WEBVTT - Yuan Devaluation Unlikely, Don’t Hit Panic Button: BBH’s Thin

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Well

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>as Greg Jarrett was just mentioning the dollar showing strength

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>at least against the Japanese end right now one ten forty,

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>also strength against the pounds sterling at one fifty three.

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us more about exchange rates and the

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>US dollars, Dr Win Thin, Global head of Emerging Markets

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>FX for Brown Brothers Harriman uh Win Thin, thanks very

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. The strength of the US

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar is that going to continue against emerging market uh,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>currencies such as Mexico and Brazil, as well as Indonesia,

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Malaysia and so on. Yes, but first of all, thanks

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. It's always a pleasure. Um. Yes,

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>uh I look for continued e M weakness. Um, it's

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for a riot of reasons. You know. Obviously the big

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>stories is higher U S rates, but I think what's

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>really given this UH, this last leg lower in the

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>e M pushes the is the rising trade tensions, you know,

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and strong global growth, strong global trade flows are are

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>really bullish for em and with all the risks that

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>are out there, all the tip for tat um uncertainty,

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>but where where the US WE stands, that's all hurting

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the emerging markets. So yes, it's a broad based dollar rally.

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not just against the e M, it's also been

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>rallied against the majors. So um that broad based rallually

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>being driven by the US interest rate outlook. So when

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, one thing that I'm struck by is the

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>strengthening dollar has been a trend for many weeks now

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and people have been adjusting to that. The rapid depreciation

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese un however, seems to be picking up speed.

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Has been the biggest weekly drop since tu in that currency,

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.239
<v Speaker 1>and you just have to wonder, you know, is this

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>UH an active devaluation by the Chinese government or does

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>this signal further and and rapidly deteriorating outlook for the

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinese economy. Well, I think it's uh. Two thinks that

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it's still early on so I don't want to tell

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the alarm bells. It's it's certainly uh, you know, raising

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>eyebrows the speed of the move this week. But what

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I've noted and what I've been telling our clients is

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that this is a short period of you want under

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>performance follows a long extended period of you want a performance.

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>And when the rest of em was selling off in

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 1>uh do out most of Q two UM, the Chinese

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>one was really holding up pretty well. It was almost unchanged.

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say a year to date, if you look

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>at your w c RS page, the Chinese you want

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is the fifth best performing currency is down only one

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.399
<v Speaker 1>against the dollar year to date. That compares to minus

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>for past though, minus seventeen and a half a turkey.

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So I just want to keep things sort of in

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in perspective. The other thing I would also add is

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>if you look at China's real effective exchange rate that

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 1>is just for the trade inflation, et cetera. UM, it's

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>done at the b I S. If you look on

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>your on your page, you carry that b I S

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>DCNR index. UM, it's it's been rising this past year,

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's because the yuan is outperforming. That is is

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it's training partners. The currency of its trading partners have

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>been weakening much more than yuan, and so the in

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>real effective terms, the yu want's actually appreciating. So again,

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>just things that sort of think about you know, I

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>know that you know these headlines, but you know, and

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to think a sort of longer view that.

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh and look, remember just that they're also reminded one

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>there in two thousands of team the last time China

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>shock the marks of evaluation, it ends up having contend

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>with the massive cap rout flows out of China, know, uh,

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and it really roys CAPA marks. I don't think that's

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>something they want to do right now. So for now,

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just sort of regular adjustment. Well, I

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>mean to talk about some of those headlines, I just

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>want to think give you one of them. China think

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>tank warns of financial panic risk and leaked note. I

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>mean there was a leaked report by a Chinese government

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>backed think tank talking about how with the rising defaulse,

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>with the trade tensions, liquidity shortages, China's looking pretty shaky

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>right now. What do you make of China? Like the

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of them is struggling um with a global environment

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that's that's not as friendly as it used to be.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Of course, China has its own domestic issues with the

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 1>banking sector, financials that I totally agree with that. My

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 1>base case has always been that that that it will

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>moddle through and I think that and the reason that's

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the main things that I feel that evaluation

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is unlikely is that's just gonna add just more uncertain

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to the mix. Um they really in times uncertainty. I

0:04:55.800 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>think in general, the Chinese policy makers seemed a favor stability,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>at least appearance of stability, and I think I'd be

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of pushing the panic button if they were the

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>value now. So um, you know again it's keep we

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta keep buying this. You know a lot of people

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>in calling for disaster and from China's last pan twenty years,

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and you'll continue to model through and then that's that's

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>still my basic case. Win. Then give you about twenty seconds.

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>If emerging market currencies continue to weaken against the US dollar,

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>all things being equal, isn't that going to be better

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>for their exports? Uh? It's better for their exports, yes, Um,

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>But again it's for instance, a lot of these countries

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that have taken on a lot of external debt in dollars,

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>so it becomes much more owners to repay that actor

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in finance excellent nets. So there's pros and cons um

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you know. To me, I think the emerging markets just

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>prefer a stable global environment, free trade, the currencies you

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>know rise, their currencies fall. But I think the possible

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>making the in which is like some clarity out of

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the US. They like they have to step back from

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>uh this this trade war talk, um, and you know

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what the US will take care of themselves. Dr Winton,

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. Dr Winton,

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>global head of Emerging Markets and Effects at Brown Brothers Harriman,

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>coming to us UH in New York and some some

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>good insight and good perspective when people start to wring

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>their hands over this really rapid evaluation of the UN

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that it has appreciated for the most part.

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>In recent months, the US Food and Drug Administration has

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>approved g W Pharmaceuticals treatment for two rare forms of

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>childhood epilepsy. Now the treatment, it's a liquid. It's made

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>from a compound in the marijuana plant. And to tell

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>us more about this, we've got the chief executive of

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>g W Pharmaceuticals, Justin go over, Justin, thank you very

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. Tell us about this treatment

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and is it epidialects or epity Alex, I beg your part.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>That's correct, it's epidialects, So thank you very much for

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>having me on your show. Yes, the treatment is called epidialects.

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>It is made from a molecule called cannabi dial, which

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>is a part of the cannabis plant that does not

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>make you high. So it's a purified um cannabi dial

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>formulation administered to children in the form of an oral solution.

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>We have developed this treatment within the field of childhood

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>onset epilepsy, conducted three controlled clinical trials published in leading

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>medical journals, and obviously delighted earlier this week that the

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>FDA has approved this medication. The types of conditions that

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we treat, these two examples of that are called lenox

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>gasto syndrome and travase syndrome are two of the most

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>difficult forms of epilepsy to treat, often uh commencing in

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>very early childhood, characterized by seizures that tend not to

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>respond to other anti epileptic drugs. So it's a real breakthrough.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>The first medicine approved by FDA derived from the cannabis

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>plant and the first and a new type of anti

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>epileptic drug. So I see that the Drug Enforcement Administration

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>has yet to reclassify this form of cannabis and that

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it has to do so before it can be put

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to market. Can you give us a sense of how

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>long that could take and what the outreach has been

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>like there? Yes, So it's important to say that this

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>is not a political issue. It's very much a procedural

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>one that follows the FDA's approval. So under the rate

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>relevant regulations, the d e A has up to ninety

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>days um to what is termed reschedule this product Epidialects,

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>so that it can be prescribed by for positions and

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>available through pharmacy. So um, the the FDA will have

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>made a recommendation to the d e A as to

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the schedule which they believe epidialect should be placed into.

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>The d e A will currently be reviewing that recommendation

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and will rule on that within a ninety day period.

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>So what that means commercially is that the product will

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>be available. We believe in the early fall of this year,

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>could this could this drug to be used to treat

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>other types of conditions well, our focus for epidialects has

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>very much been in within the epilepsy arena and specifically

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>within these two forms of childhood epilepsy. UM. I think

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it's fair to say that our focus for future development

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of this product falls within the epilepsy arena. So there

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>are several other forms of epilepsy, particularly those in childhood,

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>which summer suffer similar we have suffer similar situations with

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>regard to seizures that are difficult to control. So there

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>really continues to be an unmet need within the field

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of epilepsy, and our focus remains dedicated towards addressing those

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>patient needs. I mean, more broadly, I would say that

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:22.599
<v Speaker 1>there are within the cannabis plant and within our own pipeline,

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a range of other molecules which we call cannabinoids that

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>may not be epidone X, but maybe different molecules within

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the plant that may well have applications and other disease areas.

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>And I certainly can provide a few examples well, but

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>justin before you get into that, I think that one

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>reason why we found this so particular particularly interesting is

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>because the FDA has been slow to approve medications that

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>are based on cannabis or marijuana. And I'm wondering, you know,

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you've been in the industry, the pharmaceutical industry for nearly

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>two decades. Was the process of getting this drug approved

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>different when it comes to dealing with the FDA. Well,

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>i'd firstly, I would say, I think, I mean, the

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>FDA will be the first agency in the world to

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>have approved epidialects, So I'm not sure I would say

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that they've been slow. In fact, I think this review

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>timeline has been rapid, and the engagement that we've had

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>with FDA over the last five years as we've developed

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>this medicine has been very constructive. Indeed, so I think

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>where I think, uh, And you saw statements from FDA

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>ear earlier this week which I think ring true with us,

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>which is when when it comes to the rigors of science,

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to looking at the cannabis plant and

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>identifying molecules from it that may be developed as prescription medications. Um,

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the FDA are willing to assess and potentially

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>approve those kinds of medications and engage constructively. I think

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>what they have been pointing out is that that's a

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 1>different process and a different way of of approaching patients

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>treatment uh to um, you know, marijuana per se. So

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's what what this approval does do, is

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it it very much signals the fact that if one

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>looks at cannabis and tries to apply rate modern pharmaceutical

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>principles to components of the cannabis plant, that f d

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>A will and have shown themselves to engage very constructively

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>with industry. Thank you so much for being with us.

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Justin go Over, chief executive of GW Pharmaceuticals based in California,

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>coming to us after having their drug based aimed at

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>curing epilepsy approved by the FDA. Congratulations. Our next guest

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>has a fascinating story and he over sees a fascinating company.

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm very glad to bring in Abe and Kuma,

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>his chief executive and co founder of Nyanza, which is

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>based in San Francisco, but he joins us here in

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>our eleven three oh studios. Abe, your company is uh

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty significant and it does business with a lot

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest companies out there. But I want to

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>start with your story because you hadn't even seen a

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>computer when you were growing up in Ghana before arriving

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 1>in the US. Tell us a little bit about that. Sure.

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>First of all, thanks for having me, um. So I

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 1>grew up in Ghana. As you mentioned, I went to

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 1>high school in Ghana, but moved to the United States

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>for college. And so I went to college at Caltech

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>in southern California, where I, without seeing a computer, I

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>did the crazy thing of deciding to major in computer

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.079
<v Speaker 1>science and electrical engineering and so and so far it's

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>worked out great. Yeah, that's what everybody does, right. You know,

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't know, you don't have a computer growing up,

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and you decide comp you there's technology is where it's at.

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Like you go to cal Tech and then you go

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to Harvard Business School and then you've become a chief

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>executive of a tech Yeah. Right, that's those no stumbling

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>blocks there right now there you go. Um, let's talk

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about how you decided that the founding

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the answer that this company serves a need. What did

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you see out there and what caused you to think

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I can solve this problem? For sure? So, so I

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>started your answer, first of all with a group of

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>very talented UM other individuals as well. Um I have

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>two other co founders, um Dan and on and both immigrants,

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>both immigrants, UM a couple of m I T pH

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>d s. The problem that we saw was basically sort

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of a melding of what's happening within large businesses today.

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Right within large businesses, there there is an untapped opportunity

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to actually make sense of the data that's flowing freely

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>on their networks today. Data is the new oil, and

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>what we do is we enable our customers actually makes

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>sense of the data on their networks to solve a

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>number of different business problems. One of the core business

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>problems we allow them to use the data for is

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>around user experience and performance management. In the world where

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>things are growing from the types and diversity of devices

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>connecting to their networks and the growth of IoT devices,

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of customers have the ability to harness and

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>generate tremendous new business value on the database on their networks.

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Think about what we do as being akin to what

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Google does with websites right. Google allows you to make

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>sense out of your websites. Google allows you to make

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>sense out of the data that UM your people are

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>searching on the Internet for we're doing something similar with

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the data on computer networks. I don't think though of

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Google Search as having artificial intelligence sort of algorithms trying

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to parse out and turn in large codes in the

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>same way. I mean, perhaps that is the case, but

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking, I wonder how important it is to

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of intelligence in analyzing the data for

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>say an uber or what are the other companies you

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>work with? Yeah, so so what Whether it's um Uber

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>leveraging our technology for driving user experience on their computer networks.

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Whether it is large universities um whether it's Stanford, whether

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it's USC, whether it's Notre Dame leverage internet technology to

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>generate insights for the I T teams to better support

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the students and the end users. Whether it's a large

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>global manufacturing organization leveraging the data on their networks in

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>order to effectively um UM if um UM drive the

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing process because of the device land themselves, big data,

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>machine learning AI. It's all about making It allows us,

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>It allows our customers to see the invisible. It allows

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>our customers to make sense of invisible of what's happening

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>on their networks. By bringing you know, all this disparate

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>unstructured data, making sense of it to solve different business problems.

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>One of those could be performance, another one could be, um,

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, improving the manufacturing process. Let's say I'm the

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Braves, I come to you, I say I need help.

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>You tell me great and tell people the story. Yeah.

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, whether it's the Atlanta Braves, whether it's

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 1>a large public venue that has lots and lots of

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>users leveraging the network. What we allow a company like

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Braves to do is to actually ask questions

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>out of the data that's on their networks, right, ask

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>questions about, Hey, for this particular game or for this

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>particular time on the network, what were people actually doing,

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>all in an anonymised fashion, right. And so one of

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the things with big data and data sciences, while there's

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>a fair bit of insights to clean out of that data,

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>companies that enable that data transformation also have a big

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>responsibility in terms of respecting sort of the privacy of

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the users on their networks. And so for Atlanta Braves,

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>we give them the tools in order to sort of

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>ask questions of the networks and also give a world

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>class user experience off for their fans. Well done. Thanks

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>very much for being with us and giving us a

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>look inside the world of analyzing data on Internet systems

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that are Internet networks that are based inside of corporations.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Much appreciated. Aba h on Kuma. He is the chief

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>executive and the co founder of Nyanswa, joining us here

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in our eleven three oh studios. I do want to

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>just get a note here in on emerging markets because

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>the MSCI Emerging Markets Currency Index is now ropping today

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>for the biggest one day drop. It's the biggest since

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>March of last year. And our next guest has a

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>really interesting theory as to why. Dr Brendan Brown joins

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>US now chief economist and head of Economic research at

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Mitsubishi u f J Securities. Dr Brown, so, how do

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you interpret the weakness we've seen in emerging markets assets?

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Interpreted for the the emerging market weakness as being a first

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>sign of a credit cycle turning globally And you have

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to remember that the emerging markets have been the absolute

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>focal point of the credit inflation in this cycle. It's

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>been where the hunt for yield has been at its

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>greatest and where the various forms of financial engineering and

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>leverage have been the greatest. Okay, so this could be

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of the canary in the coalbine that more than

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a canary in a cor mine. Even the emerging market

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>economies these days PPP exchange rates account for six world GDP,

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>so so this was this could actually a signal a

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>real turning point. I'm just wondering how this relates to

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>monetary policies, which, yes, the US is tightening um, but

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the e c B is still holding on so well.

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I would make a general observation that monetary normalization at

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this point is a fiction. Even in the US, we

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>have interest rates well below rate of inflation, negative real

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, So from a point of view of money

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>supply from a central bank side of the equation, there

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is really no normalization taking place. That maybe a bit

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>less in the US and elsewhere, but monetary policy is

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>still set at a pretty inflation redial. But there's another

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>there's another dynamic in monetary policy, and that's what's happening

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>on the credit side. You can have for central bank

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>still with their foot down on the accelerator, but if

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the credit cycle is turning, the accelerator doesn't work so well.

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>And may even actually not work at some point, and

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where we're approaching. Then, Okay, I'm just

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>going to do a brief list of, you know, supposedly

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the problems in the world. Right, Okay, So you've got

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the Brexit negotiations between the UK and the European Union.

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>They seem to be a mess. You have the political

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>situation in Italy and the potential for some kind of

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>challenge to the European Union in the euro and Angela

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Merkel in Germany facing political uh pressure. Um, you had

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a change of government in Spain recently. You have the

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>issues related to Venezuela and oil politics in the Middle East.

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I raise all of the trade wars in the United

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>States and NAFTA and child I raise all these things.

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, we haven't seen a big sell

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>off in stock prices, and I'm wondering why, well, stock

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>prices are not where this all starts. I mean, yes,

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>we can all talk about the bubble and the fangs

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, but either I think the core of the

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 1>asset inflation process is in the credit markets. It's in

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the irrational strategies we see for leverage. It's in the

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>financial engine nearing, which camouflages believe ridge and that's that's

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>where the irrational forces are. By the bye, you get

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 1>asset prices which may be too high, but that's not

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>where the unwinding starts, or it may and it may

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.719
<v Speaker 1>unwind at any time, I think. Just to take your

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>points about Europe, the key point to watch there is

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that the mercle era is coming to an end and

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Germany is almost certainly or know nothing certain in politics,

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to swing towards the right away from

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the center euro center and and and that presents a

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>big change in the set of opportunities for Italy on

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, and also for the UK. And my

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>view in the UK and Brexit is that everyone will

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>remain quiet amongst the Brexiteers in the UK until Britain

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is actually out of the door next March. But that's

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>when the fun starts. But the fun will start, hopefully

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>when Merkel is also going out for the door quite soon.

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you're saying that the the the asset

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>inflation that's really most important is in the credit markets

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.360
<v Speaker 1>are where you need to really focus. Um. A lot

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of people have been looking to the U S HIG

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>yield bond market as the canary in the coal mine

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of cracks forming in credit markets globally, and you just

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>really haven't seen it. Why, what I would say was

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>two points there. Clearly in the US market, how yield

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is related to a price of equity, So if you're

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>still in the middle of a real bull market in equities,

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>that sort of keeps for high yield market up. The

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>second point, which is more strange, is well, we're not

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>so strange, is that we had that volatility sell off

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>in February, but volatility is a way back down again.

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I there is a key mathematical relationship, of course, which

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>every quant will tell you between rising volatility and the

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>price of hw yuel bonds, so that that's an accident

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:44.199
<v Speaker 1>waiting to happen at some point in the future, but

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not happened yet. So I think for key pressures

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>have been on the emerging markets rather than on the

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.479
<v Speaker 1>US hi yield credit market. So do you think that

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>people who are saying now is a time to pick

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>up extra yield go into emerging markets are fooling themselves

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and that there's more pain ahead. Absolutely, I think the

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets situation is the center of the asset price

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>deflation when it comes, and it almost certainly will go further.

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>The question is how much contagion is going to be

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>onto other asset inflated markets. Give you about thirty seconds.

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Trade wars and currency wars. Haven't heard much about currency wars,

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>have we, Which is sort of a big puzzle, because

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 1>if you were advising President Trump, you would think a

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 1>big point would now be being made about the manipulation

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of currencies by Germany and Japan. After all, Japan sticking

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>long term interest rated zero with the economy at overheating,

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and Germany and easy b chief Draggy, who's fully backed

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>by Bundas Bank and Chancellor Merkel keeping rates negative for

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>another eighteen months despite the German economy and boom. What

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>greater currency manipulation can you have? So it's very strange,

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>but this hasn't really a focal point of US trade negotiations.

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Dr Brendan Brown is the chief

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>economist and head of economic research for Mitsubishi u f

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>J Securities, also the author of the Global Monetary Plague,

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Asset price Inflation, and Federal Reserve Quantitative Easing. Thanks for

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg p and L podcast. You can

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:21.719
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio