WEBVTT - #392 Wrongful Conviction: Junk Science - Arson Evidence

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey, folks, Kate Judson here. I'm a lawyer and the

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:09.039
<v Speaker 1>executive director of the Center for Integrity and Forensic Sciences.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 1>We're back with another episode of Junk Science, a series

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we first released in twenty twenty, but these stories are

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>just as relevant as ever. This week is all about

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>arson evidence, the faulty forensic science that was used to

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>convict Cameron Willingham, whose story you're about to hear. Since

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Willingham was convicted, we're realizing more and more that

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>this type of evidence cannot be relied on. But the

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>lessons of this case don't go far enough. We still

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>have cases today where the only evidence presented is an

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>expert opinion. The problem is that the jury doesn't always

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>understand that what they're hearing is opinion, not indisputable fact,

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and deciding someone's fate based on one person's opinion is

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a recipe for disaster.

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 2>It's December twenty third. Last night, you decorated a Christmas

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 2>tree with your family. You put your two year old

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 2>on your shoulder so she could hang her favorite ornament

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 2>way up high on the tree. Your twin babies gazed

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 2>up at you from the living room floor, taking the

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 2>scene in with giggles and excited kicks of their little legs.

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Later on, your wife put the kids to bed, and

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 2>then you both stayed up late, finishing the tree and

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 2>cleaning up. In the morning, your wife leaves the house

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 2>early for some last minute chopping for the girls. The

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 2>babies hear the door slam and start to cry, as

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>they typically do. You take them out of their cribs,

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 2>give them eat a bottle, and put them on the

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>soft play mat on the floor so they can keep

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 2>each other company. You head back to your room and

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 2>as you lay down, you hear them cooing from across

0:01:55.800 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the hall. You drift off to sleep, sleep long. You

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 2>wake up to your two year old daughter screaming, Daddy, Daddy.

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 2>You're groggy, startled, but the terror in her voice snaps

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 2>you awake like a blaring alarm. And then it hits you.

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 2>The room is a dense cloud of gray and black.

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 2>You can barely see. You smell charcoal, ash, smoke. Oh no,

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 2>your girls. Gefted girls out of the house. It's loud.

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:40.679
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like an angry windstorm. The entire house is crackling, popping.

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 2>You make your way to the baby's room and feel

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 2>around on the floor, groping in the darkness. You think

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 2>you grab one of the twins, but it's just a

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 2>baby doll. Your hair is on fire. You stand up

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 2>and pat it out and frantically get on the ground again.

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Then a loud crash. Something is falling from somewhere in

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 2>the house. It must be the caving in a part

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 2>of the roof or a wall, but you can't see anything.

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 2>It's so hot you can't breathe. You need to catch

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 2>your breath before you pass out. You finally make your

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 2>way outside to get help. You'll come back for them.

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 2>You see your neighbor on her front lawn and scream

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 2>for her to call the fire department. She sees a

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 2>hysterical man covered in soot, and she yells back, they're

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 2>on the way. You try to get back inside, breaking

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>the window of the baby's room with a stick you

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 2>find in the yard. Flames explode from the opening. Oh God,

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 2>you can't get in. You're crying out for your children. Someone, anyone,

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 2>please help. The fire department finally arrives and they have

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 2>to hold you back. They find your two year old

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 2>in the bedroom on the floor. You didn't realize she

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 2>had been there, right there. Your babies are on the

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 2>floor of their room where you had left them with

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 2>their bottles. You had been so close to finding them.

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 2>They try to do CPR, but it's too late. You're

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 2>escorted away from the house, and once the fires are

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 2>under control, investigators in protective gear head inside. There's no

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 2>sense of urgency anymore. They walk through the remains and

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 2>disappear into the black and living room where you had

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 2>spent your last night together as a family. You are

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 2>dumbfounded when they arrest you for arson murder. This was

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 2>your family. You would never lay a finger on your children.

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 2>At your trial, the prosecutors call expert witnesses who tell

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 2>the jury that the proven signs of fire tells the

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 2>story of how you who committed this crime. You poured

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 2>lighter fluid, which they referred to as an accelerant, under

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 2>your baby's beds in the hallway by the front door.

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 2>The burn marks seared into the floor indicate where that

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 2>lighter fluid was puddled on the carpet. They say, there's

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 2>no way you tried to save your girls. If you had,

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 2>your feet would have been burned. Dripstains proved that you

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 2>poured accelerant up and down the hallway, the melted metal

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 2>door frame, the shattered glass. It all proves the fire

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 2>was so unnaturally hot that it produced temperatures that could

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 2>only have been created by chemicals that you intentionally poured

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 2>all over your home and your motive. Prosecutors argued this,

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 2>you love heavy metal music, and that indicates that you

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 2>have a dark side. You have posters on the walls

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 2>of your home, one of which depicts a grim reaper

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 2>that proves you're obsessed with death. You have a tattoo

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 2>of a skull and snake on your arm that indicates

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:10.239
<v Speaker 2>that you're a violent person. You have psychiatric problems, perhaps

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 2>a demonic disposition. You couldn't afford to hire a lawyer,

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 2>so the court appointed you an attorney. He too, suspects

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 2>that you killed your children. He tells you to plead guilty.

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 2>If you do, they'll give you life in prison instead

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 2>of the death sentence. You can't do this. This was

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 2>an accident. There was no crime here. You're not going

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 2>to confess to killing your three beautiful children. You didn't

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 2>do anything wrong here. You were convicted and sentenced to

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 2>death on death row. The events of that day haunt you.

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 2>You look at the photos of your children, your wife

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 2>to remember the man you were, the life you once had.

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Time seems to stand still on death row, and the

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 2>whole experience is nothing short of paralyzing. But the date

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 2>of your execution eventually closes in. You write a letter

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>to your parents, telling them to never stop fighting to

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 2>clear your name, even if it's after they put you

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 2>to death. The last words of your fellow inmates, the

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 2>ones who were executed before you, one by one, were

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 2>often apologies. Sometimes they were confessions. But before you're strapped

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 2>into the gurney and given a lethal injection, you say,

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 2>I am an innocent person convicted of a crime I

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 2>did not commit. I've been persecuted for twelve years for

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 2>something I did not do. From God's dust I came,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 2>and to dust I will return, so the earth shall

0:07:54.680 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 2>become my throne. Your parents scatter your ashes over the

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 2>graves of your children. The story you just heard is

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 2>based on the wrongful conviction of Cameron Todd Willingham, who

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 2>was wrongfully convicted and executed in two thousand and four.

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm Josh Dubin, civil rights and criminal defense attorney, an

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 2>innocent ambassador to the Innocence Project in New York Today

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 2>on wrongful conviction junk science, we examine arson evidence. In

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy three, the Nixon administration published a report entitled

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 2>America Burning. It was all about damage the fires caused

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 2>in America, both in terms of physical distrutuction and the

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 2>billions of dollars spent to repair and rebuild. But unfortunately,

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 2>much of what was considered fire signs in America Burning

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 2>was merely a set of core assumptions that were never

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 2>subjected to the rigors of the scientific method. That is,

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 2>develop a hypothesis, test it, confirm it, reconfirm it, and

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:26.239
<v Speaker 2>repeat until you know you have something sound and verifiable.

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 2>As a result of this study, fire investigators were given

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 2>a handbook, A Guide to Reading fire damage like a

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 2>psychic reads tea leaves. An investigator, having learned from this handbook,

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 2>starts his investigation at the exterior of a burnt down house.

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 2>He sees a V shaped burn on what's left of

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 2>the walls of the living room. He notes this is

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 2>the room where the fire started. He walks through the home,

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 2>keeping an eye out for the telltale signs of arson.

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 2>First crazed glass when windows shattered into irregular pieces with

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 2>light smoke deposits that indicate a rapid buildup of heat

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>that can only be caused by an accelerant. Second alligatoring,

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 2>large shiny blisters on burnt wood. Fast hot fires produced

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 2>by accelerants create this pattern. Third, puddle formations and burns

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 2>that look like drip trails. These are caused by the

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 2>spreading of accelerant like gasoline or paint thinner throughout a

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:34.239
<v Speaker 2>house before it is intentionally set on fire. The investigator

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 2>checks all of these signs off the list. He knows

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 2>this must be arson. It turns out the investigator only

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 2>had a fifty percent chance of being right at best,

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 2>because fire science was built on a foundation of conjecture

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 2>and best guesses that were never adequately tested and confirmed

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 2>according to valid scientific principles. What experts and prosecutors had

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 2>been telling juries for decades about how you can definitively

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 2>determine that a fire was intentionally set was completely wrong.

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 2>In fact, signs that indicated to investigators that they were

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 2>dealing with arson, crazed glass, alligator patterns, burn marks indicating

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 2>drips or puddles of accelerant were actually the same things

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>left in the wake of an accidental fire. So the

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 2>evidence that was used to convict Cameron Todd Willingham and

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 2>so many others was deeply, deeply flawed.

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 3>It turns out that there was no evidence whatsoever that

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 3>this had been a fire that was set by Todd

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Willingham running up and down his home, you know, just

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 3>before Christmas, spreading in all the different rooms and down

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 3>the hallway, and killing his three children. It was clear

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 3>that this was junk science. And unfortunately, by this point

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 3>in my career, I was familiar enough with the phenomenon

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 3>of junk science not to be surprised.

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Joining us today to tell us about arson evidence and

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 2>how it relates to cases like Cameron Todd Willingham's is

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Barry Sheck, co founder of the Innocence Project and famed

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 2>civil rights and criminal defense attorney. So Barry, first, thanks

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 2>for being here and for our listeners. Barry is one

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 2>of my personal heroes, and I'm just ecstatic that we're

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 2>able to get you to enlighten us about arson evidence. Now,

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 2>you worked to get Cameron Todd Willingham's case overturned after

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 2>he was executed, and this might seem like somewhat of

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 2>a pointless fight to some people, since mister Willingham was

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 2>already put to death in two thousand and four. But

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 2>you are fighting for mister Willingham's final wish for his

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 2>name to be cleared and him to be declared an

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 2>innocent man by a court. I think that it's well

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>accepted that he's an innocent man at this point. But

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 2>you're also fighting so that the kind of evidence that

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 2>was used against mister Willingham doesn't get used to convict

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 2>another innocent person. And so, to start off, Barry, if

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 2>some of the clues used an arson investigation or indeed

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 2>junk science, how did Cameron Todd Willingham get convicted in

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 2>the first place?

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 3>What the fire scientists, the arson investigators in Willingham, what

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 3>they did in that case. They would go to the

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 3>scene of a fire and they would look at all

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 3>these visual cues. And if they saw what was called alligatoring,

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 3>which was like the scales of an alligator on wood.

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 3>If they saw what was known as craze glass, that's

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 3>it's like a spider type cracking of the glass. If

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 3>they saw spawling of concrete that's like little chips coming

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 3>off the concrete at the scene of the fire, if

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 3>they saw scouring on the floor, poor patterns, they immediately

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 3>assumed that all of these visual cues meant that somebody

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 3>had spread accelerant around the house and lit it and

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 3>that was the cause of the fire. And they literally

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 3>said to the jury, we look at the fire, the

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 3>fire talks to us. The fire doesn't lie. That's very

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 3>powerful to a jury. So what happened, Josh, is that

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 3>when we at the Innocence Project saw what happened in

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 3>the Willingham case, we had just been involved in setting

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 3>up what's known as the Texas Forensic Science Commission. They

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 3>reviewed all the crime scene evidence in the Willingham case

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 3>and they said was clear and that is this is

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 3>junk science. This had been discredited by National Fire Protection

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 3>nine twenty one, ten years ago. The science was completely flawed, unreliable, ridiculous.

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 2>So even after all of that, the state of Texas

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 2>still refused to free Cameron Todd Willingham. And to show

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 2>just how flawed this evidence was, there was a man

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 2>named Ernest Willis who was convicted of a similar crime

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 2>with similar evidence than was used in the Willingham case.

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 2>But while Cameron Todd Willingham was put to death in

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and four. Willis was declared innocent that very

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 2>same year. So how is that possible, Barry, that one

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 2>man Willingham is executed based on this junk science, while

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 2>another man, Willis, whose case was very similar, gets to

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 2>go free.

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Ernest Willis went to trial, he had a completely incompetent

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 3>lawyer who was sparred for all kinds of reasons. Willis

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 3>was so upset by the fire that killed family members

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 3>that he was literally on psychotropic medication in the witness chair. Right.

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 3>He was lucky because his lawyer was so incompetent, and

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 3>on his death penalty appeal he got a patent lawyer

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 3>from LEITHA Ben Watkins in New York who dove into

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 3>the case and was able to get the federal courts

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 3>to vacate that conviction. And when the conviction was remanded

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 3>on exactly the same evidence, just like the Willingham case,

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Willis was not only exonerated. There was a prosecutor in

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Pakos County, Texas took one look at this and said,

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 3>oh my god, this was an accidental fire. This was

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 3>not an arson murder. And he not only dismissed the

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 3>case against Ernest Willis. Ernest Willis was compensated as actually

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 3>innocent by the State of Texas, while within the same

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 3>time period, Cameron Todd Willingham was executed.

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 2>It's just really hard to hear this stuff right because

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 2>right away this indicates some sort of double standard, or

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 2>at least some confusion within the justice system about what

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 2>arson evidence really means and how much it can be trusted.

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 2>And to be clear, by two thousand and four, there

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't have been any confusion about this type of evidence

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 2>because in the early nineties there were two incidents that

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to ask you about that really proved that

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the kind of arson evidence used in the Cameron Todd

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 2>Willingham case was bogus. The first was the Lime Street

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>case in nineteen ninety, which was the case of Gerald

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Wayne Lewis. Mister Lewis was accused of killing his pregnant wife,

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 2>his sister, and his sister's four children by arson. Now

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 2>Gerald always maintained his innocence, but it was actually a

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 2>prosecution expert named John Lentini who was the moving force

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 2>improving gerald innocence.

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 3>John Lentini was an arson investigator and he went along

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 3>with a colleague of his, John Dehan, to investigate an

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:19.360
<v Speaker 3>allegation of arson at a home on Lime Street in Jacksonville, Florida.

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 3>And they examined the crime scene, and they were all ready,

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 3>by their own admission, to make a recommendation that it

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 3>was an intentional arson. But they realized that right next

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 3>to the house that burned down was another house that

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 3>was abandoned, but it was the same construction. So they

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 3>rebuilt the house right next door to be identical to

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 3>the Lime Street house that burned down, and then they

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 3>basically put a cigarette on a couch. They began the

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 3>fire in a way that would be completely accidental. The

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 3>whole place burned down, and they saw all the clues,

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 3>all the visual clues from the craze glass, alligatoring, burning

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 3>under furniture, a completely compartmentalized fire. They saw all these cues,

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 3>and they knew that it was an accidental fire, not

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 3>a deliberate one, and so that began to change everything.

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 2>So again, this is very ironic and rare because Lentini's

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 2>a fire investigator that's working for the prosecution, and he's

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 2>actually trying to prove that this Lime Streek case was

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 2>in fact arson and that Gerald Wayne Lewis had actually

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 2>done it. But he realizes that there was some serious

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 2>issues with his assumptions because this accidental fire actually resembled

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 2>an arson, and it resembled it in very critical ways.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 2>And what was most shocking to me about this was

0:19:56.280 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 2>that Lentini saw puddlestains and trailmar that looked identical to

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 2>what he had been taught and so many other investigators

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 2>had been taught, or the telltale signs of someone dripping

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 2>gasoline or another accelerant throughout a house. But that definitely

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 2>was not the case here. And they knew that because

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 2>they set the fire themselves with a cigarette exactly.

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 3>And they'd say, well, that really can't happen unless it's

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 3>an intentionally set fire. But it turns out with this

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 3>phenomenon of flashover, which is you get this hot combustible

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 3>object in a small space, ordinarily a room, right, and

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 3>then it begins to cause this huge burst of heat

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 3>and fire in that room and the whole place becomes engulfed.

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 3>So that's what creates the intense heat that arson investigators

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 3>had hypothesized must come from the deliberate use of accelerants.

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 3>It turns out that it could all happen in a

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 3>completely accidental fire.

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 2>So Linini the investigator, realizes that accidental fires can look

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 2>just like arson, and he does something that is actually

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 2>quite remarkable. But it shouldn't be, because whether you're working

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 2>for the prosecution or the defense, when the science tells

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 2>you something, you should not have a bias in its application.

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't say, Oh, this is just some weird coincidence.

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to keep working for prosecutors to convict people

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 2>in arson cases based on this evidence that I now

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 2>know is clearly faulty, it's wrong. Instead, he's pretty shocked,

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 2>appalled by what he sees, and he feels like he's

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 2>been misled by this evidence for years. Right, And he

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 2>gets an opportunity to examine a bunch more accidental fires

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that his findings in the Lime Street

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 2>case were consistent with other accidental fires.

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if people remember, but these homes on

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 3>in the hills in Oakland, California, began to burn down,

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, in what was plainly a series of accidental fires.

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 3>And after all these homes were burned down, the fire

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 3>scientists went at and examined each and every one of them,

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 3>and they realized, once again, here were plainly accidental fires.

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 3>But all these visual cues that arson experts had been

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 3>relying on demonstrated that it was an accident. It was

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 3>not an intentionally set fire. So take just the craze glass.

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.360
<v Speaker 3>That's a simple thing to understand. You know, you look

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 3>at the glass, it's sort of spider glass, and that

0:22:54.040 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 3>supposedly an indication of suddenly intense heat that comes from

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 3>an accelerant induced fire. In fact, you found craze glass

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 3>all over in Oakland in the Lime Street fire. Because

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 3>craize glass happens when people come to put out the

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 3>fire and they put cold water on it and the

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 3>glass cracks. That's how you get crazed glass.

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 2>So these arson investigators have been testifying for years and

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 2>years that the reason you see crazed glass and it's

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 2>no pun intent. That it's actually a crazy notion that

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 2>they're testifying to one thing, and it turns out to

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 2>be the exact opposite. All right, So crazed glass was

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 2>caused by the cooling of the glass when they're putting

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 2>the fire out. What were some other things that were wrong.

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 3>About They would say, oh, we're looking at mattress springs

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 3>in a bed or something and they're melted. That can

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 3>only happen if it's an intentionally set fire. But when

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 3>they went to the hills of Oakland and looked at

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 3>these homes, they saw the same thing, and the same

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 3>thing at the Lime Street fire.

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you would think that would be the end

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 2>of people trying to use this kind of junk science,

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 2>this kind of false evidence, but that isn't the case.

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 3>What is really upsetting is that you see over the

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:24.719
<v Speaker 3>next few decades, nonetheless, lots of people who were convicted

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 3>because they never did scientific validation in the first place.

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 3>You actually have to conduct experiments, you have to have hypotheses,

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 3>and you have to prove that they're true, instead of

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 3>just having you know, really you know, sort of law

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 3>enforcement people in lab coats, so to speak, or people

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 3>that have expertise by way of quote unquote experience going

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 3>to crime scenes and looking at fire scenes and really

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 3>coming up with their own hypotheses that were never demonstrated

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 3>to be true by science. That's what's so shocking about

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 3>this whole area. In other words, if you believe all

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 3>these different visual cues demonstrate that an accelerant has been used,

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 3>you should do experiments to prove the point.

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Now, Barry, this isn't the case where these investigators were

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 2>out to harm people. This is just how they were trained.

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:27.479
<v Speaker 3>I have some sympathy for a whole group of people

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 3>who had, many of them just high school graduates who

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 3>were trained in arson investigation, to believe all these different

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 3>visual cues were a sign of the use of an

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 3>accelerant and intentionally set fire that was never empirically demonstrated,

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 3>and yet they were doing it, and that's how they

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 3>made a living. That's true, and they thought that they

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 3>had expertise. It's imagine how horrendous it is to believe,

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 3>as a prosecutor or as a so called you know,

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 3>arson investigator, that you were wrong and you destroyed people's lives.

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 3>People don't get up in the morning and say let's

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 3>do that, right, but it happens, and it's very hard

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 3>to admit to it.

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, So why do you think it is that?

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, generations of experts have all been proven to

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.439
<v Speaker 2>be wrong. The assumptions they rely on turn out to

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 2>be incorrect, But there's this unwillingness to change.

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Once you have invested yourself in this belief and all

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 3>these very weighty consequences follow. It's very hard to admit

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 3>that you were wrong, even when there's scientific proof that

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 3>you're wrong. John Lintini and John de Haan and all

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 3>these various experts, you know, they started off as regular

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 3>are and investigators that were taught to believe these things.

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 3>But engaging in real science and doing these experiments, they

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 3>realized it was all wrong, and they had an enormous

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 3>amount of trouble persuading the forensic science community to stop,

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 3>and they're still fighting about it even to this day.

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think that the Willingham case and all

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:31.479
<v Speaker 3>these other exonerations have exposed the community to it, and

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 3>you literally can see fewer arson convictions since that happened.

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 3>But Josh, you're absolutely right. It's mystifying. It's so upsetting

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 3>that it is taking so long to change.

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 2>It, and meanwhile, these convictions based on this false arson

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 2>science or there's fire evidence just keep on coming.

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:59.239
<v Speaker 3>Hantak Lee, whose daughter who suffered from mental illness, was

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 3>found yeah, literally burnt to death, incinerated, you know, in

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 3>a small community in Pennsylvania. He gets convicted of killing

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 3>his daughter intentionally in a fire which did not happen.

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, The case of Hantok Lee is just it's really

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 2>really troubling. I mean, here's a guy that spent fifteen

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 2>years in prison for a murder he did not commit.

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 2>And there's a quote that always stuck with me from

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 2>an opinion written by a judge during Hantok Lee's appeal,

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 2>and it was this quote. Much of what was presented

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 2>to Lee's jury as science is now conceded to be

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 2>little more than superstition end quote. I mean, that's so remarkable,

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 2>isn't it. And you know, again, the fact that this

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 2>is still used in the face of quotes like that

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 2>is just it's hard to understand. You know. He was

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 2>granted a new trial and finally exonerated, thankfully, in twenty fifteen.

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Another was a Sonia Casey, who is convicted of burning

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 3>down a house and killing I guess it was her uncle,

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Bill Richardson. And and of course it turned out that

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Bill Richardson was actually a heavy smoker and had probably

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 3>fallen asleep with a burning cigarette. But plainly she did

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 3>not start this fire. All the same kind of junk

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 3>science was used in that case. And that's the great

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 3>tragedy when you look at the arson cases, so many

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 3>people like Ernest Willis or Cameron Todd Willingham or a

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Hantock League, you know, they're all convicted of killing with

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 3>intentionally set fires. They're loved ones. That to me is,

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, the horrible, horrible irony of these junk science cases.

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Now for our listeners, I know Barry, you know twenty

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 2>years and I've seen you get emotional before and passionate

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 2>about a lot of cases. I want to go back

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 2>to the Cameron Todd Willingham case for a moment because

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 2>it seems to me that this is one that really

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 2>stuck with you, and it seems to me like one

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 2>of the two or three cases that has really haunted

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 2>you in all your innocence work.

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 3>How can it not haunt you? It should haunt everyone

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 3>in this country. I mean, this is a case that

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 3>ought to change the way the people look at capital

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 3>punishment and forensic science. I think we look we've made

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of progress, but we still haven't corrected the

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 3>biggest injustice of all, and that is the wrongful execution

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 3>of Cameron Todd Willingham. Do you see the suffering up

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 3>to the very very end and the execution of an

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 3>innocent man. How could it not haunt you? There's so

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 3>much importance attached with the state finally admitting that it

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 3>was wrong and that an innocent person is executed, and

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 3>that will happen in Texas. It will.

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Something we keep returning back to in this podcast is

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 2>the two thousand and nine National Academy of Sciences Report,

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 2>which is a report published by rigorous scientists that is

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 2>very critical of forensic sciences like arson investigation. In fact,

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 2>the only one that it's not really critical of is DNA.

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 2>And you've done a lot to try to push the

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 2>lessons of this report to overturn convictions based on junk science.

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Truth is the two thousand and nine and National Academy

0:31:55.800 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 3>of Science Report recommended that there be an independent entity

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 3>in the federal government that would be dedicated to providing

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 3>a scientific basis and oversight to all these forensic science disciplines.

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 3>And independent entity, the National Commission on Forensic Science was

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 3>put into place, which had independent experts from lots of

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 3>different scientific communities. When Trump was elected, he abolished the

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 3>National Commission on Forensic Science.

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Look, it's really inspiring to see that despite all that's

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 2>gone wrong and all that hasn't worked that you're still

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 2>hopeful because something else that's so shocking is that this

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 2>issue about what kind of evidence should be considered scientific facts,

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 2>something that can literally determine whether or not someone should

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 2>live or die based on a crime they may not

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 2>have committed. It's all still being treated like a political issue,

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 2>and you have personal experience with these political barrier Yet

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 2>you're still hopeful despite all of the harm that's been

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 2>done and continues to be done by political officials, by presidents,

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 2>by judges who, unlike Lentini, refuse to see the light,

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 2>so to speak.

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, it becomes this big echo chamber. Junk science

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 3>is admitted by one court, right, and all the experts

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 3>can then testify again and again and again, even though

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 3>it was never properly validated in the first place. And

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 3>we've had a lot of that, and judges really have

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 3>to be rigorous on dealing with it. And the problem

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 3>with judges is that we all went to law school

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 3>and not medical school. The judges really do have to

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 3>be better in terms of getting into the nuts and

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 3>bolts of the science. It's intimidating to them, just as

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 3>it's intimidating to a lot of lawyers.

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 2>You might be listening to this what you can do

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 2>to help. I want every listener to consider that even

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 2>those who were wrongly convicted and are lucky enough to

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 2>be released from prison, their lives are just never the same.

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's take the example of Sonya Casey. She's the woman

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Barry Shek mentioned who was accused of murdering her uncle

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:23.720
<v Speaker 2>by arson. We know that miss Casey was innocent because,

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 2>amongst other evidence, it was later found during the autopsy

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 2>of her uncle that he most likely died from a

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 2>heart attack. There was no soot in his lungs, which

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 2>would have been there if he had in fact died

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 2>in the fire. Instead, there was fluid in his lungs,

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 2>so the evidence supported the conclusion that he was dead

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 2>before the fire had even spread. Nevertheless, Casey was sentenced

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:53.839
<v Speaker 2>to ninety nine years in prison. Sonya Casey was eventually exonerated,

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 2>but the stain of her wrongful conviction meant that on

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 2>every job application or when she try to rent an apartment,

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 2>she would either have to check a box saying that

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 2>she had been convicted of a crime, or it would

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 2>be revealed on a background check that made it nearly

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 2>impossible for her to find work or a place to live. So,

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 2>if you own a business, or you're a landlord, or

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 2>you're just in a position to either approve or reject

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:25.320
<v Speaker 2>someone for work or a place to live, and someone

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 2>checks the box that they had previously been convicted of

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:32.320
<v Speaker 2>a crime, please talk to them. Learn about the circumstances

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:35.919
<v Speaker 2>of their arrest, the accusations against them, who they are

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 2>now as a human being. Perhaps you'll find that they

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 2>were the victim, yes, the victim of a wrongful conviction.

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Or maybe it's just that they've done something in their

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:50.879
<v Speaker 2>past and are no longer that person. The great civil

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 2>rights attorney Brian Stevenson said it best. Each one of

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 2>us is more than the worst thing we've ever done.

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 2>The true measure of our character is how we treat

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 2>the poor, the disfavored, the accused, the incarcerated, and the condemned.

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 2>I think we can all learn something from that. Next

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 2>week will analyze hair microscopy, the profoundly flawed junk science

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 2>that attempts to use human hair to accuse and convict

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 2>people of crimes they did not commit.

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 4>Wrongful conviction junk science is a production of Lava for

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 4>Good Podcasts and association with Signal Company Number One. Thanks

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 4>to our executive producer Jason Flahm and the team at

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:46.280
<v Speaker 4>Signal Company Number One executive producer Kevin Wardis and senior

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 4>producers Karen Kornhaber and Britz Spangler.

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Our music was composed by Jay Ralph. You can follow

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 2>me on Instagram at dubin Josh.

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Follow the Wrongful Conviction podcast on Facebook and on Instagram

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 4>at Wrongful Conviction and on Twitter at wrong Conviction