then, by the way, 253 00:15:09,680 --> 00:15:11,480 Speaker 3: after I do that, I'll start telling you about the 254 00:15:11,520 --> 00:15:14,520 Speaker 3: show that I love, and then maybe I'll influence people 255 00:15:14,520 --> 00:15:18,440 Speaker 3: who don't have an affinity necessarily for Nordic procedurals, but 256 00:15:18,560 --> 00:15:26,720 Speaker 3: could inherit said exactly could inherit. You know that that 257 00:15:26,880 --> 00:15:31,560 Speaker 3: love for our engagement for these opportunities, for these types 258 00:15:31,600 --> 00:15:36,240 Speaker 3: of things, right, So like talking to audiences unapologetically is 259 00:15:36,240 --> 00:15:38,120 Speaker 3: also a big theme for us. It's one of the 260 00:15:38,160 --> 00:15:41,720 Speaker 3: reasons we invested in mucha Maas. We just made the investment. 261 00:15:41,840 --> 00:15:44,240 Speaker 3: And so one of the first films is this movie, 262 00:15:44,320 --> 00:15:45,800 Speaker 3: The Long Game, which. 263 00:15:45,600 --> 00:15:49,800 Speaker 1: Is getting got a very strong review from Variety. 264 00:15:48,800 --> 00:15:51,600 Speaker 2: Ready to see, completely coincidental from our. 265 00:15:51,480 --> 00:15:59,280 Speaker 3: Conversations, great little movie. I think that we could have 266 00:15:59,320 --> 00:16:03,080 Speaker 3: gone deeper in our specific audience, right, and we weren't 267 00:16:03,120 --> 00:16:05,840 Speaker 3: necessarily control of that, but you know, we look forward 268 00:16:05,840 --> 00:16:07,960 Speaker 3: to doing that on the next project. But that's I 269 00:16:07,960 --> 00:16:10,280 Speaker 3: think the kind of thing you have, great movie. It 270 00:16:10,400 --> 00:16:14,160 Speaker 3: resonates with the poor audience. Just go tell them. You 271 00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:17,520 Speaker 3: may catch everybody else on top of it, but if 272 00:16:17,560 --> 00:16:20,160 Speaker 3: you go tell them that, that's what they should be 273 00:16:20,240 --> 00:16:22,560 Speaker 3: seeing and looking at and not be afraid to do 274 00:16:22,640 --> 00:16:25,680 Speaker 3: that right Like I think the old model of trying 275 00:16:25,720 --> 00:16:29,440 Speaker 3: to be everything to all people, it dilutes the It 276 00:16:29,480 --> 00:16:33,240 Speaker 3: dilutes the audience experience, and also you potentially, I mean 277 00:16:33,400 --> 00:16:36,080 Speaker 3: it's great now that content creators can get this specific 278 00:16:36,160 --> 00:16:40,840 Speaker 3: so you get this really great you know, engaged authentic storytelling. 279 00:16:41,280 --> 00:16:42,720 Speaker 3: We have to make sure that the way that we 280 00:16:42,760 --> 00:16:47,200 Speaker 3: get to audience matches and mirrors the way the content is. 281 00:16:47,800 --> 00:16:49,560 Speaker 3: The vision for the content is. 282 00:16:49,520 --> 00:16:52,800 Speaker 1: That, of course, YouTube is a you know, a fairly 283 00:16:52,920 --> 00:16:54,120 Speaker 1: democrat platform. 284 00:16:54,200 --> 00:16:56,280 Speaker 2: You can get up there and you know there is 285 00:16:56,320 --> 00:16:58,880 Speaker 2: a there, there is a there is a mechanism for 286 00:16:58,920 --> 00:17:01,720 Speaker 2: getting paid, which is definitely better. There is some that 287 00:17:01,840 --> 00:17:06,080 Speaker 2: still don't, but it is your model is success in 288 00:17:06,119 --> 00:17:09,160 Speaker 2: your model still accessing what we would consider the more 289 00:17:09,200 --> 00:17:14,359 Speaker 2: mainstream lanes of NBC, ABC, who lose you know, studios, 290 00:17:14,400 --> 00:17:17,920 Speaker 2: if it's movies that can distribute around the world, is there. 291 00:17:18,440 --> 00:17:20,359 Speaker 3: I think it's all of it. I think it's really 292 00:17:20,400 --> 00:17:24,320 Speaker 3: embracing the fact that finding and seeing how and when 293 00:17:24,400 --> 00:17:27,320 Speaker 3: people show up is I think really important. One of 294 00:17:27,320 --> 00:17:30,240 Speaker 3: the things on the theatrical side is that obviously so 295 00:17:30,440 --> 00:17:34,720 Speaker 3: many of the later stage windows are still keyed off 296 00:17:34,760 --> 00:17:38,639 Speaker 3: of what happens doing a theatrical window, and so that's 297 00:17:38,680 --> 00:17:42,640 Speaker 3: still sort of a legacy, you know, like scaffolding, if 298 00:17:42,640 --> 00:17:44,600 Speaker 3: you will, in the businesses. So there's some of that 299 00:17:44,600 --> 00:17:48,320 Speaker 3: that you can never kind of really ignore. But sorting 300 00:17:48,359 --> 00:17:50,880 Speaker 3: your way through how do you get to audience most 301 00:17:50,920 --> 00:17:56,680 Speaker 3: efficiently in democratized formats is a big piece of everything 302 00:17:56,720 --> 00:17:59,040 Speaker 3: that we look at. Any kind of investment opportunity they're 303 00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:01,960 Speaker 3: looking at is really around Okay, well, what do we 304 00:18:02,000 --> 00:18:04,720 Speaker 3: think the path the audience is right if we found 305 00:18:04,840 --> 00:18:08,400 Speaker 3: people who tell great stories, have great businesses and great infrastructures. Okay, 306 00:18:08,400 --> 00:18:10,080 Speaker 3: But the key thing, because that's how we get our 307 00:18:10,080 --> 00:18:12,520 Speaker 3: money back, candidly, is like, how do we get to 308 00:18:12,560 --> 00:18:14,879 Speaker 3: audience and how do we know where those are? And 309 00:18:14,880 --> 00:18:17,040 Speaker 3: how do we track and use data to help us 310 00:18:17,040 --> 00:18:20,280 Speaker 3: to manage and monitor that and optimize that for the outcome? 311 00:18:22,280 --> 00:18:25,200 Speaker 2: No problem just finding great content. Let me ask you 312 00:18:25,320 --> 00:18:28,840 Speaker 2: step back a bit, what was it about mucho maas 313 00:18:29,119 --> 00:18:31,600 Speaker 2: that said? I want to said to you, I want 314 00:18:31,600 --> 00:18:33,239 Speaker 2: to be in business with these guys. There's a lot 315 00:18:33,280 --> 00:18:36,439 Speaker 2: of different people putting out very creative things, but there 316 00:18:36,520 --> 00:18:38,120 Speaker 2: must have been something that sparked. 317 00:18:37,960 --> 00:18:39,960 Speaker 3: You, so absolutely so much of Moss is our second 318 00:18:40,000 --> 00:18:43,200 Speaker 3: investment in the film Intellivision Space. Our first is Macromedia 319 00:18:43,280 --> 00:18:47,000 Speaker 3: with Charles King and the team right and Muchams is 320 00:18:47,040 --> 00:18:51,639 Speaker 3: our second. I think listen identifying partners that I'm in 321 00:18:51,680 --> 00:18:54,080 Speaker 3: the good human business. So the first my first actually 322 00:18:54,560 --> 00:18:57,120 Speaker 3: test is is it a good human? Can I work 323 00:18:57,160 --> 00:18:59,960 Speaker 3: with them? Do they have good values? But the second is, 324 00:19:00,119 --> 00:19:03,640 Speaker 3: particularly as we're watching this moment, can we think about 325 00:19:03,680 --> 00:19:10,000 Speaker 3: how to identify really great, high quality outcomes? With Roi 326 00:19:10,080 --> 00:19:14,639 Speaker 3: in mind and Javier Chotboss and the team was really 327 00:19:14,640 --> 00:19:16,960 Speaker 3: focused on doing that, and we sort of liked that. 328 00:19:17,080 --> 00:19:19,639 Speaker 3: We sort of really wanted to lean into that model 329 00:19:19,880 --> 00:19:25,320 Speaker 3: of identifying highly engaged, high quality content but done at 330 00:19:25,359 --> 00:19:28,199 Speaker 3: the right price, or done that at the price that 331 00:19:28,280 --> 00:19:30,240 Speaker 3: we think was really interesting. So that's one of the 332 00:19:30,280 --> 00:19:32,919 Speaker 3: reasons why we spent more time with that team. And 333 00:19:32,920 --> 00:19:34,840 Speaker 3: we've got a lot of other things in the pipeline that, 334 00:19:34,920 --> 00:19:39,680 Speaker 3: you know, we think are very similarly suited high quality delivery. 335 00:19:39,880 --> 00:19:43,600 Speaker 3: You know, people who have done really great work over 336 00:19:43,640 --> 00:19:46,119 Speaker 3: the years, but kindilly haven't had a partner to create 337 00:19:46,240 --> 00:19:49,040 Speaker 3: the type of independence that they needed to be able 338 00:19:49,080 --> 00:19:53,480 Speaker 3: to build projects efficiently without worry and take them to 339 00:19:53,920 --> 00:19:57,800 Speaker 3: take them to an audience. And so that's what was 340 00:19:57,880 --> 00:20:00,600 Speaker 3: really exciting about Avier and the team. Group of people 341 00:20:00,880 --> 00:20:03,920 Speaker 3: focused on a set of you know, a parameter set 342 00:20:03,920 --> 00:20:06,240 Speaker 3: that they could deliver against a track record of doing 343 00:20:06,359 --> 00:20:09,879 Speaker 3: projects at a cost, great references from the marketplace. So 344 00:20:10,280 --> 00:20:12,120 Speaker 3: that was what was really attractive to us. 345 00:20:13,400 --> 00:20:16,080 Speaker 1: Don't go anywhere. We'll be right back with more from 346 00:20:16,160 --> 00:20:25,680 Speaker 1: harbor View Equity CEO charissee Clerk Suarez. And we're back 347 00:20:25,760 --> 00:20:30,280 Speaker 1: with more from harbor View Equity CEO charissee Clerk Suarez. 348 00:20:30,960 --> 00:20:33,359 Speaker 1: Let me set back again and ask you about harbor 349 00:20:33,480 --> 00:20:36,639 Speaker 1: View Equity. Do you see yourself as mostly an investment 350 00:20:36,680 --> 00:20:39,199 Speaker 1: firm or do you function as a holding company for 351 00:20:39,240 --> 00:20:40,280 Speaker 1: some of your investments. 352 00:20:40,359 --> 00:20:44,080 Speaker 3: Yeah, no, we see ourselves as an investment firm first 353 00:20:44,119 --> 00:20:49,000 Speaker 3: and foremost. But I will tell you like in comparison 354 00:20:49,280 --> 00:20:54,199 Speaker 3: to let's call them and many of these firms are 355 00:20:54,240 --> 00:20:57,199 Speaker 3: partners of ours. So I say this with great care 356 00:20:57,240 --> 00:21:00,679 Speaker 3: and respect. We are not all things to all people. 357 00:21:00,800 --> 00:21:05,080 Speaker 3: We are specifically focused on our niche of sports, media 358 00:21:05,080 --> 00:21:09,040 Speaker 3: and entertainment. We're building a firm with investment products around 359 00:21:09,119 --> 00:21:13,320 Speaker 3: delivering to our investors expertise around those segments of the industries, 360 00:21:13,760 --> 00:21:17,320 Speaker 3: creating a value proposition on how we create value in 361 00:21:17,680 --> 00:21:20,320 Speaker 3: the investments that we've made, whether they're assets like just 362 00:21:20,400 --> 00:21:25,080 Speaker 3: music assets, or whether they're value to the operating companies 363 00:21:25,080 --> 00:21:28,040 Speaker 3: that we invest in. That's really sort of our focus. 364 00:21:28,480 --> 00:21:33,640 Speaker 3: When we talk to entrepreneurs and operators. You know, what's 365 00:21:33,720 --> 00:21:37,399 Speaker 3: really interesting for them about us is that we actually 366 00:21:37,400 --> 00:21:40,439 Speaker 3: do feel more strategic. So we sort of sit and 367 00:21:40,480 --> 00:21:44,280 Speaker 3: we like sitting in this middle zone of being great 368 00:21:44,320 --> 00:21:48,960 Speaker 3: translators for the creative ecosystem, allowing them to feel like 369 00:21:49,000 --> 00:21:52,720 Speaker 3: they have a partner that understands creative businesses, the creative process, 370 00:21:53,320 --> 00:21:56,960 Speaker 3: respects the work that they're doing, but translates the investment 371 00:21:57,000 --> 00:22:00,000 Speaker 3: process to them. And then similarly, we're like the translation 372 00:22:00,040 --> 00:22:03,200 Speaker 3: leaders for investors. We get the access to this marketplace, 373 00:22:03,720 --> 00:22:08,399 Speaker 3: we demonstrated a track record of delivering returns, and we 374 00:22:08,760 --> 00:22:11,920 Speaker 3: basically can be good translators to them about the space too. 375 00:22:11,960 --> 00:22:15,760 Speaker 3: But we are we function and we've had many operators 376 00:22:16,200 --> 00:22:19,480 Speaker 3: and many creators tell us that it feels more like 377 00:22:19,520 --> 00:22:24,080 Speaker 3: a strategic relationship than it does just a purely financial 378 00:22:24,160 --> 00:22:28,119 Speaker 3: relationship and that's intentional on our part because of the 379 00:22:28,240 --> 00:22:30,639 Speaker 3: opportunity that we see in this lane to be a 380 00:22:30,720 --> 00:22:35,000 Speaker 3: scaled investor in this space. There just aren't that many 381 00:22:35,080 --> 00:22:38,919 Speaker 3: investors who've chosen this lane at scale as a place 382 00:22:39,080 --> 00:22:44,280 Speaker 3: that is not one that is, you know, on their 383 00:22:45,040 --> 00:22:48,919 Speaker 3: bucket list as a tourist spot or tourification right, we 384 00:22:49,000 --> 00:22:52,399 Speaker 3: are residents of this business and we want to be here, 385 00:22:52,760 --> 00:22:56,440 Speaker 3: you know, for the long term, and and so we 386 00:22:56,480 --> 00:22:59,520 Speaker 3: take up space, we get points of view, our team 387 00:22:59,640 --> 00:23:04,280 Speaker 3: or a deep industry experts around this stuff and continue 388 00:23:04,280 --> 00:23:07,320 Speaker 3: to develop and scale or acumen around having a point 389 00:23:07,359 --> 00:23:11,159 Speaker 3: of view around this business, this business opportunity set. So 390 00:23:11,320 --> 00:23:15,440 Speaker 3: we're decidedly an investment firm around the sports being entertainment practice, 391 00:23:15,760 --> 00:23:19,560 Speaker 3: but we are very focused on feeling and being strategic 392 00:23:19,640 --> 00:23:23,760 Speaker 3: to our partners, whether they're musicians, whether they're artists, whether 393 00:23:23,800 --> 00:23:27,320 Speaker 3: they're you know, producers, filmmakers, directors, whether they're CEOs or 394 00:23:27,359 --> 00:23:28,280 Speaker 3: operating companies. 395 00:23:28,560 --> 00:23:31,120 Speaker 1: Charles King is an alumnus of this podcast. He came 396 00:23:31,119 --> 00:23:33,240 Speaker 1: out right around the time that Judas and the Black 397 00:23:33,280 --> 00:23:36,000 Speaker 1: Messiah came out from a good conversation. But to be 398 00:23:36,119 --> 00:23:39,000 Speaker 1: somebody that can instigate from the greed. You know, from 399 00:23:39,040 --> 00:23:42,000 Speaker 1: the planting that seed, that money is still you know, 400 00:23:42,240 --> 00:23:46,000 Speaker 1: still even in the way that the businesses for twenty years, 401 00:23:46,040 --> 00:23:48,959 Speaker 1: nobody has spent their own money. But Charles is somebody 402 00:23:49,119 --> 00:23:51,800 Speaker 1: you know who came into the business obviously and realized 403 00:23:51,840 --> 00:23:55,840 Speaker 1: the need. But from your perspective, what is you know, 404 00:23:55,880 --> 00:23:58,640 Speaker 1: economics one on one tells us that a marketplace dominated 405 00:23:58,640 --> 00:24:00,320 Speaker 1: by a handful of giants is not going to be 406 00:24:00,320 --> 00:24:01,399 Speaker 1: a vibrant marketplace. 407 00:24:01,440 --> 00:24:03,520 Speaker 2: What have you found in coming in here? 408 00:24:03,680 --> 00:24:07,600 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think you know, what we found is tremendous opportunity. 409 00:24:07,960 --> 00:24:12,360 Speaker 3: Our pipeline is robust. We have me and I'm talking 410 00:24:12,720 --> 00:24:19,440 Speaker 3: from again, you know, award winning you know, in every category, 411 00:24:20,000 --> 00:24:24,639 Speaker 3: high quality, great human beings. We have a really robust 412 00:24:24,920 --> 00:24:29,119 Speaker 3: opportunity set. I think what people are craving for, and 413 00:24:29,240 --> 00:24:33,760 Speaker 3: this moment I think exacerbates it is a way to 414 00:24:33,840 --> 00:24:39,280 Speaker 3: create long standing value for themselves, for their teams, for 415 00:24:39,359 --> 00:24:43,399 Speaker 3: their legacy. And the business over the last fifteen years 416 00:24:43,480 --> 00:24:48,440 Speaker 3: really changed into you know, effectively people being work for hire, 417 00:24:48,960 --> 00:24:51,159 Speaker 3: which was very lucrative. 418 00:24:50,760 --> 00:24:53,520 Speaker 1: From an upfront business, from a back end business to 419 00:24:53,640 --> 00:24:57,239 Speaker 1: an upfront business. And people are recognizing the limits of 420 00:24:57,280 --> 00:24:57,960 Speaker 1: that even. 421 00:24:57,800 --> 00:25:00,640 Speaker 2: Though those big checks up front at the start. 422 00:25:01,160 --> 00:25:06,320 Speaker 3: Yes, so so one, I think that moment creates so 423 00:25:06,520 --> 00:25:09,840 Speaker 3: this moment creates a lot of opportunity, and the recognition 424 00:25:10,000 --> 00:25:12,879 Speaker 3: of this moment changing creates a ton of opportunity. But 425 00:25:12,960 --> 00:25:19,240 Speaker 3: then two, I believe that there My ministry has never 426 00:25:19,240 --> 00:25:22,520 Speaker 3: been in front of the camera. You know, I was 427 00:25:22,520 --> 00:25:26,679 Speaker 3: a child actor. I like, you know, I was in 428 00:25:26,760 --> 00:25:28,840 Speaker 3: some movie as an extra with all my friend from 429 00:25:28,920 --> 00:25:32,359 Speaker 3: high school. I played lassical piano like I was on 430 00:25:32,400 --> 00:25:34,400 Speaker 3: the dance scene. But it was never gonna be my ministry. 431 00:25:34,520 --> 00:25:38,480 Speaker 3: My ministry was always going to be in investing in 432 00:25:38,840 --> 00:25:43,760 Speaker 3: transactional work. And so it felt really important to me 433 00:25:44,359 --> 00:25:49,960 Speaker 3: to bring that lens to this space because also, again Barnun, 434 00:25:50,200 --> 00:25:54,840 Speaker 3: there really is not that many people that have dedicated 435 00:25:54,840 --> 00:25:58,280 Speaker 3: efforts everybody, you know, obviously with the bidding wars, in 436 00:25:58,920 --> 00:26:03,040 Speaker 3: the most recent saga around all Things paramount, there are 437 00:26:03,119 --> 00:26:06,040 Speaker 3: multiple people who are pitting for that, But there isn't, 438 00:26:06,080 --> 00:26:08,600 Speaker 3: you know, sort of a lot of scaled institutional dollars 439 00:26:08,600 --> 00:26:10,800 Speaker 3: that are really thinking about this day and day out 440 00:26:10,880 --> 00:26:13,720 Speaker 3: with an intention and a focus solely focused on this space. 441 00:26:14,320 --> 00:26:18,160 Speaker 3: And so when we see these big, major media companies 442 00:26:18,200 --> 00:26:20,120 Speaker 3: which for a long time, for lack of a better word, 443 00:26:20,200 --> 00:26:22,199 Speaker 3: have been content investors. That's really what they I mean, 444 00:26:22,240 --> 00:26:24,080 Speaker 3: they also like, you know, develop things and et cetera, 445 00:26:24,119 --> 00:26:26,800 Speaker 3: but they've been content investors. It's too few hands to 446 00:26:26,960 --> 00:26:32,400 Speaker 3: actually really create the right incentive structure, I think, and 447 00:26:33,240 --> 00:26:37,000 Speaker 3: create and partner with creators to create long term alignment. 448 00:26:37,280 --> 00:26:39,400 Speaker 3: And I do think also in this moment, which will 449 00:26:39,440 --> 00:26:41,920 Speaker 3: be really interesting, is that a lot of those companies 450 00:26:42,000 --> 00:26:44,359 Speaker 3: now trying to figure out how to move from the 451 00:26:44,359 --> 00:26:50,679 Speaker 3: industrial revolution into you know, into motorized vehicles, are going 452 00:26:50,720 --> 00:26:53,520 Speaker 3: to be looking for our partners to come together in 453 00:26:53,560 --> 00:26:57,720 Speaker 3: more innovative structures. So I think that's what's really exciting. 454 00:26:57,840 --> 00:27:02,520 Speaker 3: I'm excited to basically continue to have capital in this 455 00:27:02,680 --> 00:27:05,600 Speaker 3: moment for the next twelve to eighteen to twenty four months. 456 00:27:05,680 --> 00:27:07,400 Speaker 3: Around this space, I think there's gonna be a lot 457 00:27:07,440 --> 00:27:11,120 Speaker 3: of really great opportunities in ways that we think can 458 00:27:11,359 --> 00:27:17,280 Speaker 3: empower the creative community, maybe helped to balance the balance 459 00:27:17,320 --> 00:27:20,000 Speaker 3: the scales a little bit for creators too, while also 460 00:27:20,080 --> 00:27:23,760 Speaker 3: creating alignment and then ultimately hopefully creating you know, real 461 00:27:23,880 --> 00:27:28,560 Speaker 3: great returns for our stakeholders and maybe also shifting the 462 00:27:28,640 --> 00:27:30,320 Speaker 3: landscape of then what we see. 463 00:27:31,320 --> 00:27:33,679 Speaker 2: Was it your familiarity with the space? What was it 464 00:27:33,760 --> 00:27:36,919 Speaker 2: that led you to music? Was kind of the origins 465 00:27:37,080 --> 00:27:38,480 Speaker 2: for your company? You know? 466 00:27:38,640 --> 00:27:40,359 Speaker 3: Some of it is I kind of look back on 467 00:27:40,400 --> 00:27:42,719 Speaker 3: the journey that we've been here and people are like, oh, 468 00:27:42,720 --> 00:27:44,960 Speaker 3: my goodness, your company's done so much in three years, 469 00:27:45,000 --> 00:27:47,560 Speaker 3: and I'm like, it's the classic line of overnight success 470 00:27:47,600 --> 00:27:49,960 Speaker 3: twenty years in the making. You know. I spent a 471 00:27:50,000 --> 00:27:52,159 Speaker 3: lot of time. I wrote a business school essay to 472 00:27:52,200 --> 00:27:54,960 Speaker 3: go to be accepted to EAHBS about how I wanted 473 00:27:54,960 --> 00:27:57,840 Speaker 3: to invest in content over the long haul. I had 474 00:27:57,880 --> 00:28:00,240 Speaker 3: no idea how I was going to get there, that 475 00:28:00,280 --> 00:28:03,480 Speaker 3: I was going to start like taking away. And again 476 00:28:03,520 --> 00:28:06,680 Speaker 3: after business school, I went and worked at CIT right 477 00:28:06,680 --> 00:28:10,480 Speaker 3: around the corner from here, and focused mostly on film, 478 00:28:10,640 --> 00:28:15,239 Speaker 3: mostly film. Television Really wasn't they weren't television slates in 479 00:28:15,280 --> 00:28:16,560 Speaker 3: the early two thousands. 480 00:28:16,560 --> 00:28:21,359 Speaker 1: Definitely still the not fair haired child, Yes, industry for sure. 481 00:28:21,440 --> 00:28:26,080 Speaker 3: Yeah that's changed. Yes, it's changed, yes, but mostly film 482 00:28:26,119 --> 00:28:30,119 Speaker 3: financing and film structured investing, et cetera. And then when 483 00:28:30,160 --> 00:28:32,720 Speaker 3: I got back to Morgan Stanley in two thousand and nine, 484 00:28:32,760 --> 00:28:37,200 Speaker 3: after the global financial crisis, I helped to lead our credit, 485 00:28:37,680 --> 00:28:40,480 Speaker 3: our corporate credit business across all industries, which was really 486 00:28:40,520 --> 00:28:44,400 Speaker 3: fascinating because it really continued to expand my ability to 487 00:28:44,480 --> 00:28:48,560 Speaker 3: really think around how to deploy capital invest capital across 488 00:28:48,640 --> 00:28:54,600 Speaker 3: a variety of different circumstances. But about in two thousand 489 00:28:54,680 --> 00:28:59,440 Speaker 3: and sixteen, a colleague of mine at Morgan Stanley came 490 00:28:59,760 --> 00:29:03,760 Speaker 3: to me and said, in our wealth management business, we've 491 00:29:03,840 --> 00:29:08,840 Speaker 3: started this entertainment and media focus and sports focused wealth 492 00:29:08,920 --> 00:29:11,800 Speaker 3: management practice, and we have all of these clients that 493 00:29:11,840 --> 00:29:17,160 Speaker 3: are looking for working capital or looking to monetize working 494 00:29:17,200 --> 00:29:20,840 Speaker 3: capital to create new projects. They're looking for capital to 495 00:29:21,360 --> 00:29:26,000 Speaker 3: capitalize their operating companies. They're looking for to monetize libraries 496 00:29:26,040 --> 00:29:28,120 Speaker 3: of content that they had, whether it's film or music 497 00:29:28,200 --> 00:29:30,640 Speaker 3: or otherwise, and they're like, how should we do something. 498 00:29:30,720 --> 00:29:32,800 Speaker 3: I was like, great, I know, good, I think, I know, 499 00:29:32,880 --> 00:29:37,080 Speaker 3: I know, I know. There isn't institutionally skilled capital focused 500 00:29:37,120 --> 00:29:39,200 Speaker 3: on this marketplace. We should go figure that out. So 501 00:29:39,280 --> 00:29:41,080 Speaker 3: long story Shore we went to go figure this out 502 00:29:41,240 --> 00:29:45,840 Speaker 3: and it ended up with first It also intersected really 503 00:29:45,960 --> 00:29:51,680 Speaker 3: nicely in twenty sixteen with the reemergence of the music 504 00:29:51,760 --> 00:29:54,160 Speaker 3: business a little bit go again. They went through their 505 00:29:54,240 --> 00:29:55,960 Speaker 3: napster a moment which is again the chaos I think 506 00:29:55,960 --> 00:29:58,800 Speaker 3: that we're seeing practically a decade later in the film 507 00:29:58,800 --> 00:30:02,240 Speaker 3: and television business. But you started to see this emergence, 508 00:30:02,280 --> 00:30:05,800 Speaker 3: this light a day around digital consumption and helping to 509 00:30:06,080 --> 00:30:12,080 Speaker 3: resurrect the music business, make it visible and give real investibility. 510 00:30:11,360 --> 00:30:14,800 Speaker 1: And taking away borders. Yes, that allows a pistel pluma 511 00:30:14,840 --> 00:30:16,240 Speaker 1: and an estrap on our monitor. 512 00:30:16,800 --> 00:30:21,920 Speaker 3: Correct removing the borders, removing a centralized purveyor of culture 513 00:30:22,920 --> 00:30:26,959 Speaker 3: from the equation so that now audience can just connect 514 00:30:26,960 --> 00:30:29,400 Speaker 3: with what they think is interesting. And so you saw 515 00:30:29,440 --> 00:30:32,800 Speaker 3: that starting to emerge. And as you know, as we 516 00:30:32,800 --> 00:30:34,240 Speaker 3: were sort of trying to figure out the right way 517 00:30:34,280 --> 00:30:37,160 Speaker 3: to take a product to market, and we heard investors 518 00:30:37,200 --> 00:30:39,600 Speaker 3: again having this like, ah, I'm going to lose all 519 00:30:39,600 --> 00:30:41,200 Speaker 3: my money. We lose all my money and lose my right. 520 00:30:41,880 --> 00:30:47,040 Speaker 3: The nice thing that we saw emerging from the from 521 00:30:47,160 --> 00:30:52,440 Speaker 3: this revolution in the music space was visibility of cash flow. 522 00:30:53,440 --> 00:30:56,960 Speaker 3: And that visibility of cash flow was easier to understand 523 00:30:56,960 --> 00:31:00,200 Speaker 3: for investors. It was visible, it was underwritable, and so 524 00:31:00,400 --> 00:31:02,440 Speaker 3: it made it easier to start with music. It caused 525 00:31:02,480 --> 00:31:05,320 Speaker 3: me to start my first company, which was Temple Music. 526 00:31:05,760 --> 00:31:09,360 Speaker 3: I ultimately resigned from that platform in the end of 527 00:31:09,480 --> 00:31:13,600 Speaker 3: December of twenty twenty because if I'm candid, I just 528 00:31:13,600 --> 00:31:15,960 Speaker 3: didn't own enough of it, and so I decided to 529 00:31:16,040 --> 00:31:18,160 Speaker 3: erect harbor View and I saw an opportunity to do 530 00:31:18,200 --> 00:31:22,360 Speaker 3: a little bit more broader. But Temple was the result 531 00:31:22,360 --> 00:31:25,120 Speaker 3: of the work. I started out doing it more than Stanley. 532 00:31:25,240 --> 00:31:29,240 Speaker 3: So we started with music because of just where the 533 00:31:29,280 --> 00:31:32,560 Speaker 3: marketplace was. After I did Temple, launch harbor View and 534 00:31:32,640 --> 00:31:36,040 Speaker 3: then leaned into my most recent track record started with 535 00:31:36,080 --> 00:31:39,120 Speaker 3: a music launch. Continue to deploy capital and music every day. 536 00:31:39,160 --> 00:31:41,560 Speaker 3: We just closed a deal last week, probably closed you know, 537 00:31:42,120 --> 00:31:45,400 Speaker 3: a bunch of deals a month. But saw this as 538 00:31:45,440 --> 00:31:47,959 Speaker 3: a really a vessel to really start thinking through and 539 00:31:48,000 --> 00:31:49,360 Speaker 3: talking to the marketplace. 540 00:31:49,640 --> 00:31:51,080 Speaker 2: What was it like for you when you went on 541 00:31:51,080 --> 00:31:53,800 Speaker 2: on your own and it wrote that first check for 542 00:31:53,920 --> 00:31:54,800 Speaker 2: your first deal. 543 00:31:54,960 --> 00:31:57,680 Speaker 3: Oh my goodness, it's still satisfying. 544 00:31:57,720 --> 00:31:59,680 Speaker 2: It Was it scary? Was it invigorating? 545 00:31:59,800 --> 00:32:02,000 Speaker 3: Was it all of that all at once? It's it's 546 00:32:02,040 --> 00:32:06,000 Speaker 3: scary and invigorating and all of it at once. I mean, 547 00:32:06,040 --> 00:32:10,760 Speaker 3: I think the scary part is, you know, there's just 548 00:32:10,920 --> 00:32:13,480 Speaker 3: not a lot of women in private equity, and particularly 549 00:32:13,480 --> 00:32:16,480 Speaker 3: black women in private equity. So pinch me. This is 550 00:32:16,520 --> 00:32:17,040 Speaker 3: what I'm doing. 551 00:32:17,080 --> 00:32:22,720 Speaker 2: This is what I do every day. Thanks for listening. 552 00:32:23,160 --> 00:32:25,720 Speaker 1: Be sure to leave us a review at Apple Podcasts 553 00:32:25,720 --> 00:32:29,640 Speaker 1: and Amazon Music. We love to hear from listeners. Please 554 00:32:29,680 --> 00:32:31,920 Speaker 1: go to Variety dot com and sign up for the 555 00:32:31,960 --> 00:32:36,960 Speaker 1: free weekly Strictly Business newsletter, and don't forget to tune 556 00:32:37,000 --> 00:32:40,160 Speaker 1: in next week for another episode of Strictly Business