WEBVTT - US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer Talks Hormuz, China Talks, Trade Tariffs

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 2>The conflict in the Middle East whipsawing food prices and

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 2>creating uncertainty for global trade. Palmer Am Marie John is

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 2>from Washington now with a special guest, a Marie. Good morning, John.

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 3>That's right, an individual who just met with a number

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 3>of the US trade partners at a wto meeting and

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Cameroon is Ambassador Jamison Greer, the United States Trade Representative.

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Ambassador gear Good morning, Thank you so much for joining me.

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, great to be here.

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 3>So you just got back from meeting with a number

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 3>of trade partners, and at the moment, global trade is

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 3>upended by what's going on in the Strait.

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Of her Moose.

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Did you have an update to give American trading partners

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.919
<v Speaker 3>about the flow of trade through that critical waterway.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, right now. I think the thing to understand is

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that the United States is generally insulated from a lot

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of the supply chain effects when it comes to direct

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>commodities and things like that. For a lot of that,

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we have domestic sourcing. We have sourcing from our partners

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to the north and south of US and other places.

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>But obviously we're aware that this has an impact in

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>other countries, particularly in Asia. We know that their supplies

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>are tight, and so we're watching that really closely. When

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I was meeting with all of them, this was not

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly high on their agenda things to discuss with me

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>because we were meeting for other reasons. But we're monitoring

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the situation given that the supplies of commodities coming out

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Gulf can affect our treating partners longways.

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 3>And it's not just crude, it's loqualified petroleum gas, which

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 3>you need, especially in countries like India to cook.

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 2>It's fertilizer. Do you have a sense of a timeline.

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, first of all, any kind of operation,

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you're focused on objectives and you don't want to set

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>artificial timelines. When I hear from the Secretary of State

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of sectur of Defense, they talk about, you know, operations

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of weeks. We hope that's the case. The

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration has made a lot of headway and its

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>objectives in Iran in terms of destroying ballistic missiles, destroying

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the navy, and making progress to make sure that they

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have in a nuclear weapon.

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.919
<v Speaker 3>You met on the sidelines with your Chinese counterpart. China

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 3>buys the lion's share of Iranian crude. We have seen

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Chinese vessels given safe passage to Destrait. Did this become

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 3>a focal point of that conversation.

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 2>It did not.

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>When I met with my counterpart, Minister Wong, the Ministry

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of Commerce minister, this did not come up. We were

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>focused on preparing for the Leader's meeting, which will occur

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in mid May. We were talking about the WTO itself

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and the future of it, or potentially lack thereof, as

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the case.

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 3>May be, And so black there up youre thinking about getting.

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Out, well, I wouldn't say that. I would just say

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that the ability of the World Trade Organization to meet

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the needs of the moment, addressing structural imbalances, currency issues,

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>huge export driven surpluses by other countries, the WTO has

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>never been able to address those things and it won't

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>be going forward. It can barely address issues on its

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:53.399
<v Speaker 1>current agenda.

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 3>So potentially you want a revamp of the WTO.

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 2>Is that what you're calling for?

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you that we have called for a reform.

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>The Trump administration has put in many proposals, concrete proposals

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>about reform about how to graduate countries to take on

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>more obligations as they become more developed. We've talked about

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 1>making sure that countries can adjust their tariff schedules to

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>account for national core interests, and we put forward a

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 1>reform plan together with a bunch of trading partners at

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a recent meeting and Cameroon, and there was near consensus

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>on this. Countries like Brazil and Turkey eventually opposed the

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>closing package, which is unfortunate, but it's also kind of

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>exhibit a of how the WTO's unable to address these

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>core challenges.

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Back to the street.

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 3>In your conversation with your Chinese counterpart, the President has

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>been pretty direct to European allies, if you want the

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 3>straight to open, you should also help us send vessels,

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 3>send a mind.

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Sweep er, send your navy.

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 3>If China is the one that's benefiting the most in

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 3>terms of they're the ones that for years have been

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 3>supporting this brutal regime.

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Should they also not be on the hook to reopen

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 2>the street.

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, this is a decision for China, and I'll

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously let the President and TERFF, State and SECT Turf

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Defense decide how they're going to line with other countries

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in reacting to the straight Offomus closing. Again, it affects

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>these other countries much more than affects US.

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Other countries have been.

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Working with Iran to figure out arrangements to get out oil, gas,

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>fertilizer and all these other things. But it is clearly

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>in the interest of the world community to make sure

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>not only to make sure that the Strait is open,

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>but to make sure that Iran doesn't get a nuclear weapon,

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Iran doesn't empower its terror proxies in the region. The

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>world would be much safer if the world was aligned

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>on taking care of the Iran issue.

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 3>As you prepare for this trip, there's a lot of

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 3>reporting that China, like Russia, is helping Iran, even when

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 3>it comes to not just supply chains but targeting US troops.

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Is this going to be on the agenda when the

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 3>president meets? Is this even potentially a reason why the

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 3>trip could maybe get postponed.

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>In past meetings between the presidents, they've always talked about

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>conflicts and hotspots. In the past, they've talked about Ukraine

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and Russia, They've talked about Iran. Assume that they'll talk

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>about these things again. With respect to your question, is

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>there going to be a delay in the meeting. I

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard talk about that either internally. I didn't hear

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that from my Chinese counterpartment. I talked him last week.

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.239
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to the tariffs right now, there's Section

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 3>three or one tariffs that you're looking into when it

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 3>comes to China, and we've seen China actually have their

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 3>own announcement that they're going to investigate US companies. This

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 3>tit for tat we might see in the trade between

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Ijing and Washington back to where we're almost what it

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 3>feels like.

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 2>A year ago.

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that's going to hinder the US from

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 3>getting back to the twenty percent level they were at

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 3>before I eep it was struck down.

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. When you look back to the

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Busan agreements, the agreements we achieved with the Chinese last year,

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>we were seeking stability. We were seeking to receive, achieve

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>a level of tariff application on one side and the

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>flow of rare earth minerals and things from the other side.

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Both sides want stability, Both sides want to see continuity.

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>The Chinese know that the United States is trying to

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>control for our you know, giant trade deficit, we've had

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>with China for a long time, which went down by

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent last year, by the way, So I don't

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's going right.

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 3>But China's imports to other countries in the and I

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 3>went up, and then those countries are important to the

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 3>United States, don't you have an issue with transhipment at

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 3>the moment?

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's always been an issue with transhipment. But

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>when you look at our shipments from third countries outside

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of China since April, right since Liberation Day, that deficit

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>has gone down by seventeen percent. So while there may

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>be some transhipment, overall, our trade deficit is going down,

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>so down with China, it's going down with the rest

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of the world. It's going exactly the right production direction.

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, wages are going up in America,

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>productivity is going up.

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 2>Do you think you're going to get to the twenty

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:39.679
<v Speaker 2>percent level?

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, I can't prejudge the investigations right at Section three

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>oh one. We have to go through the legal process.

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>We have to collect information. It's quite public, it's quite transparent.

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>You know. We know what the nature of the deal

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is that we struck with the Chinese, so we will see.

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>All I know is that the President for sure is

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 1>going to keep protecting our economy. He's going to protect

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>our producers so we can continue to have increased production

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in the US increase wages here.

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 3>If China plays hardball though, not just with their own investigations,

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 3>but potentially bringing rare earths back into the foraight. I

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 3>know they have basically till October. There's a deal on

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 3>the table potentially, then would you look to maybe decrease

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 3>the tariff level.

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, from our perspective, we're looking for stability.

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to achieve we're trying to get the trade

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>deficit reduced, We're trying to increase manufacturing in the United States,

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're trying to increase real wages and all of

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that is happening. So we don't see a need to

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>change our policy. The Chinese wants stability, We want stability.

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I actually see a positive agenda with China going forward,

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>where we learn to manage our trade with each other,

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>where we pick the kinds of things we want to

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>be selling to each other, things that are mostly non sensitive,

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to avoid some of the national security elements that prove

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>challenging and negotiations. I see stability with China over the

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>next year.

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to this extension on rare earths, Are

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 3>you going to need one in October or will you

0:07:57.960 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 3>think the United States is in a place where we

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 3>don't extension.

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, we've made a lot of progress. We have a

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>few months, so I think we'll assess that down the road.

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have Project Vault where we're stockpiling a

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of critical minerals and rare earths. We have new

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>projects in the United States to mind process and manufacture

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>rare earths, including permanent magnets that we need for different motors.

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>We're working with our counterparts and our trading partners Australia,

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the EUGE, Pan, Mexico to find projects we can do

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>together to increase supply chain security.

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 2>How much will weare Earth's.

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Be on the table this discussion with the President in

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Shijing Pang in May.

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So when we met in Paris with our Chinese counterparts

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, we talked about rare earths.

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>The process with the Chinese is working fairly well. There

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>are a few things here and there where we highlighted

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't feel like we were getting rare earths

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in a timely fashion, and we highlighted that to our partners.

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>They took note of that and have it under consideration.

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>So the presidents will talk about it if they need to.

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 1>Our hope and expectation is that we're able to manage

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it between now and then.

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 3>At the staff level, do you think you're going to

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 3>have to meet your counterparts again before for the big

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 3>leader meeting in Beijing.

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're going to need to do that,

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly when we were in Paris. We reach general agreement

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>on the types of outcomes we want for the leader's meeting,

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and right now our deputies and our staff community are

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in regular communication to try to land all those outcomes.

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Can you give us any sense of what the main

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 3>deliverables are going to be in Beijing?

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that one of them. In people. There's been

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of coverage on this. We've been talking

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>about a board of trade, a US China board of Trade,

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>which really will be a mechanism to help manage trade.

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Over the past ten years or so, as the United

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>States has tried to eliminate its trade deficit with China,

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out its export control situation, if we can formalize

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the mechanism a little bit to make sure that we

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>are we can agree on things we are selling to

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>each other. For the US, we want to be selling boeings,

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 1>we want to be selling medical devices, pharmaceuticals, AG products,

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>things like that. You know, the Chinese want to be

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>selling things to us, and we're willing to buy things

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>like you know, low tech consumer goods and things like that,

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>certain commodities that maybe the Chinese have that we don't.

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>And so coming establishing that type of mechanism at the

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>leader's meeting and then going through a process of figuring

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>out how to optimize trade with each other, that's going

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Big deliverable Ambassador Grow, Thank you so much for your time

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 3>this morning.