WEBVTT - Day 2 Rookie Wideouts

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation,

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. Now,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>here's your host, Paul. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly. It

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is our final show before the draft. My co host

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 1>today is Matt Harrison. Hi, Matt, hey, charge, how are

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you awfully excited to be able to talk rookie receivers.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>We started the conversation last week, we talked about seven

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>rookie receivers. This week we're gonna continue that conversation forward

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>with another set of guys. And you know, Matt, this

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is our last chance to speculate pre draft. You know

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>where guys might go. Particularly good fits the guys that

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>we love. And this is, by most accounts, the deep,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>best wide receiver draft of our lifetimes. So these guys

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.279
<v Speaker 1>mattered to mean the guys that were talking about. Normally,

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about guys are gonna be taken second round,

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>third round in a couple of cases, probably beyond that.

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And normally these guys are are really dicey to make

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>an impact but not this year. Most of all the

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>guys we talked about are gonna have a chance to

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>make an immediate fantasy impact. Yeah. I think most of

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>these wide receivers are probably, uh, if not wide receiver ones,

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>at least wide receiver two or three's on their team.

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of these guys are gonna get slot

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>play and the rest of them are just gonna be

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.559
<v Speaker 1>on the field for the snaps and in their rookie years.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>So I like a lot of these guys from a

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>fantasy perspective. Yeah, fantastic. Let's begin with the notable omission

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>from our list last year, and that was Denzel Mims

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>from when I said last year last week with Brian,

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Denzel Mims from Baylor, who Brian just didn't like and

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to include him in his in his top

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>seven guys. But I think he's crazy and I've gotten

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>slated going in the first round, number twenty four to

0:01:59.960 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the Saints. Denzel Mims from Baylor. Breakdown Denzel MIM's game

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and and I'll talk maybe a little bit as well

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>about why I like him so much as a potential Saint. Yeah,

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I have him as the fifth, maybe sixth

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver off the board. And it's a pretty legendary

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver class, as you said, but Mims is definitely

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest wide receivers in this class. Uh.

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Fortunately for fantasy players, he's also one of the fastest

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers in this class. Uh. He posted a four

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>three eight forty at the Combine that was third among

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. And he ranked second in college football with

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty contested catches last season. And if you watch some

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of his tape, it's it's seriously impressive. And I'm not

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna call him Randy Moss, but the way he maneuvered

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>back to the ball in the air was kind of

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 1>Moss like. Uh, it feels like he's a late first

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.119
<v Speaker 1>round or you said you got him on the late

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>first round. Uh. Bet online dot ag has him at

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>negative one eighty minus one eighty to be picked in

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the first round according to the betting odds, So he's

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big favorite to go in the first round. UM.

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I like I said, I think he's the fifth receiver

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>off the board after lamb Rugs, Judy and Jefferson and

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the comps that I saw um from some of the

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>draft experts out there are DJ Chark, who is really

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>great last year, Kenny Golladay who's a stud, and Alshon Jeffrey,

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>who up until the last season or two was one

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of the better Fantasy wide receivers. So I think the

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>sky's the limit for Denzel Mims. Yeah, what those guys

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>have in common is they're all bigger bodied guys, and

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>with the exception of Jeffrey, they can get downfield and

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>they can get some separation downfield. And that's what's really

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>special about Mims is you rarely get a big bodied

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>receiver who has the speed to get downfield and can

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>separate downfield. And I think that's part of what makes

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>him him really special. Those acrobatic catches you mentioned, the

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>contested catches that you mentioned, that's um that part all

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>boats really well for Denzel Mims. The the reoccurring negative

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that you hear about Denzel Mims is that Baylor just

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't ask him to do very much except go run

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>fast and go run straight and we'll just heave up

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball. So there are a lot of people feel

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>like he's got to learn a lot of the route

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>tree and it's there. He may have a first year

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>or two that's really kind of used as a as

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a downfield specialist until he becomes more of a student

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of the field and can learn much

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 1>more of the route tree. Well, and if he's a

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>late first round wide receiver, that means he's instantly glomming

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>onto an offense that's probably pretty good, most likely a

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>playoff team right away. So you put a talent like

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>that on a roster that's uh already been in the playoffs.

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I really like the odds there so in the Saints,

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 1>and you know it's certainly no lock he'll go to

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the Saints, but the fit is so good because Michael

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Thomas is a player who's um really got a complete

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>aime and can fill up most of the field. But

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>what he doesn't have is that over the top speed.

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's not the guy who's gonna take the

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 1>top off of the off of the off of the

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>field and forced defense is back and back pedaling because

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 1>of his speed. Well, that's where Mims comes in, and

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>it's would be perfect but as a compliment to Thomas

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and why I think that would be so lethal if

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>those two get together, and where I could see Mims

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>really vaulting, it's to me. It's almost an ideal landing

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>spot if he could pick a place where Mims reasonably

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>could go to a team that could perhaps utilize him

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the best. I think the Saints are one of those teams. Yeah,

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a lot of teams that could he

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>could really be a difference maker for. Think about San

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Francisco with their second pick. Think about Kansas City. Uh,

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>there's just Philadelphia is a place that they need a

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver as well. They pick twenty one, I believe.

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.679
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of really good spots that Denzel

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Mims could land. All right, Let's let's continue on with

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other players. One of the other players

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that is being mentioned as a possible first rounder, and

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you see him periodically popping up near the bottom of

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the first round for some different different mocks, is the

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Colorado high upside, high risk, high reward guy, Lavishka Chanult.

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is the kid from Colorado who was super productive,

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>elite playmaker ability, but also's got a variety of concerns

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>with him as well. What do you think of Laviska Chanult? Well,

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I like to give the NFL comps because that's always fun.

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>And let's start Channault with his comps, which are Big

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel or Big Percy Harvin. He lines up at

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, running back, wildcat quarterback at at Colorado. That

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.239
<v Speaker 1>makes him the dreaded gadget player, and the gadget players

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>don't always work out from a fantasy perspective, But because

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 1>he he lined up in so many different spots, he

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>broke more tackles than any draft eligible wide receiver. According

0:06:59.920 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to Post with yeah Um, his forty time was an

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>uninspiring four point five eight. He takes a lot of

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>punishment in his game because he kind of seeks out

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>guys to uh to try to destroy too. It also

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>led to a handful of injuries at Colorado, including a

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>shoulder injury and a toe injury. And get this, he

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>was diagnosed with a pubic bone inflammation in February. I

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>wonder how he got that. That doesn't sound good. Um.

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>His odds are being picked in the first round not

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that great if you think he will be though you're

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>getting plus two fifteen odds for him to go in

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the first round. I don't think he's gonna be a

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>first round pick. I think he's likely a mid to

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>late second rounder. I could see him dropping into the third.

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>We need him to go to an offense with a

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>really clever offensive coordinator for him to be fantasy viable.

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And if he goes to a spot where they're just

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>not using the analytics and they're just not using their

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>their brains to run smart ways, I think chant is

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be languished as kind of a special teams guy. Uh,

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>he's explosive in away A few players are. He's awesome

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>after the catch, and that's part of what you talked

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>about being used as a running back, not just a

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit. He scored seven rushing touchdowns last year. She did,

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and so he is. He is as lethal as anybody

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>outside is Ceedee Lamb in this draft class after the

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>catch and and I think you raise a good point

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that creative, open minded offensive coordinators will find ways to

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 1>utilize him that can be very fantasy friendly. And you're

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>right there, he falls into the wrong spot. I think

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>he could be. You know, many of those dude seasons

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>that Percy Harvin had for fantasy owners could end up

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, emerging here as well. Well, you know that'll

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>be It'll be fascinating to see where he goes but

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in the right place, He's a guy that could make

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense um and could ultimately be just

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>because of his freakish athletic ability lavishka Chanal could end

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>up being a good player. Let's go to our number three,

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>our third wide receiver that I want to talk about again,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the guy that's being frequently mocked into the second round,

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and that is kJ Hammler from Penn State. The comp

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing on him a lot is Tavon Austin. Yeah,

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 1>I have. Tavon Austin is one of his comps. Also

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Marquise Brown and uh, if we want to throw it

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>way back, how about Peter Warwick from way back in

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>the day. Um Hammler did not run at the combine,

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>but by all accounts he's one of the fastest wide

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>receivers in this draft. But at only five nine, he's

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>also one of the smallest, only a hundred and seventy

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>eight pounds. But he's definitely one of those legitter bug

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>guys that you just can't catch and he should really

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 1>factor in heavily as a kick and punt returner in

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the league, and that actually might be his best role

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Um there's some worry about him dropping

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the ball. That was a bit of an issue at

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Penn State. It was hands. It was a massive, massive issue.

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I believe the stat I saw was um, and I

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>apologize if for got this wrong. Is seventy catchable passes

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>last year. Twelve drops on seventy passes. That is a

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>horrifying percentage. And if there's one trait that scares me

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>about a receiver and the long term developmental prospects, it's drops.

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Because you've seen so many times where guys who have

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>bad hands just can't get it all together. And not always,

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>but more often than not. You know, it's handful of

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>drops doesn't bother me at all, but when you're seeing

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that level of drops, I I really worry about that part.

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>For kJ Hamler, now, get the ball in his hands,

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>all bets off. Because he's super fast, he's super elusive

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to catch even in tight spaces. I mean, that's his game.

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>His game is get the ball in his hands somehow.

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And if he can get you know, eight nine touches

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.959
<v Speaker 1>a game, he he might break one. He's that good. Um.

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, this isn't a comp that I saw, but

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit reminds me of maybe Tarik Cohen of

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bears. Uh, smaller guy who get get the ball

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in his hands a few times and see what happens.

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>But again, I think it's landing spot dependent how viable

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>he is in a in a fantasy sense, because if

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't have an offensive coordinator who knows how to

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>use a five nine one eight jitterbug player, I think

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>he might be lost on the bench. See, I think

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter. These guys never are fantasy factors, reliable

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>fantasy factors. Name me another guy like a Tavon Austin

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 1>who was a reliable fantasy producer. I can't right off

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>hand if if you would have prepped me for this

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and I would have known that question is coming, I

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.079
<v Speaker 1>would have dug deep into the archives. But it's probably

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>not that, Matt. I just don't think these guys are

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 1>fantasy producers that you can count on. Is is is

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>kJ Ham are going to break some slots, some slants,

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>some some slant catches into long gains. Absolutely, he's gonna

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>score some touchdowns. You're not gonna know where they're coming.

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be really really hard to know. And um

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and so I think, uh, I think kJ Hamler from

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy standpoint, does not interest me at least not

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>very much. Let's let's work at a quick break. When

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>we come back, I want to talk about the opposite

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a one of the better big bodied receivers that you're

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>going to find in the in this draft class. When

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we come back, Welcome back more Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charge and my co host is Matt Harrison. We're

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>breaking down the day two wide receivers and there could

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>be a bunch of them. We've already talked about Denzel

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Mims and Lavishka Chanal and kJ Hammler, who I'm pretty

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>down on. Let's talk about a big bodied receiver from

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame named Chase Claypool. He's uh, he's one of

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>the bigger guys in this draft class. He breaks tackles

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>with with strength. He's got, you know, areo typical ability

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of these bigger, stronger receivers that are taking higher draft

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>They win these contested catches, Matt. He's got the ball, skills,

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the hands. There's a lot to like here from Chase Claypool.

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And we do see most of the fan the ongoing

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>long term fantasy contributors. You're after you're our bigger bodied

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>guys like Julio Jones and A. J. Green and and

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>so many others. What do you what do you think

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of Chase Claypool? Well, first off, I think that he's

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>seven inches taller and fifty pounds heavier than kJ Hamler. Um,

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not sure that Chase Claypool will be a wide

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver at the pro level. A lot of people are

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about him as a tight end. Um and if

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>if he does convert to tight end, that's fine because

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the comps I found on him was Darren Waller,

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and uh, Darren Waller did uh a pretty good job

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>last year. Uh. He did gain nine pounds between the

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Senior Bowl and the Combine, which probably means somebody he's

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in his ear saying, yeah, dude, you're probably gonna be

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 1>a tight end at the pro level. But much like

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller, Claypool was an incredible overall athlete, averaged forty

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>five points per game in high school playing basketball. Uh,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's one of two wide receivers at the Combine

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to weigh more than two thirty pounds and run a

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>sub four four five forty at the Combine. Do you

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>know who the other wide receiver to do that was, Uh,

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>he's got a robotic nickname, Megatron. Calvin Johnson was the

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>only other one to do this. Um, his weaknesses are

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>becoming a great receiver. Um, he's really big, he's not

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>super awesome at the point of a contested catch, and

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>his route running also leaves a little bit to be desired,

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>which is why he's probably nudged toward the tight end

0:14:56.360 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>position as well. He's likely a second rounder in my book, UM,

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>comps of Waller. And then if you're going to give

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>him a comp as a wide receiver, probably DK Metcalf

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>who's huge and fast, and maybe Vincent Jackson a little

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>bit too, but he's a little bit of a slower side.

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>That's you know. I like that. That's a I think

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that is a really good comp to Vincent Jackson. That

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>makes a ton of sense. I like that. Now here's

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>for a major red flag for fantasy owners to chase

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Claypool if if he goes to a team who's going

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to convert him to tight end. That is a multi

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>year conversion that is does not happen quickly and will

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>take it will take time, and it and it means

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a very I think it means potentially very little playing

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>time in his rookie year. I would be I would

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>not chase Claypool down significantly for Dynasty Empire use if

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that happens, any use and re draft for that matter,

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>just because I think you're gonna get just just the

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>timeline for him to hit the field. It's just it's

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>just dramatically reduced. When you need to go learn how

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to block in line tight it's such a different position.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I would be worried. Yeah, he he probably falls out

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the the rookie draft first round if

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>he becomes a tight end. But uh, I mean, really,

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the sky's the limit for a guy of that size

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and and and the ability in the open field. So

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I still like him quite a bit. All right, Let's

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>go to Brandon Ayak from Arizona State. This is a

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>player I like a lot, and I think could be

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a sneaky entrant to the bottom of the first round,

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>potentially to San Francisco, which is where I currently have

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>him mocked. Brandon Ayak, what is I want to see?

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>If you are as it? If you like him as

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>much as I do. I do like him quite a bit,

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think You're right right on the money there

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that I think he might be a tail end of

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the first round guy. Everything I've read about a Yook

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>is that he's the hardest worker in this wide receiver class. Uh.

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>He's one of those guys who wasn't really recruited, went

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to JUCO for two years, started every game in his

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>two years at Arizona State after after moving up to

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>D one. UH really didn't break out until his senior season,

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 1>but Nikil Harry was right in front of him. In

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>his junior year. UM had some pretty decent success in

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the return game. Had both a punt and kick return

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:16.239
<v Speaker 1>touchdown last season, and that's something that NFL teams do

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.479
<v Speaker 1>look for in wide receivers and UM. One of the

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 1>things that I forget who said this, but I was

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>listening to another podcast and UM, guys who hit the

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>pro level, if they have a special teams touchdown on

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>their resume from college, they're much likelier to break out

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and be something of the success in the NFL. UM

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>great deep speed, very big hands, and very long arms

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>for his six ft zero frame, but wasn't a world

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>beater and contestant catch situations. UH, and he's a bit

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of a late breakout in college, and late breakouts are

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 1>always a slight concern that it might just be a

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 1>flash in the pan year. Um they gave him comps

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>of d J. Moore as a wide receiver, which is great,

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>time Montgomery in the return game, which is also great.

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think Brandon Auk has a a very good

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>chance of being a noisemaker in this draft either too.

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll be fascinating to see his landing spot, and I

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>think he can help. I think he can help almost

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>every team. I don't think he's He's not somebody that

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you need to find just the right spot for. There's

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>so this deep. This distract is super deep, and slot

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>receivers in particular, that's not him either. So I I

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>love the flexibility and I think his landing spot it

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>could be it could be helpful almost for every single

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>team he might go to. Let's go to k J.

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Hill of Ohio State, speaking of slot receivers, ran almost

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>entirely from the slot and ran almost entirely underneath routes.

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's another guy that's gonna have to

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 1>learn a broader route tree than what he showed at

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State. And kJ Hill to me is is a specialist.

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>That is a guy I need to find this landing

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>spot that's gonna use his unique slot receiver middle of

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the field talents best. Yeah. So I was reviewing all

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the kJ Hill tape that I could find, and I

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>just didn't see anything that looked particularly elite he was.

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>He was at Ohio State, and Ohio State dominated this season,

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and he was wide open on nearly every single one

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of the highlights that I saw. I didn't see any

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>moves or super elite speed or size. But he caught

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the ball a lot and he ran into the end

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>zone a lot. Is that a product of elite separation

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>or route running or is it because Ohio State was

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>so good and they were up by twenty points and

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 1>nobody can cover anybody with J K. Dobbins in the backfield.

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>So um, his metrics at the combine four six forty

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at the combine, that's not good. NFL dot Com gave

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>him a backup Special Teams grade as an overall grade

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>for him. Um. Like I said, speed's not great, scouts

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>are saying that a separation and route running his average.

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Once he gets the ball in space. He does have

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a knack for finding the end zone, and he comes

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>from the Ohio State wide receiver program, so he's got

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that pedigree. He read shirted his first year because Michael Thomas,

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel, and Braxton Miller were ahead of him on

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the depth chart. But I think on the upside, he's

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Cold Beasley in the NFL. That's the combine for him.

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that he's anything more than a slot

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>receiver that pops up for a good game now and then.

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>But it really isn't a guy that you want on

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy roster. Yeah, I'm with you. Don K J.

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Hilt does not interest me, and I think, like I said,

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he needs to find just the right spot

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>for him to be effective um and I don't know

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>that that's gonna happen. I see a potential slide for

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.959
<v Speaker 1>him in the draft as well. Let's go to uh

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>we got two receivers left that I want to talk about.

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break, get to Juwan Jennings from

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee and Brian Edwards is one of my favorite sneaky

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>under the our guys. But I don't know what the

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>radar is anymore because I'm seeing his name pop up

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot as everybody's favorite sleeper. So I'll talk about

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>those two guys when we come back for the final

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>segment of Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchi and Matt Harrison,

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>with you were breaking down the second tier of rookie

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers have already broken down Denzel Mims, Laviska, Chenalt

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>kJ Hamler, Chase Claypool, Brandon Ayuk kJ Hill we both

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>don't like much. And now let's turn our attention to

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 1>our final two guys. Juwan Jennings from tennesse See another

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>guy that didn't run only from the slot, but most

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of his production came from the slot um but still

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of parts to his game that could

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>be pretty compelling here and I think that again, in

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the in the right spot, I think he could be successful.

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And I definitely like him as a as a as

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a slot receiver more than I like k J. Hill.

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>But what are your thoughts? I'll let you go first,

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>what are your thoughts on Joan Jennings from Tennessee UH

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>six three to ten. Another big dude, but he's this

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 1>year's baggage prospect. UH tons of off field issues stemming

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to high school. Mostly dealing with

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>just his attitude around his team. He quit his high

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>school team, he was kicked off Tennessee's roster in seen.

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>They allowed him to come back, but he had to

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>miss half of the Gator Bowl this year due to

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>stomping on an opponent. So he's got that baggage with him.

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>But with that comes a lot of talent, and the

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>right coaching staff might be able to get the most

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>out of him. He had only fifty seven receptions for

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the Valls last year, but somehow he broke twenty nine

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>tackles seven receptions. That's insane. I mean, if your broken tackles.

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>For a wide receiver to break tackles on half their catches,

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that's amazing. Yeah, that's pretty good. Uh. He's very big,

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>he's very strong, he's very slippery in the open field.

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>He's really good at the point of catch. So he's

0:22:57.560 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of those physical tools that could make

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>him a very successful NFL receiver. Um the two knocks,

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>he's got the million dollar arm ten cent head thing

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>going for him. Plus his combine time on his forty

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>was slow four point seven two. That's actually um So

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I've seen him go as high as the first round

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in some mocks, but I don't believe there's a chance

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in that happening. But I've also seen him ranked like

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight among wide receiver prospects on some people's big boards.

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>So there's a giant range of outcomes for where this

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>guy might end up, and it all depends on which

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>team is in love with him and where they're willing

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to pick him. But the best comp I found for him,

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is a good comp Uh and

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Kuan Bolden. Uh not a super fast guy, but big,

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and UH had all the other tools to make him

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a really successful player. John Jennings, Tennessee. Let's let's go

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to Brian Edwards. This guy's fascinating, and I think had

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>he not just broken his foot in February and suffered

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a d injury a few months before that, we'd be

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about Brian Edwards as a as potentially an early

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>second round wide receiver. And I still think there's a

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>chance he goes there. He's the all time South Carolina

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>leader in receiving yards, he was productive throughout his entire career,

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and he feels like a guy that foot aside, assuming

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the foot's ready by the openers the kind of guy

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that you could that could be a starter as a

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>rookie on opening day. Yeah, and you talked about how

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>he held the record in South Carolina. He was Deebo

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Samuel's running mate for the Game Cox until last season. Uh,

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>he holds the record over you know, guys like Sydney

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Rice who are who are down there and Uh. Um

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>so Edwards played forty eight games for the Game Cox.

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>He caught a reception in every one of his forty

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>eight games there. That's amazing. Uh. And and he recorded

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>at least six receptions in each of his final eight

0:24:55.560 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>games in college. Um. Good size, not elite speed, more

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of a good route runner. He's pretty smart guy. Uh.

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Finds himself an open space a ton. Uh was tough

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to bring down with his big size, even in a

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>tough SEC conference. Uh. The worry is, like you said,

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the foot injury and the knee injury at the tail

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>end of his senior season. Uh. He did have injury

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to the same knee at his senior year in high school. Uh.

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>That probably caused him to drop too. I think he's

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>probably a third round pick. He could drop as far

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>as the fourth. But he's a guy that could absolutely

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>be a steal and he will. He will work his

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>way as a successful outside wide receiver in the pros um.

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a second option. He's like a wide

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>receiver too on his own team, but he should deliver

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>good consistency as an NFL starter. And the comps, I

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>saw James Jones, who had a couple of pretty good

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>years as a fantasy player top thirty wide receiver seasons

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh, Martavis Bryant without the baggage. Uh, both kind

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>of similar players. So, uh, Brian Edwards is kind of

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>an interesting dude. And I think there's gonna be a

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>team out there that's gonna get him late. They're gonna

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>sluff the wide receiver position even though they need one,

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>and they'll probably pick him up near the tail end

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of the third round. And uh, I feel like they

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>got a really good value. You and I see this

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>guy pretty differently. I think there's gonna be a team

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.199
<v Speaker 1>that takes him in the second round because of his

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>un Brian Edwards has unbelievable balance and leaping ability. His

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>contested catch rate is amazing. He's gets a good Yeah,

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>guy's big enough to break tackles. He's a big bodied

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>guy who still has balance and leaping ability. I think

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be a handful of teams. As as as

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>medical science has changed so much Matt over the last

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten twenty years, I just think the the

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>impact of injuries just isn't what he used to be,

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and that nobody is it's almost nobody is truly injury

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>prone anymore. I just think there's some guys that have

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>worse luck than others, and there are sure there are

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>some guys that that do the injuries really do cut

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>short there career, but mostly medical science has just changed

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>so much that I don't know that it really makes

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that big of a difference anymore. And I think they're

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be there's gonna be a team in the second round.

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe that's going to look past this injury and

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>just say we've got a guy who's got some really

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>really special traits in Brian Edwards. Again, the contestant catches,

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the balance, the leaping ability, the one handed catches, He's

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>he's really a special player in some tangible ways. And

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there's going to be teams out there that

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 1>are going to decide that they they're going to overlook

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that injury and all. It takes one in the second round,

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's gonna happen, you know, Charge, I

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>think you're right about a lot of things about the

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>about the medical side of it. But we're in a

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>weird year where a lot of these teams did not

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 1>get to bring these guys into their own facilities and

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>have their own medical personnel check them out. So a

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of what they're relying on is what happened at

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the Combine and and what happened at the Senior Bowl.

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these guys didn't have pro days with

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>staff on hand. So I think that there's gonna be

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of trepidation and people are going to

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.479
<v Speaker 1>back off of some of these guys uh with the

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>injury designation just because they haven't had the opportunity to

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>see them in person. And so that's why I'm worried

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 1>about guys like Brian Edwards, and I'm worried about tah Uh.

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that he could fall outside of the top

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:20.959
<v Speaker 1>ten in in in the first round of the draft,

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>and and I think that uh, his hip is a

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>pretty big concern. So I think there's a lot of

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>guys with the injury bugs in the back that uh

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>might fall. Okay, I think that's a very fair point

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that injury guys to some teams are gonna be more

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>skittish and injury guys because they couldn't look at them themselves.

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I think in other cases they're gonna go, well, we've

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this particular injury a dozen times or a

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand times, and we know, you know, we know how

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this injury works, and there just aren't that many variables. Um.

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>As for TOA dropping out of the top ten, I

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>knew I'd get you going on that. If nothing else,

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>there would be teams drafting like you know, Las Vegas

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>at twelve, um, Tampa Bay at fourteen. There will be

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>other teams that would drop, that would go up from

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a up in the draft to go get him into

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the top ten, even if for some reason, you know,

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the team's in the top ten weren't comfortable with to

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>although you know, I just think I think you're crazy

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>if you think that's the case. How you know, how

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>does TWA get by Miami at five and the Chargers

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>at six? That can't happen? Um? I think I think

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Miami passes because they think that uh, they

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>can either get a quarterback later or they're or they're

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>happy waiting on the position one more year and building

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the team first. And I think the Chargers are in

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>love with Herbert. I just think that that's how it's

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna go. Everything I've heard about the Chargers is there

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>in love with Herbert and that's the guy that's no.

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing. Chargers are projecting that potentially because

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>they want to They want to not give the impression

0:29:58.040 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that they're desperate for two US so that if they

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>need to move up to number two or they need

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to move up to number three, that they don't have

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to overpay to get there. So I think that's you know,

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm still going at too. I think two can go

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>as early as two for sure. If I'm Washington, I

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>would take it to it too, because I'm not a

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>believer in Dwayne Haskins based on what we've seen so far.

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So and I think all all that can do is

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>extend the suffering of rate of Redskins fans who have

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>been waiting for a quarterback for you know, years and

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>years and are still gonna be waiting because they still

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.959
<v Speaker 1>don't have their guy in Dwayne Haskins. Alright, churche uh.

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>If we're gonna make a one dollar bet, um, I

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>will take Justin Herbert going before to a Oh done

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>giving away a dollar here, that's right, give it away

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a dollar, and I don't want you paying me in

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>pennies or nickels. I want a sack of jewiah. Oh,

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess I can probably find that the tooth fairy

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in my house brings sack of jewias. I want. This

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is a sackato. We a bet between you and I

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>about who goes first to or Justin Herbert. Done deal?

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, great job today, Thank you, Matt. Yeah, absolutely yeah.

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week for draft reaction, and at

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that point the draft will be well, have round one

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in the books. We'll talk about all the Round one

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>rookies that went next Friday on Fantasy Football Weekly. Fantasy

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly is a production of I Heart Radio. For

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the i heart

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.