WEBVTT - From the Vault: Do ants make traps?

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>name is Joe McCormick, and today we are bringing you

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>an episode from the Vault, an older episode of the show.

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>This one is called do Ants Make Traps? It is

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>about exactly that question, whether ants the insect build traps.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>This originally published January twentieth, twenty twenty two. Hope you enjoy.

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 3>is Robert Lamb.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Joe McCormick, and today we're going to be

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about traps. I think I've mentioned this in some

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Weird House Cinema episodes, but for some reason, ever since

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I was a little kid, I have always loved movie

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.639
<v Speaker 1>scenes where the protagonists build a trap to use against

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the villain or the monster. I remember, like Home Alone

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>when I was a little kid, that whole sequence was great.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>It sort of expands to fill my whole childhood impression

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of what the movie was. And if you go back

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and watch it as an adult, it's kind of weird

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.199
<v Speaker 1>that it's only like fifteen or twenty minutes of the runtime.

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 3>In Home Alone. Yeah, yeah, yeah, it does seem like

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 3>that's the main thing I remember. Yeah, they the traps,

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 3>the traps, and certainly people feel certain nostalgia for them.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>My heart swells at the thought of a nail going

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>into Daniel Stearn's foot. But also, yeah, I remember other ones,

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>like you know, Arnold Schwarzenegger builds a bunch of traps

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and predator. But like, this wasn't just when I was

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a kid. It still works on me. I remember there

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>was a sequence I just loved in the more recent

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>horror movie It follows where the characters build a trap

0:01:58.680 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>for the last year.

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's right, that is very They have a very

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 3>much a kind of home alones setup that they do there.

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Of course, it's not only the heroes that have traps.

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 3>I always love a good villain trap as well, especially

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 3>the trap door. And the trap door sequence is always

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 3>a lot of fun, you know. Be it something like

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 3>in Lynn Labyrinth. I love the trap when the trap

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 3>door springs on our hero and that. But actually Tomorrow's

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 3>Weird House Cinema also has a fun trap door sequence.

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, so look forward to that. Well.

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, on side of the protagonists getting through traps set

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>for them, another one of my favorite movie sequences as

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a child was the beginning of Raiders of the Lost Art.

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, and when INDI's going through all the traps,

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>something about it is just like, deep in the brain,

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it's very satisfying.

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Wall to wall traps. Yeah, that's that's a great sequence

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 3>as well. And all of these are great sequences in

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 3>spite of the fact that when you when you can,

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 3>when you really think long and hard about any of

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 3>these scenarios, you know, the cracks definitely show would all

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 3>of these traps still be working in this ancient ruin

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 3>that Indiana Jones finds himself in. I don't know, it's

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 3>a hard argument to make there, right.

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>How did the spring trap operate by you sticking your

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>hand through a shaft of light when it was made

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>like thousands of years ago?

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Or you know, if it's duke and predator, like,

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.399
<v Speaker 3>how does he how does he make this super powerful

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 3>compound bow just in the space of a few hours

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 3>on an afternoon in the jungle.

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>That's just standard survival training.

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and all these other various e Wok traps

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 3>that he builds didn't didn't you go to that camp?

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Did I build a bow like that at a cat camp. No,

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 3>I think we sharpened sticks, you know, that would be

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 3>that would be more believable. Right, he makes a spear, Yeah,

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 3>to battle.

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>That's most of the way there.

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, But you know, I think it probably speaks volumes

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 3>for humans to be you know, to be said all

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 3>of this about traps, and especially about you know, loving

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 3>these cinematic treatments of traps, because because what are traps? Ultimately,

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 3>very broadly speaking, they're clever, tactical and or technological innovations

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 3>that level the playing field against predators, against prey, and

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 3>even against fellow humans. Traps are the sort of things

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 3>that humans have been up to since prehistory. So of

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 3>course we love traps, and of course we admire things

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 3>like traps that we find in other species.

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, So today we're going to be focusing on some

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>allegations of insects with the ability to build traps, specifically

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>ants that do things that may in fact be biological

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>evolutions that allow them to trap prey. Now, there are

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>some other animals that I think we could say more

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>more clearly and famously create traps. I think the obvious

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>example here would be spiders.

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, spiders are the trap builders par excellence. You know,

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 3>there are no finer trap builders in the animal Maybe

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 3>you could make a case for human beings, but personally

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm not in favor of that. I think web building

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 3>spiders especially are just such highly evolved trap masters. Every

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 3>detail of their anatomy and behavior enhances their trapping ability,

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 3>and the trap is very much an extension of their

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 3>own bodies in so many ways. And we've covered this,

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 3>and we've covered spiders in general numerous times in the

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 3>show before, and we'll likely keep coming back to them.

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, the spider, the spider is the trap maker.

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 3>There's nothing else that the spider really does. Anything else

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 3>it does the web building spider is going to do

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 3>in close proximity to the web that it has built.

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Another example that's come up before, I think in

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>our Sarlac episodes was the ant lion.

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes. Yeah, this is a case where we have predatory

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 3>larvae that in some species of antlon anyway, set up

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.679
<v Speaker 3>at the bottom of sand pits that they dig, ready

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 3>to lack shout at anything that disturbs their grains and

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, ventures down into the trap. Again, not all

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 3>ant lion species dig trap pits, but some of the

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 3>most famous ones.

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.559
<v Speaker 1>Do I remember. One of the great things we learned

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>about the ant lion was that, like you say, it

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is the ones that make traps. It is just the

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>larval period of their lifespan, their life cycle that they

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>make the traps. Then they later metamorphosed into another form.

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>But while they're in that larval stage, I think at

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>least some of them never poop. So yeah, yeah, catching

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>ants and eating them and just like waiting, and it's

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>like if you had to wait until you turned eighteen

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>to poop.

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 3>We'll go back and listen to that Sarlac episode if

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 3>you'd like to hear more about the ant lion. There's

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 3>also the species of creature known as the worm lion,

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 3>and this is unrelated to the ant lion. It's just

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 3>a matter of convergent evolution that he ends up utilizing

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 3>largely the exact same method again when it's a larva,

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 3>though the pit itself in this case is generated via

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 3>a slightly different method, so it digs its pit in

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 3>a slightly different method, but it still consumes its prey

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 3>in the same manner.

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>But for me, at least, if you ask me to

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>make a list of non human animals, that make traps.

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I could obviously go spiders. I would have thought of

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the ant lion, maybe by association the worm lion. But

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>there before I was reading up for this episode, I

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>think I would have drawn a blank. I wouldn't know

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>what to go to next.

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and part of it comes down to just how

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 3>are you going to going to define a trap? For example,

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Here's here's an interesting potential example we can discuss that

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>I read across read about when I was reading Gilbert

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Waldbauer's How Not to Be Eaten, which is largely about insects,

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 3>but there's a part where the author is discussing the

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 3>burrowing owl. So these are small birds native to the

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Great Plains in southern Florida. I think they're about the

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 3>size of a robin. I'm to understand that, you know,

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the small, little little guys. But they make their home

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 3>in burrows that they did themselves. And one of the

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 3>interesting things that they do in addition to this, if

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 3>this wasn't you know interesting enough already, is the burrowing

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 3>owl will scatter horse or cow dung around the entrance

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 3>to their burrows. And then, you know, times before European contact,

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 3>this would have probably been bison dung, and the dung

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 3>does seem to be important because if researchers remove the

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 3>dung from the vicinity, the birds will just the bird

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 3>will just go out and obtain more dung and place

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 3>it in the vicinity. So it seems to be doing

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 3>this intentionally. The theory is that they place the dung

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 3>to bait dung beetles. So they put the dung out,

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 3>dung beetles come, And indeed researchers have been able to

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 3>tell that the owls eat ten times more dung beetles

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 3>than usual when the dung is out.

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Ah. Well, this will in fact mirror one of the

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 1>two examples of potential ant trap making that I want

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk about later.

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean it's but this is a great example.

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 3>It's certainly clever. I like it. But it kind of

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 3>forces us to ask the question of a trap, like

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 3>what is a trap? Is it merely baiting a trap?

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>That is a good question, yeah, because and how much

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>does the trap structure have to be separate from your

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>body in order to recount as a constructed trap? And

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>how much does it have to how much work does

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it have to do for you?

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? And at what point does an animal's behavior stop

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 3>being a trap and just become sneaky behavior, sneaky tactics,

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 3>or simply ambush predation, because obviously there are plenty of

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 3>examples of ambush predators on land and in the sea,

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 3>and these include everything from well, the trap door spider

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 3>for one, which I think is definitely a case of

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 3>building because it's an ambush predator, but it builds a

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 3>silk hinge trap door to aid in those ambushes.

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, so the trapdoor hides it. I think you could

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>count that as like infrastructure necessary to constitute a trap.

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I think that, Yeah, definitely with the trapdoor spider.

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 3>But then you also have just various camouflage predators, including

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 3>things like frogfish, praying mantis's, chameleons, and more, which are

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 3>not building anything. They're not altering their environment, but they've

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 3>evolved to look like a part of their environment and

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 3>they have the you know, often tremendous abilities of camouflage

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 3>that enable them to quickly ambush something that they want

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 3>to eat.

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that probably doesn't That doesn't really seem like a

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>trap to me, because they're just evolved to look that way,

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 1>and they they do the actual hunting themselves.

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Right, And then of course you have various birds and

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 3>cats and big cats even that are just very stealthy,

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 3>that are just very good at not being observed by

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 3>the things they want to kill. So I was reading

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 3>a little bit about this in Douglas j Imlin's excellent

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 3>book Animal Weapons that have referenced on the Show before,

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.199
<v Speaker 3>and he points out that creatures such as this generally

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.719
<v Speaker 3>depend on quote, a quick strike weapon that immediately incapacitates

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 3>its victim. And of course these bioweapons might be enhanced

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 3>by special features, such as in various deep sea ambush

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 3>predators a bioluminescent lure, which again is not something they

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 3>have created or engineered out of their environment, but it

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 3>is a part of their body. So when we come

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 3>back to this idea that what it needs to be

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 3>something that's built, it needs to be something that's engineered,

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 3>or just a hole dug in the ground, even we

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 3>come back to that same question, well, why don't we

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 3>find more of this? And I actually found an interesting

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 3>paper title out there, Why are pitfall Traps So Rare

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 3>in the Natural World? By G. D Ruxton and MH. Hansel,

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 3>And it appeared in evolutionary ecology in two thousand and nine.

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Interesting question.

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So the authors here point out that in order

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 3>to lay a trap, you generally need either advanced cognitive

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 3>powers as with humans obviously, or you need specialist self

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 3>secreted materials as with spiders and cattisfly larvae, thing which

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 3>the catasi fly larvae use that their their secretions to

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 3>create a net like even meshed trap like a silk trap,

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 3>in order to filter catch their prey.

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense. So humans can create all kinds of

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>traps because we have, you know, cognitive powers that allow

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>us to imagine what could be done. How you know,

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>other materials in the environment could be repurposed to passively

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>ensnare or kill prey animals and spiders and stuff. That's

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>just the trap you could almost say, is a part

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of their body. Even though the web is a built thing.

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>They revolved to secrete the silk for the web out

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of their bodies, and they have very instinctually driven behaviors

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>for how they extrude that silk wear in what patterns.

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Right, So, Ruxton and Hansel here ultimately point out that okay,

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 3>we have the ant lion though, and of course the

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 3>worm lion. These are exceptions to the rule. They make

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 3>use of a pitfall trap, and so the authors ask

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 3>why is this basic tactic not more common in the

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 3>animal world? How hard is it, after all to dig

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 3>a hole? They're easy, they're cheap, and yet you don't

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 3>see this technique used by virtually anything outside of some

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 3>ant lions and worm lions. Apparently, the lack of more

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 3>pitfall traps than nature was something of a mystery and

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 3>remain something of a mystery.

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is interesting, Okay, so it took me a

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>second to get the distinction they're making. But they're saying

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>that the ant lion and the wormline would be kind

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of an outlier because they don't have complex intelligence and

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>imagination like humans, so they're not inventing traps with cognitive powers.

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>But they also don't secrete a material that CONTs institutes

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the basis of the trap like a spider. They're literally

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.079
<v Speaker 1>just building a trap out of the dead environment around

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of them by digging a conically shaped hole in such

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a pattern that ants get stuck in it when they

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>fall down the side. And why is that so rare,

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>because it would seem like that that should be a

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>strategy that lots of animals could easily employ.

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, again, holes are ultimately easy to make, low energy.

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Why not? Why why? Why why is this cat not

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 3>making a hole and using that as part of its

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 3>hunting tactics?

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>So what are their thoughts on this, like, why would

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't we see this more often?

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, they proposed two speculative reasons for the lack of

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 3>pitfall traps in nature. The first one is pitfall traps

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 3>may require a specialist micro habitat. In other words, you

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 3>can't do this just anywhere. Conditions have to be just right,

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 3>such as you know, we can look at to the

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 3>ant lions, they have to be kind of sandy conditions.

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, you have to have that kind of granular environment.

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 3>So it's the kind of tactic that a potential trap

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 3>builder would not necessarily be able to employ all over

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 3>the place. You would have to depend on again, on

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 3>a specialist micro habitat.

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I recall from our Sarlac episode where we

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>had a segment about the ant lion that they needed

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the grains of soil to be of a particular size,

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>like the sandy grains above or below a certain diameter

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>threshold would not work very well for making the traps.

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, Now the second point is that with the

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 3>ant lion in particular, the trap target's small prey, and

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 3>since they may be more functionally tied to their trap

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 3>than spiders are, traps of this nature could serve as

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 3>like basically a major bull's eye for potential predators. And

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 3>indeed the main predators of ant lions and worm lions

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 3>are birds who know what to look for.

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good point. So by building a trap

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and then sitting in it and waiting for your prey

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to fall in, you were also usually going to be

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>making a structure that makes it easy for things that

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>want to eat you to define where you are. You know,

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to look too hard because you've made

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a big hole in the ground.

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Right and and spiders just have a little more leeway

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 3>with the situation. Now, I should point out Hansel also

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 3>wrote an entire book which I'm going to reference here

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 3>in a minute. He spends a lot of time in

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 3>that book talking about spiders and how, you know, sometimes

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 3>spider webs are very visible and other times they are not,

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 3>and how that plays into the you know, the ultimate

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of complex relationship between spiders and the creatures that

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 3>would eat spiders. But just thinking about this as the

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 3>trap being this conspicuous thing. This we actually see this

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of our fantastic trap fiction. You know

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 3>that moment when the target of the clever cinematic trap,

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 3>especially if it's laid by the protagonists, the enemy almost

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 3>sets it off, right, like the predator almost triggers the

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 3>trip line you've prepared. But then something happens, right the

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 3>monster deduces that the trap is there, or it suspects

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 3>that something is off.

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh, and maybe even the presence of a trap is

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>how the hero knows that they have stumbled across the

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>bad guy's hideout.

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah. It even reminds me a bit of our

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 3>recent weird house selection, The Lift. This was the Killer

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Elevator movie, the Killer Elevator in this or I guess

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 3>you were more specifically the weird biobrain that's been installed

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 3>in the elevator shaft to power these elevators. It's kind

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 3>of an obligate trap predator, but it's so tied to

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 3>that environment that it's a little tricky, like it's not

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 3>able to pull off every kill, and it's eventually destroyed

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 3>by prey that is too clever for it.

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Brilliant analogy. This is true. The killer elevator is an

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>obligate trap predator.

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I also have to point out, speaking of the Sarlac,

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 3>is that recent Mandalorian episodes have also sort of played

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 3>with this idea. Yeah, yeah, the Mighty Sarlac. The Startlack's

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 3>pretty impressive, but they make it clear that even these

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 3>great trap predators can be a soom by the mighty

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 3>create dragon that lives in the deserts of Tatooine. So

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 3>knowing you're there being you know, this identifiable organism in

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 3>the sand, that can have a huge downside to it.

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, I was trying to think of counterpoints to the

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>idea that. Okay, so sitting at the bottom of a

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>pitfall trap and waiting for prey to fall into you

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and then eating that that makes you vulnerable to predators

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>that want to find you. Well, well, what if you

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>just make pitfall traps and then you go away and

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>then you know, leave them there and then come back

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>like a human hunter might do, you know, leave a

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>trap out in the woods and then come and see

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>what it collected lobster traps or something. But I can

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>see downsides to that as well, because if it's just

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a pit trap, you could imagine that, well, something might

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>fall in there, but then something else might eat it

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>before you get to it, right, so, or it might

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you have to make these all over

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the place, you might spend a lot of energy going

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>around from one to the other. So is that really

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>all that much better than just hunting?

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 3>Well, and then it kind of comes back to this

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 3>idea that the trap laid by an animal especially still

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 3>requires the lethal mechanism, and in the case of the antlime,

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 3>the legal lethal mechanism is itself. It is still essentially

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 3>an ambush predator like again, like Emmilin says, quote a

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 3>quick strike weapon that immediately incapacitates its victim.

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can't believe I didn't think of that. That's,

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.199
<v Speaker 1>of course a good point. You have to find a

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>way to kill the prey, right.

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 3>So I mentioned that that Henzel has a whole book

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 3>that deals with with some of this a little bit,

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 3>but just sort of the broader picture of animals building things.

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 3>It's titled Animal Architecture, and I was reading through this

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 3>a bit. He contends that we're not looking at traps

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 3>when we're looking at cases of an animal baiting another animal,

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 3>because traps are a kind of subset of animal architecture,

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 3>an engineered space that aids in capture.

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so by his metric here, what the burrowing owl

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>does by leaving dung out around its nest and having

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>this attract insects to it, that would not count as

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a trap because it is not a structure that in

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>any way aids and capture. It just attracts prey to

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a site.

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 3>Oh, by the way, I want to also, speaking of

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the burrowing owl again, I want to throw in that

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 3>while some burrowing owls do build their own burrows, they're

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 3>also burrowing owls that acquire the burrows of other creatures. Anyway,

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 3>I want to read this quote from Hansel here. I

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:29.959
<v Speaker 3>think he puts it rather well concerning the animal architecture

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 3>and traps quote. Whereas a house can just be a

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 3>barrier between the builder and the outside world, a trap

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 3>has a dynamic relationship between itself and the prey. The

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 3>prey needs to approach the trap in a particular orientation

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 3>to it, and then needs to be restrained by it.

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Traps are therefore more complex than homes and need to

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 3>be more precisely engineered, and then he goes on to

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 3>point out the quote among the vertebrates, trap builders were

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 3>apparently absent until the recent history of man. Now he

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 3>cites human mental capacity once more for the construction of

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 3>such traps, noting quote, Virtually all non human trap builders

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 3>use self secreted materials, and the capture principle they adopt

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 3>is the net. Exceptions are simple in design and operation,

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 3>as well as rare, and then he goes on to

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 3>specifically mention antlions, worm lions, and larval diptra.

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, a large takeaway here is that trap building

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is not as widespread in the animal kingdom as you

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>might expect. Humans make a lot of traps. There are

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>some very specialized animals, especially some invertebrates, that use traps

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>made of materials that they secrete from their own bodies,

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>but generally, trap building is not a very widespread hunting

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>strategy among animals of planet Earth, in which case it

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>would be very interesting to find examples of animals such

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>as ants, that make traps in order to get their nutrition.

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.199
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that's a good segue to what I

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to the main focus of today's episode. Which was a

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of examples I came across of ants that do

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>something that could be interpreted as building traps as a

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>hunting strategy.

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I mean it would make sense that we

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 3>might find something like this in the ant world because

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 3>ants are masters of construction, they alter their environment, they're

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 3>capable of practicing agriculture. They as we've discussed in previous

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 3>episodes of the show, they engage in complex conflicts that

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 3>we might well compare to warfare. They can solve problems there.

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the list goes on and on. Ants are

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 3>amazing as of course, as the now Light e O.

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Wilson was fond of reminding us, you know, ants, there

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 3>are incredible creatures that we've covered them numerous times in

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 3>the show before, we're covering today, and I'm sure we'll

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 3>cover them again exactly.

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>So the first example I want to talk about I

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>found so interesting, and this one also has some interesting

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>differences in interpretations I came across. But just to start

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>with the basic report. I was reading about this in

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a paper published in Nature in the year two thousand

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and five by land Jan Pascal, Jean Solano, Julian Irole,

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Bruno Corbara and Jerome Oreville called arboreal ants build traps

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to capture prey, and also as a supplement to the

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>paper in Nature, I was reading a summary feature that

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>was also in Nature by NoREL Tawi, published in April

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five, called Amazonian ants ambush prey. So

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>here's the deal. There's a plant in the Amazon called

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Hertella phisofera, or maybe Phisophora physo phora. I'm going to

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>try to say fizzof so these here Tella plants. Plants

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in this genus are woody trees or shrubs. I've seen

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>them called both trees and shrubs, but they're if you're

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 1>trying to picture them as a tree, you should be

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.199
<v Speaker 1>imagining a small tree, so woody stems, but not like

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, sky high. Plants in this genus are found

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>in the tropics across multiple continents, but their diversity is

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 1>concentrated around the Amazon, and they typically have flowers that

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>are pollinated by butterflies. And this one species in particular,

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>here Tella physophera, is what the authors of the paper

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:38.439
<v Speaker 1>call an ant plant. This is a plant species that

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is known to have a specific biological relationship with a

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>species of ant and these can be found throughout the world.

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>There are very common mutualisms, or you know, various kinds

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of symbiotic relationships between ant colonies and the trees or

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 1>plants they inhabit. Now, this plant in particular has a

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>relationtionship with the arboreal ant alomeras decim articulatus, and they

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>live on the body of the plant, forming colony centers

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in what the authors of the paper call leaf pouches.

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 1>They are these little bulb looking things that can usually

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>be found at the places where the branches split into leaves.

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>They look like these it's kind of hard to describe them.

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>They're just these little like green lobes or orbs, and

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>apparently the ants like to get inside those and make

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>nests in there.

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Now. Already, one of the things that's that I'm reminded

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 3>of is the idea of like a specialist micro habitat.

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 3>And if you have a situation where a plant is

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 3>the home to the ants, that they have this ant

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 3>plant relationship in place, you know that the plant itself

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 3>is kind of the environment, it's kind of the micro

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 3>habitat that the ant is the master off.

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. But the interesting thing is of course,

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>ants being builders, some ants will form complex, you know,

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>dugout colonies in the ground or other types of interesting

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>engineered environments. They can also engineer the microhabitat of the

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>surface of a plant, and that's what we're going to

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>be talking about in this case. Oh and I should

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>say that the colonies that were looked at in this

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five paper were from French Guyana in

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 1>northern South America. But so what you find in these

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>plants that are occupied by their familiar ant species is

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that along the stems of the host plant, the ants

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>will build what the authors of this paper call galleried structures,

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes they just say galleries. It's kind of hard

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to describe exactly what this is, but imagine a kind

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of platform built out over the surface of the stem

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.479
<v Speaker 1>of the plant, and it's a platform that the ants

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>can crawl underneath. And then this platform has a kind

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of spongy texture, almost as if fits or honeycomb texture.

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>It's aligned with all these holes in the platform that

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the ants can crawl in and out through. Generally the

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 1>holes are just slightly larger than the diameter of one

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>of the worker ants heads. So through these platforms raised

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>above the stem of the plant. Ants crawl underneath them,

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>but then crawl up and up and down, in and

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>out through the holes in the platform.

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is kind of difficult to describe it because

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 3>it is so different from something that that humans would

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 3>for the most part build, you know, by virtue of

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 3>the ants being far more mobile and sort of living

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 3>in a more three dimensional space than human beings tend to.

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, these are great to look up, probably

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>unless you suffer from trip to phobia, in which case

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>stay far away.

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if you're if you're freaked out by things like

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 3>lotus pods and random holes and things, yeah, you might.

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 3>You might want to avoid this particular Google image search.

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, how do the ants build these galleries, Well, they

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>apparently make them by cutting off tricombs from the stems

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of the plant. Tricombs is a word that comes from

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the Greek word for hares. These are small, little fibery

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>appendages that poke out from the surface of a plant.

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 1>You've probably seen lots of plants before that have little

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>hairy things all over the stem or the leaves. Those

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>are tricombs, and they do look a lot like hares.

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So the worker ants will move along the stem of

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a Hairtella physophera plant, clearing away the tricombs, and then,

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>just to read from the language used in the paper here,

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>quote then using uncut tricombes as pillars, they build the

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>galley's vault by binding cut tricombs together with a compound

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that they regurgitate later. This structure is reinforced by the

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:55.959
<v Speaker 1>mycelium of a complex of sooty mold species that has

0:28:56.000 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>been manipulated by the ants. Fungal growth starts around the

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>holes and then spreads rapidly to the rest of the structure.

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think you heard that right. So these ants

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>build their galleries along the stem of the plant by

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>cutting the hairs off of the plant where they live,

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>then using those hairs as building materials, along with their

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>own barf as a kind of mortar, and then holding

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>everything together by seating it with mold or fungus that

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>they farm. So they have a kind of agricultural project

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:35.959
<v Speaker 1>for farming fungal rebar that they use to reinforce the

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>galleries that they build. And in quotes given to the press,

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I've seen the authors of this study compare this composite

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>material to fiberglass.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Wow, Yeah, that does seem like a good comparison. Oh man,

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's just so amazing that it's not just

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 3>like this physical act, but they're actually yeah, seating it

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:59.719
<v Speaker 3>with with this this mold. Oh man, they're kind they're

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 3>build it, but they're also kind of growing it.

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Be amazing, and they tend to it as it grows.

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So I wanted to read another section from the study

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>where they talk about the evidence that the ants are

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>actively tending the fungus as it reinforces these structures. They say, quote,

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we noted that the stems of thirty four young seedlings,

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>which had not yet developed leaf pouches, did not bear fungus.

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Nine saplings raised in a greenhouse in the absence of alomeras.

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the ants developed leaf pouches but never bore fungus. However,

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen saplings raised in the presence of ants bore mycelia,

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>whose development was limited to the galleries. When we eliminated

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the associated ants from five of the fifteen, the fungus

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>on the galleries grew into a disorganized structure, and none

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of the nine new stems that developed bore any fungus

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>at all. Okay, so the fungus is only showing up

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>on the plant when the ants are there on the plant.

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>And if you take the ants away from the plant

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>after they've been using the fungus to reinforce their their galleries,

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the fungus kind of grows out of control in what

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>they call a disorganized structure. But with the ants still there,

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it stays nice and tightly formed around the holes in

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the galleries. So they're tending their garden. It's like a

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>living I don't know, it's like if you had to

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>have maintenance workers constantly sort of gardening and tending to

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the fungus that held up your skyscrapers.

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>But here's where we start getting to the trapping. So

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the authors of this study say that they noticed that

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 1>sometimes larger insects would become immobilized on the surface of

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the galleries. So you got these these spongy surfaces, ants

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>crawling underneath them, and sometimes like a locust or a butterfly,

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>some bigger insect lands on the gallery and then it

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 1>gets stuck. What's going on here, Well, they started to

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>investigate whether the galleries could be functioning as a type

0:31:59.880 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of trap. And here's what they say about how the

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>ambush works quote. Our observations revealed that Alomiras workers hide

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>in the galleries with their heads just under the holes,

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>mandibles wide open, seemingly waiting for an insect to land.

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>To kill the insect, they grasp its free legs, antennae,

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>or wings and move in and out of the holes

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in opposite directions until the prey is progressively stretched against

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the gallery and swarms of workers can sting it. The

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>ants then slide the prey over the top of the gallery,

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>again moving in and out of the holes, but this

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.719
<v Speaker 1>time in the same direction. They move it slowly towards

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a leaf pouch where they carve it up. Oh and

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>then once they get to one of these population centers

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of the colony, you know, the these nest sites in

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the leaf pouches, they tend to feed bits of protein

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>from the insect to their young.

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, this is amazing and suitably brutal for the

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 3>world of ants. So this, this larger creature lands or

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 3>walks on to the structure. You know, they're reaching out

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 3>of holes to pull it straight down, and then they

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:13.719
<v Speaker 3>transfer it to a place where they can carve it up.

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Right. So yeah, there's no sentimentality in the world of ants,

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>they're just like, okay, this is edible, It's time to

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>get to butcher in But anyway, these observations reveal this

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>fascinating three way interaction between the plant, the fungus, and

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the ant all sort of living together in this this

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>three way life cycle. Essentially that apparently serves the purpose

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of creating a trap to get larger insects. You know

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>these Oh I don't think I mentioned, but the Alamiris

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>decim articulatus ants are very small. It's a structure that

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>allows these tiny ants apparently to capture kill and butcher

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>much much larger prey.

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, And of course the plant out of all

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 3>of this gets some slight mutilation from the ants, but

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 3>is protected from larger insects that would otherwise no on

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 3>it and do more harm to it than just creating

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.240
<v Speaker 3>an interesting lattice work out of its body.

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Presumably, I mean, I think often there is such a

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>relationship going on. The insect also provides a benefit to

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the plant somehow, though in the sources I was reading

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't clear to me exactly if it's known what

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the major benefit provided by the ants is, but I

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>would guess that's right, that they're probably protecting the plant

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>from herbivore large herbivore insects that would chew its leaves

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>down or something, But I don't know for sure. I

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>gotta admit right.

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 3>And then of course we also have to always realize

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 3>that in the natural world the line between parasitism and

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 3>symbiosis is sometimes a bit thin. These are not relationships

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 3>that are governed by strict contracts, so you might see

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of push and pull over the course

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 3>of evolutionary history.

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Ants will take whatever they can get.

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 3>You're right, so you be careful about entering into a

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 3>bargain with the ants.

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>But on the other side of all this, I wanted

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to come back on it because I found a book

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>where the trap interpretation of these structures has been challenged.

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, this book was by somebody who's come

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 1>up on the on I think episodes we did about

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 1>ants last year, the biologist Mark W. Moffatt. Yes, yes, yeah,

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>So he has a book called Adventures among Ants that

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>was that came out in twenty ten University of California Press.

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And in this book I found a section where Moffatt

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 1>argues that the trap interpretation of these structures built by

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>alameiras decim articulatis is in fact a misinterpretation. Now I'm

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>not sure he's right about this, but I do want

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to explain what he claims, so it's a bit of background.

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>In the section of the book directly preceding this, Moffatt

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>has been talking about his observations of various species of

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:06.839
<v Speaker 1>army ants on raiding parties to forage for food and

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>also on defensive patrols to protect the colony and the

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 1>rating column from threats, and one of his observations in

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 1>this preceding section is how difficult it is sometimes to

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>tell the difference between these two behaviors and how easily

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>one bleeds into the other. So, according to Demoffitt, for

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 1>most army ants, their defensive attacks on a creature that

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is perceived to be threatening the raiding column can quickly

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>turn into a foraging raid in itself. So if the

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>threat is killed, it is pretty much immediately chopped up

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>into pieces and carried away as food. So it's kind

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of like if you imagine every monster movie ended with

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the heroes butchering and eating the monster after they finally

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>defeated it.

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, we do see that sometimes. In fact, that occurs

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 3>in the Mandalorian but the case of the Great Dragon.

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 3>But but yeah, we should see more consumption of the

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 3>d of dragons and monsters and so forth. Use every

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 3>part of the monster be responsible.

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't know. I mean that's you know, humans

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 1>are different than ants. I mean, ants are not going

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to let anything go to waste. Humans, after you've fought

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a monster, you might just want to have nothing to

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 1>do with it. To each species their own. But anyway,

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:23.479
<v Speaker 1>so from here, Moffat moves on to describing the ant

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about Elimeris decim articulatus, and he's describing

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.240
<v Speaker 1>its living situation. The one distinction he makes I couldn't

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 1>find out what was what was the disconnect here? But

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>he said, you remember how I said that the ants

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 1>build these gallery structures out of tricombes cut from the plants,

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a little plant hairs, mixed with their own regurgitation or vomit,

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and then lined with the mycelium of the fungus that

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>they cultivate. Mofatt describes it the same way, but he

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:55.320
<v Speaker 1>mentions feces rather than vomit. And I don't know who's

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 1>right there. But anyway, Moffatt gives a few reasons that

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>he had doubts about the generally accepted interpretation of this

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>structure as a trap, specifically as a trap, because he

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>says a trap implies that, for example, a locust landing

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>on the ant gallery would not have landed there if

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it saw the ants. The trap would be performing the

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>function of hiding the ants, so you know, they're hidden

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 1>beneath the vault of the gallery, so that the prey

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>insect feels it's safe enough to land and then they

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>jump out and grab it.

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, this would be in keeping with say the trapdoor

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 3>spider would probably be a great example of this.

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I think that's comparable. That's how it would

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 1>function as a trap. But Moffitt writes that he thinks

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>this is unlikely because he doubts that grasshoppers would really

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:49.479
<v Speaker 1>be able to notice the tiny workers of this ant

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>species anyway, quote particularly in mid leap, or that they

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 1>would be able to change course in mid leap after

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>noticing them. So he was a little iffy on that, like,

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that the trap would really serve much

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>purpose if it's supposed to be hiding the ants from

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the prey animal, because these are insects that are much

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 1>larger than the ants anyway.

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Right, So he's saying, basically saying like this might be

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 3>if this was a trap, which he doesn't think it is,

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 3>it would be a preposterous trap, an unnecessary trap. And

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 3>while again we love unnecessarily complex and preposterous traps in

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 3>our cinema, we're not talking about cinema here. We're talking about.

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Evolution, yeah, and sufficiency.

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah. Things need to be ruthlessly efficient, and if

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 3>it's not ruthlessly efficient, it is going to change or

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 3>go away.

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, those are his suspicions, so he decided to

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:44.280
<v Speaker 1>put them to the test. So he tells a story

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 1>of that he was studying colonies of this ant in

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the wild in Ecuador, and he put together a test

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to interrogate the trap interpretation. So to read from the

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>section of Moffitt's book where he describes this test, he says, quote,

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.760
<v Speaker 1>hung a mosquito net over a plant with a thriving

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>alomeras colony, added one hundred grasshoppers and katie diids, and

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 1>sat inside for the next five mornings. An unusual case

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of using a mosquito net to keep insects in instead

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of out. Even after the grasshoppers settled down, they were

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>indiscriminate in their movements, hopping from where the ants hid

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>under the structures to where ants strolled in full view,

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to where there were no ants at all. When they

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>landed among the ants, even on the structures, they got

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>away unhurt. Certainly, if the structures served as traps, they

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 1>were inefficient ones. So he's saying in his observations here,

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>he's seeing very little correlation between the structures and the

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>hunting behaviors of the ants or the behaviors of the

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>prey insects. So what purpose does he believed the galleries

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>are serving. Well, he points out that the galleries tend

0:40:55.800 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to run along the stems of the tree, connecting each

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 1>nest pouch to another nest mouch, and they quote contain

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:08.319
<v Speaker 1>a highway of workers commuting from nest to nest. And

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 1>then he points out that other insects, including other ant species,

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 1>do sometimes build various types of physical covers over their trails,

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 1>which are generally interpreted to be defensive in nature. For example,

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:24.840
<v Speaker 1>some marauder and driver ants have been observed to build

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 1>soil covers over their trails, So could that be what's

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 1>going on in this case? Could these galleries that the

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:35.319
<v Speaker 1>ants build actually be defensive in nature? Another strike here?

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 1>According to Moffat, he observed that the workers at his

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:41.880
<v Speaker 1>study site did not actually sit and wait at the

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 1>holes in these galleries, as you might expect them to

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>do if they were planning an ambush. He says that

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>when conditions were normal, so like if the colony is

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>not in an agitated state, things are just sort of

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>going along normally. Most of the gaps in the gallery

0:41:56.040 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>structures were unoccupied. But he says this chain when there

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>appeared to be some kind of threat to the colony. Quote,

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>after a day of pulling grasshoppers from my hair, I

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 1>noticed interlopers of another ant, a species of Fidolei or

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 1>big headed ant, climbing the plant to pin down a

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:19.279
<v Speaker 1>wounded grasshopper missed by the Alomiras. Upon the arrival of

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the fidole ants, the Alomiras workers began to guard each

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of the several dozen entrances to their arcade. And that's

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the arcade, is what he's calling the things that the

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 1>other authors called the galleries the several dozen entrances to

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>their arcade nearest the commotion caused by the intruders. These guards,

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>aided by nest mates roaming the arcade surface, also caught

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and killed one fidoli and carried it off. So, based

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:48.919
<v Speaker 1>on these observations, moffittt argues that the galleries are more

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 1>likely defensive to protect trails of workers moving from one

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 1>leaf pouch to the other, but that when something attacks

0:42:57.200 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>or threatens the colony, the workers quickly shift their behavior

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 1>from travel to defense, and then they occupy the holes

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 1>and start biting violently at anything that comes near. And

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, if they are able to immobilize an attacker

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>or not necessarily an attacker, if they're able to immobilize

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is that put them on the defense, they

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 1>immediately shift rolls again and turn that threat into food

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and begin butchering it for the colony again, to cook

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the monster, so to speak.

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:29.239
<v Speaker 3>So we might be better to think of these as

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:33.240
<v Speaker 3>defensive fortifications, kind of like to use like a medieval

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:36.720
<v Speaker 3>castle or fortress scenario. It's kind of like the various

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 3>crinolations and murder holes and arrow slits, except with the

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 3>added point that in this case the occupants of the

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 3>castle or fortress would eat those that they killed defending it.

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, That's what Moffatt argues, And so to finish up

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 1>his section, he says in the end, quote in this

0:43:57.000 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>way the organization of a super organism, referring to ants.

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:02.799
<v Speaker 1>There because I think you can make the argument that,

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, an ant colony might be best understood as

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 1>one organism rather than many. It is a super organism

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:13.399
<v Speaker 1>composed of many different bodies, he says it quote can

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:16.920
<v Speaker 1>be more responsive than the tissues in a body. Trail

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Bound workers can shift seamlessly in their behavior from transport

0:44:20.640 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to protection to predation. It's as if one's liver could

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>change function when the heart is incapacitated and pump blood.

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>So obviously I don't know who's right here. Moffatt's book

0:44:32.680 --> 0:44:35.359
<v Speaker 1>is more than ten years old at this point, and

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>most of the things I read about this ant species

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>alomeris decim articulatas still describe the galleries as ambush traps.

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:46.759
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure which interpretation is correct, but I

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>do think either way, Moffatt makes a very interesting point

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>about the fluidity of function when it comes to ant behavior.

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>How you know one moment's enemy is the next moment's lunch.

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, Like the ant colony is not just trying

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 3>to do one thing. It has a lot of objectives

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 3>and it has again this fluidity of function. Whereas it's

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 3>far easier to look at a web building spider and

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 3>know what's up. You know that the web is its purpose,

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:19.239
<v Speaker 3>the web is kind of its sole, and there's no

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 3>question about why it constructed the web.

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess. Also, this raises another question about what counts

0:45:25.040 --> 0:45:28.799
<v Speaker 1>as a quote trap because assuming for a second that

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Moffatt's interpretation is correct, I don't know it is, But

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>if he's right that these structures are primarily to defend

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the ant trails, but then when something when a threat

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 1>presents itself, they turn around and use the holes in

0:45:41.360 --> 0:45:44.279
<v Speaker 1>the galleries as murder holes and then eat whatever they

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:48.399
<v Speaker 1>can immobilize, does that count as a trap? Like how

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>specialized does a structure have to be for the purpose

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of catching prey in order to be thought of as

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 1>a trap, Because you can imagine other examples where an

0:45:58.280 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 1>animal builds a structure that's primary defensive in some way,

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's more like the home from the example you talked

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:05.520
<v Speaker 1>about at the beginning in that book. You know, it's

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:08.279
<v Speaker 1>a barrier between you and the outside world. Yet it

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 1>has some kind of feature that like another animal or

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 1>something could get stuck on or some you know, it

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:20.799
<v Speaker 1>somehow allows you to sometimes opportunistically harvest from the structure

0:46:21.200 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and then eat from it. And does that count as

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a trap?

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:26.799
<v Speaker 3>Now? I haven't seen this movie in a very long time,

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:30.400
<v Speaker 3>but but I think there might be something comparable in

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:32.399
<v Speaker 3>Home Alone too, am I right? Oh?

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Lost in New York, the one with Tim Curry?

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:36.359
<v Speaker 3>Oh? What Tim Curry's in that one?

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Yeah, I think he plays a He plays a

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 1>snooty bell hop or something.

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that sounds about right.

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but yeah, I think the Actually, we were trying

0:46:44.520 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to figure this out what this was, and Seth's just

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 1>chimed in to let us know he was right. The

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 1>house where he builds the traps and Home Alone two

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is a house that's like under renovation, so it already

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 1>has feature Like, all the traps don't have to be

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in from scratch. There are already features of the house.

0:47:03.000 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember exactly what they are, but there are

0:47:04.640 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 1>things that are dangerous about it already.

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:15.719
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, yeah.

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 1>But I wanted to talk about my second example of

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 1>ants potentially doing something that you could interpret as a

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:25.799
<v Speaker 1>trap ok, and this one also involves using foreign materials

0:47:25.960 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 1>around the nest. So the second example was described in

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a paper that I was reading published in twenty nineteen

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:39.359
<v Speaker 1>in the journal Ecological Entomology by Innacio Gomez Diego, Santiago

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Ricardo Campos, and Heraldo Vasconcelos. It was called why do

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 1>fight oly oxyops ants place feathers around their nests? And

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I also got some additional information from reading an article

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:57.440
<v Speaker 1>about the study published in Scientific American by Joshua rapp

0:47:57.520 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Learn in November twenty nineteen. But here's the deal. So

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>there is this species of ant called Fidolei oxyops. We

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:07.440
<v Speaker 1>were already talking about some fidoli ants in the last

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:11.440
<v Speaker 1>example because the remember the fidoli ants invaded the tree

0:48:12.000 --> 0:48:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and then they got kind of butchered by the alomiras ants.

0:48:16.239 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 1>But fidoli ants are a genus known as the big

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 1>head ants, and this species, in particular, fidoli Oxyops, is

0:48:23.560 --> 0:48:26.799
<v Speaker 1>native to South American savannahs. So these would be you know,

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:31.840
<v Speaker 1>grasslands ants. Sometimes they appear to do something pretty weird.

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:37.759
<v Speaker 1>They collect feathers and place them around the entrance of

0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>their nests. So, if you imagine the nest is buried,

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the entrance is basically a hole in the ground, and

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:47.920
<v Speaker 1>then you might just find feathers all around the holes,

0:48:47.920 --> 0:48:51.320
<v Speaker 1>scattered around on the ground outside the hole. That's weird.

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 1>It might make it look like the ants ate a

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:56.320
<v Speaker 1>live chicken or something, but that is not what happened.

0:48:56.560 --> 0:48:59.400
<v Speaker 1>They appear to collect the feathers and put them there.

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:01.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it kind of looks like there's a hole in

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 3>the ground and like a bird was sucked down that hole,

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 3>and this is these are the cartoonish remnants of that incident.

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought the same thing. Yeah, I was like, hmmm,

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:13.799
<v Speaker 1>pop and then just puff of feathers they settle around it.

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:16.320
<v Speaker 1>But no, that is not what has happened. The ants

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>put the feathers there. Strange. So this paper published in

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:26.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen in Ecological Entomology, it claims that these feathers

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 1>function as bait to attract prey animals, which then tumble

0:49:31.760 --> 0:49:35.640
<v Speaker 1>into the nest entrance as if it were a pit trap.

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:38.920
<v Speaker 1>And the Scientific American article actually reports a bit of

0:49:38.920 --> 0:49:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the background on the paper. It says that the studies.

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>First author in Nacio Gomez, is an ecologist at the

0:49:45.719 --> 0:49:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Federal University of Visosa in Brazil, and while walking around

0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:54.319
<v Speaker 1>city parks and his college campus, he noticed examples of

0:49:54.360 --> 0:49:58.840
<v Speaker 1>these ant nest entrances with feathers all around him. Apparently

0:49:58.880 --> 0:50:02.439
<v Speaker 1>this had been observed, and also I was looking at

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 1>another paper about this ant species, fidally oxyops. This one

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 1>was by Diego asis at All from twenty twenty one,

0:50:10.560 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and this paper said that in addition to feathers, there

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:18.640
<v Speaker 1>will sometimes be other objects around these entrances, including shells,

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 1>flower pedals, and seeds. But this study in particular was

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:29.280
<v Speaker 1>focusing on the feathers, and so he noticed these feathers

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:32.160
<v Speaker 1>around the entrances and he wondered what was the deal

0:50:32.200 --> 0:50:35.359
<v Speaker 1>with this. Apparently this had been observed before, and there

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 1>were already a couple of untested hypotheses in the scientific

0:50:39.000 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>literature about what the feathers were doing there. One idea

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:47.040
<v Speaker 1>was that the feathers could collect do in arid regions,

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:49.799
<v Speaker 1>so they would help provide the ants with water in

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 1>the mornings, and the other idea was that some of

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the feathers could serve as lures, attracting prey to the nest,

0:50:57.480 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and so the twenty nineteen study tested both. In one experiment,

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the researchers supplied the ant colonies with water soaked cotton balls,

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 1>so made sure they had access to plenty of water,

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:11.960
<v Speaker 1>but the ants in these cases preferred to collect feathers anyway.

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:14.359
<v Speaker 1>It did not seem like access to water played any

0:51:14.480 --> 0:51:18.919
<v Speaker 1>role in their desire to collect feathers, and this could

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:22.440
<v Speaker 1>be evidence that the feathers were not primarily for collecting water.

0:51:23.040 --> 0:51:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But another test was designed to see if feathers scattered

0:51:26.000 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 1>on the ground would attract prey. So they tested this

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:33.360
<v Speaker 1>with artificial traps that were made to resemble the nest

0:51:33.520 --> 0:51:36.680
<v Speaker 1>entrances of these ants, and the team found that if

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 1>you put out a trap and scatter feathers around it,

0:51:39.440 --> 0:51:43.319
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, it will tend to trap more just

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:46.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of wanderers, you know, arthropods that are out on

0:51:46.920 --> 0:51:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the ground, than traps without feathers, And so interesting question

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:54.360
<v Speaker 1>why would they do that. Why would a hole in

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the ground surrounded by feathers get more bugs to fall

0:51:57.360 --> 0:52:00.959
<v Speaker 1>into it. It's not known, but Gomez suggests that maybe

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:03.719
<v Speaker 1>it's something about the smell of the feathers, something about

0:52:03.719 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the visual appearance. Maybe a quote he gives to the

0:52:07.080 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Scientific American article, he says, just in general, soil insects

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:14.920
<v Speaker 1>are quote very curious, So maybe putting an unusual item

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:17.719
<v Speaker 1>around the entrance to the nest will just tend to

0:52:17.760 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 1>get wandering bugs to walk up to it and see

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 1>if it's something of use to them. But I think

0:52:24.560 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this would not count just as baiting the way the

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:32.319
<v Speaker 1>burrowing owl example would with the cow dung or the

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 1>bison dung, because in this case it's not just to

0:52:35.560 --> 0:52:39.160
<v Speaker 1>get the insects close to the nest. In this case,

0:52:39.200 --> 0:52:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the actual nest entrances, basically holes in the ground, function

0:52:43.360 --> 0:52:46.880
<v Speaker 1>quite well as pit traps because once the prey insect

0:52:46.920 --> 0:52:49.839
<v Speaker 1>falls in, they have difficulty climbing back out, and the

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:53.400
<v Speaker 1>ants will rather quickly grab and butcher them. Now, this

0:52:53.520 --> 0:52:57.359
<v Speaker 1>is clearly not the only way this ant species has

0:52:57.360 --> 0:53:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to acquire prey. Fidolioxyops do lead the nest to acquire prey.

0:53:01.640 --> 0:53:05.440
<v Speaker 1>They forage like other ant species. But it's possible that

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 1>using the nest as a pit trap and surrounding it

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 1>with feathers as some kind of evolved behavior for luring

0:53:13.680 --> 0:53:18.239
<v Speaker 1>more insects into the hole that helps the colony supplement

0:53:18.280 --> 0:53:21.239
<v Speaker 1>their diet during especially times of the year, such as

0:53:21.280 --> 0:53:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the dry season in this region when prey is more scarce,

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:25.359
<v Speaker 1>harder to come by.

0:53:25.880 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 3>So they wouldn't be obligate trap builders. They would they

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:31.719
<v Speaker 3>would be sort of they would have like a trap

0:53:31.760 --> 0:53:34.000
<v Speaker 3>business on the side. I guess you would say.

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, if the trap interpretation is correct, it seems like

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:40.520
<v Speaker 1>this would be a supplemental role in getting extra food

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:45.319
<v Speaker 1>to them, extra diet diversity, especially in times when they're

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:47.960
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be getting less in their foraging or

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:49.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe when they're doing less foraging.

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, because they're you know, again they're altering their

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:59.840
<v Speaker 3>immediate environment anyway. There and then again, a whole like

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:03.879
<v Speaker 3>this is not a huge energy investment.

0:54:05.360 --> 0:54:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Is already part of the nest.

0:54:06.680 --> 0:54:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, already part of the nest. I guess the question

0:54:09.040 --> 0:54:11.799
<v Speaker 3>is coming back to those those reasons that were put

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:16.279
<v Speaker 3>forth earlier that we don't see more pit traps. Does

0:54:16.360 --> 0:54:20.120
<v Speaker 3>this would this make the the ant population more visible

0:54:20.160 --> 0:54:21.279
<v Speaker 3>to potential predators?

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:54:22.760 --> 0:54:25.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean maybe so, maybe not. Maybe maybe the animals

0:54:25.960 --> 0:54:30.120
<v Speaker 3>that would be interested in eating the ants already would

0:54:30.160 --> 0:54:32.600
<v Speaker 3>be able to detect their presence. And then again also

0:54:32.760 --> 0:54:36.360
<v Speaker 3>the ants have more capabilities than that one little larva

0:54:36.440 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 3>at the bottom of a small pit. You know, we're

0:54:38.200 --> 0:54:42.400
<v Speaker 3>not dealing with one organism. We're dealing with this, uh,

0:54:42.480 --> 0:54:46.280
<v Speaker 3>this entire colony of organisms that that kind of behave

0:54:46.400 --> 0:54:47.600
<v Speaker 3>as a single organism.

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, obviously I don't know what all the you know,

0:54:49.960 --> 0:54:53.759
<v Speaker 1>the cost benefit analysis of this evolutionary calculus would be.

0:54:54.320 --> 0:54:58.759
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, there must be some reason why by

0:54:59.120 --> 0:55:01.600
<v Speaker 1>having your ant nest a as a pit trap and

0:55:01.680 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this environment for this ant is is not such a

0:55:06.080 --> 0:55:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not such a danger that it outweighs the benefit

0:55:09.120 --> 0:55:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of getting some bugs to fall in as free meals.

0:55:12.440 --> 0:55:15.440
<v Speaker 1>But I also like this because it's like by house analogy.

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:19.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like if your entire house was just like below

0:55:19.400 --> 0:55:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the ground and the entrance to the house was a

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:25.920
<v Speaker 1>spike pit trap like a tiger trap. Yeah, just waited

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:28.480
<v Speaker 1>for things to fall in and be like, oh bonus,

0:55:28.480 --> 0:55:32.400
<v Speaker 1>here's dinner, and you always and you had the lures,

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you had the feathers all around. I don't know what

0:55:33.880 --> 0:55:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that would be in the human example, you put just

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:39.319
<v Speaker 1>cotton candy around the around the trap that you come

0:55:39.360 --> 0:55:39.719
<v Speaker 1>in through.

0:55:40.280 --> 0:55:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is certainly another fascinating example. Yeah, and I

0:55:44.160 --> 0:55:47.000
<v Speaker 3>love how both present the possibility of ants building traps.

0:55:47.400 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 3>But since they are ants, like it's it's not that

0:55:50.719 --> 0:55:54.040
<v Speaker 3>cut and dry, like, ants have a complexity all their own,

0:55:54.360 --> 0:55:55.960
<v Speaker 3>so you can't really look at them in the same

0:55:55.960 --> 0:55:59.000
<v Speaker 3>way that you would look at a single solitary spider

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:02.719
<v Speaker 3>or certainly even you know, the human example, Like what

0:56:02.840 --> 0:56:04.800
<v Speaker 3>we do with traps and how we think about traps

0:56:05.080 --> 0:56:07.359
<v Speaker 3>is a rather different scenario compared to anything, you know,

0:56:07.400 --> 0:56:11.000
<v Speaker 3>anything that we're seeing in several of these animal examples.

0:56:11.280 --> 0:56:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I guess that does it for ant traps

0:56:14.640 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>on my end.

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, well this was fun. Who knows what the

0:56:18.120 --> 0:56:22.040
<v Speaker 3>future will hold. Perhaps there'll be more exciting studies coming

0:56:22.080 --> 0:56:25.000
<v Speaker 3>out of the world of ant research. I mean, it's

0:56:25.080 --> 0:56:28.279
<v Speaker 3>it's highly possible. I mean, we're still we're still making

0:56:28.440 --> 0:56:32.080
<v Speaker 3>significant discoveries about ant species and what they're up to.

0:56:32.440 --> 0:56:35.640
<v Speaker 1>There are frontiers of ants you couldn't even dream of.

0:56:36.320 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 3>There are ant traps that we don't even know about

0:56:39.680 --> 0:56:41.799
<v Speaker 3>yet because they haven't been sprung on us.

0:56:41.920 --> 0:56:43.680
<v Speaker 1>When you fall into them. You go through the two

0:56:43.719 --> 0:56:49.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one stargate and in the room with the

0:56:49.120 --> 0:56:49.960
<v Speaker 1>French furniture.

0:56:52.480 --> 0:56:54.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, we've never watched an ant movie for a

0:56:54.680 --> 0:56:57.280
<v Speaker 3>weird house cinema. I wonder if we should at some point.

0:56:57.520 --> 0:57:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I have for years been looking at the cover

0:57:00.960 --> 0:57:05.799
<v Speaker 1>of a Blu ray at Videodrome called Phase four. It's

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a picture of a hand with some ants. I know

0:57:08.160 --> 0:57:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it involves ants. I don't know anything else.

0:57:10.880 --> 0:57:13.520
<v Speaker 3>I guess the question I would have, especially after talking

0:57:13.600 --> 0:57:17.760
<v Speaker 3>about ants like this again, is are we looking at

0:57:17.760 --> 0:57:21.160
<v Speaker 3>thinking about movies that have a giant ant in them

0:57:21.280 --> 0:57:24.360
<v Speaker 3>and have encounters with various giant ants, or is it

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:27.800
<v Speaker 3>truly about the ants as this kind of super organism

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:29.560
<v Speaker 3>And I like the latter.

0:57:29.640 --> 0:57:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:57:29.960 --> 0:57:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, though, maybe having a giant sized ant is kind

0:57:33.800 --> 0:57:37.600
<v Speaker 3>of a way through our fantastic fiction that we think

0:57:37.640 --> 0:57:40.600
<v Speaker 3>about super organisms. So it's kind of like, yes, the

0:57:40.600 --> 0:57:43.120
<v Speaker 3>ants are small, but they work together and they're able

0:57:43.120 --> 0:57:45.000
<v Speaker 3>to do great things. So we just think of like

0:57:45.040 --> 0:57:48.400
<v Speaker 3>a giant ant. That's like just one way of contemplating

0:57:48.400 --> 0:57:52.600
<v Speaker 3>what they're capable of. So the next time ant movies

0:57:52.640 --> 0:57:55.120
<v Speaker 3>come back, if you're out there thinking about resurrecting the

0:57:55.160 --> 0:57:59.520
<v Speaker 3>giant ant movie, consider having them like tear people apart.

0:57:59.560 --> 0:58:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Things like that. You know, crawling out of windows, pulling

0:58:02.960 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 3>people taunt against the sides of a building and then

0:58:06.400 --> 0:58:08.960
<v Speaker 3>transferring them up to the rooftop and tearing them to pieces.

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Nice final processing.

0:58:11.400 --> 0:58:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes, all right, well we're gonna gohe and close out

0:58:14.760 --> 0:58:16.880
<v Speaker 3>this episode here, but we'd love to hear from everybody

0:58:16.880 --> 0:58:20.480
<v Speaker 3>out there about traps, traps and movies, Traps in the

0:58:20.520 --> 0:58:24.200
<v Speaker 3>human world, traps in the animal world. Is there is

0:58:24.240 --> 0:58:26.200
<v Speaker 3>there some corner of this topic you'd like for us

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:29.000
<v Speaker 3>to explore more in the future. Let us know we

0:58:29.040 --> 0:58:30.880
<v Speaker 3>would love to hear from you. If you would like

0:58:30.880 --> 0:58:33.000
<v Speaker 3>to listen to other episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind,

0:58:33.320 --> 0:58:35.280
<v Speaker 3>you will find them in the Stuff to Blow Your

0:58:35.280 --> 0:58:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Mind podcast feed Core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays, listener

0:58:38.360 --> 0:58:42.520
<v Speaker 3>mail on Monday's short form artifact on Wednesdays. On Friday,

0:58:42.520 --> 0:58:44.120
<v Speaker 3>we do Weird House Cinema. That's our time to set

0:58:44.160 --> 0:58:47.840
<v Speaker 3>aside most serious concerns and just look at a strange film.

0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:50.320
<v Speaker 3>As always, you can also get to us rather quickly

0:58:50.360 --> 0:58:53.200
<v Speaker 3>by going to Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:58:53.480 --> 0:58:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Huge Things, So as always to our excellent audio producer

0:58:56.440 --> 0:58:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get in

0:58:59.000 --> 0:59:01.480
<v Speaker 1>touch with us with back on this episode or any other,

0:59:01.600 --> 0:59:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to suggest a topic for the future, just to say hello.

0:59:04.240 --> 0:59:07.040
<v Speaker 1>You can email us at contact and Stuff to Blow

0:59:07.080 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind dot com.

0:59:15.800 --> 0:59:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:59:18.840 --> 0:59:22.680
<v Speaker 2>more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:59:22.760 --> 0:59:38.760
<v Speaker 2>or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.