WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - May 15th, 2021

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week Inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news as it happened. Bloomberg

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messier and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Stinevin on Bloomberg Radio. Hi, everyone, welcome to the weekend

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week, Week sixty one. Working from home.

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>We were both in the office this week and Tim,

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it was a week full of a lot of economic data,

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>volatile markets. We saw global stock slide on inflation concerns. Yeah,

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>we did a busy week here at Bloomberg headquarters. Lots

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of our colleagues return into the office for the first

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>time in over a year. So it's good to see

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that things are slowly getting back to normal. I talk

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>about this all the time. More and more traffic, Yeah,

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and a lot more traffic on the roads and in

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the elevators. Coming up on Bloomberg Business Week, We've got

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a jam packed show. We've got live person CEO Rob

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Lacazio on the proliferation of artificial intelligence. Also an inside

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the volatile nature of the multibillion dollar video

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>game industry. And we've got in music legend joining us

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. Rock and Roll Hall of Famer Nancy Wilson

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>on self discovery with live music. She is putting out

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>her first solo album ever. And you guys talk a

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the late great Eddie Van Halen as well.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Just some great stories. Well, all that to come. We're

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna begin this week with the cover story in Bloomberg

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>business Week, The spack boom has sputtered thanks to SEC

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>warnings and some disappointing performances. One guiding voice admitted all

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the former immigrant kid who is now worth billions, the

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>so called pied piper of the recent blank check craze.

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about venture capitalist to moth Pollyopatia. Bloomberg Projects

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and Investigations reporters Zeke Fox explores how Pollyopatia shaped the

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>media and Wall Street narratives around Clover. It's a middling

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>health insurer in New Jersey that he reframed as a

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>disruptive and game changing profit machine. We're also joined by

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week editor Joel Weber. So the pitch for

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Clover Health is that it was a tech company that

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>was going to revolutionize healthcare, and if you weren't listening

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to that closely, you might not even really pick up

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that it was really a health insurance company. And of

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>course you can find this all out from its securities

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>filings if you're the kind of person who reads those.

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>But really it's a medicare advantage plan that almost exclusively

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>operates in New Jersey. Not really a very big company,

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and from talking to former employees, one that's had a

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of trouble hitting its growth targets in the past

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 1>expanding the way it wanted to. Now, of course they

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>have this pitch now that they've invented uh tech tool

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of the culmination of, you know, a decade

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of their existence that's really going to bring together all

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>their machine learning technology to analyze patient data and recommend treatments,

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and that this is what's really going to make the

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>company take off. Um. But I hope that the investors

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that are buying it understand that, you know, this is

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a pretty risky new business rather than something that is

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, guaranteed to go up, and you say, decade

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in business still losing money, So that if it was

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>being taken public, you know, and it was going on

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a road show, you would certainly see, Zeke, it become

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>under a lot of scrutiny. Yeah, that's sort of the

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>appeal of SPACs for a lot of companies is when

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you go public, the un writers are worried about getting

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>sued if they make projections that are wrong, So you're

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>almost forced to dwell on your recent results. So if

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 1>you're a company with like Clover that's losing huge amounts

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of money every year, but you're on the verge of

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a turnaround, you say, um, when you do a spack,

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you can talk more about your great future prospects and

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you can hopefully investors won't dwell on your recent losses.

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>And there's been just like a huge wave of these

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>unprofitable UH companies with big dreams going public through spacts

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, and for a while it just seemed like

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>all of them went up almost people were talking about

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it like it was almost a new asset class. You

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>could just invest in SPACs and get great returns well.

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And then um, gravity kind of came in and and

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>things have changed a little bit um and hence the

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>spacticost flat cover. Um. Zeke, though, I wanted to ask

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>because despite what what we'll publish in the magazine. And Um,

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>despite maybe that data, it doesn't seem like it might

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>stop Jamas. Right, And even as you were working on

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>this story, he announced that there was another one coming

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>with a certain gym chain. So how do you how

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>do you make sense of of of where Jamas could

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>go with his vision of SPACs. So he has turned

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>himself into kind of a brand name like Goldman Sacks.

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And if you're a company that wants to go public,

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe you hire a bank to do an I p O.

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And now people are aware that there's another option that

0:04:56.000 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you could merge with one of Pollhopatia's SPACs. And my

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>big question is whether the brand name can survive one

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 1>or two bad deals. Um, if it was it was

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>built on just sort of this to the moon idea. Um,

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna lose his appeal if he has a

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 1>mixed track record like anyone who's bringing companies public is

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>likely to have. In the long run, you can't all

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>be winners. But you're right, he's just the other day

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News broke that he is planning to bring the

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Jim chain Equinox public um. But he hasn't raised any

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>new blank check companies for a while, So that's something

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to keep an eye on. If he's uh, raise those

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>more gets closer to his goal of like he said,

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that was Bloomberg's Zeke Fox on the King of Spacks

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Chamas Pollopatia. But I think to his followers he's more

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of like a one name person Chama. People tweet it,

0:05:54.800 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know who they're talking about, like Madonna. He's definitely

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we within that world. And listen. I think for SPACs, uh,

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>the history books will see how they cover this era

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>because back is not a new thing. But man, we've

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>had quite a boom in the past year. We really have.

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>The big question is how sustainable is it because the

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>last few months haven't seen that similar boom. Right, we're

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>not seeing it in the returns either. Coming up the

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>changing face of consumer interactions, that is, they have no

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>face at all, live person CEEO Rob Licasio on earnings

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and the booming market for conversational artificial intelligence software. It's

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>about bots. It's when we go on a website, tim

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and we get to actually kind of talk with somebody.

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm talking with the person. Yeah, it's working,

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>It is working. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week. This

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Quick Takes to insinivate from Bloomberg Radio to

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of segments. We're gonna take a look

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>at consumers and shopping because we've seen a lot of changes,

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>increasingly everybody going digital in the last twelve thirteen months

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>because of the pandemic. And I guess some of the

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>questions are what happens in a post pandemic world? And

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>this one next guest kind of gives us some clues. Yeah,

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>it's Rob Lacatio, the founder, chairman, and CEO of the

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>publicly held application software company it's called Live Person. He

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.679
<v Speaker 1>joined us after his company reported he's strong first quarter.

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>He's someone we've talked to you though throughout the pandemic,

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>keeping my Live Person. It's an a I powered conversational

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>platform for consumers to essentially talk with companies, engaged with companies,

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and Lacascio says, there's a good chance you've interacted with

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>his platform, whether you know it or not. We're talking

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>about bots, so much demand for UM you know, AI

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and conversationally on bots and messaging consumers, we want to

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>do things differently, and so we had like you know,

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Dunkin Donuts now is using it for their consumers to

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>sign up for their loyalty programs. And there we got

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a big jewelry company, one of the public company's they're

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>selling diamond jewelry with it, sort of like daun it's

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the diamonds. It's kind of like it's moving beyond care

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. We just sawty growth in the quarter. That's

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>our highest glowth quarter in the history of our companies.

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So so for people who aren't familiar with the actual technology,

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>explain where they might have interacted with it. You mentioned

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of companies there, and what exactly they're doing

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>when they're communicating and do they know that they're not

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>necessarily communicating with a real person. Yes, So like if

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever been on Delta Airlines or T Mobile

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>or City Bank there, you'll be basically if you've messaged

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 1>into using Apple Business Chatter or SMS or even in

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>their app, if you're messaging with them like you do

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>your friends and family, you're using our technology. So sometimes

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not a live agent, and we provide an automated

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>what we call botty chiplte that you can order a

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>burrito now with a bot called Pepper and pick that

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>burrito up at the store. So that's where you would

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>have touched it. And we have eighteen thousand customers all

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>around the world, so we do about eighty million people

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a month will be interacting on our system with one

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>of our eighteen thousand customers. WHA, So what's changed? I mean,

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you have a great you know, first of all, we've

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>talked to you a couple of times throughout the pandemic

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's been great checking in with you because you

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>do have a great vantage point. You work with a

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of different companies, different industries from that vantage point.

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>We were just talking about. C e o s are

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>not giving a lot of forecast longer term, so we're

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 1>not quite sure what happens after maybe the pop in

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter and after that. What would you say

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about the economy today and maybe out through the end

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I mean, we're seeing like we have

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of travel, hospitality customers and some of the

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>biggest brands in the world from hotels to um you know,

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>airlines and man like they they reduced their staff in

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>some cases down to like nothing, and now they've had

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:06.319
<v Speaker 1>the overhire for the amount of demand we're seeing their retail, online, retail.

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>We have some of the biggest home building companies in

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the world. We're seeing a lot of action. Their home

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>improvement companies a lot of action there. So I think

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 1>there are are are we're seeing basically across our customer

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>base a lot of movements. So it feels like things

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>are bouncing back now in our world a lot to

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>shift into digital. So I think those brands that are

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>really being digitally forward and aggressive and really changing how

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>they were doing business during COVID are gonna sort of

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna they're gonna really get the real bang out

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of as we come through this thing. So what does

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>that look like on the other side in terms of

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.559
<v Speaker 1>how people interact with other people versus how they're interacting

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>with bonds. What do companies that are reopening or that

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>have reopened need to be prepared for the different way

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that consumers want to communicate. What do you see? I

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's really like the retail, it's been really interesting retail,

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Like obviously the retail physical locations got shut down. Now

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they're opening back up, but we're seeing such demands still

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in digital using messaging, allowing the consumer to have that

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>personal experience, and that's what we need, Like we'd like

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to have conversations as people because it's how our brain works.

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>We want to ask questions about products and we need that.

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So being able to provide that, especially in the retail area,

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's about going back to stores. It's about, yes,

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the stores will be there. But I can tell you

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>these retailers were working with like this big jewelry company,

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>like they have three thousand stores in the US, the

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>amount of money they've they've created an opportunity digitally now

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>where they didn't think they could sell like this, sell

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a diamond necklace or diamond ring, and they're able to

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>do it. That's what they're really starting to see is that, oh, yeah,

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>we should have done this a long time ago. This

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is our future. We don't have to just rely on

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>people walking in our stores. You and I talked about this,

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I think before. It was somebody during the pandemic that

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>we talked with. It was kind of high end watches

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and they were doing virtual meetings with consumers to show

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>them stuff, you know, and shot that way and personally

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>these converse conversational bots. I kind of enjoyed. It engages

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>me and I feel like I actually have some personal experience. Rob, Yeah,

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's what it is. Like the version one

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of the bots a couple of years ago, we're pretty bad.

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>But our platform and what we're able to do with it,

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's just the way we built the platform and

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the way we have the data and the way our

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>customers can build their bods like Pepper this this bot

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>for Chipalti. It's it's like you basically you talk to

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>it and you have this relationships and you build a

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>burrito and and it's cool. It's like it's not just

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>like give us your burrito order, Press one, Press twility,

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>like you converse with this, like there's a personality and

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>as personality. And that's the cool thing is that the

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>websites are all sort of the same when you think

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>about them, top navigation a bunch of texts and pictures.

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Every brand now can create a different type of think

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>about it, like it's almost like they put a live human.

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>They it's automated, but they create a personality for it.

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 1>That was Roblicasio, founder, chairman and CEO of Live person listen,

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I think about, you know, what I have done over

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the last twelve thirteen months. And when I go online,

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not just about looking at a website, picking things

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and just filling out the order form. Essentially. There are

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>times I have questions. I did it with a paint

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>company and I started talking with somebody. I did it

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>with framing, somebody actually had an ongoing conversation. And I

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>have to say, as a consumer, I really like it

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>because I get my questions answered right away. I do

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's something that has become as as the technology

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>has gotten better, it's become increasingly acceptable to consumers because

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>there is that fine line between what actually works and

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>what makes a consumer more frustrated if they can't get

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the answer to what they're looking for. And I have

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to stay every once in a while, though, there's a

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>bot that it's like, you can tell it's like standard questions.

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>You're like, no, that's not what I want, that's not

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>what I'm asking, all right. Still ahead on Bloomberg Business Week,

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Ruin and Recovery in the video game industry. Bloomberg's Jason

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Schreyer on his book Press Reset, all about how our

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>series of renowned studios fell apart. This is someone who

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>knows the video game industry inside and it's a second

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>book on the industry. Yeah, and it is a fantastic read.

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Also up next the Shop from Home. Boom is here

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to stay, but now people are buying clothing and accessories

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for going out. Retail veteran Julie Bornstein on consumer spending

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>patterns and the one year anniversary of her shopping app,

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the yes, are you shopping more? I am shopping a

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>little more, a little differently. Yeah, I mean I don't

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>shop much in general. Okay, okay, cat talk to your wife,

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes you can, all right, that's coming up. This is

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Broadcasting from the financial capital of the world, Bloomberg

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>eleven Frio in New York to Washington, d C. Bloomberg

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to Boston, Bloomberg one O six one to San Francisco,

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg nine six to the country Sirius XM CHADO one

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>nine team, and around the globe the Bloomberg Business app

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Business Week.

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned we had a couple of interviews when it

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>comes to consumer spending. This is our second one and

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>this next guest has a front row seat when it

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>comes to consumer spending in retail. We're talking about Julie Bornstein.

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>She's founder and CEO of the shopping app The Yes,

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>which she launched him one year ago. Talk about timing, Yeah,

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and she knows a thing or two about retail. She's

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a former chief operating officer of stitch Fixed, former chief

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>digital officer at Sephora, executive responsibilities at Urban Outfitters in

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Nordstrom as well, and now she's steering a company that

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>she launched during the pandemic towards a more normalized retail climate.

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So here's what people are spending their money on. When

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it comes to fashion, we definitely are starting to see

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of a turn in pattern. Um. I would say.

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>In the beginning of our launch last May, which was

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a crazy time to try and launch a fashion business,

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we were primarily selling casual clothes Zoom tops was a

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>big category, and leggings and comfortable clothing, um. And it

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>was interesting because we definitely saw, with the world really

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>focusing on online shopping, an appetite for consumers to try

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>out new apps. You know, I think as everyone started

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>doing grocery shopping on instat cart and other ways of

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of going through life. We saw a lot of

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>people downloading our app called the Yes and UM, you know,

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say both playing around and uh sort of

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking about what they want to buy in the future

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and then buying pretty practical clothes. Um. But we started

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to see um, some light at the end of the

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>tunnel of the COVID pandemic in the thought that people

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>are starting to buy for going out. So we're seeing

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>some occasion categories like dresses and heels, UM, and some

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>other interesting trends. How much are they buying and how

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>much do you think has also been impacted as a

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>result of the stimulus payments? How much has that given

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of maybe a boost to some of the business

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>at the Yes. The Yes cells primarily branded um, you know,

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>mid to hire price points, so we're probably a little

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>less sensitive to the checks. But I think just the

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think a combination of the stimulus checks

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that sort of consumer confidence is growing

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and people just are starting to think about going out

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>again is very evident in we're seeing an increase in

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>total sales and obviously a change of what people are

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>buying well. And so how has kind of what you've

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>seen Julie and maybe the last few months maybe changed

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts and thinking about the rest of the year. Um.

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that the it's hard to predict

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>how things will come back, UM, and I think it's

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna be, um, a slow, steady return, especially in fashion.

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>If you kind of look at historical trends, you know,

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it takes a little while for things to come back.

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>And it also, UM, I think there's sort of this

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>combination of you have sort of this money that you

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't spent in this category, UM, so you're excited to

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>spend it. And on the flip side, you haven't worn

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>anything in your closet for the past year, um, And

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I think and then the things that

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you have bought you kind of want to burn because

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you've been wearing but you have gotten used to wearing

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 1>comfortable things. So I think there are a number of

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 1>interesting dynamics that play and we're seeing a little bit

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>all of it play out. Um. Certainly in terms of

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the you know, if you look at the

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>product categories that the fashion brands are making, they've added

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of casual into their line and it seems

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>as though they will keep that while also we'll start

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>to see the return of more, you know, sort of

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>clothing to go out in for occasions and ultimately for work,

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.959
<v Speaker 1>which I think will come back even later because return

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>to office won't happen more at scale until the fall, right.

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, i'mwhere in heels, to be fair, I'm getting

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>dressed up you so like you do get back and

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>that's from you know, yoga pants and jeans and bare

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 1>feet at home for eight nine months. Um Or is

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>there anything you know, you're just talking about kind of

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>how people are adapting some of their lines to include

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>some of that you know, casual wear. But is there

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>anything from the pandemic in terms of how we shopped

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>or how we looked at the stuff we owned, how

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>that stays with us post pandemic. Yeah. I mean I

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>think two of the um sort of trends that I

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.959
<v Speaker 1>think stick is, you know, we saw a step function

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:08.719
<v Speaker 1>change in the amount of purchasing online and so you know,

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>there have been sort of there's been a steady growth

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in online purchasing. I've been in online retail for twenty

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>years and you know you've seen a very steady rise. Um.

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think we saw a step change function this

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>year that will continue um, meaning that we've increased the

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>trend and now we will sort of continue to grow

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>off of that new trend. That was Julie Bornstein, founder

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of the shopping app The Yes. She was

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>former chief operating officer of stitch Fixed, former chief digital

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>officer as Aphora or did Urban Outfitters Nordstrom. You know

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>someone who really, you know, has worked in retail for

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a long time see me ups and downs and understands

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of the evolution in how we're shopping throughout the pandemic.

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>We've been hearing from executives and talking about this a lot.

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>The acceleration of trends pretty amazing, Caroll. To see a

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>company get five years worth of shopping trends compressed into one.

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>That's that really stood out for me, just as a

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>reminder of how much happened in the last year and

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>and the impact it's going to have want all of

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 1>us going forward. All Right, you're listening to Bloomberg Business

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Week coming up next, the rise and fall of some

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>gaming heavyweights. We're talking about video games. Yeah, the dark

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>side of the video game industry. We're bringing it to light.

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Do my reclose cover story Bloomberg Business Week from the summer.

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 1>It was about the dark underbelly of a business built

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>on fund Tim, this is a story about the video

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>game industry. Bloomberg News technology writer Jason Schreyer joined us again,

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>this time around talking about his new book, an excerpt

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of which was just in the magazine. I could not

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>put this story down when I started reading, and Carol,

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a gamer, and the mark to me of

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>good writing is bringing someone in who has no experience

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in something, and that's how I feel about gaming. I

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>just could not stop reading this. I was enthralled. Well,

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>this is the second book on the industry, and he

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>really brought it down to the people in the industry

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and how the ups and downs can really imp packed

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>them personally. The book is called Press, Reset, Ruin and

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Recovery in the Video Game Industry, and an unforgiving one

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>despite the hundreds of millions of dollars that it generates.

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So with my first book, I kind of broke down

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the question of why are games so hard to make?

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And I kind of answered that through a bunch of

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>case studies exploring different games and telling their stories. With

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>this book, I wanted to so more of a human story,

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>tell the story of people in the video game industry

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>and the hardships that they sometimes go through, and what

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that means for them, what it does to them, um,

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>what kind of how it feels, how they recover afterwards.

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 1>And through that I explored the question of why is

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>this games industry which is making so much money, it

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>made a hundred eighty billion dollars last year, Why is

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>it so unstable for its workers? Why are workers whether

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>they have such a hard time keeping their jobs in

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:50.959
<v Speaker 1>this industry. You write it's about heartbreak and tragedy, it's

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.239
<v Speaker 1>also about recovery. I mean, there are several instances in

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the book where you talk about you know, people who

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have worked together, as you say, pulled all nighters, you know,

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>working on games, you know, hitting deadlines and so and

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>so forth, only to come in and just find out

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that they don't have a job and they're not going

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to see these people anymore. Yeah, And it's not only

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that their games failed or that the company is in

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>business trouble. Sometimes it's a successful game, as in the

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>case of Irrational Games, which is one of the companies

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that I cover in the book. They made a game

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>called BioShock, which is very popular, critically acclaimed. About a

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 1>year after their most recent game, BioShock Infinite, everybody came

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in to find that the studio was shutting down. And yeah,

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it can be really brutal. One of the worst parts

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, and I talked about this quite a book,

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit in Press Reset, is that, um, you

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>are kind of stuck wherever you are, and you might

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>have to move thousands of miles away. I didn't get

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a new job in a Rationals case. They were in Boston,

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and there are not a lot of other video game

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 1>companies in Boston, so a lot of the people who

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to stay and keep working in games have to

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.959
<v Speaker 1>move across the country, up with their whole families. And

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it can be really just burn people out. It's it

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>feels unsustainable to me. I feel like it's a company

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that goes bank right and then all of a sudden,

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody's in there, the vultures like I want the desks,

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I want this, But I mean, you talk about when

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a company goes down, one of these video game company

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>goes down, then all of a sudden, recruiters fly and

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 1>right to kind of take the workers. So they are

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in demand, but as you said, they often have to

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>be uprooted and move their families, maybe across the country. Yeah,

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. I saw it stat just the other day.

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>That was essentially it was a list of job postings

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>for the video game industry, and there were like a

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of hundred jobs here and there for junior level people,

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and then it was like thousands of senior level Apple

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>like applicated job listings for senior level positions. And the

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>reason that is is because the game's industry has this

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 1>dearth of people who have five ten years of experience

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>because so many of them burn out. So yes, these

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 1>recruiters are seizing in and helping to get some of

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that talent, some of that experience. But a lot of

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>those people might not want to move. I mean, in

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the Rationals case, a lot of the people who were

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.719
<v Speaker 1>in Boston. Um, maybe if they're in their twenties, they

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>can move across the country and get these jobs they're

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of free. But if they're in their thirties, they

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>have families, didn't want to pull their kids out of school,

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:02.959
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of them just left the industry entirely

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>went to other tech companies in the area, UM finance company, banks,

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, and that we are seeing uh way

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>too much. Well, we all got a tease of your

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>book thanks to Business Week magazine where there was an

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>excerpt in there, and that's where the Bloody Sox chapter,

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>which is specifically about Kurt Chilling of the Red Sox UM.

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Just give us a little little tease and and folks

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 1>can go to Bloomberg dot com or on the Bloomberg

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>or buy your book to read the whole story, because

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that chapter alone could be a Netflix

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>series or a movie because it's just fascinating, very successful

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>baseball player, but it didn't turn out so well when

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to video games. Ultimately. Yeah, yeah, man, thank

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you for the kind words. And yeah, so Kurt Chilling,

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>formerly of the Red Sox UM these days best known

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>as kind of uh provocateur, right wing provocateur um. But yeah,

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>he very much like came from the baseball life. Was

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>very much like I'm going to treat all my employees

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>like all stars. I'm going buy them the best of

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the best, get them on these perks and the best

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 1>health benefits, which on it's on the on the face

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>of things, is pretty great by that. But he wound

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>up running the company completely out of money. They wound

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>up taking a giant low and that was guaranteed by

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the state of Rhode Island for seventy five million dollars

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in exchange for moving to Rhode Island and getting a

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.719
<v Speaker 1>bunch of jobs. They're in Providence, um, and wound up

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 1>burning through that in a year. Suddenly, one day everybody

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>gets into works. They think they have been made in

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the shade that they're here at this company where they

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 1>are treated like the best of the best. They get

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>into work one day and they are not paid their

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>paychecks of not process. Because it turns up the company

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 1>ran completely out of money. Um. None of them got severance,

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>none of them got those final paychecks that were all

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>robbed essentially of weeks of work, and all were stuck

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in Rhode Island where there are no other game companies.

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>It's a similar story, so Chason, chapter nine, Human Costs,

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Human Solutions, and you and you write, ask any veteran

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>video game developer their least favorite thing about the industry,

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and you'll probably get a different for of the same answer.

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 1>It treats people poorly. It choose them up and then

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>spits them back out, leaving nothing but gristle and bones behind.

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So why do they do it? Because people go back, right?

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Or do they go back to the industry? I mean

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>they do write they like it well and pretty much

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a young persons industry. And um, there's a great there's

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a great quote in the book from a guy named

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Zack Mumbox who has been a long time at e A,

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and at one point later in his career, he said,

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>I was looking around in the office, and when I

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>had started in two thousand, I was in my twenties

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and everyone else is in their twenties. Now I'm looking

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>around my thirties and everyone else is in their twenties,

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, where is everyone who came up with me?

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is that the video game industry, while

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly fun, I mean it's fun to work on games,

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and it can be really interesting and challenging and creatively satisfying. Um,

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.199
<v Speaker 1>all these these terrible factors, including the volatility that I

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>cover in press reset um just lead to a whole

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of burnout. Um. And I'm not sure how many

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of those people are going back. I think a lot

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of people just feel like games does not treat them. Games,

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the games industry does not treat them right. Is there

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>any model that just seems to work above and beyond

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>other models or is this just yeah, like, what are

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the companies that maybe have done it right? Yeah? Well,

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of things, and I explore in

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the chapter you mentioned, I explore some of the potential

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>answers to these questions and solutions to these problems that

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I bring up there. Um. One is the big one

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is unionization, which has not happened in the North American

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>video game industry at all. Um. And you look at, uh,

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.959
<v Speaker 1>the video games kind of sister industry in Hollywood, and

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons that people are able to maintain

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 1>careers in that field just because they're unionized and so

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>they have protections in place, and they might pounce around

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 1>from gig to gig, but they know they'll get paid

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>for every overtime hour, and they know they're going to

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>get a certain minimum salary, and they know they're going

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>to get benefits and health care. UM. So that's a

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>big thing, and I think that could offer some protections

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and give workers to see the table in the video

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>game industry UM to a level that they haven't seen before.

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>The other thing and this is it. It's wild timing.

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>You were talking about zoom before and how a year

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>ago we had no idea what it is. UM. I

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>actually think that remote work is one of the big

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>solutions to the to the video game industry's woes. And

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I said that because, like I mentioned earlier, UM, the

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>worst part about being caught in a layoffers to be

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a shutdown is knowing that you might have to move

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 1>thousands of miles away, you might have to uproot your family.

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>That's ultimately what drives a lot of people out of gaming.

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And a solution to that might be if hey, okay,

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I just got laid off, but I can just log

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>into my computer my home office and potentially get a

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>job anywhere without having to move. That I think would

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>keep a lot of people who left the industry from

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>burning out because they would have to worry about moving

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to a new city every time they had to switch shops.

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So a game changer. Give me an idea too, you said,

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it tends to be a lot of younger individuals. I

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>remember doing a story on a video game company years

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>ago out on the on the West coast, uh, in

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>conjunction with it, think it was Stanford that either had

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a program you know, that was just specifically geared to

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>UM teaching people to kind of how to be in

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the video game industry. What do they get paid typically? Yeah,

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean it varies drastically. Like if you're on if

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you're in San Francisco, coach, you're an engineer, you could

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>be making over six figures. It could be making a

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty something like that. But then again you look

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>around and face between Google and you could be making

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>double the double that. So it's it's uh, it's all relative, right, UM. Yeah,

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it could really drastically differ depending on your discipline,

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>depending on your years of experience, depending on whether you're

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>at a big company or smart company. UM. But in general,

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the people on the bottom of the potem pole, the

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>q A, which is quality assurance, the testers in the

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>video game industry, they're the people who are paid to

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>find all the bugs and games. UM. They're making around

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>usually close to a minimum wage, maybe not exactly that,

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>but um, twenty dollars an hour or something like eighteen

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars an hour, um. And then you kind of

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>get bumped up over that as you become if you're

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're a junior designer, maybe you're making I don't

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>know how forty fifty a year, and then you kind

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of go up from there. It is, by no means

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a well paying industry. It's not. It's not banking or

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>chech or anything like that unless you are at the

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>very top. Unless you're here. Yeah. That's Bloomberg's Jason Schreier

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>on his new book Press Reset, ruining recovery in the

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>video game industry. Jason, by the way, also best selling

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>author of his first book, Blood, Sweat and Pixels, also

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>on the video game industry. That reps up the first

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>hour of the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week from

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. I'm Carol Masser and I'm Tim Standard. That

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>coming up in our next hour, Pulitzer Prize winning journalist

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Joyant Lublin on the importance of women in the workforce

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and rock and roll legend and Nancy Wilson fly solo

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>for the first time. I love that interview. Also, Americans

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>faith in their biggest institutions, including the business community, remains fraud.

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Edelman founder and CEO Richard Edelman on his firm's latest

0:30:55.480 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>trust barometer that's coming up. This is Bloomberg. This is

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week inside from the reporters and editors who

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus global business,

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>finance and tech news. As it happened. It's Bloomberg Business

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovin

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Hi, I'm Carol Masser and I'm Tim

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>stan playing ahead in our second hour of the weekend

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week, and we really dig deep,

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Tim into leadership and the workplace because there is a

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of a shift going on because of what happened

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in the past twelve and we're going to continue to

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>see it. This one we're doing with former Best Buy

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>CEO he Bears Jolie, who says that it's time to

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>enter the next era of capitalism. We'll also hear from

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>award winning journalist Joanne Lublin on her new book Power Moms.

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>It's all about struggles of women trying to balance management

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>responsibilities with raising children. She talked to some really prominent

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>female executives, many in the C suite, for her book.

0:31:57.760 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's Get It All started with an update on trust

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>between A. Mary Kins and companies, the government, media and more.

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>We are talking about the trust barometers from the Global

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>communications from Edelman, which this time around looked at business

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and racial justice in America, and for that we heard

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>from Edelman founder and C Richard Edelman. We began with

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>asking how the business environment has evolved in the past year.

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I think on systemic racism, there's an increased height of

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the bar. You know, a year ago it was companies

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>just saying or or or or or ads for brands

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>saying you know how sorry we were for the murder

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of George Floyd. That's performative. Now we're looking to companies

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to actually make a big um commitment, a big difference,

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, otherwise it's just not going to work.

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, Basically, there's such an opportunity for business here

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>two talk to its employees, all of whom are looking

0:32:54.240 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for serious action on more diversity on boards, more diverse

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>city and senior management, change in the supply chain. So

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that you use black and Hispanic small businesses. And also

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they want CEO to speak up on voting rights bills,

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and how is it that we passed legislation in Florida

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and Texas that restricts people's right to vote. I think

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a great thing that we had record voter turnout

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in UH this year compared to any election since. But

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not what some others see well, and I have

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to say it was a little surprising I think on

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>some level that maybe Americans didn't think we made more progress.

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Dig a bit deeper into some of the data points. UM.

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>One that came out for me through just people of

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>color black, we're talking about UM, Latin Americans here in

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the United States, the Asian CE brands is doing enough

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to redress racism in their communities. I mean, that's a

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>small percentage. Well, Carol, the big thing that changed in

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>this last year since we lasted this study is that

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>corporations actually jumped about over fifteen points. Brands were flatlined.

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:10.399
<v Speaker 1>So again the idea that corporations have made some progress

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>in their hiring and in promotion of people of color, UM,

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>but a big change the Asia, the Asian Americans, they

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>are seeing record levels of violence and all of a sudden, um,

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, six of them say the business community is

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>ignoring problems of racism against Asian Americans. So this is

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a big new constituency that we have to pay attention

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to do something to help. Well. And what's interesting is, um,

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the constituency is doing something right and they are stopping

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>using a lot of brands right if they don't agree

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>with how certain companies have responded to systemic racism. Wasn't

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it amazing that the respondents said they've actually changed brands

0:34:57.520 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>if they don't stand up and speak up. And I

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 1>think a good example of doing it the right way

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is Dove where you see that, you know, for their

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Dove Men's UM. They showed on the n C Double

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>A Men's Finals UM a ad that showed um, African

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Americans who have been basketball players who have gone on

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to great careers, and it says, you know, see African

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 1>American men for who they are, you know, their politicians,

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:28.439
<v Speaker 1>their business people, their teachers, They're not just jocks right exactly. Well,

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what's interesting is that, I mean, what is

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 1>it that Americans, our consumers or customers want businesses to

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>be doing is it transparency in addition to taking action

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>but then showing you know the results of such. They

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>want to change the game. Example, KFC put a hundred

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 1>million dollar fund together to enable African Americans and Hispanics

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>especially who our store managers, to be able to become franchisees.

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>They had a very low percentage of diverse owners and

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>so they've changed it by putting up the equity money

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>such that then that man or woman can go to

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the bank and borrow the money, then become a franchise

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 1>that puts them on the trained to success. And otherwise,

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>these these sort of financial hurdles make it impossible to

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>create step change. So Richard tell us, there's one finding

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that talks about the number of Americans who believe CEOs

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>themselves are deeply racist. What did you guys find? So, look,

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that UM eight intent expects CEOs to act

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that they have to have a zero tolerance for racism

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and the organization. They have to ensure the organization is

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>racially representative of the country as a whole. They have

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that their training and promoting black and

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Latin and API employees. The question is are CEOs unaware?

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Are they or are they somehow you know, acting in

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a knowledged in a way in which they have knowledge

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of the racial problems. And I think CEOs have to

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>pay real attention here. Two how they change their organizations.

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 1>This is not something that's going to pass. This is

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>absolutely as much an urgent issue as it was a

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>year ago. And the companies are being expected to fix

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>problems that government normally would right that they're stepping into

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the void. My employer is the most trusted organization, big

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>jump seventeen points and my employer, meanwhile, government pretty well

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 1>go sideways. And you know it's twenty points higher than

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 1>business and thirty points higher than than than government. My employer.

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So my company's got to act, that's what I'm expecting. Well,

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that's Edleman, founder and CEO Richard Edelman. You're listening to

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week coming up. He was at the Helm

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>when Best Buy emerged as one of America's top electronics retailers,

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and now he there Jolisa's it's time to reach think

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>how we look at stakeholder capitalism and prioritize purpose over profits.

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Bloomberg Quick takes Tim Stenovik from Bloomberg Radio.

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Kuber Julie ran best By a CEO for about seven

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.360
<v Speaker 1>years before transitioning to chairman for another year. He is

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>on the boards of J and J. Ralph Lauren a

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:32.399
<v Speaker 1>senior lecturer at Harvard Business School. He has done a lot. Yeah,

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>He's been recognized as one of the top CEOs in

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the world by the Harvard Business Review, one of the

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>top thirty CEOs in the world by Barons, and one

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of the top ten CEOs in the US by Glassdoor

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and Tim. We caught up with him to talk about

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>his book, It's just at the heart of business leadership

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 1>principles for the next era of capitalism. Safe to say

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 1>things are changing, well, I think it leads to evolve

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>right the shift if we locate it. It's clear that

0:38:55.719 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we're facing a multifaceted crisis, right, health crisis, economic crisis,

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>societal crisis, systemic racism, environment, political or the all you

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 1>can eat menu of challenges. And so what's the definition

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of madness? Carol Right doing the same thing and hoping

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>for a different outcome. And I think I've bested by

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:18.919
<v Speaker 1>over the last eight or nine years, we've demonstrated there's

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a very powerful way to achieve extraordinary results by putting

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>people and purpose at the heart of business. And I

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's a philass of fee that is particularly relevant

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>today because I think we need to see businesses be

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a force for good. I think I've seen best by

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the power of unleashing human magic in support of that purpose,

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and the importance of embracing all stakeholders, including community and

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the environment, and treating profit as an outcome and not

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the goal. Even though you know, during my tenure or

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>since I became to Seal, our share price went from

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>eleven dollars to now between hundred and ten and h

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty sorts of a powerful for me. It's one that's

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 1>very relevant today, very needed, and I thought that in

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>writing this book, leveraging the experence I've had, you know,

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I could help others on the journey. So many of

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>us on this journey right doesn't want to be on

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that journey, and who are eager to lead from a

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>place of purpose and with humanity and we although it's

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>desirable and it's hard, and I think that's with the

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>experience I could help. Well, it's interesting you talk about

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you know your kids. You talk about the dinner table,

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 1>how you your children talked about how excessive consumerism. I

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 1>was drawn to this in the book Excessive Consumerism and

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 1>waste was contributing to global warm warning. I have to say,

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>no one calls me on the carpet like my eighteen

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 1>year old about the impact things we are having on

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:44.919
<v Speaker 1>society or the things that I've done or she thinks

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I've done in my world and how it's not making

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it a good world. But they do think differently. They

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>look at products differently, brands differently. What can we learn

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>from a younger generation? So have to disclose something to you.

0:40:57.280 --> 0:41:00.720
<v Speaker 1>My daughter went to Boundard College, same as you. Great

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>love that of course, and she together with my son,

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:07.879
<v Speaker 1>are saying exactly the same thing. And it's a call

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 1>for action. Right. We need to create a future that

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 1>does not exist yet, but that needs to be more sustainable.

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And my experience at best bias that we can embrace

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>all the dimensions, all of the stakeholders. So at Best Buy,

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:22.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, and we're not perfect, right, We're on this journey.

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>We've had this recycling program right where you can bring

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 1>all of your old electronics and then we'll work with

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>partners to recycle it. It's good for the customer, it's

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:34.840
<v Speaker 1>good for us because it creates traffic to our stores,

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's good for the for the planet. Same we're

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 1>working with vendors on the circular economy. Same at our

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:44.280
<v Speaker 1>flown where on the board. You know, the power industry

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is a big polluter, So how can we use plastic bottles.

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:51.719
<v Speaker 1>That's what graph has done Plastics recycled plastic bottle to

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>create the the Earth's Polo shirt. So you see businesses

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that are embracing these principles. And we have a ticking

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>time bomb. Love Bill Gates book right we published in February.

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 1>We have thirty years to get to net zero. And

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that if we all mobilize and stop I

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>think this excessive focus on profits. You know, we have

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.839
<v Speaker 1>to start with how can we create some good things

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in the world. How can we mobilize the human resources?

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>People are not the problem? Right sometimes you know, turnaround?

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 1>You know the advice I got you in twent twelve

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>when I studied is cut cut cut right, Like if

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 1>people are the problem, no, people are the sourced There

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the solution. By first week on the job, I spend

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it listening to frontliners, and so I think we need

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>to think leading differently. And that's what I'm calling for,

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is a re foundation of business and capitalism around these

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 1>principles of purpose and people at the heart of business. Yeah,

0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:46.759
<v Speaker 1>there's a section in your book about cutting jobs as

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the last resort that definitely chopped out for me. Let

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:52.319
<v Speaker 1>me let me ask you something though, because you know,

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 1>how would shareholders really react? Though? If you are another CEO,

0:42:57.200 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know you make profits. Maybe this is the wrong

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:03.400
<v Speaker 1>word and afterthought, I mean it's hard as a publicly

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>held company. I understand purpose, I understand e s g uh,

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and I do think it's becoming you know, easier to

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>do that financially. But if you've got to make a

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 1>decision between kind of doing the quote unquote right thing

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>versus being profitable, especially if you're public, how do you

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 1>do that? So I think it was three years ago

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Cal actually told our shareholders we was at an investor conference.

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 1>He said, our purpose as a company is not to

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 1>make money. It's a now it's an imperative, it's an outcome,

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and you guys are a very important stakeholder. So we're

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 1>going to take care of you. But the way we're

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna do this is by first focusing on doing the

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:45.280
<v Speaker 1>right thing, and we're gonna work hard to then create

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:47.799
<v Speaker 1>profit as an outcome. One of the things I've learned,

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it was thirty years ago when I was

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:53.239
<v Speaker 1>at McKinsey from a kind of mind it told me

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>there of the questions that I asked us, either or

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a better answered that, and to fuse the tyranny of

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>war and embrace the power of ants. And I think

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:05.920
<v Speaker 1>our challenge as leaders it's not easy, but it's doable.

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what I've learned during my career, in particular at

0:44:08.719 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 1>best Buy. You have to force yourself to find ways

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:15.359
<v Speaker 1>that our win win win. Uh. And so my view

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:18.239
<v Speaker 1>of purpose and stickholder capitalism this is not at the

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>expense of shareholders. This is in fact how you create,

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:27.319
<v Speaker 1>you maximize, you know, performance for shareholders, but not at

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the detriments of other stakeholders. That's what I've learned. That's

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you bear Jolie really successful career in the C suite,

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:36.279
<v Speaker 1>of course, but now his mindset is changing. Is he

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.319
<v Speaker 1>imparts wisdom to current in future executive Carol, I I

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>do wonder to what extent this type of thinking actually

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to stick moving forward, because look, when we

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 1>talk earnings, we're talking about the top line in the

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>bottom line, and we're talking about outlook, we're not talking

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>about different different forms of capitalism, right, and investors are

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 1>reacting to those numbers. I remember in our planning call

0:44:55.120 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 1>before doing this interview, and you said, you know, I

0:44:57.000 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you know you put it off two shareholders

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and say, listen, we're going to be a better company.

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:03.839
<v Speaker 1>We're going to put purpose over profits, which means maybe

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we will be as profitable. How they will feel about that?

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of investors might be like, Okay, good,

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:11.319
<v Speaker 1>but I still want to see you being really profitable. Right. Look,

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 1>It's it's one thing for a private company like Patagonia

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to do that. It's a completely different thing for a

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:18.279
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded company. Still to come on Bloomberg Business Week,

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna stay on this theme about how work is changing,

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>leadership is changing. We're gonna catch up with Joanne Lublin

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Wall Street Journals. She's a Pulter Prize winning journalist.

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 1>She's got a new book out on power Moms. Got

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to Say Tim In the last year we've seen women

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 1>slide back when it comes to some of the inroads

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that they've made in the workplace. They are juggling a

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 1>lot right now, taking care of kids, schooling kids at home,

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:43.200
<v Speaker 1>taking care of maybe elderly. It's not easy. It's not easy.

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 1>We saw that data just recently in the latest jobs

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:47.799
<v Speaker 1>report that all the new jobs that came back, those

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>went two men. Yeah, exactly. Plus how a year away

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>from touring helped a music legend right her latest chapter,

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Nancy Wilson. Yeah, she's going to join

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>us on Bloomberg Business Week. She talks about a song

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 1>that she wrote about the late Eddie Van Halen. Now

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 1>life on the road to This is Bloomberg Broadcasting from

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 1>the financial capital of the World, Bloomberg eleven Frio in

0:46:12.320 --> 0:46:16.839
<v Speaker 1>New York to Washington, d C. Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>one oh six one does San Francisco, Bloomberg nine sixty

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to the country Sirius XM Chado one nine team and

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:26.400
<v Speaker 1>around the globe the Bloomberg Business app and Bloomberg Radio

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. This is Bloomberg Business Week. As promise, we're

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 1>going to continue talking about what's going on in the workplace.

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Things are changing, and that has certainly happened for women

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:41.280
<v Speaker 1>in the past year. They have been hurt disproportionately harder

0:46:41.560 --> 0:46:44.479
<v Speaker 1>because of the pandemic. Joanne Lublin was The Wall Street

0:46:44.520 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Journal's career columnist for many years. I knew her when

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I worked at the Wall Street Journal. She's also an

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:51.800
<v Speaker 1>editor covering workplace issues from the c suite on down,

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Poulter Prize winning journalist, and she still contributes to the Journal.

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>She's the author of two books about female business executives.

0:46:58.239 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Her latest is Power Moms, How Executive Mothers Navigate work

0:47:01.520 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 1>in Life, all about that delicate balance that women with

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>management aspirations are forced to deal with while raising families.

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's become that much harder, as I mentioned earlier,

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>harder during the pandemic. She explained to us how her

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:15.920
<v Speaker 1>last twelve months has been that's where we started. Well,

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the last year has been sort of anticlimactic for me

0:47:19.000 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>because I turned in the manuscript for this new book

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:25.719
<v Speaker 1>literally on the day before America shut down, and I

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:28.080
<v Speaker 1>had been a hermit for the prior nine months writing

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the book, and I thought, oh great, now I can

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:33.360
<v Speaker 1>go out and party and socialize and take some trips,

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, then the world's kind of turned on

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>its head. And so I've been doing what everyone else

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 1>has been doing, which is basically, you know, quarantining in place.

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I've taken flights twice in the last year to visit

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:50.680
<v Speaker 1>my out of town grown children and grandchildren. But that's

0:47:50.719 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 1>about it. Yeah, interesting, and I do wonder how are

0:47:53.760 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you thinking about women right now? We talked about some

0:47:56.200 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>data that showed that women dropped out of the U

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 1>s labor force in April for the first time since January.

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:02.799
<v Speaker 1>It was I think initially we thought Joey and the

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:06.440
<v Speaker 1>pandemic would be maybe helpful for women, you know, finally

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>giving them some flexibility and how they worked and took

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 1>care of their families. And yet we're finding out that

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case necessarily. Unfortunately, that is indeed correct,

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, the Wall Street Journal did an analysis

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:24.239
<v Speaker 1>of US data and they concluded that they're nearly one

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 1>point five million fewer working mothers in the workforce than

0:48:27.800 --> 0:48:31.919
<v Speaker 1>before COVID nineteen. And this is especially hitting women hard

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:34.839
<v Speaker 1>who have school aged children. They're having a difficult time

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 1>returning to work because frankly, the balance of power in

0:48:39.000 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the home. As much as has shifted somewhat, dad's have

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:46.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly picked up a bigger share of responsibility while everyone's

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>been working from home, the burden is still squarely on

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:53.640
<v Speaker 1>mom's shoulders, particularly when it comes to school aged children.

0:48:53.880 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that even for younger generations of couples that it's

0:48:56.960 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>still the case? Well overall, that's what the studies I've

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:04.400
<v Speaker 1>seen have suggested, But certainly in the women that I

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:08.400
<v Speaker 1>interviewed for the book, I saw a marked difference between generations.

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 1>For this book, I interviewed women from the Baby Boom generation,

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:16.360
<v Speaker 1>my generation, to look at the first wave of women

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 1>who had gotten an executive level roles in business and

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:21.960
<v Speaker 1>also had kids, And then I compared that to a

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:25.359
<v Speaker 1>similar sized group of women who were millennials and Gen

0:49:25.560 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 1>xers anywhere from their early thirties to early forties. Altogether

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:32.840
<v Speaker 1>eighty six such women plus twenty five adult daughters of

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:35.319
<v Speaker 1>the boomers. And I was looking to see what had

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 1>gotten better, what had stayed the same, and what had

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:41.880
<v Speaker 1>gotten worse in terms of how they navigated work and life.

0:49:42.320 --> 0:49:44.719
<v Speaker 1>And to your point, yes, I did see that there

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:48.120
<v Speaker 1>were improvements among the younger generation when it comes to

0:49:48.160 --> 0:49:51.879
<v Speaker 1>sharing the duties at home. But we haven't gotten all

0:49:51.880 --> 0:49:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the way to the you know, goal line yet. Yeah, no, exactly.

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Well what's interesting is talk to me a little bit

0:49:57.840 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 1>about your book. What did you set out to do.

0:49:59.520 --> 0:50:02.239
<v Speaker 1>You've written books before. What was your hope to do

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>with this? Well, my hope was to explore just that

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 1>because my first book, which was called Earning It Hard

0:50:09.520 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 1>One Lessons from Trailblazing Women at the Top of the

0:50:11.960 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>business world, looked at fifty two high ranking corporate executive women,

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 1>all but one of whom were baby boomers, and of

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:23.399
<v Speaker 1>those women, it turned out, had children, and among those

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:27.200
<v Speaker 1>who have become public company CEOs, the proportion was even higher.

0:50:27.640 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So what was their secret sauce? Well, they were trailblazers.

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:34.080
<v Speaker 1>They were the pace setters. They were the first, frankly

0:50:34.280 --> 0:50:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of their generation to get into the executive suite, and

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in many cases did so while having children. And it

0:50:42.520 --> 0:50:46.280
<v Speaker 1>just made me wonder, have things changed all that much

0:50:46.840 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 1>for that younger way the women who in more recent

0:50:50.160 --> 0:50:54.400
<v Speaker 1>years have become executives after having children or having children

0:50:54.400 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>when they became executives. And when I found was that

0:50:57.360 --> 0:51:00.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely things have gotten better. The Wall Street olds Joanne

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Lublin on her book Power Mom's Carol. Something that's happened

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:06.440
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic is I've returned to work, but my

0:51:06.520 --> 0:51:09.360
<v Speaker 1>wife has been working from home for more than the

0:51:09.360 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>past year, and she just started going back to the office.

0:51:12.120 --> 0:51:14.239
<v Speaker 1>But what I saw play out in our household over

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the last year has really what has played out across

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the country. Because she has been home, the work of

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the home has disproportionately fallen on her. Yeah, and listen.

0:51:22.280 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think initially we thought the pandemic was going to

0:51:25.040 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 1>provide women some flexibility of maybe being at home, and

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that it would be an advantage and help women in

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:32.279
<v Speaker 1>the workplace. But as the months played out, as the

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:35.279
<v Speaker 1>numbers showed, that wasn't the case, and that women have

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:38.279
<v Speaker 1>definitely slid back because of the pandemic. All Right, you're

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:40.479
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Coming up, we're gonna wrap

0:51:40.560 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>up do something a little bit lighter with rock and

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:46.000
<v Speaker 1>roll Hall of Famer Nancy Wilson, of course, one part

0:51:46.120 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of the great Iconic rock band. Alright, we also get

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to hear some stories about the late great Eddie Van Halen.

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 1>You do not want to miss it. This is Bloomberg.

0:52:01.280 --> 0:52:04.799
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and

0:52:04.880 --> 0:52:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovy from Bloomberg Radio. We welcome back.

0:52:22.640 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's the title track from Nancy Wilson's first ever

0:52:26.320 --> 0:52:29.040
<v Speaker 1>solo album. It's entitled You and Me the track in

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the album. Nancy, of course, along with her sister Anne,

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:34.920
<v Speaker 1>are the iconic rock band Heart in the Rock and

0:52:35.000 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Roll Hall of Fame. They were touring just before the

0:52:37.200 --> 0:52:39.279
<v Speaker 1>world shut down because of the pandemic, and during the

0:52:39.280 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>past year as the world stopped, Nancy produced this new

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:45.520
<v Speaker 1>album working at our home studio. It will be released

0:52:45.560 --> 0:52:48.280
<v Speaker 1>May seven. Let's get more cuss lucky for us. Joining

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 1>us is singer songwriter Nancy Wilson, also author of Heart

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:55.960
<v Speaker 1>memoir Kicking and Dreaming, and she joins us on zoom

0:52:56.000 --> 0:52:58.759
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles. Nancy, so nice to have you here

0:52:58.760 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 1>with us. How are you. I'm good. How are you

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:03.920
<v Speaker 1>doing over there? We're doing okay. You know, we're feeling

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:06.439
<v Speaker 1>like things are starting to open a little bit. Well,

0:53:07.120 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm in northern California now. We moved here right in

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:14.640
<v Speaker 1>time for the shutdown actually, which was a very very

0:53:14.719 --> 0:53:18.759
<v Speaker 1>lucky thing for us because we got to kind of

0:53:18.800 --> 0:53:21.239
<v Speaker 1>get out of this the big city, which was maybe

0:53:21.280 --> 0:53:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a little more scary to be there then. But uh,

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:27.560
<v Speaker 1>now it's you know, it's been going well. There seems

0:53:27.600 --> 0:53:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to be some light at the end of the tunnel.

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Um because of the vaccines obviously, and the and following

0:53:34.560 --> 0:53:37.960
<v Speaker 1>all the rules and the protocol is working. So it's

0:53:38.000 --> 0:53:42.120
<v Speaker 1>really a beautiful, um thing to be able to say,

0:53:42.200 --> 0:53:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, go into inside in a restaurant and you know,

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:49.200
<v Speaker 1>with a mask of course, but and then you know,

0:53:49.280 --> 0:53:52.000
<v Speaker 1>we dined for for our anniversary, and the other night

0:53:52.080 --> 0:53:54.759
<v Speaker 1>we went and had dinner at a favorite restaurant and

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that was like really like oh my god, really exciting

0:53:59.160 --> 0:54:02.760
<v Speaker 1>right right, like getting back to quote unquote normal. Um,

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting over the past year, a lot of musicians

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and it sounds like yourself, you know, once you found

0:54:07.280 --> 0:54:10.360
<v Speaker 1>your footing, have been very creative and productive over the

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 1>past year. Tell us about this new album that you

0:54:13.320 --> 0:54:17.359
<v Speaker 1>are putting out. Well, I I started realizing, you know,

0:54:17.680 --> 0:54:21.719
<v Speaker 1>after we moved in and and and we realized we

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:23.879
<v Speaker 1>might be here for a while, shut that shut into

0:54:23.880 --> 0:54:26.880
<v Speaker 1>our home, not daring to go out, and you know,

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:30.319
<v Speaker 1>even touch anything or just all of the sphere at

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this thing, but I did have a

0:54:32.960 --> 0:54:37.120
<v Speaker 1>new space to do music in. So I got my stuff,

0:54:37.520 --> 0:54:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, out of storage. I pulled it into my space.

0:54:40.880 --> 0:54:43.839
<v Speaker 1>I got my best guitars out. I got my amps out,

0:54:43.880 --> 0:54:47.839
<v Speaker 1>and my pedals and my microphones and my new interface.

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:50.080
<v Speaker 1>A friend of mine nose how to run for me,

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:53.759
<v Speaker 1>and uh, just a real simple gere and the simplest

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:56.799
<v Speaker 1>but you know, the old guitars that have the good

0:54:56.800 --> 0:54:59.719
<v Speaker 1>sounding dirt in them and the old amplifiers that have

0:54:59.800 --> 0:55:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the sounding dirt in them. And decided to start writing

0:55:03.719 --> 0:55:06.600
<v Speaker 1>again since a lot of people have said, why aren't

0:55:06.640 --> 0:55:08.879
<v Speaker 1>you gonna do it's all album? Ever, you've never done

0:55:08.880 --> 0:55:11.719
<v Speaker 1>it yet, so only a live thing once, but that

0:55:11.840 --> 0:55:15.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a studio album, and and so I started to write.

0:55:16.160 --> 0:55:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And the first thing I wrote was called um We

0:55:19.480 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Meet Again, which I thought was a kind of a

0:55:23.280 --> 0:55:26.759
<v Speaker 1>long view at the horizon of your life a little bit,

0:55:27.280 --> 0:55:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and feeling like when you have somebody that you love,

0:55:31.440 --> 0:55:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be there with You're gonna be there for them,

0:55:33.920 --> 0:55:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna be there for you for the for

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:41.279
<v Speaker 1>the entire ride. So Um, I thought it turned out nice,

0:55:41.320 --> 0:55:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and so I kept writing, and I kept writing, um,

0:55:44.600 --> 0:55:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and and then I decided to do the Rising of

0:55:48.040 --> 0:55:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Bruce of Bruce Springsteen cover pretty early on because I

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:55.680
<v Speaker 1>saw how the world was suffering and how that song

0:55:55.920 --> 0:55:59.720
<v Speaker 1>had been written for nine eleven originally, which I thought

0:55:59.800 --> 0:56:03.560
<v Speaker 1>was really appropriate for the times, and it might be

0:56:03.680 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 1>something that's maybe a little aspirational for people trying to

0:56:06.719 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 1>get through all of this loss and all of the

0:56:09.719 --> 0:56:12.320
<v Speaker 1>fear and all of the suffering involved in this whole

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:16.879
<v Speaker 1>this whole whip lash of experience we had to be

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:20.759
<v Speaker 1>tossed into, you know. So I think, um, it's sort

0:56:20.760 --> 0:56:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of a woman's voice singing a song like that was

0:56:25.120 --> 0:56:29.920
<v Speaker 1>even more kind of mothering and nurturing and and aspirational.

0:56:30.360 --> 0:56:32.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of where it started out, and I

0:56:32.760 --> 0:56:36.640
<v Speaker 1>kept I just kept on building songs. Well, tell tell

0:56:36.680 --> 0:56:39.760
<v Speaker 1>me that, because it really does feel like a very

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:43.040
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful and very deep and very reflective of what you

0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:45.319
<v Speaker 1>were going through. And I think it will I think

0:56:45.320 --> 0:56:48.319
<v Speaker 1>for people who listen to it will feel, um, some

0:56:48.360 --> 0:56:51.040
<v Speaker 1>connection easily with things that they were going through. And

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:53.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I think about the past year,

0:56:53.160 --> 0:56:56.680
<v Speaker 1>we lost some really incredible people in the music industry,

0:56:56.680 --> 0:56:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and you have a tribute to Eddie van Hale and

0:56:58.920 --> 0:57:02.319
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about that. Yeah. Well, somebody said you've got

0:57:02.320 --> 0:57:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to do an instrumental song on your album, which I said, okay,

0:57:06.880 --> 0:57:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you could twist my arm, you know, because I love

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:12.360
<v Speaker 1>just playing instrumental stuff because I did a lot of

0:57:12.400 --> 0:57:15.600
<v Speaker 1>score scoring of movies before in the past, and it's

0:57:16.000 --> 0:57:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a great thing to be able to transition between

0:57:20.080 --> 0:57:24.840
<v Speaker 1>songwriting and just instrumental writing. So I somebody said, okay,

0:57:24.880 --> 0:57:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll do I agreed to do it, and then I said,

0:57:27.760 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and not only that, I'm going to dedicate it to

0:57:29.920 --> 0:57:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Eddie van Halen and then and then I was like

0:57:33.040 --> 0:57:37.840
<v Speaker 1>why did I say that? Like I was like, oh no,

0:57:37.840 --> 0:57:40.680
<v Speaker 1>now I've really painted myself into work arder, you know,

0:57:41.040 --> 0:57:42.960
<v Speaker 1>because I have to not have to actually come up

0:57:43.000 --> 0:57:46.600
<v Speaker 1>with it and figure out how to do it, and

0:57:46.600 --> 0:57:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and you did. So I really avoided it. I avoided it.

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I've procrastinated as long as possible. I finally got my

0:57:55.520 --> 0:57:58.600
<v Speaker 1>head around it when I thought about, you know, Eddie's

0:57:58.720 --> 0:58:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I listened to Eddie and even I listened to Van

0:58:01.520 --> 0:58:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Halen songs and I watched a bunch of his footage

0:58:05.720 --> 0:58:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, well, here's something I know that I

0:58:08.680 --> 0:58:11.480
<v Speaker 1>could try to do. Is it's something in a very

0:58:11.520 --> 0:58:17.680
<v Speaker 1>happy key. Like his music was all very major key stuff. Um,

0:58:17.760 --> 0:58:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't hear a lot of blueslicks, you know in

0:58:19.880 --> 0:58:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Van Halen songs, you're you're positive, forth right, jubilant stuff.

0:58:25.040 --> 0:58:28.160
<v Speaker 1>So that helped me figure out, like how to find

0:58:28.160 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the right key, the right tuning, the right um structure

0:58:34.480 --> 0:58:37.320
<v Speaker 1>where you a little bit of a classical, a little

0:58:37.320 --> 0:58:39.120
<v Speaker 1>bit of rock in the middle, and then a little

0:58:39.120 --> 0:58:41.800
<v Speaker 1>classical at the end and not too long like in

0:58:41.880 --> 0:58:46.400
<v Speaker 1>score scoring for film with anything without lyrics in it,

0:58:46.960 --> 0:58:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, might text the listener a little bit. I

0:58:50.280 --> 0:58:54.480
<v Speaker 1>kept it short and sweet just for Edward. Yeah, I

0:58:54.520 --> 0:58:57.240
<v Speaker 1>love the title for Edward. And I mean you guys

0:58:57.320 --> 0:59:00.200
<v Speaker 1>toured together with Eddie van Halen. I mean you have

0:59:00.200 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a story of memory. Well, we did tour a bunch

0:59:02.720 --> 0:59:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of different places and times together, um, and we always

0:59:07.160 --> 0:59:10.520
<v Speaker 1>found each other hitting it off, you know, like backstage

0:59:10.720 --> 0:59:13.560
<v Speaker 1>or you know at the hotel, passing in the hallway,

0:59:13.800 --> 0:59:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they were like, hey, come down and

0:59:15.880 --> 0:59:18.600
<v Speaker 1>have a drink with us in the hotel bar. And

0:59:18.680 --> 0:59:20.680
<v Speaker 1>so it's like, okay, great, we'll get to know you.

0:59:20.880 --> 0:59:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And so they were drinking Kama Kaze's and WHOA, what

0:59:26.400 --> 0:59:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is that? Here? Try one? You know, They're like, whoa,

0:59:30.120 --> 0:59:32.200
<v Speaker 1>how do you drink more than one of those? I'll

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:35.760
<v Speaker 1>never know. And those guys were pretty, you know, pretty

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:39.480
<v Speaker 1>heavy duty partiers, and they were pretty primal with it.

0:59:39.520 --> 0:59:42.480
<v Speaker 1>They would get all tangled in some kind of an

0:59:42.600 --> 0:59:45.520
<v Speaker 1>argument and then they they started hugging and going, I

0:59:45.560 --> 0:59:48.400
<v Speaker 1>love you man, and they were just really primal with

0:59:48.480 --> 0:59:53.560
<v Speaker 1>their party. And but they were really sweet guys. And

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Eddie's a sweet person who was very we were just

0:59:57.720 --> 1:00:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we were kind of fond of each other because he's

1:00:00.800 --> 1:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>told me he liked my guitar, my acoustic playing, and

1:00:04.280 --> 1:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't believe he even said it, you know, And

1:00:07.600 --> 1:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and then he's I said, what about you? Why don't

1:00:10.240 --> 1:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you play more acoustic? And he said, well, I don't

1:00:12.280 --> 1:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>have an acoustic. I made a little video story Storytellers

1:00:16.600 --> 1:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>video about it with the song but um, and I said, well,

1:00:21.520 --> 1:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have this guitar right now because you need

1:00:23.680 --> 1:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>an acoustic. So early the next morning, when it's just

1:00:27.960 --> 1:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>getting light, he calls my hotel room and plays me

1:00:31.760 --> 1:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>this gorgeous piece of instrumental acoustic music which I when

1:00:36.800 --> 1:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to recall that as much as I

1:00:39.240 --> 1:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>possibly could do for the for Edward tribute song. So

1:00:44.000 --> 1:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I get close, but I got something.

1:00:49.240 --> 1:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>It's really I got it done. It's a really lovely tribute.

1:00:52.280 --> 1:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, Um, you're incredible. I grew up

1:00:54.840 --> 1:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of music, from Sinatra and Polkas to

1:00:57.800 --> 1:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the Beatles, the Dead Heart, you name name it. So um,

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, music really shaped me in my family, and

1:01:04.520 --> 1:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I can kind of feel it. I feel like when

1:01:06.880 --> 1:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you talk about it and how it influences you and

1:01:08.960 --> 1:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the people you met. I have to say, one of

1:01:10.800 --> 1:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>my favorite things that you and your sister did was

1:01:13.680 --> 1:01:16.439
<v Speaker 1>the Kennedy Center Honors when you guys covered the leaded

1:01:16.480 --> 1:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Zeppelin Stairway to Heaven. Uh. That must have been incredible

1:01:20.240 --> 1:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to do with led Zeppelin looking on. Yeah, well we couldn't.

1:01:24.120 --> 1:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Luckily we could not see them in the balcony from

1:01:26.400 --> 1:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the stage because of the light they were tearing out that.

1:01:29.040 --> 1:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was like that was a tough room.

1:01:32.000 --> 1:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's all these dignitaries and really famous people

1:01:35.680 --> 1:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and the President and the First Lady were there too,

1:01:38.720 --> 1:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and led Zeppelin no less, so you know, we were

1:01:42.640 --> 1:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>we were very methodical in our approach to uh, focusing

1:01:49.400 --> 1:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in on starting the song. We had to take a

1:01:52.480 --> 1:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>really really deep breath and you know, like a yoga

1:01:58.280 --> 1:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of a breath. That's rock and roll Hall of

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Famer Nancy Wilson of Heart talking about the late great

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Eddie Van Halen. I love hearing about stories like on

1:02:05.520 --> 1:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the road and you know, different musicians meeting each other

1:02:08.760 --> 1:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and their interactions. What's also interesting is that over the

1:02:12.320 --> 1:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>past year, a lot of musicians, they were out touring,

1:02:14.560 --> 1:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>they had concerts planned, all of that had to stop.

1:02:17.520 --> 1:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Their world was up ended like all of us, but

1:02:19.720 --> 1:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>they used that time often to produce some new music. Yeah.

1:02:22.160 --> 1:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>It's something I thought a lot about during the pandemic,

1:02:24.000 --> 1:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it's literature, whether it's fine art, whether it's music.

1:02:27.080 --> 1:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to see some sort of explosion in

1:02:29.160 --> 1:02:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the next few years of art that was created during

1:02:31.440 --> 1:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>this time? Yeah, I wonder about like virtual concerts, like

1:02:33.720 --> 1:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>well they continue doing some of that stuff, which would

1:02:35.760 --> 1:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>be kind of fun. Alright. That wraps up the weekend

1:02:37.880 --> 1:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Thanks so

1:02:40.160 --> 1:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. I'm Carol Masser and I'm Tim Stanovik.

1:02:42.640 --> 1:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to tune into our Bloomberg Business Week daily show.

1:02:44.840 --> 1:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>It's Monday through Friday and it starts at two pm

1:02:46.840 --> 1:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Time on Bloomberg Radio. You can also watch

1:02:49.320 --> 1:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>our daily broadcast on YouTube. Just search Bloomberg Global News

1:02:52.480 --> 1:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and check out our Bloomberg Business Week podcast. You can

1:02:54.600 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>find it at Bloomberg dot com, Apple, or wherever you

1:02:57.120 --> 1:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>get your podcast. That's where you can find kind of

1:02:58.960 --> 1:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the full conversation stions of a lot of our interviews

1:03:01.840 --> 1:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>throughout the week. Bloomberg Business Week also available on newsstands

1:03:05.240 --> 1:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com and on the Bloomberg Terminal. You

1:03:07.800 --> 1:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>can also see me on Bloomberg Quicktake available at Bloomberg

1:03:10.360 --> 1:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com, slash Qt, and streaming platforms like Roku, Apple TV,

1:03:13.720 --> 1:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Samsung TV, and more. Have a great weekend. Stay safe everyone.

1:03:17.080 --> 1:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg