WEBVTT - Early Look at Week 6 NFL Lines (Ep. 114)

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, Welcome back to the Betting Pros podcast. I'm

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>your host, Dan Harris. Find me on Twitter at Dan

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Harris eighty. It is time for an early look at

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the week six NFL lines, and to break it all

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>down with me is my friend Mike Randall from the

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Action Network. You can find him on Twitter at Randall Rant. Mike,

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks for coming on the show.

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 2>How you doing, Dan, I'm doing great. It's an honor.

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Week six here, refreshed and replenished from an exciting Week five,

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 2>we can hit week six and go over all the games.

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>First of all, is the second time we've been talking

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that you've said that it's an honor to be on

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, So I feel like you have definitely put

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>this up way too.

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 3>High on like a pedestal.

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, all right for me, I'm fine to be here.

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>It's nice to have you whatever. I don't really care

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that much, but anyway, let's get into it.

0:00:58.280 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 2>We got it.

0:00:58.560 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 3>You're right. It was a crazy week.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Watching last night was just nuts, absolutely nuts. You know,

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 1>we do a lot of fantasy, obviously, and it was

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>just insane, completely decided fantasy. I was thankfully on the

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Colts plus seven and a half did you climb to

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it at the very end, so thankfully, but it was

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>getting a little nerve wracking there.

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, let's get into it.

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Before we do, let me give you the latest software

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, from bet MGM. New customers can win one

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars in free bets that they bet five dollars

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>for any NFL team to score a touchdown if either

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>team I'm sorry scores a touchdown on any NFL game

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that you bet on.

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 3>So again, you bet five dollars any team, any game you.

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Want, you win one hundred dollars in free bets if

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that team you bet on scores a touchdown.

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:41.839
<v Speaker 3>Use the code Juice one hundred.

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>That is our other podcast, the Daily Juice Gray podcast,

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>hosted by Matt Parrel. You should listen to it every

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>single day you wake up. I mean Matt has not

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>missed a day in well over a year. He did

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it from the hospital, as he did it from Yeah,

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you let amazing the dedication. I by the way, we

0:01:58.000 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>are doing this on the Tuesday instead of a Monday.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I happen to be visiting my mother, which I could

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>have recorded there I opted not to. That's my low

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>level of dedication. That's why I listened to the Jews.

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Definitely Deally juice. Juice one hundred is of Codett bet MGM.

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, Mike, we walked through it a little bit.

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready to get going? Walk through some of

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the lines.

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's go through them. We'll run through them. Dan, if

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 2>you want, walk over whatever you want.

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 3>I should have you on this podcast every week. Let's

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 3>go with.

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>The Bucks are visiting the Eagles on Thursday Night Football.

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>The Bucks are currently laying seven. The total is fifty

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. We obviously have some unknowns a

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit here. You've got maybe Rob Gronkowski plays. Hopefully

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll know that soon. Brady has the big rap apparently

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>on his thumb. Chances are he's going to play. What

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think here with the point spread of seven.

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm going towards the Bucks. Do you know Dan

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 2>that the Buccaneers have allowed to opposing quarterbacks a grand

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 2>total of thirteen yards this year on nine attempts. On

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the other side, we have Jalen Hurts here second among

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 2>all quarterbacks and rushing yards. Something has to give. I'm

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna go with the Bucks defense. The Bucks play at

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 2>a real fast paced Philadelphia has been tough. They battled.

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 2>They had the great comeback win against Carolina this week.

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 2>But Tampa Bay has just been clicking. Has so many weapons,

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Antonio Brown, Tom Brady, the offense is so efficient. I

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 2>just don't see a way that Philadelphia is gonna be

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 2>able to generate enough points if they're not dominant on

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 2>the ground, and they're not going to be. Jalen Hurts

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 2>has been oppressive for fantasy owners. They love him because

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 2>he finds a way to get to those twenty to

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty five fantasy points, but I don't trust their passing attack.

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 2>The Eagles always play hard, have a strong defense. It

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 2>looks like they'll be without Dallas Goddard this week, also,

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>who was just placed on the COVID list. Bucks are

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 2>also four and one to the over this year in

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 2>their games. This game is hovering in that low fifty range.

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it's gonna go well. Over games in prime

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 2>time were really hot going to the over, then they

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 2>slowed down in Week four. I think this one picks

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 2>up again. The Eagles always can score points late. I'm

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>gonna take the Bucks and lay the points. I wish

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 2>it was at six and a half, which it was

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 2>at earlier in the week, but I'll lay this here

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 2>for the Buccaneers on the road.

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It is oddly enough, it is at six and a

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>half at my book, thankfully at DraftKings, so I will

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>be able to take it. But I am in agreement

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>with you all the way around. And again, people have

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>been listening to this podcast now, I basically back the

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Eagles every week we have our three best bets. I

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.799
<v Speaker 1>took the Eagles this week against the Panthers.

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 3>I like, sort of.

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's so much more under the surface with

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles, but not in this game right now. I

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>really don't see how it's gonna happen. And again, the total,

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you're right, do you think it's gonna move by the way,

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I assume it's probably seven. I feel like

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it's probably where other than DraftKings. Seven is probably where

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>it lands in the end. I mean, we all have

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days at this point, but.

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 2>I think it's seven. You don't want to give that

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 2>seven and a half. And we saw last night with

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 2>the Colts and the Ravens how important that seven is.

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 2>That's the place it's gonna end up. I just see

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>this game being very similar when the Chiefs played at

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 2>Philadelphia and it just gets away from them late couple

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 2>turnovers there. They will battle with Hurts, but I don't

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 2>see a situation Dan where Hurts and the Eagles offense

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 2>can dominate on the ground. And if that's the case,

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 2>this game could get blown wide open.

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're not even gonna Nobody even attempts at

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>this point to run the ball whatsoever. It's gonna be

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see what Hurt says. But it was a

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>great sat that you gave there about quarterbacks rushing. Let's

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>go to the Dolphins visiting the Jaguars. Dolphins are laying

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>three and a half right now in the total is

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>forty seven.

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 3>What do you think.

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Favorites in the London game over in the pond nineteen

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 2>to ten against the spread. That's sixty six percent. Jaguars

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 2>have their bye week coming up, and there's a lot

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 2>of reports that Urban Meyer will be fired, so you

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 2>can argue he's a dead man walking here. Miles Gaskin

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 2>came alive for the Dolphins. He was the PPR RB

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 2>two and the Jags are just dreadful on defense, thirty

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 2>first overall, only behind the Chiefs. I trust Brian Flores

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 2>more getting his team ready. There's not gonna be Will Fuller.

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 2>There's injuries on both sides. No DJ chalk for Jacksonville.

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 2>I just think that the Dolphins right now are the

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 2>more cohesive unit. I think they're better coached, and I

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 2>think they find a way here with a little more

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 2>talent than a Jaguars team that is just going in

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 2>the wrong direction. I do like the under here, though,

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 2>I have to tell you the Jags in Miami, they're

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 2>both very slow in their pace. I know that the

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.559
<v Speaker 2>over got there last week in sort of an odd

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 2>situation at the end of the game. But I like

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins to win this game to cover the number,

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 2>and I do like the under here. Over in the

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 2>pond with this game between the Jags and Dolphins.

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 3>This is where you think it ends up, by the

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 3>way three and a.

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Half, Yeah, I think so. They're gonna those key numbers

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 2>are three and seven, so they're gonna want to keep

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 2>it there to try to attract the fifty to fifty action.

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 2>But I just don't think it's gonna matter because I

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 2>think the Dolphins here finally have found a running back

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 2>that they need, Jacoby Brissett, is very solid. Trevor Lawrence

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 2>has had some turnover problems. They still should have beat

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 2>the Cardinals in that game except for that ridiculous flea

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 2>flicker at home that was a pick six. So I'm

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 2>just trusting the better team. Other Jaguars going to break

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 2>through here for a lame duck coach over in the

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 2>pond against the Dolphins, I don't see it.

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Hey, can I ask?

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Because I think and again I'm being as totally honest

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>with our audience as possible as I said. I was

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>visiting family in New York. I've been keeping up with

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the news. I've still been working, but I've been driving

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty much all day. I there seems to be some

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of remote optimism that Tua could potentially play in

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>this game.

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Or am I totally off on that? Is it just

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 3>definitely preset in.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 2>This I'm hearing that I think it's gonna be Brissett.

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 2>If it was Tua, I would feel even stronger about

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 2>this because I think he comes back and he gives them,

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, he still has that talent. People are down

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 2>on two are very polarizing in Miami. If he comes back,

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 2>I like it even more. I'm making this pick based.

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 3>On Bressett perfect.

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what I thought, by the way, because I

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>also like it more if Tua comes back, and I

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>agree like I was very high, again mostly from a

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy perspective, but on what we were going to see from

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>two and now they've got injuries. Who who knows a

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Parker is going to play, and as you said, they're

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>already down Will Fuller. I don't think it matters. I

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>think they can easily take this game. The Jaguars are

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in disarray, and you're right after that bye week, we're

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>going to see what's coming up. The Vikings now are

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>visiting the Panthers. The Panthers are laying a point and

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the total is forty six.

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 3>What do you think about this one?

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 2>I like the Vikings here. I have had some strange

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 2>attraction to the Minnesota Vikings all year. I trust Mike Zimmer.

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 2>I think this defense is going to improve. They should

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 2>have had a couple more wins. Of course, the miskick

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 2>against Arizona. They were gaming at Cincinnati in the opening game.

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Both Carolina and Minnesota are great against the pass. The

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Vikings do need Dalvin cookback. I'm hoping he returns here.

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Alexander Madison is fine. But I like this Vikings team.

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 2>I think they're gonna get better as the year goes on. Now,

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 2>the line opened at three and dropped despite the overwhelming

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 2>amount of bets and money are coming in on the Panthers.

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 2>I think the Vikings are very live underdog here. People

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 2>are going to be off them because you can argue

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 2>they should have lost against Detroit last week. No problem,

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 2>I like the Vikings. I think the Panthers are a

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 2>little overrated right now. Sam Darnold's been fantastic. I don't

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 2>think last week is going to repeat itself. But I

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 2>think this is a very close game. I think it's

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 2>a low scoring game and I will take the Vikings

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 2>here to pull the upset straight up against the Panthers.

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's right. Again.

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 1>I actually thought very disappointing with the Vikings because I

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>mean they were laying I think it might have closed

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>at ten. It was nine and half when I saw

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it early on the week. I thought they were gonna cover.

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I thought they were gonna absolutely blow the doors off

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that game, and they didn't. And they just couldn't put

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the lines away. Now admittedly they should, I mean, you

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>know they fumbled at the end. The fact that they

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>won on the last second field go like they also

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>fumble the ball away that allowed the Lions obviously to

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>score and take the lead. But I agree, I've kind

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of look, man, I get that the Panthers start out hot,

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>their defense played has played better than expected generally, and

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it's fairly strong. But realistically, I've seen Sam Donald play

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>for years. This does not look like a different version

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of Sam Donald right now. So I'm all about fading

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers. I agree with you right now, even on

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the road, I would. I do like the Vikings here.

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Bengals are visiting the Lions. The Bengals are laying three

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>and a half. The total is forty seven and a half.

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 3>What do you think?

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, the Lions have played very tough and if

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 2>you look at the stats, they don't look that great

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 2>with DVOA. But I like the Lions at home here

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 2>getting that number. That is a key number you're going

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 2>to give to me. The Bengals are going on the road.

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 2>They fought against that Packers team. The Lions should have

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 2>won this game. They are still fighting for Dan Campbell.

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 2>DeAndre Swift has been absolutely fantastic and the Bengals get

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 2>gashed by opposing pass catching running back second most targets,

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 2>third most receptions. I think this is a possible win

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 2>for the Lions at home. I think they're gonna get

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 2>off the schneid here and find a way to beat

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 2>a Bengals team that still has troubles Dan on that

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 2>offensive line, Dan Campbell gets that defense fighting Jared Goff.

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully Hockinson is able to play and can be effective.

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I like the Lions here. That's a lot of points

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 2>to be laying with a Bengals team on the road.

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 2>They have played well, the defense has played well, so again,

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 2>I like the under here, but I'm not at the

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 2>point where I'm laying points with the Bengals on the

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 2>road yet, not against the team that will respond positively

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 2>to that Dan Campbell press conference after the loss last week.

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>This strikes me as a game where the public is

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be more on the Bengals and the sharp

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>betterers are going to be more on the Lions, right

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>because as long as you are getting that hook, there's

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be value with that on lines at home.

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Who again, as you mentioned, they play their butts off

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 1>all right. They may not have the talent right now.

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Their offensive line has been decimated another injury a wide

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>receiver right now with quint Stivas and the collar bone,

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>but they have enough.

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Sort of wherewithal I think to keep this game close.

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you are getting overfield goal out of curiosity,

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>do you think, because I'm assuming right now, that when

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you're going to count the number of bets that come in,

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be heavily on the Bengals. When you're

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna count the money, it's going to be closer to

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty to fifty, maybe even lean the Lions. Do you

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>think the Lion stays at above the field goal? Do

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you think there's any possibility of the books putting it down,

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in which case it's better to grab it now.

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the bets are probably about two to one to

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals right now, but the Lions are getting the

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 2>majority of the money. Of course, I love those situations

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.199
<v Speaker 2>where the majority of bets are going one way and

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the line moves in the favor of those people that

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 2>are betting, because it sort of gives you an idea,

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 2>if Vegas has an idea how this is going to go.

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 2>But the Lions three and two against the spread despite

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 2>not having a win and two and zero against the

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 2>spread at home. Those bets are going to come in

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 2>on the Bengals. But I like the underdo here grabbing

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 2>the points.

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Love it.

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Texans are visiting the Coults. Killer for the Colt I

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>feel so bad right the Cults. The Cults are laying

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half here at home against the Texans.

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Total is low forty two and a half. What do

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 3>you think?

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like the Colts. The Cults are gonna make

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 2>some noise in this division when all is said and done.

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 2>I remember seeing Dan beginning of the year, like ninety

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 2>five percent of the bets in that AFC South were

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 2>going on the Titans. It was almost like a FATA

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 2>comp play that the Titans are going to win the division.

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 2>I still think the Cults are going to have something

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.199
<v Speaker 2>to say about it. That was a tough, tough loss

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 2>last night. Yeah, they found some things. Jonathan Taylor's over

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 2>under proper receiving yards is twelve and a half. He

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 2>goes right away, goes seventy three yards right to start

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 2>the game.

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 3>I love it.

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yeah, they've been Michael Pittman should do some things.

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 2>And I also believe in something I call the law

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 2>of efforts. So the Texans really came out against the Patriots.

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 2>They gave it there all. They almost had that game won.

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Now they have to go on the road against the

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 2>division rival that's going to be angry, that has not

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 2>won a lot of games to start the year, that's

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 2>having a disappointing season. This one reeks to me to

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 2>be a blowout. I understand Davis Mills played well. I

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 2>think they can scheme something for Brandon Cooks. This is

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 2>a cult win, I think comfortably by double digits. I

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>know I have to lay a lot of points, but

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna do that here With Indianapolis.

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>This is interesting to me, Mike, because of the fact

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>that I think there's probably a line of thought out

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>there that just said the Colts not only are they

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be on a short week, of course, but

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>they just got their guts ripped out in like the

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>most painful way. Pageant you might be thinking they might mail.

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's one in four at this point. The

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that you're talking about the division is fantastic actually

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.959
<v Speaker 1>just for discussion points. But you think that despite that,

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>despite the short week, they are gonna come out here

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and make a statement in conjunction with the fact that

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the Texans probably poured their heart and soul into that

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>game against the Patriots and maybe a due for a

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a letdown.

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Dan, I've seen it before. I think Frank Reich is

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 2>a solid coach. If this was a situation like Jacksonville

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 2>with Urban Meyer, no way. But I think Frank Reich

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 2>is a good coach. They come home, He's going to

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 2>have this team ready. They're not going to mail it in,

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 2>and they've started to unleash Jonathan Taylor. Paris Cambo was

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 2>involved as well. Moley Cox at a couple of receptions,

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 2>I think this is a surprise. I know most people

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 2>will grab the points. To me, I was a little

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 2>surprised that it was high, but then I realized, I

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 2>like the Colts. I feel like they're almost tempting you

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 2>to take the Texans. Yeah, Texans almost beat the Patriots,

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 2>so they can certainly cover ten. I'm gonna go the

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 2>other way. It reminds me of the Washington Buffalo game

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 2>from a couple weeks ago, when everyone was wondering what's

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 2>wrong with Josh Allen. That line was nine and a

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 2>half and then the Bills ended up blowing him out.

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 2>I think the Colts have a big game here on Sunday.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love it actually, And I love what you're

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>saying because when you do look at the line, you

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>do say this is a you have to take the

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Texans on this line like that, that's what it's telling.

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And whenever you see something like that, you're like, Okay,

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I probably don't need to be taking the Texans. And

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>again with the Colts, even with all of that, there

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>are so many positives that you could have taken away.

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Rodrigo Blanket Ship got hurt in the game

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>or early on in the game. If he's not hurt,

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>they win that game. They suffered a massive amount of

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>injuries just as that game went on on defense and

0:14:57.920 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. Maybe they hold the ford of that,

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>so it's not as if it was a pure choke

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>job like they obviously could have. And Carson Wentz like

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>looked fully healthy. Jonathan Taylor is running extremely well. Now

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to buy into this and it's making me

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a little annoyed. So let's get to the next game,

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>which is the Chiefs visiting Washington. The Chiefs are laying

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>seven on the road. The total fifty five and a half,

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, just came across the wire as we

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>were recording this that Clyde Edwards Hilaire. We knew he

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>was going to be out, but he's officially been placed

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>on injured reserve, so he's gonna be out for at

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>least three weeks. God Chiefs saying.

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Seven desperate time for Kansas City. Here. They are in

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 2>last place in the AFC West. Go figure that after

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 2>five weeks they are one in four against the spread.

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna take the Chiefs in a desperation situation. Look, Washington,

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 2>I think could be a lot better than their two

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 2>and three record if they had a different quarterback. Taylor

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Heineke is fine. He's a backup. He's doing what he can,

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 2>but he is sort of the issue here. One of

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 2>the most disappointing units, I would say in the NFL

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 2>has been Washington's defense. I expected a very big performance

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 2>against the Saints. That it was a limited Saints team,

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Winston conservative game plan, coming off a loss to the Giants,

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I expected them to play well. I was disappointed. They're

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 2>going to give up deep passes and bombs to the Saints.

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 2>What's gonna happen with the Chiefs. They need to win

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 2>in the worst way. I would like it if this

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 2>number can get under that seven, stays under that seven,

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 2>because of course it's a great teaser play. You can

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 2>argue teasing this with the Bucks. Both of those games down.

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 2>But let's keep in mind here before we bury the

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs or think that maybe they're a notch below their

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 2>slate of opponents that have started this year. They started

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 2>with the Browns, who are legitimate contender, at home, and

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 2>they won that game. They played at the Ravens, another

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 2>AFC contender, and lost by one. The Chargers, another really

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 2>solid team and a contender for the Super Bowl, lost

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 2>by six. Then they hung forty two on Philly, and

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 2>then they lost to Buffalo, who may be the best

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 2>team in the NFL right now. I think this is

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 2>a King of the Little People situation with the Chiefs.

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 2>I think they go in here and cover it. I

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 2>do not see how Washington can generate enough offense and look,

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 2>if their defense was going to show up and change

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 2>the script, they would have done it against a limited

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Saints team. I don't like this game at all. I

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 2>think the Chiefs role let me.

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Ask you something.

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>You've got a Chiefs offense that is almost certainly going

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to come out and just go ape right, like that's

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>just they know they have to because their defense is terrible.

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>But their defense is terrible. The total is an astronomical

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty five and a half. Is that a stay away

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for you? And do you expect it to probably hang

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>around there for most of the week.

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it'll hang around And I don't like going

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 2>over high numbers. But Washington's defense twenty eighth and DVA

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 2>overall ninth against the run, twenty ninth against the pass.

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 2>So here we have a Washington defense that struggles against

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 2>the pass against the desperate Patrick Mahomes led team, and

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs defense, which is the worst for football outsiders

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 2>in DVA. I don't see the contrarian play here. I

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 2>don't see how Washington's defense, who could not stop the

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Bills and could not stop the Saints, is now going

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 2>to stop the Chiefs. So they're going to have to

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 2>score Antonio Gibson's explosive, so is Terry McCain. So I

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 2>lean to the over there. If I'm gonna have to

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 2>make a pick.

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>So do I, which makes me feel disgusting because I

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>don't ever like to go into these high numbers. But

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>give me, I don't care what it is at this

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>point because you're right, you got and you mentioned it.

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Mike Washington's defense.

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Probably like I mean, I know people talk about it

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, and I deal with it from a fantasy perspective,

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but probably like the most disappointing I mean overall unit,

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:25.959
<v Speaker 1>just that there is, like this was supposed to be

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>like a top unit right now, a unit that you

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>faded generally speaking when you were betting against them and

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy, and it is neither. You pick on them

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. Skim's gonna be fun to watch. I think

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be a lot of fireworks. And I agree

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>with you if I have to go to over fifty

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>five and a half, I've never bet a spread over

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that high, Like I just I can't. Like it's very

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>difficult for me, but I would if I were somebody

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>other than me. Chargers are visiting the Ravens now who

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Chargers are getting three in this game in the totals fifty.

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 3>One and a half. Real interesting one here? What do

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 3>you think? Like?

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the Browns brought a different level of physicality

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 2>and the overall rushing attack against the Chargers. I think

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Staley's going to adjust to that. I like the

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.719
<v Speaker 2>Chargers here going on the road. Ravens had a big comeback.

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 2>They have a short week. This Charger team is very,

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 2>very strong. I know the Ravens are gonna pound the ball,

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 2>and if you look on the surface, you're gonna say, well,

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 2>the Browns just ran all over the Chargers. What are

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens gonna do? I think their secondary can limit

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Marquise Brown. I think that Staley will learn from the

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 2>Browns game, which were they were lucky to escape, and

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I think they will come out here and continue. The

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Ravens defense does have trouble with big plays. This Chargers

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 2>offense is at a different level. We saw what happened

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 2>with Jonathan Taylor with pass catching running backs and now

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 2>here comes Austin Eckler. I like the Chargers, even though

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 2>you would look on the surface and say the Browns

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 2>just put all those numbers up. Ravens will do better

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 2>not coming off a short week. I like the Chargers

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 2>to went now right, and I would love the points

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 2>there as well.

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll take them on the money line.

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>For sure, because I do think the Chargers are actually

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna win this game, and again, it has all the

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>makings of a put aside the public sort of thing.

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Ravens have to be completely after that win,

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>like win great, like fantastic, but you've got to be

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>absolutely drained after that win. And the raven like, their

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>defense is nothing really that you need to be afraid

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of anymore. And even if it were, the Chargers are

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously a strong enough unit that they can attack anyone.

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.719
<v Speaker 1>I worry a little bit about how vulnerable the Chargers

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>are on the ground, But again, the Ravens are sort

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of more like they're putting their running backs on the

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>block at this point, like in real life, they're just like,

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever, we're gonna have Lamar throw the ball

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>or have Lamar run.

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you.

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think, by the way that this ends at three?

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Like I honestly I expected it to be within a

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>field goal. And maybe it's because the fact that Ravens won,

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, in such a dramatic fashion last night, But

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I expected this to be within a field goal. So

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's gonna move either way? Or do

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you think it basically sits here at three.

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I expect the money to come in on the

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Ravens because betters tend to have that recency bias, you know,

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 2>you just it's vividness to you. You saw it last

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 2>night Lamar Jackson and Scott Fishbell had like sixty four points.

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 2>He broke the whole thing. So I expect that the

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Ravens will get money and the Ravens will get bets.

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 2>And I wouldn't be surprised if we see Vegas. As

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 2>we said, adjust that line and sort of make it lower.

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 2>The Chargers are very live. They have no trouble going

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 2>on the road. Everyone talks about the home field advantage,

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 2>which may be an oxymoron, but I like this team.

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>They're very solid, they're very well coached, and they have

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 2>no problem with big play. Who's hotter than Mike Williams

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 2>right now as a wide wide receiver two in fantasy.

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 2>And we're forgetting about Keenan Allen, who will dominate that

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 2>intermediate short to intermediate area against this Ravens team. I

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 2>expect both defenses to play well, go towards the under,

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 2>but I will grab the points with the Chargers. Like

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 2>you said, money line is a great bet yep.

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Packers are visiting the Bears. The Packers are laying four

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half total forty five.

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 3>What do you think?

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Packers have won nine of the last ten against Chicago.

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Chicago is thirty first in pass offense DVOWA. They really

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 2>struggle justin fields hyper extended. D may be a little

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 2>banged up. I expect him to play here come the

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.959
<v Speaker 2>Bears without David Montgomery with a limited justin fields, the

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Packers defense should play very well. And what I think

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 2>dan is without Vic Fangio. When they've played four games

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 2>here Packers and Bears. Without Fangio as a defensive coordinator,

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay is four and zero and the last three

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 2>games besides the opener in twenty nineteen, they have won

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 2>by an average of seventeen and a half points while

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 2>averaging themselves thirty eight points. I don't think the Bears

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 2>was a nice road win Khalil Mack revenge game against

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders that all the chaos going on. I don't

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 2>think they changed the script here with justin fields. Great

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 2>staff from JJ Zacharison on FanDuel today. DeVante Adams has

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 2>forty five targets in the last three weeks. The entire

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 2>Bears team has fifty seven targets. Packers are four and

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 2>one against the spread. I think they'll contain fields here.

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 2>I also love the under. The Bears are four and

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 2>one to the under. Yeah, Green Bay plays at a

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 2>very slow pace. This reeks to me to be like

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 2>sort of a Browns Bears game from a couple weeks ago.

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 2>Packers cover under as well with the total.

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 3>I agree.

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I bet both now and I probably will usually Mike,

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I do it during the podcast. That's when I said

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>something that I like, I'm gonna wait out of just

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>sheer respect for you.

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 3>I completely.

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Bears, they you know what I think,

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>justin fields. Unless I'm either make some numbers. It might

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>be seventeen twenty seventeen or twenty seventeen twenty either way

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>for pass attempts in his three starts right now, they

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>have no interest in passing the ball. And he's banged up.

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned, he is going to play. I agree

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>with the hyper extension, but he's banged up. The receiver's

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.959
<v Speaker 1>doing nothing. You know, again, from a fantasy standpoint, everybody

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>get really excited about Darnell Mooney. I didn't get it

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>because there's just I understand that when Fields does throw,

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>he pushes the ball down the field, but he doesn't

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>want to throw.

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 3>That's just what it is. That's not how they want

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 3>to run their offense. They want to rely on their defense.

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Which is good, not great though, because you can't exploit

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that secondary pretty easily that Monta Adams can exploit any secondary,

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>but especially you know in the slot.

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 3>They can do some things there.

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.239
<v Speaker 1>But the Packers as well, coming off you know, a

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>tough game against the Bengals, they're not that explosive anymore

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>offensively or anything like that. So I agree with you

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that I lean the under and I will take the points.

0:23:58.200 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you have to run to bed at

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>four and a half, Like the move is not going

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to be someplace that I think is going to put

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you off it either way, right, it's not going to

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>get to seven, it's not going to get to three.

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're fine to wait if you want.

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>But I'm in total agreement with you on the sides.

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 2>On both the Bears are going to have to force turnovers,

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 2>and Rodgers is just the king. He milks that clock

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 2>to the very end. You have Damian Williams and Khalil

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Herbert who are trying to do a decent job in

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 2>the backfield. But it's not the same as having Montgomery

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Alan Robinson mi Ia right now. There's no chemistry with

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 2>him and fields. It just seems like they would have

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 2>to force a lot of turnovers and I don't see

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 2>that happening with an intra division game here where Rodgers

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 2>are very used to the Chicago defense.

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's got to be something flugy realistically for

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the Bears to be able to win this game or

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>really keep it that close.

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 3>So I'm in total agreeing with you.

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And again, it's not a game in my opinion that

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to run out to do something now, because

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect.

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 3>It to move all that much. I think the numbers are.

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Fine, but I'm definitely with you on both the side

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and the total. The Rams are visiting the Giants, the

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Rams are laying ten and a half and the totals

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 1>forty seven and a half. Obviously, we have questions about

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>here about the Giants as to who's going to start

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback, which receivers are going to be healthy. You've

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously already got Saquon Barkley out we know Kenny Galladay

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is out, So what do you do here with the

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>line that's over ten points?

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Ten and a half here at forty seven and a half.

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Really tough one for me. Dan, It's to stay away.

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 2>If I had to lean, I would lean towards taking

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 2>the points at home. This Giant team plays hard. Daniel

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Jones can do some things as a mobile quarterback that

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 2>can throw off the defense. The Rams are just playing

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 2>at a different level though. Stafford and that offense are clicking.

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 2>They struggled last week, but they found a way to

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 2>get a win on the road Cooper Cup. There's a

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of receiving options, so I think the Rams win.

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:38.679
<v Speaker 2>I have no interest in taking the Giants on a

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 2>deep money line or something. It's just that number is

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 2>right there. If that number was seven, I would like

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 2>it eight even, but ten is an awful lot. Jones

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 2>can do a backdoor cover lead them down there in

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 2>garbage time. I don't want any part of that. Kadarius

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Tony looks fantastic, So it's a stay away from me.

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:55.959
<v Speaker 2>The line is a really good one set here by Vegas.

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 3>It's too many question marks for me there.

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with you, like there is just there's

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>no path that I see, absent multiple major injuries for

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 1>the Giants to be able to win this game. But

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it's ten and a half, Like I have no interest

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in taking the Giants like, there's just no chance. There

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 1>are no circumstances under WHI I would feel comfortable regardless

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of the spread. But it's just too much for me

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to go. Really interesting game here, a game that everybody's

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be watching. The Cardinals are visiting the Browns. The

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Browns home favorites two and a half, the total fifty

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half. What do you think, Mike, I.

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 2>Love the Browns. I think the Browns have a style

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 2>that's very unique in today's NFL. Everyone's doing the short,

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 2>quick passing attack. They are gonna pound that ball, They're

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.959
<v Speaker 2>gonna go strong, and then Baker Mayfield's going to make

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 2>enough place to win the game. The Arizona's defense is

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 2>legit fourth overall in DVOA, but thirteenth in run defense.

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 2>That's bad against the Browns, who when they come home,

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 2>they are going to be an issue. They just pound

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 2>that ball down your throat. Second in volume to the

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Saints as well. Kyler Murray was much less effective last

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 2>year when he got injured, and what was interesting is

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 2>he had one rushing yard last week. The key to

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 2>this game, I think is the health status of center

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Rodney Hudson, who came over from the Raiders. He's done

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 2>a fantastic job for the Cardinals. When he came out

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 2>of that game, Bosa came in hit Kyler Murray. You

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 2>saw him on the on the bench moving his arm

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 2>trying to get it loose. That to me means they're

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 2>going to have a conservative offensive game plan, which is

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 2>what happened last year. If you look at his box

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 2>scores once he had a little bit of an injury,

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 2>his rushes went down nineteen yards, thirty one yards, fifty yards.

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 2>When he's rushing a lot is when their offense is clicking.

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Baker Mayfield rumors about his shoulder, I think that was

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Stefanski trying to do some some questionable things there

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 2>to throw us off because he looked fine, especially on

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 2>the Hail Mary. Bets are about fifty to fifty, but

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 2>the heavy money is on the Browns. Sign of a

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 2>sharp play. I really like the Browns here.

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised, I guess a little bit. I mean,

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a three out there at Fandle by the way,

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>which is fine. I mean that no, I get it,

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but that's I was surprised a little bit about it.

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought that it would be maybe you pick him,

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, because I think the I guess, you know, the.

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Public is whatever.

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought the public would be all over the Cardinals

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>if I've no Cardinals Kyler Murray.

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 3>We love it, so exciting, so explosive getting points.

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But I agree with you. The Browns are great. I

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:11.959
<v Speaker 1>mean they should have won that game against the Chargers.

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 1>They are extraordinarily well coached. They are Their defense is

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>very regardless of all the points they gave up last week,

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>their defense is highly above average.

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Mayfield, you're right again.

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>We talked to doctor David Chow, who's on our fantasy

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>podcast every Friday, and he said, this is nothing like.

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>The injury to Mayfield is nothing like. It's his left shoulder.

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a harness, totally fine, yet a bad day. It

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really the shoulder, and he looked fantastic here against it.

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 3>I am in agreeing with you.

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I wish Baker and Odell Beckham Junior could get on

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the same page a little bit. But it's it's kind

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of irrelevant really really for their offense. They're playing extremely well,

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>So go ahead.

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a concern, and I'm looking for negative regression here.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the Cardinal should have lost to the Vikings,

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 2>and then if Jimmy Garoppolo plays that game instead of

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Trey Lance against the Niners, they probably lose at home there.

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 2>So there's two games at home. They probably had a

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 2>path to having two losses. I think we have the

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 2>regression here. The Browns are good folks. They are legitimate

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl contender, and they have a style with Chubb

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 2>and Hunt that no one else has.

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>No, they're a really, really good team and they're fun

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to watch. So I'm with you on that. The Cowboys

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>now are visiting New England. They are laying four points.

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 3>And the total is fifty and a half.

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 2>What do you think give me the points? With Belichick,

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 2>I said the same thing when they ended up playing

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Tampa Bay. The book said that was the game they

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 2>needed the absolute most besides like a Super Bowl where

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 2>all the money is being bet. Right now, the Patriots

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 2>back against the wall, coming off a game that they

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 2>almost lost to the Texans. Belichick scheme over the Cowboys.

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys have been fantastic and they probably should be undefeated

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 2>except for that opening game against Tampa Bay. But you're

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna give me points of Bill Belichick at home, I

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 2>will grab them. I think the Pats can find a

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 2>way here to maybe win the game. You know they're

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 2>going to shut down the top option Amari Cooper was

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 2>injured at the end of that game last week, so

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 2>we don't know how that's going to go. You know

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>their run defense will be solid. I like the underheat

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 2>and I love the points of Belichick. It worked well

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 2>for me against Tampa Bay. I'm going back to it

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 2>in Foxborough.

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm I don't know how I feel about the spread.

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want the Cowboys, I can tell you that,

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>but I love the under. I love the under at

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty and a half for sure. I would take it

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>now because wherever it's going to go. But this strikes

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>me as a game that's going to see way fewer

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>points than anybody expects.

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:19.719
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, the public loves the Cowboys, that love their offense,

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but you're right, they've got some issues right now. You

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>know Belichick is going to have a scheme that's going

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to work and again the New England offense like it.

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>They don't try to be explosive. They don't want to

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:32.719
<v Speaker 1>be explosive. They want to kind of control everything. Make

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it that way.

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 3>I love the under at fifty and a half. I

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 3>was surprise that was that high.

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Raiders. Some turmoil with the Raiders

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>visiting the Broncos. The Broncos are laying three and a half.

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 3>The totals forty four.

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 2>What do you think if you look at this the

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Denver Denver Raider game had usually gone the last couple

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 2>of years for the home team. The Raiders had a

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 2>run there where they were upsetting teams on the road. Again,

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to trust the better coach. I'm going to

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 2>trust the one that's prepared. Vic Fangio Courtland Sutton into

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 2>that game last week against the Steelers. He was a

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 2>little banged up. I wasn't sure. He looked fine. I

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 2>think he gets this defense rolling. This is a Raiders

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 2>team that's in turmoil. If you want to say there's

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 2>some benefit emotionally from firing Gruden, I don't think so.

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 2>I think they were doing very well. The situation happened.

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 2>He had to be let go. I understand that, but

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 2>it's not the win one sort of for the new coach,

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 2>which could happen in Jacksonville because that's drawn out. I

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 2>just think the Broncos are better prepared. Teddy Bridgewater against

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the spread historically has been fantastic, especially at home. Denver

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 2>has the home field advantage. I'm rolling with the Broncos

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 2>here against the Raider team that right now is in

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of chaos.

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I look for any reason, especially relatively early in

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the season. I know it's not real early, but to

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>back the Broncos at home early in the season, four

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>teams have fully gotten their conditioning all set and everything

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>like that, I agree with you. I like the Broncos

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>here in a game that they fought hard. I did

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>think the Steelers were gonna win that game last week.

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 3>I did have them. But I think that this is

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 3>a game again.

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>You're right that this is a bounce back sort of

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>spot for them now after winning the three and then

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>losing a couple, I think they bounced back here and again.

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders right now are just in such this array,

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, their offense does not look anything

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>like it looked early on in the season.

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Derek.

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Carr has looked sort of skittish a little bit in

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the pocket and everything like that. So I agree with

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you here. I like the Broncos. Let's go to the

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks visiting the Steelers.

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Probably not the.

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Game that the NFL really envisioned it would be at

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>this point when they made that Sunday Night Football. But

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers are laying four and a half and the

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>total is forty two and a half.

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 2>I grabbed it right away when it was three, and

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 2>now it's climbed. I'm all over Pittsburgh. I think they

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 2>turned a corner. Look if this was Russell Wilson, this

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 2>is a spot that the Seahawks could step up. I

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 2>think they turned a corner. Juju is out, I understand that.

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it streamlines the receiving options. I think pat

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Freyermuth is gonna have a big game here, and Najay

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Harris has just been clicking. That was a good Denver

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 2>run defense, yes, and he ended up scorching them last week.

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I think at prime time at home, Geno Smith, I'm sorry,

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 2>I just don't see Gino coming in. I don't think

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 2>the Seahawks Dan can win. So if that's the case.

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Am I going to debate over four points or three points?

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I am not. I think the Steelers are starting to

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 2>get it going. You know, their run defense is going

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 2>to be solid, which means they'll probably have a conservative

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 2>game plan with Gino here that's not going to work.

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 2>They could hit a couple deep shots, but Gino's also

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 2>a radic got picked off to end the game at

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 2>the end against the Rams. I can't take Gino on

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 2>the road. Give me the Steelers who are trending in

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 2>the right direction now primetime at home with a solid

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 2>defense that should stifle the Seahawks rushing attack.

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this was This really was something where it did

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>feel like I don't want to call it a get

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>right game because the Steelers have plenty of issues, but

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Nagie Harris was able to succeed and

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>looks so good running the ball against at Denver defens

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>made me feel a little more just excited about him

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and the team generally, because the offensive line has had

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>so many issues. You're right, you do is out for

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the season pretty much. I don't think it matters. He

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't doing much anyway as long as Chase Claypole and

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Deante Johnson are healthy, and again, Pat Fryer, I would

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>love it because we'd love to see the breakout happen.

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And for the Seahawks, look kudos to Gino who stepped

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in and looked really good. Step again, but I think

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:11.439
<v Speaker 1>right now, you're going to give a team Steelers at

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 1>home on a primetime game a week to prepare for

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Gino Smith. They're not going to be able to run

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball they've got obviously the pass catchers and the

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Steelers are vulnerable through the year. But I think again,

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>with Gino there, I agree with you. I will take

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it at four and a half right now. It's at

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>five at my book. But again, I'm not going to

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>qubble necessarily with that at that but kudos to you

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>for grabbing it. At three Monday night football, last game

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of the week, the Bills are visiting the Titans. The

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Bills are laying five and a half and the total

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:39.959
<v Speaker 1>is fifty four.

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 3>What do you think?

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think there's a little bit of letdown here.

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I like Tennessee at home getting those points, so that

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 2>five to five and a half number always sets bells

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 2>off in my head because it's sort of a no

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 2>man's land there. The Bills look great. They beat the Chiefs.

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 2>They struggled last year they came into Tennessee. I think

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 2>it was a Monday night or Sunday night game, or

0:34:57.680 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe it was postponed. There was a postponeing because of

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 2>a COVID issue, and they really struggled. I think the

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Titans defense has been rough this year, but I do

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.280
<v Speaker 2>think with Derrick Henry, they have the type of script

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 2>that can frustrate the Bills. I think the Titans keep

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 2>this game close. I think Mike Vrabel has Tennessee ready.

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Five is a lot of points. I expect the Bets

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 2>to pour in on Buffalo here, but with aj Brown

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 2>looking a little bit better, maybe Julio Jones is back.

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Tannehill's a mobile quarterback and you have the big

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 2>dog back there running the ball into that Bills line.

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 2>They just need a couple turnovers. Five as a frisky number,

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna take it with the underdog Titans.

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Yet, despite the fact that the Titans obviously are coming

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:36.759
<v Speaker 1>off a nice win here, there is a lot of

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>negativity around the team because they just don't look you know.

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>It's basically a you've got Derek Henry and nothing else,

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>and Ryan Tannehill hasn't really been gone because they haven't

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>had the wide receivers and even when AJ Brown has

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>been healthy, he hasn't quote unquote produced from you know,

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>at least a fantasy standpoint or whatever.

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:52.359
<v Speaker 3>But I agree with you.

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a great spot for the Titans

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 1>with the Bills coming off that you know, enormous win

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, and they're a great team. Okay, their defense

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>is played better than I expected to see them necessarily,

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but there is no defense right now that can stop

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry and I think hopefully Julio Jones. Again, this

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>is the third week I think for Julio Jones. He

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't placed on injured reserve. That means that they probably

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>expected him to be able to return at this point,

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and if they have him, then it really is a

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:17.280
<v Speaker 1>difference maker.

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 3>But I agree with you. Again, it's a weird number.

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:21.439
<v Speaker 1>And again, you know, I talk about this with Matt

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Parult a lot, like the favorites at five and a

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 1>half always a little weird.

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 3>He always thinks that like the four and.

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>A half to five and a half is Vegas, basically

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>being like, oh, we don't really know, let's just see

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it out, yes, right, but I like the Titans in

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 1>this spot as well, and again I do generally favor

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the Titans overall.

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 3>All right, this was great.

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you rolling with the punches, man, I know

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd originally wanted to do this on Monday. I appreciate

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you being able to squeeze us in here and to

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 1>remind everybody where they can find more of you and

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 1>your work.

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 2>You can follow me on Twitter at Randel Ran. I

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 2>have a work up for the Action Network working on

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 2>college basketball previews. Also last word on NFL. I do

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 2>some work for betting pros. Just all over the place,

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 2>just working away here, loving the NFL. It's a great

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 2>time of year, Dan. I appreciate you, myke.

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Youar superstar. I'm really glad we were finally able to talk.

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I look forward to doing it again soon. In the meantime,

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody enjoyed the rest of your week. Joe will be

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>back with the College Football Podcast with Bagman. I'll be

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>back on Thursday with our best bets. I will talk

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to you then,