WEBVTT - Ep133 "Why do people hold misbeliefs?" with Dan Ariely

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Why do people sometimes buy into ideas that seem obviously

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>falls from the outside, as we see with conspiracy theories.

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Is this kind of misbelief a failure of intelligence or

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>something deeper and more universal to human brains? Do conspiracy

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>theories offer a sense of clarity and belonging when reality

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>feels chaotic and threatening? And what would it take for you,

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>under the right emotional conditions, to begin believing something that

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>your past self would find unbelievable. Today we'll speak with

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>behavioral economist Dan Arieli, who has thought a lot about misbelief.

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>For him, it's a scientific question, but also an interest

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that started very personally. Welcome to Inner Cosmos with me,

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>David Eagleman. I'm a neuroscientist and author at Stanford and

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in these episodes we sail deeply into our three pounds

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>universe to understand how we see the world even when

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't match the facts. Today we're diving into one

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>of the most perplexing phenomena about the mind. When we

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>think about brains or computers, we think about how to

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>gather facts about the world and put them together into

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a model. So one of the most interesting problems in

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 1>brain science is that of misbelief. Now, I'm not talking

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>about misinformation here. If someone hands you the wrong fact

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and then you repeat it, that's one thing. I'm talking about,

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the deeper psychological journey by which a person becomes convinced

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of something that outsiders find totally detached from reality. So

0:01:56.040 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we've got conspiracy theories, medical skepticism, political fan These are

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>all meaningful forces in our culture. Now, one thing to

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>note right away, these aren't new. You can see these

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>throughout history, dating back at least two and a half millennia,

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>when people had conspiracy theories about, for example, Socrates's execution

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and who is really behind it? Or the same thing

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>happened later with the death of Alexander the Great and

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>then with the assassination of Julius Caesar. Now, if this

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>reaction to a national tragedy sounds familiar, it's because it

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is throughout history. Every time there's a significant event, people

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>jump in with their hypotheses, and these live in a

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 1>spectrum from reasonable to outlandish. I'm not sure if there's

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>really an upper limit to how wild the hypotheses are

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>likely to get. Now, this all would be nothing but

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>an academic interest, except that often crazy ideas are capable

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:57.119
<v Speaker 1>of tilting elections or fracturing political alliances, or influencing things from.

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 2>Public health to wars.

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so whenever we look at historical features that are

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>present in every generation like this, it tells us we're

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:10.519
<v Speaker 1>not looking at some local cultural phenomenon or some consequence

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of social media. Instead, we're looking at some issue about

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>how brains naturally work and what their failure modes are.

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 2>The general story.

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that the brain's job is to make good predictions

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>about the world, to reduce uncertainty, to create coherence from chaos,

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and to generate frameworks that make us feel safe and oriented.

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But under stress, those systems can shift, emotions can become

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>louder than evidence, threat detection ramps up, Identity becomes a filter,

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and into this vacuum come narratives that promise clarity. You

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>find communities that promise belonging or stories that give you

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a clean explanation for why everything feels wrong. These narratives

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>are structured to be sticky. Once you take the first step,

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the next one is easier, and before long, someone who

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>once trusted the people around them or the institutions around

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>them might find themselves trapped in a self reinforcing ecosystem

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of mistrust. Now, I have my own take on conspiracy theories,

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>which you can hear in episode sixty six from last year.

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>But recently, my friend and colleague Dan Arieli wrote a

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>book called Misbelief Now. Dan is a behavioral economist at

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Duke University who has spent his career studying how humans

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>make decisions, why we often get things wrong and predictable ways,

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and the ways in which our circumstances shape our judgment.

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>You may know him from his book Predictably Irrational or

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>his other excellent books, and you might also know him

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>from his enormous body of research over the years. Nan

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>is an expert in rationality and trust and incentives, and

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>this gives him a rare vantage point into why people

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>fall into conspiracy thinking. His book Misbelief goes further. It's

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>a scientific deep dive, but it's also a personal story

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. Here in a minute. It starts with his

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 1>experience of getting targeted with crazy COVID era conspiracy theories,

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>where some people accused him online of collaborating with pharmaceutical

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>companies to destroy humanity with COVID. Now, it goes without

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>saying that Dan's research hopes to save humanity, not destroy it.

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing, because he's a super thoughtful person,

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the results of being on the barrel end

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of this was a fascination with the process by which

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>people take on beliefs, beliefs about other people or the

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>news media or whatever. He became entranced with the ways

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that people go down a funnel of beliefs to arrive

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in a place that's unrecognizable. So here's my interview with

0:05:51.760 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Dan Rilly. So, Dan, you've spent in your career studying rationality,

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>but misbelief is more personal. So what you started down

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>this road of trying to understand why people have conspiracy theories?

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 3>So first of all, you're absolutely right.

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 4>And usually when I write books, I finished the research

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 4>and then I write about it.

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 3>This was a very, very different story.

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 4>So COVID started and I dropped everything and I was

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 4>just doing COVID related things.

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 3>And COVID of courses is.

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 4>A problem with biology, but it's also a problem of

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 4>social science. Domestic violence increased by about nine hundred percent.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 4>What do you do with remote work, What do you

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 4>do with kids studying remotely? What do you do with

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 4>furlough with firing people, What do you do with government subsidies?

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.119
<v Speaker 4>Lots and lots of big questions. Do you give people

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 4>finds for not putting masks?

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 3>And so on?

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 4>And I dropped everything and I just did COVID and

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 4>I was just trying to do research, trying to understand,

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 4>trying to give advice whatever I could. And about five

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 4>months into it, I get an email from a woman

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 4>I once helped with the presentation she was doing for

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 4>her company, and.

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 3>She said, Dan, what's wrong? Would you what happened? How

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 3>did you become that person?

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 4>You know? I don't think very much about this email.

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 4>We get lots of emails, let's send back what do

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 4>you mean? And I get back an email with lists

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 4>of links that tell me that I'm an awful person.

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 4>For example, there was one link that showed a video

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 4>of me in the burn department saying that I was

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 4>burned when I was eighteen, through seventy percent of my

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 4>body through almost three years in hospital. True, but then

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 4>the video went to say that because of that, I

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 4>started hating healthy people and that's why I joined the

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 4>cabal to try and kill as many people possible. First

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 4>with COVID and then with the vaccine there was no

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 4>vaccine yet there were videos of me in Nazi uniform

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 4>concentration care.

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Like.

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 4>The amount of things were incredible, and my first reaction

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 4>was to set them straight, like this must be some misunderstanding.

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 3>How can that be?

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.679
<v Speaker 4>I wake up every day trying to do the best

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 4>I can for the world with this very very difficult pandemic,

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 4>and these people think I'm evil, Like, how can that be?

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 4>But I thought better of it, and I said, let

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 4>me call two PR experts and asked what would they do.

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 4>People are experts in this, and they said, don't touch it.

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 4>And I was very proud that I called them, but

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 4>they couldn't follow their advice. You know, imagine, imagine somebody

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 4>came to you and said, David, I know that you're

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 4>just an awful person, and here's all the things you've done.

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 4>It like feels Anyway, I spend a month trying to

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 4>convince people.

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 3>It was awful. It was awful because I showed people

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 3>my calendar. People thought I had the contract with Pfizer.

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 3>I said, look, I'll show you a way tax with hers.

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 3>It was incredible. These people are so convinced.

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, I spent a month trying to convince them, and

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 4>I failed terribly felt but in the meantime, the anger

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 4>against me increased further and I started getting death threats.

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 4>And then I said, okay, I'm not convincing anybody.

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Let me stop that. But I truly think that there's

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 3>a big topic here that I need to understand. You know,

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm a social.

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Scientist for a reason, and you know there's something people say, Okay,

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 4>I believe the earth is flat. Okay, but when somebody

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 4>comes to you and say I know something about you,

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 4>and he said, no, no, no, I don't have a contract

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 4>with Pfiser. How can you say that I have one?

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 4>I had to study this. So the next two years

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 4>I spent. I started by talking to the same people

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 4>who are my accusers, and I called them up and

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 4>I said, look, forget about me. I want to understand

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 4>your journey. Tell me what happened, like like, you started

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 4>with something, At what point did you become somebody with

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 4>very very different beliefs?

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 3>What was the trigger? What happened?

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 4>And I try to understand the journey that people move

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 4>from being, you know, believing the normal things that people

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 4>believe in society to become I call the misbelievers, people

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 4>who view the world not just believe in something that

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 4>is not correct, but view the world from that lens.

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 4>Because the people who who believed that did not just

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 4>believe that there was a cabalance so on, they looked at.

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Everything through that through that lens.

0:10:50.240 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 4>And psychologically I divided into four parts emotion, stress, cognition, personality,

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 4>and social And the stress part is the first thing

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 4>where you ask yourself, why would somebody wake up in

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 4>the morning and they have a choice. They can believe

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 4>in the benevolent God that is taking care of us

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 4>and helps us, and you.

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Don't need to worry and everything has a purpose.

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Versus believing that there's a cabau there's a hugely powerful

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 4>group of people who are trying to hurt them, poison them,

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 4>getting their kids not to have kids so they don't

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 4>have grandchildren, trying to all kinds of control. Why would

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 4>somebody want to believe that? It is a very very

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 4>strange set of belief. And what I found is that

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 4>stress is the answer. So that when people are saying,

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't understand the world. I thought things were supposed

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 4>to go this way. Why am I hurting? Why am

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 4>I hurting more than other people? Why am I not

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 4>getting my share of.

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Things like that?

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 4>We want an answer, and the answer better has a

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 4>villain and a story, and I'll give you kind of

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 4>a kind of My two favorite studies of this. One

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 4>is a very old study in anthropology where they looked

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 4>at tribes and they look at tribes that fish in

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 4>the ocean versus tribe that fish in lakes. And of

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 4>course the tribe that fish in the lake have much

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 4>more predictable life. The lake is basically the same every day.

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 4>The ocean has huge fluctuations. Which tribes have more superstitions

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 4>or the ocean?

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Why?

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Because it gives you a feeling of control, feeling of control.

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 4>Or I'll give you another example. And you know these

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 4>studies about white noise, not not hearing, but sight. So

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 4>you have a picture with black and white thoughts randomly organized.

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Like an all television screening.

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and you show them, You say do you see

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 4>an image? And people say yes, no, yes, and no.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 4>It turns out that as you increase stress, for example,

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 4>you go skydiving, the more stress you have, the more

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 4>patterns you see. Now, why does this happen? Imagine you're

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 4>an animal in the jungle and you think there's a predator.

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 4>What is your mind doing? It goes into hyper drives, saying, well,

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 4>these two leaves are moving, maybe there's a tiger there.

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 4>You overinterpret patterns because you want to make sense of

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 4>the work. So the first thing to understand is that

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 4>when people feel stressed, like kind of learned helplessness, kind

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 4>of stressed, I don't understand the world. Things are not

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 4>going my way, there's a temptation to solve that problem

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 4>by creating a belief that says, I now understand what's

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 4>going on. It's the bad entities creating this bad outcome.

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 4>You can't say, oh, something bad happen and to be

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 4>I believe this is a benevolent God because you're trying

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 4>to explain the bad thing. And then from there are

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 4>things a theory we can talk about this, but that

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 4>that's the starting point.

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 3>We say, why would people start believing that?

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And so walk us through the funnel that people go

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>through as they go from having some idea all the

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>way to full blown belief.

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so you start with this beginning, I'm stressed, things

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 4>are not going well. What is going on? You start,

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 4>you go YouTube, you try to understand, you find some

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 4>beginning of a journey, and that gives you comfort. Shorten,

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 4>it gives you comfort because you say, oh, now I

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 4>understand it's not my fault, it's these people and so on,

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 4>and then things can't keepe. So they continue through cognitive processes,

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 4>and there's a few of them, but let's talk about one.

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 4>And so you know, first of all, we all know

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 4>that we don't view all the information.

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 3>We view the information that agrees.

0:14:56.680 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 4>With us, right We what we like from the media

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 4>is to tell us, oh, you're really smart, you know

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 4>all this, you know everything, but here's something extra new,

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 4>but you're very genuinely correct. We don't want to be

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 4>confronted with things that would say you're an idiot, you

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 4>have no idea what you're talking about the world is

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 4>very different than what you think. So we look for

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 4>things that as our confirmation pots. So that's the beginning.

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 4>But one of the interesting version of the cognitive part

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 4>is what is called the illusion of explanatory depth. And

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 4>the way I kind of tested it in one experiment

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 4>was with flash toilets. So I show people a flash toilet.

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 4>Do you understand how a flash toilet works? Absolutely? On

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 4>the scale from one to seven, almost seven. That's wonderful.

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 4>Here all the pieces for a perfectly brand new flash toilet,

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 4>please assemble it. What do you think is the percentage

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 4>of people who manage to assemble it? Zero? And then

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 4>I asked them, and how well do you understand flash toilet?

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 4>And say, you know what, not so much. Now, think

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 4>about it. In a regular conversation, we go at people,

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 4>we argue, they argue, We argue, they argue at the

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 4>end of those so they we think about you, all

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 4>your debate in the last three years, how many of

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 4>them ended when the other person is saying, you know what.

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I've never heard such good arguments. I'm changing my opinion completely.

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 3>You're absolutely correct.

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, zero small number?

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 4>And how many ended the other way when you said

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 4>to somebody, you know what.

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm being good. It's a really interesting thing because when

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 3>we discuss things with people, the mechanism is that we

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 3>counter argue when we say things. We say things, and

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 3>when they see things we already counter argue. I think

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of.

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if it was always the case like this,

0:16:55.200 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 4>but we're not working toward joint new understand ending. We're

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 4>really kind of protecting our position. And what the illusion

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 4>of explanatory depth says is, don't worry about the facts initially,

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 4>worry about overconfidence. So with the flash dollar, don't worry

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 4>about the facts, worry about crush people's overconfidence first, and

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 4>then we can talk later. So the strategy is to

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 4>say people are resisting facts because of their overconfidence, and

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 4>what we need to do for persuasion is to first

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 4>think about them the overconfryt.

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of listeners are probably familiar with the

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Dunning Kruger effect, which is the less you know about

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a topic, the more confident you are that you know It's.

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 3>It's not the less, it's it's.

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 4>A function where it's like when you know something, you're

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 4>the most dangerous. It's when you know nothing, you know

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 4>you know nothing, When you know a lot, you know

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 4>you know a lot.

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 3>The danger then in Kruger effect is when you know

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 3>a little.

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Like the metaphor is like first year undergrad, you finished

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 4>right the introductory to biology textbook, Okay, I know biologic

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 4>yes exactly.

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, with the illusion of explanatory depth,

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>and one I always uses the electoral college, I asked people, hey,

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>do you.

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Know how that works. They say, yeah, now that works.

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 2>I said, great, can you explain it to me?

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Nobody is nobody so far has been able to really

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>tell me all the way down.

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 4>And by the way we used it with the Trump elections,

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 4>some people thought that he that you won. And we

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 4>came to people and we said, you think the Trump

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 4>on the election, Yes, you think the elections were stolen. Yes,

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 4>explain to us how, but walk us through the details.

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 4>People go into the booth what happens. And people did

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 4>not say, oh, you know, he really lost the election,

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 4>but they said, you know what, I don't know how

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 4>it really happened. So the illusional it's a very important

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 4>issue to go into the mechanism and get people to

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 4>be more modest about their beliefs.

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Does that actually change anybody's mind? Now, let's say you

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>felt the election was stolen and you don't know how

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>because you feel like, look, it's a big world, hundreds

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 1>of millions of people doing things in the United States.

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't know all the details, and yet I have

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>reasona believe that's true. Would increase intellectual humility do anything

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in that situation, or would a person still say, look,

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no way for me to know the answer to that,

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>But I have other reasons to believe this, So.

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Let me say that you're right. So intellectual humility is

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 4>the is the key. And of course we teach our

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 4>students to say not knowing is great and not knowing

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 4>is a very good thing.

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 3>So I would say that I believe it very strongly.

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 4>I believe that if you think about misbelief and you say,

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 4>there's the belief in something that is not true, and

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 4>there's adopting it as a perspective on life. So I

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 4>think the earth is flat, and I'm looking at everything

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 4>from the perspective that the earth is flat. I think

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 4>that the illusion of explanatory depth of intellectual humility would

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 4>reduce the second part first, So I would not look

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 4>at the world from that lens initially because I'm not

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 4>the moment, you know, one hundred percent sure it's not

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 4>a lens from which you view things. But this is

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of a general argument. I'll tell you what I

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 4>have data about. So I have now a site where

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 4>I invite Antisemites to talk to me Solemn Israeli and

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 4>Jewish I. October seventh was terrible in all kinds of ways.

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 4>But when October seven happened, I decided to come to

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 4>Israel as quickly as possible, and the flight I could

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 4>take came through London, and I was in London during

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 4>the first prop Palestinian demonstration, and this was before Israel

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 4>went to Gaza, and there were already a lot of

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 4>anger told Israel. Even though Israel just suffered a huge

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 4>attack and didn't do anything. My daughter, who was in

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 4>high school, almost got canceled. Her mother, my ex wife,

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 4>is Indian, so my daughter is, you know, half Jewish Israeli,

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 4>half Indian and Hindu, both my kids. But she was

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 4>at the risk of being canceled just just by having

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 4>this affiliation. And she didn't vote for she doesn't have

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 4>a citizenship in Israel. She didn't vote for the Antennao government,

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 4>and nobody in her family did. But she felt unbelievably attacked,

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 4>and the antisemitism part.

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 3>Was very, very surprising.

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 4>So anyway, so I opened this website that I'm trying

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 4>to understand antisemitism, and I invite people to nominate antisemites

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 4>that I should talk to, and then once or twice

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 4>a week I have discussions with anti Semites, and I

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 4>don't talk to anti Zionists. I don't talk to people

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 4>who just have complains about the Nathaniel government, which I.

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 3>Do as well.

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 4>I talk to people who define themselves as antisemite, and

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 4>I do with them this exercise we just talked about.

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.239
<v Speaker 3>I say, I'm not trying to convince you.

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 4>Just tell me, like, when was the first time you

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 4>heard negative things about Jewish people? In most cases it

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 4>comes from early childhood and how did it develop and

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 4>what else did you learn and who did you meet?

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 4>And I we basically talk about the evolution of the idea.

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:36.479
<v Speaker 4>And I would say that almost everybody at the end

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 4>of the conversation says, I still am antisemite, but I

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 4>know that not all Jewish people are like this, So

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 4>there is And by the way, one of the triggers

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 4>that I think is very interesting is when people recognize

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 4>that they got this idea very early on at home.

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 4>When somebody says I heard it when I was, you know,

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 4>before Elmntory school for my father, who said a few things,

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 4>and I said, okay, so did I really come to

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 4>that conclusion or was I given it? So for me,

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 4>kind of this exercise of where did you get this idea?

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 4>When did you test it? When did you test reality?

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 4>And so on?

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Seems to be very good for.

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 4>People not to change your opinion, but say, you know what,

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 4>I know it's more nuanced than that. And that's really

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 4>all I can hope for in a discussion, to say

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm more nuanced in that.

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so many people imagine that conspiracy theorists are uneducated,

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>but in fact your research shows they can be perfectly

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>smart people.

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 2>So what's your take on that.

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, first of all, I don't like the term conspiracy theorists,

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 4>and it's derogatory by now, so I adopt the term

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 4>misbelievers and again, and the other thing about it is

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 4>that it's not just believing in something that is wrong.

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 4>It's about adopting that as a perspective. I think it's

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 4>very important. So, you know, when I ask people what

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 4>is the least harmful wrong belief, people say the Earth

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 4>is flat, because if you don't believe in COVID, you

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 4>might in fact other people, you might do all kinds

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 4>of things. If you believe that the Earth is flat,

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 4>you're not going to change the curvature of the Earth.

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 4>But it turns out that people who believe the Earth

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 4>is flat that belief expands because they believe that the

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 4>US government is lying and NASA is lying, and every

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 4>airplane pilot knows the truth, and they're lying, and every

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 4>government knows the truth, they're lying.

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 3>And then no satellites.

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 4>And and they look at everything through what else are

0:24:55.920 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 4>they doing to So it's it's a really for me.

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 4>The issue is not just I don't believe in x is.

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:09.199
<v Speaker 4>There's a sense of perspective in everything. One of the

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 4>women we talked to for the book who really hated

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 4>me the beginning and decided to hate me a little

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 4>less after COVID she called me up.

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 3>She had cancer.

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 4>She had cancer, and she thought she would consult me

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 4>about taking and not taking treatment. I was very much

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 4>in favor of treatment, and she decided not to take it,

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 4>and she passed away about a year later. But she

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 4>expanded her view to the whole medical system. Everything was corrupt,

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 4>everything was wrong, everything was poison.

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 3>And so on.

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 4>Now, the thing about your question was it's us versus there.

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 4>And you know, it's very easy to say, oh, us

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 4>the reasonable people, smart, intelligent, understand truth from not and

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 4>they're them and so but the reality is that we

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 4>have not had the stress some of them had we

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 4>had not had the initial conditions for it, and we

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 4>can't judge. We can't judge what would have happened to us,

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 4>like what like what sort of initial conditions. So somebody

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 4>who lost their job when other people don't. Some people

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 4>who had a terrible personal tragedy and they say why

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 4>why me? Some people who invest in the market like

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 4>they were supposed to and stock goes down and they.

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Lose, They lose a lot of things.

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 4>So when you think about this initial condition of what

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 4>gets people to start looking at something else. So almost

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 4>everybody has in their close circuit somebody that five years ago,

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 4>ten years ago, you would say, me and this other

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 4>person understand the world in the same way. And now

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 4>they look at that person and say, I just don't

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 4>understand how.

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 3>We do this.

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 4>Now go back to that person when they started their journey.

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 4>Most likely there was some stressful event that a person

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 4>wanted to deflect play and then and then they start,

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 4>and then they start the journey. And the journey also

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 4>has a lot of frandomness. What do you encounter on YouTube?

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 4>Who do you talk to?

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 3>So you know, when we.

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 4>Let's say you're in a workplace and there's lots of

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 4>people you respect and they have different opinions. You have

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 4>to be exposed to very different opinions. Move to COVID

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 4>your home. You don't talk about chit chat, you don't

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 4>talk about other things. Everything you talk at work is

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 4>just over zoom about the work. You don't get exposed

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 4>to other people. You join social media, you meet only people. Okay,

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 4>now we're moving to the last part.

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 3>The part that.

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Consolidates those beliefs, and that's very important whether you move

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 4>there or not, is the part in which you leave

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 4>your friends.

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 3>And you join a different group.

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 2>The social aspect to it.

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 4>The social aspect very hard to if you get into

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 4>that part, very hard to escape. So you feel ostracized

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 4>from your friends, you go into another group that accepts you.

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 4>Then you become more extreme, and then things move from there.

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 4>And by the time, like if you think about the

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 4>range of opinions, it kind of keeps intellectual humility. Okay,

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 4>I think this, but you think this, and I respect you,

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 4>so I'm not going to be one hundred percent sure.

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 4>The moment you moved into a group that just has

0:28:55.160 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 4>that and uses extreme opinions and signaling, now it becomes

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 4>very very tough, very very tough. So I would say,

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 4>if you have somebody in your life that is a misbeliever,

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 4>what you really want to do is stop them early

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 4>before they change their social circle to include just people

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 4>who believe those thicks. There's one very interesting element in

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 4>all of this called she Bullet. So the story of

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 4>she Bullet is that there were this war in the

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 4>Bible between two tribes. After the war, they settled on

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 4>two sides of the river. But you know, the river

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 4>is small, you can move from side to another. So

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 4>you walk around and you meet people, and you want

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 4>to know if they're your tribe or the other tribe.

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 4>And it just so happened that these two tribes pronounce

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 4>the name of the plant she bollet slightly differently. One

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 4>of them said she Bollet. One of them said sea Bollet.

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:57.719
<v Speaker 3>So I meet you.

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 4>I said, hey, you, how do you this plant? If

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 4>you say the way I'd say it, you're from my tribe.

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 4>If you say the way the other tribe is saying it,

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 4>I have to chase your way or try to injury.

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 4>And we now use these terms she bullet for a

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 4>discussion that looks like it's about the facts, but It's

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 4>really about identity. Because when I show you the plant

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 4>and I ask you what any of this plant? Do

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 4>I care about the anair of the plant?

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 4>Now, think about how much of the discussion in our

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 4>world are she Bullet are really like President Trump in

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 4>the election saying the immigrants are eating cats and dogs.

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 4>Is it a statement that he's indicating as truth or

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 4>is she Bollet saying, look at my identity, I'm willing

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 4>to say such extreme things against immigrants as a signaling

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 4>from my identity. So the social element, especially in social media,

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 4>and especially when you want to be seen above the fault,

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 4>basically creates this pressure to become more and more extremely

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 4>what you say.

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 3>It's a very confusing kind of discussion.

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Imagine you look today at the news and you try

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 4>to figure out what people are saying that it's real,

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 4>and what people are saying that is she Bullet that

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 4>is just singing from.

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 3>The river to the sea.

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's the people who say from the river

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 4>to the sea really mean let's kill everybody in Israel,

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 4>get them get I don't think so some people do,

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 4>but I think for most people it's not a statement

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 4>that is real. By the way, the same thing is true.

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 4>Lots of lots of Israel's saying statement that are that

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 4>are shep bullet and our are not taken like this.

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 4>So but but the thing about she bullet is that

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 4>once you get into that speech, it is very confusing,

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 4>and it's also gets things to go into a downward

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 4>spiral of what was what was outrageous a year ago

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 4>and next year you might need something during it. So

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 4>that's kind of the final start with stress, cognition, some

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 4>personality within touch on, and then the social element is

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of what seals the deal. And maybe the last

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 4>thing to say about all of this is that for me,

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 4>the whole thing is that it kills trust.

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Imagine that was COVID twenty six January.

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 4>We're going to get new COVID. How prepared are we

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 4>for that? And I think we're less prepared for that

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 4>because we can't work together. Everything is political. They're like,

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 4>there's so many things. COVID is an example, but there's

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 4>so many things that we have to work together. Like

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 4>imagine ten years ago they asked us what are the

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 4>big problems of the world. We would say poverty, We

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 4>say a list of things. I think now misinformation and

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 4>polarization is at the top, because how can we agree

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 4>on any action If we can't agree, we have to

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 4>we have to get the shared understanding, caring, seeing each

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 4>other with mutual interest moving forward, and we don't have

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 4>any of those, you know.

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I just want to come back to this social aspect

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>because I think there are a couple of other social

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>aspects that are.

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 2>That are important but are rarely talked about.

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>One is, if you're a conspiracy theorist or a misbeliever,

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:44.479
<v Speaker 1>you can get to show up at the cocktail party

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and say something and other people think you're pretty smart.

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Possibly at least you believe that.

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>People think that because you're the guy with the answers

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and you get to explain something that everyone else has

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>been confused about.

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 4>So so we started with stress and we say you

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 4>feel hard done by the moment, you feel you have

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 4>more knowledge than other people. You basically reverse that. So

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 4>the misbelievers caught us sheep for example, They're saying, you

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 4>think that I'm not doing well, but really what's happening

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 4>is you don't understand what's going on, and I'm the

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 4>one who understand it, So I absolutely agree with you.

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:28.919
<v Speaker 4>The stories people look for are stories that allow them

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 4>to feel more in control but also more knowledgeable, superior

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 4>rather than inferior.

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And actually this is consistent with what the second thing.

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I talked to some kid who had gone pretty far

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>down the rabbit hole where he felt that everything he.

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 2>Saw on the news and the papers and so on

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 2>was lying to him.

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>And he explained to me that he felt a sense

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>of success at coming to understand, to see through the

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>veil to learn the truth. He felt really empowered by

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that was the sense of you know, okay, everyone's lying

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to me, and I solve the puzzle.

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:05.919
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 4>QAnon QAnon has been an unbelievable like like somebody like

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 4>somebody compared it to a game. It's really it's really

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 4>a game. There were there's a Q and there were

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 4>people who are interpreting, and there were drops, and there

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.399
<v Speaker 4>was and a You got to feel to be one

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.320
<v Speaker 4>of the elite group that understands how the world works

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:32.240
<v Speaker 4>compared to everybody else. It's a very very satisfying feeling.

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 4>You know, you and I when we do an experiment

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 4>and we find out something new, we feel at the

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 4>top of the world in this world. And and by

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 4>the way you want a misbelief about something that updates,

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 4>like there's more news, there's more information that there's a

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 4>keeping keeping on top of that. But yes, but it's

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 4>a very it's a very good feeling of superiority, control, understanding,

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 4>being unique, very very important.

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 1>So if you could design one or two features in

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>our information environment and social media or the way we

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>get our news to lessen the degree of misbelief, what

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>would you implement?

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:32.439
<v Speaker 4>So there's all kinds of simple things to implement, And

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 4>let's take Facebook as an example, but it doesn't it

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 4>doesn't have to be Facebook. I would ask people to

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 4>separate between facts and opinions. So when you generate something

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:48.879
<v Speaker 4>or so, just tell me fact and opinion. That's one.

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 4>And the second thing I would do is I would

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 4>when people like something, I would pop up a window

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 4>and say, are you sure this is the truth? Because

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 4>liking something it's a very ambiguous statement. Are you saying

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 4>it's ridiculous? Are you saying it's true? Are you saying

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 4>it's interesting? I was saying it might be true. What

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 4>exactly are you say? So I think that I would

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 4>I would solve those two ambiguities if I could do

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 4>something else. So I had a lot of discussion with

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 4>the social media networks when I was I started really

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 4>bothering when I started getting death threats.

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 3>I got death threats almost every day for two years.

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 3>Duke where I teach, they got some very frightening letters

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 3>and that they had to refer to the authorities. It

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 3>was a complex periit and I talked to lots of

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 3>those people.

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 4>By the way it terms that I could convince that

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:52.359
<v Speaker 4>it's against against just policy standards to threaten someone.

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 3>And one of the interesting thing.

0:37:55.600 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 4>That is happening is that people don't understand this reputation.

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 4>So imagine again Facebook, and imagine it. You start posting

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.839
<v Speaker 4>things that people appose, people say, this is this is fair.

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 4>What happen is your reputation goes down. So imagine you

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 4>have one hundred thousand followers and when you post something,

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 4>ten percent of them get it, and then people start

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:25.919
<v Speaker 4>complaining about you. So your reputation goes down. It doesn't

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 4>go to ten percent, it goes to nine percent or

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:33.240
<v Speaker 4>eight percent. What do you see as an information generating engine?

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 4>You see less likes, so you said to yourself, let

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 4>me get more aggressive. So ironically, the solution that they

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 4>have is actually doing the opposite. But I think the

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 4>easiest thing to do is not allow bots. Think about

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 4>X versus LinkedIn, Like if you came from out of space,

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 4>you would say, these are not the same universe. I

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 4>think what's happening here sin is what's happening here. One

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 4>is allowing bots and anonymity. One doesn't allow bots and anonymity.

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Things change very very quickly. So anyway, I think there's

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 4>lots of little things we can do. And and when

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 4>I started writing this book, I promised the publisher a

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 4>chapter on solutions. I don't have a chapter on solutions.

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 4>I have a chapter on you know, hopefully helpful. I

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:36.280
<v Speaker 4>think there are solutions, but they are at the regulator level.

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 4>So all the all the media company can get together

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 4>and self regulate. The regulate can regulate them. But I

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:45.439
<v Speaker 4>think there are lots of things that we could do.

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:49.359
<v Speaker 4>We as the people need to decide we care enough

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 4>and it's important enough to act it. I don't think

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's impossible, but we need to suffer

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 4>enough from that to make it a priority, and I

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:00.760
<v Speaker 4>think we getting there.

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So I have a quick tangential question here, which is

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes on social media we see people who pedal conspiracy theories,

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if they actually believe it. I

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:15.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's a misbelief or if it's something

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that works for them. This is consistent with what you

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>said about the likes and the algorithms and so.

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 2>On, So how do you classify them.

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>They're not exactly misbelievers, they're just taking advantage of other people.

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 4>So there are lots of actors with bad intentions. So

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 4>there are states that are meddling in our life, and

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 4>there are bad actors that do things either financially or

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:48.240
<v Speaker 4>for a social reason. Just for example, a real battle

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:53.280
<v Speaker 4>happening in Wikipedia. People are trying to rewrite the world's history.

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.240
<v Speaker 4>I think what I read is that in twenty twenty four,

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 4>the item that was most edited and re edited on

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Wikipedia as Hitler. It has been dead for a while.

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 4>The fact that the debates are still going on tells

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 4>you something about So there are groups that are fighting

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 4>about reframing the truth, and there are groups that are

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:19.360
<v Speaker 4>trying to create havoc. And yes, there are lots of

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 4>bad actors. So I focused on the psychology of not

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 4>people with bad intentions, but the people with good intentions

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 4>who get get dragged into it. But you're absolutely right

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 4>that there's lots of bad intentions. Like if you look

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 4>at COVID, there was one chiropractor in Florida that produced,

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 4>like I don't know exactly, but about ten percent of

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 4>the misinformation on COVID came, okay, came from him. At

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 4>some point it was ten percent. But there's lots of

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 4>very strange incentive in this in this world.

0:41:58.239 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So now you've said in your book that under the

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>right circumstances, anyone can become a misbeliever.

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 2>And presumably there are small.

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Things that you and I have misbeliefs about. So what

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>do we do about that? How do we put checks

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>on ourselves?

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:21.479
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we can fix wrong beliefs. That's really hard.

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 4>We need to trust lots of things. I ask my

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:31.280
<v Speaker 4>friends usually, I said, what do you believe in global warming?

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:34.360
<v Speaker 4>All of my friends I believe it's a real problem.

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 4>And then I said, what if you read and they

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 4>said the UN report? And they said, did you really

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 4>read the UN report? And they said the summary? And

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of our beliefs that are based on trusts,

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 4>are based on partial information and there's just too much

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 4>to know. There's too much. No, I don't think we

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 4>can fix that. I think the real key is intellectual humility.

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 4>I think the real key is to recognize that we

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 4>know something, we believe something, but to be open to

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:08.879
<v Speaker 4>the fact that we're wrong. And I think that's what

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 4>we try to do in scientific training for ourselves and

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:18.319
<v Speaker 4>for students, is to embrace uncertainty. So if you ask

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 4>me what to do for ourselves and what I would do,

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:24.840
<v Speaker 4>like if I could include a new course at the

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 4>University of high school, it wouldn't be media literacy because

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 4>that I think changes too quickly. It would be intellectual humility.

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 4>I think that's that's kind of a key. The key

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 4>for ourselves, and the other thing is is when we

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 4>talk to people, adopt the perspective of I'm trying to

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 4>learn here together. What's the point of fighting like it

0:43:47.960 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 4>doesn't work? Like it's an unbelievable thing. Right, people have

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 4>zero success Right, that's what you want to spend your

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:56.399
<v Speaker 4>time on something you has zero success rate.

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 3>It's unbelievable.

0:43:57.920 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 4>So I think I think figuring out discussions of how

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 4>to get to a new shirt understanding and intellectual humility

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 4>are tightly linked, and that's what we need to do

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 4>for ourselves.

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>That was my interview with behavioral economists Dan Arili, and

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to me, what surfaces is that misbelief is not just

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:22.920
<v Speaker 1>something we can write off to a few misguided people,

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 1>but instead it's a feature of the human mind under

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:30.959
<v Speaker 1>the right conditions. Our brains are prediction engines, and they're

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>constantly trying to weave data into a coherent picture of

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the world, and they usually do a reasonable job, but

0:44:38.760 --> 0:44:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that same machinery can lead us astray when stress rises,

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>or when trust e roads, or when someone does something

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 1>mean to us, or when our social circles shift. In

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:54.279
<v Speaker 1>these moments, the brain reaches for the explanations that are

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 1>comforting and coherent enough, and ones that feel like they

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:01.799
<v Speaker 1>restore agency. It's of course tempting to imagine that we

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 1>are immune. In other words, that misbelief is something that

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>happens to other people. But with enough pressure or uncertainty

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 1>or emotional vulnerability, presumably every one of us has the

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>cognitive ingredients to slide into narratives that distort reality. And

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 1>understanding how this all happens matters for our communities, for

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:26.879
<v Speaker 1>our scientific institutions, for keeping a healthy democracy, because when

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:30.760
<v Speaker 1>misbelief takes root, it can reduce trust and create.

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Entire parallel worlds of meaning.

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So the challenge is not to correct bad facts, because

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that's often a fool's errand what we should be doing

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is always working to understand the emotional terrain beneath the stories.

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 1>If we approach misbelief with humility and understanding, we can

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 1>do better not only at helping others, but recognizing the

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>subtle ways that our own beliefs are shaped by our communities,

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 1>our identity, these and our emotions. Go to eagleman dot

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 1>com slash podcast for more information and to find further reading.

0:46:11.560 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Join the weekly discussions on my substack, and check out

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:17.239
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe to Inner Cosmos on YouTube for videos of

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>each episode and to leave comments until next time. I'm

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:23.239
<v Speaker 1>David Eagleman and this is Inner Cosmos.