WEBVTT - Skin Tests to Detect T-Cell Immunity to Covid-19

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanobek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the worlds of business and finance,

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. The World Health Organization, they

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>have been in China. They've been doing their own investigation

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>after a long time of kind of wrinkling back and

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>forth to be able to get access. But they have

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>found now that they've been doing this, that the coronavirus

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>most likely jumped to humans through an animal or frozen

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>wildlife products, and a theory that it resulted from a

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>laboratory leak is quote extremely unlikely end quote, which is

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we know some people have, you know, speculated on Yeah,

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>they have, and and look, I think that will not

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily some of the people who think that it did

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>come from that to rest, but it is helpful to

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>hear that from the World Health Organization. We're also seeing

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>some other numbers, including a five percent Governor Andrew Cuomo

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>saying that the White House is boosting vaccine allocation another

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>five percent for the next three weeks. The additional five

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>percent was announced on a White House call with governors

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday, and it follows initial increase and then a

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>subsequent yeah, exactly. Uh. And it's interesting though, um, let's

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>just see it says the supply will only really increase

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 1>when and if J and J has approved, the governor

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>saying Jane j would be a major and significant increase

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in production. There will be more information of that over

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the next few weeks. Listen, you know, over the next

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. Excuse me, but we know, uh, Timy and

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I have talked about it, and we've talked about with

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>medical professionals that it's going to take many and multiple

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>vaccines to kind of get this all under control. And

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>we know each vaccine, you know, comes with its own

0:01:56.040 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, caveats, two doses, one doses, extreme refrigeration not

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>so much the case. And there's still somewhat of a

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>debate about you know, should we just skip, you know,

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>saving those second doses and get it out to more people.

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>The Body administration telling governors they are adamantly opposed to

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>using second doses as first doses. I know from people

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>who've gotten first dose, they're like, I want my second dose.

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>That's when I will feel secure and confident and comfortable. Listen,

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>let's do what the CDC says. We got a good

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>um and we got a good a good stat here

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in New York today to the city has surpassed a

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>million doses. Remember, Mayor build a Lasio had hoped to

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>reach that by the end of January. It took a

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>few extra days. Here we are in February nine, and

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>now we have surpassed that. Yeah, exactly. And just keep

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in mind global cases exceeding one six point five million,

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>deaths passing two point thirty two million, and our global

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccine tracker more than a hundred and thirty four million

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>shots have been given worldwide. But as we know, in

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a world of many billions of people, one of the

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>other things that we're watching when it comes to COVID

0:02:55.720 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is tonics pharmaceuticals surging yesterday rallying again to day up

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent before backing off a little bit, well, actually

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.519
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but they're still up about five six percent today,

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>up nearly a hundred forty two percent now this year

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 1>after a forty drop last year. Just kind of setting

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the scene because it's a company's story, it's a fundamental story,

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 1>but it's also a stock story. Um, and let's talk

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>about why we're seeing the big moves because apparently the

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>company has come out and said it is developing a

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen skin test, and that has got investors interested.

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Dr Seth Letterman is a guest and friend of the show,

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>co founder, CEO and chairman of the New York based

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>specialty pharmaceutical and clinical stage biopharmer company Tonics Pharmaceuticals. He's

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>with us today on the phone in New Bedford, Massachusetts.

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Dr Letterman, good to have you back here on Bloomberg. Uh,

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>investors very enthused about this development. Tell us about this

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen skin test. Oh, we're developing a vaccine primarily

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that stimulates key cell immunity. It's based on a live

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>viral factor that's called horsebox, and it's a one shot

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>vaccine that we believe from historical parallels could provide decades

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of protection. We have monkey data supporting the vaccine, so

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>we were very happy when we announced yesterday that we're

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>developing a skin test that will measure T sell community

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to COVID. And we think that this is important because

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>there are two arms of the immune system, antibodies and

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>T cells. Antibodies are transient. They can be measured for

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe three or six months. The T cells last for

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>years or decades, so we think it will be very

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>important to figure out how many people have T cell

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>immunity instead of just the antibody test. How long do

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you think that will stick or I mean, how long

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think we will have to know this? I

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>mean I'm thinking about this in the context of right

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>us being on the other side of this pandemic at

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>some point, But how many more years do you envision

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>us actually needing to get sted for immunity. Well, unfortunately,

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that COVID is here to stay. I think

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>it's the majority opinion of people that of experts, that

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>COVID will become endemic after I just want to make

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>sure I understand this here to stay. We've only eradicated

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>one one thing, and that is smallpox. In around the world. Smallpox,

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>we were very fortunate was eradicated because it was extremely deadly.

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Thirty percent of infected people died. But part of the

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>success of smallpox eradication was the vaccine that was used.

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>And the other part of the success with smallpox vaccination

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>was that there were no animal reservoirs. And by animal reservoirs,

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that no other non human animals got infected

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>with it. With COVID, we already know that's not the case. Manx, hamsters, tigers,

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a variety of different animals get so it's very unfortunately

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 1>unlikely that this might be eradicated. So I think that

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the solution long term will be childhood immunization in the

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>same way that we immunize for MMR measos moms and rebella.

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>We probably will go to a system of immunizing children,

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we think of vaccine like ours, a

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>live replicating vaccine which can provide years and decades of protection,

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is the best solution for that post pandemic COVID problem.

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>So you answered my question, which is you envisioned this

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>being a vaccine that a child gets at a very

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>young age and then they don't have to worry about

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this for decades. That's the hope. But it wouldn't be infants,

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of our own vaccine is for um,

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the case of smallpox, it was administered

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to children about five years old or so, but not

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>not for infants. But yes, I think that that would

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>be the plan. But clearly, first we have to get

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the pandemic. And for this, I think we're

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>all extremely grateful to the people who have quickly developed

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>these vaccines, the m RNA vaccines and maybe now these

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>ad no valuous vaccines. Uh, they definitely have an incredibly

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>important role and I can't wait to get mine. So

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, first we have to put out this fire

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and then we can go to more durable solutions. So

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and forgive me, I just want to go back to

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>because I know and just reading in before you were

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>coming on and I know you are working on the vaccine,

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>But what about this skin test, because it does seem

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>like investors are very enthusiastic. Are they wrong to be

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>so enthusiastic about that and not focus on the vaccine instead?

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>The skin test is very important? Now is mentioning the

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>vaccine because it tells a little bit of this story

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>about how we got to the skin test. But the

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>skin test is very important because we really don't know

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>how many people have immunity and we can't measure it.

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So there are many cases, for example, where there's a

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>husband or life and one of the spouses gets infected.

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>The other cares for them, but for example, the caregiver

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>frequently doesn't get sick, doesn't develop antibodies, etcetera. We believe

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that a number of these cases actually T cell immunity

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>develops without antibodies. There it's now known by much more

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>complicated laboratory techniques that T cell immunity is protective of

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>developing serious disease. So we just think this skin test

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is important and we think the excitement is justified because

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>we would really get a better handle on how much

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>T sell immunity is in the population. And also it

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>will be important information for people as individuals to go

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>back to work to feel more safe knowing that even

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>though they don't have antibodies, they may have T sell immunity.

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>It certainly sounds like when all of said and done

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>and we've gotten through this, we had no playbook, But

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to certainly have a tool kit with various

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>tools in the form of tests, vaccines, and treatments, um

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>so that we can be ready for the next virus.

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And that seems like where we're going through in terms

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of the skin test. In terms of your vaccine specifically,

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, when does it actually when does it actually

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>get out there and can be used? Well, we're going

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to be in human trials with both of them, we

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 1>believe this year. But I think in terms of you know,

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>getting out beyond trials hopefully, and we'll have to see

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.199
<v Speaker 1>what the regulatory environment is like how well the current

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>vaccines are keeping this situation under control, because if we

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>go to a more traditional vaccine development, you know, that

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>could be three years or so, not for the skin

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>test but for the vaccine. But does but does that

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>become does that become moot? Forgive me for interrupted, because

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to understand does that become moot though

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>at this point because if we've got vaccines that are

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>already out there that we're using that are working, No,

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't become because I think what maybe one way

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to think about it is we need pandemic vaccines that

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>are very fast to develop, but may not have all

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the characteristics that we want, and then it will take

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>time to refine them and make them better because we

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have to be dealing with this problem for you know,

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>centrally centuries, hopefully millennia. UM. You know, this problem isn't

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>going away. We have to develop tools so that people

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>can be protected for a long period of time. And

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 1>also another characteristic of vaccines is to stop people from

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>spreading it. So there's a lot to be learned, and

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's it's wonderful that we have some quick

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>fixes that we need durable solutions to concern just so

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I make sure I get this right. Your main concern

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>with the vaccines that are available right now is longevity.

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>How long for protection they allow they give to the

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>person getting the vaccine. Is that correct? There are several concerns,

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 1>but durability protection is important. Another one is do they

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>block transmission that's not known yet um. And and there

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you are their concerns what type of immunity they confer.

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>So these are brand new technologies. No m RNA vaccine

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>has ever been approved ever before and even these just

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>have emergency use authorization, so we're using a much more

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>standard technique that has a lot of known characteristics. But

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>again I applaud the speed with which these vaccines have

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>been developed, and I encourage everyone to get them in,

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, when their number comes up. So I'm I'm

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>very pro vaccination, but I also think that we can't rest.

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>We can't think that this problem is solved by any means,

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think that we all have to work very

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>hard to develop better vaccines so that because obviously we

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>have to protect people who aren't even born yet. Yeah.

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>We're talking with Dr Seth Letterman, co founder, chief executive

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>officer and chairman of Tonics Pharmaceuticals, with us on Tuesday

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>from New Bedford, Massachusetts. So when you think about your

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>own vaccine um, Dr Letterman, is it more about the

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.959
<v Speaker 1>viruses to come? Which bus this week? The cover story

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>right now is get ready for the next pandemic, folks,

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's coming. So are you thinking when in terms

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of the development of your vaccine, that it's more about

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily this covid vaccine, but the next one. Oh,

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>We're very focused on this, this covid um. But as

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>as I'm sure you know, this covid is a moving target, correct,

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And already last summer there were a number of mutations

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that were being noticed around the world. And now I

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>think we should all still be bracing for the British

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>strain which has now arrived in the United States. South

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>African straint has arrived in the United States. And in

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>addition to just these new variants, the variants are now

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>believed by some to recombine. So we have a lot

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of misery to go through before we are out of

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this so um our vaccine we believe can be important

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>for the COVID can be adaptable to variants, and um

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>we cannot get complacent just because we have these first

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>few vaccines. Dr Letterman, what do you mean by these strains,

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>these new variants can recombine. What does that mean? Well,

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that means that, you know, the the so called British

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>variant is defined by a number of mutations, and the

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>South African mutation is defined by a number of mutations.

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>But they're already viruses that look like they have some

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>from some and some from another, some from one and

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>some from the other. So all of these mutations aren't

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>rising spontaneously, many believe. So it just means that this

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>this COVID two virus is diabolical and is a moving target.

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think everyone has to really focus on this

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for some time to come. And even I'm sure you

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>know that even with the nation, we still recommend mask wearing,

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>social diff and washing all the rest of it. So

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>we're far from out of it. Hey, listen, I have

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to ask you just got about a minute left here

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>before you go. I know last month your stock kind

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of was the target of day traders uh touting the

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>company on message boards for at that time no apparent reason.

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>We we reported out here at Bloomberg UM obviously different

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>from the trade that we're seeing today. How do you

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>feel about that? And you're stock getting caught up in

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>some of that, and how do you as a CEO

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of monitor it and take care of it or

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>just at least keep an eye on it. Well, we

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>we've raised money yesterday from for healthcare specific institutional funds,

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>so I think our primary investors are are funds UM.

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>But there was a day in January when your your

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>organization wrote a story about it. We I actually went

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>on Reddit for the first time last weekend and tried

0:14:57.960 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to figure it out, and I apologize I didn't get

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>very far so I think it's an exciting development. Um uh,

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>so far, to my knowledge, we haven't really been caught

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>up in it, but I do think that one of

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the most exciting things about it is the transition of

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>people to being interested in individual names, because I think

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>we've come from a period maybe ten years where particularly

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>younger people have just bought E T s and indexes

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. So maybe if people are at home,

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe that you know, the no fee trading, but whatever,

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very exciting that people are getting back

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>into the individual names instead of the indexes. And as

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>far as I know, we're mostly an institutional stock. For example,

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's entire seventy million dollar financing was for institutions. All right,

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>good to know. I just wanted to get you away

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in Dr Seth Ladderman, co found er, CEO and chairman

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of Tonics Pharmaceuticals. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:15:56.040 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic from Bloomberg Radio. Carol,

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we talk a lot about the toll of the pandemic

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>has taken in terms of numbers cases people who've died

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>as a result of the pandemic. But one thing that's

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>getting more and more focused right now is the way

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that we have put off going and visiting the doctor.

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>We've put off getting healthcare, and different communities that have

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>been affected more than others as a result of that.

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And McCourt joins us now. She's healthcare reporter at Bloomberg

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>News and she's writing about she's talking about her recent

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>article miss doctor visits have created COVID's shadow health crisis. Emma,

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it's great to have you on Bloomberg Business Week Radio.

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>This story is really important. Take us through some of

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the numbers as to what we're learning about how people

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>might not have visited the doctor like they used to

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic. Right, Well, thank you so much for

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>having me on. I'm really excited to be here. Um.

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Some sobering news, however, about the sort of neglect of

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>non COVID UH conditions during this past year. Um. You know,

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of us can relate for sure

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>having pushed off you know, maybe a primary care doctor visit,

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a routine dermatologist visit. Um. But you know, the big

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of takeaway here is in those early months of

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic in particular, there was just such profound disruption

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to the medical system, and it was people being told

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to stay home, people being afraid to go to the hospital,

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>even in cases where they really needed emergency care. UM.

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And even kind of in the months since then, it's

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 1>been a little harder to get in to see a doctor.

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>They're UM sitting out their waiting rooms because they don't

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>want a lot of people credit in their things like that. UM.

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, the most dramatic change I think

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you see in those early weeks, it was about UM

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>at least two point seven billion of routine healthcare spending

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>just sort of disintegrated during that really disruptive early period

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it And we've seen those numbers come back. But I

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>think the big takeaway is that even with the rise

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of virtual doctor business, we haven't seen UM that that

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>depth is that sort of being made up. M Well

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and so listen, we've talked about this a bunch on

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>air with a lot of UM members of the medical community,

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and Emma, you know the thing is, you tell I

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>want to drill down a little bit because you talk

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>about one individual, specifically, tell us about Sarah strim Al. Yeah,

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So Sarah's story, UH, was very troubling so she UM,

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.360
<v Speaker 1>she's thirty nine, she's owned a New York yoga studio.

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>She realized over the summer that she had a lump

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in her breast and you know, immediately had a visit

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>with her physician as quickly as she could to consult

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>with her doctor about it. She was referred for a

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>scan UM, but was told, you know, the stud disappointment

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you can have is three months away. And she ended

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>up actually finding a private firm that could do it

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>much sooner. She paid out of pocket for it UM

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>and was diagnosed with these two breast cancer UM you know,

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>days later. So her physician actually told her that taking

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>such quick action and probably saved her life because she

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>her cancer could have progressed a lot further in those

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>UM in those months if she had just waited to

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>get the scan. And I think that kind of illustrates, how,

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the most dramnast dramatic scenarios in

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>which UM, not having easy ready access to a physician

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 1>UM can really affect people's health. Now, we hope that

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>all these UM mispreventative care or routine care or even

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>scans like with Sarah, that all these kind of disruptions

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to the system don't have such dramatic effects for people's help,

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's likely that it will, especially in situations where

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a chronic chronic conditions like diabetes, hypertension, and you

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:05.959
<v Speaker 1>really do need to have ready continuous monitoring of those

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>um of those conditions. Otherwise you can have complications and

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>it can enforcetion your quality of life. That can even

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, right, right, and listen, right, there's implications for

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>someone's individual personal health, but there's also you know, if

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>we think about it down the road, maybe also how

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it will add to overall health care costs in this nation.

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Listen this, I think everybody can relate to this story

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 1>where things were put off during the pandemic, partly because

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>she didn't want to go near your health facilities and

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>partly because health facility says, don't come near me. And

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>so now we're all playing catchup, right, Tim, I kidded

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>with you about even going to the dentist for a while,

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know what, it worked. I went to the

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>dentists and it was all good. I'm kind of tough. Uh, Emma,

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a really smart story. Um, thank you for

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>bringing to us. Uh, we really appreciate it. Am a Court,

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>she's healthcare reporter at Bloomberg News on the phone in

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>New York City, and I know as soon as things

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>were open, I was like, all right, let's go back right. Yeah,

0:20:57.880 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it absolutely makes sense. I mean, think about the way

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that people change their behavior on the pandemic and continue

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to as well. Really important. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic from

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Do you want to get to among our

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>most read stories on the Bloomberg Love Love love this story.

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>The headline for it, Uh, it really says so much, Tim.

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>It's about the mastermind behind one of the world's richest companies,

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a two point three trillion dollar fortress. Reporting for Bloomberg

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with another deep dive amazing one is Bloomberg

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>News Technology Report to Austin card joining us on the

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>phone in Los Angeles, and Austin, I love this star

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>story and I think about you know, when we think

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 1>about the genius behind this company, we understandably and rightfully

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>think typically of Tim Cook's predecessor at Apple. We think

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>about Steve Jobs, and yet Tim Cook has really taken

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple to a whole other level totally. Um, what the

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>story really dives into is a different exploration of Apple. Traditionally,

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>every look at Apple is about its product, about the

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>mythology of Steve Jobs, about it design DNA, and what

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we really wanted to show was in fact equally important

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>to that trajectory of this company is the operational, the

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>supply chain DNA that that Tim Cook had baked into

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the into the company, as well as sort of the

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>political and diplomacy skills he brings as a leader of

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the company, which is definitely you know, we have someone

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>in there just describing his personality as a you know,

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a tag boring perhaps compared to the Steve Jobs, but

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>but that's what Apple needed in the last year's, last

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>ten years, especially during the the drump era. Do weeber

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>you're also with us, joining us and this is like

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>one of those stories. I just love that you you

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>learned something else about a company that we cover so much,

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>but yet here you go you find out something new. Yeah.

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So I have just been amazed by how good this

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 1>story was because you know, I think there's a moment

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>here that we found ourselves in where we're ten years

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>after Steve Jumps, and you know, this tenure moment that

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook has basically um lead this company through is

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>basically unrivaled in this capitalism. Um we've seen this thing,

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>this company go from a really important player to to

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>something whose market camp is two point three trillion dollars.

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>We one of those sources in the story says within

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>another twelve months, we're going to see it at three trillion.

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>So the revenue really does look endless. And you know,

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the one of the more um significant parts

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>here and I think Austin did a good job UM

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>showing this is you know, even with all that revenue

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and and all the innovation that they've had, you know,

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:41.959
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that they've really been able to do

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is doubled down on on themselves. And I think what

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing now is this um, you know, this privacy

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>battle that they found they found themselves locked in with Facebook.

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, Tim Cook is very effective at wielding the

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>public's uh focus and effectively has has really turned this

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>into a conversation about privacy, which really benefits Apple and

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is a challenging one for Facebook and Austin. What are

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the stakes when you think about what that means not

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>only for for the two sides and how they've been

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of waging war publicly, but but where it might

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>unfolds going forward. Yeah, the really brilliant thing we've seen

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>is sort of Apple apply its marketing uh strength to

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the political realm. Um. You know, there's this public messaging

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>battle not just between Apple and Facebook, Tim Cook and

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg, but essentially Apple and every software maker out there,

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>from Spotify to Epic Games and one are the clever

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>things that they've really done when it comes to anti

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>trust scrutiny. Um. When you know, we're we're sort of

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in the early stages of whether we'll see the Biden

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>administration support congressional increase into that. Um. But Cook has

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>really repositioned the company as this privacy forward, um, you know,

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>advocate for for uh the Silicon Valley, and really uh

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, rather than being on the defensive, is really

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>attacked Facebook and other social media companies and just wanted

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to to push all that anti trust scrutiny on them.

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>And it's a really difficult messaging war because on the

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>one hand, they're saying, we want to protect privacy and

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that's why you should focus on section two thirty and

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>all these other issues. Uh, And if you're Mark Zuckerberg

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>or anyone at Facebook, it's so hard to make the

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>argument against that because you just sound like you're against privacy.

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.479
<v Speaker 1>So it's a really clever UH diplomacy attacked. And and

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the things that we saw now in

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration, which we learned tons of lessons about

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>during the Trump administration. Well, how we handled that administration

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and considering how disruptive it could have been to uh

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 1>to Apple with their supply, the reliance on on China. Yeah, Austin,

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>what about when it comes to actually manufacturing in the US.

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>There's this this great anecdote about President Trump form of

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>President Trump and Tim Cook together in Texas. Take us

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>take us back there, what happened and why what President

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Trump said at the time was not at all accurate

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 1>about Apple's manufacturing in the US. So, yeah, there was

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>this big event in November nineteen, about a year before

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the presidential election, and Tim Cook joins President Trump, who

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the surface have very differing personal politics.

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, what uh you know, sources

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.479
<v Speaker 1>tell us is that uh, Tim was extremely good at

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>trading optics. You know, uh, you know, Trump is a

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>guy who wanted to have his sort of business credentials validated,

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and what better than attached himself to one of the

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 1>more beloved American brands when it comes to innovation or

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:39.239
<v Speaker 1>job creation. Uh. And and they come to this this

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>tour at Texas and sort of presented as this, uh,

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, the future of US manufacturing, a sign that

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:48.959
<v Speaker 1>this reshoring effort that that Trump has has taken on

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 1>with the trade war is working. But internally over the years,

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>sources just said that factory was quite a disappointment. Um,

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of an early experiment to see whether

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the US supply chain could compete with China's and one

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>source to set it failed miserably. So the irony was

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that even with those struggles at the plant, Tim Cook

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>was still us able to to repurpose that to use

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the Apple brand and reposition that factory to sort of,

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, help solidify his relationship with Trump, which

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>who knows, could have uh you know, led to more

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>terrefully less disruption to their their supply chain and generally speaking,

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just let's you know, fire uh from Trump, you know,

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.360
<v Speaker 1>from tweets like you've seen him criticize other CEOs, particularly

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos. Tim Cook never received that, and it's light

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>it it's because of this diplomacy efforts that he he

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>did in Texas as well as in Washington over the

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>past four years. Yeah. I think what's interesting too, as

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you write about just this kind of unlikely, but it

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>really kind of makes sense, this combination between Tim Cook

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 1>of Apple and President Donald Trump, and a lot of

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it had to do as you write about this kind

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>of the president really craving a mainstream business validation. It

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 1>is an amazing story. Like Joel, Joel mentioned, really just

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of information and just give us some more

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>insight into the man who's you know, leading one of

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the biggest companies out there. Uh, Joel Weber, thank you

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 1>so much. Editor of Bloomberg Business Week, Austin Carr, Tech

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>reporter of Bloomberg News on the phone in l A.

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovik on Bloomberg Radio. All right, everyone,

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 1>just about sixty minutes left in today's trading session, and

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the top stories today is how House Democrats

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>are proposing to limit the next round of COVID nineteen

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>relief payments, and they're talking about households are making the

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>limitations to households earning less than two hundred thousand dollars.

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>We know that there's been a fair amount of pushback

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of the aisle when it comes to

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>President Biden's one point nine trillion dollar stimulus package. So

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>let's get into it, Tim. Let's bring in Bloomberg News

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Congressional tax reporter Laura Davison. She's on the phone in

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>d C. So Laura, tell us about the latest and

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>what you're hearing and maybe what's likely to happen in

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>order to get this COVID nineteen relief package through. Yeah. So,

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>last night UM House Democrats put out a series of

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:08.959
<v Speaker 1>different composals, and one of the things that we were

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>really watching for was you know where exactly are these uh,

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>these stimulus payments going to go on. This has been

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a point of contention between Republicans and Democrats and even

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>without among Democrats for for several days. Where they landed

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>on this proposal is that if you are a single

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>person earning UM seventy five thousand dollars, a year, you

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>get that full fourteen hundred dollar payment. Same a couple

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>married couple making uh up to her hundred and fifty

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars will get a hunt fourteen hundred dollars each.

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Those payments will then phase out for singles earning up

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to a hundred thousand dollars or couples earning up to

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>two hundred thousand dollars. And and this was sort of

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a compromise between what some Senate Democrats had wanted. They

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>kept those caps, but they basically phased the payments out

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>more quickly than they did in previous in previous bills. Um,

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>so what's next? Uh, they will go and do what's

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>called a markup. This is basically going through the legislation

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>line by line um in the House all this week. Uh.

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>It was basically they'll wrap everything up by the end

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of this week, looking to vote on the legislation potentially

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>as soon as next week. And then Pelosia said she'll

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>send it over to the Senate um as soon as

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:14.959
<v Speaker 1>they're done in the House and looking to pass this,

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you know fully through Congress by mid March. Okay, So

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>how does this compare, Laura to what Republicans wanted to see.

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>So basically, Republicans wanted to have a lower cap. So

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>instead of fifty thousand dollars, they wanted forty thousand dollars

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>instead of you know, a hundred thousand sorry instead of

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.719
<v Speaker 1>a sorry, I miss quoted those numbers, instead of seventy

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>five thousand dollars, they wanted them capped at fifty thousand dollars.

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And instead of having um couples earning up to two

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars, Democrats proposed, they wanted to to phase

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>those out around eighty thousand dollars. So the limits were, uh,

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty stark. And also Republicans were proposing only one

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars per person versus that fourteen hundred that Democrats

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>have been talking about. So, does this indeed make it

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a more make these payments more targeted? Does it? Does

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it indeed help per and this from benefiting the wealthy?

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Or are there still some issues to work out? They

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>have really cut off, you know, sort of the issues

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that we saw with some previous rounds or kind of

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>issues that we're discussed. If they hadn't put these caps on,

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, these payments going to you know, three hundred

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar, you know a year. Households that won't happen

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>under here. Basically the difference, uh though kind of on

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the lower side of the income spectrum. It's very similar

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to what we've seen. The big difference when you look

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>at the numbers comparing you know, like the payments from

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the Cares Act versus this proposal is that households with

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>children will just get a lot more money. So under

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the Cares Act, it was only five hundred dollars per kid.

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>This would have it at fourteen hundred dollars per kids.

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know, a family of four under that under

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that one hundred and fifty dollar income threshold will get

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty six hundred dollars. So it's a pretty large check,

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>particularly for households that have you to three or four children.

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So what they're trying to do it sounds like Laura's

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>like trying really hopefully make sure our money is going

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to people who might be most likely struggling, and we

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>know folks with kids. Um, you know, I was looking

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>at a story that you also put out um with

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Katerina Sarajeva about US child poverty crisis. I mean, more

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>than eight million Americans, including many children falling into poverty

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>during the second half of last year. I mean, you know,

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to look away from that, and it's hard

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>not to think about, all right, how do we best

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>make sure that kids are being taken care of, that

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>there's food on their table, and that the parents that

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>are overseeing them can do that. Yeah, but this is

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>another key portion of the Democrat's proposal is to do

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>this child tax credit um and this would essentially work

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a separate round of of stimulus payments

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>versus kind of the child tax credit. How we thought

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>about it for years. You know, it's just something that

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you either get added onto your tax refund, it's used

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>offset tax liability. What this proposal will do would send

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>out a payment, a monthly payment, spreading out the total

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>value of the credit throughout the year. So for you know,

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a single child would be you know, between the pending

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>on the age of the child, between two hundred and

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty or three hundred dollars a month. So this is

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>something they're proposed to do for the rest of this year.

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>But Democrats are already thinking about how could we make

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>this a permanent proposals so that households had a little

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of extra infusion to pay for for expenses throughout

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:15.959
<v Speaker 1>the year. Can I just imagine a chart, more than

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>children the US are in poverty in December. That's just

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that's just rough. That's for a time. The timeline for

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>these checks. You know, we we talked a lot about

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the one point a trillion dollar stimulus package. Unclear the

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>timeline there, but but how quickly could people get relief?

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>So the I R S has said that they are

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>are prepared, uh and ready to go if the if

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Congress passes another round. Um. In December, when they passed

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the stimulus bill, they got those checks really out within

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a matter of days. Um, they started sending them and

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of over the course of three or

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>four weeks they got into the vast majority of those

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>payments out. Same thing here. We could see that, you know,

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>if they are able to pass this bill mid March,

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of by you know, mid to late March, people

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>could start seeing the direct deposits for the child tax credit.

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>That will take longer. Congress is going to give the

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I R S and told jo Lie to start sending

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>those out. Yeah, it's interesting, Um, are you anticipated all right? So,

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, something's going to happen, right, and it's obviously

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be a little bit different from what President

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Biden put out there, but it's moving along. Bottom line,

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it certainly is you know. The question really is when

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>they move it over to the Senate, that's when all

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the funky rules about the special budget process that they're using,

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we could see parts getting stripped out

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>of this bill as they run a foul of this

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>budget reconciliation process. Hey, Laura, one last quick question. Is

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 1>impeachment going to get in the way of any of this?

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you think, um, impeaching? It looks like it will wrap,

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, by um early next week. If they're able

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:40.359
<v Speaker 1>to kind of stick to the time and lean out,

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it should be done soon. All right, Good to know, um, Laura,

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, really appreciate it. Laura Davison and

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Congressional tax reporter at Bloomberg News on the phone from Washington,

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>d C. Tim. You know, I'm looking at her story

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know what you could get versus what you

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>could get under the Cares Act. I mean, it does

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>sound like they're trying to figure out how to make

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.280
<v Speaker 1>sure that the money gets to the right hands, and

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to argue with that. So right. The criticism,

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, is that it's not targeted enough. Right, It's correct.

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Stimulus payments are going to people who are working, people

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.280
<v Speaker 1>who don't necessarily need the money. And when that happens,

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we've learned, they might save it, they might not spend it,

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and it won't have that stimulating effect that economists are

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>looking for exactly, which is why it's so tricky, and

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>which is why we kicked off the top of the

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>show talking to Mike about you know, some of these

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>things we have to think about longer term investments and

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>longer term impact romal a journal. Yeah, but you let

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 1>me drive. Oh no, no, no no, no, honey, please, I'll

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:42.800
<v Speaker 1>do the riding drivel. I want to drive it. Just drive, baby,

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the question. This is the drive to the globe. Thanks.

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll try us down on Bluebird Radio. All right, folks,

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Just about eleven minutes left in today's trading day. We're

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>hovering near our haws of the session. But little changed.

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 1>As Charlie just mentioned on the SNP Dowd just up

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:11.399
<v Speaker 1>about eleven nasty act the app performer, but just by

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a hair up about thirty nine points or at point

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>three percent. Let's get to a top performing fund manager,

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>someone we've had on before. Eric Clark, back with us,

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager at Rational Dynamic Brands Fund. His Rational Dynamic

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Brands Fund, by the way, continuing to beat just about

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.479
<v Speaker 1>all of its peers this year and over the last

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>five years. Over the past five years check it out

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>up on average nearly annually, putting his fun in the

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 1>ninety percentile according to our data here at Bloomberg. Eric's

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 1>back with us on the phone from San Diego. So, Eric,

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you back with us. How are you.

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing great. Happy New Year. Yeah, although it feels

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot like in many ways. Well, so listen, you

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 1>dig into different brands. A lot of them are names

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that we know, we've talked about it before, whether it's

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>an Amazon and Apple, a Master, Hard and Nike, um,

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 1>these are some of your top holdings. Has this year

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:07.439
<v Speaker 1>changed at all in terms of how you're thinking about

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio versus what we saw that might have been

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>some some very strong pandemic plays in it really has?

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, We've we're probably as balanced by the winners

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of last year that we think still have a lot

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of room to run with some of the laggard's turned

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to leaders of particularly areas where we we think consumers

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 1>are really pent up and and travel is certainly right

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>at the top of my list getting out rather than

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>staying in and and we're we're still it's obviously still winter.

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>We're in February. But it won't shock me soon if

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you get to hear from from mayor BnB and Marriott

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and Hilton, some of those brands, and they talk about

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the reservations being, you know, kind of building as people

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>get excited for spring and summer travel. And I don't

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's in the stocks yet. So we're building that

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 1>big travel basket, if you will, of great brands. Okay,

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>so explain now. You can be bullish both on on

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.959
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb and on on Hilton, right because somebody could argue

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that Airbnb is disrupting Hilton. That's true. I I you know,

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you, I think there's gonna be

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 1>so much demand it's gonna overflow. I mean, certainly the

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb and the v R b OH and we own

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Expedia for the v r b OH exposure. Um, that's

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 1>an area that's really become popular because of covid, and

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it will continue, but in many cases, I mean,

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb is extremely expensive relative to the to the other companies.

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>We still love it, but but the demand is going

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 1>to kind of outstrip supply between the house sharing as

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>well as the hotel. So I just think the whole group,

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>as well as the platforms of expedient booking, are just

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna experience some epic demand across the board. So, Eric,

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>have you been doing any buying or paring back of

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:56.359
<v Speaker 1>some of your positions and just curious about any kind

0:38:56.400 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>of logistical move that you've been making in your portfolio. Yeah, mean,

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>what we've we've certainly done some trimming of the higher

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 1>valuation winners of uh you know, we had a much

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 1>bigger position in PayPal. Still love it, uh Square, still

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>love it, but we've we've kind of paired back some

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of those high valuation names. I mean, everybody's kind of

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:22.800
<v Speaker 1>over their skis lathered up with with tech, but everybody

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>is underweight the consumer brands, particularly in consumer discretionary. So

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I love being in an area that isn't crowded when

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:33.840
<v Speaker 1>when the valuations are much better and we see some

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>some great demand and and you know, we're still with

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a vix still stubbornly over twenty We're still using tactical trading,

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.880
<v Speaker 1>active trading as a way to to kind of use

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>some cash, get in, get paid, and then get back

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 1>to the cash and then wait for another opportunity. So

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>between that and just avoiding some of the higher valuation

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 1>names that we think comparisons year over year are just

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna be too too difficult. I love the balance that

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>we have now that when the old winners in the

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:04.280
<v Speaker 1>in the kind of laggards to turn to turn leaders

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>this year. Okay, so you guys own Uber. Uh you

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you say that you love the stock. Why we have

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Lift earnings after the bell today? Why Uber and not Lift?

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And what do you think of that one point one

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar acquisition of Drizzly that was announced last week.

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's great. On the Drizzly acquisition, I mean,

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it just fills up their ability to kind

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of control the last mile. And I like Lift and Uber.

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I just think Uber has a lot more optionality with

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:35.439
<v Speaker 1>all the other subsidiaries that they have and have UH

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>exposure to through jvs around the world. But I you know,

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>for the same reason that Travel should do well the

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>things that are tied to travel, like an uber like

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 1>a lift should do well as a recovery theme. And

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I like, you know that they have the Uber eats

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>um that I you know, let's face it, we got

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>used to certain things. Some of that will continue on

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the Uber eats. With the Drizzly, you got a new

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>revenue stream. And then you have the ride the ride

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:07.799
<v Speaker 1>sharing as well that that will that will eventually come

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 1>back and has already I'm sure seen lots of loss

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of recovery. So I just not to mention from a

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>technical perspective, that's not looks like it's just on the

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:19.720
<v Speaker 1>verge of breaking out. So that's kind of an early

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:23.319
<v Speaker 1>breakout sign for that for that group when some of

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the other tech stocks have run and in my opinion

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 1>are pretty extended to the ups. Well, having said that,

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>are you I hate to use this expression keeping some

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:34.919
<v Speaker 1>powder dry, um, but are you holding back because there's

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 1>been such a run up and waiting for a better

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 1>entry point. I'm just curious if you have up your

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 1>cash positions at all so that when we do see

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a pullback, which many predict that you can kind of

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.839
<v Speaker 1>get in there at some lower rates. Well, we are

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we we were tending to trend some things

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that are at the top end of the range and

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:54.840
<v Speaker 1>adding to some things that are kind of at the

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>bottom end of the range. And it's not getting a

0:41:57.160 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of news, but we've had a bit of a

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>rolling corruption over the last couple of months. It hasn't

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>been a very even everything going up at the same time.

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So I love the ability to sell something that's that's

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:13.439
<v Speaker 1>up and to the right into the top, and then

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 1>buy something that's already experienced a five or ten percent

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>pullback and and just keep recycling that that cash allocation

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>into names that have much bigger upside to keep this

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>thing rolling. Hey, Andy Jesse at Amazon, I know Amazon

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is one of your top holdings. What do you make

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of Jeff Bezo stepping down later this year. Well, I

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's I think it's the normal succession that happens.

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's still young, but he's been there a

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>long time, and I'm sure he has other aspirations philanthropic

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and space and all that stuff. But to have a

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 1>guy who's been there for twenty five years and understands

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the culture was part of building the culture, to me,

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 1>that's a much better m a much better decision than

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>bringing somebody from the outside, because you know, I have

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of friends that work there, and it's a

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 1>unique culture. Let's just put it that way. If you're

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>ingrained in the culture, that's probably a good extension. And

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Andy's been, you know, a part of all of the decisions,

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 1>so it's not like you have an outsider coming in

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>without that. With that, that that Amazon view of the world.

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, listen. Always love checking in with you, Eric,

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. I love all the specificity in

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of talking names. Eric Clark, he's portfolio manager at

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the Rational Dynamic Brands Fund. Check it out the performance,

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 1>as I said, short term, longer term five years, beating

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty much all of its peers, returning on average about

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>annually over the past five years. Thanks for listening to

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to our

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:49.280
<v Speaker 1>watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News