Speaker 1: This is Buck's first thoughts, the news you need to
Speaker 1: get through your day in forty five minutes. Make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe on the iHeart Act or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. I understand that there is a desire to
Speaker 1: think that this is all over. I understand that people
Speaker 1: want to celebrate the end of the pandemic, and there's
Speaker 1: certainly cause for a lot of optimism here. But I
Speaker 1: have to tell you all that this thing is not
Speaker 1: only not over, but until we repudiate what has gone
Speaker 1: on here, until we actually win the argument against what
Speaker 1: has been done to this country, the power grab is
Speaker 1: just put on pause. Why do you think they're leaving
Speaker 1: some of these rules in place. Why do you think
Speaker 1: they're engaging in some of these efforts at Soviet style
Speaker 1: rewriting of history so they can bring it all back
Speaker 1: when they decide to think that they didn't like the
Speaker 1: power that they had. You don't think that they're going
Speaker 1: to try to expand upon this for other situations and circumstances.
Speaker 1: We now live in a country where a governor of
Speaker 1: a state can effectively say, I think there's a really
Speaker 1: important reason to restrict your movement, to restrict your breathing
Speaker 1: to restrict your life, and you have to just say sir,
Speaker 1: yes sir, or ma'am, yes, ma'am, and that's the end
Speaker 1: of it. I'm sorry, that's not America. I'm not letting
Speaker 1: this thing go. We have a fight to win now
Speaker 1: over what has happened, what they did to us, what
Speaker 1: was necessary, what wasn't necessary, what worked, and what failed.
Speaker 1: We don't just go forward and let all of this
Speaker 1: pass because it's not the end of it. It's not
Speaker 1: the last time. They're not even getting rid of everything.
Speaker 1: Is you know it? You currently have to still wear
Speaker 1: a mask even if you're vaccinated on a plane. Why
Speaker 1: our plane is a big note of transmission. Are people
Speaker 1: getting them on planes? Vaccinated? People getting COVID on planes? Really?
Speaker 1: Is that what's happening? I don't think so. This is absurd.
Speaker 1: But there's also a lot of confusion out there because
Speaker 1: finally they didn't keep pushing in the lockdown extreme direction,
Speaker 1: and that means that people are thinking about all the
Speaker 1: different arbitrary aspects of this. Here is the single worst
Speaker 1: little lab coat tyrant the Health Policies Stalinist in chief
Speaker 1: doctor Anthony Fauci about the confusion on the mass policies.
Speaker 1: Play three. The science that evolved over the last few
Speaker 1: weeks that trompted the CDC to make the recommendations that
Speaker 1: people who are vaccinated should feel safe and be able
Speaker 1: to go indoors and outdoors without wearing a mask relates
Speaker 1: to the evidence of how effective these vaccines are not
Speaker 1: only in protecting you against infection, but even if you
Speaker 1: have a breakthrough infection, the chances of your transmitting it
Speaker 1: to someone else is extremely low, very very low. The
Speaker 1: problem in the issue is that we don't have any
Speaker 1: way of knowing who is vaccinated and who's not vaccinated.
Speaker 1: And I think that's where the confusion arises, because there
Speaker 1: are some establishments who are saying, well, I'm going to
Speaker 1: have people coming into my establishing, my store, or what
Speaker 1: have you. Some are going to be vaccinated and some
Speaker 1: are not. I'm not going to know the difference. Some
Speaker 1: might be infected and might actually have a risk of
Speaker 1: infecting someone else. And under those circumstances, it's perfectly reasonable
Speaker 1: and understandable for the owner of that establishment to say,
Speaker 1: you know, we're going to keep the mask mandate up.
Speaker 1: And that's what we're seeing. And I think that's causing
Speaker 1: the confusion because some are maintaining a mask mandate and
Speaker 1: others are not. You should pressure any place that does
Speaker 1: not anymore have the force of law on its side
Speaker 1: to drop their mask mandate. This is important. You should
Speaker 1: go in. I'm I'm going to as of tomorrow Wednesday,
Speaker 1: I'm going to walk into places without a mask on,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to force them to say put your
Speaker 1: mask on, sir. And I'm gonna say why. There's no law,
Speaker 1: there's no rule. So you're just now an establishment that
Speaker 1: wants to force people to wear masks. This is what
Speaker 1: I mean by the fight is not over. You're going
Speaker 1: to see plenty of places now. I know if you
Speaker 1: live God bless, if you live in a red state
Speaker 1: or a red part of a state where there are
Speaker 1: sane human beings who have not all been brainwashed by
Speaker 1: CNN or are not perma maskers forever maskers. You're like, Buck,
Speaker 1: it's your problem, buddy, Well, yes, and no, it's my problem.
Speaker 1: It's the problem of of you know, New York City
Speaker 1: and Denver and Los Angeles and Portland, and you know
Speaker 1: cities that are going to have this for quite some time. Chicago,
Speaker 1: although actually I got a check and see what the
Speaker 1: latest on their mandate is. It's also on federal federal property.
Speaker 1: It's going to be on airplanes, it's going to be
Speaker 1: on anything that's crossing state lines, buses, trains, and they
Speaker 1: may just leave that. Look at how absurd airlines are
Speaker 1: and have been all along with their rules, not just
Speaker 1: on COVID, just in general. You think that all of
Speaker 1: a sudden they're going to become reasonable on this issue.
Speaker 1: You think that all of a sudden the airlines are
Speaker 1: going to be fair minded about how long they keep
Speaker 1: in place the stupid where a mask rule that they've
Speaker 1: had this whole time. It's not over. I mean, I
Speaker 1: understand that we all want to exhale literally and breathe
Speaker 1: free fresh air. But there are going to be places
Speaker 1: and people that try to keep this thing going, and
Speaker 1: it is incumbent upon all of us to actually push back. Now,
Speaker 1: we had the force of the state against us, including
Speaker 1: unto the Trump administration. Trump could have been stronger on
Speaker 1: this issue. That's just reality. Everybody was bending the knee. Now.
Speaker 1: It's also fair to say that we didn't have all
Speaker 1: the data, We didn't have the winter that we just
Speaker 1: went through, and that it wasn't as clear that mandates
Speaker 1: don't do a damn thing. Now it's quite clear. So
Speaker 1: to be fair to the Trump administration, it was earlier on.
Speaker 1: And you know, I'm trying to assess this not as
Speaker 1: an unfair money Morning quarterback, but sometimes that's going to happen.
Speaker 1: But get ready for this. There's going to be a
Speaker 1: push in some places to get vaccine passports, but as
Speaker 1: long as we have a non compliance and pushback against it,
Speaker 1: it won't happen. And yes, the fact of the matter
Speaker 1: is that people are just going to have to go
Speaker 1: back to living in a society. They're gonna have to
Speaker 1: go back to living in a world where it is
Speaker 1: possible that somebody will have a respiratory infection that you
Speaker 1: can catch and that the state cannot protect you from that,
Speaker 1: because as we see from what we've been through the
Speaker 1: last fifteen months, the state has never been able to
Speaker 1: protect you from that. You know, I've been accusing Fauci
Speaker 1: along here of not listening to the science. The science.
Speaker 1: You know, you gotta just or else you get a
Speaker 1: plateau and then a surge, So you got to listen
Speaker 1: to aience. I look at the data and I come
Speaker 1: to a determination about it. Really, it's the best thing
Speaker 1: for you for me to just listen to everything I say.
Speaker 1: But found she walks around with a mask on Why?
Speaker 1: In fact, I think it was just yesterday he was
Speaker 1: photographed outdoor sunny day in the DC area at some
Speaker 1: event and he had a big mask on his face outside.
Speaker 1: Why he's vaccinated? What is he doing? Well, here you go,
Speaker 1: he actually has to admit it. Now, play four. How
Speaker 1: has it changed what you do? How has it changed
Speaker 1: your mask wearing practices? Well, you know, George, I'm obviously
Speaker 1: careful because I mean, I'm a physician and a healthcare provider.
Speaker 1: I am now much more comfortable in people seeing me
Speaker 1: indoors without a mask. I mean, before the CDC made
Speaker 1: the recommendation change, I didn't want to look like I
Speaker 1: was giving mixed signals. But being a fully vaccinated person,
Speaker 1: the chances of my being infected in an indoor setting
Speaker 1: is extremely low. And that's the reason why an indoor settings.
Speaker 1: Now I feel comfortable about not wearing a mask because
Speaker 1: I'm I'm fully vaccinated. Okay, what about the outdoor setting
Speaker 1: where you were in a mask yesterday? It's a security blanket, folks.
Speaker 1: We can all see it. It's clear, we know, we understand,
Speaker 1: and then there's the issue. This is why I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: I understand, what what am I gonna? I'll talk to
Speaker 1: you about some of the other news stories today that
Speaker 1: are out there, But what's more important than this. If
Speaker 1: you have children, your children are still expected to run
Speaker 1: around with a mask on. Your children are still expected
Speaker 1: to be in the sun this summer at camp thanks
Speaker 1: to the CDC in ninety five degree heat, running around
Speaker 1: with a stupid mask on their faces. So we're not
Speaker 1: done here. I understand, we all want to be done,
Speaker 1: but the lunatic mask lockdowners need to Their ideas need
Speaker 1: to be defeated and eliminated. Their hysteria, their neuroses has
Speaker 1: to be overcome. Because you've got people like Fauci advocating
Speaker 1: for it is effectively mass child abuse. Play two, what's
Speaker 1: your message to parents this morning? These kids are unvaccinated? Well,
Speaker 1: the same as Sephanie just mentioned, and that is that
Speaker 1: the CDC recommendations still maintain that for children who are
Speaker 1: not vaccinated. Obviously most children are not twelve to fifteen
Speaker 1: are getting vaccinated. That indoors, they should still wear masks
Speaker 1: and that's the CDC recommendation. Will that change as we
Speaker 1: get more and more information, as we get more and
Speaker 1: more people vaccinated. Certainly we have to keep up with
Speaker 1: the evolving situation. George, We're not going to have kids
Speaker 1: at that age vaccinated for at least several months as
Speaker 1: we get towards the end of this year, in the
Speaker 1: beginning of next year, an old Democrat bureaucrat jerk advocating
Speaker 1: for supporting defending MA child abuse because that's what masking
Speaker 1: up children who are not at risk from this disease
Speaker 1: and do not effectively spread this disease. That's what it is.
Speaker 1: So as I've been telling you, we're not done, not
Speaker 1: even close, well okay close, but we're not done, and
Speaker 1: there's a lot of fighting left to do here or else.
Speaker 1: Not only will it be the Soviet style rewriting of history,
Speaker 1: but there will also be an effort to bring all
Speaker 1: of this back. I hear everything you're saying, and I
Speaker 1: do think though, there needs to be some clarity that
Speaker 1: there are some pockets of the country that may not
Speaker 1: be ready. I'm here in Washington in many ways, I'm
Speaker 1: here doing know your value interviews, but I am working
Speaker 1: with a team here and there was one person on
Speaker 1: the team who is not vaccinated. I'm wearing a mask
Speaker 1: around that person. You know. It is really if you
Speaker 1: want to follow the science, then there are times you
Speaker 1: need to still wear the mask. And that's where I
Speaker 1: think it gets really confusing as we try and move
Speaker 1: forward as a country and put this pandemic behind us.
Speaker 1: The other thing is this pandemic is not behind us globally,
Speaker 1: and that means that we could run into problems again.
Speaker 1: You never know. If you're looking at the science and
Speaker 1: you're looking at breakthrough cases and you're looking at other strains,
Speaker 1: it's not completely behind us. Doctor Meeka is a moron,
Speaker 1: But that's not a surprise to you. This is the
Speaker 1: problem though people get there. They get their news and
Speaker 1: information from people like Mika Prazynski, who is essentially a
Speaker 1: you know, model with a famous last name. That's that's
Speaker 1: really the basis that the origins of her credentials here
Speaker 1: to talk about anything, never mind to talk about science,
Speaker 1: and this this notion that there could be breakthrough k
Speaker 1: We've been through all this, No, no enough. If she
Speaker 1: if she is vaccinated, as she clearly is, she's wearing
Speaker 1: a mask around one person that she knows who's not vaccinated.
Speaker 1: Does she understand what the statistical reality is here of
Speaker 1: being over ninety percent protected from infection yourself and also
Speaker 1: this other person being at a viral load level and
Speaker 1: in close contact long enough to infect her. I mean,
Speaker 1: you're starting to just see how crazy folks have become
Speaker 1: over this. But they've been like this all along. They've
Speaker 1: been completely unreasonable. They didn't come down hard in the
Speaker 1: corporate press on Gavin Newsom when he shut down outdoor
Speaker 1: dining in California. They didn't come down hard on the left,
Speaker 1: the Democrats, certainly on Cuomo, the five million dollar man.
Speaker 1: By the way, go to Cuomo got a five million
Speaker 1: dollar book deal. What do I mean by five million?
Speaker 1: Not one million, not two million, but three million? Oh okay, no,
Speaker 1: five million, actually five million. I thought it was initially
Speaker 1: three million. It's five million dollars for a book that
Speaker 1: almost no one will read and no one cares about.
Speaker 1: But why do publishers do this. It's a great way
Speaker 1: to pay off the people running states like New York,
Speaker 1: which really matters. What do you think Most of the
Speaker 1: major publishers are based New York City. Their offices are
Speaker 1: not far from where I'm doing this show right now,
Speaker 1: and go see them. They have big midtown towers in Manhattan,
Speaker 1: and they have a way of funneling millions of dollars
Speaker 1: to a guy who was the worst when it came
Speaker 1: to the pandemic. Actually, Producer Mark, do we have speaking
Speaker 1: of Morning Joe? Now they're willing to say, oh, Cuomo
Speaker 1: was not was not so good after all? Play that
Speaker 1: there's a lot of money, I mean for a public servant,
Speaker 1: and don't I don't know that things have worked out
Speaker 1: quite so well. He's under an investigation right now on
Speaker 1: whether they cooked the books when it came to nursing
Speaker 1: home deaths. And when I say, I don't know, that's me.
Speaker 1: That's what the kids call these days understatement. That's crazy money.
Speaker 1: It's crazy money for anyone. And we asked him in
Speaker 1: real time whenever that book came out last year, when
Speaker 1: he came on the show, why on God's Earth you
Speaker 1: would write a celebratory book about your leadership while you're
Speaker 1: still right in the middle of the crisis. And it
Speaker 1: has not worked out well for him, As you said,
Speaker 1: the initial decision two marches ago to send patients back
Speaker 1: into nursing homes, then covering up the number of deaths
Speaker 1: that were inside those nursing homes. There's also, of course,
Speaker 1: the sexual harassment investigation at his time as governor. And
Speaker 1: yet I don't know how in good faith you could
Speaker 1: accept the five million dollars for a book about your
Speaker 1: leadership in a crisis when your state, the state of
Speaker 1: New York, not all through his fault, but it's a
Speaker 1: truth had it as bad or worse than anybody else
Speaker 1: in the country. And the leadership in many cases, as
Speaker 1: these investigations are showing, and these journalism has shown, has
Speaker 1: been frankly terrible and deadly in many cases. You know,
Speaker 1: Morning Joe was a show that was a big proponent
Speaker 1: of and for the New York and DC elites that
Speaker 1: are the Morning Joe audience has never been a big audience,
Speaker 1: but it's very important hedge fund managers and politicians that
Speaker 1: watched the show. That's what we're always told in the media.
Speaker 1: They were big proponents of Cuomo. Do you remember Cuomo sexuals.
Speaker 1: That was a term that became popularized for a while
Speaker 1: because of how sexy Cuomo was during his press conferences.
Speaker 1: Do you remember the various politicos, writers, authors, pundits who
Speaker 1: were saying that Cuomo made them all feel so safe,
Speaker 1: made them all feel so safe. In the early days,
Speaker 1: before we knew anything about this, even I was thinking, well,
Speaker 1: he's not being overly political. I guess that's, you know,
Speaker 1: a good thing in the early days when he was
Speaker 1: talking about the need for ventilators and the administration helping
Speaker 1: and but then he went political, and then we found
Speaker 1: out he lied, and we found out about the nursing
Speaker 1: Home Order, we found out about all the disasters. And
Speaker 1: yet there were still people covering for him. There are
Speaker 1: still people that were saying, oh no, let's wait and see.
Speaker 1: Cromo was the worst governor in America during a time
Speaker 1: of real trial, and he was rewarded for it. Why
Speaker 1: because he's a part of the Democrat system, and they
Speaker 1: reward and take care of their own. As I have
Speaker 1: always told you, it's one of the big advantages that
Speaker 1: Democrats have the apparatus of the left. Make sure that
Speaker 1: they're important fighters, that they're political assassins, that the people
Speaker 1: that do their dirty work they always get another job,
Speaker 1: they always get a payoff, they're always taken care of.
Speaker 1: They're like mafia hitman who go to prison and their
Speaker 1: family is you know, taken care of by the don
Speaker 1: that's the Democrat Party. On the right, we get people
Speaker 1: that get crushed for doing nothing, and then it's just yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, go sell real estate in Montana, see you later.
Speaker 1: You know, good luck. That's what ends up happening. It's
Speaker 1: one of the one of the reasons why we lose, folks.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna I like to speak about that with you, honestly. Now,
Speaker 1: Why does the right lose on issue after issue? Why
Speaker 1: do we lose control of institutions? Why? Why have corporations
Speaker 1: gone woke? Why can't you send your kids to school
Speaker 1: about being indoctrinated with critical race theory? Why are all
Speaker 1: elite universities in the country run by left dis loons? Now?
Speaker 1: Because we keep thinking that we're playing a game where
Speaker 1: the objective is neutrality and fair play, and the left
Speaker 1: keeps playing a game where the objective is control and win. Well,
Speaker 1: when you're up against that in the long run, which
Speaker 1: side do you think gets their way more? We can disengage,
Speaker 1: We can all do what I understand the conservative mentality,
Speaker 1: you know, get off the grid, don't even deal with it.
Speaker 1: Buck Well then they're really going to be in control
Speaker 1: of everything. So we have to be honest about this,
Speaker 1: and we have to also see in what ways do
Speaker 1: we create an ecosystem for political victory by supporting people
Speaker 1: who are important to our cause and doing so in
Speaker 1: every way that we can, because the left absolutely does that.
Speaker 1: Look at Quomo with his five million dollar book deal.
Speaker 1: Do you know how many books you would have to
Speaker 1: sell to earn out that advance? Think about that. Do
Speaker 1: you think people are buying that Quomo book? I don't
Speaker 1: think so important to share your patriotism and show your
Speaker 1: love of country these days, and I think that one
Speaker 1: of the best ways you can do it is by
Speaker 1: displaying a beautiful American flag. Not all flags are the same.
Speaker 1: Sometimes they get all twisted, they can get torn up
Speaker 1: if they're not high quality made from the right materials.
Speaker 1: And you don't want a flag that gets wrapped around
Speaker 1: the pole and people can't see it, and you don't
Speaker 1: want to be dealing with that. So I want you
Speaker 1: to try Allegiance Flag Supply. Allegiance Flag Supply is an
Speaker 1: all American company that makes American flags the way they're
Speaker 1: meant to be, bright, beautiful, the red, white, and blue,
Speaker 1: and they don't shred, they don't tear. They're made from
Speaker 1: very durable fiber, and they also don't get wrapped around
Speaker 1: the pole, so they'll display beautifully. We've got Memorial Day
Speaker 1: coming up, We've got the Independence Day Holliday. Now is
Speaker 1: a great time to get an American flag and get
Speaker 1: it from a company that's all based here in the USA.
Speaker 1: The flags are made in the US, and in fact,
Speaker 1: there are seamstresses that are specifically used by Allegiance Flag
Speaker 1: Supply because they're based here in the States instead of
Speaker 1: letting this work be done overseas. So the quality of
Speaker 1: the craftsmanship here is absolutely top flight. And I've got
Speaker 1: an Allegiance flag right now in my living room. I've
Speaker 1: just given my parents one to put on their balcony.
Speaker 1: This is a great flag company. It's all American top
Speaker 1: to bottom, and it's the kind of American flag you
Speaker 1: should have in your home or flying out in your yard,
Speaker 1: off your porch wherever. Get it in time for Memorial
Speaker 1: Day if you can. The offer code to use right
Speaker 1: now is buck for ten percent off. All you have
Speaker 1: to do is go to this website, show Allegiance dot com.
Speaker 1: That's show Allegiance dot com. When you use the promo
Speaker 1: code buck You'll get ten percent off. Go right now
Speaker 1: get a beautiful all made in America American flag at
Speaker 1: show Allegiance dot com. We have to reopen smart. We
Speaker 1: have to reopen with a cautious eye. But we have
Speaker 1: to get back to life, and we have to get
Speaker 1: back to life and living, and we have to do
Speaker 1: it the way New Yorkers do it. We have to
Speaker 1: do it quickly and robustly effective. This Wednesday, we're going
Speaker 1: to adopt the CDC's new guidance and regulations on masks
Speaker 1: and social distancing for vaccinated people. By the CDC guidance
Speaker 1: and you know, compromise people and vaccinated people should continue
Speaker 1: to wear a mask in social distance, but if you
Speaker 1: are vaccinated, you are safe. No masks, no social distancing.
Speaker 1: We're also going to follow the CDC's guidelines that you
Speaker 1: will still need to wear a mask on public transportation,
Speaker 1: the subways, the buses, nursing homes, homeless shelters, correctional facilities, schools,
Speaker 1: and healthcare facilities. Why are we having this back and forth? Still,
Speaker 1: if you're vaccinated, you're safe, but then there are all
Speaker 1: these places where you're not safe like schools. Why is
Speaker 1: that the case? What is the basis for this? Has
Speaker 1: there been a lot of spread in these places? You
Speaker 1: remember how they shut down restaurants in New York City,
Speaker 1: And this is true in many cities across the country,
Speaker 1: but New York is where I am, so it's a
Speaker 1: city I know the most about well in terms of everything,
Speaker 1: but certainly in terms of COVID policy. Why was there
Speaker 1: not a lot of focus but on the fact that
Speaker 1: they only thought one percent, which is within the margin
Speaker 1: of error, one percent of actual transmission of COVID was
Speaker 1: happening in restaurants, period, but they shut them down for
Speaker 1: months and months and months. You know, you have to
Speaker 1: wonder does that one percent get eliminated even from the
Speaker 1: COVID total, or is it does it just move? Does
Speaker 1: that transmission just move somewhere else in the home, in
Speaker 1: close quarters somewhere. But Cuomo was saying that they'll get
Speaker 1: rid of this by tomorrow in New York. What's fascinating
Speaker 1: is that, as expected, there are some states that are
Speaker 1: just going to be more intransigent on this, and they
Speaker 1: certainly you see see I think there's a big part
Speaker 1: of this where they want you to be grateful, because
Speaker 1: if you have to show gratitude for getting back your liberty,
Speaker 1: your basic freedom, then you look ungrateful the moment you say,
Speaker 1: you know, hold on a second, was it really necessary
Speaker 1: to do all this stuff you guys did do us?
Speaker 1: Should it really have happened this way? Did you have
Speaker 1: to do these things? You see, they want you to
Speaker 1: be thanking them for this, because then it makes it
Speaker 1: very difficult. It makes it awkward to turn around and say,
Speaker 1: what the heck did you idiots do to us? What
Speaker 1: did you put us through for? What? What benefit did
Speaker 1: we get out of this? Oh? Where's the data? Where's
Speaker 1: the science on that one? See? Now there's going to
Speaker 1: be a huge fight and this is what I'm really
Speaker 1: focusing on today. There's gonna be huge fight over what
Speaker 1: the lessons are from the pandemic and how we deal
Speaker 1: with this going forward, because I want you to be
Speaker 1: clear on this fact. The apparatus, the Democrat Party, the
Speaker 1: corporate media, their belief is that they handled this really well.
Speaker 1: The only problem with the Trump supporters who wouldn't go
Speaker 1: along with the guidance. They wouldn't mask up enough and
Speaker 1: mitigate enough, and if it weren't for them, it would
Speaker 1: have all been under control. We'd be Australia if it
Speaker 1: wasn't for Trump supporters. That's the narrative from the left. Now,
Speaker 1: if you actually look at mask mandates, if you look
Speaker 1: at California versus Florida, for example, with their lockdown policies,
Speaker 1: they're wrong, but they don't think so. They think they're heroes.
Speaker 1: I know this will be a little bit mind blowing,
Speaker 1: but it is true. Governor Cuomo of New York justifies
Speaker 1: everything that he has done in his own head by
Speaker 1: thinking he really believes. I can guarantee you that he
Speaker 1: saved lives. He saved lives. Maybe some lives were lost
Speaker 1: because his policies, but far more, you know that was
Speaker 1: in the nursing homes. Far more lives were saved because
Speaker 1: of his brilliant leadership. And if that is really your belief,
Speaker 1: well then how could anyone challenge you? How could anyone
Speaker 1: say you're wrong right? How could anyone come along and
Speaker 1: tell you that you should leave, resign in disgrace. People
Speaker 1: think that that Cuomo is all embattled. Cuomo is Colonel
Speaker 1: Nathan are Jessup, United States Marine Corps, Guantanamo Bay Cuba.
Speaker 1: You need me on that wall. In places you don't
Speaker 1: talk about a cocktail parties, you need me on that wall. Right,
Speaker 1: That's Cuomo's attitude about him as the governor of New York.
Speaker 1: And when it comes to nursing homes, he's like, you're
Speaker 1: gosh darn right, I ordered the code read. That's his attitude,
Speaker 1: Make no mistake about it. He thinks he's the good guy.
Speaker 1: He thinks he's the hero. And actually, I've heard some
Speaker 1: military friends say that Jack Nicholson's actually kind of he
Speaker 1: kind of gets a raw deal in a few good men.
Speaker 1: But back to the way these policies are being unfold
Speaker 1: are being unveiled. Now, how this is all unfolding? So
Speaker 1: Cuomo says they're gonna get rid of it. Governor Murphy
Speaker 1: of New Jersey right next door here to New York, Oh, California.
Speaker 1: June fifteenth, from Gavin Newsom. Why June fifteen, Why a
Speaker 1: month from now? Arbitrary? Arbitrary bull crap? Okay, Well, how
Speaker 1: are things going in New Jersey with Murphy? Play thirteen? Well,
Speaker 1: why did you decide to go against the CDC guidance
Speaker 1: and keep the indoor mask mandates in place? For fully
Speaker 1: vaccinated people. Good to be with you, Jake. I wouldn't
Speaker 1: say necessarily against it. We're just not ready yet. We've
Speaker 1: been clawbered, not once, but twice. We've lost over twenty
Speaker 1: six thousand people. We know the virus is more lethal indoors,
Speaker 1: and you're asking somebody who's the hardware store working there,
Speaker 1: or in a retail or a grocery store to make
Speaker 1: the judgment on who's vaccinated who's not. We're not there yet.
Speaker 1: We're close. I think we're you know, within a matter
Speaker 1: of weeks of getting to a better place. Our density
Speaker 1: usually helps us, not in a pandemic. We want to
Speaker 1: make sure we get this right. How would you feel
Speaker 1: if a business said, if you show proof that you've
Speaker 1: been vaccinated, you can come into our store or our
Speaker 1: establishment without a mask. But if you don't, then you won't.
Speaker 1: I mean, there isn't the idea of an incentive to
Speaker 1: encourage people to get vaccinated, right, Yeah, I mean I'd
Speaker 1: feel better about that for sure. But again, I don't
Speaker 1: think this is This is not remotely forever and always.
Speaker 1: This is a matter of a couple of more weeks
Speaker 1: on the clock. Listen. I think we were the first
Speaker 1: state in America to put in place an indoor masking requirement.
Speaker 1: We know it's been hugely helpful. If we can save
Speaker 1: only one more life by waiting a couple of weeks longer,
Speaker 1: I'll sign up for that much wrong in one one
Speaker 1: statement here, So much wrong from the governor New Jersey,
Speaker 1: and the mentality is the same for the governor of
Speaker 1: Michigan Whitmer, the governor of Oregon, the governor of California,
Speaker 1: the governor of New York, the governor of Maryland, the
Speaker 1: governor Good on the list, governor of Virginia. So much
Speaker 1: of the same wrongness here. First of all, New Jersey
Speaker 1: has I believe, the worst death rate per capita of
Speaker 1: any state in the US from COVID. So New Jersey
Speaker 1: is absolute bottom of the barrel with its COVID response
Speaker 1: by the numbers. So the idea that the governor is
Speaker 1: forwarding here that because they had an indoor mask mandate,
Speaker 1: people were safer and saved from this is just flatly absurd.
Speaker 1: What the heck is he talking about? The mass mandate
Speaker 1: worked so well, Murphy that you had more people die
Speaker 1: per happita as a share of your population in your state,
Speaker 1: then anywhere else in America. But that's what that's a
Speaker 1: statement of the success of your policies. People are nuts.
Speaker 1: But then he gets also to the core of it.
Speaker 1: Then he gets really to the center of it all.
Speaker 1: If it saves just one life was this was always
Speaker 1: the mentality. This was the way they got all of this.
Speaker 1: They just fled all this all along. If it saves
Speaker 1: just one life, think of all the policies that you
Speaker 1: could justify that are oners, that are absurd, that are annoying.
Speaker 1: If that were the case, think of all the frustration, pain, anxiety, difficulty,
Speaker 1: and loss you could put people through for that. This
Speaker 1: was all along the we should have a ten million
Speaker 1: hour speed limit in this country approach, and some people
Speaker 1: were willing to go there on COVID. Even as annoying.
Speaker 1: It's not like this is zero cost stuff. As annoying
Speaker 1: and frustrating and painful as this is, if it saves
Speaker 1: just one life, we should do it. An abject fallacy
Speaker 1: of weak governance, cowardly thinking, And that is his approach.
Speaker 1: You hear this when they want to do something on
Speaker 1: gun control, though, too, you hear this one. You know,
Speaker 1: if you if you have to make if you have
Speaker 1: to make ten million gun owners, you know, wait five
Speaker 1: days and spend fifty hours of their lives, you know,
Speaker 1: filling out paperwork and doing nonsense. But it saves maybe
Speaker 1: one life? Is that worth it? This is what they'll
Speaker 1: say to you. I mean, you know, people die slipping
Speaker 1: in the shower. Should we not allow showers? Should we
Speaker 1: only allow people to have, you know, handheld spritzers to
Speaker 1: you know, to shoot water on themselves. No more showers
Speaker 1: because people die in the shower. We could do this
Speaker 1: all day. This is a pathway to insanity. You understand this, right,
Speaker 1: And it's one that they put the country on because
Speaker 1: it was a to justify for the weak willed and
Speaker 1: the weak minded. It was a way to justify absolute
Speaker 1: control during a time of heightened anxiety and risk to
Speaker 1: the American people. You can never be woken up. That's
Speaker 1: the problem. It keeps going. It keeps going further and
Speaker 1: further and further down the line. And if you get
Speaker 1: to the point where you capitulate, where you agree to
Speaker 1: all these demands, it will eventually get to straight. White
Speaker 1: men are not allowed to talk right because it's your
Speaker 1: privilege to express yourself when other people of color have
Speaker 1: been silenced throughout history. It will be you're not allowed
Speaker 1: to go outside because so many people were imprisoned for
Speaker 1: so many years. I mean, I'm not joking. I know,
Speaker 1: I know. It really will get there. It's that crazy,
Speaker 1: you know. We just got to be nice to each other. Man.
Speaker 1: And there's a lot of people that are taking advantage
Speaker 1: of this weirdness in our culture, and then that becomes
Speaker 1: their thing. Their thing is calling people out for their privilege,
Speaker 1: calling people out for their position. It's about power. Joe
Speaker 1: Rogan is totally right here. And because it is about
Speaker 1: power and the left can never have enough, there is
Speaker 1: no limiting principle to wakeness. There is no limiting principle,
Speaker 1: there's no framework in place for it other than whatever works,
Speaker 1: whatever gets it done. They create a narrative, and the
Speaker 1: narrative is essentially that there are endless amounts of and
Speaker 1: different representations of oppression in society, specifically American society. And
Speaker 1: that means that you can always make a case that
Speaker 1: individuals are not to be held to account based upon
Speaker 1: their action what they do, but their group identity is
Speaker 1: the identifier for them. Their group identity is what really matters,
Speaker 1: and they are held either up or down based upon that,
Speaker 1: and the most important thing is to hold down those
Speaker 1: who are in this narrative the oppressors, meaning straight white males,
Speaker 1: and elevate others, although not all in the same way.
Speaker 1: You'll notice with the with the removal of standardized testing
Speaker 1: from the University of California system, So now SAT act
Speaker 1: California schools, Berkeley, UCLA, US oh No, USC's Private Berkeley,
Speaker 1: UCLA and other you know, UC San Diego, all these
Speaker 1: different UC schools. They can't they cannot look at your
Speaker 1: SAT s. So what that is going to do. That's
Speaker 1: going to disadvantage by the numbers, a lot of children
Speaker 1: of Vietnamese immigrants, children of Chinese and Korean immigrants, who
Speaker 1: disproportionately do very well on the SAT. Same situation here
Speaker 1: plays out in New York City at a school called Stuiveson, Well,
Speaker 1: it's really the three flagship schools for New York City. Steveson,
Speaker 1: Bronx Science in Brooklyn Tech. You take a straight up exam,
Speaker 1: exam of academic ability, and it's very similar to an SAT,
Speaker 1: but for eighth graders to go into high school, you
Speaker 1: take that exam and then whoever gets a certain number.
Speaker 1: That's it. You get the number, you're in. I got
Speaker 1: into Stuyveson story for another time. But you take the test,
Speaker 1: you get in, you can go. And they keep saying
Speaker 1: that this is unfair, and they never really explain why
Speaker 1: it's unfair other than look at the numbers. Some groups
Speaker 1: do better than others. You say, well, how do we
Speaker 1: address this fairly to the people that do have the
Speaker 1: merit while making this a question about societal impact or
Speaker 1: historical grievance or anything else. It's just there aren't a
Speaker 1: limiting principles here. It's just about power, using victimization and
Speaker 1: using the rhetoric of historic injustice and oppression in order
Speaker 1: to victimize actually people today and to take away from them,
Speaker 1: to undermine them, not based upon any objective standard, but
Speaker 1: based upon the preferred narrative of the left. It is
Speaker 1: racial Marxism. That's what this is. Right. Do you go
Speaker 1: to the heart of Marxist theory, and it's that there's
Speaker 1: this system of oppression through capitalism that was holding people
Speaker 1: down and exploiting them, That all profit is theft, that
Speaker 1: all labor for wages is inherently exploitation. There's no benefits
Speaker 1: from this. It is just a system that is, you know,
Speaker 1: the continuay or the next tier, the continuation of serfdom
Speaker 1: in Europe, which was a quasi slave status where people
Speaker 1: were tied to the land and you could say, yeah,
Speaker 1: they could go somewhere else, but they would starve. I'm
Speaker 1: talking about medieval, medieval serfdom now. And so then capitalism
Speaker 1: is a continuation of that same mentality of oppression and
Speaker 1: dictatorial power over the lives of people and their families.
Speaker 1: And so what Marx was saying is we're going to
Speaker 1: create a society where there'll be a dictatorship of the
Speaker 1: proletariat that the workers inherently somehow just be wiser better.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's all this worker worship. When you look
Speaker 1: at the writings of Lenin and Stalin, and yes, Stalin
Speaker 1: did a lot of writing too. People don't know this
Speaker 1: or forget this. Stalin was actually, for a time the
Speaker 1: editor of Pravda, the premier Bolshevik newspaper inside what became
Speaker 1: the Soviet Union, and Stalin did a lot of writing.
Speaker 1: Salin was a journalist for those who were wondering, Stalin
Speaker 1: was a community activist and a journalist those were really
Speaker 1: and a bank robber those were his professions before he
Speaker 1: was in the Central Committee of the Soviet Union, and
Speaker 1: then of course became the premier and the dictator and
Speaker 1: the one of the most monstrous tyrants of all history,
Speaker 1: certainly in the top three of all history. And we
Speaker 1: look at this now and we see that it's all
Speaker 1: happening exactly. If you have an understanding of critical race
Speaker 1: theory as racial Marxism, everything we see going on in
Speaker 1: our society makes sense. They're divide people, they're creating animosity,
Speaker 1: but it's animosity that's not tied to individual action. So
Speaker 1: you can't really do anything about this. You just have
Speaker 1: to submit to the narrative of victimology that is being
Speaker 1: infused all throughout society. And there are people who are
Speaker 1: elites who benefit from this because as long as people
Speaker 1: are looking at each other saying, hold on, my ethnic group,
Speaker 1: you're ethnic group, we're getting this. You're getting that, they're
Speaker 1: not saying, m are we really just running a system
Speaker 1: here where the inflation of assets through central bank manipulation
Speaker 1: keeps the rich richer than ever before and involve you know,
Speaker 1: we're not looking at that stuff anymore. We're not looking
Speaker 1: at how American companies making money by offshoring and sending
Speaker 1: jobs overseas while benefiting from being an American company and
Speaker 1: having access to and recourse to our courts and our markets.
Speaker 1: That that's exploitative and a betrayal of American values. You know,
Speaker 1: we don't think about those things. So the elites, the
Speaker 1: ultra rich, the woke, they're happy to have people marching
Speaker 1: around for BLM and not thinking about what's really happening
Speaker 1: in the economy and who's really in control of the
Speaker 1: power structure. As a result of our prompt action to
Speaker 1: roll out the vaccine and boost the economy, we've gone
Speaker 1: from stagnation to economy that's growing faster than it has
Speaker 1: in nearly forty years. We've gone from anemic job creation
Speaker 1: to record or creation for more for a new administration.
Speaker 1: None has ever created this many jobs from this timeframe.
Speaker 1: The progress is undeniable. But we're not done yet, and
Speaker 1: some of the hardest workers ahead. Yeah, we got a
Speaker 1: great economy. And you know, just slogan, slogan, port or
Speaker 1: plate euphemism, euphemism, you know, a little more broad nonsense,
Speaker 1: something about workers, union jobs. It's about jobs, folks. This
Speaker 1: guy's been giving the same dumb speech for forty years.
Speaker 1: You know that, right, It's just we come together. You
Speaker 1: just shut up and do what my Democrat puppet masters
Speaker 1: want you to. You know, then maybe we'll send you
Speaker 1: more checks in the mail at some point in the
Speaker 1: future that your grandkids will pay for. But by that
Speaker 1: point I'll be gone. There you go, leader of the
Speaker 1: free world. This is straight out of the bi I
Speaker 1: mean the Obama playbook, now the Biden playbook, but straight
Speaker 1: out of the Obama playbook. To say that this economy
Speaker 1: which has now four percent consumer price index inflation, rapidly
Speaker 1: rising gas prices. I know some of this was colonial pipeline,
Speaker 1: but it was rising before then. And the colonial pipeline
Speaker 1: fiasco shows that our real economic week week point when
Speaker 1: it comes to energy as fossil fuels, as in we
Speaker 1: need more and we need redundant access and better supply.
Speaker 1: We have a total embrace of American fossil fuels. America
Speaker 1: as the world's fossil fuel superpower is essential to our
Speaker 1: actual status as global superpower. In fact, here here's Senator
Speaker 1: James Langford pointing out that this liberal hatred of pipelines
Speaker 1: is just it's delusional. This is not based in any reality,
Speaker 1: kind of like the double maskers after Vaccination play nineteen.
Speaker 1: We have a gas pipeline that has gone down to
Speaker 1: a ransomware attack. It reminded me again of how important
Speaker 1: gas pipelines are all over our nation. And it's interesting
Speaker 1: to me that on day one, one of the first
Speaker 1: things that President Biden did was he stepped in and
Speaker 1: ended the Keystone pipeline moving through here and is now
Speaker 1: actively working to be able to shut down all pipeline
Speaker 1: construction around the country. Can I remind Americans, especially Americans
Speaker 1: on the East Coast, what it means to lose a
Speaker 1: pipeline when the President says we're not going to do
Speaker 1: more pipelines, that we have no redundancy, that if a
Speaker 1: pipeline goes down, there's not an additional backup one in
Speaker 1: construction to be able to get there. It's better to
Speaker 1: have multiple pipelines in an area, so if one goes down,
Speaker 1: you've still got other fuel supplies. What if this pipeline
Speaker 1: had actually been a larger scale issue, even than a
Speaker 1: ransomware attack. As bad as that is, this whole fight
Speaker 1: that we're having about pipelines suddenly makes sense to a
Speaker 1: whole lot of folks on the East Coast that can't
Speaker 1: get gasoline. Pipelines are not evil. Pipelines are moving energy
Speaker 1: across the country, and it's the least expensive, safest way
Speaker 1: to be able to move that energy across the country.
Speaker 1: It absolutely is. And yet Democrats still cling to their
Speaker 1: environmentalist green loon left on this issue. And I want
Speaker 1: to be very clear that they're un I will use
Speaker 1: this term a lot. We're talking about Democrats. They are
Speaker 1: un serious on so many of these matters. The White House,
Speaker 1: this was just yesterday in the Hill White House Environmental
Speaker 1: Justice advisors express opposition to nuclear and carbon capture projects.
Speaker 1: I can say this to you unequivocally that if you
Speaker 1: really want to get rid of carbon emissions without massive
Speaker 1: reductions to quality of life and standard of living, and
Speaker 1: I mean way more expensive products, heating of homes, travel,
Speaker 1: I mean enormous depletion of wealth, not for rich people,
Speaker 1: particularly for those who don't have a lot of resources.
Speaker 1: If you want to really lower carbon emissions and you
Speaker 1: are opposed to nuclear energy, you are un serious. Libs
Speaker 1: un serious. It's not even worth listening to all your
Speaker 1: other BA BA black. Let's build, let's build more windmouth,
Speaker 1: clap lap. It's garbage. It doesn't mean anything. It's just
Speaker 1: that it's just claptrap, fun word to say. And they're
Speaker 1: opposed to carbon capture projects as well. This is the
Speaker 1: White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council. This is a bunch
Speaker 1: of social justice libs who don't know what damn thing
Speaker 1: about energy. But the White House has to do the
Speaker 1: whole Oh, let's have our Environmental Social Justice Council come
Speaker 1: in and talk to us about this stuff. Absurd, absurd.
Speaker 1: I mean Biden has actually promoted a carbon capture tax
Speaker 1: credit in his infrastructure plan. Infrastructure, you know, trillions of
Speaker 1: dollars they plan on spending. Now, I think carbon capture
Speaker 1: is stupid. Okay, that's a whole other thing. It's worthless.
Speaker 1: The world is warming, it's okay, We're gonna survive. There's
Speaker 1: no catastrophe coming. That's reality. And you know, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: keep saying this every year. I'm gonna be giving I'm
Speaker 1: gonna be giving the same, you know, words of wisdom
Speaker 1: on this in twenty years, doing this radio show hopefully,
Speaker 1: And I'm gonna be right then, and there will the
Speaker 1: people that are saying now that in ten years, it'll
Speaker 1: be too late and it's all over. We're gonna catastrophic
Speaker 1: forming guarantee you. In twenty years, they'll be saying, oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, in ten more years, we'll be past the
Speaker 1: point of no return and we'll have to sit there
Speaker 1: and listen. Then we'll have the pat you know, middle
Speaker 1: aged AOC on the head and say yeah, sure, sure,
Speaker 1: that's great, really really intelligent commentary. As are so many lives.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's all over the place. I mean, the
Speaker 1: Democrats really believe this. This is an article of faith
Speaker 1: for them, like double masking after vaccination. The world is
Speaker 1: going they're calling an existential threat. We all know what
Speaker 1: the word existential means, right, It's an existential The Secretary
Speaker 1: of Defense, this guy get up, keeps saying, General, he's
Speaker 1: now you know, SECTIF Austin, Secretary Defense Austin. He says
Speaker 1: climate change is an existential threat to the United States.
Speaker 1: The biggest challenge we face this is the guy whos
Speaker 1: ahead of our military. I mean, what are we gonna do.
Speaker 1: We're gonna start firing hellfire missiles at clouds. Take that
Speaker 1: cloud you're blocking the sun and changing the temperature. We
Speaker 1: just start you know, firing off mortar rounds, that plumes
Speaker 1: of smoke coming out of factories. No more zo two,
Speaker 1: what are we doing? What's wrong with these people? And
Speaker 1: I know you could say, well, the White House doesn't
Speaker 1: have to listen to the Environmental Justice Council or whatever
Speaker 1: for but then why have them? And they will get
Speaker 1: pushed on this issue. They're not going to do nuclear.
Speaker 1: Democrats won't. Democrats won't do nuclear. Won't do it because
Speaker 1: it would work. And how do you get all these
Speaker 1: how do you create all these green new jobs to
Speaker 1: build windmills and solar panels if you're going to be
Speaker 1: doing you know, nuclear is a very specific thing. People.
Speaker 1: To work in a nuclear plant requires actual expertise and
Speaker 1: real training. But yes, it's it's a viable alternative to
Speaker 1: much of our energy needs. Could provide for our energy needs.
Speaker 1: And if it wasn't for the environmentalist left who really
Speaker 1: slowed and even shut down nuclear plant production for decades
Speaker 1: in this country based upon irrational fear, you know, the
Speaker 1: double masking. The double masking Fauciites of the seventies were
Speaker 1: also concerned that nuclear power was going to destroy the
Speaker 1: world unless they shut it all down. Well, now they're
Speaker 1: concerned that CO two from our other energy sources is
Speaker 1: going to destroy the world, and we realized, you know,
Speaker 1: we should have had nuclear along. But they listen to
Speaker 1: the science, whatever that means. Back to Biden here, I
Speaker 1: got a little distracted from a Biden on how we
Speaker 1: have this really rapidly rising and growing economy. This is,
Speaker 1: as I said, straight out of the Obama playbook, everything
Speaker 1: that Obama did in the economy for the first two
Speaker 1: years of his presidency. They would point to the worst
Speaker 1: month of job losses in a cyclical recession that was
Speaker 1: the worst since the Great Depression in this country. They
Speaker 1: would point to that and say, see how much better
Speaker 1: we are than that, as if that justifies everything that
Speaker 1: they were doing. But it's really a psychological trick here.
Speaker 1: You know, it's it's really a trick of the propagandist.
Speaker 1: You know, I could I could go and you know,
Speaker 1: drive around a race car track a few times, and
Speaker 1: if I was racing against somebody who was a NASCAR driver,
Speaker 1: They're gonna kick my button go a lot faster than me.
Speaker 1: But you know, let's say that they had a tire
Speaker 1: blowout and it was no fault their own, and they
Speaker 1: ran into the side railing or whatever, and they there
Speaker 1: the car got totaled, and then I just keep driving
Speaker 1: in circles saying, see him, I'm a much better driver
Speaker 1: than that guy. It's like, well, not a better driver
Speaker 1: than him. There was a one unforeseen accident. And I'd
Speaker 1: like to think that I could beat a NASCAR driver,
Speaker 1: and but I'm I live in the real world. I
Speaker 1: know I have no chance. I'm not even that I see.
Speaker 1: Unlike a lot of people, I don't have delusions about
Speaker 1: what a great driver, and I'm like, I just drive
Speaker 1: to get places safely and comfortably. I'm not. I don't
Speaker 1: think I'm the fastest. So many people I know think
Speaker 1: they're the fastest driver. What does that even mean? What
Speaker 1: are you like speeding one hundred miles an hour in
Speaker 1: a fifty five and think that that's a good idea.
Speaker 1: A lot of you are like, yeah, buck, I drive fast.
Speaker 1: I drive pretty fast too, But you get my point
Speaker 1: about the NASCAR driver. That's what they do. They point
Speaker 1: to the absolute worst moment in a you know, in
Speaker 1: an aberrant fashion, something that just came out of the blue,
Speaker 1: and then they say, oh, but we'll look at how
Speaker 1: much better we are than that COVID lockdowns created a
Speaker 1: massive contraction of GDP, loss of jobs, and all the
Speaker 1: rest of it. All you have to do to stop
Speaker 1: that is distribute vaccines, reopen the economy. But this is
Speaker 1: what I've said along, they're in a very advantageous position
Speaker 1: because they're gonna look at numbers from a year ago.
Speaker 1: A number is gonna gonna look at the numbers in
Speaker 1: May of twenty twenty and May of twenty twenty one
Speaker 1: and say, see how much better we're doing. Look at
Speaker 1: these great Biden policies, and people can know if they
Speaker 1: think about it, well, that has nothing to do with
Speaker 1: the Biden policies. But is that going to convince enough people?
Speaker 1: Is everyone going to recognize that no Obama administration three
Speaker 1: point zero, they're hay been using the same tricks. In
Speaker 1: some ways, it's it's even easier for them too, because
Speaker 1: they just let the apparatus do so much. You know,
Speaker 1: Obama was always out there giving speeches and we're all
Speaker 1: supposed to worship at the altar of Obama's greatness and
Speaker 1: all that. With Biden, they don't even really pretend. This
Speaker 1: kind of walks around muttering, and then the people really
Speaker 1: making the calls. That's what they're doing.