WEBVTT - Trump Weighs Imposing Copper Import Tariffs in Weeks, Not Months

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily reporting from the magazine

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 2>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 2>and trends shaping today's complex economy, plus global business finance

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Daily Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Steneveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>President Donald Trump is getting ready to renounce some auto

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>tariffs that is expected to come at four pm today.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>We heard that from the White House spokesperson. This would

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>be a move that would certainly escalate his fight with

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>global trading partners ahead of a broader tariff push next week.

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>We're expecting comments from the White House at four o'clock.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 3>We will bring the President's comments to you live as

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 3>we do get them. In the meantime, US tariffs on

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 3>copper imports could be coming within several weeks, months earlier

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 3>than the deadline for a decision. Also, according to people

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 3>familiar with the matter, coppor trading in New York rose

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 3>to a record as a result with a tariff round up.

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Back with US is Bloomberg News. Medals and Mining, heavy

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Machinery reporter Jodo who joins us here in the studio.

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Usually I have this little chart Joe that keeps me

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 3>up to date with the tariffs, the who, the what,

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 3>the where and the when. Yeah, but fortunately we got

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 3>you in the studio today, and that's much better than

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 3>my little cheat sheet.

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 4>It's it's a lot, right, And it's like even like

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 4>if you're on the weekends hanging out with like friends

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 4>who don't care about markets, they're like, oh, tariffs, do

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 4>you want to talk about the tariffs? I mean that's

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 4>how it's just become like part of the conversation in

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 4>the US right is like one thing everybody knows is happening,

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, beyond the signal story that happened the other

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 4>day is terroriffs.

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Well to that point, we see it hit consumer sentiment.

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 3>And when you see consumers cite this stuff as the

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 3>reason that they're concerned, you know, it's reaching a level

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>that typically financial news doesn't reach when it comes to

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 3>everyday people.

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I think, listen, this is where or it's

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 4>important for us when we're doing these stories to kind

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 4>of keep in mind, like what is the consumer impact

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 4>so Copper, for example, this this report that we had

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 4>last night we've been working on now for a little bit.

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 4>We had started hearing, Wow, actually, these these tariffs might

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 4>be coming sooner than expected. Now to put that into

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 4>context is a little wonky. When we got steel and

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.519
<v Speaker 4>aluminum terraffs in twenty eighteen, the President of the United

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 4>States announced in twenty seventeen that he was doing the

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 4>so called Section two thirty two investigations to put tariffs

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 4>on steel and aluminum imports because they had feared that

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 4>the import market was impacting national security. At the time,

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 4>like nobody had heard of this. Like when we first

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 4>talked about this, you guys might not remember it.

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I do.

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 4>It was like, what is section two thirty two, and

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.959
<v Speaker 4>how can we claim this thing? Well, now it's very

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 4>well known and the markets know it very well, and

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump knows it very well. And what Donald Trump

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 4>knows is that Section two thirty two is not only

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 4>an executive power that he has, but one that he

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 4>implemented and one that was tried by the courts, and

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 4>the courts said last time around, Yeah, all of this

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:05.679
<v Speaker 4>is legal. This is exactly the power that he has.

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 4>We talked about this when he re implemented the Section

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 4>two thirty two aluminum and steal tarriffs just last month

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 4>when he put the twenty five percent on or earlier

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 4>this month, and that brings us to copper. Copper was

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 4>not among any of the investigations in the first term.

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 4>And when Trump brought up that he wanted to do

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 4>copper taroffs, he said it. He said it when he

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 4>was talking about the Canada Mexico stuff. I know we're

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 4>getting into it, but he said it in his quote

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 4>unquote State of the Union address where he said we're

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 4>going to do copper as well. It was a weird

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 4>one because he had just announced an investigation in Section

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 4>two thirty two on copper, but he said in the conversation, well,

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 4>we're going to do these terrorists.

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 5>Look, oh, he did.

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 4>He did right, which was a bit of a slip

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 4>of the tongue because he still needs to wait for

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 4>his Commerce department to do the investigation. The investigation goes

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 4>two hundred and seventy days long. But we've learned from

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 4>our sources that the market should expect this to come

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 4>much sooner. In fact, what our sources were telling us

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 4>was you're going to hear some sort of decision within weeks,

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 4>not months the market was expecting months. What month exactly unclear,

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 4>but Goldman Sachs had been saying we expect a twenty

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 4>five percent tariff on copper sometime at the end of

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 4>the year. Is kind of how they phrased it in

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 4>notes to their clients earlier this week.

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's a lot earlier.

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be a lot earlier according to our sources.

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>So what's the impact of that, And remind us, forgive us,

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>because I know you're so good at like reminding everybody

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>for this in this example, like what the copper market is,

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>what's the US exposure to what we do? Remind us,

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>so what it is and what impact it might so have.

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 4>We consume one point eight million tons of copper per

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 4>year in the United States. That copper is one of

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 4>the most ubigulous metals. It's used in everything your iPhones,

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 4>your laptops, these microphones, the wiring in your house, the

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 4>wiring in your car. It's everywhere you touch copper at

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 4>some point every day in your life. So in terms

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 4>of tonnage, it's not the size of steel that it

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 4>is quite important. So it's one point eight million tons.

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 4>Half of that we import, so it's about nine hundred

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 4>thousand tons we require to import. What really happened in

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 4>the market is you need to remember demand across the

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 4>economy is lackluster. So it's not like we're having this

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 4>big explosion demand in the United States for appliances, for cars, like,

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 4>everything's just kind of there. But we have seen a

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.119
<v Speaker 4>trade happening in the market. The rest of the world

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 4>understands that there could be a twenty five percent tariff

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 4>put on copper in the United States. Well, there's copper

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 4>all over the world. So traders have been playing this

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 4>by saying the copper price in the United States is

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 4>about eleven five hundred dollars per ton. In London it's

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 4>about ten thousand dollars per ton, So why wouldn't you

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 4>just take that physical metal, ship it into the United

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 4>States and catch the ARB window. And that has been

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 4>the story now for weeks. Well now everybody's realizing that

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.359
<v Speaker 4>there might be an earlier end date for when you

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 4>need to get in under the terrace. And that's what

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the bank analysts were reporting on today

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 4>was listen, if there's a shorter timeline for when President

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Trump expects to announce the tariff, then that ARB should

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 4>eventually close, right, Like if the ARB is at like

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 4>nineteen percent spread, right, then eventually twenty five percent is

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 4>what the spread would be, and then the ARB is done.

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Joe, you said, forgive me. You said, half of the

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 3>copper that we use in the US we import, We

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 3>get half of it from the US.

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so about half of what we consume is produced

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 4>US ethnic domestic exactly, and then the other half comes

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 4>from abroad.

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 3>So is there enough copper supply in the US. No,

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 3>to satisfy it. Want to satisfy the needs absolutely. The

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 3>reason I ask is because the whole idea with these tariffs,

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 3>at least from the President's perspective, is to bring commerce

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 3>into the United States back to the United States. In

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 3>this case, it's not like you can start producing more

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 3>or extracting more copper from the US to nicate the

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 3>need port copper, right. It doesn't seem like it has

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 3>the same mechanisms that some of the other tariffs that

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 3>he's implemented or talked about implementing.

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 4>Have Yeah, it's a bit of a weird one. And

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.559
<v Speaker 4>we asked this question too, is like why has Trump

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 4>focused on copper and you know, One of the things

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 4>is like copper is technically kind of the make America

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 4>great again umbrella. Right, Like copper we were a great

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 4>we have been, we still are a great copper producing country,

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 4>but we used to be larger. The question becomes, can

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 4>you get the minds up and running and can you

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 4>get the processing facilities to a scale that you'd be

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 4>talking about to offset it. Honestly, I don't think the

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 4>discussion has been, oh well, let's just like completely, you know,

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 4>change the way production is in the United States. The

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 4>conversation has more just been let's do this because we should.

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 4>And listen, you know, Freeport mcmaran, Rio Tinto, like, there

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 4>are big names that operate in this inside this country,

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 4>and sure they'd probably be more than happy to start

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 4>doing a little more production, mine production, more processing production.

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 4>But you know, like at the same time, they're also

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 4>shipping into the United States.

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 5>All Right, I know there's going to be more to come.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>We know we could probably talk an hour with you,

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>but you're just going to have to hopefully come.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 5>Back tomorrow or something.

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Jojo, thank you, because it certainly is top of mind

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>for us. On this Wednesday, Bloomberg News, Metals and Mining

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Heavy Machinery reporter Jojoe joining us here in studio.

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Borers are piling into the global bond market, and what

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>they're looking to do is get some deals done ahead

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of US President Donald Trump's plans to impose global tariffs

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>on April second. You know, tariffs have been top of

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>mine once again today, so global bond investors really kind

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of looking to take advantage of this week's relative calm

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 1>in the market for today.

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 5>I was kind of like, I was thinking about this

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 5>when a relative, Tom Carrol, I know exactly. It was

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 5>kind of mellow for a while.

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 3>But the bomb market's mellow today.

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I guess I guess you could say I feel

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 5>like tik tik tik. We're waiting to see what's next.

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 3>We's with more. We got Rejief Sharma with us, managing

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 3>director of fixed Income Investments over at Key Private Bank.

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a division of the publicly held eighteen billion dollar

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 3>market cap bank Key Corp. Sixty billion dollars in assets

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 3>under management for Key Private Bank. Ree chief joins us

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 3>in the Bloomberg BusinessWeek studio. The fixed income market, we

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 3>know lots of moving parts. The headlines though, the developments

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 3>that you're following the most closely. What is it?

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 6>You know, there's been so much uncertainty in the market.

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 6>There's been this big push for you know, are we

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 6>having a growth scare? Is there going to be a

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 6>slow down in the economy? And what we're really looking

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 6>at here is this is the opportunity right now for

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 6>investors to look at asset allocation, how their portfolios look.

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 6>And that's where fixed income comes into play. When you

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 6>start seeing all this vola toady in the market, you

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 6>see most of them the equity side. We haven't seen

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 6>that level of voltodio on the fixed income side. So

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 6>it gives us a good all right.

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of specific metrics though, that you keep

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>an eye on, and I understand the low ball that

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, or the different volatility we're seeing in the

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>fixed income market. Is it though, FED policy, is it

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>tariff policy, Washington policy?

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 7>What is it?

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 5>Top of mind? You get up in the morning and

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 5>you're like, tell me what's going on.

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 6>It truly is all of the ebove because what ends

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 6>up happening is you get the tariff headline policy, which

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 6>is almost on a daily basis, that does spoof the market.

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 6>It causes a lot of uncertainty in the market. You

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 6>start seeing the effects in equities. What's really been interesting

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 6>is the credit markets. If you look at credit spreads,

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 6>they have been very well behaved, right, so they're not

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 6>screaming any signs of recession. They're not any sides of

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 6>a slowdown. That has actually become a nice barometer for

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 6>other investors' equity investors who look at as long as

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:47.599
<v Speaker 6>there's nothing wrong in the credit markets, we should be

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 6>okay in the equity market.

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 3>My instant Bloomberg is blowing up with people who want

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 3>to ask questions about fixed income to you, first one coming,

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 3>do you anticipate swelling from fixed income and that money

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>then going into equities?

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 6>I think right now, what we've seen in the past

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 6>is the money market funds have done very well when

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 6>they're getting good rates, and everybody expected that money to

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 6>go to the equity market, right, that didn't happen.

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 3>It's still money put that money still out there. It's

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 3>still out there. Do you see more coming from the

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 3>selling of fixed income or do you see it more

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 3>as like that cash and money market accounts is going

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 3>to move, So I.

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 6>Think it would be the cash of money markets accounts.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Where do you think it's going to go.

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 6>It'll probably go lockstep into fixed income first because right

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 6>now you're still getting corporate bonds that are very nice yields.

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 6>Right now you're getting blue chip companies that are trading

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 6>at very good income levels. So it makes a lot

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 6>of sense really because you can sleep at night without

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 6>worrying about it's just going to blow up my portfolio.

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>So is it corporates that you think see the flows

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>going into more so than sovereign or.

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 6>A lot of investment grade corporate bonds do extremely well

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 6>in this type of alto environment. What's really been happening?

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 6>These are really big, liquid, blue chip companies that offer

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 6>you quite a bit of income with their coupons. So

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 6>you're not talking how ye, we're not talking hy yo, okay,

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 6>talk high yield. I'd be very particular about what sectors

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 6>I want to invest in high yield. It would have

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 6>to align with the America first, agenda, So you would

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.319
<v Speaker 6>look at maybe manufacturing or energy being very advantageous in

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 6>high yield.

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 5>All right, but among the blue chips, where would you got.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 6>The blue chicks. You look blue chips, you look at

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 6>consumer staples, you're looking at energy, you're looking industrials, You're

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 6>looking at anything that promotes the initiatives of the Trump

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 6>organ Trump administration about getting growth America first, trying to

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 6>look at maybe deregulation, which will be very helpful for financials.

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 3>In terms of what your clients care about. Are they

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 3>more focused on yield or do they care about credit spreads?

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 6>Our clients care a lot more about yield as long

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 6>as you're getting yield. I think every investor has gotten

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 6>really accustomed at being in an environment years ago when

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 6>you weren't getting any yield and fixed income. Now you're

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 6>getting yield again, and you want your client the clients

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 6>really want that yield again. What's very interesting, however, is

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 6>you can get that yield in very high quality securities now,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 6>so you don't really have to go down the credit

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 6>rating spectrum to achieve that kind of yield.

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the risk goouls be President of the Chicago Fed

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>telling the Financial Times in an interview, the FED is

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>no longer on the golden path witnessed in twenty twenty

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 1>three and twenty twenty four. Fedead now entered a different

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>chapter where there's a lot of dust in the air,

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and he says he believes burn costs would be a

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>fair bit lower in twelve to eighteen months from now,

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>cautions it may take longer than anticipated for the next

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>cut because of economic uncertainty. How does maybe it being

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of dust in the air, like you said,

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of things every morning, how does it

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>complicate things and how do you ultimately figure out when

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to kind of, you know, push the button on an investment.

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 5>Right now, the.

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 6>Markets have been generally thinking about the mantra you don't

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 6>fight the Fed, and right now the FED is in

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 6>a wait and see approach. They're not looking to cut

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 6>rates right now. They have the luxury of waiting, so

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 6>they're deciding right now, we're going to wait for more data.

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 6>We're going to find out what the fiscal policy is

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 6>before we start cutting rates. The market, however, is once

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 6>again trying to dictate terms. If the FED came out

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 6>last week and said we'll have two rate cuts for

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty five. The market is leaning towards three, so

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 6>that dislocation is one of the worries, worry signals for

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 6>us because that has to resolve itself, and that's going

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 6>to resolve itself, but we go through vold Tody to

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 6>get there.

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 3>So what is your outlook on the rate path for

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the next twelve to eighteen months.

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 6>I do think that we will have a continued rate

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 6>cutting cycle, but I think it's going to be later

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 6>in the later part of this year. We probably will

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 6>get one rate cut this year, but what will have

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 6>to line up will have to be a lot more

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 6>clarity on tariffs. You'll have to see a lot more

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 6>inflation data that kind of supports the trend towards a

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 6>two percent goal, and you need to make sure the

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 6>jobs market stay stable.

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Are you concerned that the tariffs are inflationary?

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I am. Tariffs are generally inflationary. It was interesting

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 6>to see Fetcher Powell note that in his FMC meeting

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 6>press conference. So everybody knows that tariffs could be inflation stoking,

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 6>but he did come out and say that he thinks

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be a short lived inflation.

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 3>I believe the term he used was transitory.

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 6>I didn't want to use Okay, I know, don't say it.

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Don't say it.

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you buy that the president will ultimately get to

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>growth later this year and the idea being tariffs first

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and then a cut in taxes an easying regulatory oversight

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>later in the year. His Commerce secretor has talked about

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>growth later this year, a dynamic perhaps economy maybe not

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>his word, maybe my word, but just a stronger growth

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in the United States.

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 5>Do you believe in that?

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 6>It's a very good question. I think there's certain things

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 6>that need to happen to get to the growth prerogative

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 6>that he had set for himself that he ran on

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 6>his campaign for. But I think that's kind of getting

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 6>muddled right now. I think it's going to take more

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 6>time to get there than it was earlier anticipated.

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, what do you think is the catalyst for that?

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Is it tax cuts? Is it manufacturing coming back to

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 3>the US. What's the realistic part in your view?

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 6>I really feel like the tax cuts need to happen.

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 6>I think that was the number one priority when everybody

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 6>thought that was a number one priority when he was running.

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 6>That's now become almost a third priority. And with that

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 6>I think growth gets his step back.

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, last question, it definitely relates to Trump policy. Maybe

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>less federal money going to the states at this point.

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean for municipalities states in terms of

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:02.119
<v Speaker 1>their fiscal finances?

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 5>Is it more issuance or is it more trouble.

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 6>I really feel like municipal securities is a great area

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 6>to invest in fixed income. I think there'll be more

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 6>issuance if we have infrastructure spending. And these are those

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 6>kinds of securities that do not get you rich, but

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 6>they keep you rich.

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 3>What about ending tax breaks for munis? Is that on

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 3>your radar?

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 6>It's on my radar. Those kind of conversations creep up

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 6>every now and then, they don't really go anywhere. There's

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 6>a big, strong lobby for munichs to not lose that,

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 6>so I bet shocking they are writing for their conversation

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 6>for radio.

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>People love their tax remmunis. Just ask some of the

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>folks around here. All right, we're going to leave it.

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 5>There, Razeeve, thank you so much.

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Ajeeb Sharma, Managing director of Fixed Income Investments, are at

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Key Private Bank, joining us here in studio.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Listen live each

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 2>weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple car Play

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 2>and the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 2>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>New York station. Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty. This

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 2>sounds like a big, big, big story.

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Bailey lipschultzen'strem Gafari out with some details. When it

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 3>comes to open AI's finances, the company expects to more

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 3>than triple its revenue this year to twelve point seven

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars.

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 5>Just a lot.

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm not paying for it, but I use it.

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 5>No, I'm not either. But there is a paid version.

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Paid version twenty bucks a month. There's only two hundred both.

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of companies right that are talking.

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, this is corner A person familiar with the matter.

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 3>The company generated three point seven billion dollars in annual

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 3>revenue last year, and they expect revenue to continue growing

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:36.919
<v Speaker 3>out a fast club, more than doubling next year to

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 3>twenty nine point four billion dollars. Curious what Ruth fox

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Blader has to say about all this. She's founder of

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 3>managing partner at Fox Capital. It's an early stage VC firm.

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 3>That she launched last year. She joins us from France. Ruth,

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 3>good to have you with us. Have you invested in

0:17:55.680 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 3>any of these LM companies like Athropic open AI.

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 8>You know, I haven't, and that's partly because the fund

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 8>that I run is not a multi billion dollar platform.

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 8>I think that if you're getting involved with actually building

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 8>large language models, you really need to be able and

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 8>willing to deploy massive amounts of venture capital into these projects.

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 8>And as we've seen, you know, there are some really

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 8>big incumbent tech players with enormous balance sheets who are

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 8>also investing in these projects. Right but certainly, pretty much

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 8>every startup in my portfolio is moving at systems to

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 8>run in some way on these lms, and there are

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 8>an enormous amount of new projects that are coming to

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 8>the fore and pretty much every industry which will be

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 8>based on these technologies.

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Does it feel like a disadvantage though, to not have

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 3>the dry powder to be able to invest in some

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 3>of these rounds or do you see opportunity bigger, earlier

0:18:57.680 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 3>and smaller.

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 8>That's amazing is that what these technologies are doing is

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 8>really offering a new platform for reshaping the entire economy

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 8>and probably, you know, reshaping our society if we're honest

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 8>about it. So the enabling technologies and that sort of

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 8>critical infrastructure needs to be built, and sometimes it'll be

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 8>built by you know, massive government investment, big technology companies

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 8>with big balance sheets investing the biggest VC funds in

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 8>the world. But there is so much and just such

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 8>an enormous it's it's hard to describe how much opportunity

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 8>there will be to use these technologies to really reshape

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 8>every industry imaginable. And so there's more than enough opportunity

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 8>for investors of all sizes. We certainly have dry powder

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 8>we're actively investing, but not in the models themselves.

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's talk about some of the areas that either

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>coming across the pitches, coming across your desk or in

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>your inbox that are you know, connected to AI artificial intelligence.

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 5>Walk us through ruths, some of the things.

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>That are coming across that you are like, Wow, this

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to be potentially a significant trend maybe in

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the years to come.

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, we've seen a lot of early activity and early

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 8>integration of artificial intelligence into the places where large language

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 8>models really have a lot to say, and that's you know,

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 8>things to do with language. So we're seeing a lot

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 8>of activity in the legal tech area. A lot of

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 8>companies are deploying large language models actively to do programming.

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 8>So it's no surprise that the early adopters of technology

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 8>would be technologists. And we're seeing just this tremendous ability

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 8>to build companies that are much smaller. So a lot

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 8>of the startups, even the early stage businesses that I'm seeing,

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 8>it's just shocking how the size of company that you

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 8>need to have from a full time employee perspective to

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 8>get to critical revenue is dramatically smaller than it was

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 8>even a couple.

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 7>Of years ago.

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 3>How's the fundraising environment right now? From the perspective of

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 3>a venture capitalist? Is it difficult out there to raise.

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 8>Money so as a fund or as a startup?

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 3>As a fund.

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 8>The environment I'm not currently raising capital, but you know,

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 8>I have lots of friends, and you know.

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 3>The environment venture capitalists always raising capital.

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 8>Yes, and actually it would be probably indiscreet to, you know,

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 8>acknowledge anything around actual capital raises. But I am, you know,

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 8>not as actively in market as I've been in the past,

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 8>and we'll be in the future. So what I'd say

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 8>is you know, there there are big platforms, as I said,

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 8>which are really well known, which really have no difficulty

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 8>raising capital. Actually raising capital is a fund is very

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 8>similar to the experience of raising capital as a startup.

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 8>Venture is a game of exceptions and there are absolutely

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 8>no rules. So you know, we've talked about big dips

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 8>in startup financing in particular sectors. You know, in twenty

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 8>twenty three, twenty twenty four, we'll see what happens this year,

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 8>but then we'll also see these absolutely huge mega rounds.

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 8>There's there's there tends to be enormous bifurcation in the

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 8>venture market, and you know, some people have it really

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 8>easy and some people find it to be a grind,

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 8>even in the most excessive of capital environments. Right now,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 8>there has been I think a little bit of an

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 8>overhang from the venture capital bubble that we saw during

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 8>COVID zero interest rate moments when people were kind of

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 8>running into the private markets and really there was quite

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 8>a lot of capital running into all markets. And there's

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 8>been a slight correction, but I think that there's still

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 8>you know, there's still capital out there for interesting projects.

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Ruth.

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 5>What you know, I know, when.

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You share notes and thoughts with our producer Paul Brennan.

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, part of the conversation, I think we've touched

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>upon it, but this idea of a generational technology revolution

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>with artificial intelligence, what exactly does that mean? What's the

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>generational generational technology revolution you anticipate is coming our way

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>as a result of AI, which has been around for

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a long time. But you know, obviously we're talking about

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>generative AI, large language models, things that could really potentially

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>already are and even more so.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 5>Change kind of how we do things in the future.

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we're what.

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 8>We're seeing is something really probably on the scale of

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 8>the commercial Internet itself. So the Internet was around for

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 8>a long time and then you know, people started using

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 8>it and it just had this enormous impact on the

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 8>way people do everything, the way they think, the way

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 8>they research, the way they read, the way they shop,

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:38.959
<v Speaker 8>the way they interact with each other. And you know,

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:43.360
<v Speaker 8>we saw kind of the mobile replatforming and a lot

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 8>of those same sort of large shifts happening and moving

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 8>onto mobile here. I think that what we're seeing is

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 8>not only the prospect of really changing unit costs. So

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 8>what we were talking about previously where you can just

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 8>do a lot with fewer human beings organization, but that

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 8>you know, potential to impact the revenue profile of companies.

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 8>So definitely something that will change, certainly how we value

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 8>businesses and maybe the value that businesses are able to create.

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 8>But it's also a social you know, it's a big

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 8>social shift. And it's not just like, oh, are people

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 8>using Perplexity instead of Google to search? It's really where

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 8>are people getting information? And how are they comfortable communicating

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 8>with machines? And I really see this not only amongst

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 8>kind of people who are in the tech world, but

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 8>even you know, folks and other parts of society who

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 8>are actually asking chat GPT for personal advice and you

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 8>know things that were inconceivable really like Revenge of the Nerds,

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 8>like having a relationship with a robot.

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 3>But you know, well you said no judgment, I said,

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 3>not great. I know.

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 5>Well I have to tell you.

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, we were talking about you coming on in

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the newsroom and we were just talking as every day

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it feels like we have conversations around our I've got

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to yeah, cc H our producer we were talking with,

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and we kind of came to like, we really want

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 1>to ask you this question. We're just going to go

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>for it. I'm going to just go for it. How

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>do we avoid creating a future generation of idiots or

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>at least individuals who can't write and think if we're

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>constantly going now and I understand having played with chat chipe,

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>do you have to think and like how to get

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>like different question?

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 3>You mean, like okay, college students Carol using it to

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 3>write term papers and stuff.

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Exactly like people who don't write or at least get

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>something started with something, so you know, with a chat

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>device or something like what does that mean?

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 2>What does that looks like?

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 8>I can't you know, I can't say that that. I

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 8>think it's a stupid question. And I think this is

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 8>what what you know, when I think about this technology,

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 8>it's not only so impactful on the stock market, and

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 8>you know, in terms of uh sort of geeky tech innovation,

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 8>I really do think that it is going to massively

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 8>have a huge social impact. And you know, even when

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 8>we think about are we going to lose skills that

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 8>we consider sort of near and dear to our hearts,

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 8>like you know, writing and sort of thinking in the

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 8>written word and communicating or even just doing work unassisted

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 8>without sort of the the the kind of long arc

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 8>of history in our in our computer that we can

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 8>kind of tap into at a moment's notice. And there

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 8>are those same conversations happening when the commercial internet came around,

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 8>and you know, the kind of dumbing down and the

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 8>social crutch. But I think that these are questions that

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 8>are really critical to ask. And you know, you can

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 8>take the point of view that technology is neutral and

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 8>it's what we do with it, but we know that

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 8>these new technologies dramatically shape our behaviors. And there have

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 8>been enormous numbers of studies that have been done about

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 8>the impact of social media on youth or you know,

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 8>regarding impression, and I see it with my own kids,

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 8>just you know, the behavioral habits and the behavioral changes

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 8>that have happened, and you know, just a couple of

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 8>generations are really quite crazy. And so there will be

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 8>people who use these technologies to get even smarter and

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 8>to do even more interesting things. But I think that

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 8>this is a really big question, is what are we

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 8>going to do if we end up creating technology which

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 8>is so powerful that fewer people need employment in a

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 8>world where there are you know, more people every year,

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 8>and how are we going to really hold our critical

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 8>values or continue to transmit values that we consider critical.

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 8>And I'm sure that some of those values will go away.

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think this is we're on the cusp

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 8>of a really big social change too.

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a tricky territory, I think, especially as a

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 3>parent in thinking about this technology for kids. Ruth the

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Fox at Blader, founder and managing partner at Fox Capital,

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 3>the early stage VC firm she launched it last year.

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 3>I've been playing a little bit with Lily the dual

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 3>lingo chat Bob and well, my son loves it and

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 3>he's six, and like, I don't want him to think that,

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 3>like this is real life. It's pretty cool, though, it

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 3>is pretty cool.

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 5>I yeah, I don't know. Time will tell, right, this

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 5>is Bloomberg Business Week Daily.

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Rubmcle I'll bet you let me drive.

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, no, no no, this is not a twenty's going.

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 4>To drive, honey, please, I'll do the gravels.

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's wait, I want to drive.

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a good question.

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 3>This is the drive to the.

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Clothes plums for me.

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 5>I think.

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:36.360
<v Speaker 9>Well.

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 2>By John and Don on Bloomberg Radio.

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, everybody, we are just about eighteen minutes away

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>from the closing bell on this Wednesday, Carol Master, along

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>with Tim Stanwick, life here in our Bloomberg Interactor Broker

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>studio here on Bloomberg Business Week Daily. H As Charlie

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned, we are kind of bouncing around our loads

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of the session. So down about seventy one points on

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the S and P five hundred, down more than a

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>point full percentage point, about one and a quarter percent

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to be Zach and down Tim just about two percent

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>on the nasdaque. We've been talking about some of these

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>big megacap tech names putting some pressure once again. But

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's safe to say we're taking our cues

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>constantly out of Washington concerns about more tariffs. What it means,

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>what it means specifically.

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's see what Sevesty Bilofis has to say. She's

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 3>CEO at Golvest Advisory. She's back with us. They've got

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 3>about six hundred million dollars in assets under management, She

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 3>joins us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. How

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 3>are you positioning portfolios right now? Are you? Are you

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 3>overweight cash because of uncertainty? What's going on?

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 9>Okay, so we're not overweight cash.

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 7>But for people that have cash.

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 9>On the sidelines, new clients that have come in and

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 9>they've had a liquidity event and they have cash, we

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 9>are being slow. Our normal build out process would be

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 9>ten to twelve weeks. We're pausing on that. We're looking

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 9>at five to six months in terms of deployment. So

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 9>we're not rushing with cash right now.

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 5>But for people so leaving it in lee hash.

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 9>Well, okay, so giving it in cash or T bills

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 9>or going into things like private credit which have a

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 9>lower volatility, or going into some structured notes alternative investments,

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 9>which we like and we can talk about, but not

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 9>rushing into equity. So the equities part of the portfolio

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 9>taking a lot longer to deploy that cast.

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So the private credit part of the portfolio is something

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you would have done anyway, and you're like, it doesn't

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>matter because we just talked about a story about how

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the private equity guys really want to tap into the

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>four oh one K plans. But the thinking is it's

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:34.959
<v Speaker 1>going to sit there for several years, so it's okay

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to put it to work now.

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely the private credit. A couple of things on the

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 9>private credit lower volatility and we do think even with

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 9>all of this noise and uncertainty and a slow down

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 9>that we think is coming, we don't think it will

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 9>be a hard landing, severe recession that we end up seeing.

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 9>And so in that environment where default rates and private

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 9>credit are not expected to be high, I like private credit.

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 9>It's a slow and any clip that we end up getting.

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 9>So that's one thing. But you bring up a very

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 9>good point with in private markets, investors have a long

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 9>term time horizon, for one case being one example. But

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 9>even with taxable dollars, a lot of our investors have

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 9>a long term time horizon. They aren't planning on touching

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 9>that cash for at least ten to fifteen years out.

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 9>For some part of the portfolio time, having private credit

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 9>and private equity is certainly appropriate.

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's a small part of the portfolio for most people.

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 3>What's typical right now in terms of asset allocation, because

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 3>there's been a lot of talk this year of concerns

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 3>around this idea of American exceptionalism and then also our

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 3>performance in Europe.

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 9>Yes, yes, so we are looking at we've previously had

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 9>an underweight to equities and it's to excuse me, let

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 9>me correct that European equities, and so we've been neutral

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 9>weight equities and more of our portfolios invested in US equities,

0:31:57.080 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 9>and that's been the case for a long time.

0:31:58.440 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 7>So certainly this year you've seen a.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 9>Versu all of that, and European equities do look more attractive,

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 9>But we are not overweighting European equities.

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Why is why we were that was stereo.

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 7>Its exactly a couple of things.

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 9>I think the reasons why so European equities have had

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 9>low relative valuations compared to US for a long time.

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 9>They've had lower valuations for a reason. Reasons why we

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 9>didn't prefer European equities.

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 7>Six months ago.

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 9>Are still there things around demographics, for example, or things

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 9>like regulation being more onerous in Europe versus in the US.

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 5>State like Germany said about the Spans, we love that.

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 9>We love that, like Germany, Germany and Europe overall. I

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 9>do think that we'll see more spending. There's been this

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 9>aha moment where all of a sudden, Europe collectively realizes

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 9>we need to spend more, and so I do think

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 9>that will happen. But at the same time, and I

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 9>do want exposure, and we are adding to our under

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 9>weight that we had in European equities. We are adding

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 9>to it, but I still don't think that European equities

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 9>are going to outperform the US equities over the long run.

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 7>Now that's it.

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:12.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, at the game, I'm table, you're not all in,

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>not all in. So when you say you add in,

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I always been curious about percentages, right, like how much?

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>So how much is typical for Europe?

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 5>And have you done?

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 7>Okay?

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 9>So we so typically the benchmark waiting for European equities

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 9>or international developed equities, I should say, is about thirty percent.

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 9>So if we think of a one hundred percent equity portfolio,

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 9>about thirty percent is the benchmark weight towards Europe. We've

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 9>been less than ten percent in our one hundred percent

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 9>equity waiting. We're closer now to about eight percent in

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 9>Europe in international development. So we're still underweight, but we've

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 9>increased our equity allocations. Equities, yes, and the one hundred

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 9>percent yes, so some in private markets, a lot in

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 9>public markets, but the other area we like somewhere. Yes,

0:33:59.880 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 9>in private markets.

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Equities U S equaries have worked really well for the

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 3>last dozen years.

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 7>They have. They haven't especially tech. But what we're seeing now.

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 9>And this is also another area that we're investing in,

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 9>So market s and P is down year to date,

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 9>and it's certainly like since the peak Feb nineteen or

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 9>so it's been, it's down. If you look at dividend

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 9>stocks though for example, they're actually up. So there are

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 9>plenty of areas for sectors in the US markets that

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 9>there's still opportunity there and I feel more comfortable investing in.

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 5>So you're all in on the US US equities.

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, right, So the idea of like, you know,

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we've had a lot of conversations about American exceptionalism. Do

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you think that ultimately policies out of Washington will settle down.

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 9>I think we've been hit with a lot of bad

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 9>news first in terms of you know, when the President

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 9>got elected, there was a lot of talk of and

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:02.240
<v Speaker 9>you saw an increase in performance because of talk on deregulation,

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 9>pro growth, tax cuts that will be extended. We've started

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 9>now with we saw a lot of policy and shake

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 9>ups and alliances, and I think we've started with some

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 9>bad news, so tariff certainly being one of them, because

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 9>they have caused a lot of this uncertainty, and it

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 9>will continue until we have things figured out. But I'm

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 9>excited to see about the tax cuts that get extended,

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 9>and maybe there's more of them. There's more, there's more

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 9>that will come in the second half of the year

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 9>that I think will be more positive. Once the uncertainty

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 9>around tariffs goes away.

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 3>We're basically exactly where we were election day, yes, right now,

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 3>five hundred yes.

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:41.720
<v Speaker 9>So it was a lot of enthusiasm of what will happen.

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 9>The agenda comes out, it's about you know, immigration and deportation,

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.359
<v Speaker 9>and then about the tariffs, and we don't know from

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 9>one day to the next what to focus on. You know,

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 9>we were talking about Liberation day April second, and all

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 9>of a sudden, it's auto tariffs today. So once this

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 9>calms down, there's more more clarity around the tariffs, we

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.919
<v Speaker 9>can move forward and talk about the more exciting pro

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:07.720
<v Speaker 9>growth parts that will help the US market.

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Really cool stuff, always interesting, especially in contrast to some

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff we've had as of late.

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Sevesti Belafas, CEO at Goldvest Advisory, back with us here

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 3>and are Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio Sevesti always good to

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 3>see you, thank you. Thanks so much for coming in too.

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Here.

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal