Speaker 1: All right, News round up in Information Overload Hour. Here's
Speaker 1: our toll free telephone number if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. It's eight hundred and ninety
Speaker 1: four one Sean if you want to join us. So
Speaker 1: yesterday we spent a lot of time on this program,
Speaker 1: going over the release by the House Committee on Oversight,
Speaker 1: the Oversight Committee chaired by Congressman James Comer, friend of
Speaker 1: this program. It's called the Biden Auto Pen Presidency Decline,
Speaker 1: Delusion and Deception in the White House, and it was
Speaker 1: prepared by the committee. I'll go right to the conclusion. Now,
Speaker 1: you don't need to read all ninety one pages as
Speaker 1: I did, but it's fascinating reading and you can't believe
Speaker 1: all this happened. The committee recommends the Department of Justice
Speaker 1: investigates all former President Biden's executive actions, particularly clemency actions,
Speaker 1: to assess whether legal action must be taken to void
Speaker 1: any action that former president the former President did not
Speaker 1: in fact take himself. They lay out a compelling case.
Speaker 1: Here is James Comer on with our friend John Solomon,
Speaker 1: investigative reporter Justinnews dot com, saying they should all be
Speaker 1: Nolan void.
Speaker 2: Listen, I think all the pardons should be declared, Nolan
Speaker 2: Boyd that were signed.
Speaker 3: With the Auto pin.
Speaker 4: These were all done during the lame duck period when
Speaker 4: Joe Biden.
Speaker 3: Was checked out. I think the executive orders that we're
Speaker 3: done during the lame duck period should be declared. Nolan Boyd.
Speaker 1: And the committee also released this montage of the people
Speaker 1: that testified before the committee, including those pleading the fifth We.
Speaker 5: Were watching the testimony of this woman here, Annie Thomas Senior.
Speaker 5: She's the former senior advisor to President Joe Biden. She
Speaker 5: was the third person set to appear before James Covers Committee.
Speaker 5: She has now taken the fifth There is now a
Speaker 5: pattern of key Biden confidant seeking the shield themselves from
Speaker 5: criminal liability for this potential conspiracy.
Speaker 2: Were you ever told to lie about the president all
Speaker 2: the advice and council, Mister respectully declined to answer, based
Speaker 2: upon the physician patient privilege and in reliance, am I
Speaker 2: right under the fifth Man of the Constitution. Let the
Speaker 2: record reflect that doctor O'Connor has invoked the Fifth Amendment
Speaker 2: right against self incrimination. Doctor O'Connor, did you ever believe
Speaker 2: the President was unfit to execute his duties as president, and.
Speaker 5: We can tell you that he will have the same
Speaker 5: answer with respect to any questions that are asked.
Speaker 2: Did any unelected official or family member of President Joe
Speaker 2: Biden execute the duties of the presidents? Did Joe Biden,
Speaker 2: a member of his family, or anyone at the White
Speaker 2: House ever instruct you to lie regarding his health on the.
Speaker 6: Advice and Council? I respect him declined to answer the
Speaker 6: question for the Constitution.
Speaker 1: All right, joining us now? He is the chairman of
Speaker 1: the all important House Oversight Committee's the chairman, James Comer
Speaker 1: is with us. Well, Uh, you've been busy. This is
Speaker 1: about as damning a report as I've ever read coming
Speaker 1: out of Congress. It is extraordinarily meticulously well researched, well written,
Speaker 1: well laid out with I believe the right conclusion. But
Speaker 1: I want to hear it directly from you because you've
Speaker 1: been spending a year of your life on this.
Speaker 4: Well, thanks Sean. And it is a very substantive report.
Speaker 4: We did hours and hours and hours of depositions with
Speaker 4: all of the players in the Body administration that had
Speaker 4: any role whatsoever in the use of the autoped What
Speaker 4: we concluded were two things first of all, the obvious
Speaker 4: and you said it forever, we all saw it with
Speaker 4: our own eyes. But there was a cognitive decline in
Speaker 4: the president, and his inner circle covered that up. They
Speaker 4: shielded him from even his most inner circle of staffers.
Speaker 4: There were staffers like Ian Sam's that would go out
Speaker 4: and speak on behalf of Joe Biden every day to
Speaker 4: the national media. And when we got him under oath,
Speaker 4: he admitted he only saw and spoke to Joe Biden
Speaker 4: in person two times in two years. The same with
Speaker 4: his executive secretary of near attendant. She would go weeks
Speaker 4: and weeks and weeks without seeing him. That's your most
Speaker 4: closest staffer as a president United States. So there was
Speaker 4: a cover up. The staffers admitted under oath that they
Speaker 4: talked about giving Joe Biden a cognitive test. I mean,
Speaker 4: who does that, Sean? I mean, no one's sitting around
Speaker 4: Fox to you saying Sean Annity or or Laura Ingram
Speaker 4: should be taking a cognitive test. I mean you only
Speaker 4: say that if the if it's obvious they.
Speaker 1: I think liberals would like me to take one. But
Speaker 1: all said, I'm not worried about it.
Speaker 4: Well, but you know, at the end of the day,
Speaker 4: they all said they decided against it. Now, if you
Speaker 4: thought he should take a cognitive test, and if the
Speaker 4: American people, even some in the in the left wing media,
Speaker 4: were saying the president should take a kind of test
Speaker 4: and then you all ltimately rule against it, I mean
Speaker 4: that shows that you had no confidence he was in
Speaker 4: a pass it. But we found there was a cover up.
Speaker 4: And secondly, we found that there was no evidence that
Speaker 4: Joe Biden was involved in any of the decision making
Speaker 4: process with respect to the pardons.
Speaker 1: And you know, and by the way, just to remind people,
Speaker 1: we're talking about over four thousand of them, and executive
Speaker 1: actions on top of it.
Speaker 4: And Joe Biden gave one interview post presidency, and he
Speaker 4: gave it to the New York Times, and he admitted
Speaker 4: to the New York Times and what should have been
Speaker 4: a puffy article for him, that he didn't review all
Speaker 4: the pardons, and he delegated that, well, that's not how
Speaker 4: it works, Sean.
Speaker 1: You have to well, well, it actually was more than that,
Speaker 1: because he said he set up standards and practices and
Speaker 1: guidelines for his staff to make the decisions. But as
Speaker 1: you rightly point out in your report, and you quote
Speaker 1: our Constitution that the power of the pardon is absolute.
Speaker 1: There's no no disputing that. However, the decision has to
Speaker 1: be made specifically by a president.
Speaker 4: Yes. And and again there was no there were no
Speaker 4: notes in the national archives, there was no chain of
Speaker 4: custody that there was no uh, emails back and forth,
Speaker 4: you have. We just met with the president and he
Speaker 4: said this. When the pardons were authorized on the auto pen,
Speaker 4: it was you know, a different process for for different partons.
Speaker 4: It would be a phone call from a stafford to
Speaker 4: a friend to another staffer. Yeah, and they would say, yeah,
Speaker 4: the President gave that okay, and that you know, there
Speaker 4: was no there was no in the archives. There's no meetings. Uh,
Speaker 4: there are no planning sessions. Uh, there are no notes. Nothing.
Speaker 4: And again with the way the staff shielded the president
Speaker 4: says uh, and the way they just disregarded him and
Speaker 4: pushed him aside after that debate, after he dropped out,
Speaker 4: that's when the auto pen you went off the charts.
Speaker 4: Is when Joe Biden, when the American people saw with
Speaker 4: our own eyes that he's not mentally capable of performing
Speaker 4: the duties of the presidency. That's when the staff seemed
Speaker 4: to take over, and even we found Sean there were
Speaker 4: emails from the Department of Justice, from the Americ Garland
Speaker 4: Department Justice questioning whether or not Joe Biden was involved
Speaker 4: in the decision making process with the pardons and warning
Speaker 4: the staff of the excessive use of the autopin on
Speaker 4: legal documents.
Speaker 1: Well, you go through a lot of specificity in detail,
Speaker 1: and you really, I think went very hard, rightly so
Speaker 1: at doctor O'Connor, who propped up Biden with you know
Speaker 1: what you describe as grossly misleading assessments in all of this,
Speaker 1: and how Biden, you go into specificity, was losing command
Speaker 1: of himself. You know, Congressman, I first started pointing this
Speaker 1: out to the American people in twenty nineteen. It was
Speaker 1: apparent to me all there's used to be and all
Speaker 1: men and women are created by the thing, oh you
Speaker 1: know the thing.
Speaker 6: I mean.
Speaker 1: It was like moment after moment, and then as his
Speaker 1: presidency went on, it was worse and worse. It was mumbling,
Speaker 1: it was bumbling, it was fumbling, it was slurring. It
Speaker 1: was which way do I go? You know, you know,
Speaker 1: having somebody direct him off the stage. You go into
Speaker 1: all of this and how scripted everything was, and how
Speaker 1: his inner circle controlled is every step it was. There
Speaker 1: was you know, extreme gatekeeping with his inner circle, and
Speaker 1: you know how delusional either they were delusional or lying.
Speaker 1: I happened to lean towards believing that a lot of
Speaker 1: people lied. That's my own personal opinion.
Speaker 4: Well, look, John, nobody's disputing it, and it always seen
Speaker 4: from the Biden camp is a is a statement from
Speaker 4: some unnamed stafford. I thought, how how consistent is that
Speaker 4: with the way with the report, the way the White
Speaker 4: House was operating. You don't know who wrote that statement.
Speaker 4: But at the end of the day, no one in
Speaker 4: the Biden administration wants to come out and dispute this
Speaker 4: because they don't want to be brought in before the
Speaker 4: Justice Cabinet or before the Oversight Committee. Because we saw
Speaker 4: with our own eyes. You you have always reported this
Speaker 4: accurately about the mental decline and Joe Biden. Everyone saw it.
Speaker 4: Everyone saw it. And if you really want to see
Speaker 4: a sad example of Joe Biden's mental decline, then you
Speaker 4: need to watch the Robert her interview where Joe Biden
Speaker 4: had to sit there. The staffers couldn't stand.
Speaker 6: When are we going to get access to view it.
Speaker 4: Well, we we're gonna do everything we can to make
Speaker 4: that public. That right, So you've watched it, yes, yes,
Speaker 4: and it's pain.
Speaker 6: Can you describe it?
Speaker 4: He doesn't know, He gets confused, he thinks he's vice president,
Speaker 4: he gets confused on what year it is. I mean,
Speaker 4: this is unbelievable situation. And what I think you could
Speaker 4: see is Joe Biden was good for five, ten, fifteen minutes.
Speaker 4: I wouldn't say good. He was, you know, coherent, But
Speaker 4: as time went on, he deteriorated. He lost focus, he
Speaker 4: forgot you know, dates, and he would forget the question
Speaker 4: that the Robert Her would ask him a question and
Speaker 4: he would start mumbling, and then then he would get
Speaker 4: sidetracked and he would be talking about something completely irrelevant
Speaker 4: to the question, something that happened in Delaware thirty years ago.
Speaker 4: I mean, he all the characteristics of people that you
Speaker 4: see with early stages of dementia or Alzheimer's or things
Speaker 4: like that. We all have people in our family, we've
Speaker 4: all seen the symptoms of that, and that's why Robert
Speaker 4: and Her put that in the report. You kind of
Speaker 4: have a different appreciation for the Her report when you
Speaker 4: watch the video of the of the interview. So I
Speaker 4: think that you know, we're relieved seeing all the audio
Speaker 4: of the depositions, and we're going to do everything we
Speaker 4: can so the American people can see for themselves the
Speaker 4: situation the president was in. And then you realize there
Speaker 4: was a cover up by a few staffords because a
Speaker 4: lot of his cabinet secretaries, like Vudhajig, they didn't seem
Speaker 4: for months and months at the end of his administration.
Speaker 1: Quick break right back more with the Chairman of the
Speaker 1: House Overside Committee, James Comer on the other side than
Speaker 1: your calls coming up eight hundred and nine to four
Speaker 1: one Sean, if you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program, continue now with the Chairman of the House
Speaker 1: Overside Committee, and they're huge blockbuster report on the Biden
Speaker 1: autopen presidency declined the lusion deception in the White House.
Speaker 6: Let me ask you this now.
Speaker 1: You have said that they should be null and void,
Speaker 1: meaning the pardons and the commutations. Okay, I appreciate all
Speaker 1: of that, and I agree with your conclusion. I think
Speaker 1: it was transparent, It was obvious for anybody with eyes
Speaker 1: to see that wasn't politically biased. I mean, well, you know,
Speaker 1: why did they have that debate so early in June?
Speaker 1: Because I believe he was pushed into it for the
Speaker 1: purpose of him being exposed.
Speaker 6: Am I wrong? I'm believing that.
Speaker 4: I think you're right. And we asked every one of
Speaker 4: the twelve Biden staffers that exact question, and they just
Speaker 4: they would all have different, you know, reasons. Well, you know,
Speaker 4: we just wanted to get it started and get the
Speaker 4: momentum building, you know. And and you know, I think
Speaker 4: the same thing you think. I think that there were
Speaker 4: people in the Democrat Party, uh maybe Obama people like
Speaker 4: that that that.
Speaker 6: That's never happened before.
Speaker 4: They never knew there was a problem, and they're like,
Speaker 4: all right, we've got to We've got to put him
Speaker 4: out here, let him, let him hang himself, and then
Speaker 4: we'll we'll try to, you know, put.
Speaker 1: We'll go in for the kill and and and he
Speaker 1: won't be able to run. I mean, the moment when
Speaker 1: Trump was asked, well, what do you think about Biden's answer,
Speaker 1: he said, well, I don't think he knows what he says.
Speaker 1: I don't know what he said, and I don't think
Speaker 1: he knows what he said. Was that was the That
Speaker 1: was it for him. All right, last question, how do
Speaker 1: you know and void these pardons and commutations? Would that
Speaker 1: include the pardons for his family?
Speaker 4: Absolutely? And you know the only pardon that he signed
Speaker 4: for his family was for Hunter, and Hunter's pardon was
Speaker 4: months before.
Speaker 1: What about what about as Oh, you mean the one
Speaker 1: he signed personally? What about his brother and others?
Speaker 4: They were all signed with the autopen. The brother, both brothers,
Speaker 4: and the and their spouses. They were all signed with
Speaker 4: the autopen. So uh, but the process, Shawn, would be
Speaker 4: the Department of Justice would then uh declare them Nolan void.
Speaker 4: It will end up in court. We believe that this investigation,
Speaker 4: the ninety three pages, the links to all and then
Speaker 4: plus all the transcripts of the deposition, plus all the
Speaker 4: emails and all the evidence is enough evidence to hold
Speaker 4: up in court if the Department of Justice comes to
Speaker 4: the same conclusion that we came to committee.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to ask this audience three ninety one
Speaker 1: pages because everybody's busy, but I'm going to put up
Speaker 1: the five page executive summary. And you did a phenomenal
Speaker 1: work here. It's a shame that we don't have more honesty.
Speaker 1: And I think at some point somebody is going to
Speaker 1: open up and say, yeah, we all knew. I'm just
Speaker 1: waiting for that moment to happen. Phenomenal work. I know
Speaker 1: it's been a heavy lift. I know you've been under
Speaker 1: heavy fire because of it. But this is a you know,
Speaker 1: this is a scandal unlike any we've ever seen in
Speaker 1: this country. Who was in charge? We don't know who
Speaker 1: gave the ok for all these decisions. We don't know.
Speaker 1: Congressman James camer great work. We really appreciate you more.
Speaker 6: Than you know.
Speaker 4: Thank you, Sean.
Speaker 1: All right, let's go to Israel. Jerusalem Isaac on the
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity Show. Are you listening in Jerusalem?
Speaker 7: Yes, I'm in Jerusalem right now. Sean.
Speaker 6: What's going on? Thanks for listening. Glad you called.
Speaker 4: Yes.
Speaker 7: Yes. First of all, I'm from Brooklyn. I'm only here
Speaker 7: for a few months. But there was amazing seeing President
Speaker 7: Trump come here and how the country was celebrating two
Speaker 7: weeks ago, and how the President just made a whole
Speaker 7: country just on such a high high happiness, and there
Speaker 7: was amazing to see it as an American experiencing it.
Speaker 7: And also, Sewan, the way they love you over here. Also,
Speaker 7: they like your support. They love, your support. The way
Speaker 7: you stand betune because not too many people in the
Speaker 7: world staying with Israel, and when they see Americans, you know.
Speaker 1: Can I just stand and can I make a statement
Speaker 1: about this? You're still there? That I lose you, I
Speaker 1: think I might have lost them. You know, I will
Speaker 1: say this, there's times in life when you need moral clarity,
Speaker 1: you need a moral compass. And when I hear and
Speaker 1: see the rise of virulent anti Semitism, it disturbs me
Speaker 1: a lot because there's a lot of ignorance behind the
Speaker 1: positions that people have. And I don't care if you're
Speaker 1: hearing it in the halls of Congress, on college campuses,
Speaker 1: if you see the rise of anti Semitism worldwide, you
Speaker 1: know in the punditry class it's everywhere. And you know,
Speaker 1: everyone's entitled to their opinion, but an opinion that's based
Speaker 1: in ignorance, to me is it's it's just intellectually lazy,
Speaker 1: and it's missing a sense of right and wrong and
Speaker 1: moral clarity. And you know, I don't know what part
Speaker 1: of Israel having to withstand hundreds of thousands of rockets
Speaker 1: over the decades being fired into their countries by groups
Speaker 1: that have in their charter, like AMAS a call for
Speaker 1: the destruction of Israel, and they follow through, culminating in
Speaker 1: what happened on October the seventh. You have a very
Speaker 1: small population in Israel, under ten million people, you know'll
Speaker 1: compare that to America's population, what three fifty sixty million people?
Speaker 1: That would be like losing forty thousand Americans in a day.
Speaker 1: And I'm having a hard time understanding those that don't
Speaker 1: understand that Israel does have their right to exist and
Speaker 1: their own country. And what would you want your country
Speaker 1: to do if some country was firing all of these
Speaker 1: missiles into American towns, American cities, you know, killing forty
Speaker 1: thousand Americans in a day, kidnapping thousands of Americans in
Speaker 1: a day, you know, never mind the rape, the kidnapping,
Speaker 1: the torture, and the beheadings that I also know took
Speaker 1: place because I've seen the videos. Anyway, did we get
Speaker 1: Isaac back from Jerusalem? All right, We'll give you a
Speaker 1: last comment. I was explaining that to me, this is
Speaker 1: a simple right wrong, moral clarity issue.
Speaker 7: Yeah, Yeahjean, And you're totally right and everything you're saying,
Speaker 7: and it really, really, it's really comforting to hear you
Speaker 7: and Mark Mark Levin also and all the all the
Speaker 7: people on the right, because it's a shame how there's
Speaker 7: people on the right also now that I love President Trump,
Speaker 7: and but like the Tuckers and everyone listen.
Speaker 1: I mean, everyone's entitled to their opinion. And for me,
Speaker 1: it's you know, radical Islamists. We need to understand them.
Speaker 1: You know, for example, when the President wiped out the
Speaker 1: Ice Says Caliphate and he took out around his nuclear sites,
Speaker 1: you know, the world is a safer place because he
Speaker 1: did both things. When he took out Solamani and Bagdaddy.
Speaker 1: You know, the world's a safer place. Is a proper
Speaker 1: use of military that fits into the Trump doctrine, which
Speaker 1: is also no forever wars. I appreciate you calling in
Speaker 1: from Jerusalem. Thank you, my friend. Eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: four one, Shawn is a number if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. Frank North Carolina next
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity Show. It's up, Frank, how are.
Speaker 3: You hey, Sean? Thanks for the call, two time caller,
Speaker 3: longtime listener.
Speaker 1: Well, thanks for being here. I love, by the way,
Speaker 1: North Carolina's beautiful. I've been in the mountains of North
Speaker 1: Carolina above the clouds, you know, visiting a friend.
Speaker 3: The lives there anyway, retired Navy twenty four years Saberne Force.
Speaker 3: But I wanted to ask what you thought about Fetterman
Speaker 3: using his position in the Senate to Coherst Dems as
Speaker 3: a run for as a ruse or a springboard for
Speaker 3: twenty twenty eight presidential run.
Speaker 6: You know, I.
Speaker 1: Actually have come to like Fetterman a lot. I think
Speaker 1: Fetterman is an anomaly in the Democratic Party. And when
Speaker 1: I interviewed him, what a week or so ago on Hannity,
Speaker 1: you know, we just had a fair open discussion. He goes,
Speaker 1: if you're looking, you know, I'm not the Democrat that's
Speaker 1: going to be screaming Nazi, fascist, racist. I do believe
Speaker 1: the President made the right call on Iran's nuclear sites.
Speaker 1: I do support Israel's right to exist, and I'm not
Speaker 1: going to be shy about who I am. And he goes,
Speaker 1: I'm not running for re election right now. I don't
Speaker 1: care what the consequences are.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 1: That's not something you often hear from an elected official,
Speaker 1: and I kind of admire that a lot. And you know,
Speaker 1: I think he understands his parties radicalized. He just refuses
Speaker 1: to go along with it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he's definitely making a better name for himself than
Speaker 3: leveraging and getting more attention from what I believe Republicans
Speaker 3: see him as something that we can get behind. Now.
Speaker 3: I'm not saying I'm going to be behind him, but
Speaker 3: you know, I kind of like him. Definitely overnews him,
Speaker 3: definitely overnews him.
Speaker 1: Well, you got Newsom, you got Pete Buddha Judge, you
Speaker 1: got Kamala Harris, you got AOC. I mean, I don't
Speaker 1: see a more moderate Democrat breaking through and winning a
Speaker 1: primary because I think the basis is with the radicals.
Speaker 1: I think the whole party has been transformed. You know,
Speaker 1: I mentioned this study earlier in the program. You know,
Speaker 1: seventy percent, this is one hundreds of thousands of people
Speaker 1: surveyed see that the Democratic Party is too extreme and
Speaker 1: too radicalized, and that they're wrong on the borders, they're
Speaker 1: wrong on law and order, they're wrong on the economy,
Speaker 1: and they're too fixated on all the wrong issues. Those
Speaker 1: are devastating numbers. I doubt that the Democrats will.
Speaker 6: Pay attention to it.
Speaker 1: You know, the reason Bill Maher was right in his
Speaker 1: observation that every Democrat is on the ballot in New
Speaker 1: York City is because he's right. I mean, the whole
Speaker 1: country's gonna watch that election. And assuming Mam Donnie wins
Speaker 1: this election, that's gonna that he will be the poster
Speaker 1: child of the new radicalized Democratic Left. It will empower
Speaker 1: the likes of AOC and the Squad and Newsome and
Speaker 1: and all the people that are pretty radical left. And
Speaker 1: you know, if either Harris or Newsom okay, when you
Speaker 1: get to a general election, assuming they win the primary,
Speaker 1: you know, do you want New York? Do you want
Speaker 1: America to be California? And I think most of America
Speaker 1: will reject that. You know, it doesn't mean things can
Speaker 1: change over time. Thank you, Frank, appreciate it, buddy, God
Speaker 1: bless you. Eight hundred and nine four one. Shawn is
Speaker 1: a number Todd in Arizona. What's up, Todd?
Speaker 8: Thank Sean, Thanks for having me.
Speaker 4: You're a great American.
Speaker 3: The thank you shutdown.
Speaker 8: I think the Democrats are showing their cards. The forty
Speaker 8: two million people on SNAP is a problem in itself,
Speaker 8: But with that said, I would venture to say the
Speaker 8: bulk of those constituents belong in Democratic run cities, and
Speaker 8: so they're just cutting their people loose over health care
Speaker 8: for illegal immigrants and a very small percentage I wanted
Speaker 8: to point out, and it doesn't affect very many people.
Speaker 8: My wife and I were both junior andlisted with two
Speaker 8: children and full time employed obviously in the military, but
Speaker 8: when we were young, we still qualified for which programs.
Speaker 8: So there's a portion of the military out there with
Speaker 8: larger families that are being deployed and whatnot that are
Speaker 8: dependent on government subsidies on top of their minuscule government
Speaker 8: paycheck for what they're doing.
Speaker 1: No, it's terrible, and it's terrible. I mean, we've got
Speaker 1: to have a livable wage for people that serve. You know,
Speaker 1: the last caller serve twenty four years. Thank him for
Speaker 1: his service. It's just but you're right in your observation
Speaker 1: forty two million Americans. Now it's not the time to
Speaker 1: really have the conversation about why so many people are
Speaker 1: in need of basic food assistance like this in this country.
Speaker 1: You know, this is why I keep reminding everybody that
Speaker 1: you have all of these high paying career jobs now
Speaker 1: in the pipeline, and we're talking about seventeen trillion and
Speaker 1: committed money from manufacturing. You'll have the massive impact when
Speaker 1: it kicks in of the economy and the Trump tax
Speaker 1: cuts really take hold. I would say by this time
Speaker 1: next year, you're going to see a dramatically different economy.
Speaker 1: That's my prediction. And it took Reagan about a year
Speaker 1: and a half to get out of the malaise of
Speaker 1: Jimmy Carter once his once his plan was passed, So
Speaker 1: I think it's going to take about that long. But
Speaker 1: I but you know, the President very cleverly, you know,
Speaker 1: is incentivizing building these auto plants, pharmaceutical plants, uh, semiconductor
Speaker 1: chip plans and rare earth you know, minerals and then
Speaker 1: also opening up you know, energy dominance jobs that are
Speaker 1: going to be you know, high paying career or oriented.
Speaker 1: All of this is you know now it's it's kind
Speaker 1: of been jacked up on steroids and human growth hormone
Speaker 1: because of the President and this you know one hundred
Speaker 1: percent uh deduction uh part of the big beautiful bill.
Speaker 1: You get one hundred percent depreciation if you build a
Speaker 1: manufacturing facility.
Speaker 6: That's awesome.
Speaker 1: That's that means they're going to get it up and
Speaker 1: running now while they get the tax benefit of doing
Speaker 1: it simultaneously creating all those jobs, including in construction. Once
Speaker 1: you get interest rates down, it went down another half
Speaker 1: point today, and we get a new fed chair in May,
Speaker 1: then you're going to see sale of pre existing homes skyrocket.
Speaker 1: Now you're going to see new home construction begins to skyrocket,
Speaker 1: and you know things are going to be humming along
Speaker 1: at a pretty good clip. That's my prediction. That's what
Speaker 1: I believe. I'm a supply side economics guide. This is
Speaker 1: it on steroids. Anyway, appreciate the call real quick. Caroly
Speaker 1: in California. Carol, how are you.
Speaker 8: I'm fine, Sean, Thank you for taking my call.
Speaker 6: I got about a minute, but it's all yours go.
Speaker 4: We need help.
Speaker 7: Musom is trying to push this prop fifty, telling people
Speaker 7: that it's giving the power back to the people.
Speaker 8: It's the exact opposite. We used to have a committee
Speaker 8: that drew the lines.
Speaker 7: Now they're trying to take it away from us.
Speaker 1: We need They're trying to circumvent this is a jerry
Speaker 1: mandering ploy the Democrats. Yes, but you know remember all
Speaker 1: the jerry mandering in the world has been done in
Speaker 1: liberal states like yours.
Speaker 3: Yes, and I don't know how they can do any worse,
Speaker 3: but they're trying to take the few people that we
Speaker 3: have away from us.
Speaker 4: We need your help. Tell the people know on fifty they.
Speaker 6: Know on fifty I just told them, and I'm serious.
Speaker 6: This is not good.
Speaker 8: No, it's terrible, terrible. We need your help.
Speaker 6: Why do you stay out in California?
Speaker 8: Well, my house is paid for. I couldn't afford to
Speaker 8: live here otherwise, and I'm involved in a release.
Speaker 1: Well, prop third Team was good because you get capped
Speaker 1: out on your property tax.
Speaker 6: That's helpful.
Speaker 1: And if are you retired, yes, all right, so your
Speaker 1: income is not being taxed at the highest rate in
Speaker 1: the country, but you still pay the highest sales and
Speaker 1: gas taxes in the country.
Speaker 4: Right, exactly.
Speaker 8: I don't know how young people can do it. I
Speaker 8: really don't.
Speaker 6: Well, it's not a surprise you have the highest poverty
Speaker 6: rate in the country.
Speaker 1: No, I've tried to have productive conversations with Gavin, but frankly,
Speaker 1: they're you know, it's sadly become a waste of time
Speaker 1: as his presidential aspirations grow by the day.
Speaker 6: Carol, I got a run, though. I appreciate your call.
Speaker 6: God bless you.
Speaker 1: And uh, you know, it is a beautiful state in
Speaker 1: terms of geography, but I don't see California switching. Steve
Speaker 1: Hilton would be a great governor, you know. I hope
Speaker 1: he can make a competitive anyway, We're going to be
Speaker 1: in New Jersey tomorrow night for Hannity with Jack Chidarelli.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 1: They now have another pullout one point race that's gonna
Speaker 1: wrap things up today. But I have good news. We
Speaker 1: have a great Hannity tonight nine Eastern on the Fox
Speaker 1: News Channel. Please set your DVR. Senator Josh Hawley tonight.
Speaker 1: We also have Senator Tom Cotton, Trey Goudy tonight, Jonathan
Speaker 1: Turley tonight, also Jason Chafitz. We have Klay Travis, we
Speaker 1: have Peter Doucey who's been with the President, Kaylee McGhee white,
Speaker 1: and much more news you'll never get from the state
Speaker 1: run Legacy Medium Mob nine easton tonight on Hannity on
Speaker 1: Box News.
Speaker 6: We'll see you then.
Speaker 1: We will be in New Jersey tomorrow for tomorrow night's
Speaker 1: town hall with Jack Chitdarelli. New Jersey's in play, as
Speaker 1: is Virginia, New York City.
Speaker 6: Good luck.
Speaker 1: We'll see you tomorrow from New Jersey. Thanks for being
Speaker 1: with us, See you tonight.