Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. President Trump and the
Speaker 1: First Lady test positive for COVID. They will both beat
Speaker 1: this virus. Audio leaks of the floatist calls, more white
Speaker 1: supremacy talk from the media, and the ACB hearings are
Speaker 1: full speed ahead. This is the Buck Sexton Show, where
Speaker 1: the mission or mission is to decode what really matters
Speaker 1: with passionable intelligence. Mag no mistake, You're a great American. Again,
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy. No, Welcome,
Speaker 1: my friends to the buck Sexton Show. Big news today
Speaker 1: that everybody's talking about is about the President of the
Speaker 1: United States testing positive for COVID nineteen, as has the
Speaker 1: First Lady. As I come to you on air now,
Speaker 1: the chief of Staff as tested negative. Vice President pencis
Speaker 1: tested negative, the Vice President's wife has tested negative, and
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is also negative. So everyone's now focused on
Speaker 1: this today. It's created a bit of a frenzy. Let's
Speaker 1: all take a deep breath, Let's take a step back
Speaker 1: from all the insanity. It'd be very clear about what
Speaker 1: we know right now and what this means. As of now,
Speaker 1: the President has a virus that has infected millions, perhaps
Speaker 1: at this point, tens of millions of Americans. His chances
Speaker 1: of a full recovery, including a full recovery after pretty
Speaker 1: minimal symptoms, are very high. He does have some cold
Speaker 1: like symptoms at this point, so he is not asymptomatic. Now,
Speaker 1: this is a time when you do want to pray
Speaker 1: for the President and the First Lady. This is not
Speaker 1: a terminal cancer diagnosis. This is not something that we
Speaker 1: can't treat or we don't know what to do. There's
Speaker 1: an overwhelming likelihood based on just the statistics, the numbers,
Speaker 1: the President is going to be just fine. First Lady
Speaker 1: just fine. I mean, she's actually inconsiderably better statistical condition,
Speaker 1: although the President should be just fine as well. Now,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of speculation that comes out of this
Speaker 1: right away. The New York Times, Washington Post already putting
Speaker 1: up things about, well, can the president even really still
Speaker 1: stay on the ballot, or can the President be expected
Speaker 1: to continue on in this campaign in any meaningful way. Look,
Speaker 1: he's supposed to quarantine now for two weeks. We'll see
Speaker 1: how he does. It's as I've said, I'm very confident
Speaker 1: that the President's going to beat this thing, and we're
Speaker 1: going to hear in about a week's time that he's
Speaker 1: feeling pretty good and he's going to finish out his
Speaker 1: quarantine and get right back to it. That is my expectation.
Speaker 1: Nothing is perfect, nothing is certain. We know that too,
Speaker 1: But thoughts and prayers go up to the President, the
Speaker 1: first Lady, everybody affected in the President's family, in the
Speaker 1: White House, and for the whole country. I don't care
Speaker 1: who you are, I don't care what we're talking about.
Speaker 1: If you're an American and the President of the United
Speaker 1: States has a disease that can be fatal, although it
Speaker 1: is very unlikely to be, so you are praying for
Speaker 1: the speediest possible recovery. It's what's best for the country.
Speaker 1: It's also what's the most fundamental decency we have as
Speaker 1: human beings. I can assure you right now that if
Speaker 1: Heaven forbid, Joe Biden came down with the coronavirus, the
Speaker 1: only thing you would hear from me on this show
Speaker 1: about that about the condition diagnosis is I hope Joe
Speaker 1: Biden beats this thing as fast as possible with the
Speaker 1: bare minimum of symptoms and discomfort, and God bless him
Speaker 1: and his family. That's the only way there's no other way, right,
Speaker 1: there's no other way. You can't consider yourself to be
Speaker 1: a moral person and not root for your fellow American,
Speaker 1: your fellow human being, to beat this disease. I'm not
Speaker 1: worried for the President. I'm just hopeful he'll beat it
Speaker 1: quickly and get back on on the campaign trail. I mean,
Speaker 1: I could say I'm concerned. We're all a little concerned.
Speaker 1: I'm not worried. One thing we do know about this president.
Speaker 1: He's a fighter, and we know that this is a
Speaker 1: fight that he absolutely is going to win. Now. I've
Speaker 1: also if you recall months ago, I said, it's likely
Speaker 1: that one of the candidates. We've got a lot of
Speaker 1: senior citizen politicians out there, and it's likely that one
Speaker 1: of them is gonna get COVID. You have to go
Speaker 1: back in the files, but I remember talking to this
Speaker 1: on the show. We're probably going to have somebody who
Speaker 1: is COVID positive who's either the either the president or
Speaker 1: one of the Democrat candidates. This is you know, earlier
Speaker 1: on one of the Democrats at the top of their
Speaker 1: list coming forward with this that that was what I
Speaker 1: thought was going to happen. And it's just it's what
Speaker 1: you would expect under the circumstances. Now, now that we've
Speaker 1: dealt with the basic truth of this, which is that
Speaker 1: the president has COVID, I think he's going to be fine.
Speaker 1: I'm not worried about him, and I'm praying for him
Speaker 1: and his family. And now let's talk about, because we
Speaker 1: have to. This is a political show. What are the
Speaker 1: responses to this? What do people say in positions of
Speaker 1: power of prominence when they hear that the President of
Speaker 1: the United States has what can, in fact be a
Speaker 1: fatal disease. Now, as I've said, very unlikely. You know,
Speaker 1: it's point zero something or other in fatality overall. But
Speaker 1: today is unfortunately one of those days where you can
Speaker 1: make a very strong case that Live Blue check journals
Speaker 1: are in fact the worst professional class in America. I
Speaker 1: don't even think it's worse. It's worth it to go
Speaker 1: through and cite all the individuals who are I'm talking
Speaker 1: about not just strangers. Obviously, there are unhinged left wing Democrats.
Speaker 1: There are crazy people who are Democrats all across the
Speaker 1: country who are openly rooting for the demise, the physical demise,
Speaker 1: the passing of the president of the United States. There
Speaker 1: are people out there who are saying it publicly, we
Speaker 1: see it, including blue checks, including people who make a
Speaker 1: living doing commentary. Now you would think you'd like to
Speaker 1: think at least that this would be shouted down by
Speaker 1: other blue checks, that this would be considered so far
Speaker 1: beyond the pale, so unacceptable. But generally speaking, they move
Speaker 1: past it. They just ignore it, almost like Antifa and
Speaker 1: the BLM riots. If they're not defending it, they're pretending
Speaker 1: it's not there. The people who are wishing for the
Speaker 1: death of the President of the United States on social
Speaker 1: media are a moral monstrosity. And I can tell you
Speaker 1: this if you were a blue check conservative, if you
Speaker 1: were somebody in the media who works at one of
Speaker 1: the conservative one of the few conservative media platforms, or
Speaker 1: you're a talk radio host like me, and the roles
Speaker 1: were reversed and Joe Biden got sick with COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: and anybody who said you know that they were happy
Speaker 1: about that, or god forbid, they were hoping that that
Speaker 1: had a tragic end they would be held to account
Speaker 1: by their peers. I would not allow it to go
Speaker 1: unconfronted if somebody on our side was doing that. It's
Speaker 1: happening all over the place with the Libs. It's disgusting,
Speaker 1: and it's also entirely predictable. It's not even a little
Speaker 1: bit surprising, although I have seen a couple of people
Speaker 1: on the right in media who are taking screen grabs
Speaker 1: of because they know that it's usually the emotional outburst
Speaker 1: from the Libs that shows you what they really think,
Speaker 1: and then sometimes they're trying to clean it up afterwards,
Speaker 1: so they're screen shotting all these tweets they're putting out
Speaker 1: after the President has come down with COVID nineteen to
Speaker 1: make sure that we know, we know what they really think,
Speaker 1: we know what their real beliefs are around the health
Speaker 1: and safety of the leader of the free world. But
Speaker 1: there are people who are now trying to score political
Speaker 1: points as well. So there's the unhinged leftist mob that
Speaker 1: is rooting for the President to fail in his fight
Speaker 1: against this disease, which is which is absolutely disgusting. But
Speaker 1: you know, the same kind of moral monsters who cheered
Speaker 1: on the smearing and the psychological torture of Supreme Court
Speaker 1: Justice Brett Kavanaugh. But a couple of years ago, it's
Speaker 1: not a surprise that they're that much that they're that deranged,
Speaker 1: that there are a bunch of savages, a bunch of
Speaker 1: true barbarian morons who now are openly rooting for COVID
Speaker 1: nineteen to beat the president in this fight. So, but
Speaker 1: we do need to establish that that is there. And
Speaker 1: I'm telling you, and they would argue this, and I
Speaker 1: don't care. It's more prominent on the left than it
Speaker 1: would ever be on the right because they have convinced
Speaker 1: themselves it is mainstream. It is the dominant thinking on
Speaker 1: the left is that the president is an evil man
Speaker 1: who's a threat to this country as long as he
Speaker 1: is president, and that he needs to be punished, up
Speaker 1: to and including what they're saying on social media now
Speaker 1: about COVID. On the right, we would say that that's disgusting.
Speaker 1: We would never want that to be a claim made
Speaker 1: or a desire in the name of our beliefs, in
Speaker 1: the name of our politics. If Joe Biden were sick,
Speaker 1: and I can tell you this, and I know you
Speaker 1: feel the same way. Not one day, not one second,
Speaker 1: have I thought to myself, you know, it would be
Speaker 1: really great. First if Joe Biden got COVID nineteen, wouldn't
Speaker 1: that's it's an atrocious thought, and it's a real moment
Speaker 1: of moral testing here. There's a real gut check that
Speaker 1: comes into this because I don't believe that both political
Speaker 1: parties are morally equivalent. I don't think either is perfect.
Speaker 1: But I do not believe that the right that conservatism
Speaker 1: in America, that people who share the beliefs and fundamental
Speaker 1: principles that I do. I don't think that the left
Speaker 1: is as worthy on those points. I don't think that
Speaker 1: the left holds itself to account. I think that they
Speaker 1: are much more willing to embrace psychotic viciousness in the
Speaker 1: name of politics, truly vindictive, unhinged mob mentality. You know,
Speaker 1: this is straight from the darkest moments of the French Revolution. Right,
Speaker 1: grab that person that never did anything to me and
Speaker 1: rip them apart, with the angry mobs screaming and shrieking
Speaker 1: and covered in blood. I mean, that's how crazy the
Speaker 1: left has become. And you see this now, you see
Speaker 1: the way they respond to the president's diagnosis. You see
Speaker 1: the way they cheer on mobs attacking police officers in
Speaker 1: the streets, are burning down buildings. They have developed the Democrats,
Speaker 1: let's use the word the left the Democrats one and
Speaker 1: the same, a psychological sickness here over politics and the
Speaker 1: way they respond to the president. The first lady coming
Speaker 1: down with this diagnosis is yet more proof of that.
Speaker 1: And that's what's really troubling to me. I have full
Speaker 1: confidence in our president. He's a fighter, he's going to
Speaker 1: make it through this, and he is in very robust health,
Speaker 1: thank god, he has been for a very long time.
Speaker 1: And lady is considerably younger than the President, and so
Speaker 1: she's at me. She'll probably again thoughts and prayers, and
Speaker 1: we don't know, but the likelihood is in this situation
Speaker 1: that she'll end up with, you know, a sniffle and
Speaker 1: a sore throat for a week, let's hope, you know,
Speaker 1: or less. But then there are people that are making
Speaker 1: this deeply political about masks, and they're going to drill
Speaker 1: down into this. And so this prove some thesis here
Speaker 1: because the President hasn't been the most vocal about masking
Speaker 1: always in all the time. If you really believe, and
Speaker 1: when I say you you know what I mean, if
Speaker 1: one believes, if a person believes that wearing a raggedy,
Speaker 1: multiple use, dirty, covered in bacteria cloth mask sometimes not
Speaker 1: what you're eating in the restaurant when you walk into
Speaker 1: the restaurant, not in your home where you're around people. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: you're most likely to get COVID from his family members.
Speaker 1: That's true. Intrafamilial transmission is really the biggest risk. It
Speaker 1: was they thought no socomial transmission, transmission of the virus
Speaker 1: in the hospital, but it's really intrafamilial where a lot
Speaker 1: of people are getting this. And if you really think
Speaker 1: that that little cloth on your mouth is a better
Speaker 1: precaution than what has been around the president, what the
Speaker 1: President has subjected everybody who meets with him too. They're
Speaker 1: doing daily testing for people in the White House. I
Speaker 1: got tested and they would not let me get into
Speaker 1: the actual West Wing. They would not let me actually
Speaker 1: sit down with the president until I had a negative test. Okay,
Speaker 1: but he has been masking more and more in the
Speaker 1: last couple of months, right, the President finally said, okay,
Speaker 1: you know, we'll make this concession. He has been masking
Speaker 1: up a lot more, and now he gets the virus,
Speaker 1: and now they're gonna say, oh, but it's because he
Speaker 1: didn't do it. He didn't do what the science said.
Speaker 1: You're already hearing this Nancy Pelosi taking a cheap shot.
Speaker 1: Maybe now he knows that you need to wear masks,
Speaker 1: as if we haven't had tens of thousands of people
Speaker 1: who were living in terror, constantly wearing masks, who still
Speaker 1: got sick, who still got sick. But this is being
Speaker 1: right away politicized about who believes in the signs Trump
Speaker 1: is sick, Biden isn't. That's because Biden is wearing a
Speaker 1: mask all the time. No, it's because Biden is hiding
Speaker 1: in a basement. I mean, look, I agree, if you
Speaker 1: don't go outside, if you don't live your life, if
Speaker 1: you don't actually campaign for president in any normal way,
Speaker 1: you're at less risk for the disease. But if you're
Speaker 1: going to live your life and go out there, how
Speaker 1: much just having this porous cloth that is not sealed
Speaker 1: around your nose or your mouth on sometimes protect you
Speaker 1: maybe a little bit. But that's not the takeaway. They
Speaker 1: want the takeaway to be. Oh, there's some poetic justice
Speaker 1: in the president catching COVID and I'm mind me talking
Speaker 1: about the psychopaths that want the president to become really
Speaker 1: ill hospitalized, and I'm just talking about people in general.
Speaker 1: They're saying, see, he got it because he didn't listen
Speaker 1: to the science. Really morons, because Boris Johnson got it.
Speaker 1: Other premiers of foreign countries have gotten it, including countries
Speaker 1: where they were all about masking all the time. Oh,
Speaker 1: the president had to keep being the president. And here's
Speaker 1: a narrative that may emerge out of this. Here's one
Speaker 1: that I see coming. We may in fact have a
Speaker 1: president who has been fighting with us through this virus
Speaker 1: for seven months, leading this country, not panicking people, being reasonable,
Speaker 1: working with states, making sure that the PPE was out there,
Speaker 1: making sure the virus vaccine was coming as quickly as possible.
Speaker 1: He may end up getting it himself because he was
Speaker 1: still out there, still being president, not hiding an abasement.
Speaker 1: And he'll beat this in a couple of weeks time,
Speaker 1: and then have a few weeks to go out and
Speaker 1: show the American people that his story is our story.
Speaker 1: We're all going to beat this thing. We're not going
Speaker 1: to succumb to fear and hysteria. We as a country,
Speaker 1: as a people, will beat this virus, just like the
Speaker 1: President of the United States and the first lady will.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom mind. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Well, of course, as with everyone. We all
Speaker 1: receive that news with great sadness. I always pray for
Speaker 1: the President his family that they're safe. Continue to do
Speaker 1: so more intensified. We must have spatial distancing, we must
Speaker 1: be wearing our masks, We must have sanitation because it
Speaker 1: can help crush the virus and stop the spread. So
Speaker 1: maybe now that people who see the President of the
Speaker 1: United States with all the protection that he has and
Speaker 1: the first lady still having this exposed, it might be,
Speaker 1: as you say, a learning experience, but more than learning,
Speaker 1: it has to be something that is acted upon. This
Speaker 1: is tragic, it's very sad, but it also is something that, again,
Speaker 1: going into crowds, unmasked and all the rest was sort
Speaker 1: of a brazen invitation for something like this to happen.
Speaker 1: It's sad that it did, but nonetheless hopeful that it
Speaker 1: will be a transition to a saner approach to what
Speaker 1: this virus is all about. Yeah, she's praying for him,
Speaker 1: but she's also telling you the President was asking for it.
Speaker 1: That's her opinion. I wanted it was Boris Johnson asking
Speaker 1: for it to the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.
Speaker 1: I just want to know, was he reckless? Was he
Speaker 1: against the science he got it. You look at the
Speaker 1: list of people around the world. You know, was Tom
Speaker 1: Hanks reckless and against the science he got I mean,
Speaker 1: you just look at all these different people that have
Speaker 1: gotten coronavirus. It's an airborne disease that's very contagious. Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi's whole premise here that we can stop the virus,
Speaker 1: we can stop the tread that's a that's a lie.
Speaker 1: There is no evidence that that is actually possible unless
Speaker 1: you lock down the entire country continuously, which is insane.
Speaker 1: So they don't seem to understand. You either live life
Speaker 1: and there is risk from that living of life, or
Speaker 1: you just keep not living life and you're safe from
Speaker 1: the virus until you start living your life again. This
Speaker 1: is the reality. Yeah. Sure, if it was just as
Speaker 1: simple as wearing masks, we'd all be done with this.
Speaker 1: We wouldn't have cases anymore because people have been wearing
Speaker 1: masks in places for months. Blows. He doesn't care. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the Busess and show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcast, at the iHeart Radio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. We don't even know what's
Speaker 1: going on because all of the lies. But here's the
Speaker 1: thing that's so we're responsible. He's going in Minnesota knowing
Speaker 1: that Hope padded. He's going to New Jersey knowing that
Speaker 1: Hope padded. Now the White House Press Secretary, unmasked, is
Speaker 1: giving a press conference. Nobody in the Congress is being notified.
Speaker 1: And so this is just rank irresponsibility, and it's rank incompetence.
Speaker 1: And let's just stipulate. He's lied about the science for
Speaker 1: six months, couldn't protect himself or his family, So how
Speaker 1: is he going to protect the American people going forward?
Speaker 1: And so I feel bad that he's sick. I want
Speaker 1: him to get better. Certainly, it's a tragic situation, but
Speaker 1: we have to not let up on the gas. If
Speaker 1: you want to remove him, we have to still discuss
Speaker 1: the racism, the destruction of the democracy, the demolishing of
Speaker 1: the institutions of our government, the voter suppression, all of
Speaker 1: this stuff has to be discussed now. I mean, the
Speaker 1: Mooch is a tremendous scumbag. I wanted you to hear
Speaker 1: that so you could know what a scummy fellow this is.
Speaker 1: And the President made him chief of his transition. The
Speaker 1: president has bad instincts about people that he puts in charge.
Speaker 1: That's established. Even the most art and Trumpers have to go, oh, okay, okay,
Speaker 1: you want to play this game. The mooch Cohen, I'm
Speaker 1: a rosa. You get on the list. These are people
Speaker 1: he gave real authority and power to. So the president
Speaker 1: has had some very bad decision making around that. Look,
Speaker 1: no one's perfect. I get it. I'm not. I'm not
Speaker 1: trying to bash or dive into that right now, but
Speaker 1: I mean the moos this guy here, he's just pairting
Speaker 1: what the Democrats want to hear. Right, This is if
Speaker 1: you want to be an MSNBC. This is what you
Speaker 1: have to say. The President's lied about the science. Okay,
Speaker 1: Like how notice how when let's say, Fauci's out there saying, okay,
Speaker 1: don't wear a mask, especially outside. It's dumb wearing a
Speaker 1: mask if you're healthy. He doesn't make any sense. You
Speaker 1: don't need to do that. Oh, he wasn't lying, he
Speaker 1: just was wrong. If the President said something at any
Speaker 1: point during COVID, it's gonna go away. Don't worry about it.
Speaker 1: We're gonna be all right. He's lying, so the experts
Speaker 1: can get away with being factually wrong at any point
Speaker 1: in this the experts and I will not let this
Speaker 1: go at least the ones that we see on TV
Speaker 1: who are doctors and public health and epidemiologists, They would
Speaker 1: justify the BLM protests. Remember, BLM protests happen, huge spike
Speaker 1: in cases all some are all across the country. But
Speaker 1: we're supposed to believe that didn't spread the virus. Right,
Speaker 1: the big biker rally up in the Dakotas that spread
Speaker 1: the virus they said was ended up not even being true.
Speaker 1: But the BLM riots where people were showing up in
Speaker 1: close quarters screaming for hours and hours. Right, When I
Speaker 1: say outdoor transmission isn't a risk, I'm obviously not saying
Speaker 1: you can go up to someone and spit in their
Speaker 1: face and you're outdoors so you can't get the virus.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, in the normal course of walking past people,
Speaker 1: if you keep six feet from somebody outside, the scientific
Speaker 1: evidence is there's basically zero chance. Right, There's like less
Speaker 1: than a lightning strike chance you're actually going to contract
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen from walking past someone outside who doesn't have
Speaker 1: a mask on or and if you don't have a
Speaker 1: mask on. But if you're all packed together screaming, get
Speaker 1: a whole, streets are streets, and then you might put
Speaker 1: yourself at some risk. But I just really hate this
Speaker 1: to Scaremoji couldn't protect himself for his family. What a
Speaker 1: scummy What a scummy guy. This fellow is really anything
Speaker 1: to just be, uh, whatever benefits him the most. So
Speaker 1: the mooch is scummy. Don Lemon is just dumb. Here's
Speaker 1: Don Lemon play ten Carl In large part it's his
Speaker 1: own dereliction is partly to blame for this. He chose
Speaker 1: to go out to rallies, he chose to downplay masks,
Speaker 1: he chose to not social distance and call it a hoax,
Speaker 1: and so on and so forth. But you know, again,
Speaker 1: it's horrible that the president has this, but he chose
Speaker 1: to handle this situation this way. People in the West
Speaker 1: Wing and the administration saying it's frowned upon to wear masks.
Speaker 1: You know, we saw all the tape of Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: getting her haircut walking around a salon people working in
Speaker 1: there are no mask on a salon that was shut
Speaker 1: down because people can't get their haircut because you know,
Speaker 1: even with a mask on, it's so dangerous. We saw
Speaker 1: the video of Diane Feinstein walking through the airport, no
Speaker 1: mask on a private airport, of course, because she's super
Speaker 1: rich and important, but no mask on. The pilots have
Speaker 1: masks on, they have to, but Diane Feinstein, the rules
Speaker 1: are for the little people. Look, this is really getting
Speaker 1: into some core psychological and I really think brain wiring
Speaker 1: differences between the left and the right. I want to
Speaker 1: be and I think the conservative mentality is I think
Speaker 1: people that share my worldview, my view of life. I
Speaker 1: want to be as much in charge of my own
Speaker 1: decisions my own life as humanly possible. And I do
Speaker 1: not trust people that there's no accountability for and don't
Speaker 1: give a crap about me to make decisions about my
Speaker 1: health and my life. Okay, that's the base. Other people think,
Speaker 1: Oh if the mob, if the crowd says that this
Speaker 1: is what should be done, even if they're changing their
Speaker 1: mind every month, even if they're hypocritical because they don't
Speaker 1: actually do the things they tell other people to do.
Speaker 1: I'm going to do that because their security in consensus.
Speaker 1: But it's actually a false security because there isn't a
Speaker 1: real consensus. But the president partly to blame no, the
Speaker 1: president made a decision, an affirmative decision to go out
Speaker 1: and campaign and be, Gosh jarn president of the United States.
Speaker 1: I want to say something else, but you know, family
Speaker 1: show be the president of the United States, even during
Speaker 1: a pandemic, to campaign, to take his message to the people.
Speaker 1: And I think that this is an example of how
Speaker 1: we all should be able to make choices in our lives. Okay,
Speaker 1: you don't want to wear a mask, you don't want
Speaker 1: to be around anybody, stay home, stay home until the
Speaker 1: vaccine has been tested for eighteen months. Will make sure
Speaker 1: you get all the food you need, will take care
Speaker 1: of those people. But to have everybody basically stay home,
Speaker 1: what are we doing? They agreed in the risk analysis
Speaker 1: in the early days that lockdowns and these restrictions until
Speaker 1: the vaccine were catastrophic, destructive and wrong. But this has
Speaker 1: become polarized, it's become political. Now. We got an election
Speaker 1: coming up, so they're not going to relent on this
Speaker 1: at all. They pretend like we didn't have these discussions.
Speaker 1: They pretend that no one really knows what was said
Speaker 1: before and can't compare it to what is being said now.
Speaker 1: But I'm just here to remind everybody that the experts
Speaker 1: have been wrong time and time again. That they wanted
Speaker 1: us to create at one point a million ventilators, and
Speaker 1: since then we found out that ventilators are not a
Speaker 1: good treatment for this an absolute last resort, and with
Speaker 1: the way they're putting people on ventilators in the beginning,
Speaker 1: there was about a fifty percent chance that that person
Speaker 1: would die after being put on the ventilator. They didn't
Speaker 1: know very much, they didn't understand very much, and they
Speaker 1: were telling us just panic, lockdown, don't go outside. We
Speaker 1: have no idea how much real damage has been done
Speaker 1: to the economy yet, because we haven't been able to
Speaker 1: normalize what stores are really going to open, what business
Speaker 1: models are really going to work. How many miscancer diagnoses
Speaker 1: are there, how many you know, they're not really tabulating
Speaker 1: the overdosed numbers and everything at a national level. I'd
Speaker 1: be very curious to see how many people have become
Speaker 1: so depressed that they're suicidal because they're separated. Froeple. There's
Speaker 1: this terrible story of a woman Senior citizens dinner nineties
Speaker 1: in Florida, and she just stopped eating because she couldn't
Speaker 1: handle the isolation anymore isolation imposed on her. She's a
Speaker 1: healthy woman. She was a healthy woman, but oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: you might you might get COVID, so no one's allowed
Speaker 1: to see you. Story out of Florida just in the
Speaker 1: last week, stopped eating, died. You know, that's where we are.
Speaker 1: We have seniors who are going on effectively self imposed
Speaker 1: hunger strike because they're being abandoned by society, because God forbid,
Speaker 1: we make some Look, we got to take some precautions,
Speaker 1: but you're gonna not let anyone see their loved ones.
Speaker 1: You're gonna have people locked down and nursing homes that
Speaker 1: can't have any contact with the outside work. We can't
Speaker 1: do test and basic precautious for seniors. No, it's just
Speaker 1: it's so much easier to say, wear a mask, shut up,
Speaker 1: stay inside, lockdown. These people are desperate for a control.
Speaker 1: Control that doesn't exist. The virus is going to keep spreading.
Speaker 1: The virus is going to be all over the place.
Speaker 1: We have a vaccine coming, hopefully it works really well.
Speaker 1: There is a possibility that we're going to have to
Speaker 1: deal with this even after the vaccine, that there may
Speaker 1: be mutations and this now becomes like the flu a
Speaker 1: seasonal affliction that we have to deal with. What's really
Speaker 1: the answer. You're going to wear a mask forever. You're
Speaker 1: gonna work out with a mask on forever, You're gonna
Speaker 1: go for all your jogs with a mask on the
Speaker 1: rest of your life. For a disease that kills substantially
Speaker 1: less than one percent of the people who get it,
Speaker 1: and now is they're getting better at the treatments on
Speaker 1: it too, that number keeps going down. I mean, really
Speaker 1: the fatality rate that we've been talking about. Point zero
Speaker 1: three is the one that you most often, I think
Speaker 1: see point zero three, point zero four, that's for all
Speaker 1: age categories you get under fifty, it's like point zero
Speaker 1: zero zero one. And that number is also going to
Speaker 1: keep going down because of therapeutic are getting better, or
Speaker 1: because the vaccines will be a useful tool in helping
Speaker 1: to control this. But see, control is really the word
Speaker 1: we have to focus on here, because the left want
Speaker 1: to control you. They want to tell you what to do,
Speaker 1: and there are a lot of people who honestly go
Speaker 1: about their day to day lives with a tremendous amount
Speaker 1: of anxiety and a bit of cowardice. I really think
Speaker 1: that the government is going to be able to protect
Speaker 1: them from all the bad things. If only the big
Speaker 1: mean people like me and you who believe in individual
Speaker 1: freedom and choice and liberty stopped wanting those things, the
Speaker 1: government would make them safe and warm at night. The
Speaker 1: government would provide for them, and everything would be better.
Speaker 1: This is the fantasy that leads to tyranny, and unfortunately,
Speaker 1: it's a fantasy that about half of this country has
Speaker 1: fallen in love with. It's not real. We're going to
Speaker 1: continue to get dragged through this. If Joe Biden gets elected,
Speaker 1: it's only going to get worse. A national mask mandate,
Speaker 1: think about that. It'll be enforced in a way that's
Speaker 1: clearly selective. It'll be used as a cudgel against Remember
Speaker 1: the Red States. Oh, they don't believe in masks. They're
Speaker 1: still bad. The Red States have, especially the large, heavily
Speaker 1: populated ones, had far better outcomes in this fight against
Speaker 1: COVID than the Blue States have. But that's always lost
Speaker 1: in the conversation. Somehow, the worst places in the country
Speaker 1: are in the northeast of the United States, the bluest
Speaker 1: of the Blue states. Somehow, we're not supposed to pay
Speaker 1: any attention to that. We all wearing masks here in
Speaker 1: New York. Yes, we were. People want to spit on you,
Speaker 1: which obviously could actually transmit the virus if you go
Speaker 1: outside a beautiful sunny day, don't have a mask on,
Speaker 1: And we had the worst outcomes here. We weren't anti
Speaker 1: mask truthers in New York City. I can tell you
Speaker 1: that in the beginning of the pandemic, and I'm not
Speaker 1: ashamed to say it, I never left the house without
Speaker 1: a mask. I was wearing rubber gloves. But that was
Speaker 1: after having been on the subway four times a day
Speaker 1: during the maximum spread, when no one even knew what
Speaker 1: the heck this thing was. We've forgotten everything though. It's
Speaker 1: just panic and politics and the infliction of emotional distress
Speaker 1: on the population so that they don't push back and
Speaker 1: they don't have any willingness to say enough is enough.
Speaker 1: That's really the Democrat vision for your future. And they're
Speaker 1: trying to leverage the fact that the President of the
Speaker 1: United States, like many other presidents and prime ministers around
Speaker 1: the world, has COVID nineteen to further ram all of
Speaker 1: this down your throat. It's really upon all of us
Speaker 1: to decide whether or not we're going to accept that.
Speaker 1: I say, no, you're in the Freedom und This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show podcast. You are second in line
Speaker 1: for the presidency. Has the White House contacted you about
Speaker 1: the continuity of government? No, they haven't, but that is
Speaker 1: an order going not with the White House, but with
Speaker 1: the military quite frankly in terms of the or some
Speaker 1: officials in the government. But let us just all pray
Speaker 1: for the president's health. Thank god. The vice president has
Speaker 1: tested negatively, and and the second Lady as well. So
Speaker 1: again that continuity of government is always in place. A
Speaker 1: lot a lot here. Actually it's it's somewhat subtle, but
Speaker 1: there's MSNBC asking Nancy Pelosi, has anyone talked to you
Speaker 1: about how you know you might have to become the president? Um? No,
Speaker 1: because the president president is going to be fine. He's
Speaker 1: not going to be holding in person meetings, but he's
Speaker 1: just going to be not dealing with other people directly.
Speaker 1: He has devices. He has Skype, he had or not Skype,
Speaker 1: you know, I mean video conferencing. They have secure stuff. Um,
Speaker 1: he has phones. This is this is not the you know,
Speaker 1: the president hasn't had a hasn't had a stroke where
Speaker 1: he's unable to be responsive. But the Libs are already
Speaker 1: jumping to, oh my gosh, maybe Nancy Pelosi will have
Speaker 1: to take over for a while at least as president.
Speaker 1: Mike Pence is fine and Nancy Pelosi is almost eighty,
Speaker 1: so I believe it or not, even though she goes
Speaker 1: around with a mask for the cameras, she is also
Speaker 1: at risk from COVID. There really seems to be a
Speaker 1: mentality that comes out today from the media where, well,
Speaker 1: we know, none of the none of the Democrats are
Speaker 1: going to get it. New York City full of Democrats
Speaker 1: and a lot of us, A lot of us here,
Speaker 1: my fellow New Yorkers died from COVID, wearing masks all
Speaker 1: the time, still died from COVID, still got it, still
Speaker 1: had bad health outcomes from it. I mean, you can
Speaker 1: tell they really think, you know, the well, the democraman
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi's she's invulnerable because you know, she's one of
Speaker 1: the good smart science people, so she's had no real
Speaker 1: risk from getting COVID. But you know pens Oh, now, look,
Speaker 1: I know Pence has been in closer contact with the presidents.
Speaker 1: People would say he's been around people who are COVID positive.
Speaker 1: But I can assure you Nancy Pelosi has also been
Speaker 1: around people who are asymptomatic and COVID positive and hasn't
Speaker 1: known it. Everybody has. It's just a statistical certainty. And
Speaker 1: then you get, oh, where are you really so protected?
Speaker 1: Really so protected from aerosols? You know that you can
Speaker 1: get it in your eyes right, and can get it
Speaker 1: in your nose too. I keep seeing people all the
Speaker 1: time now though their mouth is covered, but their nose isn't.
Speaker 1: It's like, well, there's actually a belief that your nose
Speaker 1: may there may be more of the COVID virus in
Speaker 1: someone's nasal cavity than even in their throat at some
Speaker 1: stages of this. But you know, make sure that you're
Speaker 1: breathing through your nose out there without the mask that
Speaker 1: this is this is what we're seeing all over the place.
Speaker 1: Could you imagine Nancy Pelosi even as acting president of
Speaker 1: the United States. It's a terrifying thought. But the Libs
Speaker 1: find that to be that would be delightful to them.
Speaker 1: But Pelosi really one of one of the very worst
Speaker 1: examples of the contemporary Democrat mindset, A true limousine liberal,
Speaker 1: a true phony and really no moral compass whatsoever. I mean,
Speaker 1: I do think it's interesting that you have these Democrats,
Speaker 1: Democrat politicians of all people that need to tell us
Speaker 1: how much they are they are praying for the president.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's what they have to say. They've also
Speaker 1: called him a traitor and wanted to throw him in prison,
Speaker 1: so I haven't forgotten that. But at least they're smart
Speaker 1: enough in the short term to say what they know
Speaker 1: they need to say about this. Otherwise, any person of
Speaker 1: good sense, you're, respective of their politics, would say, well,
Speaker 1: these Democrats are completely insane. These Democrats have completely lost
Speaker 1: their minds. Now, what does this mean going forward for
Speaker 1: the debates, for the campaign trails? That is an area
Speaker 1: of focus I think is very interesting. The likelihood here
Speaker 1: is that there'll be people doing analysis for years to come. However,
Speaker 1: the election ends up happening and Trump's going to be
Speaker 1: on the ballot, and this stuff they're saying about, oh,
Speaker 1: maybe he shouldn't even stay in there, and this is
Speaker 1: wishful thinking from the libs. Dream on Libs, the President's
Speaker 1: going to be fine and he's going to be their
Speaker 1: on election day, and God willing, he's going to win.
Speaker 1: But There'll be a lot of historical analysis of this
Speaker 1: after the fact, where people say, I can tell you
Speaker 1: this much. If Trump beats Joe Biden in the election,
Speaker 1: there will be a Democrat narrative, get ready for it,
Speaker 1: that the President garnered sympathy during this period that propelled
Speaker 1: him to win. Right now, they're saying, oh, see, this
Speaker 1: is going to be terrible for Trump. Not talking about
Speaker 1: his health now, but politically going to be terrible for
Speaker 1: Trump because it shows how reckless he was. But if
Speaker 1: he beats Joe Biden, they're gonna say, oh, but what
Speaker 1: really happened is everybody felt sorry for Trump, so they
Speaker 1: voted for him. Just watch Thanks for listening to the
Speaker 1: Bus Show past. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. My initial
Speaker 1: reaction was this is great, because so often these debates
Speaker 1: become parallel news conferences where one candidate answers the question
Speaker 1: to him, that candidate answers the question to him. So
Speaker 1: when the President started engaging with Biden, I thought, we're
Speaker 1: going to have a real debate here. It became clearer
Speaker 1: and clearer over time that this was something different and
Speaker 1: that the President was determined to try to butt in
Speaker 1: and throw Joe Biden off. You gave your statistics. I
Speaker 1: saw another Fox analysis that indicates the President interrupted either
Speaker 1: Biden's answers or my questions a total of one hundred
Speaker 1: and forty five times, which is way more than one
Speaker 1: a minute, and he bears the primary responsibility for what
Speaker 1: happened on There were a lot of interruptions that that
Speaker 1: is the true. There were a lot of it. Now, Biden,
Speaker 1: I think, interrupted about seventy times Trump. He says one forty,
Speaker 1: so Trump more interruptions and Biden Biden interrupted him back.
Speaker 1: I mean a lot of interruptions, That is a fact.
Speaker 1: I can't say that that's not a lot. But I
Speaker 1: think that the biggest problem with the debate, if they're
Speaker 1: would be any one thing, was the moment the president
Speaker 1: felt like it was a two on one. Then he
Speaker 1: then he just wanted to go bare knuckle and it
Speaker 1: was a free for all. And that happened very early on.
Speaker 1: It happened because the way that Chris Wallace, a Democrat
Speaker 1: who clearly wants a job at NBC News, a Democrat,
Speaker 1: interacted with Trump from the earliest phases of the debate
Speaker 1: showed exactly what I used to deal with when I'd
Speaker 1: go on to represent a conservative point of view at CNN,
Speaker 1: which is that, oh, the moderator, the anchor, whatever, he's
Speaker 1: on this other guy's team. That much was quite clear.
Speaker 1: He's on this other person's side. And once you feel
Speaker 1: like that's the case, then things really get crazy, Then
Speaker 1: things really good nuts. And that's what happened there was that.
Speaker 1: So the lack of a perception of impartiality by by Trump,
Speaker 1: which I think is completely founded, that was a big problem.
Speaker 1: But the even more obvious problem, perhaps because that one,
Speaker 1: there's some subtleties, The even more obvious problem is that
Speaker 1: the questions that were asked were just that the topics
Speaker 1: were not very good, and the questions were clearly meant
Speaker 1: to attack Trump, and they were dumb. We'll get into
Speaker 1: this white supremacist fixation that's I think fading today, but
Speaker 1: the media had it for a few days. But the
Speaker 1: whole way that this was structured and set up, and
Speaker 1: the attacks on the way the questions that Chris Wallace
Speaker 1: put out there were meant to undermine the president was
Speaker 1: very obvious. So of course he's going to react in
Speaker 1: a way where he feels like he's in an ambush.
Speaker 1: And this is I can tell you this right now.
Speaker 1: Even if you're really a depth debater, and I'm sure many, many,
Speaker 1: many of you listening are, debating two people is really hard.
Speaker 1: It's really hard because you have, especially if you're a
Speaker 1: person who's generally fair minded, you know, you want to
Speaker 1: give them equal time or at least sometime to respond.
Speaker 1: But when it's two people and you feel like it's
Speaker 1: two and one, well now it's clearly not equal times.
Speaker 1: So now you're just gonna fight for everything you have.
Speaker 1: Now you're just going to be in a position where
Speaker 1: you feel like they're throwing elbows. I'm throwing elbows too,
Speaker 1: and you got two people you gotta hit back against.
Speaker 1: So the questions were a total traffsy. I don't want
Speaker 1: to get too much into the debate aftermath. We already
Speaker 1: did that. But now it's the Okay, what's happening in
Speaker 1: the next debates is you know the Vice president is
Speaker 1: scheduled to debate Kamala Harris coming up on Wednesday. I
Speaker 1: think that will be interesting. I think that Mike Pence
Speaker 1: is a little bit of an undervalued asset to the administration.
Speaker 1: The guy is. It's funny so much of the criticism
Speaker 1: around Trump as he's not presidential and Mike Pence could
Speaker 1: be the president in every movie ever made, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: Mike Pence is the guy you think of. It's total voice,
Speaker 1: is demeanor, the way he looks everything. I mean, it's like,
Speaker 1: this guy looks like he's a president straight out of
Speaker 1: Central Casting. And a very nice guy too. All my
Speaker 1: interactions with him, I found him to be a very,
Speaker 1: very pleasant and it seems like that's really who he is.
Speaker 1: And I think it's it's a it was a very
Speaker 1: I mean I criticized the president before. He's made some
Speaker 1: bad choices about picks. He's also made some great choices,
Speaker 1: and I think Vice President Pence is an excellent choice
Speaker 1: and has been a huge asset to the administration. I
Speaker 1: think Pompeo is a great choice. Bar I mean, so
Speaker 1: you know, credit where it's due, always right, let's be
Speaker 1: let's be honest and fair. So now what happens in
Speaker 1: the presidential debate, though, that's that's an open and open question.
Speaker 1: I don't think anybody really knows for one thing. There's
Speaker 1: all this talk about and I said, I kind of
Speaker 1: like the idea, and now I've gone back, So you know,
Speaker 1: I changed my mind about these things where I evolve
Speaker 1: in my thinking because I was frustrated about all the
Speaker 1: cross talk. It's not fun to watch cross talk as
Speaker 1: a viewer. This is one of the reasons I don't
Speaker 1: have Democrats on radio to argue it, because we're just
Speaker 1: gonna start. It's it's I value your time so much
Speaker 1: that I don't want you to hear you know, the
Speaker 1: back and forth of remember and you don't know what's
Speaker 1: being said, and I like, what am I wasting my
Speaker 1: time here for? So crosstalk inherently is a frustrating It's
Speaker 1: like the equivalent of watching a TV that has a
Speaker 1: fuzzy picture. I don't care what the show is. You know,
Speaker 1: you could be watching your favorite movie of all time.
Speaker 1: If there's lines going through the picture and it's fuzzy,
Speaker 1: You're like, ah, I'm not enjoying this. That's what cross
Speaker 1: talk does in a debate, in an exchange on politics.
Speaker 1: So that was why I was thinking maybe a mute
Speaker 1: button would stop that. But of course then the mute button,
Speaker 1: how that moderator and the moderators that Trump's going into
Speaker 1: here are Libs the next in the next round. I've
Speaker 1: never even heard of some of them before. I think
Speaker 1: it's fascinating who the Commission on Presidential Debates chooses to
Speaker 1: moderate a presidential debate. Because I've never heard of them.
Speaker 1: I think it's likely they'll probably not be so one
Speaker 1: sided in their questioning. I think it's likely they won't
Speaker 1: be so clearly favoring one side. That doesn't mean they
Speaker 1: won't favor but I don't think they'll be as obvious.
Speaker 1: Chris Wallace, of course, doesn't think he was obvious. I
Speaker 1: think it was a disgrace, but it's also telling that
Speaker 1: Democrats really don't want Biden to go into another debate.
Speaker 1: Which if they thought that Trump was such a barbarian
Speaker 1: and so terrible and so awful, wouldn't they want this right?
Speaker 1: I mean, you know what I'm I'm I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: say it. I'm freakishly good at ping pong, and I
Speaker 1: smoke people in ping pong all the time. I don't
Speaker 1: know why now they're obvious. Some of you are looking
Speaker 1: I'm a professional on the Olympic team. Yeah, you would
Speaker 1: beat me, But your average weekend warrior ping pong player
Speaker 1: can't hang with the buckster, and if I beat somebody,
Speaker 1: they want to come back and they want to play,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna say, yeah, sure, I'll beat this guy before
Speaker 1: I'll beat him again. Right, it's pretty easy, pretty straightforward. Well,
Speaker 1: why wouldn't Pelosi if Trump was such an uncouth barbarian
Speaker 1: and Biden did so well against him, why would she
Speaker 1: be saying this play nine? You know? People say, well,
Speaker 1: they should have had a button that turned one microphone
Speaker 1: off while the other person was speaking. Whatever it is.
Speaker 1: I think one and done, one and done. But when
Speaker 1: people run for president, that's president of the United States.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden will do He's courageous. I never thought he
Speaker 1: shouldn't do it because I didn't think he would do well.
Speaker 1: I thought he shouldn't do it because I thought something
Speaker 1: like this could happen. But we're up to you. One
Speaker 1: and done isn't one and done, one and done? What
Speaker 1: did I tell you again? I don't like to be
Speaker 1: the guy that's always well, I kind of do you
Speaker 1: like to be that guy? But I said, people ask me,
Speaker 1: if you go back to some of the roll calls
Speaker 1: in July August, I was like, there's gonna be one
Speaker 1: debate there's gotta be one debate. Biden's got to show
Speaker 1: up for it now with the COVID diagnosis of Trump,
Speaker 1: And are we sure there's going to be another debate.
Speaker 1: I'm not certain. I'm not certain. I think the Democrats
Speaker 1: believe it. They could get away with not doing it.
Speaker 1: And that's also one of the reasons they're attacking the
Speaker 1: COVID precautions or lack thereof, they say from the Trump
Speaker 1: side of this last debate, to say, see, it's like
Speaker 1: a debating Trump is not just unpleasant because he's so mean,
Speaker 1: but it's also a health risk. Right. This is the
Speaker 1: other thing that you now hear from people. And there's
Speaker 1: Joy Baiha. She's on television, so she could just tell
Speaker 1: you about politics. You don't know, big whoop. Here she
Speaker 1: is play eighteen. You don't think Biden should show up
Speaker 1: to the debates, Joy anymore? Is that true? Yes? I
Speaker 1: don't think he should do it. I think should stay away.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden has nothing to gain from this. It's a fiasco.
Speaker 1: It gives Trump a platform to lie, to give dog
Speaker 1: whistles to his base, to sort of instruct them to
Speaker 1: be violent. And this very sort of semi semi subtle way.
Speaker 1: I'll say there's absolutely nothing. Biden is too much of
Speaker 1: a gentleman to be talking on the same stage with
Speaker 1: this neanderthal. Look at what happened the other night when
Speaker 1: Trump attacked his son, Biden's son. Biden couldn't could have
Speaker 1: gone after him and talked about Ivanka the consultant, but
Speaker 1: he did not do that because he's a gentleman. Americans
Speaker 1: have seen enough. We don't need to see anymore. If
Speaker 1: you're still undecided out there, you need to see a shrink.
Speaker 1: You need to see a shrink. I think I think
Speaker 1: Joy needs to see a shrink. I think Joy's out
Speaker 1: there saying things that are just not true. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: you're gonna compare Hunter Biden to Ivanka Trump. Good luck
Speaker 1: with that one, Joy, See see how that goes in
Speaker 1: the public eye. Yeah, one is a crackhead who impregnates
Speaker 1: strippers and pretends he's not the daddy of the baby
Speaker 1: after making lots of money from his daddy's connections, and
Speaker 1: the other is of Vunca Trump. So yeah, just saying,
Speaker 1: I don't think that really has quite the resonance that
Speaker 1: she thinks that it does. Biden's too much of a
Speaker 1: gentleman to be talking on this same stage with this neanderthal. Okay, Joy, Okay, sure,
Speaker 1: who listens. I want to meet a person who thinks
Speaker 1: that they should hear what Joy Behart thinks some politics.
Speaker 1: I want to meet this person and then ask them
Speaker 1: if they can tie their own shoes, just as an experiment.
Speaker 1: I just want. I want to know. I'm curious. It's
Speaker 1: like a sociological experiment. Like you know, I just listen
Speaker 1: to Joy. I think Joy's got great advice and thoughts
Speaker 1: on things. Says Joy. I don't see it. I don't
Speaker 1: see it at all. But she's great for this show though,
Speaker 1: you know, just because I talked to him, Millia, I'll stop.
Speaker 1: I know a lot of you like Buck good God,
Speaker 1: get a grip. Uh yeah. Will there be another debate?
Speaker 1: I'm not sure. Will Trump win the next one? I
Speaker 1: think he would if you see the Uh there's a
Speaker 1: there's a poll that was circulating. I think it was
Speaker 1: a CNC pole hundreds of thousands of votes. Now it's
Speaker 1: not a scientific poll. Okay, yeah, no, c SPAN Paul,
Speaker 1: pardon me? Who won the first presidential debate sixty nine
Speaker 1: percent with three hundred and twenty five thousand votes in
Speaker 1: sixty Donald Trump, I think maybe that's why they don't
Speaker 1: want another debate. You're in the Freedom This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. You know, Biden lost Badley when
Speaker 1: his supporters are saying that he should cancel the next
Speaker 1: debate now that we want to change the rules. They
Speaker 1: want to change the rules, that's what they want to do,
Speaker 1: and allow the moderator to cut off the microphone. Democrats
Speaker 1: always want to shut down free speech. That's what they
Speaker 1: want to do because they're terrified the American people will
Speaker 1: hear the truth. They want to rig this debate. They
Speaker 1: want to rig the election with the ballots, these millions
Speaker 1: of ballots that are coming in that nobody knows where
Speaker 1: they're coming from, who they're coming to, and who's sending them.
Speaker 1: I'm not just running against your Biden. I'm running against
Speaker 1: the corrupt far left media, the socialist communists, and the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party and the special interests to get rich, bleeding
Speaker 1: off our country and bleeding a dry Never forget they
Speaker 1: are coming after me because I am fighting for you.
Speaker 1: So true, It really is true that they've tried, in
Speaker 1: so many different mechanisms, so many different ways to change
Speaker 1: the rules at the last minute. And this is what
Speaker 1: they This has really become a progressive Democrat obsession. They
Speaker 1: want to make sure that they just change the rules
Speaker 1: of the game. They're afraid they can't actually win the game.
Speaker 1: The contest will not work for them, so they want
Speaker 1: to change the rules around it. They completely dispense with
Speaker 1: any pretense that we've got these rules for a reason,
Speaker 1: and the rules have been agreed to. The rules are
Speaker 1: there because they're sensible, because they're fair to both sides. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: forget that, whatever it takes anything to win. That's the approach.
Speaker 1: And that's also of the Democrats. And that's why I
Speaker 1: view the Trump response to all of this. I view
Speaker 1: President Trump's feelings on not just the way he interacted
Speaker 1: with Joe Biden, but also how Joe Biden now wanted
Speaker 1: to duck a debate is indicative of the real feelings
Speaker 1: of Democrats. I think this is pretty obvious at this point.
Speaker 1: I think it's true, but we shall see if it
Speaker 1: ends up happening or not. Now we also have the
Speaker 1: ACB situation right where people have been saying people have
Speaker 1: been saying that they should now deferred or delay the
Speaker 1: ACB nomination based upon based upon the president having a
Speaker 1: COVID diagnosis, and I understand this. She I believe already
Speaker 1: had COVID nineteen, as did her husband of the summer,
Speaker 1: and she's now fine, so she should probably have some
Speaker 1: degree of immun to it now. Although that A. There's
Speaker 1: all these studies about how the antibodies were off after
Speaker 1: a few months or whatever. But ACB, it has nothing
Speaker 1: to do with the president. There's no reason the Senate
Speaker 1: was able to conduct its business yesterday. The Senate should
Speaker 1: be able to conduct its business tomorrow. There's nothing about
Speaker 1: this that should make us all think that we don't
Speaker 1: go forward with the process. But Democrats are desperate. Right there,
Speaker 1: they've gone from it's not in the rules too, now
Speaker 1: it's a COVID too. Once again, it's always for them
Speaker 1: about complaining about the process when it doesn't work for them,
Speaker 1: and claiming the process is absolutely sacrosanct when it does. Right,
Speaker 1: a principle would be the understanding of why things are
Speaker 1: the way they are, the reasons for that, and how
Speaker 1: it's fair to both sides, including when both sides disagree
Speaker 1: on something. With Democrats, it's purely about self interest in
Speaker 1: whatever works in the circumstance, and that's how they approach it.
Speaker 1: That's how they approach everything. It's the way they feel
Speaker 1: about the debates, the way they feel about man in ballots,
Speaker 1: and now it's the way they feel about the ACB nomination.
Speaker 1: I think it's we've actually reached a point here where
Speaker 1: the ACB. I had initially thought that it would add
Speaker 1: you know, we would. Everyone's been making the same joke
Speaker 1: about this a spinal tap, it'll take the dial to eleven.
Speaker 1: But something like that that it would just be the
Speaker 1: shark Nato of political clashes, right, just every Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: we got this presidential election with Trump, and then we've
Speaker 1: got an ACP nomination for the RBG seed. And now
Speaker 1: I'm starting to think that maybe this is like another
Speaker 1: movie analogy. Remember in shaw Shank when he uses the
Speaker 1: thund of the thund the sound the found the sound
Speaker 1: of the thunder to a mask when he breaks open
Speaker 1: the sewage pipe with the rock. Great movie, producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: you've seen Sawshank Redemption? Right? Yeah? Great movie? I mean ridiculous,
Speaker 1: Like doesn't it's very unrealistic, But who cares? A great movie?
Speaker 1: I don't care. So I really like the movie a lot,
Speaker 1: but you know, he masks the pounding sound of the
Speaker 1: rock with the thunder, and I almost feel like, right now,
Speaker 1: the ACB nomination, there's so much they've put so much
Speaker 1: energy into Trump hatred that maybe, and I may regret
Speaker 1: saying this in a week or two, I'm gonna admit
Speaker 1: this right now, maybe they're just, you know, they've got
Speaker 1: their reserves of the lunatic libs, you know, off the
Speaker 1: main battlefield, and they're about to rush out. I don't know,
Speaker 1: but it feels like they might have exhausted all resources
Speaker 1: and energy of hatred and insanity at Trump, so they
Speaker 1: just can't even They want to make a total war
Speaker 1: situation out of the ACB nomination, But how do they
Speaker 1: go beyond the max? You know, how do you go
Speaker 1: beyond all out war, the full lawn frenzy. It doesn't
Speaker 1: seem clear to me how they would do that. It
Speaker 1: doesn't seem clear to me what they would do to
Speaker 1: go there. I'm not saying it's not possible, but I'm
Speaker 1: starting to think that maybe maybe the Trump not maybe
Speaker 1: the Trump election is the thunder that's going to mask
Speaker 1: the rock breaking the pipe of the ACP nomination at
Speaker 1: some level, like it's just they can't do both of
Speaker 1: they can't fight both of these wars effectively at the
Speaker 1: same time. They don't have you know, like they're fighting
Speaker 1: a war on two fronts and they don't have the
Speaker 1: manpower to do it because they've gone all in against Trump.
Speaker 1: And that's why I mean Schumer for example, of saying
Speaker 1: stuff like this, it's just such weak sauce played thirteen.
Speaker 1: No dem has attacked Barrett over her face. It's a
Speaker 1: diversion because they don't want to address the issues, including
Speaker 1: healthcare and including Roe v. Wade. I think Roe v. Wade,
Speaker 1: if Judge Barrett got on the court could either be
Speaker 1: eliminated or at the very minimum, horrible minimum, so greatly
Speaker 1: constricted that you never recognize it. No, we're avoiding I mean,
Speaker 1: that's crazy. First of all, the the the the claim
Speaker 1: that no one's attacking her over her faith. It's happening
Speaker 1: all over the place, all over the media. They're attacking
Speaker 1: her constantly, okay, about things that have to do with
Speaker 1: her Catholicism. So he's just that's just crazy talk, right,
Speaker 1: that's a but he knows that it's not a good
Speaker 1: look to attack, especially attack a woman I think over
Speaker 1: her faith. I just think the public views that as
Speaker 1: you know, a Catholic mom. Oh she she's now, she's
Speaker 1: now a psycho weirdo Jesus freak. Is that what they're
Speaker 1: really saying? Not a good look, Libs, not a good
Speaker 1: look Democrats. But now to say that oh row is
Speaker 1: under threat, guess what conservatives wanted to be? Liberals act
Speaker 1: like if people here that Roe v. Wade maybe in jeopardy,
Speaker 1: everyone who supports the ACB nomination is gonna be like, well,
Speaker 1: in that case, you have it backwards. Schumer, you gross
Speaker 1: underhanded fellow. You thanks for listening to the bus and
Speaker 1: show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart
Speaker 1: Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. I have
Speaker 1: to say I've said it many times, and let me
Speaker 1: be clear again. I condemn the k k K. I
Speaker 1: condemn all white supremacists. I condemn the Proud Boys. I
Speaker 1: don't know much about the Proud Boys, almost nothing, but
Speaker 1: I condemn that. But he should condemn also Antifa. Antifa
Speaker 1: is a horrible group of people. They kill people, they
Speaker 1: what they do to people, and they're causing insurrection. They're
Speaker 1: causing riots. He doesn't want to do that, but the
Speaker 1: press doesn't go after him. And that's a really bad
Speaker 1: group of people. But I condemn them. And if I can,
Speaker 1: if I say it a hundred, if I say it
Speaker 1: a hundred times, it won't be enough because it's fake news.
Speaker 1: It's true. It won't be enough. It's not about getting
Speaker 1: an answer from the president. That was Trump on Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity Show. And yeah, the President has said it before,
Speaker 1: he's saying it again. The people sing this question aren't
Speaker 1: trying to get an answer. It's an assault. It's an insult.
Speaker 1: The question is meant as an insult. Okay, so understand that,
Speaker 1: be clear on that from the get go. Once once
Speaker 1: we've established that issue, then all of a sudden everything
Speaker 1: else becomes much more apparent. Then all of a sudden
Speaker 1: everything that follows from and you go, oh, well, exactly.
Speaker 1: That's why the President gets so angry when they ask
Speaker 1: him this. Wouldn't you be angry too? I mean, we've
Speaker 1: gone over this, we've talked about this. The whole thing
Speaker 1: is so upsurred. Speaking of angry, though, Fox News, some
Speaker 1: Fox News folks about a tough week, not a good
Speaker 1: not a good one for a Chris Wallace or John Robert.
Speaker 1: The White House corresponded, he got very very hissy yesterday
Speaker 1: outside the White House. Play too. And for all of
Speaker 1: you on Twitter who were hammering me for answering that
Speaker 1: quite for asking that question, I don't care, because it's
Speaker 1: question that needs to be asked, and clearly the president's
Speaker 1: Republican colleagues a mile away from here are looking for
Speaker 1: an answer for it too. So stop deflecting, stop blaming
Speaker 1: the media. Tired of it? Tired of it? Come on, man, really,
Speaker 1: come on, you're dumb enough to think that we have
Speaker 1: to get the on the record denouncing of white supremacists
Speaker 1: from a president who's announced it a million times, and
Speaker 1: you think people aren't going to hold you accountable for that. Look,
Speaker 1: I know what it's like. I've rarely but occasionally either
Speaker 1: asked a question or said something in media that I
Speaker 1: thought that wasn't really my best moment. Yeah, I don't
Speaker 1: go around blaming everybody else for it, though. You know,
Speaker 1: John Roberts, you know, take the L, John, Just take
Speaker 1: the L. It's not a big deal. Just take the L.
Speaker 1: Don't don't get all. Don't throw a tantrum on National
Speaker 1: TV about it. It's a dumb question, shouldn't be asked,
Speaker 1: it's it's an offensive question. It's already been dealt with,
Speaker 1: and we all know the game that the Libs are
Speaker 1: playing here. But let's now go a little more specifically
Speaker 1: into this notion of forget about the President announcing right,
Speaker 1: We've dealt with that, that's just a lib attack. Let's
Speaker 1: talk about white supremacy. Let's talk about why the Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: the liberal media has such an intense fixation on this. Well,
Speaker 1: for one thing, it, as I've been saying to you,
Speaker 1: it creates a false moral equivalence between the two political
Speaker 1: parties that, well, we have our violent people, they have
Speaker 1: their violent people and right, and our violent people are
Speaker 1: the white supremacists and the Proud Boys. Now there's a
Speaker 1: lot going on here. For one, the Proud Boys, and
Speaker 1: one of their founders is Gavin McInnis. I know Gavin McGinnis.
Speaker 1: He used to be on Fox News a lot. He
Speaker 1: was on the show Red Eye frequently, if you remember
Speaker 1: that show. I've I've talked to Gavin before. He's he's
Speaker 1: a provocative guy, but he's not a white cremacist, at
Speaker 1: least by his own by all of his own claims
Speaker 1: what he says publicly, he's not a white supremacist. I
Speaker 1: believe he's actually married to a Native American and he
Speaker 1: is somebody who. Yes, he says things that I would
Speaker 1: not say, but he does not claim nor has I've
Speaker 1: never heard him claim to actually be a white supremacist.
Speaker 1: The Proud Boys, the organization that has affiliated with him, now,
Speaker 1: I don't know how. I don't think he has anything
Speaker 1: to do with it anymore, but I believe he was
Speaker 1: one of the founders. He was also one of the
Speaker 1: founders of Vice, remember that big liberal left wing media
Speaker 1: organization that was all sort of built on venture capital
Speaker 1: money in fumes. But he's one of the founders of
Speaker 1: that as well. But the Proud Boys organization, Look, it's
Speaker 1: not my it's not my thing. Okay, I wouldn't show
Speaker 1: up and want to fight Antifa. But here's what I
Speaker 1: do know about the Proud Boys. One is that my
Speaker 1: my friend Aunt Coulter has had interactions with them, knows
Speaker 1: that and says that they essentially are a like a
Speaker 1: drinking club for men. It's for mental only. It's a
Speaker 1: drinking club for men, and they're also patriots who will
Speaker 1: show up at events and not allow Antifa to threaten,
Speaker 1: attack and hurt people. Right, they don't go outside of
Speaker 1: people's homes to harass them over politics. They don't elude stores,
Speaker 1: they don't burn up, they don't do any of these
Speaker 1: things that the left does and that the organized left,
Speaker 1: under the auspices of either Antifa or BLM do. The
Speaker 1: Proud Boys do not do that. The Proud Boys have
Speaker 1: not yet as an organization. And again, like I said,
Speaker 1: not my thing. I wouldn't do it. And I'm not
Speaker 1: taking any responsibility for things that they've said in the
Speaker 1: past or whatever. I'm just trying to I'm trying to
Speaker 1: analyze this group versus as it is, versus what the
Speaker 1: media claims it to be. They have not killed anybody.
Speaker 1: I think that's I think that's a pretty profound fact
Speaker 1: in all of this. They've never killed anyone. No, probably
Speaker 1: has never killed anybody. I don't believe they've even ever
Speaker 1: severely injured anybody. I mean, maybe some cuts and bruises,
Speaker 1: a black eye here or there, but I don't believe
Speaker 1: they put anybody in the hospital. I'm not aware of
Speaker 1: that ever happening. And if I'm wrong, I will come
Speaker 1: on and say I'm wrong. BLM is murdered, cops murdered cops,
Speaker 1: executed them, assassinated them. BLM supporters have done that. Now
Speaker 1: to be a BLM supporter or to be a part
Speaker 1: of BLM, what, it's just professing your allegiance, right, And
Speaker 1: we do accept this with other extreme mistentities. If someone
Speaker 1: says I'm going to go out and blow up a
Speaker 1: building on behalf of al Qaeda, they're considered to be
Speaker 1: someone who is at least inspired by al Qaeda. Right.
Speaker 1: Maybe they haven't sworn the bya the oath of loyalty
Speaker 1: to al Qaida, but they're doing it as part of
Speaker 1: the organization. People have killed because of the ideology of BLM.
Speaker 1: Antifa has murdered people. Antifa murdered a Trump supporter in
Speaker 1: Portland a couple of weeks ago, just cold blooded execution. Okay,
Speaker 1: So in what way are these organizations really equivalent? And
Speaker 1: I know for sure the Proud Boys have never engaged
Speaker 1: in a riot. They've never engaged in looting a store,
Speaker 1: burning down a business. They do not attack innocent people.
Speaker 1: BLM and Antifa attack innocent people because they feel like
Speaker 1: they have this license because of systemic oppression and the
Speaker 1: racism and all this stuff. They just hurt people or
Speaker 1: threaten them or destroy their stuff. Another Proud Boys, in
Speaker 1: a sense, have become a kind of anti Antifa, showed
Speaker 1: up at speeches that conservatives will give, they'll defend them.
Speaker 1: And this is this was alto. I talked to Anne
Speaker 1: last night. I had her on NYC radio and we
Speaker 1: had a discussion about this, and she knows them well,
Speaker 1: and I know some of your frustrator them because she's
Speaker 1: not as support of the president. She's voting for the president.
Speaker 1: She wants him to win, but she feels like he
Speaker 1: hasn't followed through on some promises. And that's a conversation
Speaker 1: we can get into another day. But to call the
Speaker 1: Proud Boys white supremacists and try to put them in
Speaker 1: the same category as neo Nazis, I don't see the
Speaker 1: evidence for that. I don't see how. And that is
Speaker 1: the media claim that a guy with Suastika's tattooed on
Speaker 1: his neck who believes in white racial superiority, which would
Speaker 1: mean a guy who is an evil moron, is the
Speaker 1: same as the Proud Boys, Like these are these are
Speaker 1: the same things. Now I know the President has denounced them, officially,
Speaker 1: it said, you know, because this is whatever. If he doesn't,
Speaker 1: it's like, oh, well, he's not denouncing the Proud Boys
Speaker 1: as white supremacists. And the Southern Poverty Law Center is
Speaker 1: a joke. It's atrocious. They think Dennis Prager's a white supremacist.
Speaker 1: They put Ben Shapiro's name in publications about extremists on
Speaker 1: the right, which is, you know, absurd. I wish they
Speaker 1: do that to me because it's great press, great pr
Speaker 1: But anyway, Southern Property Loss Center is a disgusting left
Speaker 1: wing hatchet job organization. That's what it's become. I know
Speaker 1: it wasn't always, but that is what it has become.
Speaker 1: Same thing with the ACLU. The ACU is anti liberty.
Speaker 1: It's just there to destroy Christianity and America. That's what
Speaker 1: the ACLU really stands for now. But the Proud Boys,
Speaker 1: when you really look into this, there are some holes
Speaker 1: in the narrative from the left about it, and there's
Speaker 1: this obsession because they're the only visible so called alleged
Speaker 1: white supremacist. The media can point to that in Charlottesville,
Speaker 1: which was four years ago, where all these white supremacist rallies,
Speaker 1: where are all these people that are standing up and
Speaker 1: saying they're white supremacists. No, in fact, to do so
Speaker 1: is social suicide. That's how America really feels about it.
Speaker 1: If you say are a white supremacist, and you're on
Speaker 1: and you think of yourself as on the right, nine
Speaker 1: percent ninety nine point nine percent of conservatives, they're gonna say, oh,
Speaker 1: that's disgusting, don't talk to me again. That's the reality
Speaker 1: of this country with white supremacy. But the Proud Boys, Oh,
Speaker 1: they create this connection between the two things. Here is
Speaker 1: the chief of the Proud Boys in Salt Lake City, Utah,
Speaker 1: for example, and he is he's a minority. I can't
Speaker 1: remember if he's either Hispanic or black, but he is
Speaker 1: one or the other. I just I don't recall right
Speaker 1: now top of my head. And here's what he says
Speaker 1: about white's officially on the record in an interview with
Speaker 1: cn here's what you said about white supremacy. Play one.
Speaker 1: I will go out and say that the Proud Boys
Speaker 1: as a whole, I will say this on behalf of
Speaker 1: the entire national organization denounced white supremacy. We are in
Speaker 1: no way, shape or form white supremacists. We have a
Speaker 1: vetting system that just gets those guys out of our hair.
Speaker 1: We do not have anything to do with white supremacy.
Speaker 1: We do not have anything to do with the Ku
Speaker 1: Klux Klan. We denounce those organizations. Could he be more emphatic,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean, I guess he could throw
Speaker 1: some curses in there. But seam is pretty clear to
Speaker 1: me that here you have a guy who is in
Speaker 1: a leadership position for this loosely affiliated but it is
Speaker 1: in an organization, and he's saying, look, white supremacies horrible,
Speaker 1: and he's not white. In fact, I believe the national
Speaker 1: head of the Proud Boys is a Cuban American, so
Speaker 1: it's a white supremacist. If you listen to the media,
Speaker 1: here you have a white supremacist organization with not white
Speaker 1: people in the top leadership positions. For a true white supremacist,
Speaker 1: that would be a problem, right, Wouldn't that be an
Speaker 1: issue if the whole group is about racial purity and
Speaker 1: these other evil and discredited ideologies, wouldn't that be an
Speaker 1: issue for Well, maybe they're not white supremacist. And like
Speaker 1: I said, I'm not sitting here saying I don't know
Speaker 1: enough about the Proud Boys, what they do everywhere. But
Speaker 1: I do know other conservatives who say that to call
Speaker 1: them white supremacists is a slander It's not true, and
Speaker 1: to compare what they do to what Antifa does is
Speaker 1: also slanderous and unfair. Yeah, the Proud Boys are not
Speaker 1: going to ruin your business. They're not going to show
Speaker 1: up and demand that you say something because they think
Speaker 1: they have some political authority and power to do so. No,
Speaker 1: they you know, go to drinking events, wave around American flags,
Speaker 1: and they don't let Antifa threaten conservative speakers on college
Speaker 1: campuses and other venues. That's that's what I know of
Speaker 1: them so far, and I've been looking into this and
Speaker 1: talk to people who've spent a lot of time around them.
Speaker 1: I don't, I don't. I think I was at one
Speaker 1: DC drinking kind of like conservative drinking event, and there
Speaker 1: were some people who were Proud Boys who were outside
Speaker 1: of it, like they had showed up to the venue.
Speaker 1: Um I didn't, I don't. I didn't talk to them.
Speaker 1: I didn't spend any time getting into it. I mean,
Speaker 1: I remember there's one guy who's like yelling, you know,
Speaker 1: I'm a proud boy. Because there were some Antifa that
Speaker 1: showed up too, so that's they look there, they they
Speaker 1: this is kind of like a little bit like a
Speaker 1: political fraternity, maybe a political gang, but it's not. It's
Speaker 1: not white supremacists. And the media should be able to
Speaker 1: get this right, but they don't want to get it
Speaker 1: right because the threat of white supremacy is a necessary
Speaker 1: boogeyman for the Democrat media at this point, because now
Speaker 1: they can say, see, there's political violence on all sides,
Speaker 1: and in fact, they even go a step further than
Speaker 1: that and will claim that most political violence, after what
Speaker 1: we have seen four months now, most political violence in
Speaker 1: America actually comes from the right. That's that's really the
Speaker 1: claim that they will make most political violence comes from
Speaker 1: our side. It's stunning, but this is what they do.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hid. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. This is not to discount the idea that
Speaker 1: violence is an explicitly part as an idea, but right
Speaker 1: now the organized violence is coming from white supremacist groups.
Speaker 1: They are gathering together. They used together together in places
Speaker 1: like Spacebook, but now they have to go to deeper,
Speaker 1: darker corners of the web. They make events and they
Speaker 1: tell people we're gonna go, you know, beat up the
Speaker 1: left here the initiation process. But the Proud Boys, the
Speaker 1: very last step is to commit violence on behalf of
Speaker 1: the Proud Boys. That's what this is about. So, yes,
Speaker 1: you know, Antiva is a violent ideology that you know,
Speaker 1: push us back against what they deem to be fascism.
Speaker 1: But the organized groups that are committing domestic terror in
Speaker 1: the United States, according to Donald Trump's own intelligence agencies,
Speaker 1: that's white supremacy. That's the problem right now, that we
Speaker 1: not just extremism researchers, but the actual officials trying to
Speaker 1: tamp down this stuff. That's the problem. Yeah, now now, sorry,
Speaker 1: not going to do this thing. Antifa thinks they're pushing
Speaker 1: back on fascism, Well they're a bunch of delusional lunatics
Speaker 1: because what they're really doing is attacking police officers. So
Speaker 1: unless we're going to have NBC's extremism corresponding here explain
Speaker 1: how cops in America are fascists, which I think a
Speaker 1: lot of the Libs do want to believe, they will
Speaker 1: go along with this absurdity. Antifa is engaged in organized violence.
Speaker 1: Antifa has a book called the Anti Fascist Handbook that
Speaker 1: explains their whole ideology and history. They organize online, they
Speaker 1: show up on mass they attack people, businesses, strangers. They
Speaker 1: are a paramilitary terrorist group operating in the United States.
Speaker 1: They've been doing it now four months on end, and
Speaker 1: they've actually been doing stretching back for many years. And
Speaker 1: our own media whitewashes the whole thing. What do you
Speaker 1: mean there's no Oh yeah, they think they're pushing back
Speaker 1: on fascism. Well they're wrong. They're lunatics. They're psycho libs
Speaker 1: who need to get a grip and get a job,
Speaker 1: get a girlfriend or a wife. I mean, really, that's
Speaker 1: the truth. A lot of in cells, I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: say it, a lot of in cells in this Antifa movement.
Speaker 1: You see these guys, they're getting arrested and said, just
Speaker 1: tell a bunch of losers, a bunch of losers. You know,
Speaker 1: I can't imagine anybody who has not been completely brainwashed
Speaker 1: hearing this NBC News report on how you know that
Speaker 1: the organized violence comes from the right. What's the horizon
Speaker 1: we're talking about here? Are they looking back twenty years
Speaker 1: and saying that you know that that right wing extremists
Speaker 1: overall have accounted for more? Well, what counts what? Because
Speaker 1: a left wing extremist, that's another question that's worth asking.
Speaker 1: And police assassinations shouldn't that go under the left wing category?
Speaker 1: And they also used to do this thing of discounting,
Speaker 1: you know, let's say, right wing violence minus nine to
Speaker 1: eleven worse than any other ideology in America. Yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: and without Pearl Harbor, we wouldn't have gotten into World
Speaker 1: War two? What exactly are they saying? Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Reject David Duke rejected David Duke, I've rejected
Speaker 1: the KKK. Do you want white supremacists to go for you? No?
Speaker 1: I don't at all, not at all. Racism is evil
Speaker 1: and those who cause violence in its name. And I'm
Speaker 1: not talking about the neo Nazis and the white nationalists
Speaker 1: because they shout condemnly against hatred, bigger trein violence and
Speaker 1: strongly condemn themist condemned racism, bigotry, and white some any
Speaker 1: group of hay I don't like it, any group of
Speaker 1: hay I have, whether it's I totally disavowed. How much
Speaker 1: more of that does he have to do. It's a
Speaker 1: montage courtesy of Reagan Battalion there, and you just have
Speaker 1: to wonder, right, this is now? This is bad faith
Speaker 1: to ask the question, to keep asking the questions, right,
Speaker 1: They just keep saying it. They're convinced, trumps of white
Speaker 1: supremacist convinced. Remember, they were also convinced that Mitt Romney
Speaker 1: Milktoast Mitt as we should call him, was giving a
Speaker 1: people cancer and was a terrible person. I mean, I
Speaker 1: think the guy's not really all that conservative, and you
Speaker 1: can't count on him in a bar fight or a
Speaker 1: political fight. But I don't think he's some evil monster
Speaker 1: who gives people cancer and throw his grandma off a clip,
Speaker 1: but that's what they were saying. And abuse his dogs
Speaker 1: and was a bully in high school. These are the
Speaker 1: things they said about him. But their favorite is the
Speaker 1: the white supremacist attack. And it is like being called
Speaker 1: a witch during the various scares. We often think of
Speaker 1: the Salem witch trials in this country for obvious reasons,
Speaker 1: and when we think of people being accused of witch
Speaker 1: of witchcraft, but it existed in medieval Europe for centuries,
Speaker 1: and there would be these these frenzies, these panics where
Speaker 1: somebody would say that there was witchcraft in a town
Speaker 1: and a lot of women were burned at the stake
Speaker 1: over this. This was not a an isolated thing that
Speaker 1: happened just in Salem, Massachusetts. A lot of women were
Speaker 1: burned at the steak and it went on for centuries,
Speaker 1: and it was really just the frenzy and rage of
Speaker 1: the frightened and stupid mob, you know, consolidated into this
Speaker 1: one issue of witchcraft. But you have the same, the
Speaker 1: same thing. I mean, the crowd is monstrous, right. Crowds
Speaker 1: act in ways that individuals would not. They feel empowered,
Speaker 1: they move, I mean, Gustave le Bon has a wonderful
Speaker 1: treatise on this about the madness of crowds. And we
Speaker 1: continue to see this happen in this country around Trump
Speaker 1: and around the imaginary white supremacists that are constantly menacing
Speaker 1: all aspects of American life. And remember, they have also
Speaker 1: expanded the term white supremacy to be all aspects of
Speaker 1: the system that the Democrats view as oppressive. So how
Speaker 1: can you even prove that there isn't really that much
Speaker 1: white supremacy when they're going around saying, oh no, our
Speaker 1: educational system as white supremacist? Are the banking system as
Speaker 1: white supremacist? The sixteen nineteen project of the New York Times,
Speaker 1: with the Henna Nicole Jones as the main author, which
Speaker 1: now claims that it was not trying to reset the
Speaker 1: American founding to sixteen nineteen, even though that was explicitly
Speaker 1: what they said about it when they launched the project
Speaker 1: and for many many months afterwards. But they claimed that
Speaker 1: our capitalist system is rooted in white supremacy and the
Speaker 1: protection of slavery and the exploitation of human beings, of
Speaker 1: black human beings in this country. That is a I
Speaker 1: read the essay. I mean, that is what the sixty
Speaker 1: nineteen project says. So there's so much white supremacy according
Speaker 1: to the new rules and definitions that you say, if
Speaker 1: it's everything, then where is it really? If it's in
Speaker 1: all of our systems, then what are we supposed how
Speaker 1: are we supposed to tackle this? Bro What are we
Speaker 1: supposed to do? Then? Even then, never get to that,
Speaker 1: obey or else, and they'll throw the allegation at you.
Speaker 1: It's a bit like the inquisition, right, obey else. Obey
Speaker 1: or else will ruin your business, will destroy your reputation,
Speaker 1: and we will punish you, we will immiserate you and
Speaker 1: all those around you. Okay, that's that's what we want
Speaker 1: as a country. That's where we are. That's what we're
Speaker 1: being pushed into. You know, they're they're really just getting
Speaker 1: more and more unhinged as we get close to this election.
Speaker 1: I can't really envision what's going to happen if Donald
Speaker 1: Trump wins, because the left, I don't know. Maybe they'll
Speaker 1: be so upset, you know, when you're so angry that
Speaker 1: you're actually I don't know if you've ever had this before,
Speaker 1: but you're so angry or emotionally distraught that you all
Speaker 1: you can do is just sort of stare and be
Speaker 1: quiet because you're overcome. Maybe there'll be a little bit
Speaker 1: of that for a day or two with the Democrats,
Speaker 1: and then there'll be the destruction and the rioting and
Speaker 1: all the madness because the Trump presidency has really been
Speaker 1: that bad for all these people. That's the other part
Speaker 1: of this that I'm always pretty amazed by. I'll talk
Speaker 1: to Democrats. I've got Democrat friends still, and I'll talk
Speaker 1: to Democrats and they'll say how horrible everything is with Trump,
Speaker 1: and I'll say, what, exactly what is it that he's
Speaker 1: done that has really made things worse for you? What
Speaker 1: is it the president has said or what I'm sorry
Speaker 1: I forget about said, because that that'll have a lot
Speaker 1: of a lot of things I'll say about that. What
Speaker 1: action has been taken that has really harmed people in
Speaker 1: this country in a way that is worthy of this
Speaker 1: level of upset from the Libs? And they never have
Speaker 1: an answer. They'll usually mutter something about Russia and Charlottesville,
Speaker 1: and these are all just these are all creations of
Speaker 1: the Democrat media. These are all just narratives there, they're fabrications.
Speaker 1: There's nothing there. What is the action? It's almost like
Speaker 1: the left is upset with him for not starting and
Speaker 1: unnecessary war, killing a lot of people in that country
Speaker 1: and losing a lot of our own soldiers. It's almost
Speaker 1: like the left is upset in him for not dictating
Speaker 1: more to businesses, taking more money from them, putting more regular,
Speaker 1: onerous regulations on them. I try to think of what
Speaker 1: really is is so horrific and why they had this mentality.
Speaker 1: You want to ask, you know, where where did the
Speaker 1: mean Trump abuse you guys so badly? What is it
Speaker 1: that has made you this way? I didn't felt this
Speaker 1: way about Obama. Yeah, I thought Obama was breaking constitutional
Speaker 1: norms and he wasn't as great and smart and perfect
Speaker 1: as the media he was always saying he was. And
Speaker 1: he was pushing socialism and he's got, you know, just
Speaker 1: bad economic concepts and doesn't really understand that stuff. But
Speaker 1: I don't think he was some monster who wanted everyone's
Speaker 1: children to die. They really believe that about Trump, They
Speaker 1: really think this stuff. I mean, you can't find levels
Speaker 1: of exaggeration that go beyond with their fevered dreams of
Speaker 1: Trump are already conjure up. I mean, here, here you go.
Speaker 1: You've got over at MSNBC. A guy you gotta hear
Speaker 1: this is one of their analysts, national security analysts. Supposed
Speaker 1: to be smart, supposed to know some things play six
Speaker 1: and over the next thirty three days. But's not on
Speaker 1: the ballot is merely a choice between Republicans or Democrats,
Speaker 1: or Trump or Biden. Actually, what's on the ballot is
Speaker 1: a choice between democracy or whether or not we're going
Speaker 1: to revert to some Russian form of dictatorship or autocracy
Speaker 1: where our democracy is undermined. It's long been an ambition
Speaker 1: of Putin. It's long been an ambition of Russian state
Speaker 1: propaganda to show the world that American democracy doesn't work,
Speaker 1: that actually the people can't elect their representa and that
Speaker 1: this peaceful transfer of power cannot occur, and that of
Speaker 1: course is used to justify Putin's staying in office for ten, twelve,
Speaker 1: sixteen years, which is exactly the kind of rhetoric at
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is now talking about on the stands, saying
Speaker 1: I'm going to stay in office for sixteen years. And
Speaker 1: his effort, make no mistake, is to undermine the ability
Speaker 1: of the American voter to have confidence in our democracy.
Speaker 1: He wants people to stay home, He wants his white
Speaker 1: supremacist gangs to come out, so violence if necessary to
Speaker 1: prevent people from going to the polls under the guise
Speaker 1: of poll watching. I mean, this guy really is having
Speaker 1: some kind of a mental breakdown on air. What is
Speaker 1: he talking about? What's on the ballot is a choice
Speaker 1: between I know this is standard fair over the MSNBC.
Speaker 1: People are watching this all day. This is the quote,
Speaker 1: what's on the ballot is a choice between democracy or
Speaker 1: whether or not we're going to revert to some Russian
Speaker 1: form of dictatorship or autocracy. Why in what way is
Speaker 1: Trump a dictator. Let's have a reality check here. We're
Speaker 1: going through a pandemic that state governors in blue states
Speaker 1: and even Texas a little bit. I mean, some of
Speaker 1: the red states haven't been great here either, but we're
Speaker 1: going through a pandemic where there's a huge opening for
Speaker 1: government overreach and real dictatorial power. New York's governor Cuomo
Speaker 1: has been given dictatorial power by the legislator. He's in
Speaker 1: a state of emergency at lasts a year. He can
Speaker 1: do whatever he wants. I mean, if he wanted to
Speaker 1: arrest people for not doing ten jumping jacks every morning
Speaker 1: when they wake up, because that's gonna raise your circulatory
Speaker 1: system and help you fight COVID, probably do it. That's
Speaker 1: how completely unhinged people are in the face of this
Speaker 1: and how much they'll trust democrats state is to enact
Speaker 1: their will. Trump is allowing states to make a lot
Speaker 1: of their own determinations about this. He wants people to
Speaker 1: return to normal life. He wants people to have as
Speaker 1: much freedom as they can have while being somewhat cautious
Speaker 1: and safe in dealing with this all. And we're still
Speaker 1: talking about how he's a dictator. We gave him the
Speaker 1: This has been a huge opportunity for him to be
Speaker 1: an autocrat and see power, the whole COVID thing, and
Speaker 1: he's gone in the opposite direction. So we have tested
Speaker 1: out this thesis, and now this is a thesis that
Speaker 1: is only believed by idiots, by people who are just
Speaker 1: not very smart, not very bright. They've had a lot
Speaker 1: of instruction, but it has not been it has not
Speaker 1: translated in their minds into both knowledge and wisdom, which
Speaker 1: results in good judgment. They don't have it. This guys.
Speaker 1: Some national security analysts at MSNBC saying the dumbest stuff
Speaker 1: I've ever heard of my life. Revert to dictatorship or autocracy?
Speaker 1: Anyone really believed that? Do any of you think for
Speaker 1: one second if the president refused to leave office, if
Speaker 1: he really did lose the election, that Republicans would not say, Okay,
Speaker 1: this is too much. We don't you know, we gotta no.
Speaker 1: Of course, not right. Of course, we wouldn't allow the
Speaker 1: president to stay in office if he lost the election,
Speaker 1: because we actually believe in the system. You see the Democrats,
Speaker 1: it's it's like dealing with somebody who has no reason
Speaker 1: or accountability. They're just always in hysterics. They want to
Speaker 1: change the system, they want to undermine this system. But
Speaker 1: the real threat to the system is Donald Trump. And
Speaker 1: they don't see any incoherence in this. They don't see
Speaker 1: any any lack of sanity. Oh or they want to
Speaker 1: they want to change the system. They also want to
Speaker 1: set up a kind of you can call it, official
Speaker 1: deep state commission to vet presidential candidates before they can
Speaker 1: run for office. Here's the former counterintelligence chief of the FBI,
Speaker 1: and Lacomi has taken the FBI's reputation and poured a
Speaker 1: bunch of gasoline on it, you know, lit it on fire,
Speaker 1: and then even just done the same thing over again.
Speaker 1: He has ruined the FBI's reputation for being a nonpartisan body.
Speaker 1: Whatever you thought about that before an it's an entirely
Speaker 1: unserious claim to make. Now, no one really thinks the
Speaker 1: FBI is at the top echelon a politically neutral organization
Speaker 1: that can be trusted on these matters. But here's former
Speaker 1: assistant FBI Director Frank Figliozzi talking about a deep state commission.
Speaker 1: He doesn't call it that. Play five. So I suggest this, Stephanie,
Speaker 1: We've got to have a national discussion about how we
Speaker 1: vet a presidential candidate. We screwed this up. Whether it's
Speaker 1: the media not digging deeply enough, whether it's a time
Speaker 1: to have a discussion about a bipartisan committee that demands
Speaker 1: tax returns, make that a requirement, or exposes financial pictures
Speaker 1: for candidates. But we got this wrong, and this can't
Speaker 1: happen again. Wait now we're going to pretend that the
Speaker 1: problem is the media, And he's that sound bites actually
Speaker 1: even a little longer, and he makes more explicit. His
Speaker 1: view is that the media wasn't tough enough on Trump,
Speaker 1: didn't dig deep enough on Trump. Not only was the
Speaker 1: media psychotically opposed to Donald Trump and still is in
Speaker 1: this upcoming weeks away election, but they created lies to
Speaker 1: try to destroy him. If that's not tough enough, what
Speaker 1: is for this guy? They destroyed their integrity, They eliminated
Speaker 1: any doubt about their partisan bias for a person who's
Speaker 1: intelligent enough to see things for what they are. And
Speaker 1: he's saying that the problem is that they didn't vet
Speaker 1: the president enough. He also goes on in this little
Speaker 1: moment he's on, I mean, MSNBC's really it's like watching
Speaker 1: a lunatic asylum. I mean, that's what you're seeing on
Speaker 1: television all the time. He goes on to talk about
Speaker 1: how it's what's not in and I said this, I
Speaker 1: was half kidding, but right after the tax return. Oh
Speaker 1: remember the tax return story that was last weekend. I
Speaker 1: don't even remembers it anymore. But it's what's not in
Speaker 1: the tax returns that's so concerning. It's what's not proven
Speaker 1: about Russia collusion that we have to find. Now. You
Speaker 1: cannot convince these people to stop the madness. You cannot
Speaker 1: convince the Libs to stop being crazy. And we just
Speaker 1: have to deal with that. We just have to work
Speaker 1: through it and defeat them. The only justice for Trump
Speaker 1: in the face of all of these lies comes through victory.
Speaker 1: Everything else is just conceding to madness. You're in This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Here's a hard
Speaker 1: and fast principal, Folks. Anyone who tapes a person who
Speaker 1: trusts them and tries to use what is believed to
Speaker 1: be a private conversation between a two friends to confidence
Speaker 1: two colleagues for leverage later on or for publicity later
Speaker 1: on is scum. It's a scum move. No other way
Speaker 1: to say it, no other way around it. It's a disgusting, cowardly,
Speaker 1: dishonorable thing to do. And someone did it to the
Speaker 1: first Lady, not a surprise, someone who worked on her staff.
Speaker 1: This uh, this atrocity known as Winston, Miss Winston willcough
Speaker 1: what's her first name? Who cares? But it's gross Stephanie
Speaker 1: Winston woolcough. And everyone's like, oh, listen to the first Lady.
Speaker 1: She curses in this surreptitiously taped audio. Yeah, I'm an adult.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna tell you I never curse on this show
Speaker 1: and I never will, but I do curse in my
Speaker 1: private life. So if some tape ever emerges of me,
Speaker 1: drop an F bombs, I'm telling you right now, I'm
Speaker 1: a salty language person where appropriate. What does that mean?
Speaker 1: We all? I mean, I don't. I know very few
Speaker 1: people that aren't dropping a curse word here or there
Speaker 1: when they're conversing as adults, you know, not in front
Speaker 1: of kids, not in a professional setting. And there's some
Speaker 1: things that but what's the big reveal here? Now? They're
Speaker 1: just just betraying the first Lady. I mean, here's I'm
Speaker 1: playing the audios everywhere, so it's not like I'm giving
Speaker 1: you some uh you know insight here that everyone doesn't
Speaker 1: already have who has access to the internet. Um, but
Speaker 1: I mean here's pretty smart. Just play some of it.
Speaker 1: They say. I'm I'm completed. I'm the same like him.
Speaker 1: I support him. I don't say enough. I don't do enough. No,
Speaker 1: it's where I put I'm working like a ask my ass.
Speaker 1: I know Christmas stuff that you know some kids are
Speaker 1: about Christmas stuff and the creation. But I need to
Speaker 1: do it right. Yeah, but you had no choice and okay,
Speaker 1: and then I do it. And I said that I'm
Speaker 1: working on Christmas planning for the Christmas and they said, oh,
Speaker 1: what about the user and that they were separated. Give
Speaker 1: me great Lanky was saying anything like Obama did that.
Speaker 1: I know, I cannot go. I was trying to get
Speaker 1: the kids grounded with the mom. They didn't have a chance.
Speaker 1: He needs to go through the process and through the law.
Speaker 1: I like the first Lady more after this, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: tell you, first of all, Yeah, it's probably annoying to
Speaker 1: be the first Lady and be in charge of all
Speaker 1: the White House Christmas stuff. Like she's not an interior decker.
Speaker 1: She doesn't care, did she? Somebody else do that stuff.
Speaker 1: But oh, she's expected to as the first Lady because
Speaker 1: of tradition. Okay, you know, she's doing her job, and
Speaker 1: she didn't complain about it publicly, But let's just do
Speaker 1: a confidant who's betrayed her, because the confidant is scum.
Speaker 1: But and then you talk about the kids. It's like
Speaker 1: they weren't complaining under Obama, which is true. They weren't
Speaker 1: complaining about this under Obama. And she's like, look, I'm trying.
Speaker 1: Everyone's you know, she's under a lot of heat. The
Speaker 1: media treats are horribly. They really do fine, she's a
Speaker 1: little frustrated about it. I love how this is. Oh
Speaker 1: look at the American people, the first ladies cursing and
Speaker 1: and complaining about how people, you know, treat her in
Speaker 1: the media. Maybe now voters will turn on her. No, no,
Speaker 1: but this is you know, here we go. It's it's
Speaker 1: an October surprise. You know it's gonna be This's gonna
Speaker 1: be an October surprise every three days for the whole month. Here.
Speaker 1: It's all bull, it's all nonsense. Melanie Trump's done a
Speaker 1: very nice job as First Lady. Okay, she's not you know,
Speaker 1: speaking down to people like other first ladies have in
Speaker 1: the past. She's not being a pain in the butt's
Speaker 1: doing her job. She's let it fly on a private conversation.
Speaker 1: Good for her. Call me. We can talk about politics
Speaker 1: anytime and I won't betray her trust. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to The bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Roll Call Friday, hit It, Team buck It's
Speaker 1: time for roll Call, Roll Call Everybody. Facebook dot com,
Speaker 1: slashbuck sexon Team Bucket, iHeartMedia dot com. Don't forget got
Speaker 1: to buck Sexton book dot com. Get a copy of
Speaker 1: the Socialism Survival Guide. Eight radical predictions that will come
Speaker 1: true after this election. Let's see how many might get right,
Speaker 1: mostly about the economy, about socialism. I do predict well.
Speaker 1: I predict who wins the election, so you can check
Speaker 1: out the book for that and what happens after the election.
Speaker 1: Win bucksextonbook dot com. You can get your copy there.
Speaker 1: Please do and uh yeah with that, Bruce Mark any phone.
Speaker 1: Weekend plans. Yeah, me and the wife are going to
Speaker 1: a Sangria and Slider's event, some winery and Jersey that
Speaker 1: legitimately sounds delightful. Yeah, there's gonna be a live band.
Speaker 1: It's all outdoors, you know, all that social distancing stuff,
Speaker 1: and it sounds fun finally doing something. Oh Man, Sangria
Speaker 1: and sliders. I I gotta tell you I have gotten
Speaker 1: I'm gonna sound like a kid who's breaking into the
Speaker 1: man of Chevits at his friends. Uh, what do you
Speaker 1: call the party when you're sixteen? Mark sweet sixteen? No? No, no,
Speaker 1: no no, Rather the Jewish show that's when you're thirteen.
Speaker 1: That'd be a barabart mitzvah. Yeah, yeah, barmtz barmtz but sorry,
Speaker 1: that's what I meant. Yeah, no, kin Sanyara's when you're fifteen.
Speaker 1: It's Spanish culture barmitzvabat mitzva. Yeah, I'm saying like like
Speaker 1: a kid who broke into the man of Chevits and
Speaker 1: got drunk, which may or may not have happened to
Speaker 1: me at a at a friend's bar mitzvah, you went
Speaker 1: with man chevats. It's not good, not good, not good.
Speaker 1: But uh, sangria. I've gotten lit on sangria before it
Speaker 1: could be fun. Man. Every Thanksgiving, my in laws make
Speaker 1: like a big jug of sangria. Oh it's delicious. Great. Yes, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's because it's foreign. I feel like people aren't allowed
Speaker 1: to give you. It's basically like a fancy wine cooler.
Speaker 1: But it's delicious. I mean it's just basically wine with
Speaker 1: some raw and some fruit. Yeah, it's delicious. That's kind
Speaker 1: of what a wine cooler is. Fruit flavoring and a
Speaker 1: little bit of rum and you know. And yeah, I'm
Speaker 1: just saying I didn't know there was rum and wine coolers. Well, no,
Speaker 1: there's not rum. But sometimes I'll put a little bit
Speaker 1: of grain alcohol in it to you know, punch it
Speaker 1: up a bit. Sure. Yeah. Uh. Speaking of which, Ziema,
Speaker 1: I missed those days. I missed the nineties, I really do.
Speaker 1: I think the nineties are great, like the late nineties.
Speaker 1: It's really the high that's really the high mark for America.
Speaker 1: Nineteen ninety six to two thousand was like as good
Speaker 1: as it gets in America. But anyway, great music, go back,
Speaker 1: listen to the tunes in the nineties versus what's going
Speaker 1: on today. Anyway. I know I'm not gonna get into
Speaker 1: whole get off my lawn right here, by the way,
Speaker 1: did you wake Green Day up? What do you mean, well,
Speaker 1: it's October. They like to be woken up when September.
Speaker 1: And their tunes are super catchy. Their politics are horrible,
Speaker 1: just like Rage Against the Machine. Great music to work
Speaker 1: out to, not somebody that I want to hear from politically,
Speaker 1: but the tunes are nice. You brought up nineties music,
Speaker 1: so I made it that joke. No, I appreciate that.
Speaker 1: I know. Is there a nineties band that you still celebrate?
Speaker 1: What do you mean still celebrate? You can still listen
Speaker 1: to this stuff? A Backstreet Poise of course? Ah, look
Speaker 1: at you. You really have a trust in this audience.
Speaker 1: You will, you will cop to liking the Backstreet Poise.
Speaker 1: There's nothing wrong with liking the Backstreet Poise. Nothing nothing,
Speaker 1: ain't nothing wrong with it, Ain't nothing wrong with it.
Speaker 1: I'm also going to tell you right now that I
Speaker 1: asked a question. I don't know if you saw this
Speaker 1: Prucer Markus last weekend on social media. What is the
Speaker 1: movie that you know is ridiculous, but you love anyway
Speaker 1: and you don't care what anybody says about it. You're
Speaker 1: always gonna love it, even though you objectively understand it.
Speaker 1: Can't be that people would say, oh, look back to
Speaker 1: the Future. I'm like, back to the Future is a
Speaker 1: great movie. What do you mean, Like, I mean a
Speaker 1: movie that that you would be that you're you're you're
Speaker 1: embarrassed at how much you like it, but you don't care.
Speaker 1: I don't know if there is one. Maybe Adam Sandler,
Speaker 1: Yeah I would count, that would probably count. But he
Speaker 1: had made some really good stuff and then he's made
Speaker 1: some really bad stuff. So yeah, like if you told
Speaker 1: me that you love um, what's the walm Jack and
Speaker 1: Jill want to Touch the That one? His worst movie
Speaker 1: ever is Jack and Jill. Well, I haven't seen that one.
Speaker 1: Walms like want to touch the Can I say? Can? I?
Speaker 1: I can say hinee on radio? Right? You want to
Speaker 1: touch the hinee? That thing? Where? What's that movie? I
Speaker 1: don't know what movie that is? Billy Madison, Billy Madison,
Speaker 1: Like if you love Billy Madison, that would count. That's
Speaker 1: a bad movie. Like it's fun and I've seen it
Speaker 1: and I enjoyed it, but it's a bad movie. I
Speaker 1: mean that probably describes most of Sandler's nineties movies. Is
Speaker 1: you know, a couple good ones, but most of them
Speaker 1: are just hilarious happy Gilmore holds up pretty well. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but is it a good movie technically? It's like no,
Speaker 1: I don't think it's a totally sillier like like the
Speaker 1: movies that I had in mind. Um. I love the
Speaker 1: Masters of the Universe movie with Dolph Lundgren where he
Speaker 1: plays he Man, which is just bonkers. It's like it's
Speaker 1: like an acid trip. It doesn't make all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: there's in like some suburban town, there's like monsters and
Speaker 1: Heman and there's spaceships. It's crazy. It's crazy. It's kind
Speaker 1: of great though for what it is. I don't watch
Speaker 1: movies like that. Well, maybe you should expand your horizons
Speaker 1: a little bit. Big Trouble in Little China definitely in
Speaker 1: this category because it's just in a it's the whole
Speaker 1: movie and nothing makes any sense. But it's great. I
Speaker 1: love it. I prefer watching movies that I like number
Speaker 1: one and that are good. Two. You've never seen Big
Speaker 1: Trouble in Little China. No, what is that? Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: I have so much to teach, I really do. Oh
Speaker 1: you know what actually comes to mind? The scary movies
Speaker 1: that would count. If you love scary movie, that movie
Speaker 1: is absurd. I don't love them, but they're absurd the
Speaker 1: other the other like big trees. I'm trying to think
Speaker 1: of the ones that kept coming up for people. Um,
Speaker 1: the Flash Gordon series with Queen doing the soundtrack, that's
Speaker 1: definitely up there. The movie Labyrinth with David Bowie, that
Speaker 1: definitely is in the category. Some said The Rock, but
Speaker 1: I'm I think The Rock is just a badass movie.
Speaker 1: I don't think I have you seen You've seen Ted
Speaker 1: right oh with a Little Bear. There there were a
Speaker 1: few scenes in that movie where I am embarrassed about
Speaker 1: how hard I laughed. Actually, I loved both of them
Speaker 1: so much. I'm not embarrassed to admit it. I love them. Um.
Speaker 1: I would just say the checkout scene from the grocery
Speaker 1: store in the first one, and it's not for kids,
Speaker 1: this is not a movie for the children, but the
Speaker 1: checkout seed I was that. I don't know what it was,
Speaker 1: that just really sometimes something just really gets you that
Speaker 1: really that was it's so gross and so over the top.
Speaker 1: I found it really funny. Alright, alright, let's let's roll
Speaker 1: call it up. Let's roll call it up. T J. Buck,
Speaker 1: I'm sure Trump's positive COVID is the only thing that
Speaker 1: we'll be talked about personally. I don't think it means much,
Speaker 1: assuming that he has a speedy recovery, and my opinion,
Speaker 1: the biggest implication is if it will push their next
Speaker 1: debate back at all. The good thing is that Trump
Speaker 1: has the next two weeks to do nothing but debate prep.
Speaker 1: Whether that debate is held in person or virtually is
Speaker 1: still up in the air. However, if I were Trump,
Speaker 1: I would just accept the new mic cutoff rule, and
Speaker 1: during the debate, when he gets cut off, just visibly
Speaker 1: pull out his phone and start live tweeting. The moderator
Speaker 1: may ask what he's doing. At some point, he can
Speaker 1: simply reply, Hey, if you're gonna silence me, I'll just
Speaker 1: go around you. Yeah, I think you know. I like
Speaker 1: where your head's at on this one. I don't think
Speaker 1: he should live tweet during the debate. Some people might
Speaker 1: find that a bit disrespectful, but I also agree with you.
Speaker 1: I think that the president's gonna and it'll be quite
Speaker 1: a change. I think in a lot of people's perception
Speaker 1: of this. Presidents seventy two years old, seventy three years old,
Speaker 1: and he's he is um, what's the word? You know?
Speaker 1: I don't think his weight would be considered a major
Speaker 1: risk for what they're talking when they say, you know,
Speaker 1: a weight being a risk factor for COVID buddies, think
Speaker 1: what the guy. The guy likes his good cheeseburger. I know,
Speaker 1: so I do why. I don't know what else to say,
Speaker 1: but I think if he gets through this, uh pretty
Speaker 1: quickly and without too much of seventy four actually, wow,
Speaker 1: he's seventy four, um, then I think that he will
Speaker 1: remind a lot of folks that we don't have to
Speaker 1: live in fear of this. That will be will be okay.
Speaker 1: I think it might be a really a big positive
Speaker 1: for the public perception of how we can get past
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen. So that that part of it, I think
Speaker 1: is a really good thing. Uh, gentry hey buck. Not
Speaker 1: to beat a dead horse or anything, but I realized
Speaker 1: just what an amazing example of negative press spin we
Speaker 1: just got recently. I know what happened so often now
Speaker 1: that it's like white noise, but when they really step
Speaker 1: in it, that is what you want to point out.
Speaker 1: The New York Times story was spun in an effort
Speaker 1: to make Trump sound like a monster for not paying
Speaker 1: more than he was legally bound to. At no point
Speaker 1: was an accusation of lawbreaking made that I heard. Wouldn't
Speaker 1: the actual story be that, after four years of leftists
Speaker 1: insisting our president was enriching himself using the office and
Speaker 1: taking untold sums of Russian dark money, that that particular
Speaker 1: narrative was debunked. Well, yes, Gentry, you're approaching this as
Speaker 1: a rational person who wants the truth and wants to
Speaker 1: get to the facts of the case. That's not the
Speaker 1: purpose of all these media narratives. That the media narratives
Speaker 1: are not put in place because people want to know
Speaker 1: what's true. It's put in place because they want a
Speaker 1: certain outcome. And the outcome is the president to be
Speaker 1: damaged and for him to lose reelection, and if they
Speaker 1: can even stop it, for the president not even to
Speaker 1: make it to reelection. I mean, that's what the Libs
Speaker 1: are out there doing. That's what they're saying. Zach writes Buck,
Speaker 1: how do we get President Trump to calm down at
Speaker 1: this next debate and show how he can be professional
Speaker 1: and make his point. I feel that we need from
Speaker 1: him to appeal to the undecided, independent voters and even
Speaker 1: the middle of the road Democrats who don't like the
Speaker 1: direction the Democratic Party is heading in Zach, you make
Speaker 1: a fair point here. I've said similar things about how
Speaker 1: I wish the President had interrupted a little bit less,
Speaker 1: a little toned down. But I also understand that it's
Speaker 1: not going to be perfect, and you know, Trump's gonna
Speaker 1: be Trump, folks. This is just who he is. So
Speaker 1: on one level, I feel like it's not useful. It's
Speaker 1: not helpful for us to sit around and philosophies about
Speaker 1: a kinder, gentler Trump debate performance, because he's gonna no
Speaker 1: one's gonna tell him how he's gonna debate Joe Biden
Speaker 1: on that stage. Really, he's going to be the ultimate
Speaker 1: arbiter of that. But I the c Span pole was interesting.
Speaker 1: I mean, when you're talking about over sixty percent of
Speaker 1: people thinking the president clearly won, and about ten or
Speaker 1: fifteen percent I think in that poll I don't remember
Speaker 1: now said neither side one. So I mean Trump had
Speaker 1: a solid chunk of people overall, who you know, either
Speaker 1: they think it was a draw or he won a
Speaker 1: pretty small minority. Thing. Biden one that it was even
Speaker 1: more so than I had anticipated. Jay Buck, Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: FBI Director Ray and others on the left keep claiming
Speaker 1: that the rioting and violence are actually being perpetrated by
Speaker 1: right wing white supremacist groups which are posing as ANTIFA
Speaker 1: in order to infiltrate peaceful BLM marches and turned them violent.
Speaker 1: Question if this were true, then why aren't these Democrat
Speaker 1: mayors governing doing everything they can to put down the violence?
Speaker 1: If these are actually right wing agitators, you'd think the
Speaker 1: Democrats wouldn't tolerate them destroying their cities, but they are.
Speaker 1: Love the show, Thank you. Jake tell a producer Mark
Speaker 1: that his favorite BK sandwich, the Whopper, actually has mayo
Speaker 1: and ketchup shields high Is that true? Producer? Mark? First
Speaker 1: of all, I don't need Burger King very often. It's
Speaker 1: probably been years since I have. Second of all, I'm
Speaker 1: a pro at hating mayonnaise. I asked for no mayo
Speaker 1: on anything, even if there isn't even a chance that
Speaker 1: mayonnaise would be put on that sandwich. Huh. What is
Speaker 1: your favorite fast food chain? I guess Chick fil A
Speaker 1: if we're counting that, but other than that, probably Wendy's.
Speaker 1: I gotta say I'm pretty I'm pretty partial to shake Shack.
Speaker 1: I used to be in and out guy, but Shake
Speaker 1: I've become I've kind of started cheating too much on
Speaker 1: in and out with shake Shack, And now shake Shack's
Speaker 1: like moving in with me and we're getting a dog together.
Speaker 1: Shake Shack is not fast food. It is incredibly slow
Speaker 1: food actually, but it's really good. It's really good. But
Speaker 1: I call that like in more of the chipotleagory, like
Speaker 1: fast casual. Hm hm, yeah, I probably made with better
Speaker 1: and quality ingredients than you know, McDonald's one good. It's good.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it. I actually not my favorite burger.
Speaker 1: Five guys in that category would be my favorite burger.
Speaker 1: I will say that there was a five guys in
Speaker 1: DC that in my in my reckless youth in my twenties,
Speaker 1: when I was but a single buck working at the
Speaker 1: CIA and chasing ladies all weekend. I would get I
Speaker 1: would get absolutely ripped sometimes and then wake up Sunday
Speaker 1: with a vicious hangover. And I don't know what it
Speaker 1: is they put in those five guys burgers and fries,
Speaker 1: but when you had a bad hangover, it was like
Speaker 1: food of the gods, so greasy, so bad for you,
Speaker 1: but so delicious. Yeah, it was pretty damn good. You're
Speaker 1: this is the Buck Show podcast, all right? Next up
Speaker 1: in roll call, we got Jail. Oh no we I
Speaker 1: didn't answer Jay. I was too busy talking about delicious
Speaker 1: burgers because I'm getting hungry. But Jay's point is very good,
Speaker 1: which is that if it were in fact right wingers
Speaker 1: destroying the cities and doing all the violence we've seen
Speaker 1: these riots, which is a completely absurd, I mean, a
Speaker 1: wildly absurd claim. But if it were right wingers, then
Speaker 1: what would be what would be the compunction? I use
Speaker 1: that word a fair amount. It's probably a hesitation. It
Speaker 1: is probably a better word, or at least word. People
Speaker 1: might appreciate more hesitation to bring in the National Guard
Speaker 1: and put down all these crazy white sorry right wingers.
Speaker 1: And the answer is, of course, well that's why they
Speaker 1: won't do it, because it's Democrats and they don't want
Speaker 1: to have people using truncheons and billy clubs on their base,
Speaker 1: so to speak. So Jay, very good point, exposing why
Speaker 1: the left is full of it. I like it, very astute,
Speaker 1: and you love the show, so clearly you have excellent taste.
Speaker 1: Erin Hey bucking producer, Mark, I think it's worth mentioning
Speaker 1: to the Libs that the same poor old Joe who
Speaker 1: complains about how rough Trump was in the bait is
Speaker 1: the same guy who would shout down the average citizen
Speaker 1: as a dog faced pony soldier for questioning him on
Speaker 1: policy during a town hall event. When Joe is coming
Speaker 1: from a position of power, He's a bully. That's how
Speaker 1: Trump treated him in the debate. Love the show, Shields High, Aaron,
Speaker 1: I think that's a good point. I think that Trump.
Speaker 1: I think that Biden is very dismissive to people when
Speaker 1: he thinks he can get away with it. I think
Speaker 1: he does have a short temper. So well played, Well
Speaker 1: played Justin first off, producer Mark is the greatest. Justin
Speaker 1: definitely wanted to be in Roll Call reference for before
Speaker 1: Original Saturday Squad. Should be boss before Original Saturday Squad.
Speaker 1: I've been a podcast listener since the Blaze days. Earbuds
Speaker 1: in running CNC Machines, twenty years on the grind, no
Speaker 1: college education, wife and two kids, two thousand square square
Speaker 1: foot house on one point five acres, single family income.
Speaker 1: Who says the American dream ain't real. Keep up the
Speaker 1: great work. You two are the best. Shields High, well
Speaker 1: justin God bless you man. I hope you enjoy every
Speaker 1: day the success of the American dream that you've created
Speaker 1: for yourself, for you and your family. That's awesome. And
Speaker 1: you've been with me for years and I can't tell
Speaker 1: you how much I appreciate that. It really does mean
Speaker 1: a lot to me. Roger Buck, Donald Pazon is the
Speaker 1: actor from Scrubs you were referring to. Love that show, Roger,
Speaker 1: I may have to check it out. And look, he
Speaker 1: was great in Clueless, which I don't care what anybody says.
Speaker 1: It's a fantastic movie and I think most people understand that.
Speaker 1: But yeah, Donald Phazon, he plays Chris Turk, one of
Speaker 1: the main characters. Great character. There we go. We might
Speaker 1: have to check it out this weekend. Team, rest up, relax,
Speaker 1: recharge this weekend. All right, those are your orders, because
Speaker 1: on Monday, we're back in the fight for this election.
Speaker 1: Shields High