WEBVTT - Will a THIRD Party Ever Beat Democrats & Republicans?

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Hello there, Welcome to my Thursday edition of the Chuck Podcast.

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I got a great episode for you today if you're

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>frustrated by the two political parties. And there's actually been

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.319
<v Speaker 1>some news about that, right The former White House Press

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:20.080
<v Speaker 1>secretary for Joe Biden announced that she's leaving the Democratic Party,

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Jean Pierre, who one time we used to work

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>for move On, which was in itself a force that

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>was more progressive than Democratic. Interesting decision there, And she's

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>got a book that's going to be coming out about

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>her experience at the White House. But launching her book,

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 1>launching the book, news was this idea that she is

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>unregistering as a Democrat. Well, guess who I've just interviewed

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and what this episode is going to feature. It's the

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>CEO of the Forward Party. You may remember the Forward

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Party from the days of Andrew Yang, who was a

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>presidential candidate in twenty twenty one. Of many he actually

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>caught a little bit of fire the Yng Gang at

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>one time. He had a friend of mine reminded me

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>he may have had the best political paraphernalia in a

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>big shot glass and it was like the ultimate long shot.

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Yang for President, which was terrific, but he his

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>experience running as a Democrat working with the Democrats caused

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>him to think that there's got to be a better way,

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>so he started the Forward Party. It has since sort

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of combined forces with what former New Jersey Governor Christy Whitman,

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>one time a Republican, now I think an independent now

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 1>member of this Forward Party. Kerrie Healy, who was Romney's

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>lieutenant governor when he was governor of Massachusetts, is also

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>active in this and so there is a growing coalition

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of sort of what you would call refugee political refugees

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>from the two parties. Now, I think we're going to

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>have this conversation with Lindsay and you'll see what they're

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to be. They Are they an outpost for the

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>frustrated man major party adherents or are they going to

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>try to be something more. I'm not going to give

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that away, but there's a lot of people frustrated by

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the direction of both parties, and there's always been this

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>question why do we have only two? Obviously, battled access

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is one reason the two parties have created duopoly. If

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>any other business work this way, there'd be the government

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>would force some sort of change here. But there's no

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>doubt that the political party structures in this country need

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to be disrupted or we're going to continue to have

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>these unhappy elections where we continue to vote out whatever

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 1>parties in power. And if you look at basically, that's

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the twenty first century, and to me, it is a

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>sign of wholesale dissatisfaction with political leadership. And so the

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>only thing we can do if we don't like our

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>political leadership is vote the other party in. And if

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you look, I mean it is amazing. We've only had

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>two elections this century where the status quote prevailed completely.

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It was in two thousand and four and twenty twelve

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bush reelect and the Obama reelect, and both Congress

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Senate did not change hands in either of

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>those cycles sations the only time that's happened. Every two

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>years we have tossed some party out of power of

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>either the White House, control of the House, or control

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Senate every single election two six, eight, ten, twelve, fourteen, sixteen, eighteen, twenty,

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:31.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, twenty four, likely twenty six. Right, we'll see

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>what's coming. So it is to me a primal screen

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>from the American public that they want to stop picking

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>going to the clothing store and only having the choice

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of extra small or extra large. I think they would

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>like some some sort of choice of political of parties

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in between those two. But before we get to that,

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I've got a there's been in some ways this goes

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to the distrust of the two political parties. Well, first,

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>let me touch quickly on the Elon Musk Donald Trump feud.

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.839
<v Speaker 1>What are we to make of this? Right? What I'll

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>say is be careful lumping all of the opposition to

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the big beautiful Bill into one camp. Right, Elon Musk's

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>opposition is different than Josh Holly's opposition, is different than

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Murkowski's opposition, is different than Akim Jeffrey's opposition. There

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>is and so while there is a growing collection of

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>people of all politicians of various stripes, if you will,

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>and political leaders of various stripes, most of them have

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a different reason for what they're upset about. I will

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>just say this, if the Republican Party, or if the

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump White House is frustrated by this process, they only

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>have themselves to blame. They have chosen not to govern

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for the entire country they have chosen to try to

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>govern via one party rule. Governing via one party rule

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>never works. You do not get what you want. Obama

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>got forced into one party rule. But the reason Obamacare

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>stuck is at least he spent a year trying to

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>get bipartisan support. He went and sat there and let

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>invited Republicans to Blairhouse to give their perspective on healthcare.

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>It was a bipartisan effort, even though the ultimate result

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>in order to pass it was a partisan was a

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>partisan vote. But at least the process was bipartisan. They

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>were trying hard, and it was essentially a Republican idea.

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>The mandates and just remember Obamacare is just a derivative

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of the original Heritage Foundation idea from the mid nineties

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that Bob Dole was a fan of. That met Romney

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>built the Massachusetts health Care Plan. So the point is

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>it was an effort to so the idea was bipartisan,

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>even if the result getting it done was. But ever

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>since then, and in some ways perhaps it's the wrong

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>lesson that both parties took from that experience from Obama

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is like, well, just do it with one party. It's

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the only way. In that way, you're only negotiating with yourself.

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>But this is not how you govern, and this is

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>not how you get anything done. And then you end

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>up creating these Frankenstein bills, right Biden had a Frankenstein bill.

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump put together a Frankenstein tax bill the first time,

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they had to create this expiration date

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>in order to prevent the deficit from look from the

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>debt projections from just blowing people, blowing the markets out

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of the water. And now they're stuck with another version

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of a Frankenstein bill that if they would actually try

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to get bipartisan buy in, they might have a more

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>durable bill. It might not be have everything that they

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>wish that they had, but they wouldn't have the political

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>nightmare that they're dealing with right now. And of course

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter what gets past. It is not going

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to say half of it is going to get overturned

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>by the next administration, just like this administration is trying

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>to overturn half of what Biden got done. There'll be

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>some things they won't be able to get rid of,

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>just like there'll be some things the next administration won't

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we get rid of Trump, but it will be a

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>much easier to wipe away his legacy, just like it's

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty easy to way boy the Biden legacy simply because

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of this decision by everybody. And they blame it. You know,

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>it's the other party's fault that we have to do

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>this one party. You got to get caught trying. And

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing Barack Obama did is got caught trying. And

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, even though he didn't get any Republican support

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>for Obamacare, he went through the motions. You don't even

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>see Biden didn't go through the motions. Trump certainly is

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>going out of his way not to go through the motions.

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the fact that they are purging people based

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>on whether they gave money to Democrats, what they did

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to this NAS employee, which of ken I think? And

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>this gets me to Elon Musk. So what do we have?

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>What do we make of this? Right, there was plenty

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of us that said, we know this relationship is going

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to end badly. We just don't know when it's going

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to end badly. And you know, there was always going

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a test of wills. Right, one is the

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>most powerful person in the world and one is the

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>richest person in the world. One is term limited. The

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>rich guy is not, and so I had always assumed

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it's and it was it felt as if and if

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to just look at it through the terms,

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and Trump is a power guy first and foremost, right,

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why he always, you know, sits a certain way.

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>He always wants to be in a power position. He

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>believes in just sort of doing things every once in

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a while to make sure people know where they who they,

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>where they sit, as far as is Orbit's concerned. So

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not a shock to me that he wanted to

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>send little shot at Elon that says, hey, just remember

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you know you still need me. So he dumps the

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 1>NASA guy. Well, in some ways, I think Musk took

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that as oh, okay, well then I can go public

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>criticizing you if that's the shot at them. And so

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>here we are, do I think it will escalate more.

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I kind of have my doubts. One thing about the

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>pattern of Donald Trump is anybody who's wealthier than he is,

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't quite go after with the same vigor as

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>he will say me and other people in the press,

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>for instance, Right, I mean, look at how he softened

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>on Zuckerberg and softened on Bezos anybody with money he

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>will eventually soften on. Part of it is that he

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>just usually because he wants a piece of the piece

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of their action, and if they come in with some

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of transactional aspect to it, then he's there to

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>do business. So I think he will. He will be

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>careful here too much. So I have to tell you

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>there's one thing I want to single out, and I

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>actually i'm hoping to. I'm going to, you know, I'm

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>going to publicly say that I want to book Ari

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Fleischer and have a discussion with something he tweeted. Ari

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>was reacting to what Elon Musk was doing, and he

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>tweeted this. He said, Elon Musk is on his way

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to becoming Scott Scott McClellan. Scott McLellan was a press

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>secretary during the Bush forty three administration who did a

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>tell all book and suddenly everybody hated him in the

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party because he did a tell all anyway, so

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Ari Fleischer said, that's he's becoming Scott McClellan. That's not good,

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>smart or principal thing to be. These will always hate him,

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>even if they may now quote him before he destroys

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the good will he still has with ours. I hope

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>he'll think twice he's done great things. I hope he

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't burn all his bridges. So basically, what what Fleischer

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is implying, it's like, hey, if you have an independent thought,

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 1>be careful expressing it because you're going to need one

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>party or the other and those guys are always going

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to reject you. Don't you want don't you want our support?

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And this I just hate that this is the mindset.

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And ri might be right. I'm not going to sit

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>here and say he's wrong that. You know, if Elon

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>thinks this is going to help him get back into

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the good graces of a democratic leadership administration, should that

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.719
<v Speaker 1>be what comes next? Maybe he's right and these will

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>never you know, forgive him for his relationship with Trump

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>or what he did, you know, his sort of what

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>he did at AID, which is just a ridiculous way

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to go about this with DOJE. But this shouldn't be

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the mindset, right. This assumes that basically the goal of

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>governing is only one party, right, and if you're in

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>charge your part, you do everything with your party, and

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you better be a team player. God forbid you. You

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you somehow disagree, don't ever say you're disagree. This is

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of what's wrong, right. This is why both parties

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>have had this outsider explosion at the elites and the

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>establishment of these two parties because of this type of behavior.

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>So I you know, like I said, I hope to

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>have of a more robust conversation with Ari about this

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>because I think he will. He's willing to have thoughtful

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>conversations like this about you know, this is this is

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>no way to do This is no way to governor country.

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>We cannot keep having this mindset. We are just going

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep going down the road that we've been going

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>down for the last ten years. One other topic I

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>want to get to before we get to my conversation

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>with Lindsay Draft and the future of third party politics,

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>independent politics in this country. Andrew Cuomo, we are three

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>June twenty fourth, We're going to have the New York

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>City Democratic primary, and in probably the winner of the

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>primary probably is the next mayor. I say probably Eric

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Adams and company is running on an independent line. Things

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>have happened, but you have a primary that looks like

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be fairly competitive with Cuomo one and

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a progressive candidate coming close but probably coming up short.

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But I have to say, and you've heard me with

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>some a couple of these interviews I've had with New

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>York City Members of Congress Dan Goldman, who is not

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>supporting Cuomo, Richie Torres, who is supporting Cuomo. I didn't

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know if there's an enthusiastic amount

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of support for Cuomo, but there is a lot of

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>people who are looking at the options and going, well,

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>what choice do we have? Cuomo's might be the most competent,

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>even if it's not clear whether he deserves this access

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>or not. And that's that's where I want to get

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>at something. So Cuoma did this interview at the Times.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't done many interviews, but he did this interview

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>at the Times. And there were two things that stuck

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>out to me on this interview. One had to do

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>with him admitting that he hadn't lived in New York

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>City since he was thirty two. He's now sixty seven,

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's been thirty five years since he had a

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 1>domicile in New York City until the last six months.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, yes, you know, it's not as if Cuomo

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.599
<v Speaker 1>isn't of New York City. You know, he worked on

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>his dad's campaign for mayor that was unsuccessful in seventy seven, certainly,

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and he said he lived there till he was thirty two,

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>until he ended up in the Clinton administration. But I

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a you know, that that could leave a mark.

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>If if the the candidates that have lived in New

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>York City longer than six months are likely to make

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>an issue of that, that could that could matter. That

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>could matter. Although I just don't think anybody's going to

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>think Cuomo's not a New Yorker, right given how how

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, he's just a part of the

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of the of the fabric of New York on that front.

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>But it was something else he said that I think

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>deserves a little more. He said he regrets resigning, and

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it gets me to something. You know what, He's right,

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>he shouldn't have resigned. But I have a different reason

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>why he shouldn't have resigned because we did not get

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>closure on whether what he was accused of doing is

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>something he did. He said he chose to resign to

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>avoid an impeachment process, that he chose to resign to

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>avoid the distractions to governing that would have created the

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Attorney general. Leticia James came out with a scathing report

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, just to take you back into that moment, right,

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the allegations emerge. You know, in in mid March,

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>he was still you know, a majority of New Yorker

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>said no, they didn't want him to resign. Then on August,

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that was March of twenty twenty one, so it was

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>sitting out there. Then you had various leaks of different

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>women coming out in different media reports, but his numbers,

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, you know, there were you know,

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>his personal fable ratings went down. It was very similar

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to what Bill Clinton happened to Bill Clinton in the nineties.

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>But there was a there was a chunk of New

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Yorkers that are like, no, he should stay governor. Then

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Letitia James releases her report on August third, and the

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>next day Maris comes out with a poll and it

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>was fifty nine percent of New Yorkers thought Quoma should resigned.

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Fifty two percent of Democrats thought the same thing. By

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a few days later, as more people absorbed the information,

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a Quinnipiac poll had the number up to seventy percent

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of New Yorkers who wanted him to resign, and basically,

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, within a week he were to resigned and

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>he was out. Here's what we didn't get. And this

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is where I think. I think these these forced resignations

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of democratically small d democratic elected officials without a full

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>accounting of what they did when you resign in disgrace,

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to have and this is something

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that would probably take constitutional amendments in some states, but

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that there should be an extra penalty if

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you resign in disgrace before the end of your term.

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>You shouldn't be allowed to immediately come back and run

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>for another office. Right if you resign in order to

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>avoid an ethics investigation in the House or the Senate.

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Right if that's what happens. Literally, if the Ethics Committee

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>has opened a probe on a member of Congress and

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that member of Congress decides to resign, the probe is dropped. Right,

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So then all you have are the allegations which do

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>stick to that, but there's no sort of due process

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for the individual. Now you could argue they would have

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>had due process, that they'd chosen to go through the process. Well,

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that brings me to Andrew Cuomo. So these allegations come out,

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>there is no you know, in some ways, there's no

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>We have not had them litigated under oath. Had there

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>been an impeachment proceeding in the New York legislature, there'd

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>have been a trial and we would have at least

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>been able to let the public decide whether or not

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>he should he should, you know, with all the evidence

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>out there. But this was you know, so in some

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:05.479
<v Speaker 1>ways you know I this, you know this, And sometimes

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the media plays a role in this, right, which is

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to sort of create the drum beat to just force

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>these individuals out, when that is the worst thing for

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the democracy. We need to air the dirty laundry. In

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>some ways, the impeachment proceedings of Bill Clinton and Donald Trump,

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>while horrendous perhaps to watch and certainly created a lot

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.959
<v Speaker 1>of acrimony and dysfunction in the country, was also a loot.

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Was also an education of the process for the country,

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and so it gave them an idea, Okay, what is

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>serious and what isn't you know? In fact, I think

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>going through the impeachment process cured voters of the idea that,

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, how much should character impact whether someone should

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>stay in office or not. And of course we have

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>selective outrage when it comes to character. If we're mad

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>at somebody about something else, then we look for a

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 1>character excuse in order to get rid of him. I

0:17:55.440 --> 0:18:00.239
<v Speaker 1>would argue that Andrew Cuomo, you know he was at

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>first it looked like he was handling COVID Well. I

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>think now history shows that he didn't do the best

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>job that was possible there and certainly seemed to worry

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>more about his self image during the COVID thing than

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>actually getting stuff done. But we didn't. We didn't have

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's right. He shouldn't have resigned. And

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I think this of everybody I went through, I'm going

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to go through some. We've of all the people since

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty that have statewide governors that have resigned while

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in office. You've had John Rowland of Connecticut who just

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>got a pardon from Donald Trump, Jim McGreevy in New

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Jersey who basically resign due to an extra mental affair,

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Robert Bentley in Alabama in twenty seventeen, he resigned due

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to an extra medical affair. John Kitzeber of Oregon resigned

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>early because he didn't want more information about an extra

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>marital affair. Eric Brighten's essentially very similar things in named

0:18:53.920 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>crew Cuomo, but all of them essentially ducked an opportunity

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to defend themselves. And to me, if you resign in disgrace,

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>we really there should be an extra penal. We should

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>be forcing due process for the voter. Right, it is

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that the voter deserves a full accounting and a full story.

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:21.719
<v Speaker 1>And it's also not fair to that potentially disgraced politician

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that the innuendo and accusations, because when you resign, then

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody believes it. Right, If Andrew Cuomo believes he was railroaded,

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>then why did he resign? Right the minute he resigned,

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>he ended up essentially con confirming the entire report. Now

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he may believe he wasn't doing that by resigning, but

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>as far as a majority of the New York public,

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the message he was sending. Well, she got me,

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>when maybe society would have been better served to like,

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>let's let's get the detail of the allegations out there

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and if it's too again, if it's too embarrassing for you,

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>then you want to resign early. You have put the

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 1>state in a bind. You sometimes resignation forces a special

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>election sometimes resignation, so there should be a higher penalty,

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 1>and that penalty should be a six year ban, an

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>eight year ban, a ten year ban from running for

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:21.959
<v Speaker 1>any office in that state. Again because the Andrew Cuomo campaign.

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Here we are he resigns in twenty one. Now he's

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>running for marin twenty five, and we don't know, we

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>don't really have the full accounting. We know why I resigned,

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>we know what he was accused of. He denies some

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of it, but we've not had a formal, a formal

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 1>process to sort of litigate this and to hear his

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>side of the story under oath rather than his side

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of the story via via political campaigning. You know, I

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>mean it is you look at the Senate resignations. The

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.959
<v Speaker 1>most egregious is clearly the Al Frankin one where Al

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Franklin was basically forced to resign by his own party

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>all because Chuck Schumer wanted to win the Alabama Senate race,

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>right if the Alabama Senate race doesn't happen. And you

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>know it was also loud calls by Senator Kirsten Jillibrand

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 1>was the first she was getting ready to run for president.

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, so there was a lot of political factors

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>outside of Franken's control. But what we never got and

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Franken went ahead and resigned, but we never got a

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>full accounting of the ethics committee. That's not fair to Franken,

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>nor is that fair to the voters of Minnesota. But again,

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>all that was done because in the moment, Democrats were

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>trying to embarrass Roy Moore in Alabama and that mess,

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and they wanted to look cleaner than the Republicans, and

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, essentially they sacrificed Franken in order to get

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a Senate seat for Doug Jones. You might say that

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was politically smart, What was that really good for the process?

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Was that really good for democracy? And does that really

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>increase trust in politicians anyway? I just it was it

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting thought experiment. I agree with Cuomo, but

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>not for the reasons perhaps he thought he shouldn't have resigned.

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>He really I think it would have been better for everybody,

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>better for Cuomo, better for the voters, better for the

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>for the institutions, had you actually let the impeachment process

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>play out. But sometimes we're in such a hurry to

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of move on to the next story that that

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>becomes this sort of feeding frenzy. The press plays a role,

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>pundits player role, people just looking to move up in power,

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>lieutenant governors wanting to become governor. There becomes all of

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this rather than realizing, you know what's in the this

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 1>was a duly small de democratic elected official. So if

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna we probably should take take those take those

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>elections a bit more seriously, take the voters a bit

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>more seriously, and not just sort of force somebody out.

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>So you have all these appointed people in power who

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:57.479
<v Speaker 1>weren't put there by the voters. So anyway, I'm curious,

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd love your reaction to this. Send me a note

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>on this, Ashta look at thechucktodcast dot com. If about

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>my idea that resigning in disgrace, resigning to avoid an

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>ethics committee, and resigning to avoid an impeachment process with

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>your legislature should automatically trigger a five or ten year

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>ban from running for office after that, you shouldn't be

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>able to do that essentially to avoid scrutiny and then

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>get to come back into public life without having to

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of go through go through that process you broke,

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>You potentially broke a trust with the voters. You ought

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.239
<v Speaker 1>to have to be forced to see it through and

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>explain to the voters why or why not that that

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>trust was voting. All right. So, now that I've put

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you in the mood of really loving the two parties

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 1>these days, enjoy my conversation with a third alternative. Lindsay

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Draft of the Poet Party and joining me now is

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the head of the Forward Party. I believe the title

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>is CEO, not party chair. And we're going to discuss exactly.

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Forward Party was started by Andrew Yang. It's merged with

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>an organization that Christy Whitman, the former Republican governor of

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey's been involved with. Essentially, it's a whole group

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of people concerned about that the two major parties aren't

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>answering the call here and for those of you, I

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>hear it all the time. Is there another way? Well,

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I think Lindsay's here to make the case that Forward

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>could be that other way. The question is what is it?

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>Is it a party? Is it a movement? Is it

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a reform project? These are the questions I hope she

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>answers with us today. Lindsay, nice to see you.

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Great to be here, Chuck, thanks for having me. All right,

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 2>let's do the elevator pitch.

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:51.959
<v Speaker 1>So, meaning you tell somebody I'm with the Forward Party,

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>They say, what is that? What do you say?

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 2>We are a new political party in the United States

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 2>that is an ideologically inclusive movement working to reduce toxic

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 2>polarization and extremism by introducing competition into the political arena.

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Somebody whose next question might very well be, well, are

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you red or blue?

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we're neither. We're purple. We're purple. Okay, But

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 2>you know what.

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean? Are you centrist? Are you independent?

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? You know, so we are independent. We are independent.

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 2>And the reason why I don't love the word centrist

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 2>is I think that it has become a catch all

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 2>for people who are committed to pragmatism and common sense solutions.

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 2>So if you are not an extremist on the left

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 2>or the right, then you must be a centrist. But

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 2>what a lot of American voters kind of equate centrism

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 2>with or moderation is that there's actually that you lack

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 2>conviction on particular issues. And so what I really want

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 2>to encourage people to do is to kind of shake

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 2>off this idea that all policy solutions are either decidedly

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 2>progress or decidedly conservative, and in fact, a party and

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 2>individuals within a party can explore all sorts of new

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 2>innovative solutions to policy issues outside of that idea, that

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 2>kind of you know, binary access there. So what does

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 2>it look like if we triangulate the whole thing and

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 2>really focus on an independent party?

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So look, it is this is one of those things

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>where you would say the market really demands this, absolutely,

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>but there are real barriers to entry, right that this

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>is a there is a strong duopoly in here, and

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>if the Republican Party and their Democratic Party were businesses

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:47.239
<v Speaker 1>that were regulated by the federal government, I have a

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling they would be charged with operating a duopoly. But

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>that obviously those that are in charge are members of

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this duopoly.

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Literally, the FEC, the Federal elegentc Commission, is made half

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 2>of Republicans and half of Democrats.

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So it is not necessarily a fair arbiter of anything

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 1>that's outside the two major parties, And I guess that

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>would be my You know, it is so obvious that

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a vacuum here, and there is a lot of

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>cynicism that anybody can fill it because we've seen we've

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>seen attempts like this multiple times. What gives you faith,

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>what gives you hope that this time is different? Well,

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:28.719
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I think that we are an unprecedented

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>moment in American history right now that will allow for

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>this sort of innovation to come to light. Fifty one

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of Americans last summer, Pew tracked at the high

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>water mark were registered as independents or unaffiliated voters. You

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>have people leaving the two party system in droves. Sixty

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>five percent of Americans say they do want a new

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>political party. And you post the question earlier, Chuck, about

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>is this a movement? Is this a party?

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 2>And what I would say is this is a movement

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 2>of people, but we are deploying that movement through the

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 2>vehicle of a political party, because that's how we run

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 2>candidates in the United States. And you talked about that

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 2>barrier for entry that the duopoly has created, and secretaries

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.880
<v Speaker 2>of states and election boards around the country wear jerseys.

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 2>They wear red and blue jerseys, and when more competition

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 2>has come to the table, they've raised that barrier for

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 2>entry time and time again. In fact, in New York,

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 2>one of our the legacy organization that merged with US,

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the Serve America Movement. They achieved ballot access in both

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 2>New York State and in Connecticut, and they ran candidates

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 2>for governor in both states. When the Democratic Legislature convened

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 2>the following year in New York, they went, oh, gosh,

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 2>those guys got really close. We better raise the barrier

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 2>for entry. And they raised it such that actually it

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 2>knocked off not only the Serve America Movement party, but

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 2>it knocked off the Green Party and the Libertarians off

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the ballot as well.

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean they raised in the threshold of

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>what you have to meet to get automatic to avoid

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>having to do petition signatures to get on the battle yep.

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 2>So they raise a threshold for signatures and also introduced

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 2>a requirement that you had to run a candidate for

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 2>President of the United States in order to be a

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 2>recognized party in the state. So that you know that

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 2>continual moving of a the ligne is why we are

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 2>deploying this movement through a political party, because independents face

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 2>a much more significant barrier to entry running by themselves.

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 2>The other thing that political parties do is they provide infrastructure.

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, anytime anyone's knocked on your door, they've probably

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 2>gotten your address and your voter registration from their political party.

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Anytime you get an email and it asks you to

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 2>click here and you use Act blue or Win red,

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 2>those are payment processors that are are built by the

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Republican and the Democratic parties. Anytime someone texts you to

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 2>get out the vote and says, you know, go, you know,

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 2>go vote for Glenn Youngkin, I know you're in Virginia, chut,

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 2>that text processor is paid for by a Republican Party effort.

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 2>So we need to build the infrastructure to support independently

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 2>minded candidates across the country. And that's what we're doing.

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So what does success look like in ten years? Is

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it that the Forward Party is one of the two

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>major parties or that the two major parties that we

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>know of today have reformed in response to the Forward

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Party successes.

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean success for us in ten years is

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 2>a functional and representative government that's responsive to its voters.

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Where we have actually seen a shift in incentives in

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 2>terms of the way our elected officials behave and respond

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 2>to voters. Right now, the incentive system right now is

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 2>focused on a very very small swath of the electorate,

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 2>a very progressive swath of the electorate, and a maga

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 2>swath of the electorate because of closed party primaries that

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 2>lock out competition and lockout independent voters. So a combination

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 2>of introducing a new political party that runs, new candidates

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 2>for office that are incentivized to be responsive to, a

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 2>broader swap of the electorate, structural changes that open up

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 2>our primary system. Those things together will allow for a

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 2>representative and responsive government that is not gridlocked the way

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 2>we see government now. And you know, we talk a

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 2>lot about Washington, d C. You and I are here

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 2>in d C. But I'm talking about it in state

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 2>houses across the country as well, completely gridlocked, you know,

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 2>driven by partisan politics. We are building this party from

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 2>the ground up, Chuck, which means I get to go

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 2>around the country and meet incredible candidates or municipal seats

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 2>for you know, mayors, city councils, school boards, and they

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 2>just want to serve their communities. So success for us

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 2>would be to create a movement and infrastructure that allows

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 2>people to serve their communities authentically at the federal level,

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 2>at the state wide level, in communities. And that might

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 2>mean it might mean a durable and lasting third party.

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 2>It might mean a more responsive and functional two party system,

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 2>but I think that we have to we have to

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 2>introduce competition through a third vehicle in order to realize

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 2>one or those other two things. So this they're not

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 2>going to do. They're not going to do it by themselves.

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Give me a little bit of the origin story here

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>for everything, because I know Andrew Yang's basically started this

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>party after twenty twenty, yeah, and then I know there

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>was emerging and I hope I got it right with

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what Christy Whitman was doing. So walk me through sort

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of what it was that Yang started and what it

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is today. What's the additive?

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 2>So I will talk to folks a lot about hows

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 2>and whys. There are a number of organizations around the

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 2>country that share a similar why. You know, we want

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 2>we want to reduce extremism, we want to reduce toxic polarization.

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 2>How we go about it, chief that is a little

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 2>bit different. What levers do we pull to get there?

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 2>So Andrew Yang started the Forward Party, and he wanted

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 2>to disrupt the duopoly by creating a new political party,

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 2>in large part to elect people who were fans of

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 2>non partisan structural democracy reforms. So I talked about our

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 2>primary system. So what does it look like to open

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 2>up our primary system? What does it look like to

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 2>introduce innovations like brant choice voting, non partisan primaries, things

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 2>that we've seen adopted in places like Alaska, Maine, Washington State, California.

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 2>The introduction of those reforms means that you're challenging the

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 2>status quo. You're challenging the power structures of current elected officials.

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 2>So Andrew's you know theory of change is that well,

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 2>if you if you launch a movement of people that

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 2>elect people into positions of power with a different incentive structure,

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 2>they can pass these uh you know, these these reforms.

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 2>So there was a group called the Serve America Movement.

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 2>I referenced their work in New York and Connecticut, and

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 2>they also had a similar theory of change, which was

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 2>disrupting the duopoly, uh, you know, through through a new

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 2>political party. Their executive director was a guy named David Jolly,

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 2>who was a Republican member of Congress. David's been in

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 2>the news lately because he actually has become a Democrat.

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 2>He's become a Democrat. He's going to run for governor

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 2>in Florida as a Democrat. And then there was a

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 2>group called the Renew America Movement UH where Governor Whitman

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 2>was and and that group their acronym was RAM, you know,

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 2>it was their theory of a change was how do

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 2>we It was more of a communication strategy, So how

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 2>do we hold up a mirror to bad actors? And

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 2>then potentially what does it look like to galvanize folks

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 2>who were in the Republican Party who were not excited

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:51.280
<v Speaker 2>about the Mega movement. So the fact that our origin

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 2>story is one of merger and alignment, I think is

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 2>really really important as we go out to do the

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 2>work because.

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>We'se right, wh what we're wanting out of our government?

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely sure. I mean I always say politics was invented

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:10.359
<v Speaker 1>by humans to you know, resolve disputes without violence, right,

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.479
<v Speaker 1>which meant not everybody gets what it gets everything they want.

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 1>That that's what political are. Real good political decision usually means.

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 2>You have to walk into a room willing to give

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 2>something up.

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think so that the President that that

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 3>merger set was really important for us, and it's continued

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 3>as a real es central part of our ethos.

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Christy Whitman and Andrew Yang co chairs. And what's the

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:39.280
<v Speaker 1>role of Kerry Heally, the former Republican Lieutenant governor of Massachusetts,

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Romney's one time running mate on the statewide level. What

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 1>what is is she also a chair of this or

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 1>how does that?

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Such? So so? A gentleman not by the name of

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Michael Wilner was also a founding co chair along with

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Christy and Andrew. We kind of frank and boarded the

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 2>Forward Board when it was founded. So we had four

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 2>members of each of the Legacy Board come together with Michael,

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Christy and Andrews serving as equal co chairs. Certainly, you

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 2>know Christy and Andrew having you know, big externally facing personalities,

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 2>people who knew them. They had name recognition and brand

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.479
<v Speaker 2>I d. They did a lot of externally facing work.

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 2>In the last two and a half years, almost three

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 2>years since the merger, we've expanded our board with intentionality.

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Some of the former board members from the legacy organizations

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 2>have rolled off. New board members have come on, and

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 2>as we have leaned into a collective brand and a

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 2>collective culture, we asked Carry Healy to take over his

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 2>executive chair because she's not from one of the three

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 2>legacy organizations.

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Chair of the board.

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she's the executive chair of the board. Yeah. And

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Carrie's fantastic. She took over as president of Babson College,

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 2>and I'm going to watch the numbers a little bit,

0:36:57.480 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 2>but it was they were in the kind of sub

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 2>one hundred rankings of colleges and universities around the country

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 2>and when she left there like number two, and so

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I just kept saying to her, well, that's fine, just

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.280
<v Speaker 2>do that with forward. You know, we're the third political

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 2>party right now before yeah, after you take us. So, yeah,

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 2>you take over and we'll be the first.

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, second to none. Eight. I remember Avis used to

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>do a whole thing. They were always number two to Hurtz,

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and they decided we're second to none. But it was

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 1>eart of their way. They embraced the we're number two,

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>but we're second to none. I always thought that was

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.280
<v Speaker 1>over we're second to none. Very clever Madison Avenue campaign.

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>So give me the goal for the midterms?

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Is it?

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I remember Andrew I interviewed him about oh,

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, eighteen months ago, and he talked

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 1>about the role he wanted to play in the twenty

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty four election was hey, if we can recruit candidates

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>on the local level, state rep, State Senate, school board,

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 1>city council. That he wasn't really focused on Congress at

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>all or Senate. It was really much lower because he believed, hey,

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we can just if we have sort

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of more local candidates and it actually has a better

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 1>chance to the message can go more locally viral and

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:12.359
<v Speaker 1>be more authentic. Is this time are you trying to

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>go to congressional and statewide races this time?

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes? And the strategy that you're referencing last cycle was

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 2>our reverse coattail strategy. So we had to do a

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of kind of debunking of what we weren't check

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty three. We are not running a candidate

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 2>for president, We are not a third party spoiler. We

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 2>are not a platform for Andrew Yang to run for

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:34.839
<v Speaker 2>president again. So there was a lot of what we

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 2>aren't and then we had to get very specific about

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 2>what we are, and we are a movement that is

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 2>building from the ground up, and the best way to

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:47.719
<v Speaker 2>do party building is to coalesce around state and local candidates.

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 2>So this concept of a reverse coattail strategy is that

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 2>it's been proven, is that if you have disaffected voters,

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 2>and in the twenty twenty four election, you know, we

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 2>talked a lot about double doubters, people who weren't excited

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 2>about Trump or Harris at the top of the ticket.

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 2>If you had disaffected voters and double doubters who were

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 2>not inclined to show up on election day, but someone

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 2>was running for office in their own community, they were

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 2>much more likely to go out and actually vote for

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:19.759
<v Speaker 2>that member of their community. And once there and once

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 2>in the polling place, the books that were motivated by

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.399
<v Speaker 2>community leadership were more likely to vote for the pro

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:28.800
<v Speaker 2>democracy candidates towards the top of the ticket and for

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 2>federal seats and for president. So that was a way

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 2>for us to both help turn out pro democracy voters

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 2>during the twenty twenty four election and also do authentic

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 2>party building from the ground up. At the beginning of

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the segment check you said, you know, my title now

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 2>is CEO. If I do my job right, I will

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 2>no longer be a CEO, and instead there will be

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 2>a party chairman that is elected by our members of

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.879
<v Speaker 2>our party members from around the country. And so as

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:58.959
<v Speaker 2>we look to twenty twenty eight. So you asked about

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 2>ten year horizons and ten year goals twenty six and

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight. In twenty twenty eight, we are going to

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 2>go to the Federal Election Commission and apply for federal

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 2>party status. In order to do that, they give you

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 2>a menu of requirements that you you have to fulfill

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 2>in order to get federal party status. Running candidates for

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 2>federal office on a ballot line is one of the requirements.

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Having an ongoing.

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Specific amount, you know, to get you know, do you

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>have to be in twenty five states that you've done this.

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.879
<v Speaker 2>It's big, it's a vague, so it's fake. So we

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 2>are we are wanting to run federal candidates for office

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 2>because we have to to apply for federal party recognition,

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 2>because we want to have an impact in Congress, because

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 2>we want to contribute members who are going to caucus

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 2>together and vote in a way that is is you know,

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 2>it's it's that they're voting with integrity and that they're

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 2>voting and serving in a way that's representative of a

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 2>collective set of values and principles that the majority of

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Americans share. And so we are we're very bullish about

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 2>looking at seats in twenty six and also mapping up

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 2>to twenty eight to run those those federal candidates. And

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 2>the wonderful thing is it is it's a it's a

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 2>it's a bottom up, top down, you know strategy that

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 2>we're looking towards in twenty twenty six. You know, if

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 2>we have an opportunity to run a candidate against an

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 2>extremist who is you know, someone who's an obstructionist in Congress,

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 2>and we can run a fordist against that person, the

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 2>brand id and the inspiration for people down ballot, we

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 2>hope we'll get more people out and working. And similarly,

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 2>all the party building and the voter turnout that we

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 2>can do around down ballot candidates at the municipal level

0:41:55.280 --> 0:41:58.719
<v Speaker 2>will then serve those candidates that are running up at

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:00.360
<v Speaker 2>the top of the ticket for federals.

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 1>So are you going to be targeting the single party

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:10.799
<v Speaker 1>districts more often than the supposed swing districts, meaning like

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent blue eighty percent red? That in some ways,

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>is that is that the better place for a forward

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:17.399
<v Speaker 1>candidate to go.

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm looking at as an and right now,

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 2>so a lot of the folks in our coalition in

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 2>the pro democracy space. They're looking at that for those

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:29.239
<v Speaker 2>forty swing seats around the country, and in some of

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 2>those swing seats, there are bad actors who are obstructionists

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:36.319
<v Speaker 2>and who are not serving in a way that we

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:39.280
<v Speaker 2>think is alignment in alignment with our principles and our values.

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.360
<v Speaker 2>So if we can go after some of those extremists

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:45.400
<v Speaker 2>and coalition with partners where we have ballot access and

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 2>we can use a forward ballot line to run to

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 2>run by partisan, pragmatic focused candidate, we're thrilled to But

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 2>these ones, you know, these these uncompetitive seats, or what

0:42:57.719 --> 0:42:59.799
<v Speaker 2>I think is really exciting and what people aren't really

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 2>talking about, which is, you know, eighty seven percent of

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Congress is decidedly you know, those districts are rud or blue.

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 2>There's no competition.

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Most state legislative race, I mean, Virginia absol. Virginia's Assembly

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:13.799
<v Speaker 1>is a classic like fifty to fifties, you know, on

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:17.319
<v Speaker 1>a knife's edge, you know, and there's only like, out

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of thee hundred seats, like ten seats that are competitive,

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Like there's only ten thirty five on each side.

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 4>I think that are that are almost unopposed, you know, yeah,

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:26.399
<v Speaker 4>which is actually why we're running candidates for the state

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:29.320
<v Speaker 4>legislature in Virginia this year because they have off yer elections,

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 4>and we did exactly that.

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 2>We focused only on in two congressional districts Virginia five

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:37.879
<v Speaker 2>and six, that are decidedly read. You know, these are

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 2>like R plus twelve districts. So those down ballot seats

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:43.840
<v Speaker 2>and those legislative seats see no competition, and the Democratic

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Party is effectively seated any opportunity to run candidates against that.

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:51.400
<v Speaker 2>And you see the same thing in blue states like Massachusetts,

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 2>where the Republican Party no longer has I mean, who

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:56.919
<v Speaker 2>would support Charlie Baker right Like? I mean, I don't

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:59.399
<v Speaker 2>mean that from a voter's perspective. Lots of voters would

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 2>he left with like sixty four percent approval rating that

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:05.719
<v Speaker 2>there's no infrastructure to actually build a bench of candidates

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:09.280
<v Speaker 2>that could level up to a Republican gubernatorial candidate in Massachusetts.

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 2>So those are places where we're really really excited and

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 2>where we're seeing a lot of traction. Utah is a

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:17.359
<v Speaker 2>great example of a place where we're seeing a ton

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 2>of traction because there's no competition from the Democratic Party there.

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:25.879
<v Speaker 1>How many states, right now do you have major part

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:27.799
<v Speaker 1>did you do? What do you call it? Just major

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:29.719
<v Speaker 1>party status or party status? How does that?

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 2>What party status? Party status?

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 1>How many states study of official status? Because I know

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it's different. Every state has its own set of rules.

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Four plus Connecticut where we have party status in

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 2>a series of townships. Got so, yeah, so we've got

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:52.760
<v Speaker 2>we have Canada. We have BAID access in Florida, South Carolina, Utah,

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 2>and Colorado. So not only can you register as a

0:44:57.080 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 2>member of the Ford Party as a voter in those

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 2>states is a ballot line and you can run for

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 2>office on that ballot line in those states.

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:05.359
<v Speaker 1>So Virginia that you don't have this. So how does

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a Virginia Forward candidate going to appear on the ballot

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:10.800
<v Speaker 1>as an independent? As an independent?

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting as an independent? Now they can identify in

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:16.919
<v Speaker 2>Virginia as a Fordists on the ballot, but we don't

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:18.200
<v Speaker 2>actually have ballot access.

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's interesting. Can put it independent and you can

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:23.760
<v Speaker 1>say Forward parties, Well.

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 2>That's fusion voting. They can identify themselves as Forward when

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 2>they petition onto the ballot, but we don't formally have

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 2>ballot acts.

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 1>And in a minute, but yeah, so just since we're

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:41.360
<v Speaker 1>both very familiar with Virginia, what would it take for

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you to get party status in Virginia? What are their

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:44.919
<v Speaker 1>roles specifically?

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:49.799
<v Speaker 2>So it's a signature collection campaign, similar to a lot

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 2>of states. So you have to collect signatures that are

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 2>verified signatures, which means you have to collect many more signatures.

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 1>Than is it each cycle? How many times you have

0:45:58.360 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to do this to prove party status?

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:02.359
<v Speaker 2>You only have to do it once. But then it's

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 2>a it's a percentage of the voter voter turnout, so

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:11.920
<v Speaker 2>you have to turn out a particular percentage of the voters.

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 1>With what state wide with a state wide candidate.

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 2>With a state wide candidate, and.

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:17.560
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter if it's governor or senate or lieutenant

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 1>governor attorney general or is that vague in the rules.

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not vague in the rules. It's vague in

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 2>my memory. So I to look at it, Chuck, But

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 2>I got it.

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not trying to play yet multiple you know,

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple choice here. But I'm just trying to give people

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>an understanding of just how this is not going to

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:42.160
<v Speaker 1>be easy, even though there is such a probably you know,

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:43.799
<v Speaker 1>if you did a poll and say hey, should this

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:47.359
<v Speaker 1>party be on the ballot? Very seventy plus percent would say, yeah,

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't you want that party on the ballot, Like

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's one of these no brainer ideas that

0:46:52.120 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it's hard to execute.

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is. It's hard to it's hard to execute,

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 2>but it's not impossible. And as we said before, you know,

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 2>the two parties have done an incredible job pulling up

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 2>the ladder behind them and making sure that we're not

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:10.359
<v Speaker 2>able to access the ballots and introduce competition. But it is.

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 2>It's navigable. You just have to understand the nuances of

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:16.920
<v Speaker 2>each state. You have to study the laws of each state.

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 2>They're constantly changing. Filing deadlines are changing, signature requirements are changing,

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:25.399
<v Speaker 2>so and you have to do that fifty times over.

0:47:26.719 --> 0:47:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Certain states have really low signature thresholds, like Louisiana is

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 2>only five hundred, but then they've got a really high

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:37.279
<v Speaker 2>voter threshold for a position of statewide. You need the

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 2>following here.

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about this when we were having an

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:45.760
<v Speaker 1>off the record earlier. You know, you really need because

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys aren't Libertarians or Green Party or anything like that,

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:53.880
<v Speaker 1>or working families, but they're having to deal with the

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:56.680
<v Speaker 1>same obstacles you're dealing with. And it almost feels like

0:47:57.239 --> 0:48:01.880
<v Speaker 1>our democratic infrastructure needs an ACLU that you know, like,

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, look God by a c l You always

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 1>say this. Everybody, you know, everybody is thankful with the

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a c l U is there for them, right, They're

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:14.880
<v Speaker 1>usually not crazy about what they do until they're suddenly

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 1>needing protection, right and somebody fighting for their speech rights.

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 1>But because let's talk about the open primaries, I don't

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:28.319
<v Speaker 1>see how if my tax dollars are being used to

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:34.560
<v Speaker 1>pay for an election, why then the state can bar

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 1>prevent my ability to vote in that primary? Right because

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a member of a private club. You know,

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you've told me this is a private club. And at

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the same time you're using public funds. This feels like

0:48:48.760 --> 0:48:51.520
<v Speaker 1>how it feels like partisan primaries that are funded by

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:57.319
<v Speaker 1>the state are all unconstitutional And I don't understand how

0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that that there, that is that is even allowed. Now

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:03.359
<v Speaker 1>where are you guys? I know you're part of you know,

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 1>one of your goals is to open up primaries. Obviously,

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 1>what is the legal route here to sort of is

0:49:11.239 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>there a legal way to get rid of partisan primaries.

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I know there's attempts to change the laws in these states,

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:19.319
<v Speaker 1>but is it possible that that there's a case that

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 1>partisan primaries funded by tax dollars are unconstitutional?

0:49:22.880 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I think absolutely. We just Governor Whitman, you know, as

0:49:26.640 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the former governor of New Jersey, just signed on to

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:33.720
<v Speaker 2>another another letter related to the banning of fusion voting

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 2>in New Jersey. So there's a there's been an ongoing

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:40.400
<v Speaker 2>legal case there about the fact that it was not

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:41.959
<v Speaker 2>constitutional to ban fusion voting.

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And let me do that. Some people may be wondering

0:49:44.320 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>fusion voting, what do we mean in a handful of states.

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:49.120
<v Speaker 1>It's mostly in the northeast, correct me if I'm wrong,

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:52.280
<v Speaker 1>where you can be on the ballot line in multiple

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 1>multiple states. New York, the politicians have used this to

0:49:56.120 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>survive primaries in years past. You have various the Conservative

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Party that Republicans would always have an extra ballot line.

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Democrats usually worked with something called working families, and you'd

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 1>have these multiple where literally you could appear. There was

0:50:10.280 --> 0:50:12.319
<v Speaker 1>an Independence Party in New York. I don't know what

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the status that they are, because to me, they should

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:17.400
<v Speaker 1>be a forward party chapter at this point. If they

0:50:17.440 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 1>still exist because I think they were part of the

0:50:19.640 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 1>old Parole Reform Party network, but where you could appear

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on the ballot in multiple on multiple lines, so literally

0:50:28.520 --> 0:50:31.319
<v Speaker 1>your name would be on there twice. And what was it.

0:50:31.440 --> 0:50:33.919
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, It's like New Jersey, Connecticut, New York.

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:38.280
<v Speaker 1>It's mostly New England states if memory serves.

0:50:38.480 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's funny that Independence Party in New York. The

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 2>woman who used to lead that effort, named Jackie Salet

0:50:44.239 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 2>is on our board and she's one of the most

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 2>preeminent experts on independent voting trends and ballid Actually she

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 2>is around the country and she talks about when Bloomberg

0:50:52.040 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 2>came to the Independence Party asking for ballot access and

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:59.960
<v Speaker 2>what it looked like. And they had a really really asked,

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:04.400
<v Speaker 2>rational deal that they struck with him, which was abolished

0:51:04.480 --> 0:51:09.759
<v Speaker 2>party primaries, launch a commission to pursue the abolishment of

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:13.600
<v Speaker 2>party primaries UH in New York. And by doing that effectively,

0:51:13.640 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 2>she kind of knew she was going to put herself

0:51:15.040 --> 0:51:19.479
<v Speaker 2>out of business, but she was motivated, you know, by

0:51:20.000 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 2>by a vision of good governance in order to do that.

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 2>And and he did put together a commission and it failed, unfortunately,

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:28.680
<v Speaker 2>but they're they're doing it again in New York City

0:51:28.760 --> 0:51:31.759
<v Speaker 2>right now. There's a commission for open primaries and it's

0:51:31.800 --> 0:51:34.760
<v Speaker 2>been received really favorably, which is exciting.

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So they just independent party in New York anymore.

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:40.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if there is or not, because you.

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 1>When you said you didn't have I was surprised when

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:44.399
<v Speaker 1>you said you didn't have party status in New York

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:48.680
<v Speaker 1>because I thought there were some legacy manager basically, yeah, yeah,

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>there was.

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:51.279
<v Speaker 2>Remember I took but five years ago they bumped a

0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:53.239
<v Speaker 2>bunch of the guys off of the ballot because of

0:51:53.239 --> 0:51:56.080
<v Speaker 2>their provision that you have to run a presidential candidate.

0:51:56.400 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Now we have merged. So this this legacy of solidation

0:52:00.680 --> 0:52:03.960
<v Speaker 2>and uh and coalition building we have continued. We merged

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:07.799
<v Speaker 2>with the Independence Party of South Carolina, so they were

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:11.399
<v Speaker 2>they were kind enough to take our name and then

0:52:11.440 --> 0:52:14.200
<v Speaker 2>we actually took their ballot access there so Forard Party

0:52:14.239 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 2>of South Carolina merged Independence Party South Carolina. We merged

0:52:18.120 --> 0:52:21.160
<v Speaker 2>with the United Utah Party in Utah. We both already

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:24.400
<v Speaker 2>had ballot access, but acknowledged that we could be so

0:52:24.520 --> 0:52:29.440
<v Speaker 2>much stronger by combining efforts. And these are also parties,

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:34.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Independence Party of South Carolina, the United

0:52:34.440 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 2>You Taught Party are ideologically inclusive parties that are values

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:42.080
<v Speaker 2>uh and principles based rather than single party or single

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 2>policy issue parties like the Green Party or the Libertarians.

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:48.120
<v Speaker 2>So there's you know, there's a there's a lot of

0:52:48.160 --> 0:52:51.680
<v Speaker 2>diplomacy involved and a lot of trust involved and really

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:54.520
<v Speaker 2>exploring what are you all about, what are you wanting

0:52:54.520 --> 0:52:56.680
<v Speaker 2>to accomplish? What sort of candidates will you run on

0:52:56.680 --> 0:52:59.680
<v Speaker 2>this ballot line? And I don't take that lightly. I

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 2>think the fact that that South Carolina, you know, they

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 2>were willing to hand that that line over to us

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:08.200
<v Speaker 2>after they had stewarded it for so many years, was

0:53:08.200 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 2>a real exercise and trust.

0:53:10.120 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting with if you look at the

0:53:13.600 --> 0:53:19.680
<v Speaker 1>history of non major parties, how often converts from the

0:53:19.719 --> 0:53:23.440
<v Speaker 1>major parties essentially, you know, refugees from one of the

0:53:23.480 --> 0:53:27.319
<v Speaker 1>major parties have been foundational to the success or even

0:53:27.360 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>brief success right, you know, obviously Whigs, right, the Wigs

0:53:33.080 --> 0:53:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you Millard Fillmore, I think right, if I'm I think

0:53:36.000 --> 0:53:36.440
<v Speaker 1>was part of.

0:53:36.440 --> 0:53:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Is it Filmore? The free Soilers, Presoilers.

0:53:39.480 --> 0:53:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Or something like that, And you had obviously there's Teddy

0:53:42.600 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Roosevelt and in parole in some ways. I guess he

0:53:47.280 --> 0:53:49.320
<v Speaker 1>was always kind of an independent that kind of was

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a Republican, but you know, uncomfortably so. And when he

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:57.800
<v Speaker 1>started his thing, and obviously his wealth helped there. Nothing

0:53:57.800 --> 0:53:59.920
<v Speaker 1>would jump start you more than getting you know, you

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:02.440
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of formers that are members of the

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Forward Party right now, but some currents And I don't

0:54:07.400 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 1>want to put words in your mouth, but it sounds

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:14.000
<v Speaker 1>like you guys wouldn't mind somebody who said, yeah, I

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:16.120
<v Speaker 1>caucus with the Republicans, but I'm a member of the

0:54:16.160 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Forward Party and I'll be running as a Republican. I

0:54:20.080 --> 0:54:22.239
<v Speaker 1>caukd this with the Democrats, but I'm a member. You know,

0:54:22.280 --> 0:54:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe in the Forward Party and I also am

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a member of the Democratic Party. Is that a future

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you envision or do you envision it? I No, I'm

0:54:29.880 --> 0:54:33.239
<v Speaker 1>a member of the Forward Party, but I caucus with

0:54:33.360 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 1>this party for this cycle because they've they've agreed to

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:42.759
<v Speaker 1>these to work on. I mean, what do you envision here?

0:54:43.040 --> 0:54:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking, like, let's say, in a perfect world, Lisa

0:54:45.760 --> 0:54:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Murkowski says, Hey, I'd love to be a member, but

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm also going to be running. Letting people know that

0:54:50.719 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll be running and working with the Republicans. What what

0:54:54.600 --> 0:54:58.120
<v Speaker 1>what do you envision here in trying to recruit currents.

0:54:58.520 --> 0:55:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that they're there's both the practical aspect

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:04.840
<v Speaker 2>to what you're laying out, which is that in forty

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 2>five states across the country, we don't have ballid access,

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:09.960
<v Speaker 2>so actually running someone as a forwardist is not possible.

0:55:09.960 --> 0:55:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Now we could run someone as an independent with the

0:55:13.000 --> 0:55:15.680
<v Speaker 2>support of the forward infrastructure, and we will be running

0:55:15.719 --> 0:55:18.520
<v Speaker 2>that play many, many, many times over some real.

0:55:18.360 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Opportunities in twenty six I just you know, absolutely the

0:55:23.160 --> 0:55:25.960
<v Speaker 1>governor's race in Michigan, where you have a former Democratic.

0:55:25.520 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Mink doug In.

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:30.479
<v Speaker 1>He's awesome and he's really you know, there's a poll

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that I featured on my podcast last week that showed

0:55:34.280 --> 0:55:36.439
<v Speaker 1>he was the only candidate for governor that had net

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:39.440
<v Speaker 1>positive ratings with Democrats, Republicans, and independents.

0:55:39.760 --> 0:55:42.120
<v Speaker 2>He's amazing, He's well, you know, when you talk to

0:55:42.120 --> 0:55:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Mike and his campaign too, he's talking about issues that

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 2>are important in Michigan Anders and as the mayor of Detroit,

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:52.400
<v Speaker 2>he found that the two most resident issues that voters

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:55.520
<v Speaker 2>were concerned about were education and job creation. And so

0:55:55.680 --> 0:55:59.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these big national themes that most Democratic

0:55:59.680 --> 0:56:02.400
<v Speaker 2>candid are talking about, whether it's women's reproductive rights or

0:56:02.640 --> 0:56:08.160
<v Speaker 2>gun violence prevention. He's just job creation and education, job creation, education,

0:56:08.440 --> 0:56:12.560
<v Speaker 2>and it's what his community wanted to hear. But chuck

0:56:12.600 --> 0:56:15.279
<v Speaker 2>back to the you know, kind of the affiliation way

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:18.040
<v Speaker 2>and what does it look like it is? So it's

0:56:18.080 --> 0:56:20.719
<v Speaker 2>both practical and that we don't have ballid access in

0:56:20.760 --> 0:56:23.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of places. But I also think it speaks

0:56:23.960 --> 0:56:29.759
<v Speaker 2>to our commitment to good governance over party affiliation. And

0:56:30.360 --> 0:56:33.480
<v Speaker 2>so the idea that we would have full CRuMs that

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:38.359
<v Speaker 2>were forward, full CRuMs made up of Republicans, Democrats, independents,

0:56:38.400 --> 0:56:41.839
<v Speaker 2>and Fordists is really unique. And we talked earlier about

0:56:41.880 --> 0:56:45.239
<v Speaker 2>why why now in America and the idea that you

0:56:45.239 --> 0:56:48.520
<v Speaker 2>would be party agnostic. You truly don't care if it

0:56:48.600 --> 0:56:51.200
<v Speaker 2>is a comma R or a comedy or a Comma I,

0:56:51.880 --> 0:56:56.560
<v Speaker 2>because you're committed to caucusing together and furthering legislation that

0:56:56.640 --> 0:56:59.040
<v Speaker 2>you believe in that will help address the real issues

0:56:59.080 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 2>of our country. That's the way we're approaching it right now.

0:57:01.640 --> 0:57:05.440
<v Speaker 2>So if I look at a particular seat and there

0:57:05.520 --> 0:57:08.920
<v Speaker 2>is a really compelling Republican and it's an R plus

0:57:09.040 --> 0:57:11.759
<v Speaker 2>eight district and I don't have ballot access there. The

0:57:12.480 --> 0:57:14.440
<v Speaker 2>threshold for an independent to get on the ballot is

0:57:14.480 --> 0:57:18.480
<v Speaker 2>way too high. But a really principal, thoughtful Republican who

0:57:18.560 --> 0:57:21.000
<v Speaker 2>wants to affiliate with the Forward Party and say I'm

0:57:21.000 --> 0:57:24.440
<v Speaker 2>a Ford aligned Republican, we are all about supporting that person,

0:57:25.240 --> 0:57:28.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, and they sign a candidate pledge committing to

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:32.120
<v Speaker 2>upholding our principles and it's very actions oriented.

0:57:32.200 --> 0:57:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask you this, what did the Problem

0:57:34.400 --> 0:57:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Solvers Caucus fail at? Because this was arguably what they

0:57:38.440 --> 0:57:40.160
<v Speaker 1>tried to do, and what no labels tried to do

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 1>was try to create this, you know. But it wasn't

0:57:43.080 --> 0:57:44.919
<v Speaker 1>a party, right, but it was more of a hey,

0:57:44.960 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 1>these groups promised that they would do this, and of

0:57:47.840 --> 0:57:50.880
<v Speaker 1>course it never worked, right. The pressure of the party

0:57:51.160 --> 0:57:53.600
<v Speaker 1>always pulled, you know, either the d's away or the

0:57:53.720 --> 0:57:56.400
<v Speaker 1>RS away, depending on who was in charge of that

0:57:56.440 --> 0:58:00.320
<v Speaker 1>congressional bill at that given time. How do you how

0:58:00.360 --> 0:58:03.760
<v Speaker 1>do you prevent failure? How do you prevent a problem

0:58:03.880 --> 0:58:07.640
<v Speaker 1>solver's caucus failure? Because it's been a failure. It's a

0:58:07.680 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 1>noble idea, but it is not worked.

0:58:10.600 --> 0:58:14.360
<v Speaker 2>You have to introduce individuals who aren't beholden to leadership

0:58:14.400 --> 0:58:16.200
<v Speaker 2>of one of the other parties, you know, I mean,

0:58:16.200 --> 0:58:17.800
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the day, it's a it's a

0:58:17.960 --> 0:58:20.880
<v Speaker 2>it's always a race for the majority. Their focus is

0:58:20.920 --> 0:58:24.400
<v Speaker 2>going to be achieving a majority. And if that weren't

0:58:24.400 --> 0:58:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the case, you know, Kevin McCarthy would still be Speaker

0:58:28.200 --> 0:58:30.480
<v Speaker 2>of the House. You know, you would have had Democrats

0:58:30.680 --> 0:58:35.760
<v Speaker 2>in the in the problem Solver's caucus actually come together

0:58:35.840 --> 0:58:37.120
<v Speaker 2>with Republicans.

0:58:36.640 --> 0:58:38.920
<v Speaker 1>They could vote for. They couldn't do it. Yeah, they

0:58:38.960 --> 0:58:40.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the partisan protection, you know.

0:58:40.720 --> 0:58:43.840
<v Speaker 2>But a Fordist could chuck and an independent could and

0:58:43.880 --> 0:58:44.200
<v Speaker 2>if you.

0:58:44.160 --> 0:58:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Have enough, you ran with that promise to voters, and

0:58:48.280 --> 0:58:52.520
<v Speaker 1>voters in theory wouldn't punish that candidate for essentially not

0:58:52.600 --> 0:58:54.200
<v Speaker 1>abiding by the Democratic Party or.

0:58:54.160 --> 0:58:56.440
<v Speaker 2>The Republican Party. Yeah, it should be something that the

0:58:56.600 --> 0:58:59.960
<v Speaker 2>voters are applauding. And you know you mentioned Senator More.

0:59:00.520 --> 0:59:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, she has built that level of trust with

0:59:02.680 --> 0:59:06.439
<v Speaker 2>her constituent base where she can, you know, she can

0:59:06.920 --> 0:59:10.720
<v Speaker 2>vote on things that she knows are right for Alaskans

0:59:10.880 --> 0:59:14.920
<v Speaker 2>and vote against party leadership on certain things. She caucuses

0:59:14.960 --> 0:59:18.680
<v Speaker 2>across the aisle. You know, Jared Golden is doing that

0:59:18.720 --> 0:59:20.880
<v Speaker 2>in the House. Marie Gloosen camp Perez is doing that

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:24.200
<v Speaker 2>in the House. But what is a common thread between

0:59:24.200 --> 0:59:27.080
<v Speaker 2>those three members of Congress is that they are all

0:59:27.120 --> 0:59:30.560
<v Speaker 2>representing states with non partisan structural democracy reforms.

0:59:30.680 --> 0:59:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, it is not an accident. It is so true,

0:59:33.240 --> 0:59:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Angus King, Lisa Murkowski, John Curtis, Marie gluskut Perez, Jared Golden.

0:59:40.920 --> 0:59:45.760
<v Speaker 1>You go through the list, David Valdeo in California all over,

0:59:45.800 --> 0:59:49.320
<v Speaker 1>got to talk to correct right. Meanwhile, you got a

0:59:49.320 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 1>guy like John Cornyn, who if he had the system

0:59:52.440 --> 0:59:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of Alaska or Utah, he'd be untouchable.

0:59:56.760 --> 0:59:58.560
<v Speaker 2>He'd unto artists absolutely.

0:59:58.760 --> 1:00:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, here's a guy who who really is And look,

1:00:02.520 --> 1:00:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I you know, he's been a Republican his whole life.

1:00:04.760 --> 1:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>He can't think outside the Republican box because if he could,

1:00:08.840 --> 1:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>he could really be a trailblazer. But I get it.

1:00:11.200 --> 1:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, people are who they are, right like you

1:00:13.240 --> 1:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>can't and he grew up in the party, so I

1:00:17.040 --> 1:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to. I sort of I get it. Okay's

1:00:20.320 --> 1:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it's been good to him for his professional career, right,

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>so I get his indecision to walk away. But his

1:00:26.200 --> 1:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>constituency is not inside the current makeup of the Texas

1:00:29.040 --> 1:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party is constituency are more independent, you know, and

1:00:33.440 --> 1:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of this, and yet he's got a structure in Texas.

1:00:36.520 --> 1:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>It's impossible for him to survive well.

1:00:38.960 --> 1:00:41.800
<v Speaker 2>And look at three of his colleagues who who were

1:00:41.880 --> 1:00:45.040
<v Speaker 2>able to serve in a way that is probably very

1:00:45.040 --> 1:00:47.960
<v Speaker 2>aspirational for Senator Cornyn did so because they knew they

1:00:48.000 --> 1:00:51.480
<v Speaker 2>were going down swinging. So Mitt Ronney heres in Cinema,

1:00:51.720 --> 1:00:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Joe Manchin. They all knew they were retiring. And what

1:00:54.480 --> 1:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>did they do. They started to behave in exactly the

1:00:56.760 --> 1:00:59.640
<v Speaker 2>same way that we're talking about. That the problem. The

1:00:59.680 --> 1:01:01.760
<v Speaker 2>members the problem solver's caucus have not been able to

1:01:01.760 --> 1:01:03.800
<v Speaker 2>behave that way because at the end of the day,

1:01:04.280 --> 1:01:05.680
<v Speaker 2>they'll go back and they'll get primary.

1:01:06.120 --> 1:01:09.439
<v Speaker 1>They have their own politically, whatever it is comfort or

1:01:09.600 --> 1:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>security or write nothing. You know that they embrace their

1:01:13.800 --> 1:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Janus jobs Joplin. Right freedom is when you have nothing

1:01:17.360 --> 1:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>left to lose.

1:01:18.120 --> 1:01:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Right freedoms when you have nothing left to lose.

1:01:20.560 --> 1:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>So no, Christofferson wrote it, so I should give him

1:01:23.080 --> 1:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>more credit than you.

1:01:25.920 --> 1:01:28.200
<v Speaker 2>But we're calling you know, we'd call on members of Congress,

1:01:28.760 --> 1:01:32.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, whether they're looking to retire or not to

1:01:32.720 --> 1:01:35.400
<v Speaker 2>come and talk to us about what it looks like

1:01:35.440 --> 1:01:38.960
<v Speaker 2>to start to put together this full croum. Now, you know,

1:01:39.000 --> 1:01:40.840
<v Speaker 2>how can we start to put together a full croom

1:01:40.880 --> 1:01:45.320
<v Speaker 2>of members of Congress and also in state legislatures around

1:01:45.360 --> 1:01:48.760
<v Speaker 2>the country where Okay, we're going to we're recruiting them,

1:01:48.760 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 2>we're running them, you know. I mean, I was at

1:01:50.400 --> 1:01:53.120
<v Speaker 2>a dinner with Lisa and she said, it can't just

1:01:53.200 --> 1:01:55.600
<v Speaker 2>be me. It can't just be me and Susan. And

1:01:55.640 --> 1:01:57.959
<v Speaker 2>that's why Ford is here, because we want to run

1:01:58.040 --> 1:02:01.280
<v Speaker 2>candidates so that they can join these caucuses.

1:02:01.360 --> 1:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So what does she want? What would it take for

1:02:03.440 --> 1:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>her to feel comfortable joining your cause? You think, I mean,

1:02:06.720 --> 1:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>without without betraying personal confidences. But whether it's her and

1:02:10.920 --> 1:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I know you've met with other sort of what i'd

1:02:12.920 --> 1:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>call sort of you know, democracy first people. You know,

1:02:15.640 --> 1:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's maybe it's an Ankus King, maybe it's a

1:02:17.720 --> 1:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>John Curtis, you know, but what is the general sense

1:02:22.440 --> 1:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>that they're like, because I'm sure they're all like, boy,

1:02:24.920 --> 1:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could I really want to do this butt?

1:02:27.960 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Like what's their butt? And how do you respond? To

1:02:30.400 --> 1:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>their butt.

1:02:31.600 --> 1:02:34.080
<v Speaker 2>I think their butt is that there is not a

1:02:34.160 --> 1:02:37.400
<v Speaker 2>landing pad. If I jump, If I walk the plank

1:02:37.440 --> 1:02:40.720
<v Speaker 2>and I jump, who's going to catch me? And that's

1:02:40.760 --> 1:02:43.200
<v Speaker 2>why scaling this movement is so critical, Chuck, and doing

1:02:43.240 --> 1:02:45.800
<v Speaker 2>it in coalition with other pro democracy partners is really

1:02:45.800 --> 1:02:49.040
<v Speaker 2>critical as well. You know, last year the Republican and

1:02:49.040 --> 1:02:52.760
<v Speaker 2>the Democratic Party spent twenty billion dollars fighting each other

1:02:53.480 --> 1:02:56.160
<v Speaker 2>and we got nothing for it. Twenty billion dollars. So

1:02:56.320 --> 1:02:59.880
<v Speaker 2>on fire the pro democracy movement as a whole, I

1:03:00.080 --> 1:03:04.439
<v Speaker 2>would I would say, and I don't include voting rights

1:03:04.440 --> 1:03:06.320
<v Speaker 2>in this, because the voting rights community is incredible and

1:03:06.360 --> 1:03:08.240
<v Speaker 2>they do great work. But I'm talking about, you know,

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:12.240
<v Speaker 2>actually running candidates outside the two party system, focused on

1:03:12.240 --> 1:03:17.080
<v Speaker 2>on you know, independent candidates and independent movement changing our

1:03:17.160 --> 1:03:21.480
<v Speaker 2>voting structures. What's six hundred and fifty million dollars, right?

1:03:21.520 --> 1:03:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we have to scale this movement and having

1:03:25.160 --> 1:03:27.880
<v Speaker 2>audiences like yours today is amazing, Chuck, Like, we want

1:03:27.920 --> 1:03:30.320
<v Speaker 2>people to come to us and help build so that

1:03:30.360 --> 1:03:33.640
<v Speaker 2>we can then go to the Brian Fitzpatrick's and the

1:03:33.680 --> 1:03:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Don Davises of the United States Congress and say come,

1:03:36.840 --> 1:03:39.840
<v Speaker 2>you can jump we've got you.

1:03:39.880 --> 1:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>No, it's it's you know, you sit here and again

1:03:41.760 --> 1:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like the market, if this were a free market.

1:03:45.400 --> 1:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, we see what a free market of political

1:03:47.240 --> 1:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>parties looks like. It's in the UK and we see

1:03:51.080 --> 1:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>what's happening. The Tories are collapsing and there's a new

1:03:54.840 --> 1:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>right wing party and I say this like, okay, that happened.

1:03:57.560 --> 1:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Say you know brand X failed, here's brand why. So

1:04:00.440 --> 1:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Nigel Faros has brand why And it is gaining traction,

1:04:04.120 --> 1:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>did really well. He could not have succeeded here because

1:04:09.760 --> 1:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of our structure and and and that continues to be

1:04:14.920 --> 1:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the toughest thing. You need some wins. Where do you think,

1:04:19.920 --> 1:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>what's what's what's realistic in winning? You know, is it

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:25.280
<v Speaker 1>getting a Mike Duggan, you know that would be a

1:04:25.280 --> 1:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>big one. Is it getting mister Morgan and Morgan which

1:04:29.200 --> 1:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in some ways you know, he's he's his own entity,

1:04:32.400 --> 1:04:34.439
<v Speaker 1>he's his own character, and he might be his own

1:04:34.480 --> 1:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>party And I don't know, you know that's always that

1:04:37.440 --> 1:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you.

1:04:38.320 --> 1:04:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Open the candidate, it was already on buses, Chuck, that's great.

1:04:42.160 --> 1:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, you know you were you opened the door to

1:04:45.160 --> 1:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, to a big ten independent party and you

1:04:47.800 --> 1:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>never know who might come in the door.

1:04:50.360 --> 1:04:51.520
<v Speaker 2>That's true, could be Ross.

1:04:51.920 --> 1:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>But you really do need a win, right You need

1:04:53.800 --> 1:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you need a you need a person to say hey,

1:04:55.840 --> 1:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, I look around. Dugan feels like

1:04:59.560 --> 1:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the best potential avatar, especially if he wins and if

1:05:03.760 --> 1:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>he and they couldn't govern. You know, Jesse Ventura couldn't govern.

1:05:07.560 --> 1:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>He tried, you know, but his frankly hit I think

1:05:10.960 --> 1:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>naivete and what he was facing, you know, the last

1:05:14.880 --> 1:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>basically true independent governor, I guess Alaska kind of somebody

1:05:18.400 --> 1:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>who was independent but was sort of a major party

1:05:21.520 --> 1:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>player for a while. You know where else am I

1:05:25.880 --> 1:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>missing any any other places? Or is Doug really probably

1:05:28.720 --> 1:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the biggest potential?

1:05:30.760 --> 1:05:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Well? I think I think it's interesting because we've been

1:05:32.800 --> 1:05:35.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about well, we've been talking about legislative branches, and

1:05:35.000 --> 1:05:39.240
<v Speaker 2>we've been talking about Congress. But voters have a very

1:05:39.240 --> 1:05:42.280
<v Speaker 2>different relationship with executive leadership than they do there.

1:05:42.560 --> 1:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>They care about it and it's very personal.

1:05:44.640 --> 1:05:47.480
<v Speaker 2>It's very personal. So the relationship that voters have with

1:05:47.520 --> 1:05:50.120
<v Speaker 2>their mayor, with their county executive, with their governor is

1:05:50.200 --> 1:05:52.800
<v Speaker 2>very very personal. And because of that, I think we

1:05:52.880 --> 1:05:57.080
<v Speaker 2>have a great opportunity with with gubernatorial seats around the country.

1:05:57.120 --> 1:06:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Mike's someone we're talking to a lot. We really like him.

1:06:00.280 --> 1:06:04.480
<v Speaker 2>He just did Andrews podcast last week. His campaign manager

1:06:04.560 --> 1:06:07.280
<v Speaker 2>is fantastic. One of the interesting things that we've been

1:06:07.320 --> 1:06:09.720
<v Speaker 2>talking about with their campaign is actually going back to

1:06:09.720 --> 1:06:13.960
<v Speaker 2>the idea of infrastructure. So you know who's our digital vendor.

1:06:14.160 --> 1:06:16.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, he was a Democrat, so obviously, like all

1:06:16.560 --> 1:06:18.680
<v Speaker 2>of that democratic resources, you want.

1:06:18.520 --> 1:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>To be a logistics resource. He needs absolutely structure. Do

1:06:22.960 --> 1:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you have a voter file? Are we do?

1:06:25.880 --> 1:06:28.440
<v Speaker 2>We are building a voter file. It is a it's

1:06:28.480 --> 1:06:30.560
<v Speaker 2>a huge goal of mine to build that voter file

1:06:30.640 --> 1:06:33.840
<v Speaker 2>together with other organizations so that we can rival like

1:06:33.880 --> 1:06:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the Data Trust of the conservative movement and you know

1:06:37.680 --> 1:06:41.080
<v Speaker 2>ngp VAN and Phoenix on on the progressive side, so

1:06:41.120 --> 1:06:43.400
<v Speaker 2>that you know, when we have our payment processor and

1:06:43.400 --> 1:06:46.280
<v Speaker 2>you donate to Mike dug In that we're learning about

1:06:46.320 --> 1:06:48.080
<v Speaker 2>all of those folks and we're building up that same

1:06:48.120 --> 1:06:50.640
<v Speaker 2>network that you know an Act Blue or a Win

1:06:50.760 --> 1:06:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Red voter would have or donor would have. So but

1:06:53.640 --> 1:06:56.160
<v Speaker 2>it is it's a lot of questions about infrastructure and support,

1:06:56.760 --> 1:06:58.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, and and that's the other thing, you know,

1:06:58.720 --> 1:07:01.080
<v Speaker 2>when we go back and talk about kind of jumping

1:07:01.080 --> 1:07:02.640
<v Speaker 2>the plank, you know, and what does it look like

1:07:02.720 --> 1:07:05.360
<v Speaker 2>to get some of these converts, to show them that

1:07:05.400 --> 1:07:08.280
<v Speaker 2>there is a there are resources there for them. Don't worry.

1:07:08.320 --> 1:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>If the party that you're leaving pulls your voter file,

1:07:11.440 --> 1:07:14.280
<v Speaker 2>We've got you. If the party that you're leaving, your

1:07:14.400 --> 1:07:17.480
<v Speaker 2>campaign manager quits, I've got talent for you. The party

1:07:17.480 --> 1:07:20.680
<v Speaker 2>that you're leaving, you know, and tells your digital vendor

1:07:20.720 --> 1:07:22.640
<v Speaker 2>they can no longer work for you. And these are

1:07:22.640 --> 1:07:24.720
<v Speaker 2>all real things, right like, these are all real things

1:07:24.760 --> 1:07:27.080
<v Speaker 2>that happen to people. I had coffee with Kearson, Cinema's

1:07:27.120 --> 1:07:31.200
<v Speaker 2>digital director a couple of months ago, and talking to

1:07:31.240 --> 1:07:34.440
<v Speaker 2>me about the logistics of her leaving the Democratic Party

1:07:34.480 --> 1:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>and serving as an independent. What did it mean for

1:07:36.800 --> 1:07:41.360
<v Speaker 2>her to continue to communicate, you know, in campaign and

1:07:41.440 --> 1:07:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the already had Reuben Diego running against her, and she,

1:07:44.880 --> 1:07:47.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, she didn't necessarily know. I think that she

1:07:47.480 --> 1:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>wasn't going to run for reelection when she switched to

1:07:49.280 --> 1:07:52.760
<v Speaker 2>an independent, but she had no infrastructure to support her

1:07:52.880 --> 1:07:55.120
<v Speaker 2>in that race. So we that's a lot of the

1:07:55.120 --> 1:07:58.520
<v Speaker 2>conversations we're having with Mike are related to resourcing his

1:07:58.640 --> 1:08:01.120
<v Speaker 2>campaign and what is it looked like to have access

1:08:01.120 --> 1:08:04.520
<v Speaker 2>to those technologies and that talent, And those are conversations

1:08:04.560 --> 1:08:07.360
<v Speaker 2>we're excited to have with with other governors across the country.

1:08:07.680 --> 1:08:11.040
<v Speaker 2>We did have a big win this spring. Dan Thatcher

1:08:11.760 --> 1:08:15.280
<v Speaker 2>was a Republican member of the Senate in Utah and

1:08:15.320 --> 1:08:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Senator Thatcher came out and switched parties. So he stood

1:08:18.160 --> 1:08:20.880
<v Speaker 2>on the steps of the Utah Capital in Salt Lake

1:08:21.280 --> 1:08:23.240
<v Speaker 2>and said he is joining the Forward Party.

1:08:23.560 --> 1:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean convert in some ways. Converts are your are

1:08:26.560 --> 1:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>your are your best advocates?

1:08:28.920 --> 1:08:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Earlier the hugely yeah. I mean for them to say

1:08:31.960 --> 1:08:35.000
<v Speaker 2>I could not serve my community, I could not serve

1:08:35.040 --> 1:08:37.360
<v Speaker 2>my constituents as a member of one of these two

1:08:37.439 --> 1:08:41.200
<v Speaker 2>legacy parties. And Forward told me that I just have

1:08:41.280 --> 1:08:43.800
<v Speaker 2>to commit to you know, a set of values and

1:08:43.840 --> 1:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>principles in this pledge and then I can focus on

1:08:45.880 --> 1:08:49.520
<v Speaker 2>what my constituents want. Is incredibly empowering for them.

1:08:50.080 --> 1:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>You're planning a convention midterm concens Yeah, what would that

1:08:54.320 --> 1:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>look like? Is it going to be virtual? Is it

1:08:56.080 --> 1:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in person? I please say it's in person.

1:08:58.240 --> 1:09:01.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm tired of gather somebody wants to be together. It's

1:09:01.640 --> 1:09:04.000
<v Speaker 2>so inspiring. Check I got a time. I mean, you

1:09:04.080 --> 1:09:06.760
<v Speaker 2>go to these meetings. I was in Colorado last week

1:09:06.920 --> 1:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>meeting with all these municipal leaders and meeting with our

1:09:08.960 --> 1:09:10.040
<v Speaker 2>leadership Colorado.

1:09:09.720 --> 1:09:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Springs as an independent mayor these days.

1:09:11.800 --> 1:09:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah me Mobilatti, Yeah, we love Yemy. He's great Nigerian immigrant,

1:09:16.680 --> 1:09:20.959
<v Speaker 2>Red District military bases Colorado Springs. They elected an independent.

1:09:21.360 --> 1:09:24.639
<v Speaker 2>So there's there's precedent. We're seeing this happen around the country.

1:09:24.720 --> 1:09:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, we're going to look at some

1:09:26.800 --> 1:09:30.880
<v Speaker 2>really serious contenders for governor in California as independents.

1:09:32.120 --> 1:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>So well, the opportunities in California give you, give you

1:09:35.800 --> 1:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>at least a boxer's chance, right the top two system.

1:09:39.200 --> 1:09:41.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would assume that that in some ways

1:09:42.320 --> 1:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll end up. Look not to tell you what a target.

1:09:45.080 --> 1:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>There's underwhelming candidates for governor in Arizona, and Arizona is

1:09:48.000 --> 1:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a state that's usually pretty friendly to independence.

1:09:51.200 --> 1:09:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Arizona has an incredible infrastructure too of pro democracy supporters.

1:09:57.320 --> 1:10:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Former mayor of Phoenix Guy named Paul Johnson, was a Democrat.

1:10:00.320 --> 1:10:03.720
<v Speaker 2>He left the Democratic Party and as an independent and

1:10:03.880 --> 1:10:07.880
<v Speaker 2>the business community. Paul's been a leader there. What's interesting

1:10:07.920 --> 1:10:11.720
<v Speaker 2>about Arizona is the business community has been really involved

1:10:11.800 --> 1:10:14.920
<v Speaker 2>in pro democracy efforts, So trying to open up the

1:10:14.920 --> 1:10:17.560
<v Speaker 2>primary system in a way, I have to say, I

1:10:17.600 --> 1:10:19.559
<v Speaker 2>don't think I can think of another state where the

1:10:19.560 --> 1:10:26.479
<v Speaker 2>business community has so invested in democracy initiatives, Because, you know,

1:10:26.880 --> 1:10:30.440
<v Speaker 2>a state that refuses to certify the results of elections

1:10:30.520 --> 1:10:32.519
<v Speaker 2>if not good for business. And I think you know

1:10:32.600 --> 1:10:34.720
<v Speaker 2>and business leaders in Arizona get that. So we're going

1:10:34.760 --> 1:10:36.120
<v Speaker 2>to spend a lot of time in Arizona.

1:10:38.040 --> 1:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Let me get you out of here on this, and

1:10:39.400 --> 1:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that is, can you be a political party that doesn't

1:10:45.000 --> 1:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>have an ideology?

1:10:48.080 --> 1:10:51.599
<v Speaker 2>We will continue to refine our ideology the more we

1:10:51.680 --> 1:10:55.879
<v Speaker 2>run candidates. The more candidates run, the more they champion

1:10:56.920 --> 1:11:00.320
<v Speaker 2>policies and solutions to real issues. In the United States,

1:11:00.520 --> 1:11:02.519
<v Speaker 2>can you have candidates that contradict each other?

1:11:02.640 --> 1:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you may have a candidate that says, hey,

1:11:05.240 --> 1:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm for school choice, and you may have another candidate

1:11:08.479 --> 1:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>that says, you know, I don't like this about your stuff,

1:11:12.200 --> 1:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, But at the same time they're both they

1:11:14.760 --> 1:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>both don't like the two major parties, right, Like, what

1:11:16.720 --> 1:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>do you do with like a couple of candidates like that.

1:11:19.800 --> 1:11:22.240
<v Speaker 2>I would ask Jeff Sessions and Olympia Snow how they

1:11:22.320 --> 1:11:24.320
<v Speaker 2>used to serve together, you know, I mean it was

1:11:25.160 --> 1:11:29.120
<v Speaker 2>the two parties had a history of being much more

1:11:29.120 --> 1:11:32.160
<v Speaker 2>ideologically inclusive. The part is a litmus tests that we

1:11:32.200 --> 1:11:36.840
<v Speaker 2>see now are far worse than they were twenty years ago.

1:11:36.960 --> 1:11:39.440
<v Speaker 2>There was a lot more room for people to authentically

1:11:39.520 --> 1:11:43.160
<v Speaker 2>serve their communities but be part of a big tent party.

1:11:43.720 --> 1:11:45.560
<v Speaker 4>And that's what we want to replicate. You know that

1:11:45.960 --> 1:11:47.560
<v Speaker 4>if you look at there are both parties are not

1:11:47.600 --> 1:11:49.960
<v Speaker 4>big tents anymore. There are litmus tests now, and it

1:11:50.080 --> 1:11:51.880
<v Speaker 4>used to be. You know, it's funny, it used to

1:11:51.920 --> 1:11:53.479
<v Speaker 4>be there was a bit of a seesaw. When one

1:11:53.600 --> 1:11:55.360
<v Speaker 4>one party got two litmus tests, the other.

1:11:55.240 --> 1:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Party opened up their aperture a little bit, right, and

1:11:58.880 --> 1:12:01.639
<v Speaker 1>culturally that sort of happened this last cycle. I think

1:12:01.760 --> 1:12:04.519
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why Republicans did a little bit

1:12:04.560 --> 1:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>better is because they looked a little less judgy, right.

1:12:08.240 --> 1:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats have all these rules to be Democrats, the

1:12:10.960 --> 1:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>rules of speech and you know, all this stuff, so

1:12:13.320 --> 1:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I you know, in that sense, them Fresh calls it

1:12:16.360 --> 1:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the tisk party. Right exactly. So I buy that culturally

1:12:21.120 --> 1:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>there was a bit of a seesaw here, but for

1:12:24.800 --> 1:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the most part on issues, you can't you know, well,

1:12:28.200 --> 1:12:30.799
<v Speaker 1>not long ago that plenty of you know, Barack Obama

1:12:30.800 --> 1:12:33.479
<v Speaker 1>would endorse a pro life Democrat because that pro life

1:12:33.520 --> 1:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Democrat was you know, parts two or name him to

1:12:37.720 --> 1:12:41.479
<v Speaker 1>to be as vice president. Right. Well yeah, well multiple

1:12:41.560 --> 1:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>choice with Joe Biden over some days. But it is

1:12:48.240 --> 1:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and now it's unfathomable, right, Like, I don't know if

1:12:50.720 --> 1:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you can be an advocate of just public schools and

1:12:52.760 --> 1:12:55.519
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party anymore type of thing, right, or you

1:12:55.560 --> 1:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>can't be for charter schools if you're on the Democratic Party.

1:12:57.800 --> 1:13:00.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean there is so I guess what you're trying

1:13:00.680 --> 1:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to say is, hey, we're going to be you know,

1:13:02.800 --> 1:13:06.479
<v Speaker 1>we're a solution solutions oriented and we're not going to

1:13:06.600 --> 1:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>fight over the details at the beginning. We're kind of

1:13:10.240 --> 1:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to like gather people in who at least will

1:13:13.000 --> 1:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>agree to agree to compromise. Is that absolutely?

1:13:17.040 --> 1:13:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Absolutely, you know, a commitment to pragmatism, to decisions,

1:13:22.720 --> 1:13:26.840
<v Speaker 2>decision making based on data, you know, upholding the constitution,

1:13:27.200 --> 1:13:30.479
<v Speaker 2>adherence to the rule of law, you know, these are

1:13:30.520 --> 1:13:33.000
<v Speaker 2>these are really pretty basic tenants that we think that

1:13:33.160 --> 1:13:36.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, anybody in public service should adhere to. But

1:13:36.400 --> 1:13:40.120
<v Speaker 2>we're actually having people signed pledges to that end and

1:13:40.120 --> 1:13:45.240
<v Speaker 2>and our uh, our membership models that behaviors, as do

1:13:45.320 --> 1:13:48.960
<v Speaker 2>our elected officials. And it's and there's all sorts of

1:13:48.960 --> 1:13:51.800
<v Speaker 2>really cool things happening to around the country that help

1:13:51.880 --> 1:13:56.240
<v Speaker 2>facilitate that sort of compromise, like citizens assemblies, right Like

1:13:56.280 --> 1:13:58.840
<v Speaker 2>there's all these really cool innovations. It's all it's all

1:13:58.880 --> 1:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the rage in Paris right now.

1:14:02.000 --> 1:14:04.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean I not to be you know, totally self

1:14:04.479 --> 1:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>aggrandizing here, but it's like there are issues that are

1:14:08.240 --> 1:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>unresolved that only one party seems to care about at

1:14:10.800 --> 1:14:12.519
<v Speaker 1>any given time. Like, you know, I look at campaign

1:14:12.560 --> 1:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>finance issues, which I think I used to you know,

1:14:15.439 --> 1:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>not I'm a free marketer, so I used to say, look,

1:14:18.479 --> 1:14:21.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, money, bad money, good money. It's money. It's

1:14:21.479 --> 1:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the actors that matter here. But we are getting absurd,

1:14:24.840 --> 1:14:27.439
<v Speaker 1>like there is there's so much money in the lobbying

1:14:27.520 --> 1:14:31.439
<v Speaker 1>trade that we now have. It isn't like corporations versus people.

1:14:31.479 --> 1:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>It's one corporation hires lobbyists, apple versus another corporation Meta,

1:14:36.200 --> 1:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and they're fighting over government regulation that could benefit Apple

1:14:40.000 --> 1:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>or hurt Meta or vice versa. And you're like, how

1:14:42.040 --> 1:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>does this have anything to do with the voter? And

1:14:44.040 --> 1:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>then you look at our debt issue, it's rhetorically usually

1:14:47.280 --> 1:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>only folks on the right that care about it, but

1:14:48.800 --> 1:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>they never do anything about it. If anything, they add

1:14:50.800 --> 1:14:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to the debt as fast as the left ads to

1:14:52.560 --> 1:14:55.799
<v Speaker 1>the debt. And then the right never cares about campaign

1:14:55.800 --> 1:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>finance issues. And I want to say, guys, you know,

1:14:58.920 --> 1:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the more money in pol takes, the more money that

1:15:01.080 --> 1:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>gets taken out of government. Right, Like, it's clear these

1:15:04.200 --> 1:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>two things are interconnected. Look at I guess, how do

1:15:08.720 --> 1:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you become this nexus on these issues?

1:15:11.080 --> 1:15:13.240
<v Speaker 2>I guess yeah, if you if you look at lobbying

1:15:13.320 --> 1:15:18.439
<v Speaker 2>registrations in Q one and then terminations and you track

1:15:18.520 --> 1:15:22.160
<v Speaker 2>that in Q one and Q two of twenty twenty four, Honestly,

1:15:22.200 --> 1:15:24.880
<v Speaker 2>it's really depressing. I think it's really depressing the way

1:15:24.920 --> 1:15:27.760
<v Speaker 2>you looked at Bolts Shift and the amount of money

1:15:27.760 --> 1:15:30.160
<v Speaker 2>they were spending on lodding firms versus all of the

1:15:30.640 --> 1:15:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Democratic lobbyists that had mass resignation, you know, mass terminations

1:15:34.680 --> 1:15:37.040
<v Speaker 2>for their for their client base. These are just tens

1:15:37.120 --> 1:15:39.960
<v Speaker 2>and tens of millions of dollars just in lobbying, just

1:15:40.000 --> 1:15:40.439
<v Speaker 2>in one.

1:15:40.320 --> 1:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Quarter, right, and it's just well, these people are in power,

1:15:43.439 --> 1:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>so we'll do it this way.

1:15:44.840 --> 1:15:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah. And I think that that's too short term

1:15:48.439 --> 1:15:51.240
<v Speaker 2>right now. And I think that the American people are

1:15:51.280 --> 1:15:53.040
<v Speaker 2>grown ups, and I think that we can have real

1:15:53.080 --> 1:15:57.040
<v Speaker 2>conversations about real issues. You know, we talked about Ross

1:15:57.040 --> 1:16:00.479
<v Speaker 2>prow and you're talking about national debt. I mean, Ross

1:16:00.479 --> 1:16:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Proe just said things. He just talked to Americans about

1:16:03.800 --> 1:16:07.240
<v Speaker 2>things that were real, you know. I mean, we are

1:16:07.439 --> 1:16:10.840
<v Speaker 2>in this culture of punditry right now where it's like, Okay, well,

1:16:11.040 --> 1:16:14.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm a Republican surrogate, I'm a Democrat surrogate. I'm going

1:16:14.360 --> 1:16:18.280
<v Speaker 2>to use my weekly talking points to be little script is.

1:16:18.840 --> 1:16:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Tell me what the script is. It's not they're not

1:16:20.720 --> 1:16:26.800
<v Speaker 2>actually engaging in discussion. And a new party that encourages

1:16:26.840 --> 1:16:30.000
<v Speaker 2>people to engage in that discussion to address real issues

1:16:30.880 --> 1:16:35.040
<v Speaker 2>like a federal debt is. I think people are hungry

1:16:35.080 --> 1:16:36.720
<v Speaker 2>for it, and so we're excited for people to come

1:16:36.720 --> 1:16:39.679
<v Speaker 2>to forward and engage in those difficult conversations.

1:16:39.520 --> 1:16:42.639
<v Speaker 1>It is, like I said, the market is the market

1:16:42.680 --> 1:16:45.679
<v Speaker 1>is there, the demand is there, if only they allow

1:16:45.800 --> 1:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you to practice, if only they allow you to participate,

1:16:49.360 --> 1:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay druft. So it's going to be I look, I

1:16:52.120 --> 1:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>if not now, when right? I mean, I'm sure that's

1:16:55.400 --> 1:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>how you guys know.

1:16:56.280 --> 1:16:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Then when we are we're fighters too. You know, there's

1:16:59.040 --> 1:17:01.439
<v Speaker 2>there's a rebellious streak to what we are doing here,

1:17:01.600 --> 1:17:03.439
<v Speaker 2>what we're doing with the mare.

1:17:03.640 --> 1:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>You're recovering republican? Is that the good way of describing

1:17:06.400 --> 1:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you recovering democrat?

1:17:08.360 --> 1:17:11.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, yeah, No, it's a great it's

1:17:11.520 --> 1:17:13.040
<v Speaker 2>a great group. Like I said, like we are we

1:17:13.120 --> 1:17:16.240
<v Speaker 2>are we are optimists, but we're pragmatic optimists and we

1:17:16.320 --> 1:17:18.240
<v Speaker 2>know that this is a grind and we're just we're

1:17:18.240 --> 1:17:19.720
<v Speaker 2>going to grind it out every day because it's the

1:17:19.760 --> 1:17:20.320
<v Speaker 2>right thing to do.

1:17:20.400 --> 1:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Chuck lindsay draft, I'll be watching. I'm We've got to

1:17:24.960 --> 1:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>open this up. I mean, politics is inaccessible. It feels

1:17:28.160 --> 1:17:30.519
<v Speaker 1>very inaccessible to a lot of people. We've never been

1:17:30.560 --> 1:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>more accessible to each other. And yet our politics and

1:17:33.800 --> 1:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>our government very inaccessible unless you're unless you unless you

1:17:38.479 --> 1:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>follow the rules of these two clubs. And I think

1:17:41.360 --> 1:17:42.400
<v Speaker 1>people are getting tired of that.

1:17:43.640 --> 1:17:45.439
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, indeed, thanks for having me today.

1:17:45.479 --> 1:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Check, I got it. It's great, Thank you well. I

1:17:50.840 --> 1:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>hope you enjoyed that conversation. Look, I I you may

1:17:54.240 --> 1:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>think everybody tries to figure out what am I partial to? Right?

1:17:56.880 --> 1:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, some on the right thing I'm partial to

1:17:58.360 --> 1:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the left. Some on the left think I I'm partial

1:18:01.000 --> 1:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to the right. What I am partial to is a

1:18:03.960 --> 1:18:07.360
<v Speaker 1>freer market for political ideas. And I think the two

1:18:07.360 --> 1:18:13.599
<v Speaker 1>parties are are duopoly and they stifle competition, and they're

1:18:13.600 --> 1:18:17.839
<v Speaker 1>stifling competition now. Both parties used to be geographically diverse

1:18:17.840 --> 1:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and ideologically diverse, and they didn't stifle as much competition.

1:18:21.240 --> 1:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>But I look at what the DNC is doing now.

1:18:23.000 --> 1:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to do preferred agreements with for their voter

1:18:27.439 --> 1:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>file with Target Smart, and part of that agreement will

1:18:30.320 --> 1:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>be you know, people challenging incumbents in a primary may

1:18:33.200 --> 1:18:37.519
<v Speaker 1>not have access to that. It's it's it is not

1:18:38.080 --> 1:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it is not going to be good for the free

1:18:40.320 --> 1:18:46.519
<v Speaker 1>market of ideas. And we desperately I'm I you know,

1:18:46.800 --> 1:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I tell you I one of the one of my

1:18:49.160 --> 1:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of half baked ideas to borrow a phrase from

1:18:52.720 --> 1:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Bill Simmons. One of my half baked ideas is that

1:18:55.720 --> 1:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the two parties ought to ought to create political subsidiaries

1:19:00.479 --> 1:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that essentially function if we were in a prime minister

1:19:03.400 --> 1:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>situt parliamentary system. They would function as sort of the coalitions. Right,

1:19:06.880 --> 1:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you have your left coalition and your right coalition, but

1:19:09.120 --> 1:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>there ought to be the Working Families Party is the

1:19:11.160 --> 1:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Progressive Party, and you know, maybe the New Democrat, New Democratic,

1:19:15.400 --> 1:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, democratic Liberals, what are you going to call them?

1:19:17.040 --> 1:19:19.479
<v Speaker 1>As your centrist party, and then you'd have a Maga

1:19:19.479 --> 1:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>party under the under the right wing umbrella, and you

1:19:22.880 --> 1:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>might have a Chamber of Commerce party. But they're subsidiaries

1:19:26.439 --> 1:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>and they're almost funded by them, and you sort of

1:19:28.680 --> 1:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>instead of having interest groups create create sort of political

1:19:31.080 --> 1:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>party subsidiaries and then candidates can choose. Well, I want

1:19:34.120 --> 1:19:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to tell you what kind of democrat I am, or

1:19:36.120 --> 1:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to tell you what kind of Republican I

1:19:37.720 --> 1:19:41.599
<v Speaker 1>am by filing with this with this wing of the

1:19:41.640 --> 1:19:45.519
<v Speaker 1>party versus this wing of the party. Anyway, just a thought,

1:19:46.120 --> 1:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>as the two parties says, I do think disruption's coming,

1:19:49.479 --> 1:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in form of the Forward Party or independence.

1:19:52.920 --> 1:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>By the way, keep an eye on Mike Duggan uh

1:19:56.760 --> 1:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>in Michigan, the Detroit mayor who's running as an independent.

1:20:00.120 --> 1:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>He could you know somebody is going to be the

1:20:02.280 --> 1:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>spring cord for this, you know, uh kind of what

1:20:05.320 --> 1:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you know? When Rossboro created the Reform Party, it did

1:20:07.360 --> 1:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>hand us a governor eventually. And Jesse Ventura, do you

1:20:11.160 --> 1:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>get a dug In? Do you get an Angus King

1:20:12.800 --> 1:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and Lisa Murkowski to realize that they'd be better off

1:20:15.320 --> 1:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>being members of the Forward Party than they would be

1:20:17.720 --> 1:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>caucusing with either of the d's or the rs. These

1:20:20.000 --> 1:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>are the things that I think is is potentially possible

1:20:24.760 --> 1:20:27.559
<v Speaker 1>h in this uh, in this current environment, and perhaps

1:20:27.640 --> 1:20:30.559
<v Speaker 1>is necessary if you want to see both parties sort

1:20:30.560 --> 1:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of sober up, uh and get their acts together. All Right,

1:20:34.640 --> 1:20:36.599
<v Speaker 1>it's time for a little last check. May I answer

1:20:36.600 --> 1:20:37.519
<v Speaker 1>a few questions here?

1:20:37.760 --> 1:20:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Ask Chuck.

1:20:42.240 --> 1:20:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Remember shoot me any notes ask Chuck at thechuckcodcast dot com,

1:20:46.080 --> 1:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>drop a note in comments on YouTube, DMS, LinkedIn's, you

1:20:50.920 --> 1:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>name it, we Are, and every social media site you

1:20:53.280 --> 1:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>can think of. All right, this question comes from Corey B.

1:20:56.000 --> 1:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>In a recent episode, you mentioned that you disliked the

1:20:57.840 --> 1:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>West Wing because it wasn't realistic, but I'm assuming used

1:21:00.240 --> 1:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to watch it. You clearly have a strong grasp of

1:21:01.880 --> 1:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>politics and a deep understanding of the political arena. That

1:21:04.120 --> 1:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>got me thinking, is there anything that would make you

1:21:06.040 --> 1:21:08.439
<v Speaker 1>consider working at the White House as a communications director

1:21:08.439 --> 1:21:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in another advisory role, and if so, what qualities would

1:21:11.439 --> 1:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you look for in a president or candidate that would

1:21:13.240 --> 1:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>inspire you to take that kind of job. Well, I

1:21:16.360 --> 1:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would probably only unlikely, Okay, And I'll

1:21:22.280 --> 1:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>tell you one reason. I feel like my career in

1:21:25.680 --> 1:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the in media has been both prominent enough that if

1:21:32.200 --> 1:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I chose to work to sort of become a politician,

1:21:34.880 --> 1:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and you go work in the White House, you're becoming

1:21:36.400 --> 1:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a politician, that I'd be doing a disservice to my

1:21:39.439 --> 1:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>journalism colleagues. I don't begrudge people that have done that,

1:21:44.160 --> 1:21:47.559
<v Speaker 1>gone through the revolving door, because everybody's got to live

1:21:47.600 --> 1:21:50.439
<v Speaker 1>their own life. Everybody's got mouths to feed, everybody's got

1:21:50.479 --> 1:21:55.559
<v Speaker 1>tuitions to pay, loans to repay mortgages, et cetera. But

1:21:56.360 --> 1:22:00.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, perception is reality these days, and so I'd

1:22:00.560 --> 1:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>be very hesitant. So the only, the only even remote

1:22:05.400 --> 1:22:07.640
<v Speaker 1>possibility would be the person would have to be a

1:22:07.680 --> 1:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>member of neither party an independent. I'd probably be more

1:22:11.920 --> 1:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>likely to want to help somebody who's a little bit

1:22:15.240 --> 1:22:18.360
<v Speaker 1>new to the process. So maybe it's a former military leader,

1:22:18.720 --> 1:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a former business executive. If you're asking me

1:22:24.080 --> 1:22:27.599
<v Speaker 1>the type of you know, because I think I could help, right,

1:22:27.680 --> 1:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>it would not be a thing where I would want

1:22:29.640 --> 1:22:31.519
<v Speaker 1>to gain where where Where do I think I could

1:22:31.560 --> 1:22:34.679
<v Speaker 1>help the most? And I think I could help somebody

1:22:34.680 --> 1:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>who's new to Washington navigate the place. And but I

1:22:41.280 --> 1:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>but it would have to be somebody who wasn't interested

1:22:43.320 --> 1:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in building a political movement, but it was more of

1:22:46.040 --> 1:22:49.479
<v Speaker 1>a coming in. They're the problem solver, They're a fix it.

1:22:49.640 --> 1:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>You know. I do think we're due for a mechanic

1:22:52.560 --> 1:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>president that's basically a democracy mechanic. You know, like, look,

1:22:57.280 --> 1:22:59.599
<v Speaker 1>we've got to we've got to rebuild this thing so

1:22:59.640 --> 1:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that we can and have a more honest government. I mean,

1:23:02.479 --> 1:23:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the most depressing aspect of the pardons for

1:23:06.760 --> 1:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>sales story of Trump is how little outrage there is.

1:23:11.479 --> 1:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>And you know, my wife said, she goes her and

1:23:15.680 --> 1:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I asked, you know, I sort of lewis lamenting this,

1:23:18.720 --> 1:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and she says, well, it's because the reason there's no outrage,

1:23:23.280 --> 1:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody assumes this is always how it works, and that

1:23:26.479 --> 1:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about and I think she's right, and so you know,

1:23:30.200 --> 1:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we're in this we're in a period where people just

1:23:34.920 --> 1:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>believe the worst in politicians and believe the worst in institutions.

1:23:38.040 --> 1:23:40.719
<v Speaker 1>And the reason you know, there's a lot of people

1:23:40.720 --> 1:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>who support Trump because they think, well, he just says

1:23:42.880 --> 1:23:45.719
<v Speaker 1>what's already been done. He behaves the way others behave.

1:23:45.800 --> 1:23:47.519
<v Speaker 1>You just know it, right that the Mike Johnson, well,

1:23:47.560 --> 1:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, Biden did it undercover. Trump does it out

1:23:49.920 --> 1:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in the open. My goodness, right, we sort of need

1:23:54.400 --> 1:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to We need to repair the image and the relationship

1:23:58.920 --> 1:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of the democracy with the public and of these institutions.

1:24:02.320 --> 1:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>So you're asking the type of the type of candidate.

1:24:05.840 --> 1:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>It would have to be an unconventional, non major party person,

1:24:11.200 --> 1:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and it would have to be somebody who's again who

1:24:14.720 --> 1:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to be a pastor for patriotism. I think that's

1:24:17.840 --> 1:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>what we could use a little bit right now and

1:24:20.120 --> 1:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a mechanic for the infrastructure of the democracy. All right,

1:24:24.280 --> 1:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>next question, doctor b I've been listening to your show

1:24:28.240 --> 1:24:30.519
<v Speaker 1>for many, many years. I appreciate that I appreciate the

1:24:30.560 --> 1:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>level of scholarship and networking you bring to journalism. One

1:24:32.640 --> 1:24:35.360
<v Speaker 1>thing I know you appreciate is democracy. The patient scope

1:24:35.360 --> 1:24:37.479
<v Speaker 1>of the erosion of our civil liberties is unnerving. I

1:24:37.520 --> 1:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know about you, but I want my life back.

1:24:39.439 --> 1:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of Americans want our lives back,

1:24:41.120 --> 1:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>our freedoms, and I want to check in your opinion,

1:24:43.240 --> 1:24:46.519
<v Speaker 1>what are demonstrated political conditions or pathways for restoring and

1:24:46.600 --> 1:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>advancing lasting civil rights? Who would you say you say

1:24:49.720 --> 1:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>are the most interesting change makers or organizations right now?

1:24:52.320 --> 1:24:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Can you speak to the history of political leadership during

1:24:54.400 --> 1:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the successes of the civil rights movement up to now?

1:24:56.920 --> 1:24:59.559
<v Speaker 1>Why has targeting our freedom's been so easy? I would

1:24:59.600 --> 1:25:02.719
<v Speaker 1>love to hear your a soapbox on civil freedoms, change

1:25:02.720 --> 1:25:05.479
<v Speaker 1>makers organizing in the pathways to balance power with lasting

1:25:05.479 --> 1:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>peace for humanity. Wow, thanks for all that you do.

1:25:08.200 --> 1:25:11.479
<v Speaker 1>You are I fear that I cannot deliver what you're

1:25:11.520 --> 1:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>looking for. Uh And in some ways you're I think

1:25:15.240 --> 1:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you're pining for the leader I just described of who

1:25:17.720 --> 1:25:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I would you be looking for in something like this?

1:25:21.760 --> 1:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I think we need a pastor for

1:25:23.400 --> 1:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>patriotism and people need to understand. You know, there's America

1:25:29.000 --> 1:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is an idea. We're not an ethnicity. And I think

1:25:32.200 --> 1:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that this is a fundamental disagreement that's going on right

1:25:34.760 --> 1:25:38.679
<v Speaker 1>now in America. There's plenty of people, particularly I think

1:25:38.760 --> 1:25:41.599
<v Speaker 1>Trump tapped into this, and the Maga movement has tapped

1:25:41.640 --> 1:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>into this, is that no, no, no, no, we are an

1:25:44.680 --> 1:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>ethnic democracy. We are a Judeo Christian you know. And

1:25:48.960 --> 1:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like, no, that wasn't the intent. We may have

1:25:51.760 --> 1:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>developed that way in reality, but you know, I always

1:25:55.200 --> 1:25:57.559
<v Speaker 1>say the single most important phrase of our founding fathers

1:25:57.640 --> 1:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>is more perfect union, the implication it was never going

1:26:01.000 --> 1:26:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to be perfect, but that we were always going to

1:26:03.360 --> 1:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>try to be better, right, And America was an idea.

1:26:07.320 --> 1:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And so I do think we need the type of

1:26:10.240 --> 1:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>leader that can teach us again about the story of America,

1:26:15.920 --> 1:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that actually appreciates the story of America. I mean, one

1:26:18.240 --> 1:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of my big frustrations with Donald Trump. Here's this American

1:26:23.160 --> 1:26:27.519
<v Speaker 1>success story. His family immigrated here, grandfather goes to Alaska,

1:26:27.720 --> 1:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>starts may or may not have run a brothel or

1:26:30.360 --> 1:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>at least some sort of hotel out there in Alaska

1:26:32.680 --> 1:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>in the frontier, made enough money to support a family

1:26:36.439 --> 1:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>got you know, you know, there's there's and and you know,

1:26:39.640 --> 1:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't have had this success anywhere else. And yet

1:26:43.680 --> 1:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't really appreciate the story of America and the arc,

1:26:49.000 --> 1:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, and it's and he's the first president in

1:26:53.280 --> 1:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>my lifetime, you know that that hasn't sort of understood

1:26:58.160 --> 1:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that this is a long story, that we're writing new

1:27:01.040 --> 1:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>chapters and that they're but there's a through line here.

1:27:04.920 --> 1:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know, this is why I think I'm always

1:27:10.400 --> 1:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>hopeful that there's a military leader that's going to step

1:27:12.800 --> 1:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>into the you know, not because I think the military

1:27:16.960 --> 1:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is the perfect place for this, but I do think

1:27:18.880 --> 1:27:22.599
<v Speaker 1>the military is the least political side. I'm concerned how

1:27:22.640 --> 1:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Pete hag Seth is recruiting. I think he's trying to

1:27:25.080 --> 1:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>create a partisan environment in the military, which is a

1:27:28.040 --> 1:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>huge mistake because I think one of our strengths is

1:27:30.000 --> 1:27:32.799
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the military is the last place where

1:27:33.320 --> 1:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>deep red and deep blue are in a in a

1:27:35.880 --> 1:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>bunker together and they're just Americans first. Man, they're Marines first,

1:27:41.120 --> 1:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>they're infantry men first, right, they're naval guys first. You

1:27:45.240 --> 1:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>get my point. So I I just think that there's

1:27:50.320 --> 1:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>an appreciation that somebody with military experience, particularly career military,

1:27:56.600 --> 1:27:59.479
<v Speaker 1>who is seen that that. You know, it's the closest

1:27:59.479 --> 1:28:03.640
<v Speaker 1>part of our society that tries to be more colorblind

1:28:03.680 --> 1:28:06.479
<v Speaker 1>than in class blind than any other part. It exists there.

1:28:06.520 --> 1:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to sit here and say it doesn't.

1:28:08.040 --> 1:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to imply that, but it is better.

1:28:12.439 --> 1:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a better institution than really in many of the

1:28:15.200 --> 1:28:18.639
<v Speaker 1>other institutions. And so that's why I think if we're

1:28:18.680 --> 1:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>going to find that pastor for patriotism that can sort

1:28:22.000 --> 1:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of renew our interest in the story of America, I

1:28:25.040 --> 1:28:26.920
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling it's going to come from somebody who's

1:28:26.960 --> 1:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>had the experience of being in a bunker with people

1:28:31.200 --> 1:28:35.160
<v Speaker 1>from all different classes, and all different geographic locations and

1:28:35.200 --> 1:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>all different ethnicities. All Right, last question comes from Josh.

1:28:40.880 --> 1:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>He says, check, I listened to to west more in

1:28:43.000 --> 1:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina, and it seems to me the den most

1:28:44.880 --> 1:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>likely to be able to build a coalition similar to

1:28:47.160 --> 1:28:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the one that powered Bill Clinton, Obama, Hillary and Biden

1:28:50.680 --> 1:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to a DEM nod. What do you think of that possibility? Yeah, Josh.

1:28:54.080 --> 1:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>When I'm asked to name the three most likely Democratic nominees,

1:28:57.960 --> 1:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I usually demurror and say I have

1:29:01.720 --> 1:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a feeling I'd still rather be a candidate I haven't

1:29:04.960 --> 1:29:07.639
<v Speaker 1>heard of yet than anybody that we see in the mix.

1:29:07.680 --> 1:29:12.559
<v Speaker 1>And I make a note that Pete Bootajij circa twenty seventeen, right,

1:29:12.800 --> 1:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>was this guy who just unsuccessfully ran for DNC chair,

1:29:16.280 --> 1:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of people enjoyed interviewing him, and people

1:29:19.160 --> 1:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>were wondering, Hey, that guy's got a future, he's got

1:29:21.000 --> 1:29:23.439
<v Speaker 1>something to say, And within three years he was a

1:29:23.479 --> 1:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>major candidate for president. And frankly, if there were a

1:29:26.360 --> 1:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>normal campaign rather than COVID, there's a chance that he

1:29:30.680 --> 1:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>would have been the nominee in twenty and literally, you know, so,

1:29:35.720 --> 1:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who the mayor of South Bend is

1:29:37.200 --> 1:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. I haven't looked it up. But you get

1:29:38.720 --> 1:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>my point, right, which is I think it's possible we

1:29:41.360 --> 1:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know yet the next star of the party. That

1:29:44.000 --> 1:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of catches fire. But if you're asking me to

1:29:47.920 --> 1:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>name three people who are out there that are the

1:29:49.600 --> 1:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>most likely nominees right now, the three names I put

1:29:54.000 --> 1:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>out there are Wes Moore, Pete Bootagig, and Gretchen Whimer.

1:29:58.880 --> 1:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Whitmer's the most s tessful two term governor

1:30:01.160 --> 1:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that will be running. I think that Wes Moore. Look,

1:30:06.000 --> 1:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right. I think both Wesmore and Pete

1:30:09.160 --> 1:30:13.439
<v Speaker 1>h having military backgrounds are vital. I mean, I think

1:30:13.560 --> 1:30:17.639
<v Speaker 1>if the Democrats need that, that that is a I'm

1:30:17.640 --> 1:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>not saying it's a must in their next nominee, but

1:30:19.760 --> 1:30:22.559
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a I think it's an important potential

1:30:22.560 --> 1:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>asset for the next nominee. And look, Wes Moore's connections.

1:30:30.560 --> 1:30:34.719
<v Speaker 1>He ran the Robin Hood Foundation, He's got finan very

1:30:34.760 --> 1:30:37.599
<v Speaker 1>wealthy connections. Although he's not from wealth, he certainly knows

1:30:37.600 --> 1:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wealthy people. I think that he and

1:30:40.360 --> 1:30:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Budhaji will have the most professional operations that are running

1:30:43.760 --> 1:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>for president. And that means something. You know, it doesn't

1:30:47.000 --> 1:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>guarantee anything, but it puts you. You know. It's sort

1:30:49.840 --> 1:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of like it's like getting the top seed in the

1:30:52.880 --> 1:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>NCAA basketball tournament or baseball tournament doesn't mean you're going

1:30:56.680 --> 1:30:58.599
<v Speaker 1>to make it to the final four or to Omaha,

1:30:59.160 --> 1:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>but you're going to have an easier path to get

1:31:01.760 --> 1:31:04.479
<v Speaker 1>to the final four or Omaha. So I do think

1:31:04.800 --> 1:31:07.519
<v Speaker 1>Wes Moore, in theory, will have all the right people

1:31:08.000 --> 1:31:12.559
<v Speaker 1>wanting to work for him will have the resources. But

1:31:12.640 --> 1:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll be honest with you, I'm very skeptical. You know,

1:31:15.280 --> 1:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>he's got to figure out how to not feel like

1:31:17.439 --> 1:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a derivative campaign, right, And there's like a part of

1:31:20.760 --> 1:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>me with with you know, you know, I'm with you.

1:31:26.040 --> 1:31:27.639
<v Speaker 1>He says a lot. I mean when he talks about

1:31:27.720 --> 1:31:31.679
<v Speaker 1>national service and he's got he's off created and basically

1:31:31.680 --> 1:31:34.599
<v Speaker 1>a service program in Maryland that I think he wants

1:31:34.640 --> 1:31:36.559
<v Speaker 1>to emulate. So there's a lot of things that I

1:31:36.600 --> 1:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>think that he's I think he's I think he understands

1:31:40.560 --> 1:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the tone he needs to have if he does become president.

1:31:45.680 --> 1:31:47.439
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there's also a part of me. It's

1:31:47.439 --> 1:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>like I remember a candidate that seemed this perfect at

1:31:50.920 --> 1:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>this point in time, a guy named John Edwards. And

1:31:54.680 --> 1:31:58.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, let David Axelrod has this great saying that

1:31:58.520 --> 1:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>running for president is an MRI for the soul. Bodhajid

1:32:02.160 --> 1:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>has already had a little bit of the Rotor Router test,

1:32:04.439 --> 1:32:06.639
<v Speaker 1>so he's going to have a vetting and that might

1:32:06.680 --> 1:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>be a slight advantage, although I think the Biden baggage

1:32:09.040 --> 1:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be quite heavy for him. You know,

1:32:13.800 --> 1:32:15.479
<v Speaker 1>we got to see how well Wes Moore goes through

1:32:15.479 --> 1:32:19.519
<v Speaker 1>the process. But here's what I will tell you, I

1:32:19.560 --> 1:32:22.719
<v Speaker 1>can't the last I'm trying to think of the last

1:32:22.760 --> 1:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Democratic president in my lifetime that got elected. You know,

1:32:28.320 --> 1:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden is the only one in my lifetime that

1:32:30.600 --> 1:32:34.519
<v Speaker 1>got elected after failing in a presidential candidate the first

1:32:34.520 --> 1:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>time Bill Clinton won a first time he ran, Barack

1:32:36.880 --> 1:32:39.479
<v Speaker 1>Obama won the first time he ran, Jimmy Carter won

1:32:39.520 --> 1:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the first time he ran. Democrats have a tendency not

1:32:42.920 --> 1:32:46.519
<v Speaker 1>to not to go for somebody that ran before, which

1:32:46.560 --> 1:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I think is the problem for Bootajid, and that's a

1:32:48.320 --> 1:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>potential advantage for more. So. Look, I think More right

1:32:51.160 --> 1:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>now is an early Uh. He would be in the

1:32:54.320 --> 1:32:58.439
<v Speaker 1>preseason top five of your polling, no doubt about it.

1:32:58.520 --> 1:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>But as we all know, sometimes those season polls are

1:33:00.800 --> 1:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>super accurate and sometimes they end up being super wrong.

1:33:05.640 --> 1:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>All Right, with that, I hope you enjoy your weekend.

1:33:08.439 --> 1:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a big weekend in the Todd household. My son's

1:33:11.880 --> 1:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>graduating high school. We're very excited. I got a lot

1:33:15.120 --> 1:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of family in town.

1:33:16.680 --> 1:33:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

1:33:17.160 --> 1:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's about to go empty nest, and it's going

1:33:22.040 --> 1:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to happen faster than I realize. Yes, they don't go

1:33:24.800 --> 1:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>off back to college until August, but they're so busy

1:33:28.240 --> 1:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>this summer. I think I'm going to test right it.

1:33:30.280 --> 1:33:34.519
<v Speaker 1>So I will be sharing some of my empty nest

1:33:35.920 --> 1:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>anxiety with you a little bit. I'm not going to

1:33:39.160 --> 1:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>overly personalize this, but uh, I'm certainly very proud, proud

1:33:43.880 --> 1:33:49.559
<v Speaker 1>of my son and and I just can't believe that

1:33:49.560 --> 1:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that this part, this part of the journey, is already over.

1:33:53.760 --> 1:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But with that, enjoy, enjoy your weekend, and I'll see

1:33:58.080 --> 1:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you on this channel the next time I up. Oh

1:34:00.200 --> 1:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to you Monday morning. M