WEBVTT - NFL Divisional Round Best Bets (Ep. 73)

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, Welcome back to the Betting Pros NFL podcast.

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host Dan Harris with me is Matt Perrault.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Find us on Twitter at Dan Harris ad and at

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Sports Talk Matt. Matt, how are you?

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 2>We got T shirts for the Daily Juice. I'm great.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>You are so excited about the Daily Juice T shirts.

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Look, if you listen to this, you hopefully listen to

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Daily Juice, which we talked about a lot. Daily podcast

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>hosted by Matt finally got T shirts that everybody has

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>been asking about. You can find them at fantasypros dot

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>com slash shop. Just look for the newest items. It's

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>one of our newest I mean, Matt on Discord, they

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>were going like hot gigs. I mean I checked in

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>on your the Daily Juice channel and everybody just like,

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I got two. I'm getting one here. I like this.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I've already gotten requests for sweatshirts. People in Chicago were like,

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I need sweatshirts. It's too I was like, you want sweatshirt?

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 2>I was like, let's walk first, Okay, Like I just

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 2>just got the T shirts, Like eventually hats, Eventually we'll

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 2>get sweatshirts. We'll get all sorts of fun stuff going.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 2>And people were like throwing out slogans they want on

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 2>the back of the shirt and whatnot, Like all right,

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 2>like we'll have runs one, two, and three. This is

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 2>just like the beginning, just the start.

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, I were producer of this show. Clinton hard working

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>guy and begged me not to throw him shot up,

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>but I am anyway, was the one who finally got

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the shirts up and running, and he produces the show,

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>so he's listening. So Clinton, you got it. Now we

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>need everything. We need hats, we need sweatshirts, we need slogans,

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>so we will get on that. Shud.

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Sorry the record, Clinton, I'm very happy you just have

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 2>the T shirts. Well, thank you for so.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Matt WANs more. Matt wants more. It's very clear he

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is not satisfied until he's got like her. I don't know,

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>he's got a banner flying it, you know, with an

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>airplane or something like that. All right, let's get into it.

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>It's the divisional rounds to only four games, so it's

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be a little bit of a shorter show

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>than usual, but we'll break down each game. But last week, Matt,

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>we were really not not we did not have last week.

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think most people had last week correct as

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>far as I could tell. But let's just talk about

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the official picks that we made yesterday, and we have

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to if we don't have to, actually, would you prefer

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to skip? It?

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Were better?

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Your yours were better than mine. My official picks were

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we did one spread, one over under, and one teaser.

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>My spread was the Bills lank six and a half.

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>That was wrong. My over under was the Bucks and

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the Washington football team under forty four and a half,

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>which was a loss. Thankfully. My two team teazer did hit,

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>which was the Bills down to only a pick which

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>was half a point. That was pretty close, and the

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Bucks down to lane two and a half. So that

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>did hit. Matt. You had the Steelers laying five and

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a half in that game, forget about. I don't even

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>know what to say. And that was on me. I

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.559
<v Speaker 1>was you were very much like I have some minor trepidation,

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, why they have no coach, They're

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>not practiceding, it's gonna be great. That was ridiculous. You

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>had the Bills at the podcast, Matt, you had it

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>over fifty one. So that's a push, right, you added

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty one and a half.

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I bet the and a half. It was just the

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 2>story of my last two weeks has been half unit losses.

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 2>It's been brutal.

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, you also hate your teaser, which was the Bill's

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>minus half a point and the Rams getting nine and

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a half. I have already bet a two team teaser,

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>so I will give that later. But let's start it off.

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Rams visiting the Packers. That's the

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>first game of the week. Right now, the Packers are

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>laying six and a half points. A little surprising to

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>me that this hasn't jumped back up to seven, because

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it kind of has been back and forth a little bit.

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.119
<v Speaker 1>So it's at six and a half. I'm not saying

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad line. I just think that they're from

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>what I could tell, the Packers seem to be pretty

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>heavily bet considering all the issues that are going on.

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 2>So why so let's let's play bookmaker? Yes, why wouldn't

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 2>If the line is six and a half stagnant and

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 2>all the money's coming in on the Packers, what does

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 2>that tell you.

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>That what that the books think that the Rams are

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>going to cover? All? Right?

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the are live here in this game.

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that they're got that that bookmakers think

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that chance to win the game?

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Goodness? All right, So first of all, the over unders

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>at forty five and a half. Here's the deal. Wolford

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is out right, he's been ruled out completely. So it's

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Goff with Blake Bortles. Back them up Goff as much

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>as they want. You were on that game, Matt. You

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>you had a good feel for that Rams game. We

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>both liked him at three and a half for sure,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>but you did think that they had the chance to

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>win out right. Their defense is legitimate. I guess Aaron

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Donald today was taking off the injury report. I still

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>find it very difficult to believe that he's one hundred

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 1>percent healthy, particularly with the cold whatever he's got, with

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the rib injury. Cooper Cup is battling, you know, the knee.

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>You've got Jared Goff who kind of looked like he

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>was me pushing the ball, you know, down the field,

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and just I don't know, I'm surprised. I guess that

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the that they think it's like, have you talked to anybody,

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>do you have a good sense of why? And do

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>you think that the Rams are alive to win this game.

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think the Rams are allowed to win the game.

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 2>I think the Rams are allowed to cover the spread.

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 2>And the number is seven. So so last week on

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the podcast, everybody was talking to me about the Washington

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 2>football team and Tempa Bay Bucks, right, and I told

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 2>everybody here on the podcast the number was nine. Nine

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>was the number where the bad guys were coming in

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 2>and dropping large sums. What did the line? What did

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 2>the game end at? Eight? Okay, same thing here. Seven's

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the number. It went to seven for like a second

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 2>in Vegas and they got it, just blitzed with money,

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.679
<v Speaker 2>tons of money on plus seven. That's the number I want.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I want plus seven. I may have to buy it

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 2>to get there. Yeah, seven is the number for the Rams.

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 2>And then it comes down to whether or not that

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 2>defense can turn the football over. I think it's a

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty four to twenty type of victory. I think the

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 2>number for the total is right there. I wouldn't touch that,

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't go near it, but I think you might go, well,

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 2>how are the Rams gonna score? One? Akers running the football?

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 2>Two dink and dunk? Okay, and look it's Lambeau. Could

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 2>we get a freak snowstorm. Could we get really cold.

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, let's see what the weather looks like before

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 2>we bet it. But the worse the weather, the better

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 2>it is here, in my opinion, for the Rams defense

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 2>to be able to keep the game close, Ramsey could

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 2>take away potentially. Now you could say Ramsey does great

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 2>against DK Metcalf. DeVante Adams is a different story. He's

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 2>quick twitch, he's very smooth, he's very quick in and

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>out of the brakes. He's tough to guard crue true,

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 2>but if footing's a problem, Ramsey may be able to

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 2>stay with them a little bit more. And if you

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 2>take him out of the equation and you make somebody

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 2>else beat you. I'm not saying that there aren't mvs

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 2>can't do it, but I think the Rams are pretty comfortable,

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, worrying about MBS versus DeVante Adams here, So

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 2>I just wonder about possessions. Can the Rams keep the

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 2>football away and can the Rams not turn the ball over?

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>That is the biggest It's a key in every game,

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 2>but to me, it's the biggest key in this game.

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 2>If they don't turn the ball over, they're going to

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 2>be in the game.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is I think you have it right. Everything

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you've said I think is exactly right. If I am

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>forced to pick a side on the total, which again

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I think is right on at forty five and a half,

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I actually kind of would lean under. I'm very gun

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>shy on unders right now because of last week where

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it felt like right, it felt like there were a

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of unders and just didn't really come close. So

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>with this one, though, I do think because I think

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you're right, I think you're going to see a whole

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of cam akers as you have seen over the

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.119
<v Speaker 1>last several weeks for the Rams, but especially with Goff.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>And again that is how you attack Green Bay is

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>their run defense. Now, I think that it The issue

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for me is if Cup is not healthy for this game,

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>even if he plays, but he's limited in this game,

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna be able to stick j R. Alexander

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>on Robert Woods and you're going to be able to

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of sell out to stop the run and then say,

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, Jared Goff, we're going to take away your

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>one legitimate wide receiver. Good luck beating us elsewhere, you know,

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>And if they can do that, then they can do that.

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>But I don't see the Rams being able to put

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>up a ton of points in this game absence some

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of defensive score, which you can't really count on

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>with Rogers. But the reason I kind of lean towards

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the under is that exact thing, which is they're gonna

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>run the ball time, that's gonna bleed the clock as

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>much as possible. And I don't think that the Packers

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to be able to just drive down the

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>field that you know, you've seen these games, right the

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Bucks game with Rogers right where Oh my goodness, what

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in the world you get pressure on Rogers every once

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in a while, and now all of a sudden, that

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay offense doesn't really work. So for me, I

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>lean the under, but I wouldn't touch it because I think,

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, forty five and a half, just with the

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>way the game is right now, I wouldn't go near

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it if I had to choose the side. Are you

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>basically saying that you're staying away from the side unless

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it gets to seven, in which case you take the Rams.

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Right, I need seven. I want seven to feel comfortable

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 2>because I am concerned about the ability for the Rams

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 2>to score. I think people who are questioning saying I

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 2>don't see the Rams scoring more than seventeen points. I'll

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 2>give you that. I think I think the total is right.

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 2>I think the Rams are gonna have to play the

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 2>game that they played last week, and they're gonna have

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 2>to play defense. And their defense is you know, they

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 2>need short fields. They need Aaron Donald to be Aaron Donald,

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 2>whether he's a one hundred percent or not. They need

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 2>him to be double teamed, and they got to be,

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, making the Packers worry about him every single

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 2>snap and then other players go and make plays and

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 2>hopefully you know, either pressure Rogers or stripsacks or whatnot

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 2>and get after it. Rogers is you know, it's always

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 2>difficult to look at him off of a bye week,

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 2>in the cold weather, in the playoffs. I mean, just

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 2>there are a ton of things pushing that the Packers

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 2>are going to be extremely public in every teaser. This

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 2>is the Steelers all over again. Okay, everyone is teasing

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 2>this game down to a half a point and taking

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 2>the Packers. So that's my only concern about this game

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 2>is just the numbers not moving, and there the liability

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 2>keeps on stacking up and up and up. And I've

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 2>been a fan of this Rams team all year, and

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I just wish it was John Whalferd because if it

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 2>was John Walford a quarterback, I would I would be

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 2>taking the Rams outright.

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>That's actually what I was a little surprised that. I

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:03.719
<v Speaker 1>thought when Walford wouldn't was declared out that that might

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 1>move into seven right right, it still didn't.

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Nothing, not even a tick, not even touch nothing. I

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 2>was like, okay, that's interesting.

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 1>Out of curiosity. Do you know what it's going to

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 1>take to buy the half a point to get from

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>six and a half to.

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Probably be one thirty to forty would be my guest

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 2>would be somewhere in that general range in terms of cost.

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not going to be cheap to do it,

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 2>but I think in terms of avoiding losing versus pushing,

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 2>it might be worth it.

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No, no, I get it. I because I have

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>not been so basically to sum it up as much

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>as possible, I don't love either anything in this game,

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 1>like just where it is right now at six and

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a half and at forty five and a half, I

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>don't like it either side. I lean the under really,

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I just don't have a good sense. I think the

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Packers are going to win this game, okay, and I

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>could see it being you know, a you know, a

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>double digit win for the Packers, but it is so public,

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and you're right, I mean that just screams tease us

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>down to a half point, right and then so for

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.319
<v Speaker 1>that makes me a little nervous.

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 2>So scary, that's what's scary. See the thing about right

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 2>now is all of the data, all the information. These

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 2>lines are as razors sharp as they of all year.

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 2>This is the weekend the public gets destroyed. Last weekend

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 2>that got destroyed too, But this is normally the weekend

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 2>they get annihilated because all the data. You just see

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 2>that line, it looks so tempting. Oh Packers under a touchdown?

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh Rogers, of course, how are they gonna score? And

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 2>then we're gonna be sitting here. It's gonna be like

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 2>a twenty one seventeen type of game. And it's like,

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 2>oh they knew right?

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I I get it. I mean I wonder

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>whether or not if you do involvement in the teaser,

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>would you rather tease the rams up?

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Twelve and a half, I would, yes, and I would,

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 2>and again I would hope that we can you cross

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 2>a key number of seven across key number of ten,

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 2>so the couple of key numbers you cross there by

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 2>doing that. But it's it's a hard it's a hard game.

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at debate that it's a really hard game.

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I agree. It's one that I don't really

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>want to go near. And I'd feel a lot better

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>about it if this doesn't feel like they're just begging

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you to do to take the Packers and to tease

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>the Packers down to half a point. That does make

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>me worried. I do still think that the Packers are

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>going to win this game. That's particularly true because I

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>don't believe. I'm glad Donald is off the injury report,

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>but you saw him last week. That dude's like the

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>toughest due in the NFL. He really struggled last week.

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>It's hard for me to believe that he's one hundred percent,

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 1>particularly going now to the cold and you've got Cup

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and now you've got golf like all of that. Just

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>as sort of I can't talk myself into the Packers.

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the next game. Interesting one. I'm interested

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>here how you feel you've been fading the bills for

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>most of the year. You've got the Ravens visiting the Bills.

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the Bills are laying two and a half,

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>which has kind of bounced back and forth a little

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>bit between two and two and a half. The total.

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>What I'm saying is it's dropped now to forty nine

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and a half. It was fifty when I looked early

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in the day. So what do you think of this game?

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm all over the Ravens, all all over the Ravens.

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 2>This is where having a outdoor game in Buffalo, New

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 2>York burns the Bills because they're not built for it.

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 2>It's cold, it's not gonna be nice. You got an

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 2>issue with the knee for Cold Beasley. You've got a

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 2>defense that's got a secondary that's playing really well, that

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 2>can take away digs, and you're gonna put it on

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 2>a running game that only is the quarterback. Because of

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 2>injury and ineffectiveness for the Buffalo Bills, the Ravens were

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 2>the best team going into this year. Everyone loved the Ravens.

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 2>They had COVID problems, they had bad losses, they didn't

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 2>look right. Well, they're right now, and I think having

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 2>a running quarterback in this type of weather. This is

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 2>the guy you want, This is the play you want,

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 2>This is the MODI, this is what you want to

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>have happen. You want a guy like Lamar Jackson in

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 2>the game in a cold weather situation. I know he

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 2>doesn't like the cold. I don't care. Okay, in his career,

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I think under forty degrees, he's seven to zho straight

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 2>up in temperatures below forty. So it's not like he

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 2>can't play in this game. I this is just you

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 2>can say, Matt, it's a typical fading of of Jared.

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allens is going to come back and burn me.

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 2>But if I may have to buy it to three,

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 2>but I will be on the Ravens money line in

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 2>this game.

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't have a great feel for it. Again,

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>like I hate to say that if I do go

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>one way, I do kind of lean the under, just

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>because I think that, you know, forty nine and a half,

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>just again betting on I haven't bet the under. I'm

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>probably not gonna bet the under. I lean the under,

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>but again, betting unders. Right now, I'm doing whatever I

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>can to avoid it because it's just not where we are.

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think these teams kind of match up,

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>at least defensively pretty well. I mean, the Ravens defense

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>is playing very, very solid football at this point. I

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>mean you saw Derek Henry couldn't do anything, and again

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned it correctly. The Bills can't run the ball,

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and Zach Moss's out anyway, and he is their better runner.

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's just going to be Devin Singletary, maybe TJ. Yeldon.

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen is fantastic, Stefan Diggs is fantastic. They'll find

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a way to put up points because their offense is creative,

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, with their system and everything like that. The

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Ravens obviously you attack the Bills for the most part.

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>The Bills defense, when you just step back from it,

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you're like, well, this doesn't match up well, Like we

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>have a great outside corner. But really, like, even if

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you take away Hollywood Brown, depending on where Hollywood Brown

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>runs out of, they're not great against tight ends necessarily.

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're not a complete shutdown defense against tight ends.

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews should be fine in the game. They don't

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>stop the run particularly well. The Ravens love to run,

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>so on paper, it doesn't look like a fantastic matchup.

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>But you remember last year the Bills weren't that great

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>against the run either, and they played the Ravens I

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>think last year, and they they held Lamar in check

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, you know, not completely shut them down,

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>but they know how to play this offense. So I

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>do think that this is going to be a game

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be generally speaking, pretty low scoring, a

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit like the Titans and then and the Ravens.

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So I kind of lean towards the ender. If I

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>had to pick a side, I don't. I don't have

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a great feel for it. Matt, Like, I mean, you're confident,

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean confident in quotation marks you confident that the

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Ravens are going to win this game? Yes, okay, is

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this your favorite play of the week Ravens? No? Oh, okay,

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>very good. Then I will I will put it out

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>there that if I'm forced to choose a side, I'm

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with the Bills. And this is not I

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>don't feel great about it. And again I'm just being

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>as honest with you guys as possible. I have not

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>bet this game, like I haven't because I don't have

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a good feel for it. I can see the Ravens.

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But I do see a scenario where the Bills kind

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of just completely sell out to stop the run. And look,

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the Titans kind of did the same thing last week,

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and they did they held him in check until they

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't because Lamar Jackson is just a complete freaking nature

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>on the ground and.

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Alma though, don't don't don't sell the wide receivers that

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 2>short here. I mean, I know Lamar played poorly in

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 2>the first quarter throwing that jump ball down down the field.

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 2>That wasn't good, But he really played well after that.

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he settled down, he really played well.

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>He did, he did, he did, But it's just, you know,

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it's again I think that at the Bills offense and

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>just how well coached they are, and how good Josh

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Allen is and how good Stefan Diggs is. I know

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the corners are great for Baltimore, but you know, part

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of me thinks I was a little surprised with the

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with the Titans, for example, why they got away from

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Brown right like they didn't. They went to Brown early,

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>he had the touchdown and then you didn't really see

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>all that much from him. Again, I think, you know,

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Diggs is borderline uncoverable at this point. So I do

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>expect the Bills to put a point and if they

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>can get a lead, and if they're home, I think

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a little tougher for Jackson to

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>come back.

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 2>But again, they came back now ten on the road

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 2>last week.

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, very true, very true, But.

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:40.360
<v Speaker 2>That narrative's gone that they can't up back on the road.

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh, you're absolutely right, And that's why I said, I

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think like they can't. I think though, that they're

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>playing a team that has a better defense now, because

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 1>I know the Bills defense. You you're right, you you

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>had that a couple of weeks ago. I was I

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 1>was getting very very high on the Bills defense, and

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you kind of talked me down, and you were correct

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.120
<v Speaker 1>because they did not improve nearly as much at least

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>as they shown lately. But they're facing a bet offense

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>or more explosive offense and a better defense. So this

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>is one where I think if they did fall down,

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it had more than ten, because ten, you can stick

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>with it. But it's a fair point. I just I

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have a great feel for it. If I have

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to go someplace, I'm gonna go with the Bills, who

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of been backing a little bit for a

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>while at this point. They weren't that good last week

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>at all. But yeah, it's a game I'm staying away from.

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>You like the Ravens little more. What do you think,

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the total forty nine and a half.

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if I had to bet it, I probably

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 2>would bet the under, just because I think it's going

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 2>to be one of those games where the clock's running constantly,

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 2>but because I think everyone's gonna expect points. So I

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 2>think the whole the public's gonna go off blow fifty.

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Give me the over, and I don't know if they

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 2>score thirty. They score twenty seven last week, so I

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 2>think Buffalo probably scores, you know, somewhere in the lower twenties,

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 2>and the Ravens somewhere right in the same area, you know,

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. I see this as like a twenty four

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 2>to twenty three game one way or the other.

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I agree, And that's why I lean the under. Again,

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not betting it because there's really only you know,

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't like you Saturday. I'm gonna more enjoy football.

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I probably will do a very minor teas piece with

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that Packers game, and I'll probably be very public with

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it and tease the Packers down to a half point.

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, this one, I'm just gonna more enjoy. Let's

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>go to the Sunday games. The Chiefs are laying ten

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>right now to the Browns. That total is at fifty

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>seven right now. It's fifty seven and a half at

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.199
<v Speaker 1>bet MGM, it's fifty eight at Sugarhouse, but it's fifty

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>seven in our consensus line. So what do you think here.

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 2>You may hate that game with the Ravens and the Bills.

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 2>I hate this game with the Browns and the Chiefs.

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs have cost me so much money. I can

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 2>talk my way into both sides that the Browns win

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 2>this game outright, or this is a fifty point win

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 2>for the Chiefs and it's an absolute route. I don't

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 2>know what to do with this game. I'm scared to

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 2>tease it because if the Chiefs do what they're capable of,

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 2>sixteen is not enough and it's just a complete twenty

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 2>one point destruction and bye bye teasers. I'm concerned about

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 2>teasing it down to four because I think it's the

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 2>only way to tease this game is down to four.

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 2>But I got this weird, sneaking suspicion that the Chiefs

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 2>have been on ice skates, skating their way through their schedule,

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 2>and all of a sudden, they're gonna take on a

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 2>team that may feel like they got, you know, destiny

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 2>on their side, and everything sometimes bounces go your way.

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I've seen it. I watched the Patriots nineteen eighty six

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 2>have no right to go through three teams on the

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 2>road and make it to the super Bowl and get

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 2>their doors blown off by the Bears. I've seen it. Okay,

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 2>you can win games on the road and get complete

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 2>fumble and turn over luck that gets you on your

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 2>way to the super Bowl. I don't know. This game

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 2>scares the holy heck out of me that the Cleveland Browns

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 2>are gonna shock the world and beat the Chiefs. I'm

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 2>not touching this game.

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I don't think that they're gonna win. But

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with you because I you know, I look,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 1>two team teasers at this point aren't fun. You know,

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 1>the lines are so sharp, so when I look for

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>them this game, there's no piece of it that I

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>would feel comfortable teasing in either direction, right, Like I

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>don't feel real great about the Browns getting sixteen, but

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel real great about the Chiefs laying for Like,

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know what's gonna happen. I if I'm

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>forced to pick aside, and again that's where we're basically

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>at at this point, I would lean the Browns getting ten. Okay,

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd love it if it got to ten and a half.

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>But I like them getting ten because again we've seen it.

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs just don't have for the most part, or

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't yet this season, had the we are gonna lock

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>this thing up and it's gonna be done. But they're

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>off a by this point out it's worth noting you

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>remember last year, of course, what happened with the Texans

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and they fell way behind. They wound up winning, but

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>they came out so flat yep, at this point. So

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the look. If the Chiefs are vulnerable on defense, it's

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. The Browns have a great running game,

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and Baker Mayfield has played really, really well this season.

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>If you take out the games where he either has

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>no wide receivers to throw to or is not like

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a wind crazy game, they can keep this game close.

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>The total is just nuts, Like fifty seven. I don't

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a ridiculous total. Like again, it's something

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>where I'm like, well, I think the value is probably

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on the under, but I'm not gonna bet it. So

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>this is this game above all is probably now on

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the spread. The game I'm staying away from is the

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Bills and the Ravens. I have like leans on the

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>other one, Bills and Ravens. I'm just like, I don't

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>know this one. The total I'm just totally saying away from.

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>If I had to go, I think the Browns mat

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 1>like getting ten because again, I just don't see this.

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't see the Chiefs coming out here. And just

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, even if they come weigh, if they get

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>way ahead, you know, they just they've never finished it

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>off right this whole year.

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 2>And now I just think it's got back door written

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 2>all over it. It's got it's got falling apart in

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 2>the fourth quarter written all over it. It's it's just

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 2>has it has the recipe to be one of those

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 2>games where at halftime we're laughing at the Browns Haha,

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 2>you stink, And in the fourth quarter we're like, are

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 2>you kidding me? Are they actually gonna blow this game

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 2>or the Chiefs gonna lose like that. That's how I

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 2>feel like this game is going to go. It's just

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 2>absolutely crazy, all right.

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's get to the last game, which you feel

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>like you're probably eyeing. This is the game that I'm

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>eyeing as well, So let's get to it. It's the

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Bucks visiting the Saints. The Bucks are getting three. This

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>is one word. Oh, I don't where did it open, Matt?

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Four?

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>I thought it opened at four. Okay, I thought I

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>saw like an early line.

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 2>And a half at four. It was four at DraftKings,

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 2>three and a half of most books Vegas. It's pretty

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 2>much painted at three right now.

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the consensus over under is fifty two. But

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>it's basically fifty one and a half or fifty two.

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>It's bouncing back and forth out of the Bucks. So, Matt,

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>do you have strong positions on either one of these numbers? Okay,

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, go ahead. I hope we're on the same side.

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Go right. So I've been talking about Tampa for a

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 2>while now after the bye. If you look at the

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 2>teams the Buccaneers have played after their bye week, which

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 2>is causing everybody to jump up and down. They played

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.719
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings twice, they played the Lions once, and they

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 2>beat Washington on the road last week. Those teams stink.

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Everyone thinking that the Bucks, Oh my gosh, they've righted

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the ship. Brady's right, everything's perfect. Well, no, okay, everything's

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 2>not perfect. There's still playing the same typical brand of

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 2>football that they played all year, which is they beat

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 2>up on bad teams and they lose to good teams.

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 2>The last two good teams Tampa played was before the

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 2>bye week with way the Chiefs and the Rams, and

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 2>they lost both those games twenty seven to twenty four.

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 2>This is a road game to the Saints. I do

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 2>not care that they played three times. This is the

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 2>third time they're playing. I put no stock in the

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.719
<v Speaker 2>idea that it's hard to beat somebody three times in

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 2>one season. I do not believe that Leonard Fournette or

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 2>even Ronald Jones are gonna be able to run on

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 2>that Saints defense. And when you can't run for the Bucks,

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 2>they lose. Look at all their games they have lost.

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 2>They can't run. They have to run in the first half.

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 2>I think Fournette got to his overall rushing prop in

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 2>the first quarter last week against Washington that set everything

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 2>else up for their offense and allowed them to throw

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 2>the ball deep with play action and everything Brady does

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 2>this Saints team, You're not running on these guys. And

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 2>then they got guys in the back end who can

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 2>at least make it difficult to get the ball to

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Evans and company. I know Godwin played well, but I'm

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 2>saying I'll say it again, this offense was better when

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 2>they had Scotty Miller in the slot in Gronk going

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 2>down the scene. And they don't do that anymore. Saints

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 2>lay the three New Orleans wins.

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm on the other side. I'm on the other

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>side of this.

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 2>This is a double bag game for people here in

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Vegas that I know that are weighing in. Wait and

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 2>if it goes it ever goes to two and a half,

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 2>If the public is dumb enough to get this thing

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 2>to two and a half, watch how much money comes

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 2>in on the Saints.

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I do agree with that. I think if you

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>get it under a field goal, I get I'm sure

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>money is going to come in pouring on the Saints.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Then how can you be on Tampa at three? Then,

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 2>because basically you're praying for it.

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that. I'm not saying that they' I'm

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>saying that the money is going to come in. I'm

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>sure because that you get the home team in the

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>plaids beaten this team twice. You've got the Bucks, who,

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>for all the reasons that you said, have not been

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>overly impressive, and they've been beating up on, you know,

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>bad teams. And I think that if you're gonna give

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>a team like the Saints at home to you know,

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>under a field goal, that money is going to come

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 1>in on the Saints. I am on the Bucks, and

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>I look, I get everything you're saying. Here's the thing, Matt,

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we you you liked Washington last week, right, like not

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>not to necessary, you thought there was even a chance

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>that they could win, but you weren't picking them to

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>win or anything. But you liked them. Spread Why was that? Like? What?

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>What did what did we think was gonna happen? Did

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you like their offense or did you like their defense

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and thinking to get pressure?

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 2>I like, I really wanted them. With Alex Smith at

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback spots, really was. I fell in love with

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 2>it so phenomenally. He played incredibly well. So so I

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 2>mean but going into the game, the reason why I

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 2>was so high on it is because Alex Smith was

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 2>going to play, and the Alex Smith was gonna make

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 2>enough place to really help that team down the field.

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, henecky missed him throws and he played. He

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 2>played great. So there's a big caveat as to where

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Washington was. Washington, I was actually really confused as to

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 2>what they were doing and why they were running the

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 2>same type of stunts, the same play over and over

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 2>again when it wasn't getting home. And you said the

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 2>offensive line played really well, I think I had more

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 2>problems with the defensive line for Washington than the offensive

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 2>line for I mean, Chase Young, why are you just

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 2>lining him up in the same spot and having him

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 2>run the same thing over and over again when he

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 2>was getting taken care of by the left tackle. It

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 2>was driving me. Get the guy, move him around, use

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 2>him in different ways. He's incredibly difficult him up against

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 2>a running back. He'll run the guy over. So yeah,

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not worried about the Saints lack of pressure because

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 2>you have to again, you have to run the ball.

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 2>If you know, if you're the Tampa Bay Bucks, you

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 2>have to run the football and you're not gonna run

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 2>on the Saints.

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I hear what you're saying. I put less of

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the blame on the Washington defensive line and more of

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the credit to the Bucks offensive line with Margaret Back.

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I really think that that offensive line now is in

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>the position where they're going to be able to protect Brady.

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And if you protect Brady, I don't care how about

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>anything else about a defense. I really don't. If you

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>give Brady time, he will find the open guy. And

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>then I mean you look, you talked about the receivers. Yeah,

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got Evans who's banged up, and Marshawn Lattimore generally

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>shuts him down. Godwin played pretty poorly. I mean, I

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know how many drops he had in that game.

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>He didn't play all that well. Gronk isn't involved. But

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you know who is pretty involved and who looks really good,

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>as much as I hate to admit it, is Antonio Brown.

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>He does, he has been. He looks great, and I

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>think they've got enough now. I agree. If ron Jones

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>returned to practice, I don't know if he's gonna play,

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but I agree it's going to be very, very difficult

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>for Leonard Fournette to run against the Saints. I agree

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>with that, But I also think that the Bucks defense,

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>as much as they you know, didn't look good, you know,

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>against Taylor on I think a lot of that was

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that they probably prepared for Alex Smith to play and

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>he would Bucks defense. Really I don't.

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 2>But on the right as the Saints against three last

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 2>game ever, potentially loses his career is done. It's how many?

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>How many times, though have we seen the Saints have

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>games where we thought they were going to win in

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs and they just didn't against the Vikings. And

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>right now you've seen Drew Brees. You've watched all these games, right,

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>do you feel confident in Drew Brees right now being

0:28:56.240 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>able against a critical throw if they can get every.

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay with Michael Thomas, with Michael Thomas on the on

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 2>on the field against that secondary, yes, I do.

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fine the Bucks. The biggest thing with

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks is that they are not only good against

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>running backs running the ball, they are good against pass

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>catching running backs, including Alvin Kamara. Like that is what

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I expect to happen now. I don't think either defense

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to be able to shut either offense down.

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I think, who's the kid that had the breakout game?

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Who I'm blanking on? His name for the Saints. The

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 2>scatback who had a crazy game last week? Uh the

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Saint week? Yeah, I'm blanket on I'm blanking against the Bears.

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 2>He had a huge game last week against the Bears.

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Who has been hurt most of the entire year. And

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 2>everyone will be like, where has this guy been all season?

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I haven't. I wasn't watching the game all that closely,

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>so I'm sorry. If I need to look at them,

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, look it up, then look it up then

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and find who it is. But where I'm coming from

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is I think both of these teams are going to

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to put up points. But I don't think.

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Look the Saints, you know they Harris. Deontay Harris is

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>not a guy.

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh dude. He had seven catch If you didn't watch

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 2>the game close, he had seven catches for eighty three yards.

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 2>He was averaging twelve yards per catch, and he was

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 2>unbelievable in the scene.

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Harris, I'm I'm well aware of the fact that Deontay

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Harris having seven catches in eighty three yards against the

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Bears does not make me say WHOA.

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Whose defense is better? Bears are Tampa?

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the Bears?

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe WHOA?

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Maybee the Bears.

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 2>You. I'll make this bet right now. The Saints score

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 2>more than twenty one points against Tampa.

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I have no I'm not saying that they won't.

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not and they listen twenty one of the Bears.

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the Bucks are going to score more

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>than twenty one on the Saints?

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I really, I really don't know.

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I I so you probably like the under in this game.

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 2>I would lean towards the under. Yeah, I mean I would.

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 2>I I'm not playing totals this week at all.

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not touching I.

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Got tot o win three last week. I'm not touching him.

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I was a half. I had fifty one and a

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 2>half in the Bills game. This that I the two

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 2>unders and the other two game and I miss those.

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not touching totals this week. I'm staying far away.

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 2>But I think this Saints team laying a field goal

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 2>at home. I think Drew Brees he just threw for

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 2>two sixty five and twenty eight of thirty nine. I

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 2>think Kamara is gonna have a big running game. I

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 2>think he's gonna have a big catching game. I love

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Deontay Harris to open up the middle of the field.

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I love that Deontay Harris is like their key.

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, so bad. I'm telling you he was such

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 2>a big deal. He was a huge Heck, even even

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Bruce Arians talked about it this week that their offense

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 2>having because he didn't play any other games, that he's

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 2>a total game changer for them because of how quick

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 2>he is and how fast he can get to the corner.

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you that this is Ravens plus two and

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 2>a half in Saints minus three. Are are my two

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 2>favorite plays of the week.

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:49.959
<v Speaker 1>All right, hold on, I'm looking up not available on draftings.

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So I was trying to look up his prop for

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you on receiving yards for Deontay Harris.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 2>He'll he'll be there.

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Better right now. You can bet it right now? Yeah. Look, okay,

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So you love the Saints and three and I like

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks. I'd love it and I got it when

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it first, so I got it three and a half.

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>So for me, that's where I was in on them

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>at three and a half, and I actually tease them

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>up to nine and a half, so that that's part.

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Of the mind not play. I mean, I don't mind,

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't mind teasing them up. I think it's a

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 2>touchdown game, Max.

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I look there, Look, there is a plausible way,

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>because we've seen it before with the two teams, that

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>they completely destroy them like that. The Saints just come in.

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I would I would be very surprised to watch any

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Tom Brady team get destroyed in the playoffs.

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think, really what this comes down. And as

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>much as you and I are going back and forth,

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think like we're well off. I you

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>sound like you're giving zero credit to the Bucks defense.

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Is that I don't think the best defense is any good.

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I really don't.

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think the Buck.

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 2>That the Washington football team moved the ball in the

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Washington football team, if they had one other wide receiver,

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 2>probably win that game.

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that if the Bucks defense played like they

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>played last week, you're absolutely right. I just for me,

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that that was tar about And you know

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>again that that game I was like glued to. I

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>have a very close friend who's a Bucks fan, so

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>we we sort of watch all the games. I'm like

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a quasi Bucks fan whatever, But I do think that

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>they played absolutely.

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh so you have a fandom interest in this game now,

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 2>I see it.

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Now as somebody who bet against the Jets every single

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>time I could. My fandom does not weigh in on

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>how I placed my wagers. But I watched the game

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:25.719
<v Speaker 1>close and we were screaming at the at the defense

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>like it was a terribly called game by Bulls. But

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I really I think it was much more because they

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>they didn't know what to expect from Heineke and they

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>weren't prepared for it. I think their defense, we know

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>they can stop the run, we know that. I mean,

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>can they take away Kamara? I don't know for sure,

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>but they are really really good elite at stopping the

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.479
<v Speaker 1>run and at pass catching back, so I think if

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you can take them Ora out of the way. Michael

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Thomas looked good, looked healthy, So that is an issue absolutely.

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>But again, Drew Brees throws lollipops out there. I don't

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>think this is the type of offense anymore. That's just

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to three seconds drive the ball down

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the field and score, you know, all the time they want.

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>But more importantly, I think the Bucks are going to

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to score in this game. I really do.

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And my teaser, which by the way, is the same

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>game teaser which we'll get to, is going to be

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the bucks up to nine and a half, and I'm

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna take the total down and go with the over,

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>which is the total down to forty five and a half.

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>So that is my two team teasers.

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean teasing that total down to forty five, take

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the over, and that I do. I do direct, I

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 2>do like the second.

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.439
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's really what I like. I haven't gotten

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>out there and gotten like this is mine. I'm going

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 1>crazy with the with the bucks. That is gonna be

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>my pick though for and it sounds like it's gonna

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>be your pick, So that is gonna be like the

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 1>one thing I know, but that is gonna be my

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>my teaser. Is that way. I think that this is

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a close game. I think they're gonna hang

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 1>with it, and so I think realistically, I think the

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>most likely outcome is probably the Saints winning a very

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>close game within three points. So that's why I think

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:52.439
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna go. I think the offense is gonna stick

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>with it.

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, you're taking three and a half So from

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.800
<v Speaker 2>an audience standpoint, you're betting with me because the audience

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 2>can't get three and a half. The audience not getting

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 2>three and a half again.

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Correct, So I'm taking three, So.

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 2>You're riding with me minus three for the Saints.

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:09.439
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm taking the bucks getting three. Okay, I'm still going.

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Look here's I don't like any of the.

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Saints are gonna win by three, So how could you do?

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no, I said the Saints. I think are

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna win a close game. I think they'll probably win

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 1>by what I'm all These lines are very sharp, Matt,

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>like that. That's what we've talked about, right, There's no

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:24.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not coming here. I'm like, I've got such good

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 1>value on this line right now, Like if you got me.

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:29.759
<v Speaker 2>Way better than three, if you like I have three, right,

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 2>I have it at three and a half.

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>As a personal matter, But we are doing this show, right,

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to get back to three and a half. No,

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>we know that there's no way it's getting back to

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>three and a half, So we can't recommend saying it

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 1>so for purposes of the show. Using the bettingpros dot

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Com consensus lines, which shows you the lines from every

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>available sports book. It's at three. I still like it

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>at three because Matt, if I'm if, I kind of

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>think that the Bucks are going to win this game,

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 1>so that that's where I'm coming from. Look, I have

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a future on the Saints winning the Super Bowl, so

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm rooting for the Saints in that sense, but I

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of think it good heads, We're going to win

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>this game, so.

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 2>It's a good head.

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 1>That's where I'm at.

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's ahead, so I think it works.

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but that's where I'm all right, So let's go.

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to our official then plays. Matt will do

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>one spread, one total, and then one two teams or

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 1>teaser if you want to do teaser. So my mind

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 1>where I guess we'll just be on opposite sides. It

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is my guess. But my favorite line is the Bucks

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>getting three and yours is what is it? The Saints

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>laying three?

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Correct?

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>All right? Perfect?

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Really? And I may buy to two and a half though, but.

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's fine for the purpose of this is self. Actually,

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I could see getting into three. You know, that might

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>be right because when I look at the DraftKings, it's

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 1>minus one twenty nine to get to three. And a

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>half at this point, that might be something which maybe

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I should just recommend.

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:44.439
<v Speaker 2>That going up buying it to buying it one buying

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 2>it to three and a half. That's not bad. I mean,

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 2>the hook is a big deal. I mean that's yeah,

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 2>it's always the most expensive move to buy it off

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 2>of three up or down.

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for me, it's one twenty nine on.

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:55.439
<v Speaker 2>It wants it to go down to two and a half.

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Let me check it right now, live looking at this

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>hold on one. Let me get there. It's the last game,

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>so I gotta scroll, all right. So the Saints ling

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 1>two and a half would be minus one twenty nine.

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, so same different, So I would spend that

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 2>one thirty.

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 1>You want do that? All right? So let's make those

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>are official players.

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Got about that all right? Because you can do that,

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>get my minus one twenty all right, bucks getting three

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half minus one twenty nine, and you're gonna

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>go with the Saints lang two and a half getting one. Yeah,

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that's cheaper than I would have expected, So I will

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:26.879
<v Speaker 1>take that. Actually, I remembered it now that I looked

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:29.319
<v Speaker 1>at it earlier, and I was like, oh, yeah, that's right. Okay, great,

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>So we'll do that. So what's your favor You have

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:33.479
<v Speaker 1>to met a total. I know you're staying away from totals, Matt,

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>but if you absolutely have to do you want them again?

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Give me what? What is the Rams Packers total?

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 2>Forty five?

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Forty five and a half.

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 2>It's so sharp, My gosh, that that's.

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>A really sharp line.

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I agree, gosh. I will take them in Ravens Bills

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 2>is what forty nine and a half and Brown's Chiefs is.

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>What fifty seven?

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'll take Brown's Chiefs under.

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Brown's Chiefs under.

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm not betting it, but I'll take the other. No,

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not betting there, and it's the highest point total,

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 2>and i'll hope for like a thirty to fourteen win

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 2>for the Chiefs.

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, since I'm not doing it anyway, and you can

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 1>tell our lack of confidence in these over underpicks because

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not betting it, I'm going to go with the

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>one that I actually think is probably my favorite one

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.959
<v Speaker 1>to do, and that would be the Rams Packers under

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>forty five and a half. That's a great line, it's

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>right there. But if there's one game that I see

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of being low scoring, especially giving all the Rams injuries,

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be that one. So that's it. So

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 1>do you have a teaser in mind, Matt? Yeah, you

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>have ahead.

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Take the Rams up twelve and a half, take the

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Ravens up eight and a half.

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I like it, all right, and I will go same

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 1>game teaser. I will go the Bucks. I'll put it

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 1>at nine because it's at nine, which is fine because

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it's at three right now, so we don't have to

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:55.879
<v Speaker 1>do that. But the Bucks up to plus nine and

0:38:55.920 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the total down to forty five and a half. So

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>those are our official plays. Is it tough? I mean,

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>this is tough, man, They've got there's everything so sharp

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>at this point, it really is so. But it's gonna

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 1>be a fun weekend. I really look forward to it,

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>especially Sunday. Sunday night. You and I are going to

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>be probably texting back and forth, hopefully at various times,

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking I've got this, You've got this, whatever it is.

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>But that's good, all right. So that's it for this

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>week's show. We'll be back of course next week, just

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, just doing the championship weekend. Don't forget to

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>check out Matt's live streams again to this weekend, right,

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt one on.

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Saturday, Saturday and Sunday for both games, both sorts of games.

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Love at YouTube dot com slash betting Pros. Matt will

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>do one Saturday at eleven am Eastern Sunday, Is that right,

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 1>eleven am Mat Yeah, eleven am Eastern Sunday at eleven

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>am Eastern and go to fanspros dot com slash shop

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>check out the new daily juice swag that we've got

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>going on there, and again where Clinton's listening right now

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 1>as he's doing this, He's definitely gonna go make some

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>sweatshirts and some hats and all the good stuff. Until then,

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>enjoy your weekend of betting, everybody. We'll talk to you

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 1>next week

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Because