WEBVTT - US Logistics Will Flex to Absorb Bridge Shock

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Wait inside from the reporters and editors who bring you

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>America's most trusted business magazine plus global business, finance and

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week Podcast with Carol Messer

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>You folks, we are of course continuing to follow the

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 2>latest on the accident at Baltimore's Francis Scott Keybridge. Six

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:37.599
<v Speaker 2>people are presumed dead after search officials just pointing that

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>out press conference. So loss of life continues to be

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 2>obviously top of mind. The bridge, as you know, collapsing

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 2>in just a matter of seconds yesterday. But the consequence

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 2>is tim the catastrophic consequences could be set to stretch

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 2>out for weeks.

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, as much as two point five million tons of coal,

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of cars made by Ford and General Motors, and

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 3>lumber and gypsum are threatened with disruption. It's just another

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 3>pot factor that may need to go into the US

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 3>economic model or not if the logistical world can adapt

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 3>quickly so that Carol is where we go now it is.

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.119
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to our Key interview on this Wednesday back

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 2>with US is Bloomberg News International Economics and Policy correspondent

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Mike McKee. He's here in our studio in New York City,

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 2>along with Bloomberg News Global Economy reporter and occurr and

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 2>he's out there in our Washington, DC bureau. First up, Mike,

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 2>I do kind of want to start with you. You

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 2>do put always everything that's happening in our world into

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the economic context for us. Are we hearing anything from

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>FED officials or from the economics community about the concern

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 2>that this will have on supply chains or is it

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 2>still kind of too early.

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Nothink from the Fed yet? We have heard from economists

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 4>on Wall Street who put pencil to paper and try

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 4>to figure out what the impacts might be. And while

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 4>this is a terrible tragedy in human terms, and it

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 4>is going to have an economic impact, certainly on Baltimore

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 4>for quite some time, it is not going to have

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 4>a major impact on the overall UA economy. Tim brought

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 4>up the idea of how quickly logistics can adapt, and

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 4>we're being told by everybody in that business that they

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 4>can adapt fairly quickly. The biggest thing, as you mentioned,

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 4>is that automobiles. It was the biggest port for import

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 4>export of automobiles. They've got to get the port open

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 4>for about half of it. BW and BMW are outside

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 4>of the bridge, so they can still take in some cars,

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 4>and we understand may take in other people's as well,

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 4>and there are other ports. Savannah's built up a big

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 4>what they call roll on roll off capability and so

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 4>they will take some as well. So it looks like

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 4>they may be able to work this out relatively quickly now.

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Pete Buddha Judge was just briefing at the White House.

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 4>He was asked how long it will take to get

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 4>the port open, which is going to be the key

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 4>economic question, and he said it's still too early to tell.

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 4>They're trying to figure it out. It'll be up to

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 4>how fast to the core of engineers can get Iron

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 4>out of the way out of the harbor.

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Right, hey, and come on in here, because Mike just

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 3>went through some of those individual companies and what they

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 3>could do to adapt. But as you and the team

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 3>writing the Economics Daily newsletter out earlier today, the US

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 3>economy is in a different position right now. It's in

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 3>a much better position than it was a few years

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 3>ago to handle a challenge such as this, do we

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 3>have the pandemic to thank for this or is it

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 3>something else?

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So anytime we got a kind of a supply

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 5>chain scare, it's always benchmarked against what happened in the pandemic,

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 5>which was such an unusual time. We had this year

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 5>in the Red Sea crisis a you know, earlier part

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 5>of this year, people were saying, is it going to

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 5>be another global supply crunch? And of course now we

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 5>have this disaster yesterday with the human tragedy first and foremost,

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 5>with people asking what will this mean for the supply

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 5>chain story. I think, as Mike was saying, it's more

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 5>benign this time around, because there are a couple of differences.

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of capacity on international and shipping at

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 5>the moment, a lot of spare containers, a lot of

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 5>spare ships. Sure rates have gone up a bit, but

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 5>it's there, it's available if needed.

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 3>That's number one. And number two.

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 5>Of course, demand for goods is not like it was

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 5>during the pandemic. So one of the reasons that there

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 5>was such a choke point at ports and in manufacturers

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 5>around the world a few years ago was just the

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 5>share demand by people in the US spending their money

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 5>staying at home buying the stuff that they need. That's

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 5>not really there now. The hot side of the economy

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 5>is more on the service side of things, So that's

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 5>another reason why it's not expected to be, you know,

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 5>the complete choke point that you might suggest on paper.

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 5>And then as Mike's outlining, there's other options within the US.

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 5>You got the West Coast for other alternative ports. There's

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 5>road freight options to take some of this. So when

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 5>you stack it up, it's certainly a complication. It's certainly

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 5>a major issue for the regional economy up there around Baltimore,

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 5>but I don't think anyone's yet suggesting this is going

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 5>to be a major, major supply choke for the US

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 5>or the global economy.

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 4>One thing you just mentioned that Secretary of Budha Judge

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 4>brought up as after the pandemic, the Biden administration set

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 4>up a command post in the Transportation Department for logistics,

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 4>and they're activating that now so that they can work

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 4>with not just the UPS's and the Fedexes and the

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 4>trucking companies in the area, but all the smaller companies

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 4>in the area that need to coordinate getting in and

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 4>out and getting their stuff together. So he was suggesting

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 4>that that might make it easier for particularly smaller companies

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 4>to adjust.

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, if you remember logistics, it's the big guys, but

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of little players too that get all

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 2>that stuff to us. Having said that, Mike, right during

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the pandemic, as and I was pointing out, we were

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 2>buying so much stuff because we couldn't go anywhere. Now

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 2>we just want to go anywhere. And in my house too,

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, I'm done with this stuff.

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 3>You don't need another couch. You're not going to need anything.

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 4>I hope you're not going to drive through Baltimore.

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm not anytime soon.

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Having said that, goods inflation it's come down way, like

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.239
<v Speaker 2>where are we And if we do see a little

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 2>bit of pressure on the good side, can we afford

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 2>that economy?

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes, we could afford it. It was going down for

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 4>months and months, and then in the last couple of months,

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 4>goods inflation has gone up a little bit, and that

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 4>is something the Fed is keeping an eye on because

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 4>if it starts to if it continues to do that

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 4>and picks up speed, then that's more of a concern.

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 4>They did expect goods inflation to flatten out, and basically

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 4>that's where we are with some minor increases. So we'll

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 4>have to see if this does push any prices higher.

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 4>Probably not, because of the fact that the country is

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 4>so big and this is such a small area in

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 4>terms of prices that will be affected. New car prices

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 4>have gone down, they're going down now, actually disinflating, and

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 4>so even if this puts a little straight on auto inventories,

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 4>shouldn't raise prices too much.

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Might do we expect to hear from the FED at

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 3>all on this?

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh? I would imagine that FED officials who speak will

0:06:55.279 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 4>get asked about it. I would imagine they will say this, Jaye, how.

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Is are you talking on Friday?

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 3>Friday?

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 4>They will say the same thing that everybody else is saying.

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 4>It All the officials at this point is we just

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 4>don't know. We have to see how this plays out. Obviously,

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 4>there are logistical issues around the world right now, from

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 4>the Red Sea to Africa to.

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Asia and so all that.

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 4>Will play into this, but it doesn't look like at

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 4>this point it would be huge. But I don't think

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 4>they have a good handle on it.

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 2>And another element to this is certainly the job market

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 2>right we're essentially back at full employment. I mean, how

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 2>does that so that if one other port somewhere needs

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 2>more workers are sown and so forth to pick up

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the slack as a result of what's going on in Baltimore,

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 2>that's a positive.

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 5>I'm assuming, well, that's the hopeful case that you know,

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 5>people are back in the workforce, they are available, and

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 5>the flexibility there. But you know, it depends, you know,

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 5>if there was a real crunch on at the ports,

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 5>remember the threat of labor action in some of the

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 5>ports as well. You know, not benign to would be tested.

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 5>Because we know that broadly speaking, the jobs market's so

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 5>strong and there are plenty of employers in America complaining

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 5>that they can't get stuff so right here right now,

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 5>as we heard the White House say yesterday, the jobs

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 5>market is in good order. People are there and working.

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 5>That's a plus when you have something like this happening.

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 5>But of course it's not hard to see how the

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 5>labor market will be stretched a bit thin if there

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 5>was a further stress test.

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 4>One interesting aspect is that it will take time to

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 4>get the port open, and the job's survey is taken

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 4>during the week that includes the twelfth of the month.

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 4>So if they're not open in two weeks, there's one

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 4>hundred and forty thousand workers at the Port of Baltimore,

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 4>and if they can't, they have stuff that's come in

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 4>already that they're working and moving out. But if all

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 4>that stuff moves out it isn't replaced, then you could

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 4>have people who are laid off, and it could show

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 4>up in the April jobs report. I mean, hopefully it's

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 4>only temporary, but one hundred and forty thousand a lot

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 4>of people who wouldn't who might not be at.

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 3>It's not like, to Mike's point, those one hundred and

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 3>forty thousand folks could pack up and go south to

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 3>another port, or go north to the Port of New

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 3>York and New Jersey. Is their capacity? You mentioned capacity

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 3>on ships, but is there actual number of workers in

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 3>capacity at the ports to accept more well.

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 5>As I say, one of the big concerns of the

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 5>ports around the US at the moment is the threat

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 5>of strike action. If that was to go ahead, that

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 5>would potentially cause significant disruption. But I think beyond that,

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 5>my understanding is that ports are pretty much handling capacity

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.439
<v Speaker 5>at the moment and even with the extra capacity that's

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 5>going to have to be spread out from Baltimore. Everyone

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 5>I spoke to you yesterday said it can be absorbed

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 5>into the system, but will just take a bit of

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 5>reshuffling up and down the East coast and maybe across

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 5>the West coast. I don't think that's going to be

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 5>the primary concern. The bigger issue is going is I

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 5>think effectively going to be on the port itself. How

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 5>long will this block a germain? How long will it

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 5>take to get that port reopened again, and how long,

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 5>of course will take the bridge to get built. Everyone

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 5>I've spoken to say that the rest of the just

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 5>six network should be able to absorb what's going to

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 5>happen over to coin months.

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, one thing I want to just kind of pivot.

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 2>We've got about four minutes or so left here, and

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking, Mike, certainly about the Friday inflation read. You

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 2>guys are going to be here live reporting it out.

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 4>Jen Tecker was talking about people who get days off.

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh, come on, you love this stuff. Jay Powell's going

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 2>to speak a few hours after that inflation reading. What's

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 2>top of mine? And then I want to kind of

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 2>spin it to you and about kind of the global

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 2>inflation picture, because I do feel like we focus on

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 2>the US, but you know, we got to kind of

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 2>think about what's happening around the globe. But let's talk

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 2>about Friday's data.

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, Friday is the income spending in PCEE numbers for

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 4>the latest month for February, and it's it comes out

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 4>much later than CPI, but the Fed follows the PCEE

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 4>inflation numbers, so they're going to be very important, and

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 4>they're expected to rise just a little bit the way

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 4>that CPI did, but not as much as we saw

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 4>in CPI, so there will be a lot of attention

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 4>paid to those. We also get the income and spending numbers.

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 4>Retail sales we're not particularly great, so there'll be some

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 4>focus on whether Americans are still spending once you fold

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 4>in the services. I mean, you're taking your trips, you're

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 4>doing services, you're not buying goods.

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 3>But we need to see some strength there.

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 4>The one thing we have seen on a regular basis

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 4>is that incomes have been relatively strong, particularly when you

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 4>look at wages and salaries, and if that continues, then

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 4>you relax a little bit about the spending, and that

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 4>you know that people can afford it. They tend to

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 4>spend what they earn. So that's why we're looking at

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 4>all that, and then of course we get almost a

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 4>real time reaction from the chairman. I'm sure first question

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 4>will probably be the inflation numbers that day, and so

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 4>we'll get a sort of set up. It's very early.

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 4>They just met last week and we don't have another

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 4>FED meeting till May first. First, so you have to

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 4>kind of take anything. Jay pol says, not with a

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 4>grain of salt. But obviously it's going to be a while.

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 4>He could change his mind depending on what other data

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 4>we get. But you know, the markets come Monday morning

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 4>are all going to come in and react to it.

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 4>And if you get notes from the bond market people,

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 4>they're not really happy that he's doing this on a

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 4>day when the markets are closed.

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, Josenthalen is you know, five things to watch

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 2>every morning, and we all kind of read through it.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things he was looking at is

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 2>global inflation and a Canadian CPI for February grew less

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 2>than expectations. You can flight inflation falling to its lowest

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 2>level in over two years. Coming in also cooler than expected.

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 2>I think Spain's preliminary harmonized CPI measure was less than

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 2>expected slightly. I mean, and as he writes, every economy

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 2>has its own story, but we are seeing a lot

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 2>of it feels like correlation between global economies and global inflation.

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 2>What do we know about that, what's the importance of

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 2>that and what it tells us maybe about what's going

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 2>on more globally around the world when it comes to

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 2>price pressures.

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 5>Carol, Absolutely, inflation's coming off right around the world. I

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 5>heard an economists this morning actually make the point that

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 5>in Europe inflation is going to come off much quicker

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 5>than people anticipate, and that's going to clear away from

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 5>mortgage rates, boring costs come down. Around the world, it's

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 5>a very similar story. I mean, the US has had

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 5>a bit of a scare earlier this year, as Mike

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 5>was alluding to there, but broadly speaking is on track

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 5>everywhere else. Let's not forget that the world's number two economy, China,

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 5>is battling deflation. They've never had the inflation outbreak to

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 5>begin with, but the other are Plenty of analysts will

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 5>tell you that when Shawn is battling deflation that will

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 5>take pressure off the global prices as well. So everyone

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 5>I speak to you and everything I read suggest that

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 5>this remains the year of this inflation around the world.

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 5>Boring costs and industrates are going to come down. Switzerland

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 5>has already moved, they had room to do so, of course,

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 5>but several others are expected to follow suit, and I

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 5>think once we get to midyear, you'll hear a loup

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 5>more chatter around which major tuns of mind would be

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 5>going first and by how much.

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 4>Mike's final thought, well, I think the one thing we

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 4>want to watch, particularly because it's a political year here

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 4>in the United States, gasoline prices. Oil prices have been

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 4>going up. We're getting into the season where there's more

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 4>oil demand and more gasoline demand, so that'll put some

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 4>pressure on prices, which would push headline inflation higher. That

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 4>is a certain concern to the FED because they look

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 4>at headline inflation. But it's also going to be a

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 4>factor in probably the political races.

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I care when I go to the pump.

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Don't you care what everybody cares? That's everybody cares about

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 3>the pump big time, all right.

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Mike McKee, International Economics and Policy correspondent here at Bloomberg

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 2>End occurrent Global Economy Reporter. Bloomberg Radio will be live

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Friday for that inflation read in of course Chair Powell

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 2>and his comments and speech. This is Bloomberg.

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio and Television.

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, Carol mass inctentic life here in our

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 2>New York studio. So I got to say that this

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 2>is something we talk a lot about, Tim, and that

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 2>is how financial inclusion major issue around the world. McKinsey

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 2>noting last year that nearly a billion and a half

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 2>people living in emerging economies don't have access to formal

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 2>savings and credit, and that while the overall global wealth

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 2>and income graph has narrowed since the eighties, inequality has

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 2>actually increased within advanced economy. So it's not just emerging,

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 2>it's advanced as well. YEH.

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Needless to say, there's still a lot of work to

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 3>be done. And Shamina Saying knows that she's the founder

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 3>and president of MasterCard Center for Inclusive Growth. She's held

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 3>senior positions in the White House and the House of Representatives,

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 3>including appointments by President Obama. She joins us now from

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 3>New York City. Welcome, Shamina, How are you doing well?

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 7>Thanks, thank you so much for having me.

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thanks so much for joining us on this. So

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of your professional life, what you've done as

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 3>an adult, has centered around the global economy that takes

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 3>everyone into account. It's not something that is actually happening

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 3>right now. What's the nut that needs to be cracked

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 3>to break the great financial divide that we talk about

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 3>so much?

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's such an important point, and I think Carroll

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 7>started off rather well, which is it really is about

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 7>financial inclusion? You know, I think we take for granted

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 7>that you know, sitting here in New York City certainly

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 7>and a lot of times in the United States, you know,

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 7>you have a phone that gives you access to a

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 7>train ticket or a train or a bus ticket, or

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 7>any kind of digital access that you need. That's just

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 7>not true for many millions of people around the world.

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 7>But we're making progress. I mean, I think at MasterCard

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 7>in the Center, we actually made a commitment to bring

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 7>a billion people into the formal financial system by twenty

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 7>twenty five, and we're almost there. We're at about eight

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 7>hundred and seventy million, so we are well on our

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 7>way to hitting that goal. But it's also important that

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 7>we make sure that small business owners succeed in what's

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 7>increasingly becoming a digital economy. So we made a commitment

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 7>there to ensure that we bring fifty million small business

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 7>owners into the formal economy again by twenty twenty five,

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 7>and we're almost there, that we're at forty eight million

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 7>right now. But the final piece around small business and

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.239
<v Speaker 7>financial inclusion, to your point about closing that gap or

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 7>cracking that nut, is to ensure that we include marginalized

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 7>communities in those small business ownerships. And so as part

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 7>of our commitment, we wanted to make sure that at

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 7>least twenty five million of our target were women owned

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 7>or women led businesses. And I'm really happy to say

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 7>today that we surpassed that target and are now on

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 7>our way to even going further. So I think that.

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 2>What I want to one thing I want to ask you,

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think folks would applaud your efforts in the

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 2>progress that you guys have made, and it seems like

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 2>ahead of schedule. Having said that, I'm going to get

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 2>a ton of hate mail if I don't ask you this,

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 2>and this is major credit card companies. To be fair,

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 2>they are quick to amp up rates on customers, even

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>good customers, but that may have a balance that maybe

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 2>is growing a little bit unwieldy, if you will, but

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 2>nonetheless maybe making their payments a way above the Fed

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Funds rate, way above the prime rate. I mean, I'm

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 2>talking about what we've got a Fed funds rate I

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 2>think at about five or five and a half percent here,

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 2>and you're talking about rates that go to eighteen, nineteen,

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty eight percent so quickly on individuals. So what's

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 2>the thinking around that to make it easier for more

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 2>consumers and also for small business folks.

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 7>I think it's I mean, look, I think it's a

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 7>really important point. We've seen rates around the world, especially

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 7>in unregulated markets, climb way above even twenty percent, and.

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Even in the US market, which is a regulated market,

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 2>we see them climb and I know it's within the law,

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 2>but nonetheless it seems many would argue, really not.

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 7>Fair, No exactly. I mean, the truth is that unless

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 7>we're working on making sure that small business owners and

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 7>those who are interested in participating in the digital economy

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 7>through regulated bank accounts, which is where we're focused. It's

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 7>going to be really important that we also include responsible

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 7>lending practices and the education that's required to ensure that

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 7>once you join the formal financial system, you're operating within

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 7>it in a way that helps you not only survive

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 7>but thrive in the digital economy.

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 3>If parents don't teach their kids that stuff, where are

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 3>they supposed to learn it?

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 7>So I think that's again it's a great point. As

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 7>part of the work that we've been doing in the

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 7>United States and in around the world, we've launched a

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 7>program that we call Strive, which is a focus on

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 7>small business owners. Like I said, in the United States

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 7>and around the world. In the United States in particular,

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 7>we're at a historic moment, and this is because there

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 7>are literally billions of dollars coming out of the federal

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 7>governments to the states to help support small business owners.

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 7>The problem is that but that money may or may

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 7>not get to them directly, as we saw during COVID,

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 7>and so part of our work with STRIVE is to

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 7>ensure that we're helping those intermediaries, those organizations that are

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 7>called community development finance institutions across the United States, they're

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.239
<v Speaker 7>closest to the small business owner, and they're really the

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 7>ones who provide culturally competent and proximate education around financial lending,

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.199
<v Speaker 7>the things that you're talking about. And so one of

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 7>the things that we really encourage is that small business

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 7>owners who are looking to capitalize on the enormous amount

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 7>of money that's coming out of the government right now,

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 7>they really connect with their local community development finance institution

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 7>to get close to the education as well as the

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:48.360
<v Speaker 7>capital they need to start their business.

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 2>But you know, and I guess would I guess I

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 2>would jump in and just say that for a lot

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 2>of individuals, individuals are small business owners, they are responsible.

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 2>I feel like Mohammed Yunis of the Gramin Bank and

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 2>microlending have really taught us that these small entrepreneurs tend

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 2>to be very very responsible with their money, whether it's

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 2>especially in emerging in the emerging world, but also in

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 2>the developed world. And I guess it still seems like

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the difficulty of getting the access and that is still

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 2>very very tricky. How do we open up that pipeline

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 2>even more without all the kind of connections or higher

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 2>costs that seem to go along with it.

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 7>I think you're one hundred percent right. I mean, you

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 7>can look at one of our partners right here in

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 7>the United States is actually grimen USA. Another partner is

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 7>the acci On Opportunity Fund, the Community Reinvestment Fund. There

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 7>are all sorts of again, they're called CDFI's in the

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 7>United States. They're called microfinance institutions outside of the United States,

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 7>but they're really the one. They're really organizations who are

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 7>working very closely with small business owners. And my view is,

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 7>and what we've seen is a lot of small business

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 7>owners don't actually know that these organizations exist. I can

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 7>just give you one example in South Dakota of a

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 7>woman who just opened her coffee shop and she had

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 7>been using her own personal credit card, which many times

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 7>small business owners do to borrow against that to kind

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 7>of buy the things she needed to start start her business.

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 7>Once she was connected to an organization called Four Bands

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.640
<v Speaker 7>Financial Institution, which is a CDFI based in South Dakota,

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 7>they worked with her over several years to not only

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 7>ensure that her responsible her responsible perspective was supplemented with

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 7>the educational components she needed, but they worked with her

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 7>to get the actual capital she needed to open and

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 7>run her business. And so this is not a multi

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 7>day strategy. This is a multi year strategy if we

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 7>really want to make sure that small businesses not only

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 7>have the on ramps, but the tools, education, capital, also

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 7>access to digital that they need to succeed.

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 3>Heysh. I mean, if we think about your goals at

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 3>the center here in the US, I want to specifically

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 3>focus in the US before talking about the entire world.

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 3>If we think about your goals here in the US

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to financial inclusion and closing the gap here,

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 3>what's the biggest impediment out there right now? What's the

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 3>biggest thing that holds people back?

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think, you know, I think both you and

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 7>Carol have mentioned it when we've done our research and

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 7>uh and from you know, obviously personal experience. Being the

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 7>daughter of immigrants, I've seen it firsthand. My parents tried

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.479
<v Speaker 7>to open a business when I was growing up in

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 7>southern Virginia and many of my colleagues have as well.

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 7>And the real what what we have seen and what

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 7>the research shows is that entrepreneurs aren't necessarily the ones

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 7>that we see in Silicon Valley who are looking for

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 7>that unicorn, who are looking for that that lightning bolt

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 7>path to you know, multi billion dollar valuation. Most entrepreneurs

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.479
<v Speaker 7>that we have found are looking for stability. We call

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 7>them stability entrepreneurs. They want to make a good living,

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 7>they want to hire good, good staff from them, and

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 7>they want to grow in a consistent and responsible way.

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 7>And that's a little bit of a different framework than

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 7>I think folks think about when we think about entrepreneurs

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 7>and small business owners. That's one big thing is our mindset.

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 7>We need to meet them where they are, which is

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 7>in a place of let's get this right, let's grow

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.199
<v Speaker 7>over time, let's go responsibly. But then they also have

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 7>to ensure that they get that access to capital so

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 7>that they're not using their personal credit cards that are

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 7>actually getting formal lending from CDFIs or banks. They go digital.

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 7>We found that during COVID, if you weren't going, if

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 7>you weren't in a position to go digital, were really

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 7>at a disadvantage for continuing your business. And finally, as

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 7>we've talked about, they have to grow their networks in

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 7>their know how so doing this in a way that

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 7>is not only expanding their capabilities with the nuts and

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 7>bolts of what you need to understand about interest rates

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 7>and marketing and markets, but you also need to be

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 7>able to access your peers who are on the journey

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 7>with you. And as Carol said, that's really about That's

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 7>really what the Gremen model taught us is that your

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 7>peer network is very important in your success.

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 8>All Right?

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Can I leave it on that note, Shamina, thank you

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 2>so much, appreciate some time with you on this Wednesday,

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 2>shaminas saying she's founder and president at the MasterCard Center

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 2>for Inclusive Growth. Joining us there in New York City.

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play and then brout Auto with a

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business act or want us live on YouTube?

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 8>Well, time to share.

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 3>This is not the Kasso is a service that allows

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 3>you to own a share of the vacation home instead

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 3>of having to buy the whole thing. Like I said,

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 3>maybe an eighth of a share of a skihouse in

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 3>Park City or Breckinridge that'll set you back maybe seven

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty five thousand dollars, or an eighth of

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 3>a share of a home in Malibu for under a

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 3>million dollars. So it's not just that you own a

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 3>share of it. You share the costs that are associated

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 3>with the home as well the other co owners, and

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 3>then Picasso handles the maintenance and other management issues.

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, and now it's looking the company to broaden

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 2>it's appeal by offering shares at a lower price point.

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 2>So let's get into it with Austin Allison. He's co

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 2>founder and chief executive officer of Picasso. He joins us

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 2>in our studio, but coming in from San Francisco. How

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 2>are you.

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 6>I'm doing well. Thanks for having me today.

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 2>It's great to have you here. You know, before we

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 2>got started, you said you guys were launched in twenty twenty,

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 2>so you're coming up on your fourth year.

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, three and a half years since launching. It's been

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 6>a wild ride.

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 2>I bet it is, all right, So give us an

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 2>idea of the trajectory. I mean, from when you started,

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 2>and I mean I'm assuming that was kind of fast

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 2>and furious and that there was a lot of demand

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 2>or was there?

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it was a crazy time for sure. Let me

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 6>just start with the mission and the vision of the company.

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 6>The vision is about empowering more people to find their

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 6>happy place through co ownership. And we started the company

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 6>in twenty twenty in San Francisco. We've grown to now

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 6>almost every market around the US, but until the week

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 6>we were operating in about forty destinations around the US

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 6>as well as Paris, London, and Mexico. And what we

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 6>do is very simple. We empower families to co own

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 6>beautiful luxury vacation homes together and Picasso manages every detail,

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 6>everything from design to furnishing to bill pay and maintenance.

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Who determines the time that these families get to go

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 3>spring break is oftentimes overlaps with other spring break of families.

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so this is the number one question that we

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 6>get from prospective buyers. And the answer is we've created

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 6>a proprietary scheduling tool that we call smart Stay. It's

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 6>available from an app on your iPhone or Android, and

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 6>smart Stay will ensure that you get your pro rat

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 6>of time throughout the year. So if you own one

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 6>eighth of a home, smart Stay will ensure that you

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 6>get one eighth of the peak season, one eighth of

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 6>the non peak season, and one eighth of the holidays.

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, so when the plumbing goes everybody's got to

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 2>chip in.

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, yeah, and a lot of that is accounted for

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 6>and planned and advanced. So as the manager of the home,

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 6>Picasso is thinking about what things might break or what

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 6>things may wear over time, and we're actually accruing in

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 6>the budget so that there's funds available to repair some

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 6>of those things when they occur.

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, go ahead, Carl, No, no, no, no, no, go ahead.

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 3>So talk to us about the business. Because you guys

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 3>sell you you buy the homes and then you resell

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 3>them as shares. Is that correct?

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, kind of. Usually the way that it works is

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 6>we have thousands of listings on our website at Picasso

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 6>dot com. You can also see them on our app,

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 6>and consumers will go to our website and express interest

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 6>in homes that meet their needs. Once we see enough

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 6>interest in a particular home, then Picasso gets involved, works

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 6>with the listing agent to get the home under contract,

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 6>We do diligence on behalf of the ownership group, and

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 6>then we convert it into a co owned Picasso home.

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating. Talk to us about the ramp up and demand

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.719
<v Speaker 2>and types of sales. Just give us, give us some metrics.

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>We're bloomberg as we all. Yeah, I'd love to know

0:28:58.080 --> 0:28:58.479
<v Speaker 2>some of them else.

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Well, back to your question what it was like

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 6>launching during the pandemic. The first couple of years were crazy.

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we grew from zero to We've done more

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 6>than a billion dollars in revenue over the course of

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 6>the first three years of the company's history. We have

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 6>thousands of owners and the way that our model works

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 6>is when we aggregate an ownership group and identify the home,

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 6>we make a service fee that's baked into the share

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 6>price of the home, and then we provide a variety

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 6>of services throughout the life of the relationship that we

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 6>have with our customers. So that includes things like property management, financing.

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 6>About seventy percent of people who buy a Picasso use financing,

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 6>and Picasso is the originator of those loans. We also

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 6>help with resale, so when you buy an eighth or

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 6>a quarter of a beautiful vacation home through Picasso, and

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 6>someday you decide to sell, we help with that sales

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 6>process as well, and it's really easy.

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 2>How long do people stay with their ownership, I'm curious

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 2>about turnover.

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it depends on the owner, but we estimate that

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 6>the average owner going to stay in their Picasso home

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 6>for about five years because.

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 2>They are staying in I mean you're now three and

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 2>a half years in, so the people.

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, we're looking at cohort trends to estimate what we

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 6>think the average life is going to be. A whole

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 6>home somebody would typically stay in for you know, seven

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 6>to eight years on average.

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's say I'm interested in home in the mountains

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 3>in the winter, I want to ski there in the summer.

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 3>I want a mountain bike there. Where do I leave

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 3>my skis? Where do I leave my mountain bike? So

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 3>the seven other families don't mess with my stuff?

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, one of the best parts of owning a home

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 6>is that you get to keep your stuff there. That's

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 6>true of owning a Picasso as well. We outfit every

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 6>Picasso home with eight owners closets, so when you show

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 6>up at the home, you pull your stuff out of

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 6>your owner's closet and you enjoy the home with none

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 6>of the headaches or none of the hassle.

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 2>What are some of the common headaches that come up

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 2>in this process.

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 6>Well, there aren't really any any headaches because we're taking

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 6>on that burden as the manager of the property. But

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 6>I would say the compromise associated with co ownership is

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 6>that you don't own a undred percent of the home,

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 6>which means you're not going to get one hundred percent

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 6>of the calendar.

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 2>You can't say, hey, honey, let's just for the weekend,

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 2>go up and.

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 6>You know, well, actually you can. You can, so as

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 6>long as the home is available, you can. But basically,

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 6>the main compromise with co ownership is that you're sharing

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 6>the calendar with other people. So the way that most

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.479
<v Speaker 6>of our owners describe the calendar benefit is you're going

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 6>to get about eighty percent of the dates that you

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 6>want out of the calendar, and you're happy to make

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 6>the trade off on the twenty percent that you're not

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 6>getting because you're saving so much money. It's about eighty

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 6>five percent less expensive to own a picasso when compared

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 6>to owning the whole home. It's about seventy five percent

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 6>less expensive per night than renting a comparable Airbnb or

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 6>short terminal. So it just makes a lot of sense financially,

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 6>and it's a lot easier as well, because we manage

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 6>the whole experience.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 3>How do you make decisions that for personalization? For example,

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 3>let's say, I want to get a hot tub at

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 3>that mountain home, but you know the other families don't

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 3>want a hot tub there. How do you do that?

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:56.959
<v Speaker 2>It's like the co op, right kind of tested.

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it is analogous to the co op in some ways.

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 6>But when owners buy into a Picasso, they're typically buying

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 6>into the style of that home, the design of that home,

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 6>which which we manage, and the amenities of that home.

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 6>So if somebody wants to make a change, like let's

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 6>say that you bought into a home without a pool,

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 6>and later you decide you want a home with a pool,

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 6>most people would just sell out of their Picasso without

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 6>a pool and sell into a new one. But it

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 6>is possible for all the owners in a home to

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 6>actually vote and make a change to a home such

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 6>as a bedroom or a pool, and in that scenario,

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 6>Picasso would facilitate the project on their behalf awestin I'm.

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Curious though, if you buy fractional ownership into a particular

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 2>piece of property and then you sell, do you sell

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 2>at the price you bought into or you with the

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 2>market bear? Like, how does that work? Because can you

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 2>lose money on that initial investment?

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, like any real estate purchase. Yes, you could lose money,

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 6>but most real estate goes up in value over time,

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 6>and that's certainly what's happened with our real estate. So

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 6>people who have purchased a pic and later resold our

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 6>customers have made on average a ten percent gain over

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 6>what they paid. But it trans I mean with Picasso,

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 6>you're buying a home. The only difference is you're buying

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 6>a portion of it instead of the whole thing. So

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 6>it trades just like the underlying real estate would if

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 6>you were selling the whole home. But we make the

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 6>process easier by facilitating the share of part of the home.

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 3>There's a huge affordability problem in a lot of these towns,

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 3>absolutely right. How do you handle pushback? I know that

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 3>in some areas where you operate, for example in St. Helena, California,

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 3>you had to reach a settlement with the town. How

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 3>do you anticipate pushback on this model?

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, the housing affordability problem is real and it's

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 6>here to stay. You know, homes aren't going to get

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 6>a whole lot cheaper into the future. So what we're

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 6>seeing is consumers are resorting to co ownership as a

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 6>way to make housing more affordable that could.

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Also be said to price out locals from living there.

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 6>No, it actually has the opposite effect in a small town.

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 6>So one of the challenges in a small vacation home

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 6>community is that second home buyers are buying up a

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 6>lot of the median price homes. The beauty of this

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 6>model is it's kind of like car pulling, but for

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 6>second homes, where we're aggregating demand into fewer properties. So

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 6>instead of having eight families in San Francisco buying median

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 6>price homes in Napa just to have them sit empty

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:25.280
<v Speaker 6>ten months per year, our model concentrates those eight families

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 6>into one home, so it actually creates more opportunity for

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.439
<v Speaker 6>the local workforce. But like any new category, it takes

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 6>time to be understood.

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Who's your typical buyer? Just got about thirty seconds.

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So the typical buyer ranges from a young family

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 6>that's early in their career and maybe can't afford or

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 6>can't justify owning the home of their dreams, all the

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 6>way to a very established, you know, empty nester that's

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 6>looking for a special happy place for the family.

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Regat well that's the range. Just quickly, is there a bulk?

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 2>Is it like people a certain demographic in terms of age, I.

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 6>Would say the sweet spot is like forty to sixty

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 6>in terms of of age. And I would say seventy

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 6>to eighty percent of people are looking for a home

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 6>that's within a two to three hour commute from their

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 6>primary home.

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 2>And just quickly, one last question ten seconds. Do you

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 2>make money on every transaction? How does it do?

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 6>What's the business? We make money on the service fee upfront,

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 6>and then we make money on the recurring services that

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 6>we provide, including property management, financing and resale.

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting, really cool stuff.

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:23.839
<v Speaker 6>Thank you, Thank you so much.

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 2>Austin Allison, co founder a CEO of Picasso, joining us

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:28.280
<v Speaker 2>here in studio.

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Come brother Marco a journal How about you let me drive?

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 5>Oh no, no, no, no, who's going to drive?

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Honey?

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 6>Please, I'll do the gravels. Let's wait, I want to drive.

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 6>It's good question.

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 3>This is the drive to the Globe.

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 8>Dot com communing well, Bun Jelda Don on Bluebird Radio.

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, just about eighteen minutes left in today's

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 2>trading sessions. Some buying into the clothes. We got to

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 2>pop to the pside, which is kind of interesting. I

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 2>feel like in the last I don't know ten or

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 2>fifteen minutes. So fascinating to see still just up, as

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 2>John mentioned, about three tens of a percent on the

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Nasdaq one hundred up, about seven tens of a percent

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 2>on the S and P five hundred, Dow up more

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 2>than one percent. But it's a straight lineup, So I'm

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:20.839
<v Speaker 2>not sure. We talk about volatility as we get near

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the end of the quarter, so maybe some of that

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:25.879
<v Speaker 2>is at play, but nonetheless certainly notable as I look

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 2>at my Bloomberg and I look at the charts across

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the board.

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Also a reminder Carol that this quarter we're toward the

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 3>end of the quarter, but this quarter we're seeing the

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 3>market serge close to ten percent.

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's been quite great quarter.

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I seven on the S and P five Was it.

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 2>Just last week? We had the best week right for

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:44.919
<v Speaker 2>the four stocks here in twenty twenty four.

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 3>I want to think get an idea for what Mace

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 3>McCain has to say about all this. Mace's chief investment

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 3>officer at Frost Investment Advisors. They've got about five point

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 3>one billion dollars in assets under management, Mace joining us

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 3>from San Antonio, Texas. Mace, how are you very good?

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 8>Thank you for having me on today.

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, good to have you with us. How are you

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 3>looking at a year where the quarter has already sent

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 3>shares hire by ten percent and we're not even three

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 3>months into this yet.

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 9>Well, in the very near term, we're a little cautious

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 9>in that, you know, measures of in semester sentiment are

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 9>pretty extreme and look like they could be overbought in

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 9>near term.

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 8>Of course, those conditions can stay over.

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Oops, we're having a little technical difficulty, so we're going

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 2>to see if we can get back and reconnect with

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Mace McCain over at Frost Investment Advisors.

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Interesting about the sentiment, right.

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, you know, quite a bounce, and I think

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of it has to do with and we've

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 2>talked about this right a lot about expectations in terms

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 2>of global central banks finally saying okay, we're ready to

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 2>start cutting rates. It's just it's not no longer. It's

0:37:57.320 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 2>no longer. You know, if we're going to do it,

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 2>it's just a case of time and when we're going

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 2>to do it.

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know about that though, right We know that

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 3>it's going to happen, We just don't know if there's

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 3>actually going to be three this year from the Federal Reserve.

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.399
<v Speaker 3>We don't know if we've had or exactly we've had

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 3>more and more folks come on our air lately and say,

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.839
<v Speaker 3>wait a second, we're looking you know the whoky said

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 3>yesterday Carol, that the FED is looking for an excuse

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 3>not to.

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Cut exactly our guest that was in here. But it's interesting.

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at what, as you said, the S and

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 2>P five hundred since the beginning of the year, or

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 2>at least in this quarter, up about eleven percent. We're

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 2>looking at a Nasdaq one hundred that's up about fourteen percent,

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 2>so pretty significant run. Hey, we're back with Mace McCain,

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 2>chief investment officer at Frost Investment Advisors. So Mace, you

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 2>were talking a little bit about sentiment and what we're

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 2>seeing and maybe what it means perhaps going forward from here.

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 9>Yes, we look to be a little overbought in the

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 9>short term, but as I say, we could stay that

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 9>way for a while. But I think that your points

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 9>on the FED are very important. I mean, the FED

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 9>risk is skewed at this time.

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 8>The FED is.

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 9>You know, not going to be raising rights if inflation

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 9>stays sticky and comes in hot, we're just going to

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:06.839
<v Speaker 9>get higher for longer. But if they have the opportunity,

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 9>they're going to start to cut later in the year.

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:13.800
<v Speaker 9>So we kind of skewed bed risk to towards cutting

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:14.800
<v Speaker 9>rather than raising.

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 8>So that's pretty supportive into markets.

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.359
<v Speaker 2>But is it dangerous to rule out the idea that

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:23.719
<v Speaker 2>maybe the FED ultimately considering. I don't know. We were

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 2>talking with Mike right a little bit about some of

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 2>the weakness we're starting to see in data points, But

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, are we being still too enthusiastic when it

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 2>comes to expectations about how many FED cuts we might get.

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think that they're off the table for a while.

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 9>And what's more important though, is, you know, we're in

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 9>an environment where we seem to be having either a

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 9>soft or no landing scenario. So people are figuring that

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 9>we're going to have a rate cut eventually. But right

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:54.399
<v Speaker 9>now we're seeing a broadening of the market. We're seeing

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 9>mid caps and small caps a little bit better. And

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 9>I think people's expectations for growth is gone, I know,

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 9>and maybe we're going to get out of what has

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 9>been a profits recession ast we look into the next year.

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 9>So I think that the fundamental side, the earning side,

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:15.359
<v Speaker 9>the cop of corporate side, is strengthening, and so as

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:17.359
<v Speaker 9>long as that's going on for a while, it takes

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 9>the FED out of the it becomes less important in

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 9>the mix.

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 3>A means where do you not want to be right now?

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:28.359
<v Speaker 8>The everything is run?

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:30.720
<v Speaker 9>You know, we've seen junk bonds go up, credit credit

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 9>go up, interest rates have really rallied off of this

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 9>last falls highs and so.

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 8>On the credit market.

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 9>You know, we were looking at bonds and the basically

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 9>the shorter end the value of the curve three to

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 9>five years, looking to anticipate the FED easing. We also

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 9>think once again that we're going to see a rally

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 9>possibly in a mid cap and small cap if we

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 9>continue to see the product market broadened and we continue

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:04.879
<v Speaker 9>to see growth surprise to the upside. So all that

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 9>is positive. It will probably take a little bit of

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 9>the spotlight of the leading leaders on technology as we

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 9>broaden the market, but that would be healthy to us.

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Where don't you want to be in this market environment?

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 9>You know, we are concerned enough about sticky inflation that

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:28.240
<v Speaker 9>I wouldn't want to be buying out.

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 8>Beyond ten years in the bond market.

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 9>We think that inflation expectations could rise based mostly on

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 9>the fact that we're going to we continue to be

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 9>short labor. If we do see manufacturing continue to strengthen

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 9>we're just going to.

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 8>See more demand for labor.

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 9>And unless we see workforce participation come up, we think that,

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:54.320
<v Speaker 9>you know, seeing significant progress towards our heads inflation targets

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:55.359
<v Speaker 9>could take a long time.

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious about asset allocation in a market that's up

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 3>ten percent on the year, that had a great year

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 3>last year. If if somebody comes to you, a client

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 3>comes to you, a new client comes to you with

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 3>new money and says, you know, throw this money where

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 3>you think it should go for the next few years,

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 3>what does that asset allocation look like.

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, we had a great year last year

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 9>in the stock market, but if you look at two

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:24.280
<v Speaker 9>years where it's not such great returns, So we borrowed

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 9>a lot this year, you know, catching up from last

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 9>year twenty three was based on a really four twenty two.

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 9>We're not at extreme valuations, very doubt believe. So we

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 9>still like stocks and so we think that you know,

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 9>the returns will be more modest because of valuations where

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 9>they are and the pe ratios, but we do think

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 9>that stocks will still be the best place to be

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:51.839
<v Speaker 9>as and as I said, if we do get some

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 9>economic strength, we think that we could finally see some

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 9>participation in the small and mid cap and so hopefully

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:02.320
<v Speaker 9>that'll out to market and help returns.

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 8>In the next year.

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Mace, gonna leave it on that listen. Thank

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 2>you so much, so appreciate it. Mace mccainey's chief investment

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:10.879
<v Speaker 2>officer at Frost Investment Advisors, as you mentioned earlier, about

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 2>five point one billion in assets under management, and he

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 2>was joining us there from San Antonio, Texas.

0:43:16.600 --> 0:43:20.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast of a Little Apple,

0:43:20.680 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Business App. You can also watch us live every weekday

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Jermale