WEBVTT - The Highs and Lows of Being a Bitcoin Maximalist

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Stacy Marie Ishmael, Managing editor of Crypto for Bloomberg News,

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg Crypto at Daily Bloomberg. I heard podcast.

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>It's Thursday August. Some of the biggest and brashest figures

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in crypto have faced staggering losses in the current downturn.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Multiple crypto companies have filed for bankruptcy, and more than

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>one high flying crypto ceo has found themselves out of

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a job. Case in point Michael Sailor, the co founder

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and former CEO of a software services firm called micro Strategy.

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>But software isn't what made micro Strategy a household name

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>among bitcoin believers. Instead, it was Sailor's decision to use

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the company's balance sheet to bet big on bitcoin all

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the way back in that really catapulted them into the

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>headlines for a while. As bitcoin prices rallied, that two

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>million dollar bet looked like a genius move. But as

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>prices fell, micro Strategy found itself facing significant losses. What

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>does this all mean for micro Strategy and for Michael Sailor?

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>For more? I'm joined by Bloomberg Senior editor Dave Litka.

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe he was on the back of the New

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>York Post as this man lost six billion dollars of

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>one day, and by Bloomberg accounting specialist Tom Kuntilliano, they

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:29.919
<v Speaker 1>bought four billion dollars worth of a big climb between

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>here and there to discuss exactly what happened. Well, it

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is a benefit of a place like Bloomberg where we

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>can have, you know, two people with highly specialist and

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>very different expertise to sort of combine into an episode

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>about one of the most colorful people in a very

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>colorful universe of crypto folks. And that is none other

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>than Michael Sailor, until recently, the CEO of a little

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>company or not a little company called micro Strategy, And Dave,

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I would just like you to start from a place

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of it may well be that our listeners are very

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a way of Sailor. They're very aware of, you know,

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>what a big proponent of bitcoin he was, but they

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know anything about who he was before that big

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin bet. Where did Michael Sailor come from? Sure? Great question.

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Um Sailor has been a colorful character for a very

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>long time, both on a local and uh in the

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>business world sense on it. He's very a self made

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 1>an amazing story. Was an Air Force sergeant's son ended

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>up getting a scholarship to M I T. Graduated from

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>there when in the industry, had some success there as

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a early software consultant and developer, broke off with some

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of his M I T buddies formed this business software

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>company and took off from there and was worth billions

0:02:57.800 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>by the time he was in his thirties. And this

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>was at heights of the first dot com boom? Is

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 1>that correct exactly? He rode that wave company was doing

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>great going into that did an I P O in

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>nine and again it was worth about seven billion at

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 1>his peak. Unfortunately, they ran into a counting issue about

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand the slot crashed. I believe he was on

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the back of the New York Post as this man

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>lost six billion dollars of one day and they ended

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 1>up settling. And uh, he actually settled into obscurity for

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a little while. Least the company did after that. Somehow.

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>It's always an accounting issue. And so Tom, I'm gonna,

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna, I'm gonna turn to you. So Michael Sailor,

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>colorful character, you know, has experience in software sales and services,

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>has experiences of creative accounting and turns up new company,

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>co founder of something that's also a software services company.

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>It's called micro Strategy. Sure, great, all typical. What was

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a typical about micro Strategy as of a couple of

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>years ago. I think what was a typical about micro

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Strategy was they, as Dave mentioned, they were sort of noon.

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was in Northern Virginia at the time

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of the tech bubble. They were known as the company

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that went to the Sun and then came back and

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>fell back. And it was until two years ago, unless

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you really were paying attention to markets, that the name

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>really popped up again. Um, and it popped up again

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in the context of bitcoin, and literally two years and

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 1>a week ago, bitcoin finally appeared on an earnings release

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and became a separate strategy from from just being a

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>software intelligence company. And as of when that happened, were

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>they the first company to have bitcoin appear in a

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet as far as you're aware, right around the

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>same time you had Tesla and and Square were also

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the two companies publicly traded companies that made it part

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of their their treasury um as well too, and that

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>they weren't crypto companies. In and of themselves, but they

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>were engaging in crypto. So they were engaging in crypto.

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>But it seemed like micro Strategy, despite having as other

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>actual business and software services, really became known for its

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin bets. Yeah. I mean two years ago they were

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollar company. Within six months of getting into crypto,

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.119
<v Speaker 1>they seared twelve cks there were there over twelve billion

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for a little while, um, and nothing had really changed

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>too much about the software business, but their their position

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoin has only gotten bigger since then. And Dave,

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>this is for you. It sounds like they were perceived

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>as like a bet on the direction of bitcoin, or

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>at least the potential direction of bitcoin. Their stock was Yes,

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they basically became an investment play on or investment fund

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to bet on bitcoin without actually buying bitcoin. Sailor again

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>rose the prominence mostly through social media for a lot

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of crazy sayings and doubts about what bitcoin and how

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>would change the world, and people bought it, and for

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a while it looked like he was right right. I

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>mean there if you look at sort of bitcoin charts

0:05:57.880 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and a micro Strategy charts, it was like they were

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the same chart for a minute there. But the problem

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>with that correlation is then bitcoin prices started going in

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the other direction. That was not so helpful for them.

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And Tom, what happens when you have bitcoin on your

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet and the price of bitcoin suddenly starts going down. Yeah,

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the accounting for for bitcoin is a little little crazy

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.679
<v Speaker 1>in that it's it's really the accounting for acquisitions, for

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for buying another company that that we're using right now

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>for bitcoin. So hang on a minute. You're telling me,

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>there's no like specialist this is how you account for crypto.

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>It's like, this is how we account for other stuff,

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna apply that to crypto exactly. It's being

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>considered now by the governing body by fazz BE that

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>they will possibly come up with a tailored accounting for it.

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>But right now, long and short of it is, if

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the value of crypto falls below what what micro strategy

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>bought it for, they have to write it down. They

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>have to write down the value of the asset, and

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and it goes only in one direction. It doesn't come

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>back if if crypto should rebound, they don't get the

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>benefit of that, at least on their balance sheet. So, Tom,

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>what I'm hearing from you is even if bitcoin were

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to go, you know, as they say, to the moon again,

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>micro Strategy would still have what looks like a hole

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on their balance sheet. Yeah. From a financial statement perspective,

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're number one. They're they're writing down bitcoin

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty much every quarter since they've owned so their earnings

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>have been horrendous as a result, even though Bitcoin at

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>times has been a very profitable bet for them. And

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>then in terms of what you're talking about, the the

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>actual bitcoin itself on the balance sheet, all it does

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is disappear every time they have to write it down. So, um,

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>they've written down more than half of the roughly four

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars a bitcoin that they've bought since since they

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>began this for a and just so because sometimes accounting

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and the real world seemed very far apart. When we

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about writing down an asset. It doesn't mean that

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>they've gotten rid of it. It just means that they're

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>no longer considering it for accounting purposes. Yeah. Yeah, The

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>accounting on that is that it's considered impaired, meaning that

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the value should never come back. But obviously, in the

0:07:58.160 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>case of bitcoin, it it can come back in a

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>moment's notice, So it doesn't really match the reality. Thankfully,

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>micro strategy does provide a lot of information, so investors

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>are able to figure out where they're where they truly

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>are positioned on a day by day basis. So from

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>what I'm hearing from you, they made a bet on

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin significantly benefited, you know, going from a billion

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar company to a twelve billion dollar company just on

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the strength of a two and fifty million dollar bets

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>on bitcoin. And now they're being I suppose punished is

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>too strong a word, but you know they're they're perceived.

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>If you're just looking at the numbers in a very

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>specific way, how big do you think is the gap

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>between where they're valued at right now and what you

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>would consider or what maybe like accountants would consider it

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a fair value for the company. Look at

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, Like I said, they were about a billion

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 1>dollar company before getting into crypto, and given that's just

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the value of the stock is just north of three billion,

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 1>they bought four billion dollars worth of bitcoin between y're

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in there. Uh that bitcoin is down as of today,

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it's down a billion dollars, right It's worth three billion

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.839
<v Speaker 1>dollars right now. Um, so it's sort of spotsle on.

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>In other words, yeah, yeah, I mean, look, you can

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>take the other the other flip side of the coin

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>is it's already up half a billion dollars since the

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>last quarter. Um, So it really depends on what the

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>what the measurements are that you want to use up next.

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>You'll hear more from Bloomberg senior editor Dave Litka and

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>from our accounting specialist Tom Contuliano all about Michael Sailor

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and micro Strategy. Micro Strategy is changing up its leadership.

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sailor, who co founded the company in nine nine,

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is giving up his CEO title, saying he will increase

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>his advocacy efforts for holding bitcoin. Michael, great to have

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you with us, So talk to us about what drove

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>this decision to move on from that CEO spot. Is

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it the end of the bitcoin era for micro Strategy? No, No,

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it's the the getting of the bitcoin error. In kind

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>of a blockbuster announcements as part of their last earnings,

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>they said that he would no longer be the CEO

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 1>of the company. Dave, what went down there? Well, they

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>announced that he would now serve as executive chairman, and

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that triggered a lot of speculation. Okay, was he pushed

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>because the bait went bad on it? It's still a

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>question that's unanswered. But he does the way they the

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>common shares of the company are structured, he does still

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>control the vast majority of the voting rights, so he's

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>still his own boss on it. Um, but you would

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>assume there has to be some pressure when you take

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollar quarterly loss and you look at the

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>core business and sales are falling, right, So he's once

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>again in a position where he is a person who

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>looked like he lost a ton of money in a

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>very short amount of time. Sure, I would be surprised

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>if there's many folks who have lost more than a

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars toy. I've been working with Fong on CEO

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>succession for about four years now, and it's always been

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the plan. We finally got to the point

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>where we had Andrew our new cfol on board and

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>we could actually make the change in Pong told CEO.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the markets responding to the fact

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that now instead of two executives Sailor and Fong Lee,

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>we have three executives, and um, it allows me to

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>do what I like to do. Which is bitcoin advocacy,

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin Acquisition. I'll continue to provide oversight for Bitcoin Acquisition.

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Is the chair of the Investments Committee of the board.

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll stay as a chair of the board. So he's

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>still the controlling sharehold of the company. He's still the

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>executive chair of the board. What do we think is

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of a meaningful next step from a business perspective

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>for micro Strategy, Tom, Like, do you think they're going

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to go back to focusing on software? Is there a

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>universe in which the attempt to you know, I've off

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin owning section of the business, Like, what are

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the kinds of strategies that you've seen in

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the past with folks attempting to deal I mean, suppose

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no really an exact comparable, but you know where

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to isolate something that is no longer core

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>or perceived as core. Yeah, but you could also take

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the opposite view that micro Strategy stock is almost tripled

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>since they got into bitcoin. Um, you could sit there

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>as a chairman CEO of the new CEO and say

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this is this is wonderful. People a Bloomberg are talking

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>about it. They're reading about a company that otherwise maybe

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.719
<v Speaker 1>they hadn't and investors who got in in August of

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and twenty that made an awful lot of money,

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>including including the chairman. So I think he's been pretty

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>consistent that they're in it to win it. And if

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you're on the micro Strategy bus at this point, you

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>know that you're you're staying with bitcoin. So the question

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is how how do you get more of it? Perhaps UM?

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 1>Does that software business generate enough money that they can

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>continue to buy based on the cash that throws off?

0:12:57.840 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Or is there some other way they've been creative and

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>how they've they've made some bitcoin acquisitions to date, is

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>there some other way that they haven't examined that that

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>they can get a little bit more in the coffers? Well,

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to the two other companies that you

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>mentioned as having disclosed bitcoin on their balance sheets around

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the same time as micro Strategy, Right, so Tesla which

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>has been exiting it's bitcoin position, UM and Square now

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>known as block, which just from the name is like

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>really doubling down on their own crypto strategy. You know

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>they're investing in UM technology related to crypto mining, for example,

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>But have you seen kind of an uptick across the board, Like,

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.719
<v Speaker 1>are there many more than three companies now that are

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>disclosing these kinds of holdings. I have not, And you know, Tesla.

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Anything with Tesla obviously generates a lot of headlines. Um. There. One,

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.719
<v Speaker 1>their initial one point five billion dollar acquisition of a

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is a lot of money to the three of us.

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>But two, Tesla's business is it's a little bit of

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>an afterthought. Um And like you said, they have sort

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of moved out of it. So I think there is

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a question whether public companies are going to follow this

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 1>this this strategy that these three companies have embodied at

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>some point in the last couple of years. David, I

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to something just about like Sailor himself.

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, he is still personally fabulously wealthy as a

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>as an individual, and it doesn't seem like recent events

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>have dented his faith in in bitcoin specifically, or the

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>perception that you know, many in the crypto and the

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin community have that this is a person who really

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>knows what he's talking about. Are there other people, you know,

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>just in this kind of universe of like Sailor and Novograts,

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Are there other people who you're observing trying to lead

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>their companies in kind of crypto friendly directions that we

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>know we should be having a follow up conversation with

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Tom about like six to twelve months. Well, the crash

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>changed a lot of things, so he had a lot

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of people who were kind of flirting with the idea,

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and as Tom mentioned that, those those two companies and

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe a handful of crypto minors that type of thing.

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>But now with the collapse of the price, they're struggling

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to just keep their head above water and stay in business.

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So the tone has really changed for everybody except for Sailor,

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>who hasn't deviated at all from his line. When Musk

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>sold the shares for tesla Um last quarter, he bit responses,

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you left with what I get after I sell this,

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you're left with of bitcoin, and he hasn't deviated at all.

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So essentially, just to go back to Tom's earlier point,

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>even though this current quarter and perhaps the quartes have

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>come might look a little bit challenging from an accounting perspective,

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>as far as Sailor is concerned, the fundamental bet was

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the right one for micro strategy. Yeah, I mean, it

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>depends what you're looking at right, they've made roughly two

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>dozen purchases of bitcoin and what all but two or

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>three of them are underwater. Um, the overall bet itself

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is is underwater by a billion dollars. So, um, it's

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a question of time. Um, you know, maybe crypto goes

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>back up, maybe bitcoin goes back up, and suddenly that

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>looks like a great long term bet. So we're waiting

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>on on when that happens, I guess. And just to

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of follow up on that point with the time made,

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the Sailor himself has been quoted and and but believe

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it even an interview with U with us that um,

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>he had a tough choice to make. He knew his

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>company wasn't growing at the pace it should be, and

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it was either do something different or die on it.

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>And he chose something different. Yeah, and that is that's

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>what CEO do. Write. Those are those a decisions they

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>try to make. We were very unfortunately not able to

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>get Sailor himself for this episode. His folks let us

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>know that he was traveling at the time that we

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>were recording it. But Michael Saylor, if you're listening to

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>this and you want to come on and and give

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>us your perspective on this story. We would happily have

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you on the Crypto podcast. Well, thank you both for

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>being here. I really appreciate you taking the time in

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.959
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. Tom, Dave a pleasure to have you. Thank you, Stacy.

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>You can find more of their reporting on the Bloomberg

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Terminal on Bloomberg dot com, or follow Dave Litka on Twitter.

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>He's at d l I E D T k A.

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>As always, it was another busy week on the Crypto beats.

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Join me tomorrow as I call on two of Bloomberg's

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>senior editors for Crypto to break down what happened this week,

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>what we're thinking about, and a little bit about what

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>we're reading. This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily podcast from

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and I Heart Radio. For more shows from I

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. Send us your comments,

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>questions or suggestions for the show to Crypto at Bloomberg

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>dot net or find us on Twitter. We're at Crypto.

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>The supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky ver Galina.

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Our senior producer is Janet Babin. Our producers are Mohammed

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Farouk and Sharon Barrero. Associate producer is Thy Butler gesta

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>wonder At is our engineer. Original music by Leo Sidrin.

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Stacy Marie Schmal We'll be back tomorrow.