Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty Armstrong and
Speaker 1: Gatty and he Armstrong and Yetty. The White House is
Speaker 1: already all in.
Speaker 2: Yesterday we got our first peek at the Biden's holiday decorations.
Speaker 2: It's beautiful, so festive. The official theme is the Season
Speaker 2: of Peace and Light, which is much more hopeful than
Speaker 2: all the other Democrats Christmas theme. Drink three old fashions
Speaker 2: and openly weep.
Speaker 1: In front of Charlie Brown. Eh, not a muse, are you? So?
Speaker 1: We have at our store a new hoodie, Yes, a
Speaker 1: premium ang Adidas hoodie Wow Armstrong in gedddy dot com.
Speaker 1: And then got all the other stuff too. Adidas very popular. Brown. Uh,
Speaker 1: I have a text I'm supposed to look at Let
Speaker 1: me look at this according to Hanson. Oh yeah, look
Speaker 1: at that. Oh that's the hoodie there. That's good looking.
Speaker 1: That's a good looking hoo set it down there. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I like it. What was I going to say? I
Speaker 1: was gonna say something? Oh, Adida's very popular of course,
Speaker 1: with the uh what are those shoes of your kid got?
Speaker 1: And my kid's got? And everybody's got I've got a
Speaker 1: pair myself, the Adidas, the the soccer shoe that are
Speaker 1: the most popular shoe in America. But the I just
Speaker 1: saw Sambas. Yeah, very cool. Nike keeps announcing like losses
Speaker 1: and everything like that, there's a new version out today.
Speaker 1: They're down fourteen or something like that. I'm kind of
Speaker 1: surprised by that, and some of it is blamed on
Speaker 1: they got too woke. And but I don't know AnyWho.
Speaker 1: My son, who is a sneaker guy, and that is
Speaker 1: a crowd. I mean, there are certain people that are
Speaker 1: into sneakers and the whole deal, and he's one of them.
Speaker 1: And he regularly points out we walk into a story
Speaker 1: and said, dude, that guy over there has got on
Speaker 1: a pair of two thousand dollars Travis Scott's. I mean,
Speaker 1: he just he spots all these different shoes everywhere, and
Speaker 1: other people's passions seem so odd. Yeah, don't share them,
Speaker 1: including my own. I freely admit that, yes they do.
Speaker 1: They do, which is just the way human beings are made,
Speaker 1: I guess. And then he'll look on his phone real
Speaker 1: quick on Anybay, look at these. The cheapest pair I
Speaker 1: can find is eighteen hundred dollars and he's wearing them
Speaker 1: over there. And so there's tons of really expensive collector nikes,
Speaker 1: but I guess they're not selling enough of just the
Speaker 1: regular stuff to please Wall Street. Yeah, you got to
Speaker 1: go up to that guy and say, how did you
Speaker 1: find those in size ten? He'd say, I'm a ten
Speaker 1: and a half. And if your son's a ten and
Speaker 1: a half, you bap them over the head, you strip
Speaker 1: them of his shoes. And my son's are twelve. I
Speaker 1: can't wear his shoes clown shoes for me? Wow? Uh?
Speaker 1: Do they hold value? I mean, are your two thousand
Speaker 1: dollars nikes gonna be worth two thousand dollars in a year?
Speaker 1: Or is this a blip? Or I might as well
Speaker 1: ask me why people spend eight thousand dollars on a handbag?
Speaker 1: I don't know, right, So well, status, I guess I
Speaker 1: do know the But okay, but that's interesting too, because
Speaker 1: it's only status for other people who know about it. Right,
Speaker 1: So if there are only two people in the grocery
Speaker 1: store that know you're wearing two thousand dollars Nikes as
Speaker 1: opposed to the other one hundred people that are wearing
Speaker 1: eighty dollars nikes? What is that? And I'm not denying
Speaker 1: it because I do the same thing with other stuff.
Speaker 1: It's just it's an interesting facet of human nature. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't know. And at the risk of
Speaker 1: getting too far down this road, if you want status,
Speaker 1: you are much better, well, depending who you want status
Speaker 1: with buying a ten thousand dollars Rolex than a why
Speaker 1: that is worth five times that much because it will
Speaker 1: be a tiny percentage of people that recognize you're wearing
Speaker 1: that watch. But if you want to impress those anyway,
Speaker 1: I don't know, or is it for your own personal
Speaker 1: How much of it is just your own personal I
Speaker 1: have this, Yeah, I don't know, because I feel try
Speaker 1: to suppress others with my sculpted physique. Obviously that's why
Speaker 1: you're shirtless most of the time, whether you know depends
Speaker 1: all the way. Too bad, it's so cold the day
Speaker 1: I can't be shirtless. You sometimes say, yeah, because I
Speaker 1: get a little purple on those days. It's not attractive.
Speaker 1: So I think I'm tired of talking about the Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden pardon, but there's a new wrinkle on it, and
Speaker 1: it is going to emerge as over history. The worst
Speaker 1: thing Joe Biden did. The uh, we're the grown ups
Speaker 1: in the room. We're going to restore norms after the awful,
Speaker 1: awful Trump administration, I mean, one of the lowest points
Speaker 1: in American history. We're going to restore norms. And then
Speaker 1: he parts D's son and writes that letter blaming the
Speaker 1: Justice Department for playing politics with the law, et cetera. Well,
Speaker 1: a lot of the Justice Department and the judges ain't
Speaker 1: digging it, including last night, while I was in bed,
Speaker 1: the federal judge who presided over Hunter Biden's criminal tax
Speaker 1: case scolded Joe Biden for claiming his son was the
Speaker 1: victim of selective prosecution. The guy's name is Judge Mark Scarcey.
Speaker 1: He issued an order on Tuesday night acknowledging Hunter Biden's pardon.
Speaker 1: Because that's the way the whole thing works. President pardon somebody,
Speaker 1: and then a judge I say, okay, well it's over now,
Speaker 1: and then he signed some piece of paper, and the
Speaker 1: whole thing is over. Here's the statement from the judge.
Speaker 1: The President's statement illustrates the reasons for the court's disapproval,
Speaker 1: as representations contained their instand blah blah, Blah. The President
Speaker 1: asserts that mister Biden was treated differently from others who
Speaker 1: were late paying their taxes because of serious addictions, implying
Speaker 1: that mister Biden was among those individuals who ultimately paid
Speaker 1: taxes due to addictions. Scarzy said. The judge pointed out
Speaker 1: that Hunter Biden said in court filings he was addicted
Speaker 1: to drugs and alcohol through May twenty nineteen, and in
Speaker 1: his guilty plea admitted to dodging tax payments after becoming sober.
Speaker 1: We went through all this stuff earlier, but the judge
Speaker 1: gets into the damage that has been done at so
Speaker 1: many different levels to the justice system, to federal judges
Speaker 1: expressly rejected mister Biden's arguments that the government prosecuted mister
Speaker 1: Biden because of his familiar relation to the President and
Speaker 1: the president's own attorney general and Department of Justice personnel
Speaker 1: oversaw the investigation leading to the charges. In the President's estimation,
Speaker 1: this legion of federal civil servants, the undersign included are
Speaker 1: unreasonable people. The Constitution provides the President with brought authority
Speaker 1: to grant reprieves and pardons, but nowhere does the Constitution
Speaker 1: give the president the authority to rewrite history. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: saw that quote. Ya, he said honor something. So the
Speaker 1: restore norms President may have done more damage to people's
Speaker 1: respect to the Justice Department than anything true could ever do. Yet, right,
Speaker 1: it would have been better if he had waited until
Speaker 1: the eleventh hour and just done it out of paternal sympathy,
Speaker 1: as opposed to concocting this false I mean, it's the
Speaker 1: opposite of true and damaging narrative that his own Justice
Speaker 1: Department perverted justice and was politicized and all even as
Speaker 1: he pursued lawfare against Trump is just this word is overused,
Speaker 1: but it's bizarre. Well, as somebody pointed out yesterday, however,
Speaker 1: many different judges appointed by six different presidents rejected these
Speaker 1: arguments at so many different levels. I mean, this had
Speaker 1: is fair of viewing by a wide variety of levels
Speaker 1: of the justice system. Different judges appointed by different Democrats
Speaker 1: and Republicans. They all said, no, there's nothing wrong going
Speaker 1: on here, and the President of the United States pretended
Speaker 1: there was to his own ass. I guess again, like
Speaker 1: you just said, why wouldn't you just say, I'm a dad,
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna have my son go to jail. You
Speaker 1: know it's it's it's a drag that you can't do that,
Speaker 1: but I can. I'm going to right in effact or
Speaker 1: just you know, be mute about it. But no, he
Speaker 1: invented again this this awful, awful, bizarre indictment of his own,
Speaker 1: you know, administration. I think it may have been Charlie Cook.
Speaker 1: Somebody pointed out that, and it's it's quite right. This
Speaker 1: is not a strange and shocking twist in the saga
Speaker 1: of Joe Biden. This is who Joe Biden has always been.
Speaker 1: He's congenitally dishonest. He has lied at every single step
Speaker 1: of the conversation about his influence, pedaling, money laundering family.
Speaker 1: As the IRS whistleblowers pointed out, I think we read
Speaker 1: that at the end of last hour, was it, Yeah,
Speaker 1: toward the end. This is exactly who Joe Biden is.
Speaker 1: Got Joe, he's not your classic liar, though I don't think.
Speaker 1: I mean tells things that are He says things are
Speaker 1: not true, so that's the definition of a lie. But
Speaker 1: he's not your classic liar. I think this all fits
Speaker 1: in with his weird I was a truck driver, I
Speaker 1: graduated top of my class. He just he just says
Speaker 1: things that make him feel cool at the time. I
Speaker 1: think true at all, in all kinds of ways, things
Speaker 1: that don't matter and things that really really matter, like
Speaker 1: claiming the Justice Department is But he just says whatever
Speaker 1: makes him look cool in whatever setting. Then go, yeah,
Speaker 1: he's he's a fabulous I would also argue that he's
Speaker 1: just a good old fashioned liar, but yeah, go what
Speaker 1: a weird personality. So I had another point on that,
Speaker 1: the blah blah blah, but anyway, Chris Steileerwalt writes in
Speaker 1: The Dispatch today, the age of corruption roars on. An
Speaker 1: age of corruption is a time when power is routinely
Speaker 1: abused for personal purposes, and going back several years with
Speaker 1: and wherever you want to start, executive orders that are
Speaker 1: unconstitutional but get signed anyway by Republicans and Democrats. And
Speaker 1: it's been growing over the years. And just so we
Speaker 1: are into or headed to maybe already into a very
Speaker 1: high period of corruption and using all of these tools
Speaker 1: for personal reasons. That is not good. And it doesn't
Speaker 1: look like it's slown down anytime soon. No, and the
Speaker 1: voters need to reject it. Although well, I don't really
Speaker 1: have time to get into this, But I understand, given
Speaker 1: the horrific policies of the left, a certain number of
Speaker 1: Americans has said, yeah, Trump's got a whole hell of
Speaker 1: a lot of flaws, but boy is he good on
Speaker 1: those awful, awful policies the left. So we're going to
Speaker 1: go with them. I get that and one more thing
Speaker 1: for me, and then I'll shut up. And this is
Speaker 1: the worst sort of what about is a my guess,
Speaker 1: But I've got to point out, you remember when Trump
Speaker 1: was president the first time, and the Trump Corporation continued
Speaker 1: to rate that big hotel in Washington, d c. That
Speaker 1: used to be the big post office, and the left
Speaker 1: was pretending to be just outraged and horrified by the
Speaker 1: notion that foreign leaders and others might seek to curry
Speaker 1: influence from through on Trump by saying, Hey, I stayed
Speaker 1: at your hotel and it's really nice. The bed was
Speaker 1: comfy by getting a three hundred dollars a night hotel room,
Speaker 1: which probably puts ten bucks in his pocket right well,
Speaker 1: and to the extent that he would even notice. But
Speaker 1: that was outrageous, but selling influence around the globe to
Speaker 1: foreign powers, including some hostile to the United States, making
Speaker 1: millions of dollars at it, then feloniously evading the taxes
Speaker 1: on those ill gotten gains. That's no problem. But somebody's
Speaker 1: staying in the Trump hotels outrage. That's what about the
Speaker 1: ellument's clause. The emolument's clause. Oh for God, this is
Speaker 1: the people. This is the worst thing Joe Biden has done.
Speaker 1: Not the pardoning of his son. The pardoning of his
Speaker 1: son and claiming the Justice Department is corrupt. That's the
Speaker 1: worst thing he has done because it allows everybody to
Speaker 1: do that from here on out, and it's made everybody
Speaker 1: so cynical. Is if we weren't cynical enough. I would
Speaker 1: love to see I will never see it, but I
Speaker 1: would love to see some sort of orchestrated movement by
Speaker 1: prominent Democrats to stand on the steps of the Capitol
Speaker 1: Building and sing from the same hymnal or recite in unison.
Speaker 1: Or appointed spokesman probably be handier to issue a swift
Speaker 1: and unequivocal condemnation of the blanket immunity, the perverse and
Speaker 1: dishonest description of how Hunter came to be prosecuted. Say, look,
Speaker 1: you want to you want to pardon your boy? The
Speaker 1: customers gives you the power, but the rest of this
Speaker 1: crap is no good. That is the only way they
Speaker 1: conceive save even a shred of credibility on these issues
Speaker 1: going forward. So we got one of these stories, interesting
Speaker 1: tragic if you're involved. But it's a couple of kids
Speaker 1: switched at birth parents been raising them a while. It's
Speaker 1: in California, just found out trying to figure out what
Speaker 1: to do. We can lay out the details for you
Speaker 1: on that. I don't I don't know what I would do.
Speaker 1: And that's a juation, that's a rough one. Among other things.
Speaker 1: On the waist to hear said that the McDonald's ecoli
Speaker 1: outbreak is over. YEPLI is gone. Apparently whatever's in the
Speaker 1: mccrib killed it. That's pretty funny. Maybe we'll get to
Speaker 1: later the whole switch at birth thing. We got one
Speaker 1: of those stories going on in California. I think both
Speaker 1: the girls are seven. Couple of families raising these girls
Speaker 1: and find out that it's seven years in Yeah, And
Speaker 1: to me, I mean, do you keep raising the kid
Speaker 1: you've been raised and got attached to her? Do you
Speaker 1: go back to the one that's biologically yours? To me,
Speaker 1: it's pretty easy, since you know who's getting better grades
Speaker 1: or how well behaved they are. That's that's how you
Speaker 1: make the discs, so you like flip a coin for
Speaker 1: the more uh desirable. I think my girl's better behaved,
Speaker 1: so I'm going to keep this soh dary you suggest that, Sarah,
Speaker 1: you're gonna like this story. This is like an Anne
Speaker 1: Landers thing, if you're old enough to remember what this is.
Speaker 1: I came across this on Reddit. Do I tell my
Speaker 1: wife the truth? After eleven years? When we first started dating,
Speaker 1: my girlfriend asked me what my favorite meal was so
Speaker 1: she could cook it for me for our one month anniversary.
Speaker 1: We were sixteen years old. I told her my favorite
Speaker 1: meal was chicken parmesan. She cooked it for me from scratching.
Speaker 1: It was delicious, harmer. I realized that what I had
Speaker 1: meant to say was chicken alfredo. I felt bad. That
Speaker 1: sounds like me. I can't keep my sauces straight. I
Speaker 1: don't know many well. I felt bad that she went
Speaker 1: out of her way to cook what she thought was
Speaker 1: my favorite meal, so I didn't correct her or myself sport.
Speaker 1: Now we've been together for eleven years, married for two,
Speaker 1: and once a month or so, she still makes chicken
Speaker 1: parmesan because she thinks it's my favorite meal. It's good,
Speaker 1: but it's really just not my favorite At this point,
Speaker 1: is it too late to tell them the truth? Oh
Speaker 1: my god, that's hilarious. Years you've been making me this
Speaker 1: meal thinking is my favorite meal, and I like it.
Speaker 1: But if you really want to make me my favorite meal,
Speaker 1: it's chicken out free. I so want to do an
Speaker 1: advice colin. Oh good, that's funny. Yeah, that is. It's
Speaker 1: absolutely hilarious. You talk about a conundrum that's all fun
Speaker 1: and not a lot of Yeah. And my guess is
Speaker 1: they're a good couple because, you know, if that's the
Speaker 1: level of ones really committed to making the other one
Speaker 1: happy though other one's really worried about, you know, hurting
Speaker 1: their feelings and yeah, yeah, so it's a good say
Speaker 1: exact way around. But yeah, you know what, Yeah, I
Speaker 1: think it's It actually could be a depending on the woman.
Speaker 1: I assume she's sane, but it could be a hell
Speaker 1: of a bonding moment. Explain it to her, say all right,
Speaker 1: I got to tell you something hilarious. Maybe you know,
Speaker 1: fancy it up, have some champagne or something, and making
Speaker 1: the occasion of it, so she's curious and tell her
Speaker 1: you know when I told you that it's because I
Speaker 1: can't keep my sauces straight. I really meant this, and
Speaker 1: then let her know your chicken parmesan is out of
Speaker 1: this world. Yes, Katie, but I didn't want to tell
Speaker 1: you because I care about you. I did. It's a positive, yes, Katie,
Speaker 1: And what a great story to tell the kids later on.
Speaker 1: Oh it's hilarious. My god, I had your mom making
Speaker 1: me chicken palm for eleven years, and for eleven years
Speaker 1: he didn't tell me that he really meant it. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's that's that's a story of love. That's charming, and
Speaker 1: it is charming, Katie. You already for my transition to
Speaker 1: the tea's of course, maybe her secret for eleven years
Speaker 1: and she's on OnlyFans pleasing lonely people across America to
Speaker 1: make money. Not nearly so charming. No, uh, what is
Speaker 1: the deal with the only fans? We talked a little
Speaker 1: bit yesterday. How does it scale? Nobody understands? Do you
Speaker 1: know somebodyho's making tons of money? We've got an amazing
Speaker 1: story for you and an email from a beloved listener,
Speaker 1: shocking yet true. Stay with Us Armstrong and Geeddy. So
Speaker 1: the headline, if you haven't heard of Wall Street Journal,
Speaker 1: seems to think of old Pete Heggzeth nominee for Secretary
Speaker 1: of Defense. It's just a matter of hours twenty four
Speaker 1: or forty eight before he drops out part of it
Speaker 1: because of NBC and a whole bunch of stuff they
Speaker 1: came up with yesterday about his lifestyle, to which this
Speaker 1: tweet I thought was really good. So NBC runs with
Speaker 1: anonymous sources who say Pete Heggzeth is a drinker and
Speaker 1: a womanizer, but ignores everyone who is on record saying
Speaker 1: Doug m Hoff had hit his girlfriend. That is why
Speaker 1: the liberal media deserves the death that is dying. That's true,
Speaker 1: well said, Yeah, very well said. But more on that
Speaker 1: in some of the other nominees later only fans on
Speaker 1: our radar screen again, I came across this. It was
Speaker 1: somebody who you constantly hear these ridiculous amounts of money
Speaker 1: they make twenty thousand dollars a month, they make one
Speaker 1: million dollars a month or whatever on only fans, and
Speaker 1: I came across a business sort of person tweeting out
Speaker 1: I don't understand how this scales. Will somebody explain it
Speaker 1: to me. And part of the explanation, which a link
Speaker 1: to a magazine article about it, was apparently, only fans
Speaker 1: if you reach a certain level, they've got an army
Speaker 1: of people and bots that will engage your clients. What
Speaker 1: do you call them fans? I guess it's fans. You're
Speaker 1: an only fan following your followers engage them constantly, so
Speaker 1: as you as a semi attractive And I say that
Speaker 1: just because you don't have to be super hot apparently
Speaker 1: to make a lot of money on only fans, based
Speaker 1: on everything I've read, But you're a semi attractive you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know, receptionist at whatever business, and you post
Speaker 1: pictures at night, and you make so much money you
Speaker 1: don't have to call these guys all day long. They've
Speaker 1: got a call center and or bots who regularly check
Speaker 1: in with your fans, say hey, woke up thinking about
Speaker 1: how you doing today? That sort of thing. And apparently,
Speaker 1: and this is where it gets sad and takes some
Speaker 1: of the fun out of it, that there are enough
Speaker 1: people that desire a relationship, apparently, but for whatever reason,
Speaker 1: can't or don't want to have all the mess of
Speaker 1: a real one that that feeds them just enough to
Speaker 1: get by the somebody checking in with you with a
Speaker 1: text every day or send you hey, I just bought
Speaker 1: these shoes. What do you think, picture or something. I'm
Speaker 1: just I'm imagining all this. I don't actually know. There's
Speaker 1: a sexual interaction of some sort, which is the part
Speaker 1: of many healthy relationship, right, But I don't think it
Speaker 1: can be the sexual part. That's the part that's always
Speaker 1: confused me. There's no way it's the sexual part, because
Speaker 1: there's too much porn out there for people to be
Speaker 1: pouring money into the only fans. It's got to be
Speaker 1: the personal connection part. It's the combination. As I've tried
Speaker 1: to explain, it is not merely an anonymous human showing
Speaker 1: her naughty bits. For instance, I'm speaking as a heterosexual male.
Speaker 1: It's somebody with whom you've communicated and perhaps communicated and asked,
Speaker 1: you know, show me your right elbow. I got a
Speaker 1: thing for right elbows, and there's a right elbow. It's
Speaker 1: it's a very different interaction. Left elbows flashes right elbow weird. Ye, Katie,
Speaker 1: you had a friend who was doing only fans and
Speaker 1: that was the other thing.
Speaker 3: Well, I do have a friend that is doing OnlyFans,
Speaker 3: and I'm sure she's not making nearly as much as this.
Speaker 3: The girl that we mentioned earlier during the headline segment,
Speaker 3: who is Sophie Range. She's twenty years old and says
Speaker 3: she's a devout Christian and a virgin who made forty
Speaker 3: three million dollars last year on only fans.
Speaker 1: Keeping in mind, of course, you could say anything. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Actually I went to her only fans page and it says,
Speaker 3: this is my page where you see my naughty side.
Speaker 3: I may be a virgin, but I'm not as innocent
Speaker 3: as you think. Fully nude content available. And also there's
Speaker 3: a guy that paid her four point seven million dollars
Speaker 3: last year.
Speaker 1: Wow, do various stuff? Yeah wow, it's it's the ancient
Speaker 1: archetype of the virgin whoror I am pure of heart
Speaker 1: and body, but I will perform all sorts of wild
Speaker 1: circus acts for you. That's an ancient and understandable male desire.
Speaker 1: Ah wow, wow wow, so devout she's okay, So she says, interesting,
Speaker 1: got this note from a devoted listener. We were talking
Speaker 1: about whether if you were an attractive woman or whatever sense,
Speaker 1: there might be a market if you'd get on OnlyFans,
Speaker 1: and she said, I would absolutely get on OnlyFans if
Speaker 1: success in the first say, three months, was guaranteed, I
Speaker 1: wouldn't even be embarrassed about it. The part that stops
Speaker 1: me is fear of failure. If I was making great
Speaker 1: money from only fans, I would not give an f
Speaker 1: if people saw it, family excluded, but we'd survive. But
Speaker 1: the phase I cannot bring myself to face is the
Speaker 1: building period, because if you have an OnlyFans and you
Speaker 1: don't make a lot of money, you seem low moral
Speaker 1: and stupid. If you have an only fans and you
Speaker 1: make a ton of money, it's hard to argue that
Speaker 1: you haven't hacked the system. I bet that's why a
Speaker 1: lot of people don't do it, not because they're too
Speaker 1: proud to make money on only fans, but because they're
Speaker 1: too scared that it wouldn't be worth it. If you
Speaker 1: try and fail, you get all the bad with none
Speaker 1: of the good. It's too big a risk. Well yeah,
Speaker 1: and then just the personal rejection of I thought I
Speaker 1: was more attractive than that or more wantable than that,
Speaker 1: just to like, if you get a no reaction or
Speaker 1: just a whole bunch of men that would make you
Speaker 1: feel good about yourself. Well, sure, yeah, you're offering your
Speaker 1: wares up. Like I'm not twisting myself into pretzels here.
Speaker 1: This is not easy to do. Nothing.
Speaker 3: What I have a feeling if you asked a woman
Speaker 3: if she's ever considered being on OnlyFans and she said no,
Speaker 3: she's lying.
Speaker 1: Most of us have thought about it. Oh well, how
Speaker 1: such thing you think through? Yeah, sure you not. And
Speaker 1: if I had a you know, wife, girlfriend, or daughter
Speaker 1: who was attractive enough to do it, and I don't
Speaker 1: know what my argument would be exactly. I mean, there are,
Speaker 1: from what I understand, levels of only fans of things
Speaker 1: you do. But if you're just if you're by yourself
Speaker 1: in sexy clothes more or less whatever, and you're making
Speaker 1: enough money to make your house paymer or who cares
Speaker 1: tart yourself up make yourself a sexual object, perhaps I'll
Speaker 1: lend you my Bible, Jack and you could peruse that
Speaker 1: and understand a little bit. Well. But the other end
Speaker 1: of it that I'm more focused on, because I think
Speaker 1: it's going to doom society, is I know people, I
Speaker 1: actually know people who seem to be getting by with
Speaker 1: uh Because every human being has the natural need for
Speaker 1: human relationship interaction. It's just the way we're built. I
Speaker 1: know people who are getting by with just a tiny
Speaker 1: amount of stranger's interaction and there's not even any sexual
Speaker 1: stuff involved, just a little bit of Look, I have
Speaker 1: lots of friends and this person I'm pretty good friends with,
Speaker 1: and it's just practically nothing. But it's enough to keep
Speaker 1: you going and not actually go out into the world
Speaker 1: engage in anything. I read a great piece by a
Speaker 1: gal who was an influencer with six figures of followers,
Speaker 1: mostly art stuff, and I almost brought it to the show,
Speaker 1: but it was a little long, and she talked about
Speaker 1: how she would get the most reaction and the most
Speaker 1: praise for her art if she paired it with some
Speaker 1: emotional like crying because it didn't come out right, or
Speaker 1: faking up some sort of deep emotional distress. And she
Speaker 1: realized that was the way to really goose her followers,
Speaker 1: and started to think that was a little weird, and
Speaker 1: to cut to the punchline, she found herself miserable and
Speaker 1: alone at one point and said I had hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands of followers and no one to call, and she
Speaker 1: unplugged completely that's interesting because I was thinking about it,
Speaker 1: or did I read this part anyway, just the idea
Speaker 1: of it's kind of a even a lower level of
Speaker 1: like the woman who's having in a relationship with a
Speaker 1: married man. He's never leaving his wife, blah blah blah
Speaker 1: blah blah. It kind of feel like he got a
Speaker 1: real relationship. How about my favorite, you got a quote
Speaker 1: unquote relationship with a convict who's cars for most of
Speaker 1: his days. From another great example. I had another argument
Speaker 1: with Jim today. We were writing back and forth, and
Speaker 1: sometimes he can be so stubborn a sweetheart. He's in
Speaker 1: a federal penitentiary and he's never getting out. It's a weird, fake,
Speaker 1: faux relationship. But apparently the way we're built we just
Speaker 1: need like the bar for enough is lower than we fought.
Speaker 1: And I just I don't know how we're not going
Speaker 1: to have eighty percent of society doing some version of that,
Speaker 1: either with other human beings or profiting from it or
Speaker 1: AI bots in the near future. Well, then we die
Speaker 1: out as a species. Yeah, you don't think that's a problem,
Speaker 1: or you don't care. I'm here, it's not my problem. No, Well,
Speaker 1: and I just seriously. I don't. I don't. I'm not
Speaker 1: worried about it, Like am I worried about my kids
Speaker 1: or their kids or whatever being involved in that sort
Speaker 1: of thing. Yes, that being a miserable existence while humanity lasts,
Speaker 1: I do worry about that. Humanity dying out doesn't bother
Speaker 1: me because no humans will be suffering. No, no, there
Speaker 1: are no humans, I agree. And the road there could
Speaker 1: be uncomfortable, Yeah, I would. I would hate it if
Speaker 1: my kids get into their twenties and they don't have
Speaker 1: a relationship and I find out they've got kind of
Speaker 1: a little bit of one of any of the kind
Speaker 1: we just described and it's enough for them to get by.
Speaker 1: I just I don't know. It looks so sad. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: but how much money did these so called virgin make
Speaker 1: forty three million in a year? Wow?
Speaker 3: And she has a list on her page called sugar
Speaker 3: Daddies where there's a guy who has spent forty four
Speaker 3: point seven million on her in the last twelve months.
Speaker 1: Well, that person is obviously incredibly wealthy and nuts. Because
Speaker 1: you got that kind of money, you can get a
Speaker 1: real girlfriend. I guarantee you show. Hey, O, Tani's thinking,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't have to work out and all this working
Speaker 1: on hitting the curveball. I need to show my bits
Speaker 1: and make that sort of money. But you know, the
Speaker 1: other people with their I don't know what they spend
Speaker 1: one hundred dollars a week or thousand a month or
Speaker 1: whatever to I just I don't know. I find it
Speaker 1: very hard to believe it's occurring, but clearly it is.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, it is the entry level, like just to
Speaker 1: be a sub subscriber, like five ten bucks a months,
Speaker 1: and then do you get access to thousands and thousands
Speaker 1: of onlyfan pages? And then no, you subscribe to a
Speaker 1: person per And I don't. Just for the record, I
Speaker 1: knows a lot about this. I read goraciously about everything,
Speaker 1: including this in between making an own account. I have
Speaker 1: no idea. I have never done this. I just I
Speaker 1: know a fair amount about it. No, if you are
Speaker 1: a dude as you have described, and you subscribe to
Speaker 1: say three accounts, you're looking at twenty five thirty bucks
Speaker 1: a month. You know it's interesting custom made like porn
Speaker 1: end or a little bit of interaction. It's interesting like
Speaker 1: the email you read about the person, you know what
Speaker 1: they'd be judged in. I know Macaro people think my
Speaker 1: judgment's all the other direction. Attractive women who can make
Speaker 1: money doing this, I can. I like I said, I'm
Speaker 1: not exactly sure what my argument is why you shouldn't
Speaker 1: do it. The guys, you guys who are on there
Speaker 1: giving them money, I think that's sad and pathetic that
Speaker 1: would want to hide that. I would want to hide
Speaker 1: the fact that I put on a scoregirl outfit, you know,
Speaker 1: with some soft lighting to make money the object. I
Speaker 1: would want to hide the fact that I'm a dude
Speaker 1: paying these people and this is my relationship. I think wisdom,
Speaker 1: both ancient and modern would answer you. And Kurt Vonnaget
Speaker 1: wrote about this, among other people. But you are what
Speaker 1: you do. You can claim to be whatever you can claim. Well,
Speaker 1: I could have been this, But you are what you do.
Speaker 1: Your life is what your life is. But cha, but
Speaker 1: what if I teach or orphans to read all day
Speaker 1: long and then fifteen minutes I'm in the schoolgirl outfit
Speaker 1: at night. That is a more difficult answer to come
Speaker 1: up with unless a person has a specific moral code
Speaker 1: about lust, sex and sexuality. But you know, to each
Speaker 1: their own, I say, I mean, I could be scrolling
Speaker 1: through Twitter for this half hour, I lay on bed
Speaker 1: in my heels and guys send me money? Is it?
Speaker 1: High heels are the schoolgirl thing? I don't know. You're
Speaker 1: gonna go what's popular these days? You know what? I'm
Speaker 1: canceling my subscription to your channel. It's that one day,
Speaker 1: it's this, the other it's that I ain't never again theme. Exactly.
Speaker 1: It's called branding stupid. Yeah, exactly. Are you gonna sit
Speaker 1: on balloons and pop them in pigtails or not? Okay? Right?
Speaker 1: Have you ever seen that stuff? We talked about that
Speaker 1: years ago when we became aware of it. Have you
Speaker 1: ever seen that before? People that get off on hot
Speaker 1: hot chicks sitting on balloons until they pop. That's a
Speaker 1: big thing. Yeah. And then the much more horrifying women
Speaker 1: who like squash mice with their high heel right like that,
Speaker 1: there's all the sub bizarre. It's really bizarre. God, if
Speaker 1: that's your kink, your whole life though, And you think,
Speaker 1: oh my god, finally there's a website where a woman
Speaker 1: steps on mice and high heels. My ship has come
Speaker 1: in because your whole life have been it's not easy
Speaker 1: to find that. No, I wouldn't. I've never tried, but
Speaker 1: I imagine it's it's it's difficult. Yes, God, I mean,
Speaker 1: you got a girlfriend, she's attractive, and she's like, you
Speaker 1: don't have any in your apartment. You had to go
Speaker 1: to the store and buy mice to put in your apartment,
Speaker 1: and you say, oh my god, there's a mouse. Would
Speaker 1: you kill it for me? In these shoes? I mean
Speaker 1: it would be hard to get that going. The rest
Speaker 1: of this segment is going to be Jack solo. As
Speaker 1: I am checking out at this point, I wish everybody well,
Speaker 1: have a great day. All right, we got more stay here,
Speaker 1: so many texts. They're thinking of starting a homely fans
Speaker 1: for people like them. Got this note as a man
Speaker 1: who's signed up for only fans to see naughty bits.
Speaker 1: It's a lot like going to a strip club and
Speaker 1: they pretend they like you. I'm recently divorced, not a
Speaker 1: good looking guy, and struggling with anxiety going out into crowds.
Speaker 1: Only fans give you something that regular porn doesn't, and
Speaker 1: is a bit of a human connection. Is it sad? Yes,
Speaker 1: but it is getting me buy in these struggling times.
Speaker 1: I think that's what a lot of people would say,
Speaker 1: is it? I think they would say, is it sad? Yes?
Speaker 1: Does it get me through the day? Yes, Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: the problem with a lot of stuff like that, you know,
Speaker 1: drink and eating bad food, just all kinds of things.
Speaker 1: I'm getting by. I got through today, so right, And
Speaker 1: we all have those coping mechanisms. And I'm not here
Speaker 1: to judge anybody seriously depending unless your coping mechanism is
Speaker 1: like to beat up people or whatever. But uh, the
Speaker 1: only problem with those half measures is they drain the
Speaker 1: energy it takes to get what you really need, right right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's that's that's interesting. I always like the hashtag activism
Speaker 1: lowers real activism because you feel like you're doing something
Speaker 1: and you're not. That's a very good example some texts
Speaker 1: we got you got Kavanaugh and my Hegzeth. You got
Speaker 1: Hegzeth and Mike Kavanaugh. We've got more of that in
Speaker 1: our four of the kavanaughing of Pete Hegzeth, which may
Speaker 1: actually drive him out of the running. Also a brilliant
Speaker 1: takedown of the idea of slave reparations that it contains
Speaker 1: all sorts of really interesting information about the history of slavery,
Speaker 1: believe it or not. Next Hour, you don't get next hour.
Speaker 1: Grab the podcast Armstrong and getting on demand. In fact, subscribe.
Speaker 1: This is a funny text Joe will like, will doctor
Speaker 1: Jill go back into private practice after Joe's retirement correction
Speaker 1: of a misperception they're not a real doctor, so the oh,
Speaker 1: we ought to mention this. The CEO of United Healthcare,
Speaker 1: the biggest health insurance company in America, was assassinated. It
Speaker 1: would appear today in New York. Well, he's dead, but
Speaker 1: it was a targeted killing. The person that killed him
Speaker 1: was lying in wait for several minutes, according to CBS News,
Speaker 1: and is on the loose in New York and they're
Speaker 1: looking for the guy. But why is this getting so
Speaker 1: much attention? Is there some sort of implied it has
Speaker 1: something to do with healthcare, which we're all unhappy about,
Speaker 1: and something there. He's a big time business executive who
Speaker 1: was rubbed out. That's that's interesting interesting enough. I think
Speaker 1: maybe I'm not sure if they knew which door mister
Speaker 1: Thompson was going to enter and shot him several times
Speaker 1: from a few feet away, then fled on a bicycle.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure if there's a CEO of Home Depot
Speaker 1: would be getting the same coverage I think it's got
Speaker 1: something to do with our feelings about healthcare. There's going
Speaker 1: to be some attempt to claim that because people are
Speaker 1: not getting the healthcare they need, somebody was so upset
Speaker 1: and will read their manifesto and all that. Anyway, that'll
Speaker 1: play out through today. Yeah, I only have a minute.
Speaker 1: The Supreme Court is taking up a trans issue. A
Speaker 1: lot of issues need to be taken up by the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court, so we can once and for all get
Speaker 1: up ruling on it to whether or not states can
Speaker 1: ban the mutilation of kids to get sex affirming signa.
Speaker 1: But anyway, I've got this chart on the percentages by
Speaker 1: generation of people who self identify as LGBTQ plus and
Speaker 1: it's pretty interesting. Maybe we'll get to that aw or four. Also, Wow,
Speaker 1: sounds like a blockbuster revent tormation. Maybe you don't get it.
Speaker 1: I don't know what you do then, So not only
Speaker 1: is the reparations thing important, but it utterly disproves the
Speaker 1: sixteen nineteen Project fraud. If there was ever a fraud,
Speaker 1: Stay with us or join us later via bod Get
Speaker 1: Armstrong and Getty