WEBVTT - Stocks Drop & Bitcoin Slides in Weak December Start

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play or Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, you could call twenty twenty five the year

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 2>of the paradox for the stock market, right because despite

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 2>all of it, the trade tensions, the inflation, the geopolitical

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 2>surprises and shocks, you know, we're up double digits across

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 2>the board here for the major indexes. What is twenty

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty six? Hold Semashaw here glee in our studios actually,

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 2>which is very exciting. Chief global strategist at Principal Asset

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Management seem always good to see you, thanks for stopping

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 2>by the studio, So good to be here.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Is twenty twenty six going to be your paradoxes as

0:00:58.360 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>well for this market? Do you think?

0:00:59.680 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 5>I think it will be in a slightly different way,

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 5>in that you have a fairly constructive economic backdrop. Consumers

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 5>we think will be okay, not incredibly strong, but we

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:11.639
<v Speaker 5>think they'll be okay. They get help from the fiscal

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 5>side they get help from the mounetry side, and yet

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 5>despite that constructive backdrop, investors are still going to have

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 5>that niggling fear about AI, which is likely to persist.

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure if AI is going to continue to

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 3>be the tailwind that it has been for the last

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 3>several years.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 3>It seems like conversations that we're hearing from folks say, well,

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm a little bit concerned that we've gotten too far

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 3>of our skis or to run its course, or the

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 3>best growth daser behind us. How do you guys think

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 3>about that?

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think the narrative has definitely shifted in the

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 5>last two or three months. That really has gained a

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 5>lot of momentum in that people are saying, Okay, what

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 5>else is there? They're not shying away from tech by

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 5>any means, but they're not adding to exposure. They are

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 5>trying to think where else to go, whether that's of

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 5>the sectors, other regions. So there's definitely that dynamic which

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 5>is starting to come through in a lot of conversations

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 5>that we're having.

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 2>So what are you hearing from clients? I mean, where

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 2>are they looking outside of sort of the obvious tech plays.

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so I think the key areas that are really

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 5>we're speaking about is financials, which has already had a

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 5>really good year, but with that constructive backdrop that continues

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 5>to flow through into twenty twenty six. And also consumer discretionary.

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 5>We're hearing more people talk about that, of course, but

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 5>with the fiscal stimulus, the tax refunds that we're expecting

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 5>to come through in Q on, that should give a

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 5>bit of a boost, particularly after a period of some difficulty.

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 5>And then beyond regions, sorry, beyond sectors. A lot of

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 5>questions around regions, and that's been a really interesting discussion

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 5>because Europe has been really kind of underperformers, fairly boring.

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 5>This year is a good year, but what we're seeing

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 5>next year is that nobody's expecting it to be an

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 5>incredible ole performer because growth is still fairly fairly weak,

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 5>but because it doesn't have as much as much exposure

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 5>to technology, it's an opportunity for diversification with a fairly

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 5>solid macro backdrop.

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Is emerging market something you guys think.

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 5>About, Yeah, emerging markets. It's actually because I'm a real

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 5>favorite over the last nine months, and that's something which

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 5>is also carrying through. I give been very particular, you know,

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 5>pick out which areas that you want to be in.

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 5>But certainly the interest rate cycle is continuing in a

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 5>lot of these nations. And interestingly, you know, if you

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 5>still really do believe in the tech narrative when you

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 5>want to stay very much exposed to it. The thing

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 5>about Asia is it has tech but a slightly cheap evaluation.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 5>So I think there's lots of opportunities outside of the US.

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 5>And because this year you did actually see the global

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 5>diversification paid off, that theme is now following through into

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:30.839
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty six.

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>So when you talk are em doing well next year

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 2>possibly and the financials continuing to do nicely, I think

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 2>all that's predicated on a scenario where we're going to

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 2>have lower rates for longer. What happens if we don't well.

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's been interesting because the last week or so,

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 5>just the fact that the market lifted because of expectations

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 5>turning for the around the FED cut in December tells

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 5>us how important it still is. So when we're thinking

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 5>about twenty twenty six, we have this constructive backdrop. We

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 5>think that markets will do okay, And to your point,

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 5>it is predicated on the idea that policymakers are able

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 5>to still step in and provide that help wherever it's necessary. Now,

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 5>we don't think that the US requires a lot of

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 5>rate cuts, but we do need to feel that the

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 5>feders were still willing to step in.

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 3>We had some very good earnings in third quarter, I

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 3>think better than most people forecasted. Is the earnings out

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 3>constructive for this market? Are there earnings growth? Is it

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 3>enough to push this market higher?

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Absolutely, we do think that without you know, for example,

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 5>our economic growth forecast is for about two percent two

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 5>point one percent growth next year. When you have that

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 5>kind of backdrop, then really earnies can do well. Now,

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 5>again it's not bangbusters, but it is something that you

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 5>can see a bit of a broadening out and it

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 5>can continue to drive the market higher. Again, we're not

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 5>looking at twenty five percent gains, but we are thinking

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 5>that this is still a fairly decent year for next

0:04:58.040 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty six.

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Do tariffs trip up finally trip up Corporate America next year?

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Because I mean, if you look at earnings this past quarter,

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 2>they really didn't.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't think that tariffs are going to be that

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 5>much of an issue, you know, we're expecting that the

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 5>amount of uncertain that we have this year is going

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 5>to continue to fade into next year, though of course

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 5>there'll be pockets volatility and concerns, but ultimately we have

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 5>also realized that businesses are able to adapt. We don't

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 5>think that they are willing to pass on too many

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 5>price increases, so you could see some margin compression, but

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 5>we're not expecting it to be very very significant.

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 3>But geopolitics, I mean, it just seems like, you know,

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 3>we still have I don't know what's going on in

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 3>the mid mid East, but does nothing seem to be

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:42.679
<v Speaker 3>resolved there. We've got ongoing negotiations between the ukin and Russia.

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 3>We've got China. Who knows what's going to happen in

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 3>that part of the world. The market seems to have

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 3>discounted most of that throughout this year. Is that something

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 3>we can expect to continue to think or is that

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 3>a black swan out.

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 5>There that is now I believe that the market should

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 5>continue to discount it was right and ounting it this year. Historically,

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 5>whenever there've been geopolitical events, unless it fundamentally changes the

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 5>inflation story, it is not something which has a sustained

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 5>market impact. So of course we keep an eye on it,

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 5>but it's not something that we're willing to try and

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 5>position portfolios around.

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 2>And what about outside equities, I'm thinking, well, crypto, which

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 2>we know volatility is sort of always the word of

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 2>the day. But even things like private credit, where there

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 2>have been some concerns and we've seen pockets of weakness,

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 2>how do you look at that in twenty twenty six.

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we still have a constructive view of private credit.

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 5>Of course, I've been as you said, there's been pockets

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 5>of weakness and it has created a lot of concerns.

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 5>Are they something more sinister underlying it? But a lot

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 5>of that has to us it's been idiosyncratic shocks. If

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 5>we're looking at the consumer base, for example, and how

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 5>this feeds through to private credit, we don't have that

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 5>many concerns. We still think they strength in that underlying story.

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 5>It is losing a little bit of shine, I would say,

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 5>but that means that investors need to be really careful

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 5>abou where they're looking at. So for us, the middle

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 5>market direct lending is an area which you have a

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 5>little bit more defensive nacio slightly more high quality within

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 5>that space. So I think it's important that investor's position

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 5>appropriately within private credit. But importantly, going forward, these returns

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 5>are going to be more and more difficult to come

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 5>about in the same way that we've had over the

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 5>last few years. So dipping into private markets is going

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 5>to be credit increasingly important.

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Not for nothing but the high temperature today in des

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Moines I was supposed to be thirteen degrees.

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 2>We're looking forward to that.

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 3>And dude, the low temperature in Wednesdays can be minus five.

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 5>So the thing is is that in de Moines you

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 5>don't need to step outside. You can go through the skywalks.

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, because for those of who all know Principal Asset Management,

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 3>great great asset management business. They've been into business forever.

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 3>I've gone out there to Des Moines many times to

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 3>see those folks. It's December and it's chili in Des Moines. Yeah,

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 3>and so Seema being the leader of you know, one

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 3>of the senior folks of Principal as the managers, he's

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 3>got to go to des Moines and see the folks there.

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 5>Black Friday thermal thermal sales.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you're stocking up.

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 3>This is not London because this is not the city

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 3>of London. This is De Moines, Iowa in December.

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Makes it look like a heat wave here in New

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 2>York City exactly.

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Semasha, thank you so much for joining us.

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 4>We appreciate it.

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 3>On our way from London to Des Moines, Iowa, make

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 3>a little stopover in New York City here, Smashaw, chief

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 3>global Strategist, principal Asset Management to stay with us. More

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 3>from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am. He's durn Listen

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Karplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, Paul, we are going to have a new

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 2>FED chair in in May. President Trump says he's decided

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 2>on his pick. He hasn't announced too, but we know

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 2>that Kevin Hassett, his chief Economic advisor, seems to be

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 2>at the top of that list. Want to dig into

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 2>how that may impact market decisions and take a look

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 2>at sort of the more global political landscape, if you will.

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 2>With Henrietta Trey's co founder of Veda Partners. Henrietta, thanks

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 2>so much for being with us. Let's just start with

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 2>the Federal Reserve, the changes that are to come in

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 2>the months ahead. How are you looking at that when

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 2>you think about markets overall in twenty twenty six.

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 6>I think it's obviously the core question.

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 7>And with so much uncertainty at the FED, what I

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 7>like about having a new FED member, specifically if it's

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 7>Kevin Hassett, is you know how that member is going

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 7>to vote.

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 6>There's not any confusion, and with such.

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 7>A disparate FED, that's been something that's tricky for investors

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 7>to really nail down. So you now will have two

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 7>guaranteed locks on the voting basis of whether or not

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 7>there should be cuts.

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 6>The tricky part is the timing.

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 7>As we get into May, the President is going to

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 7>be staring down the twenty twenty six midterm elections coming

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 7>up in November, and all four hundred and thirty five

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 7>members except for the twenty two I think Republicans who

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 7>are not running again, are going to be up for reelection.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 6>They're going to have to sell the United.

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 7>States consumer on the idea that the economy is great

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 7>and so we should be cutting interest rates if we

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 7>need to, or the job market is where we should

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 7>be prioritizing our time, but simultaneously that we need a

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 7>two thousand dollars tax rebate to offset the cost of

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 7>the tariff. So it's a really tricky dynamic to have

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 7>that conversation at the same time.

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 6>That's what I'd be worried about in terms of timing,

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 6>but Kevin has it. I think we'd get through the set.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 7>Without too much of a problem on the confirmation front,

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 7>unless there's some unknown quantity we haven't learned about the

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 7>last decade of his time in the public space.

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Henrietta, I know you're going to tell us that Congress

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 3>is either on break now or they're about to go

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 3>on break, But what's the to do list for our

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Congress here?

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 4>Looking forward?

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, the to do list is really going to be

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 7>dominated by those ACA subsidies, which is where they actually

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 7>have promised the Democratic Conference that they will hold a

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 7>vote this year.

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 6>So in the three week work session.

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 7>Which equals out to about twelve days of legislative action

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 7>for the whole month of December through the end of

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 7>this year, they're going to have to.

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 6>Hold some sort of vote on ACA subsidies.

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 7>They also wanted to hold something that they were calling

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 7>Russia week but as the President is negotiating deals with

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 7>Brussia and Ukraine separately, they'll probably not hold those votes.

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 7>So mostly ACA subsidies continued work on the appropriations bills

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 7>to avoid a shutdown.

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 6>As we come back in early twenty twenty six, and.

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 2>You throw into the mixed Venezuela now Henrietta right, President

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Trump said that Airline should consider the airspace above and

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 2>around Venezuela to be closed. As his administration continues to

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 2>threaten more aggressive steps against President Maduro's government. We see

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Oil reacting to this news. Oil is hired today. No

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 2>big surprise there, But how do you see that possibly

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 2>playing out?

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, The thing about going into foreign policy issues is

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 7>that members, especially on the Senate side on Armed Services

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 7>and Foreign Affairs Committee, they take their.

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 6>Jobs incredibly seriously. They're going to want to hold hearings.

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 7>They're going to want to talk about the potential commands

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.479
<v Speaker 7>that HEXIT delivered to kill two remaining survivors.

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 6>They take that incredibly seriously.

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 7>You've seen it in the backlash that came out this

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 7>weekend in public comments from Republican members as well. So

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 7>that's going to eat up a lot of airtime for

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 7>probably weeks, if not months, well into twenty.

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 6>Twenty six, I would expect as well.

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 7>And again, it just takes away those twelve legislative days

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 7>of action that they actually have in the month of

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 7>December to tackle government funding.

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 6>And ACA subsidies. That's going to be.

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 7>Where all their concentration and oxygen is and they love

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 7>those moments.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 6>They really want to have hearings about it. Oversight. That's

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 6>very serious for those members.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm heading Tooruba next month and that's like right off

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 3>the coast of Venezuela, so I'm paying attention to I mean,

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.599
<v Speaker 3>I'll be sitting on the beach watching navy ship. I

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 3>don't know what's going on. Hey, Henrietta, can you tell

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 3>me what an auto pen is? And do I need

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 3>to care about this?

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 6>I would. They're used all the time.

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 7>The President signs a million different things today and the

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 7>auto pen is a time test used in every single

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 7>administration way to get signatures out the door from the president. Obviously,

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 7>President Trump has a bone to pick with the auto pen,

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 7>but I would be shocked if he hasn't also been

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 7>a profligate user of it, particularly in his first term.

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 2>But he actually made Biden's portrait in the White House

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 2>a picture of the autopen his auto signature. Yes, so

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 2>it's not Biden's face, it is his auto pen signature

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 2>hanging in the White House.

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Estra.

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 6>So the maturity is astounding.

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Henriette is. We had the governorships in Virginia and New

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Jersey several weeks ago, which were a positive for the Democrats,

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 3>and that kind of caused the Trump administration too, I

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 3>guess focus a little bit more on affordability. Is that

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 3>still a theme for this White House or as it

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 3>moved on?

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 6>You know, it has to be.

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 7>It has to be because the president is very closely

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 7>watching the midterms. If the Democrats control the House, which

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 7>is very likely to be the outcome of the next election,

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 7>then he has a serious problem in terms of real oversight, subpoenas, etc.

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 7>That will occupy the next the final two years of

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 7>his term in office. So winning the twenty twenty six

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 7>midterms has been a huge focus for the president, which

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 7>is why there's been the redistricting efforts across Indiana and

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 7>Texas and everywhere else. And the problem for the Trump

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 7>administration is the top issues for the American voters are

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 7>not the Russia, Ukraine, War, Israel, Gaza, Venezuela. None of

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 7>the foreign policy stuff is of interest to US voters.

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 7>They're famously not following international politics. What they do care

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 7>about is inflation and prices. Those the top two issues

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 7>facing consumers in all polls that are taken, along with

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 7>the economy and the job market. So whether the President

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 7>wants to focus on those issues or not, it's mandatory

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 7>because that's what the voters are going to turn out

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 7>to either support their Republican ideas or reject them in November.

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 7>So those Governatario races where Democrats picked up twelve thirteen

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 7>points in New Jersey and Virginia, where Republicans are really

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 7>hoping to make gains and keep it to like five

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 7>point wins, showed that that's not going to be an

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 7>option as long as affordability remains the number one problem.

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 7>So whether they want to or not, it has to

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 7>be the core focus of the Republican conference and the

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 7>administration AC subsidies player role, and that prices, inflation, all

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 7>those pieces, tariffs are hugely important to the US consumer

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 7>and voter.

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 2>And of course the job market, which you mentioned just

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 2>a second ago. So we know that this administration vows

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 2>strict immigration curves, especially after that National Guard member or

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 2>two of them dying after being ambushed near it near

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 2>the White House last week. So how if they continue

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 2>with that strategy, which it seems like they're going to

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 2>throughout the Trump administration, how do you see that impacting

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>the job market specifically?

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, the job.

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 7>Market is hugely problematic, mostly because people don't feel comfortable.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 6>If you look at the University.

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 7>Of Michigan consumer confidence data and whether they think they

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 7>have an opportunity to go get a new job, if

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 7>they're going to get a pay increase, everybody's sort of

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 7>staying put. But on top of that, you're seeing major

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 7>corporations fire folks. I think it's eighty six thousand jobs

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 7>in the manufacturing job sector have been lost since Liberation Day.

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 7>So there's this sense amongst the US consumer that there's

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 7>not another job out there and they.

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 6>Need to stay put.

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 7>That creates the uncertainty and the lack of wage growth,

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 7>and again that compounding issue of focused on prices and

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 7>affordability that keeps all that front and center on the

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 7>immigration front.

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 6>From my seat, the response function.

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 7>That you see in the voter polls is that they

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 7>think the President has quote gone too far on immigration,

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 7>and a lot of that is to do with the

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 7>National Guards being sent to cities around America.

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 6>They're coming to New Orleans this week.

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 7>So that's an issue that the American voter sees and

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 7>has decided that they don't like, even though they just.

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 6>Voted for it in twenty twenty four.

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 7>So that's going to be an area of overreach and

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 7>that sort of pendulum swing that we're very used to

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 7>in politics. So you elect one party to do sweeping

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 7>change in one year, and then as soon as they

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 7>start doing a sweeping change, you decide you don't like it.

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 6>That's the phase that we're in right now.

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 2>From the book base, Well, Henrietta, you provide investors with

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 2>economic policy analysis. You've been doing it for years. You're

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna have a very busy twenty twenty six. How Manyetta Treys,

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 2>co founder of Veda Partners.

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.919
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app or

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>watch US live on YouTube.

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Brian Levitt, chief global market strategist for Investco, joins US

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 3>here in our New York City studios. Brian, what is

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 3>the twenty twenty sixth call for you guys?

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 4>This year?

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 8>The twenty twenty six call for us is that we

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 8>will continue to see resilience in the global economy, actually

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 8>even a pick up in global economic activity given some

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 8>school support policy easing in the United States, and that

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 8>should continue to drive markets higher. We're looking for some

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 8>type of rebalancing, you know, sector rotation even within growth,

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 8>but also to broadening out to other parts of the markets,

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 8>specifically non US markets.

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 4>As the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates.

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so what non US markets do you particularly like

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty six?

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 8>Typically the developing markets of the world perform best in

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 8>an environment when the FED is easing and when the

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 8>dollar is either flat to weakening. And so you know,

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 8>that's why so much of this is on the FED

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 8>right now, and why the focus is so significant on

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 8>the Fed, because a lot of these calls are predicated

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 8>on the fact that we will get easier monetary policy,

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 8>a steepening of the yield curve and no additional upward

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 8>pressure on the US dollar, and so in that backdrop

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 8>a number of developing economies, the central banks of developing

0:18:55.880 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 8>economies can lower interest rates and produce better economic outcome.

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 2>In the US.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Here it's been twenty twenty five has been I guess

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 3>the theme has been AI and what it means for everybody.

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 3>Do we still play that in twenty twenty six. Do

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 3>we have a different playbook for AI in twenty twenty six.

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, the nice thing about it, I think you continue

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 8>to play it. But the nice thing is you can

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:21.239
<v Speaker 8>diversify some of your portfolio into other parts of the

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:24.479
<v Speaker 8>market if you get the policy easing and a pickup

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 8>in activity. And so the challenge for the last couple

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 8>of years has been it's really been an environment where

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 8>economic activity has been basically flat. There's been no real

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 8>catalyst to unlock value in the US markets, and so

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 8>in a slow growth environment, you buy growth. I don't

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 8>think we give up on that trade. But if you

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 8>get to pick up an economic activity that we are expecting,

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 8>you should be able to participate with a better valuation portfolio.

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 8>That would mean moving into MidCap strategies, moving into more

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 8>value oriented parts of the market.

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.719
<v Speaker 2>And what about private credit, which we know has been exploding.

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 2>You see opportunity there in the new year.

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we do.

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 8>And I don't think that you know this the concerns

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 8>that people have with a couple of high profile names,

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 8>questions about whether that was systemic, and you know, I

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 8>went on record saying idiosyncratics.

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 4>So so far, so good.

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 8>I don't think that the private markets are paired as

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 8>impaired as many people believe. And you're still looking at

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 8>yields of you know, seven eight percent, which is you know,

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 8>probably a reasonable equity like return, maybe even better than

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 8>equity like return over the next decade, and the fundamentals

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 8>still appear to be sound.

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Twenty twenty eighty five. I mean, if you look across

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 3>fix income, I do that with the I go function

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 3>on the Bloomberg terminal, Like you could read about how

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 3>fixing come is performing globally the US fix income market.

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 3>I mean mid to high single digit returns this year.

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 3>It's been a good year, and some of the best

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 3>returns have been. If you've been taking credit risk, high

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 3>yield leverage loans, how do you think about the credit

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 3>profile out there?

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 8>Well, the first thing I would say about just the

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 8>returns in general and the aggregate. How many people were

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 8>trying to warn us at some point this year about

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 8>the sustainability of the US fiscal situation, and we heard

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 8>things like rates are going to keep going well above

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 8>five six percent.

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 4>I never bought into that.

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 8>In essence, what investors were trying to tell us was

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 8>that the US Treasury was going to trade like a

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 8>credit No, the US Treasury is going to trade based

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 8>on the nominal growth potential of the country. That's precisely

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 8>what it did, moving down from four to eighty and

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 8>mid January to basically four percent today. Now the credit markets,

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 8>what ends up happening mid cycle is that investors become

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 8>very concerned about spreads. But spreads can remain very tight

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 8>so long as the economy doesn't roll over or inflation

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 8>expectations break out, and neither of those things happen. So yeah,

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 8>you should expect coupon like returns in investment grade, in

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 8>high yield, unless you leave we're heading towards a recession.

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 8>And if we were heading towards a recession, I think

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 8>it would look like a much different backdrop, not the

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 8>least of which the FED would probably be looking at

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 8>titan policy and the bankers would probably be tightening lending standards,

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 8>neither of which is happening right now.

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Are you reading any tea leaves and what's happening in crypto?

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we've got bitcoin now below eighty six thousand.

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 2>It was at one hundred and twenty six thousand just

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 2>a couple months ago. Not even what do you do

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 2>with bitcoin in particular in the new year.

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 8>It seems to me that it's been very much predicated

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 8>on expectations of the Fed, which makes today seem like

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 8>a little bit of a surprise compared to where we

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 8>have been. If you look at when Jerome Powell first

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 8>indicated that there might be some differing of views at

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 8>the FOMC, that's when you started to see things like

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 8>crypto sell off. You started to see nonprofitable tech sell off,

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 8>So that was all.

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 4>Part of the same trade.

0:22:58.040 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 8>I've got to be honest, I'm not the world's form

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 8>most crypto expert, but I assumed as there was greater

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 8>clarity from where we were going with the Federal Reserve

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 8>as December got priced back in for a raykit, I

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 8>didn't expect this morning's action.

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 4>In crypto, so clearly there's still.

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Some is there just contagion selling? I mean there's some.

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 8>Leverage in those markets, contagion selling. I mean it has

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 8>moved pretty far below it's it's fifty day moving average

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 8>right now, where the S and P five hundred does not.

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 8>I don't view it necessarily as a harbinger of where

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 8>the stock market is going, but certainly interesting to watch today, intriguing,

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 8>not something I would have expected. I did not expect

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 8>to wake up this morning and see crypto down five percent.

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, you're a Michigan man in good standing after four years,

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 3>winning year in sale? Are you top universe? I expect

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 3>this from Tom. What was your takeaway from this Saturday?

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 3>The Ohio State University and you're Michigan.

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 8>Michigan could not stop the run, and you know you

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 8>had a twelve minute dry Ohio State just rolling them.

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 8>I think sixteen of eighteen plays were running. Michigan couldn't

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 8>stop the run, they couldn't get anything going on offense.

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 4>They'll be back right.

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 8>These things are These things have tended to be a

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 8>little bit cyclical.

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Ohio State's got.

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 8>A very good team this year. They've got a number

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 8>of first round picks heading towards the NFL.

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 4>We'll be back go blue.

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 3>And it's crazy. If the Ohio State coach did not

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 3>win this game and he won the national championship, he

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 3>still would be at risk. Remarkable, right and believed because

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 3>you can't Michigan, you can't get.

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 4>As you should have been. Exactly exactly, That's how it works.

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Brian Levi at Chief Global Market Strategists for Investment. Stay

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.479
<v Speaker 3>with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen on

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>applecar Play and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 3>It is time for newspapers and Lisa Manteoli, So what

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 3>have fors?

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 7>All?

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:04.959
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 9>So I want to talk about DNA test kits. Right,

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 9>I'm not sure if you guys have done that. My

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 9>sisters have tried it.

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 2>You know the twenty three did it? You did the

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty three and meters you did see that's when they

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 2>did too. It's really popular. But here's the thing.

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 9>It's now causing issues for families that are handling the

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 9>states because they have surprised heirs who are now looking

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 9>for their cut of.

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 2>The inheritors only under services way.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 9>Yes, yes, yes, yes, so the Wall Street Journal actually

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 9>had this is an interesting take on it. States are

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 9>now reconsidering laws because a will or a trust it

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 9>doesn't necessarily prevent surprise.

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 2>Relatives from making a claim.

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 9>And there's phrases and will sometimes like to my descendants,

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 9>So that can leave out room.

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 2>For like the open Yes it does, it does.

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 9>So that I mean the rules differ from state to states,

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 9>so it depends on what state you are. But lawyers

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 9>are saying what you need to do is you need

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 9>to create a state plans that account for potential surprise

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 9>heirs because it's.

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Happening more and more. I can't believe it. Can you

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 2>believe they're now in yan need to add a line

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 2>to your wills and trusts?

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Now, did you have me surprises in your twenty three

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 3>and me experience?

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 2>No surprises? It sort of just confirmed what I thought. Oh,

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of neat.

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's fun.

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay, good good, No surprise anything out there. You're

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 2>just putting that out there, nothing surprising. You're not going

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:17.719
<v Speaker 2>to claim anybody's art.

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 9>Its Okay, did you guys go to the movies over

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 9>the weekend?

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 2>No, yes, I did. Okay, did you see the Utopia too?

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 4>I did?

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.479
<v Speaker 2>I know, and I saw this story that I saw Wicked.

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh you did, okay, which I really enjoyed. Okay, good, good,

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 2>And I'm surprised it was not number one because I

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 2>know what you're going to tell us.

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 9>Yes, Yancey's which I was surprised too, because I was like,

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 9>Wicked is huge and it's been huge. But yeah, it's

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 9>now Walt Disney. They are front and center Utopia too.

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 9>It's a sequel to the film that was back in

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 9>twenty sixteen, so it's been like a while since. This

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 9>came out one hundred and fifty six million in North

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 9>American box office over Thanksgiving, five hundred and fifty six

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 9>million worldwide. Disney said it's the biggest animated opening for

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 9>all of all time in China. That excludes like the

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 9>local because that's huge, the biggest.

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's rarely.

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Global Hollywood, because China has been kind of closed off.

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 3>After becoming the second biggest movie theater in the world

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 3>after North America, it kind of slowed down over the

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 3>last six seven, eight years. But you know, I think

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 3>it's opening.

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 4>Up a little bit more.

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 3>So that's a good sign for Hollywood.

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 9>Okay, good, good, good, And it's good news for theaters,

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 9>right because it's been kind of slow before before Wicked

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 9>came out. And it kind of sets the stage two

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 9>for the next Disney movie, which is Avatar. It's coming

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.679
<v Speaker 9>December nineteenth, so they're kind of set in the stage

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:34.400
<v Speaker 9>for a little bit.

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I hope to go see it. I like

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 2>the first one.

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 3>It was very cute movie, I mean cuteness, surprise. I

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 3>think for Disney they thought it could be big bag.

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I see Wicked after just one weekend. That's

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 2>that's what's surprising to me. But okay, those Utopia.

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.959
<v Speaker 9>Yes, yes, yes, okay, So this one, there was a

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 9>big ultra marathon in DC over the weekend. But it

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 9>might not be the one that you've heard of. It's

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 9>the Taco Bell DC fifty k. Okay, So here's what you.

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 4>Have to do.

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 9>Thirty one miles of running, but you have to stop

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 9>and eat at nine different taco bill the way. Okay,

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 9>each location you have to purchase and eat an item.

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 9>Drinks don't count as a purchase, and the race rules

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 9>say that yes, vomiting is discouragement.

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Allowed, oh gosh, but.

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 9>Also no pepto, bismal, no alcocy. You're not allowed to

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 9>take any pepsid. You can't do anything like that before

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 9>the race. And it gets tougher as you go on

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 9>because they start add it on, like at this you know,

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 9>by this time you hit this chain, you have to

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 9>eat this many chilupus or something like that.

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 2>So they really push it. You have to hand in

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 2>a receipt when.

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 9>You cross the finish line to show that you had

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 9>you know, all the greasy event. Yes, you have to

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 9>complete it in eleven hours at least that's the cutoff. Okay, okay,

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 9>but people, it's something new. It's like ultra marathons is

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 9>like this whole big you know, crazy They can.

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Eat any crazy stomach for something like that.

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 4>I get.

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 3>I would not want.

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would not even attempt, especially our clean eater

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Lisa Macheo. I cannot see you doing.

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 9>I mean, granted you run off the calories, but still

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 9>it can't be good.

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm going to pass on that running experience, all right.

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 3>The newspapers, Lisa Matteo, there you go. The highlight of

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 3>the day.

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:20.959
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal.