WEBVTT - Google Cloud Debuts New AI Chips

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast, with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and Eva low In sent frances Go.

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet's Google Cloud division on veils the latest generation of

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 3>its tensor processing unit, or TPU, and announces a slew

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 3>of partnership deals or break it all down.

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 4>Plus, a small group of unauthorized users has accessed anthropics

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 4>new AI model Mythos, which the company says can enable

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 4>dangerous cyber attacks.

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 3>And we'll catch up with Rivian CEO RJ. Scarringe to

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 3>discuss a big milestone for the company's new R two

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 3>that's later this hour.

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 4>First we check in on these markets, which managed to

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 4>be shrugging off yet further chao sort occurs in the

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.279
<v Speaker 4>straight orfor moves. The oil market doesn't shrug it off,

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 4>and we're currently seeing Brint up almost three percent.

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 5>We're back above one hundred dollars a barrel.

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting is equities managed to push through that inflationary

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 4>headwind and that geopolitical anxiety. In fact, we've got new

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 4>record high on then as that one hundred s and

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 4>P five hundred very close to that record, So ed

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 4>there is a lot of optimism.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 5>A lot of it's around earnings and other news.

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, news is driving stocks.

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Google had a big jump in the pre market, carried

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 3>over into the main session and is sustained up one

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 3>point seven percent. There is a lot of Google news

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 3>to weigh through. First, let's talk about tensor processing units

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 3>or TPUs. Alphabet's Google Cloud division unveiled the latest generation

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 3>of its TPUs design to make AI computing services faster

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 3>and more efficient. The U lineup comes in two versions,

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 3>the TPU eight T for creating AI software and the

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 3>TPUAI for running AI services that have been created. In

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 3>other words, carro training and inference specific.

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean it sounds like Amazon in many ways of

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 4>their chips they've been making, but Google has led the

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 4>charge in terms of who designed their own types and

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 4>then vertically integrates.

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 5>That's really led the point.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 3>We talked to in the week that there would be

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 3>an inferant specific TPU. We got both a training and

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 3>an inference specific TPU.

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 2>What else?

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 4>I think it's important that Google had been Google had

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 4>been reporting Bloomberg and reporting all of this.

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 5>But also let's talk.

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 4>About more in the world of Google Cloud because the

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 4>company has just expanded several partnerships Oracle to give joint

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 4>customers a simpler way to interact with their Oracle data

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 4>using natural language. But there's also within video to help

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 4>power agenic and physical AI and AI factories. There are

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 4>also agreements with Salesforce, crowd Strike, broad comm startups such

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 4>as Mira Marati's Thinking Machines. There was a whole wealth

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 4>of headlines we had to navigate through.

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 5>But maybe it's the fact that they're making their own chips.

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 4>It's becoming more efficient and that makes more people want

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 4>to come in on the cloud reglationship.

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's be honest, this is a massive news from Google Cloud,

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 3>and there are signs that internally more ARI code is

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 3>being written with AI. But they're doing deals and Cloud

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 3>could be taking market share. Let's stay on alphabet man

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 3>deep seeing the Bloomberg intelligence is with us. I don't

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 3>know if you were going to publish one react or

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't react because there are so many pieces of

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 3>new information. I suppose that start on the TPU angle.

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 3>That's a big focus for Google Cloud. Why why do

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 3>we care so much about their custom silicon?

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look right now.

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 6>It is about having the capacity to deploy AI workloads.

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 6>That's what everyone is scrambling for. You have seen you know,

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 6>Anthropic really kind of change their models because they don't

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 6>have the capacity to serve their best model. And look,

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 6>Google has that advantage when it comes to owning that

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 6>TPU supply and also deploying it at scale with their

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 6>family or apps. And I think the best data point

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 6>we are going to get in this earning season is

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 6>the cloud growth for Google segment already was close to

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 6>fifty percent last quarter when Azure grew forty percent, So

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 6>that gap most likely.

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Is going to increase.

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 6>And not only are they growing fams than the other

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 6>cloud players, their margins are expanding. And that's where people

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 6>will realize they are the lowest cost token provider when

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 6>you compare them to everyone else out there.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 4>We don't have to wait long to get that data.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 4>April twenty ninth is when the earnings come. What do

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 4>you make of all the expanded deals? Then? Just this

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 4>just hint. The Mormon people are coming to them for

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 4>the cloud. Does it matter whether they're startups or whether

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 4>they're legacy businesses.

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Look, I think a lot of the deals involve

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:32.919
<v Speaker 6>vertical integration where they are providing the TPUs, they're doing

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 6>it on their cloud and it's using Gemini. So you know,

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 6>if you are using Google Cloud, you're getting that complete package,

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 6>whereas with everyone else you're using either in video chips

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 6>or a BLUs cloud. And to me, the best illustration is,

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:52.239
<v Speaker 6>you know the deal that Amazon has had with open

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 6>Ai and Entropic, where they are giving Entropic five billion

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 6>dollars money to spend on their cloud, whereas the deal

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 6>that Entropic had with Google three point five gigawards. Google

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 6>is not.

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Giving Entthropic anymore.

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 6>So that is a sign that illustrates that Google probably

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 6>is in a better position when it comes to negotiating

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 6>with these frontier and.

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 4>For our client base of a Bloomberg terminal, for example,

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 4>you think about just the finance industry. Citadel's over there

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 4>talking about how they're using Google. But there's a story

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 4>that's really well read on the terminal talking about Vista

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 4>striking a deal to speed up Google AI in.

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 5>Its software portfolio.

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 4>This is very much financially focused in terms of the

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 4>industry that it's changing.

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 3>So let's just call Vista a private equity firm or

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 3>an investor that has a portfolio of companies. This is

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 3>a kind of tried and tested format where Vista makes

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 3>deal with Google Cloud, but the net result is the

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 3>portfolio companies get access to either the compute capacity or

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 3>something on customs, silicon, whatever it might be. But Vista

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 3>has the cloud to do that on the portfolio company's behalf.

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.559
<v Speaker 3>That's a playbook we've seen before. But yeah, yeah, spend

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 3>a bit of money on AI and spending.

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 5>They are mandy.

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Just briefly, how much do you think that this adds

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 4>to the revenue run rate? How much does all of

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 4>this really matter to Alphabet's huge business model, which isn't

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 4>oil about.

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 3>It so real quick, like I'm not going to read

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 3>you every single headline insert company name here. Expanded pack

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 3>with Google Cloud.

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Some reports in.

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 3>The press, like with Thinking Machines, it's a multi billion

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 3>dollar deal that will show up, right, surely it will

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 3>show up.

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 6>I mean Google's share of infrastructure cloud where you know,

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 6>think of the triopoly there was Amazon, Microsoft and Google.

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Way, well they will move up.

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 6>I think with AI workload share, they will certainly have

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 6>a higher share compared to what they had in their

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 6>traditional cloud and this will probably be the biggest driver

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 6>of that owning the TPUs, and then obviously their chips

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 6>doing far better than other ASA providers, including Amazon.

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I just want to go back to the basics of

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the TPU.

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 3>You and I have discussed that body of research that

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 3>you did comparing the existing generation TPU performance against other

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 3>A six and Nvidia. What's the basic story of the TPU.

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 3>What's the selling point of Google saying you should use

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 3>this instead of using the latest in video gear.

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 6>I mean, look, these are not confirmed reports, but Mythos

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 6>may have been trained entirely on TPUs or majority of

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 6>the cluster for that Mythos training was Google GPUs. So

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 6>from that perspective, if the best model out there, whether

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 6>it's their own, Google, Gemini or Anthropics models, is trained

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 6>on TPU, that is a pretty good validation of how

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 6>good their chips are both for training and then they

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 6>deployed at scale across their family of apps, search being

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 6>that biggest kind of surface where they deploy their own

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 6>models at scale, and that's all inferencing.

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 4>Okay, we want to go back to something that you

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 4>said at the very top of the conversation. You hinted

0:07:55.840 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 4>that mythos maybe being unfolded as it is a compute

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 4>rather than perhaps it's all powerful nature.

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 5>What gives you that feeling?

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 4>And how will the token economics change that for some

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 4>of these lms in the future.

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so right now, if you look at the last

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 6>data point that Google has shared, they're around fifteen hundred

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 6>trillion tokens per month. That's about three to four times

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 6>that of open ai and Tropic based on our work.

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 6>So they're already operating at such a high scale. Why

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 6>Because they are the lowest cost token provider. They don't

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 6>have to get those chips from Nvidia to you know,

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 6>deploy it for inferencing, and that is the difference. I

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 6>think that will become more and more obvious as we

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 6>go towards AGENTYKEAI, which is basically doing inferencing much longer

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 6>than you know, using it in a copilot or a

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 6>chat pot type of inference format.

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 4>All night, all day, all night, man deep saying and

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 4>bloemberg intelligence. Great to have you break down what is

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 4>a whole swofth of news around alphabet coming up?

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 5>Rivian's long promised DOR two starts.

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Rolling off the line's sweet with the CEO about the

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 4>next chapter for the electric vehicle maker.

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 5>It's a bloomberg tech.

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Rivian's new R two is rolling off the line in

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 3>normal Illinois.

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Big milestone for the company.

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 3>It's a smaller, more affordable suv and for many this

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 3>is the vehicle that will define Rivian's path to profitability.

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 3>The company continues to burn through cash. Joining us now

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 3>from the factory is CEO RJ. Scaringe, who has driven

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 3>quite a few R twos off the line already today.

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 3>It's a big moment, but ourj we should point out

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 3>that on Friday the facility was hit by a tornado,

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 3>by a big storm. There was damage to certain parts

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 3>of the factory. What was the net result of that?

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Is everyone okay? And has there been any material impact

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 3>to the startup production plan?

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 7>I mean, of course, of course, you can't plan for

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 7>these kinds of things, and we didn't expect to tornado

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 7>to hit Friday night, but you know, the teams responded

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.839
<v Speaker 7>really well. Fortunately everyone was safe. We followed our protocols

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 7>as soon as we knew there were tornadoes in the area.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 7>But yeah, tornado went through the south end of the

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 7>plant and ripped the roof off the building and knocked

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 7>down some of the some of the plants as well,

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.599
<v Speaker 7>and so the last you know, seventy two hours have

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 7>been around the clock. You're getting all the water out

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 7>of the facility and getting ready to rebuild the south end.

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 7>But you know, it's like the ultimate example of resilience

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 7>of the business where the teams have come together and

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 7>we still had vehicles come off the line this morning.

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Is the plan still the same You can get through

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 3>the same kind of ramp strategy that you had the

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 3>same volumes in that initial output.

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, our ramp up this week and into next week.

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 7>We're not making changes to the plan. We're obviously having

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 7>to make some accommodations for the fact that a big

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 7>it's the logistics area of the plant and so the

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 7>way that materira was flowing into the plant through the

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 7>dock doors does not have to come in a different way.

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 8>But you know, we're working through it. We're working through it.

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting is orders demand configuration, ah J. What do

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 4>people want and how willingly are they putting in the orders?

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, I'm as you said, I drove a

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 7>bunch of our twos off the line today. I've been

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 7>driving in our two for a while, and the car

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 7>is just incredible. It's the combination of the package, the

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 7>driving dynamics, the efficiency of course, the design, and just

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 7>the aesthetic feel. So we're really excited to get folks

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 7>into it. There's a tremendous amount of enthusiasm. We've had

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 7>a few events where we've hosted potential customers to experience it.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 7>And you know, we were in Denver a couple of

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 7>days ago and there's like a super long line just

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 7>to sit in the car.

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 8>So we'd love to see the enthusiasm.

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 7>And I can't wait to continue to ramp up production

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 7>start seeing these on the road.

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I loved Ed's enthusiasm when he came to

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 4>have a look at your in house AI chip, and

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested as to where therefore that vertical integration comes in.

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 4>You're also including light O. Look, there's there's a roadmap

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 4>for these variants. When does that ender production?

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 7>A J sour our in house silicon, which is a

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 7>eight hundred tops per chip. We have two of those

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 7>chips in the vehicle and we couple that with cameras,

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 7>radar and a lighter that sits to the top of

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 7>the windshield that comes in at the end of this year,

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 7>and so our launch edition still has a very highly

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 7>capable self driving platform, which is essentially a further development

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 7>of what's in our our one vehicle now. But across

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 7>the vehicle, you know, R two just represents so many

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 7>learnings for us as a business, whether it's the drive line,

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 7>the power electronics, just the way it's being built in

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 7>terms of cost and cost efficiency, and so there's there's

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 7>like not a there's not a detail in the car

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 7>that hasn't been thoughtfully evolved or developed relative to what

0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 7>we've done in our one.

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh Ja, I want to go a bit more specific

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 3>on what car is talking about. The story with R

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 3>two has changed a little bit. I think you're probably

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 3>thinking about an autonomous future a bit more than you were.

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 3>But the idea was to get close to that forty

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 3>five thousand dollars mark a vehicle for the masses. You

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 3>start with a premium and more expensive variant, But what

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 3>are you seeing in the demand pockets for getting to

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 3>a lower price point that is where you want to

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 3>take on the established lowems.

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 7>Right, Yeah, Well, the average price of a new car

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 7>in the United States is about fifty thousand dollars and

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 7>so really important to us as we're developing R two

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 7>is recognizing we wanted to be right in that range,

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 7>and so having a variant that starts at forty five

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 7>and then going up to our top speck for the

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 7>performance version with all the kit for the interior is

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 7>at fifty seven, it allows us to really nicely straddle that.

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 7>And of course, you know, launching any product, you have

0:13:58.160 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 7>the decision of what do you launch first? You launch

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 7>the base back, midspec top spec right, and it's impossible

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 7>to sort of make everyone happy with when you have

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 7>a launch edition. So we decided to launch with the

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 7>premium spec, but we'll be introducing like a middle like

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 7>a midspec vehicle, and then the forty five thousand version

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 7>will come thereafter. But that all rolls out over roughly

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 7>the next year, and you know, there's so much enthusiasm

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 7>for the product that we're very like, we feel really

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 7>confident with the way we've configured the specifications and even

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 7>the pricing.

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 8>We feel quite strong that we've we've.

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 7>Priced it appropriately, especially when you look at the capabilities

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 7>and then the cross shop of what other vehicles are

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 7>in the space.

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 3>I've experienced the R two that does have the lde

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 3>R and the in house silicon, and it's so interesting

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 3>there's going to be a generation of R twos that

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 3>don't have it. I know that you said they're very

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 3>capable with the Nvidia silicon and without LIDR, but that's

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 3>a big call to make, right. Is there any flexible

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 3>to accelerate the timing of where you can start production

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 3>on the R two line in Illinois and bring in

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 3>that gear, because what you're pitching for the autonomous capabilities,

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 3>even the advanced driver assistance capabilities of R two, they

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 3>are predicated on the on that next gen gear.

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 7>Well, the launch edition still has a very high ceiling,

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 7>and so this will get to and our Gen two

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 7>R one will also do this.

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 8>Later this year, will start to.

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 7>Roll out point to point level two, so I meaning

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 7>hands off wheel, eyes on road, but you type the

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 7>address and the car completely drives you there.

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 8>And then into next.

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 7>Year we'll start to roll out level three, so hands off,

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 7>eyes off for specific domains in this case, you know,

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 7>starting with highways, and that will be true for Gen

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 7>two of R one, It'll be true for the launch

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 7>edition of R two, and will of course be true

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 7>for the varying of the vehicle that has the higher

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 7>comput stack and more capable perception. That more capable perception

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 7>is going to allow for is a higher ceiling of

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 7>what the vehicle can ultimately achieve, and so it'll achieve

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 7>higher levels of capability. And importantly, it serves as a

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 7>really viable part of our data flywheel.

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 8>And so think of v R two fleet.

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 7>It's a high volume product as being part of training

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 7>are what we call our large driving model and the

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 7>existence of a light our plus the enhanced inference just

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 7>allows us to do a better job of capturing lots

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 7>and lots of driving miles to train our model.

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 4>Look, other automakers are probably looking at that flywheel, ah Jay,

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm really interested in some of the hints we're getting,

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 4>some of the coverage in the markets about discussions to

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 4>license your software, your autonomy stack, your underlying technology to

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 4>other automakers.

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 5>Is that in the works?

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think in the fullness of time.

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 7>When you look at what we're building as a business,

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 7>there's really two revenue opportunities. One is we continue to

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 7>grow by selling vehicles. So of course R two is

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 7>the embodiment of that. That's what we're driving towards But

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 7>there's another element of our business which is leveraging the

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 7>technology we're developing. And the first example that was what

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 7>we did with Volkswagen. We did a five point eight

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 7>billion dollar software licensing deal and that allows us to

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 7>deploy this stout, our self driving but our compute stack

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 7>and our software platform, our oas across a wide range

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 7>of electric vehicles within the Volkswagen portfolio. And so we're

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 7>excited about the potential to do more deals like that

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 7>with our operating system in the vehicle, with our vehicle

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 7>and certainly as we think about autonomy, the potential that's

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 7>there for us also license that in the long term.

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 5>Ravian CEO RJ scarrange.

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 4>We'll let you get back to those R twos that

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 4>are rolling off the shop floor.

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 5>We so appreciate your time today from MENINOI.

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, electric vehicle adoption it has been accelerating, particularly in

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 4>China and increasingly spilling into global markets, driven by a

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 4>wave of lower cost models and the country's leading cheaper

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 4>battery production.

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 5>It's the topic of tonight's episode of Primer.

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 9>Take a listen, you're driving a car, you're driving a

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 9>battery and China right now is the leader in batteries.

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 4>China's evs are already cheaper on average than similar gas cards,

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 4>and it's no surprise that four of the top five

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 4>battery makers in the world are located here. Also, one

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 4>of them, BYD, has been jocking with Tesla for years

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 4>for the title of the world's biggest EV maker. All

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 4>that success means lots of competition at home, propelling China

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 4>to look outward for expansion.

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 5>And while some big markets like the US and.

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 4>The EU have resisted China's cheaper evs, many emerging markets

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 4>have brought them in.

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 3>You can catch the full episode of Primer tonight on

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg six pm Eastern and on Bloomberg Originals at eight pm.

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Terrific work from Caro and the team. Now coming up dogs.

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 3>The AI moth model the Anthropic warned was two big

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 3>cybersecuritists to release widely has been accessed by unauthorized users.

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 2>That's according to a Bloomberg sauce.

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 3>We have that report.

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Next, this is Bomberg Tech.

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 4>A small group of unauthorized users have accessed to anthropics

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 4>new AI model mythos. It's according to a person familiar

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 4>with the matter, and documentation viewed by Bloomberg News.

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 5>Now, as you probably remember.

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 4>And Throberic has said mythos can enable dangerous cyber attacks,

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 4>and because of that, the company only gave access to

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 4>select users to help them probe their own systems for vulnerabilities.

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Let's get the latest. Bloomberg's AI reporter Rachel Mets. This

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 4>caused quite the stir when you reported it last night.

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 4>And what's so extraordinary is who's done it and how.

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 5>They did it, Rachel. These aren't people wanting to wreak havoc.

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 5>They want to play with a thing exactly. Yeah.

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 10>These are people that enjoy playing with new EI models.

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 10>And they had been try trying to figure out the

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 10>names of various AI models for Anthropic, in particular, through

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 10>a variety of techniques such as having some familiarity with

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 10>what the online location of Anthropics old models looked like,

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 10>you know what that URL would look like, and using

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 10>that to guess as to what it might be in

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 10>the future.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 2>So being very specific about this, Rachel. One of the.

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Group, which was a discord community right had a contractor

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 3>relationship with Anthropic, so had some sort of credentialed access.

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>But the rest of it was sleuthing right, thinking, where

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 3>is the source code for this likely to be? Explain

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 3>literally the mechanisms by which they found Mythos.

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 11>Sure.

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 10>So, I mean the key piece here is that one

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 10>of these people has worked as a contractor for a

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 10>third party, not for Anthropic directly, but for a third

0:20:56.040 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 10>party that works with Anthropic, and through that they had

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 10>had a authentication that they would need in order to

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 10>access certain models. With that, and then with some slew

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 10>thing that they did, including details that had been involved

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 10>in data breaches online and that just their past experience,

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 10>they sort of put these pieces together of what the

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 10>online address could be for the Mythos model, and all

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.919
<v Speaker 10>those things together led them to be able to access

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 10>it on the same day they say, as when Anthropic

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 10>announced it.

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 4>I can't help but feel that this is terribly basic

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 4>cybersecurity practice one oh one that was missed here over

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 4>an Anthropic And what can this therefore mean when they're

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 4>meant to be very carefully through project glassing allowing other

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 4>people to use it.

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, I think that's one of the things

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 10>that the person that I spoke with was really concerned about.

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 10>They are part of a small group that is just

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.679
<v Speaker 10>playing around with this. From what they said, they're not

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 10>doing anything that they shouldn't be doing with it, obviously

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 10>accessing it in an authorized way, but not doing anything

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 10>bad with it. They think, well, if it was this

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 10>uncomplicated for us to get access to it, what does

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 10>that mean for other people? Are there other people working

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 10>for third party contractors who could be nation state actors

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 10>or something like that that are using access legit access

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 10>seeming to technology and then getting access to me This.

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 3>Right the most read story across Bloomberg today, unauthorized access

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 3>to me TH's bloombergs.

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 2>Rachel metch top recording.

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Thank you coming up, SpaceX and Cursor teaming up to

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 3>quote create the world's best coding and knowledge work AI.

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 3>We have the report. Next, it's half time and this

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech if you're

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 3>just joining us. So many news headlines that are driving

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 3>individual names in the markets. There's a report from the

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Information that deep Seek, the Chinese based China based Frontier

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Lab is thinking about doing around at a twenty billion

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 3>dollar value, but that specifically Ali Barber and Tencent, who

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 3>are not yet investors in deep Sea, are considering participation.

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Right now, the US listed shares of Ali Barber up

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 3>one point three percent. It did shoot up in the

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 3>pre market after that report hit. Again, that's from the information.

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 3>We have not yet verified it, but it would be

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 3>an interesting development, Caro, for China's domestic AI ecosystem.

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:37.479
<v Speaker 5>It certainly would be.

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 4>And it just thinks about the story that we continue

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 4>to hear of M and A an ecosystem in AI ecosystem,

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 4>And let's discuss a little bit more close to home

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 4>in your maskers moving to catch his rivals in AI

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 4>coding tools for a potentially sixty.

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 5>Billion dollar deal.

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Now, SpaceX has secured the right to acquire AI startup Cursor, but.

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 5>It's not pulling the trigger just yet.

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Ahead of its ip over the most Natasha Mascaronas joins

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 4>US now PSHA. So after much sort of excitement about

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 4>Cursor and other companies looking to potentially purchase it looks

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 4>as though SpaceX has gone edge.

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 5>It sounds like it.

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 12>I mean, this is a very unique, very elon musk deal.

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 12>It's the right to acquire Cursor later this year for

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 12>sixty billion, like you said, if not, as we exclusively

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 12>reported yesterday, the ten billion dollar fee is actually being

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.239
<v Speaker 12>looked at as a breakup fee, and so in the

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 12>next six months, what have you We expect to see

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 12>some sort of update there and Curser no longer need

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 12>to look at venture capitalists for its compute needs for

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 12>the short term as well.

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 3>So on that point, you know, we had reported that

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Cursor was in talks to raise funds at a fifty

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar valuation. So you're going to point out the

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:54.959
<v Speaker 3>obvious that SpaceX, which owns Xai now has filed confidentially

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 3>for an IPO, and on paper, this is a big

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 3>piece of M and A which would materially change the

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 3>parameters of that S one. Give us the backstory. This

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 3>is not straightforward, Natasha.

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 5>Not straightforward at all.

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 12>I mean, listen to your point. We're not going to

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 12>see We're not expecting to see SpaceX make an acquisition

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 12>right before the IPO.

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 5>It would require a huge upheaval.

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 12>However, I mean, this is a huge change to the

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 12>SpaceX IPO narrative. Right about two months ago, Elon Musk

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 12>announced that Xai and SpaceX were merging. Now we have

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 12>this deal coming out of the woodwork. It's a huge update.

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 12>And listen, I mean, I think Cursor shareholders are extremely

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 12>happy with the news. Around this time last year, Cursor

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 12>was anticipating being valued at around a ten billion valuation.

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 12>Now ten billion is the breakup fee, and so talk

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 12>about a huge change and sentiment around Cursor.

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 4>Natasha just remind us of this space in vibe coding

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 4>or coding more broadly as well, because it's very competitive.

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 4>But also it feels as though XAI and SpaceX cat.

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 5>Shop hit absolutely.

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 12>I mean, this is the same reason that we saw Windsurf,

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 12>another competitor a once a standalone competitor two Cursor last

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 12>year seek compute partnerships and opportunities with bigger technology companies.

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 12>Windsurf of course saw its co founders leave to join Google,

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 12>and Cognition, another coding company, acquired up the remaining assets.

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 12>All these companies are looking for more ways to secure compute,

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 12>and so it's a deeply competitive environment. When the deal

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 12>was announced yesterday on x understandably we saw Cursor CEO

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 12>Michael Truell announce that first and foremost, this is a

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 12>win for Cursor's agentic coding model, and so this is

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 12>very much a response to the competitive environment because they

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 12>need more and more compute and this.

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 5>Solves that number one bottleneck.

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Bloombs Attasha Maskarinus, thank you very much. Shares a T

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 3>Mobile in the US session are down four percent. Deutsche Telegom,

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 3>which just closed trading in Europe, downfaller point sixty five percent.

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Deutsche Telecom is said to be considering a merger with

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 3>its US arm, a deal that would create the world's

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 3>largest telecom company. That's all, according to sources. For more,

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Bloombergs telecom reporter Kelsey Griffis is with US.

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:15.479
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 3>I didn't have this on the Bingo card, but there

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 3>is a backstory, a shared history, particularly at the C

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 3>suite level.

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 2>What are we reporting? What do we need to know?

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 13>I can say I didn't have this on my Bingo

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 13>card either, ed, but I do think that this is

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 13>something that has been rumored in the telecom industry for

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 13>a while. I had some sources tell me this was

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 13>an open secret. This is something the T Mobile parent

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 13>company had thought about for a while. It comes and

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 13>goes every few years, and we're in one.

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 11>Of those cycles.

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 13>It's really interesting to see what could potentially happen here.

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 13>According to our great colleagues reporting there could be a

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 13>holding company that would essentially bring in both the parent

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 13>company deutcha Telecom, and Tmobile and unite them under one

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 13>sort of umbrella.

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.360
<v Speaker 4>What's while Tim Horkers, who's over at Deutsche Telecom, has

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 4>been frustrated for a while, probably with the fact that

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Deutsche Telecom is worth less than T Mobile even though

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 4>they own a little bit more than a majority of

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 4>the US It sort of comes full circle. How is

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 4>this going back in history?

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 5>In some ways?

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 14>Right?

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 13>We've seen a relationship, a back and forth relationship between

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:31.199
<v Speaker 13>the Deutsche Telecom parent company and T Mobile US. The

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:36.919
<v Speaker 13>current T Mobile US CEO, Shreading Gobolon, is actually a

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 13>former T Mobile, or rather a Deutsche Telecom CEO in Germany,

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 13>so he has a close relationship with the current Deutsche

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 13>Telecom CEO. They are really aligned on strategy. They're aligned

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 13>on trying to increase profits, increase market share, and I've

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 13>been told the two men are very close, so there

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 13>is an alignment there. What we don't know is the

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 13>reaction from T Mobile Domestically. It does seem like the

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 13>alleged deal, a potential deal would allow the parent company

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 13>to kind of increase their control over this very profitable

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 13>US branch of the company.

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of question marks regulatory about approvals, about

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 4>whether it's spart more M and A in the US,

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 4>and analysts A trying to get a grip on it,

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 4>as as well as investors Blueing, mos Kelsey Griffiths.

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 5>Great to have you on. Thank you very much.

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 4>Inde coming up an exclusive conversation with vast day to

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 4>CEO Brendan Hallak. As a company hits a thirty billion

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 4>dollar valuation after raising another billion it's a blue met.

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Tech software maker.

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Vast Data has announced it's raised a one billion dollar

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Series F round, more than tripling the company's valuation to

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 3>thirty billion dollars. Here to discuss this, Vast Data CEO

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 3>ren and Hallak some big numbers.

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Congratulations, you must be pleased.

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 3>But jess One talks about this five layer cake of

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 3>of ai I think we're trying to understand what vast

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Data does, what it is. You know, you describe yourself

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 3>as an AIOS, but let's start there.

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 2>What do you do?

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, the five layer cake.

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 9>Jensen made this analogy of power chips, infrastructure models, and applications.

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 9>Were that middle layer we try to fill in that

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 9>software infrastructure layer of the stack. And we started from storage,

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 9>building very large data storage systems, and then we added

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 9>structure data with the database and the data engine to

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 9>manage compute. And as we progress, more and more parts

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 9>of that stack needed to be filled out for AI

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 9>to become widespread.

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 3>So here are some of the companies and groups that

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 3>you work with, right and there is all kinds of

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 3>AI infrastructure. But NASA is on there as well. Pick

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 3>anyone give us a case study of the work that

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 3>you might do with one of those key customers.

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 9>So, for example, with core Weave, they're the biggest AI

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 9>cloud out there and the way for us to get

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 9>to these new AI startups companies like Cursor and a

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 9>lot of others as well as the large AI companies

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 9>out there. They're serving everybody and we're helping them again

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 9>provide those cloud services by having that software infrastructure layer

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 9>in place.

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 4>The money menan, what is it that you need the

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 4>money for and why potentially do you need even more money.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 4>You're considering potentially an IPO by the end of this year.

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 9>So we don't need the money, is the honest answer.

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 9>In parallel to tripling the business roughly year over year,

0:31:57.480 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 9>we've been very efficient in the way that we build

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 9>the company. We've been generating quite a bit of cash.

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 9>In fact, on the rule of forty we have a

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 9>rule of two twenty.

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 11>Eight as of last year.

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 5>WOW.

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 9>The funding round is partially primary, partially secondary, and we

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 9>expect to continue to grow the business with a very

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 9>very strong balance sheet to give our customers confidence that

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 9>they can make very large bets on us.

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 4>A lot of American focused customers that we just saw.

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 4>But you have been going global and it's interesting that

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 4>you've taken funds from UAE from Singapore. How are you

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:37.719
<v Speaker 4>seeing the global expansion of our data?

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 9>So wherever AI is, that's where we see very fast growth.

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 9>It's been surprising at times. The Middle East Singapore are

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 9>places that are moving faster than some of your more

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 9>traditional markets.

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 4>But we still still the Middle East is running at

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 4>this moment where people perhaps question how much they can

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 4>focus in on investing on AI, particularly in the USA

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 4>when we're concerned about geopolitics and war.

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 9>I think that's a temporary thing. Hopefully we come out

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 9>of the other end stronger and safer. Definitely, in the

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 9>last couple of months have been challenging, but if I

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 9>look at five years out, ten years out, I still

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 9>think the UAE can lead RUG over a lot of

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 9>other countries.

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Dear Bloomberg Tech audience member, the rule of forty is

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 3>something that software companies do where they think their revenue

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 3>growth and their profit margin should combined be above forty percent.

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 3>But you know, Rennan, the other type of company that

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 3>talks about the rule of forty is one that thinks

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 3>about going public.

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Is that in your plans we.

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 9>Don't have a timeline. We've definitely been preparing Amy RCFO.

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 9>She came about eighteen months ago from Shopify, and she's

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 9>been working very diligently to make us ready to be

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 9>a public company. My best guess is that sometime later

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 9>in this year we will be ready for IPO, and

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 9>then we'll need to decide if and when to pull

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 9>that trigger.

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 3>In your world, generally, that particularly the data layer of

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 3>what's happening in AARI.

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Or Cursor.

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 3>That was a nutstory SpaceX the right to acquire Cursor.

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 3>What do you think it is that the market's assigning

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 3>value to, like what is it that they see in

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 3>companies like yours and say wow, yeah, this is worth

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 3>the premium?

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 9>So SpaceX Cursor amazing examples XAI, all of which are

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 9>have been long standing customers of ours. We love to

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 9>see this type of consolidation happen when AI companies and

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 9>AI teams work together to build even faster and even

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 9>bigger things. And that's what we enable. Our system enables

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 9>very very large scale, very large capacity and ability to

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 9>store vast amounts of information and give access to that

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 9>information to the largest GPU clusters in the world. It

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:02.919
<v Speaker 9>allow heows our customers to organize their data, to make

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 9>sense of it, to generate insight from it, and to

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 9>build these new workloads in a way that could not

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:10.720
<v Speaker 9>be built before.

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Ran and Halek of vast Data raising a billion and

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 4>a thirty billion dollar valuation, a mulling an IPO by

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 4>the end of the year.

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 5>We really appreciate you coming on. Come back soon. Have

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 5>a feeling you might.

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, a new global report from KPMG finds that nearly

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 4>three quarters of business leaders say look AI will be

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 4>a top investment priority.

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 5>Even if a session occurs over the next year. Look.

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 4>While the average global firm plans to invest about one

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:35.879
<v Speaker 4>hundred and eighty six million dollars in AI in that span,

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 4>there's a significant value gap. Nearly all have an AI strategy,

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 4>but only eight percent are seeing a clear return on

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 4>that investment. Rasanchez, KPMG principle and AIQ PROGRAMM lead, joins

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 4>US now to discuss this data. And look, you're going

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 4>around surveying big companies with big revenue flows and no

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 4>matter what, they're all still all in on the AI

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 4>investment even without an ROI.

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely spend.

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 15>If we look at the survey results are double what

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 15>we saw in Q one twenty twenty five, and in

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 15>the US that's two hundred and seven million. If we

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 15>look out in Asian pac it's over two hundred and

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.240
<v Speaker 15>forty million, And so there's no turning back.

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 11>Everyone is all in.

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 15>And what you just heard earlier today on the show

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 15>is there are new capabilities that are coming out that

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 15>allow our clients and companies to expand from pilots who

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 15>across the enterprise, and that requires this level of spend.

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 4>This level of spend needs to be met with capability

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 4>and with training and sound. When people are spending that amount,

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 4>what are they actually spending it on.

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, we are seeing them do everything from take agents

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 15>to reimagine workflows across the enterprise to upskilling their professionals, right,

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 15>they are hiring some, but really it's about upskilling their

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 15>existing resources because they have the depth of knowledge about

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 15>their organizations to allow them to get the most from AI.

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 11>And so we're calling this the Great.

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 15>Skill Reset because there's so much investment and so much

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 15>focus on the human element to optimize AI in this day. Additionally,

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 15>there's lots of focus on governance and making sure that

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 15>organizations are are addressing the risks associated with the expansion

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 15>of AI across the enterprise, from data privacy to security,

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 15>to the ability to actually deliver their products to their

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 15>clients in a way that their clients will trust.

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 3>A conclusion of the survey, which is of twenty one

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 3>hundred C suite names and the rapport, is that AI

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 3>agent adoption is accelerating. But what I found interesting within

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 3>the data is to me, it seems like from a

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 3>low base, you're saying thirty two percent of those surveys

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 3>are actually deploying agents. Does that come across to you

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 3>as a low base.

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 15>It's not a low base because what we saw in

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 15>earlier results was that everyone was in this pilot mode,

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 15>and actually we see a dip of those companies that

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 15>are piloting only from sixty one percent down to thirty percent.

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 11>And so what you see in this is this shift.

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 15>And so we're excited for next quarter's results because we expect,

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 15>with the introduction of new capabilities, the increase and available compute,

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 15>that we are going to see this number continue to

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 15>grow at a very rapid clip. And that's what our

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 15>clients are coming to us and saying they need to

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 15>enable in their organizations in order to actually, which you

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 15>mentioned earlier, get to that value and see that value

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:36.320
<v Speaker 15>at scale across their enterprise.

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 3>Because you know, a company like Salesforce for example, which

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 3>is just one example, but you know they are at

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 3>the forefront of at least marketing the virtues of an

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:48.919
<v Speaker 3>AI agent. They get criticized for actually converting that into

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 3>sales and then have customers do something meaningful with it.

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 3>So the other data point is that twenty seven percent

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 3>of those you surveyed have multiple agents.

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 2>It's more than one.

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Where are you seeing the sort of echin make benefit

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 3>being generated, people making revenues from the investment they've made.

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:10.879
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, it's absolutely from either enabling new services. So we're

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 15>seeing lots of that where they're able to enter new markets.

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 15>The second is allowing for vertical integration of services with

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 15>other providers to be able to deliver things in a

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 15>different way. And then lastly looking at the key economic

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 15>levers of any organization and how they can take not

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 15>only costs out of that but actually increase speed. Right now,

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 15>the currency is speed to execute, and so it's either

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:38.360
<v Speaker 15>to get new services out or to deliver what you

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 15>do today in new and different ways. It's what we're

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 15>doing as an organization, it's what we see our clients

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 15>doing that is driving the ability to get to that value.

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 4>Raissan, this is a B to B conversation, and rightly so,

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 4>I want to talk to the disconnect that's happening at

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 4>the moment. You talk about the skilling of the workforce.

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 4>I just think about what's happening online with Uspoon daring

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 4>to dip her toe into the idea that the women

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 4>should be using AI in their everyday lives and the hate,

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 4>the disgust coming from many around it.

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 5>What do you see in business? Is there a pushback?

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 4>Is there a concern about environmental impact, about loyalties, about

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 4>the impact of AI written large on jobs?

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:16.919
<v Speaker 11>Yeah?

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 15>Absolutely, and most companies that are leading the path. Those

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 15>that are at the front, they are addressing these challenges

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:27.959
<v Speaker 15>head on, talking about what they're doing to be responsible

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 15>with their AI use and how they are holding their

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 15>vendors responsible to do the same, and really addressing the

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 15>known things and the things that are unknown, particularly around

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 15>sustainability and what the impacts are to the environment as

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 15>well as the impact to the human experience as it

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 15>relates to work. And so I think being responsible in

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 15>addressing those within a governed framework allows enterprises to be

0:40:55.280 --> 0:41:00.359
<v Speaker 15>able to move forward with confidence and hold themselves and.

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 11>Accountable to what they're doing.

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 15>The other thing I would tell you is in this day,

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 15>the access to AI capability is very advanced for consumers

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 15>and you know the pushback to Reese, She's absolutely right.

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 15>Everyone should be out there trying to build their AI capability,

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 15>their AI skills.

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 11>And no matter how you start, that's okay.

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 15>If it's helping you pick out an outfit, if it's

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 15>helping you manage your schedule, if it's creating a new

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 15>capability that the world has never seen, whatever you do,

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 15>the key is start, Because the gap between those who

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 15>are leading and those who are just joining is widening,

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:44.439
<v Speaker 15>and so there is no better time to make sure

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 15>that you're upskilling yourself.

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:48.880
<v Speaker 3>Raissan shaz A KPMG, thank you very much joining us

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 3>in b tech. Coming up, we're going to look ahead

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 3>to Testa's earnings, which are after the closing bell.

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 2>That's next. This is beling Bug Tech.

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Tesla reports earnings after market closed today. But a blowout

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:06.800
<v Speaker 3>might not be enough for the start, which is down

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 3>maybe thirteen percent so far this year. That even make

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't really trade on the SERB cars anymore anyway,

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Investors focused on AI and robotics, Bloomberg's EV reporter Cara Colson,

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 3>So it doesn't really matter what they say, right robotaxi

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 3>optimists keeping everyone looking to the rise and what do

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 3>we need to know?

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:27.439
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so there's, as you mentioned, a lot of people

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:30.879
<v Speaker 14>are very much looking ahead. They're looking at Robotaxi, which

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 14>is still kind of getting off the ground for the

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 14>most part. For Tesla, they're looking way ahead to optimist

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 14>the humanoid robot. But there's also a lot of near

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 14>term concerns that people are looking for, including you a

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 14>cashburn and whether Tesla can keep up, you know, keep

0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:48.240
<v Speaker 14>putting revenue out to kind of counter that A bit.

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 4>No one's expecting huge cyber truck sales. But where are

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 4>we thinking about robocab or about things getting into customers'

0:42:57.440 --> 0:42:59.439
<v Speaker 4>hands in the near term in terms of supply chain.

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so Tesla is you know, expected to put out

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:10.799
<v Speaker 14>their start doing volume production of their cybercab, which will

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 14>primarily be used within their own robotax. See, there's not

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 14>a lot of near term catalysts as far as their

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 14>current lineup. They are really have the Model y, the

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 14>Model three cybertruck. So sales are becoming increasingly less relevant

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 14>to a lot of a lot of analyst and a

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:28.800
<v Speaker 14>lot of investors in the near term.

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 4>All the questions about humanoids and Optimus. Blomber's Cara Carlson,

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 4>it's great to have you. You'll be busy tonight as

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 4>will ed. That does it in this edition of Bloomberg Tech.

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 4>But remember all the earnings after the belt tesa IBM.

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 4>We've got Texas instruments.

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it really starts in earnest and we will get

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 3>a good global lens of the health of that industry.

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget it was a huge news dump this morning.

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Recap all of it on the podcast. You know where

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:54.719
<v Speaker 3>to find it. Apple, Spotify, iHeart and of course on

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 3>all of our Bloomberg platforms from New York City, this

0:43:58.320 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Tech.

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 6>H