Speaker 1: It is eight hundred and nine four one sewn. If
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. Well,
Speaker 1: she's back right now. Favorite congresswoman who speaks for the
Speaker 1: radical extreme Democrats in Congress is apparently going into Congress.
Speaker 1: You have a message for Elon Musk. I bet most
Speaker 1: of you in your mind's eye right now can guess
Speaker 1: what she probably says.
Speaker 2: Let's play it. If you could speak directly to Elon Musk,
Speaker 2: what would you say?
Speaker 3: That's it?
Speaker 1: You got him, he really did. I'm sure his feelings
Speaker 1: are hurt. It's just they will never get it. I
Speaker 1: did this this interview for a website called Mediaite, and
Speaker 1: maybe we'll post it on Hannity social media. But and
Speaker 1: I explain now why I said in seven that journalism
Speaker 1: is dead, and then after this election, legacy media is dead.
Speaker 1: And they are and in large part because they get
Speaker 1: everything wrong and they have a political agenda and they
Speaker 1: light to their audiences and as a result, they have
Speaker 1: lost all trust from the people that used to watch them.
Speaker 1: Interesting to watch, you know. Conspiracy theorist, extraordinary, not exactly
Speaker 1: a truth teller in her own right, went along with
Speaker 1: the Russian Live. We played her yesterday saying that if
Speaker 1: you get the shot, you're not going to get COVID,
Speaker 1: and if you get the shot, you're not going to
Speaker 1: infect others, going along with government talking points. Rachel Maddow
Speaker 1: angry over the firing of Joy Reid at MSDNC and
Speaker 1: how it was mistake and even inferring it was related
Speaker 1: to race.
Speaker 4: In all of the jobs I have had, in all
Speaker 4: of the years I have been alive, there is no
Speaker 4: colleague for whom I have had more affection and more
Speaker 4: respect than Joy read I love everything about her. I
Speaker 4: have learned so much from her. I have so much
Speaker 4: more to learn from her. I do not want to
Speaker 4: lose her as a colleague here at MSNBC, and personally,
Speaker 4: I think it is a bad mistake to let her
Speaker 4: walk out the door. It is not my call and
Speaker 4: I understand that, but that's what I think.
Speaker 1: I will tell you.
Speaker 4: It is also unnerving to see that on a network
Speaker 4: where we've got two count of two non white hosts
Speaker 4: in primetime, both of our non white hosts in primetime
Speaker 4: are losing their shows, as is Katie Fang on the Weekend,
Speaker 4: and that feels worse than bad no matter who replaces.
Speaker 4: Now that feels indefensible, and I do not defend it.
Speaker 2: So who is she talking about? Enjoy reading?
Speaker 1: And look what they do over there has no impact
Speaker 1: on my life, to be very honest, and I only
Speaker 1: get has impact on anybody else's life because if it did,
Speaker 1: they would have done a lot better in this election
Speaker 1: because they were deep part in the paint with fascist
Speaker 1: racist Hitler Mussolini. I mean, I even got a cut
Speaker 1: of joy read Fascism is already here, et cetera.
Speaker 2: But just who is she defending? Let's listen, and the.
Speaker 5: Potito family certainly deserve answers and justice. But the way
Speaker 5: this story has captivated the nation has many wondering why
Speaker 5: not the same media attention when people of color go missing? Well,
Speaker 5: the answer actually has a name, missing white woman syndrome.
Speaker 5: But I do hope that as a senator, you'll prove
Speaker 5: those who call you a token wrong. Gotta love the
Speaker 5: Tim Scott standing there to provide the patina of diversity
Speaker 5: over that round of words at a basketful of words.
Speaker 5: Guarantee you if that was a Black Lives Matter protest.
Speaker 2: In DC, there.
Speaker 5: Would already be people shackled, arrested, or dead. So for
Speaker 5: so many reasons, being a freeloader and a selfish and
Speaker 5: disrespectful one, and for misappropriating Black vernacular for misogenistic purposes.
Speaker 4: Elon Musk is the absolute worst.
Speaker 5: If somehow they managed to stumble into the Supreme Court,
Speaker 5: do any of you guys trust Uncle Clarence and Amy
Speaker 5: Cony Barrett and those guys to actually follow the.
Speaker 1: Letter of the law.
Speaker 5: No, all right, can even ever begin to read out
Speaker 5: tonight with a message to Republicans.
Speaker 2: Okay, we get it.
Speaker 5: COVID is the precious and you love it. Now are
Speaker 5: we have a Republican party that not only at its base,
Speaker 5: is becoming putinite pro pudent.
Speaker 2: This fourth brag.
Speaker 5: Renaming falls under the performative, But the other half, which
Speaker 5: is far more serious, sure looks like an attempt to
Speaker 5: resegregate the military.
Speaker 6: And I thought you would go astronaut keeping it real,
Speaker 6: He to me, would have been the safest, most conventionally safe.
Speaker 6: Pick white, super white, like you know, mayonnaise sandwich on
Speaker 6: wonderbread white from the you know, from a border state.
Speaker 5: Similar similarities to what happened in Germany and what's happening
Speaker 5: now in America are just undeniable. History may not repeat verbatim,
Speaker 5: but it sure does.
Speaker 3: Rhyme.
Speaker 5: Make your own dinner, Mega, make your own sandwiches, wipe
Speaker 5: your own tears, troll amongst yourselves with Elon, and leave
Speaker 5: us alone. You got your heart's desire, the president you
Speaker 5: dreamed of and worship instead of Jesus. And this time
Speaker 5: you didn't even have to storm the capital, smash the windows,
Speaker 5: or try to kill police officers or issue death threats
Speaker 5: to bool workers. See, when you are in the midst
Speaker 5: of a crisis, and specifically a crisis of democracy, how
Speaker 5: do you resist when fascism isn't just coming, it's already here.
Speaker 5: So what if anything can you do about it?
Speaker 1: All right, joining us to analyze what I believe is
Speaker 1: the death of legacy media and the frankly, the end
Speaker 1: of the modern Democratic Party is it has now embraced
Speaker 1: radicalism and an agenda that favors the rights of illegals
Speaker 1: over the safety of Americans and men's rights. They champion
Speaker 1: men's rights to play in women's sports, and of course
Speaker 1: they want to justify tens and tens and tens what
Speaker 1: will be hundreds of billions of dollars in waste, fraud, abuse,
Speaker 1: and corruptions spent abroad to advance their radicalism without the
Speaker 1: transparency you would expect from Congress anyway. As our friend
Speaker 1: Miranda Divine, author of the number one best seller of
Speaker 1: The Big Guy, How a President and his Son Sold
Speaker 1: Out America? Miranda, do you agree with me legacy media
Speaker 1: is dead? Do you agree with me that what we
Speaker 1: are witnessing with in Congress is you know, they now
Speaker 1: have the lowest approval rating ever is kind of the
Speaker 1: end and the death of the old Democratic Party too.
Speaker 7: Yeah, Hi, Sean, Look, I think what I would say
Speaker 7: is not necessarily legacy media, because I guess that's what
Speaker 7: we are at the New York Post and the Fox
Speaker 7: News and so on. I think propaganda media is dead.
Speaker 7: I think that whether it be MSNBC or the New
Speaker 7: York Times, Washington Post, the clock is ticking for them
Speaker 7: when they just continue to gaslight and lie to their
Speaker 7: audiences because their audiences are wise to them. And we
Speaker 7: saw that at the last election, when suddenly people realized
Speaker 7: that you know, Donald Trump was not hitler, that the
Speaker 7: lawfair against him was completely unjust and unjustified, and that.
Speaker 3: You know, they looked at the.
Speaker 7: Assassination attempt against him in Butler and the way he responded,
Speaker 7: and they thought, hey, that's not the guy that I've
Speaker 7: been told that Donald Trump is by my favorite media organs,
Speaker 7: And so they switched off. And you see, you just
Speaker 7: played all that litany of disasters from Joy Reid. Her audience,
Speaker 7: like all her saddlemate's audience at MSNBC, has been cut
Speaker 7: by a half. They've lost half their audience since the elections.
Speaker 7: And that's because the air audience, even those people who've
Speaker 7: been brainwashed and propagandized for years by Joy Reid's particularly
Speaker 7: toxic brand of poison and Rachel meadows slightly more sophisticated
Speaker 7: brand of poison, they won't. The audience woke up and said,
Speaker 7: you aligned to if we're done with you, And I
Speaker 7: think that is lethal. The same goes for the Democratic Party,
Speaker 7: because of course MSNBC is just a mouthpiece for the
Speaker 7: Democratic Party and they're a washed up outfit. Unless they
Speaker 7: change direction, they show no sign of doing that, they're dead.
Speaker 2: Well. I would make an exception.
Speaker 1: There are a few legacy media outlets like the New
Speaker 1: York Post where where I think you're the top columnist,
Speaker 1: or we'll certainly invite at the top to me and
Speaker 1: one of the best authors and investigative reporters in the country,
Speaker 1: and you tell truth, and that is a rare exception
Speaker 1: in legacy media. Okay, I would argue that new media
Speaker 1: began with talk radio, it extended out into Fox News,
Speaker 1: and because Fox is so distinctly different, I don't really
Speaker 1: count it among legacy media. And we're fairly relatively speaking.
Speaker 1: I've made an observation and then this interview that I
Speaker 1: gave to media that I think the model of Fox
Speaker 1: News and talk radio is going to be studied for
Speaker 1: decades and decades and decades to come because of what.
Speaker 2: A phenomenon it was.
Speaker 1: And trust me, they gave us no shot of success
Speaker 1: when we started.
Speaker 2: We were laughed at.
Speaker 7: Yes, that's so true, and yes I agree. I mean
Speaker 7: New York Posts you could not say it's anything but
Speaker 7: legacy because it's the oldest newspaper in the country. But
Speaker 7: I think what Fox News did and what was it's
Speaker 7: sort of brilliance apart from you know, great packaging and
Speaker 7: much pressure, which really was a pioneering venture, but also
Speaker 7: it just gave voice or was middle of the road,
Speaker 7: you know, all the news that fit to print, which
Speaker 7: is used to be the New York Times motto. It
Speaker 7: was fair and balanced, and that was the Fox News motto.
Speaker 7: And you know, you put it up against CNN or
Speaker 7: MSNBC any day and you will get different voices. You
Speaker 7: get Democrats on Fox News. Obviously the preponderance is conservatives,
Speaker 7: but there still are democratic voices. And that makes it
Speaker 7: more interesting because you see the ying and the yang
Speaker 7: and not treating the audience like a bunch of idiots
Speaker 7: that are brainwashed. We trust the audience to, you know,
Speaker 7: understand an issue and make up their own minds. And
Speaker 7: I think that's where MSNBC goes so wrong, because they
Speaker 7: just shove their viewpoint down their audience's gullet and they
Speaker 7: cannot abide any kind of you know, difference. CNN's a
Speaker 7: little different. I think they're trying hard lately to change
Speaker 7: the diet a bit. They've got a couple of Republicans
Speaker 7: on there, who who in their panels. They're obviously outnumbered,
Speaker 7: but they managed to hold their own. So I think
Speaker 7: that's showing to see an audiences that.
Speaker 8: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I just saw a clip of fake Jake Tapper and
Speaker 1: he goes on a rant against Donald Trump and the
Speaker 1: guy considers himself quoted journalist. I think that's the whole
Speaker 1: premise is is they consider themselves newspeople and journalists. And
Speaker 1: I make a very clear distinction about who I am
Speaker 1: and what my job description is and what I do.
Speaker 1: I'm a talk show host. Yes, I'm a member of
Speaker 1: the press, and we do straight news. I can produce
Speaker 1: thousands of hours of it, investigative reporting. I can produce
Speaker 1: thousands of hours of that. We do opinion. I'm up front.
Speaker 1: I was very clear with the audience like I am.
Speaker 1: Every election, I voted for Donald Trump and advocated for him,
Speaker 1: so on the editorial page, and then we do culture
Speaker 1: and sports and other issues of the day. I consider
Speaker 1: myself an entire newspaper and as a member of the press.
Speaker 1: They claim their journalists, they're not journalists, Miranda. They lie
Speaker 1: about what they are and what they do.
Speaker 7: Yeah, I think that once you've lost your way, I
Speaker 7: don't think that you perhaps should be calling yourself the journalist.
Speaker 7: But on the other hand, I think, you know, journalisms
Speaker 7: are pretty broad church and it has been produced, particularly
Speaker 7: since the Trump era began in twenty sixteen. I think
Speaker 7: a lot of people like the deep state, the intelligence community,
Speaker 7: a lot of journalists who had forged relationships with various spooks.
Speaker 7: They all lost their minds when Donald Trump came along.
Speaker 7: A journalists decided to remember the New York Times famously,
Speaker 7: the editor said, well, you know, these are different times,
Speaker 7: and we can't be objective when it comes to Donald Trump.
Speaker 7: And I think the same thing happened with the FBI
Speaker 7: and the CIA and so on. They just decided that
Speaker 7: they were not going to obey the commander in chief
Speaker 7: because it was Donald Trump. They were going to go
Speaker 7: off on their own little frolics. And you know, many
Speaker 7: disasters ensued until Donald Trump came back to try and
Speaker 7: take control of the government again. So it's always a
Speaker 7: dangerous path. And you know, their excuse was, especially the journalists,
Speaker 7: was that Donald Trump was an existential threat to quote democracy,
Speaker 7: whatever that means. And that was their justification for breaking
Speaker 7: every single rule in journalism, lying to people being completely biased,
Speaker 7: only following certain stories, censoring other stories like the laptop
Speaker 7: from Now.
Speaker 3: You know, that's not journalism.
Speaker 7: They showed none of the normal curiosity that journalism is
Speaker 7: meant to show. And you know, I'm an opinion journalist,
Speaker 7: I write opinion. I'm on the opinion page, I'm perfectly
Speaker 7: entitled to only give one side. But when you're on
Speaker 7: the news pages, and when I write news stories, which
Speaker 7: I do, I make sure that I give both sides.
Speaker 7: It's a very different genre, and there should be a
Speaker 7: difference between when you are a straight news journalist and
Speaker 7: when you're an opinion journalist. And I think for a
Speaker 7: lot of them, they've lost that objectivity. And certainly you
Speaker 7: see it in the news pages of once respected publications
Speaker 7: like the New York Times, in the Washington Post. You
Speaker 7: could read some of their news stories as if they
Speaker 7: were opinion columns.
Speaker 1: Oh well, nobody does it better than you. You thread
Speaker 1: that needle perfectly, Miranda Devine. We always appreciate you. Thank
Speaker 1: you so much for being one of us. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety four one. Shawn is our number. If you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. Quick break
Speaker 1: right back. We'll continue. All right, Let's get to our
Speaker 1: busy telephone, shall we. All right, we have Ray in Canada.
Speaker 1: I'm very unhappy with Canada right now, and I want
Speaker 1: Canada in the US to be the best allies ever
Speaker 1: as we have been for you know, however, many years
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty of plus years, and right now
Speaker 1: I feel that the Canadian people booing our national anthem
Speaker 1: threatening I saw this article yesterday threatening boycotts. Well, we're
Speaker 1: not going to come to America. Okay, they have what
Speaker 1: forty two million in their population America was three hundred
Speaker 1: and forty million. And I've never considered, never supported a
Speaker 1: boycott in my life, but if this gets legs, I
Speaker 1: might consider it anyway.
Speaker 2: Ray and Canada, How are you, sir, great John, how
Speaker 2: are you good? I'm glad? What's on your mind today?
Speaker 3: All the boycott's already begun. It began be poor the
Speaker 3: organized boycotts. People are buying. Canadian people aren't going to
Speaker 3: Florida in their trips, and they're just looking to sort
Speaker 3: of abrogate America basically and say, you know what, you've
Speaker 3: disrespected us to this point and we have to respond.
Speaker 3: I mean I booing the anthem, I think nobody should
Speaker 3: do anybody's anthem. That's disrespect for somebody.
Speaker 1: So you do you support this boycott of people traveling
Speaker 1: to America?
Speaker 3: I think people have to decide. But yeah, if they
Speaker 3: don't feel comfortable going to America because of this, then
Speaker 3: they shouldn't go There are other destinations they can go to,
Speaker 3: and it is okay.
Speaker 1: So when I tell this audience has about half your
Speaker 1: population of this radio show, and if I tell my
Speaker 1: audience that I'm supporting an America boycott of Canada, you're
Speaker 1: okay with that?
Speaker 3: Well, Trump is already dooing.
Speaker 2: Well, you don't like it.
Speaker 1: You wouldn't like it because there's three hundred and forty
Speaker 1: plus million Americans and you have a population of forty
Speaker 1: two million Canadians. And who would be more likely? Who
Speaker 1: would be hurt worse by that boycott?
Speaker 2: War?
Speaker 3: The number one visitor to Florida is Canadian citizens going
Speaker 3: to Florida.
Speaker 1: Who would be hurt more? Because there are plenty of
Speaker 1: Americans to go to Montreal and Quebec and Ontario and
Speaker 1: all sorts of places over Canada.
Speaker 2: Who who? In the end, do you think it's hurt
Speaker 2: more Canada or the US?
Speaker 3: I think we both get hurt with this, this whole
Speaker 3: thing that's going on.
Speaker 1: But forty two million versus three hundred and forty million,
Speaker 1: you're gonna get hurt worse. You're hurting yourself by doing this. Now,
Speaker 1: let me tell you why I have issues with Canada,
Speaker 1: and you tell me if you if these are legitimate concerns.
Speaker 1: You do know that Canada already, prior to Donald Trump
Speaker 1: winning this election, puts tariffs on American products.
Speaker 2: You are aware of.
Speaker 3: That, right, absolutely yes, and we have.
Speaker 1: To okay, okay, And you are aware that Canada has
Speaker 1: done nothing to stop you know, the inflow, the influx
Speaker 1: of illegal immigrants and securing their northern border.
Speaker 3: You do all that, right, absolutely untrue. We put a
Speaker 3: one point three billion towards that.
Speaker 1: Now only only only recently have you stepped up enforcement
Speaker 1: and a military presence on the border, and that's after
Speaker 1: Donald Trump threatened the tariffs, which he might go through
Speaker 1: with next week. You do know that Canada has not
Speaker 1: paid its fair share like America has to NATO.
Speaker 3: Right, I agree with you wholeheartedly. We have a twenty
Speaker 3: thirty point where we're trying to reach that two percent goal.
Speaker 3: It's already been.
Speaker 2: Okay, So Canada is not paying their fair share.
Speaker 1: And you do know that probably the greatest defense for Canada,
Speaker 1: if God forbid, something ever happens and you guys are
Speaker 1: in trouble, would be the United States of America.
Speaker 2: You are aware of that.
Speaker 3: Oh, it's always has been Absolutely, we have Nora D,
Speaker 3: we have protected We need America to do that, but
Speaker 3: America needs to do that as well. They're own protected.
Speaker 2: America has already been doing all of this.
Speaker 1: And then in comes Donald Trump and he's talked about
Speaker 1: something called reciprocal tariffs, and he's basically saying to Canada,
Speaker 1: pay your fair share for NATO alling you out on it,
Speaker 1: do a better job securing your border because we're being
Speaker 1: impacted greatly by it, and it's partly your responsibility too.
Speaker 1: And he is saying that if you're gonna put traye,
Speaker 1: if you're gonna put tariffs on us, we'll have to
Speaker 1: slap tariffs on you. And if you don't do these
Speaker 1: three things, that's really all he's asking, then it's going
Speaker 1: to result in America but is slapping a big fat
Speaker 1: tariff on Canada. Now, do you think that he's being
Speaker 1: unfair in saying that.
Speaker 3: Why tariff you have tariffs for like you're farming, for
Speaker 3: farming for your agriculture is to.
Speaker 1: Protect agriculture poultry that you you won't import any seeds
Speaker 1: from the United States. Uh so there's an outright ban
Speaker 1: of certain products. Yeah, I mean I think that's kind
Speaker 1: of unfair, don't.
Speaker 3: You don't you think, Sean, that a country needs to
Speaker 3: protect the ability for it to feed its people. That
Speaker 3: if if we don't protect our farmers in our industries,
Speaker 3: the Americans would because of your size. If you said,
Speaker 3: three hundred forty to forty million Tyson farms who could
Speaker 3: come in here and dump dump all kinds of products
Speaker 3: on us, destroyer farming, and we have the inability to
Speaker 3: feed ourselves.
Speaker 2: Nobody wants to hurt.
Speaker 1: Listen, if my goal for the US and Canada, just
Speaker 1: to be very clear is I want us to be
Speaker 1: good friends and neighbors.
Speaker 2: But it's a two way street.
Speaker 1: And I think that these three specific areas where Donald
Speaker 1: Trump has complaining, you're not pushing back, You're acknowledging these
Speaker 1: legitimate concerns, and that Canada probably could do a better
Speaker 1: job in terms of reciprocity.
Speaker 3: Oh absolutely, I think you're right on. We need to protect.
Speaker 1: So why doesn't Little Justin then just sit down with
Speaker 1: the president Because he's dumb, he's done, he's done well,
Speaker 1: he is done, and he's kind of dumb too. I'd
Speaker 1: argue he's both. And I'm not a big a Little
Speaker 1: Justin but I'm just saying it's frustrating to Americans when
Speaker 1: they learn these things, and Donald Trump, unlike every other politician,
Speaker 1: just refuses to let America be taken advantage of. I mean,
Speaker 1: on top of all of that, your national security is
Speaker 1: almost entirely dependent on the goodwill of the United States military,
Speaker 1: and that is a really, really great benefit to your
Speaker 1: friendship and partnership. So for all the people in Canada
Speaker 1: are friends in Canada. Because I'm not willing to go
Speaker 1: there yet that might be considering this boycott effort against
Speaker 1: the United States. Understand that America is going to respond
Speaker 1: in kind, and I might even join them, because I
Speaker 1: think it's so unfair and frankly unappreciative of what we do,
Speaker 1: and I think as part of a good friendship, I
Speaker 1: think that movement needs to stop.
Speaker 3: I don't disagree with you. I think it's I think
Speaker 3: remember that the security of Canada benefits the security of
Speaker 3: the United States. You need a protected north as much
Speaker 3: as we need to protect it north because if Russia
Speaker 3: and China start to invade the northwest past but.
Speaker 1: We're doing all the protecting for the most part. That's
Speaker 1: the problem. We're bearing the brunt of it.
Speaker 3: No, No, it's shared. We're we're we were all we
Speaker 3: have an agreement on new icebreakers. We haven't. Nora had
Speaker 3: to share. There is shared.
Speaker 2: I agree that there is some shared.
Speaker 1: There is there, there is some contribution, but the overwhelming
Speaker 1: majority is provided by the United States military.
Speaker 2: It's just a fact.
Speaker 3: Can I can I tell you like, I don't disagree
Speaker 3: with both.
Speaker 2: Listen, I want to get along.
Speaker 1: If I was Canada, the maybe maybe the one point
Speaker 1: of irritation you would have with Trump you haven't brought
Speaker 1: up yet, and that is when he says, well, Canada
Speaker 1: should be the fifty first state. Well, and what he's
Speaker 1: let me Let me tell you why I don't want
Speaker 1: Canada the fifty first state, because you're too liberal for me.
Speaker 1: You know, I mean, I know you. You have your
Speaker 1: single payer healthcare that most Canadians are stuck with. I
Speaker 1: know plenty of Canadians that don't like the system. And
Speaker 1: I know many wealthy Canadians that will come to the
Speaker 1: United States for medical care because they can't wait the
Speaker 1: six or eight months that they'd have to wait to
Speaker 1: get the treatment that the government so quote guaranteed them.
Speaker 1: But I think the better answer is I think that
Speaker 1: I would prefer the Canadians look objectively at whether or
Speaker 1: not they're they're they're being good partners on their and
Speaker 1: first and the benefits they have from the United States,
Speaker 1: and maybe it's time for them to step up as
Speaker 1: it relates to these these three issues. And I think
Speaker 1: if they do, I think all will all will go away.
Speaker 1: I think, I think, and then we'll go back to
Speaker 1: being best friends again.
Speaker 3: I think I know what it's like two siblings wedding
Speaker 3: older brother, younger brother. You know, you're getting on my
Speaker 3: nerves and right now you're having a time out right now.
Speaker 1: But honestly, look, Donald Trump is calling you guys out
Speaker 1: for things that you're acknowledging our work in favor of Canada,
Speaker 1: and you're kind of justifying on the on the tariff deal.
Speaker 1: I'm a free trader, free and fair trader, and this
Speaker 1: isn't free and fair when you're putting tariffs on us
Speaker 1: and you don't expect tariffs back on you.
Speaker 3: But the man that negotiated the USNC is saying that
Speaker 3: it's a foolish agreement. He basically said, to anybody of
Speaker 3: any of these agreements, they're fool But he negotiated it
Speaker 3: and find it so okay.
Speaker 1: But there's still gaps in the coverage of you. Well,
Speaker 1: so I would argue that it's time for Canada to
Speaker 1: do a better job at the border, pay their fair
Speaker 1: share for NATO, and I would have free and fair
Speaker 1: trade across the board, no tariffs on anybody, and we'd
Speaker 1: get along like you know, siblings, the way we should.
Speaker 3: It's not possible. I mean, we have to have to protect.
Speaker 1: Certainly you you're you're protecting your you're protecting your industries,
Speaker 1: and if the United States does it back, it's unfair.
Speaker 3: The United States has tariffs on softwood lumber as well.
Speaker 3: There's terroifts that are ingreened by the States to protect certain.
Speaker 1: That's what reciprocal That's what reciprocal tariffs is going to
Speaker 1: be about. But the problem is, I think that the
Speaker 1: Canadian economy is more reliant on the US economy than
Speaker 1: vice versa. I don't think that the In the end,
Speaker 1: I'd rather not have this conflict. In the end, I
Speaker 1: think it's in everyone's best interest to resolve these issues
Speaker 1: peacefully and as friends. And and I'll even tip my
Speaker 1: hat Canada won the hockey game is one of the
Speaker 1: closest best games I've ever seen.
Speaker 3: It was a great game. Actually, the game on Saturday
Speaker 3: with the three fights was the best game I ever
Speaker 3: saw that.
Speaker 2: It was great.
Speaker 1: Nine seconds in boom, gloves are off, Let's go game on.
Speaker 1: I loved every minute of it. All right, listen, Just
Speaker 1: something to think about. And when you talk to your
Speaker 1: Canadian friends, know that in the hearts of Americans, we
Speaker 1: like the people in Canada, and we we want to
Speaker 1: get along with Canada. But America does have legitimate arguments
Speaker 1: back here.
Speaker 3: Okay, just still President Trump, that that our kindness and
Speaker 3: our politeness doesn't mean we're weak. We're still strong and
Speaker 3: we believe in our country and we believe it.
Speaker 2: No, but you got to be just be fair. I'm
Speaker 2: not asking you not to be strong.
Speaker 1: We want strong neighbors exactly, but don't be But don't
Speaker 1: take advantage of us either.
Speaker 3: No, I know. But Indiana all right, in the long term,
Speaker 3: And it was pleasure to talk to you. By the way,
Speaker 3: Katie is a wonderful lady of your call screen of fantastic.
Speaker 1: Oh you're sucking up to the call screen and I
Speaker 1: get it, all right, don't force me to do something
Speaker 1: I've never done in my life or career because I
Speaker 1: don't like them, and that's called the boycotts. But you
Speaker 1: guys are starting one and I don't. I don't want
Speaker 1: to see this thing at legs. And if it does,
Speaker 1: there's going to be a lot of angry America and
Speaker 1: this thing is going to get way out of control
Speaker 1: and it won't help Canada.
Speaker 2: I can tell you that.
Speaker 1: Alright, quick break right back, more of your calls eight
Speaker 1: hundred nine one, Shawn. As we continue.
Speaker 9: In the world gives you insanity, he gives you common
Speaker 9: sense solutions.
Speaker 2: This country needs a course correction.
Speaker 9: Immediately find your station at Hannity dot com and listen
Speaker 9: three hours a day.
Speaker 1: Hi, we continue now with our busy phones. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine one, Shawn is our number. Let's say hi to
Speaker 1: Ron in South Carolina.
Speaker 2: What's up Ron? We only have a minute though, Ron.
Speaker 2: How are you?
Speaker 8: Hey, Sean, We're doing great. It's good to talk to you.
Speaker 8: Just wanted to ask a quick question and get your
Speaker 8: comment on it. With all that does is fining, with
Speaker 8: all the fraud that's going on, do you believe that
Speaker 8: there's going to be prosecution the individuals responsible? And also
Speaker 8: I wanted to say too that I know in the interview,
Speaker 8: President Trump said that what mister Musk is doing for
Speaker 8: our nation as a thankless job. But I think I
Speaker 8: speak for a lot of people when I just shout
Speaker 8: out to him, thank you, mister Musk very much, and
Speaker 8: appreciate all you're doing.
Speaker 2: Those were some great.
Speaker 3: Interviews you gave there.
Speaker 1: I appreciate it, and I'm thankful to mister Musk, who
Speaker 1: and as he said to me, uh, they're not going
Speaker 1: to get everything right, and and when they get it wrong,
Speaker 1: they're going to fix it very quickly. But you know,
Speaker 1: there's no room for error in a world of Trump arrangement,
Speaker 1: rage and insanity.
Speaker 2: I'll tell you that.
Speaker 1: But you know what, if we don't do it now
Speaker 1: for the sake of our kids and grandkids and for
Speaker 1: the sake of American taxpayers, this is probably the only
Speaker 1: opportunity we have, you know. And everyone goes, well, what
Speaker 1: about my friend's one job, Well, if they were working
Speaker 1: for USAID, that was not a job that ever should
Speaker 1: have been created, because that money never should have been
Speaker 1: spent that way. Anyway, I appreciate to call my friend,
Speaker 1: God bless you. Eight hundred nine four one Shawn is
Speaker 1: on number. If you want to upgrade the look at
Speaker 1: your home, you don't want to break the budget. Right now,
Speaker 1: you can save up to forty percent off site wide
Speaker 1: on custom window coverings when you go to Blinds dot com.
Speaker 1: There is a better way to give your home the
Speaker 1: Presidential treatment without With Blinds dot Com, they are by
Speaker 1: far the number one online retailer of custom window treatments.
Speaker 1: You shop one hundred percent online on your schedule. That
Speaker 1: means no hassle in home consultations and pushy commission salespeople.
Speaker 2: Now Blinds dot Com.
Speaker 1: They make it simple, easy, affordable, free virtual consultations with
Speaker 1: design professionals. You get free samples delivered to your house
Speaker 1: fast and free. They have an extensive range of styles,
Speaker 1: woven wood shade shutters, motorized options, upfront pricing, no hidden fees,
Speaker 1: and you can install it yourself or have one of
Speaker 1: their professionals do it. Whether you install one or one hundred,
Speaker 1: it's the same low rice. They have over twenty five
Speaker 1: million windows covered, and they offer the one hundred percent
Speaker 1: satisfaction guarantee. Even if you pick the wrong color, they'll
Speaker 1: make it right. Go to Blinds dot com right now,
Speaker 1: save up to forty percent off with a minimum purchase
Speaker 1: up to forty percent off for a limited time when
Speaker 1: you go to Blinds dot com today. One of our
Speaker 1: new sponsors Rapid Radios walkie Talkies. It lets you keep
Speaker 1: in touch with your family at the touch of a button. Now,
Speaker 1: these are not the average walkie talkies that you knew
Speaker 1: as a kid. No, they're way better. Now connect with
Speaker 1: your kids an aging parent instantly with a push of
Speaker 1: a button, one touch connection. Now, Rapid radios work on
Speaker 1: a national LTE network, but you're never going to have
Speaker 1: a contract, just like walkie talkies. With the ease of
Speaker 1: today's technology, I mean, it's fantastic technology. Rapid radios are
Speaker 1: a great communication device for kids now keep them off
Speaker 1: the Internet, but be able to talk to them at
Speaker 1: a practice or riding their bike. It's one hundred percent private,
Speaker 1: there's no subscription ever. They're ready to go right out
Speaker 1: of the box, and we even use them right here
Speaker 1: on this show. Rapidradios dot com and for a limited
Speaker 1: time go to rapid radios dot com. You'll get up
Speaker 1: to sixty percent off, free ups shipping from Michigan, plus
Speaker 1: a free protection bag. If you add the code radio
Speaker 1: you get an extra five percent off,