WEBVTT - China Hits Pause on Giant Chip Spending

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanevik. We're here every day bringing you the latest

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>news from the world's of business and finance, plus technology, politics, economics,

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>all harnessing the power of Business Week reporters and editors,

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>not to mention our journalists and analyst in more than

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>one twenty countries. You can download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com. You can also listen to our

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>or stream us live on YouTube and Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, right now, we want to get to another

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>story that caught our attention, certainly earlier in the day,

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and that is what's going on in the chip space.

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Some news out of China pausing massive investments aimed at

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>building a chip industry to compete with the US as

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>a nationwide COVID resurgence strains the world's number two economy

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and Beijing's finances. Tim, we have a great voice when

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>it comes to what's going on in global Semis very

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>pleased to have back with us. Chris Miller. He's the

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>author of Chip War. It's the fight for the World's

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>most critical Technology. Chris's associate professor of international history at

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.559
<v Speaker 1>Tufts University. He joins us once again via zoom for Boston.

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I do want to note that Chris's book was recently

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>highlighted in a selection of the best business books of

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the year from the New York Times. Chris, good to

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>have you back with us. Uh, this exclusive from our

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>team here at Bloomberg News. How should our investing audience

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>understand China potentially scaling back its investments to compete with

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>international ship manufacturers. Well, I would say first off that

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>we need to wait for more information and corroboration from

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>China to see how true uh this is. I don't

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>doubt the report itself, but the Chinese policy making process

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>works in complicated ways, and focusing on domesticating semiconductor technology

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>has been a core goal of the Chinese government since

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and so it would really be a dramatic shift if

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>overnight China where to really scale back ship making. Somebodies,

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>especially because it would only about a month ago when

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>China announced over a hundred billion dollars of new subsidies

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>for the chip industry. So I think we need to

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>wait for some more information to understand what exactly does

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this new report mean in the context of what China's

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>policy has been for almost a decade. Chris, that's a

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>great point. I do feel like sometimes I'm getting smacked

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in many directions when it comes to China policy and

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to make sense of what are they really doing,

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>especially for a country that we know lays out long

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>term policy. Chips are in everything chip. You know, China

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>has come out very clearly and said it wants to

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>dominate on a higher technology level, right, So I mean

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>having said that, you know, we're seeing the socks you know,

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a rally today. Again, we kind

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of have to wait longer term, but doesn't it I mean,

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>just using our brains say that China is gonna have

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to invest in this space because this is the future. Well,

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I certainly think that's been what China's signaled over the

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>path decade, both from officials with high up the changing

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>paying all the way down until local level. We've heard

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of uh Chinese visual talk about the industry

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>being important, and if you look at the Chinese economy, um,

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 1>whether it's manufacturing or the tech sector, there's deep reliance

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>on sem conductors, and today China has been more money

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>importing chips that's been importing oil. So there's a really

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>strong rationale for China to want to domesticate. Uh. Some

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of that it has to import from abroad. On the

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>other hand, though, it is the case that the restrictions

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the US imposed on China late last year are really

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>top and it will just be really expensive to get around,

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>So it would be economically rational I think for China

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to recognize the ways it's just going to have to

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>remain reliant on important technology. But it hasn't in the

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>past focused on economic issues when national security is in play. Hey, Chris, Uh,

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking over the last few months about investments

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that companies including Intel, TSMC, and more have made in

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the US in places like Ohio, Arizona, and more. When

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it comes to building facility, these that perhaps one day

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>will build chips or parts of chips up on the

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>supply chain. Uh. What more do you think the American

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>government needs needs to do in order to uh spur

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>innovation manufacturing here at home? How would you advise policymakers

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>if you were doing that. I think the first thing

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the US needs to do and is doing is implement

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the policies that have already been passed. The Congress pass

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>the chip stacked last year, but it's still in the

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>really early stages of implementation, and it's going to take

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years to have all of the changes

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that were put into that law actually enacted and the

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>incentive programs dispersed. The other fact of this is that

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a key input the company's decisions about where to UH

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>where to invest is tact policy, and in the past,

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>US tact policy has been much less favorable to UH

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>some anconductor investment and then in places like Taiwan or

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in China, and so right now that the key area

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>of focus is making sure that the US has the

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>best tax policy UH in terms of providing deductions for

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing investment in low tax rates to make it viable

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to operate a semi facility here relative to other countries

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that have lower taxes. I mean, Chris in some ways,

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>like as you say, you know microchips, semis, you know

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the new oil. So I do wonder do we think

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>about kind of the model of the Middle East, right

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and their dominance and control and hold over most of

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the world, certainly the developed world for decades, you know,

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:31.679
<v Speaker 1>is that the model could you know essentially, if one player,

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it's China, whether it's the US, is a dominant

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>player when it comes to semis is that how we

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>need to think about it. Well, the chip industry is

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>actually much more concentrated than even the oil industry. We

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>think of Thoudy as being really important, but the study

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>produced only fifteen or so percent of the world oil,

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>whereas Taiwan produces of the world's most advanced processor chips.

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:00.039
<v Speaker 1>But even more concentration and therefore even more risk of

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to your political disruption when it comes to semiconductors relative

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>uh to oil. And that's why the concept of a

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>chip war is is so important, not just for the

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>security implications, but also for the economic implications, because it's

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>far worse in terms of it's not kind of effect

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>than just the disruptions to the oil larks that we've

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>seen with the Russia stactions this year. You would imagine,

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, a disruption to its high want ability to

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>exupport chips. Does the world outside of China have what

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it takes to actually cut China out of the process

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>at any point in the next decade, Well, China is

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>already far cut off, cut out of the process of

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>making advanced chips. China can't make the most advanced ships

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and because of the latest U S controls, it won't

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>be able to make the second generation most advanced ships

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>going forward. China can make fairly low TEX chips and

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it will be able to UH for some time. But

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>China is really not a major player when it comes

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to advanced ships. Where things stand today, what does it

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>mean to you? We know t SMC, what investing some

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>forty billion UH in that US plant here, giant US

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>planted in the United States. Um, is that a new

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>t SMC going forward in terms of being here, having

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a physical presence and just got about thirty seconds. Well,

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a big change for t SNC to have major

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>facilities outside of Taiwan. Before this year, t SMC had

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>almost volve its manufacturing in Taiwan and just a little

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>bit in China. So t SMC becoming a more globalized

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>company as it invests in the US and also in Japan,

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe down the road in Europe too. Yeah, that investment

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>by t SMC one of the largest foreign investments in

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States and the largest I believe in the

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>State of Arizona. So pretty big deal, Chris Miller, you

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>are a big deal. Associate Professor of International History at

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Tufts University. Check out his book Chip Or The Fight

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>for the World's Most Critical Technology as to mention, recently

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>winning the Book of the Year award from The Financial Times.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Tim Stanovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well McDonald's

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>commitment to Russia a long and deep, nothing short of

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a revolution to make it all happen, officially creating a

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>restaurant from the ground up more than three decades ago. Well,

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming new issue of Bloomberg business Week, Bloomberg's Clint Rainy,

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a contributor to the magazine, takes us throughout the iconic

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>fast foods journey that changed the way Russia did business

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and how it all came to an end. We've got

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>with us this afternoon. Bloomberg Business Week editor Joel Weber,

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>who's in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. Jeremy Keane joins

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>us as well. These Business Week Features editor on the

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>phone from New York City, Joel, I want to start

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>with you just give us an idea of how this

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>story came together, because it's a real deep dive into

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>sort of McDonald's history. And really, you know, when when

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the Russia's invasion of Ukraine happened, McDonald's did something that

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it's never done in its history. Yeah. So the story

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>begins thirty three years ago, in three weeks and that's

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that's um the day that McDonald's opened up in Pushing

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Square in Moscow and basically brought capitalism to Russia. And boy,

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a really interesting, uh storyline to be thinking about

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>over the past year. And I think actually one of

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the big business stories of last year was to watch

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>business russell with what to do with Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of companies immediately left, others got stuck

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in the middle for a while, and some are still

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>there and quietly kind of trying to figure out what

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>their moves are. McDonald's was one that got called out

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>early and then walked away. Um and that was um

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>no doubt of really trying business conversation within the company

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>because of this kind of amazing history story. Is that

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to me, this is the kind of story that we

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>do every once in a while. It feels like the

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:50.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing of business school is going to talk

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.439
<v Speaker 1>about forever, which is, boy, you have a success story

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, maybe a situation out of your

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>control makes you have to reevaluate what you're doing. And

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, in this case, Russia um ended up walking

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>away from from this. McDonald's end up walking away from

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>this really interesting story. Um. But you know, Jeremy, the

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that I found that was so interesting here was

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that the raw ingredients that you need to make uh

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for McDonald's, Russia has them, but they weren't. They weren't

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>really you know, turning it into Big Max to start with.

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>But you think, you know, dairy potatoes, meat bread, those

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>are all like raw ingredients that you would need to

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>make McDonald's happen. So what was the magic that allowed

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>McDonald's to crack Russia initially? Yeah, so, I mean they

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>had a first mover advantage because the George Collen, a

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>longtime executive McDonald has kind of made it his mission

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 1>to get into the Soviet Union. That took him a

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>very long time to kind of work through the communist

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>bureaucracy and get permission to do that. And then you know,

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they were sort of the first of these Western companies

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to me in there. UM and you know, a bunch

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of others uh followed over over the nineties and into

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand's UM, but you know McDonald's initially it

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>caught on quickly because it was a symbol of capitalism.

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>It was something that I think Russians were hungry for

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>at that moment, that terrible pun sorry, uh, at that

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>moment in history and UM and then and then it

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of worked that advantage, you know, it built on it.

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>They what old talking about is UM over the two

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>thousands in particular, you know that they developed they realized

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that they needed to do a better job of working

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>with Russian ingredients, that they had everything available, and started

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.839
<v Speaker 1>building this this big supply chain to complement the the

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.599
<v Speaker 1>operation that they that they developed to you know, to

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>service the restaurants themselves. And they built it out and

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>built it out to the point that you know, by

0:11:56.040 --> 0:12:00.599
<v Speaker 1>the time Putin came along, UM and and now nationalism

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>increased in Russia, they were able to say like, well,

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>look like we're already very Russian in terms of you

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>look at our supply chain and and the way that

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we do you know, even the potatoes for their fries,

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>which they know they struggled to find. Really, even the

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>Russia produces a lot of potatoes, they struggled to find

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the ones that would produce the Christmas that they were

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>after with surprise, and you know, after a long time

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>they eventually figured that out too. So you know, for them,

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>they had they had invested and kind of built deep

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.599
<v Speaker 1>roots in the country by the time the envision of

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine happened, and you know they yah, it's pretty incredible. Jeremy,

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>just to share, well, actually, before I get to these numbers, Clint,

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>did you know, go a few years ago and actually

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>eat at the restaurant and pushkin square and he does,

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>right that it actually seems like a big mac or

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you know what they call it there. You know, I

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>actually don't even know what they call it in Russia.

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Helped me out, y'all um, but it's it's the Jeremy,

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>what is it? The mac uh? What macdac is McDonald's that. Yeah,

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's pretty you know, he said it did actually

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>taste better there, and you know they said, oh, well,

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that's because all the ingredients come come locally. But I

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the economic impact of the restaurant

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>on the country. H In the chain purchased about four

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of Russia's potatoes, two percent of its cheese, paid

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars in taxes h during the years of

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>this study, so between roughly by it accounted for seven

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>percent of all Russian restaurants sales. So what's going on

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>now with sort of the I don't want to call

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it a reinvention, but a rebrand of the existing McDonald's,

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>which they were close to a thousand. Yeah, so they

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>basically sold, they suspended operations and then sold all their

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>assets to Alexander go our Um Mining Executive and he

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Um spent Um. They rebranded it of Crucial which tasty

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>period and kind of continued along the way that they were.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Clint gets into the story. It's kind

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of a sub sub theme of the story that there

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>was sort of a long tradition of Russian imitators of

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>McDonald's who would pop up and try and do what

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>they were doing. Sometimes the the rip offs boiled down

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to even using essentially the same menus um and so

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and also over the years, like Russian

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>competitors responds, there are companies like Terra Mock, who speaks

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>with the CEO of that company, and they make their

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>BLEMI chain and they really followed McDonald's textbook too, so

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you know that the market I guess has become more

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>mature and there's more local options and that sort of thing.

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So there, you know, there there's local operators who are

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of doing what was going on before. And

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they also, I found not mistake and retained

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a fair bit of the staff um from before, so

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that you know they they have to some degree, I believe,

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>continued the operations and the brand. It's pretty incredible when

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, because it's like, wow, like McDonald's

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>came in, there's no mistaken McDonald's, Like anywhere you go

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world, every body knows what double Archers look like.

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And then all of a sudden, like kind of almost overnight,

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like this huge geopolitical catastrophe happens and then they're gone,

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>but yet the brand has been rebranded and like is

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>in new ownership now and yet sort of sort of

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>still there. It's it's wild. It's a really interesting story

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that I think, um, you know, before we totally wrap up,

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it's worth mentioning like how how big of a business?

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh deal? This was? You do think about how peace

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>schools too? Will like use that. It's like a case study, right,

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and like as a CEO of this, you know, hey,

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>your business is being impacted by events that you don't like.

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna do about it? All right? Thanks

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to Joe Weber, Editor Bloomberg Business Week. This story in

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. Jeremy Keane,

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Features editor Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg Radio. You're

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Tim

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio. We'll get into a Tessa and

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you can definitely be in the fast lane and it

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>can even use all up pilot, but be careful. She

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>got to stay awake in hands on the wheel. I

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>was wondering where that was going. We learned that lesson

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Tesla for a long time was in the Fascela in

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of the share price. But it's been a very

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>different story in the last year or so. Stock though

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>up today after twelve sell off yesterday, stuck still down

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>about from it's November one high. But Tim and I

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about this earlier, Tesla shares getting a boost thanks

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to Kathy Wood of our investment. She's been on a

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>buying spree really in the last couple of months as

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Tesla has really tanked and doing some big buying yesterday

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. And why wouldn't she, I mean back in

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>carried her to triple digit a triple digit returns and

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>really brought our invest to the forefront of Benny investors

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>mind with more on Tesla. Let's bring in Bloomberg News

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>technology reporter Dana Hole. She's a go to voice for

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>us on all things Tesla. She joins us on the

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>phone from San Francisco. Danna, good to have you with us.

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>What the conversation about Tesla in recent days, recent months

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>has really been about, well, a few things. One, supply

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and demand. We learned that, you know over the weekend

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>when we learned that deliveries for the most recent quarter

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>for the third time in a row, missed expectations. But

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it's also been one about Elon Musk and his focus

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and where that focus has been of late. What's top

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of mind for you and indeed for Tesla investors too,

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is they kind of determined, Well, Hey, where's this company

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>going to go in Yeah, I mean I think for

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a long time, you know, Tesla under promised and over delivered.

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Now it's kind of the opposite where they're over promising

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:27.959
<v Speaker 1>and under delivering, and that has investors really rattled. I mean,

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>if you'll remember, in the third quarter, Musk said that

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>there was going to be this epic year end, and

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>then they ended the year like missing not only like

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.479
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street consensus for delivery figures, but their own company

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>compiled consensus and thirty four cars were like still in transit,

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>which begs all these questions about like why can't they

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>figure out their logistical issues? Um? And then here we

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>are heading into three. Musk still seems to be very

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 1>focused on Twitter, the company that he bought in October. Um.

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>He has said that he'll eventually name him a new

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>CEO Twitter, but it's not clear who actually wants that job.

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter doesn't even have a board of directors. At Tesla,

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>there's only three named executive officers. Like, there's no clear

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 1>secession plan at Tesla, So it's sort of like how

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>stretched thin can this guy be? I mean, he already

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>runs SpaceX, so now he's basically running three companies and

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>no one company has his full attention. Well, sorry, Carolin,

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to cop in here. Is SpaceX a little

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>different because it has you know, Gwen Shotwell who sort

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of seems to be running day to day operations there

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And could that be some sort of model for what

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Tesla could be if he does indeed install some number two. Yes,

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think I think SpaceX is very different

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>when is the clear number two has been for quite

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>some time? And space X is a private company, um,

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, and its customers are like the military and NASA,

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>whereas well you're saying the government gives money to Elon

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 1>musk Oh, Yeah, has just want to confirm, like Tesla,

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Tesla sells a consumer facing product, and I mean you

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>know that. The two other named officers are Zach kirk Corn,

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the highly regarded CFO, and Drew Biglino, who is basically

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the CTO. But it's not like there's no clear number

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>two there. And then we've had a lot of reporting

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>here in Bloomberg recently about Tom Zoo, who's kind of ascendant.

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>He has been the guy overseeing Tesla China. He has

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>been brought in recently to kind of help with production

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in Texas and he seems to be like a rising

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>star at the company, but there has been no press

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>release or eight K or any announcement like promoting Tom officially.

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, well, so what's up with that? Like,

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just kind of time for Tesla to

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>fill out its bench and give some clarity as to

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>like what is Elon's Like, what is how is Elon

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>spending his time? I mean, um, so, yeah, it's and

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>people are just very rattled. I mean, beat beat is

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a beat, a miss as a miss. They were promising

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty year of rear growth and this year it was

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's a significant off the market. Tart,

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>That's that's significantly off the market from what they promised.

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So growing pains for Tesla distracted el On, you know,

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>and investors just not willing to give Ellen some space

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>and a break because we used to all the time,

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Our investors used to all the time. So how do you,

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.719
<v Speaker 1>from someone who has really watched the trajectory of this

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>company and of this individual, how do we assess it

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Like at this moment of time of the company's history.

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that we just have to remember the kind

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of larger macroeconomic picture, which is that Tesla was born

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in the last recession, got through the recession thanks to

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>funding from the Recovery Act and the Obama administration, and

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>then kind of ran wild in this era of low

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. That era is over, like the FED rates

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>are high, we are we are in an inflationary environment

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and Tesla cars still cost luckily sixty and you know,

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>so it's just a very different scenario. And I mean

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Ellen himself basically keeps bashing the said, you know, for

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>all of his problems, and um, so I don't want to.

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't so, I just want to It's like when

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the when the era of free money and low interest

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 1>rates and the you know it, it does change the

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>equations for cars as a whole. I mean, I think

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we're just sort of entering an environment where, um, you know,

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 1>people are thinking quite carefully about making a big purchase

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>like a vehicle. And you know, for a decade, Tesla

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>basically ran the field. And now there are other options.

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you want to buy an electric car,

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you can get a Rivian pickup truck. You can look

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>at you know, what Hyundai has to offer. I mean,

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Tesla is not the only game in town anymore? Do

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you feel like a Tesla buyer is the same as

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a Hyundai buyer, And forgive me, that's not like the

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>electric keyas the electric Undas are cool. I'm just saying, Okay,

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not making forgive me and it's it's better than

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the other. I just feel like they're different markets. Is

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that well? So I think for a long time people

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>were like, you know, the consumers weren't like, I want

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to buy an electric vehicle. They were like, I want

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>to buy a Tesla. But now you have this whole

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>swath of consumers that are like, I want to buy

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a Tesla. But I am really turned off by on

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Musk and his politics and his the things that he

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 1>said about Dr Fauci and the way that he's acting,

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm gonna look elsewhere and I'm gonna option shop.

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And so you're seeing like that core constituency, which for

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so long was like the liberal Californian who wanted to

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>save the planet, now like now just thinking twice about

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>buying a Tesla. I mean that said, you know, Tesla

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>cars still have the best range and the best charging

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure and the techne you know, and the best software.

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>And so it's not like there's going to be this

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>huge cannibalization. But for a long time, like there really

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't another electric car on the market and now there is.

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Danna back to this interest rates discussion because I mentioned

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this last week, but during my week the week before Christmas,

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Elon must did this Twitter spaces and he really bashed

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the idea of higher interest rates and UM. He's tweeted

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>about UM and he's he's talked about it being a

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>challenge for the company. But what what rings hollow to

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>me about that argument is that that's a that's an

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>environment that every single company out there has to face.

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Higher interest rates are not unique to Tesla, Folkswagon, everybody

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>out there, Microsoft, Apple, we all live in a higher

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>interest rate environment. Yeah, no, we do for sure, and UM.

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>And so it's interesting. So it's just sort of interesting

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that he's he's kind of blaming the macro and not

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>taking any responsibility for his own action. I mean, the

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>same thing to do would have been on the last quarter.

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>They could have they could have lowered their guidance. They

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>could have said, listen, we've got disibility into you know,

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>orders for the for the fourth quarter, we're we're heading

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>into and you know, we're heading into a downturn. You know,

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we originally gave guidance year year growth. Now I think

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.199
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be closer, but they didn't do that.

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you'd listen to the call, Zach Kirkhorn

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>was very like, sort of frugal and kind of was

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>like we we might be short of fifty percent, and

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>then Ellen was like, no, no, it's going to be

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>an epic year end. And so it's like, come on,

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>like just be honest with your investors. I mean, I

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's that's what's happening here. You're sharing me

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>see cracks in people believing what Elon has said. Kathy

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>what is still a believer? Oh yeah? And like for

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>long term fans, I mean they see this as like

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a once in a generation buying opportunity, you know. And

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's people on Twitter that I've talked about

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>mortgaging their houses so that they can load up on

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>more shares because it's never been this cheap. Um. I mean,

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>we shall see, you know, I mean the you know,

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the stock could make a comeback. I

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>mean when it drops as far as it did in two.

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>There's you know, it's like how there's only sort of

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 1>one way to go. I mean, I guess, I mean

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it could drop further, of course, but like you know,

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>they could climb, it could also climb back. Um. But

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just it's just it's just so fascinating. I mean,

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>if you had told me in the beginning of that

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk was gone by Twitter and that the company,

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and that the company would lose two thirds of its value,

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I would have never ever forecast that. And uh so

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>here we are at the beginning of the new year,

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, what's the theme for this year? Um?

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's like Ellen's got to make a decision,

0:24:57.960 --> 0:24:59.719
<v Speaker 1>like where is he going to focus his energy? Like

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>being a CEO is not a part time job, and

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>he's basically the CEO of three companies and overseeing two

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>other startups. As I've said before, Peter Attward always reminds me,

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm always say when it comes to Ellen, where weary

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of him and wary of him because you just never

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>quite know where it's going to go. Danna, I think

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I may have asked this type of question for you before.

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I've only got about thirty seconds. But if you could

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>sit down with Ellen and ask him one one question,

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>what would it be? When are you gonna when are

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 1>you going to name a CEO at Tesla? And who isn't? Okay,

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what the new year brings. Um, maybe an

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>interview with Musque, Danna, I don't think why would he

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>so he doesn't need to interview with me. He'll just

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>go on Twitter speed and heard it out. It's so true,

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>right if they would need a PR department to to

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>start with it. Well, gets a lot of attention, Danna.

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Thank you as always, looking forward to all your reporting

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:52.719
<v Speaker 1>in the new year. Donna Hall, she is a go

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>to voice for us when it comes to Tesla and

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk. We've said it before, because it's true. Donna's

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News Technology reporter joining us on the phone. Uh

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco shares a Tesla. Right now, they are

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>up about five percent, but as we know, way way

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>down from their high back in one. All right, you're

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>listening watching Bloomberg Business Week, Carol Master, Tim Steinfeck. This

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Radio. I'm Brolo Maca turn on. Yeah, but

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you let me drive. No, no, no no, who's all right, please,

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the riding gravels. I want to drive. It's

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a good question. Drive this good ride to the clothes

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>well Briar on Bloomberg Radio. All Right, folks, just got

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>about eighteen minutes left in today's trading session. We've got

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>stocks up and down, if you will, off our highs

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>and loads of this session, still down on the Dow

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Jones Industrial average. And now i's like just going back

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>into the red. Of course, Charlie breaking down the numbers here.

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>We've got a great guest to talk about those fed

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>minutes and a way forward here in very please to

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>app back with us. Liz Young, head of investment Strategy.

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>It's so Fi Technologies. It's the online personal finance services company.

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>She joins us from New York this afternoon. Liz, Happy

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>New year. How are you? Happy New Year to you?

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I am, well, hopefully in for a better year than

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the question. I think one person who's kind

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of in charge of that right now is true Oo

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>and Powell at the Federal Reserve kind of you know,

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>putting a little uh damper on the enthusiasm that we

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 1>got earlier in the day when those minutes came out

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>at two o'clock today. What was your read on the

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>way that the FED talked about not pivoting in and

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 1>not cutting rates in twenty three and how that kind

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 1>of goes against what the tone of the market has been,

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>at least in the first part of December. Well, well, look,

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at what happened in December,

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it was actually not a very good month all things considered.

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>We were down seven percent in a month that we

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 1>were supposed to have seasonal tail winds, and there might

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have been a year end rally. None of that ever

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>really materialized. So I think what happened so far in

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 1>three is that the sentiment, that bearish sentiment, the selling sentiment,

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>has carried over. Obviously, we've seen a couple of swings

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>today and we're only two days in, so we can't

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 1>really talk about this as a year to date situation yet.

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But what we heard from the Fed again is the

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 1>same thing that we keep hearing. And I don't know

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>why people are hoping that they're going to change their minds,

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>because the data has not shown them that they should

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>change their minds. So we are going to continue hearing

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>from them that they intend to fight inflation, They intend

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates up to a point that is probably

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>close to five percent, and that they don't intend to

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>cut rates in Now that being said, everything that they

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>intend to do obviously will change if there is an

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>event that would change their minds or change the sentiment

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in the market. So if the consensus view is that

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>we have a recession in three, that likely pulls the

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Fed's reaction function forward, and I would expect to see

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more of a dubbish conversation later in

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the year, but that's just not something that we're going

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to know in the first quarter of this year. So

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we just don't know, right So would you love to

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of fast forward list like six months from now.

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like there'll be more clarity. Yes, I

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>think there'll be more clarity at the end of the

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>first quarter, and the way that the market is pricing

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it in right now, we're going to see a twenty

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>five basis point hike in February and another one in March,

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and that might be it. So we may know by

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of the first quarter that they're done hiking rates,

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll just move to the question of Okay,

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>how long do they keep rates this high? And that's

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>really more along the lines of what does the economy

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.719
<v Speaker 1>look like in the meantime and our capital markets functioning

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in a healthy manner. Now, when I want to be

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>really clear here, capital markets functioning in a healthy manner

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean always going up. They can go down. We

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>can continue to see draw downs, and we can see

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a drawdown beyond if we're going into a recession. The

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>FED would not likely characterize that as an unhealthy thing.

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want investors to get kind of twisted

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>with the idea that, my gosh, if the market goes

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>down that means they'll pivot. That is not at all

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the case. So we do not think, Lisen, that the

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>recession is already factored in in the markets. You don't.

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I do not think it's already factored and I think

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten close. So the biggest drawdown that we saw

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in from from a peak to a trough in was

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty mild when you look at the context of

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>prior recessionary drawdowns. Usually a recessionary drawdown is beyond and

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>actually on average beyond we may not get down that far,

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it's all entirely priced in yet

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think there are a decent amount of investors

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>still hoping for that soft landing. The soft landing is

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe what's priced And yet some individual names you could

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>argue maybe could be in a recession, a pretty deep recession,

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>right do you So are they outliers exceptional cases? How

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think about that? Uh? They're not necessarily outliers.

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>And I can't speak to specific names, but if you

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>just look at basically the industry groups, the sectors that

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>have been hit hardest, that are beyond that draw down,

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>those are the ones that were most sensitive to an

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>environment like this, or the ones that enjoyed so much

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of the upside before this environment began, So there was

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot more to give back and there was a

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>lot more to bring back in balance, Also, this has

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>affected different parts of the economy at different speeds. So

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>right now we're sort of sitting on this waiting game

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of when will it affect the consumer and when will

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it affect the labor market? I think actually once the

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>labor market gets affected is when the consumer pulls back

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>meaningfully and they're spending, and then we start to see

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that in the data. But because it's happened at different speeds.

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>It's also happened at different speeds in the market, and

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>different sectors have taken it on the chin more than others.

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Is there any indication to you that we're getting any

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>closer to a time when this will affect the labor market?

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at the Jolts number that we got

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>this morning, another another strong report for employees right now,

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean people who are looking for a job there,

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what, one point seven jobs for every person

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>looking for one. Yeah, a Jolts data certainly has not

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:05.479
<v Speaker 1>shown any meaningful weakness yet. But I would point out

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that that Jolts number was from November. So when we

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>start to get the December data in labor, I think

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that that will be the first month where we say,

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what, things changed a little bit when we

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>have to look back on it. Right this might be

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>in May that we're looking back on December data and

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>saying that that was the month that it changed. But

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I do think we're going to start to see weakness.

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I say that is because we heard

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of those tech layoffs, but technology really

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make up that big of a portion of the

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>labor force. In December, we started to hear about layoffs

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and other sectors. It bled into some of the big banks,

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>We heard about it across other sectors of the economy,

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's when it starts to hit the actual data,

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the monthly data that we hear from jobs and also

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the continuing claims information that we've gotten has shown a

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty decidedly upward move in claims. That's been consistent over

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks. So continuing claims is people that

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>have been claiming jobless for more than two weeks. So

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>once that starts to bake into the data too, we'll

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>see it in the monthly numbers. Interesting year. I feel

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>like it could be another tricky year. Having said that,

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>what do you think investors should watch more closely that's

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be more accurate and kind of of where

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>we are and where we're going. The bond market or

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the equity marketing just got about thirty seconds. Well, if

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you read my outlook or anything that I've written in

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty days, I think the bond market has

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>this right. But when I say bond market, I mean

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the treasury market, and the treasury market is calling for

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a recession. I think the credit market has yet to

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>really get that message, so we'll probably see spread blowout

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. Alright, Gonna leave it on that note, Hey, listen,

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Liz Young, Happy New Year. She's

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>head of investment strategy over its so Fi Technologies, the

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>online personal financial services company, joining us as you saw

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>via zoom For those who are watching on YouTube and

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quicktakes, she's there in New York City. Thanks for

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com. You can also listen to our

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 1>stream us live on YouTube and Bloomberg dot com